2011 ANNUAL REPORT Table of contents

A Word from the Chairman 2 of the Board A Word from the President 4 and Chief Executive Officer Who We Are 6 Mission 6 Values 6

01.The Year in review 7 Labour Relations 8 Collective Agreements 8 Grievances and Arbitration 8 Negotiations 9 Workforce, Labour and Training 9 Training Centre 9 Health and Safety 9 Highlights 12 Technologies 13 M.E.A.’s Web Portal 13 Workforce Management 13 Network Operations 13

02.Statistical Review 14 2011 Summary 15 15 Port of Trois-Rivières/Bécancour 19 Port of Hamilton 21 Port de 23

03.The Team 26 Members of the Board of Directors 27 Finance/Audit Committee 27 Advisory Contract Committees 27 Trust Committees, I.L.A. Pension Plans and Employee Benefits Funds 28 M.E.A. Members 29 M.E.A. in short 29 Coordinates 30

04.Financial statements 31

Maritime Employers Association 1 A word from the Chairman of the Board

Dear Members, We achieved our objectives in 2011 because we were careful, we managed our affairs even more closely and we adopted some innovative processes. Our excellent The Maritime Employers Association (M.E.A.) efficiency record notwithstanding, we developed indi- results for 2011 rang in slightly ahead of our cators which allow us to conduct an even more detailed initial projections. This positive outcome must analysis of the many data at our disposal. be interpreted cautiously, however, given the In 2011, we went further. In light of the new business precarious economic conditions we are facing. environment and the realities of the world’s economy, The year that has just wrapped up was full of we dared to question vested interests. A number of our challenges as well as accomplishments. While efforts focused on the future and laid the basis for new 2010 was a year of transition, 2011 was a time methods that will help us maintain our prime position on the North American scene. for prudence and reflection. The markets are shifting, our clients’ needs are changing even more quickly and the competition is deploying all The caution demonstrated by the Board of Directors the resources at its disposal to attract new clients. was forced upon us by uncertain, volatile and unpredic- At the same time, technology is advancing at an alarming table economic conditions and sustained by our deep pace and all our partners are being forced to rethink determination to protect not only our growth but also their positions. These are just some of the reasons our longevity. Our challenge has been and continues compelling us to look at the future from a different pers- to be doing more with less, without endangering the pective. An in-depth examination of the major issues nature or quality of the services we offer. Delivering on confronting us marked the second half of our work that intention requires vigilance, creativity and the will in 2011. to dare to do things differently.

Maritime Employers Association 2 The Board of Directors devoted a great deal of energy and resources defining its future role based on the needs and requirements of tomorrow. Where is the industry headed? What emerging needs will the M.E.A. have to meet? How can the Association be part of the solution? How can we contribute to the industry? What will we need to fulfill our role with the various stake- holders in our industry? We asked ourselves all these questions in 2011 and the answers were drawn from our solid experience as an association as well as the rationality of our members.

What does 2012 hold in store for us? Stimulating chal- lenges we are well-prepared and well-equipped to face. Our teams are ready to set to work, our partners are drawing the same conclusions as we are, and the Association is counting on a culture of preparedness to rise to the task.

I would like to conclude by taking a moment to ack- nowledge how far the M.E.A. has come, along a path marked by cautious headway and calculated risk. I want to commend the diligence, conscientiousness, auda- city and commitment of all the members of the Board. The performance posted in 2011, in difficult and unpre- dictable economic times, allows us to face the future together with an optimistic outlook.

As the year draws to a close, the members of the Board join me in acknowledging the work of all the M.E.A. employees who shared our concerns, promptly answered our questions and found innovative solutions to problems that arose.

It is with pride and humility that I submit this Annual Report to you today.

Thank you,

Kevin M. Doherty Chairman of the Board

Maritime Employers Association 3 A word from the President and Chief Executive Officer

On the operational front, market conditions are reducing Dear Members, our capacity to predict the future, which makes it harder to plan our activities. However, these new operating It is with no small pride that we are closing the conditions have forced us to review our processes year 2011 with this message: mission accom- in order to adapt to emerging realities. We have embra- ced change and will continue to adjust our environment plished! We have achieved our objectives to maintain the speed dictated by our industry. in terms of both labour relations and managing the Association. The unions are also more aware of the transformation the industry is undergoing today. We believe it is up to us to share with them the challenges of tomorrow, to create the conditions for a mutual understanding This year, the M.E.A. signed four collective agree- of our issues and concerns in order to work together ments: two in Hamilton, one in Montreal and another and find solutions to face our changing situation. Suc- in Trois‑Rivières/Bécancour. The negotiations for the cess demands a new approach in our relations. renewal of the collective agreement for the Port of Toronto are well underway, and the M.E.A. and the As for labour relations, we realized that management Montreal Longshoremen’s Union are already in informal model has also changed. From a rigid collective agree­ talks to sign the next agreement even though the current ment we have advanced to an agreement which allows agreement is still in force. for constant adjustments. Gone are the days when the parties to an agreement saw each other once We are all aware that the portrait of the maritime industry only every four years in order to sign a firm deal: now is shifting and evolving, due in part to increased com- is the time of ongoing negotiation. This flexibility and petition, volatile economic conditions that are changing quickness to adapt more readily to the business environ­ our market, and technological advances. ment give the Association a clear competitive edge.

Maritime Employers Association 4 For example, the collective agreement in effect at the Port of Montreal between the M.E.A. and the Longshoremen’s Union was modified several times this year to take into account short-term agreements and new market opportunities or to resolve potentially conflicting issues.

On the employees’ side, we have put a lot of emphasis on health and safety by means of increased prevention and training; workplace health and safety is gaining importance, as the clear decrease in the number and severity of accidents attests.

We have been working relentlessly to establish a solid basis that will allow us to confront market variations, and we can now say that our efforts have paid off. Thanks to recent investments in technology, carefully planning the next generation and a more personalized service offer, the M.E.A. has managed to maintain its competitiveness, thanks to best practices which are the envy of our industry.

The last few decades have rarely produced a period with so many challenges on so many different fronts. We are living in exciting times laced with constant changes. The future promises more of the same, therefore we will have to continue to be creative and innovative in everything we do.

In closing, I wish to thank the members of the Board of Directors again this year for listening and for their constant support and availability. And of course my deepest gratitude goes to the extraordinary team which surrounds me and makes it possible for the M.E.A. to meet its objectives year after year.

Thank you,

Jean Bédard President and Chief Executive Officer

Maritime Employers Association 5 WHO WE ARE

The Maritime Employers Association is a non-profit organization representing member companies involved in shipping. Members of the Association include ship owners, operators and agents of vessels, stevedoring contractors and terminal operators.

OUR MISSION OUR VALUES

In accordance with Article 34 of the Canada Labour The Association’s activities are based on fundamental Code, the M.E.A. acts on behalf of its Members in the values: respect for individuals, appreciation of creativity, negotiation and management of the collective agree- employee leadership, integrity and trust. ments for more than 1,200 employees working in the Ports of Montreal, Trois-Rivières/Bécancour, Hamilton and Toronto. It has the mandate to dispatch and to provide training to a skilled workforce. In addition, it plays an advisory role regarding occupational health and safety issues with terminal operators.

The Association has several objectives: to provide labour relations services to its Members; to provide a healthy environment to all its employees; to become the bench­ mark in matters of employee training, and health and safety issues.

Maritime Employers Association 6 The year 01 in review

Maritime Employers Association 7 01. The year in review Labour relations

Collective Agreements

The year 2011 was very active in terms of labour rela- tions. Four collective agreements were signed with various unions. A five-year agreement was reached at the Port of Trois-Rivières/Bécancour with the CUPE Union Local 1375, Longshoremen, on April 15, 2011. At the Port of Hamilton, two eight-year agreements were concluded: one for the longshoremen (I.L.A. Local 1654) and one for the checkers (I.L.A. Local 1879). Finally, an agreement was signed with the Port of Mon- treal Checkers (I.L.A. Local 1657) in September 2011. At this time of writing, negotiations are underway to renew the collective agreement for the Port of Toronto, which expired on December 31, 2011.

Number of Union Employees Local Effective Expiration 886 CUPE 375 Montreal – Longshoremen 01-01-2009 31-12-2012 136 I.L.A. 1657 Montreal – Checkers 01-01-2009 31-12-2012 Trois-Rivières/Bécancour 85 CUPE 1375 Longshoremen 01-01-2011 31-12-2015 40 I.L.A. 1842 Toronto – Longshoremen In negociation 49 I.L.A. 1654 Hamilton – Longshoremen 01-01-2010 31-12-2017 12 I.L.A. 1879 Hamilton – Checkers 01-01-2010 31-12-2017 TOTAL: 1 208

Grievances and Arbitration

The various meetings of CUPE Local 375 Longshore- In December 2011, the Port of Montreal Checkers’ union men’s grievance committee led to an agreement on filed an accreditation application before the Canada the settlement of grievances from 2006 to 2010: over Industrial Relations Board (CIRB). The union is asking 800 grievances held in abeyance were settled. The few the CIRB to change the checkers’ accreditation certi- remaining active files will be entrusted to the different ficate in order to include security guards who work at administrative tribunals. As for Local 1657 Checkers’ a container terminal. The written arguments were sub- files, they are under assessment and we will try to mitted to the Board and we are awaiting its response. settle them all with the help of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

Maritime Employers Association 8 Negotiations Training Centre In order to identify best practices in labour relations, It was a year of transition for the Training Centre. observe work methods and port training programs, a In 2011, management of the Centre was turned over tour of European ports was planned in 2011. An M.E.A. to a new coordinator, and a new training consultant delegation, accompanied by Dr. Michael Ircha, profes- joined the team. sor emeritus of the University of New Brunswick and Senior Advisor for the Association of Canadian Port The complete overhaul of our course contents, which Authorities, visited the ports of Rotterdam, Zeebrugge, we started in 2010, still remains an ongoing project. In Antwerp, Hamburg and Barcelona, touring the facilities cooperation with our team of instructors, five courses and training centres. They were also able to hold speci- have been remodelled based on a new adult learning fic talks with a number of employer associations: approach and using various documentation such as CEWEZ (Federation of Employers Zeebrugge), CEPA the Canadian Standards (C.S.A.), the operator’s (manu- (Port of Antwerp Trade Union and Employers Associa- facturer’s) manual and reference works on various equip- tion) and SAGEP (Employers Association for Port Wor- ment. We also developed an e-learning training project kers, Barcelona). Several new European ideas have for the transportation of dangerous goods (TDG). already been integrated into the collective agreements at the Port of Montreal; we learned a lot on the tour and By developing a new physical hiring test, the Training we will try to implement certain practices in our next Centre helped the Association identify the best candi- round of negotiations. dates for stevedoring work in the Port of Trois-Rivières/ Bécancour.

Workforce, Finally, we created a partnership with the Human Resources Sectorial Committee of the Maritime Indus- Labour and Training try. When participating at their “Open House Day,” held on February 10, 2011, we met with three groups of high The year 2011 was very busy for the workforce at the school students from the greater metropolitan region, Port of Montreal. Further to the renewal of their collec- to introduce them to stevedoring and the related jobs tive agreement, the checkers (I.L.A. Local 1657) had they might pursue. This partnership looks very promising access to a general posting of positions. The M.E.A. as we will benefit from the Committee’s help to promote seized the opportunity to balance the distribution of its the development and growth of our Training Centre. workforce when a complete overhaul was undertaken.

The CUPE Union Local 375, Montreal Longshoremen, also underwent some reorganization, including a few Occupational Health in the conventional sector teams. Throughout the year, and Safety the classification committees were very active and innovative in the task of optimizing the workforce. The Maritime Employers Association’s Health and Safety department pursued its active involvement with Following the renewal of the longshoremen’s collective all the port terminals to manage risk and prevent work agreement at the Port of Trois-Rivières/Bécancour, accidents. We also continued to maintain a strong pre- a new group of casual labour was created to make up sence in port activities. In particular, the M.E.A. took for work shortages. part in local health and safety committee meetings, coordinated innovative projects to reduce the frequency Finally, in November 2011, we participated in a tripartite and severity of occupational injuries and maintained committee of the International Labour Organization close relationship with government authorities. These (I.L.O.) in Geneva. Representatives of the BCMEA efforts demonstrate the M.E.A.’s ongoing commitment (British Columbia Maritime Employers Association), to the process of changing our organizational culture the NYSA (New York Shipping Association), Panama, which we initiated a few years ago. Venezuela, South Africa, Netherlands, China and the M.E.A. took part in the committee, which is working Working with the Department of Kinanthropology to adopt competency-based training guidelines for at the Université du Québec à Montréal, the M.E.A. port employees. The American port workforce training conducted a study to evaluate the vibrations and impact organizations have teamed up to create a conference on longshoremen are subject to when driving trucks. training that should be held in a near future.

Maritime Employers Association 9 The results helped us evaluate the scope of changes required so this position may be used in the workplace rehabilitation program for employees suffering minor work-related back injuries. In addition to reducing the frequency of impact-related injuries, ongoing improve- ments on container terminals will allow these workers to get back to the job in a timely manner.

In 2011, the container pile wind resistance study was completed. The results were presented to various stakeholders who will develop intervention procedures in the event of high winds which could present a real risk of toppling containers. This large-scale project was used to modify safety procedures at various ter- minals to reflect new environmental realities caused by climate change.

This year also saw the workplace’s Health and Safety department handle the first complaints under the Workplace Harassment and Violence Prevention Policy. The proactive management of these cases will instil a healthier, safer work environment and allow the M.E.A. to take the required steps to manage psychological health in the workplace.

The M.E.A. continues to contribute to the work of the National Maritime Safety Association (NMSA), a health and safety committee composed by American and Canadian maritime transport employers. By serving on its Board of Directors and participating in various NMSA technical committees, the M.E.A. has increased its visibility to the entire North American maritime com- munity and has gained access to important information to help fulfill its objectives and those of terminal operators. The NMSA’s work ensures that the maritime cargo industry is fairly represented next to the American and Canadian governments.

Maritime Employers Association 10 PORT OF MONTREAL Number of Work Accidents 200 Number of Accidents 90 180 80 160 70 140 This year was marked by a significant drop in the severity 60 120 of accidents. The historic results, in terms of the number 50 100 of accidents, remained the same, also demonstrating 40 80 the positive effects of the employers’ long-term health 60 30 and safety efforts. 40 20 20 10 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 With Loss of Time Without Loss of Time Severity Index

Work Refusals Number of Work Refusals

At the Port of Montreal, the number of refusals to work 20 was at its lowest in the last five years at the Port of Montreal. No refusal to work required the intervention 15 of government authorities in 2011, demonstrating a significant increase in the confidence levels between 10 union and employer stakeholders with regard to health and safety. 5

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Settled by the Settled by Governmental Grievance Committee Authorities

Port of Trois-Rivières/ Number of Work Accidents Bécancour 14 90 12 80 70 Number of Accidents 10 60 8 The number of accidents slightly increased between 50 40 2010 and 2011, but there was a significant decrease 6 30 in accident severity. 4 20 2 10 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 With Loss of Time Without Loss of Time Severity Index

Maritime Employers Association 11 Highlights

In terms of labour relations, 2011 was another very dyna- Occupational Health and Safety mic year. Despite some economic instability, careful ƒƒActive involvement with port terminals in preventing management allowed the M.E.A. to stay on course. work accidents ƒƒCompletion of a joint study with UQAM to evaluate Labour Relations impacts and vibrations longshoremen are subjected to when driving trucks ƒƒFour collective agreements were signed ƒƒCompletion of container pile wind resistance study ƒƒOver 800 outstanding grievances from the years 2006 to 2010 were resolved ƒƒImplementation of a workplace Harassment and Violence Policy ƒƒTour of European ports to identify best labour relations practices ƒƒActive involvement in the NMSA ƒƒReduction in the severity of workplace accidents at Workforce, Labour and Training the Ports of Montreal and Trois-Rivières/Bécancour ƒƒWork Refusals are at the lowest level in the last five ƒƒCreation of a group of casual labourers paid on years at the Port of Montreal a different salary scale than regular longshoremen at the Port of Trois-Rivières/Bécancour ƒƒParticipation in a tripartite committee at the Interna- tional Labour Organization in Geneva (Switzerland), bringing the associations from Montreal, Vancouver and New York into closer collaboration on training ƒƒCreation of a partnership with the Human Resources Sectorial Committee of the Maritime Industry

Maritime Employers Association 12 01. The year in review Technologies

M.E.A. Network and web portal telecom operations

A new online application has been developed that Achievements in 2011 allows stevedoring companies to order manpower daily, using M.E.A.’s web portal. Efforts from the Reviewing and implementing backup solutions were two team responsible for re-engineering the systems were priorities for the ITC department. warmly acknowledged by the users of this new man- ƒƒCreation of an automated relief site for the power ordering service. The efficiency, speed and M.E.A.’s fibre optic network in order to guarantee accessibility provided by the service were amongst uninterrupted workers’ dispatch operations. the top priorities in the redesign. ƒƒReplacement of the M.E.A. Headquarters’ telephone system to include a backup solution for the Association’s Call Centre in order to Port workforce guarantee uninterrupted service for companies management at the Port and port employees, in the event of an emergency. of Trois-Rivières/Bécancour ƒƒThe technical team also contributed to the hardware portion of the Training Centre’s e-learning project. In 2011, the ITC department automated the employee dispatch system for the Port of Trois-Rivières/Bécan- Finally, the server’s virtualization project continues cour. The files of the Trois-Rivières/Bécancour longsho- apace. The architectural overhaul of the hardware and remen are now integrated into the Head Office’s central software and the introduction of pilot servers were the information system thus allowing employees to pick up last steps in this crucial process. We have now added their daily assignments through the Association’s Call an authentication server on the new platform to validate Centre and, very soon, from the M.E.A. website. user access to our services. The migration of the web application server for companies and port employees should be completed shortly.

Maritime Employers Association 13 Statistical 02 Review

Maritime Employers Association 14 02. Statistical Review 2011 summ ary

Labour Costs (thousands of dollars)

Port of Montreal 140 000

120 000

Labour Costs, 2007 to 2011 100 000

80 000

60 000

40 000

20 000

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Pension and Bene ts 19 968 20 639 18 913 19 471 20 228

Job Security 9 948 9 327 14 510 11 536 11 540

Vacations 14 310 14 442 10 764 11 604 11 722

Wages 86 822 87 716 65 891 71 482 74 476

Total 131 048 132 124 110 078 114 093 117 966

Wages Vacations Job Security Pension and Bene ts

Average Number of Employees Number of Employees Required on Weekdays 700 611 On average, weekday labour requirements were 600 592 521 538 500 up slightly (3%) in comparison to 2010. Although we 500 experienced an increase of over 14% in weekend labour 400 398 372 requirements in the first quarter of 2011, but the situa- 300 273 271 tion returned to normal in the second half of the year, 220 essentially finishing the year at the same levels as 2010. 200 100

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Monday-Friday Saturday-Sunday

Labour Shortages (Weekdays) Labour Shortages Days On weekdays, we experienced a shortfall of 10 or 200 fewer labour shortages, 62% of the time. It should be 175 noted that 79% of weekday shortages were filled by 150 employees volunteering to work (fishing). 125 100 75 50 25 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 0 to 10 11 to 30 31 to 50 51 to 100 Over 100

Maritime Employers Association 15 Labour Shortages (Weekends) Number of Shortages

In terms of weekend days, statistics show that there Days were 10 or fewer shortages over a total of 75 days. 100 90 In 2011, over 90% of weekend shortages were filled by 80 employees volunteering to work (fishing). 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 0 to 10 11 to 30 31 to 50 51 to 100 Over 100

Longshore Tonnage, 2007 to 2011

Break Bulk (thousands of tons) Containers (thousands of tons) Conventionnel Conteneurs 350 13 500

300 13 000

250 12 500

200 12 000

150 11 500

100 11 000

50 10 500

0 10 000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Grain (thousands of tons) Bulk (thousands of tons) Grain Vrac 40 350

35 300 30 250 25 200 20 150 15 100 10 5 50 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Total (thousands of tons) Total 14 500 14 000 13 500 13 000 12 500 12 000 11 500 11 000 10 500 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Maritime Employers Association 16 Longshore Hours and Productivity Index, 2007 to 2011

Longshore Hours (thousands of hours) and Productivity Index

2 500 8

2 000 7,5 1 500 7 1 000

6,5 500

0 6 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Longshore Hours Productivity Index (Tons/Hour)

Grievances, 2007 to 2011

Number of Grievances Grievances Breakdown, 2011

150 126 Jurisdiction 40%

107 Disciplinary/ 101 17% 100 Dismissal Manpower/ 16% Linesmen 50 48 44 Call/Dispatch/ 14% 33 37 Hours of Work 32 29 10 Miscellaneous 13% 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Disciplinary Normative

Maritime Employers Association 17 Labour Training, 2007 to 2011

Training Hours Breakdown of Hours by Type of Training, 2011 Nombre d’heures de formation 30 000

25 000 Practical Training 70% 20 000 Familiarization 24% 15 000 Specialized 5% 10 000 Training

5 000 Refresher Training 1%

0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Most Popular Trainings (top 5), 2011

3 500

3 000

2 500

2 000

1 500

1 000

500

0 Top Transtainer Gantry Power Checker Handler Crane Shovel

Training Hours

Ratio of Training Hours by Sector, 2011

20%

Container

49% Bulk Break Bulk 31%

Maritime Employers Association 18 Port of Trois-Rivières/ Bécancour

Labour Costs, 2007 to 2011 Labour Costs (thousands of dollars)

6 000

5 000

4 000

3 000

2 000

1 000

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Pension and Bene ts 377 422 345 549 571

Vacations 409 416 358 512 485

Wages 3 482 3 559 2 744 4 117 3 857

Total 4 268 4 397 3 447 5 178 4 913

Wages Vacations Pension and Bene ts

Average Number of Employees Required Number of Employees Nombre d’employés on Weekdays 50 44 44 43 42 The statistics indicate that in 2011, the average number 40 of employees required on weekdays remained essenti- 31 ally the same as the previous year. 30

20

10

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Longshore Tonnage, 2007 to 2011

Break Bulk (thousands of tons) Grain (thousands of tons) Grain 350 35

300 30

250 25

200 20

150 15

100 10

50 5

0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Maritime Employers Association 19 Bulk (thousands of tons) Total (thousands of tons) Vrac Total 140 450

120 400 350 100 300 80 250 60 200 150 40 100 20 50 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Longshore Hours, 2007 to 2011

Longshore Hours (thousands of hours)

120

100

80

60

40

20

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Longshore Hours

Grievances, 2007 to 2011

Number of Grievances Grievances Breakdown, 2011

80 72 Jurisdiction 66 56% 59 60 Disciplinary/ 16% 49 Dismissal Manpower/ 40 3% Linesmen

Call/Dispatch/ 17% 20 16 Hours of Work 11 7 5 Miscellaneous 3 1 8% 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Disciplinary Normative

Maritime Employers Association 20 Port of Hamilton

Labour Costs, 2007 to 2011 Labour Costs (thousands of dollars)

5 000 4 500 4 000 3 500 3 000 2 500 2 000 1 500 1 000 500 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Pension and Bene ts 613 781 325 465 494

Vacations 377 484 200 290 328

Wages 2 757 3 491 1 468 2 029 2 180

Total 3 747 4 756 1 993 2 784 3 002

Wages Vacations Pension and Bene ts

Average Number of Employees Number of Employees Nombre d’employés Required on Weekdays 50

40 40 35

30 29 25 20 20

10

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Maritime Employers Association 21 Longshore Tonnage, 2007 to 2011

Break Bulk (thousands of tons) Bulk (thousands of tons) Conventionnel Vrac 600 140

500 120 100 400 80 300 60 200 40

100 20

0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Total (thousands of tons) Total 700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Longshore Hours and Productivity Index, 2007 to 2011

Longshore Hours (thousands of hours) and Productivity Index

120 6

100 5

80 4

60 3

40 2

20 1

0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Longshore Hours Productivity Index (Tons/Hour)

Maritime Employers Association 22 Port of Toronto

Labour Costs, 2007 to 2011 Labour Costs (thousands of dollars)

1 600 1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Pension and Bene ts 223 181 110 133 159

Vacations 146 118 72 87 109

Wages 1 071 859 683 615 737

Total 1 440 1 158 865 835 1 005

Wages Vacations Pension and Bene ts

Average Number of Employees Number of Employees Required on Weekdays Nombre d’employés 15

12 12 10 9 8 7 6 6

3

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Maritime Employers Association 23 Longshore Tonnage, 2007 to 2011

Break Bulk (thousands of tons) Bulk (thousands of tons) Conventionnel Vrac 160 50 140 40 120

100 30 80 20 60 40 10 20 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Total (thousands of tons) Total 200

150

100

50

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Longshore Hours and Productivity Index, 2007 to 2011

Longshore Hours (thousands of tons) and Productivity Index

40 6 35 5 30 25 4

20 3 15 2 10 1 5 0 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Longshore Hours Productivity Index (Tons/Hours)

Maritime Employers Association 24 Pension and Benefits

Trois-Rivières/ Toronto/ Montreal Montreal Bécancour Hamilton Longshoremen Checkers longshoremen longshoremen/ Checkers I.L.A. CUPE I.L.A. CUPe locals 1842, Local 375 local 1657 Local 1375 1654 & 1879

Pension plans Employers Contributions 2011 $11 679 036 $1 421 257 $571 317 $625 982 Pension Plan Assets $425 502 537 $52 330 013 N/A $10 440 167 (as of Dec. 2010) Solvency Ratio 92,7 % 91,3 % N/A N/A (as of Dec. 2010)

Benefit plans Employers Contributions 2011 $6 465 477 $662 652 Included in Included in Pension Pension Contributions Contributions

Maritime Employers Association 25 THe 03 team

Maritime Employers Association 26 03. THE TEAM MEMBERS FINANCE/ OF THE BOARD AUDIT OF DIRECTORS COMMITTEE

Kevin Doherty Daniel Bélisle Chairman of the Board Océanex inc. Montreal Gateway Terminals Partnership Andrew Chodos Daniel Bélisle Empire Stevedoring Company Limited Océanex inc. Holger Oetjen David Cardin Hapag-Lloyd (Canada) inc. Maersk Canada inc.

Andrew Chodos Empire Stevedoring Company Limited Contract Ross Kennedy Robert Reford Advisory Committees Holger Oetjen Hapag-Lloyd (Canada) inc.

Madeleine Paquin Logistec Stevedoring inc. Port Of Montreal

Roger Carré Flavio Tiseo Richard Piechowiak Mediterranean Shipping Co. (Canada) inc. Termont Montréal inc. Michel Tosini Philippe Desgagnés Fednav Limitée Normand Desjardins Maxime Fauteux Frank Vanduyn Logistec Stevedoring inc. Hanjin Shipping Canada, inc.

Meguerditch Kanondjian David Watson Jean-Nicolas Lavoie OOCL (Canada) inc. Daniel Tremblay «The Board of Directors of the Association Montreal Gateway Terminals Partnership shall consist of eleven (11) Directors.» M.E.A. By-Law 4, Article 4.2 Ross Kenny Cerescorp Company

Don Scardochio Empire Stevedoring Company Limited

Maritime Employers Association 27 Port of Trois-Rivières/ TRUSTS Bécancour COMMITTEES, Michel Brisebois Jean Gaudreau I.L.A. PENSION Jean Poliquin PLANS AND Terminaux Portuaires du Québec inc. EMPLOYEE Geneviève Gauthier Pierre Lefebvre BENEFITS FUNDS Carl Pépin Logistec Stevedoring inc.

Michel Dallaire Port of Montreal Patrick Milette (CHECKERS) Services Maritimes Laviolette inc.

Jean Bédard Eric Boisvert Maritime Employers Association Bryan McCarthy

Marc Paquin Normand Daoust Somavrac inc. Maritime Employers Association

Chantal Lefebvre Port OF Hamilton Maritime Employers Association

Michel Brisebois Stéphane Morency Bruce Graham Maritime Employers Association Tim Sheppard Stevedoring Co. Ltd. Benoit Forest Maritime Data Centre inc. Keith Flagg Bernie Mailloux Fednav Limitée Ports of Hamilton Riley Verhelst and Toronto Richardson International Ltd. Jean Bédard Jeff Reid Maritime Employers Association Waterford Group Mike Kirkpatrick Fednav Limited

Port of Toronto Alan J. Paul Toronto Port Authority Alain Lefebvre Logistec Arrimage inc. Joe Walsh Maritime Employers Association Keith Flagg Bernie Mailloux Fednav Limitée

Maritime Employers Association 28 LOGISTEC STEVEDORING INC. M.E.A. SERVICES MARITIMES LAVIOLETTE INC. MONTREAL GATEWAY TERMINALS PARTNERSHIP MEMBERS SOMAVRAC INC. TERMINAL MARITIME CONTRECŒUR TERMONT MONTRÉAL INC.

CATEGORY I «Employers of labour belonging to unions with respect with whom the Association is the authorized employers’ represen- tative.» APL (CANADA) LTD. M.E.A. By-Law CANFORNAV INC. CMA-CGM (CANADA) INC. COLLEY MOTORSHIPS LTD. CURRIE MARITIME CORPORATION FEDNAV LIMITED M.E.A. in short GRESCO LTÉE Hanjin Shipping Canada, inc. HAPAG-LLOYD (CANADA) INC. INCHCAPE SHIPPING SERVICES LADEN MARITIME INC. Senior Officers MAERSK CANADA INC. McLEAN KENNEDY INC. Jean Bédard MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO. (CANADA) INC. President and Chief Executive Officer MONTREAL MARINE SERVICES INC. MONTSHIP INC. Normand Daoust NAVITRANS SHIPPING AGENCIES Vice–President, Administration and Secretary NORTON LILLY INTERNATIONAL INC NYK LINE (CANADA) INC. Chantal Lefebvre OCÉANEX INC. Director, Finances and Treasurer OOCL CANADA INC. POROS SHIPPING AGENCIES INC. PROTOS SHIPPING LIMITED RAMSEY GREIG & CO. LTD. Executive Management RICHARDSON INTERNATIONAL LTD. ROBERT REFORD Francine Fields SCANDIA SHIPPING (CANADA) INC. Director, Human Resources and Administration SEABRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING INC. WATSON MARINE AGENCY Alexandre Gagnon WESTWARD SHIPPING LTD. Director, Occupational Health & Safety ZIM ISRAEL NAVIGATION CO. (CANADA) LTD. Manon Gervais «Owners and/or operators and/or agents of vessels» Director, ICT Services and Dispatch Centre M.E.A. By-Law Malcolm Mac Leod Director, Operations CATEGORY II Stéphane Morency C.L. TERMONT Director, Labour Relations and Manpower CERESCORP COMPANY CL-CERES COMPANY COMPAGNIE D’AMARRAGE DE TROIS-RIVIÈRES LTÉE COMPAGNIE D’ARRIMAGE DE QUÉBEC LTÉE EMPIRE STEVEDORING CO. LTD.

Maritime Employers Association 29 COORDINATES

Head Office Trois-Rivières Office

2100 Pierre-Dupuy Avenue 225 Des Forges Street Wing No. 2, Suite 1040 Suite 115 Montreal (Quebec) Trois-Rivières (Quebec) H3C 3R5 G9A 2G7 514 878.3721 819 376.4456

Training Centre Hamilton Office

Section 44, Port of Montreal 208 Hillyard Street Montreal (Quebec) Hamilton () 514 524.7442 L8L 6B6 905 523.5351 Dispatch Centre

Section 50, Port of Montreal Montreal (Quebec) 514 866.5965

Maritime Employers Association 30 financial 04 statements

Maritime Employers Association 31 04. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | CONDENSED VERSION BALANCE SHEET As at December 31, 2011

2011 2010 $ $ ASSETS Current assets Cash & Short-term investments 9 512 901 8 079 842 Accounts receivable 2 569 543 2 922 316 Prepaid expenses 86 878 375 159 12 169 322 11 377 317 Fixed assets 393 912 482 254 Prepaid pension future benefits 1 370 303 1 278 328 13 933 537 13 137 899 LIABILITIES AND OPERATING RESERVES Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 3 242 031 3 021 211 Current portion of severances payable 1 346 640 598 849 4 588 671 3 620 060 Employee other future benefits 1 563 546 1 180 546 Severances payable 4 133 103 5 177 862 10 285 320 9 978 468 Operating reserves Port of Montreal 3 446 444 3 123 785 Port of Trois-Rivières/Bécancour 88 748 72 524 Port of Toronto 40 696 70 896 Port of Hamilton 72 329 (107 774) 3 648 217 3 159 431 13 933 537 13 137 899

Maritime Employers Association 32 STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE For the year ended December 31, 2011

2011 2010 PORT OF MONTREAL $ $ Revenue Assessments levied 39 399 944 41 100 090 Interest income and sundry revenue 91 326 55 337 Linesmen services 1 691 235 1 713 984 41 182 505 42 869 411 Expenditures Job security 9 510 311 10 012 095 Pension and welfare 19 786 079 19 085 747 Manpower training 1 987 741 1 581 935 Severances - 5 776 711 Accretion expense on severances payable 336 782 - 31 620 913 36 456 488 Linesmen services 2 849 642 2 682 931 Administration 6 389 291 4 924 936 Total expenditures 40 859 846 44 064 355 Excess of revenue over expenditures (expenditures over revenue) 322 659 (1 194 944) for the year

2011 2010 PORT OF TROIS-RIVIÈRES/BÉCANCOUR $ $ Revenue Assessments levied and sundry revenue 550 590 580 750 Expenditures related to manpower 80 832 62 208 Administration 453 534 458 748 Total expenditures 534 366 520 956 Excess of revenue over expenditures for the year 16 224 59 794

2011 2010 PORT OF TORONTO $ $ Revenue Assessments levied and sundry revenue 32 975 27 496 Expenditures related to manpower 42 400 48 613 Administration 20 775 25 084 Total expenditures 63 175 73 697 Excess of expenditures over revenue for the year (30 200) (46 201)

2011 2010 PORT OF HAMILTON $ $ Revenue Assessments levied and sundry revenue 560 759 388 986 Expenditures related to manpower 110 863 113 131 Administration 269 793 379 885 Total expenditures 380 656 493 016 Excess of revenue over expenditures (expenditures over revenue) 180 103 (104 030) for the year

Maritime Employers Association 33 Photo credits M.E.A. Port of Montreal Sylvian Giguère

Design + layout Enigma

writing M.E.A. Enigma