DOCSLIB.ORG

Coastal Erosion Non Tech Summary Report PK1 TH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Predicting Auckland’s Exposure to Coastal Instability and Erosion December 2020 Technical Report 2020/021 Cover picture: Stanmore Bay PREDICTING AUCKLAND’S EXPOSURE TO COASTAL INSTABILITY AND EROSION Predicting Auckland’s exposure to coastal instability and erosion, TR2020/021 December 2020 Auckland Council ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-1-99-002266-1 (Print) ISBN 978-1-99-002267-8 (PDF) Reviewed and recommended for publication by: Name: Branko Veljanovski Position: Head of Engineering Design & Asset Management Approved for publication by: Name: Sarah Sinclair Position: Chief Engineer Recommended citation: Roberts, R., N Carpenter and P Klinac (2020). Predicting Auckland’s exposure to coastal instability and erosion, Auckland Council, technical report, TR2020/021 © 2020 Auckland Council Auckland Council disclaims any liability whatsoever in connection with any action taken in reliance of this document for any error, deficiency, flaw or omission contained in it. This document is licensed for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In summary, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the material, as long as you attribute it to Auckland Council and abide by the other licence terms. PREDICTING AUCKLAND’S EXPOSURE TO COASTAL INSTABILITY AND EROSION Acknowledgements This document was prepared with technical input from Auckland Council and industry experts including, but not limited to, the following individuals: Authors (Part 1) Natasha Carpenter, Ross Roberts, Paul Klinac (Auckland Council) Authors (Part 2) Patrick Knook, Ben Westgate, Rebekah Haughey, Tom Shand, Richard Reinen-Hamill (Tonkin + Taylor). Editor Ross Roberts (Auckland Council) Peer reviewers Mark Dixon (University of Auckland) Murray Ford (University of Auckland) Martin Brook (University of Auckland) PREDICTING AUCKLAND’S EXPOSURE TO COASTAL INSTABILITY AND EROSION Part 1: Table of Contents Part 1 Non-Technical Study Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... i List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 National and local policy context ....................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Method ................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Scale of assessment .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Areas susceptible to coastal instability and/or erosion (ASCIE) ........................................................ 4 2.3 Division of the coastline into beaches, cliffs, and reclamation .......................................................... 4 2.4 Effects of climate change ................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Selection of timeframes ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.6 Modelled scenarios ............................................................................................................................ 8 2.7 Calculation of area susceptible to coastal instability and erosion ..................................................... 8 3.0 Results ............................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Cliffs ................................................................................................................................................. 10 3.2 Beaches ........................................................................................................................................... 12 4.0 Next steps .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Part 2 Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Instability and Erosion Part 1: Non-technical summary PREDICTING AUCKLAND’S EXPOSURE TO COASTAL INSTABILITY AND EROSION i Executive Summary The Auckland region has over 3,200 km of coastline including three major harbours and a range of sandy beaches and dunes, rocky shores and cliffs, estuaries and offshore islands. As well as a long and diverse coastline, Auckland has the largest population density to coastline ratio in New Zealand. As a result, the city has a high exposure to coastal hazards including coastal instability and erosion. These hazards can present a safety risk, adversely affect property and infrastructure, and damage or destroy cultural and environmental sites. A study undertaken in 2006 is the basis for the current coastal erosion rules within the Auckland Unitary Plan. No more up-to-date information related to the potential exposure of Auckland’s coastline to erosion was available at the time of the plan’s development. To fill this knowledge gap, a programme of research has been undertaken to identify, at a regional level, the Area Susceptible to Coastal Instability and/or Erosion (ASCIE). ASCIE is the area landward of the current coastline that is at risk because of coastal erosion or instability caused by coastal erosion. Titled “Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion and Instability”, this study was undertaken for Auckland Council by Tonkin + Taylor Ltd., with a peer review by the University of Auckland. The study forecasts the areas of Auckland’s coastline that could be affected by coastal erosion and instability under a range of climate change (sea-level rise) scenarios and timeframes. A non-technical overview of the study is given in Part 1 of this Technical Report while the detailed study as reported by Tonkin + Taylor is presented in Part 2. The intent of this separation is to provide a Council synopsis and interpretation for non-technical readers. To assess the ASCIE, the coastline of Auckland was divided into 568 coastline ‘cells’, where the controlling factors are broadly consistent. The impact of sea level rise was modelled for each cell at 30, 50, and 100+ year timescales, and two climate change scenarios were used. A high emission scenario with little mitigation controls (RCP 8.5M), which matches the current track for global emissions, was used across all three timeframes. To get a full understanding of the worst-case scenario and check the sensitivity of the models, an extreme emissions scenario with no mitigation (RCP 8.5H+) was also modelled at the 100+ year timeframe. The ASCIE has been calculated for each of these combinations, and the results for each cell presented as a distance in metres landward of the current coastline. The ASCIE of cliffs and beaches are controlled by differing processes and were calculated separately using current best practice. The results are presented in tabular format and on a regional ‘heat map’. While the regional ‘heat map’ provides a high-level understanding of the potential erosion rates across Auckland’s coastline, further work needs to be done to refine the model and provide more PREDICTING AUCKLAND’S EXPOSURE TO COASTAL INSTABILITY AND EROSION ii detailed mapping showing areas susceptible to coastal instability and erosion at a sub-regional level. ASCIE was not calculated for reclaimed shorelines as it was assumed that structures reinforcing these shorelines will be maintained, supporting the planning definition in the Auckland Unitary Plan of reclaimed land as permanent. PREDICTING AUCKLAND’S EXPOSURE TO COASTAL INSTABILITY AND EROSION iii Part 1: Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... i List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 National and local policy context ....................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Method ................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Scale of assessment .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2
Recommended publications
  • Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review Landscape Report

    Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review Landscape Report

    HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW LANDSCAPE REPORT September 2006 1 Prepared by Hudson Associates Landscape Architects for Auckland City Council as part of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review September 2006 Hudson Associates Landscape Architects PO Box 8823 06 877-9808 Havelock North Hawke’s Bay [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Landscape Character 10 Strategic Management Areas 13 Land Units 16 Rakino 31 Rotoroa 33 Ridgelines 35 Outstanding Natural Landscapes 38 Settlement Areas 40 Assessment Criteria 45 Appendix 48 References 51 3 LIST OF FIGURE Figure # Description Page 1. Oneroa 1920’s. photograph 6 2. Oneroa 1950’s photograph 6 3 Great Barrier Island. Medlands Settlement Area 7 4 Colour for Buildings 8 5 Waiheke View Report 9 6 Western Waiheke aerials over 20 years 11 7 Great Barrier Island. Natural landscape 11 8 Karamuramu Island 11 9 Rotoroa Island 12 10 Rakino Island 12 11 Strategic Management Areas 14 12 Planning layers 15 13 Waiheke Land Units 17 14 Great Barrier Island Land Units 18 15 Land Unit 4 Wetlands 19 16 Land Unit 2 Dunes and Sand Flats 19 17 Land Unit 1 Coastal Cliffs and Slopes 20 18 Land Unit 8 Regenerating Slopes 20 19 Growth on Land Unit 8 1988 21 20 Growth on Land Unit 8, 2004 21 21 LU 12 Bush Residential 22 22 Land Unit 20 Onetangi Straight over 18 years 23 23 Kennedy Point 26 24 Cory Road Land Unit 20 27 25 Aerial of Tiri Road 28 26 Land Unit 22 Western Waiheke 29 27 Thompsons Point 30 28 Rakino Island 32 29 Rotoroa Island 34 30 Matiatia, house on ridge 36 31 Ridge east of Erua Rd 36 32 House on secondary ridge above Gordons Rd 37 4 INTRODUCTION 5 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared to document some of the landscape contribution made in the preparation of the Hauraki Gulf Islands District Plan Review 2006.
  • Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009

    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009

    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc.
  • Historic Heritage Survey Aotea Great Barrier Island

    Historic Heritage Survey Aotea Great Barrier Island

    Historic Heritage Survey Aotea Great Barrier Island May 2019 Prepared by Megan Walker and Robert Brassey © 2019 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. The publication, information, and data contained within it are provided on an "as is" basis. All contemporary images have been created by Auckland Council except where otherwise attributed. Cover image: Ox Park (Auckland Council 2016) Aotea Great Barrier Island Heritage Survey Draft Report 2 Executive Summary Aotea – Great Barrier has had a long and eventful Māori and European history. In the more recent past there has been a slow rate of development due to the island’s relative isolation.
  • Auckland Trail Notes Contents

    Auckland Trail Notes Contents

    22 October 2020 Auckland trail notes Contents • Mangawhai to Pakiri • Mt Tamahunga (Te Hikoi O Te Kiri) Track • Govan Wilson to Puhoi Valley • Puhoi Track • Puhoi to Wenderholm by kayak • Puhoi to Wenderholm by walk • Wenderholm to Stillwater • Okura to Long Bay • North Shore Coastal Walk • Coast to Coast Walkway • Onehunga to Puhinui • Puhinui Stream Track • Totara Park to Mangatawhiri River • Hunua Ranges • Mangatawhiri to Mercer Mangawhai to Pakiri Route From Mangawhai Heads carpark, follow the road to the walkway by 44 Wintle Street which leads down to the estuary. Follow the estuary past a camping ground, a boat ramp & holiday baches until wooden steps lead up to the Findlay Street walkway. From Findlay Street, head left into Molesworth Drive until reaching Mangawhai Village. Then a right into Moir Street, left into Insley Street and across the estuary then left into Black Swamp Road. Follow this road until reaching Pacific Road which leads you through a forestry block to the beach and the next stage of Te Araroa. Bypass Note: You could obtain a boat ride across the estuary to the Mangawhai Spit to avoid the road walking section. Care of sand-nesting birds is required on this Scientific Wildlife Reserve - please stick to the shoreline. Just 1km south, a stream cuts across the beach and it can go over thigh height, as can other water crossings on this track. Follow the coast southwards for another 2km, then take the 1 track over Te Ārai Point. Once back on the beach, continue south for 12km (fording Poutawa Stream on the way) until you cross the Pākiri River then head inland to reach the end of Pākiri River Road.
  • Auckland Region

    Auckland Region

    © Lonely Planet Publications 96 lonelyplanet.com 97 AUCKLAND REGION Auckland Region AUCKLAND REGION Paris may be the city of love, but Auckland is the city of many lovers, according to its Maori name, Tamaki Makaurau. In fact, her lovers so desired this beautiful place that they fought over her for centuries. It’s hard to imagine a more geographically blessed city. Its two magnificent harbours frame a narrow isthmus punctuated by volcanic cones and surrounded by fertile farmland. From any of its numerous vantage points you’ll be astounded at how close the Tasman Sea and Pacific Ocean come to kissing and forming a new island. As a result, water’s never far away – whether it’s the ruggedly beautiful west-coast surf beaches or the glistening Hauraki Gulf with its myriad islands. The 135,000 pleasure crafts filling Auckland’s marinas have lent the city its most durable nickname: the ‘City of Sails’. Within an hour’s drive from the high-rise heart of the city are dense tracts of rainforest, thermal springs, deserted beaches, wineries and wildlife reserves. Yet big-city comforts have spread to all corners of the Auckland Region: a decent coffee or chardonnay is usually close at hand. Yet the rest of the country loves to hate it, tut-tutting about its traffic snarls and the supposed self-obsession of the quarter of the country’s population that call it home. With its many riches, Auckland can justifiably respond to its detractors, ‘Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful’. HIGHLIGHTS Going with the flows, exploring Auckland’s fascinating volcanic
  • North Shore Heritage Thematic Review Report

    North Shore Heritage Thematic Review Report

    North Shore Heritage Thematic Review Report 1 July 2011 TR2011/010 North Shore Heritage Volume 1 A Thematic History of the North Shore TR2011/010 Auckland Council TR2011/010, 1 July 2011 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) Volume 1 ISBN 978-1-927169-20-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-21-6 (PDF) Volume 2 ISBN 978-1-927169-22-3 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-23-0 (PDF) 2-volume set ISBN 978-1-927169-24-7 (Print) ISBN 978-1-927169-25-4 (PDF) Reviewed by: Approved for AC Publication by: Name: Leslie Vyfhuis Name: Noel Reardon Position: Principal Specialist, Built Heritage Position: Manager, Heritage Organisation: Auckland Council Organisation: Auckland Council Date: 1 July 2011 Date: 1 July 2011 Recommended Citation: North Shore Heritage - Thematic Review Report. Compiled by Heritage Consultancy Services for Auckland Council. 1 July 2011. Auckland Council Document TR 2011/010. © 2011 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council's (AC) copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of AC. AC does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication.
  • Hauraki Gulf Islands

    Hauraki Gulf Islands

    SECTION 32 REPORT REVIEW OF INDIGENOUS VEGETATION CLEARANCE CONTROLS – HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS 1.0 Background 1.1 Introduction In 1999, the Council commissioned Hill Young Cooper Limited to undertake a review of the indigenous vegetation clearance, earthworks, and lot coverage controls applying in the Hauraki Gulf Islands Section of the Council’s District Plan (‘the Plan’). The Plan has been operative since June 1996 and this work was commissioned as part of a progressive review. Hill Young Cooper was asked to focus on whether the practical application of the rules actually achieved the stated outcomes. In its report1, Hill Young Cooper suggested several changes to the existing indigenous vegetation clearance controls. In particular, it recommended to reduce or increase the amount of vegetation clearance permitted for differing land units to ensure the controls were more consistent with stated objectives and policies. The consent thresholds could then be better linked to the adverse environmental effects of indigenous vegetation clearance i.e. erosion, loss of natural habitats and ecology etc. Building on the conclusions of the Hill Young Cooper report, the Council prepared a draft Plan Change in October 2001, however, it did not proceed to the Planning and Regulatory Committee as it did not satisfactorily address the findings of the Auditor General’s report2. The Auditor General’s report found that the indigenous vegetation clearance rules were causing difficulty as they are generally more restrictive than that of previous plans. Therefore, particular sectors of the community, particularly farmers, felt disadvantaged due to the strict permitted clearance controls and the relative cost of obtaining a resource consent.
  • Schedule of Significant Surf Breaks Schedule ID Name Location Break

    Schedule of Significant Surf Breaks Schedule ID Name Location Break

    Draft Auckland Unitary Plan – March 2013 Appendix 6.3: Schedule of Significant Surf Breaks Schedule ID Name Location Break type Seabed Description composition 1 Te Arai Beach East Coast Beach break Sand Exposed beach break that is (including Pacific frequently suitable for wave riding. Road access point Good wave quality suitable to all skill 'Black Swamp') levels. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with lack of development. Good access. 2 Pakiri Beach (North - East Coast Beach break Sand Exposed beach break that is 'Forestry') frequently suitable for wave riding. Good wave quality suitable to all skill levels. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with lack of development. Good access. 3 Pakiri Beach (South) East Coast Beach break Sand Exposed beach break that is frequently suitable for wave riding. Good wave quality suitable to all skill levels. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with lack of development. Good access. 4 Goat Island East Coast Reef break Rock/sand Semi exposed reef break. Relatively inconsistent. Good to high wave quality suitable to experienced surfers. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with little development. Good access. 5 Daniels Reef Leigh, East Reef break Rock Exposed reef break. Relatively Coast consistent. High wave quality suitable to experienced surfers. Good access. 6 Boulders Leigh, East Reef breaks Rock/sand Exposed variable reef breaks. Coast Frequently surfable. Good to high wave quality suitable to experienced surfers. Offers a 'wilderness' experience with a lack of development. Difficult access. 1 Draft Auckland Unitary Plan – March 2013 Schedule ID Name Location Break type Seabed Description composition 7. Omaha Beach and East Coast Beach break, Sand Semi exposed beach, bar and groyne Bar bar break, breaks.
  • Hearing Report Recommendation

    Hearing Report Recommendation

    Appendix 3 314/274010-004 Hearing report recommendation Auckland City District Plan (Proposed Hauraki Gulf Islands Section 2006) alteration under clause 10 of schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 1. Amendment to planning map no. 2 sheet no. 41 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 20 Glenfern Road, Great Barrier Island Submission Number: 430/1 The land shown to be removed from sensitive area 41-14 Scale 1:6,000 D 41-14 A O R Y A B A R A A R A I A K Not to scale Rarohara Bay Page 1 Appendix 3 314/274010-001 2. Amendment to planning map no. 2 sheet no. 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 339 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island Submission Number: 3052/3 The land shown to be added to site of ecological significance 50-2 Scale 1:5,000 O ' S H E A R O A D 50-2 Not to scale A O T E A R O A D Page 2 Appendix 3 314/274010-004 3. Amendment to planning map no. 2 sheet no. 50 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 219 Aotea Road, Great Barrier Island Submission Numbers: 2865/1, 2865/2 The land shown to be removed from sensitive area 50-4 Scale 1:7,000 C URR EEN RO AD A O T E A R O A D 50-4 Not to scale Awana Bay Page 3 Appendix 3 314/274010-004 4. Amendment to planning map no. 2 sheet no. 53 (Maps volume 2 - Outer Islands) Location: 590 Blind Bay Road, Great Barrier Island Submission Number: 3104/1 The land shown to be removed from sensitive area 53-4 Scale 1:5,000 53-4 Not to scale Page 4 Appendix 3 314/274010-004 5.
  • Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2004

    Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2004

    Hauraki Gulf Forum The Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report Preface Vision for the Hauraki Gulf It’s a great place to be … because … • … kaitiaki sustain the mauri of the Gulf and its taonga … communities care for the land and sea … together they protect our natural and cultural heritage … • … there is rich diversity of life in the coastal waters, estuaries, islands, streams, wetlands, and forests, linking the land to the sea … • … waters are clean and full of fish, where children play and people gather food … • … people enjoy a variety of experiences at different places that are easy to get to … • … people live, work and play in the catchment and waters of the Gulf and use its resources wisely to grow a vibrant economy … • … the community is aware of and respects the values of the Gulf, and is empowered to develop and protect this great place to be1. 1 Developed by the Hauraki Gulf Forum 1 The Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2004 Acknowledgements The Forum would like to thank the following people who contributed to the preparation of this report: The State of the Environment Report Project Team Alan Moore Project Sponsor and Editor Auckland Regional Council Gerard Willis Project Co-ordinator and Editor Enfocus Ltd Blair Dickie Editor Environment Waikato Kath Coombes Author Auckland Regional Council Amanda Hunt Author Environmental Consultant Keir Volkerling Author Ngatiwai Richard Faneslow Author Ministry of Fisheries Vicki Carruthers Author Department of Conservation Karen Baverstock Author Mitchell Partnerships
  • 12 September 2016 Principal's Awards Class Placements for 2017

    12 September 2016 Principal's Awards Class Placements for 2017

    Principal’s Awards COMING UP Congratulations to the following children who received Principal’s Awards at MON 12 SEPTEMBER assembly on Friday 9 September. Dental Therapists at CBS Aidan Lowe (Rm1), Jenna Kim (Rm 2), Sebastien Phillips-Smith (Rm 3), TUE 13 SEPTEMBER Jason Inglis (Rm 4), Mila Shan (Rm 5), Sebastien Leigh (Rm 6), Dental Therapists at Kaya Donnelly (Rm 10), Yoon Ho Maeng (Rm 11), Holly Yuan (Rm 12), CBS Skye Meldrum (Rm 13), Emma Molesworth (Rm 14), Matthew Chen (Rm 18), Plant to Taste Room 10 Interschool Cross Logan Mander (Rm 19), Lulu Gibbes (Rm 20), Ryan Russell (Rm 21), Country – selected Year Torunn Clarkson (Rm 22), Elyn Xu (Rm 23), Hunter Phelps (Rm 24), 4, 5 & 6 students Kyle Calubaquib (Rm 25), Joshua Shorter (Rm 26), Rio Mauger (Rm 26), WED 14 SEPTEMBER Celia Morris (Rm 27), Abdullah Adeel (Rm 36), Liam Crooks (Rm 37), Dental Therapists at CBS Stella Williamson (Rm 5O), Vincent Dall-Hjorring (Rm 5Y), Plant to Taste Room 22 Charlotte Penny (Rm 5B), Azhar Adam (Rm 5S), Alex Xu (Rm 5G), THU 15 SEPTEMBER Alex Beilby (Rm 6O), Cam McGlashan (Rm 6B), Ava Renford (Rm 6S), Dental Therapists at CBS Jack Li (Rm 6G). Waterwise Room 6O Save Day Interschool Cross Country Congratulations to Georgia Aitken from FRI 16 SEPTEMBER 6Orange, the recipient of the inaugural Dental Therapists at ‘Tony Ebert Kiwi Spirit’ Award. CBS MON 19 SEPTEMBER Dental Therapists at CBS TUE 20 SEPTEMBER Dental Therapists at CBS Plant to Taste Room 12 WED 21 SEPTEMBER Dental Therapists at Class Placements for 2017 CBS Plant to Taste Room 18 Important information regarding class placements for next year has gone home THU 22 SEPTEMBER with students today.
  • Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays

    Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays

    Draft Area Plan Hibiscus and Bays October / November 2012 Draft for public engagement: 23 October to 23 November 2012 1 DRAFT HIBISCUS AND BAYS AREA PLAN Table of contents Hibiscus and Bays vision 3 What are Area Plans? 4 The relationship between Area Plans and other plans 5 The role and purpose of the Area Plan 6 Community Engagement in the Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan 7 Setting the strategic context: Auckland-wide 8 What does the Auckland Plan mean for the Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan? 9 Setting the local context: Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area 10 Future challenges and opportunities for Hibiscus and Bays Local area 11 Hibiscus and Bays outcomes and actions 13 Hibiscus and Bays key moves 14 Area Plan Framework Map 2042 16 Hibiscus and Bays Town Centres, Local Centres and Neighbourhood Centres 26 Coastal Villages 32 Natural, Heritage and Character Outcomes 34 Economic and Community Development Outcomes 42 Transport and Network Infrastructure Outcomes 50 Implementation and prioritisation plan 58 Key Priorities 59 10 year prioritisation schedule 62 Glossary 68 Disclaimer: Auckland Council is not liable for anyone or any entity acting in reliance of this area plan or for any error, defi ciency or omission in it. Front cover image: Long Bay Regional Park looking south towards urban Auckland. Inside cover: Ōrewa Town Centre from Red Beach. 2 Hibiscus and Bays vision The Draft Hibiscus and Bays Area Plan provides a vision for how the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area could change over the next 30 years. It outlines the steps to “Hibiscus and Bays - values achieve this vision and how the Hibiscus and Bays Local Board area will contribute to Auckland becoming the our beaches and coastal world’s most liveable city.