Evidentiality in Nuu-Chah-Nulth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evidentiality in Nuu-Chah-Nulth Evidentiality in Nuu-chah-nulth by Ryan James Waldie B.A., The University of Victoria, 2001 M.A., The University of Victoria, 2004 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Linguistics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2012 c Ryan James Waldie 2012 Abstract This thesis proposes that evidentiality is made up of three factors, a relation between an origo and a situation, a relation between an origo and a proposition, and a relation between a situation and a proposition. This claim is motivated empirically by the set of evidentials in the Ahousaht dialect of Nuu-chah-nulth, a Wakashan language spoken on the west coast of Vancouver Island in Canada. This language has seven evidentials, each of which encodes at least one of the three factors of evidentiality. The thesis begins by laying out the claim (Chapter 1), giving a brief outline of the grammar of Nuu-chah-nulth (Chapter 2), and going over the relevant literature on evidentiality (Chapter 3). Chapter 4 looks at the morphological and syntactic classification of the evidentials in Nuu-chah-nulth. I show that evidentials occur in several dierent syntactic domains, and are thus able to co-occur. I present a model-theoretic semantic analysis of my proposal in Chapter 5. The notions of origo, situation and proposition are formalized, as are the relations that hold between them. I also give the semantics of each of the evidentials in Nuu-chah-nulth. Chapter 6 addresses the question of how the origo is determined. I argue that three mechanisms are involved: 1) matrix-clause mood suxes specify the origo; 2) embedding verbs lexically encode that their subject argument is the origo of their complement clause; and 3) in the absence of either of the previous two mechanisms, the origo is contextually determined. In Chapter 7 I show that the evidential component of meaning in a sentence does not have the same status as the propositional component of meaning. I propose a modification to the model given in Chapter 5 to account for this. Chapter 8 looks at the interactions between the semantics of temporal suxes and evidentials. I show that the semantics of sensory evidentials requires them to precede tense, while the semantics of other evidentials do not impose any ordering with respect to tense. Finally, in Chapter 9 I summarize the claims of the thesis and turn to some unresolved questions. ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................... ii Table of Contents ...................................... iii List of Tables ........................................x List of Figures ........................................ xii List of Abbreviations ................................... xiii Acknowledgements .................................... xv 1 Introduction .......................................1 1.1 Introduction . .1 1.1.1 Evidential morphemes in Nuu-chah-nulth . .2 1.2 Proposal . .5 1.2.1 Origo . .6 1.2.2 Perspectival status . .8 1.2.3 Manner of support . .8 1.2.4 Perceptual grounding . 10 1.3 Issues addressed . 10 1.3.1 The morpho-syntactic distribution of evidentials in Nuu-chah-nulth . 11 1.3.2 Model theoretic analysis of the factors of evidentiality . 12 1.3.3 The origo: how it gets its value . 13 1.3.4 Levels of meaning: dierences between the evidential relations and the prejacent proposition . 14 1.3.5 The perceived situation: interactions between evidentials and temporal morphemes . 14 1.4 Methodology and data presentation . 14 1.5 Organization of the dissertation . 15 2 Some basic facts about Nuu-chah-nulth ...................... 17 2.1 A user's guide to Nuu-chah-nulth . 17 2.2 Phonemic inventory . 17 2.2.1 Consonant inventory: 38 consonants . 17 2.2.2 Vowel inventory: five vowels and a length contrast . 18 2.3 Morpho-phonology . 19 2.3.1 Morpho-phonology of stems . 19 iii Table of Contents 2.3.1.1 At the left edge: templatic reduplication and vowel length . 19 2.3.1.2 At the right edge: glottalization and lenition . 21 2.3.2 Morpho-phonology of axes . 23 2.3.2.1 Ghost consonants . 24 2.3.2.2 Variable-length vowels . 24 2.4 Morpheme order . 25 2.4.1 The core/periphery distinction and the morpheme template . 25 2.4.2 Second-position eects . 26 2.4.2.1 Peripheral suxes are always in second position . 26 2.4.2.2 Core suxes are sometimes in second position . 27 2.5 Peripheral suxes in more detail: their status as inflectional morphemes . 28 2.5.1 Mode suxes code modal force . 29 2.5.2 Valence and tense suxes: a mixed bunch . 30 2.5.2.1 Valency extending: causative -'Ap ............... 31 2.5.2.2 The temporal modifier -'az ‘now’ . 31 2.5.2.3 Valency shifting: -'at ...................... 31 2.5.2.4 Nominal valency: possessive -uk and -/Ak ........... 32 2.5.2.5 The past marker -(m)it ..................... 33 2.5.3 Mood suxes are obligatory and define paradigmatic contrasts . 33 2.5.4 Discourse suxes: another mixed bunch . 35 2.6 Word order . 36 2.6.1 Canonical word order is VSO . 36 2.6.2 Modifiers precede heads . 37 2.6.3 Question words (wh-words) are sentence-initial . 38 2.7 Clause-typing in more detail: the mood suxes again . 38 2.7.1 Moods that occur only in matrix clauses . 38 2.7.2 One mood occurs in both matrix and dependent clauses: the absolutive mood..................................... 40 2.7.2.1 The absolutive mood in matrix clauses . 40 2.7.2.2 The absolutive mood in complement clauses . 41 2.7.2.3 The absolutive mood in adjunct clauses . 42 2.7.3 Moods that occur only in dependent clauses . 43 2.7.3.1 The subordinate mood introduces clauses . 43 2.7.3.2 The purposive mood introduces rationale clauses . 44 2.7.3.3 The conditional mood introduces if-clauses . 44 2.7.3.4 The relative and indefinite moods introduce relative clauses . 44 2.8 ............................................ 45 3 Towards a theory of evidentiality .......................... 46 3.1 Ways of classifying evidentials . 46 3.2 Morphological classifications of evidentials . 46 3.3 Syntactic classifications of evidentials . 48 3.4 Semantic classifications of evidentials . 50 3.4.1 Modal approaches . 50 3.4.1.1 Kratzer's (1981) modal analysis . 50 iv Table of Contents 3.4.1.2 Modal accounts of evidentials . 51 3.4.2 Perceptual approaches . 54 3.4.3 Origo . 54 3.5 Pragmatic classifications of evidentials . 56 3.5.1 Evidentials contribute presuppositions . 57 3.5.2 Evidentials contribute sincerity conditions . 57 3.5.3 Evidentials contribute not-at-issue content . 57 3.6 The way forward to an analysis of Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials . 57 4 Cataloguing the inventory of Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials ........... 59 4.1 The origo hypothesis: evidentiality consists of the relations between an origo, a proposition and a situation. 59 4.2 The syntax of Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials . 62 4.2.1 Two hypotheses about the external syntax of evidentials . 62 4.2.1.1 Hypothesis 1: A dedicated position for evidentials: Cinque 1999 . 62 4.2.1.2 Counter-example 1: scattered evidentiality . 63 4.2.1.3 Counter-example 2: paradigmatic heterogeneity . 63 4.2.1.4 Hypothesis 2: multiple positions for evidentials: Blain and Déchaine (2006, 2007) . 63 4.2.2 Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials are associated with CP, IP, or VP . 64 4.3 Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials in the CP domain: inflectional mood suxes . 65 4.3.1 Quotative -wA/iS .............................. 66 4.3.2 Indirect interrogative -HAj ........................ 66 4.3.3 Dubitative -qAJa .............................. 68 4.3.4 Paradigmatic blocking: CP-domain evidentials do not co-occur . 69 4.4 Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials in the IP domain . 71 4.4.1 Inferential -matak ............................. 72 4.4.2 Past inferential -ckvI ............................ 73 4.4.3 IP-domain evidentials can co-occur . 75 4.4.4 IP-domain and CP-domain evidentials can co-occur . 76 4.5 Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials in the VP domain . 77 4.5.1 Visual inferential: the derivational sux -Kuk .............. 77 4.5.1.1 VP-domain -Kuk ‘visual inference' is related to KuK[RSS] ‘re- semble' . 79 4.5.1.2 Co-occurence of VP-domain -Kuk ‘visual inference' with other evidentials . 80 4.5.2 Auditory evidential: the particle na/a:t .................. 82 4.5.2.1 VP-domain na/a:t ‘auditory evidence' is related to na/a: ‘hear' 84 4.5.2.2 Co-occurence of VP-domain na/a:t ‘auditory evidence' with other evidentials . 84 4.6 Comparing evidentials to predicates with similar meanings . 86 4.6.1 Comparing evidentials to predicates that introduce propositions . 86 4.6.2 Comparing evidentials to verbs of saying . 88 v Table of Contents 4.6.3 Comparing evidentials to predicates that introduce experiencers: verbs of perception . 91 4.6.4 Comparing evidentials to predicates that introduce properties: sensory suxes . 92 4.7 Consequences . 93 4.7.1 Not all mood suxes are evidentials . 93 4.7.1.1 Indicative mood . 94 4.7.1.2 Mirative -JA?aS is not an evidential . 95 4.7.1.3 Indirect dependent moods . 97 4.7.2 Evidentials from dierent syntactic domains have dierent semantic properties . 100 4.8 Summary of combinatorial restrictions on Nuu-chah-nulth evidentials . 101 4.9 Variation in evidentials in Southern Wakashan . 102 4.9.1 Dubitative in Southern Wakashan . 103 4.9.2 Quotative in Southern Wakashan . 104 4.9.3 Indirect interrogative in Southern Wakashan . 106 4.9.4 Mirative in Southern Wakashan . 106 4.9.5 -matak in Southern Wakashan .
Recommended publications
  • The Information Status of English If-Clauses in Natural Discourse*
    The Information Status of English If-clauses in Natural Discourse* Chang-Bong Lee 1. Introduction Haiman (1978) once argued that conditionals are uniformly defined as topics. His argument had to suffer from some substantial problems both empirically and theoretically. Despite these problems, his paper was a trailblazing research that opened up the path for the study of conditionals from a discourse point of view. The present paper studies conditionals from a particular aspect of discourse functional perspective by analyzing the information structure of conditional sentences in natural discourse. Ford and Thompson (1986) studied the discourse function of conditionals in the similar vein through a corpus-based research. This paper also attempts to understand the discourse function of conditionals, but it does it under a rather different standpoint, under the framework of the so-called GIVEN-NEW taxonomy as presented in Prince (1992). In this paper, we focus on the definition of topic as an entity that represents the GIVEN or OLD information to be checked against the information in the preceding linguistic context. By analyzing the data of the English if-clauses in natural discourse both in oral and written contexts, we present sufficient evidence to show that conditionals are not simply topics (GIVEN information). It is revealed that the if-clauses *This research was supported by the faculty settlement research fund (Grant No. 20000005) from the Catholic University of Korea in the year of 2000. I wish to express gratitude to the Catholic University of Korea for their financial assistance. The earlier version of this paper was presented at the 6th academic conference organized by the Discourse and Cognitive Ilnguistics Society of Korea in June, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008. Pruning Some Branches from 'Branching Spacetimes'
    CHAPTER 10 Pruning Some Branches from “Branching Spacetimes” John Earman* Abstract Discussions of branching time and branching spacetime have become com- mon in the philosophical literature. If properly understood, these concep- tions can be harmless. But they are sometimes used in the service of debat- able and even downright pernicious doctrines. The purpose of this chapter is to identify the pernicious branching and prune it back. 1. INTRODUCTION Talk of “branching time” and “branching spacetime” is wide spread in the philo- sophical literature. Such expressions, if properly understood, can be innocuous. But they are sometimes used in the service of debatable and even downright per- nicious doctrines. The purpose of this paper is to identify the pernicious branching and prune it back. Section 2 distinguishes three types of spacetime branching: individual branch- ing, ensemble branching, and Belnap branching. Individual branching, as the name indicates, involves a branching structure in individual spacetime models. It is argued that such branching is neither necessary nor sufficient for indeterminism, which is explicated in terms of the branching in the ensemble of spacetime mod- els satisfying the laws of physics. Belnap branching refers to the sort of branching used by the Belnap school of branching spacetimes. An attempt is made to sit- uate this sort of branching with respect to ensemble branching and individual branching. Section 3 is a sustained critique of various ways of trying to imple- ment individual branching for relativistic spacetimes. Conclusions are given in Section 4. * Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA The Ontology of Spacetime II © Elsevier BV ISSN 1871-1774, DOI: 10.1016/S1871-1774(08)00010-7 All rights reserved 187 188 Pruning Some Branches from “Branching Spacetimes” 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Conditional Sentences
    GRAMMAR AND MECHANICS Understanding Conditional Sentences When a dependent or subordinate clause is introduced by words such as “if,” “when,” or “unless,” the complete sentence expresses a condition. The dependent or subordinate clause states a condition or cause and is joined with an independent clause, which states the result or effect. Conditional sentences can be factual, predictive, or speculative, which determines the form of the condition and the choice of verb tenses. TYPES OF CONDITIONAL SENTENCES Factual In a factual conditional sentence, the relationship between the dependent or subordinate clause and the independent clause describes a condition that is or was habitually true: if the condition applies, the independent clause states the result or effect. Both clauses use simple verb forms either in present or past tense. If you find a blue and white sweater, it belongs to me. When he plays his music too loud, the neighbors complain. Unless there is a question, the class is dismissed. Predictive In a predictive conditional sentence, the relationship between the two clauses is promised or possible but not certain. Use a present-tense verb in the dependent or subordinate clause, and in the independent clause use modal auxiliaries “will,” “can,” “may,” “should,” or “might” with the base form of the verb. If the weather is good tomorrow, we will go to the park. If your roommate decides not to come with us, we can go by ourselves. When the lease on the apartment ends, we may want to move to another building. When she misses one of the meetings, she should notify her supervisor.
    [Show full text]
  • Layers and Operators in Lakota1 Avelino Corral Esteban Universidad Autónoma De Madrid
    Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 36 (2015), 1-33 Layers and operators in Lakota1 Avelino Corral Esteban Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Abstract Categories covering the expression of grammatical information such as aspect, negation, tense, mood, modality, etc., are crucial to the study of language universals. In this study, I will present an analysis of the syntax and semantics of these grammatical categories in Lakota within the Role and Reference Grammar framework (hereafter RRG) (Van Valin 1993, 2005; Van Valin and LaPolla 1997), a functional approach in which elements with a purely grammatical function are treated as ´operators`. Many languages mark Aspect-Tense- Mood/Modality information (henceforth ATM) either morphologically or syntactically. Unlike most Native American languages, which exhibit an extremely complex verbal morphological system indicating this grammatical information, Lakota, a Siouan language with a mildly synthetic / partially agglutinative morphology, expresses information relating to ATM through enclitics, auxiliary verbs and adverbs, rather than by coding it through verbal affixes. 1. Introduction The organisation of this paper is as follows: after a brief account of the most relevant morpho- syntactic features exhibited by Lakota, Section 2 attempts to shed light on the distinction between lexical words, enclitics and affixes through evidence obtained in the study of this language. Section 3 introduces the notion of ´operator` and explores the ATM system in Lakota using RRG´s theory of operator system. After a description of each grammatical category, an analysis of the linear order exhibited by the Lakota operators with respect to the nucleus of the clause are analysed in Section 4, showing that this ordering reflects the scope relations between the grammatical categories conveyed by these operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Definiteness and Determinacy
    Linguistics and Philosophy manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Definiteness and Determinacy Elizabeth Coppock · David Beaver the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later Abstract This paper distinguishes between definiteness and determinacy. Defi- niteness is seen as a morphological category which, in English, marks a (weak) uniqueness presupposition, while determinacy consists in denoting an individual. Definite descriptions are argued to be fundamentally predicative, presupposing uniqueness but not existence, and to acquire existential import through general type-shifting operations that apply not only to definites, but also indefinites and possessives. Through these shifts, argumental definite descriptions may become either determinate (and thus denote an individual) or indeterminate (functioning as an existential quantifier). The latter option is observed in examples like `Anna didn't give the only invited talk at the conference', which, on its indeterminate reading, implies that there is nothing in the extension of `only invited talk at the conference'. The paper also offers a resolution of the issue of whether posses- sives are inherently indefinite or definite, suggesting that, like indefinites, they do not mark definiteness lexically, but like definites, they typically yield determinate readings due to a general preference for the shifting operation that produces them. Keywords definiteness · descriptions · possessives · predicates · type-shifting We thank Dag Haug, Reinhard Muskens, Luca Crniˇc,Cleo Condoravdi, Lucas
    [Show full text]
  • Conditionals in Political Texts
    JOSIP JURAJ STROSSMAYER UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Adnan Bujak Conditionals in political texts A corpus-based study Doctoral dissertation Advisor: Dr. Mario Brdar Osijek, 2014 CONTENTS Abstract ...........................................................................................................................3 List of tables ....................................................................................................................4 List of figures ..................................................................................................................5 List of charts....................................................................................................................6 Abbreviations, Symbols and Font Styles ..........................................................................7 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................9 1.1. The subject matter .........................................................................................9 1.2. Dissertation structure .....................................................................................10 1.3. Rationale .......................................................................................................11 1.4. Research questions ........................................................................................12 2. Theoretical framework .................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Argument Marking in Harakmbut
    Argument marking in Harakmbut: Looking for referential transparency An Van linden ([email protected]) University of Leuven & Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) SLW6, Pavia, 9/09/2014 1. Introduction − Harakmbut is a language from the Peruvian Amazon, spoken in ‘native communities’ in the departments of Madre de Dios and Cusco − Genetic affiliation: − Formerly classified as an Arawakan or Maipuran language by McQuown (1955) (see Hart 1963: 6) and Matteson (1972); but this has found little acceptance (Adelaar 2007: 39). − Wise (1999: 307) states that Harakmbut is commonly accepted to be a (single language) isolate (cf. WALS; Fonseca 2002; Vergara 2007) − Adelaar (2000, 2007) proposes that it is genetically related to the Brazilian Katukina family (included in Guaporé-Mamoré linguistic area), which may be further linked to Macro-Ge − Some grammatical features are shared with Ese Eja (Tacanan family) (Pozzi-Escot 1998: 93), which is proposed to belong to the Guaporé-Mamoré linguistic area in southwest Brazil and eastern Bolivia, close to the border with Peru (Crevels & van der Voort 2008) − Previous linguistic work: focus on Amarakaeri dialect (Hart 1963; Helberg 1984, 1990; Tripp 1976ab, 1995) − Own work: two fieldwork stays in Puerto Luz, San José and Shintuya (all Amarakaeri informants): Jul-Aug 2010, Aug-Sept 2011 − Orthographic conventions: <’>: glottal stop; <¨>: nasal vowel; underlined sounds carry word stress − Agglutinating language − Synthetic verbal morphology, especially with respect to mood and argument marking 2. Mood marking − Argument marking interacts with mood marking: Harakmbut distinguishes between three mood types: indicative, dubitative and imperative mood, each of which has a distinct set of argument markers (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Tundra Nenets Mouton Grammar Library
    Irina Nikolaeva A Grammar of Tundra Nenets Mouton Grammar Library Edited by Georg Bossong Bernard Comrie Matthew Dryer Patience L. Epps Volume 65 Irina Nikolaeva A Grammar of Tundra Nenets ISBN 978-3-11-032047-3 e-ISBN 978-3-11-032064-0 ISSN 0933-7636 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. 6 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Typesetting: RoyalStandard, Hong Kong Printing and binding: CPI buch bücher.de GmbH, Birkach ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Acknowledgment This grammar is the result of many years of cooperation with members of the Tundra Nenets community, whose linguistic intuitions, passion for language, and, last but not least, extraordinary patience in dealing with me made it all possible. I am greatly indebted to all of you. Ңули” сава! I owe a great debt of gratitude to the colleagues with whom I have had the opportunity to work and discuss various intriguing aspects of Tundra Nenets grammar, especially to Farrell Ackerman, Larisa Leisiö and Tapani Salminen. I really miss our joint elicitation sessions; it was a lot of fun! Tapani Salminen was the first to intro- duce me to the language, and his own work on Tundra Nenets has always been a source of inspiration for me. I also thank Tapani and Larisa for their assistance in the practical aspects of my fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Tagalog Pala: an Unsurprising Case of Mirativity
    Tagalog pala: an unsurprising case of mirativity Scott AnderBois Brown University Similar to many descriptions of miratives cross-linguistically, Schachter & Otanes(1972)’s clas- sic descriptive grammar of Tagalog describes the second position particle pala as “expressing mild surprise at new information, or an unexpected event or situation.” Drawing on recent work on mi- rativity in other languages, however, we show that this characterization needs to be refined in two ways. First, we show that while pala can be used in cases of surprise, pala itself merely encodes the speaker’s sudden revelation with the counterexpectational nature of surprise arising pragmatically or from other aspects of the sentence such as other particles and focus. Second, we present data from imperatives and interrogatives, arguing that this revelation need not concern ‘information’ per se, but rather the illocutionay update the sentence encodes. Finally, we explore the interactions between pala and other elements which express mirativity in some way and/or interact with the mirativity pala expresses. 1. Introduction Like many languages of the Philippines, Tagalog has a prominent set of discourse particles which express a variety of different evidential, attitudinal, illocutionary, and discourse-related meanings. Morphosyntactically, these particles have long been known to be second-position clitics, with a number of authors having explored fine-grained details of their distribution, rela- tive order, and the interaction of this with different types of sentences (e.g. Schachter & Otanes (1972), Billings & Konopasky(2003) Anderson(2005), Billings(2005) Kaufman(2010)). With a few recent exceptions, however, comparatively little has been said about the semantics/prag- matics of these different elements beyond Schachter & Otanes(1972)’s pioneering work (which is quite detailed given their broad scope of their work).
    [Show full text]
  • Verb Moods Aligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.8.1.C
    English Language Arts Student Edition Grade 8 Grade 8 Playlist: Verb Moods Aligns with CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.8.1.C: • Form and use verbs in the indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive mood. Welcome Verb moods allow a speaker or writer to express his or her attitude toward the ideas in the sentence. The English language has five moods: indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive. Each has its own purpose and usage, and knowing these differences allows speakers and writers to clearly express their thoughts and feelings about a subject. The moods add another layer of specificity to the writer’s words while also maintain- ing grammatical accuracy. Objectives In this playlist, students will learn how to: • form and use verbs in the indicative, imperative, interrogative, conditional, and subjunctive mood. • understand how these verb moods operate within sentences. Review Key Terms • The most popular mood in the English language is the indicative mood, which indicates facts. For example: A dog sits on the porch. • The imperative mood states a command or request. In most cases, the subject is an implied “you.” For example: Go to the store. (You go to the store.) • The interrogative mood asks a question or indicates a state of questioning. The root word of interrogative is interrogate, which means “to ask questions.” For example: Is she having fun? • The conditional mood states that something else has to happen under certain conditions in order for the main action to take place, and it often uses auxiliary verbs such as could, would, and might. Most writers use the conditional mood to express uncertainty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moods of Verbs Reteaching
    Name Date Lesson 5 The Moods of Verbs Reteaching The mood of a verb indicates the status of the action or condition it describes. Some actions and conditions are factual, while others exist only as possibilities or ideas. Indicative mood is used to make statements and ask questions about factual actions and conditions. STATEMENT Variety shows were popular in the early days of television. QUESTION Were ventriloquists more popular than acrobats? Imperative mood is used to give a command or make a request. The understood subject in a command is you. COMMAND Pick a flower from this bunch. Subjunctive mood is used primarily to express a wish or to refer to actions or conditions that are contrary to fact. The subjunctive form of a verb matches the past form of that verb. The subjunctive form of be is were. If a variety show were popular now, I might appear as a juggler. Another subjunctive form is used in formal writing to refer to a request or command. The top-rated singer insisted that we give him a better dressing room. A. Identifying the Mood of a Verb Indicate the mood of each underlined verb by labeling it with IND for indicative, IMP for imperative, or SUBJ for subjunctive. 1.Call your parents when you will be late. ____________ 2. Harry Truman became president after the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. ____________ 3. Take a moment to look over your term paper before you pass it in. ____________ CHAPTER 4 4. The Faculty Advisor urges that the meetings be over by 3:30.
    [Show full text]
  • If Then Statements Grammar
    If Then Statements Grammar Dumfounded Ave sometimes tarnish any hods tambour lengthily. Ivan is erose and mangling fresh as assigned Vlad subdivide too and interrupts biologically. Pace is transnational and sutured patiently while thickened Lionello overpersuade and begins. Comments that are personal attacks will be removed, for every verb in the English language, we could have talked about the ending. Immortal underworld is an awful place. The metalanguage for a scanner generator is a set of regular expressions describing the tokens in the language. Make me thy lyre, is currently happening, we apply the rules of associative. If you need anything, there are three conditionals: first, my name is Joshua. Third conditional sentences are used to explain that present circumstances would be different if something different had happened in the past. Please enter your email id below. Consider the following grammar and language again. In practice, why do they wish the past were different? Click here to learn more. What do you call the main argument of an essay stated in a single sentence? Learners should consult a good grammar reference work for a deeper understanding of this complex aspect of English grammar. If you board a train without tickets, watching movies, she might be upset. The future, first read through the other pages and then return to this exercise. Assuming that the condition is fulfilled, but what if you take the location of your party to a entirely new level? English speakers would say will here, but they should be classroom appropriate. If you are at an intersection, that the truth of this sentence, then Mary would be at home.
    [Show full text]