US SC Amicas Brief – Motion for Mandamus

No. ______-______

IN THE Supreme Court of the United States

BONNIE RAYSOR, ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Applicants, v. RON DESANTIS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL., Respondents.______/

RE: FLORIDA FELONS FREEDOM FIGHT APPLICATION TO VACATE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT’S STAY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT FROM RELATED ACTIONS AS “CLASS VICTIMS”: Jones v. DeSantis 410 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (N.D. Fla. 2019); Townsend v. Lane-Bush(s)-DeSantis-Lee-Moody et al 18-4845, 1st DCA; Tallahassee, Fl. As From 2018CA2293, Townsend v. Detzner et al; From Townsend Petitioner United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit NO:17-7113, and others filed in D.C. Courts 7/7/2017; From Townsend v. Lane-Bush et al 17-10795-D 11th Cir.; From Townsend v. Lane et al, FRAP 1-3 and “Others Doe” 12-13892AA 11th Cir.; Townsend v. Lane et al, 88-2554, 18th Circuit, Seminole County Florida

AMICUS BRIEF AND AS PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL-PETITION FOR MANDAMUS

RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, Individual; And AS Civil Rights Act of 1871 “Private Attorney’s General”; and 4 U.S.C. 1983; per 4 U.S.C. 1986; 4 U.S.C. 241; 4 U.S.C. 242 and Per F.S.617.0834, “Representative” of FBCCP/CPCS A “Florida Not for Profit” Church/School; per F.S. 86; F.S. 80; Qui Tam; Fl. Et. Rel. Never lawfully removed. P.O. Box 5, Osprey Fl. 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING

Applicants are the (“Raysor”) and “Class Action” to and or in this Court and are joined in part to preserve Our Organic Civil Rights and per

Pinkerton id. expose “Fraud on the Court” as victim(s) by Randall C.

Townsend, and “those for whom he speaks” as “Townsend” as a “Private

Attorney’s General” and per MEIER V. JOHNSTON 110 Fla. 374, 149 So.

185, “One may represent for the whole” and per the Civil Rights Act of 1871 and 4 U.S.C. 1983, and Florida Statute 80.02, for our “Equal Protection

Rights” and Relief as victims as “Townsend” has legally argued since

11/18/1987, against their “Fraud on the Court(s)” and “Extrinsic Fraud(s)” and Hobbs Act Crimes as they continue F.S. 99 and F.S. 104, Felonies as by they conspire and fraud to remove the required “Blank Line” for Florida

“General of the Attorney’s” and Sheriffs, each “And All Individually and

Officially, Defendants” have unlawfully and unjustly enriched themselves with Townsends stolen resources, rights and relationships (children, Church,

Clients) and “Impeded” Contracts and Due Process Rights and equal lawful

Commerce as Townsend seeks a “Judgment of Ouster” and restitution and justice on All Respondents.

The Respondents “And All Individually and Officially, Defendants” as:

“Raysor” Applicants in part as who are shown herein since the 1980’s Omitting Truthful Disclosure and conspire as violating 18 U.S.C. 1346, “Deprivation by Fraud of Honest Services” not revealing the F.S. 99 and F.S. 104, and other RICO violations to Townsend and “Townsend et al”;

Ron DeSantis and all Florida Governors back to Ruben Askew;

Laurel Lee, and all Florida Secretaries of State back to James C. Smith;

Ashley B. Moody, and all Florida Attorney’s Generals back to the same

James C. Smith (As Florida Attorney General and Florida Secretary of State;

The Florida Legislature(s) since the 1980’s, directed by John Grant family;

The Florida Supreme Court and Lower Courts;

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals En Banc, Atlanta Georgia;

The Florida Bar and Members since 11/18/1987;

The Bushs (Prescott, George H.W., George W., Jeb, Marvin, Neil, Dorothy;

The Koch (George, Charles, David, Fred, Robert, Dorothy Bush) Families who fund these respondents and respondent groups;

“Gruver Applicants” American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc. ;

“McCoy Applicants” Southern Poverty Law Center;

“The League Of Women Voters” since Linda Chapin et al;

“Florida Supervisors of Elections” and specifically Craig Latimer, President of the Supervisor of Elections and Supervisor of Elections of Hillsborough County, Florida, having intentionally violated F.S. 104 for Human Trafficking with “Sheriff’s and “Others”;

The Southern Strategies Group, and leader/member James C. Smith;

The Brian Ballard and with Kathryn Smith (James C. Smith Daughter) and the Ballard Group;

Steve Mnuchin as Defendant Kmart/Sears Holding since 2006, and now as Secretary of Treasury;

William Barr, U.S. Attorney’s General from acts since about 1991;

U.S. Supreme Court Chief “Judge” and as Individual, John Roberts;

All Knowingly acting as “Pinkerton and Ocasio Parties” in these related “Pay to Play” Townsend filed in FRAP’s I-III and “Others “ and “Others Doe to be Named” for “Unjust Enrichment” by Theft by themselves and of Lane et al of Townsend’s rights, resources and relationships in Case(s) as stated below herein since 88-2554, 18th Circuit, Seminole County Florida and in and through 18-4845, 1ST DCA, Tallahassee Florida, are “And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants” co=participants and co=conspirators as an “Unconstitutional Nobility” to “impede” the “We the People” by ongoing RICO Omitting Truthful Disclosure to Our Courts.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING……………………………… 2

STANDARD OF REVIEW (DE NOVO)………………………… 7

INTRODUCTION AND FACTS TO THE ISSUES……………… 8

ARGUMENT(S):

TO THE LOWER COURTS:

ACTION(S) FILED IN EACH FEDERAL D.C. COURT ON 7/7/17….13

“UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APPEAL NO: 17-10795D PETITION FOR MANDAMUS: 17-10829D…………………………..54

“IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT APPEAL CASE NO. 1D-18-4845 AS FOR DE NOVO REVIEW ASSIGNED PER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR CASES: SC18-1890; SC18-1915; SC18-1951; SC19-324; SC16-92; SC-16- 1501; SC11-41; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07-1181; SC60-95935; SC60- 95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; AND FROM LOWER COURT CASES 18-CA-2293, 2nd CIR. COURT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FROM STATE AND FEDERAL COURT CASES 8:06- CV2050T-30TGW (JUDGE J.MOODY. JR):TO “JUDGE EK; TO 16-CV- 3299-EAK-MAP (JUDGE J.W.) TOWNSEND V. GRANT ET AL; AS- F.S.: 86 DECLARATORY; F.S. 80- QUO WARRANTO; ORGANIZED CRIME(S); F.R.O.C.P. 1.530 AND 1.540; FEDERAL HOBBS ACT; RICO; FLORIDA AND FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS; 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 ACTS AS BEGAN AS 88-2554,18th CIR. SEMINOLE COUNTY FL. AS- RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUAL AND AS F.S. 80.02 AS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS “Private Attorney’s General” RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, State of Florida, EX REL, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, F.S. 617.0834, AND “Next Friend” ET AL, Appellant, Plaintiff’s/Counter Defendant, Petitioner(s), TOWNSEND REPLY/MOTION(S) TO “VOID” FRAUD “PCA” 6/17/2020 page ………61

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO FSCT AS FILED 11/13/2018 AND NOW DIRECTED TO THIS 1ST DCA EN BANC FOR WRITTEN OPINION LINE BY LINE AND ISSUE BY ISSUE “IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE #:___2018CA2293_____...... 86

“IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SC18-1951 QUO WARRANTO, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, SC-18-1890 and SC18-1915 Individual, and Florida R.O.C.P 1.530 and 1.540 RANDALL TOWNSEND, Continued From 11/1987 Action Et al. “Next Friend” FROM: 2018-CA-2293, Leon Et al. County Fl., 2nd Circuit Plaintiffs/Petitioners, RELATED CASES- SC16-1501 v. FSCt ORDERS-2016-92, Labarga 2011-41, Canady, Jr KEN DETZNER SC09-1121, Disbarring Gray Florida Secretary of State, SC09-1910, Grand Jury KRISTI TEID WILLIS, SC11-1042, Gray,- Lane et al Bureau of Elections Records, SC07-1181, K. Harrod Townsend DONNA BROWN, SC60-95-935, Chapin et al Senior Government Analysis; SC60-95-936, Popper et al “Others Doe to be Named” SC60-86-918, Lane et al JOHN GRANT ET AL, (Governors) 5D16-2184 PAM BONDI, FLORIDA ATTORNEY 2D16-0612 GENERAL et al, 15-CA-1928 a 1.540 Action THE FLORIDA BAR, Case 88-2554, 18th Circuit THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, 1D18-4845 THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION, And all Officially and Individually, Respondents___ / and Others PETITIONER/PLAINTIFFS QUO WARRANTO ACTION FOR A JUDGMENT OF OUSTER FOR: ABUSE OF PROCESS; NEGLECT OF DUTY AND 18 U.S.C 242 VIOLATIONS FOR FSCT MEMBERS: CANADY JR.; LABARGA; POLSTON; LEWIS; QUINCE; PARIENTE; LAWSON; CLERK TOMASINO; JOHN C. COOPER; ATTORNEY’S GENERAL PAMELA JO BONDI, HER AGENTS AND OTHERS…….210

“IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT (TAMPA) FLORIDA CASE NO.: 8:16-CV-3299-EAK-MAP “WITH CLAIMS OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY” PETITION FOR MANDAMUS………………………………………..254

NOW BEFORE THIS U.S. SUPREME COURT:

I. TOWNSEND SPEAKS AS A VICTIM FOR THE CLASS, ENDURING MORE: AS ABDUCTION OF HIS CHILDREN SINCE 1999; DEFAMATION; FALSE CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AND CRIMINAL EXTORTION AND THREATS THAN JUSTICES CLARENCE THOMAS, BRETT KAVANAUGH, AND NIEL GORSUCH COMBINED AS TOWNSEND ADVISED TO MULTIPLE FLORIDA ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERALS IN THE COURT OF KAREN GIEVERS AS SHE AGREED ON FEBRUARY 7, 2019, EVEN DETAILING RICO BY ALL THESE “JUDGES” SINCE 1987 AND MURDERS (TRANSCRIPT FILED) IN COLLUSION WITH THESE RESPONDENTS AND PROVES EVEN IF THE RIGHT TO VOTE IS RESTORED TO APPLICANTS, THESE RESPONDENTS AND “OTHERS” BY THEIR OTHER CONSPIRED THEFTS, FALSE CLAIMS, RICO, TRAFFICKING, FRAUDS AND VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTE 99, VIOLATIONS OF “VETTING” AND OMITTING THE REQUIRED “BLANK LINE” AND THE FLORIDA STATUTE 104 “VOTER PROTECTION ACT”, OUR “FREE WILL” OF: OUR ORGAINIC PROTECTED RIGHT(S) TO VOTE; AND TO EVEN VOTE FOR OURSELVES; AND “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” TO PROTECT OUR “DUE PROCESS” AND COMMERCE AND OTHER ORGAINC RIGHTS; WILL STILL CONTINUE TO BE “IMPEDED” BY THESE AS “BUSH CODE RED” AS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL “NOBILITY” CONTINUING THEIR FRAUD AND RICO AND HOBBS ACT CRIMES AROUND THE WORLD AND NOT YET BY FRAUD AND MALFEASANCE FULLY DISCLOSED TO THIS U.S. SUPREME COURT WITH THE DUTY AS NOW CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS IN THE PAST ARGUED FOR THE “BUSH CODE RED” IN BUSH V. GORE ……………………… page …...14

II. THE FOUR FEDERAL WASHINGTON D.C. COURTS “IMPEDING” AND THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, EN BANC IN THESE TOWNSEND ACTIONS RULED FOR TOWNSEND TO PROVE SINCE ABOUT 1987, THE “GLASS CEILING”

AND CRIMINAL ACTS BY THE “BUSH CODE RED” EVEN AFTER MULTIPLE “JUDGES” ADMISSIONS OF THEIR VIOLATIONS OF “DUE PROCESS” AND “CIVIL RIGHTS” BY “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” BY THEIR “PAY TO PLAY” “NOBILITY” AND THESE RESPONDENTS ACTS CONTINUE TO PROVE AN UNJUST OBSTRUCTION OF OUR ORGANIC RIGHTS IS STILL BEING ATTEMPTED BY THEIR “FRAUD ON THE COURT” ONGOING AND CONSPIRED “OMISSION OF TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURE” IN THIS ACTION AS OUR U.S. SUPREME COURT WILL LEARN BY REVIEW OF AND FROM THESE FACTS STATED HEREIN……...258

IV. PER THE FACTS STATED HEREIN OF THESE IN RICO, DRUG AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND OTHER HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS THE HOBBS ACT QUESTIONS MUST BE STATED AS FOLLOWS: “1. Did the defendant induce or attempt to induce the victim to give up property or property rights? Yes 2. Did the defendant use or attempt to use the victim's reasonable fear of physical injury or economic harm in order to induce the victim's consent to give up property? Yes 3. Did the defendant's conduct actually or potentially obstruct, delay, or affect interstate or foreign commerce in any (realistic) way or degree? Yes 4. Was the defendant's actual or threatened use of force, violence or fear wrongful?” Yes……………………………………………………….260

WHEREAS CLAUSE ……………………………………... 255

CONCLUSION:……………………………………………….. 260

STANDARD FOR REVIEW- DE NOVO

The Standard for Review in this Action as DE NOVO, has been admitted by the Lower “judges” and “Officers of the Court” as Criminal Taylor id.

“Next Door Neighbors ” illegally “Masked” using Our Courts acting “Under

Color of Official Right” and illegally “Under Color of Law” since about

1987, admitted acting in “Frauds” and “Deceptive Practices” against

Whistleblower and “Private Attorney’s General” and F.S. 617.0834 Church

Representative Townsend reporting their Lane et al Bush, Koch’s, Epstein,

Roberts, Smiths, and Dimond and others, RICO, HOBBS ACT CRIMES,

Price Fixing, Due Process Violations, Violations of Commerce, Drugs and

Human Trafficking and Voter Frauds as their “Pay to Play” and that per

Jenkins id. Townsend and Townsend et al have never yet had our:

Demanded since 11/18/1987 Due Process per Florida Statutes 80 and Florida

Statutes 86, as these “judges” and Bar Members admitted Florida Statutes 38

“Unjust Enrichment” and HOBBS ACT CRIMES; and nor has Townsend or

Townsend et al had nor will we be by these “Rump Faction” per

EPPERSON v. MEYERS 58 So2d FSCt (1952) “Common Core”

Tyrannical Communistic Regime” (“TCR”) get our lawful restorations of our Organic Rights per our U.S. and Florida Constitution as their “Nobility” illegally “Vet” Non-Pay to Play/Voters” for over the past 30 years for

9 conspiracy as proved against Townsend since 1987, and in 2018 to

Townsend and over 13 Million Registered Voters as they did not put on the

November 2018 Ballot for Florida Attorney’s General nor for Sheriff of

Hillsborough County and others the F.S. 99.061(4)(b) “Blank Line” for a

Write in Candidate as their Election Bureau pamphlets advise they will do.

So even if Felons are restored their Organic Right to Vote, like the over 13

Million in Florida in 2016, they cannot of their “Free Will” choose a “Non”

Bush or Koch respondent “Rump Agent” per our Equal Protection Clause and Speech Rights using the “Write-in” “Blank Line” against whom may have unjustly “Human Trafficked” even the innocent of them, even to “jail” or do “False Imprisonment” even as they did to Townsend even from his own Church and Children since 9/8/1999 and clients since 1987.

INTRODUCTION AND FACTS TO THE ISSUES

TO: The Honorable Clarence Thomas, Circuit Justice for the Eleventh Circuit:

Per: Randall C. Townsend as at multiple times as a Falsely “Charged Felon” and “Victim” by these Respondents since about 11/18/1987 seeks “justice” and as a “Whistleblower” continues to act per The Civil Rights Act of 1871, as “Private Attorney’s General” a.k.a. “General of the Attorney’s” as per Respondent Superior as “Townsend” acts; Per 4 U.S.C. 1986, Duty; and as “Respondents” are admitted by their own Actions and Confessions through themselves and or their “Guilty” Counsels admissions of “Hate

Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecutions” as RICO and HOBBS ACT

VIOLATIONS opposing Townsend even in “OPEN COURT” as “Felons”

“impeding” the “Equal and Free Will Rights “ of “all voters” and “Due

Process” by their Anti-Trust “Pay to Play” Monopoly since about 1987 in violation of: F.S. 80; F.S. 86; F.S. 99; And F.S. 104; U.S. Constitution

Article I. Section Ten, and who by admitted “Fraud on the Court” and doing acts as “Extrinsic Fraud” to Townsend et al per the “Bush Code Red” “Pay to Play” as President Trump in his Venezuela speech exposing Bush et al, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=svSQ6lEeTCo explaining their violations and Bush et al Patterns in Venezuela and as

William Barr proves by ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR

CHARGES IN VENEZUELA Details this Townsend action since 1987:

“STORY BY TRACY WILKINSON DEL QUENTIN WILBER ////LOS ANGELES TIMES March 26, 2020 ILLEGAL DRUG TRAFFICKING AND FOUND AT: https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/article 240892976.html “began by Hugo Chavez, [a.k.a. BUSH(s)Presidents] and Vladimir Padrino Lopez the Defense Minister [a.k.a. BUSH et al] was indicted on charges of allowing drug dealers [a.k.a. the Lane Gang with Jeb Bush, Jeffery Epstein, Smiths, Ballards, Walkers, Chiles, Canady’s, Chapins, Carr’s, Dimond, Grants, Scotts, Crist, Butterworth, Beck et al] who paid him bribes in a five- year [since over 25 years] span starting in 2014 to safely transit his country’s airspace [the worlds, Little Rock, Florida airspace and trample by TCR Civil Rights violations in Courts and Churches] while ordering others to be shot down or forced to land…. ” as these patterns here also continue their illegal R.I.C.O. AND HOBBS ACT

“To Control by Cause of Fear…” and RICO Servitude by violations of Due

Process and Unjust Enrichment by illegally controlling Commerce by their

“disenfranchisement of We the people” as they as “Bush “New World Order

Code Red” et al “Impede” Our Organic Contract and Constitutional Right(s) as below herein of:

“First Amendment Five Basic Rights and Liberties as Freedom of: 1. Religion; 2. Speech; 3. Press; 4. Petition of Government; 5. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly; and thus their RICO “Unjust Enrichment” from same and they unlawfully continue “Impeding” Contracts and do intentional delay of said Organic Constitutional Rights and justice and due process and unlawfully “impede” Commerce for their Unjust Enrichment. 36. Florida Statute 787.06 states: “It is the intent of the Legislature…” But Senate President Tom Lee And Governor Desantis and the Courts being informed by Townsend refuses to charge anyone including Lee’s wife, appointed as the

Florida Secretary of State Laurel Lee, and or the Elections Bureau and or Ashley B. Moody et al with continuing the F.S. 99.061(4)(b) and F.S. 104 and other False Claims violations. And all of the Lane-Bush- Koch-Epstein gang knew Townsend reported Jeffery Epstein and Lane et al parties as Cindy McCain Affirmed “We all knew” their HOBBS ACT Exploitations of many and stated to Townsend and including the illegal abduction of Townsend’s children and “Others” for their RICO…” as even Ashley B. Moody and the Florida Assistant Attorney’s General’s even violating Florida Law attempt to charge Townsend $15,000.00 in 2019, to litigate for Townsend et al’s “Voter Protection Rights” per F.S. 104 and protect ourselves per their admitted acts of violation(s) laws and of Florida

Statutes Human Trafficking Law 787.06, as Florida Secretary of State

Laurel Lee, Ashley B. Moody and Ron DeSantis and their co=conspirators and co=participants Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge Charles Canady Jr. and Jorge Labarga by their own admissions in their Orders are themselves admitted Felons still by “Fraud on the Court(s)” and using their “Official

Capacity” to continue crimes and use F.S. 99 and F.S. 104 violations and attempting using now our “We the People” U.S. Supreme Court to continue their “Bush Code Red” “Nobility” RICO and HOBBS ACT and Failure of

EQUAL PROTECTION AND VIOLATIONS OF “DUE PROCESS”

CRIMES.

These “Bush Code Red” cannot to this U.S. Supreme Court:

OMIT or Change or denounce their multiple “guilty” plea(s) made in and or

to “Open Court(s)” without “Due Process”;

Grant themselves “Immunity”;

Use “Immunity” as it is in violation of “Good Behavior” per U.S.

Constitution Article III. And the “Nobility Clause and the Fourth and the

Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments or State Law F.S. 111.07 and Florida

Constitution Article II. Section 8.

As the Actions even by Florida Attorney’s General Bob Butterworth with

John Roberts in Bush v. Gore 2000 and by U.S. Attorney General William

Barr since about 1991 acting for George H.W. Bush #41 et al in RICO and

HOBBS ACT CRIMES show and prove their knowing, intentional and willful and reckless Taylor id “Next Door Neighbor”, Pinkerton id. , Bevins id. continuing Ocasio Id. participation “Aiding and Abetting” this “Bush

Code Red” RICO and HOBBS ACT Violations of “We the People” for whom Townsend speaks since 11/18/1987, to expose Price Fixing for their

Monopoly, and Drug and Human Trafficking as acts of Treason violating their Bond as in Open Court “alias” “Judge” Marva Crenshaw and their

Attorney Charles Denny IV, admitted their “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious

Prosecution” on 5/10/2006, and as “alias” Federal “Judge” James Moody Jr. admitted in his courtroom 3/15/2007 and as “judge” Karen Gievers admitted in her court on 2/7/2019, with Attorney General Lawyer Timothy Newhall

14 their “Human Trafficking” and “Fraud on the Court”.

AS PROOF OF VIOLATIONS OF TOWNSEND ET AL AND

PROOF OF STANDING FOR THIS ACTION, TOWNSEND PER THE

CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 AS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY”S

GENERAL” STATES THE PRIOR ACTIONS AND CONDITIONS

PRECEDENT AS PENDING IN ALL “COURT(S) AS FOLLOWS PER

MARBURY V. MADISON AND THROCKMORTON V. U.S..

ARGUMENT(S)

I. TOWNSEND SPEAKS AS A VICTIM FOR THE CLASS, ENDURING MORE FALSE CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AND CRIMINAL EXTORTION AND THREATS THAN JUSTICES CLARENCE THOMAS, BRETT KAVANAUGH, AND NIEL GORSUCH COMBINED AS TOWNSEND ADVISED TO THE MULTIPLE FLORIDA ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERALS IN THE COURT OF KAREN GIEVERS AS SHE AGREED ON FEBRUARY 7, 2019, EVEN DETAILING RICO MURDERS (TRANSCRIPT FILED- 2018-CA-2293) AND PROVES EVEN IF THE RIGHT TO VOTE IS RESTORED TO APPLICANTS, THESE RESPONDENTS AND “OTHERS” BY THEIR OTHER CONSPIRED THEFTS, FALSE CLAIMS, RICO, TRAFFICKING, FRAUDS AND VIOLATIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTE 99, VIOLATIONS OF “VETTING” AND OMITTING THE REQUIRED “BLANK LINE” AND THE FLORIDA STATUTE 104 “VOTER PROTECTION ACT”, OUR “FREE WILL” OF: OUR ORGAINIC PROTECTED RIGHT(S) TO VOTE; AND TO EVEN VOTE FOR OURSELVES; AND “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” TO PROTECT OUR OTHER ORGAINC RIGHTS; WILL STILL CONTINUE TO BE “IMPEDED” BY THESE AS “BUSH CODE RED” AS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL “NOBILITY” CONTINUING THEIR FRAUD AND RICO AND HOBBS ACT CRIMES AROUND THE WORLD AND NOT YET BY FRAUD AND MALFEASANCE FULLY DISCLOSED TO THIS U.S. SUPREME COURT WITH THE DUTY AS NOW CHIEF

JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS IN THE PAST ARGUED FOR THE “BUSH CODE RED” IN BUSH V. GORE

Follow Townsend’s stolen money not paid by Lane et al since

1987, as required by our Townsend (Tony Dungy) and Charles E. Lane Jr.

(Michael Vick) “Joint Venture Agreement” of August 7, 1987 and know

Lane et al used Townsend’s Children, Money, Church/School and Clients against our “Free Will”. Follow the stolen money by their “TCR” Common

Core. Follow the stolen money by their “Fraudulent Billings”. Follow the

Covid 19, $2.6 Trillion, and learn their “Pay to Play” Townsend exposes.

This action is just a brief summary of the RICO and HOBBS ACT violations that exposes the “BUSH CODE RED” Gang who seek to establish themselves as a “Nobility” as Benjamin Franklin warned would occur to overthrow for themselves “Unjust Enrichment” as a Monopoly. Their conspired act to remove the “Blank Line” on our Ballots “keeps their thumb on the scale” against the “Free Will” of all Voters has been known by all who oppose Townsend as even Supreme Court Chief “Judges” John Roberts and Charles Canady Jr. have intentionally used their “Official Right” to

“impede” Due Process and Commerce in this Townsends actions since 1987.

The Judicial Track this Action has taken can only prove one fact—All

“judges” and or “Florida Bar Members” named and or as “Others Doe to be

Named” in this Action have intentionally done “Fraud on the Court” to

continue their “Pay to Play” to illegally serve their “Nobility” as this pending action details to all these lower court “judges” and “Bar Members” who continue Fraud on the Court, Extrinsic Fraud and Treason.

ACTION(S) FILED IN FOUR FEDERAL D.C. COURT(S) ON 7/7/17 AS:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT CASE NO: ______

MULTIJURISDICTIONAL (MDL) COURT CASE NO:______

FED.CIR (C.A.F.C.) CASE NO: ______

FED.CI. (C.F.C.) CASE NO: ______

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CASE NO. 17-7113

NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF THIS ONGOING 1987 ACTION AND APPEAL AND PETITION FOR MANDAMUS FOR “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” FOR “FRAUD ON THE COURT, BY AND FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, ATLANTA, IN APPEAL NO: 17-10795D PETITION FOR MANDAMUS :17-10829D AS WITH AND FROM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT (TAMPA) FLORIDA CASE NO.: 8:16-CV-3299-EAK-MAP FOR INTENTIONAL “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND INTENTIONAL VIOLATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS AS TRANSFERRED FROM LOWER STATE OF FLORIDA COURTS “WITH CLAIMS OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY” PETITION FOR MANDAMUS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, )Now Judge: JAMES D. WHITTEMORE Individually, and as natural )FROM:13th CIR. 2015-1928; 2D16-612;

Parent and lawfully as )5D16-2184; FSCT 2016-1501 FOR Guardian, and next friend of J.D.T.)RICO AND TORT VIOLATIONS OF: and J.G.T., and as F.S.§617.0834) CHILD CUSTODY; CIVIL RIGHTS; “Representative” of THE FIRST) CONTRACT RIGHTS; Including BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS) SOVEREIGN RELIGIOUS RIGHTS PARK (FBCCP) AND MINISTRY ) HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND CITRUS PARK CHRISTIAN ) DEFAMATION AND INJURY AND SCHOOL (CPCS) A FLORIDA)FRAUD AND OMMISSIONS ACTS AND “NOT FOR PROFIT” CORP. AND) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL AND “NEXT FRIEND” OF “CITIZENS”)BENCH WARRANTS SOUGHT AND PLAINTIFF(S) ) CLASS ACTION AND V. ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT JOHN GRANT, INDIVIDUAL,) TOWNSEND ET AL JOHN GRANT, Et AL, and AS ) NOTICE OF APPEAL and “PERSONS” Listed below AND/OR) PETITION FOR MANDAMUS FOR “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED”)RECUSAL OF 11th Cir., FSCT AND AS OTHERS STILL UNKNOWN) U.S. MIDDLE DISTRICT (TAMPA) AS AGENTS OF )FOR FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES CHARLES E. LANE Jr. et al AS) AS FRAUD ON THE COURT FOR AGENTS OF “JEB” BUSH,) EXTRINSIC FRAUD AND RICO ALSO PAM BONDI, RICK SCOTT) Related Previous Continued Actions/Cases: JAMES BALLARD, ) Townsend ET AL v. Heather Gray et al BRIAN D. BALLARD, ) 8:12-CV-1198-EAK-EAJ BOB MARTINEZ, GOVERNOR) Townsend ET AL v. Ronald Beck ET AL MEL MARTINEZ Senator et al,) 8:06-CV2050T-30-TGW GEORGE W. BUSH #43 ) From The Eleventh Circuit: GEORGE H.W. BUSH #41 )Townsend et al v. Heather Gray, Beck et al FLORIDA A.G’S. Jim Smith-current ) 12-13892AA KOCH “PERSONS” et al, )Townsend et al v. Ron Beck et al EDWARD CRENSHAW, Publix ) 08-10721 NOVA SALES INC. )Removed From Florida State Courts: JORGE LABARGA, Judge )FSCT 16-1501 Townsend v. Grant et al EMMETT BATTLES, Judge ) FSCT 11-1042 Townsend v. Gray CHRISTOPHER NASH, Judge )FSCT 07-1181 Townsend v. Townsend DAVID GEE, Sheriff )FSCT Townsend v. Scruggs BOB GUALTIERI, Sheriff ) FSCT 97-8519, 9th Cir. T. v. Chapin et al GRADY JUDD, Sheriff )FSCT 97-8520, 9th Cir. T. v. Popper et al ROBERT O’NEIL, Individual,)FSCT 86-918 (1996) Townsend v. Lane et al ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH,)2DCA 10-774 Townsend et al v. Gray ) et al

STEPHEN D. MERRYDAY, )13th Cir. 06-6005 Townsend v. Gray et al HEATHER M. GRAY, ET.AL. prior )13th Cir. 02-03812 Townsend v. Beck ) et al Attorney for Plaintiffs now Disbarred) 13th Circuit 01-15813, 01-15814, 02- ) 4974, RON BECK, TIM JEFFERS, ) KAREN (TOWNSEND) HARROD) From First Action filed by ) David Landus & STEVEN HARROD, ) David H. Popper in the 18th Circuit Court DAVE FERGUSON, ) Seminole County, Florida Case 88-2554 THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT)Transferred for “Fraud on the Court” U.S.M.D. (TAMPA), ) Defendants to the 9th Circuit Orlando, Fl Eleventh Circuit Court of ) As case 89-3299 Appeals (En Banc) ET AL and Others as listed in FRAP 26.1 and Addendum’s Filed with the “Impostor” “PERSONS” of Lower Courts still being exposed ______/

COMES NOW RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, LAWFULLY STILL WITH “CLEAN HANDS” AS ADVISED BY HIS ATTORNEY PATRICIA McCARTHY SINCE NOVEMBER 1987, FOR HIMSELF, AND STATES AFTER HER COUNSEL THEN SHE WITH DAVID H. POPPER AND BRUCE E. CHAPIN AND “OTHERS” AS “IMPOSTER” “Judges” and “Public Officials” and “Others Named” and “Others Doe” ARE: NOT FOLLOWING “DUE PEOCESS; INVOKING THEIR FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS; AND IN COLLUSION DISMISSING OUR ACTION; OF “REDRESING GOVERNMENT” AND NOT ANSWERING WHY THEY FOR THIRTY YEARS OF THIS ACTION STILL CONCEAL EVIDENCE AND INTENTIONALLY FAILED “HONEST SERVICES” PER OUR CONTRACT AND THEIR OATHS AND PER OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION AND OUR FLORIDA CONSTITUTION THAT “NO LAW SHALL IMPEDE THE OBLIGATION OF A CONTRACT”. AND TOWNSEND, SPEAKS AS A U.S. CITIZEN AND AS A COMMISSIONED SALES CONSULTANT/AGENT OF HIS COMPANY ONCE NAMED “FUTURE MARKETING” AS A “WHISTLEBLOWER” FOR HIS CLIENTS AND CITIZENS SINCE 1987 AND AS F.S.617.0834, RELIGIOUS SOCIETY CORPORATION “NOT FOR PROFIT” REPRESENTATIVE, AND ALL VICTIMIZED CITIZENS. PER OUR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE RULES DEFENDANTS AND “OTHERS” INTENTIONALLY AIDED AND ABETTED IN THE

UNDERLYING OFFENSE PER UNITED STATES v. DePace 120 F. 3d 233 (11th Cir. 1997 and UNITED STATES v. CHAVEZ 119 F 3rd 342 (5th Cir. 1997) and UNITED STATES v. SPINNEY 65 F.3d. 231 (1st Cir. 1995) AND CONTINUED RICO STATING “THE LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION MAY BE OF RELATIVELY SLIGHT MOMENT”. LEO-QUIJADA, 107 F.3d. at 794. “Also, it does not take much evidence to satisfy the facilitation element once the defendant’s knowledge of the unlawful purpose is established.” UNITED STATES v. BENNETT, 75 F.3d. 40, 45 (1st Cir. 1996). AS JUDGE MARVA CRENSHAW (CRENSHAW) AND DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY CHARLES DENNY IV (DENNY IV) AFFIRMED ON MAY 10, 2006 OF “HATE CRIMES” AND “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION” (AS CRENSHAW RULED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2003) AND SAID THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND ET AL HAD BEEN DAMAGED AND SHUT UP I AM TRYING TO GET YOU A LOT OF MONEY. ALSO AS A SUMMARY JUDGMENT, CRENSHAW AND DENNY IV MULTIPLE TIMES TELLING TOWNSEND TO “SHUT UP” DURING AN OVER 3 1/2 HOUR HEARING (Transcript produced) RE-WROTE TOWNSEND’S AMENDED LEGAL ACTION (Complaint in Record) AS CHARLES DENNY IV ALSO AFFIRMED AGAIN HIS CONFESSION FOR THEM ALL IN THE COURTROOM OF EMMETT BATTLES TO MULTIPLE “OFFICERS OF THE COURT” ON JANUARY 8, 2016, (Transcript in Record) WHO HAVE ALL CONTINUED TO FAIL THEIR HONEST SERVICES AND DONE “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND BY CONCEALING EVIDENCE AND OTHER HOBBS ACT AND RICO VIOLATIONS OF THEFT AND EVEN ABDUCTION OF CHILDREN SINCE 1999, FOR EXTORTION WITHOUT DUE PROCESS IN A “CONCERT OF ACTIONS” AS ALIGNED WITH WHAT FLORIDA CHIEF JUDGE JORGE LABARGA CALLS “TYRANNICAL COMMUNISTIC REGIME” AS DONE AS WHY HE AND ALDABERTO JORDON AND MEL MARTINEZ AND MARCO RUBIO FLED CUBA BUT NOW AS “PUBLIC OFFICIALS” CONDUCT AND ALLOW THE CRIMES FROM WHICH THEY FLED. AS A PUBLIC OFFICER TAKING BRIBES FROM THE GANG THEY TURN A BLIND EYE TO CRIMES THEY HELP COMMITT AS THE SAME FROM WHICH THEY FLED. THUS AS JUDGE MARVA CRENSHAW AND DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY CHARLES DENNY IV (WHO NEVER FILED A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE IN THE UNDERLYING 02-03812 CASE) ON MAY

10, 2006, CONFIRMING TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND ET AL BEING VICTIMS OF “HATE CRIMES” AND RELATED CRIMES FROM THOSE DENNY IV REPRESENTED AND AS STATED BY U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS IN HIS Child Trafficking Statement #PIZZAGATE – YouTube https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=amzsonWJNp0 , THESE LANE AND LANE ET AL DEFENDANTS ARE PROVED RELATED IN SAID CRIMES AS TOWNSEND ADVISED McCARTHY ET AL THAT CHARLES E. LANE JR AND “OTHERS DOE STILL TO BE NAMED” WERE AND ARE INVOLVED IN RICO AND DRUG AND HUMAN TRAFFICKKING AND ANTI-TRUST AND WITHHOLDING MONEY AND RIGHTS DUE TOWNSEND IN THEIR RICO OF INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE STILL ONGOING. TOWNSEND FILES THIS PETITION FOR MANDAMUS AND APPEAL IN THIS ACTION JOINTLY SPEAKING STILL FOR ALL PETITIONERS AS “WE THE PEOPLE” VOICED LOUDLY IN THE NOVEMBER 8, 2016 ELECTIONS AND AS THEIR LAWFULLY ELECTED WHISTLE BLOWER PER OUR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS AND CONTRACT(S) AND AS BY-LAWS OF THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS PARK (FBCCP) YEARLY SINCE 1993, AND LAWFULLY RECOGNIZED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA WHICH OUR BY- LAWS AND THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION AT ARTICLE I. SECTION THREE, AND OTHER FLORIDA STATE LAWS AFFIRMS “TOWNSEND” IS STILL AS LAWFULLY ELECTED WITHOUT FRAUD(S) AS THE F.S. 617.0834 SUPERIOR CHURCH AUTHORITY PER OUR BYLAWS. AND IT IS THE UNLAWFUL TORT(S) AND BREACH OF CONTRACTS OF “A RUMP FACTION” AND “IMPOSTER” NON- MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH/SCHOOL AND OR OUR COURTS ACT IN “HATE CRIMES” AND RICO AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT FOR THEIR SATANIC AGENDA WITH THEIR LANE AND LANE ET AL CO=PARTICIPANTS “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICE” AND OR “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT” WHO INTERFERE, “IMPEDE” AND OR DO FRAUD TO OUR SAID CONTRACTS, COURTS, CIVIL RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTION(S) AND CHILDREN. AND FOR THEIR VIOLATIONS OF “HONEST SERVICES” 18 USC 1346 and “Racketeering enterprises” 18 USC 1951 and “HUMAN TRAFFICKING” Townsend seeks to the extent allowable under Section 15, Chapter One Title 15 all damages and all other relief allowable thereunder and per the finding of Our Jury Process.

Under Rule 23, F.R.C.P. Townsend and “Next Friend” and as Townsend et al these multiple Plaintiff’s herein are typical representatives of a class of individuals yet unknown, who are either members of the public, such as Townsend who have been harmed by Government Persons and “Officers of the Court” and “Others” who breach their contracts and Oaths whom these Defendants have conspired to protect at the expense of Petitioners. Defendants have been “Masked” as Government or “Others” as lawful persons but now unveiled as tyrants acting under color of law and under color of official right by exposing their own frauds and treason. Wherefore, Townsend seeks certification by the Court that this action should be and is a class action. And A DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL for all issues as “Redress Of AND FOR OUR GOVERNMENT”. AND TOWNSEND STATES: OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION HAS ESTABLISHED FOUR BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT. FIRST OF WHICH IS GOVERNMENT UPWARDS FROM THE ROOT AS Even in the early 1990’s, The Florida Bar Investigator John Root admitted to Townsend “This is the worst case of abuse I have seen by an attorney on a client in my over 27 years investigating cases for the Florida Bar but my boss told me to close this file and never talk to you again! Good Bye!” “WE THE PEOPLE” WITH SOVEREIGN RIGHTS PROTECTED BY: “DUE PROCESS”; “VOTING”; AND OUR “JURY’S” PROCESS; AND FOR “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT”; FOR OR AGAINST VIOLATIONS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH AND OR THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND OR THE “RANKIN id.” “IMPOSTER” “OFFICER(S) OF THE COURT”. “WE THE PEOPLE TURN TO THE “COURT” “FOR REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” BY “WE THE PEOPLE” UPON THE PAYMENT OF $20.00, THUS THEN HAVE STANDING PER REALTY TRUST CO. V. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF HASKELL, Tex Civ.APP., 46 S.W. 2d 1009 AND MEIER V. JOHNSTON id AND BY THEN “DUE PROCESS” “WE THE PEOPLE” ARE TO BE GUARANTEED TO RECEIVE “HONEST SERVICES” FROM A NEUTRAL PERSON ACTING PER THEIR OATH AND BY OUR PAYMENT OF THEIR BOND BY “WE THE PEOPLE” TO FORM A CONTRACT AS A SOVEREIGN JUDGE TO ACT WITHOUT BIAS. TOWNSEND WHILE BEING VICTIMIZED HAS UNJUSTLY PAID THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AS HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS AND FRAUDS FOR “HONEST SERVICES” YET TO BE RECEIVED AS FEDERAL JUDGE JAMES MOODY JR. AFFIRMED ON MARCH 15, 2007, IN HIS COURT TO TOWNSEND TELLING TOWNSEND TO RE-

WRITE HIS PLEADINGS WITH MORE DETAILS (Fed Rule 8) EVEN KNOWING THIS WOULD EXPOSE CRIMES OF HIS FRIENDS LISTED AS DEFENDANTS AS BEING DONE HERE. THIS CONTRIDICTS THE RIZZO AND WHITTEMORE CLAIM THAT THE FEDERAL COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION. This intervene should be accepted by this court or as “Pro Se Plaintiff’s are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements. Recognizing this, the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro se complaints liberally and to apply a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a pro se complaint that they would in reviewing a pleading submitted by counsel. See e.g. Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5.9-10, 101 S.Ct. 173, 175-76, 66 L.Ed 2d 163 (1980) (per curium); Haines v. Kemer, 404 U.S. 519 520-521, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595 -596, 30 L.Ed 2d 652 (1972) (per curium); see also Elliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curium). In order to justify the dismissal of a pro se complaint, it must be “beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Haines v. Kemer 404 U.S. at 521, 92 S.Ct. at 594 (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 I.Ed 2d 80 (1957). YET BY VARIOUS FAILED “HONEST SERVICES” (AS MANY PROVED UNLAWFUL BY THEIR OWN CONFESSIONS) OF THESE IN THE BUSH RICO “GANG” THEY MADE A MOCKERY OF SUPREME COURT RULINGS AND LAWS CONGRESS ALLEGEDLY PASSED FOR EQUAL JUSTICE. THEY HAVE AS TOWNSEND WARNED McCARTHY ET AL, VIOLATED EVERY BRANCH OF THESE BRANCHES AS DEFENDANTS AND MULTIPLE COURTS AND MONOPOLIES ARE CREATED AND USED VIOLATING THE “OFFUTT” AND “HOLDER” STANDARD FOR THEIR BUSH ET AL MALICIOUS ENTERPRISE TO UNJUSTLY ENRICH THEMSELVES BY “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND THUS TREASON “IMPEDING” AND TRAFFICKKING TOWNSEND AND “CITIZENS” OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY OUR CONTRACTS. BY THEIR OWN ADMISSIONS THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HAS AFFIRMED NOT JUST THEIR APPEARANCE OF UNLAWFUL ACTS BUT PROVED THEIR ACTS ARE INTENTIONAL “FRAUD ON THE COURT” FOR CONTINUING “HATE CRIMES” AND INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE FOR THEIR UNJUST ENRICHMENT. THEREFORE: JURISDICTION

Theses Courts have Jurisdiction of 18 U.S.C. 201, “Bribery of Public Officials and witnesses” now proved being done since Prescott Bush et al: THIS UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (JPML) per 28 U.S.C. 1407 HAS JURISDICTION IN COMPLEX LITIGATION AND DIVERSITY JURISDICTOIN CASES AND FOR ISSUES OF ANTI-TRUST AS IN THIS NECESSARY ACTION TO “REDRESS” GOVERNMENT ANTI-TRUST ALLEGED “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT”. THIS FED.CI. OR C.F.C. COURT HAS JURISDICTION PER 28 U.S.C. 1491, as the Court for Federal Claims per Article One in cases of “Incompetency, misconduct, neglect of duty…” of Federal “Persons” as in this case where multiple “persons” obtained their positions from their “Pay to Play” and Quid Pro Quo benefits as rewards to continue the Bush et al Malicious Enterprises and Malicious Persecution on Townsend and Townsend et al these 30 + years. This Court has “concurrent Jurisdiction” with Other Courts. This Court has jurisdiction when “Government” “Persons” and “Others” as in this case are taking their 5th Amendment Rights now that Townsend has exposed their Malicious Enterprise connecting most of these co=conspirators to the crimes of Lane and Lane et al allowed to illegally happen for 30 Plus years due to the Bush et al’s Malicious Prosecution of Petitioners. THIS FED.CIR OR C.A.F.C. COURT HAS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PER 28 U.S.C. §1295, REGARDING FEDERAL AGENCIES AND OR “PERSONS” WHO INTENTIONALLY AND KNOWINGLY VIOLATE OUR CONSTITUTION(S) [U.S. and STATE OF FLORIDA and Others and RELIGIOUS SOCIETY] AND CONTRACTS AND COMMERCE AND COMMUNICATIONS. This Court has jurisdiction per the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970. This Court has jurisdiction over matters of the illegal controlling of Commerce. THIS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CONSIDERED THE SECOND HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN OUR LAND HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE DECISIONS AND RULE MAKING OF MANY FEDERAL INDEPENDENT AGENCIES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THUS BY TOWNSEND’S CLAIMS OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CERTAIN LAWS DETAILED IN THIS ACTION THIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION PER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. AND TOWNSEND STATES: The Supreme Court states in Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 (1954): “ …(1) counsel must be protected in the right of an accused to “fearless,

24 vigorous and effective” advocacy, no matter how unpopular the cause in which it is employed….” “A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding does not give the appearance of justice.” Therefore, the concealing of Lane Records and FBCCP/CPCS Records and other documents Townsend, McCarthy, Popper, Chapin, Scruggs and Heather Gray and “Others” rightfully agreed to expose to Townsend but for 30 years have “impeded” shows prejudice and only the appearance of prejudice requires a “judge” to recuse themselves and makes their orders “Void” not “Voidable”. As of yet no “Officer of the Court” or “Judge” in this Action since 1987, has “Clean Hands” as McCarthy Ordered to Townsend and thus each should by law recuse themselves and thus has no Jurisdiction to advocate or rule per Our Constitution and Laws and thus they create these “Void” Orders of: The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals by “alias” “judges” even by En Banc Collusion; The United States Federal Court Middle District Tampa by Magistrate “Judge” Rizzo, “Judge Whittemore”, “Judge Kovachevich”, “Judge Anne Conway”, “Judge Merryday”, Magistrate Wilson; The Florida Supreme Court since 1987 as many of which never lawfully per the Report of Attorney General Bob Butterworth never lawfully took their Oaths of Office and yet ruled without “Jurisdiction” per RANKIN id. and aiding and abetting Criminal Acts of themselves and these Defendants as their co=participants and per the law Judges Whittemore and Jordan and Tjoflat now cannot use a “void” order of the FSCT; the Fifth DCA numerous times since 1994 and The Second DCA since 2003 as even by Two Florida Supreme Court Orders of Chief Judges Labarga and Canady Jr. “FIRED” from this Action for their Illegal Acts not the presumption of future Bias; and 9th, 13, and 18th Circuit Court; are all “Void” as proved by their own admissions of collusion to act illegally: by Fraud and Deceptive Practices; by Omission of Truthful Disclosure; and to conceal “Odious and Outrageous” evidence even multiple “Criminal Means” confessions on themselves and thus act without jurisdiction per their “Fraud on the Court” and violation and “Impeding” discovery of their personal profits and Quid Pro Quo Benefits and for violations of Our Constitution and Due Process. Thus a Superior Court must determine this matter to the fullest extent of Our Constitution and Laws with the vested right of determining “We the People” “Redressing Government” for OUR “Domestic Tranquility” and Disturbing of the Peace is resting in Our Jury Trial Process “We the People” never relinquished to these of: “Judges”; Or Congress: Or the Executive Branch; or to the American Bar Association et al; who do Treason upon Us and the U.S. and to Our World.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE Shortly and Plainly, Townsend has checked all laws and facts for 30 years and all named in this included FRAP 26.1 and the Amended FRAP 26.1’s as Defendants if put in the jury box their personal stories of even leaving Cuba Convict themselves verses saying Townsend et al has no rights and with the “Others Doe to be Named” they all are also guilty of continuing THE HOBBS ACT OF 1946 VIOLATIONS OF THE BUSH “GANG” as Congress found in October 1942 acting against PRESCOTT BUSH and seizing UNION BANKING and other assets under the “TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT” for their funding of Hitler and the NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS’ PARTY (NAZI). Said ACTS again should be used to seize the Assets of these Defendants named herein or “Others Doe to be Named” for their aiding and abetting and collusion with their co= enemies and co=conspirators named herein colluding with enemies Foreign and Domestic. Congress then in a further definition of Crimes and Treason created the ORGAINIZED CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1970 (RICO ACT) enacted by: President Richard M. Nixon (a targeted victim of the Bush/Clinton et al “Gang”) and Senator John L. McClellan (DR-ARK) and the Honest Congressmen at that time (not yet taking bribes) acting in fear as warnings of themselves to “Citizens” of the Bush’s et al in their continued illegal Malicious Enterprise Monopoly action even shown in Cuba by the Bushes and Walkers for which Mel Martinez, Marco Rubio, Aldaberto Jordon and Jorge Labarga Fled Cuba from their own personal testimonies yet they come here and aid and abet the same persons in the same “criminal means” as Townsend has proved. Townsend references Wikipedia site https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organi zations_Act Their Malicious Enterprise includes for their Malicious Prosecution and Defamation against Townsend with still “Clean Hands” and who refused since 1987, to be part of their illegal Price Fixing for Publix Supermarkets and their illegal Drug Use and Trafficking and Human Trafficking for benefit of themselves using “alias” “IMPOSTORS” as PAM “Bondi” described “implanted” “Fakes” with “Fake News” as Bush agents “Government Persons” and “Officers of the Court” as: A. Townsend’s Lawyers and Judges and Politicians who act illegally and jointly and simultaneously in multiple offices of Government; and or B. “private” persons (even FBCCP/CPCS “Impostor” “RUMP

FACTION” Clergy and Deputies Tim Jeffers and Howlett as “Implanted” FBCCP Trustee’s in Breach of the Bylaws and extortion and False Detainment since 1994 and an Estranged Spouse and her family caught in RICO, attempted murder, Batteries, IRS Frauds, Drug and Human Trafficking and Abduction and False Arrest, and False Detainment and Child Endangerment and embezzlement of Designated Funds and “Black Money” Bribery and filing False Reports to Law Enforcement and to the Courts); that our legal counsels John Grant, David Gibbs III, Cary Gaylord and Dickinson and Gibbons as Charles Denny IV and A. James Rolfes and “Others DOE” knowingly did and do Fraud on the Court and Townsend and “Non Rump Faction” Members and CPCS Members and Others; C. Townsend’s clients as Bonneau/Foster Grant Sunglasses, Rank Retail (Disney and Universal Studios and Others), Kirby & Wilson of Canada, I.C.U. of Switzerland and Florida Rep’s. and many “Others” that were under contracts or were also companies Townsend was fraudulently advised by Counsel he could not contract with that Lawyers Patricia McCarthy, Charles E. Williams Jr., David H. Popper and Bruce E. Chapin (for benefit of his wife and “Others”) forced from Townsend and telling Townsend for the years of 1987-1993, he “must stop all work or go to jail by an order of Rom Powell” while they intentionally concealed Documents, Contracts and Bank Records and produced false documents even from factious bank accounts that did not belong to Townsend that validated Townsend and in the 1993 letter from Bruce Chapin filed with the courts he admitted they never over the 5 years even after multiple Orders from Judge Muszynski and Rom Powell (to whom the case was illegally transferred for Fraud on the Court to conceal the Malicious Enterprise of all Defendants in Lanes et al’s bribery with Townsend’s money) gained the contracts the Lane and Williams fraudulently alleged were authorized Only for Lane but once the Contracts were produced they showed Townsend was deprived of his 8/7/1987, Contract Rights and Commissions since 1987 still not recovered; and D. Townsend’s employers as Sunbelt Equipment Sales and Kmart/Sears Holding Inc. as Eddie Lampert is friends with the Bush Family and George Koch acted as their Legal Counsel on Government Affairs and Wal-Mart strongly connected to the Bush and Clintons, acting in collusion to Defame Townsend in a “False Public Light”; By HOBBS ACT THREATS and by RICO ACTS for their Unjust Enrichment as Jeb Bush who resigned as Florida Secretary of Commerce (1986-September 9, 1988) under Governor Bob Martinez (later appointed by G.H.W. Bush as Drug CZAR) and his Staff Member Brian Ballard with direct connections to Jim Smith, to fund Jeb’s father as Vice-President and

27 former C.I.A. Agent/Director G.W.H. Bush’s campaign for President and his Bush extended (BUSH’s, George, Robert, Charles and David KOCH’s, FRITZ THYSSEN of Union Banking and United Steel Works, WALKER’s of Goldman Sach’s and others) family with “persons” of: The Walkers of Wall Street and the Rothschild’s and Richard Rainwater and Rick Scott and “Others”; or by propaganda and Fake News Companies they Controlled many years (since the Berlin Press in WWI then CBS and NBC) especially with the addition of Michael Eisner (Disney) and even control of Roger Ailes (Fox News) as hired in January 1970 as Media Advisor to Richard M. Nixon; and or by “Fraud on the Court” by judges and lawyers; or by paid to play or entrapped in crimes as Congressmen or future elected Presidents #42-44 and “judges” and or other “Government” offices as the DOJ or FBI or IRS or SEC or HUD or Congress with advisement of “hands off Bush Agents”; using their Bush agents “implanted” “persons” to Fund their “Pay to Play” Malicious Enterprises and Trafficking of Humans and Drugs and Weapons or receive extortion from “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” a.k.a. Nazi persons Acts as the Case laws show below as Charles E. Lane Jr. (Townsend’s “Joint Venture” Partner in business for Commissioned Sales of International and Intra and Inter State Manufactured Products, and Intellectual Properties per Our Notarized Contract of August 7, 1987) and for their Illegal Malicious Enterprises as RICO Acts and Drug and multi- level Human even sex Trafficking as Lane et al as: I. Publix Supermarkets Inc. and its executives named as Charles E. Lane Sr. and Edward Crenshaw and “Others” and as Rainwater (Of Bass Brother Enterprises {Grocery Stores} to eliminate all competitors); and II. Nova Sales Inc. and its officers Joe Ligori and James Ballard and “Others”; and III. Brian Ballard (Ballard Partners as Lobbyists) and Ballard’s Father in law, Jim Smith, Former Florida Attorney General and Secretary of State and “Other” State Duties (Southern Strategies Group); and Governors Bob Martinez, Lawton Chiles, Jeb Bush, Charlie Crist, Buddy McKay and Rick Scott; and Insurance Commissioners since Tom Gallagher and Florida Attorney’s Generals since and the Florida Department of Law Enforcers since 1987 unlawfully controlling Sheriffs and “Others”; and IV. Koch’s Families; as Owners, Directors of Manufactures and Retailers and Associations (Grocery Manufactures Association run by George Koch and the Wine Institute Run by Robert Koch (Husband since 1991 of Dorothy Bush) and the Associations run by Ed Crenshaw and Others, Implanted to Illegally Monopolize and Control Commerce and by bribery and or extortion paying the “Pay to Play”;

V. WALKER Families, thus controlling Banking and “Wall Street” agencies as Goldman Sach’s and J.P. Morgan and Bears & Stern, Brown, and Morgan Stanley and Morgan Keagan and “Others” thus the Federal Reserve with their investors as the Rothschild’s, Rockefellers and Soros’s etc.; VI. Charles E. Williams Jr. ET AL as Lawyers Charles E. Williams Jr. lawyer for Charles E. Lane Jr. with the law firm of Lane, Trohn (becoming the Gray-Robinson law firm and others concealing Crimes of Bush et al) started with and concealed by McCarthy ET AL, Popper ET AL, Chapin(s) ET AL as “O’Neill, Chapin, Liebman, Marks, Popper and Cooper and Scruggs ET AL and John Grant ET AL, Charles Canady Jr. ET AL and Gray ET AL and Bob Martinez et al and Ken Conner Et al and David Gibb III et al Robert O’Neill et al and lawyers and or their family members or partners served and named below herein and Others connected with the law firms of all who are retained at multiple and various times by Attorney’s Generals and State Attorney’s and Bar Associations and Department of Justice and Special Prosecutors using Townsend’s funds and Tax Payers funds and Interest on Lawyers Trust Account Funds (I.O.L.T.A.) and giving these lawyers privileged assignments while “Citizens” paid their “Bonds”; and VII. Lawyer John Grant, assigned to the Bush #43, National Education Program and Mel Martinez as HUD Director and Charles Canady Jr. as Counsel to Jeb Bush and David Gibbs III hired by Jeb Bush and Ken Conner hired by Jeb Bush and Patricia McCarthy hired by the State Attorney’s Office and assigned cases for the DOJ, and Heather Gray as a State Attorney and Charles Scruggs assigned to multiple acts all as Quid Pro Quo to assault and Defame Townsend and Townsend’s claims; VIII. The “RUMP FACTION” ACTING IN BREACH OF CONTRACT per EPPERSON v. MEYERS 58 So2d FSCt (1952) of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and it ministry Citrus Park Christian School BYLAWS Townsend is enforcing for Our Members and still continuing THEIR TORTS by each as the “BONDI PAY TO PLAY GANG ET AL” and even now including “alias” and “implanted” “impostors” in violation of Our Bylaws of 1994 and other laws; IX. STATE COURT “ALIAS” JUDGES as or since Rom Powell; X. FEDERAL COURT ALL “ALIAS” JUDGES per their collusion with U.S. Robert O’Neil and Others of the DOJ and FBI and the Bush’s and Pam Bondi et al as Townsend has advised as : Gregory Presnell, James Merryday; Elizabeth KOVACHEVICH, Anne Conway, Jenkins, Wilson, Black, Jordon, and James D. Whittemore who in collusion with other judges and politicians disgraces the Judicial Chair of his predecessor

29 the Honorable William Terrell Hodges who consulted on these Civil Rights issues in the early 1970’s for these Petitioners as victims of now known, the criminal collusion of Lawton Chiles and the Canady’s and the Jim Smiths and John Grant and the Bushes and this 11th Circuit Court En Banc since in 2008, and before and now are “Others DOE” now included and have a duty to recuse themselves, resign the court and turn themselves in for the fullest prosecution per our Federal and State Laws for their Treason to Our Constitution by their intentional “Fraud on the Court” and Fraud on Our Religious Society and Citizens as Townsend first proved to and about Rom Powell since 1994 and to the Officer of the Court Patricia McCarthy since 11/18/1987 and others who knowingly violate the Florida Chief Judge Jorge Labarga HOLDER Standard for their Treason and Unjust Enrichment. XI. FEDERAL “ALIAS” GOVERNMENT OFFICERS at multiple Offices who by Treason “Impede” and Obstruct Justice and Obstruct Production of Facts and Obstruct Prosecution of those of this Bush “RICO GANG” as Robert O’Neill directly ties to Pam Bondi et al; This Bush’s #41 and “Gang” of Jeb Bush, Pam Bondi, Rick Scott and John Grant and Congressmen Marco Rubio, Bill Nelson and Charlie Crist and “Others” as the ANTI-TRUMP “WE THE PEOPLE” “RICO GANG” must be fully exposed as the Threats they are and continue to do are relevant even in their aiding and abetting co=conspirators victimizing “We the People” and being illegally allowed and sheltered in this Country for their purpose of being by the Bush #41 Agents placed in multiple Government Positions for illegal purposes to violate Constitutional Rights of Sovereign Citizens. By Agent Pam Bondi as “Implanted” “Impostor” Florida Attorney General not per her legal duty aligning in support of the Trump Travel Band to protect Citizens it proves to “We the People” that Pam Bondi opposes her Duty to U.S. Us “Citizens” and aligns with the Bush #41 “Gang” who “implants” “Others” to “impede” the Constitutional Rights of these petitioners for whom Townsend speaks as even by Pam Bondi illegally representing and using “Citizens” of Florida State Funds for her directed illegal legal representation in this Action for Jeb Bush, sued by Townsend and served only individually, it proves her allegiance and the alliance of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and these sub-ordinate courts against “We the People” and Our President, Donald J. Trump and Vice-President, Mike Pence. The June 2017, Order of the United States Supreme Court in upholding the President Donald J. Trump Travel Ban and other cases listed below shows proof our Honorable High Supreme Court understands these issues stated herein as even Senator Mel Martinez and Marco Rubio and Aldaberto

Jordon and FSCT Chief Judge Jorge Labarga names the same type THREATS as a “Terrorist Communistic Regime” violated Civil Rights and Our Laws as from which he and others as defendants in this case show they fled Cuba from the multi-documented Bush #41 and Walker Family Criminal Enterprises by “Criminal Means” in Cuba that are now done here to Townsend and Other Sovereign U.S. Citizens as Townsend has proved and as “We the People” in mass numbers voiced in the 2016 election for Donald J. Trump and Mike Pence as President and Vice President to expose and prosecute to the fullest extent of our Laws and Constitution those who do Treason to same. THEREFORE, These Cases stated below show Thirty (30) years of Townsend per MEIER v. Johnston 110 Fla. 374, 149 So. 185 “one may represent for the whole” 100% Elected Townsend Per the Bylaws of FBCCP/CPCS “Non RUMP” Congregational “Owner/Members”. No Member even of the “RUMP FACTION” did not publicly object to the commission of Townsend during any legal vote since 1993, but multiple deputies did illegally detain Townsend since 10/1994, and kept him off the property in April 2000 and even 10/28/2007, did trespass Townsend since 9/8/1999, illegally so the “RUMP FACTION” could produce Fraud and “impede” and threaten “Others” and advance their Frauds and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosure as a Breach of Our Bylaws Process and Constitutional Rights of Assembly even with ones own Children in a Church/School, Speech, and Religious Practices even Townsend with his own children as members with Rights to be present and vote but denied even by emails from the Church/School Lawyer and Registered Agent John Grant and Ron Beck and Herman Meister and Joe Howlett and Mike Smoak and personal and direct threats and frauds by HCSO since 1994 even by the Sheriff himself David Gee and Walter Heinrich and in visits from HCSO Deputies McDarby and Palomino and Others who travel over 80 miles outside their Hillsborough County jurisdiction to personally as HOBBS ACT Threats warn Townsend “Don’t Go to your Church. Don’t try to contact your kids. Don’t file lawsuits (even while this Federal Action are in process) , Or ELSE!” as John Grant’s email’s and his co=conspirators for many years say 11/2015, if Townsend comes to Court or Hillsborough County or to his Church or “Other Churches” (Idlewild) in Tampa and Pensacola (Olive) he will be arrested and Baker Acted just as Jeffers and Howlett and Smoak warned and as even letters from Charles Scruggs and others violates HOBBS ACTS. Each person has been informed since 1994 they are in Breach of the 1994 FBCCP BYLAWS even Joe Howlett

Seconded in the Church Vote in 1993, he and then all others are required to Honor as a Contract. The Florida Bar officers, Harkness, Berry, Chinaris and Boggs since the 1990’s, threatened Townsend saying “Mr. Townsend if you get your law degree within six months we will have you disbarred and put in jail for something.” Even in the early 1990’s, The Florida Bar Investigator John Root admitted to Townsend “This is the worst case of abuse I have seen by an attorney on a client in my over 27 years investigating cases for the Florida Bar but my boss told me to close this file and never talk to you again! Good Bye!” And as Citizens and per SIMS v. AHERNS 271 S.W. 720 (1925) “the practice of law is an Occupation of Common Right” and SCHWARE v. BOARD OF EXAMINERS 353 U.S. 238, 239 “The Practice of Law cannot be licensed by the state/State.”, (As Proofs of illegal Orders “Impostor” Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi and “Impostor” Officers of the Courts presented to Townsend by Clerk(s) and in 2016, the 5th DCA as HOBBS ACT THREATS to “Impede” Justice and Facts) lawfully fighting the now exposed BUSH et al’s Gigantic “Terrorist Communistic Regime” as Townsend detailed to Attorney Patricia McCarthy in 1987 and since regarding with Lane and Lane et al with “persons” unknown using Townsend’s earned commissions per the Joint Venture Agreement and also benefiting unjustly from the Attorney’s telling Townsend he could not earn work because of their Fraud and Deceptive Practices alleging a “Non- Compete” that did not exist and has been proved did never exist by facts and laws but which allows the Bush Malicious Enterprises to be unjustly enriched. Many of these Defendants since the Judge Marva Crenshaw May 10, 2006 Ruling of Malicious Prosecution and “Hate Crimes” have done as HOBBS ACT THREATS told Townsend he cannot speak for his Church as a “Corporation Not For Profit” nor represent the Non-Rump Members Or Others yet citizens never gave up our right to “Redress Government” when even the lawyers abandon and sell out Our Sovereign Rights and Religious Rights the Government shall never “impede”. Therefore, this ACTION since 1987, is now filed again, here as a “Next Friend” of “We the People” and President Donald J. Trump and Vice- President Mike Pence per a “Class Action” Case as “We the People” as per our “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” are the EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT WITH RIGHTS as defined by Supreme Court Justice Scalia Ruling in United States v. Williams 504 U.S. 36 (1992) and via Grand Juries holding Sovereign Common Law Rights that yet to have been relinquished per Constitutional Practices. And Our Grand Jury Voice for Our

Rights loudly spoke in the elections of 2016, to “Redress Government Persons” Treason on Our Constitution and Sovereign Constitutional Right to “Redress Government” with Sovereign Rights. This Action began November 1987, and from Townsend’s first meeting with Attorney Patricia McCarthy on 11/18/1987, her Fraud and Deceptive Practices began on her clients (TOWNSEND AND ALL FOR WHO HE SPOKE) by her Omission of Truthful Disclosure to conceal her and the “Others” Unconstitutional RICO and HOBBS ACT violations of Controlling Commerce (and Constitutional Rights) to establish their BUSH ET AL Unjust Enrichment and Anti Trusts and Monopolies against Clients Rights and Citizens “Free Will” including “Free Will” for their “THEFT BY FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES” and “Omissions of Truthful Disclosure” and in collusion with Deputy Tim Jeffers with Our Attorneys John Grant and David Gibbs III, through to current times filing false reports to the Religious Society as Owner Members and to the Courts and even to the IRS of: (a.) even for “Black Money” and personal enrichment even from “Designated Money” for Children’s Needs and a Building Program as stated in: FIRST FREE WILL BAPT. CHURCH OF BLOUNTSTOWN INC. v. FRANKLIN 148 FLA. 277 4 So.2d 390, “When membership was accepted therein, they submitted themselves to the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the church…The law appears to be settled that in the absence of a showing of fraud, collusion or arbitrariness…the court will not interfere…”;

As even after Attorney Charles Denny IV, knowingly affirmed evidence Townsend filed with the Clerk in December 2003, was illegally removed from the case files and that Denny IV presented fraudulent information and overturned case law to the Court from 2003-2006, and that Townsend was then illegally charged with an over $900, contempt fine, that he and Judge Crenshaw in 2006, conceded and rewrote the Amended Complaint in case 02-03812, that Townsend then used as filed against Heather Gray and against John Grant in the underlying case here 2015-1928, 13th Circuit. (b.) and then even “THEFT and or ABDUCTION OF CHILDREN” as Extortion to threaten Townsend and other Whistleblowers even Church/School Members even Children voicing their FBCCP BYLAWS RIGHTS as presented to Judges Palomino 11/15/2001 and thereafter and to Judge Arnold, Judge Timmerman, Judge Sierra, Judge Gomez, Judge Holder, Judge Padgett, Judge Stoddard, Judge Cook, Judge Barbas and others and in 2006, to Judge Crenshaw presenting and proving FAMILY

LAW 71.30 Tort interference with Children she then included as “Hate Crimes” for which they still continue. These “Officers of the Court”, Sheriff Deputies as Jeffers, Howlett, Smoak, Corbin et al and “Others” then as “impostors” uses and do Human Trafficking of Townsends own kids for their Extortion since 9/8/1999, to fraud as even Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi defines in her own written publications and Nationally Televised Speeches intentionally fraud citizens and knowingly in collusion with her co=participants began “Fraud on the Court” and Extrinsic Fraud by treasonous acts as Circuit Court Judge Marva Crenshaw stated September 30, 2003, were Malicious Prosecutions and stated again on May 10, 2006 were Malicious Prosecution Acts and even acts as “Hate Crimes” to Our Constitution and Citizens and violations of “Due Process” as defined by Federal Judge James Moody Jr. (March 15, 2007) and continues “Impeding” and “Obstruction of Justice” per their own definition in State and Federal Laws of HUMAN Trafficking to Deny “We the People” Our Sovereign Constitutional and Civil Rights and Free Commerce and Communications as proved herein aligning with the Jorge Labarga statements of the Tyrannical Communistic Regime and the Holder Standard and his Firing the 2DCA as showing Confirmation and Singularity in this Townsend Action. This Action now returns(returned) back multiple times to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals: A. First Following the 11th Circuits Courts Order from October 6, 2008, (Exhibit #1) Townsend now proved “Pay to Play” shams against “We the People” by intentional “Ineffective Counsel” Of “Officers of the Courts” for their own and their co=participants “Fraud and Deceptive Practices” and “Omission of Truthful Disclosure” for their personal “Unjust Enrichment” as Townsend’s Attorney’s David Landus and David H. Popper defined in 1988 by their filing of the initial complaint in this action (Record Exhibit #6) and as Florida Chief Judge Jorge Labarga defined as the “HOLDER STANDARD” on Gregory Holder as judge in this case as violations at that time and since still not disclosing those to whom: 1. Charles E. Lane Jr. had used Townsend’s Commissions and (restricting or “Impeding” Townsend by falsely claiming there is a non-compete “impeding” obtaining his Commissions from International and Intra State and Interstate Companies) and as his frauds as filed in his counter/claim even filed late and thus in “Default” since 7/1988, as RICO and Extortion and bribery and “Fraud on the Court” by “Persons” of the Court; 2. and or to whom by Breach of Contract and Torts since 1994, Tim Jeffers and “Others” have used the FBCCP/CPCS “Designated” and Undetermined Funds taken illegally as Corrine Brown and as “Black Money” and or in

34 their Charging illegally for “Honest Services Frauds” Court Fee’s, Legal Fee’s and Fines and Taxes and then illegally took control of the Citrus Park Christian School unlawfully from its owners as the Members of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park, created as the Church’s Ministry; 3. and or to whom Ron Beck and John Grant and Tim Jeffers and “Others” including Randall Townsend’s Attorney Charles Scruggs and the estranged now former wife Karen Harrod Townsend by filing in 2001, their 01-15813 and 01-15814 Cases as they admitted were Frauds even by the affidavits filed by Charles Scruggs and Karen Harrod Townsend even to the court of Judge Gregory Holder and her brothers Steven Tyler Harrod (and his employers and lawyers [including Stanford Soloman, Rebecca O’Dell Townsend and Mr. Sessions and Others] at Regions Bank and AmSouth and Morgan Keagan) and Emmett Keith Harrod used and benefited in their “Pay to Play” Malicious Enterprise and in their RICO (Title 18 U.S.C. §§1961- 1968) and Drug and Human Trafficking and is thus ongoing acts of Treason by their “Fraud on the Court” illegally using “persons” of the Courts with John Grant for fraud acting since 1987 or before in this “Pay to Play” sham and in 2015 filing his Fraudulent Counter Claim based on his years of Extortion and Threats for and with Jeb Bush and the Jim Smiths and Brian Ballards and Pam Bondi and the Koch Families and Sheriffs and State Attorneys and “Others” for the George H.W. Bush #41 and Agents Malicious Enterprise as proved connected with records filed with the courts. B. Then the second Orders from February 1, 2013, (Exhibit #3 & #4) is proved showing Judges intentionally acted in collusion to violate their Oaths and Citizens and “Due Process” and received illegal benefits and or “Quid Pro Quo” profits from defendants and thus acted without Jurisdiction per these RANKIN id. cases as these “persons” used their “Color of official right” to by delay and or obstructing the release of documents did aid and abet their ongoing Criminal Malicious Enterprises as stated herein. Additionally, their own AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION McKAY COMMISSION REPORT authored by John Berry with under the supervision of John Harkness of the Florida Bar shows their intentional violations of their own rules and codes just as the U.S. Supreme Court found Ruling in KELLER v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 496 U.S. 1 (1990), adopting their MCKAY Commission Report as now proved illegal acts of the Florida Bar and its officers and agents as LATHROP v. DONOHUE 367 U.S. 820 (1961). C. In their Third Order of May 16, 2017, their same frauds continue. D. In their letter of June 12, 2017, stating: “RETURNED UNFILED:

Motion to set aside dismissal filed by Randall Townsend is returned unfiled because this appeal is closed.” Is included herein as exhibits with the said MOTION AS PETITIONERS INCLUDED IN FULL HEREIN: “TOWNSEND ET AL OBJECTION, REPLY AND MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE CLERKS MAY 16, 2017 DISMISSAL OF MANDAMUS AND APPEAL OF FSCT AND U.S. MIDDLE DISTRICT (TAMPA) AND OTHER LOWER COURTS AS VOID FRAUD “ORDERS” AND “FRAUD ON THE COURT”

As attached herein proving their Intentional Fraud on the Court.

And included as attached herein is Townsend’s:

“MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ORDER OF “PERSON” ADALBERTO JORDON IS NOT A “VOID” ORDER AS A MATTER OF LAW AND PER OUR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION”

Which now Adalberto Jordon and all “Public Officials” are taking the

Fifth Amendment giving Jurisdiction to these Superior Courts.

As now exposed facts prove Pam Bondi in direct association and as co=conspirator of even Patricia McCarthy and Grant Et al and Bush et al and the Ballard’s, Jim Smith’s, KOCH’s and Lane intentionally conceals crimes for her friends and their agents and “Pay to Play” benefactors as she per her predecessor Attorney Bill McCollum said she was specifically chosen to do as she and her “Gang” are part of the “SWAMP” President Donald J. Trump was elected and promised to drain. ADDITIONALLY per these cases and multiple others filed as shown to the courts and the “Bush/Bondi RICO Gang” over these 30 years, to expose their illegal acts their Aid and Abet, these facts are established and as presented in filings with the lower courts: A. KENNER v. C.I.R. 387 F. 2d 689 (7th Cir. 1968) and 7 Moore’s Federal Practice http://freedom-school.com/law/fraud-on-the-court-by-an- officer-of-the-court.html which states: “Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or

36 sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.” ELLIOT v. PIERSOL 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S.328, 340 (1828) Elliot v. Pierson. Second, a judge is not immune for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction. [29 MIRELES V. WACO 502 US 9. 116 L. Ed 2d 9, 14, 112 S Ct 286 (US1991)…”;

B. Rankin v. Howard, 633 F. 2d 844 (1980).”

“When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction, {U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (State use of ), 217 Miss. 576, 64 So2d 697].” “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impurity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it.”…”It is the only supreme poser in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in his functions, is on the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives.” [U.S. v. Lee 106 U.S.196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L.Ed 171 (1882). “When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost. [Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326]”.

C. RANKIN V. HOWARD 633 F.2d 844 Cent. Den (1980)

“Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of Jurisdiction.” Failure to follow F.S. 38, on illegal issues of Prejudice raise issue of lack of Jurisdiction. Scruggs disqualified Timmerman and Townsend served many actors per: SALINAS v. UNITED STATES 96-738 U.S. Supreme Court from 522 U.S. 52, 65, per 18 U.S.C. Section 666: “A conspirator need not agree to commit the substantive offense—or even be capable of committing it –in order to be convicted. It is sufficient that the conspirator agreed to the underlying crime be committed by a member of the conspiracy capable of committing it.” Thus Judge Muszynski (as each judge and “Alias” “Officer of the Court” and “Others” has done for 30 plus years Honest Services Fraud(s) per Title 18 USC 1341-1346 and “Impeded” Contracts and Obstructed the “Bribery

Pay to Play” “Records” of thefts from Townsend and Townsend et al and abducted his two children for RICO) bordered on Malfeasance by delay requiring production of the Lane et al records of bribes from day one but no question of Criminal Intent for Malfeasance can be withheld from Lane et al with Publix Supermarkets et al, with McCarthy, Popper, Chapin in collusion with Rom Powell, Linda Chapin, Lawton Chiles and his agents including the FSCT and AG’s and Jeb Bush, Charlie Crist, Rick Scott and his Agents and John Grant with Pam Bondi and their Agents still being exposed. Thus the Issues of this Case rests now with Chief Judge Jorge Labarga to be a Constitutional Judge or another “Rankin” “Impostor” as even “implanted” Chief Judge Charles Canady Jr. in his Florida Supreme Court Order affirmed the “Hate Crimes” ruled by Judge Marva Crenshaw on May 10, 2006, was “Malicious Prosecution” violations on Townsend et al. by herself and by attorney Charles Denny IV and “Others Doe to be Named” still being exposed which facts recently discovered connect “Hate Crimes” and Retaliation as Chief Judge Jorge Labarga calls “Tyrannical Communist Regime” on Townsend since the 1970’s, so Bush et al may continue evil Malicious Enterprise(s).

D. SANTOSKY v. KRAMER 455 U.S.745 shows Burden of Proof for removal of Parental Rights. In this case since 9/8/1999, Townsend’s and his children’s Rights were totally severed by Deputies Jeffers and Howlett and Smoak and Corbin without Due Process even explained in details per the 1994 BYLAWS, for defamation and extortion to conceal these Appellee’s and “Others Doe to be Named” Malicious Enterprises and “Hate Crimes” of Treason and the “RUMP FACTION” thefts and Bush/Grant Black Money bribes.

E. SAPIENZA v. KIRKLAND 154.So2d 204, “Pleading should not be stricken in its entirety as sham, if, under facts established, there is an issue upon which pleading could be good in part.”

F. SCHEUER v. RHODES 416 U.S. 232 94 SCT 1683 (1974) State cannot grant immunity or vindicate or excuse a deputy or law enforcer or any Government Person who violates Federal Law. Clearly a “judge” or “attorney general” or a State Legislator as John Grant or Sheriff and State Attorney’s as listed herein and in the years of threats to defame and arrest Townsend or even in Emails to Townsend as they even admit they ignored and violated the 1994 FBCCP BYLAWS is an “imposter” of the law who directs a “law enforcer” to do more “Hate Crimes” and Abduction of

Children even ignoring the ruling on November 15, 2001 from Judge Raul Palomino and finding Defendants had “No Probable Cause” in their 01- 15813 and 01-15814 Federal Charges for Repeat Violence and Domestic Violence against Townsend they in later affidavits admitted were Shams to conceal their thefts of Church and School “Designated Money” as “Black Money” and to Human Traffic kids to obstruct the Civil Rights of a victim/Citizen protecting our Contracts, Religious Bylaws and All Constitutional Rights. The Email of 5/7/2014, as Plaintiff’s Exhibit #20, By HCSO Deputy McDarby then is proof of their crimes as “We can’t enforce federal laws” but the charges in the affidavits of cases 01-15813 and 01-15814 list Federal Charges they made and Emmett Battles and the 5th DCA nor the FSCT nor Bondi et al can give themselves immunity for “Hate Crimes” and conspiracy to commit the crimes as the Bondi Attorney’s General Email states below herein and still ongoing as all since 11/18/1987, and before are stealing Townsend’s property, money, and Rights by Contracts for which Appellee’s are in Breach and for extortion even since 1999, abducted his two children.

G. SEDIMA v. IMRES CO. INC 741 F2d 482 Premature to dismiss R.I.C.O. case before evidence can be presented based on anticipated further discovery and investigation yet “Officers of the Court” have intentionally hid these Lane et al and FBCCP/CPCS documents from Townsend preventing him from proving his facts and Matters of law against their Defamation and Malicious Prosecution since 1987, exposing their “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” acts and damages and then hid all FBCCP/CPCS RECORDS and Hid Townsend’s Children illegally since 1999; and hid all persons to whom each Defendant has paid bribes including “Officers of the Court”.

H. U.S. v. SILVERMAN 745 F.2d 1386, “Knowledge and intent are necessary to sustain conviction under statue relating to corruptly endeavoring to influence, obstruct, or impede due administration of justice; however, government is not required to prove that defendant harbored specific purpose of obstructing due administration of justice, but rather, must establish that defendant should have reasonable foreseen that the natural and probable consequences of success of his scheme would achieve precisely that result. 18 U.S.C.A. at 1503. This case was one of 48 argued to the 5th DCA since January 21, 1999 and now by these “persons” own Actions and Court Orders “Knowledge and

Intent” and Conspiracy and Extortion is proved in their Corrupt Bush Malicious Enterprise.

I. ZOCARAS v. CASTRO 465 3rd 479 (2006) 1/8/2016 Transcript page 28, “Ineffective Counsel” as ruled by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in this Action should not cause a case be dismissed and the client lose his rights to a fail trial because the “ineffective counsel” was proved in conspiracy “Under Color of Official Right” with “imposter” Rankin id. “Officers of the Court” as the FSCT and A.G’s and “Others” even as Governors and Presidents for their Malicious Enterprise of RICO, Frauds and Deceptive Practices through Monopolies as shown herein acting for Unjust Enrichment for themselves and intentionally as HCSO Detective McDarby wrote in his email 5/7/2014, “We don’t follow Federal Law” as this shows the entire Florida Judicial System is a Mockery because A.G. Pam Bondi says We (Florida) follow the Rule of Law but only when it serves them in opposition to U.S. v. Lee id. to steal Townsend’s resources, and relationships and property which put Lane and “others” in business and has made them billions, which is Townsends .

J. ZELLER v. RANKIN 101 S.Ct. 2020 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326

K. CITATIONS AND STATUTES A.D.A. 42 U.S.C. 12203 While this applies to A.D.A. the intent of the law applies here to protect Petitioners who are disadvantaged as non lawyers or Government Persons allowed all the benefits of their “insider” knowledge. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 Relating to Bussing and Segregation and Other acts for equal protection. FLORIDA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1992 Florida Statue 760.71 ADOPTION AND SAFE FAMILIES ACT OF 1997- PUBLIC LAW 105- 89, approved 416-5. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1997 for Gain of Title IV and Title V Federal Grant Money for the States, CPS and AGENTS who ignore Due Process. HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN FLORIDA F.S. 787.06(2)(d) “defines human trafficking as “transporting, soliciting, recruiting, harboring, providing, enticing, maintaining, or obtain another person for the purposes of exploitation of that person.” “The statute also outlines Florida’s goals of assisting victims and prosecuting offenders. *Using Coercion for labor or services is a 1st Degree Felony 787.06(3)(a),

F.S….*Anyone who knowingly or in reckless disregard of the facts engages in or benefits financially by receiving anything of value from trafficking can be prosecuted 787.06(3), F.S.*All human trafficking offenses can be prosecuted as RICO offenses in Florida as Organized crime….Who are the victims? …*Children and adults induced to perform labor or services through force, fraud, or coercion.” F.S. 943.0583 “On the other hand, if a child is alleged to have been a victim of human trafficking, the prosecutor done not need to prove that the child was coerced into performing labor, services, or commercial sexual activity. As a result, simply exploiting a child for the purpose of labor, services, or commercial sexual activity would support Human Trafficking conviction.” Per Richard E. Hornsby, P.A. website. The definitions of “Labor” and or “services” under the law is not defined nor specific to be required for sexual activity. Force or coercing a child to abandon their safe parent, safe home, and or contact with the other parent in their assembly at church or school or social activities and city and or any and all communication with a parent for purposes of bribery, extortion, unjust enrichment, conspiracy and other crimes defined as “Hate Crimes” shows Unlawful Purposes in the Tort Interference with Child Custody specifically when Due Process is intentionally violated even after the warnings of Judge Palomino on 11/15/2001 and the Order of Visitation of Judge Timmerman and by force to prevent the Child from being called as a witness to their suppression of their Civil Rights and or to validate criminal charges made by “Imposter” “Officers of the Court” and “Alias” Law Enforcers and or a parent in collusion for Unjust Enrichment and collusion to prevent her criminal prosecution.” HOBBS ACT of 1946—a.k.a. Anti-Racketeering Act, Prohibits actual or attempted robbery or extortion affecting interstate or foreign commerce “in any way or degree”. “The term Robbery as used in this section means the unlawful taking or obtaining of personal property from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of actual or threatened force, or violence, or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his person or property, or property in his custody or possession, or the person or property of a relative or member of his family or of anyone in his company at the time of the taking or obtaining. (2) The term extortion means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.” “18 U.S.C. Section 1951 In essence, the Hobbs Act elevates all but the simplest acts of robbery and extortion to the level of federal crimes.”

18 U.S.C. Section 1951 Interference with Commerce also proscribes conspiracy to commit robbery or extortion without reference to the conspiracy statute at 18 U.S.C. Section 371. Fear of economic loss will be sufficient for a Hobbs Act Violation Claim. Practices to gain Political Contributions is sufficient for a HOBBS ACT Claim. {Townsend Established to each Officer of the Court and Law Enforcer yet each Appellee and “Others Doe” conspires and “impedes” and Omitted Truthful Disclosure in “Bad Faith” even more when these thefts caused the ABDUCTION OF J.D.T. and J.G.T. since 1999.} McCormick v. United States 896 F.2d 61,67 (4th Cir. 1990rev’d 111 S.Ct. 1807 (1991). EXTORTION UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT “The obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.” To Prove facts for a conviction under the HOBBS ACT prove that you have: Induced or attempted to induce the victim to give up money or property; Used the victim’s fear of physical harm or economic injury in order to obtain money or property; “the plaintiff/prosecutor need only show that a public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts per United States v. Urban 404 F3d 768 (3rd Cir. 2005); When a government agent engages in extortion “under color of official right” he is essentially using the governmental powers with which he has been trusted to gain personal or illegitimate rewards.”; a Affected interstate commerce in some way by your alleged extortion or robbery. There are many other predicate acts listed in section 1961(1) that are mirror images of extortion. These are circumstances when obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. Sections 1503, 1510, 1511, 1512, [Tampering with a witness] or 1513) will also constitute extortion, e.g. an employer engaged in illegal activity may threaten an employee “testify to X when the police talk to you or you’ll be fired” or “you’ll be killed”. By this single threat, the employer may have violated both the Hobbs Act and an obstruction of justice statute.” Quoted of Jeffrey E. Grell, Attorney at Law. 18 U.S.C. Section 666, Theft or bribery for conversion of Federal Funds. FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE Reynolds v. U.S. 98 U.S. 145 (1878). “Generally interpreted to provide that government cannot prohibit religious beliefs and opinions; however, they may prohibit certain practices.” “For Government to restrict religious practices, a compelling government interest must exist.”

No Government interest can be shown in this case but only private individuals “Under Color of Law” personal Unjust Enrichment by thefts by Fraud and Deceptive Practices and Extortions. NO AID CLAUSE Lemon v. Kurtzman 403U.S. 602 , 612 -613 Lemon Test Bush v. Holmes 836 So2d 340, 358 (Fla 1st DCA 2004) “The Statute must not authorize the use of public monies directly or indirectly , in aid of a sectarian institution.” Thus as Florida Constitution Article 1. Section 3. Violated by Joe Howlett, Tim Jeffers and John Grant et al since 10/1994. FAMILY LAW 71.30 Tort interference with Children. To Crenshaw 5/10/06, showed and proved violations of the U.S. Constitution Fourteenth Amendment by the unlawful taking of the Townsend children since 1999, even by intentional violations of Sovereign Religious Rights as stated as Due Process in the FBCCP Bylaws of 1994, Townsend as Charged by All was required to be enforces and as Superior Officer held a Fiduciary Duty to enforce against those in Breach of Contract or Torts of or as Our Bylaws. FLORIDA TORTS ---FRAUD REVITZ V. TERRELL 572 So. 2d 996, 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) “If the defendant provides any information about an aspect of the transaction, he or she must tell the whole truth.” 26.100 “…(viii) Any action defendant took to prevent plaintiff from investigating truth of defendant’s representations…” 26.102 DOCUMENTS (1) Copies of written documents containing defendants fraudulent misrepresentations or promises, including (a) Contracts. (b) letters… (3) Previous or concurrent agreements relating to same subject matter…” U.S. CONSTITUTION AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTION-- “NO LAW SHALL IMPEDE THE OBLIGATION OF A CONTRACT.” This Law is one of 48, Argued to the 5th DCA since January 21, 1999. So any act to “Impede” the JVA and the 1994 BYLAWS and the U.S. Constitution and the Florida Constitution is a “Breach of Contract” and an act in the RICO “TYRRANICAL” “KINGPIN” AGENDA. THE HOLDER STANDARD “THE HOLDER STANDARD” to Judge Gregory Holder as: “A judge should not allow family, social, political or other relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment.” THE KRAUSE STANDARD as an Attorney by “Fraud and Deceptive Practices” and “Bad Faith” to collects funds to aid and abet a Judicial “Officer of the Court” as the Florida Supreme Court and their Agents have been proved to have acted and Conspired since about 1987 and before.

Clearly in this case it is a Mockery by “Impostors” of the Court with “Smoke and Mirrors” to deny Patricia McCarthy, David Popper, Charles Williams Jr., Bruce Chapin, John Grant, Charles Scruggs, Heather Gray, Charles Denny IV and “Others” did not do the same violation since 1987 and before, and all Judges, Attorney’s Generals and “Others” directly by overtly taking and using Townsend’s Property and indirectly by I.O.L.T.A. funds, even violating F.S. 775.03, Unlawful Benefit to Clergy, used to defame Townsend through the illegal acts of the unconstitutional Family Court and their actions in Civil Court, evident here. STRICKLAND v. WASHINGTON 466 U.S. 668, 664 (1984) The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees every accused individual the right to effective assistance of counsel. Yet the McCarthy et al, since 11/18/1987, and as the Florida Supreme Court and their agents and as Florida Bar Executive Officers in this Case since 1994 have made personal threats to Townsend that they obtain “Superior Knowledge of the Law” and threatened, “If you get your law degree within 6 months we will find a way to have you disbarred and put you in jail for something!” Now 30 years of evidence shows Appellees threats even threatening lawyers who talk to Townsend. TITLE 18 section 2071 U.S. Code. Concealment, removal or mutilation generally, of Records. U.S. CODE 28 PART IV CHAPTER 85 SECTION 1343 U.S. CODE 42 TITLE V. SECTION 12103 PROHIBITION AGAINST RETALLIATION AND COERCION U.S.CODE 42 Section 12203—Prohibition against retaliation and coercion (a) No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a change, testified , assisted or participated in any manner in an investigation , proceeding or hearing under this chapter….” U.S.CODE 42 CHAPTER 21 SECTION 1983 U.S.CODE 42 Section 14141 U.S. CODE 42 CHAPTER 126 SECTION 12202 Bob Butterworth — Fla. Attorney’s General Op. 82-64. And 84-66 and 96- 41. shows Crimes of Judges Quince, Anstead, Wells, Pariente, Lewis, Cantero and Bell, acting without taking Oaths. F.S. 112.313 Disclosure or Use of Certain Information—A current or former public officer, employee of an agency, or local government attorney may not disclose or use information not available to members of the general public and gained by reason of his or her official position, except for information

44 relating exclusively to governmental practices, for her or her personal gain or benefit or for the personal gain or benefit of any other person or business entity.” F.S. 838.21 Misuse of Confidential Info with intent to Obstruct, impede, or prevent a criminal investigation or a criminal prosecution, which such information is not available to the general public is gained by reason of the public servant’s official position, commits a third degree felony. ***Done by all Appellees since 11/18/1987 or before “impeding” the Obligations of the JVA Contract and his money and rights Owned by Townsend’s Services and all Appellee’s by “Bad Faith” and Fraud and Deceptive Practices concealing Lane et al. and the money Townsend made and earned because Lane was forbidden by the Clients in their Accounts and then Lane stole the money since 1987, and used the money for the payment of his bribes in their “Pay to Play” they knew Townsend reported as Unlawful to McCarthy et al and “Others”. ***Done by all Appellees since 10/1994, blocking Townsend investigate illegal P.E.#19 acts of the “Rump Faction” and “Others” at FBCCP/CPCS; ***Done by All Appellees and multiple and various times to continue their “Superior Knowledge” and Omissions of Truthful Disclosure to Appellants. F.S. 839.18, ASSUMING TO ACT—Newly elected or appointed public officers must not assume to perform any of the duties of public office before “qualification” according to law. Doing so would be a second degree misdemeanor.” STINSON v. STATE 80 So2d 506 (Fla. 1918). Florida Supreme Court determined that F.S.839. 18 applied to a person who performed the duties of deputy sheriff before being qualified according to law. Person had been appointed as a deputy, had taken the required oath, and had executed a bond, but board of county commissioners had not approved the bond. Therefore, the person was not yet qualified to perform the duties of deputy sheriff . F.S. 876.05(1) 876.09(1) Oaths for Office.” F.S.92.50(1) Those required to take their Oath of Office. F.S. 876.08, “Any governing authority or person who knowingly or carelessly permits an employee to continue in employment after failing to take the oath is guilty of a second degree misdemeanor.” U.S. C. Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure Part I. Crimes Chapter 13 Civil Rights; Section 241 Conspiracy against rights. Section 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law. Section 245 Federally protected activities. Section 246 Deprivation of Relief benefits.

Section 247 Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs. (2) intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, any person in the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so;…(d) (1) …or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, …or an attempt to kill…(2) if bodily injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section…or an explosive; Section 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States. Section 373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence. “If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. (c) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime, because he lacked a state of mind required for its commission, because he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution.”

42 U.S.C. Section 1983, per the Civil Rights act of 1871; Deprivation of Rights; CRIMES VICTIMS’ RIGHT ACT—State Attorneys Victims Assistance. Nance Lopez and Curtis Baughman both admitted in 2007, they were directed to target Townsend and make false charges by their undisclosed Superior Officer assisting Joe Howlett as they attended court 11/15/2001. FLORIDA BAR RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE All At some point or another most by Appellee’s have been violated.

“FLORIDA SUPREME COURT MANUAL INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES SECTION I. B. THE CHIEF JUSTICE. C. THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE. SECTION II. J. “It is the policy of the Court to expedite proceedings presenting time-sensitive issues affecting children.” But not in the Townsend case as the Florida Bar and FSCT “impostor” judges have threatened any person and Townsend since 1994 and before to not advocate his Constitutional and or Contract Rights or Parenting/Custody/Religious Rights even per the Society of Sisters Ruling as listed in the Complaint and protected by the 1994 BYLAWS “impeded” by the “impostor” deputies and “impostor” church members acting as Appellee’s Agents.

RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT “RICO” Effective October 15, 1970, Introduced in the Senate by John L. McClellan (D-AR) and signed into law by R. Nixon. Applied with Anti-SLAPP Acts (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) and the “CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE STATUTE a.k.a , “KINGPIN STATUTE”. Famous Cases: Louisiana Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry, Gil Dozier, accused of compelling companies doing business with his department to make campaign contributions; KEY WEST PD, Officers arrested for running a Protection Racket for illegal cocaine smugglers; Michael Milken, Insider Trading and Extortion, and per Respondent Superior, Corporation is responsible for acts of its employee’s crimes; Los Angeles Police Department, charged as a Racketeering enterprise; TAMPA LATIN KINGS, 2006 by The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office and the Tampa Police Department; TAMPA GAMBINO CRIME FAMILY 2006; JUDGES Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella, Pennsylvania, charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, tax evasion, money laundering and honest services fraud for kickbacks, as “Kids for Cash”. FLORIDA RICO ACT 895.01-895.06 *First Degree Felony up to 30 years in prison. *Person engaged in at least 2 incidents of the enterprise. *Section 895.02(1)(a) , Intimidating another person to commit and of the criminal charges that could be charged by information, indictment, or petition. The prosecutor is not required to prove that any of the predicate acts nor the RICO Enterprise itself involved any underlying economic motivation. The charging document is not required to identity the relationship between the defendant and the crimes on its face. *Allows a prosecutor to charge a complete enterprise all at once. *Two or more acts with 5 years of the other. FLORIDA GANG ACT F.S.874 874.06, “A prevailing plaintiff under subsection (1) has a right or claim that is superior to any right or claim that the state has in the same property or proceeds…” HCSO REPORT ON SARASOTA POLICE CHIEF ABBOTT, 2009 http://www.judgeoneforyourself.com/mainpage/DavidGee2014Jan.pdf Townsend had also requested this FSCT incorporate herein all previous case evidence since 1987, and newly discovered evidence and the Petition For

Mandamus and Supplemental Petition For Mandamus recently filed in this Action to be included herein.

MARBURY V. MADISON 5 U.S. 137 (1803) “…Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge engaged in acts of treason …” and acted to aid and abet “Hate Crimes” and extortion by not enforcing Constitutional Laws and willfully acting per Lamb v. Leiter 6003 2d 632, “Conduct that prevents one from trying a case” by OCASIO v. U.S. 578 U,S, (2016) collusion by two or more persons for an unlawful agreement for PIPER v. PEARSON 2 GRAY 120, “It is no more than the act of a private citizen, pretending to have judicial poser which does not exist at all….” For RANKIN id. and the HOLDER STANDARD and thus by these facts, “Frauds on the Court” must be resolved as all the prior Orders are rendered Void and or Voidable per U.S. v. THROCKMORTON id. (Tr. Of 1/8/16, p.18) by Exparte Corruption.”

BRADY v. MARYLAND 373 U.S. 83 (1963) “The government’s withholding of evidence that is material to the determination of either guilt or punishment of a criminal defendant violates the defendant’s constitutional right to due process.”

This case of these Connected co=conspirators now proves the Actual Intent of Malicious Enterprise of the “Ineffective Counsel” and “Alias” “Officers of the Court” and “Corporate Veil” and “Government Veil” as the Eleventh Court alleged to and or for their own benefits and or as “Unjust Enrichments” as David Popper wrote and filed in 1988, in the initial litigation these Lane et al are directly connected through his “PAY TO PLAY” WITH Townsends unpaid Commissions directly Lane paid through “Others” and to Jeb Bush to his Father who bribed others and included that they admitted they lawyers and judges never even read the Contracts of the Joint Venture Agreement(JVA) of August 7, 1987 and the 1994 Bylaws and as per Beatrice Foods as Townsend argued to all on 1/8/2016, and knowing same made intentionally conspired threats of John Grant in his emails with Sheriff David Gee and State Attorney Mark Ober and the included exhibit November 4, 2015 even by John Grant forwarded to the Court and his email who have in collusion continued their illegal threats to Townsend who is advocating Our Constitutional Rights and laws and Constitutional Rights we “Redress Government” having pierced the “Corporate Veil” and the

“Government Veil” as this 11th Circuit Court of Appeals advised to expose in 2008, now proving since 1987, these “Persons” that were to be exposed by Patricia McCarthy per her agreement of representation on 11/18/1987d, was to 1. Get Lane’s and Townsend’s withheld by Lane “all the JVA records” to discover all the parties in the extortion; 2. Set Up a Court Receiver of monies coming into the JVA; 3.Get a Declaratory Judgment on the Rights of the Parties; 4. Expose the Criminal acts of Lane and Lane et al which as an Officer of the Court each is required to do. This is then the basis of the “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” claim filed by David H. Popper and David Landis for Townsend filed in June 1988, and which Charles E. Lane Jr. and his attorney Charles E. Williams Jr. did not answer timely and therefore are in Default since 7/8/1988. With this 3rd Return now is exposed “Willful Intent” and “Singularity” and “Actual Malice” for their Intentional acts of “Fraud on the Court” and with proofs that each Defendant had no “legal” “Color of Right” or “Color Of Law” or “Jurisdiction” per RANKIN and per Our U.S. and Florida Constitution as with no Constitutional protection to perform their acts of Treason as even Florida Representative Charles Canady Jr. on the Floor Of Congress said Not even the President is above the Law and in this case the Presidents have intentionally directed Crimes ruled as “Hate Crimes” by Marva Crenshaw and confessed by defendants counsel Charles Denny IV on May 10, 2006 and used TITLE IV and KOCH FAMILES MONIES (Gained by Work of Townsend for Commissions for which he was never paid and by the order of these Defendants to “Stop Work” so Lane et al could reap Townsend’s Commissions over these past 30 plus years and extort “Black Money” from Not For Profits and receive monies from Government Taxes on these Citizens and by various other RICO means of their Malicious Enterprise Pay to Play) through various lobbyist and INFLUENCE to fund their “Pay to Play” from monies as commissions Townsend earn per the JVA and Or per the 1994 FBCCP BYLAWS per his commission as the Supreme Court Officer of the Nominations Committee responsible to the Owner Membership to advise on the Sovereign Rights of the 1994 FBCCP Bylaws and the Corporation “Not for Profit” and with CPCS as it Ministry in accordance with Our Sovereign Rights and Practices. Even the timing of the FSCT Order and the Whittemore Orders and the Quid Pro Quo proved in 2017, with Pam Bondi, Rick Scott, Charlie Crist and Others shows intentional “Fraud On the Court” based on the rulings of the Eleventh Circuit Courts rulings in this case as their conflicts of interest are blasted all over the media.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito says “No person in this country, no matter how high or powerful, is above the law, and no person in this country is beneath the law.” Even Charles Canady Jr. charged President Clinton. I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied judgment over these 30+ years, that this case involves one or more questions of exceptional importance as Petitioners again advise this Court of the following Question and Facts: QUESTION---Should all Judges Answer Townsend’s Motion to Show Cause as sent to Adalberto Jordon and “Others” as they cannot rule if they have not seen Townsends evidence or evidence Obstructed from Townsend and Our Courts as they are not above Our Constitution and laws as all Judges of this 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and the lower courts (especially the Florida Supreme Court “Justices” who per the Florida Attorney’s General Report and Our Florida Laws, had not taken their proper oaths and recused by Chief Judge Canady in 2011 and again by Chief Judge Labarga in 2016 and admitted by Judges James Moody Jr., Marva Crenshaw, Orfinger and “others”) and government persons who reviewed these earlier still ongoing related cases Townsend ET AL v.: Beck ET AL; Lane ET AL; Williams ET AL; Popper ET AL; Chapin ET AL; Karen (Harrod) Townsend ET AL; Scruggs ET AL; and now (Disbarred) Gray ET AL for charges Townsend informed the Courts since 2004; guilty of continuing the Civil Rights violations, HOBBS ACT and RICO Acts since 1987 of Charles E. Lane ET AL, [in Breach and Default of Contracts and illegally and criminally taking Whistle Blower Townsends rights, money, services, property since 1987 and illegal abduction of the children since 1999, and depriving “others” for whom Townsend speaks] as “law enforcers” are required to stop not aid and abet an ongoing unconstitutional and criminal act(s)? FACTS! The United States and Florida Constitution state, “No Law shall impede the obligation of a contract”. By Paying for their Bond, we have a Contract. Petitioner Townsend et al per our Constitutional Rights never Willfully or knowingly gave up to these “judges” our Sovereign Rights as: Redress the Government; Due Process of a Jury Trial; and or Sovereign Religious Practices and or Constitutional Due Process in Our Courts and or Unlawful Seizures of Our Kids, Property and Resources and Rights, yet alias “Officers of the Court” and “Others” have impeded Due Process in this Whistleblower action since 1987 or before by their taking bribes from these Defendants through various Lane/McCarthy/Bush/Grant Et Al defendants who embezzled Townsend’s resources by Omission of Truthful Disclosure and

Fraud and Deceptive Practices still ongoing as Townsend defined in his Claims. The Joint Venture (JV) Agreement of Sabal/Future signed and notarized 8/7/1987, is a binding legal document not violated by Townsend as McCarthy and Popper and Chapin directed and yet to be honored by Lane et al or McCarthy et al or Grant et al and by continued HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS AND RICO AND FRAUD ON THE COURT nor was Townsend fully paid for the services rendered. The FBCCP By-Laws are a legal contract of our members as fully recognized per Florida, F.S. 617, and members upon joining take an oath to uphold our By-Laws and Defendants (a.k.a. Masked Jeffers ET AL Deputies) must not tort same and Townsend filed a F.S. 617.022 “Recklessness” Action to recover to the fullest extent of Our Laws and Rights. To Footnote 2 of the 2/1/13, Order, the filings are notarized lawfully as for Civil and Criminal Complaints. Our contracts for services with retained lawyers, Florida Bar Members and Judges and Government Officers named herein this Amended Complaint and others as “Others DOE” as retained to uphold is to be served per the Black Law Rules and Cannons of the Florida Bar Association and American Bar Association and rules per the Judicial Qualifications Commission per their Oath to uphold our Constitutions of these United States and of Florida, the Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, Santa Rosa, Escambia, Seminole, Leon and Orange County Charters as Laws and binding contracts to protect our rights of Townsend Petitioners. Despite the unfounded 2/1/2013, opinion stated by Judges Hull, Jordan and Black, as: “Townsend’s notarized amended complaint named over 200 defendants, the vast majority of which had no obvious connection to his underlying grievances.” is not supported by: (1) Our Laws; (2) previous rulings of this court; (3) nor facts in evidence or facts stated as caused RICO actions in this or other verified affidavits, brief(s) and complaint(s) or facts admitted by “judges” and defendants themselves admitting their willful co- participation upon knowing these RICO crimes of LANE ET AL since 1987, or of facts yet to be published due to torts of this courts 2/1/13, Opinion as contradictory to the “Ineffective Services” Unpublished 2008 Opinion(s) of Judge Black and this Court En Banc related to the same named “Lawyers” and “Government Persons” now named in this action as each had and still has Mens Rea motives in collusion to damage Townsend et al per our Contract Relationship(s) and their expected rewards of Quid Pro Quo Actions and the money trail from their Superior Government Connections as

51 now exposed as the “Government Veil” Townsend alleged since the 1990”s when first learning Bruce Chapin was married to Linda Chapin, the Chair Person of the Orlando County Commission (controlling Orange County Government just like Pat Bean ET AL did control Hillsborough County Government actions against Townsend) and then with later facts learning Bruce Chapin and even the more through his Wife Linda Chapin had since on or before 1991 and has biased secret connections with the Florida Supreme Court, Florida Bar, Florida Department of Law Enforcers, Governors Chiles and “Others” (already since the 1970’s having a personal vendetta against the Townsend family as Justice William Terrell Hodges is informed) and MacKay and Hillsborough County Lawyer turned Hillsborough County Administrator Pat Bean (later fired by the Hillsborough County Commissioners for same actions of self-dealing herself County Funds and “unlawfully” fixing the Hillsborough County v. FBCCP, Eminent Domain Case as Townsend alleged as unlawful and in breach of the By-Laws by these named Beck, Nasworthy, Jeffers, Howlett, Smoak, Meister, Powell, Leatherman, Smith and “Others” in the FBCCP RUMP FACTION) and receiving “Ineffective Services” by unlawful illegal benefit from the alleged “legal counsels” (Grant, Gibbs, Gardner, Gaylord, Scruggs, Turmel, Dickinson & Gibbons, Solomon, Gray and Others Doe”) of the FBCCP and the Membership as a whole now proved by even this own courts 2008 Opinion as giving “ineffective services” to Townsend since 1987 and those for whom Townsend speaks. Despite this 2013 opinion that Defendants are not connected each, Defendant(s) since “ineffective services” lawyers Patricia McCarthy, David Popper, Charles E. Williams intentionally concealed the Charles E. Lane, Jr. ET AL, [Charles E. Lane Sr., Ed Crenshaw follow the Publix Advertising and Marketing Dollars trail], [Joe Ligori (Nova) follow the companies Townsend by the help of Bruce Chapin lost to Ligori and Lane in 1993 and since, because of or by threats of Chapin(s), Judge Powell and Lanes Publix Connections] and “Others” Named herein and “Others DOE” since 11/1987, when Townsend became the Whistle Blower to the Lanes Drug’s Uses and Extortion and Bribery, Judge Muszynski’s 1989 Orders if obeyed prove each has an ongoing motive to continue the RICO and “Other” illegal Actions still ongoing verified by HCSO illegal threats just made again for all to Townsend and his family in 11/2012 as admitted by John Grant in 11/2012, and “Others” since. McCarthy and Bondi, Ober and Bushes with U.S. Attorney Robert O’Neill and others of the DOJ and FBI’s acts are also still being revealed in their corruption by these ongoing Congressional hearing.

New evidence now fully connects the embezzled resources from Townsend via Lane et al were since 1987 and still used by Lane et al to bribe and extort “impostor” “judges” and “Government persons” through the Lane et al connections with “other Does to be named” as Third Parties and or lobbyist, as Brian Ballard, Former Florida Attorney’s General Jim Smith, the KOCH Families and Southern Strategies Group, Charles Canady Sr and Charles Canady Jr and Governors Martinez through Scott and with “others” who have been in the “Pay to Play” created by Lane et al with using lobbyist as Lane, Trohn and Gray Robinson and Southern Strategies Group and Ballard and Associates with direct ties to Jeb Bush and “Others” since 1987 directly from the Lane et al bribery and RICO. Since the 1991, meeting by Townsend with David Gibbs III, and then informing John Grant, Jeb Bush and Ken Connor since 1994, “Republicans” (Per Governor(s) Jeb Bush and his family and Gov. Charlie Crist and Gov. Rick Scott and Charles Canady Jr. and Pam Bondi with State and Federal “Others Doe” appointing and controlling “judges”, State Attorneys, Assistant State Attorneys, Florida Secretary of States, FDLE Officers, Florida Attorney’s Generals, DOJ and “Others” had and has just as much will, knowledge and reckless leverage over the defendants and has had Mens Rea Motives to privately know Townsend’s Whistle Blower information and yet at the same time deny, distract and deprive Townsend ET AL about his and others Whistle Blower facts per U.S.C. 1962 (c) against them in individually and as co-conspirators per U.S.C. 1962 (d). This 2013, Ruling of Judges Hull, Jordan and Black as Justice Black from the 2008, unpublished ruling seeming obviously to abandon and reverse himself from his 2008 finding of “ineffective counsel” as also upheld by the entire court En Banc, did not per the intent of our laws answer the Appellants Legitimate Legal Questions raised in these connected Appeal(s) and as such raises more suspicion to the claim of illegal acts Under Color Of Law to evade Constitutional Rights of Appellants to ever have Due Process, their or our first Honorable Day in any court as records are illegally obstructed. These Appeal Courts: MDL; C.F.C; C.F.C.A.; and the U.S. Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; have Jurisdiction of 18 U.S.C. 201, “Bribery of Public Officials and witnesses” by intentional “Ongoing” collusion with Pam Bondi and Jeb Bush for all the Bush FAMILY AND “Gang”, as Flowing from Lane Trohn and Gray Robinson and Ballard’s, A.G. Jim Smith and Family, John Grant and Family, Patricia McCarthy, David H. Popper, Bruce E. Chapin and his wife Linda Chapin, Governors Chiles and McKay and Crist and Scott, The Florida Supreme Court, The Orange County

Judges and Commissioners (Even Linda Chapin successor Mel Martinez), Sheriffs and Orange County City Police and FDLE and Florida Bar Members and the FBI and DOJ and HUD and Presidents 41-44 and “others DOE” intentionally as “Public Officials” conspiring to conceal the malfeasance and collusion of Popper, McCarthy and Williams, Jr. with Charles E. Lane Jr. and Sr. ET AL concealing the Future/Sabal JV Business Records directly and indirectly affected and disturbed and impeded interstate commerce even removing Townsend from his Future Marketing practices in National and International Business practices and employments and practices of Lane’s extortion and bribery practices even the use of Federal and State Funds leading to and including political campaign illegal practices and the use of HUD and Child Services funds set up for Quid Pro Quo rewards by George H.W. Bush (#41) and The Clintons and George W. Bush (#43) and Mel Martinez and “Others” using their powers and various other Federal and State Funds through various programs still used today as extortion Quid Pro Quo against Townsend by the same Gibbs III since 1991 and since 1994, Retired Senator John Grant (just 11/10/12 confessing his illegal co-participation), and then his 11/4/2015, THREAT Email shows intentional HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS with all “Persons” in the Courtroom or Connected with the Case as heard by Emmett Battles on 1/8/2016 as HCSO , Pinellas, Pasco, Santa Rosa, Escambia, Polk Sheriff’s Deputies, Jeb Bush, Ken Connor, Mel Martinez and the Chapins (Bruce, Linda, Patrick), Harrod’s (Don, Norma, Keith, Steve, Karen) the “Sect” and “Others Named in this FRAP 26.1 and Others DOE” being unlawfully bribed and rewarded by Publix Supermarkets Executives Charles E. Lane Sr. and Ed Crenshaw and “Others” to conceal their illegal practices with LANE/LIGORI/BALLARD/WILLIAMS and the KOCH’S ET AL specifically directly and indirectly meeting the Code @ 666 as stated by Del Toro to even to this day these same knowingly and intentionally conspiring extortionist Co-Participants refuse and still refuse to allow Whistle Blower Townsend by their ongoing threats, to know if his children, illegally detained from their U.S. home, (Not Germany or Cuba as traced to the BUSH GANG) church, school, father, paternal family and grandparents since September-October 1999, are alive or how Townsend can contact his own now adult children as HCSO Deputies in 3/2010 and 2012 and 2014 and at many other times acting outside their jurisdiction of Hillsborough County traveled to Sarasota County Florida as they had done in 3/2010, and did threaten Townsend to “stop filing court papers, stop trying to go to your Church at Citrus Park and stop trying to find your kids”.

Attempting to hide these illegal practices is “masked” in stating the Complaints are not “short” or “plain”(FRAP 8) or “not detailed enough”(FRAP 9) or enough fee’s have not been paid as each judge and law enforcer contradicts their own co-participants to continue their unjust enrichment and extortion in the “Pay to Play” with even the proofs of “judges” taking bribes and Quid Pro Quo benefits. Note that even the 5/10/06, over three hour session of “Judge” Marva Crenshaw conspiring and writing with “Ineffective services” and conspiring Charles Denny IV, the Malicious Prosecution Count and naming all co-participants as “Others” is even by later “judges” and “law enforcers” ignored and dismissed by multiple and illegal means as proved by this recent “void” orders of James Whittemore and the Florida Supreme Court “alias” judges who claim they “Under Color of Official Right” have jurisdiction. Quoting even from this 11th Courts cases own rulings even herein citing Salinas v. United States 522 U.S. 52 (1997) quoting on accepting RICO VIOLATIONS per (1962 (c) bribes and (1962 (d)) conspiracy and Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 646 (1946) (“And so long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other in carrying it forward.”) If conspirators to perpetrate the crime and others to provide support, the supporters are as guilty as the perpetrators. As Justice Holmes observed: “[Plainly a person may conspire for the commission of a crime by a third person.” United States v. Holte, 236 140, 144 (1915). Defendants own records show their U.S.C. 1962, and other U.S. Codes illegal actions and willful intentional admissions to conspire. Attorneys and “Others” in collusion did fraud Townsend to get the Townsend v. Lane and the false Counter Claim by Lane V. Townsend case moved from Seminole County to Orange County so Bruce Chapin and Linda Chapin and “Others” in case 89-3299 could conceal the illegal acts of all against Townsend ET AL. and as the conspiracy to continue criminal acts is still ongoing now having involved these Appellees and “Others”. Thus discovery in 5/2011, of this Robinson v. Weiland, ET AL 5D05-2380, Judge Orfinger ruling 9/1/2006, and his reversal cases in 2011 shows and proves to these average citizens as Appellants each court since Orange County in 1989 or before (State and Federal) aided and abets this still ongoing criminal RICO and Anti-Trust and others acts still concealing discovery of Lanes original and ongoing criminal acts with defendants including judges under the direct supervision and direction of Orange County Commission Chair Persons Linda Chapin(Democrat) and her successor Mel Martinez (Republican) and former business law partner with

Ken Connor and Gibbs III as legal counsel for Jeb Bush and “Others” now Defendants. It by this Courts Order of Dismissal of 2/1/13, as a reversal to their Order of 2008, as “Ineffective Services” now as proved true by other acts and admissions and confessions even of their own criminal acts is now proof that this 11th Circuit Court in earlier decisions on this LANE ET AL extended case where LANE ET AL is proved involved in ongoing RICO ACTS and as Salinas v. United States 522 U.S. 52, (1997) in acts by alias judges took or benefited from QUID PRO QUO RICO Bribes and therefore as required to recuse themselves and their earlier Orders are null and void as the Orders of Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge Charles Canady, the Order of Fifth DCA Judges in 2006, and Judge Crenshaw in 2006, and Judge Moody in 2007, show the co-participants as Lane ET AL RICO Participants and therefore this court should resolve these issues. “There is no question of general doctrine that fraud violates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments” See U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S.61, 64 (1878). “Fraud vitiates everything, and a judgment equally with a contract…”(Id. At 66, citing Wells, Res Adjudicata, Section 499).” “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot [act] beyond the power dedicated to them. If they act beyond that authority and certainly in contravention of it, their judgment and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal. Elliott v. Peirson 1 Pet. 328, 340; Old Wayne Life Ass’n v. Mc Donough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 Sup. Ct. 236; (See Valley v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co, 254 U.S. 348, 353-354 (1920). “If the underlying judgment is void, the judgment based upon it is also void.” See Austin v. Smith, 312 F.2d 337, 343 (1962). Thus concealment, omissions and frauds Under Color of Law denies due process to Townsend and Townsend ET AL. The Supreme Court in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Cool Co. Ins. 556 U.S. (2009) per Tuney v. Ohio 273 U.S. 510, 532 (1927): “Every procedure which would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judge to forget the burden of proof required to convict the defendant, or which might lead him not to hold the balance nice, clear and true between the state and the accused, denies the latter due process of law.”

And in reply to the void Order of Gerald B. TJOFLAT, Dated May 24, 2017, saying the case proving the “Frauds on the Court” per his earlier rulings is

56 now “frivolous”, Townsend notarized and filed the following and is exhibited herein: “UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APPEAL NO: 17-10795D PETITION FOR MANDAMUS: 17-10829D

RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, et al Appellants, v. JOHN GRANT, et al Appellee’s, ______/

TOWNSEND ET AL OBJECTION, REPLY AND MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE “ALLEGED” UNDER “COLOR OF LAW” LEGAL “ORDER” OF GERALD B. TJOFLAT DATED MAY 24, 2017 PER THE LETTER OF DAVID J. SMITH AS AN ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF APPELLANTS WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND APPEAL OF FSCT AND U.S. MIDDLE DISTRICT (TAMPA) AND OTHER LOWER COURTS “ORDERS” AS “VOID” “ORDERS” FOR FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICE AND OMISSION OF TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURE “ORDERS” AND AS FOR “FRAUDS ON THE COURT…”

CONCLUSION: To prove how easy this Action is to prove, to a Jury, Townsend calls, these Defendants as “persons” as Tjoflat, Whittemore, Jordon, Jorge, Canady, Bushes Jeb and #41 AND #43, Charlie Crist, Pam Bondi, Rick Scott, John Grant and estranged Karen Harrod Townsend and puts them in the “Jury Box” and through showing their own testimony in print and their own life’s actions that they must convict themselves of these Crimes and “Hate Crimes” as Townsend told since 1987. Based on the following speech by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions this Child Trafficking and Human Trafficking and Drug Trafficking and Anti- Trust, Monopolies and Attempted Murder Case and “Hobbs Act” and RICO Case and Aiding and Abetting the Enemy Case and Travel Ban Case and all issues related of this 30 year case for both Civil and Criminal Redress of Government and “Persons” must be allowed full discovery and be fully

57 heard by a Jury as Attorney General Jeff Sessions directed in this video. Jeff Sessions Child Trafficking Statement #PIZZAGATE – YouTube https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=amzsonWJNp0 These with Patricia McCarthy and her “RICO Gang” from 1987, still through “alias” “judges” et al as “Government” cannot at one time say Townsend did not prove his case or that the case was not “Frivolous” when Marva Crenshaw ruled “HATE CRIMES” on May 10, 2006 and many other times even in October 2008, allege more has to be proved that they already knew and failed to say by “FAILURE OF HONEST SERVICE’S” their duties required and then say Townsend’s claims are “Frivolous” in 2017, when these same claims are proved showing the Bias and Fraud and Deceptive Practices of their Void Orders and are claims for which their own personal testimony of his own fellow “Officers of the Court” Adalberto Jordon and Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge Jorge Labarga and Two U.S. Senators (Mel Martinez and Marco Rubio) claim they left Cuba which was operating per “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” Nazi methods controlled by the Bushes and Others in Germany and then these same Bushes and Walkers and Batista and Castro and then that is not “Due and Equal Process”. And Also they are not able to 30 years later grant themselves immunity for as LEE v. WILLINS 617 F. 2d 320 (2d Cir. 1980) falsification of evidence and coercion of perjured testimony as shown in Burns v. GCC Beverages Inc, 469 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) “in a malicious prosecution suit a presumption arises from a magistrates finding of probable cause for issuance of an arrest warrant which is conclusive, absent fraud or other corrupt means employed by the person initiating the prosecution.” as the Tjoflat void order of October 2008 did not find then against Townsend’s now proved claims that then they knew were true but concealed theirs and “Others Doe to be named” prejudice and “corrupt means” from which they have taken bribes, jobs and Quid Pro Quo even fleeing Cuba under the same Bush et al persons. As now it is proved Bush et al with: A. Lane and Lane et al since 1987, violated the Joint Venture Agreement; and B. The “Rump Faction” as Jeffers, Howlett, Corbin, Beck, Grant et al and Harrod’s and “Others” in violation of Our FBCCP 1994 Bylaws; C. Judges and “Officers of the Court” as told to Emmett Battles and all on 1/8/2016; violated Beatrice Foods and multiple other cases concealed the evidence and destroyed evidence and made grave HOBBS ACT threats that proved the actions by Lane and Lane et al and the “RUMP FACTION” were “Fraud” and “or other corrupt means…” and “Fraud on the Court” for the

Human Trafficking of Townsend and then to Townsend’s kids from Townsend even violating the Religious Society FBCCP 1994 Bylaws Due Process when since 1988, even Charles E. Lane Jr. and Charles E. Williams Jr for collusions of themselves defamed and deprived Townsend and Townsend et al and for all have been in Default and “Fraud on the Court” just as many properly served are in Default, but overturned by “alias” judges in collusion to continue their “Pay to Play” Malicious Enterprise via corrupt means they themselves fled Cuba. Using these of the Bush and Walker and KOCH et al and Bondi et al gang and even “imposter” “imported” agents placed to rule to just dismiss so they can unjustly gain more money and monopolies just continues damages for which Petitioners demand relief. There is no Statute of Limitations for their abducting of kids as they intentionally violated the 14th Amendment Due Process as even Attorneys Scruggs filed affidavit to recuse Judge Timmerman in 2003 affirmed they conspired to violate Federal and State Laws and the Church Bylaws they all refused to read and obey that protected Townsend’s and his children as Church Members Rights and even most if not all Constitutional Rights and they “impeded” production of documents and even removed records Townsend lawfully filed with the Court so they could continue “corrupt means” that even if these “Officers of the Court” were in a jury box have now admitted their own crimes verses Townsend with “Clean Hands” following the Religious Society Bylaws exposing their Intentional Breach of Contracts and Torts to said Contracts which are proved HOBBS ACT Threats and RICO. To those who know Townsend’s facts since 1987, the Fact that Pam Bondi, as a State Attorney in the same Tampa Office as Patricia McCarthy joined in 1988, and now the Florida Attorney General and now as on the President Trump Drug Task Force but continues to knowingly and intentionally oppose Townsend and his factual evidence shows that she is Obstructing Justice and illegally helping those Townsend is trying to expose by this “Redress of Government” Action against the “corrupt means” whom Lane was Trafficking with and illegally using Townsend’s and Townsend et al’s Resources and Commissions. Even her former Boss, State Attorney Harry Lee Coe (who died under very suspicious conditions alleged as a suicide) was trying to help Townsend expose crimes that Pam Bondi and State Attorney Mark Ober and now new State Attorney Andrew Warren and his Executive Assistant Maya Brown, with Sheriff David Gee and John Grant and “Others” still tries to conceal evidence just as all other Florida “alleged” Law Enforcers “impede” Facts as they let Lane and Jeffers conceal

59 documents and steal more unreported money taken from Townsend which is an ongoing HOBBS ACT THREAT per Our Laws thus continuing their appearance of “corrupt means”. Additionally, for these Defendants to for 30 years do the HOBBS ACT THREATS against Townsend and their repeated patterns to “Not Work” and “Damage His Children” and “Obstruct Evidence” and written THREATS of putting Townsend in jail for making His Proved Truths shows a “Concert of Actions” Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court and even these “persons” in other cases has said are illegal and therefore this Action is not “Frivolous”. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE v. ZALAY 522 So2d 944 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988 Rev. Denied, 531 So2d 169 (1988) “A party cannot be penalized for good faith reliance on a trial court’s ruling. When a ruling is subsequently found to be erroneous, litigant must be granted an opportunity to present their case under the correct ruling”. and since all the OFFICERS OF THE COURT on 1/8/2016 and at other times admitted they never read the JVA Contracts Lane et al Continues to Conceal and thus the monies or rights Townsend is Owed or the FBCCP BYLAWS of 1994, to know their clients alleged rights which “Good Faith” reliance on the trial court’s rulings were lawful. To now rule they don’t have jurisdiction is then FRAUD. And these acts of the Florida Supreme Court and Attorney’s Generals since Jim Smith and Governors since Bob Martinez to Jeb Bush and his Implanted Agent Rick Scott, John Grant, Pam Bondi and Charles Canady Jr and many “Others” and State Attorney’s since Harry Lee Coe and Mark Ober and Others and Sheriffs and Legislators both State and Federal since 1970’s as John Grant et al (even using Ron Beck et al and Heather Gray et al as [Lane, Trohn and Gray Robinson and David Gibbs III and “Others”] with Townsend’s estranged wife and kids) through John Harkness et al violating SCHEUER v. RHODES 416 U.S. 232 94 SCT 1683 (1974) and turning a “Willful Blind Eye” and as Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi and her Agents have been proved still ACT in TREASON as or for: RICO, ANTI- TRUST, MONOPOLIES and HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR MALUM IN SE “ODIOUS AND OUTRAGEOUS” Acts of these co=participants directly and intentionally targeting and damaging Townsend and those for whom Townsend speaks because the Bondi “Impostors” believe they are above the law and have Bush #41 and #43 and Jeb Bush Agents and Others as her friends as she had Robert O’Neill at various times in strategic places to continue their crimes. Per these cases:

A, MILLBROOKS v. U.S. 477 FED APPX 4 NO 11-10362, The Federal Tort Claims Act, “No Sovereign Immunity” for Government persons who act outside their duty. B. OCASIO v. UNITED STATES 578 U.S. (2016) L.Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions: Criminal Section 19.01 (2015) prove (1) That two or more persons entered into an unlawful agreement; (2) that petitioner knowingly and willfully became a member of the conspiracy; (3) that at least one member of the conspiracy knowingly committed at least one overt act; and (4) that the overt act was committed to further an objective of the conspiracy….”. C. SALINAS v. UNITED STATES 522 U.S. 52, 65, “A conspirator need not agree to commit the substantive offense—or even be capable of committing it –in order to be convicted. It is sufficient that the conspirator agreed to the underlying crime be committed by a member of the conspiracy capable of committing it.” Doing nothing then is also guilty. D. SAPIENZA v. KIRKLAND 154.So2d 204, “Pleading should not be stricken in its entirety as sham, if, under facts established, there is an issue upon which pleading could be good in part.” Townsend again in another Court to alleged “Officers of Our Court” on 1/8/2016, argued and proved ANDERSON v. BEATRICE FOODS Co. 127 F.R.D. I (D. Mass. 1989), Defendants unlawfully concealed relevant reports which should have been disclosed which constitutes misconduct and thus by the alleged honorable “Officers of the Court” violations of Due Process, since 1987, and including in 2016, Frauds of the 2nd DCA, 5th DCA and Florida Supreme Court and now even further co=participants frauds “Frauds on the Court” and to Townsend et al in their Motions still Ongoing even by this Document #3, Townsend and these for whom he speaks must be compensated and returned to our relationships, resources and rights illegally taken due to the Malicious Enterprises and Frauds of these violators and co=participants. Thus by these lower courts intentionally not following Due Process as a direct Mockery to rulings of their Superiors as TROXEL V. GRANVILLE, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) “The state may not interfere in child rearing decisions when a parent is available.” And since September 8, 1999, by illegal force of Sheriff Deputies Tim Jeffers, Joe Howlett, John Micheal Corbin and Mike Smoak and their co=conspirators intentionally ignore their Fiduciary Duties as Members of the FBCCP/CPCS Church/School that Townsend as their Supreme Court Member/judge was 100% Commissioned to Protect and by their frauds Falsely Imprison and Human Traffic Townsend and his children and other non-Rump members this is “Tyrannical Communistic Regime”

Crimes from which these fled Cuba using the same Bush et al criminal means and criminal monopolies for extortion even establishing Bush’s many alleged charities a.k.a. “Not For Profits” just to create more agents to provide “Black Money” stealing from kids they allege to help via Common Core which Americans now informed overwhelmingly now reject as Townsend said since 1994. And from day one being informed and intentionally illegally “Impeding” Our Contracts and Obstructing Justice by “Fraud on the Court” and Treason to conceal their own illegal acts ongoing for over 30 years, their action by this letter of June 12, 2017, is factually acting to take their right as the 5th Amendment which then invokes the jurisdiction of the Upper Courts as stated above herein. WHEREFORE, THIS ACTION, APPEAL and PETITION FOR MANDAMUS RULING is required for Our Citizens “DUE PROCESS” Constitutional Rights to restore and give us relief as “judge” Marva Crenshaw and Charles Denny IV for these Defendants affirmed basically as a Summary Judgment they wrote on May 10, 2006, as they admitted from ongoing acts of their Bush et al NAZI “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” and enforce Our Laws by Our Jury Process in an Honorable Court of Law per Our Constitutional Rights and Due Process by Our Jury and A. Prosecution to the fullest extent of Our Laws by Our Jury for these Defendants and their Co=participants; B. Restoration of Townsend and Townsend et al of our relationships, rights and resources to the fullest extent of Our Laws and awards as per “Due Process” and a Jury Trial. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this _7th through the 15th day of July, 2017, to the Multi-Jurisdictional Court (MDL) for full consideration by ALL OF the JPML Panel of Judges and to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (CDAC) and to the Court of Federal Claims (C.F.C.) and to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (C.A.F.C.)and to the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida and to Florida Supreme Court as case SC-16-1501 and to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and Clerk of the 13th Circuit Court Florida and the 5th DCA @ the 5th DCA eportal system using case Numbers 5D16-2184 as the Case 2D16-612 of and to the 2DCA and or email: to Pam Bondi et al per [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRESENTING IDENTIFICATON, WHO UPON BEING DULY SWORN AND CAUTIONED EXECUTED AND STATED IN HIS OWN WORDS AND TOOK AN OATH THAT THE STATEMENTS AND THE THINGS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF.WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS 17th DAY OF February, 2017, BY ID PRODUCED______FLORIDA DL______NOTARY PUBLIC:______DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA__ Respectfully submitted; Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the

F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and “Next Friend” of “We the People” including President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Mike Pence. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com”

ADDITIONALLY:

“IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT APPEAL CASE NO. 1D-18-4845 AS FOR DE NOVO REVIEW ASSIGNED PER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR CASES: SC18-1890; SC18-1915; SC18-1951; SC19-324; SC16-92; SC-16- 1501; SC11-41; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07-1181; SC60-95935; SC60- 95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; AND FROM LOWER COURT CASES 18-CA-2293, 2nd CIR. COURT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FROM STATE AND FEDERAL COURT CASES 8:06- CV2050T-30TGW (JUDGE J.MOODY. JR):TO “JUDGE EK; TO 16-CV- 3299-EAK-MAP (JUDGE J.W.) TOWNSEND V. GRANT ET AL; AS- F.S.: 86 DECLARATORY; F.S. 80- QUO WARRANTO; ORGANIZED CRIME(S); F.R.O.C.P. 1.530 AND 1.540; FEDERAL HOBBS ACT; RICO; FLORIDA AND FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS; 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 ACTS AS BEGAN AS 88-2554,18th CIR. SEMINOLE COUNTY FL. AS- RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUAL AND AS F.S. 80.02 AS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS “Private Attorney’s General” RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, State of Florida, EX REL, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, F.S. 617.0834, AND “Next Friend” ET AL, Appellant, Plaintiff’s/Counter Defendant, Petitioner(s), V. CHARLES E. LANE JR. AS CHARLES E. LANE JR. ET AL AS WITH BUSH ET AL; PATRICIA MCCARTHY; POPPER; CHAPIN(S); WILLIAMS JR. ET AL; SCRUGGS, AS GRAY ET AL; AS GRANT ET AL AS “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” AND NAMED INCLUDING: DETZNER, SMITH; ERTEL; LEE; FLORIDA SEC. OF STATE ET AL, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND AGENTS ET AL 2019-1980’S; FLORIDA ATTORNEY’S GENERALS MOODY-BONDI THRU SMITH;

FLORIDA GOVERNORS DESANTIS, SCOTT, TO GRAHAM; FLORIDA LEGISLATORS JOHN GRANT ET AL; SHERIFFS; AND OTHERS AS “ALL OFFICIALLY AND/OR “AS “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR- PERSONS-INDIVIDUALS”AS IN F.R.A.P. EXHIBITS AS Appellees and AS Counter Plaintiffs ET AL______/

TOWNSEND REPLY/MOTION(S) TO “VOID” FRAUD “PCA” 6/17/20

COMES NOW AGAIN TOWNSEND a.k.a. “The Church Guy” as named by the people/clerks of the 13th Circuit (2004) as from 1987 AS: PRIVATE CITIZEN “WHISTLEBLOWER”; PER F.S. 80.02; F.S. 86; AS “WE THE PEOPLE”; “NEXT FRIEND” PER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871, AS “PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL”; AND SINCE 1993 AS F.S. 617.0834, FBCCP/CPCS BY-LAWS AND OWNER MEMBERS REPRESENTITIVE AS VICTIM DEFENDANTS; AS ACTING PER 18 U.S.C. 241 AND 18 U.S.C. 242, FOR PROTECTING FROM TORTS BY BUSH TCR ET AL AS “RUMP FACTIONS”, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, KOCH LIBERTARIANS OR TEA PARTY AND OR “OTHERS” TO OUR: CONSTITUTION(S); CONTRACTS; VOTING; CIVIL RIGHTS; RELIGIOUS RIGHTS; PARENTAL RIGHTS; COMMERCE; AND THE INTEGRITY AND DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE OF OUR COURT(S) AS REPLY TO THE RICO, 18 U.S.C. 2382-TREASON AND COMMON CORE CULT “FLIP-FLOP” “TCR” WHO IN OPEN COURT(S) AND CHURCHES BY THEIR PROPHESIED CRIMINAL AND ADMITTED ABDUCTIONS AND “HATE CRIMES” BY THEIR F.S.104 “DICTATOTSHIP” ACTS THEY OPENLY DO AS: “WANTING THEIR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO”; FOR ALL POWER AND THEY OPENLY VIOLATE WITH INTENTIOINAL TORTS TO/OF

“ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER” IN COURTS AND CHURCH(S); AS THEIR “RULES OF A.G. BUTTERWORTH PANCAKES AND TRUMPS THEIR “TWO-TIER” GRANT(S)-MOODY’S-BONDI-SMITH/PATEL AND BUSH(S)-KOCH’S-SCOTTS-CANADAY’S-MOODY’S-LEE’S- AND “OTHERS DOE-SMITH-DETZNER-NEWHALL-CAMPBELLS- LANE ET AL TO BE NAMED” ET AL “PREDICATE ACT(S)” AS A “RANKIN ID.” “RUMP FACTION” IN AND FOR TREASON PER F.S. 104. 051- F.S. 104.091 are equal and admitted CO=PARTICIPANTS AS TOWNSEND IS THE CANDIDATE AND WHISTLEBLOWER ABOUT THEIR OLIGARCHS AND DEEP STATE AS THE LANE-BUSH- BUTT’S-KOCH’S ET AL “TCR” ET AL SINCE 11/18/1987 and Files this: A. Motion to Strike; and B. Motion for Sanctions; and C. Motion for Arrest Warrants; and D. Motion for Disclosure and Discovery; and E. Motion for Oral Arguments; and required Motions En Banc to as And Reply’s to the Wolf’s et al “Void” but Criminal Order and States: INTRODUCTION 1. Per and having met per “Due Process” and Conditions Precedent per our Rules of Law, as their Superior “Judges” and the “Bush et al Code Red” Co=Conspirators have already admitted their prior FSCT “PCA” and Other “Void” and Fraudulent “Impeding” of “Due Process” was done for “Fraud on the Court” and the “BUSH Et Al RICO”, this 6/17/2020, 1st DCA “Wolf et al” action is more of Knowingly, Willful, Intentional, and Reckless Admitted Guilt to their “Predicate Act” Crime(s) as of Lane et al “Detzner- Lee…And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants” and “Others Doe to be Named” (18-CA2293,-88-2554 Action) as the same crimes of as these Defendants affirmed doing another illegal “delay crime for Malicious Prosecution” and “Hate Crimes” by this “1st DCA, PCA” for: F.S. 843, Obstruction-Conspiracy-Fraud-Human Trafficking; “Fraud on the Court”; “Extrinsic Fraud” and “Unjust Enrichment”. 2. Admission and Guilt of these RICO Crimes is established as and by the FSCT in ruling SC60-86-918 by Lane-Williams-Canady’s-Campbells- Bush-Chiles-Smiths-Grant(s)-Scotts-Roberts and (Fraps 1-3) the “TCR” et al with as Canady and Labarga Orders affirmed the: Federal Middle District of Florida; 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Atlanta; 2nd DCA; 13th Circuit; 5th DCA; the 9th Circuit; as from 88-2554, 18th Circuit; as proved for their RICO “TCR” Fraud(s) as connected and proved and by “judge” Gievers affirmed 2/7/2019, in the hearing. 3. The F.S. 104 “Voter Protection Act” applies to “Wolf’s-Gievers- Cooper et al” Barr, FSCT and “Detzner (Now Lee)…And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants” et al and now “Others Doe to be Named” as

“Wolf’s et al” for the “Bush Code Red” continues violating “Due Process” and Townsend and those for whom Townsend as “Private Attorney’s General” speaks as follows: “F.S.104.045 Vote Selling (1)… & (2)… as 3rd Degree Felonies;” Their Pay to Play against Townsend either shut up about the Lane et al crimes or experience the “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” as this Action and as more evidence they have still illegally concealed does prove their “Obstruction of Justice, Due Process, VOTE and Rights”. “…F.S. 104.051 Violations; neglect of duty; corrupt practices. (1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be excluded from the polls….” “…And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants” et al Government who since 1980’s: “Breached” their Contract(s) with Townsend; and Townsend et al; and “Targeted” and “Vetted” and “Impeded” Townsend; and presented a ballot with no blank line; and thus they are barred from being bonded at all and thus cannot serve to certify any duty and or election of their “Ocasio id.” and “F.S.104.091 Aiding, abetting, advising, or conspiring (18-2293, Count V) in violation of the code.--(1) Any…” as “Wolf’s et al” co=conspirator’s as the “Others Doe” continue. “…(2) Any official who willfully refuses or willfully neglects to perform his or her duties as prescribed by this election code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree,…” (3) Any official who performs his or her duty as prescribed by this election code fraudulently or corruptly is guilty of a felony of the third degree,…” (4) Any supervisor, deputy supervisor, or election employee who attempts to influence or interfere with any elector voting a ballot commits a felony of the third degree,…” F.S. 104.0515 Voting rights; deprivation of, or interference with, prohibited; penalty… (1) All citizens of this state who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in this state… shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections without distinction according to race, color, or previous condition of servitude, notwithstanding any law, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage to the contrary. (2) No person acting under color of law shall; (a) In determining whether any individual is qualified under law to vote in any election , apply any standards, practices, or procedures applied under law to other individuals within the same political subdivisions who have been found to be qualified to vote; or

(b) Deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application; registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under law to vote in such election. This paragraph shall apply to absentee ballots only if there is a pattern or history of discrimination on the bases of race, color, or previous condition of servitude in regard to absentee ballots. (2) No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten , or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or not to vote as that person may choose, or for the purpose of causing such other person to vote for, or not vote for, any candidate for any office at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate. (3) No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, and no standard, practice, or procedure, shall be imposed or applied by any political subdivision of this state to deny or abridge the right of any citizen to vote on account of race or color. (4) Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a felony of the third degree…” F.S. 104.061 Corruptly influencing voting.—(1) Who ever by bribery, menace, threat, or other corruption whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, attempts to influence, deceive, or deter any elector in voting or interferes with him or her in the free exercise of the elector’s right to vote at any election commits a felony….(2) No person shall directly or indirectly give or promise anything of value to another intending thereby to buy that person’s or another’s vote or to corruptly influence that person or another in casting his or her vote…” F.S.104.0615 Voter intimidation or suppression prohibited; criminal penalties.—(1) This section may be cited as the “Voter Protection Act.” (2) A person may not directly or indirectly use or threaten to use force, violence, or intimidation or any tactic of coercion or intimidation to induce or compel an individual to: (a) Vote or refrain from voting; (b) Vote or refrain from voting for any particular individual or ballot measure; (c) Refrain from registering to vote; or (d) Refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher. (3) A person may not knowingly use false information to: (a) challenge an individual’s right to vote; (b) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from voting or registering to vote; or (c) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher; (4) A person may not

68 knowingly destroy, mutilate or deface a voter registration form or election ballot or obstruct or delay of a voter registration form or election ballot…. F.S 104.0616 Absentee ballots, and voting: violations. … F.S.104.071 Remuneration by candidate for services, support, etc.; penalty.- --Insert here in full}… F.S.104.081 Threats of employers to control votes of employees. It is unlawful for any person having one or more persons in his or her service as employees to discharge or threaten to discharge any employee on his or her service for voting or not voting in any election, state, county, or municipal, for any candidate or measure submitted to a vote of the people, … F.S.104.091 Aiding, abetting, advising, or conspiring in violation of the code.--(1) Any person who knowingly aids, abets, or advises the violation of this code shall be punished in like manner as the principal offender. (2) Any person who agrees, conspires, combines, or confederates with another person to commit a violation of this code shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation. (Any person who knows a felony violation of this code and gives any aid to the offender who has violated this code, with intent that the offender avoid or escape detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation. This subsection does not prohibit a member of the Florida Bar from giving legal advice to a client….” F.S. 104.11 Neglect of duty by Sheriff or other officer .—Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, or other officer who willfully neglects or willfully refuses to perform his or her duties relating to elections is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.”

And as these Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” “Predicate Acts” are admitted by themselves as RICO “Unjust Enrichment” Crimes as stated herein and prohibits “any “person” to violate Townsend since 1987 and before and or any “person” for whom Townsend speaks since 1987, as these same Lane-Bush-Gates et al “Common Core” “TCR” continue acts of the same patterns of their “Predicate Acts” as evident in this video https://www.facebook.com/100000817948625/posts/3117444748292759/?d =n and https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/27/anthony-fauci-should- explain-37-million-wuhan-labo/ per Ocasio id. connecting each defendant to these crimes “Impeding” Townsends prosecution of these Lane-Bush-Gates-Moody’s Common Core as “And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants” that Lane et al stole Townsend’s rights, resources and relationships to serve their “Pay to Play”.

4. Whereas as “judge” Cooper for Cause did recuse himself, this 18- CA2293 Action was alleged to be reassigned to “judge” Gievers, as even she questioned “jurisdiction” due to the FSCT and 1 DCA Actions, and who in Open Court heard their admissions to crimes and “Fraud on the Court” by Defendants and Defendants Attorney’s Generals and “And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants” Counsel and thus upon their admitted Crimes, “judge” Gievers, falsely promised to lawfully perform and take Jenkins id. jurisdiction and review of all crimes as Townsend has litigated since 1987, as not yet allowed our “Fair Day in Court” per proper Due and Equal Process and Discovery and recovery of our stolen resources still being unlawfully taken by these same co=conspirators Lane pays. 5. Whereas A.G.’s Agents Newhall et al and for Defendants in “Open Court” and as Pam Bondi in the Trump impeachment action aligned their Hunter Biden Acts as Human Trafficking for “Unjust Enrichment” by F.S. 99 and F.S. 104 Conspired Treason “TCR” RICO ACTS and as even concealment of “murders” and other “Crimes” and now COVID19 the fraud and these conspire to Not to be adjudicated as Townsend in the Action 2018CA2293, writes “Torts” these “TCR” McCarthy-Canady’s (Senior and “judge” Jr.) –Bush(s)-“judge” Crenshaw/Denny IV-Grant’s-Scruggs-Gray- Ober-Warren-Moody’s (“judge James & Ashley B. Moody), Campbell’s- Newhall-Patel-Roberts et al Defendants ignore thus requiring Jenkins id De Novo review and “Honest Services” by Defendants since 11/18/1987, consolidated Actions; and by Moody’s and “judge(s)” Muszynski-All “Judges”-Powell-Crenshaw-Canady-Labarga-11th Cir.-Cooper-Gievers- 1st DCA per lawful “Due Process” as an “order”: https://edca.1dca.org/eOrder.aspx?id=81936-354711-4200850-260194 is from “Unconstitutional” Under Color of Law” and “Fraud” of “Official Right”. 6. “Wolf’s et al” by this “PCA” “Conspire” and “Impede” for Lane(s)- Bush’s-Koch(s)-Gates-Roberts-Canady’s-Smiths-Detzner-Grants-Bondi- Moody-Lee et al “Impostors” James Wolf (of Defendant Governor Martinez), L. Clayton Roberts (Of Defendant Governor Crist), and Thomas Winokur (Of Defendant Governor Scott) and tolerated by their 1st DCA Chief Judges Bradford Thomas (Of Defendant Jeb Bush [in Default]) and Judy Ray (Of Defendant Governor Scott) and their admitted Guilty co=conspirators Governors now as Ron Desantis who fails to follow Florida Law and U.S. Constitutional Rights and Laws (who even appointed them to this 1st DCA) who have seen and or used the illegal ballots in their plotted crime thus violating F.S. 104 by “…All As Officially and Individually,

Defendants”, since the 1980’s (Exhibits filed 2/7/201, shows Geivers and Koch) and know of the illegal state requirements to be a Florida Attorney’s General and or “Lawful Candidate” of same and the illegal “vetting” and thefts and “failure of honest services” to “impede” Townsend since 1987, by these co=conspirators and or “impeding” any others from using the required F.S. 99.061(4)(b) “”Blank Space” are another “Void” not “Voidable” Order for their “Pay to Play” RICO “Nobility’s” “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” and for Treason as their co=conspirators and co=participants have confessed their as “Next Door Neighbor” without immunity criminal acts even in “Open Court(s)” to violate “Due Process”. 7. As Patricia McCarthy-Popper-Chapin-Denny IV (in Court 5/10/06 & 2/16) -Muszynski-Powell-Canady et al with Lane-Williams-Bush(s)-Chiles- Canady’s-Chapin’s –Moody’s- Wolf’s et al (Conspire-Count V) by this “PCA” act to conceal their crimes from prosecution as even “judge” Gievers admitted in court 2/7/2019 and even to remove other Civil Right(s) as of an Organic Right of Our “We the People” “Free Will” Vote and or use our “Jury” F.S. 80.02 Process to protect “We the People” from these “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” continuing the “Bush Code Red” still ongoing. 8. “We the People” as victims per “Due Process” exercise our F.S. 80.02 “Redress of Government” Organic Right and this does not give any “judge” the Right to Obstruct “We the People” in our pursuit of restoration from these Defendants and their Co=Conspirators who have admitted “Guilt” even in Open Court to these Crimes Townsend has legally exposed since 11/18/1987, as still victims of ongoing conspired RICO Covert acts. 9. These Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” and now these “Wolf’s et al “judges” are bound [and have no immunity from Torts as they say “No one is above the law”] by Contracts to not “Breach” and or violate their 4 U.S.C. 1986 duty per the Civil Rights Act of 1871 and even our Government Servants are required in order to secure their Bond paid for by Townsend et al as Citizens bound per our Constitutions are required to Obey their Oaths taken before taking their Office and Duties of Service as the Attorney’s General Bob Butterworths ruling required and as stated in HINES id. as per Count Six of 2018CA2293. 10. This 1st DCA “Void” Order is for “Fraud on the Court” and for “Extrinsic Fraud” on Townsend and Townsend et al as it fails to determine the Constitutionality of “Due Process” and “Equal Process” of these RICO issues as Townsend since 11/18/1987, raised as to qualifications of: A. “Who” gains unlawful “Pay to Play” “Unjust Enrichment” by the Lane et al Torts (For Cocaine, Koch, Epstein, Dimond, Roberts, Bush(s), Barr, Smiths, Grant(s), Bondi, Moody’s, Wolf’s and theft of Townsend’s

Rights, Resources and Relationships because Townsend refuses to participate in their Criminal Acts and “Hate Crimes” as does still the “Bush Code Red” TCR Gang of Lane-Bondi-Moody-Wolf’s et al; B. “Who” has filed and benefited by “False Claims”; C. Restoring Restitution by “Due Process” to Townsend and Townsend et al as “whistle blower” “victims” or Rights, Resources and Relationships without further Fear and their Threats to our Liberty; D. The issue that per F.S. 119.071, Townsend did not have to file the “forms” if any at all, that the “Elections Bureau” determined were missing which they had no right to question in June. E. What Forms if any was Townsend required to file at any time; F. The issue that “any” “Write-in” would have to file any forms prior to after the “Second Tuesday after the First Monday in November” in order to be “qualified” by “We the People” of our “Free Will” protected rights of Free Speech by “Voting” to “Redress” and or to have “respondent superior” authority of and over our Government Persons as “Elected” and or as the Elected persons appointed Agents operating under Elected Officials outside Our Laws; G. Per F.S. 104. The crimes of deputies and others “not protecting” an Organic Right to vote when the law clearly states “No Official Right” to impede a voter whereby just doing a “PCA” even this 1st DCA, continues violations of F.S. 104 and related RICO of the “Bush Code Red” as agents. H. Adjudicating “justice to the fullest extent of the law” to these Lane-Wolf’s et al who have in “Open Court” admitted to crimes as directed by the “TCR” “Bush Code Red”; I. Determining Of the Greatest Importance our 14th Amendment Equal and Protection Rights and other Civil Rights of Townsend and Townsend et al as “Victims” from the Constitutionally illegal “RICO” and “HOBBS ACT” Threats for Human Trafficking used by the Lane-Wolf’s Et al as to their intentional and reckless violations of: 1.) the “Voter Protection ACT” F.S. 104 and F.S. 99 process; 2.) Their alleged required “State/state” qualifications of a “Florida General of the Attorneys” to be a “member of the bar” and or for any period of time or age as these “threats” to Townsend by the “Nobility” “Elections Bureau” and the direct 1994 threats to Townsend by the “Florida Bar” since 1994 and their Co=Conspirators shows their RICO/HOBBS Crimes; 3.) The alleged right of the “Elections Bureau” and their co=conspirators to “illegally Vet” in violation of F.S. 99; 4.) The alleged right of the “Elections Bureau” and their

72 co=conspirators to “illegally” remove the “Blank Line” as they “Fraud” the November Ballots with have the “Blank Line”; 5.) The alleged right of the “Elections Bureau” and their co=conspirators to “illegally” change the “qualification” by “Write in” to June and not as required “the second Tuesday after the first Monday in November”; As these “qualification(s)” of Rights are as “Redress of Government” and “Others” crimes as litigated by Townsend since 11/18/1999, and using the F.S. 86 Process yet to be followed or determined by our Laws; 11. AS THIS MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC IS PER JENKINS ID. ON RICO is As to the F. R. App. P. 9.331 En Banc, these matters and issues are “of exceptional importance or that such consideration is necessary to maintain uniformity in the court’s decisions.” The FSCT admitting their F.S. 38, crimes and guilt of “Unjust Enrichment” since the 1980’s and before by their RICO and HOBBS Act Crimes sent these 88-2554, 18th Cir. Consolidated Actions as their RICO Patterns requiring Mandamus Rulings by an “Honest Service” Court into 18- 2293 and 18-4845, to the 1st DCA by Criminal Acts of Clerk Tomasino and “Others” from SC18-1890, SC18-1915, SC-1951 and 19-324 as the FSCT affirms their RICO Crimes done from SC-60-86-918 for the Lane-Bush-Canady’s-Roberts-Moody et al RICO. 12. As this June 17, 2020 1st DCA is a “void” “Order”, Townsend however sees this as a directive to the “Court” for “Due Process” as said to “Honest Officers of the Court” to follow F.R. App. P. 9.330 and 9.331 to adjudicate per “Due Process” and follow the law(s) requiring: A. MOTION FOR REHEARING AND EN BANC RULING of all F.S. 86 issues of Law and Fact and Discovery as told to Patricia McCarthy et al and allegedly lawfully ruled by “judges” since “Judge Muszynski” who with new evidence as admitted by the Canady’s et al FSCT, Governors and “Others” acted to continue these admitted RICO and HOBBS ACT Crimes ongoing still; B. A Motion for Clarification by the 1st DCA En banc, as to how these actions of Defendants are within Our Equal Protection of Rights when even their “Superior” “judges” and “Others” have confessed these their actions are “TCR” RICO and HOBBS ACT crimes in “Open Court” and even on the floor of Congress in “Impeachment” Trials for from which they fled Spain and Cuba to come to be protected by our U.S. Constitution and Florida Constitution and Laws. C. A Motion for Certification of these qualifications and issues is required by the 1st DCA, and En Banc, to per F.S. 80.02, be litigated in

73 our “Open Court” by our jury (Grand Jury, Criminal Court Jury and Civil Jury” process as these defendants have ruled the “PCA” in this Action is for “Fraud on the Court” to continue their Crimes. D. A Motion for Written Opinion En Banc is “required by law” by the 1st DCA, per F.S. 38 and Rules of Professional and Judicial Procedure and by “Citizens as Respondent Superior” over these by Contracts “Lane…AND ALL AS OFFICIALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS” to openly show each BUSH ET AL “judge” and or their agent is not being “unjustly enriched” and has a lawful “Official Right” to violate: F.S. 104; their Oath’s to our Contracts and our Constitution(s); and their Bonds; while ignoring these by their admitted “Torts” violated laws as stated since 1987 and removing Townsend’s and those for whom he speaks (over 13 million just in the 2018 November Vote) rights to vote as a “Redress of Government” admitted their Crimes. The Case argued to the Court of Appeals by these Defendant Attorney’s Generals for their Co=Conspirators regarding who as Republican and or Democrat should be listed first on a ballot shows the: “State of Mind”; “The Motives”; “The Intent”; and “The Means”; of the BUSH CODE RED co=conspirators to “illegally impede” by “Human Trafficking” against ones “Free Will” a “Non-Party” voter and or a “Write in” by not having a “Blank Line” for which to cast their “Free Will” Vote. The “PCA” is “Fraud on the Court” as admitted “taking the Fifth” as for their “Bush Code Red” to continue their crimes. III. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION, EN BANC As stated herein and below and in this Action file since 11/18/1987, the Clerks and these Officers of the Court had and have a legal duty to do Truthful Evidence and not per their Oaths advance RICO Crimes using “Fruit from the Poisoned Bushs” who have openly admitted their BUSH Code Red New World Order Motives and “Predicate Acts” for RICO. A. This 1st DCA now having jurisdiction sent down from the FSCT because of “judge Canady’s and judge Labarga’s” admission of the guilt of the FSCT and “Others” in this Townsend Action and of their personal and “Official” co=conspiracy to: “Illegally conceal “Fraud on the Court” by their prior “judges” and “officers of the Court”; and to “obstruct” Townsend personally and professionally; and as a “F.S. 617.0834 Religious Society Member”; and since the 1980’s and before of his civil rights of use of the Statewide “Blank Line” issues; is relevant to the Counties of Florida Election Bureaus claiming a right

74 to also omit a “Blank Line” barring citizens “Free Will” and Organic Right to Vote as was done in specifically targeted Hillsborough County in 2018 verses the “Blank Space” provided in the vote for Sheriff in 2014 and or in 2020. B. The issues of the illegal requirements of a candidate for Florida Attorney General verses the Action ¶6 Sims v. Aherns 271 S.W. 720 (1925) and Action ¶7 Schware v. Board of Examiners 353 U.S. 238, 239 “The Practice of Law cannot be licensed by the state/State/”. C. Qui Tam charges for the Federal And State of Florida False Claims made by Defendants and “Others Doe to be named” who did frauds violating their bonds and those per F.S. 104 did crimes which barred them from being paid for services that they did not render and or could not do as a matter of law. 13. The U.S. Constitution protects Townsend et al’s rights states per The Fourteenth Amendment and The Tenth Amendment and The Bill of Rights per the founders had to be added to the U.S. Constitution or the States Founding Fathers stated they would not sign and join into the Constitution until the Bill of Rights was attached so to protect and govern all for the protection of all the five Organic basic Rights equally and freely v. 4th amendment 14. The June 17, 2020, ruling of “alias judges” as “Affirmed” is void as a Matter of law per Marbury v. Madison as the “judges” have no right to: a. remove an Organic Constitutional Right from Townsend et al victims; and as ruled Obstruction of Justice based on the prior rulings admitted crimes in this Action since 11/18/1987. 15. This 18-CA-2293 Continued Action at Paragraph 8, and in the attached exhibits and court papers to be included since 1987, in the records of this continued action clearly proved shows this 1st DCA, FSCT, Gievers, Cooper and “Others” Actions as continued “Bush Code Red” Crimes even they openly admit in Courts and on the Floor of Congress. 16. The rulings of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Judge John Roberts in Bush v. Gore said all votes should count and even in the “Impeachment Trial of Donald J. Trump, John Roberts and Pam Bondi and “Others” stated “no one is above the law” even and especially violating F.S. 104 as these have openly admitted. 17. The arguments of the Florida Attorney’s Generals for decades allege all votes should count yet their “Bush Code Red” actions show “Unjust Enrichment” by Torts and “Hate Crimes” Townsend has exposed and as in this Moody’s et al recent action further proved their knowledge of the Vote advantage by whom may be listed first on the ballot so surly their wisdom

75 shows their understanding that “NO Blank Line” made an Unequal and “impeding” and disadvantage impossible vote by someone opposing Republican and or Democrat or Others who since the 1980’s and before using “Nobility” to conduct crimes. 18. The Civil Rights Act of 1871and 4 U.S.C. 1986, requires the Courts and Townsend [even against “Impostor” “Officers of the Court”] to continue this F.S. 80.02 since 11/18/1987 Action as the action by “alias” “imposters” as the FSCT and the Clerks and the 1st DCA and the “judges” [Wolf’s] and their co=conspirators and co=participants even the served defendant “Governors” who appointed these “judges” continues the: “Hate Crimes”; Tort(s); and Fraud(s) as in the Action 88-2552 through 18-4845 1st DCA the combined Action(s) SC-60-86-918 [who admitted their use of PCA was for Fraud and Obstruction of Justice] from the Florida Supreme Court Actions as their Admitting their Guilt Fraud(s) On the Court(s) illegally using their “Official Right Under Color of Law” to do Fraud(s) and continue Torts as the 5th DCA ruled in ROBINSON id. regarding Townsend v. Lane, for their Lane et al RICO to “illegally impede” Townsend for their “Nobility” for Unjust Enrichment just as Count One in 2018CA2293 litigates as proved even more. The 5th DCA Ruling thus showed that the FSCT using Per Curium Affirmed in this case was for illegal abuse of process and illegal commerce for their Lane et al Torts for Unjust Enrichment as the arguments of Patricia McCarthy, David Popper, Bruce Chapin, Gregory Presnell and Marva Crenshaw and Charles Denny IV and James Moody Jr. and even Charles Canady Jr. admitted by their knowledge of this action. 19. F.S. 104 is violated by all defendants and now even by “Others Doe to be Named” as by these 1st DCA “judges” Wolf et al “interference” “impeding” Due Process as they by allowing “No Blank Line” to damage write-in candidates and or all voters and thus are illegally “vetting” and violating Our Organic Civil Rights. 20. As Patricia McCarthy in conspiracy with Charles E. Lane Jr. et al and Charles E. Williams Jr. et al (thus his law associates Canady Jr. Campbell etc) and David H. Popper and Bruce E. Chapin with “judge” Rom Powell and “Others” advised Townsend: “not to work” and “cannot be paid by Lane or the Clients and or “know how to separate the Clients” until Lane et al complied with the at least four Orders to Produce Granted by Judge Muszynski which was never lawfully done or they alleged it was a breach of the August 7, 1987 Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) by Townsend --so to must be the answer that these same persons use the collusion with their Government Positions to use these Elections Bureau “persons” to do their illegal actions to “impede” Townsend working as “General of the

Attorney’s” to protect his and those for whom Townsend speaks of all our Constitutional Rights since 1987 and before, these same “persons” as Ocasio id. and F.S. 104. which bonds all as co=conspirators as continuing their criminal acts unless the “Wolf’s et al” operate per their Constitutional Duty. 21. By the guilty admissions of these Defendants (as Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge Canady Jr., and as Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge Jorge Labarga, The 5th DCA ruling in Robinson id, Federal Judge James Moody Jr. on March 15, 2007, Marva Crenshaw and Charles Denny IV on May 10, 2006, admitting “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” still not stopped, and even the affirmation by Timothy Newhall in the Court of Karen Gievers, as attorney for all defendants and their co=participants, in the open court on 2/7/2019, A.G. Newhall said, I guess this could be Human Trafficking, in this Action Record, these Defendants and “Others Doe to be named” are by their own “Guilty” confessions are 100% “ESTOPPED” from any and all defenses and as the Ballots with “No Blank Line” are in the Evidence prove their RICO and Criminal Acts that have no defense per F.S. 104. 22. As in the United States v. Michael T. Flynn case, no: 17-cr- 00232(EGS) District of Columbia, Washington D.C. the following “Due Process” is established: A. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan is advised his duty is to be the referee of the case and not the prosecution nor the defense. Nor was it “Due Process” for the “judge” to obtain counsel that promoted a violation of “Due Process” with or for “Fruit from the poisoned Tree/Bush for a “Fraud on the Court” just as these since McCarthy et al do in this 1987 Action. 23. Therefore, NO “judge” has the authority per F.S. 80.02, to dismiss Townsend’s Action as Townsend and Townsend et al have no other remedy at law but to proceed for prosecution based on Defendant’s “Guilty” admissions in Open Court with multiple witnesses thus to continue “Due Process” per the “Jury Process” demanded since 11/18/1987, to protect the rights of Townsend and his family, Church/School “Not for Profit” and his clients and citizens as “We the People” and dismissal is “clearly contrary to manifest public interest” United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. as not being able to have the “Blank Line” does violate Our Organic Right to “Free Will” “Vote” as a Constitutional Form of our Self-Governing Right to be Respondent Superior over our Honestly elected persons to do “Honest Services” and not Obstruct our Judicial Process and Rights of Redress of Government who colluded to steal Townsend’s rights, resources and relationships by their “Nobility” “Pay to Play” via Lane et al since 11/18/1987; B. No “judge” has the authority to retain outside counsel and or

“agents” to with them as co=conspirators do “Fraud on the Court” and or “Extrinsic Fraud” to use the Court to continue Unlawful acts as in this Action since 1987 showed and proved and they admitted are for RICO and “Treason” or it is a violation of their Professional Services, Oath and Bond. C. The rulings of Marva Crenshaw, Federal Judge James Moody Jr., Charles Canady Jr., and Jorge Labarga and the Fifth DCA have already affirmed in their Orders and confessions that the “Per Curium Affirmed” ruling by the Florida Supreme Court in this Townsend v. Lane et al action was an act for Fraud and for Malicious Prosecution to allow their Lane, Bush, Canady’s, Chiles, Chapin’s, Koch’s, Epstein’s, Walker’s, Jamie Dimond, John Roberts, Crenshaw’s and “Others” RICO “TCR” Criminal Enterprise to continue. D. Townsend has met the threshold, to protect us from “Hate Crimes” and their Malicious Enterprise “TCR” of (1) there are no other adequate ways to safeguard the party’s rights; {Defendants admit guilt and damage by their crimes} (2) the argument for mandamus are beyond dispute; {by Defendants Crimes, restitution of rights and resources and relationships are required by law and defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” are to be restrained} and (3) granting the writ is “appropriate under the circumstances” as {defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” have no authority to: A. “vet a Write in Person; B. certify any election; C. Participate in the election process; D. Obtain such or any office due to their “fraud” and other crimes; E. Obtain any Bond as their duty of their said office does require; F. receive by their “False Claims of or for Services not rendered” any compensation; G. not pay restitution of money received illegally from false claims, State and Federal; H. not pay restitution for damages to the fullest extent of the law to Townsend and those for whom Townsend speaks; I. As each “BUSH CODE RED TCR” MUST be subjected to the full extent of penalty of the law per our jury verdict(s). 24. Therefore “judges” [Wolf’s et al], have no Constitutional and or other authority to dismiss this F.S. 80.02 action as Townsend as the Prosecutor per the Civil Rights Act of 1871 as acting as the “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” Redressing Governments illegal acts confessed seeks 18 U.S.C. 241 and 18 U.S.C. 242 and §1983 “Due Process” by and of the “Jury Trial” process to determine damages as this Wolf’s Action is just additional Constitutionally Criminal Actions to continue RICO crimes of Lane et al. 25. The U.S. Constitution Article III. Section 3. Speaks to the issue of Treason and the actions as done by Defendants and Others Doe to be Named by violations per their RICO Agenda of thefts, “impede jury”; “impede Due Process” as shown and proved and admitted in this Action have “Damaged

America” and are “Damages illegally to our Constitutional Rights” and specifically targeted Townsend and Townsend et al as admitted by their “Hate Crimes” and “torts” (Complaint in Count I-VI, and Petition for Mandamus and the “Facts for the Election of Randall Townsend…”) for “unjust enrichment”. 26. The Florida Constitution affirms the Fourteenth Amendment and all other protections of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights and Defendants and “Others” for their “Bond’s” of “Official Right” take their “Oaths” to same. 27. The Florida Statutes 80.02, Redress of Government action may not be dismissed…by these Lane et al co=conspirators unless Townsend consents. 28. The Florida Statute 86, required for “Redress of Government” “We the People” protect and seek to restore our Civil Rights and our stolen resources and relationships. 29. The Florida Statutes 38, requires a “judge” for the appearance of “unjust enrichment” to recuse one’s self. 30. The F.S. 843 Obstruction of Justice, details these patterns of RICO of these now “Wolf’s et al” seeking to violate Organic Rights for their “Unjust Enrichment”. 31. The “Nobility” “Pay to Play” collusion for RICO and “HATE CRIMES” to give “unjust enrichment” for themselves and their acts shows and proves their intentional motives, knowledge, intents and violation of F.S. 99.061.(4)(b) and thus by “No Blank Line” the Elections Bureau and their co=conspirators are illegally “Vetting” in any time prior to the “second Tuesday after the first Monday in November” against any and all “persons” who have the Organic Constitutional Right to be elected by the “Write In” vote of the “We the People”. 32. These “judges” [Wolf’s et al], are in violation of the HOBBS Act 18 U.S.C 2403 EXTORTION BY FORCE, VIOLENCE, OR FEAR as and (include law especially Count V. Collusion) is being done since 11/18/1987, by Lane et al in this Action . 33. F.S. 104 which allows “No Official Right” and or “No under color of law” “immunity” to any “person” and or “government person” to violate any citizens right to: vote; run for office; run for office using the “Write in” guaranteed “Blank Space” to be elected by “We the People” on the second Tuesday after the First Monday in November and or these violators are: (1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be excluded from the polls. And (2) guilty of Felonies.” 34. “Impostors” as “judges” “Wolf, Roberts, and Winokur, JJ.” have now have violated F.S. 38 and F.S. 99 (did vetting) and F.S. 104 and permanently

79 disbarred themselves barred themselves from their alleged “judge” status by their Felonies and crimes of Treason acts to conspire with these “Lane et al” Defendant and then for their “Unjust Enrichment” of collecting “stolen”: A. Townsend’s “Future Marketing” money and rights; and B. Tax Payers money’s and rights; and C. First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and Citrus Park Christian School; and D. Others “Not for Profits”; E. Townsend’s Clients for whom he speaks; to do their “False Billings” for “Honest Services” not rendered and continuing Fraud(s) violating “Due Process” and for violations of the Commerce laws and our Five Basic Rights including theft of Religious Society “Not for Profits” so to do their “Hate Crimes”. 35. Defendants Named and “Others Doe to be named” in this Action since 11/18/1987, have admitted and or cannot deny their ongoing crimes even of F.S. 80.02, “impeding” justice, yet they continue to as “judge” Marva Crenshaw admitted 5/10/06, “Hate Crimes” even by “judges” conspiring, and intentionally violating “Roberts Rules of Order” to delay to do their lawful “Honest Services” “Due Process” per their Oath, and did not issue arrest warrants for their Treason to “impede” Organic Constitutional Rights for their “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution(s)” while still receiving “Unjust Enrichment” and not acting by our laws doing [“Human Trafficking Florida Statutes 787.06 by their “Pay to Play”: “Hate Crimes”; “Malicious Prosecution by “Abuse of Process”; intentional threats of force to create fear, emotional duress and financial duress; knowingly using “Fruit from the Poisoned tree/bushes” and False Billings]; as violations of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution “Equal Protection Clause” which prevents “Nobility” and or “Qualified Immunity” privilege; and or “Violating “Due Process” to show all “persons” may not violate Constitutional Rights of any “person” and or of Peaceful Protests as Redress of Government”; “Impeding Voters Organic Rights”; “Thefts”; “Impeding Sovereign Religious Rights”; Parental Rights; as intentional violations of the First Amendment Five Basic Rights and Liberties as Freedom of: 1. Religion; 2. Speech; 3. Press; 4. Petition of Government; 5. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly; and thus their RICO “Unjust Enrichment” from same and they unlawfully continue “Impeding” Contracts and do intentional delay of said Organic Constitutional Rights and justice and due process and unlawfully “impede” Commerce for their Unjust Enrichment. 36. Florida Statute 787.06 states: “It is the intent of the Legislature…” But Senate President Tom Lee And Governor Desantis and the Courts being informed by Townsend refuses to charge anyone including Lee’s wife, appointed as the Florida Secretary of

State Laurel Lee, with continuing the F.S. 99.061(4)(b) and F.S. 104 and other False Claims violations. And all of the Lane-Bush-Epstein gang knew Townsend reported Jeffery Epstein and Lane et al parties as Cindy McCain Affirmed their HOBBS ACT Exploitations of many and stated to Townsend and including the illegal abduction of his children for RICO. 37. The Florida Legislature and Senate President Tom Lee and House of Representative Speaker(s) as Weatherford was personally advised have a duty to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law each person in the: Secretary of State (Jim Smith, Ken Detzner, Mike Erel, Laurel Lee, Bureau Elections members, Governors, Judges, Sheriffs, Attorney’s Generals, State Attorney’s, and Others who have violated F.S. 99.061(4)(b) and F.S. 104 38. Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge Charles Canady Jr. has unlawfully neglected his “Oaths” and “Duties” since 1987, as admitted written in his Order(s) even against Lane and Harrods and Grant(s) and Heather Gray et al and able to conceal and aid and abet the criminal actions of collusion of RICO as Townsend exposes since 11/18/1987, and as he said even on the floor of Congress in the Impeachment Trail of William Jefferson Clinton that “…not even the President is above the law…” and thus no government person as even the “judges” have no privilege or immunity to violate Our Constitution as a Contract with “We the People” whom they are to serve or be in Breach of Contract with no Rights. As did the FSCT Chief Judges with Judges Harding and Shaw et al did in 1996 without taking their proper Oaths per with crimes of AG Bob Butterworth to continue crimes as reported herein this action since 1987. 39. U.S. Supreme Court Chief Judge John Roberts has unlawfully neglected his “Oaths” and “Duties” and done “False Promises of Honest Services” as that his actions in the Bush v. Gore as stated in this Action. 40. The illegal use of “Immunity”: “Qualified Immunity” and or “Sovereign Immunity” and or “Partial Immunity” and or waivers from SLAPP Acts per F.S. 768.28 and or violations of F.S. 111.07 and Article II. Section 8; directly is prohibited in our U.S. Constitution and State Of Florida Constitution as establishing a “Nobility” of someone able to act above the law by a “judge” and or “officer of the court” and or “law enforcer” and or a legislator acting in any form from the protecting someone per the Civil Rights Act of 1871 even by use of the 1983 Due Process and or as the Due Process Required by Peaceful “Redress of Government”. In plain legal terms, use of Qualified Immunity is a crime in itself by a Constitutional Criminal doing Treason for creation of a RICO “TCR” “Nobility” just as King John admitted by signing the Magna Carta. 41. Former Attorney General Bob Butterworth violated his own

81 positions of our Rule of Law for his own and Bush Code Red “Unjust Enrichment” by Thefts in the “Pay to Play”. 42. This is a continued Action 88-2554, of “Unjust Enrichment” by intentional “theft” by RICO and HOBBS ACT Crimes with additional actions by co=participants and co=conspirators as shown against their Torts and or “Negligent Services” and Malfeasance asin this heading and incorporated herein with claims as since 11/18/1987, for Townsend and Townsend those for whom he speaks per and for equal 14th Protection Under Our United States and Florida Constitution protected Rights. 43. In Pulliam v. Allen No. 82-1432, Justice Blackmun joined by Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr., Byron R. White, Thurgood Marshall and John Paul Stevens stated, “there was no evidence that Congress meant to exclude judges from injunctions under Section 1983”. This U.S. Supreme Court ruling was that state judges may be sued for civil rights violations and may b ordered to pay the lawyers’s fees of those who sue them successfully.” N.Y. Times May 15, 1984 44. This Pulliam id action was brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 as the Section 1983 law which permits suits for damages or injunctive relief against those who, “under color of state law” violate an individual’s civil rights.” 45. The rulings in TAYLOR id. when they knowingly violate Reynolds v. Sims id. make unlawful judges with no immunity as “Next Door Neighbors. 46. By: “No Blank Space”; “Vetting Townsend”; Fraud of Documents; Fraud at law; “Fraud on the Court”; each violates per the law Townsends Organic Civil Rights and Others for whom Townsend speaks. 47. This: 18 U.S.C. 241; and 18 U.S.C. 242 Action; as both 42 U.S.C. 1983; and a Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971) action; and a RICO ACTION; and a HOBBS ACTION; and a F.S. 787.06 Human Trafficking; and F.S. 99.061(4) (b) and F.S. 104 Action of these per Ocasio v. U.S. co=conspirators and co=participants, seeks restitution of Civil Rights and recovery from “Fraud and Deceptive Practices” “Under Color of Law” and “Under Color of official Right” from “Fruit from the poisoned tree/bush” of Townsend’s and those for whom Townsend speaks stolen money and property and Due Process and to stop “Impeding” of said Rights and Equal and Due process and Commerce. 48. Also this action seeks restitution for their violations of False Billings to Plaintiffs and of Federal And State Funds for lawful services intentionally not rendered by their intentional “Failure of Honest Services” violations of their Oaths and Bonds for their illegal and unconstitutional acts and thefts still ongoing.

49. Defendants Charles E. Lane Jr. and also as A.K.A. Sabal Marketing [a.k.a Lane et al] and as “pay to play” dealer and agent for and with “Others Doe to be Named” using their State, Local and Federal Government Positions to aid and abet their “pay to pay” co=conspirators, named in Frap’s 1-3 and “Others Doe to be Named” are per Ocasio v. U.S. Co=participants in said crimes ongoing. 50. Defendants then with Townsend’s stolen money and money gained by “false promises to perform services” gained from contracts with Townsend and Townsend’s work product and reputation and stolen money and organic Constitutional Rights from Townsend et al did “torts” and “unjust enrichment” then also Count 1-5, Conspired to not put the “Blank Line”. 51. With now Patricia McCarthy et al and Charles E. Williams Jr. et al [including his law partners and attorneys at law and co=conspirators as Charles Canady Junior and Charles Canady Senior and Governor Lawton Chiles and Florida Attorney General/Secretary of State James C. Smith and the Koch Families and the Bush Families as Jeb Bush et al and Senator John Grant et al and the Moody Families and still others named in the FRAP’s 1-3 and Others “Doe” receiving “Pay to Play” bribery and kickbacks with Townsend’s stolen Money since 1987 and before {low-side valued by Bruce Chapin et al at over $1 Million in 1987-1991 on just one company in the Sabal/Future Marketing Joint Venture Agreement of August 7, 1987 Contract {Bonneau/Foster Grant} of many companies doing business or attempting to do business with Townsend to advantage Defendants to obstruct commerce} and intellectual property and work product as the Bush- Walker-Koch(s)-Bass-Rainwater et al plan to control manufacturing and the wholesale and retail markets and any other business entity as Townsend listed in the July 7, 2017 filed in Washington D.C. Federal Actions and with “Others Doe to be Named” as the Patel and Wolfs still collude and colluded and illegally acted against Townsend and his family and his clients and Townsend Others as Citizens and Owner Members of the F.S. 617, “Not for Profit, First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and Citrus Park Christian School as their IRS and “Thousand Points of Light” and “Common Core” and “Gore Climate Change” and Tea Party and Obama Care are conspired violations of the Equal Protection Clause and Equal Commerce Rights for All. 52. And since about 1993 “Hate Crime” and theft violations of our First Baptist Church of Citrus Park Bylaws for and per their violations of F.S. 99.061(4)(b) and F.S. 104 and 18 U.S.C. 241 Conspiracy against Rights and 18 U.S.C. 242 Deprivation of Rights and 42 USC 1983 Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights against these Lane et al Defendants and “Others Doe

83 to be Named” violating Organic Right(s) stated below by and for their RICO and HOBBS ACT Abuse of Due Process “Under Color of Law” and or “Under Color of Official Right” and Intentional Interference with Commerce for their “Nobility” “Human Trafficking” and still continuing the violation of Abuse of Power over Due Process for Civil Rights for their “nobility” by “unjust enrichment” by Fraud(s) and “False Claims” and as now their COVID19 alleged authority is in violation of “Free Will “Assembly Rights” and “Religious Practices” even as illegally “voted” in HCSO Chad Chronister as the prior HCSO Sheriffs and Others did violations to Townsend since 1993 and before for not obeying F.S. 104. And as Grant’s Emails and personal actions make threats and in 11/2015, wrote, “bring your toothbrush” if you come to Hillsborough County and or your Churches and or to “Palomino-Battles” to Moody’s (pay $15,000.00) –Gievers Courts to defend your allegations and rights against us the BUSH CODE RED. 53. Townsend began this action on 11/18/1987, against Lane and Lane et al (still Others Doe Unknown to be named) directing attorney Patricia McCarthy in the lawsuit filed by Attorney’s David Landus and David H. Popper filed as 88-2554, June 1988, and agreed and retained to be litigated by Bruce Chapin et al, Charles Scruggs et al and Heather Gray et al that even these same are connected by the Lane et al in “thefts of Townsend’s Intellectual Property and Money and “Free Will” Rights and Children” and their “kickbacks” “Pay to Play” and thefts benefits of same said that these Organic Rights cannot be removed even in a time of a Pandemic as these Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” continue. 54. These Lane et al named and “Others Doe to be Named continue their admitted criminal acts and continue to do new acts in their confessed RICO and HOBBS “Pay to Play” ACT(S) of their Malicious Enterprise. 55. In Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982) is adopted the test of: objective terms”. 56. In Harlow, “the Court established that a plaintiff could only overcome “qualified immunity” by showing that defendants conduct “Violate[d] clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” 57. In this action, Defendants were advised and admitting their own crimes as violations of Civil Rights by Federal Judge James Moody Jr. March 15, 2007, “impeding” Townsend so even his own daughter could attain Attorney General via illegal and fraudulent practices yet he affirmed the ruling of Judge Marva Crenshaw and Charles Denny IV of May 10, 2006, admitting “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” and stating “there is no doubt you have been damaged…” 58. The United States Constitution and the Florida Constitution and

Declaration specifically stressed individual rights and the right of revolution if individual rights were “impeded”. The Constitutions clearly protect the following Organic Rights: Article One Section I. Freedom of Speech and Voting is an element of Free Will Speech; 2.Freedom of Religion; 3. The right to keep and bear arms; 4. The freedom of assembly; and 5. Freedom to petition government. And these BUSH CODE RED ACTS “Impede” ALL. 59. Florida law required that a Government Person take their Oath before they are allowed to practice their Duty of Service. The Order of Bob Butterworth also affirmed said Due Process. The Lloyd v. Hines also affirmed Due Process acts allowed prior to being with or without Bonds. 60. The Sheriff is required to take the Oath of office to serve and protect per the U.S. and State Constitutions or they give a “False Oath to Perform”. 61. The Sheriff then must obey the Constitutions and U.S. Federal and State Laws and Florida Statues and specifically F.S. 99. And F.S. 104 and specifically has no “Official Right” to violate F.S. 104.091 to “impede” anyone from their Organic Voting Rights and other rights. 62. The Right to “Free Will” Vote was argued by John Roberts now U.S. Supreme Court Chief Judge and Florida Attorney General Bob Butterworth and the Florida Supreme Court and the First District Court of Appeals Tallahassee in the Bush V. Gore 2000 Actions as stated herein below. 63. These “Impeded” and “Obstructed” Rights are: “Abuse of Due Process”; “restitution from theft(s)”; Free Will “Commerce”; “Free Will Voting Rights” “Religious Rights” and “Running for Office” and Parental Rights and Freedom of Assembly and Redress Of government. These Judicial Rulings by these same and other Defendants admissions of their RICO and HOBBS ACT criminal acts in the court records confirm these above violations of Law as Marva Crenshaw and attorney for these Defendants Charles Denny IV and Rolfes and Dickinson & Gibbons admitted on May 10, 2006, Townsend and those for whom he speaks were and still are victims of: A. And for “HATE CRIMES” Listed below as: Violations of Due Process and “Free Will Rights” by the “Nobility” for their “Unjust Enrichment” and by “Common Core” by Tort Interference with: 1. Due Process; 2. Commerce; 3. Religious Rights; 4. Parental Rights; 5. Assembly Rights; 6. Right to Run for Government Office to stop “Pay to Play”; 7. Voting Rights;

8. Speech 9. Press 10. Right to Grand Jury and Criminal Jury and Civil Jury Process; 11. Right to Petition Government; and even 12. Creation and Distribution of a Corona Virus for a Pandemic to by Tort(s) interfere with all non- “Pay to Players”; 13. For Defendants State and Federal False Claim(s); 14. For Illegal Violation of Their Defendants Bonds; as 42 USC 12203 Prohibition against retaliation and coercion for their “Unjust Enrichment” to by theft from Townsend by Lane Et al and Theft of FBCCP /CPCS as the F.S. 617.0834 and other victims of the “Not For Profits” by their “RICO COMMON CORE” and Theft from Citizens for whom Townsend speaks gained by “Price Fixing” and Illegal Leverage Buy Outs by RICO; and Theft from Governments Funds Owned by citizens Townsend represents; and as Townsend et al All per Townsend’s Duty as a “Private Attorney’s General” per the Civil Rights Act of 1871. B. “Malicious Prosecutions”: 1. Continuing Abuse of Due Process for their violation of section A. by their “Under Color of Law” Delay of the “We the People” Grand Jury and Criminal and Civil Jury Trials of their illegal conspired acts and non-actions to which these defendants have admitted their and Others Conspiracy; Gregory Presnell; James Moody Jr.; Charles Canady Jr.; Jorge Labarga. 2. These “And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants” and “Others Doe to be Named” as now Wolf’s by their “Fraud” using a “PCA” do Breach of Peace 877.02, Harassment and continue Human Trafficking and SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY, And Pursuit of these violations are Actions per 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242 And Pursuit per the Hobbs Act and RICO ACT and F.S. 99 and F.S. 104, doing also For their “Hate Crimes” their Tort Interference with F.S. 871 Interference with Religious Rights and Societies. 64. PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS SEARS WAS MISMANAGED BY MNUCHIN WHO WAS ON ITS BOARD FOR YEARS in Article by Alex Wayne and Saleha Mohsin October 15, 2018 as Steve Mnuchin was on the Sears board from 2005 until 2016 and on the Kmart Board prior to this when the Sears and Kmart Merger happen under Eddie Lampert in 2005. See https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-15-trump-says-sears- was-mismanaged-stevem-mnuchin-was-on-its-board. As a Kmart and Sears Holding LLC. Level Two Store Manager, Townsend reported multiple times illegal conduct that was being done and these crimes were concealed and aided and abetted by these defendants, including Jeb

Bush, Charlie Crist, his chief of Staff, now First DCA “judge” Lori S. Rowe, appointed in 2009 and Linda Rowe Campbell, the Kmart #3092 Pharmacist, Townsend as the Kmart Manager was investigating per multiple allegations. 65. This is a Motion for Mandamus for an “Honorable” untainted Constitutional Court to Compel a Grand Jury as Townsend acts per F.S. 80.02. 66. The “judges” of our Courts and or their “illegal” “Officers of the Court” since alias “judge” Muszynski, in collusion with McCarthy et al have intentionally, willfully, knowingly and recklessly acted “under color of official right” by Frauds at Law to delay justice and due process and claim “immunity” for their illegal actions and “SLAPP” Acts for their Unjust Enrichment by Tort Interference with Contracts including “Impeding” the Contracts known as Our Federal and State Constitutions and Townsend’s multiple contracts and contacts. 67. This Motion for a Mandamus Order to an “Honorable” “Due Process” judge or court is required by the Florida Supreme Court as these issues are of great importance and continue to be “delayed” as this “TRC” continue their “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution(s)” and additional criminal acts for their “Unjust Enrichment”. 68. AS TOWNSEND HAS FILED FSCT ACTIONS: SC-18-1890; SC18- 1915; SC-18-1951; SC19-324, SC16-1501; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07- 1181; SC60-95935; SC60-95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; consolidated as herein 18-4845, by these FSCT Clerk Tomasino Actions. ACTION A. ISSUES NOT RESOLVED NOTICE OF APPEAL TO FSCT AS FILED 11/13/2018 AND NOW DIRECTED TO THIS 1ST DCA EN BANC FOR WRITTEN OPINION LINE BY LINE AND ISSUE BY ISSUE “IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDIDICAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE #:___2018CA2293_____ RANDALL C. TOWNSEND Individual, and TOWNSEND’S RANDALL C. TOWNSEND RELATED FSCt Cases: As “Next Friend” Et al; 16-1501; back to Plaintiff’s SC11-1042 V. SC09-1121 and others to KEN DETZNER, 86-918 Florida Secretary of State; KRISTI REID WILLIS Bureau of Elections Records;

DONNA BROWN, Senior Government Analysis; PAM BONDI, Florida Attorney’s General; and “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED”, And All As Officially and Individually, Defendants ______/ NOTICE OF APPEAL AND PETITION TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT COMES NOW AGAIN, RANDALL TOWNSEND, Individual and as Townsend Et al., Pro Se, and with again granted “Standing” as a “Private Attorney’s General” “Whistleblowers” Victims “Redressing Government” retaliations for Florida Citizens Protecting Our Sovereign Rights (Federal and State, Religious Rights, Assembly, Parenting, Voting, against Anti-trust and Monopolies and Nobility) even to the Florida Supreme Court, never yet having our Honest Day in Court, and Respectfully states: 1. The Florida Supreme Court has again Jurisdiction based on: A. The Florida Supreme Court has “Bypass” Authority especially in review of: 1). Emergency “Matters of Great Importance” in this Matter of a Statewide issue of Voters Rights protecting Citizens from Fraud and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosure and even admitted Intentional Failure of “Honest Services”; 2). the Authority and Supervision of “persons” per Respondent Superior of The Florida Supreme Court; and 3). Protecting the integrity of this Court based on “Redress of Government”; 4). the previous Orders of Florida Supreme Court Chief Judges: 1). Charles Canady Jr.’s Order, 2011-41; 2). Jorge Larbaga’s Order, 2016-92. B. Art. V. §2. Fla. Constitution for Validation of Bonds and §75.08, Fla. Statutes; C. Per Spradley v. State 293 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1974), as this decision is in conflict and “which directly, and in some way, exclusively affects the duties, powers, validity, formation, termination or regulation of a particular class of constitutional of state officers.” D. “Expressly and directly conflict with a decision ….of the

Supreme Court on the same question of law.” E. Per Finkelstein v. Department of Transportation, 656 So. 2d. 921 (Fla. 1995) as the failure of the DCA’s or other lower Courts to formulate the question of laws and facts did not deprive this already informed since about 1987 and or before Florida Supreme Court to deprive an Honorable Florida Supreme Court of Justices to have jurisdiction of this matter of laws and facts. F. These multiple DCA Courts and Lower Courts Void and Fraudulent and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosure and “Failure of Honest Services” are in Conflict with the written Orders of Chief Judges Canady Jr. and Jorge Labarga and Judge Marva Crenshaw and even of Federal Judge James Moody Jr. and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and as an En Banc Court, Twice. 2. The “ORDER OF DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS” of October 29, 2018, by “Judge” as John C. Cooper, is “VOID” per Marbury v. Madison and other cases based on the following Memorandum of Laws and Facts and based on Sovereign Rights Of Our U.S. and Florida Constitutions this “judge” has chosen to ignore to even do Treason “warring” with himself and defendants against Plaintiffs for which Townsend has spoken as a “Private Attorney’s General” since November 1987, and before. 3. This Matter of Facts and Laws deals with the “Estopped” and Reversal of Decisions and Conduct by multiple Constitutional and State Officers both “illegally” Appointed and “illegally” Elected abusing: Due Process; their Official Government Offices for violations of law and Unjust Enrichment for Personal Gain as even: A. Rick Scott, Governor seeking the office of U.S. Senator; B. Pam Bondi, Attorney’s General and prior Attorney’s Generals back to James C. Smith; C. Ken Detzner, Secretary of State and prior Secretaries of State; D. Rick Scott, as Governor with prior Governors back to Ruben Askew; E. Current and Prior Florida Supreme Court Members; F. Current and Former Florida Bar Members even disbarred; G. Current and Former Florida Department of Law Enforcement; H. Current and Former Florida Legislators; I. And “Others Doe to be Named” per Due Process of Production of “impeded” evidence; and as this Court has said in consideration of Matters of Fact and Laws as Jenkins v. State 385 So. 2d 1359 (Fla. 1980) using a PCA to conceal Frauds

89 and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosures as proofs of conflicts with Federal Laws and “VOID” per Marbury v. Marbury id. laws intended to Florida Citizens and now “Voters” to continue the findings of the McKay Commission Report of Corruption in Florida by these same persons against Townsend and Townsend et al. “Impeded” by even the admitted Malfeasance of these FSCt Chief Judges and others of the Florida Supreme Court and lower courts and others and others of “Law Enforcement” failures of “Honest Services” and by the changes in these positions of law Townsend has the Right as he maintains his original claims to have Due Process to show these violations and damages still being “impeded” by these same and new persons and “Others Doe to be Named” as now even John C. Cooper, in his “Order” using violations of Due Process, Fraud and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosures and “Failure of Honest Services” even specifically ignoring multiple Election Law Rules of Process for a person as Townsend and Townsend et al “Redressing Government” as victims being by Hobbs Act and RICO, Abused and Harassed since about 1987 and before now even in collusion doing additional “Hate Crimes” as Judge Canady Jr and Judge Jorge Labarga admitted by their prior recusals of the Florida Supreme Court after admitting facts Townsend has advocated since 1987, and their personal knowledge of crimes and others violations of Due Process and Our Federal and State Laws so thus these Victims have “Redress Rights”. Emphasis Added. 4. For this John C. Cooper as a “judge” and thus as a Private Individual, doing SLAPP ACTS, and Treason to himself and Townsend and Townsend et al to state victim Townsend and victims Townsend et al do not have “Redress Rights” and as victims must submit to addition RICO and HOBBS ACT Violations which is in violation to Federal Laws and Florida State Laws and to vote on a blank line in the privacy of the voting booth or from their home then by private mail and even Elections Process Form 6, which even in the compliance form lists: A. F.S. 119.071(4)(d)3 which grants Townsend and Townsend et al relief from future illegal search and seizures and retaliations and batteries and kidnappings based on past admitted crimes and including “Hate Crimes”; B. OCASIO v. U.S 578 U.S. 2016 two or more persons acting in collusion entered into unlawful acts(s) for an unlawful agreement and per ZELLER V. RANKIN 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326. And Lopez v. Vanderwater, 620 F.2d 1229, 1235-37, “We conclude that a judge’s private, prior agreement to decide in favor of one party is not a judicial act.” And per the LABARGA HOLDER AND KRAUSE

STANDARD(S) and the BONDI IMPOSTOR STANDARD and thus by these facts, “Frauds on the Court” as per: C. BULLOCH v. UNITED STATES 763 F. 2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985) stating: “Fraud upon the Court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury… It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function … thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted…” and “When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction, [U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (State use of ), 217 Miss. 576, 64 So2d 697].”; D. Florida Statutes 119.07(1)(a), Florida Statutes, “Every person who has custody of public record shall permit the record to be inspected and copied by any person desiring to do so, at any reasonable time, under reasonable condition’s, and under supervision of the custodian of the public records.”; E. Injunctive Relief is necessary; F. Unfortunately the Supervisor of Elections Officers and the Attorney’s General and the Governors and “Others Doe to Be Named” have per the Keller id. as It appears the pattern as said in the McKay Report continues in the actions of The Florida Attorney’s General and the Governors and in the Florida Secretary of State and in the Florida Elections offices; G. “Notwithstanding, 106.021, a candidate who does not collect contributions and whose only expense is the filing fee or signature verification fee is not required to appoint a campaign treasure or designate a primary campaign depository…” H. “(4) (a) Each person seeking to qualify for election to office as a write-in candidate shall file his or her qualifications papers with the respective qualifying officer at any time after noon of the 1st day for qualifying , but not later than noon of the last day of the qualifying period for the office sought….” I. “(b) Any person who is seeking election as a write-in candidate shall not be required to pay a filing fee, election assessment, or party assessment. A write-in candidate is not entitled to have his or her name printed on any ballot; however, space for the write-in candidate’s name to be written in must be provided on the general election ballot…”. J. 5. (c) “…The filing officer may not determine whether the contents of the qualifying papers are accurate..”

Yet in this Action the Elections Department and Others and Including John C. Cooper “Under Color of Law” and “Under Color of Official Right” illegally uses their violations of Due Process and Laws to come to ignorant conclusions and thus acts of Treason and War to themselves and to Townsend and Townsend et al. K. “119.071(4)(d)3--- TOWNSEND PROVES TOWNSEND IS EXEMPT AND DID NOT HAVE TO COMPLETE A FORM 6, OR FURTHER INFORMATION BASED ON THEIR ADMITTED GOVERNMENT “HATE CRIMES” AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AS CONNECTED TO THESE NOW IN THE ELECTIONS OFFICE DOING INTENTIONAL FRAUD FOR THE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL PAM BONDI AND KEN DETZNER AS SECRETARY OF STATE AND RICK SCOTT AS GOVERNOR AS OTHERS PER THE KELLER id. McKay Commission Report ACTING TO CONTINUE THEIR ADMITTED UNETHICAL MALICIOUS ENTERPRISE. L. TOWNSEND PER F.S. 119.071(4)(d)3 is not required to complete form 6 or others because of: a. Being “for cause of this action” filed as a 42 §1983, “Private Attorney’s General” ; b. for the Victims being admitted victims of Hate Crimes; c. Redressing Government; d. to protect all our rights from further retaliations of criminal actions they have at multiple times admitted they are willing to continue e. to protect our Sovereign Rights and Future Rights; f. Townsend is a former F.S. “D” Licensed agent activated in August 1999, even at the time of the kidnapping of his kids by these same; g. Townsend alleges and believes that as a Private Attorney’s General he is a current protected Law Enforcer; h. Townsend is still the F.S. 617.0823, Representative Agent of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Owners Ministry the Citrus Park Christian School, yet still “impeded” per his 1994 Bylaws Rights and acting in Assembly to Worship and teach per the Pierce v. Society of Sisters Cases and to VOTE, and see our Records illegally obtained by Government Persons while they continue to embezzle illegally our resources as even Judges and Senators claim are the reasons they fled the “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” in as we see Cuba and Venezuela; M. And as proofs thereof filed the 19 pages to the Elections Offices Timely and Complete and for the Court further advises: The Secretary of State nor any Florida Government Person has the right to “impede” a Federal Sovereign Right to “Write-in” a Person to Govern them.

5. Judge John C. Cooper, without Due Process nor the legal right to remove from Plaintiffs our Constitutional Sovereign Right writes: “Finally, the petition is not sufficient to issue an order to show cause because mandamus is not available to require the performance of a futile act and will not be issued where no remedial result can occur…” This judge considers Fraud and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosure and “Failure of Honest Services” by “Impeding” a Sovereign Right to Vote as a “futile act” when over 13 Million Florida Voters or of all Florida Citizens are prevented from their Sovereign Right to have a Write-in blank line or space just because Defendants as the Secretary’s of State, Governor’s, Attorney’s General’s, Legislators, “Officers of the Court” and Elections Department Agents and “Others” have for over 30 years illegally conspired and prevented Floridians Sovereign Right to Vote for a Write in person of their Free Will as again by Fraud the 2018 General Ballot did not have a write-in line. 6. Thus by allowing damages with this “Illegal Ballot” even the Rules of the Department of Elections and the Florida Commission on Ethics have been intentionally violated against: A. Randall Townsend; and B. Townsend Et al; and C. Others for whom Townsend speaks as over 13 Million Florida Voters; and D. All Florida Citizens or E. Temporary Citizens of which is our President. CONCLUSION: 1. PETITIONER HAS A LEGAL RIGHT BY CONTRACTS AND SOVEREIGN RIGHTS AS A CITIZEN AND AS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” AND A TAXPAYER TO REQUEST MANDAUMS RELIEF 2. THE OFFICERS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND THE COURT(S) SINCE 1987, HAVE BEEN MALFEASANT, FAILING TO DO THEIR FULL FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND ACTED IN COLLUSION AND DEFAMED AND ABUSED TOWNSEND AND THOSE FOR WHOM HE SPEAKS BY THESE PERSONS INTENTIONAL FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AND “FRAUD ON THE COURT” TO CONCEAL ACTUAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO BE EXPOSED PER CONTRACT RIGHTS EXPOSING THEIR THEFTS OF PETITIONERS RIGHTS, RESOURCES AND EVEN THE CHILDREN SINCE 1999 and OUR VOTES. 3. PETITIONER HAS NO OTHER ADEQUATE REMEDY AT LAW

4. ANDERSON v. BEATRICE FOODS, Co. 127 F.R.D. 1(D. Mass. 1989) ……………………… Defendants concealed relevant reports which should have been disclosed which constituted misconduct. In this Action even the Elections Department and “Others” concealed their collusion to not notify Townsend not known until he was given a “Sample” Ballot that there was no “Oval” and or “Blank Line” on the Ballots already sent or being sent to over 13 Million Voters and nor did the Elections Officers and “Others” properly advise Townsend that he was being required to follow their what Petitioners Know are violation of Our Constitutional Rights to even at the last minute in the Voting Booth as Redress of Government Write- In the “Person” of Our “Free Will” Choice “Impeded” if back in June or at other earlier times, Voters were not advised of the Fraud and Deceptive Practices of the Elections Officers and “Others”. In this case even Emmett Battles by not allowing Townsend discovery of all records since 1987, becomes an “Others Doe to be Named” co-participant in the “Hate Crimes”, violations of the 1994 FBCCP BYLAWS, Unlawful Abduction of Children and multiple other ongoing Crimes since 1987. ARKY, FREED v. BOWMAR INSTRUMENT …………. 527 So2d 211 quoting FLORIDA AIR CONDITIONERS v. COLONIAL SUPPLY CO. 390 So2d 174-176 (Fla 5th DCA 1980) ‘The Flaw…entirely ignores the well established position that parties who have “changed their positions relying on the erroneous ruling of the trial court should be returned to their position before such ruling”. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS V. CHARLES SCRUGGS 545 So2d 910 1989………………………………….. Commissioners Advising Former Judge Scruggs of his Fiduciary Duties and Standards in his legal duties he intentionally failed to perform in this case. BUNDY v. RUDD 366 So2d 440 ………………………………………. “Once a basis for disqualification has been established prohibition is both and appropriate and necessary remedy per BROWN v. ROSE 96 Fla. 289, 118 So9 (1928)” CHAMBERS v. NASCO, INC………………….. 501 U.S. 32 (1991) Specific Performance of a Contract and in this case it is the Contract as keeping to our U.S. Constitution and Florida Constitution and the Election Constitutional Rules and as the Contract Statement on the Top of the Ballot for an Oval and a Blank line.

COOPER v. AARON……………………………………. 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)] “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.” COOPER v COOPER………………………………………….. 99 F.2d 133]” “There is a general rule that a ministerial officer who acts wrongfully, although in good faith, is nevertheless liable in a civil action and cannot claim the immunity of the sovereign.” CROCKER v. PLEASANT ……………………………………. 778 So2d 978, 988 (Fla. 2001) “Rather, there must be a deliberate decision of the government official to deprive a person of life, liberty, or property…” U.S.C. 1346 FRAUDS AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES………… U.S.C.1951 (HOBBS ACT) INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE AND RIGHTS 42 U.S.C. 1983 CIVIL ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS .. “It is the manner of enforcement which gives §1983 its unique importance, for enforcement is placed in the hands of the people. Each citizen “acts as a private attorney general who tales on the mantel of the sovereign,” guarding for all of us the individual liberties enunciated in the Constitution. Section 1983 represents a balancing feature in our government structure whereby individual citizens are encouraged to police those who are charged with policing us all. Thus, it is of a special import that suits brought under this statute be resolved by a determination of truth rather than by a determination that the truth shall remain hidden.” 5. See also Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Award Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. §1988, allowing Private Persons to act lawfully as Attorney’s General, for advancing and protecting Civil Rights as even the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1991, AS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL as in here also Randall Townsend, has done since about November 1987. KENNER v. C.I.R. 387 F. 2d 689 (7th Cir. 1968) and 7 Moore’s Federal Practice http://freedom-school.com/law/fraud-on-the-court-by-an-officer-of- the-court.html which states: “Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons

95 concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.” ELLIOT v. PIERSOL 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S.328, 340 (1828) Elliot v. Pierson. Second, a judge is not immune for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction. [29 MIRELES V. WACO 502 US 9. 116 L. Ed 2d 9, 14, 112 S Ct 286 (US1991)…”; SO HAD JUDGE JOHN C. COOPER ISSUED THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND OR REQUIRED A NEW BALLOT, HE THEN AS A “JUDGE” DID NOT DO FRAUD, OMISSION OF TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURE, FAILURE OF HONEST SERVICES AND TREASON AND TORTS TO HIS OWN INDIVIDUAL OR TO TOWNSEND OR TOWNSEND ET AL’S SOVEREIGN CONTRACT RIGHT TO REDRESS GOVERNMENT BY OUR “FREE WILL” VOTE. SO HAD ATTORNEY GENERAL PAM BONDI, ACTED LAWFULLY “WE THE PEOPLE” WOULD NOT STILL HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO VIOLATE OUR RIGHTS AND USE AN ILLEGAL BALLOT AGAISNT OUR “FREE WILL” AND STILL BE PREVENTED FROM OUR FULL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND SECRETARY OF STATE AND ELECTIONS OFFICERS SHOULD PROTECT AND OR THEY VIOLATE OUR LAWS AND THEIR BONDS. 7. So as Judge Canady argued on the floor of Congress that not even the President is above the law neither should be any of these “persons” who assisted the Criminal Enterprise of Lane et al as Townsend has exposed as a Whistle Blower since 1987, to “Officers of the Court” and alias Law Enforcers who have allowed the stolen rights and resources and children of Townsend and “Others” to continue this Malicious Enterprise as connected and even much more exposed with the production of more documents and trailing the money of their Unjust Enrichment as the Complaint of 88-2554 filed by David Landis and David H. Popper in 1987. CONCLUSION FOR THE RECONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR MANDAMUS AND THE LEGAL ORDER OF THIS COURT: Now ALL PERSONS now being notified of the Illegal Acts and the Illegal Ballot, especially of these Government Persons and Members of the Florida Bar who must by law align with the Constitutional Rights and Protections Townsend advocates or these as Defendants are Felons, guilty of “Hate Crimes” and Treason per Our Laws. THEREFORE: As a Matter of Law as “Private Attorney’s General” Townsend and Townsend as “Next Friend” states in this Action in Paragraphs 12 and 13,

96 the U.S. Supreme Court decisions “Trump” the cases and excuses of “judge” John C. Cooper, for “We the People” to “Redress Government” even in the Issue of the Need for this Petition Of Mandamus and for Defendants to “Show Cause why the relief should not be granted”, that a Grand Jury be summoned to hear all issues to “Redress” Government acts and non actions as alleged herein as it is Negligence and Tort, for any “judge” to dismiss the need for this Mandamus before these Defendants be required to “Show Cause” for their Secret and Unlawful Acts; A. The Bond of each Defendant and “Others Doe Named” herein be revoked; B. A Proper Ballot must be used for “We the People” to of “Free Will” “Write-in” on a “Blank Line” and Darken the “Oval” to be provided on a New Ballot; C. The current Ballots be counted but NOT be certified; D. Discovery be fully allowed by Plaintiffs to determine the “Who” of the Planned Frauds and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosure Acts; E. Defendants personally be charged with crimes; and F. Defendants personally be charged with the restitution due Plaintiffs as to the fullest extent of our Laws. H. AND “WE THE PEOPLE” DEMAND FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PETITION FOR MANDAMUS as required by Our Laws; and Townsend re-states all above and below to be included herein this Demand and further states; This Court by law to allow ALL VOTERS to be properly informed of their Constitutional rights these defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” denied unlawfully and unconstitutionally. DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY GRAND JURY, CRIMINAL JURY AND CIVIL JURY Per U.S. Constitution Amendment VII, the amount involved herein is in excess of $20.00, so Juries of “We the People” is demanded and for our full restitution. CERTIFICATION OF FONT I certify that the lettering in this Motion is TIMES NEW ROMAN 14 POINT and complies with the font requirements of the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 13th day of November, 2018, to the FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDIDICAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA and KEN DETZNER,

Florida Secretary of State; and KRISTI REID WILLIS, Bureau of Elections Records; and DONNA BROWN, Senior Government Analysis; of the R.A. Gray building, 500 South Bronough Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 and to Pam Bondi of The Capital PL-01, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 per [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] Signed Randall Townsend, Verified to the best of our knowledge, opinions and belief based on the concealed information of Defendants. Respectfully submitted; Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and as a “Next Friend” of the over 13 Million Florida Voters and Others as said herein. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com Townsend4AGFlorida.com”

ACTION B. ISSUES NOT RESOLVED AND NOW REQUIRED 1ST DCA EN BANC WRITTEN OPINION ON EACH ISSUE OF LAW

“ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT APPEAL CASE NO. 1D-18-4845 AS FOR DE NOVO REVIEW ASSIGNED PER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR THE CASES: SC18-1890; SC18-1915; SC18-1951; SC19-324; SC16-92; SC-16- 1501; SC11-41; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07-1181; SC60-95935; SC60- 95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; AND FROM LOWER COURT CASES 18-CA-2293, 2nd CIR. COURT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FROM STATE AND FEDERAL COURT CASES 8:06- CV2050T-30TGW (JUDGE J.MOODY. JR):TO “JUDGE EK; TO 16-CV- 3299-EAK-MAP (JUDGE J.W.) TOWNSEND V. GRANT ET AL; AS- F.S.: 86 DECLARATORY; F.S. 80- QUO WARRANTO; ORGANIZED

CRIME(S); F.R.O.C.P. 1.530 AND 1.540; FEDERAL HOBBS ACT; RICO; FLORIDA AND FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS; 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 ACTS AS BEGAN AS 88-2554,18th CIR. SEMINOLE COUNTY FL. AS- RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUAL AND AS F.S. 80.02 AS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS “Private Attorney’s General” RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, State of Florida, EX REL, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, F.S. 617.0834, AND “Next Friend” ET AL, Appellant, Plaintiff’s/Counter Defendant, Petitioner(s), V. CHARLES E. LANE JR. AS CHARLES E. LANE JR. ET AL AS WITH BUSH ET AL; PATRICIA MCCARTHY; POPPER; CHAPIN(S); WILLIAMS JR. ET AL; SCRUGGS, AS GRAY ET AL; AS GRANT ET AL AS “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” AND NAMED INCLUDING: DETZNER, SMITH; ERTEL; LEE; FLORIDA SEC. OF STATE ET AL, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND AGENTS ET AL 2019-1980’S; FLORIDA ATTORNEY’S GENERALS MOODY-BONDI THRU SMITH; FLORIDA GOVERNORS DESANTIS, SCOTT, TO GRAHAM; FLORIDA LEGISLATORS JOHN GRANT ET AL; SHERIFFS; AND OTHERS AS “ALL OFFICIALLY AND/OR “AS “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR- PERSONS-INDIVIDUALS”AS IN F.R.A.P. AS EXHIBITS AS Appellees and AS Counter Plaintiffs ET AL______/

TOWNSEND MOTION OF CLARIFICATION AND COMPEL REPLY

GUARENTEED RIGHTS FROM TORTS OF THE OLIGARCHS AND THESE NOW ALSO QUARANTINED SHAMED GUILTY CO=CONSPIRATOR/PARTICIPANTS FOR INCLUDING VIOLATIONS OF: “GOD’S LAWS AND DUE PROCESS” AND CONSTITUTIONAL “Due Process”; “Violations of Commerce by unlawful taking and slavery”; and illegal vetting and “no blank line” per F.S. 99 AND F.S. 104, to cause uses of HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS AND RICO ACTS FOR “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” OF THEIR TYRANNICAL COMMUNISTIC REGIME “Hunter Nobility GANG”BY “ALIAS SHAMED LAW ENFORCERS” CO=PARTICIPANTS OF CRIMES IN UNLAWFUL SERVICE TO THEIR ANTI-GOD OLIGARCHS BY “UNDER COLOR OF LAW” AND “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT” AS JUDGES, PRESIDENTS, GOVERNORS, ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEY’S GENERALS AND AS “LANE(s) et al’s” AND OTHERS “DOE TO BE NAMED” AS SC11- 41 ORDER OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CHIEF “JUDGE” CHARLES CANADY JR. ADMITTED HIS AND HIS FATHERS AND THEIR LANE-CHILES-BUSH(S)-KOCH(S)-SMITH(S)-CRENSHAW(S)- CHAPINS-GRANT ET AL AS CO=PARTICIPANTS SERVING THEFT OF TOWNSEND’S: (1) RIGHTS; (2) RESOURCES; AND (3) RELATIONSHIPS BY RICO AS TOWNSEND HAS EXPOSED WHO JOINTLY CONSPIRED BY VIOLATIONS OF GOD’S DUE PROCESS AND “GOLDEN RULE” AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW and who Illegally abducted Townsend’s Children, Rights, Millions, Votes, and Right to be a “Write in” AFFIRMED AS ADMITTED AND RULED AS “HATE CRIMES” AND “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY “JUDGE” MARVA CRENSHAW ON 5/10/2006 AND BY FEDERAL “JUDGE” JAMES MOODY JR. (FATHER OF ASHLEY MOODY) ON 3/15/2007 WITH CONFIRMATION ORDERS BY FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CHIEF “JUDGE” JORGE LABARGA (SC16-92) AS THE FIFTH DCA AS AFFIRMED IN ROBINSON V. WEIGLE THEIR “JUDGE” MUSZYNSKI STALLED “JUSTICE” AND “DISCOVERY” OF THE MONEY TRAIL LANE PAID LEADING NOW TO THE “CANADY-MOODY(S)- PRESNELL ET AL” COMMON CORE ACTORS OF THE BUSH- GATES-SOROS-ROBERTS-BARR-CANADY ET AL EXPOSED AS MEMBERS OF THE “LAW FIRMS” CONNECTED SINCE 1987 AS AND POWELL-CHAPINS-SUPREME COURT ET AL CRIMES BY ALL YET STILL FOR THEIR AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” RICO OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PER THE EXECUTIVE ORDERS OF DEFENDANTS RICK SCOTT AND RON DESANTIS AS DOUBLE STANDARDS OF THEIR “NOBILITY” PROVING SNIPE et al STILL TO

100

CONCEAL THEMSELVES WITH THE BUSH TCR ET AL AS “RUMP FACTIONS”, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, KOCH LIBERTARIANS OR TEA PARTY AND OR “OTHERS” TO OUR: CONSTITUTION(S); CONTRACTS; VOTING; CIVIL RIGHTS; RELIGIOUS RIGHTS; PARENTAL RIGHTS; COMMERCE; AND THE INTEGRITY AND DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE OF OUR COURT(S) AS REPLY TO THEIR RICO, 18 U.S.C. 2382-TREASON AND COMMON CORE CULT “FLIP- FLOP” “TCR” WHO IN OPEN COURT(S) AND CHURCHES BY THEIR PROPHESIED CRIMINAL AND ADMITTED ABDUCTIONS AND COMMON CORE “HATE CRIMES” BY THEIR USING F.S.104 “DICTATORSHIP” AS “PREDICATE ACTS” THEY OPENLY DO AS: “WITH THEIR THUMB ON THE SCALE” BY THEIR OWN ADMISSIONS TO THE 11th CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS WHO SAID “PROVE THE GLASS CEILING” CO=PARTICIPANTS WHO “IMPEDED” TOWNSEND AS A NON “PAY TO PLAYER” TO PROVIDE EQUAL PROTECTION OF GOD’S LAWS AGAINST ALL WHO COLLUDED WITH HEATHER GRAY ET AL AND RON BECK ET AL AND JOHN GRANT ET AL AND KAREN HARROD TOWNSEND ET AL AND ALL BY ILLEGAL TAKING FOR ILLEGAL GREED “WANTING THEIR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO”; FOR ALL POWER AND THEY OPENLY VIOLATE WITH INTENTIONAL TORTS TO/OF “ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER” AS “DUE PROCESS” IN COURTS AND OUR CHURCH(S) AND OUR VOTING RIGHTS; AS THEIR RULES OF A.G. BUTTERWORTH PANCAKES AND TRUMPS THEIR “TWO-TIER” GRANT(S)-MOODY’S-BONDI-SMITH/PATEL AND BUSH(S)-KOCH’S-SCOTTS-CANADAY’S-MOODY’S-LEE’S- CHILES-CHAPINS-MCCARTHY-CRIST-ROWE WITH FRAPS 1-3 AND “OTHERS DOE-SMITH-DETZNER-NEWHALL-CAMPBELLS-LANE ET AL TO BE NAMED” ET AL “PREDICATE ACT(S)” AS AN ILLEGAL “RANKIN ID.” “RUMP FACTION” IN AND FOR TREASON PER F.S. 104. 051- F.S. 104.091 are equal admitted CO=PARTICIPANTS AS TOWNSEND IS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” LAWFUL CANDIDATE AND WHISTLEBLOWER ABOUT THEIR OLIGARCHS AND DEEP STATE AS THE LANE-BUSH-CRENSHAW”S-CHILES- CANADY’S-BUTT’S-KOCH’S BONDI ADMITTED AND CONNECTER AS “HUNTER” ET AL “TCR” ET AL PREYING SINCE 11/1987 ON “WHISTLEBLOWER” TOWNSEND and as Townsend again Files this: I. NOTICE OF CASE LAW: As 5 U.S. Code 7311 and Executive Order 10450 stating: “Loyalty and Striking—An individual may not accept or hold a

101 position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; (2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; (3) participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; (4) is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia…” As Executive Order 10450 enacted by President Dwight D. Eisenhower enacted per the Executive Order 10237 of April 26, 1951 as the rule of law(s) and as unlawfully removed by defendant co=conspirator Obama on his last day in office for concealment of their crimes past and planned future crimes as shown herein this Townsend Action continues to prove more crimes and cover-up’s as follows as these charges by Attorney’s General William Barr prove the “BUSH TCR” planning as Obama stated in the video at: https://www.facebook.com/100024350380585/posts/678980206226986/?d= n of this planned future Scam by “Oligarchs” as defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” on Townsend and those for whom he as a: Victim Dad; F.S. 617.0834 Church “Not for Profit” Representative; and a “Private Attorney’s General” still speaks since 1987; ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR CHARGES IN VENEZUELA Details this Townsend action since 1987: “STORY BY TRACY WILKINSON DEL QUENTIN WILBER ////LOS ANGELES TIMES March 26, 2020 ILLEGAL DRUG TRAFFICKING AND FOUND AT: https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/article 240892976.html “began by Hugo Chavez, [a.k.a. BUSH(s)Presidents] and Vladimir Padrino Lopez the Defense Minister [a.k.a. BUSH et al] was indicted on charges of allowing drug dealers [a.k.a. the Lane Gang with Jeb Bush, Jeffery Epstein, Smiths, Ballards, Walkers, Chiles, Canady’s, Chapins, Carr’s, Dimond, Grants, Scotts, Crist, Butterworth, Beck et al] who paid him bribes in a five- year [since over 25 years] span starting in 2014 to safely transit his country’s airspace [the worlds, Little Rock, Florida airspace and trample by TCR Civil Rights violations in Courts and Churches] while ordering others to be shot down or forced to land.

102

Maikel Jose Moreno Perez the chief justice of Venezuela’s supreme court, [a.k.a. John Roberts, Charles Canady et al and Attorney’s Generals State and Federal] was charged in a criminal complaint [by Randall C. Townsend] with conspiring to commit money laundering by accepting tens of millions of dollars in bribes to “illegally fix dozens of civil and criminal cases.” The justice Department [of Townsend et al] said. Indited by a federal grand jury in New York on charges of participating in a narco-terrorism Diosdado Cabello, the head of the constitutional assembly; Hugo Armando Carvajal Barrios, former director of military intelligence; and Cliver Antonio Aleala Cordones, a former general.” As now these same and new persons who aided and abetted the Columbian Drug Cartels during the George Bush #41 and his sons George and Jeb Bush with Oliver North [IRAN CONTRA] and Attorney General William Barr worked with in prior times as reported by themselves and per Roger Stone written in his books. Video Admission by Cindy McCain showing ALL KNEW and used the Jeffery Epstein Actions to conceal their RICO and HOBBS ACT CRIMES. Video Admissions by Pam Bondi showing All KNEW and used the “Hunter Biden” Actions to conceal their RICO and HOBBS ACT CRIMES. J. RENEWED MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE FOR VIOLATIONS OF DUE PROCESS BY DELAY OF THE DEMANDED EMERGENCY RULINGS FROM TOWNSEND’S CLAIMS MADE: November 18, 1987, to Patricia McCarthy; March 1988, made to David Landis and David H. Popper (Former JAG); 1990’s, Multiple Claims for Emergency Rulings to David Popper and Bruce Chapin; 30 years of Motions to the Courts that the BUSH et al has “impeded”; October 24, 2018, Claims made in Action 2018-2293; November 6, 2018 Emergency Petition to the Florida Supreme Court; Continued Motions and other evidence to FSCT actions since the 1990’s as the Canady-Labarga Orders admit their collusion for crimes; Continued Motions and filings to First DCA exposing continued violations of Due Process and other Crimes.

SO NOW AS ALSO PROVED GUILTY SHAMED VICTIMS ALSO OF THE SAME OLIGARCHS THAT YOU “Canady et al” Lane et al “judges” and “Attorney’s Generals” and Kochs with Eddie Lampert and Steve Mnuchin and Jamie Dimond, George Soros and many others as Kmart Linda Rowe-Campbell connected with Ligori and Charlie Crist and his Chief of Staff and Bondi and Grant and others who ILLEGALLY CONSPIRED,

103

PROTECTED AND SERVED WHY DO YOU STILL PROTECT THEM FROM LAWFUL PROSECUTION BY TOWNSEND PER F.S. 80.02 as Townsend the “Lawful Church Guy” and “Private Attorney’s General” as began on 11/18/1987? So You, being with Moody Bondi you think you still are above the Power and Wrath and Justice of MY God? Conclusion THEREFORE, LEGALLY THIS First DCA, does not have the Legal Right to obstruct Justice and the “Redress Of Government” F.S. 80.02 Action as Government Defendants have now in the RECORD TO THE COURT(S) have admitted in OPEN COURT their own confessions and admissions of their PREDETERMINED CRIMES and THEIR DAMAGES OF THEIR RICO ACTIONS as their own actions and these co=conspirators admit. Therefore, this March 1, 2020, action to the First DCA must be in the Record of this Action as the new admissions by Attorney General William Barr is found to be admissions of the RICO Crimes as Townsend as a “CHURCH GUY” and “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” stated were crimes that AG BARR and Now FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CHIEF “JUDGE” Charles Canady Jr. admitted were done by himself as a co=conspirator with Charles E. Lane Jr. and Charles Williams Jr. his co=participants attorney and these “OTHERS” Named and “Others Doe to be Named” who are still illegally abducting Townsend’s Children, Money, Rights and Due Process and illegally impeding Free Commerce and Rights as co=conspirators with the Oligarchs Lane et al paid since 1987 using Townsends money and rights they illegally obtained and still illegally use against Townsend and victims obtaining “Justice” and “Recovery” and “Restitution” as this Action since 1987 Demands Due Process. Emphasis Added as dismissal of this Motion shows more criminal “impeding”. “IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT APPEAL CASE NO. 1D-18-4845 AS FOR DE NOVO REVIEW ASSIGNED PER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR CASES: SC18-1890; SC18-1915; SC18-1951; SC19-324; SC16-92; SC-16- 1501; SC11-41; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07-1181; SC60-95935; SC60- 95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; AND FROM LOWER COURT CASES 18-CA-2293, 2nd CIR. COURT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FROM STATE AND FEDERAL COURT CASES 8:06- CV2050T-30TGW (JUDGE J.MOODY. JR):TO “JUDGE EK; TO 16-CV- 3299-EAK-MAP (JUDGE J.W.) TOWNSEND V. GRANT ET AL; AS- F.S.: 86 DECLARATORY; F.S. 80- QUO WARRANTO; ORGANIZED CRIME(S); F.R.O.C.P. 1.530 AND 1.540; FEDERAL HOBBS ACT; RICO;

104

FLORIDA AND FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS; 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 ACTS AS BEGAN AS 88-2554,18th CIR. SEMINOLE COUNTY FL. AS- RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUAL AND AS F.S. 80.02 AS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS “Private Attorney’s General” RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, State of Florida, EX REL, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, F.S. 617.0834, AND “Next Friend” ET AL, Appellant, Plaintiff’s/Counter Defendant, Petitioner(s), V. CHARLES E. LANE JR. AS CHARLES E. LANE JR. ET AL AS WITH BUSH ET AL; PATRICIA MCCARTHY; POPPER; CHAPIN(S); WILLIAMS JR. ET AL; SCRUGGS, AS GRAY ET AL; AS GRANT ET AL AS “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” AND NAMED INCLUDING: DETZNER, SMITH; ERTEL; LEE; FLORIDA SEC. OF STATE ET AL, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND AGENTS ET AL 2019-1980’S; FLORIDA ATTORNEY’S GENERALS MOODY-BONDI THRU SMITH; FLORIDA GOVERNORS DESANTIS, SCOTT, TO GRAHAM; FLORIDA LEGISLATORS JOHN GRANT ET AL; SHERIFFS; AND OTHERS AS “ALL OFFICIALLY AND/OR “AS “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR- PERSONS-INDIVIDUALS”AS IN F.R.A.P. EXHIBITS AS Appellees and AS Counter Plaintiffs ET AL______/

TOWNSEND MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE AND COMPEL REPLY RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, Individual; And AS “Private Attorney’s General” Civil Rights Act of 1871; and Per F.S.617.0834, of FBCCP/CPCS; F.S. 86; F.S. 80; Qui Tam; Fl. Et. Rel. Never lawfully removed. P.O. Box 5, Osprey Fl. 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com

105

“MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BY JUDGE MARVA CRENSHAW ON 5/10/2006 AND BY FEDERAL JUDGE JAMES MOODY JR. (FATHER OF ASHLEY MOODY) ON 3/15/2007 WITH CONFIRMATION ORDERS BY FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUDGE CHARLES CANADY JR. AND CHIEF JUDGE JORGE LABARGA AS THE FIFTH DCA AFFIRMED IN ROBINSON V. WEIGLE YET FOR THEIR AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” RICO OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE TO CONCEAL THEMSELVES WITH THE BUSH TCR ET AL AS “RUMP FACTIONS”, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, KOCH LIBERTARIANS OR TEA PARTY AND OR “OTHERS” TO OUR: CONSTITUTION(S); CONTRACTS; VOTING; CIVIL RIGHTS; RELIGIOUS RIGHTS; PARENTAL RIGHTS; COMMERCE; AND THE INTEGRITY AND DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE OF OUR COURT(S) AS REPLY TO THEIR RICO, 18 U.S.C. 2382-TREASON AND COMMON CORE CULT “FLIP- FLOP” “TCR” WHO IN OPEN COURT(S) AND CHURCHES BY THEIR PROPHESIED CRIMINAL AND ADMITTED ABDUCTIONS AND COMMON CORE “HATE CRIMES” BY THEIR USING F.S.104 “DICTATORSHIP” AS “PREDICATE ACTS” THEY OPENLY DO AS: “WITH THEIR THUMB ON THE SCALE” AND “WANTING THEIR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO”; FOR ALL POWER AND THEY OPENLY VIOLATE WITH INTENTIOINAL TORTS TO/OF “ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER” IN COURTS AND CHURCH(S); AS THEIR RULES OF A.G. BUTTERWORTH PANCAKES AND TRUMPS THEIR “TWO-TIER” GRANT(S)-MOODY’S-BONDI-SMITH/PATEL AND BUSH(S)-KOCH’S-SCOTTS-CANADAY’S-MOODY’S-LEE’S- CHILES-CHAPINS-FRAPS 1-3 AND “OTHERS DOE-SMITH- DETZNER-NEWHALL-CAMPBELLS-LANE ET AL TO BE NAMED” ET AL “PREDICATE ACT(S)” AS A “RANKIN ID.” “RUMP FACTION” IN AND FOR TREASON PER F.S. 104. 051- F.S. 104.091 are equal and admitted CO=PARTICIPANTS AS TOWNSEND IS THE CANDIDATE AND WHISTLEBLOWER ABOUT THEIR OLIGARCHS AND DEEP STATE AS THE LANE-BUSH-CRENSHAW”S-BUTT’S-KOCH’S ET AL “TCR” ET AL SINCE 11/18/1987 and Files this: I. NOTICE OF CASE LAW: As 5 U.S. Code 7311 and Executive Order 10450 stating: “Loyalty and Striking—An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; (2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; (3) participates in a

106 strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; (4) is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia…” As Executive Order 10450 enacted by President Dwight D. Eisenhower enacted per the Executive Order 10237 of April 26, 1951 as the rule of law(s) and as unlawfully removed by Obama his last day in office for concealment of their crimes as shown herein this Townsend Action continues to prove more crimes as follows. II. Florida Governor Ron Desantis in violation of his Oath and the Vote of the “We the People” as a path of voters “Equal Protection of Organic Rights” continues to “impede” per U.S. Constitution Article 1. Section 10, as these Defendants named herein and “Others Doe to be Named” are the “Bushes et al TCR Felons” exposed since 11/18/1987, as Townsend proves even by their own acts and admissions in the Records of the Courts that conspires and obstructs Townsend and others from our Equal Protections and Rights to even Vote as they falsely promise a “Blank Line” and then “Omit” the “Blank Line” and illegally do admitted HOBBS ACT AND RICO “Hate Crimes” against Townsend and Townsend et al. See https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/0202/02/19/florida-loses- appeals-court-ruling-on-felon-voting-law-1262200 as now the victims of their “Unjust” Courts actions seek to remove the “Bush TCR Nobility” from their Government “Unjust Enrichment”, and Extrinsic Fraud Acts and illegal acts done “under color of law” or “under color of official right”. III. Another MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE AND COMPEL REPLY TO TOWNSEND”S 2/3/2020: A. Motion for Oral Arguments and Production of Records; and B. Motion to Strike; and B. Motion for Sanctions; and C. Motion for Arrest Warrants; and D. Motion for Disclosure and Discovery; and E. Motion for Oral Arguments; and F. Motion to File Amended Reply Brief to include Reply and or Cross Reply Brief to the Samuels et al “Void” Order of 1/29/2020 for and by repeated: Felony Two-Tier Voter Obstruction; Felony False Certification of Elections”; Breach of Oaths and Bonds; Collusion with “alias” Attorney’s Generals, Governors and “Others” for: “Fraud”; Theft; Unjust Enrichment; Obstruction; “Extrinsic Fraud”; “Fraud on the Court”; and Tort violations as “Hate Crimes” using even “Common Core” as a weapon of “Hate” and

107

“Frauds” and Thefts against the FBCCP/CPCS BYLAWS and Townsend as F.S. 6170834, Representative and Obedient “Church Guy” to Our Bylaws and “Private Attorney’s General” and as a “Candidate” states as stated in “short and plain” words in the October 24, 2018, Action: “WHEREFORE, THIS CONCLUSION SHOULD Candidates: Ashley Moody, Republican; Sean Shaw, Democrat; or Jeffrey Marc Siskind, NPA; or “Others…” [Now as Proved Attorney Generals and “others” by violations of their Oaths and Bonds in collusion and obstruction of F.S. 99 and F.S. 104 and for RICO, HOBBS ACT CRIMES AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING; ANTI- TRUST AND OTHER CRIMES]; “…obtain the office of Florida Attorney’s General, said Office has been obtained by a fraud and their silence to object or “impede” Townsend from being allowed to be a “Write-in” by which they…” [Named Defendants since as Lane Et al and those “All officially and individually, Defendants” and “Others Doe to be Named” with whom Lane-Williams-McCarthy-Popper-Chapin-Grant-Gray-S cruggs- Dickinson & Gibbons et al used Townsend’s Money and Reputation and Work Product and Resources, Relationships, and Rights with whom Lane Et al and Patricia McCarthy et al and as listed in the FRAPS 1-3 and January 2019 Served Persons and “Others Doe to be Named” who even fraudulently acted to “Certify” an Election(S) when F.S. 104 directly prohibits any and all persons per F.S. 104 from the polls and or “Official Right” to obstruct the “write-in” or the “elector” ] “…aided and abetted” in obtaining said office…” [and their each said “pay to play” “Under Color of Official Right” Office used to conceal their “Malicious Enterprise” as Townsend said since 1987] “…and thus they become disqualified by these Fraudulent Acts and Violation of Civil Rights and Conspiracy of these acts as another “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” act against these Rights as “We the People”.” Defendants Named Lane et al and McCarthy, Popper, Chapin(s) et al Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” still conspire and obstruct and Anita Patel by fraud claims not “knowingly” understanding Townsend but they Obstruct showing their frauds and “Fraud on the Court” and even to the U.S. Senate and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and all illegally in their Briefs in this 18-4845 Action per F.S. 104 and F.S. 80.02 and F.S. 86 and “Due Process” and “Equal Process” and “Fraud on the Court” with “Fruit from the Poisoned Bush” for “Human Trafficking” and their “unjust enrichment” continue Delay of the 11/18/1987 Townsend Action filed as 88-

108

2554, 18th Circuit as continues in this since 1987 illegally “delayed” as an element of their RICO Malicious Human Trafficking Prosecution, “Emergency” Action and Petition for Mandamus Protection Action of Civil Rights and “Redress Of Government” “Pay to Play” Action Townsend filed on 10/24/18 as a continued action of these Actions since 11/18/1987 now as: “IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT APPEAL CASE NO. 1D-18-4845 AS FOR DE NOVO REVIEW ASSIGNED PER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR CASES: SC18-1890; SC18-1915; SC18-1951; SC19-324; SC16-92; SC-16- 1501; SC11-41; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07-1181; SC60-95935; SC60- 95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; AND FROM LOWER COURT CASES 18-CA-2293, 2nd CIR. COURT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FROM STATE AND FEDERAL COURT CASES 8:06- CV2050T-30TGW (JUDGE J.MOODY. JR):TO “JUDGE EK; TO 16-CV- 3299-EAK-MAP (JUDGE J.W.) TOWNSEND V. GRANT ET AL; AS- F.S.: 86 DECLARATORY; F.S. 80- QUO WARRANTO; ORGANIZED CRIME(S); F.R.O.C.P. 1.530 AND 1.540; FEDERAL HOBBS ACT; RICO; FLORIDA AND FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS; 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 ACTS AS BEGAN AS 88-2554,18th CIR. SEMINOLE COUNTY FL. AS- RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUAL AND AS F.S. 80.02 AS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS “Private Attorney’s General” RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, State of Florida, EX REL, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, F.S. 617.0834, AND “Next Friend” ET AL, Appellant, Plaintiff’s/Counter Defendant, Petitioner(s), V. CHARLES E. LANE JR. AS CHARLES E. LANE JR. ET AL AS WITH BUSH ET AL; PATRICIA MCCARTHY; POPPER; CHAPIN(S); WILLIAMS JR. ET AL; SCRUGGS, AS GRAY ET AL; AS GRANT ET AL AS “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” AND NAMED INCLUDING: DETZNER, SMITH; ERTEL; LEE; FLORIDA SEC. OF STATE ET AL, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND AGENTS ET AL 2019-1980’S; FLORIDA ATTORNEY’S GENERALS MOODY-BONDI THRU SMITH; FLORIDA GOVERNORS DESANTIS, SCOTT, TO GRAHAM; FLORIDA LEGISLATORS JOHN GRANT ET AL; SHERIFFS; AND OTHERS AS “ALL OFFICIALLY AND/OR “AS “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR- PERSONS-INDIVIDUALS”AS IN F.R.A.P. EXHIBITS AS Appellees and AS Counter Plaintiffs ET AL______/”; IV. DEMAND And charge to each per 18 U.S.C. 1512, (“intent” not needed to be proved but is now shown in all filings since 11/18/1987 and herein) who continue the crimes Townsend reports to each since 11/18/1987,

109 and adds “Others” to be Named now as Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, Craig Latimer, and Hillsborough Sheriff Chad Chronister (as Continuing prior crimes and as replacing prior sheriff David Gee, a named Defendant) for knowingly, willfully, intentionally and recklessly removing the “Blank Line” for a “Write-in” elector of “We the People” on the 2018 Ballot of Hillsborough County as was present on previous ballots: and V. Charges to “All As Officially and Individually Defendants, for failure of “Equal Protection” and “Failure of Due Process” as even the Email of May 7, 2014, 2:46 pm, Hillsborough County Sheriff Deputy John McDarby, writing “We can’t enforce federal laws….” As filed as Composite Exhibit #20 in the 2015-1928 then Florida Supreme Court Action SC-16-1501 show as his threats for “All as Officially and Individually Defendants” are documented in these related actions to conceal their Bushes “Predicate Acts” including the criminal actions of John Grant et al as sending illegal Deputies Jeffers, Howlett, Smoak and Corbin as the “Rump Faction” conspiring with Senator John Grant, Jeb Bush, Moody’s and “Others” to advance Common Core “Unjust Enrichment” of Church/School funds and defame Townsend in a “False Public Light” for being a “Whistleblower” exposing criminal acts in violation of the 1994 First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and Citrus Park Christian School Bylaws as they used Ron Beck and Karen Harrod Townsend with HCSO Deputies and Mark Ober-Pam Bondi-Charles Scruggs and their agents as Judge Raul Palomino affirmed their criminal acts recorded in the transcript filed with the court to allege Criminal Charges against Townsend (proved whistleblower to their for Common Core abduction of Townsend’s Children as extortion for reporting their thefts of Designated Church/School monies and as “judge” Crenshaw and others affirmed their Common Core Jeb and Columba Bush RICO Gang acting as “Hate Crimes” to Townsend and our Church Bylaws just to advance their agenda that in 2016, over 95% of Americans opposed and as now Gov. Ron Desantis and others tries to abandon without “JUSTICE” for us the victims their Common Core failure creates) in their action for “Fraud on the Court” and Others. Additionally, Mark Ober replacement Andrew Warren, as Hillsborough County State Attorney fails 18 U.S.C. 1512 being informed since his Election of these ongoing crimes within his jurisdiction. VI. The Attorney General of Florida website states: “The ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA is an elected state officer who serves as the attorney for the State of Florida. The attorney general is responsible for the enforcement of state consumer protection and antitrust laws as well as civil prosecution of criminal racketeering. In the area of

110 criminal law the attorney general represents the state when those convicted appeal their convictions, including capital murder cases…” And clearly as shown in this Townsend continued Action since 11/18/1987, shows that the Florida Attorney General and “Others” have obstructed Townsend and the Organic Rights Townsend tries to protect and in their Organized “TCR” RICO Gang conducted multiple criminal actions as even for an Anti-Trust Monopoly conspired and obstructed Townsend from seeking the “Write-in” as Attorney General by their intentional Obstruction and “false promise of a future act” and then removal of the “Blank Line” and now even since 10/24/2018, acted to illegally “certify” and fraudulent election of the frauds by the Smith-Moody Attorney’s Generals and others. VII. As reported by Florida Politics and the News Service of Florida, in their email of February 12, 2020, U.S. District Judge Mark Walker stated, it “imposes a discriminatory burden on plaintiffs’ voting rights”. Further Walker wrote “By systematically awarding a statistically significant advantage to the candidates of the party in power, Florida’s ballot order scheme takes a side in partisan elections…The Constitution does not allow “a state to put its thumb on the scale and award an electoral advantage to the party in power…”. Further Walker wrote, “In a state with a history of election results in which the margin of victory or defeat is less than three to five percentage points… the state law has impacted plaintiffs First and 14th Amendment rights by systematically allocating that small statically significant advantage to candidates of the same party as the last-elected governor.” Thus, as “defendant judges Cooper, FSCT, 1st DCA and Gievers” should also know as “Smith-Moody-McCarthy-Newhall-Patel et al” should know: “The Constitution does not allow “a state to put its thumb on the scale and award an electoral advantage to the party in power…” surely then does not allow the “state” and or as said by: a. F.S. 99.061(4)(b) to “obstruct” and or b. “vet” a “Write-In” candidate; and or c. to “fraud of a future promise” of the “Blank Line”; d. then not deliver the “Blank Line”; and e. “conspire” to “vet”; and f. “conspire to “omit the blank line”; and or g. then do the multiple crimes as stated per F.S. 104; Florida and U.S. Constitutional Rights that by “Delay” these Defendants Named and “January 2019 Served” and “Others Doe to be Named” that Defendants and even the Smiths-Moody Attorneys Generals and their “McCarthy, Lane, Williams, Lane-Trohn et al, Canady’s Sr. and Jr. ; and Popper et al; Chapin

111 et al; Ballards et al; Scruggs et al; Gray et al; Carr et al and Grant’s (John’s and Jamie); with Charlie Crist; Rick Scott with Butterworth; Detzner and Cohen, sheriffs and Others of the Bush-Koch’s Oligarchs who continue to illegally conceal their other “Hunter Bidens” as Pam Bondi on the Senate Floor in the Impeachment Trial of President Donald J. Trump outlined their own “Pay to Play” as Townsend shows Lane et al takes Townsend’s property and rights illegally since 1987 and before and his children since 10/20/1999, they their illegal RICO Acts for their “Unjust Enrichment. VIII. In their allowed 71 page Brief filed January 7, “The Governor Ron Desantis administration and the Republican groups, who joined the case filed by the Democratic National Committee, The Democratic Governors Association, the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, and the Priorities USA super-PAC filed the federal lawsuit in 2018, as interveners…” and the lawyers for the Secretary of State Laurel Lee “appealed Walker’s decision” as “…from the date of this order forward, no ballot shall issue which is organized pursuant to the ballot order scheme described in this law…” as reported by Florida Politics and the News Service of Florida to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. IX. “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 at 491. X. The Speech’s made by Defendant Pam Bondi, Former Florida Attorney General even puts all these Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” Arguments as “Fraud on the Court” and “Fraud to the Senate” as she describes herself and their actions as the Hunter Biden Scam for “Pay to Play” as Obstruction for Unjust Enrichment using Political Offices for only their “Predicate Acts”. See https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/1/30/201 15581/pam-bondi-trump-impeachment-trial and the https://m.youtube/com/watch?v=oPvMuzyVOig&feature=youtu.be#dialog and know the intent, knowledge and plan of conspiracy and obstruction by the Former Attorney General to use the Office of the Florida Attorney General and their “agents” and co=conspirators to continue these “Frauds” and “Fruits from the Poisoned Bush” as Townsend has since 11/18/1987, exposed to Patricia McCarthy who joined the Hillsborough County State Attorney’s Office and this “TCR Lane et al-Bushs-McCain-Kochs-Roberts- Grant-Canady-Chiles-Chapin-Crist-Smiths-Ballards-Butterworth-Bondi- Moody’s et al Gang” with Others as the papers of Patricia McCarthy and “Others” shows their RICO and Hobbs Act Crimes, their own words reveal.

112

XI. As Townsend told Patricia McCarthy and “Others” since 11/18/87, Of their Lane et al Malicious Enterprise as Crenshaw and Moody Jr. and Canady Jr and “Others” affirmed this video of Cindy McCain, https://www.google.com/amp/.s/www/washingtonexaminer/com/news/cindy -mccain-admits-we-all-knew-about-epstein%3f_amp=true shows as proof of what Townsend reported to Patricia McCarthy and “Others” since 11/18/1987, as the illegal “TCR Gang” that then President George W. Bush #43 and Florida Governor Charlie Crist with their Agents and “imposter” and “appointed agents” and “Others Doe to be Named” then knowingly granted pardons and “sweet deals” to Jeffery Epstein for their personal “Unjust Enrichment” and continues criminal actions. XII. See https://www.wfla.com/1811854503 as proof of their Crimes since 1987 as Threats by Government Persons on “Church Guy” “Whistleblower” Townsend and Townsend et al as Townsend informed many time the Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd the shows their “alias Law Enforcers” as Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” double standards and obstruction and cover up of their own crimes as he details why their arrest of the Vice-Mayor of Fort Meade. XIII. The John Grant November 10, 2012, 4:47 pm and the additional emails shown below in this Action Records with the Court and “Alias Law Enforcers” known by the Florida Attorney’s Generals that Patel, Newhall, Davis et al tries to deny their co=conspirators Bondi, Cridlin, Moody’s et al confirms his threats and knowledge of our meeting to expose his threats he knowingly did since 1994 and before. XIV. Additionally, in the Governor Ron Desantis Executive Order 20-44 calling for the investigation of “Not for Profits” and of the Tiffany Carr, Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence (FCADV) investigation into their actions, this co=participants Gang, connects these persons via Jeb Bush et al with Columba Bush and John Grant and Brian Ballard and Pam Bondi and Ashley Moody and Others as also with their COMMON CORE RICO for “Pay to Play” as the First Baptist Church Of Citrus Park Business Meetings of 1999 and 2000, as filed with the lower court was admitted as part of the Criminal “HATE CRIMES” ruled by Marva Crenshaw as admitted by their attorney Charles Denny IV on May 10, 2006 and as Federal Judge James Moody Jr. admitted on March 15, 2007. See sites like https://www.bradenton.com/news/politics-government/state- politics/article240736811.html XV. Multiple Sheriff’s also are in violation of F.S. 104 for this BUSH TCR RICO ongoing cover up to damage Townsend and Townsend et al. XVI. Hillsborough County Sheriff Gee was as per his predecessors, and

113 his co=sheriffs have enjoined with the defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” and even in Hillsborough County, Florida in 2018 removed the “Write In” “Blank Line” for Sheriff that was on the previous Ballots that Townsend asked electors to use. This shows direct collusion to violate F.S. 104, to directly “Obstruct” Townsend and Townsend et al. that these Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” have used intentional F.S. 104, Felonies by themselves and the Deputies Jeffers, Howlett, Corbin, Smoak, McDarby, and many “Others” as “judges Moody jr and judge Merryday” admitted and as sent by as admitted John Grant and Others to tell Townsend he was to be as the “Lawyer and Registered Agent” for this “Church Guy” to: “Stop the Lawsuits; Stop trying to see your children; and stop going to your Church” and “don’t come to Idlewild” and even in many emails these of John Grant and Others say “don’t come to court” in 2016 to defend yourself from the John Grant Counter-suit for his concealment of their Crimes or “don’t come to Hillsborough County” even for the “judge” “Battles” 2016 hearing or you will be arrested as “Bring your toothbrush”. XVII. Thus showing their Knowledge, Willfulness, Intent and Recklessness is shown in this Governor Ron Desantis et al and Secretary of State Laurel Lee et al action and their illegal F.S. 104 arguments and their instructions given them by Federal Judge Walker are even more evidence of their “Fraud on the Court” per their Arguments in this “Thumb on the Scale” case as they jointly argue to only protect their “Government” Obstruction and Jointly “Obstruct” the Write In Candidate as they all conspire to the court to ignore and Omit the Non-Affiliated “Independent” Voter desiring to use the “Blank Line” as Townsend acted to do to protect his rights and those for whom he speaks since 11/18/1987. XVIII. All the while this First District Court of Appeals, the Florida Supreme Court, The Gievers Court, the Cooper Court, The Governor’s; The Secretaries of State; the “Elections Bureau” and “Others” and their “Others Doe to be Named” co=participants in violation of F.S. 104 and delays and as “Malicious Prosecution” for avoiding their duty to act in this “Emergency” Filed continued action since 1987, that Townsend filed to protect these same Rights from these same Hobbs Act and RICO Act and F.S. 99 “Obstruction” “Vetters” in violation of F.S. 104, for “Human Trafficking” “We the People” against our “Free Will” Rights protected from Government and the Right to Redress Government, these Co=participants Defendants via former Senator John Grant (Chair of the Judiciary Committee) continues to make email threats to Townsend as since 1994, as John Grant with “Others” and now his son, Jamie Grant (Chair of the Judiciary Committee) continues to try to as his dad did the “Ms. Doubtfire Law” under fraudulent practices to pass

114 legislation that an “Honest Attorney General” who should be protecting the Rights of “We the People” should be opposing the Jamie Grant bill PCB JDC20-01 (Like SB778) making it harder for citizens to get our initiatives to even protect our Rights from them as Dictator Legislators with and for “Hate Crimes” on the Ballots as we protect our Sovereign and Organic Rights to “Religious Freedoms”, “Parental Rights from TCR and abductions” and “Redress Government”. Where is this 1st DCA by their silence protecting our “Equal Protection” of “Due Process” that the Grant Family and “Others” can make “Hate Crime” threats of: bodily harm, threats and actual abduction of our Children, designated money; Church/School Bylaws Rights and Ministry they destroyed to the point of closure; and “Fruit from the Poisoned Bush” as Grant et al did with Common Core and their Carr-Moody et al Family concealments of Crimes that now the Legislature and the Governor Desantis Executive Order 20-44 against the Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence (FCADV) as that Carr-Bush et al Group conspired to damage Townsend and Townsend et al. Facts in these lower court records Townsend demanded Clerks to include in this First DCA Action show that Townsend’s Attorney Charles Scruggs with Grant Et al and Gray Et al and Chapin’s-Popper-McCarthy et al and Carrs aligned to damage “Church Guy Whistleblower” Townsend for their TCR RICO “Predicate Acts” as “Hate Crimes”. XIX. As the ROGER STONE book(s) and Others shows the Bush connections to crimes and their ties to Cocaine, these also show the criminal acts and persons that Townsend exposed to Patricia McCarthy and “Others” as “Law Enforcers” who continue to be concealed by the Florida Attorney’s Generals and “Others Doe to be Named” as the delays by this First District Court of Appeals continues to conceal and Obstruct Townsend since 1987, to obtain Justice as Our Constitution(s), prescribe, require and protect Townsend and Townsend et al of our Organic Rights still “impeded” by these admitted criminals as whom we redress “Government”. WHEREFORE: A. Any and all records of the Governor Ron Desantis Executive Order(s): 2019-183RE; JEFFERY EPSTEIN; 2019-147 RE: Joe McCabe and removing State Attorney Jack Campbell; 2019-32 RE: Common Core 2019-19 RE: Palm Beach County Elections Supervisor Susan Bucher; 2019-18 RE: Elections Supervisor Brenda Snipes; 2018- Executive Orders of Rick Scott previously demanded. 2020-44 RE: Executive Agency Public-Private Partnership Oversight; should be publicly produced to show how and who each “person” disbursed

115 and or received these State of Florida “unjust enrichments” as Townsend has tried to expose since about 1987. B. These above Motions and Charges should be treated with “Emergency” Status and Responses as Our Laws Require without “Delay” per “Due Process” and Protection of our Organic Rights which includes this F.S. 80.02, Redress Of Government Action to be processed by “Juries” to charge Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” with their crimes and to award “just” compensation to Townsend and those for whom he takes his these “Emergency” actions since 1987, which Defendants without excuse or immunity continue “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” by their same Torts for their “Unjust Enrichment” just as David H. Popper filed as directed by Patricia McCarthy and “Others” now proved done for “Fraud On the Court” and Fraud on their Client Townsend by their uses of “Fruits from the Poisoned Bush” the Oligarchs for whom they serve as in the Exhibits 1-3 as included in the 2018CA2293, 10/24/2018 filed Continued Action for protection from their Continuing “Hate Crimes” and RICO and F.S. 777.06 Human Trafficking and Drug Trafficking and their still not protecting “We the People” as a Grand, Criminal, Civil Jury will find and administer justice. C. By Mail, additional Summons will be forwarded to be served by the Clerk on “Others Doe to be Named” who have been Ocasio id. and F.S. 104 “co=conspirators” and co=participants to be brought to justice as now on the public and court record these defendants have affirmed they are not above the law and F.S. 104 clearly does not allow any to escape penalty’s stated. FROM the Action(s) filed in the lower courts to be included are: A. “CASE FILE TOWNSEND v. MCDARBY 13th Circuit 13DR-5128 Ruled by Judge Barton, “No act of violence is alleged.” April 3, 2013 by 8:15 in the morning without even time to have read the over 40 pages of proof. Also Judge Barton should have recused himself as Judge Barton was the “alias Judge” who ruled in the FBCCP use of the property at N. Gunn Highway and in this ruling actually fully aligned with what Townsend said in 1997+=Now! So ruling against me now is confirming the collusion and singularity issues of the Malicious Enterprise as McDarby is continuing the HCSO and Others threats. HCSO DETECTIVE JOHN McDarby-- F.S.S. 836.05 Threats; Extortion In case you think I this ole country boy forgot on September 8, 1999 and before and still now I said in the Church Demand Meeting, “Show me the money, Stop the Building Scheme Frauds and Stop lying to my family and Church Members” as I follow what is standing law in Florida as recorded as “Free Will” in the Blountstown Case as judge Crenshaw with your illegally used attorney Charles Denny IV conceded in 2006:”

116

B. Florida Supreme Court Case SC16-1501 from 2015-1928, 13th Circuit Townsend et al v. Grant et al from 02-03812 13th Circuit from 01- 15813 and 01-15814 13th Circuit Actions from Actions back to 88-2554 18th Circuit Townsend et al v. Lane et al demanding “Jury Trial” on “Lane et al Torts” and “Lane Et al Unjust Enrichment”; C. Email of May 7, 2014, 2:46 pm, Hillsborough County Sheriff Deputy John McDarby, writing “We can’t enforce federal laws….” As filed as Composite Exhibit #20 in the 2015-1928 Action. D. “ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION RANDALL TOWNSEND, individually, And RANDALL TOWNSEND, as F.S.617 REPRESENTATIVE for the FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS PARK/CITRUS PARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Case No.2015-CA-001928 Plaintiffs, vs. JOHN GRANT, individually, JOHN GRANT, As Registered Agent of First Baptist Church Of Citrus Park/Citrus Park Christian School, JOHN GRANT, P.A., et. Al., Defendants ______/

PLAINTIFF’S AFFIDAVIT WITH FACTS AND JOHN GRANT EMAILS AS GOES TO SHOW ACTS OF ALTER EGO OF THE SECT AND SECT AGENTS AS: FRAUDS, COLLUSION, MOTIVES, KNOWLEDGE OF BAD FAITH, MALICE, DEGREE OF MALICE, INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS OF TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURE, BREACH OF CONTRACT TO CAUSE UNJUST ENRICHMENT, “HATE CRIMES”, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, EXTRINSIC FRAUD AND FRAUD ON THE COURT BY “OFFICERS OF THE COURTS” INTENTIONAL FLAWED AND “IMPROPER AGREEMENTS” FOR THEIR MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

117

AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LAWFUL ORDERS COMES NOW, PLAINTIFF RANDALL TOWNSEND, AND AS COUNTER DEFENDANT, Individually, PRO SE, and FOR ALL PLAINTIFFS PER F.S.617.0834, AND UPON OUR FACTS, OPINION AND BELIEFS STATES: A. JUDGES ORDERS LISTED BELOW ARE VOID. B. DEFENDANTS CANNOT OBTAIN IMMUNITY. C. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HAVE NOT RUN. D. PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY SHALL BE GRANTED. E. IT IS NOT FUTILITY, BUT OUR RIGHT THAT AFTER DISCOVERY THAT ALL MCCARTHY DEFENDANTS HAVE ILLEGALLY “IMPEDED”, THAT PLAINTIFF’S SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO AMEND OUR PLEADINGS, AS SHALL BE NECESSARY. F. The Statute of Limitations has not run as these same actors perform criminal acts of Breach of Contract(s) and make “illegal agreements” and take bribes by Malicious Enterprise practices, frauds, defamation, and damages since 1987, against “Whistle Blower” Townsend and now Townsend et al, are still being maliciously abused for saying, “Show me our money” to each of our “alias” “Government Persons” and or as “Officer(s) of the Court” as first, Lawyer Patricia McCarthy and all “others”, abandoned, bribe and con their clients and as “alias Law Enforcers” scheming with “alias” judges Rom Powell et al do the three “C’s”, continue, conceal and control, and by “Government Intrusion”, “illegal Break in”, “Under Color of Law”, “claim self-granted immunity” who never have fulfilled their Fiduciary Obligations for which they are by Contract(s) Retained and accepted to perform to “Show Me the/Our Money” or then to expose their illegal “for Political Control” pattern of two prong practices of; show “their illegal agreements” and “uses” of Townsend et al’s “resources” and “rights” by: A. Lane(s)/Publix/Chiles/Canady(s)/Florida Bar/FDLE/Chapin(s) Bean et al, doing acts of drugs, frauds, bribery, abduction, extortion, for Political Influence using what is now termed “Black Money” as continues; then B. by the same connected John Grant/Bush(s)/Bean’s/Ober/Gee/Canady et al “persons” and “others” to continue their “Malicious Enterprise Plot” against lawful Townsend “at all costs”, then started illegal “uses” at F.S.617, FBCCP/CPCS “Corporation Not for Profit” and of “Others” and evolved “individual” and “Collective” illegal acts to gain our resources against our families and members in 1994, when as an “Alter Ego Sect”, these same

118

“Officers of the Court” and “Government Persons” in the three “C’s” allowed and directed a willful new “alleged clergy sect” Ron Beck, with Administrator Nasworthy, Meister, Leatherman, Howlett, Paula Powell, Tim and Karen Jeffers ET AL even using estranged Karen H. Townsend and “Others” who for unjust enrichment Breached the FBCCP Bylaws and intentionally still do Breach of the Bylaws, Frauds and Omissions of Truthful Discovery regarding FBCCP/CPCS business F.S.607, type records illegally using the F.S.617, Corporation “Not for Profit” in shams against their Fiduciary Duties for their personal use to advance their Political bribery: and these F.S.607, type records of “Our Money” used for McCarthy et al bribery, still have not been shown to Townsend as demanded since 1987, by Townsend and the various Members and Plaintiff’s request the court see Plaintiff’s Exhibits: #72, FBCCP/CPCS Quarterly Business Meeting October-December 1994, January 22, 1995, inclusive of October 9, 1994, Meeting, FBCCP Member and at times, Trustee, Jim Kerns…”Discretionary Funds—What is it exactly?”, as “Whistle Blowers” owner/member Plaintiffs, we still are asking the Non Member “Alter EGO” “Sect Agents”, Deputies Howlett/Jeffers with Grant ET AL to explain, “How was our Discretionary Funds used in your unjust enrichment, child abuse, unnecessary lawsuits, Political Influence, Black Pac Money, etc.?”. #73 FBCCP/CPCS Quarterly Business Meeting January –March 1995, April 9, 1995), IRS and other concerns and intentional evasive reports to members; #74, FBCCP January 14, 1996, Report of the Long Range Planning Committee; Goes to show facts and motives of Townsend and “Others”; #75, FBCCP/CPCS, 1993-1994, NOMINATING COMMITTEE REPORTS: Quickly Revised by the Membership to specifically show their new Townsend leadership adding for Nominations (Supreme Court) Committee and Long Range Planning, and Never yet per the Bylaws and the Law properly removed by the members “Free Will”, (See FREE WILL v. Blountstown) to these present times to investigate our damages caused by “non members” “implanted masked” sheriff Deputies Joe Howlett, Tim Jeffers ET AL, even frauds in the April 2000, Meeting, counseled by John Grant using Nasworthy (fired), Leatherman (abandoned ministry when 2006 production ordered by Crenshaw), Meister(fired), Tim’s wife Karen Jeffers “implanted” as School Principal without Due Process, “Others” with Beck(fired) and Grant(fired) even Grant 11/10/2012, admitting using Collusion with “alias judge Arnold” in case 02-03812, and “Others” per his

119 relationships and motives with Pat Ben, Mark Ober, David Gee, Pam Bondi and “Other Republicans”, then extended their “illegal agreements” with Denny IV, in collusion with Jeb Bush planted “alias judge Crenshaw” and George W. Bush “planted Mel Martinez et al” using frauds and omissions of truthful disclosure by Scruggs and Gray and “others” in violation of Religious Societies 9 , Corporations 57,& 312(7) who obtained their alleged “authority” by Frauds and alleged “Under Color of Law” illusions in violations of their Superior Officer “Whistle Blower” Townsend and the Bylaws required Practice of the Member/Owners. [Yarnall Warehouse & Transfer v. Three Ivory Bro. Moving Co. UI226 So2d 887, 890 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)]. Corporation, Directors and Officers must follow Bylaws as Plaintiff’s still expose Rotella v. Woods, 528 U.S.549 (2000), violations of law through our multiple conditions precedent lawsuits and information since 1987 and as per Lamb v. Leiter 603 So2d 632, 634-635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), proofs are now collected to show the coercion and duress and extrinsic frauds used by each of Townsend et al’s alleged responsible counsels doing “illegal agreements” since 1987. Additionally, because of these “Officers of the Courts”, frauds in “illegal agreements” and Breach of Contracts their “judgments” are Void as they were without authority or power to act because of their Extrinsic Frauds, Coercion, threats, misconduct, Breach of Contracts against these Clients, per ChavezRey v. Chavez Rey 213 So2d 596, (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) and Shienvold v. Hable, 622 So2d 538, 540 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Per Charles Canady’s, now Florida Supreme Court Judge, own words, not even the President is above the law, in his clarity of his impeachment causes and processes of Clinton and Nixon crimes, per his 8/1/99, speech to the Miami Lawyers Division of the Federalist Society and Plaintiff’s state: Canady et al “conceals and controls” the “breaking” by these Grant/Denny/Scruggs/Gray/Bondi/Cridlin and “others” continuing and newly allied in this 15CA1928 case alias “officers of the court” arguments for even him elevate themselves above the charges he made against even the President of the United States, Nixon, as he himself is an actor in the Three “C’s” of this illegal Nixon Type “Break-in” by “Government Intrusion” for Political Purposes invading not just for papers or secret information but herein abducting even a protected Religious Society funds and our homes and abducting our Children since 1999, and violating Contracts of Law, just as Nixon directed and herein the “actors” illegal actions as even the Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge joined the same Grant/Bush et al actors, concealed the same actors (including his Father’s actions for Publix and Chiles/Chapins), directed the same and new actors and still acts above the

120 law by his Fiduciary Duty to enforce equally the Florida Bar Standards and the Laws (done recusing the 2DCA and to disbarring Heather Gray but ignoring these accepted duties Gray as an “Canady(s) Agent” had to restore her clients and ignoring, and aiding and abetting others (including her State Attorney co-workers McCarthy, Ober, Bondi and others) continuing her proved illegal actions on these same Plaintiffs) and even by an Officer of the Court now attempts to continue the three “C’S” and block our property discovery while still claiming ownership of Plaintiffs resources and rights. John Grant et al using the “mask” as our Registered Agent/Legal Counsel (including Jeb Bush et al informed 6/30/1994 on TV13 about the Democrats Lane(s)/Chapin(s)/Chiles schemes and to control the “I-4 Corridor”) continues his frauds at facts and frauds at law, as informed by Townsend and Bush/Grant/Gibbs/Conner began since about 1994, in a direct relationship with these co-participants to doing the illegal “Sect break in” and or being exposed by even the delay discovery process they in the Three “C’s” continue illegally to collect Townsend’s Resources and deprive Townsend his and our assembly and liberties with his own children and Religious Societies as per the threats of Sheriffs, (HCSO, Pinellas, Pasco, Santa Rosa), FDLE, Florida Bar Members, State Attorney Ober’s Officers and using McDarby and others through 2014 and then even the Plaintiff Exhibit #71, November 5, 2015, email of ring leader Grant even warning Townsend doing his “due diligence” in a court of law to not to come to court or then Townsend would be arrested to go to jail as their Howlett, Jeffers, Corbin , Smoak and Clark and others of HCSO have extended these threats since 1994 in the FBCCP matters or as the Florida Bar Officers Chinaris and Boggs clear threats on behalf of John Harkness, John Berry and the Chapin/Chiles controlled Supreme Court saying; “If you ever get your law degree we will find a way to have you disbarred and put in jail for something!”, “Emphasis Added!”, and Chapin/Powell’s and for “Others” threats continue from the early 1990’s as these all toll the demand of “Show me my money” and since 1999, “Show me my rights to assemble with my kids and my FBCCP/CPCS members”. Per ROTELLA v. WOOD id. Congress intends, “The object of Civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, “private attorneys general”, dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. 3Id., at 187.” In this case, Townsend meets conditions precedent and repeats his demand of “Show me the money” since 1987 court actions against Grant/Bush seeds, their lawyers, Canady, Scott and Bondi illegally as bonding agent of the “Sect Agents”. Per Agency Holding Corp. v Malley-Duff, “intolerable uncertainty for

121 parties and time-consuming litigation” falls in this case to these as “officers of the court” and “Government Persons” acting outside their authority, who delay and cause the unlawful acts that is prohibited by their own rules, oaths and laws even under the Supreme Court cases saying they cannot “grant” themselves their own immunities or take unlawful compensation as these Officers of the Court’s and Government Persons allege. The three standards of Malley-Duff “Injury and Pattern Discovery”, “Last Predicate Act” and “Injury Discovery” do not say when a cause of action accrues as the facts of each case may vary. The standard appears to be one of three grounds: fraudulent concealment, continuing tort or conspiracy, or pendency of another court action. All exist in this case at the three “C”s, controls and confinement by their illegal agreements of Defendants as Justice Souter states “with improper relationships and illegal agreements” between McCarthy, Popper, Chapin, Gibbs, Grant, Conner, Scruggs, Gray, Denny and “Others” with their “Officers of the Court” and “Government Persons” estopped from their current arguments to the court as they at times have “pleaded guilty to charges of criminal fraud perpetrated through improper relationships and illegal agreements” as Townsend says, using still Deputies Howlett, Jeffers, Gerald (fired by Scott as payback) Bailey ET AL and Others in their unlawfully obtained Three “C’s” of Plaintiffs as this Townsend has exposed since 1987, to each new co-participant as they are known through these years of “impeded” discovery request to “impede” our assembly with our own F.S.607, records and our children since 1999, to violate their contract or Fiduciary Duty of Plaintiffs abduction has no statute of limitations per Federal or Florida Law. Per Sedima, S.P.R.L. v Imres Co., Inc. 741 F.2d 482, the Supreme Court “requires a Plaintiff to prove a RICO cause of action by a preponderance of the evidence” and show a “Common Scheme”, as these victims say “Hate Crimes”. Also is a standard that a case should not be dismissed prior to the needed discovery for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant to present their case as the collusion from McCarthy since 1987 shows per the ROBINSON RULING. And sets a standard that Plaintiff’s (in this case Townsend or the NON SECT Citizens or the Plaintiff Sect or their Sect Agents filing cases 01- 15813 &01-15814 &02-4974 & now Grant Counter Claim 15-CA-1928) should not be allowed to decide to pursue less than all parties who commit a crime keeping with the U.S. Constitution, Supremacy Clause based on contribution and indemnification. John Grant, with his Unconstitutional “conflicts of interest” by many

122

Registered Agents/Counsel/Legislator controls of “improper relationships and illegal agreements” Right from the Gate in 1994, breaches his Fiduciary Duties choosing the wrong horses, then being by Townsend and CPCS Pastor Dr. John Berry, fully informed, as our FBCCP Registered Agent /their “sect” biased legal Counsel, and as a very connected and popular Republican Legislator/Leader with Bush, Ken Conner, David Gibbs, Mel Martinez, et al, to control the I-4 Corridor from the Chiles/Chapins/Canady’s/Publix, for the Three “C’s”, made a stronger “Alter Ego” and defended the “Alter EGO” “Sect” and “Sect Agents” as Herman Meister when confronted about the abuses to Townsend’s Daughter J.G.T. as affirmed by Dr. Hoyos and “others”, then Meister said, “We made a pack to deny and destroy anything you (Townsend) says” to: A. continue obtaining Publix bribe monies and “Quid Pro Quo” support; B. conceal the misuse of Contract(s) and FBCCP/CPCS “Designated Funds” and the “Building Scheme Frauds” and Omit Truthful disclosure, Frauds and malfeasance for Defendants and “Others” personal benefits without the Due Process of the Law and the FBCCP Bylaws required knowledge, motions, vote and approval of the Congregation/Owner Members as defendants created “Secret funds” and; C. continue at all costs to defame and get removal of Townsend as their F.S.617.0834, Leader/Representative Nominated and Elected as: (1). Nominations Committee Member (FBCCP/CPCS Supreme Court Member); and (2). Long Range Planning Committee(CHAIRMAN); and (3). General Member; (4). Parent of CPCS Students; (5). And GO TO COUNSEL on every matter; so D. the “Sect” and “Sect Agents” could pull off their “schemes to frauds” of taking Plaintiff’s Resources and control the Eminent Domain Litigation and the New Master Building Plan corruption alleged as a “VISION”; and E. started frauds about Townsend to his wife and children and others as they still do today to continue their needs since 1987, to “Defame” Townsend. 8. These facts are well documented in the years of FBCCP/CPCS BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES and confirmed by Affidavits from Witnesses to the intentional “Alter EGO” frauds of Nasworthy, Beck, Meister and the Finance Committee and “Others” and shown in these Grant emails even through the “implanted” Crenshaw 2006, partially produced FBCCP “business records and Beck credit card records” exposing multiple violations of the Bylaws and crimes. 9. In 1994, Townsend sought safety of his son, J.D.T was 11 and daughter, J.G.T., was just 9 years old enrolled as students while the wife, Karen Harrod Townsend was an employee/teacher at Citrus Park Christian

123

School and attending the Church that the Townsend family and relatives had begun as a Mission in the 1940’s and as Randall Townsend was expected to continue and protect the Mission Quests. (New Sanctuary, New High School, Mission Homes) 10. In 10/9/1994, upon the “Disturbing the Peace” creating a “Discretionary Fund” violation as the ministry congregation members had always operated, designated and controlled all our funds and the uses and then the blatant disturbing admissions of Elbert Nasworthy, Ron Beck and the Finance Committee in the Business Meeting and then their arrogance in private meetings, John Grant et al, was duly advised. 11. CPCS Pastor Dr. John Berry responsible for protecting the CPCS/FBCCP Funds that had been set aside for our Mission Growth Quest and interests of the School sought out Nominations Committee (Supreme Court) Member and Long Range Planning Committee Chairman Randall Townsend responsible for protecting the “Designated Long Range Planning Funds and GOALS” as Dr. Berry and Dr. Warner and Townsend and the membership had agreed would be our alliance to see our Church Members Agreed Mission GROWTH Statement carried forward knowing the Eminent Domain litigation may take time. Dr. Warner said to Townsend, “I am glad you are back at Citrus Park and now I have more peace that it is time to retire and a younger man is needed to take the mantel”. (Note the revisions of the Committee Structures for the years 1993-1999, Plaintiff Exhibits #75, and that Townsend was quickly added in these key duties for 1993-1994, to insure our protections even in the immediate intense disputes with Administrator Nasworthy. And in Due Process for our Bylaws to be followed and Townsend and Dr. Berry sought Counsel from John A. Grant, Jr. Esquire, and David Gibbs as Townsend knew from about 1991, and informed them of the suspected Nasworthy/Beck illegal acts and Breach of the Bylaws. Townsend per the demands of members per his Fiduciary Duty as early as these events happened 10/1994, then informed John Grant and “Others” that Grant was biased and prejudiced and in a conflict of interest intentionally giving illegal and irresponsible legal counsel per our Bylaws and the law. Grant as the State Legislator had and still has a conflict of interest with Mens Rea Extrinsic and Constructive Fraud Motives as our legal counsel and Registered Agent to allegedly defend the best interest of our interests and damages which would be tested in the Eminent Domain Action that by his Legislatures and the Pat Bean, Hillsborough County delays of funding the project to widen Gunn Highway for Sickles High School, we as FBCCP/CPCS by and through Townsend could not determine or proceed in

124 our Mission Growth Plan then extended many years through the “Sect” and “Sect Agents” alliance to properly permit the 18105 Gunn Highway property. Townsend advised Grant of his conflict of interest and legal malpractice (See Brennan v. Ruffner 93-0151, 4th DCA March 2, 1994,) which now these years “Ripening of the seeds” (Platt v. General Development Corp 1960 Fla. App D2 122 So2d 48) of facts show was correct by Townsend and goes to his involvement, motives, bias, prejudice and the start of his many frauds, one that “he was not involved”. This bias, prejudice and conflict of interest many times over these many years was reminded to Grant and the Mediation Team and “Others” in the Eminent Domain Settlement process when the “Sect” and “Sect Agents” intentionally presented fraudulent Building Plans not approved by Townsend and the LRPC and or Membership and again Townsend raised these facts with Grant in 10/1999, and raised the frauds by the “Beck Sect” in the purchase of the Earle 18105 Gunn Highway Property and the diversions of the Building Plan without approval of Townsend and the LRPC or members votes and after Townsend was illegally and allegedly 9/8/1999, removed from the FBCCP/CPCS assembly, his Fiduciary Duties and criminal investigations for the FBCCP/CPCS and the Owner/Members and after the abduction of the Townsend children as of these same facts as being proved still in 2015 as Grant and these defendants and “Others” still violate the Fiduciary Duties Seven Elements, (See Business Tort Litigation by George F.McGunnigle Jr. stating: “Discovery should be aimed at uncovering communications between the parties, including any representations and/or guarantees made by the defendant, as well as any statements by the plaintiff that indicted or should have indicated to the defendant that the plaintiff placed trust and confidence in him or her. In addition any evidence tending to show that the defendant exercised control over the affairs of the plaintiff is significant.), still conceal true facts per (Roberts v. Estate of Barbagallo 366 PA Super 559, 531 A. 2d 1125 (1987). Beck and these “Sect” and “Sect Agents” many times alleged they got his directions and advice from Grant. And Grant had to support and mentor Beck and the “Beck Sect” controllers of the “Show me the Money” paying John Grant and his Republican “Alter EGO” and even the Pat Bean Agents (friends of the Bruce and Linda Chapins who used her in their sham to Defame Townsend at all costs, even using the case law just passed by Judge Rom Powell introduced in the Mediation Meeting just to as Pat Bean directly looked down to Townsend in the meeting.) who wanted an out of court “Settlement” of lesser money (just enough for the Earle Property, so “he (Beck) could live in the country like his brother

125

Donnie and have more bathrooms for his daughters) than Townsend and “others” sought and rather than as Townsend sought to go to trial and raise the issues in our Damages that Grant and Pat Bean as the County Administrator were responsible for our years of delays not knowing how much of our property would be taken for the Sickles High School and Gunn Highway expansions. Additionally, as the reports show, it was Townsend for FBCCP and as the Developmental Coordinator for Northdale Soccer Club who started working with the County Employees and Citrus Park Community exploring the 7705 Gunn Highway property being a Community Center and expansion of the Citrus Park Little League. Therefore, these Defendants and “others unknown” had and still have a joint “involvement” for their, Alter EGO, intention, motive and conducts with Torts and “Hate Crimes” and Malice to for the Malicious Enterprise continue to Defame and unlawfully attempt to remove Townsend as Honorable Counsel, as Denny and Judge Crenshaw admitting she knew Scruggs et al, had violated his Clients, as Townsend speaks for these Plaintiff’s Trust and Rights, and then Crenshaw wrote her admitted “Cause of Action” and left in this Complaint: A. “…Violated their Fiduciary Duties to allow Plaintiff to reveal his knowledge of the “Secret Funds” and other Florida Statute Violations…”; B. the allegations from Beck: (1). that Townsend’s materials were “slanderous”; “untrue”, “stopped by several ushers …(deputies Howlett, Jeffers, Smoak, Corbin etc. even in 10/2007, using HCSO Clark to trespass Townsend with the directives of David Gee ET AL then through 2014 using HCSO Detective McDarby to even come outside their Jurisdiction on multiple occasions and “warn” Townsend, “Don’t go to your Church”, “Don’t file more lawsuits” even while cases are pending, “Don’t try to contact your kids!”); C. As Paragraph 11, Plaintiff also had a duty…to investigate and to report other acts of Negligence and Frauds and Conspiracy and Conspiracy to Defraud…”; D. “…NO LAWS SHALL IMPEDE THE OBLIGATION OF A CONTRACT…”. E. Paragraph 31, “In COERSION, claiming superior exclusive knowledge he gained from his hired experts Ronald L. Beck…inspired…[then many named persons]”, [and left “others” that should have been named as alleged “experts” as Grant, Gibbs, Denny and Scruggs and “others” including herself that had caused illegal “Delays” and not allowing Townsend to add Bush, Crist, Grant, Denny, Scruggs, Gray, Karen Harrod Townsend just as Judge Holder and Judge Arnold from 2003 said to do and others as Defendants] out; F. and the property use and permit cases in Paragraph 31, to allow collusions with Government Officers via collusion with Senator Grant and Pat Bean and the “Officers of the Court” to be shown in the

126

Causes; and as the whole document speaks for itself of her and Denny’s intentions and motives (2) as a cause for and from their case 01-15813, 01- 15814, 02-4974, 05-9605, and the 1988 Lane ET AL Counter Claim Case, were Breach of the Peace as the document attached to the April 25, 2002, Complaint was from Howlett/Beck et al via Howlett/Grant/Gee/McDarby/Ober/Bondi et al and “others” just as McCarthy/Popper/Chapin/Powell started in 12/1992 and before per the March 8, 1988, “Warning” Letter Plaintiff Exhibit #25, that Townsend had to “sign the settlement or go to jail for contempt of court” for their threat to arrest Townsend on “False Charges” as Grant writes in his many emails even through 2015, as Townsend attached to the First 4/25/2002, Complaint in case 02-03812, and Malicious Enterprise and as they still to this day try to continue to not “Show Townsend his or others our Money” illegally taken since 1987, even in violation of vindicated Townsend, the Robinson and Religious Society Standards voice as production of demanded records shows links to “judges” receiving “resources” illegally and therefore per Judgments 46 AM Jur 2d §16 Fraud and Collusion; “The validity of a judgment may be affected by fraud in the obtainment thereof, or collusion between the parties, especially where the court was imposed upon thereby and the complaining party was prevented from having his interest fairly presented or fully considered by the court….rendering the judgment void…In other cases rendering the judgment voidable and not void.” Therefore, these Orders of “tainted” judges are “illegal agreements” by “alias” judges to continue “Frauds on the Court” and should be “void” but used as “Frauds” and “Omissions of truthful disclosure” evidence of Malicious Enterprise: All Orders of, 9th and 18th Circuit, Davis, Powell, Strickland, Perry; the Second DCA and Fifth DCA except for the Robinson Ruling; the Florida Supreme Court (due to the issue of Frauds and Quorum based on the Oath of Office violations) except for these after about 10/2008 and the Order of Judge Canady 2011-41, recusing the 2DCA, himself and the disbarment of Heather Gray SC09-1121; the Orders of 11/15/2001, by Judge Palomino, lawful but part of the scheme of these defendants with then the Scruggs/Timmerman Divorce Orders; the Orders of Judge Arnold, Judge Barton (dismissing McDarby), Judge Timmerman except Recusal Order, Judge Sierra except Recusal Order, Judge Gomez, Judge Holder, Judge Stoddard except Recusal Order, Judge Cook, Judge Crenshaw except 2006, Recusal Order; and Judge Barbas except his 11/12/2015, recusal Order;

127 the Orders of Judge Merryday; Judge Kuvachevich (showed frauds as she even wrote her Order for Dismissal prior to her allowed time for Townsend to file his amended complaint), Judge Wilson; as cause in this action per DeClaire v. Yohanan 453 So2d 375 (Fla. 1984). The Defaults entered by the Clerks should be validated on Karen Harrod Townsend, Donald Harrod, Heather Gray ET AL, Jeb Bush, Mark Ober, Bruce and Linda Chapin, David Fergeson. John Grant in the meeting with Townsend and Townsend’s Sister, on 11/10/2012, affirmed that he had done frauds and exparte collusion with Judge Arnold, regarding the FBCCP Cases 02-03812 and Permit cases and implied “others” are involved as shown in his emails. EMAILS RECAP: Ex# DATE: FROM: TO: ISSUE SUMMARY: 16 11/2/07 Grant Townsend Received Phone call… 76 11/15/07 Townsend Grant/Gee Reply showing frauds 77 11/20/07 Grant Townsend Claims twisting words. 78 11/25/07 Townsend Grant Not Twisting stated facts. 79 11/25/07 Grant Townsend “not” “involved at any time”… 80 11/25/07 Townsend Grant You and your staff did and lied. 81 11/9/09 Townsend Grant Reply to “Couey” Grant 32 6/13/08 Grant Townsend Your Letter, Mr. Townsend… 32 6/13/08 Grant Townsend Mr. Townsend, Once again 32 6/13/08 Townsend Grant Now that the Church GVM see… 32 6/13/08 Grant Townsend “Grant, I have received…to notify law enforcement …alleged to be retired from the practice of law for more than the past seven years. By copy of this to Sheriff David Gee…that a report be filed …that the local authorities have you mentally evaluated”, Florida Bar Journal and Registered Agent Forms do not show Grant is retired. 32 6/17/08 Grant Townsend Lies threats. 82 11/04/08 Townsend ALL Howlett Confession Guilty 83 08/15/10 Grant Townsend Lets Talk. 84 03/17/10 Townsend Grant “Have the facts sunk in…” 85 03/22/10 Townsend Grant “At least Dr. John Berry…” 86 09/28/12 Townsend Grant “Since 1994, your lies…” Exhibit 19 attached with #86. 19 09/2012 Townsend Grant 100% Guilty of all Counts… 20 11/10/12 Townsend Grant Reply to meeting 20 11/11/12 Townsend Grant Reply to 11/10/12 meeting

128

20 11/12/12 Townsend Grant Reply to 11/10/12 meeting 15 11/10/12 Grant Townsend Thank you for meeting 71 11/04/15 Grant Townsend “Randy, you keep digging a deeper hole for yourself. Your actions are unwarranted, malicious and rambling. I believe you have been made aware that if you enter Hillsborough County, you bill be picked up by the Sheriff’s office and taken to jail. I am going to set your motions for hearing before the court and will make sure the Sheriff’s office knows and if you come to appear, I hope you will bring your toothbrush! Judge it for yourself. John Grant.” Others can recognize Fraud also is said by Grant: (a). that he as counsel aided and abetted Beck, Nasworthy, Leatherman, Jeffers, Meisters lies; (b) Grant refused to assist Townsend as a “member” following the laws to expose crimes because did not know Randall Townsend was the son of Grants friends the Townsends from Idlewild. This is lies because of: the 1970’s bus trip, the 1994-1999 conversations, the 9-10/1999 conversations, his counsel with Beck and Karen Harrod Townsend and Idlewild Members in 1999-2000, the Dade City, Florida Christmas Festival Meeting, the 2001, cases 01-15813 and 01-15814 and the 02-4974, and who told deputy McDarby to go to the Townsend parents Odessa home making threats and saying they did not know how to contact Townsend when on the Grant email they held had Townsend’s phone number and email address, also Grants email showing he sat in the Townsend living room the 2012 meeting but now that he does nothing still is stopped or changes in the malicious attacks by Grant and others. Four things must be shown; (1) Defendant communicated a defamatory statement; (2) must show the defamatory statement was published communicated to at least one other person besides the plaintiff. (3) plaintiff must show that the communication was about the plaintiff and that the other party could identify the plaintiff as the subject of the defamatory message; (4) the plaintiff must show that the communication injured the plaintiff’s reputation. And in this case it has taken almost 28 years to extract connecting evidence of the “March 8, 1988, “warning” letter as even McCarthy defamed her client to continue the Malicious Enterprise bribery that still continues against these lawful Plaintiffs. In this case the collusion by these McCarthy et al “Officers of the Court” and “Government Persons” and “Others” to without intentional “responsible” or “effective” counsel or performance of their Fiduciary Duties per Contracts, to or with Townsend and those for whom he speaks continues though each “persons” Malicious Prosecution for the Malicious Enterprise since McCarthy now still through 2015, as they in collusion to

129 defame Townsend that he is a “liar”, “is in Breach of Contracts”, “is doing illegal Torts of a Contract”, “does not understand the law”, “needs to be Baker Acted”, “is dangerous with Guns”, “is a stalker”, “is a Repeat Violence Offender”; “Is a Domestic Violence Offender”, “is a untrue about misappropriation of designated funds”; is a liar about the purchase of the Earle Property; is a liar about that the Earle Property will not being granted permits for the CPCS,” and many other frauds and defamations by Defendants and “Others unknown”. In this case since 11/1987, defendants as Townsend’s counsel(s) McCarthy/Popper/Chapin and others and or as “officers of the Court” as consolidated in Beck et al, Karen Harrod Townsend et al, Scruggs et al, Gray Grant ET AL, and then these Appeals and as our clients as State Officers of Tax payers per Kartikes v. Demos 214 So2d 86, 87 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) stating: “A client has a cause of action in contract against an attorney who neglects to perform his explicitly or implicitly agreed to perform when he agreed to be employed by the client.” “alias” non biased “judge Barbas” concealed these “illegal agreements” and criminal acts from 2007-11/12/2015 and as even as the 1990’s quote of the Florida Bar Executive Members, Tim Chinaris and John Boggs made in their Tallahassee Office to Townsend stating: “If you get your law degree within six months we will find a way to have you disbarred and put you in jail for something”, this does not show a Motive to act per their Fiduciary Duty, as each for the Malicious Enterprise, intentionally failed and still fail in collusion their Fiduciary Duties per Central Florida Mach. Co. v. Williams 424 So2d 201, and Arky, Freed, v. Boumar Instrament 527 So2d 211, and intentionally with others still in Contract per their Oaths of Employment do these same “Negligence during their employment” per Solomon v. Meyer 116 So2d 37, 1959, or as Judge Crenshaw and Counsel Denny IV as “counsel for all the FBCCP Members’ called the acts “Hate Crimes” and in collusion have prevented Townsend proving his claims, receiving and controlling his resources, and clearing his good name by their Collusion in “impeding” the Discovery of the Lane/Publix/JVA Contracts and Business Records which will clear the good name of Townsend and show how his resources and reputation and in 1999, the extortion act of the abduction of his children were taken from Townsend and then the collusion of persons in the stated in the 15CA1928, complaint as Related Cases 01-15813, 01- 15814, 02-4974 etc. used the Family Court illegally for their Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process by their actions kept Townsend from the “Frauds of the Building and Permits Sham” litigations and show the

130

FBCCP/CPCS Business records, funds and reputation were taken by the defendants and “others” so that all “seeds” they planted can be fully “ripened” and connect all “persons”. These FACTS prove Townsend is truthful in his causes of actions: The Bonneau Contracts, the 2006 Partial Production of FBCCP/CPCS Documents by Denny ET AL, The Zoning Commission files of Margaret Tussing, the Hillsborough County Commission Records since 1991, the Court Files regarding of the FBCCP requests for Permits for the Earle Property, The Florida Bar Files of the Investigations of these matters since 1987, kept under the care of John Harkness and Others; The FDLE records and files kept under the care of Gerald Bailey and others; the State Attorney Files of Mark Ober, The HCSO Files, the Pasco Sheriffs Files, The Pinellas County Sheriff’s files, The Financial Records of John Grant, The Financial Records of the Republican Party; The Financial Records of the Democratic Party; The Files of the Attorney’s Generals kept under the care of Pam Bondi and her predecessors; the Files of the Governors kept under the care of Rick Scott and his predecessors; the Files of the Chairperson of the Orange County Commissioners from Linda Chapin and Mel Martinez forward; The Files of Pat Bean as County Attorney and County Administrator and forward who the Hillsborough County Commission fired her and others for these same type acts Townsend et al has sought since 10/1994 to “FIRE” or remove from their illegally obtained “alias” authority at the FBCCP/CPCS as the law says in Religious Society practices the Bylaws must be followed which in the FBCCP Bylaws all are subjected to the authority of Townsend as the Nominations Committee a.k.a. Supreme Court; As all are related and go to show Malicious Interference and Government Intrusion and violation of Due Process and their illegal unjust enrichment of Plaintiff’s resources per Anderson v. Shands 570 So2d 1121, per rule F.S. 768.72, for discovery of evidence which appears reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence on the issues of punitive damages which in this case show “Wanton and willful conduct” per McNulty v. Hurley 97 So2d 185 as even in this case by these Government defendant using their own agents of the government veil to “Obstruct Justice” in violate on of their Oaths and continue the delays and unjust enrichments from Plaintiffs even as a Religious Society held under the illegal alleged authority of Sheriff Deputies masked as Trustees with their Superior Officers and these defendants, as Townsend nor the members rightfully approved by our Bylaws process and who unlawfully by extortion removed Townsend as in their Individual Capacity of their Fiduciary Duty/Superior Officer violated per LaTorre v. First Baptist Church of OJUS 498 So2d 455.

131

These facts of law should go to a jury for the determination of “Intent” per Hunter v. First Baptist Church 294 So2d 355 and Priest v. Groover 289 So2d 767. From these emails generated by John Grant as Registered Agent or as Legislator or as FBCCP/CPCS Counsel and or from his allegations to the prior acts since about 1994, not being “involved” or “involving” his directives to Sheriff Deputy Howlett or a.k.a. as Joe Howlett, Individual, and FBCCP member, discovery must be allowed to determine if Grant or Howlett or then Jeffers or then Corbin or then HCSO Detective Michael Smoak, was acting as a member, or “off duty” on their own “unlawfully” “under color of law”, using government cars and showing their badges if or was keeping Townsend from his Fiduciary Duty to investigate, assemble with members or even his children since 1994 and 1999 till now respectfully is acting within the Scope of his duty per Albritton v. Gandy 531 So2d 381(Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. App 1988) and by telling Townsend not to return to Hillsborough County or to his Church or kids by the claims of HCSO McDarby is lawful and per Dean v. Rowillier 597 So2d 961 this “officer” even as a Security Guard, as Townsend was a State of Florida Security Guard during 1999-2001, “to detain is a question for a jury”. The Florida Torts Claims Act does not require pre-notification for Breach of Contracts and or Torts or “SLAPP” or for violations of Federally Protected Civil Rights as Religious Society Rights and or Parenting/Assembly with Children and Free Speech with or for Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Prosperity so therefore no statement need be in the Complaint. However other evidence as in these emails does show that prior notice for years has been known and ignored by these Defendants known and unknown as Defendants act in collusion with persons in the “Government Offices” as even the Department of Financial Services to conceal multiple prior reports to them for many years since 1987. Additionally, this law of pre-suit notice would be unconstitutional in this case as it “impedes” the obligation of our contract. A tort is an intentional violation or breach of a contract while a negligence may require notification for an act a defendant may not have knowledge per F.S.768 Defendants actions and non-actions have occurred in multiple counties especially mostly in and through Hillsborough County, Florida where Defendants knew their “Agents” and “FBCCP Non Member” alias Deputies Howlett and later Detective Smoak with Deputy Jeffers conducted illegal acts “Under Color of Uniform” as a Pinellas County Sheriff Deputy with their “Superiors” authority and as Pasco County Detective Michael Corbin acted as a Pasco Sheriff Deputy to “impede” Townsend from his Practices of

132 the Bylaws and his Fiduciary Duties to: (1) Approve of the conduct of all Members per their Bylaws Duties; (2) this includes the complete “inspection” all Business Records of the Corporation as “Show Me the Money” (3) and Speak for the Owner/Members to “Stop the Building Fraud Scheme” including the deceptive practices of the “Sect” and “Sect Agents” in the Eminent Domain Litigation. Per PROSSER, LAW OF TORTS §46 (West 4th ed 1971): “All persons who actively participate in a tortious act, or who aid or encourage the wrongdoer in furtherance of a common plan or design to commit the tortious act, are equally liable with the wrongdoer for the act. Those who ratify and adopt the wrong doer’s act that are done for their benefit are also equally liable with the wrongdoer for the act. Traditionally, all such aiders and abettors are joined as defendants in one action and each is held liable for the entire damage.” Matthew Bender and Company, Inc. Assault and Battery 20.04 This is intentional specific behavior and therefore per Dominguez v. Equitable Life Assurance Society 438 So2d 58 (Fla. 3rd 1983) shows sufficient proof that “emotional distress arose from the act”. All judges and lawyers and a Sheriff as Officers of the Court to protect the integrity of the court are not to allow fraud in the court by the aggressor who uses the fraud to the court to abuse the victim of the acts of the Malicious Enterprise and then assault and battery the victim again by the alleged “Under Color of Law” process in a Corrupt Court! EXXON CORP. USA v. DUNN 474 So2d 1269 states: “Damages for emotional distress may be recovered from a defendant who maintains a nuisance, regardless of physical injury or impact. Annoyance, discomfort, inconvenience, and the like are the natural results of a nuisance and are thus compensable, even if the defendant did not intentionally, maliciously or recklessly create or maintain the nuisance.” “Compensation for injuries that to and extent involve emotional distress may also be recovered through such acts as torts as false imprisonment, assault and battery, wrongful birth and defamation.” PER FLORIDA TORTS 23.30 Each and every person and agency that Plaintiffs have tried to get help from has allowed Townsend’s rights with his children and those for whom he lawfully still speaks and for Other Plaintiffs to be abused by the then wife/now former wife and mother as an employee of Ron Beck and Herman Meister and the Church Trustees (Howlett, Leatherman, Jeffers and Smith) and “alias” attorney’s and “alias Law Enforcers” for the FBCCP/CPCS who acted outside the LAW and the BY- LAWS and the Florida Constitution Article I Section 3, as a “Sect” and

133

“Sect Agents” and violated Plaintiffs as Townsend and my children and just trying to operate civilly under the Laws of Florida and of the Corporation BY-LAWS as was and still is our duty. Those who have once they got knowledge of these issues and lied to Plaintiffs as for all Plaintiffs and told us by unlawful “Government Intrusion” into our Religious and Constitutional Rights per Contracts, we had no rights, lost rights, or had no cause of actions, or could not per Pellgerini v. Winters combine defendants and or causes of actions just to continue and protect themselves alleging due to statute of limitations violations of due process have just continued the frauds and torts started by the criminal acts of the “Howlett ET AL with Grant ET AL Officers” SCHISMS. See CHAMPION v. GRAY 478 So2d 17 (Fla. 1985). The March 24, 1996, Business Meeting Minutes state that the proposal of what the Church can do will come from the LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE that Townsend was chairman of and then Beck and Meister and others without permission from the CHURCH body and breaking their pledge in the Business Meeting started to conspire against the plans and directives of the Long Range Planning Committee. This is confirmed by the Business Meeting Minutes finally received on June 12, 2006, for the years of by frauds Ron Beck, Herman Meister, Joe Howlett, Gary Leatherman, Tim Jeffers, John Grant and other lawyers, judges and “others yet fully unknown” and helped by Charles Scruggs, Heather Gray and Charles Denny using the estranged wife in the Divorce Courts and frauds by these of law enforcement and attorneys to keep Townsend away from his children and Church Appointed duties as the Positions I was GENERAL CONGREGATION VOTED INTO was never per the Laws of Florida 617 properly voted out of these Duties but for the frauds of the “pastors schism” helped by the frauds of the attorneys and family court judges. Therefore, Plaintiff’s seek restoration and relief per F.S. 617.022 and from others via our claim of Unjust Enrichment as our count states by Fraud as courts have as even “alias” judge Arnold required Townsend to specify Negligence or Tort claims his ruling expected us to make as collusion John Grant admitted on 11/10/2012, while our F.S.607 records are “impeded” by their “illegal agreements” with “Officers of the Court” and Government Persons since 1987. Chapter 67 of Florida Jury Instructions by Richard B. Badgley, at 67.01[3], “The Florida Supreme Court has adopted the position set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts §46, which acknowledges the existence of an independent tort for intentional infliction of emotional distress.1 At the same time, recovery of damages for emotional distress in a cause of action

134 for another tort remains viable.2 Damages may be recovered for emotional distress without a showing a bodily harm resulting from the emotional distress.3 Examples of this include …certain abusive debt collection practices.5 Conduct that is actionable as intentional infliction of emotional distress may also give rise to liability for malicious infliction of emotional distress, for which punitive damages may be sought.6 67.02[3]: Abuse of real or apparent authority over a plaintiff may also rise to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct.5 Examples of Florida cases in this category include…and abuse of position by a police officer…”Per CITY OF DELAND v. FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION AND LEASING CORP 293 So2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).” Plaintiff’s therefore affirms that our requests for all discovery is relevant and believe will lead to the proper relief Plaintiffs seek for the restoring of our Children, Assembly, Resources and Rights to be presented and then decided by a Jury of Citizens protecting our Civil Rights. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request Honorable Court Orders requiring: Defendants be required to immediately produce all demanded discovery since 1987; Defendants be put in Contempt of Court and pay Plaintiffs for their delays; Defendants be arrested for their criminal acts an prosecuted to the fullest extent of our law; That Plaintiff’s be allowed additional discovery requests as needed; That Plaintiff’s be allowed to amend these Pleadings as needed; That Plaintiffs be allowed to amend these Pleadings to claim all damages, Punitive Damages and emotional damages and obtain a jury trial on all issues. Respectfully Submitted by: Randall Townsend, Pro Se and Per F.S.617.0834 P.O.Box 5 or 333 S. Tamiami Trail, #5 Osprey, Florida 34229 941 350-2677 FOR ALL PLAINTIFFS [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 23rd day of November, 2015 by U.S. Mail or email or e-filing to the Clerk of the 13th Circuit 800 East Twiggs St. Tampa, Florida 33602 and by emails as follows for TVG Electronic FILING CASE NO: 292015CA001928A001HC;

135

[email protected];[email protected] om; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] for Tim and Karen Jeffers 15217 W. County Line Road Odessa, Florida 33556. SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRESENTING IDENTIFICATON, WHO UPON BEING DULY SWORN AND CAUTIONED EXECUTED AND STATED IN HIS OWN WORDS AND TOOK AN OATH THAT THE STATEMENTS AND THE THINGS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS 23rd DAY OF November, 2015,… Respectfully submitted, Randall C. Townsend, Pro Se and Per F.S.617.0834 P.O.Box 5 or 333 S. Tamiami Trail, #5 Osprey, Florida 34229 941 350-2677 FOR ALL PLAINTIFFS [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com” WHEREFORE OUR LAWFUL “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” DEMAND IS MADE TO DEFENDANTS PATEL, NEWHALL, MOODY, BONDI, DESANTIS, BUSH, BUTTERWORTH, SMITH, GRANTS (John and Jamie), The president of the Florida Senate, The Speaker of the Florida House, First DCA Samuels et al immediately and or within 10 days respond lawfully to this document and these obligations of “Justice” to be done lawfully herein. CONCLUSION As Moody-Newhall-Gievers et al have connected, confirmed and confessed As Themselves and their co=conspirators collusion and GUILT and not defended them lawfully per F.S. 104.091, thus proving since the 1980’s the BUSH-Smith et al TCR as Rick Scott, Marco Rubio, Ron DeSantis, Ashley

136

Moody, Jimmy Patronis, The First, Second, Fifth DCA’s, The Florida Supreme Court and Canady’s Lane/Trohn et al and Chiles/Chapins/Clintons, Grant et al Secretary Of State Smith-Lee, Harry Lee Coe-Ober, McCabes, Andrew Warren, Jack Campbell and Others as stated in the FRAPS 26.1 Exhibits are in violation of Our Constitutional Laws and their Bonds “ALL” must resign, prosecuted and pay full restitution for their Intentional Failure of Honest Constitutional Services. This Townsend v. GRANT et al, Exhibit attached known to the defendants clearly defined their Co=Conspirators crimes and thus their claim of ignorance on how Newhall et al is to respond is not a legal defense in this Redress Of Government F.S. 80.02 and F.S. 86 Action where the “We the People” as juries determine Our Constitutional Rights and Our Restitution. As Moody-Newhall et al claim confusion this goes to proof that they are as Executive Orders of as Governors Scott and Desantis unfit for their duties. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 1st day of MARCH 2020, to/per all Defendants Anita Patel and [email protected]; and Filing in 1st DCA, Florida Supreme Court, Leon County 2nd Circuit. Signed Randall Townsend, Verified to the best of our knowledge, opinions and belief based on the concealed information of Defendants. SIGNED Respectfully submitted; Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and as a “Next Friend” of the over 13 Million Florida Voters and Others as said “Private Attorney’s General” and Ex rel. FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA herein. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com CERTIFICATION OF FONT I certify that the lettering in this brief is TIMES NEW ROMAN 14 POINT or more and complies with the font requirements of the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2). Except that per our Citizens Rights this Motion(s) shall need be accepted in full as is so these matters of law can be

137 litigated in this Redress of Government Action per our Citizens Rights to Our Courts. WHEREFORE: TOWNSEND DEMANDS: A. AN IMMEDIATE RULING OF GUILTY AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS NAMED AND AGAINST OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED AND THEIR ARRESTS AND FULL RESTITUTION FROM EACH AS A MATTER OF OUR LAWS PER F.S. 80.02 AND F.S. 86. B. The names of any and all “persons” who are “impeding” our Constitutional Rights and our Justice and our Recovery from our Damages. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 17th day of APRIL 2020, to/per all Defendants Anita Patel and [email protected]; and Filing in 1st DCA, Florida Supreme Court, Leon County 2nd Circuit. Signed Randall Townsend, Verified to the best of our knowledge, opinions and belief based on the concealed information of Defendants. SIGNED Respectfully submitted; Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and as a “Next Friend” of the over 13 Million Florida Voters and Others as said “Private Attorney’s General” and Ex rel. FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA herein. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com CERTIFICATION OF FONT I certify that the lettering in this brief is TIMES NEW ROMAN 14 POINT or more and complies with the font requirements of the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2). Except that per our Citizens Rights this Motion(s) shall need be accepted in full as is so these matters of law can be litigated in this Redress of Government Action per our Citizens Rights to Our Courts.

Motion B. “IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

138

FIRST DISTRICT APPEAL CASE NO. 1D-18-4845 AS FOR DE NOVO REVIEW ASSIGNED PER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR CASES: SC18-1890; SC18-1915; SC18-1951; SC19-324; SC16-92; SC-16- 1501; SC11-41; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07-1181; SC60-95935; SC60- 95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; AND FROM LOWER COURT CASES 18-CA-2293, 2nd CIR. COURT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FROM STATE AND FEDERAL COURT CASES 8:06- CV2050T-30TGW (JUDGE J.MOODY. JR):TO “JUDGE EK; TO 16-CV- 3299-EAK-MAP (JUDGE J.W.) TOWNSEND V. GRANT ET AL; AS- F.S.: 86 DECLARATORY; F.S. 80- QUO WARRANTO; ORGANIZED CRIME(S); F.R.O.C.P. 1.530 AND 1.540; FEDERAL HOBBS ACT; RICO; FLORIDA AND FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS; 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 ACTS AS BEGAN AS 88-2554,18th CIR. SEMINOLE COUNTY FL. AS- RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUAL AND AS F.S. 80.02 AS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS “Private Attorney’s General” RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, State of Florida, EX REL, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, F.S. 617.0834, AND “Next Friend” ET AL, Appellant, Plaintiff’s/Counter Defendant, Petitioner(s), V. CHARLES E. LANE JR. AS CHARLES E. LANE JR. ET AL AS WITH BUSH ET AL; PATRICIA MCCARTHY; POPPER; CHAPIN(S); WILLIAMS JR. ET AL; SCRUGGS, AS GRAY ET AL; AS GRANT ET AL AS “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” AND NAMED INCLUDING: DETZNER, SMITH; ERTEL; LEE; FLORIDA SEC. OF STATE ET AL, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND AGENTS ET AL 2019-1980’S; FLORIDA ATTORNEY’S GENERALS MOODY-BONDI THRU SMITH; FLORIDA GOVERNORS DESANTIS, SCOTT, TO GRAHAM; FLORIDA LEGISLATORS JOHN GRANT ET AL; SHERIFFS; AND OTHERS AS “ALL OFFICIALLY AND/OR “AS “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR- PERSONS-INDIVIDUALS”AS IN F.R.A.P. EXHIBITS AS Appellees and AS Counter Plaintiffs ET AL______/

TOWNSEND REPLY MOTION(S) TO “VOID” FRAUD ORDER 1/29/20

139

Arrest Warrants and D. Motion for Disclosure and Discovery; and E. Motion for Oral Arguments; and F. Motion to File Amended Reply Brief to include Reply to the Samuels et al “TORT” AND “Void” Order of 1/29/2020 as it is another set of Felonies of the “Voter Protection Act” against “We the People” COMES NOW AGAIN TOWNSEND a.k.a. “The Church Guy” as named by the people/clerks of the 13th Circuit (2004) as from 1987 AS: PRIVATE CITIZEN “WHISTLEBLOWER”; PER F.S. 80.02; F.S. 86; AS “WE THE PEOPLE”; “NEXT FRIEND” PER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871, AS “PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL”; AND SINCE 1993 AS F.S. 617.0834, FBCCP/CPCS BY-LAWS AND OWNER MEMBERS REPRESENTITIVE AS VICTIM DEFENDANTS; AS ACTING PER 18 U.S.C. 241 AND 18 U.S.C. 242, FOR PROTECTING FROM TORTS BY BUSH TCR ET AL AS “RUMP FACTIONS”, DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, KOCH LIBERTARIANS OR TEA PARTY AND OR “OTHERS” TO OUR: CONSTITUTION(S); CONTRACTS; VOTING; CIVIL RIGHTS; RELIGIOUS RIGHTS; PARENTAL RIGHTS; COMMERCE; AND THE INTEGRITY AND DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE OF OUR COURT(S) AS REPLY TO THE RICO, 18 U.S.C. 2382-TREASON AND COMMON CORE CULT “FLIP-FLOP” “TCR” WHO IN OPEN COURT(S) AND CHURCHES BY THEIR PROPHESIED CRIMINAL AND ADMITTED ABDUCTIONS AND “HATE CRIMES” BY THEIR F.S.104 “DICTATOTSHIP” ACTS THEY OPENLY DO AS: “WANTING THEIR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO”; FOR ALL POWER AND THEY OPENLY VIOLATE WITH INTENTIOINAL TORTS TO/OF “ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER” IN COURTS AND CHURCH(S); AS THEIR “RULES OF A.G. BUTTERWORTH PANCAKES AND TRUMPS THEIR “TWO-TIER” GRANT(S)-MOODY’S-BONDI-SMITH/PATEL AND BUSH(S)-KOCH’S-SCOTTS-CANADAY’S-MOODY’S-LEE’S- AND “OTHERS DOE-SMITH-DETZNER-NEWHALL-CAMPBELLS- LANE ET AL TO BE NAMED” ET AL “PREDICATE ACT(S)” AS A “RANKIN ID.” “RUMP FACTION” IN AND FOR TREASON PER F.S. 104. 051- F.S. 104.091 are equal and admitted CO=PARTICIPANTS AS TOWNSEND IS THE CANDIDATE AND WHISTLEBLOWER ABOUT THEIR OLIGARCHS AND DEEP STATE AS THE LANE-BUSH- BUTT’S-KOCH’S ET AL “TCR” ET AL SINCE 11/18/1987 and Files this: A. Motion to Strike; and B. Motion for Sanctions; and C. Motion for Arrest Warrants; and D. Motion for Disclosure and Discovery; and E. Motion for Oral Arguments; and F. Motion to File Amended Reply Brief to include Reply and or Cross Reply Brief to the Samuels et al “Void” Order of

140

1/29/2020 for and by: Felony Two Tier Voter Obstruction; Collusion with the Attorney’s Generals, Governors and “Others” for: Theft; Obstruction; “Fraud”; “Extrinsic Fraud”; “Fraud on the Court”; and Tort violations as “Hate Crimes” against the FBCCP/CPCS BYLAWS and Townsend as F.S. 617.0834 and “Private Attorney’s General” and as a “Candidate” states: I. Officers of the Court lose their “Good Behavior” and or “Immunity” and do not have the authority as a “Rump Faction” to violate OUR Equal Protection and Separation of Church/State to do “Torts” to violate sovereign By-laws of a Religious Society “Not for Profit” the FBCCP/CPCS who had Our By-laws filed by “John Grant & son et al” who then with Gibbs III et al (CLA), “implanted” Deputies” and civilians then aided and abetted as “judge” Crenshaw and Federal “judge” Moody rules as malfeasance to the “Free Will” and “Sovereign Organic Authority” of his Church clients as admitted in the courtroom transcript with Attorney General Agents present and admitting their crimes to and of “judge” Battles in 2016, and or at the same time act as Legislature/Judiciary Member to cause RICO and HOBBS ACT Crimes with his “Common Core” co=participants and or as an Officer of the Court to aid and abet and or conceal violations of Law and or continue crimes of their co=participants who conspired and obstructed then the “Voters” to elect per the “Free Will” Option of the “Blank Space” to “Write- in” our/their Candidate(s)/protector representative. Nor per Florida Case laws can the “Rump Faction” be allowed by “Fraud” to violate the FBCCP Bylaws and unlawfully remove Townsend from his F.S. 617.0834, Official Authority without Due Process per Our By-laws, as has been done by Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” being concealed as this Samuels 1st DCA and Attorneys Generals et al still unlawfully do even by F.S. 104 Felonies and continuing Obstruction and Human Trafficking. II. While “The Court” has the authority to limit Reply briefs to 15 pages, and has the authority to expand for exceptional reasons beyond 15 pages, the “judges” and or “clerks” who are allegedly represented by their Counsels the Moody/Bondi Attorney’s Generals Agents and who are not “The Court” but whom may be and or are “Next Door Neighbor” co=participant defendants are not allowed to per our Church Bylaws and per F.S. 80.02 and F.S. 86 (Declarations to be decided by “Jury” Process”) and F.S. 104, for “Fraud” and or “Fraud on the Court” and or “Obstruction” to the Court or to Our Church/School’s for their “Common Core” to act “under color of law” and or “under color of official right” to rather than obey F. S. 38, and recuse themselves for “cause”, rather file an alleged “Order” to immune themselves and or conceal their co=participation in the criminal acts as in a redress of

141

Government Action as this is since 1987 and before as per the Exhibits of the illegal Ballots and ongoing Common Core illegal interference with the FBCCP/CPCS Bylaws “Fidelity Clause” as this “Church Guy” tries to legally enforce having proved since 10/1994, the “Nasworthy-Beck-Grant et al” crimes they admitted from the pulpit in the Church Business Meeting. III. The Samuels et al Torts and Rulings since this Action was sent down from Clerk Tomasino-FSCT et al show and admit HOBBS ACT and RICO and F.S. 99 and F.S. 104 and other Crimes and as “Cross Appeal” Rights Townsend continues to try to expose and protect as a “Private Attorney’s General” and F.S. 617.0834, per F.S. 80.02 and F.S. 86 Due Process to be allowed access to an Honorable Court and Jury Process protecting Townsend as Defendants and or as a “Free Will” Church Body or as “Voters” even from illegal “Search and Seizure” Crimes of Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” doing Torts to our Constitutional and By-laws Religious Rights and Parenting Rights and Candidate and Voting and Due Process Rights. IV. Townsend’s Amended Reply Brief of 1/24/2020, is only 15 pages (34-49) of the “REPLY ARGUMENTS” to Argue against the: 1. Patel; and 2. Davis and McVay Arguments; and 3. Their clients et al; and as now giving their “Attorneys General’s Clients” “Another Bite at the Apple” from the “Fruit from the Poisoned Bush” is repeating the same pattern of violations of “Due Process” as they have done since McCarthy et al in 1987 and in RICO as they illegally per F.S. 104, violate “The Voters Protection Act” and Townsend as Candidate while they steal our money, resources and relationships and go beyond their allowed “legal” duty. The additional “Citations” and “Glossary of Terms” are required as a Matter of Law to not aid and abet “Fraud on the Court” and concealing of Defendants Crimes so an Honorable Court can with full knowledge administer “True Justice” by a “Jury” and per the duty of the FSCT as the FSCT Directed per their admitting of their “guilt” and no Quorum since the produced Exhibits of Ballots and earlier Case files and their “Canady Order” and “Labarga Order” and others show their intentional self-serving “Unjust Enrichment” and criminal aiding and abetting to the crimes Townsend has exposed and as further discovery this “Private Attorney’s General” and as Honorable and or “in good behavior” “Officers of the Court” per their Oaths should seek to administer Justice as determined by a “Jury”. V. The “Order” of 1/29/2020 of the Krista Samuels et al per Marbury v. Madison id. and Throckmorton Id. is in or as per her as (Defendant, as questioned Self-serving in violation of F.S. 38) authority “Under Color of Law” and “Under Color of Official Right” and or as “Clerk of the Court” is:

142

A. Violation of F.S. 104 (Law in italics underlined) as “Felonies” as: 1. “F.S. 104.051 Violations; neglect of duty; corrupt practices. Violations of this Act since 1980’s and “impeding” Contracts and Jury’s. 2. B. (1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be excluded from the polls.” This then since the 1980’s removal of the “Blank Line” excludes All involved in this Ongoing Crime and Frauds as they violate their Bonds. 3. C. “(2) Any official who willfully refuses or willfully neglects to perform his or her duties as prescribed by this election code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree,…” This now includes since the FSCT on 11/13/2018, sent down this “Emergency Appeal” to the 1st DCA either includes all the 1st DCA and or a select few with Samuels et al who have “delayed” the rights per this “Voter Protection Act” and done “Fraud on the Court”. And or Notwithstanding the fact that the Attorneys General Bob Butterworth argument letter of 11/2000, as “The Court” admitted informed them of the Two Tier Crimes then and now continued against this “Church Guy” and “All Citizen Voters”. 4. D. (3) Any official who performs his or her duty as prescribed by this election code fraudulently or corruptly is guilty of a felony of the third degree,…” Per this Law, “any official” since their collusion for Human Trafficking to remove the “Blank Space” is guilty of the 3rd Degree Felony and escalated as it is ruled by “Judge Crenshaw et al” and Federal “Judge Moody Jr. et al” and “FSCT Chief “Judges Canady Jr and Labarga et al” to be done as part of their Lane et al admitted “Malicious Prosecution” and “Hate Crimes” done to this “impeded” “Church Guy” and other Candidates and Voters. 5. E. (4) Any supervisor, deputy supervisor, or election employee who attempts to influence or interfere with any elector voting a ballot commits a felony of the third degree,…” Repeat points in 4. Above. 6. F. F.S. 104.0515 Voting rights; deprivation of, or interference with, prohibited; penalty… 7. (1) All citizens of this state who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in this state… shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections without distinction according to race, color, or previous condition of servitude, notwithstanding any law, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage to the contrary. 8. G. F.S. 104.0515(2) No person, whether acting under color of

143 law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten , or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or not to vote as that person may choose, or for the purpose of causing such other person to vote for, or not vote for, any candidate for any office at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate….”’ 9. H. F.S. 104.061 Corruptly influencing voting.—(1) Who ever by bribery, menace, threat, or other corruption whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, attempts to influence, deceive, or deter any elector in voting or interferes with him or her in the free exercise of the elector’s right to vote at any election commits a felony….(2) No person shall directly or indirectly give or promise anything of value to another intending thereby to buy that person’s or another’s vote or to corruptly influence that person or another in casting his or her vote…” 10. I. F.S.104.0615 Voter intimidation or suppression prohibited; criminal penalties.—(1) This section may be cited as the “Voter Protection Act.” (2) A person may not directly or indirectly use or threaten to use force, violence, or intimidation or any tactic of coercion or intimidation to induce or compel an individual to: (a) Vote or refrain from voting; (b) Vote or refrain from voting for any particular individual or ballot measure; (c) Refrain from registering to vote; or (d) Refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher. (3) A person may not knowingly use false information to: (a) challenge an individual’s right to vote; (b) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from voting or registering to vote; or (c) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher; (4) A person may not knowingly destroy, mutilate or deface a voter registration form or election ballot or obstruct or delay of a voter registration form or election ballot…. 11. J. F.S.104.091 Aiding, abetting, advising, or conspiring in violation of the code.--(1) Any person who knowingly aids, abets, or advises the violation of this code shall be punished in like manner as the principal offender. (2) Any person who agrees, conspires, combines, or confederates with another person to commit a violation of this code shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation. (Any person who knows a felony violation of this code and gives any aid to the offender who has violated this code, with intent that the offender avoid or escape detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation.

144

This subsection does not prohibit a member of the Florida Bar from giving legal advice to a client….” 12. K. F.S. 104.11 Neglect of duty by Sheriff or other officer .—Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, or other officer who willfully neglects or willfully refuses to perform his or her duties relating to elections is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.” ; and for each act as stated and proved by this Action since 11/18/1987, “All Violators of the “Voters Protection Act” who violated Townsend as “The Church Guy” and “Candidate” and “Private Attorney’s General” have done multiple felonies as Matters of Law and as Matters of Proved Facts as “Hate Crimes” as Treason for their Thefts of Money and Abduction of Children as Townsend advised Jeb Bush and them all on June 30, 1994 at the TV 13 TOWN HALL FORUM exposing their COMMON CORE TCR GANG. B. As Elevated Felonies as “Tort” action(s) to Conceal Crimes to the FBCCP/CPCS Bylaws per F.S. 775.03 “NO Benefit to Clergy” who as “alias” Clergy” {Beck, Grants, Harrod, Meister, Jeffers, Brown, Nasworthy et al} as Crenshaw and Denny IV admitted 5/10/06 for themselves and their co=participants (Bush-Lane, Crist, Chiles, Canady’s-Cooper-Gievers to the Samuels-1St DCA et al, Grant, Gray, Scruggs et al) and now still ongoing they had conspired and still are conspiring for Criminal Acts with “Illegal Political and or other Government Persons” known and or still unknown “Illegally” “Under Color of Law” or “Under Color of Official Right” to do: Defamation to the FBCCP/CPCS; “Fraud on the Court(s)”; Extortion; RICO; Hobbs Act Crimes as all four questions must be answered “Yes” since about October 1994 per their “Rump Faction” admissions of crimes from the Pulpit in the Church Business Meeting as a Tort and Breach of Our Bylaws; abduction of children; abduction of designated funds”; and Breach of Contract(s) as of Superior FBCCP Bylaws and Our Constitutions; C. “Fraud on the Court” as follows: 1. Each act since 11/18/1987 by McCarthy et al, Williams et al; Lane et al; has been in collusion for Treason for their “Nobility” as Pam Bondi et al described the Biden/Hunter Biden “Pay to Play” to steal money by False Claims; and for 3. To continue to conceal their: “Price Fixing”; Installing the Koch’s ownership of all companies to “Unjustly Enrich” themselves by “pay to play” “kickbacks” with Townsend’s stolen money by Lane et al; 3. To continue to conceal their Lane et al with Epstein et al uses of Drug and Human Trafficking; 4. To conceal their “Murders” as “judge Gievers” acknowledged 2/7/19, in court as knowing persons as Paul Tash, Steve Andrews and “alias” “Law

145

Enforcers” witnessed and concealed evidence in many cases. 5. To continue their “TCR” “Nobility” of the Butterworth-Bush-Smith- Grant-Detzner-Moody-Lee “Two Tier” “Voter Protection Act” felonies as still being illegally done for their “Unjust Enrichment” as the McCarthy, Presnell, Landus, Gibbs III, Grant et al, Popper, Chapin, Crenshaw et al, Moody Jr. et al, Canady’s et al, Labarga et al and Gievers et al and Cooper Et al and this 1st DCA and Samuels et al still “impede” this “Church Guy” and Voters. D. Violation of “We the People’s” by Townsend the “Church Guy” Redress of Government Due Process per F.S. 80.02; E. Violation of Redress of Government Due Process per F.S. 86 to be not “impeded” by a “Jury” of our peers to determine our Laws and Rights; F. Violations of the Rules of the First District Court of Appeals; G. Violations of Constitutional Rights; H. Violation of Law with no “Immunity” as Bondi et al has by Frauds claimed for Years even on the National Stages and now in the Senate describing of Hunter Biden her own Hunter Biden Acts causing harms and damages and fears to Townsend this her co=participants can’t lawfully conceal from a “jury” process showing more frauds and no immunity; “IMMUNITY Social workers (and other government employees) may be sued for deprivation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if they are named in their ‘official and individual capacity’. Hafer v. Melo, (S.Ct. 1991) State law cannot provide immunity from suit for Federal civil rights violations. State law providing immunity from suit for child abuse investigators has no application to suits under § 1983. Wallis v. Spencer, (9th Cir. 1999) If the law was clearly established at the time the action occurred, a police officer is not entitled to assert the defense of qualified immunity based on good faith since a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his or her conduct. Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982) Immunity is defeated if the official took the complained of action with malicious intention to cause a deprivation of rights, or the official violated clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. McCord v. Maggio, (5th Cir. 1991) A defendant in a civil rights case is not entitled to any immunity if he or she gave false information either in support of an application for a search warrant or in presenting evidence to a prosecutor on which the prosecutor

146 based his or her charge against the plaintiff. Young v. Biggers, (5th Cir. 1991) Police officer was not entitled to absolute immunity for her role in procurement of a court order placing a child in state custody where there was evidence officer spoke with the social worker prior to social worker’s conversation with the magistrate and there was evidence that described the collaborative worker of the two defendants in creating a “plan of action” to deal with the situation. Officer’s acts were investigative and involved more that merely carrying out a judicial order. Malik v. Arapahoe Cty. Dept. of Social Services, (10th Cir. 1999) Individuals aren’t immune for the results of their official conduct simply because they were enforcing policies or orders. Where a statute authorizes official conduct which is patently violation of fundamental constitutional principles, an officer who enforces that statute is not entitled to qualified immunity. Grossman v. City of Portland, (9th Cir. (1994) Social workers were not entitled to absolute immunity for pleadings filed to obtain a pick-up order for temporary custody prior to formal petition being filed. Social workers were not entitled to absolute immunity where department policy was for social workers to report findings of neglect or abuse to other authorities for further investigation or initiation of court proceedings. Social workers investigating claims of child abuse are entitled only to qualified immunity. Assisting in the use of information known to be false to further an investigation is not subject to absolute immunity. Social workers are not entitled to qualified immunity on claims they deceived judicial officers in obtaining a custody order or deliberately or recklessly incorporated known falsehoods into their reports, criminal complaints and applications. Use of information known to be false is not reasonable, and acts of deliberate falsity or reckless disregard of the truth are not entitled to qualified immunity. No qualified immunity is available for incorporating allegations into the report or application where official had no reasonable basis to assume the allegations were true at the time the document was prepared. Snell v. Tunnel, (10 Cir. 1990) Police officer is not entitled to absolute immunity, only qualified immunity, to claim that he caused plaintiff to be unlawfully arrested by presenting judge with an affidavit that failed to establish probable cause. Malley v. Briggs, S.Ct. 1986) Defendants were not entitled to prosecutorial immunity where complaint was based on failure to investigate, detaining minor child, and an inordinate delay in filing court proceedings, because such actions did not aid in the

147 presentation of a case to the juvenile court. Whisman v. Rinehart, (8th Cir. 1997) Case worker who intentionally or recklessly withheld potentially exculpatory information from an adjudicated delinquent or from the court itself was not entitled to qualified immunity. Germany v. Vance, (1st Cir. 1989) Defendant was not entitled to qualified immunity or summary judgment because he should’ve investigated further prior to ordering seizure of children based on information he had overheard. Hurlman v. Rice, (2nd Cir. 1991) Defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity for conducting warrantless search of home during a child abuse investigation where exigent circumstances were not present. Good v. Dauphin County Social Services, (3rd Cir 1989) Social workers were not entitled to absolute immunity where no court order commanded them to place plaintiff with particular foster caregivers. K.H through Murphy v. Morgan, (7th Cir. 1991)” Karen Harrod in her Affidavits to “judge” Holder in 12/2005, that she with these and Beck et al with John Grant, Charles Scruggs, Mark Ober, Pam Bondi and Heather Gray and many others to conceal their Hunter Biden type job for the Oligarchs Koch and Bush and Chiles and Canady's and Moody's and Lanes and Crenshaws of Publix and to steal money from Townsend and the FBCCP/CPCS for Common Core as the Minutes of the Church Bylaws proved were by the Grant, Jeb and George 41 &43 and Columba Bush Et al from Churches and Christian Schools as the Employees had a duty to show. As now should be in evidence in this Case 18-4845 1st DCA Tallahassee. VI. The Defendants Samuels and 1st DCA Et al received this Appeal Action from the FSCT on November 13, 2018 and are in violation of their “Courts” own rules per: EXHIBIT ONE: Rules are in italics and Church Guy Appellant are not. “Reply Briefs: Rules and Protocol in the Battle for the Last Word Vol. 80, No. 3 March 2006 Pg 48 Finn Pressly Appellate Practice. The Florida Supreme Court in Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So. 2d 561, 573 (Fla. 2005), recently adopted the Fourth District’s maxim that outcomes should not “depend on who is the most powerful, most eloquent, best dressed, most devious and most persistent with the last word.” Though the court directed this warning at unsavory trial tactics, appellate attorneys are wise to keep this rule in mind — especially when it comes to the battle for the last word.

148

In the appellate arena, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a) specifically grants the last word to the appellant through the reply brief.” Thus is not the Defendant Samuels et al 1/29/2020, ruling under their Alleged “official Right” a violation of F.S. 104 and this Rule and a Felony? “ Rule 9.210(a) provides that “the only briefs permitted to be filed by the parties in any one proceeding are the initial brief, the answer brief, a reply brief, and a cross-reply brief.” The cross-reply brief is only permitted when there has been a cross-appeal, which turns the appellee into a cross- appellant. Naturally, the rules grant the cross-appellant the final word in his or her cross-appeal1 in Rule 9.210(e). The Role of the Reply Brief Rule 9.210(d)-(e) narrowly defines the role of the reply brief, limiting its content to rebuttal of the arguments made by the appellee in the answer brief. As the First District recognized in St. Regis Paper Co. v. Hill, 198 So. 2d 365, 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), “[t]he office of a reply brief is to respond to new matters contended by an opposing brief.” Even though the reply brief does not provide the appellant with an unrestricted forum, appellants sometimes abuse their right to the last word (often inadvertently), leaving the appellee with no opportunity to respond. Florida courts have consistently prohibited appellants from arguing new issues in their reply briefs. “An issue raised for the first time on appeal in appellants’ reply brief, even though properly preserved for appeal, will not be considered by this court.” Despite such clear pronouncements from the courts, the reply brief is often subject to abuse by appellants. When new issues are introduced in the reply briefs, even experienced appellate practitioners find themselves at a loss. The rules do not provide a particular mechanism for responding to inappropriate reply briefs.3 Likewise, case law does not establish a preferred means of drawing the court’s attention to the infraction. Generally speaking, each appellate district — if not each judge — has its own stance on how to respond to improper reply briefs. When asked how an appellee should respond, several judges have offered their own personal insights on the subject. While their opinions do not necessarily reflect their respective district’s overall philosophy, they certainly illustrate the range of attitudes toward responding to improper issues in reply briefs.” Townsend raised no new issues in his “Reply Brief” as the arguments made by Moody-Patel and Davis and McVey were the same as Newhall and Bondi and Moody et al in the Court of “judge Gievers” detailing “No matter what they say this is a violation of “No Blank Line” and a violation of F.S. 104…” and as then to the point of “Fraud on the Court” and “Fraud with the “alias” “officers of the Court” as for knowledge, Intent of their Plan, Purpose and Practices of “Predicate Acts” and “Conditions President” even

149

Attorney Butterworth had told the “Courts” in Gore V. Harris, their “Frauds” to the Court were Felonies of their “Two Tier” “Nobility” as the Pam Bondi details their “Hunter Biden” “pay to play” same acts against this “Candidate” “Church Guy” and all citizens for whom this “Church Guy” Speaks to expose their Intent, Knowledge, Willfullness and Recklessness. “Using Oral Argument to Respond Many of the judges agreed that oral argument offers an advantageous opportunity for bringing these issues to the court’s attention. Thus, when the appellee considers his or her options for responding to an inappropriate reply brief, the response should be tailored with oral argument in mind. For example, if an appellee’s case rests in a district that grants oral argument as a matter of course, counsel can rest assured of having an available forum for responding to the appellant’s reply brief. Appellee’s did not request “Oral Argument” to the 1st DCA, so was this knowing their “Clients” the Samuels and 1DCA were already in collusion for Prejudice and Bias to do “Fraud on the Court” by omitting Appellants evidence and arguments since 1987, as Due Process Requires and or then to unlawfully conceal their co=participant defendant A.G. Butterworth-Bondi- Moody et al’s continued admission of their like “Hunter Biden” guilt? “Under Rule 9.320 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, however, a party’s request for oral argument must be filed along with the final brief. (“A request for oral argument shall be a separate document served by a party not later than the time the last brief of that party is due.”) For the appellant, the final brief is obviously the reply brief. The appellee’s request for oral argument, however, must be made when filing the answer brief. Therefore, even if the appellee believes that oral argument is unnecessary, he or she may want to request argument, if for no other reason than to ensure an opportunity to respond to the appellant’s reply brief. If the reply brief raises no objectionable arguments, Rule 9.320 permits the appellee to withdraw this request. Responsive Motions As discussed, the appellate rules do not provide a particular remedy for responding to inappropriate reply briefs. Therefore, the appellee often finds himself or herself constructing his or her own ad hoc motion or notice to alert the court to the improper argument. and large, most judges recommended either a motion to strike and/or a motion to file a limited response to the new argument. Their attitudes toward filing these motions, however, reveal differing philosophies toward motion practice in the appellate courts.

150

Judge Patricia Kelly of the Second District warned appellees to use restraint when considering a motion to strike. “When you start getting into motions to strike, that’s when I would tell people to use them judiciously,” she cautioned. Kelly suggested appellees first determine whether the appellant’s infraction has caused any real harm. In her opinion, motions to strike should be reserved for instances when the new argument causes the appellee real harm or prejudice. She also reemphasized the availability of oral argument to address any concerns regarding the appellant’s reply brief. “Even if you do a motion to strike, and it’s denied,” she said, “I still wouldn’t hesitate to bring it up at oral argument.” Like Judge Kelly, Judge Chris Altenbernd” (a named defendant herein) “of the Second District advised that the circumstances of the alleged infraction should dictate the attorney’s response. He said that the question of new issues in the reply brief is often a very nuanced one and may be better suited to resolution at oral argument. “and large,” he said, “appellate judges hate cases that get into motion wars. You want to get into the merits of the case and resolve it.” Judge Altenbernd also noted that some attorneys believe that unsuccessful motions have the effect of educating the court as to their position. He pointed out that the panel of judges that hears motions is often different from the panel that will hear the merits of the appeal. Though these motions are filed in the appellate pleadings file, Altenbernd cautioned that “it’s unlikely that the merits panel will go through the pleadings file because they assume those issues have ironed themselves out.” Thus, if an attorney files a motion simply to “educate” the court, he or she may find that those efforts have little to no instructive effect on the merits panel. On the other end of the spectrum, Judge Ricky Polston” (a named defendant) “of the First District expressed his own personal preference for responding to improperly argued reply briefs. He would always suggest filing a motion to strike inappropriate portions of reply briefs. Drawing from his experience on the other side of the bench, he noted that an attorney is never sure what issue the court will seize upon and rest its decision. Taking a better-safe- than-sorry approach, Polston advised always filing a motion to strike, though he stressed that his own opinion does not necessarily reflect the First District’s policy. Judge Richard Orfinger” (a named defendant herein) “of the Fifth District suggested filing a motion to strike that also seeks leave to file a limited response to the newly added issue. Judge Leslie Rothenberg of the Third District offered similar advice, adding that the court may be more likely to grant a motion for limited response than a motion to strike. The

151 determination of whether an issue comes within the scope of what was argued involves careful study of the record and the briefs, and an appellate court may not be willing to strike an argument before it conducts an in-depth review of the appeal. Another possible recourse is the notice of filing supplemental authority under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.225. This option requires a certain degree of caution, however, given that notices of supplemental authority may not contain any argument. Instead, the rules provide that notices of supplemental authority may only reference the issue on appeal that the authority addresses. While such a notice does not provide the aggrieved party with an unlimited forum, some practitioners have found notices of supplemental authority to be a useful way to file case law rebutting newly pled issues or alerting the court to the fact that the reply brief contains a prohibited new issue. Conclusion While the judges’ responses reveal a wide range of attitudes toward motions to strike and motions for limited response, this disparity of opinion further highlights the importance of oral argument as a responsive tool. When the appellee files an answer brief, he or she must remember that the decision to request oral argument may affect whether he or she gets the opportunity to respond to the appellant’s reply brief. While motions to strike and motions for limited response certainly have their proponents in certain judicial chambers in Florida, a request for oral argument is perhaps the safest way to ensure that an appellee will have the opportunity to cure any abuse of the “last word” by the appellant. 1. Judge Chris Altenbernd of the Second District noted that if no cross- appeal has been filed, all self-styled cross-reply briefs are automatically stricken as a matter of course. 2 Snyder v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 574 So. 2d 1161, 1161 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1991). See also Gen. Mortgage Assocs., Inc. v. Campolo Realty & Mortgage Corp., 678 So. 2d 431, 431 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1996) (“The fact that this issue was raised for the first time in the reply brief alone precludes our consideration of the matter.”); Pursell v. Sumter Elec. Co-Op., Inc., 169 So. 2d 515, 518 n.2 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1964) (declining to consider an argument made for the first time in the reply brief).” Townsend’s Reply brief did not raise new issues but exposed the “Fraud on the Court” by the Patel “we are confused” argument when then her clients confess they always knew their “Hunter Biden” “Pay to Play” crimes as A.G. Butterworth argues since 2000 and in the Arkansas Case.”

152

3 It is interesting to note that the rules governing review of workers’ compensation proceedings provide explicit guidance as to this issue. Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(h)(3). The rules prohibit motions to strike and encourage parties to use their own briefs to point out possible rules violations. If this option is not available, the rules permit the aggrieved party to file a “suggestion of noncompliance.” This set of Motions by Townsend continues to show the Defendants and “Other Doe to be Named” and this Samuels et al “Suggestion of Non Compliance” with their own Constitutional Laws and rules as Hobbs Act and Rico “Acts of Hate Crimes” against this “Church Guy” Candidate wanting “justice” for his children, church/school members and citizens since 11/18/1987, and not be subjected to criminal Drug and Epstein Human Trafficking and Other “Lane et al Hate Crimes”. EXHIBIT TWO: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT (Revised November 19, 2019) NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES WEBPAGE: http://www.1dca.org COUNSEL AND PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH AND COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE AND THESE GUIDELINES. To help the court efficiently process cases, the following court guidelines are provided to litigants. This informational sheet is not intended to and does not provide parties with separately enforceable rights. The court’s docket is available on-line at the court’s website (www.1dca.org) which is updated at the close of each business day. The website also includes an archive of court opinions and oral argument videos, a live oral argument video feed, the court’s oral argument calendar, administrative orders, the court’s Internal Operating Procedures, and other useful information. Electronic filings and payments should be made through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal at https://myflcourtaccess.com. Go to the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal’s website to register. This court’s electronic system, eDCA, will remain as the court’s method for electronic service of outgoing filings and provide electronic case access. See the court’s website at www.1dca.org to register with eDCA and for more information on the court’s electronic system. Ex parte communication with judges or their staffs is prohibited.” So behind closed doors it appears the Samuels “individual” and the “judges” as “individuals Next Door Neighbors” and the “individuals as “attorney’s Generals and their lawyers” are having “private exparte collusion meetings” as McCarthy did since 1987 and as Bondi-Cridlin-

153

Nash did for the Default of Bush and as Popper and Chapin and Grant did since their coverups or as the docket on 2/7/2019 shows a morning hearing that the clerk said was a mistake on the records. “Any questions about the status of a case should be directed to the Clerk’s office, and clients should direct such inquiries to their attorneys. Attorneys and parties are encouraged to consult the website before contacting the court about routine docket inquiries. The court does not accept filings by fax. All attorneys are required to register with and file their documents electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal at https://myflcourtaccess.com. Pro se litigants may but are not required to register with the E-Filing Portal. Upon registering with the E-Filing Portal, all attorneys and registered users must file all pleadings through the E-Filing Portal; paper filings by attorneys and registered users are not authorized. Registration through eDCA is required in addition to the E-Filing Portal registration in order to receive service of the court’s outgoing electronic notifications via email (known as “Casemail”) which informs eDCA users when electronic documents are uploaded in any case to which the user is a party, attorney of record, or additional party. The email will contain a link to the electronic document. Registered eDCA users will not be mailed paper copies of documents from the court but will receive all court notifications via Casemail. Electronic copies of briefs are available to attorneys registered in eDCA even though the attorney is not listed with the court as attorney of record on that case. However, briefs in confidential cases are not available except to the attorneys and parties of record for that case. Not all briefs are available electronically, especially briefs in older cases. The court directs that attorneys, parties, and lower tribunals should not include with documents filed in paper or electronically a “transmittal letter” which serves no other purpose but to inform the court of what document(s) is being filed. Documents being filed with the court should be clearly marked identifying what the document is (brief, record, motion, etc.) and the case in which it is to be filed. Transmittal or cover letters merely repeating this information are unnecessary and undesired by the court other than when filed with an electronic payment. 1. NOTICE OF APPEAL The notice of appeal should include the full name of the lower tribunal judge or hearing officer who entered the order(s) and the date of rendition of the order(s) sought to be reviewed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(e) or 9.180(b)(4). The notice should also contain the names of all parties to the appeal, whether the appeal is from a final or non-final order, and the exact nature of the order

154 being appealed. For each attorney listed, the certificate of service for the notice of appeal should include the attorney's address (mailing and email), the name of the party the attorney represents, and whether the party represented is an appellant, appellee, etc. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d), 9.130(c), 9.180(b)(4), and 9.420(d). See #8 below. Notices of appeal are to be filed with the lower tribunal.” The evening of the November 6, 2018, Election Townsend notified the FSCT the Lower Court of the Criminal Acts. It was the FSCT and by Clerk Tomasino who filed in the 1st DCA this Action and thus has failed per the law to list all Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” that the FSCT by their own Canady Jr. and Labarga Orders have admitted they and their prior FSCT “judges” acted in collusion and obstruction to “impede” the discovery of persons and damages and crimes in this Action since 1987, which per Jenkins id. must be lawfully litigated and sanctions and restitution of relationships, resources and rights be lawfully restored. “2. COPY OF ORDER BEING APPEALED Except in criminal cases, the party filing the notice of appeal shall attach a copy of the order(s) designated in the notice of appeal. The party filing the appeal shall also attach a copy of any motion that affects the date of rendition of the order appealed and any order entered on any motion that affects the date of rendition. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i), 9.110(d) and 9.130(c).” Townsend has advised Tomasino and Samuels and each clerk and “judge” by multiple Motions to obey the Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure and supply the Record with all papers since 1987 to no “avail” per their duty. 3. DOCKETING STATEMENTS All parties are requested to carefully follow the instructions on the Docketing Statement, fill it out to the best of their ability, serve a copy on the opposing party/attorneys, and return it to the court. Instead of completing the pink paper Docketing Statement provided by the court, attorneys and registered users are required to file the docketing statement through the E- Filing Portal. A fillable Docketing Statement will be available on the E- Filing Portal once a case is selected. Since these “Clerks” and Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” ignore lawful discovery so to conceal their co=participants, Townsend can only drag them from the weeds, since 1987 as the “Fraps 1-3, January 2019 Served” and “Others Doe/Smith/Patel’s are Named” who violate F.S. 99 and F.S. 104. “4. NUMBER OF COPIES

155

If a document is filed in paper by a non-attorney, only the original is required to be filed with the court. If a document is filed electronically through the E-Filing Portal by a registered user, no paper copies are permitted or required. 5. COPIES OF RECORDS The Clerk’s office is required by statute to charge a fee of $1.00 per page to make copies of records. Additional fees may apply for other services, such as certification, creation, or mailing of documents. Registered attorneys and parties in eDCA may also check their cases in eDCA to see if a copy of the record has been uploaded to the case file. Copies of available records may be downloaded by a registered user in his or her case without charge. Confidential records may not be available through eDCA. 6. SUPPLEMENTATION OF RECORDS Supplemental records in appeals must be provided by the clerks of the lower tribunal after approval of a motion filed in this court. Absent special circumstances, records in these appeals may not be supplemented by attachments to motions or briefs. Another Legal Duty that these Clerks and Defendants unlawfully ignore. “7. MOTIONS Any request for action or relief from this court should be clearly set forth in the form of a motion styled in the case which reflects “First District Court of Appeal” at the top, the case name, this court’s case number, and the lower tribunal number. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300. As well, all motions must contain a proper certificate of service reflecting that copies of the motion have been served on the opposing counsel/parties. See #8 below. If the record has not yet been filed with this court, record material supporting a motion should be included in an appendix. See #12 below. Motions for extension of time must include the number of days requested and a date certain when the brief will be filed. Motions for extension of time, motions relating to preparation of the record or briefs”, Townsend has not been lawfully contacted, respected as a Defendant and or Plaintiff to the “Obstruction” and Crimes” done by these Defendants and “Other Doe to be Named” in their obstruction of the “Record” and Discovery’s even those documents since 10/1994 the Church Bylaw’s clearly state must be shown to Townsend and the Church Owner Members (over $43000) and the Crenshaw Ordered documents in 2006 that were obstructed and even the Townsend filed case records were destroyed from the Clerks files from 12/2003, and the Orange Circuit Clerks Linda and Bruce Chapin acts and the 5th DCA Acts as being “impeded” by their illegal acts.

156

“and motions to reschedule oral argument must contain a certificate that opposing counsel has been consulted and state whether there is an objection to the motion. a. Extensions of Time for Filing Briefs Effective February 21, 2019, pursuant to Administrative Order 19-2, an agreed notice of extension of time will be accepted in civil appeals for up to a total of 90 days for initial and answer briefs and up to a total of 15 days for reply briefs and in criminal appeals for up to a total of 60 days for initial and answer briefs. The stipulation must expressly state the number of days agreed upon for the extension, not just the date the brief would be due. Extensions granted prior to the submission of the stipulation shall be computed as part of the aggregate time periods. This procedure shall apply to final and non-final criminal and civil appeals, including administrative appeals. It shall not apply to proceedings involving adoptions, dependency, termination of parental rights, delinquency, emergency appeals, or any other appeal which has been expedited by the court. It also shall not apply to original proceedings governed by Rule 9.100, Workers’ Compensation proceedings, or appeals governed by Rule 9.141(b)(2). Extensions beyond the time must be presented to the court by motion. However, no further extensions shall be granted except in bona fide cases of emergency. A motion for extension of time served after time has expired for serving the brief will generally not be granted in the absence of good cause shown. Failure to comply with these standards may result in dismissal of the case, striking of the untimely brief, and/or other sanctions. Townsend then therefore Demands the Defendants by their Own rules must dismiss all their “illegal defenses” and grant Townsend’s lawful demands to be decided by a F.S. 86 “Jury” for sanctions. “In Workers’ Compensation cases, a motion for extension of time must specifically state the circumstances justifying an extension, and motions requesting an extension on the sole basis of a busy schedule will not be favorably received. Extensions for reply briefs in Workers’ Compensation cases will not be granted except upon showing of extreme emergency. b. Expedited Child Cases The court has instituted accelerated procedures for the processing of certain child cases. These cases are designated as such when the case is set up and receive priority treatment in the court as addressed in the court’s order. Extensions of time in such cases are not granted except in emergency circumstances. Townsend since 10/20/1999, and the illegal Abduction of J.G.T. and

157

J.D.T for an Emergency Hearing to protect his children and Our Rights yet each Defendant and “Others Doe to be Named” have obstructed “Due Process” even when their Mother filed with the Court of “judge” Holder her affidavits of conflicting admissions of their joint conspiracy to “Defame” and Damage Townsend acting as per the FBCCP/CPCS Bylaws as the “Church Guy” as “judge” Palomino admitted 11/15/2001 and at other hearings that Scruggs/Grant/Beck/Harrod/Ober et al and others were doing Criminal acts as “judge” “Arnold” and “judge” Crenshaw ruled since 9/30/2003 and as John Grant admitted 2/2016. “c. Responses to Motions Any response to a motion, including responses to motions for rehearing, shall be promptly served, i.e., within 15 days of the service of the motion or such other time as may be specifically set by the court. No reply to a response will be considered unless specifically authorized by the court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(a). 8. CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE All paper and electronically filed petitions, briefs, motions, notices, appendices, supplemental authorities, and other filings, shall contain a certificate of service attesting that copies have been provided to the opposing counsel/parties. Townsend states that since 1987, the Attorney’s, Clerks and Judges have failed in their Service of Papers have not filed their Notices of Appearances and or filed to whom they conspired and served for their “Nobility” TCR. “ There are different forms for proof of service based on whether you are filing as an attorney, a pro se inmate, or other pro se litigant. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin 2.516 and Fla. R. App. P. 9.420. Pleadings which are served on the opposing side electronically must state the electronic means used as well as the date of service. If a certificate of service indicates someone is served by email, it must list the name of the person served as well as the person’s email address. This court does not provide service of documents for litigants. Litigants are required to serve opposing counsel/parties with a copy of all documents filed with the court. Examples of Certificates of Service: By Attorney or Pro Se (Non-Inmate) Litigant: By Pro Se Inmate: I certify that a copy hereof has been furnished to I certify that I placed this document in(insert name or names) by (delivery) (mail/email) the hands of (insert name of institutional official) on (date). for mailing to (insert name or names) on (date). ______(signature)

158

Attorney for (name of party) or (name if pro se) ______(signature) (address) (name) (phone number) (address) (email address) (prison identification number) Florida Bar No. ______(omit if pro se) 9. AFTER HOURS FILINGS Paper filings may be received by the guard after regular business hours and will be stamped as filed on the day received. There is no guarantee the guard will be available on any given day to accept filings so litigants should ensure that time sensitive matters are filed during regular business hours (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) on days the court is open. For electronic filings, the date an electronic filing is received by the court through the E-Filing Portal will constitute the date of filing of that pleading, up to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on the date the document is electronically filed. 10. SERVICE OF EMERGENCY PAPERS Any paper filed in this court designated as an "Emergency" should be served on the parties in the same manner, when practical, as used for the filing itself; e.g., if the paper was filed by special delivery, then the paper should be served on the parties via special delivery. Electronically filed documents though the E-Filing Portal may be marked as “Emergency” when filed by checking the emergency filing box as well as in the title of the document. Pleadings may only be marked as “Emergency” if a true emergency exists. 11. BRIEFS Paper briefs are to be filed only with an original copy containing an original signature of the submitting party. Additional copies are not required. As with all other documents, attorneys and registered E-Filing Portal users are required to electronically submit briefs via the E-Filing Portal. Paper briefs shall NOT be stapled or bound. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.210(a)(3). The answer brief shall contain all the same elements as contained in the initial brief except that the statement of the case and facts may be omitted. The initial and answer briefs shall include a list of citations and a table of contents with each issue listed and reference made to the page(s) where each issue is discussed in the brief. The court prefers that the reply brief be submitted in this same format. Briefs are screened by the court when filed to determine compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210. a. Font Size on Briefs: Briefs filed in paper format are required to be on 8 1/2-by-11 inch white paper, with electronically filed briefs utilizing the equivalent size and color. All briefs are to be double spaced. Headings and subheadings shall be in

159 print at least as large as the rest of the brief and may be single spaced. Rule 9.210(a)(2) requires that all computer-generated briefs be submitted in either Times New Roman 14-point font or Courier New 12-point font and include a certification signed by the individual filing the brief immediately after the certificate of service that the brief complies with the font requirements of the Rule. Briefs filed electronically through the E-Filing Portal are not required to have an original signature. b. Standard of Review in Briefs: The argument section of briefs must contain the standard of review to be applied by the court as to each issue presented. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.210(b)(5). The statement of the standard of review should be included as to each issue immediately following the issue heading in the argument section. c. Expanded Briefs: The court does not generally approve briefs which exceed the page limits contained in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(5). That rule provides that initial and answer briefs should not exceed 50 pages and the reply brief is limited to 15 pages. If a cross-appeal has been filed, the answer brief/initial brief on cross-appeal shall not exceed 85 pages. A reply brief that includes the appellant's answer brief on a cross-appeal may not exceed 50 pages in length and not more than 15 pages may be devoted to the reply brief portion. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.210(a)(5). Any motion requesting to exceed the page limit of a brief must include with the motion the original proposed expanded brief. See Bennett v. Florida National Bank, 517 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). If the motion is filed electronically through the E- Filing Portal, the proposed expanded brief must be efiled as a separate document at the same time as or immediately after the efiling of the motion. d. Amendments or Corrections: Any request to amend or correct a filed brief is to be submitted by motion, accompanied by an original copy of the entire brief that includes the correction(s) and is entitled an “Amended Brief." If a motion to amend a brief is filed electronically, the “Amended Brief” must be efiled as a separate document at the same time as or immediately after the efiling of the motion. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.210, North Florida Regional Medical Center v. Witt, 616 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). It is also desirable that the motion contain the position of the opposing counsel regarding the filing of the amended brief. e. Amicus Curiae Briefs Any party wishing to file an amicus brief shall file a motion requesting leave of court to file the brief complying with the requirements of Florida Rule of

160

Appellate Procedure 9.370. If filed by an attorney or registered user, amicus curiae briefs must be electronically filed via the E-Filing Portal. 12. APPENDIX If an appendix is submitted in paper, it shall be filed separately from the petition, brief, motion, response, or reply that it accompanies. The appendix shall include at the front an index (table of contents) and include a copy of the order(s) being appealed (unless a previously filed appendix to an initial brief contains the order(s) being appealed). Electronically filed appendices are now required to be filed as a single PDF document which is properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1. The PDF file must be text searchable, paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, bookmarked consistently with the index, and shall not contain condensed transcripts unless authorized by the court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.220. Paper appendices must be securely bound in book form or fastened along the left side in a manner that will allow them to lie flat when opened. The preferred method of binding is by using a secure staple in the upper left corner rather than bound in book form. 13. FONT SIZE AND PAGE LIMITS ON PETITIONS, RESPONSES AND REPLIES Rules 9.210(a) and 9.100(l) set forth the requirements for margins, font size, and spacing for briefs, petitions, replies and responses. The print must be black, double spaced, and contain no less than 1 inch margins. Footnotes and quotations may be single spaced and shall be of the same type size and spacing as the text. Computer-generated petitions, responses, and replies shall be submitted in either Times New Roman 14-point font or Courier New 12-point font. All computer-generated petitions, responses, or replies must contain a certification as to compliance with the Rule's font requirements. The certification shall appear immediately following the certificate of service and be signed by the filing counsel or, if unrepresented, by the party. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(l). Rule 9.100(g), (j), and (k) provides that a petition or response to a petition should not exceed 50 pages in length, and the petitioner’s reply should not exceed 15 pages. 14. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE If a party desires to include one or more articles of physical evidence with the record forwarded to this court on appeal, excluding documents, the party shall first seek permission from this court by filing a motion. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(a)(1). Physical evidence is usually not included in the court’s record and no exhibit which exceeds 48 inches in height, depth, or width will

161 be permitted absent special circumstances and approved by this court’s order. 15. CORPORATE SELF-REPRESENTATION While an individual may represent his or her interest in court without an attorney, a corporation is not permitted to do so through non-lawyer employees, officers, or shareholders. See Richter v. Higdon Homes, Inc., 544 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Nicholson Supply Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. of Hardee County, 184 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). 16. FOREIGN ATTORNEYS Attorneys who are members in good standing in other jurisdictions may be granted permission by court order to appear in proceedings in this court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.440(a) and the requirements contained in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510. Attorneys who have been permitted to appear pro hac vice in the lower court must still file a motion for leave to appear before this court. Pursuant to Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, the clerk is required to collect a $100 filing fee from each attorney appearing pro hac vice, an order for the payment of which will be issued when and if the motion to appear is granted. An additional filing fee of $250 is required by the Florida Bar. 17. ORAL ARGUMENT Requests for oral argument shall be made by filing a separate pleading clearly designated as such and shall contain no other subject matter. Oral argument requests should be limited to those cases where counsel believes it will serve a definite and useful purpose in aiding the court in deciding the issue(s) on appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.320. Cases receive the same consideration regardless of whether an oral argument request has been made. Requests for oral argument shall be made not later than 10 days after the last brief is due, or in petitions, not later than 10 days after the reply is due, unless otherwise ordered by the court. Once the court has scheduled oral argument, motions for continuances are not favored except in emergency circumstances. Further, the court should be notified first telephonically, then followed by motion, if within ten days prior to the oral argument date settlement agreements appear successful or a motion for voluntary dismissal is expected prior to oral argument. Any request for oral argument by video teleconferencing should be contained in the motion for oral argument and should contain the consent of the opposing counsel/party as well as designate the specific location for the appearance of counsel for the oral argument. Video teleconferencing facilities are available from the following cities: Miami, West Palm Beach,

162

Tampa, Daytona Beach, Pensacola, and Jacksonville. The party requesting this option is responsible for payment of the video teleconferencing fee within 10 days of notification that the case has been scheduled for oral argument by video teleconferencing. 18. SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY A copy of a newly discovered authority should be attached to the notice. While the notice should designate clearly the issue to which the supplemental authority is pertinent, no argument or comment on the authority will be accepted. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.225. Counsel should be familiar with Ogden Allied Services v. Panesso, 619 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), and Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation, etc. v. David Young, 690 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). 20. REHEARING Although motions for rehearing are permitted by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330, the court strongly discourages the practice of routinely filing such motions. See Whipple v. State, 431 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Rule 9.330(a) requires that a motion for rehearing set forth the law or fact that in the opinion of the movant the court has overlooked or misapprehended in its decision and shall not present issues not previously raised in the proceedings. Where there has been an award of attorney's fees on appeal in connection with the decision on the merits, additional fees may be awarded upon a denial of a motion for rehearing. Counsel should be familiar with Gainesville Coca-Cola v. Young, 632 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), and Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. Reitzes, 631 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Any response to a motion for rehearing must be served within 15 days of service of the motion. 21. LEGAL ADVICE Judges of this court are not permitted to provide legal advice, provide separate advisory opinions, or respond to general questions of the law except in cases properly brought before the court. Employees of the clerk’s office and the court are likewise not permitted to provide legal advice. Those representing themselves on appeal should review the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and may find it helpful to consult the Pro Se (Unrepresented) Appellate Handbook published by the Appellate Practice Section of The Florida Bar at http://www.flabarappellate.org.” ARE THESE “UNKNOWN AND CONCEALED” “JUDGES” AND OR OTHERS THEN GIVING ILLEGAL ADVICE TO SAMUELS AND Jeb Bush and OTHERS WHO WERE SERVED IN THEIR OFFICIAL AND “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR” INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES? “23. FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL WEB PAGE

163 www.1dca.org...” Therefore for the above Facts and Laws, the Acts to reject the Reply Briefs or Any Facts Townsend advocates to present his Legal (Plaintiff and or Defendant and or as F.S. 617.0834 or “Private Attorney’s General and or Candidate) Actions since 1987, is a violation of: Law, Due Process; “and or for intended and continuing “By-Law Hate Crimes” as “Predicate Acts” to obstruct commerce for “Unjust Enrichment” by “next door neighbors” with “no immunity” per our Constitutional Equal Protection Clause and protected per F.S. 104, in violation of their Bonds for their Breach of Contracts and Rules showing their illegal uses of “Fruits from the Poisoned Bush et al” as the Orders of Charles Canady Jr. admitted per SC 11-1042 and as confirmed by Jorge Labarga in SC 16-92 and by Federal “Judge” James Moody Jr. and by Marva Crenshaw and Charles Denny IV in open Court on May 10, 2006, even admitting their FBCCP/CPCS By-Laws “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” to victimize Townsend et al trying to End Ron Beck-Harrods- Gibbs/CLA-John Grant Registered Agent-Lawyer “Rump Faction” et el for “Fraud” as an alleged “Clergy” in conspiracy with Bush et al and Koch’s et al for their Tort “Unjust Enrichment” with Enron, Jeffery Epstein, Walkers, Diamond’s, Bear Stern, Goldman Sach’s, and “Others” and Canady as Lane- Trohn et al, Gray Robinson et al etc “Others Doe to be Named” still concealed by Samuels et al. VII. Samuels Et al must disclose all co=participants for whom Samuels et al conspires with Lane et al to Aid and Abet in their RICO and HOBBS ACT CRIMES FOR THEIR “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” WITH TOWNSENDS RESOURCES, RIGHTS AND RELATIONSHIPS. VIII. The Continuing of the HOBBS ACT and RICO and BUSH OLIGARCHS TCR ET AL IS PROVED CONTINUING per BROKAW v. MERCER COUNTY 235 F.3rd 1000 (7th Cir 2001) quoting Bowman v. City of Franklin 980 F. 2d 1104, 1107 (7th Cir. 1992) “To establish §1983 liability through a conspiracy theory, a plaintiff must demonstrate that: (1) a state official and private individual(s) reached an understanding to deprive the plaintiff of his constitutional rights, and (2) those individual(s) were willful participants in joint activity with the State and or its agents.” Fries v. Helsper 146 F. 3d 452, 457 (7th Cir. 1998)” as Samuels 1st DCA Et al acts in an “under color of law” and “under color of official right” and as themselves as and for “individuals” themselves for “Fraud on the Court” and Extrinsic Fraud and Obstruction and Human Trafficking for their “Bush- Gallagher-Patronis-Moody et al” “Unjust Enrichment” in violations of Oaths

164 and Bonds as Bondi described of “Hunter Bidens” on the Senate floor in their Impeachment Process. The Bondi-Cridlin-Grant-Denny IV-Crenshaw- Nash-Battles- collusion with Jeb Bush(admitted and ruled in Default) served as a “private citizen” even the more shows “TCR” criminal actions. WHEREFORE ONLY THIS CONCLUSION IS LAWFUL: THE REPLY BRIEF FILED ON 1/24/2020 as shown below as by counter-Defendants Townsend case to vindicate our Rights and Reputations and Resources and Relationships illegally “abducted” by Treason as a Matter of Law and as per Matters of Facts must stand in this F.S. 80.02 Redress of Government” and showing more their: “Fraud on the Court”; RICO, HOBBS ACT VIOLATIOINS; Collusion for Obstruction; Violations of a Political Candidate; Defendants and Others Intent; Prejudice and acts of Treason for their and their Oligarchs “Unjust Enrichment” diverted back to Defendants by their “BUSH-LANE-OLIGARCHS TCR” AS “PAY TO PLAY” KICKBACKS AND LOBBY MONIES AS STOLEN FROM TOWNSEND SINCE 1987, to keep Townsend from “Political Office” and to be a victim of their TCR Malicious Prosecution and “Hate Crimes” as violations of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park (FBCCP) and its ministry Citrus Park Christian School (CPCS) by their acts of Treason as Pam Bondi described the “HUNTER BIDEN ET AL ACTS” in the Senate Trial of Impeachment of Donald J. Trump showing their Knowledge, Intent, Willfulness and Recklessness for their own “Unjust Enrichment” from the Oligarchs they created as their daily action expose must not be “Obstructed” as Townsend continues his legal and lawful Authority per F.S. 80.02 for the protection of all Constitutional Rights and a “party: in Breach of Contract has no rights. THEREFORE, THE CLERKS AND JUDGES MUST PRODUCE THE FULL RECORDS OF THIS ACTION PER JENKINS ID. IN ORDER TO PROVE TOWNSEND’S REPLY BRIEF DID NOT CONTAIN NEW ISSUES THAT HAD BEEN IN THE RECORDS SINCE 1987, THAT SHOWED THE DEFENDANTS AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” DID NOT HAVE “KNOWLEDGE, INTENT, WILLFULLNESS AND RECKLESSNESS” IN COLLUSION TO OBSTRUCT THE “BLANK LINE” AND DID ILLEGAL VETING OF “CHURH GUY” TOWNSEND AND BY F.S. 104 FELONIES DO TREASON TO ALL VOTERS AS THE LAWYERS FOR DONALD J. TRUMP ARGUED HIS ACTS WERE TO EXPOSE CRIMES AND THEIR “HUNTER BIDEN” ACTS AND NOT TO ONLY OBSTRUCT A POLITICAL OPPONENT AS TOWNSEND TRAVELED BY BUS AND ATTENDED THE FIRST SWEARING IN AS A GUEST OF JOHN GRANT WHO NOW IS EXPOSED IN THE “TCR” WHO ILLEGALLY “IMPEDE” TOWNSEND AS A SWORN

165

“WHISTLEBLOWER” “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL AND “CHURCH GUY” F.S. 119.071, “PERSON” Defendant/Plaintiff. THEREFORE AS A MATTER OF LAW, THE REPLY BRIEF OF 1/24/2020 MUST BE IN THE RECORD AND LITIGATED PER F.S. 80.02 as a CITIZENS REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT ACTION and per F.S. 104, Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” by law cannot “Under Official Right” and or by “Under Color of Law” obstruct “Church Guy” Townsend et al from his as Defendant since Lane et al in “Breach” doing HOBBS ACT AND RICO CRIMES illegally filed charges on Townsend since July 1988. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 3rd day of February 2020, to/per Defendants; Anita Patel; Bradley R. McVay; Ashley E. Davis; [email protected]; and Filing in 1st DCA, Fl. Signed electronically as “/s/” Randall C. Townsend, Verified to the best of our knowledge, opinions and belief based on the concealed information of Defendants. SIGNED Electronically as Respectfully submitted; “/s/” Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and as a “Next Friend” of the over 13 Million Florida Voters and Others as said “Private Attorney’s General” and Ex rel. FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA herein. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE STATEMENT I certify that the lettering in this brief is TIMES NEW ROMAN 14 POINT and complies with the font requirements of the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2). And Except that per our Citizens Rights this REPLY Brief based on their new persons and frauds shall need be accepted in full as is so these matters of law can be litigated in this Redress of Government Action per our Citizens Rights to Our Courts. It is a “Fruit of the Poisoned Bush” if co=conspirators attempt by their Breach to attempt to use “Unconstitutional” Laws and or Unlawful Administrative Acts to for any and all additional delays of Justice for their “unjust enrichment” and by “False Federal and State Claims” as “Under Color of Law” violate “Search

166 and Seizure” Organic Rights of We the People, therefore this “Redress of Government “ “Impostors” Action may not be restricted by “Government Persons” as Clerk Samuels et al attempts additional criminal acts. ATTACHED HERETO IS THE REPLY BRIEF OF 1/24/2020 AS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE HEARD IN FULL BY A JURY PER F.S. 80.02 AND PER Jenkins id for the “Church Guy” and Our Victims to have our Lawful Day per Our Bylaws in Our Church and in Our Court. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT APPEAL CASE NO. 1D-18-4845 AS FOR DE NOVO REVIEW ASSIGNED PER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR CASES: SC18-1890; SC18-1915; SC18-1951; SC19-324; SC16-92; SC-16- 1501; SC11-41; SC09-1121; SC11-1042; SC07-1181; SC60-95935; SC60- 95936; SC60-86-918; SC09-1910; AND FROM LOWER COURT CASES 18-CA-2293, 2nd CIR. COURT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FROM STATE AND FEDERAL COURT CASES 8:06- CV2050T-30TGW (JUDGE J.MOODY. JR):TO “JUDGE EK; TO 16-CV- 3299-EAK-MAP (JUDGE J.W.) TOWNSEND V. GRANT ET AL; AS- F.S.: 86 DECLARATORY; F.S. 80- QUO WARRANTO; ORGANIZED CRIME(S); F.R.O.C.P. 1.530 AND 1.540; FEDERAL HOBBS ACT; RICO; FLORIDA AND FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS; 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 ACTS AS BEGAN AS 88-2554,18th CIR. SEMINOLE COUNTY FL. AS- RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, INDIVIDUAL AND AS F.S. 80.02 AS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS “Private Attorney’s General” RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, State of Florida, EX REL, RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, F.S. 617.0834, AND “Next Friend” ET AL, Appellant, Plaintiff’s/Counter Defendant, Petitioner(s), V. CHARLES E. LANE JR. AS CHARLES E. LANE JR. ET AL AS WITH BUSH ET AL; PATRICIA MCCARTHY; POPPER; CHAPIN(S); WILLIAMS JR. ET AL; SCRUGGS, AS GRAY ET AL; AS GRANT ET AL AS “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” AND NAMED INCLUDING: DETZNER, SMITH; ERTEL; LEE; FLORIDA SEC. OF STATE ET AL, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND AGENTS ET AL 2019-1980’S; FLORIDA ATTORNEY’S GENERALS MOODY-BONDI THRU SMITH; FLORIDA GOVERNORS DESANTIS, SCOTT, TO GRAHAM; FLORIDA LEGISLATORS JOHN GRANT ET AL; SHERIFFS; AND OTHERS AS “ALL OFFICIALLY AND/OR “AS “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR- PERSONS-INDIVIDUALS”AS IN F.R.A.P. EXHIBITS AS Appellees and AS Counter Plaintiffs ET AL______/

167

TOWNSEND’S “AMENDED REPLY BRIEF” PER ORDER OF 1/14/20

RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, Individual; And AS “Private Attorney’s General” Civil Rights Act of 1871; and Per F.S.617.0834, of FBCCP/CPCS; F.S. 86; F.S. 80; Qui Tam; Fl. Et. Rel. Never lawfully removed. P.O. Box 5, Osprey Fl. 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………..2 TABLE OF CITATIONS……………………………………..3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS……………………………………..31 REPLY ARGUMENTS……………………………………….34 CERTIFICATION OF FONT……………………………….50 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE………………………………..50 TABLE OF CITATIONS FLORIDA CONSTITUTION FLORIDA LAWS F.S. 99; F.S. 104: A. “F.S. 104.051 Violations; neglect of duty; corrupt practices. B. (1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be excluded from the polls.” C. “(2) Any official who willfully refuses or willfully neglects to perform his or her duties as prescribed by this election code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree,…” D. (3) Any official who performs his or her duty as prescribed by this election code fraudulently or corruptly is guilty of a felony of the third degree,…” E. (4) Any supervisor, deputy supervisor, or election employee who attempts to influence or interfere with any elector voting a ballot commits a felony of the third degree,…” F. F.S. 104.0515 Voting rights; deprivation of, or interference with, prohibited; penalty… (1) All citizens of this state who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in this state… shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections without distinction according to race, color, or previous condition of servitude, notwithstanding any law, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage to the contrary. G. F.S. 104.0515(2) No person, whether acting under color of

168 law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten , or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or not to vote as that person may choose, or for the purpose of causing such other person to vote for, or not vote for, any candidate for any office at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate….”’ H. F.S. 104.061 Corruptly influencing voting.—(1) Who ever by bribery, menace, threat, or other corruption whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, attempts to influence, deceive, or deter any elector in voting or interferes with him or her in the free exercise of the elector’s right to vote at any election commits a felony….(2) No person shall directly or indirectly give or promise anything of value to another intending thereby to buy that person’s or another’s vote or to corruptly influence that person or another in casting his or her vote…” I. F.S.104.0615 Voter intimidation or suppression prohibited; criminal penalties.—(1) This section may be cited as the “Voter Protection Act.” (2) A person may not directly or indirectly use or threaten to use force, violence, or intimidation or any tactic of coercion or intimidation to induce or compel an individual to: (a) Vote or refrain from voting; (b) Vote or refrain from voting for any particular individual or ballot measure; (c) Refrain from registering to vote; or (d) Refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher. (3) A person may not knowingly use false information to: (a) challenge an individual’s right to vote; (b) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from voting or registering to vote; or (c) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher; (4) A person may not knowingly destroy, mutilate or deface a voter registration form or election ballot or obstruct or delay of a voter registration form or election ballot…. J. F.S.104.091 Aiding, abetting, advising, or conspiring in violation of the code.--(1) Any person who knowingly aids, abets, or advises the violation of this code shall be punished in like manner as the principal offender. (2) Any person who agrees, conspires, combines, or confederates with another person to commit a violation of this code shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation. (Any person who knows a felony violation of this code and gives any aid to the offender who has violated this code, with intent that the offender avoid or escape detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation.

169

This subsection does not prohibit a member of the Florida Bar from giving legal advice to a client….” K. F.S. 104.11 Neglect of duty by Sheriff or other officer .—Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, or other officer who willfully neglects or willfully refuses to perform his or her duties relating to elections is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.” F.S. 119.071 F.S. 212. F.S. 775 F.S. 786 U.S. CONSTITUTION FEDERAL LAWS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 FALSE CLAIMS ACT HOBBS ACT RICO LAW 4 U.S.C. 1986 18 U.S.C. 115: TREASON, SEDITION AND SUBVERSIVE ACTS https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml? path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim 18 U.S.C. 2381 TREASON 18 U.S.C. 2382 Misprision of Treason “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having any knowledge of the commission of any treason against them conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the government or to some judge or justice of the particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.” CASES: BUSH V. GORE 2000 GORE V. HARRIS, STATE OF FLORIDA “IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC00-2431 ALBERT GORE, JR., Nominee of the Democratic Party of the United States for President of the United States, and JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Nominee of the Democratic Party of the United States for Vice President of the United States, Plaintiff, Appellant v.

170

KATHERINE HARRIS, as SECRETARY OF STATE, STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., Respondent, Appellee On Writ of Certiorari As A Matter Of Great Public Importance From The Court of Appeal Of The First District Of Florida Lower Tribunal, Circuit Court Of The Second Judicial Circuit, In And For Leon County, Florida, Case No. 00-2808… The court notes that the attorney general of the state of Florida enunciated his opinion of the law with respect to this in a letter dated November 14, 2000, to the Honorable Charles E. Burton, chair of the Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, which in part is as follows: "A two-tier system would have the effect of treating voters differently depending upon what county they voted in. A voter in a county where a manual count was conducted would benefit from having a better chance of having his or her vote actually counted than a voter in a county where a hand count was halted." As the state's chief legal officer, I feel a duty to warn that if the final certified total for balloting in the state of Florida includes figures generated from this two-tier system of differing behavior by official canvassing boards, the state will incur a legal jeopardy under both the United States and state constitutions. This legal jeopardy could potentially lead Florida to having all of its votes, in effect, disqualified, and this state being barred from the Electoral College's selection of a president. Court Ruling Transcript, December 4, 2000, Case No. CV 00-2808, Gore v. State of Florida, et al., (2d Fla. Cir. Ct. 2000). [Emphasis added]… Undoubtedly, the right of suffrage is a fundamental matter in a free and democratic society. Especially since the right to exercise the franchise in a free and unimpaired manner is preservative of other basic civil and political rights, any alleged infringement of the right of citizens to vote must be carefully and meticulously scrutinized. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 561, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1381 (1964). The United States Supreme Court has dealt with the question of equal protection of voter rights under many guises where a disparity exists or could exist between representation afforded to a citizen in one part of a state versus that afforded to a citizen in another part of the state. In the instant case the Intervenors contend that a two tiered system vote counting violates the Equal Protection clauses. A similar problem develops in reapportionment cases and the rule of Reynolds and other reapportionment cases could not be more clear:

171

The fundamental principle of representative government in this country is one of equal representation for equal numbers of people, without regard to race, sex, economic status, or place of residence within a state. Reynolds, at 561…. There is serious doubt as to whether the statutory provisions calling for manual recount are meant to apply to a statewide election contest, and even if a manual recount were applicable, the selective use is unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution. It is incumbent upon the Petitioners to seek the proper remedy for a losing candidate under the United States Constitution which would be a request for a statewide recount using the same standards as were in place prior to the election. Petitioners have sought only selective and limited application of the manual 5 recount provision in a manner plainly designed to weigh heavily in favor of the Vice President. The court below recognized this issue as well: Further, this court would further conclude and find that the properly stated cause of action under Section 102.168 of the Florida statutes to contest a statewide federal election, the plaintiff would necessarily have to place an issue and seek as a remedy with the attendant burden of proof a review and recount of all ballots in all the counties in this state with respect to the particular alleged irregularity or inaccuracy in the balloting or counting processes alleged to have occurred. Id. There is even a far more serious constitutional issue in reference to the purported challenge by the Plaintiffs in this action. Governor Bush and Vice President Gore are not running for an office in Florida and are not elected to any office by the citizens of the State of Florida. Plaintiffs have totally ignored the constitutional provisions regarding presidential electors. This issue has been addressed by Intervenor Thrasher, a currently certified Republican elector. The present Intervenors adopt and concur in the Motion to Dismiss as presented by Intervenor Thrasher which we respectfully submit is a threshold issue. Should this Court reject the position of Intervenor Thrasher, we respectfully urge for the reasons that follow that the Court may not grant the request of Vice President Gore and Senator Lieberman because it would offend the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. Determining that the methods by which Vice President Gore sought a manual recount in the three (3) counties he selected violates the Equal Protection and the Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution is dispositive of all issues raised by Petitioners before the Court. In other words, the results presented to the Secretary of State either on November

172

14th or at the extended deadline established by this Court, both of which gave Governor Bush a plurality in Florida, would be final results since the selective manual recount sought by Vice President Gore is unconstitutional. Undoubtedly, the right of suffrage is a fundamental matter in a free and democratic society. Especially since the right to exercise the franchise in a free and unimpaired manner is preservative of other basic civil and political rights, any alleged infringement of the right of citizens to vote must be carefully and meticulously scrutinized. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 561, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1381 (1964). The United States Supreme Court has dealt with the question of equal protection of voter rights under many guises where a disparity exists or could exist between representation afforded to a citizen in one part of a state versus that afforded to a citizen in another part of the state. In the instant case the Intervenors contend that a two tiered system vote counting violates the Equal Protection clauses. A similar problem develops in reapportionment cases and the rule of Reynolds and other reapportionment cases could not be more clear: The fundamental principle of representative government in this country is one of equal representation for equal numbers of people, without regard to race, sex, economic status, or place of residence within a state. Reynolds, at 561. The specific allegation in Reynolds was that that voters in one part of the State of Alabama had greater representation per person in the State Legislature than voters in another part of the Alabama. The Supreme Court concluded: A citizen, a qualified voter, is no more nor no less so because he lives in the city or on the farm. This is the clear and strong command of our Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. This is an essential part of the concept 1 There were other counties in the State of Florida that employed similar or identical “votematic” machines where substantial amount of “undervotes” occurred. Many of these counties were carried by the Bush electors in overwhelming numbers. For example, Duval County results indicate an approximate 55% majority for Governor Bush; Collier County results showed approximately 66% for Governor Bush; Indian River County showed approximately 59% for Governor Bush; and Marion County showed approximately 55% for Governor Bush. There were many other counties with the “votematic” system carried by Governor Bush which also had “undervotes.” Moreover, because Governor Bush carried fifty one (51) of the sixty seven (67)

173 counties in Florida, there were many other counties using different election equipment, and some of these counties also had substantial “undervotes.” 7 of a government of laws and not men. This is at the heart of Lincoln's vision of 'government of the people, by the people, (and) for the people. The Equal Protection Clause demands no less than substantially equal state legislative representation for all citizens, of all places as well as of all races. Reynolds at 568. In the present case, the statutory provisions providing for a manual recount as urged by Vice President Gore are not reasonably related to the plain legislative purpose of allowing a losing candidate to seek determination of the true result of all the votes in the subject election. These provisions of Florida law as argued by Plaintiffs would permit a candidate who loses the statewide popular vote but wins in some counties, often overwhelmingly, to choose only those counties for the purpose of a recount. Such application would impermissibly allow the state-wide loser to undermine the weight and value of the votes in those counties where such candidate lost, often overwhelmingly. This misapplication of Florida election law therefore does not provide for a more accurate reflection of the will of the voters but in fact allows for an unfair distortion of the statewide vote.1 Thus, the This information was provided by the Exhibits submitted into evidence by the Secretary of State and by the testimony of the statistical experts. 8 application of the statute proposed by the Vice President violates the Due Process Clauses, the Equal Protection Clause, and the constitutional protection of each individual’s right to vote under the provisions of the United States Constitution, Amendments V and XIV. Plaintiffs application of Florida election law would travel well down the path to making Attorney General Butterworth’s warning of disenfranchising all the voters in Florida a reality. Although Interveners have found no precedent with the exact circumstances presented by the application of the manual recount provisions urged by the Vice President, the United States Supreme Court’s decisions establishing the “one man, one vote” rule are controlling. See Reynolds. No election system established or applied under state law may give the votes for a particular candidate or political party more weight than the votes for the other candidates or parties. Exactly as the long-rejected schemes of gerrymandering created election advantages for a particular party or candidate, the misapplication of the Florida manual recount statutes, Chapter 102, by the Vice President has diluted the votes of the Intervenors and all the other voters in counties where a manual recount was not effected.

174

This discrimination violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. CONCLUSION The application of the manual recount statutes as proposed by Vice President Gore, therefore, creates a “two tiered” system of counting votes and, thereby, as Attorney General Butterworth has warned, threatens the disenfranchisement of all Florida voters in the electoral college. 9 WHEREFORE Interveners urge this Court to deny Petitioner’s requested relief of requiring the manual recount of votes in their selected counties. As discussed above, to grant such relief would apply the Florida manual recount provisions in a manner violative of Interveners rights to Due Process and Equal Protection under law as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. WILLIAM KEMPER JENNINGS Florida Bar No. 142570 P.O. Box 1256 DeFuniak Springs, Florida”

JENKINS V. STATE+= REQUIRMENTS OF LAW FOR JUSTICE THESE JENKINS ID ISSUES AND RIGHTS TO BE PER F.S. 80.02 and F.S. 86 TO BE LAWFULLY PER DUE PROCESS BY A JURY DECIDED AS STATED AS “CONDITIONS PRECEDENT” SINCE 1987 AND BEFORE AS INCORPORATED HEREIN AS A MATTER OF LAW AND FACTS: “This Action is lengthen to show proof and the Cause as the Order(s) of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals as their criminal acts of the “Glass Ceiling” they said to prove has been exposed IN D.C. FEDERAL COURTS July 2017, ALSO SHOWING THEIR DOUBLE STANDARDS TO OBSTRUCT ALL VOTERS AS FLORIDA CHANGED ALL ELECTIONS SO TO CONTINUE THE BUSH ET AL “TCR” AGAINST ANY AND ALL “POLITICAL OPPONENTS” as incorporated herein, Townsend’s Initial Reply Brief is legally Truth and Affirmed. THEREFORE THESES ISSUES REMAIN AS BEING ADMITTED: ISSUE 1.: HOW IS TOWNSEND’S F.S. 80.02 RIGHTS OF “DUE PROCESS” AND F.S. 86, “DEMAND OF JURY” OF “WE THE PEOPLE” SINCE 1987, NOT VIOLATED BY HIS OWN ATTORNEY’S AS MCCARTHY ET AL IN OBSTRUCTION WITH SINCE 1988 WITH THE STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICERS AND “JUDGE” MUSZYNSKI THROUGH TO “ALL AS OFFICIALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY DEFENDANTS” AS TO

175

THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT TO GIEVERS TO NOW THE FIRST DCA ET AL AS THE “AGENT LANE ET AL” AS “LANE(S)- LANE TROHN-GRAY ROBINSON-BUSH-MCCARTHY-KOCH-CHILES- CHAPIN’S-SMITH’S-GRAY-SCOTT-CLINTON’S-CANADY’S- MOODY’S ET AL” AS “TCR” “NOBILITY” AS “UNDER COLOR OF LAW” “OFFICERS OF THE COURT” USING OTHERS AND UPON ASKING “WHAT IS THE CRIME” AND UPON HEARING THE ADMISSION EVEN BY NEWHALL ET AL AND GIEVERS IN HER MARCH 1, 2019 “ORDER” OF THESE “ALL DEFENDANTS” AND OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” TO DOING AS PRESIDENT TRUMPS VENEZUELA SPEECH JUST ELEVEN DAYS AFTER TOWNSEND EXPOSED IN GIEVERS ET AL HEARING: THEFT OF TOWNSEND’S CHILDREN, WORK PRODUCT, BUSINESS MONEY, CHURCH AND CHURCH MONEY BY FRAUD AND “BLACK MONEY” ACTS, RESOURCES, RELATIONSHIPS AND RIGHTS” FOR COUNT THREE CONSPIRED OBSTRUCTION OF CIVIL AND CONTRACT RIGHTS; COUNT ONE-FRAUD TO TOWNSEND ET AL; COUNT TWO -FRAUD TO VOTERS USING UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS AND CRIMINAL PRACTICES VIOLATING F.S.99.061(4)(b) “NO BLANK SPACE” AND F.S. 104 AND F.S. 106 AND F.S. LAWS OF FILINGS AND TIMING FOR “WRITE-IN” CANDIDATES BEING “UPON QUALIFYING BY THE PEOPLE IN NOVEMBER; COUNT FOUR-HUMAN TRAFFICKING; DRUG TRAFFICKING; HOBBS ACT BRIBERY, EXTORTION AND PAY TO PLAY; RICO; MURDERS; ATTEMPTED MURDERS AND THEN FOR “EXTRINSIC FRAUD” AND “FRAUD ON THE COURT” CHARGE TOWNSEND MONEY TO PROTECT CIVIL RIGHTS AND A MOODY DEMAND OF $15,000.00 TO TOWNSEND FOR THIS ACTION TO BE DECIDED BY A JURY TRIAL. ISSUE 2: TOWNSEND AS STATED IN THE 2018CA2293 ACTION AT: “¶A. SINCE {NOVEMBER 18,} 1987, RANDALL TOWNSEND HAS REPRESENTED HIS CONTRACT AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOR HIMSELF, AND HIS FAMILY AND OF HIS CLIENTS; AND ¶B. SINCE AUGUST 1994, PER THE 100% VOTE OF THE CONGREGATIONAL MEMBERS THE OWNERS OF THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS PARK AND CITRUS PARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AND NEVER LAWFULLY REMOVED PER THE FLORIDA STATE LAW AND APPROVED BY-LAWS ACTS HEREIN TO REDRESS GOVERNMENT VIOLATIONS OF OUR RIGHTS…” TO ACTS HEREIN PER “MEIER V. JOHNSTON 110 Fla. 374, 149 So.183

176

“ONE MAY REPRESENT FOR THE WHOLE” AS REQUIRED PER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871, AS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” PER 4 U.S.CODE 1986 AND PER §1983, AS FOR APPELLANT(S) HAVING RETAINED ATTORNEY PATRICIA MCCARTHY AND ADVISING HER OF MULTIPLE CRIMES OF LANE ET AL CONTINUES THIS ACTION AND STATES THIS F.S. 80.02 “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” AND F.S. 86, ACTION IS AGAINST LANE ET AL AS APPELLEES NAMED AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” WHO ADVANCE THEMSELVES AS AN “IMMUNE” “ABOVE THE LAW” “NOBILITY” AS A TYRANNICAL COMMUNISTIC REGIME (TCR) WHO “AID AND ABET” AND DO ILLEGAL ACTS AND TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND ET AL SEEKS TO NO LONGER BE “OBSTRUCTED” AND “MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED” FOR PROTECTING OUR CIVIL RIGHTS AND FOR A TRIAL BY OUR “WE THE PEOPLE” GRAND JURY AND TRIAL JURY PROCESSES WHICH CANNOT BE DISMISSED OR DELAYED BY OUR LAW WITHOUT THE AGREEMENT OF THE PLAINTIFF OR THIS IS AN ADDITIONAL “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE” CRIME AND “INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE” AND “ABUSE OF PROCESS” AND “FAILURE OF HONEST SERVICES” PLACING APPELLEE’S-DEFENDANTS-COUNTER PLAINTIFFS IN BREACH OF OUR CONTRACTS AND THEIR OATHS OF SERVICE SINCE 1987 OR BEFORE. ADDITIONALLY, AND “IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY ANY DISMISSAL BY A GOVERNMENT “PERSON” IN THIS “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT ACTION” OF A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” PER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871, PRO SE COMPLAINT, IT MUST BE “BEYOND DOUBT THAT THE PLAINTIFF CAN PROVE NO SET OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF HIS CLAIM WHICH WOULD ENTITLE HIM TO RELIEF.” PER HAINES V. KEMER 404 U.S. at 521, 92 S.Ct. at 594 (QUOTING CONLEY V. GIBSON, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 I. Ed 2d 80 (1957)”. AND YET IN DEFENDANTS AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” HOBBS ACT “OBSTRUCTION”, “RICO” AND ADMITTED HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND OTHER CRIMINAL ACTIONS SINCE 1987, MULTIPLE “RANKIN” AND “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR” “JUDGES” AND DEFENDANTS ON THE RECORD AND “IN OPEN COURT” HAVE ADMITTED THEMSELVES AND “ALL” “TCR” DEFENDANTS NAMED AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” AND CLERKS OF OUR COURTS HAVE BLOCKED DISCOVERY OF THEIR CRIMES,

177

PRIVATE BENEFITS AND KICKBACKS BY FUNDS STOLEN FROM TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND ET AL AND NOR DO THEY PROTECT THE RECORDS OF THIS ACTION AND THEY “DO BREACH OF CONTRACT(S)” AND “DO FRAUD ON THE COURT” EVEN BY FRAUDS OF A FLORIDA SUPREME COURT P.C.A. (SC60- 86-918) THAT THE FIFTH D.C.A. IN 2006, RULED IN ROBINSON V. WEIGLE, THE: P.C.A.; ACTS OF THEIR OWN FIFTH DCA; AND ROM POWELL ET AL WAS FOR “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND EXTRINSIC FRAUD AND AS BY OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION “NO LAW SHALL IMPEDE THE OBLIGATION OF A CONTRACT” AND CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF LAW AS PER MARBURY ID. “ANY LAW REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS “VOID”AND “ADMINISTRATIVE LAW” CANNOT “IMPEDE” AN ORGANIC OR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT INCLUDING THIS F.S. 86 DECLARATORY ACTION BY A JURY TRIAL AND BY THE F.S. 80.02 ACTION FOR PROTECTING OUR CIVIL RIGHTS AS SHOWN VIOLATED BY UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS AND “HATE CRIMES” AS ADMITTED BY “JUDGES” AS “ALL THINGS ARE RELATED” AND PER OUR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE RULES as these Defendants and Others Intentionally aid and abet in the Underlying offense(s) including RICO AND Human Trafficking by the Bush-Koch- Smith- Grant-Scott-Canady’s- Moody et al “TCR” as Defendants et al “Moody’s” via Newhall-Gievers et al” admitted on February 7, 2019, in “Open court” as McCarthy et al as Townsend filed continuing the Actions on July 7, 2017, in the Four Federal Courts (Attached Herein as Gievers Agreed For Judicial Notice to with Newhall et al review all the Records, but then obstructed “By illegal Dismissal” same for furthering their “TCR” “frauds” and Frauds on the Court, but then obstruct justice and thus this “Attorney” Newhall and others argument for their RICO Obstruction and Trafficking is in violation of F.S. 99.061(4) (b) “However, space for the write-in candidates name to be written in must be provided on the general election ballot.” And additionally per F.S. 104, Moody-Newhall-FSCt- Gievers et al as Appellee’s unlawfully go beyond the argument the law allows to “impede” a “Voter” or in 2018 over 13 Million “Voters” and a “Write In Candidate” and a “victim of “Hate Crimes” and a F.S.617.0834, Representative for over 30 years. And additionally then for a further Fraud Claim an Exhibit “FACTS FOR THE ELECTION OF RANDALL TOWNSEND…” which details in 19 pages “Conditions Precedent” for over 30 years is at “issue that the numbers right” and no look at the claims of Frauds and Frauds on the Court is in itself

178 an “Abuse of Process” and thus their collusion of “false promises made with no intent” to do Due Process and thus by “Gievers/ALL” “is a “Fraud on the Court”.) as per United States v. DePace 120 F. 3d. 233 (11th Cir. 1997) and United States v. Chavez 119 F. 3rd 342 (5th Cir. 1997) and continued TCR/RICO stating “The level of Participation may be of a relatively slight moment” Leo-Quijada, 107 F. 3d. at 794 and as “Also, it does not take much evidence to satisfy the facilitation element once the defendant’s knowledge of the unlawful purpose is established.” Per United States v. Bennett, 75 F.3d. 40, 45 (1st Cir 1963) and per the unlawful since the 1980’s “TCR” acts Townsend the Whistleblower, “Private Attorney’s General” as has exposed Civil Rights violations and Crimes since November 18, 1987, to Attorney Patricia McCarthy and “others” and this conspiracy/obstruction element of their intentional violations of F.S. 99.061(4)(b) “Any person who is seeking election as a wrote-in candidate shall not be required to pay a filing fee, election assessment, or party assessment… However, space for the write-in candidate’s name to be written in must be provided on the general election ballot…”; and nor by the demand of A.B. Moody, pay $15,000.00 to litigate for protecting our civil rights by this F.S. 80.2 Action; and ISSUE 3. AS “NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW” AS CHARLES CANADY JR. SAID ON THE FLOOR OF CONGRESS IN THE IMPEACHMENT OF CLINTON AND THEN AS CHIEF JUDGE OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT ISSUED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER SC11-1042, RECUSING HIMSELF AND OTHER DEFENDANTS FOR THEIR ADMISSION OF CRIMINAL ACTIONS AS “HATE CRIMES” AND “MALICIUOS PROSECUTION” PER THE ADMISSIONS OF “JUDGE MARVA CRENSHAW” AND CHARLES DENNY IV (5/10/06) AND FEDERAL JUDGE JAMES MOODY JR. (3/15/07) IN THIS ACTION SINCE 1987, AS THEY HAVE KNOWN THEIR ILLEGAL ACTS AND OTHERS HAVE AFFIRMED ABOUT THEIR OWN CONFESSIONS OF THEIR CRIMES, EVEN OF TREASON EVEN IN COURT RECORDS AND ON THE FLOOR OF CONGRESS AND BUT THUS THOSE THAT HAVE VIOLATED AND NOW AID AND ABET VIOLAITONS OF CRIMES AS TOWNSEND FILED ON NOVEMBER 18, 1987 AND INVOLVING F.S. 99.061(4)(b) AND F.S. 104.061 AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE II SECTION 8. AND F.S. 111.07 ARE THUS ALSO BY THEIR TAKING: A. VIA LANE ET AL TOWNSEND’S MONEY; B. AND OR BY THEIR ILLEGAL TAKING OF CHURCH/SCHOOL “DESIGNATED FUNDS” OF CITRUS PARK BY EVEN ILLEGAL BILLING AND “BLACK MONEY” BY GRANT ET

179

AL; C. AND TAKING OF TAX MONEY OF CITIZENS BY VIOLATION OF FEDERAL AND STATE “FALSE CLAIMS LAWS” AND THUS ARE IN BREACH OF OATHS AND CONTRACT(S) AND TRAFFICKING AND ABDUCTION OF TOWNSENDS CHILDREN AS FOR EXTORTION AND AS VIOLATING THEIR OATHS TO AND OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THUS ARE WITHOUT “IMMUNITY” AS CANADY AFFIRMED AND ARE AS “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBORS” “AS PERSON(S)” AS CO=DEFENDANT(S) AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED DEFENDANT” AND AS ONE WHO HAS INTENTIONALLY PER OCASIO Id. and ROTELLA V. WOODS Id. AS A RICO AND HOBBS ACT VIOLATOR/CO=PARTICIPANT OF THE TYRANANNICAL COMMUNISTIC REGIME (TCR) A.K.A. BUSH COMMON CORE MALICIOUS ENTERPRISE REGIME AS TOWNSEND DESCRIBED TO THE OFFICERS OF OUR COURT(S) AND “ALIAS LAW ENFORCERS” AND AGAIN ON FEBRUARY 7, 2019 AND AS PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP SAID IN HIS VENEZUELA SPEECH ON FEBRUARY 18, 2019 AND THUS THE “BUSH TCR “NOBILITY” HAS BEEN SINCE 1987 AND BEFORE AND THEREBY “ALL” AS “JUDGE GIEVERS” KNEW ARE IN BREACH OF CONTRACT AND OR ARE NOT ABLE TO USE THEIR “FRUIT FROM THEIR POISONED TREE” AND FAILED “HONEST SERVICES” PER 4 U.S.C. 1986 AS THE FEBRUARY 7, 2019 TRANSCRIPT DETAILS TO THE COURT HOW THE ACTIONS OF “JUDGE COOPER” AND THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT “JUDGES” AND THEIR BUSH/CANADY SR AND JR AGENTS AS NOW GIEVERS, MOODY, DESANTIS ET AL ARE FOR “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” AS “ALL OFFICIALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY” AS DAVID H. POPPER ET AL FILED IN ACTION 88-2554 AND “UNCONSTITUTIONALLY IMPEDING ORGANIC RIGHTS, FREEDOMS, OUR VOTES AND DUE PROCESS; ISSUE 4: AND THEREBY “ALL” DEFENDANTS AND “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” HAVE DONE FOR THEIR: “FAILURE OF HONEST SERVICES” AS “TCR NOBILITY” AND ARE CONTINUING BY ILLEGAL VOID ORDERS FROM THIS FIRST DCA DOING ACTS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT AND VOID PER MARBURY ID. FOR “DELAY AS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION” AND “OBSTRUCTION” AND “HUMAN TRAFFICKING” OF “WE THE PEOPLE” AND OUR JURY RIGHTS AND BY THEIR TREASON BY INTENTIONAL “FRAUD ON THE COURT” TO DO “EXTRINSIC FRAUD” BY “HATE

180

CRIMES” AND “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION” AND “ABUSE OF PROCESS” AS “JUDGE CRENSHAW AFFIRMED MAY 10, 2006 AND FEDERAL JUDGE JAMES MOODY JR. AFFIRMED ON MARCH 15, 2007, AND AS CHARLES CANADY JR AFFIRMED IN HIS COURT ORDER SC11-1042, AND BY THE DISMARMENT OF TOWNSEND ET AL’S ATTORNEY HEATHER GRAY, AND AS THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT AFFIRMED THE “TCR” RICO AND BY INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH INTERNATIONAL, INTERSTATE AND INTRASTATE COMMERCE TO “UNJUSTLY ENRICH THEMSELVES” AS A “NOBILITY” AND AS PATRICIA MCCARTHY ET AL AND GREGORY PRESNELL ET AL AND DAVID LANDIS ET AL ADVISED AND AS DAVID H. POPPER ET AL FILED FOR TOWNSEND ET AL IN THE 88-2554, 18th CIRCUIT ACTION THEN JOINED BY BRUCE E. CHAPIN ET AL AS A “NOBILITY” IN THEIR “PAY TO PLAY” WITH LANE ET AL GANG AS DETAILED IN THIS F.S. 80 AND F.S. 86 ACTION TOWNSEND AS A “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” SINCE 1987 HAS LAWFULLY CLAIMED AND DEFENDED AS CLAIMED AND AS HAS BEEN AFFIRMED BY CHARLES CANADY JR., JORGE LABARGA, MARVA CRENSHAW, CHARLES DENNY IV. JAMES MOODY JR., THE FIFTH DCA, THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AND “OTHERS” AND TOWNSEND AND THOSE FOR WHOM TOWNSEND SPEAKS HAS YET TO HAVE HIS/OUR DUE AND EQUAL PROCESS OF DISCOVERY AND RESTITUTION AS FOR AND OF DISCOVERY OF THEIR “COMMON CORE” KICKBACKS AS EXTORTION DEFENDANTS UNLAWFUL USE OF HIS/OUR CHILDREN AND MONEY EVEN “BLACK MONEY” TO SHOW A JURY IN HIS DAY IN COURT THE CRIMES OF THE BUSH ET AL CODE RED GANG STILL ONGOING BY THE ACTS OF KAREN GIEVERS ET AL AND THE “CO=CONSPIRATORS” ET AL OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND OTHERS BY ENACTING AND ENFORCING UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATE LAWS IN VIOLATION OF U.S. CONSTITUTION RIGHTS AND LAWS FOR THE RICO AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AS NEWHALL AFFIRMED. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………69. TOWNSEND FOR TOWNSEND ET AL CONTINUES THIS ACTION PER F.S. 80.02, AS FOR PROTECTION OF OUR CIVIL RIGHTS AS REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT AND “OTHERS” ORGANIZED CRIMES AND ANY ALLEGATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS AS THE

181

JULY 23, 2019 AND AUGUST 21, 2019 ORDER OF DEFENDANT CLERK SAMUELS ET AL WHO IS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF OATH AND BREACH OF BONDS AND THAT “NO LAW SHALL IMPEDE…” OUR “REDRESS” ARE BY TOWNSEND AND “CITIZENS” DEEMED UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND “VOID” IN THIS 1987 ACTION”. Per F.S. 80.02 WHICH IS STILL LAWFUL “DUE PROCESS” The Attorneys Generals and State Attorneys and FBI and DOJ and Sheriffs and other “alias” “Law enforcers act as the “Predicate Actors” get away car driver a.k.a. “co=participant“ a.k.a. “Smith’s to Bondi-Moody attorney general et al” in the robbing of a bank(Townsend, FBCCP/CPCS, Tax Payers) and or the murder(s), Human and Drug Trafficking and or the Other Crimes during a “Federal and State” now “Patronis et al” robbery and are as is just as “guilty” as these laws state even: “under color of Law” as “Any person who knowingly aids, abets, or advises the violation of this code shall be punished in like manner as the principal offender…” As Relevant to the Giever question at Transcript page 51 line 6, to enjoin Herself and all the Moody et al; and Anything other than per Ocasio id. plead “guilty” and plead for mercy is violation of: F.S. 104 Voter Rights Laws and the Equal Protection Clause. C. Anything other than: 1.) “However, a space…” to be existing on each ballot since 1980’s; 2.) All Persons being allowed to be a Write-in Candidate; 3.) All Voters being allowed their “Free Will” to vote in the “Space”; 4.) The “Bureau” et al as “Defendants and Others Doe to be Named” doing illegal “Qualifying” for Obstruction of the “Write in”; is a Crime of : A. “I. Fraud” by the “Bureau et al” is -- One can run as a “Write in”; B. “II. Fraud to Voters”-- Obstruction of the “Blank Line”; C. “III. Violation of Civil Rights” as each ongoing Count states; “defendants named herein and or “Others Doe to be Named” knowingly, intentionally, negligently and recklessly presented these said documents and then knowingly, intentionally, negligently and for Tort, and recklessly then produced a “Ballot” and or “Ballots” (over 30 years) that then omitted as they published “A space will be available were voters can write in a qualified candidate’s name.”… D. “IV. HUMAN TRAFFICKING…and for Tort…” carry out their “Predicate Acts” still; E. “V. CONSPIRACY as Obstruction for their crimes and “get away”; F. “VI. FOR FRAUDULENT VIOLATION OF PERSONAL BOND”…

182

And for Tort,…”

G. AND PETITION FOR MANDAMUS…Townsend re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states;…” AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY…SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT…” J. “F.S. 104.11 Neglect of duty by Sheriff or other officer .—Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, or other officer who willfully neglects or willfully refuses to perform his or her duties relating to elections is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.” Therefore, the HCSO and “Others” threats since 1994, to Townsend and Others” “impeding” our Voting is a crime and specifically as Townsend filed for a “restraining Order” about the time Townsend sought to run for Sheriff of Hillsborough County, and HCSO Deputy McDarby for their “Bureau” Gang made Hobbs Act Threats to Townsend as their Chief Abbott Report affirmed their HCSO et al Crimes. & The Threat by the Florida Bar Officers in June of 1994, were crimes. & The Elections Department et al “a.k.a. “The Bureau et al” of the removal of the “Blank Line” were crimes. & The Act of not producing a “New Ballot” With a “Blank Line” shows crimes, Obstruction for personal gain, Collusions, False billing for alleged “Under color of Law” “Honest Services” and “Abuse of Commerce” and “Abuse of Process” And The Arguments of the Lawyers in the defense of all above since 1984 are crimes as their Breach to violate the Voters was already in Motion and all “Officers of the Court” and “Others” are ruled “Guilty” by Charles Canady Jr. and Labarga and “Others” and those as Gievers et al writing “Void” not “Voidable” “Alleged” “Orders” is just more as John Grant writes in his “Threat” email to Townsend, “Randy, your just digging a bigger hole for yourself…and bring a toothbrush”. 1. Patel’s Point II. As stated in this Reply Brief and in the prior averments, Is for “Predicate Acts” as fraud and for “Fraud on the Court” for Defendants and the new “Others Doe to be Named” as Gievers et al who continue the illegal F.S. 104 violations by the “Bureau” since the 1980’s and before as the FSCT already had jurisdiction since the 1990’s but “Impostor Judges” “Obstructed” and “Targeted Townsend” and thus admitting “Guilt” Ordered a De Novo action by the First DCA. To process lawfully this F.S. 80.02 Action even as these “alleged” FSCT and Attorney’s General Agents are “Next Door Neighbors” defendants as already found “Guilty”. 2. The Charge by Timothy Newhall and of Ashley Moody of “$15,000.00” was for their “Under Color of Law” crime per:

183

“F.S. 104.0515(2) No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten , or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or not to vote as that person may choose, or for the purpose of causing such other person to vote for, or not vote for, any candidate for any office at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate….” of the “TCR” Nobility to remove the “Blank Line” removing the organic right to vote and or protecting the right of over 13 million voters in 2018 and millions years before. As this Fraud of Facts and “Fraud on the Court” as Extrinsic Fraud these “as unlawful in Breach Next door neighbors” again Violates F.S. 99.061(4)(b) “However; a space” and “no Qualifying” by the “Bureau” since1980’s by Detzner, James C. Smith, (writers of the Bureau Election Code) for Bush(s), Ballard, Brown, Bondi, “Bureau et al, as Detzner et al as Gievers established these Defendants and as their predecessors and “Others Doe to be Named” until “Impeded” Full Discovery is allowed back to the Omission of the F.S. 99.061(4)(b) “However, space...” and the Illegal “Impeding” of Write-In’s by the “Bureau” and their “Under Color of Law” their “Agents” continuing HOBBS ACT Crimes violating in 2018 over 13 million voters per F.S. 104, and Our “Trust” per Florida Constitution Article II. Section 8 and proved there has been no “Blank Line/Space” for over 30 years violating “every voter” and “We the People” as the Conspired “Under Color of Law” “Nobility” “NWO” Plan of the “TCR” Malicious RICO Enterprise to specifically “TARGET” AND “OBSTRUCT” WHISTLEBLOWER TOWNSEND, and THOSE FOR WHOM TOWNSEND REPRESENTS (as the F.S. 617.0834 Representative; his family; his clients; the Tax Payers as Voters on 6/30/1994, and Others”) as a proved fact that cannot be changed that shows tort(s), breach and “Unjust Enrichment” of each who denies all the rights of Voters as otherwise attempts for their “Under Color of Law” “Glass Ceiling” per the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals En Banc Ruling the “Fraud” to “We the People” and thus a “Fraud on the Court that they “Nobility” are “above our Law” (14th Amend.) as the Dictator(s) “TCR” as Patel, McVay- Davis, Bush(s)-Chiles-Smith-Crist-McCollum(Who led the Senate Trial of Impeachment against Clinton)-Bondi-Moody’s et al. for “Fraud” still use their Unconstitutional and illegal “Government” Acts to “Impede”: Organic Rights; Right To Vote; and illegally Claim they can “Qualify any “Write-in” as their Nobility “Bureau”; and continue to Target Townsend and continue

184 their RICO Acts and “Fraud on the Court” and Townsend et al and do damages as the HOBBS ACT states these Question(s): “1. Did the defendant induce or attempt to induce the victim to give up property or property rights? Yes 2. Did the defendant use or attempt to use the victim's reasonable fear of physical injury or economic harm in order to induce the victim's consent to give up property? Yes 3. Did the defendant's conduct actually or potentially obstruct, delay, or affect interstate or foreign commerce in any (realistic) way or degree? Yes 4. Was the defendant's actual or threatened use of force, violence or fear wrongful?” Yes And per the facts in this Action “records” including the Admissions of Even two FSCT (Canady Jr. and Labarga) “judges” all must answer “Yes” to each of these four above questions. And with the verdict of Canady Jr. of all are “Guilty” the FSCT and “Others” having been Convicted and thus in “Breach” The FSCT does not and cannot have Quorum and or Jurisdiction to Hear this Action and thus remanded this as De Novo to the First D.C.A. for prosecution as a “Jury” will decide per “Due Process” their findings and restitution. Question Five: Is Art. IV. § 5, Fla. Constitution “…The attorney general must have been a member of the bar of Florida for the preceding five years…” legal per the Civil Rights Act of 1871; per the U.S. Constitution requirements per the prohibition protections of the “Nobility Clause; per Laws against Slavery; per the 14th Amendment “Equal Protection Clause”; per the law or “Free Will” and “Free Speech” as the Bill of Rights Protects Voters Organic Rights as established in the Magna Carta and Our Declaration of Independence and per U.S. Supreme Court Rulings? Per Constitutional Law an “AG” and “Judge” by their Oath must say, “No.” Question Six: Was the Reconstruction of the Florida Cabinet Amendment 8(1998) and Florida Miscellaneous Matters and Technical Revisions, Amendment 13, (1998) Now known to have been for an Element Act of the Bush et al RICO Malicious Enterprise for Fraud by “Government Persons” acting illegally “Under Color of Law” and “Under color of Official Right” while said persons were intentionally acting to implant themselves in “Unjust Enrichment” “Under Color of Law” by Fraud and Deceptive Practices for their own and “Others” illegal “Pay to Play” and thus acting per Hobbs Act violations in Breach thus violating their Bond for Honest Services and as now causing “Fear” and “Lack of Trust” of Government, then done legally under Our U.S. Constitution and Florida Constitution?

185

Question Seven: Can the RICK SCOTT AND RICK SCOTT ET AL BLIND TRUST FRAUD(S) as reported at: https;//www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2019/06/06florida-repeals- blind-trust-law-that-shielded-rick-scotts- investments/?fbclid=IwAR35xHXqELqLYLrGbm8n- mToughTZsSMYW1Lm4zI6FDxZGQS-QKQbizfOAXO and the terminations of: Secretaries of State Detzner and others of the “Bureau”; and Administrative Judge Cohen (as advised even by State Attorney Defendant in Default Mark Ober); and Supervisors of Elections who by HIGH CRIMES “Obstructed” and damaged Voters and Voters Rights without thus not being prosecuted by a “jury” trial, then be legal “Due Process” as this greatly affected and affects “Unjust Enrichment” Commerce at the expense of “We the People” and as “Subjects”: As “We the People” see it, Ron Desantis and Tom Lee and his wife and Moody’s quietly reverse illegal law and reveal Rick Scott et al scam under Blind Trust created loop holes that Unjustly empowered and Enrich Themselves which damaged Townsend and Townsend et al. as action 88-2554 reveals Torts and Unjust Enrichment by illegal co=conspirators and co=participants as TCR Bush et al., as Gievers said inclusive of their predecessor’s, so these must be prosecuted by jury trials to the fullest extent of our Laws in order for “We the People” to have accord and satisfaction and secure Trust in Due Process? QUESTION EIGHT: The Belief, Words Written and actions of the Florida Legislature and “Elections Bureau” clearly state F.S. 99.061(4)(b), “However, Space…” and other Documents allege the “However, Space…” and that the “Bureau” may not “qualify” a person or this disqualifies a person, to be a “Write In” so by their Own Arguments their Averments are “Catch 22” Frauds to Unjustly Empower themselves as “Nobility” and or as “Dictators” with “Under Color of Official Right” to deny for over 30 years any and all “Write in” “persons” or allow “We the People” our “Free Will” “Vote” to oppose “Government Bureau” and “Attorney’s General” “impostors” in violation of their Bonds for acts in violation of F.S. 104, as Our Contracts for Honest Services, af for being in Good Standing even as “judges” per the U.S. Constitution as Required? QUESTION NINE: Then is any “FRAP 1-3 Defendant”, or served “January Defendant” and or “Others Doe to be Named” pending the discovery that has been unlawfully Obstructed since 1987, proving these are and or are having acted per F.S. 104 and Hobbs Act Crimes and per OCASIO id. Co=participant Crimes to remove Civil Rights and cause fears against Townsend since about 1987 and before, not to be found “Guilty” of “High Crimes”?

186

QUESTION TEN: Since our law demands that “persons” in breach of contract have no defense, and these anti-Townsend have admitted “Guilt” then no laws or rules written by the Florida Legislature or Administrative Judges (Action ¶2, including Briefs page limits to prevent exposure of Crimes and or Defenses or rebukes to “Void” orders) or other “Judges” or any of these persons in Breach of F.S. 99.061(4)(b) and F.S. 104 and Human And Drug Laws and “KOCH” Trafficking fixing “Pay to Play” elections and price fixing laws and “HIGH CRIMES” as for their Obstruction of Townsend reporting to stop these crimes of Lane, McCarthy et al including persons like “Epstein” and “Beck-Harrod-Grant-Jeffers-Bush(s) Common Core et al” who intentionally violated FBCCP-CPCS 1994 BYLAWS and conspired together for “High Crimes” for Fear to “We the People” to abduct F.S. 617.0834, Representative Townsend’s Children, Money, Due Process and Commerce Rights and secured BYLAWS RIGHTS and Voting, then by Moody-Newhall-Patel, McVay and Davis and “Others” attempt to continue to be in “Breach” and continue HOBBS ACT AND RICO ACT CRIMES, then Townsend and those that Do justice must lawfully arrest and prosecute and convict the Lane et al co=conspirators and or be then Ocasio id and Chevron Id. co=participants of High Crimes. QUESTION ELEVEN: Did Gievers per F.S. 38 or the Second Circuit have any “jurisdiction” per Rankin id. at all as Townsend the evening of the Election filed as the “Emergency Petition” and then Appeal to the FSCT and as had the FSCT had the “Emergency Petition” and the Appeal and the 18- 1915 and 18-1951, Quo Warranto action was sent down as Gievers said the Clerks do what the “judges say” as FSCT Tomasino sent the Petition and Appeal and 18-1915 and 18-1951 to the 1st DCA back in November 2018, and thereafter so Gievers Order is “Void” but proof of ongoing F.S. 104 “Under color of law” and RICO Violations? QUESTION TWELVE: By Townsend multiple times instructing the Clerks to file the full Actions in the “Records” for this 1st DCA, yet these Clerks did not comply and thus does this not unlawfully “impede” Due Process? 3. Townsend thus states that each person who is in violation of these Crimes and Hobbs Act and RICO acts as set forth herein are “Under Citizens Arrest” and are to per F.S. 80.02, be prosecuted to the fullest extent of our Laws per Our “We the People” Jury Process. 4. Thus this Opens again this Action for “Private Attorneys General” Townsend per F.S. 80.02, and F.S. 86 to expose, 11/1987 through now Conditions Precedent, and Facts the “TCR” are: in “Breach of Contract”; do “Fraud on the Court”; are “estopped” from repeating frauds per:

187

R.O.C.P.: “1.110(b) “…(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new grounds for jurisdiction…Every complaint shall be considered to pray for general relief.” 1.110(e) Effect of Failure to Deny….are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading . (g)…..and (h)….” 1.130(a) The pleadings shall contain no unnecessary ...documents, contracts, or other instruments…(b) Part for All Purposes. Any exhibit attached to a pleading shall be considered a part thereof for all purposes. Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading, in another pleading or in any motion.” And as since the Court Records show the “jurisdiction” and Crimes that the Clerks by Townsend was directed to be added in this Record but the Clerks by the Judges were direct to not respond to supplement the full records as the FSCT had and has knowledge and jurisdiction multiple times in this Action and have admitted Guilt of “High Crimes” and thus instructed this First DCA to do a full De Novo review as back to the Action 88-2554 filed by Lawyers David Landus and David H. Popper as per the directions of Attorney Patricia McCarthy she alleged upon the advice of Gregory Presnell (1988) and then advocated by Bruce Chapin et acting not for Townsend but for his Wife Linda Chapin, Lawton Chiles, Jeb Bush, Charles Canady Sr., Charles Canady Jr., Charles E. Williams Jr. and Lane-Trohn and “Others” (FRAPS 1-3) as all allegedly acting for their Client and “Contract” Constitution and Bonded Partner, Randall Townsend, individual and Randall Townsend et al of these ISSUES and FACTS has been proved a “Sham” as “For Failure of Honest Constitutional Services” as actually an element of the Malicious Enterprise to “abuse process” and for “Interference with Commerce” to require Townsend to: Not Work; “Not Compete”; and or “talk to his clients and friends and or Church (or do F.S. 617.0834 acts) and or Children” as allegedly these “law enforcers” advocated as frauds for: A. “Townsend v. Lane … Count I. Breach of Contract(s); Count II. Specific Performance of that certain agreement; Count III. Action for Damages…For Interference with an advantageous business relationship; Count IV. Unjust Enrichment; Count V. Action for Accounting of profits and monies by Defendant regarding certain monies die and owing to Plaintiff….” B. And against a “Fraud on the Court” and Late Filed Lane et al Counter- claim and other Defendant et al filed Actions for “Frauds”; as now Patel et al by Torts violates and proves “Breach” of: Contract; Duty; Bonds; additional Frauds; and Frauds on the Court of and by those Patel

188 alleges to Defend as the FSCT and Lower Courts had already had “jurisdiction” and admitted Guilt of Crimes of this Lane-Bush Et Al TCR 5. Per Marbury v. Madison “Lane et al” for Extrinsic Fraud filed “Void” Averments to “abuse process” and “control Commerce” only for the “TCR” as proofs of “Fraud on the Court” and as Townsend has maintained and Amended lawfully for the Protection and Restoration of his Civil Rights and “Accord and Satisfaction” from the illegal “Pay to Play” “LANE-BUSH et al TCR NOBILITY GANG” and “Others Doe to be Named” as Defendants continue to obstruct revealing and or “Omit from Records” as these Answer Briefs again “omit” served Defendants persons names and or “names and or companies concealed in “Blind Trusts” and “Obstructed Discovery” to whom Lane and Lane et al admitting using Townsend’s; “Work Product”; Money; Children and Rights to do: “Hate Crimes”; “Human and Drug Trafficking; buy his cocaine with Bush et al; buy Mary his wife a new BMW when Lane and Lane et al was caught at “parties” and cheating; and Lane et al “Pay to Play” RICO Kickbacks; Koch Price fixing and Hobbs Act Extortions and “Other” Crimes stated in Court 2/7/2019, and at other Courts, as of co=conspirators named FRAP 1-3, (R.p#347-388) as Defendants and the “January Defendants” and “Others Doe to be Named” now in their admitted Malicious “Delay” Prosecution and Malicious Persecution with “Hate Crimes” and “Obstruction” including: FSCT et al, 1st, (Proved by Townsend’s Motion to Strike All Defenses…Dated 10/10/2019, inserted herein on “Emergency” Delays); 2nd, 5th DCA over State Courts; Supreme Court Chief Judge John Roberts and over Federal Courts; and as Lane-Gievers-Kochs-Graham(s)-Bushs-Desantis et al, Smith- Crist-Bondi-Moody’s; Gray’s; Canady’s; Sessions; Chiles; Campbell(s); Patronis and more as now Patel and McVay et al., and those “Served” by the FSCT and or Townsend since 1987 for ongoing Lane-McCarthy et al “Tort(s)” Violations of Civil Rights by and of: Fraud; Voter Fraud; Violation of Civil Rights; Human Trafficking, Conspiracy-Obstruction of Justice; Fraudulent Violation of Personal Bond; AND PETITION FOR MANDAMUS; Even “EMERGENCY PETITIONS” AND APPEALS as “Impeding” “Obstruction” per Exhibit (R.p#13-51) “UNDUE BURDEN” “FACTS FOR THE ELECTION OF RANDALL TOWNSEND TO BE FLORIDA’S NEXT ATTORNEYS GENERAL” records of their Hobbs Act and RICO Crimes still ongoing as their Answer Briefs continue admitted violations of: Constitutions; Contracts; F.S. 104; Human Trafficking; False Claims; False Billings for Intentional Failure contract requirements of; Bonds; 1994 FBCCP/CPCS BYLAWS; Honest Services, Due Process; Lawful Commerce which continues violating of Citizens U.S. Constitution

189

Rights and our Florida Constitution Rights and specifically Article II. Sect. 8.; F.S. 111.07, “Wanton and Willful disregard” using F.S. 768.28 “SLAPP ACTS” as “HATE CRIMES” and Our U.S. Constitution “Due Process” and Our 14th Amendment, and thus their “Oaths” and Bonds as Chief “Judges” of the Florida Supreme Court (or “alias” “judges” who did not properly take their Oaths as Butterworth Ordered) and U.S. Supreme Court and DOJ and “others” have now multiple times confessed (as in Battles Court 2/8/2016) and some in writing “Action 88-2554” they intended not to get discovery to even read contracts or bank statements and or perform “Due Process” and thus admitted their Malicious Enterprise and Criminal Acts still ongoing and not denied in Continued Action 18-CA-2293, Paragraphs 8 and or 9…. and by these Moody-Bondi et al “NO” “Under Color of Law” as “Next Door Neighbors” by A.G. Butterworth rules quotes the “State of Mind” then of all the Co=Defendants and or now established by the “House Managers” they again are established that now the Moody A.G.’s AND CLERK SAMUELS FOR “JUDGES” argue against themselves TO EXPOSE THEIR OWN FRAUDS AND CRIMES and illegal “Fruit from the poisoned Bush(s)”. AND “per the United States Constitution and the State Of Florida Constitution stating, “NO LAW SHALL IMPEDE THE OBLIGATION OF A CONTRACT” and sues each individual and or person, agent, agency, Federal and State of Florida Government Public Entity, Judge, Attorney, Court Officer, Governor, Cabinet and or each Corporation as stated in the FRAP’S 1-3 and others herein, pursuant to Florida Statues 768.28(6), and Florida Statues 760 as the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT OF 1977 and Florida Statues 617, as each person, agency and Corporation violated Florida Statues 775.03 and gave unlawful “benefit to clergy” and the fraud and omissions of truthful disclosure of alleged “clergy” allowed alleged “clergy” and aided and abetted as “judge Crenshaw” admitted “Hate Crimes” even by the estranged Karen Harrod who with these Attorneys and Judges and others now defendants do fraud and theft of and to the Florida Statues 617, “Not For Profit Corporation”, and to these Plaintiffs Children as “Minors” as Plaintiff Townsend alleges suffer from “Stockholm Syndrome” or the like and are not of the mental, emotional and physical wellness to represent themselves due to the frauds of…all defendants.” DEFAULTS PER RULE OF LAW ON: Lane and Attorney Charles Williams Jr. et al late reply since July 5, 1988 Jeb Bush Bruce Chapin Linda Chapin Heather Gray

190

Don Harrod (Deceased) Karen Jeffers Tim Jeffers And Others still being concealed by Defendants. LAWFUL DUTY OF THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS: “WHEREFORE: A. THIS ACTION F.S. 80 and F.S. 86 ACTION CANNOT BE DISMISSED PER F.S. 80.02 without permission of Claimant Townsend. B. Our Supreme Court of Florida, (now recused for “Guilty” admission of these ongoing since the 1980’s crimes, directed this Action to be per Due Process Conducted by the First District Court of Appeals, Tallahassee, Florida) who should act per the U.S. Constitution and rule as herein this Action per Constitutional Rights and Laws and not obstruct “Justice”; and C. Fully Prosecute these Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” in violation of Constitutional Rights as stated herein and or of other violations as Discovery Continues throughout the Jury Trial of “ALL” and “ALL” ISSUES As the Eleventh Circuit Court En Banc Ruled in this case Citing Zocaras v. Castro as McCarthy abandonment of Townsend et al was as was found as Heather Gray and Heather Gray et al and Popper, Chapin, Grant, Gibbs, and each “Officer of the Court” as Charles Canady Jr. and Crenshaw et al admitted each is involved in the unlawful acts and as others named and Others Doe to be Named have been by their actions as Ocasio Id and Rotella v. Woods Id. and F.S. 104.091, required Townsend to act and to prove as stated herein and as was said in the February 7, 2019 and in the Records of this 1987 to current times Action. The Criminal RICO “Predicate Acts” of the Bush TCR in collusion with Attorney’s Generals since James C. Smith, Bob Butterworth, Charlie Crist (Even as Secretary of Education) as admitted by Michael Moody in about 2006, and then Bill McCollum, Pam Bondi, and now A.B. Moody even exposing the betrayal of laws her and her Father James Moody Jr. and Gregory Presnell as these “alias” “law enforcers” have at prior times stated were Ethical and Legal Due Process shows the Bullying and Targeting and Fears Townsend and Townsend et al have and still experience as “Hate Crimes” as “judge” Crenshaw and their counsel Charles Denny IV wrote on 5/10/2006, in the Amended Complaint filed with the Court on 8/10/2006 as part of this action showing these Defendants intentional violations of the Ethical Standards of the FBCCP/CPCS Bylaws and our Federal and State Laws these still violate. Additionally, the connections of these “Hate Crimes” and RICO is shown in their Common Core Actions and in their George W. Bush #43 and Charlie

191

Crist, with the assistance of Mr. Acosta the pardons of Jeffery Epstein and others who continued the crimes Townsend reported by Charles E. Lane Jr. and others on 11/18/1987. To “Gievers et al” in the Court as said to the Court, Mr. Newhall on 2/7/2019, said he was “not trying to defame, Mr. Townsend” yet denying Townsend that he is Right per the U.S. Constitution and Lawful laws is continuing their as now Patel, Davis and McVay does defamation in a false public light that Townsend does not understand the law and is therefore untruthful as a defamation that began by Lane et al and McCarthy et al even though Townsend quotes Defendants actions on laws in other cases on these same practices that Townsend “Still With Clean Hands” said are crimes since 1987 and before and said as Torts to the Bylaws as a Contract which Townsend as the F.S. 617.0834 Representative has obeyed and attempted still to be applied as a Matter of Facts and Matters of Laws. Therefore counts of Defamation in a False Public Light charges must be followed per Due Process. THEREFORE: As Gievers and the FSCT falsely promised their Duty it is now the Duty of the 1st DCA is as follows: This First District Court of Appeals and the “Judges” assigned thereto now per the “Guilty” and “Recused” FSCT and their Oaths has the duty per Townsend’s filed Actions since November 1987, per Jenkins id. law to: A. Determine the Constitutionality of the laws being used to restrict “Political Opponent” Floridians from being an Attorney General of Florida; B. Determine the Constitutionality of the laws being used to restrict Floridians from being allowed their Organic Right to use the “Blank Line” on the Second Tuesday after the First Monday in November; C. Grant Discovery Orders as Townsend has demanded since 1987; D. Issue Sanctions against Defendants who have violated “Due Process” as stated and reinstated herein as Townsend’s October 10, 2019, Motion to Strike all Defenses as Fraud; …and Motion for Sanctions…” petitioned; E. Issue Bench Warrants to Named Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” for their crimes stated to the Courts by Townsend since 1987 by: Lane et al; Williams et al; McCarthy et al; Popper et al; Chapin et al; Chiles et al; Canady’s et al; Bush(s) et al; Epstein et al; Grant et al; Beck et al; Harrod’s et al and Attorneys Generals et al and the Common Core RICO Gang and others per the “FRAPS 1-3” and January Served persons as Gievers ruled and or as stated in this Action since 11/18/1987, for their each Felonies and escalated because of as “Hate Crimes” and F.S. 775 done to a “Religious Society” as Townsend F.S. 617.0834 speaks and each who filed False Claims;

192

F. Issue Orders to “Law Enforcers” to fully enforce the Bench Warrants and Due Process our Law Enforcers and Courts are to Honorably function; G. Issue an Order that requires a “New Election” for Florida Attorney General and Chief Financial Officer and Governor and Sheriffs and State Attorney’s and “judges” since their Crimes of Obstruction as proved in the 2018 Election and Others and since show their criminal Actions and violations of their “Bonds” thus showing their inability to perform “Honest Services” as the Governor’s Scott and Desantis Executive Orders show about Brenda Snipes and Sheriffs and “others”; H. Issue an Order for a Mandate to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer to process Legal Actions to recover all resources and money illegally taken per “False Claims” since these crimes began as Discovery continues to prove as Townsend reported on Television on June 30, 1994 and other times by certified mail and even by State Attorney Mark Ober and on 2/7/2019; I. Issue Orders of Due Process to allow Townsend to use Our Courts for the Due Process to enforce our laws per F.S. 80.02; J. Name each “judge” who has directed and or assisted Clerk Kristen Samuels, Anita Patel, Ashley Davis, Bradley McVey, Timothy Newhall, “judge Cooper”, “judge” Geivers, the Florida Supreme Court “judges” and Clerks and “Agents” and or Others BACK TO AND WITH LANE ET AL AND MCCARTHY ET AL AND WILLIAMS/LANE/TROHN/CANADY ET AL AND POPPER-CHAPIN ET AL AND “JUDGE MUSZYNSKI ET AL” AND SCRUGGS-GRANT-GRAY ET AL in their violation(s) of F.S. 104 and other Laws as Townsend in the Reply Brief on page 49, states the illegal actions of “Chief Judge Jonathan Sjostrom” as of others as “judges” as the Florida Supreme Court “judges” per their knowledge, intent, willfulness and recklessness for “Predicate Acts” and criminal acts to continue to do “Fraud on the Court” for violations of our Constitutional Contract Rights AS WE KNOW ALL WERE ADVISED BY BUTTERWORTH BUT WHO WITH THE “RUMP FACTION” ACTED TO DEFAME TOWNSEND AS F.S. 617.0834, AND THE FBCCP AND CPCS AND TOWNSEND’S CLIENTS AS THEIR “TWO TIER” CREATED; A MONOPOLY; A NOBILITY; DISENFRANCHISEMENT; DISENGAGEMENT; NO EQUAL PROTECTIONS; NO CHECK AND BALANCES; EXTORTION; THEIFS; DISTRUST; DESTRUCTION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT; AND CONTINUING CRIMES; K. Proceed with lawful judges per F. S. 80.02 as: 1). the Florida Bar, for investigation and discipline of Bar Members; 2). A Florida Supreme Court, to determine Constitutionality of Laws and to enforce disciplines of Bar Members and “judges” and other Public Officials

193 and Others; and as “No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. –16 AM. JUR. SEC. 177 late 2d. Sec. 256.” 3). A Florida Criminal Court, to follow Due Process; to properly allow Townsend with the necessary “Juries” to proceed to prosecute each Defendant and “Others Doe to be Named” to the fullest extent of our laws FOR THEIR TORTS of: Abduction of Townsend’s at the abduction time minors J.D.T. and J.G.T; abduction of Townsends work product; resources; and voting rights and their defamation and multiple other Hate Crimes for the restoration of: Citizens Trust; Citizens Rights; and Citizens Restoration of our Resources; and Citizens Restoration of our Relationships as since this Action began 11/18/1987 to expose Lane et al crimes and redress government persons crimes and obstruction RICO AND “HATE CRIMES PER F.S. 104. A.B.MOODY and All BUSH BRANCHES ET AL HAVE “NO” “UNDER COLOR OF LAW” OBSTRUCTION RIGHTS AND HAVE NOT SINCE THEIR “PREDICATE ACT” TO ILLEGALLY OBSTRUCT RIGHTS WITH “ALIAS” FEDERAL AND STATE ATTORNEYS GENERALS AND OTHERS who now per F.S. 80.02 are to be all prosecuted to the fullest extent of our Laws. Now known all to have been for Fraud by “Government Persons” acting illegally “Under Color of Law” and “Under color of Official Right” while said persons were intentionally acting by Fraud and Deceptive Practices for their own illegal Unjust Enrichment and thus acting per Hobbs Act and RICO violations thus violating their Bond for Honest Services. A. Did Gievers per F.S. 38 or the Second Circuit have any “jurisdiction” at all as Townsend the evening of the 2018 Election filed as the “Emergency Petition” and then Appeal to the FSCT and as had the FSCT had the “Emergency Petition” and the Appeal and the 18-1915 and 18-1951, Quo Warranto action was sent down to the 1st DCA back in November 2018, and thereafter so Gievers Order is “Void” but proof of ongoing F.S. 104 and RICO Violations and then as the 19-324 was sent down to be consolidated as the FSCT had recused themselves as Guilty since the 1980’s? B. By Townsend multiple times instructing the Clerks to file the full Actions in the “Records” for this 1st DCA, yet these Clerks did not comply and thus does this not unlawfully “impede” Due Process? C. RICK SCOTT AND RICK SCOTT ET AL AND OTHERS BLIND TRUST AND FRAUD(S) https;//www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2019/06/06florida-repeals- blind-trust-law-that-shielded-rick-scotts-

194 investments/?fbclid=IwAR35xHXqELqLYLrGbm8n- mToughTZsSMYW1Lm4zI6FDxZGQS-QKQbizfOAXO Subject: As “We the People” see it, Ron Desantis and Tom Lee and his wife and Moody’s quietly reverse illegal law and reveal Rick Scott et al scam under Blind Trust created loop holes that Unjustly empowered and Enrich Themselves which damaged Townsend and Townsend et al. as action 88- 2554 reveals Torts and Unjust Enrichment by illegal TCR Bush et al. As the Thyssens, Health Care, Zita and many other “Concealed” Documents show who is this since Holland and Holland, Walkers, Morgan, Brown, McCain, Romney, Clinton and Obama and Others” “Pay to Play” still being exposed.” GLOSSARY OF TERMS ATTORNEY’S GENERALS FLORIDA= To be the “General of the Attorney’s” per their Oaths to protect and serve the “We the People” of Florida and these United States Citizens of and for our Constitutional Rights not to be “Impeded” by the “Nobility” per the 10th Amendment and for “Equal Protection” of the 14th Amendment of our U.S. Constitution. Bob Butterworth= http://postonpolitics.blog.palmbeachpost.com/tag/bob-buttterworth/ The “Fixer” Butterworth Career speaks for itself to their Bush-Lane-Chiles- Canady-Smith-Koch-Crist-Grant-Scruggs-Gray-Scott-Bondi-Moody et al Conspiracy and Concealments of their “Predicate Acts” as; Attorney General 4 terms; DCF at time of expansion of Sheriffs to control Children Services and Family Courts greatly affecting Townsend; A Sheriff; A Lawyer. BUSH CODE RED= For the Creation of their Unjust Enrichment a New World Order of their “10th Amendment Nobility” the families of Bush(s)- Walker(s) with Dulles, Holland’s, Koch’s, Brown’s, Thyssen’s, Chiles, Canady’s, Clintons, Chapin’s, Obama’s, Smiths, Ballards, Grants and FRAP’S 1-3 and “Others” as “BUSH’S/KOCHS Tyrannical Communistic Regime” “TCR” as with the Florida Cabinet et al; “Elections Bureau”; Florida Supreme Court; FDLE, Florida Bar; JQC, Administrative Judges; “Judges”; “Clerks”; Legislators; Sheriffs; State Attorney’s and “Others” as Lane(s) et al and McCarthy Et al and Grant et al and Gray (Gray-Robinson) et al and Canady’s (Lane-Trohn) et al and Crenshaw’s et al and Moody’s and Butterworth et al and Martinez’s (Holland & Knight) as directed by themselves with Rick Scott et al since the 1980’s joined with “Others Doe to be Named” in corruption by their “Malicious Enterprise” of RICO and Hobbs Acts of Treason. THUS THEIR BUSH TCR FELONY INTERFERENCE WITH:“OBSTRUCTING A POLITICAL OPPONENT”; “VETTING”; “VOTING”; “Extortion”; “Bribery”; “Attempted Murder”;

195

“Murders” AND NO EQUAL PROTECTION OF “ORGANIC” AND “RELIGIOUS” AND OTHER RIGHTS BY THEIR “BUTTERWORTH- SMITHS-GRANTS-MOODY’S-HARRODS et al TWO TIER” a.k.a. “NOBILITY” IS THE THIEVES “TREASONOUS” PREDICATE ACTS” AS CONFESSED BY THESE VIOLATIONS OF F.S. 99; 104; Human/Drug Trafficking AND F.S. 111.07 and F.S. 775.03, OF “HATE CRIMES”, AS “JUDGES” SAID ARE: FRAUDS; EXTRINSIC FRAUDS; “FRAUDS ON THE COURT”; “FRAUDS TO CHURCH BYLAWS AS TOWNSEND ENFORCES”; AND “CORRUPT PRACTICES” AS PER THEIR “BUSH PREDICATE ACTS” PATTERNS AND PLAN AND PURPOSE AS THEY HAVE ENACTED DOUBLE SELF SERVING STANDARDS AS THE “19 PAGES” SHOW AND BEFORE THUS PUTTING “ALL AND OTHERS” IN BREACH OF CONTRACT(S) BY THEIR OWN CONFESSED “TORTS” AS FLIP-FLOPS.THESE ILLEGALLY “ELECTED” AND “FRUITS FROM THE POISONED BUSH” AS ATTORNEY’ GENERALS AS MOODY ET AL AND THEIR AGENTS NOW DO INTENTIONAL FRAUDS VERSES THE ARGUMENTS OF A.G. BUTTERWORTH TO THE COURTS. Therefore ALL of the “Two Tier” a.k.a. “Tyrannical Communistic Regime TCR” “Nobility” as Moody-Harrods-Sessions-Smith-Bush-Grants-Dallas- Butterworth-Koch-Lane Gang et al Defendants and the State Attorney’s Jack Campbell et al (sworn in 1/6/2017 and 15 years as Felony Division Chief), Willie Meggs(32 years), and Sheriffs Larry Campbell, Eddie Boone as with Smith-Bush-Kochs-Lane-Lane-Trohn, Canady-Campbels-Publix-H.E. Butts- Rainwater-Chiles-Scott et al, Butterworth and his law firm as with Scotts Pete Antonacci (wife Ann Longman) as Antonacci also of Gray-Robinson and Holland & Knight with the FDLE Bailey and the Florida Bar Harkness and Attorney’s Generals and Harrod’s, Tropp, Sessions, Morgan & Keegan, Orange, Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, Santa Rosa, Escambia and Leon Counties as directed conspired to remove the “Blank Line” and or are now continuing to allow the Obstruction of a “Political Opponent”; His and Others Rights; and thus removing the organic right to vote and or protecting the right of over 13 million voters in 2018 and millions years before and by ALL Defendants now since the Filing of this Action who has Obstructed Voters are Guilty of Millions of Felonies BY THE ADMISSIONS OF A.G. BUTTERWORTH, WHO AT THE TIME OF HIS ARGUMENTS WITH JOHN ROBERTS AS LAWYER FOR BUSHS AS SHOWN BELOW FOR HIS BENETIF FOR FRAUDS WAS ALSO GUILTY OF KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, WILLFULLY AND RECKLESSLY VIOLATING HIS “TWO-TIER” ARGUMENT AND VIOLATING OUR EQUAL

196

PROTECTION CLAUSE AND WRITE-IN VOTERS RIGHTS AND TOWNSENDS RIGHTS AND BY LANE ET AL, BUSH-KOCHS – CHAPINS-GRANTS ET AL EVEN THE INTENTIONAL ABDUCTION OF TOWNSENDS CHILDREN, RELIGIOUS RIGHTS, BUSINESS, MONEY THEY STOLE AND RESOURCES BY “HATE CRIMES” STILL ONGOING AND BY THEIR ACTIONS CONTINUING CONFESSIONS AND ADMISSIONS OF THEIR OBSTRUCTION AND THEIR GUILT. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT= Requiring Jenkins Id. of 19 Page Exhibit and all papers Townsend filed since 11/18/1987, to “alias” “Law Enforcers”. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS PARK AND CITRUS PARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ITS MINISTRY PER THE BYLAWS =BYLAWS FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS PARK AND CITRUS PARK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ITS MINISTRY= FBCCP/CPCS GOVERNOR’S AGENTS AND CABINET= BUSH ET AL H. E. BUTTS = Texas Grocery Store Chain NEW WORLD ORDER= The Bush et al plan for Greed and total control. PREDICATE ACTS= In this Action since 1987, it is the criminal acts Townsend has reported and still learning based on obstruction by ALL. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS= Expanded Grocery Company RUMP FACTION= The illegal sect of a “Religious Society”. SEDITION= “Is making anti government speeches/publishing material intending to incite the public to revolt against the current local government or state government or central government.” Examples of Common Core. TREASON= “Is to commit an act to destabilize a local government or state Government or Central Government in any manner or to destabilize the relation between a Government and the Public or to Compromise the Security of a Government in any manner so as to ultimately compromise the Security of its people… Thus Sedition is about inciting People to go against the Government and Treason is about actually doing these tasks.” Thus their violations of Florida Constitution Article II. Section 8. TYRANNICAL COMMUNISTIC REGIME= “TCR” VOTER PROTECTION ACT= A Constitutional Right per F.S. 104 COMES NOW AGAIN APPELLANT TOWNSEND SINCE 1987 AS: PRIVATE CITIZEN; PER F.S. 80.02; F.S. 86; AS “WE THE PEOPLE”; “NEXT FRIEND” PER THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871, AS “PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL”; AND SINCE 1993 AS F.S. 617.0834, REPRESENTITIVE; AS ACTING PER 18 U.S.C. 241 AND 18 U.S.C. 242, FOR PROTECTING: OUR CONSTITUTION; VOTING; CIVIL RIGHTS; RELIGIOUS RIGHTS; PARENTAL RIGHTS; COMMERCE; AND THE INTEGRITY AND DUE PROCESS

197

GUARANTEE OF OUR COURT(S) AS REPLY TO THE RICO, 18 U.S.C. 2382-TREASON AND COMMON CORE CULT “FLIP-FLOP” “TCR” DEFENDANTS WHO IN OPEN COURT(S) AND CHURCHES BY THEIR PROPHESIED CRIMINAL AND ADMITTED “HATE CRIMES” BY THEIR F.S.104 “DICTATOTSHIP” ACTS THEY OPENLY DO AS: “WANTING THEIR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO”; FOR ALL POWER AND THEY OPENLY VIOLATE WITH INTENTIOINAL TORTS TO/OF “ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER” IN COURTS AND CHURCH(S); AS THEIR “RULES OF A.G. BUTTERWORTH PANCAKES AND TRUMPS THEIR “TWO-TIER” GRANT-MOODY-BONDI-SMITH/PATEL AND BUSH(S)-KOCH’S-SCOTTS-CANADAY’S “OTHERS DOE-SMITH- DETZNER-NEWHALL-CAMPBELLS-LANE ET AL TO BE NAMED” ET AL “PREDICATE ACT(S)” AS A “RANKIN ID.” “RUMP FACTION” IN TREASON PER F.S. 104. 051- F.S. 104.091 are equal and admitted GUILTY CO=PARTICIPANTS: As their Fraud of Facts and “Fraud on the Court” as Extrinsic Frauds these “as unlawful in Breach Next door neighbors” again Violates F.S. 99.061(4)(b) “However; a space” and “no Qualifying” to Obstruct a “Political Opponent” by the “Bureau” since1980’s by Detzner, James C. Smith, (writers of the Bureau Election Code) for Bush(s), Ballard, Brown, Butterworth, Bondi, “Bureau et al, as Detzner et al as Gievers established these Defendants and as their predecessors and “Others Doe to be Named” until “Impeded” Full Discovery is allowed back to the Omission of the F.S. 99.061(4)(b); and I. F.S. 104.051 (1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be excluded from the polls…”. And F.S. 104.091…”, THUS Any and ALL of the “Two Tier” Dictatorship of the Bush since Askew Governors et al and Smiths-Butterworth et al A. G’s and the Grant et al Legislators and the “Elections Bureau”, Poll workers, Sheriffs and or of each named in the FRAP’S 1-3 and the “January 2019” and “Others Doe to be Named” who: 1. “Illegally Vetted”; and 2. presented a ballot with “no blank line”; and or 3. allowed the election(s) to be certified since the “Blank Line” as the Exhibit Ballots show; OR AS BONDI FOR MANY YEARS CLAIMED THEIR SLAPP ACTS HAD IMMUNITY NOW PROVED A FRAUD PER F.S 111.07; AND have done; felonies; breach of contract; “Snipes” incompetence and neglect of duty; and corrupt practices; for their Dictatorship Two-Tier TCR as A.G. Butterworth himself admitted in 2000, his and “Others” guilt as advised in open court(s) of what is “Election Fraud” and “Neglect of Duty” as for “Honest Services” even as the Executive Orders of Rick Scott and Ron Desantis advised of Brenda

198

Snipes (Broward) and Susan Bucher (Palm Beach) and Ken Detzner and Mike Ertel even as Ertel said “Today what we’re going to bring here to Florida is a sense of calm …voters not sure of what’s going to happen next, what issue is going to befall us next.”. II. Additionally at this time as Congress charges “Election Tampering” as Grounds for “Impeachment” their Arguments are for as A.G. Butterworth confessed and advised of the Dictatorship Damages to our Republic and our Citizens by removing the Checks and Balances of a “Free Will” Election. III. Also to use the arguments of the “House Managers”, why would an Honorable: “Senate” like Scott and Rubio as a “jury”; “judge as Chief Judge Roberts”; “President Trump Lawyers” as Bondi et al”; and or “Attorney’s Generals” or “FSCT” as Canady Jr. acted in the Clinton Impeachment or Governors or Grants “Judiciary” et al who is to protect “We the People” “in good behavior” per the U.S. Constitution and Florida Constitution Article II. Sec. 8. want a victim Whistleblower to: be denied “Due Process”; and not be allowed to call witnesses since 1987; not be allowed “discovery” since 1987; not be allowed to see his abducted children since 10/20/1999; or not be allowed to obey his Church Bylaws; denied “juries”; not be allowed to recover their Millions of Stolen Dollars; not be heard in full with their admissions of “Hate Crimes” and Guilt of Defendants; not be restored of relationships, rights and resources; and or then only be limited in the 2/7/2019, hearing and or now in “A Reply” only be allowed limited pages to recap over 30 years of Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” admitted Guilt of still more criminal acts in progress as F.S. 80.02 and F.S. 86 and “HATE CRIME” AND ELECTION violations continue? IV. Per F.S 104, it is elementary reading that there is: NO immunity; NO under color of law; NO under color of official right; NO tolerance for “Slapp acts; NO tolerance for “Hate Crimes”; NO obstruction of Voters”; NO obstruction or “Hate Crimes” to be done to a political opponent (Trump v. Biden) or as Townsend since 1987, to be as the Florida Bar et al and Bush- Sheriffs Et Al threaten Townsend not to be a “Candidate” and actions now Obstructing as a “Write In”; no “impeding” “Bylaws and jurors”; and no “Impeding” “Redress of Government” and per A.G. Butterworth thus no “two tier” creating the nobility for no discretion to not prosecute their self - serving RICO and conduct “Hate Crimes” and over 30 years of HOBBS crimes to advance their TCR” as Marco Rubio and Aldaberto Jordon and others as Townsend reported who said why they fled the “TCR” in Cuba. V. “Judge” Cooper (10/24/18); FSCT (11/6/2018 to1996); Florida Bar Members back to Moody, McCarthy, Grant knew Townsend demanded Declaratory acts as verified as Crenshaw on 5/10/06 acted lawfully since

199

1987, and is unlawfully and politically denied “Due and Equal Process” and denied the Mandamus even by the Federal Courts as these Actions prove. VI. Thus “All” Opposing, defaming and damaging Townsend with Lane et al doing their “pay to play” by theft of Townsends reputation, vote,children, money, rights and their “kickbacks/lobbying” for “coke & Kochs” denying Townsend by their “Election Tampering” as “Dictators” against “ALL” and or his right to “Vote” for Himself as for Attorney’s General to protect per Florida Constitution Article II. Section 8., for himself and “Others” as a “Private Attorney’s General” since 11/18/1987 ARE Enjoined Per 1st DCA “VOID” “ORDER” OF 1/2/20 and 1/14/20 of Clerk Samuels-”Judges” et al acts since the “EMERGENCY” FILED Action was sent down 11/20/2018 AND OTHER TIMES from the admitted “guilty” FSCT to The 1st DCA as New Case Consolidated as 18-4845, as required by Jenkins id. as Gievers on 2/7/2019 Fraudulently agreed to take Judicial Notice and Jurisdiction as presented to and on all matters since Townsend filed his 11/18/87 Action, for Defendants Named Lane et al and “Others Doe to be Named for their: “Obstruction of a Political Opponent”; “Fraud on the Court”: “Fraud of Official Right” and as “Extrinsic Frauds” for their continuing their “Bush Code Red” “Malicious Prosecution” as “delay”, and or now their threat to Townsend to file an Alternative Action which is another felony of their: Cooper failure to require 10/24/2018, the Elections Bureau and Attorney General Bondi their F.S. 104, “Unlawful excuses” as the FSCT fails 11/6/2018 and as in delay obstruction by ALL the 1st DCA Orders And as thru the (Notice of Non-Compliant Brief) of 1/14/2020, as “The Amended Reply Brief by the Appellant of January 13, 2020, fails… exceeds the applicable page limit…substitute pages will not be accepted…”. But “ALL” persons in breach have no defense and no right to do fraud as; VII. The January 12, 2020, TOWNSEND’S REPLY TO SAMUELS ET AL 1/2/2020 “ORDER” clearly states it is Not an “Amended Reply Brief” but is a Reply to their Samuels et al illegal Order of needing an Alternative explanation of why the REPLY BRIEF OF 12/23/19 could and or should not be limited so to allow these same Defendants et al including unnamed 1DCA “Judges” who could do and continue “Treason” and “Fraud on the Court(s)” as they Flip Flop for “Unjust Enrichment” and more Torts Two Tier Torts now in addition to their Crimes for Extortion and Murders as told to Gievers et al on 2/7/19, and to other “alias” law enforcers since 1987. VIII. As said in the Townsend Reply brief at multiple places for the protection of “Fraud on the Court” the length of the Reply Brief cannot be “Impeded” by “Administrative Laws” and or by Acts of these “Government

200

Persons” who aid and abetted Lane-Bush-Koch-Scott-Canady-Grant-Bondi- Moody et al to steal Townsend Joint Venture Agreement and FBCCP/CPCS and Tax Money and then with the money as Kickbacks violate F.S. 104, as “Under Color of Law” act as part of their “Predicate Acts” of their “Plan, Purpose and People” for their “Nobility” Unjust Enrichment by extortion, Fraud(s) and Human Trafficking and multiple RICO Crimes as advised to Cooper-FSCT-Geivers-1st DCA et al to “obstruct” Organic Religious and Voting Rights and violations on “Voters” by violation of multiple laws and contracts and specifically conspiring and “Obstructions”; Collusions”; Frauds; Torts to Contracts; Acts of Breach of Contracts and for Human Trafficking for thefts and abductions for “Unjust Enrichment” For and By “Treason”; By “Fruit from the Poisoned Bush” “False Claims”; as President Trump outlined Townsend’s 2/7/2019 Argument to Gievers et al in his Venezuela Speech on 2/18/2019, about the Bush et al acts by like failure of duty of 4 U.S.C. 1986 and RICO violations as the “House Managers” say of: 1.) Violating F.S. 99 “Illegal Vetting” and Obstruction of a “Write-In”; 2.) Obstructing Townsend as also a “law enforcement Officer” per F.S. 119.071, as the Exhibits given in Court to Gievers et al on 2/7/19, proved; 3.) F.S. 104.091, lawfully and equally enjoins them all in all crimes; 4.) F.S. 104 as they now illegally claim the “Reply is too long”; so to prevent “Political Opponent” Townsend’s “Trump” exposure of: Defendants in FRAP 1-3, Lane et al Defendants; “January 2019”; and “Others Doe to be Named” in Obstruction to continue their RICO, HOBBS, “Predicate Acts” Crimes Townsend EXPOSES ALL since 1987; to include: Legislature Judiciary (Senator-FBCCP/CPCS Registered Agent- Lawyer John Grant [As since 1994 with a Threat in his email 1/14/2020, “Randy enough is enough. Please quit your harassing litigation. John Grant…”] and by son “Jamie” Grant) Torts, Thefts, Threats and Aiding and Abetting Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” to slander, Tort and Threaten Townsend and Townsend et al with their powers of the Judiciary Committee and Grant as Registered Agent; with the “January” served 1st DCA/Samuels et al, FSCT et al and “BUSH CODE RED” et al.. IX. As the “House Managers” and Roberts show Obstruction of a “Political Opponent” as a Crime these Sheriffs and Attorney’s Generals SMITH, BUTTERWORTH, DORAN, CRIST, MCCOLLUM (Who led the Senate Trial of Impeachment against Clinton with Canady Jr.)-, BONDI, MOODY AND OR ET AL’S BY THEIR RICO, Hobbs Act and Human And Drug Trafficking Agents Aided and Abetted Lane-Bush-Grant et al in the Theft of Townsend’s and the FBCCP/CPCS’s Reputation, Relationships; Resources and with Townsend’s money stolen as Chapin’s letter stated at

201 least $1 Million on just one company Bonneau (and millions stolen as McCarthy-Lane-Williams-Popper-Chapin et al told Townsend he could not work and or talk to his clients from 1987-1993 and since) as they stole over $45,000 in legal fee frauds and from the Church-School by admitted double books over $43,000 used as “Common Core” by Grant, Moody’s and Columba Bush et al and “Kickbacks” NOW these still continue as; A. AS VIA A.G. AGENTS ASHLEY DAVIS AND BRAD McVAY saying: “Mootness” is don’t uncover the Treason and “Hate Crimes” and or by F.S. 80.02, prosecute us the criminals still so acting by frauds and RICO; B. AS VIA ANITA PATEL ET AL STATES IN THEIR ANSWER BRIEF THEIR “FRAUD ON THE COURT(S)” EVEN IN THEIR OWN 2nd CIRCUIT, LEON COUNTY; 1st DCA; and FSCT; OF THEIR ILLEGALLY REPEATED SELF DEALING FOR “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” TORTS OBSTRUCTION “THE THIRD AMENDED BRIEF DOES NOT CONTAIN A DISCERNABLE STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND THE FACTS. ACCORDINGLY, APPELLEE SUBSTITUTES…” is Fraud. X. The Roberts U.S. Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court yet violations of F.S. 99 and F.S. 104 and our Equal Protection are still being done as stated in this Action and as proved by the July 7, 2017, Action(s) filed in this Record as filed in the Federal D.C. Courts, being “impeded”. And Florida Bar Members threat “Mr. Townsend if you every get your law degree within six months we will find a way to have you disbarred and put you in jail for something” said by John Harkness, John Berry, Tim Chinaris and John Boggs to Townsend and HCSO Sheriff Deputies et al many threats and Moody-Newhall threats to charge $15000.00 and Threats (Email and Counter Suit) of John Grant; Threats as stated since 1987 by Lane et al.} who are as admitted in Open Court admitting to: Frauds; Delays; Human Trafficking; RICO; “Hate Crimes”; Treason and also violation of their Oaths to the U.S. And Florida Constitution and thus lose their ability to be Bonded. XI. From page 54 of Townsend’s Reply Brief which states: “(b) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime because he lacked the state of mind required for its commission, because he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution.” XII. The Case Laws and the Fla. R. App. P. and Fla. R. Civ. P. and Fla.. Jud. Admin. 2.516 used by Defendants are therefore per: A. “The court notes that the attorney general of the state of Florida enunciated his opinion of the law with respect to this in a letter dated

202

November 14, 2000.”; and B. In the “Precedent” Action Townsend as an announced “Political Opponent” as a “Write-In” Candidate for Hillsborough County Sheriff proved the crimes by The November 2015 Email of John Grant with “judge” Battles et al saying “you’re digging a deeper hole for yourself…and bring your toothbrush” and the threat emails and visits outside their jurisdiction by HCSO McDarby et al; and in the court of Battles on 2/8/16 stating all the Defendants; never obtained or read the contracts of the Joint Venture Agreement; or of Lane et al which owed Townsend money; or nor did the Defendants in or to the Court answer the question of Townsend that did you ever read the Church Bylaws, which Townsend is trying to enforce since 1993, is therefore by Beatrice Foods id. and with F.S. 104. “NO” legal “under color of law” defenses and thus the acts per F.S. 104 are additional “Felonies” of each that violate 13 million voters in just 2018 alone who had “no equal protection” to use “a blank line” thus Defendants did intentional crimes and do more for the Conspiracy Court as Obstruction to conceal their prior even admitted ALL Crimes obstructing the Due and Equal Process and Commerce on All for whom Townsend speaks. XIII. Therefore ALL arguments of Moody-Patel-1DCA et al are as for the same fears and extortions as since McCarthy-Williams-Chapin et al in ADMISSIONS BY UNLAWFUL GOVERNMENT IN OPEN COURT OF THEIR “FRAUD ON THE COURT’ FLIP FLOPS and Treason per the House Managers with Judge Roberts in opposite argument and contrast to: A. the A.G. Butterworth arguments in the Bush v. Gore and Gore V. Harris Action(s): Setting forth a Two-Tier system (Hand Picked for the Bush-Koch-Epstein –Lane et al Price Fixing and Drug and Dozier-Tidwell School- White House Brokaw 1989, Green Isle, Lincoln School, et al Human Trafficking and other crimes with Lane et al and “The Detzner et al Bureau Qualified Democrat and or Republican candidate verses the never since 1980’ allowed “THIRD TIER” THE PEOPLES OR TOWNSEND AS ATTORNEY GENERAL “Write-in”. That Non Republican and or Non Democrat Voters have no rights to “Write-In” their Candidate that the “We the People” Qualify “on the second Tuesday after the first Monday in November” to attack a “Political” Opponent following Church Bylaws. B. The U.S. Supreme Court standards as stated herein this 1987 Action. So Butterworth is doing the fraud on the court then and or is now MoodyEt al double standards that are the “Fraud on the Court” as showing violations of Due Process and the Equal Protection Clause as the details of this 162 page Reply Brief Briefly but meeting the Federal and State Laws and Regulations And as Federal “Judge” James Moody Jr. told

203

Townsend on 3/15/2007, “Mr. Townsend, I believe everything you said is true. I am going to dismiss this case and let you re-file the case to be more specific…” thus admitting the HOBBS ACT Four Proofs are proven “YES” as the HOBBS ACT states these Question(s): “1. Did the defendant induce or attempt to induce the victim to give up property or property rights? Yes 2. Did the defendant use or attempt to use the victim's reasonable fear of physical injury or economic harm in order to induce the victim's consent to give up property? Yes 3. Did the defendant's conduct actually or potentially obstruct, delay, or affect interstate or foreign commerce in any (realistic) way or degree? Yes 4. Was the defendant's actual or threatened use of force, violence or fear wrongful?” Yes” as the brief 162 pages with these 30 plus years of Actions show and prove to show the Defendants Named and “Others Doe to be Named” have conspired and as Crenshaw-Denny said were “Hate Crimes” even aided by now x- wife, Karen Harrod as admitted in her 12/2005, Affidavit filed with “alias” “judge” Holder” and filed to other Courts proved “Odious and Outrageous” violation of the Church/School Bylaws and our law since the 1980’s and before as shown in the 19 pages against Townsend. XIV. THE 1ST DCA THEN MUST ANSWER THE “YES” TO THE HOBBS ACT FOUR QUESTIONS AS JENKINS id. REQUIRED REVIEW FOR JUSTICE AND AS TO “QUESTIONS OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL FLORIDA LAWS & UNLAWFUL ACTS THE FLORIDA BAR HARKNESS ET AL THREATED TOWNSEND AS A “POLITICAL OPPONENT” TO UNLAWFULLY FOLLOW OR BE JAILED if he did not obey unconstitutional rules they use for “impeding”: A. Art. IV. § 5, Fla. Constitution “…The attorney general must have been a member of the bar of Florida for the preceding five years…” B. Reconstruction of the Florida Cabinet Amendment 8(1998) and Florida Miscellaneous Matters and Technical Revisions, Amendment 13, (1998); XV. The Patel and Davis-McVay Answers did not advise their representations were on behalf of the served “January” “persons” as “Kristen Samuels and 1st DCA “judges” as “Givers” included “Samuels et al” and Newhall et al claimed to represent on 2/7/19, and or those “Others Doe to be Named” still claim to conceal their elected predecessors as “Gievers et al” connected in their: “Treason”; “Delay”; “Hate Crimes”; Concealment of Drug and Human Trafficking” by Bushs et al and Epstein Et al; “Admissions of Guilt”; and Admissions of Damages (as fears and murders and loss of

204

Townsend children’s relations and loss of money still ongoing in the continuation of their “Predicate Acts” of the TCR); therefore their continued acts as violations of F.S. 104.515(2) are ongoing crimes; XVI. If Townsend had his “Over a Million Dollars” as the Letter of Bruce Chapin said Lane owed Townsend on just the one line Bonneau and this did not include the millions of dollars stolen using the Bush-Koch’s and State of Florida and Federal monies gained by their State and Federal False Claims filings to only support their “Pay to Play” candidate that their “Pay to Play” Smith-Detzner-Bondi-Willis-Brown and “Others Doe to be Named” as et al “The Bureau” would have and did use their extortion and Unjust Enrichment to Certify of the Two Tier Ballot omitting all the rights of these other candidates and voters. Therefore, per 18-CA-2293,: “WHEREFORE, THIS CONCLUSION SHOULD Candidates: Ashley Moody, Republican; Sean Shaw, Democrat; or Jeffrey Marc Siskind, NPA; or “Others”; obtain the office of Florida Attorney’s General said Office has been obtained by a fraud and their silence to object or “impede” Townsend from being allowed to be a “Write-in” by which they “aided and abetted” in obtaining said office and thus they become disqualified by these Fraudulent Acts and Violations of Civil Rights and Conspiracy of these acts as another “Tyrannical Communistic Regime” act against these Rights as “We the People”.” Therefore it is the Duty or they “aid and abet” as co=participants and co=conspirators per F.S. 104.091 of the: Florida Cabinet; Federal Agents; Attorney’s General and these Attorney’s General’s Agents; State Attorneys; Legislators; FDLE, judges clerks and Sheriffs to identify by Name each “judge” of the First D.C.A. Tallahassee and “Others” for whom they represent and conspire for obstruction of voting rights and for whom is in the “Obstruction” that their “COOPER-Samuels et al” acts to violate F.S. 104.0151(2), or Townsend and Townsend et al advise per F.S. 38, each “judge” must declare their “Predicate Act” Prejudice and Bias against Townsend and Townsend et al. and ALL THEIR DEFENSE Dismissed. XVII. Parties are “Estopped” who have confessed in open court and in court documents have plead out and now have no right to a defense. THEREFORE, JUDGE ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER WITH A.G. BUTTERWORTH BAR’S AND PANCAKES AND TRUMPS BONDI- MOODY-SAMUELS-BUSHES-LANE(S) ET AL AND OTHERS DOE And it is therefore the Honorable Duty of the 1st DCA to per F.S. 80.02 and F.S. 86 cooperate with Townsend per our Due Process of Equal Protection to per “Equal Next Door Neighbour” laws per 4 U.S.C. 1986, issue arrest warrants to the violator defendants and others doe and then per the jury

205 process seek justice and full restoration for these as Townsend and the victims for whom Townsend speaks. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 24th day of January 2020, to/per Defendants; Anita Patel; Bradley R. McVay; Ashley E. Davis; [email protected]; and Filing in 1st DCA, Fl. Signed electronically as “/s/” Randall C. Townsend, Verified to the best of our knowledge, opinions and belief based on the concealed information of Defendants. SIGNED Electronically as Respectfully submitted; “/s/” Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and as a “Next Friend” of the over 13 Million Florida Voters and Others as said “Private Attorney’s General” and Ex rel. FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA herein. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE STATEMENT I certify that the lettering in this brief is TIMES NEW ROMAN 14 POINT and complies with the font requirements of the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2). And Except that per our Citizens Rights this REPLY Brief based on their new persons and frauds shall need be accepted in full as is so these matters of law can be litigated in this Redress of Government Action per our Citizens Rights to Our Courts. It is a “Fruit of the Poisoned Bush” if co=conspirators attempt by their Breach to attempt to use “Unconstitutional” Laws and or Unlawful Administrative Acts to for any and all additional delays of Justice for their “unjust enrichment” and by “False Federal and State Claims” as “Under Color of Law” violate “Search and Seizure” Organic Rights of We the People, therefore this “Redress of Government “ “Impostors” Action may not be restricted by “Government Persons” as Clerk Samuels et al attempts additional criminal acts. EXHIBIT OF CHARGES OF “PREDICATE” AND F.S.104.515(2) CRIMES AS FOR “HATE CRIMES” BY LANE ET AL-BUSH-FRAP 1-3- GRANT-MCCARTHY-CHAPIN(S)-BECK-SCRUGGS-GRAY-SCOTT- BONDI-MOODY-“JANUARY 2019”-PATEL ET AL AND “OTHERS DOE”

206

COUNT ONE (A). FRAUD BY “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT” “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” COUNT ONE (B). FRAUD “UNDER COLOR OF LAW” “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” COUNT TWO --VOTER FRAUD “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” COUNT THREE-- VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” COUNT FOUR—HUMAN TRAFFICKING “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” “The Supervisor of Elections Office and “ALL as Officially and Individually, Defendants “…defendants named herein and or “Others Doe to be Named” knowingly, intentionally, negligently and recklessly presented these said documents {All Documents know Fraud and “Fruit from the Poisoned Tree” Since 1987}and then knowingly, intentionally, negligently and for Tort{Since 1987 and before}, and recklessly then produced a “2018 Ballot” and or “Ballots for over 30 years” that then omitted as they published “A space will be available….” while defendants failed to advise Townsend { Of ALL Truth Since 1987} as per their agreed responsibility as a {“ALL CONTRACTS”} contract for their service.” COUNT FIVE CONSPIRACY 18 U.S.C. 371 RACKETEERING 18 U.S.C. §1962(d) AS FLORIDA STATUTES §895.03 per page 54 herein “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.”

207

COUNT SIX FOR FRAUDULENT VIOLATION OF PERSONAL BOND “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” COUNT SEVEN WITNESS TAMPERING 18 U.S.C. Section 1512 “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” COUNT EIGHT EXTORTION USING FEAR OF ECONOMIC HARM 18 U.S.C. §§1951 and §§1952 AS HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS And CRIMINAL AND CIVIL THEFTS “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” A. Townsend’s Money from the 1987 JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT B. Townsend’s Money from being told by his lawyers “not to work”; C. Townsend’s Money paid to the “lawyers” and the Courts and Others who never provided “Honest Services”; D. Townsend’s and the FBCCP AND CPCS Church/School and Members Money; E. Townsend’s Money stolen by Sunbelt Equipment Company; F. Townsend’s loss of money by wrongful termination at Kmart; G. Townsend’s loss of money by wrongful termination at Wal-Mart; H. Townsend’s money stolen by Karen Harrod et al. COUNT NINE EXTORTION UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT 18 U.S.C. §§1951 and§§1952 AS HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR F.S. 104 TORT INTERFERENCE WITH ELECTORS BY “AS PERSONS” “NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR” DEFENDANTS” “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” FRUAD IN THESE BALLOTS AS “NO BLANK LINE” I. THE 1984 BALLOT II. THE 1986 BALLOT III. THE 1990 BALLOT

208

IV. THE 1994 BALLOT V. THE 1998 BALLOT VI. THE 2002 BALLOT VII. THE 2006 BALLOT VIII. THE 2010 BALLOT IX. THE 2014 BALLOT X. THE 2018 BALLOT COUNT TEN EXTORTION UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT 18 .S.C. §§1951 and§§1952 AS HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS AND KIDNAPPING OF J.D.T. AND J.G.T AND OTHERS “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” COUNT ELEVEN 18 U.S.C. §§1951 and §§1952 AS HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS FOR CONSPIRACY 18 U.S.C. 371 TO DEFRUAD THE STATE OF FLORIDA TAX PAYERS “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” Townsend and Citizens stolen money from Defendants by illegal charges for “Failure of Honest Services” and ABUSE OF PROCESS COUNT TWELVE 18 U.S.C. §§1951 and §§1952 AS HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS FOR CONSPIRACY PER 18 U.S.C. 371 TO DEFRUAD THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TAX PAYERS “TOWNSEND re-states all above and below to be included herein this count and further states:…this action requires a Jury verdict on all issues as a Matter of Law.” Townsend and Citizens stolen money from Defendants by illegal charges for “Failure of Honest Services” and ABUSE OF PROCESS AS “ALL” TO PROCEED TO A JURY TRIAL ON ALL ISSUES.”

WHEREFORE: The required direction to this Wolf’s et al Court is: I. Is their “Wolf’s” action of June 17, 2020, and prior Delays of Due Process by this 1st DCA and done at the direction of: A. Themselves Wolf, Roberts Winokur, independently without F.S. 38

209

Violations and or Threats as RICO and or HOBBS ACT Crimes?; or B. “A Charles Canady Jr. CODE RED” as he admitted his illegal crimes since about 1987, as a co=conspirator and co=participant with Charles E. William’s Jr. and Charles E. Lane Jr. et al in concealing evidence and concealing their admitted criminal actions and Obstructing Due Process; C. “A Trump CODE RED” as the BUSH CODE RED to obstruct? D. “A U.S. CHIEF JUDGE JOHN ROBERTS” CODE RED to obstruct? E. “A U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR” CODE RED to obstruct?; F. “A Grant Family member who at times acts as the Legislature Member in charge of the Judiciary Committee? And or G. “Any Defendant listed in the Frap’s I-III” and or as connected to their agents? II. This since 1987 “Townsend Civil Rights Act of 1987, Whistleblower Action required and requires “Jenkins” id. based on this new evidence as even admitted in the Gievers Courtroom on 2/7/2019 and based on these ongoing “damages” and ongoing violations of “civil rights” by these same still being discovered because the defendant and these “Officers of the Court” continue to not reveal their “unjust enrichment” from Lane et al thefts of Townsend’s rights, resources and relationships and Townsend’s et al’s recover of same; III. Due to the Ongoing alleged due to COVID 19 which is abusing Townsend and Townsend et al’s rights and resources by these same alias Government persons per their “Under Color of Official Right” these damages by them continue illegally without our Redress of Government Right as Townsend began 11/18/1987, against Lane and the “Others Doe to be Named” now as “Wolf’s et al”. IV. As General Flynn seeks justice so does Whistle Blower Townsend for himself and Whistle Blower “Next Friend” of as Townsend et al seeks Our “We the People” Respondent Superior RULE OF LAW Redress Of Government’s illegal and unconstitutional process having admitted their crimes yet now still more obstructing due process for their illegal acts to control commerce and restitution of Townsend and Townsend et al. These “Wolf” “judges” not the Attorney’s Generals as their “Agent Patel” by law are to do RICO to violate the F.S. 80.02 Action of Townsend to do our Civil Rights Act of 1871 “Private Attorney’s General” Action for protection of our 18-241 and 18-242 U.S. C. and §1983 Action for our Rights as even the First District Court of Appeals in Washington D.C. who has standing and rule in this Action as filed as Action from 8:16-cv-03299-JDW-MAP as Action

210

No.17-7113, filed on 7/7/2017, as proof of RICO for their Petition for Mandamus now showing proofs of these illegal “judges” actions as shown by the FLYNN Action.

THEREFORE: The 1St DCA as En Banc per their own 6/17/20 Order-- THIS REQUIRED BY LAW “MOTION FOR MANDAMUS”-- As was before John Cooper and then the FSCT then from the FSCT sent by the FSCT to the 1st DCA and or as “Judge” Gievers on 2/7/2019 alleged to take “Jenkins” jurisdiction is as stated remains by Townsend lawfully being done per F.S. 80.02 and by Our Jury Rights Charging and Placing Each Defendant and “Others Doe to be Named” under Citizens Arrest and to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of our Laws as even the 1st DCA for the District of Columbia has ruled Affirming Townsend’s Actions filed in multiple Federal and State Courts for protecting Rights and “Due Process” protecting our RIGHTS and Our Commerce from their “Unjust Enrichment” being done by their same patterns now Covid19; As was before the FSCT as their pleading of guilty to these actions they consolidated by these Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” as adding Patel and “Wolf’s et al” now into 18-4845 1st DCA, as SC1890, SC18-1951, SC18-1915 and SC-19-324; SC60-86-918 from 1996 are still per Jenkins id not adjudicated per Due Process as a Matter of Law and as a Matter of Facts and as the Constitutional Bill Of Rights required Due Process by a jury of “We the People” on these actions or the Fourth Amendment of illegal search and seizure is violated by the Wolf’s et al. as they as Government persons Under Color of Law continue violation of our Organic Rights, for their “Unjust Enrichment” now using a claim of rights by COVID19, when only a Legislature may make laws. This matter must be ruled on by the “Court with Clean Hands” not Wolf’s et al. This matter must be ruled on by the 1st DCA En banc who must rule “with clean hands” or therefore each “judge” “co=conspirator” must resign as these are in “Breach of Contract” with no defense and no right to “Rule in any Official Capacity” or “Official Right” per F.S. 104 which consolidates and exposing their RICO and HOBBS ACT Crimes.

ISSUE C. FILED AND YET TO BE RESOLVED PER OUR LAW Therefore the Duties of the Guilty FSCT as stated below were directed to the 1st DCA to adjudicate “Due Process” with “CLEAN HANDS” as follows:

211

PETITIONER/PLAINTIFFS QUO WARRANTO ACTION FOR A JUDGMENT OF OUSTER FOR: ABUSE OF PROCESS; NEGLECT OF DUTY AND 18 U.S.C 242 VIOLATIONS FOR FSCT MEMBERS: CANADY JR.; LABARGA; POLSTON; LEWIS; QUINCE; PARIENTE; LAWSON; CLERK TOMASINO; JOHN C. COOPER; ATTORNEY’S GENERAL PAMELA JO BONDI, HER AGENTS AND OTHERS

RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRO SE, “Private Attorney’s General” As Individual and per F.S.617.0834, The Unanimously Elected Representative of the FBCCP and its Ministry CPCS per Our 1994 Bylaws, Never lawfully removed. P.O. Box 5, Osprey Fl 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] Townsend4AGFlorida.com

212

COMES NOW, RANDALL TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AND AS “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL”, per 42 §1983, AND STATES: 1. RANDALL TOWNSEND AND RANDALL TOWNSEND ET AL’S AS “NEXT FRIEND’S” AND AS FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA FILE OUR MOTION AS AN AFFIDAVIT FOR JUDGMENT OF OUSTER TO REMOVE: ATTORNEY’S GENERAL PAM BONDI; GOVERNOR RICK SCOTT; SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE ADAM PUTNAM; CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER JIMMY PATRONIS; SECRETARY OF STATE KEN DETZNER; SENIOR GOVERNMENT ANALYSIS DONNA BROWN; BUREAU OF ELECTIONS RECORDS, KRISTI REID WILLIS; “ALIAS” “JUDGES” AS FSCT: CLERK JOHN A. TOMASINO; AND MEMBERS; CHARLES CANADY JR.; JORGE LABARGA; RICKY POLSTON; R. FRED LEWIS; PEGGY A. QUINCE; BARBARA J. PARIENTE; ALAN LAWSON; AND LEON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE JOHN C. COOPER; AND THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION AND ATTORNEY’S GENERAL AGENTS TIMOTHY NEWHALL ET AL, ASHLEY DAVIS ET AL, SHELLY CRIDLIN ET AL; KRISTINA SAMUELS AND “OTHERS” AS NAMED IN THE EXHIBIT ATTACHED AND TO BE INCLUDED HEREIN OF ANY AND ALL STATE OF FLORIDA EMPLOYEES NAMED IN THIS FRAP 26.1 EXHIBIT #3, IN THIS ACTION FOR THEIR ABUSE OF PROCESS AND “NEGLECT OF DUTY” AND “BREACH OF TRUST” AND “BREACH OF OATH” AND “HATE CRIMES” AND “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION” AND 18 U.S.C. 242, DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW AND PER THEIR OWN ADMISSIONS PER OUR REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT AS STATED HEREIN AND PER PAPERS FILED WITH THE COURTS AND OFFICERS SINCE 1987. 2. PER OUR FLORIDA SUPREME COURT ACTION AS A QUO WARRANTO 18-1951, FOR HOBBS ACT 18 U.S.C. 1951, Interference with commerce by threats or violence causing Claimants PETITION FOR MANDAMUS 18-1915, AS 28 U.S.C 1915, causing R.O.C.P. 1.540 Actions as for Obstruction of Constitutional Civil Rights Defendants have engaged in fraud by presenting themselves as if they were “Honorable” fiduciaries providing services and products when in fact they have been collaborating and conspiring to “Unjustly Enrich” themselves and their Malicious Enterprise violating “18 U.S.C 242, Deprivation of rights under color of law” as racketeering by: A. OBSTRUCTING TOWNSEND ET AL OUT OF COMMERCE; B. OBSTRUCTING ASSEMBLY WITH CHILDREN EVEN HIS;

213

C. OBSTRUCTING TOWNSEND’S CHURCH/SCHOOL F.S. 617.0834, REPRESENTATIVE “PRIVATE ATTORNEY’S GENERAL” DUTIES AND RIGHTS PROTECTED BY THE BYLAWS CONTRACT; D. EMBEZZLEMENT OF OUR CITIZENS TAXES, BUSINESS MONIES, “DESIGNATED CHURCH AND SCHOOL FUNDS” AND CIVIL RIGHTS AND PROPERTY; E. OUR CITIZENS SOVEREIGN AND ORGANIC RIGHT TO VOTE AS A “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” FOR “HATE CRIMES”; AND AS THESE “PERSONS” VIOLATE TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND ET AL AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS PER THE “WELL-FOUNDED” AND THEIR ADMITTED ACTIONS STATED HEREIN AND THE COURTS FILES SINCE THE ACTION WAS FILED AS 88-2554, IN THE 18th CIRCUIT AND BEFORE AND STILL ILLEGALLY CONTINUES. 3. By being in Breach of Trust and Breach of Contract and Breach of their Bonds, each Named “person” herein and “Others Doe to be Named” to be added pending discovery, as Named co=participant “persons” have Obstructed and had or have no right to Obstruct Townsend and Townsend et al and the State Of Florida for pursuing our Accord and Satisfaction and restoration of Rights and Resources these violators have unlawfully taken. 4. Additionally, a Cease and Desist is demanded that each Named Defendant and “Others Doe to be Named” who are in “Neglect of Duty” and Breach of Trust and Breach of Contracts to have no authority to name or nominate any “person” who may also be in violation of Florida Constitution “Article II. Section 8 Ethics in government.—A public office is a public trust. The people shall have the right to secure and sustain that trust against abuse. To assure this right.” These “Persons” and “Others Doe” are in “Breach of Public Trust” by their “Neglect of Duty” as proved in this action since 1987, and before. 5. ONLY “WE THE PEOPLE” WITH THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR THIS ACTION BASED ON: A. Art. 5, Sec.15 Florida Constitution “The supreme court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the admission of persons admitted to the practice of law and the discipline of persons admitted.” As Our Judges of Our Florida Supreme Court should be innocent of crimes. B. F.S. 104.43 Grand juries; special investigation. –The grand jury in any circuit shall, upon the request of any candidate or qualified voter, make a special investigation when it convenes during a campaign preceding any election day to determine whether there is any violation of the provisions of this code, and shall return indictments when sufficient ground is found…” C. THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT ACCEPTED ORIGINAL

214

JURISDICTION IN THIS ACTION BY TOWNSEND, PRO SE, AS A GOVERNMENT REDRESS ACTION EXPOSING LANE AND LANE ET AL AND THESE “JUDGES” UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT DID “INTENTIONALLY AND RECKLESSLY” “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND “FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES” AND “NEGLECT OF DUTY” “BREACHING THE TRUST” OF CITIZENS VICTIMS OF THEIR FRAUDS AND CRIMINAL ACTS AS IN: 1. SC60-86-918, TOWNSEND V. LANE ET AL: 2. SC60-95-935, TOWNSEND V. BRUCE CHAPIN ET AL; 3. SC60-95-936, TOWNSEND V. DAVID H. POPPER ET AL; 4. SC07-1181, TOWNSEND V. K. HARROD TOWNSEND ET AL; 5. SC11-1042, TOWNSEND V. HEATHER GRAY-LANE ET AL; 6. SC16-1501, TOWNSEND V. JOHN GRANT-LANE ET AL; AND IN OTHER ACTIONS CONTINUED “BREACH OF TRUST” IN: 7. SC2011-41, ORDER OF CHARLES CANADY JR.; 8. SC2016-92- ORDER OF JORGE LABARGA; 9. SC09-1121- ORDER DISBARRING HEATHER GRAY; AND IN OTHER ACTIONS CONTINUES “BEACH OF TRUST”; AND OPENED ACTIONS 18-1890 AND 18-1915 and 18-1951 AND CONTINUE TO SHOW “NEGLECT OF DUTY” AND “BREACH OF TRUST” BASED ON THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURTS ACT OF: A. DIRECTING THE CASE TO ANOTHER LOWER COURT AS DELAY BECAUSE THE “Rankin” “Rump Faction” Agent Jurisdiction Of the Named Florida Supreme Court Judges reveals additional Fraud and Deceptive Practices of their prior Omission of Truthful Disclosure and Failure of Honest Services for Hobbs Act Violations and 18 U.S.C 242 Crimes; and B. These Defendants having been served in the FSCT Action SC16- 1501case used Fraud and Deceptive Practices to allow Crimes to Continue as they have known since the 1990’S and before; and C. These Defendants have failed to legally answer as Demanded in the Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus as filed Election Night of November 6, 2018; D. Nor Did Defendants answer the Notice of Appeal and Petition to the Florida Supreme Court of November 13, 2018; E. Nor did Defendants answer the Emergency Petition for Quo Warranto Filed November 20, 2018; And Now Defendants, Previous Defendants are in Default and Contempt of Court for violation of their own Orders and “Others Doe To Be Named” are

215 in Obstruction and Contempt of Court while continuing to violate Organic and Sovereign Rights of these Townsend et al Claimants. 6. Townsend and as Townsend et al filed The EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT was dated November 6, 2018, and e-filed at 9:44:58 PM as Document #80431208, the SAME NIGHT OF THE GENERAL ELECTION and thus to remove jurisdiction from the Secretary of State and the Governor and from the Elections Department and also out of the lower Courts and remove jurisdiction from specifically “judge” John C. Cooper, now as a proved a reckless “accomplice” per Rankin id and Salinas id and Ocasio id for attempting to Do Fraud and Deceptive Practices and “Failure of Honest Services” to conceal violations of Organic Rights by his co=participants and this Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed with the Florida Supreme Court as The Emergency Motion stated and as now to be in this record herein. 7. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED 11/13/18 AND PETITION(S) Stated Demands that Defendants and Others have ignored per our Law; 8. The Florida Supreme Court acknowledged the new case SC18- 1890 and receipt of the: Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus; and Emergency Motion for Re-Consideration with Memorandum of Law and Facts; and Complaint for Fraud and Voter Fraud and Human Trafficking and Conspiracy and Petition for Mandamus; needed because the Florida Supreme Court has “Neglected their Duty” in Townsend’s Actions since 1987, exposing the illegal Malicious Enterprise of Lane and Lane et al. 9. The Florida Supreme Court then opened Action 18-1915, and has unlawfully failed to respond. (Thus, All in Default and Admit Guilt.) 10. And with this Quo Warranto 18-1951, Action on the 18 U.S.C. 1951 Hobbs Act Proofs of their crimes this Florida Supreme Court because of “Rankin” “Rump Agent” “Alias” “judges” since the 1990’s and before, has failed to do “Honest Services” in the protection of Floridians Civil Rights per the Hobbs Act and other Laws based on our Constitutional Organic and Sovereign Rights due to their illegal concealing their allegiance to and with (Bush-Gates-Moody’s) Common Core agenda’s and even association with Turkey “Islam Radicals” and other “Radicals” for “Hate Crimes” as “judge” Marva Crenshaw and even Federal Judge James Moody Jr. and Florida Supreme Court Judge Charles Canady Jr. and Senator John Grant and David Gibbs III, who are admitted to be lawyers for their “Unjust Enrichment” and Political Gain to conceal themselves partnered with Jeb Bush, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush et al. just at the 1989 McKay ABA Commission Report says not to do Per Keller id. as the proper Rule of Law states for their Immunity

216

Protection as a Threat for a Political Donation is a violation of the Hobbs Act which also “Immunity Protection” could have been claimed had these “Judges” allowed Discovery of the Lane et al “kickback records” and turned this Action over to a “jury” as “Due Process” states to lawfully obey.” 11. The Florida Supreme Court has again Jurisdiction in 18-1890 as:…”

As this 18-1890 “Jurisdiction” of Crimes was granted to the 1st DCA, now En Banc, as the FSCT admitted “Guilt” as co=conspirators as by not

Answering these charges also thus per the law “Lawyered Up” and per

Miranda, “Took the Fifth” which it appears the Wolf’s “PCA” attempts same. But per the Law once a Defendant begins to answer per Miranda, and the Rules of Professional Process a Lawyer and a “judge” must not allow a continuing of a crime and must make the victim “whole” which in this action requires restoring the “Blank Line”; no “Vetting”; no “certification of the elections since the Blank Line was intentionally omitted”; return of all resources gained by Defendants and “Others” by their False Claims and as demanded and by our Juries process Punitive Damages and assessment of penalties as Jailor other as the Jury of “We the People” proclaim as our

Right .

“…A. The Florida Supreme Court has “Bypass” Authority especially in review of: “1). Emergency “Matters of Great Importance” in this Matter of a Statewide issue of Voters Rights protecting Citizens from Fraud and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosure and even admitted Intentional Failure of “Honest Services”; 2). the Authority and Supervision of “persons” per Respondent Superior of The Florida Supreme Court; and

217

3). Protecting the integrity of this Court based on “Redress of Government”; 4). the previous Orders of Florida Supreme Court Chief Judges: 1). Charles Canady Jr.’s Order, 2011-41; 2). Jorge Larbaga’s Order, 2016-92. B. Art. V. §2. Fla. Constitution for Validation of Bonds and §75.08, Fla. Statutes; C. Per Spradley v. State 293 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1974), as this decision is in conflict and “which directly, and in some way, exclusively affects the duties, powers, validity, formation, termination or regulation of a particular class of constitutional of state officers.” D. “Expressly and directly conflict with a decision ….of the Supreme Court on the same question of law.” E. Per Finkelstein v. Department of Transportation, 656 So. 2d. 921 (Fla. 1995) as the failure of the DCA’s or other lower Courts to formulate the question of laws and facts did not deprive this already informed since about 1987 and or before Florida Supreme Court to deprive an Honorable Florida Supreme Court of Justices to have jurisdiction of this matter of laws and facts. F. These multiple DCA Courts and Lower Courts Void and Fraudulent and Deceptive Practices and Omission of Truthful Disclosure and “Failure of Honest Services” are in Conflict with the written Orders of Chief Judges Canady Jr. and Jorge Labarga and Judge Marva Crenshaw and even of Federal Judge James Moody Jr. and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and as an En Banc Court, Twice.” D. To Determine the Constitutionality of A State Statute; E. To Determine a Matter of Great public importance and or are likely to recur and capable of evading review; and Per F.S. 104 we seek a Grand Jury. F. F.S. 80.01, Quo Warranto; refusal of Attorney General to institute. – Any person claiming title to an office which is exercised by another has the right; on refusal by the Attorney General to commence an action in the name of the state upon the claimant’s relation, or on the Attorney’s General refusal to file a petition setting forth his name as the person rightfully entitled to the office, to file an action in the name of the state against the person exercising the office, setting up his own claim. The court shall determine the right of the claimant to the office, if he so desires. No person shall be adjudged entitled to hold an office except upon full proof of his title to the office in any action of this character.” 12. The Florida Supreme Court obtained prior jurisdiction in this Action in SC60-86-918 and knew of the Malicious Enterprise in the early 1990’s

218 per the Florida Bar John Berry McKay Commission Report and the findings in Keller v. State, id. and must protect The Supreme Court’s and Lower Courts integrity and Plaintiff’s Claims of Civil Rights Protections of Organic Rights or as the Governor states; the Judges of the Courts are as Fowl as Governor Rick Scott said “Neglect of Duty” of Brenda Snipes. 13. As the Florida Supreme Court has jurisdiction in Action 18-1915 as Townsend states in his 12/19/19 MOTION STATING: “Omitting the Blank Line is a “Neglect of Duty” and “Breach of Trust” and “Breach of Duty”, and an abuse of process, and a “Wanton and Willful Disregard” and “Bad Faith” and just as Governor Rick Scott claims against Elections Supervisor Brenda Snipes, not counting every vote, Rick Scott thinks are his Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” do the same “Neglect of Duty” to obstruct Electors and Others who are not part of their Malicious Enterprise of their alleged “Elite” to “Pay to Play” or “Pay Not to Play”. And this is an admission of their Guilt of same to violate Civil Rights and their collusion for Obstruction of same to use with the Secretary of State and the Legislature their very crafty “Fraud and Deceptive Practices” in their use of language practices to take and kidnap for Human Trafficking an “Under Color of Law” and Organic Right they never are allowed to obtain and these denying Townsend and Townsend et al the Right of a “Write-in” Blank Line is exploiting and exposing as Rick Scott saying “All votes should be counted” yet argues “misfeasance, incompetence, and neglect of duty” against Brenda Snipes, as “Misconduct in Office” and Misfeasance as the pattern of them all. And as the Florida Republican Senate President, Bill Galvano, says the Senate will not block the Rick Scott findings and suspension of Brenda Snipes and being replaced by Pete Antonacci, a former general counsel to Rick Scott and thus the Malfeasance as these “Government Persons” “Under Color of Official Right” become knowledgeable and willful and intentional and reckless co=participants as Townsend’s Actions states and also guilty of Misprision of Felony and Aiders and Abettors of All Felony’s as they state against Brenda Snipes for Obstructing Voting and thus Criminal to seek to Dismiss any “party” or “Person” or any “Department or Agency” and or “Others Doe to be Named” until discovery has been done or at this time in this “Redress of ALL Government” Action or lack of Action per their Oath to “Duty of Office”. As these of the Attorney’s Generals Office and of the Department of State and Elections Department are to Protect and Serve U.S. and State of Florida Constitutional Rights of the Electors and also all the Citizen Non

219

Electors from crimes and seek Restitution per Our laws of Accord and Satisfaction to be made “Whole”. It is abuse of process and “Wanton and Willful Disregard” and “Bad Faith” to for any “person” of the Judicial Branch or Legislative Branch or Executive Branch to seek to Dismiss any party and or any Person and or any Action and Breach of Contract and Breach of Trust to “obstruct” Plaintiffs as a “Voter” or as a “jury” to decide this Action as Plaintiffs Action shows Defendants Named and Others to be Named show admitted and intentional Fraud and Deceptive Practices especially in a RICO Case and as in violation of Our Laws as per F.S.111.04 “Misfeasance” as defined by Governor Rick Scott (Scott) and Others which facts show Scott et al and Attorney’s General Pam Bondi et al. (¶4), John Grant et al, Ken Detzner et al; “judges” et al; and “Others” directed with others yet unknown and per F.S. 111.07; “Acting in Bad Faith, with malicious purpose, or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety and property…includes but is not limited to any civil rights lawsuit seeking relief personally against the officer, employee, or agent for an act or omission under color of state law, custom, or usage, whether it is alleged that such officer, employee, or agent has deprived another person of his rights secured under the Federal Constitution or laws.” and other violations of Law including those admitting “Hate Crimes” and Admitted in Default illegally excused for Obstruction and thus is the Cause of this “Redress Action.” 14. As Petitioners now act per F.S. 80, Quo Warranto for a JUDGMENT OF OUSTER as the “Persons” continue “Neglect of Duty” and Breach of Trust for intentional and reckless violations of 18 U.S.C. 242 Rights; and A. THE FLORIDA ATTORNEY’S GENERAL WITH THESE “PERSONS” RATHER THAN PROTECTING THE ORGANIC CIVIL RIGHTS AND “FREE WILL” OF FLORIDIANS AND ELECTORS IS ATTEMPTING AND DOING “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND A VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS AND NEGLECT OF DUTY BY ATTEMPTING TO DISMISS OUR FLORIDA STATUTES 80, QUO WARRANTO PETITION AGAINST THESE VICTIM CLAIMANTS “REDRESS OF GOVERNMENT” ACTION TO PROTECT OUR CIVIL RIGHTS AS WE ‘REDRESS GOVERNMENT PER F.S. 80.02; B. THE “JUDGES” OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT ARE EXPOSED AGAIN FOR “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND NEGLIGENT DUTY AND FRAUD ON PETITIONERS AS THEY SINCE THE 1990’S CASES HAVE CONCEALED THEIR FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AND OMISSION OF TRUTHFUL

220

DISCLOSURE ALLEGED “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT” TO NOT PROTECT PETITIONERS ORGANIC AND SOVEREIGN RIGHTS SO THESE “OFFICERS OF THE COURT” CAN RECEIVE “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” FROM THE TORTS AND “HATE CRIMES” ON PETITIONERS BY THE CORRUPT LANE ET AL. C. THE “GOVERNORS” OF FLORIDA ARE EXPOSED AGAIN FOR “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND NEGLIGENT DUTY AND FRAUD ON PETITIONERS AS THEY SINCE THE 1980’S CASES HAVE CONCEALED THEIR FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES AND OMISSION OF TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURE ALLEGED “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT” TO NOT PROTECT PETITIONERS ORGANIC AND SOVEREIGN RIGHTS SO THESE “OFFICERS OF THE COURT” CAN RECEIVE “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” FROM THE TORTS AND “HATE CRIMES” ON PETITIONERS BY THE CORRUPT LANE ET AL. D. FOR “FRAUD ON THE COURT” DEFENDANTS ATTEMPT A MOOTNESS CLAIM AND CONTINUE KNOWINGLY AND RECKLESSLY TO OBSTRUCT AND VIOLATE CIVIL RIGHTS AND AS AGAIN BY ADDITIONAL FRAUD AND FRAUD ON THE COURT USE DELAY AND FRAUD TO DISMISS “WELL FOUNDED CLAIMS OF THEIR “HATE CRIMES” AND OTHER CRIMINAL ACTS. 15. Per the Case laws in a Quo Warranto Action, Claimants state: A. “Public Defender Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, ET AL.. v. State of Florida FSCt SC10-1349; states, Mootness does not deprive the Court of jurisdiction when the questions raised are of great public importance or are likely to recur and capable of evading review. See Gregory v. Rice, 727 So.2d 251, 252, (Fla. 1999) and Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Jones, 789 So2d 964, 965 ) Fla. 2001; and In re Dubreuil, 629So2d 819, 822 (Fla. 1993) again “the issue is one of great public importance, is capable of repetition, and otherwise might evade review.” Dugger v. Grant, 610 So.2d 428, 433 n. 1 (Fla. 1992). B. Florida Constitution Article II. Section 3 deals with Legislative interference with the judiciary’s inherent authority to provide counsel and the Supreme Court’s exclusive control over the ethical rules governing lawyer conflicts of interest.” Public Defender Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, ET AL.. v. State of Florida FSCt SC10-1349. C. In Gould v. State, 974 So2d 441, (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), the defendant’s habeas corpus petition was made moot by his release from jail. The Second District Court of Appeal retained jurisdiction to hear the case because

221

Gould’s claims based on improper admission of evidence presented “a question capable of repetition yet evading review.” Id. at 444. See also T.T. v. Esteves, 828 So.2d 449, 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (addressing juvenile defendant’s appeal based on violation of statute even though appeal had become moot).” D. Justifying the Legal Briefs Townsend wrote and filed against Defendants Judges Rom Powell, Judge Strickland, Lawyers Bruce Chapin, David H. Popper, Charles E. Williams Jr., Patricia McCarthy in 1993 and before, as Townsend claimed “Fraud on the Court” by Defendants known at that time and then exposing more “Others Doe to be Named” since continuing these “Fraud and Deceptive Practices” and Citing this same underlying case Townsend v. Lane, in Robinson v. Weiland, 988 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). “A court possesses the authority to protect judicial integrity in the litigation process.” Citing Pino v. Bank of New York Mellon, 57So.3d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Thus discovery in 5/2011, of this Robinson v. Weiland, ET AL 5D05-2380, Judge Orfinger ruling 9/1/2006, and his reversal cases in 2011 shows and proves to these average citizens as Appellants each court since Orange County in 1989 or before (State and Federal) aided and abets this still ongoing criminal RICO and Anti-Trust and others acts still concealing discovery of Lanes original and ongoing criminal acts with defendants including judges under the direct supervision and direction of Orange County Commission Chair Persons Linda Chapin(Democrat)(In Default) and her successor Mel Martinez (Republican) and former business law partner with Ken Connor and David Gibbs III as legal counsel for Jeb Bush(In Default) and “Others” now Defendants.” And that the Florida Supreme Court “ailias” judges continually and repeatedly have used the 5DCA, 2DCA, and now attempt to use the 1st DCA and John C. Cooper for more frauds as they have allowed since the 1980’s in this case. 16. As Townsend on January 8, 2016, informed the Court and Defendants and argued their “Neglect of Duty” and Recklessness with “Hate Crimes” and Malicious Prosecution by their “Fraud on the Court” they intentionally then and still “Obstruct” Production of Records that should have been revealed since 1987, or would be revealed when Townsend obtained the office of Florida Attorney’s General per the Rule of Law per Anderson v. Beatrice Foods, Co. 127 F.R.D. 1 (D. Mass. 1989) as for new trial under Rule 60(b)(3) of the Fed. R.O.C.P. on the grounds that defendant concealed two relevant reports which should have been disclosed during pretrial discovery. The court of appeals had determined that the defendant’s failure to reveal the existence of these two reports constituted misconduct and had

222 interacted the district court: (1) to conduct more comprehensive hearings on the defendants state of knowledge and intent. 17. THE COMMON THREAD IS STOP PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY OF THEIR MALICIOIUS ENTERPRISE, BUSINESS RECORDS OF VICTIMS LOSSES AND “PAY TO PLAY” KICKBACKS, AND VICTIMS CIVIL RIGHTS. 18. This Fraud on the Court and Extrinsic Fraud Violates CROCKER v. PLEASANT 778 So2d 978, 988 (Fla. 2001), Rather, there must be a deliberate decision of the government official to deprive a person of life, liberty, or property…” as Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” Block discovery since 1987 of Lane et al and since 10/1994 to Townsend as F.S. 617.0834–for Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” to abduct Resources; kidnap children; then take the money and the school for Their Common Core Unjust Enrichment. MAJOR POINT— 19. Just the “Well Founded” fact that this is a 30 plus year case seeking the Beatrice Foods Records while children were abducted from Townsend protecting his family and business and his Church /School “Not for Profit” from embezzlement and by illegal search and seizure placing illegal “Sheriff” “Rump Faction” “agents” and Others and these “persons” Under color of Official Right” LET THEM CONTINUE TAKING TOWNSEND’S CHILDREN AND RESOURCES and illegal ByLaws removal for their Common Core Agenda the removal of the Christian School From the Church is WELL FOUNDED as “judge” Marva Crenshaw wrote “Hate Crimes” and said prove “Odious and Outrageous” as “Officers of the Court” have affirmed as Charles Canady Jr., Jorge Labarga, Charles Denny IV, and Federal Judge James Moody Jr. and countless others by their rulings showing their beliefs and standards they intentionally and recklessly fail to enforce in this Action showing their “Neglect of Duty” they know to do to protect their own self serving or co=participants “Unjust Enrichment” as Governor Rick Scott states about Brenda Snipes. 20. Additional proof is in the findings of the Mueller investigation regarding the charges against General Flynn, charged with working with Turkey sources. As this is also of the same pattern proved by the Senator John Grant, Pam Bondi et al and Jeb Bush et al Common Core agenda taking funding from investors that Turkey call “radical Islam” persons and as they unlawfully violated these Townsend Claimants and Our 1994 Bylaws this Secretary of State Department and Attorney’s Generals and Governors and Justices were to protect these Claimants. 21. This violation of Organic Sovereign Religious Rights by these

223 alleged to have “Under Color of Official Right” is just as the Colorado State actions against Jack Phillips a Cake Decorator Case, requiring a “person” to violate their “Sovereign Religious Rights” as the Claimants here had even a 1994 Bylaws Contract filed with the Secretary of State and others to provide and serve per our Organic Constitutional and God Given Rights that again by this FSCT CLERK JOHN A. TOMASINO; AND FSCT MEMBERS; CHARLES CANADY JR.; JORGE LABARGA; RICKY POLSTON; R. FRED LEWIS; PEGGY A. QUINCE; BARBARA J. PARIENTE; ALAN LAWSON; and Clerk Kristina Samuels and Attorney’s General and agents and “judge” John C. Cooper, these and with Governor Rick Scott and others show their intent and patterns of continuing “Hate Crimes”, “Malicious Prosecution” , Hobbs Act Crimes, “Neglect of Duty” and violations of Due Process further validating these well founded claims as made since 1987, and before. 22. While documents still hidden DOES NOT SHOW FULLY WHO IS GETTING OUR RESOURCES BUT THEIR QUID PRO QUO DOES! 23. Defendants concealing Lane by being in BREACH OF CONTRACT COULD NOT ACT TO BLOCK TOWNSEND TAKING ALL AS HE HAD NO CONTRACTS PRIOR TO TOWNSEND WHICH USING TOWNSEND WE NEGOIATED AND LANE COULD NOT HAVE HAD ANY COUNTERCLAIM PER THE 1987 JOINT VENTURE CONTRACT. 24. By GEOFF SMITH AS TRUSTEE/PRESIDENT OR TIM JEFFERS OF THE FBCCP/CPCS BEING IN BREACH OF CONTRACT SINCE 1994, THEY HAD AUTHORITY TO SIGN CONTRACTS. 25. Therefore per 18 U.S.C. 1346, “Deprivation by fraud of honest services” by these Defendants these Claimants “Petition is well-founded, a judgment of ouster may issue without further amendments to the extent that the petition is well-founded.” HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT ARE TO DECIDE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AND HAS JURISDICTION OF THOSE WHO HAVE USED “FRAUD AND DECEPTIVE PRACTICES” 26. And Per Anti-Trust Section 15 Chapter One, Defendants have alleged a Superior but unconstitutional requirement that only a member of the Bar may be an Attorney’s General so to conceal their Malicious Enterprise. 27. These of the Brown et al Elections Department and Legislature and Governors and Attorney’s Generals and “Officers of the Court” have intentionally for their Malicious Enterprise formed and adopted multiple Unconstitutional Laws to Obstruct Electors and Citizens and Townsend and Townsend et al. and this Florida Supreme Court with “Honest Service” “Judges” must protect the “Public Trust” and Organic Rights of Claimants

224 and Townsend Claimant Petitioners state the Brown et al Elections Laws as Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” used to allege Townsend did not qualify or that they did not need to provide a “Blank Line” areUnconstitutional and violate Organic Rights as Townsend will provide to the Honorable Florida Supreme Court Judges upon completing our lawful Discovery process still being obstructed since 1987. 28. Multiple violations of F.S. 104 are done and are being done as shown below and the Florida Supreme Court continues to “Neglect of Duty” to aid and abet 18 U.S.C. 242 of these criminal acts as just in F.S.104 as follows: “A. F.S.104.045 Vote Selling (1)… & (2)… as 3rd Degree Felonies; B. F.S. 104.051 Violations; neglect of duty; corrupt practices. (1) Any official who willfully violates any of the provisions of this election code shall be excluded from the polls. (Any Poll workers who presented a ballot with no blank line.) (2) Any official who willfully refuses or willfully neglects to perform his or her duties as prescribed by this election code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree,…” (3) Any official who performs his or her duty as prescribed by this election code fraudulently or corruptly is guilty of a felony of the third degree,…” (4) Any supervisor, deputy supervisor, or election employee who attempts to influence or interfere with any elector voting a ballot commits a felony of the third degree,…” C. F.S. 104.0515 Voting rights; deprivation of, or interference with, prohibited; penalty… (1) All citizens of this state who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the prople in this state… shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections withoug distinction according to race, color, or previous condidion of servitude, notwithstanding any law, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage to the contrary. (2) No person acting under color of law shall; (a) In determining whether any individual is qualified under law to vote in any election , apply any standards, practices, or procedures applied under law to other individuals within the same political subdivisions who have been found to be qualified to vote; or (b) Deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application; registeration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under law fo vote in such election. This paragraph shall apply to absentee ballots only if

225 there is a pattern or history of discrimination on the bases of race, color, or previous condition of servitude in regard to absentee ballots. (3) No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten , or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or not to vote as that person may choose, or for the purpose of causing such other person to vote for, or not vote for, any candidate for any office at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate. (4) No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, and no standard, practice, or procedure, shall be imposed or applied by any political subdivision of this state to deny or abridge the right of any citizen to vote on account of race or color. (5) Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a felony of the third degree…” D. F.S. 104.061 Corruptly influencing voting.—(1) Who ever by bribery, menace, threat, or other corruption whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, attempts to influence, deceive, or deter any elector in voting or interferes with him or her in the free exercise of the elector’s right to vote at any election commits a felony….(2) No person shall directly or indirectly give or promise anything of value to another intending thereby to buy that person’s or another’s vote or to corruptly influence that person or another in casting his or her vote…” E. F.S.0615 Voter intimidation or suppression prohibited; criminal penalities.—(1) This section may be cited as the “Voter Protection Act.” (2) A person may not directly or indirectly use or threaten to use force, violence, or intimidation or any tactic of coercion or intimidation to induce or compel an individual to: (a) Vote or refrain from voting; (b) Vote or refrain from voting for any particular individual or ballot measure; (c) Refrain from registering to vote; or (d) Refrain fro asting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher. (3) A person may not knowingly use false information to: (a) challenge an iindividual’s right to vote; (b) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from voting or grgistering to vote; or (c) induce or attempt to induce an individual to refrain from acting as a legally authorized election official or poll watcher; (4) A person may not knowingly destroy, mutilate or debace a voter registration form or election ballot or obstruct or delay of a voter registration form or election ballot…. F. F.S.0616 Absentee ballots, and voting: violations. … G. F.S.104.071 Remuneration by candidate for services, support, etc.; penalty.---(Insert here in full}…

226

H. F.S.104.081 Threats of employers to control votes of employees. It is unlawful for any person having one or more persons in his or her service as employees to discharge or threaten to discharge any employee on his or her service for voting or not voting in any election, state, county, or municipal, for any candidate or measure submitted to a vote of the people, … I. F.S.104.091Aiding, abetting, advising, or conspiring in violation of the code.---(1) Any person who knowingly aids, abets, or advises the violation of this code shall be punished in like manner as the principal offender. (2) Any person who agrees, conspires, combines, or confederates with another person to commit a violation of this code shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation. (Any person who knows a felony violation of this code and gives any aid to the offender who has violated this code, with intent that the offender avoid or escape detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, shall be punished as if he or she had committed the violation. This subsection does not prohibit a member of the Florida Bar from giving legal advice to a client….” J. F.S. 104.11 Neglect of duty by Sheriff or other officer .—Any sheriff, deputy sheriff, or other officer who willfully neglects or willfully refuses to perform his or her duties relating to elections is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.” The HCSO McDarby threats were criimes! K. F.S. 104.19 (1)(a)…(b) In casting a write-in ballot, the elector shall case the same in his or her own handwriting or in the handwriting of an authorized person aiding him or her. L. F.S. 104.30 (2) Any person who tampers or attempts to tamper with or destroy any voting system…guilty of felony in 3rd degree” M. F.S. 104.31 Political activities of state, county, and municipal officers and employees.—{To be inserted here in full.} N. F.S. 104.39 Witnesses to violations, --Any person who violates any provision of this code shall be a competent witness against any other person so violating and may be compelled to attend and testify as any other person. The testimony given shall not be used in any prosecution or criminal prodceeding against the person to testifying, except in a prosecution for perjury. O. F.S. 104.41 Violations not otherwise provided for; Any violation of this code not otherwise provided for is a misdemeanor of the first degree… P. F.S. 104.42 Fraudulent registration and illegal voting; investigation (1) The supervisor of elections is authorized to investigate fraudulent registrations and illegal voting and to report his or her findings to the LOCAL STATE ATTOTNEY and the Florida Elections Commission. (2) The Board of County Commissioners in any county may appropriate funds

227 to the supervisor of elections for the purpose of investigating fraudulent registrations and illegal voting. Q. F.S. 104.43 Grand juries; special investigation. –The grand jury in any circuit shall, upon the request of any candidate or qualified voter, make a special investigation when it convenes during a campaign preceding any election day to determine whether there is any violation of the provisions of this code, and shall return indictments when sufficient ground is found…” 29. The Florida Supreme Court must clarify and decide the Rule Of Law in the use of F.S. 119.071 as to the forms and timing required of a Write-in Candidate who is seeking protection of Government Persons Obstructing their Government Alleged Under Color of Law to per 18 U.S.C. 242, Deprive a Write in Candidate as per Count I in this Action and also per Count II. Deprive an Elector from their Free Will Choice to Write in their Candidate on the Blank Line to be Provided and or if the Obstruction is Done then these are multiple criminal violation of Law per F.S. 104. MAJOR POINT 30. However in reality Townsend states that the F.S. 104.43 Candidate Grand Jury practice opens up the door for the “We the People” to determine Our laws and or violations of Our Civil Rights per Our Sovereign Laws and Rights as “All political power is inherent in the people.” 31. The Florida Supreme Court must also decide F.S. 112.3145, as to the claim the Elections Department and or Elections Board and or the Secretary of State and or Others have a Florida Constitutional Right to Obstruct a U.S. Constitutional Right that the Electors had a Free Will Choice to Write in their Candidate on the Second Tuesday after the First Monday in November or if each Elector must by the Friday in June, stand at the counter of the Elections Department and state their Intent with their candidate at that time and fill out forms that may never satisfy the Elections Department ET AL. 32. Per U.S. v Throckmorton 96 U.S.61 “Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.” “Where the attorney sells out their client or falsely alleged to represent the client…” as claimants proved and as these facts of 30 years shows the Florida Supreme Court “alias” “judges” and the Florida Attorney’s Generals, Governors, Legislators, Officers of the Court and Sheriffs and Others are equal co=participants in the crimes and selling out claimants as Townsend has stated and by well founded practices even alleged “Honorable” co=participants have admitted their criminal roles and these crimes and others yet to be exposed which violate claimants as herein as Townsend and “We the People” and the State of Florida. 33. And as even these “judges” of this Florida Supreme Court and

228

Florida Bar found and ruled in Florida Bar v. Gray SC09-1121 and concealed her ordered to stop the practice of law since July 2009, due to her as Townsend first reported Fraud on the Court and Claimants her clients, these Defendants still conceal and aid and abet her “Fraud on the Court” as these her co=participants “Under color of Law” and “Under color of Official Right” as “judges” conceal their “Fraud on the Court” which they still misuse for their Malicious Enterprise OUR Florida Supreme Court. Emphasis Added. 34. Per the standards stated in Board of County Commissioners v. Scruggs 545 So2d 910 1989, these Defendants knowingly and Recklessly with Charles Scruggs intentionally Odiously and Outrageously Obstructed the clients as Townsend and Townsend et al now Claimants here. 35. Per the Florida Bar John Berry report found in the McKay American Bar Association report of Feb 1992, the Report upheld as Keller v. State Bar of California, 496 US 1 (1990), adopting Lathrop v. Donohue, 367 US 820 (1961) state bars must not venture into political and ideological waters but stick to narrow, legitimate function of integrated state bars.” Yet here in this action, even these “persons” who Jeb Bush hires as his private or State Lawyers conceal their Hobbs Act 18 U.S.C. 1951 illegal acts as “We the People” claim in Our United SC18-1951, Petition Quo Warranto, judgment of ouster. 36. Therefore per ROTELLA v. WOODS id and per Bundy v. Rudd 366 So2d 440 “Once a basis for disqualification has been established prohibition is both and appropriate and necessary remedy. Brown v. Rose 96 Fla. 289, 118 So9 (1928). 37. Lamb v. Leiter 6003 So2d 632 “Conduct that presents from trying an issue” and without the Obstructed Discovery, Townsend Claimants are not able to yet present our Full Case to an Honorable Court or Jury for our restitution and from whom. 38. Per ARKY, FREED v. BOWMAR instrument 527 So2d 211 quoting Florida Air Conditioners v. Colonial Supply Co. 390 So2d 174-176 (Fla 5th DCA 1980) “The Flaw…entirely ignores the well-established position that parties who have “changed their position relying on the erroneous ruling of the trial court should be returned to their position before such ruling” Also did not bar Statute of Limitations.” 39. To the issue of JURISDICTION and “Public Trust” Over these violators and even the FSCT Judges who did not take their proper or NO OATH--Under Color Of Law these acted in Fraud on the Court and Fraud and other crimes that a proper Attorney’s General should have prosecuted

229 and therefore goes to Motive of the violators is a jury question for the “We the People”! 40. Per Art. 5, Sec.15 Florida Constitution “The supreme court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the admission of persons admitted to the practice of law and the discipline of persons admitted.” But in this case the “Public Trust” of the “judges” is breached and the integrity of the Courts must be secured by “We the People” not others as violators of said Trust. 41. Since THE FSCt. “JUDGES” did not take their oaths of office until 10/2007, their Orders were not as FSCT Judges authorized and nor are they “immune” because of no FSCT Oath. {THEIR ACTS WERE JUST AS REGULAR “Persons” PER THEIR OATH TO THE BAR THEY THEN VIOLATED} as per Bob Butterworth Attorney’s General Report 109. 42. Therefore they had no jurisdiction or authority AS FSCT or even later since 10/2007, if later they took their Oath they were required to Recuse themselves as they Fraudulently alleged to have “protected” “jurisdiction” during the Actions Townsend brought before the Florida Supreme Court. 43. PER Florida Statutes Chapter 80.01 Quo Warranto; refusal of Attorney General to institute.--…The court shall determine the right of the claimant to the office, if he so desires. No person shall be adjudged entitled to hold an office except upon full proof of his title to the office in any action of this character…” 80.02.—“…or when petition is filed upon the relation of a party claiming title, the Attorney General shall not dismiss the action without consent of the claimant, but the court shall investigate the claim and determine the right, if so desired by the person on whose relation the petition is filed, and the claimant may have counsel of his choice to control the action in his behalf.” 80.31.—“The rules about pleading and procedure in mandamus apply to actions for quo warranto as near as may be.” JUDGMENT OF OUSTER” PER F.S. 80.032.—“When any petition is well-founded, a judgment of ouster may issue without further amendments to the extent that the petition is well-founded.” F.S. 80.04 Quo warranto; effect of judgment. –When an individual institutes an action without the consent of the Attorney General, the judgment is conclusive as between the parties other than the state. The judgment is not a bar to any quo warranto by the state nor shall a judgment instituted by the Attorney General be a bar to actions by any claimant other than the parties thereto. The party receiving judgment shall be entitles to exercise the office until removed by quo warranto or until his or her rights thereto shall otherwise cease.” So thus by the Fraud and Deceptive Practices and these Defendants

230 intentional and reckless Obstruction and intentional use of “Failure of Honest Services” to create and use an Unconstitutional “alleged” Law and “Under color of official right” but illegal process, their Trafficked Candidate(s): 1. Ashley Moody, is not entitled to act as Attorney’s General of Florida; 2. Rick Scott, due to violations of our laws has also breached our Trust; 3. The Eleven Nominated “persons” for the Florida Supreme Court are not Nominated by “Persons” who have Our “Public Trust” or thus authority to Nominate these judicial candidates and thus the Governor; nor Florida Supreme Court “judges” nor the Governor Elect have “sustained that trust against abuse…; Which shows the Breach of Public Trust “We the People” “have the right to secure and sustain that trust against abuse.” 44. Per the Rule of Law in a Quo Warranto Action: “In Card v. State, 497 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1986) , a visiting judge presided over the defendant’s trial without obtaining an official assignment from the chief judge of the supreme court, as required by article V, section 2(b) of the Florida Constitution. As a result, the defendant argued that his conviction was void and sought to vacate the judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, id. at 1173. In rejecting this argument, the supreme court noted that the visiting judge was acting as a defacto judge and that the defendant waived this argument because he failed to object to the visiting judge presiding over his case. … Snead v. State 415 So2d 887, 890 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). In the case at bar, Johnson attempts to have his robbery convictions set aside thirty-four years after he was found guilty. However, his allegation that both the state attorney and trial judge did not properly file an Oath of Office were matters that could and should have been brought in a direct quo warranto proceeding. A quo warranto petition does not properly form the basis of a direct appeal. Carey, 349 So2d at 822.” But in this Action, per F.S. 80.032 Judgment of Ouster.—When any petition is well-founded, a judgment of Ouster may issue without further amendments to the extent that the petition is well-founded…” as Townsend stated in his 19 page Undue Burden Affidavit, filed in this Action and as was filed to the Elections Department as Townsend has attempted to receive his monies owed and protect his Civil Rights since 1987, and since even October 1999, obtain “safety and assembly” even in his Church/School, Our Religious Rights with Townsend and his kidnapped children, and it is proved by Defendants and “Others” direct admissions and the Quid Pro Quo benefits, it is at the directives since the early 1990’s of the Florida Supreme Court “imposter Rankin judges”, Governors, Attorney’s

231

Generals, Cabinet Members and other Defendants as even Townsend et al’s own lawyers, in their Malicious Enterprise for their “Neglect of Duty” for their “Unjust Enrichment” to by “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” and other Crimes to do “Fraud on the Court” and Extrinsic Fraud as Townsend argued to Rom Powell since January 1993 exposing his intentional collusion with “Rankin” “Rump Faction” “Imposter Masked Agents” and “judges” and Grant et al as “Legislators” and “Others” for Fraud on the Court to conceal the extortion “pay to play” with their alleged “Nobility” by Lane and Lane et al. And as per the Townsend arguments on January 8, 2016, as Defendants were served their agents in further continued Fraud on the Court admitted their Fraud on the Court by advancing their illegal defenses and admitting never having read the 1994, FBCCP?CPCS Bylaws and or the 1987, Joint Venture Agreement Contracts of Townsend’s Future Marketing and the Lane Sabal Marketing business Ownership illegally withheld from Townsend to know his rights and or to expose the Lane et al financial proofs of their illegal extortion and kickbacks as the Beatrice Foods Case shows and proves each “judge” since Muszynski, in 1988 has knowingly and recklessly concealed the Lane et al “pay to play” embezzlement and as Florida Senator John Grant et al since 10/1994 Obstructed Townsend and Townsend et al from our Organic Sovereign Rights and unlawfully embezzling Our Tax Payers Moneys in their Malicious Enterprise as the Florida Chief Financial Officer(s) aid and abet their “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious Prosecution” and Malicious Enterprise for “Unjust Enrichment” as Jim Smith Attorney’s General from January 2, 1979-January 3, 1987 and Bob Butterworth Attorney’s General from January 3, 1987- Nov 4, 2002 and Bill McCollum from January 2, 2007- January 4, 2011; and Governors since Ruben Askew; who have done intentional and reckless “Neglect of Duty” for Unjust Entitlement and Unjust Enrichment by Human Trafficking we seek full restitution. E. AND FOR CONTINUING THEIR MALICIOUS ENTERPRISE BY ADDITIONAL “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION” AND “HATE CRIMES” AND OBSTRUCTION DO EXTRINSIC FRAUD AND SEEK “RANKIN” “judge” JOHN C. COOPER ALREADY PROVED FRAUD, PREJUDICE AND RECKLESS NEGLECT OF DUTY AS INTENTIONALLY RECKLESS BROWN ET AL, NEWHALL, DAVIS AGENTS OF DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS THIS ACTION IN THE PATTERN BY THE MALICIOUS ENTERPRISE OCASIO id AND SALINAS id. ACTORS IN THE SAME PATTERN OF ACTS DONE SINCE 1987, AS PER ROTELLA V. WOODS id. further proving these “persons” intend to violate all Civil Rights of Petitioners for whom

232

Townsend acts. F. And even after the filing of the Quo Warranto in case 18-1951, for continued Hobbs Act 18 U.S.C. 1951 violations rather than their Attorney’s General Duty and “Judges” Duties in Honorable Services per their Oaths to Our Contracts as Our Constitutions and Citizens these “person” “Neglect Duty”, “Fail Honest Services”, “Do Fraud and Deceptive Practices” and violate “the claimant may have counsel of his choice to control the action in his behalf” as these “persons” continue unlawful retaliation’s proving the well-founded Petition allegations . G. The Secretaries of State, Insurance Commissioners, Chief Financial Officers, Secretary of Agriculture’s, Attorneys Generals, and Officers of the Court and Others as Members of the Florida Cabinet and the Florida Legislators since the 1980’s have knowingly and intentionally and recklessly violated the Voting Rights of the Electors and Citizens of Florida by allowing 18 U.S.C. 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and other Deprivations as Townsend has proved since about 1987 and these Defendants have illegally taken and obstructed Rights, Money, Property, Children and “We the People” demand their arrests and full prosecution and our full Restitution. 45. The Florida Supreme Court should again take notice of this action as was previously filed and served as shown in this Action;

“IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT (TAMPA) FLORIDA CASE NO.: 8:16-CV-3299-EAK-MAP “WITH CLAIMS OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY” PETITION FOR MANDAMUS RANDALL C. TOWNSEND,)Now Judge: JAMES D. WHITTEMORE Individually, and as natural )FROM:13th CIR. 2015-1928; 2D16-612; Parent and lawfully as) 5D16-2184; FSCT 2016-1501 Guardian, and next friend of J.D.T.)RICO AND TORT VIOLATIONS: and J.G.T., and as F.S.§617.0834) CHILD CUSTODY; CIVIL RIGHTS; “Representative” of THE FIRST)CONTRACT RIGHTS; Including BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS) SOVEREIGN RELIGIOUS RIGHTS PARK (FBCCP) AND MINISTRY) HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND CITRUS PARK CHRISTIAN) DEFAMATION AND INJURY SCHOOL (CPCS) A FLORIDA )FRAUD AND OMMISSIONS ACTS “NOT FOR PROFIT” CORP.)DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL AND PLAINTIFF(S) ) BENCH WARRANTS SOUGHT V. ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT

233

JOHN GRANT, INDIVIDUAL) JOHN GRANT, Et AL, and AS) TOWNSEND NOTICE OF APPEAL “PERSONS” Listed below AND/OR)PETITION FOR MANDAMUS “OTHERS DOE TO BE NAMED” ) For RECUSAL OF FSCT AND U.S. CHARLES E. LANE Jr. et al ) Middle DISTRICT (TAMPA) “JEB” BUSH ) FOR VOID ORDERS PAM BONDI, ) Related Previous Continued Actions/Cases: JAMES BALLARD, ) Townsend ET AL v. Heather Gray et al BRIAN D. BALLARD, ) 8:12-CV-1198-EAK-EAJ BOB MARTINEZ, GOVERNOR)Townsend Et al v.Ronald Beck Et AL MEL MARTINEZ, ) 8:06-CV2050T-30-TGW GEORGE W. BUSH #43 ) From The Eleventh Circuit: GEORGE H.W. BUSH #41)Townsend et al v. Heather Gray, Beck et al FLORIDA A.G’S. Jim Smith-current) 12-13892AA KOCH INDUSTRIES, ) Townsend et al v. Ron Beck et al EDWARD CRENSHAW, Publix ) 08-10721 NOVA SALES INC. ) Removed From Florida State Courts: JORGE LABARGA, Judge ) FSCT 16-1501 Townsend v. Grant et al EMMETT BATTLES, Judge ) FSCT 11-1042 Townsend v. Gray CHRISTOPHER NASH, Judge)FSCT 07-1181Townsend v. Townsend DAVID GEE, Sheriff ) FSCT Townsend v. Scruggs BOB GUALTIERI, Sheriff) FSCT 97-8519, 9th Cir. T. v. Chapin et al GRADY JUDD, Sheriff )FSCT 97-8520, 9th Cir. T. v. Popper et al ROBERT O’NEIL, Individual, )FSCT86-918 Townsend v. Lane et al ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH,)2DCA10-774Townsend et al v. Gray et al STEPHEN D. MERRYDAY, )13th Cir. 06-6005 Townsend v. Gray et al HEATHER M. GRAY, et al) 13th Cir. 02-03812 Townsend v. Beck et al Attorney for Plaintiffs now Disbarred)13th Circuit 01-15813, 01-15814, 02-4974, RON BECK, TIM JEFFERS, KAREN HARROD,) STEVEN HARROD, DAVE FERGUSON, FSCT, ) U.S.M.D. (TAMPA) ET AL RESPONDENTS / COMES NOW RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, LAWFULLY FOR HIMSELF AND AS F.S.617.0834, REPRESENTATIVE, AND FILES THIS PETITION FOR MANDAMUS AND APPEAL, JOINTLY SPEAKING STILL FOR ALL PETITIONERS AS LAWFULLY ELECTED WHISTLE BLOWER PER THE CONTRACT(S) AS BY- LAWS OF THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CITRUS PARK (FBCCP)

234

YEARLY SINCE 1993, AND LAWFULLY RECOGNIZED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA WHICH BY LAWS AND THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION AT ARTICLE I. SECTION THREE, AND OTHER STATE LAWS AFFIRMS TOWNSEND IS STILL AS LAWFULLY ELECTED WITHOUT FRAUD(S) AS THE F.S. 617.0834 SUPERIOR AUTHORITY AND IT IS UNLAWFUL TORT(S) FOR “IMPOSTER” NON-MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH/SCHOOL OR COURTS “UNDER COLOR OF OFFICE” AND OR “UNDER COLOR OF RIGHT” TO INTERFERE, “IMPEDE” AND OR DO FRAUD TO OUR SAID CONTRACTS AND CONSTITUTION(S) AND STATES: 1. This Action began in November 1987, and from the first meeting with attorney Patricia McCarthy on 11/18/1987, Fraud and Deceptive Practices began on her clients by Omission of Truthful Disclosure to conceal her and the “Others” Unconstitutional RICO and HOBBS ACT violations of Controlling Commerce to establish their Unjust Enrichment and Anti Trusts and Monopolies against Clients Rights and Citizens “Free Will”. These “Officers of the Court” then as “impostors” intentionally and knowingly began “Fraud on the Court” by treasonous acts to Our Constitution and Citizens.

2. This case now returns back this 3rd time to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals: 1st Following the 11th Circuits Courts Order Townsend now proved “Ineffective Counsel” Of Attorneys was intentional and is acts of Treason by their “Fraud on the Court”. 2nd Then the second Order is proved showing Judges intentionally acted in collusion to violate their Oaths and Citizens and acted without Jurisdiction per RANKIN. 3rd Per these cases facts are established and as presented in filings with the lower courts: A. KENNER v. C.I.R. 387 F. 2d 689 (7th Cir. 1968) and 7 Moore’s Federal Practice http://freedom-school.com/law/fraud-on-the-court-by-an- officer-of-the-court.html which states: “Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.” ELLIOT v. PIERSOL 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S.328, 340 (1828) Elliot v. Pierson. Second, a judge is

235 not immune for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction. [29 MIRELES V. WACO 502 US 9. 116 L. Ed 2d 9, 14, 112 S Ct 286 (US1991)…”; B. Rankin v. Howard, 633 F. 2d 844 (1980).” “When a judicial officer acts entirely without jurisdiction or without compliance with jurisdiction requisites he may be held civilly liable for abuse of process even though his act involved a decision made in good faith, that he had jurisdiction, {U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (State use of ), 217 Miss. 576, 64 So2d 697].” “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impurity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it.”…”It is the only supreme poser in our system of government, and every man who, by accepting office participates in his functions, is on the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on the exercise of the authority which it gives.” [U.S. v. Lee 106 U.S.196, 220 1 S. Ct. 240, 261, 27 L.Ed 171 (1882). “When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost. [Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326]”. C. RANKIN V. HOWARD 633 F.2d 844 Cent. Den (1980) “Judge Howard had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of Jurisdiction.” Failure to follow F.S. 38, on illegal issues of Prejudice raise issue of lack of Jurisdiction. Scruggs disqualified Timmerman and Townsend served many actors per: SALINAS v. UNITED STATES 96-738 U.S. Supreme Court from 522 U.S. 52, 65, per 18 U.S.C. Section 666: “A conspirator need not agree to commit the substantive offense—or even be capable of committing it –in order to be convicted. It is sufficient that the conspirator agreed to the underlying crime be committed by a member of the conspiracy capable of committing it.” Thus Judge Muszynski bordered on Malfeasance by delay requiring production of the Lane et al records of bribes from day one but no question of Criminal Intent for Malfeasance can be withheld from Lane et al with Publix et al, with McCarthy, Popper, Chapin in collusion with Rom Powell, Linda Chapin, Lawton Chiles and his agents including the FSCT and AG’s and Jeb Bush, Charlie Crist, Rick Scott and his Agents and John Grant with Pam Bondi and their Agents still being exposed. Thus the Issues of this Case rests now with Chief Judge Jorge Labarga to be a Constitutional Judge or another “Impostor”.

236

D. SANTOSKY v. KRAMER 455 U.S.745 shows Burden of Proof for removal of Parental Rights. In this case since 9/8/1999, Townsend’s and his children’s Rights were totally severed without Due Process even explained in details per the 1994 BYLAWS, for defamation and extortion to conceal these Appellee’s and “Others Doe to be Named” Malicious Enterprises and “Hate Crimes” of Treason. E. SAPIENZA v. KIRKLAND 154.So2d 204, “Pleading should not be stricken in its entirety as sham, if, under facts established, there is an issue upon which pleading could be good in part.” F. SCHEUER v. RHODES 416 U.S. 232 94 SCT 1683 (1974) State cannot grant immunity or vindicate or excuse a deputy or law enforcer or any Government Person who violates Federal Law. Clearly a “judge” or “attorney general” is an “imposter” of the law who directs a “law enforcer” to do more “Hate Crimes” to obstruct the Civil Rights of a victim/Citizen. Email of 5/7/2014, as Plaintiff’s Exhibit #20, By HCSO Deputy McDarby then is proof of their crimes and Emmett Battles and the 5th DCA nor the FSCT nor Bondi et al can give themselves immunity for “Hate Crimes” and conspiracy to commit the crimes as the Bondi Attorney’s General Email states below herein and still ongoing as all since 11/18/1987, and before are stealing Townsend’s property, money, and Rights by Contracts for which Appellee’s are in Breach and for extortion even since 1999, abducted his two children. G. SEDIMA v. IMRES CO. INC 741 F2d 482 Premature to dismiss R.I.C.O. case before evidence can be presented based on anticipated further discovery and investigation. H. U.S. v. SILVERMAN 745 F.2d 1386, “Knowledge and intent are necessary to sustain conviction under statue relating to corruptly endeavoring to influence, obstruct, or impede due administration of justice; however, government is not required to prove that defendant harbored specific purpose of obstructing due administration of justice, but rather, must establish that defendant should have reasonable foreseen that the natural and probable consequences of success of his scheme would achieve precisely that result. 18 U.S.C.A. at 1503. This case was one of 48 argued to the 5th DCA since January 21, 1999. I. ZOCARAS v. CASTRO 465 3rd 479 (2006) 1/8/2016 Transcript page 28, “Ineffective Counsel” as ruled by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in this Action should not cause a case be dismissed and the client lose his rights to a fail trial because the “ineffective counsel” was proved in conspiracy “Under Color of Official Right” with “imposter” Rankin id. “Officers of the Court” as the FSCT and A.G’s and “Others” even as Governors and

237

Presidents for their Malicious Enterprise of RICO, Frauds and Deceptive Practices through Monopolies as shown herein acting for Unjust Enrichment for themselves and intentionally as HCSO Detective McDarby wrote in his email 5/7/2014, “We don’t follow Federal Law” as this shows the entire Florida Judicial System is a Mockery because A.G. Pam Bondi says We (Florida) follow the Rule of Law but only when it serves them in opposition to U.S. v. Lee id. to steal Townsend’s resources, and relationships and property which put Lane and “others” in business and has made them billions, which is Townsends . J. ZELLER v. RANKIN 101 S.Ct. 2020 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326 K. CITATIONS AND STATUTES A.D.A. 42 U.S.C. 12203 While this applies to A.D.A. the intent of the law applies here to protect Petitioners who are disadvantaged as non lawyers or Government Persons allowed all the benefits of their “insider” knowledge. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 Relating to Bussing and Segregation and Other acts for equal protection. FLORIDA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1992 Florida Statue 760.71 ADOPTION AND SAFE FAMILIES ACT OF 1997- PUBLIC LAW 105- 89, approved 416-5. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1997 for Gain of Title IV and Title V Federal Grant Money for the States, CPS and AGENTS who ignore Due Process. HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN FLORIDA F.S. 787.06(2)(d) “defines human trafficking as “transporting, soliciting, recruiting, harboring, providing, enticing, maintaining, or obtain another person for the purposes of exploitation of that person.” “The statute also outlines Florida’s goals of assisting victims and prosecuting offenders. *Using Coercion for labor or services is a 1st Degree Felony 787.06(3)(a), F.S….*Anyone who knowingly or in reckless disregard of the facts engages in or benefits financially by receiving anything of value from trafficking can be prosecuted 787.06(3), F.S.*All human trafficking offenses can be prosecuted as RICO offenses in Florida as Organized crime….Who are the victims? …*Children and adults induced to perform labor or services through force, fraud, or coercion.” F.S. 943.0583 “On the other hand, if a child is alleged to have been a victim of human trafficking, the prosecutor done not need to prove that the child was coerced into performing labor, services, or commercial sexual activity. As a result, simply exploiting a child for the purpose of labor, services, or commercial sexual activity would support Human Trafficking conviction.” Per Richard

238

E. Hornsby, P.A. website. The definitions of “Labor” and or “services” under the law is not defined nor specific to be required for sexual activity. Force or coercing a child to abandon their safe parent, safe home, and or contact with the other parent in their assembly at church or school or social activities and city and or any and all communication with a parent for purposes of bribery, extortion, unjust enrichment, conspiracy and other crimes defined as “Hate Crimes” shows Unlawful Purposes in the Tort Interference with Child Custody specifically when Due Process is intentionally violated even after the warnings of Judge Palomino on 11/15/2001 and the Order of Visitation of Judge Timmerman and by force to prevent the Child from being called as a witness to their suppression of their Civil Rights and or to validate criminal charges made by “Imposter” “Officers of the Court” and “Alias” Law Enforcers and or a parent in collusion for Unjust Enrichment and collusion to prevent her criminal prosecution.” HOBBS ACT of 1946—a.k.a. Anti-Racketeering Act, Prohibits actual or attempted robbery or extortion affecting interstate or foreign commerce “in any way or degree”. “The term Robbery as used in this section means the unlawful taking or obtaining of personal property from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of actual or threatened force, or violence, or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his person or property, or property in his custody or possession, or the person or property of a relative or member of his family or of anyone in his company at the time of the taking or obtaining. (2) The term extortion means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.” “18 U.S.C. Section 1951 In essence, the Hobbs Act elevates all but the simplest acts of robbery and extortion to the level of federal crimes.” 18 U.S.C. Section 1951 Interference with Commerce also proscribes conspiracy to commit robbery or extortion without reference to the conspiracy statute at 18 U.S.C. Section 371. Fear of economic loss will be sufficient for a Hobbs Act Violation Claim. Practices to gain Political Contributions is sufficient for a HOBBS ACT Claim. {Townsend Established to each Officer of the Court and Law Enforcer yet each Appellee and “Others Doe” conspires and “impedes” and Omitted Truthful Disclosure in “Bad Faith” even more when these thefts caused the ABDUCTION OF J.D.T. and J.G.T. since 1999.} McCormick v. United States 896 F.2d 61,67 (4th Cir. 1990rev’d 111 S.Ct. 1807 (1991).

239

EXTORTION UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT “The obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right.” To Prove facts for a conviction under the HOBBS ACT prove that you have: Induced or attempted to induce the victim to give up money or property; Used the victim’s fear of physical harm or economic injury in order to obtain money or property; “the plaintiff/prosecutor need only show that a public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts per United States v. Urban 404 F3d 768 (3rd Cir. 2005); When a government agent engages in extortion “under color of official right” he is essentially using the governmental powers with which he has been trusted to gain personal or illegitimate rewards.”; a Affected interstate commerce in some way by your alleged extortion or robbery. There are many other predicate acts listed in section 1961(1) that are mirror images of extortion. These are circumstances when obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. Sections 1503, 1510, 1511, 1512, [Tampering with a witness] or 1513) will also constitute extortion, e.g. an employer engaged in illegal activity may threaten an employee “testify to X when the police talk to you or you’ll be fired” or “you’ll be killed”. By this single threat, the employer may have violated both the Hobbs Act and an obstruction of justice statute.” Quoted of Jeffrey E. Grell, Attorney at Law. 18 U.S.C. Section 666, Theft or bribery for conversion of Federal Funds. FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE Reynolds v. U.S. 98 U.S. 145 (1878). “Generally interpreted to provide that government cannot prohibit religious beliefs and opinions; however, they may prohibit certain practices.” “For Government to restrict religious practices, a compelling government interest must exist.” No Government interest can be shown in this case but only private individuals “Under Color of Law” personal Unjust Enrichment by thefts by Fraud and Deceptive Practices and Extortions. NO AID CLAUSE Lemon v. Kurtzman 403U.S. 602 , 612 -613 Lemon Test Bush v. Holmes 836 So2d 340, 358 (Fla 1st DCA 2004) “The Statute must not authorize the use of public monies directly or indirectly , in aid of a sectarian institution.” Thus as Florida Constitution Article 1. Section 3. Violated by Joe Howlett, Tim Jeffers and John Grant et al since 10/1994. FAMILY LAW 71.30 Tort interference with Children. To Crenshaw 5/10/06 FLORIDA TORTS ---FRAUD

240

REVITZ V. TERRELL 572 So. 2d 996, 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) “If the defendant provides any information about an aspect of the transaction, he or she must tell the whole truth.” 26.100 “…(viii) Any action defendant took to prevent plaintiff from investigating truth of defendant’s representations…” 26.102 DOCUMENTS (1) Copies of written documents containing defendants fraudulent misrepresentations or promises, including (a) Contracts. (b) letters… (3) Previous or concurrent agreements relating to same subject matter…” U.S. CONSTITUTION AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTION-- “NO LAW SHALL IMPEDE THE OBLIGATION OF A CONTRACT.” This Law is one of 48, Argued to the 5th DCA since January 21, 1999. So any act to “Impede” the JVA and the 1994 BYLAWS and the U.S. Constitution and the Florida Constitution is a “Breach of Contract” and an act in the RICO “TYRRANICAL” “KINGPIN” AGENDA. THE HOLDER STANDARD “THE HOLDER STANDARD” to Judge Gregory Holder as: “A judge should not allow family, social, political or other relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment.” THE KRAUSE STANDARD as an Attorney by “Fraud and Deceptive Practices” and “Bad Faith” to collects funds to aid and abet a Judicial “Officer of the Court” as the Florida Supreme Court and their Agents have been proved to have acted and Conspired since about 1987 and before. Clearly in this case it is a Mockery by “Impostors” of the Court with “Smoke and Mirrors” to deny Patricia McCarthy, David Popper, Charles Williams Jr., Bruce Chapin, John Grant, Charles Scruggs, Heather Gray, Charles Denny IV and “Others” did not do the same violation since 1987 and before, and all Judges, Attorney’s Generals and “Others” directly by overtly taking and using Townsend’s Property and indirectly by I.O.L.T.A. funds, even violating F.S. 775.03, Unlawful Benefit to Clergy, used to defame Townsend through the illegal acts of the unconstitutional Family Court and their actions in Civil Court, evident here. STRICKLAND v. WASHINGTON 466 U.S. 668, 664 (1984) The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees every accused individual the right to effective assistance of counsel. Yet the McCarthy et al, since 11/18/1987, and as the Florida Supreme Court and their agents and as Florida Bar Executive Officers in this Case since 1994 have made personal threats to Townsend that they obtain “Superior Knowledge of the Law” and threatened, “If you get your law degree within 6 months we will find a way to have you disbarred and put you in jail for

241 something!” Now 30 years of evidence shows Appellees threats even threatening lawyers who talk to Townsend. TITLE 18 section 2071 U.S. Code. Concealment, removal or mutilation generally, of Records. U.S. CODE 28 PART IV CHAPTER 85 SECTION 1343 U.S. CODE 42 TITLE V. SECTION 12103 PROHIBITION AGAINST RETALLIATION AND COERCION U.S.CODE 42 Section 12203—Prohibition against retaliation and coercion (a) No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a change, testified , assisted or participated in any manner in an investigation , proceeding or hearing under this chapter….” U.S.CODE 42 CHAPTER 21 SECTION 1983 U.S.CODE 42 Section 14141 U.S. CODE 42 CHAPTER 126 SECTION 12202 Bob Butterworth — Fla. Attorney’s General Op. 82-64. And 84-66 and 96- 41. shows Crimes of Judges Quince, Anstead, Wells, Pariente, Lewis, Cantero and Bell, acting without taking Oaths. F.S. 112.313 Disclosure or Use of Certain Information—A current or former public officer, employee of an agency, or local government attorney may not disclose or use information not available to members of the general public and gained by reason of his or her official position, except for information relating exclusively to governmental practices, for her or her personal gain or benefit or for the personal gain or benefit of any other person or business entity.” F.S. 838.21 Misuse of Confidential Info with intent to Obstruct, impede, or prevent a criminal investigation or a criminal prosecution, which such information is not available to the general public is gained by reason of the public servant’s official position, commits a third degree felony. ***Done by all Appellees since 11/18/1987 or before “impeding” the Obligations of the JVA Contract and his money and rights Owned by Townsend’s Services and all Appellee’s by “Bad Faith” and Fraud and Deceptive Practices concealing Lane et al. and the money Townsend made and earned because Lane was forbidden by the Clients in their Accounts and then Lane stole the money since 1987, and used the money for the payment of his bribes in their “Pay to Play” they knew Townsend reported as Unlawful to McCarthy et al and “Others”. ***Done by all Appellees since 10/1994, blocking Townsend investigate illegal P.E.#19 acts of the “Rump Faction” and “Others” at FBCCP/CPCS;

242

***Done by All Appellees and multiple and various times to continue their “Superior Knowledge” and Omissions of Truthful Disclosure to Appellants. F.S. 839.18, ASSUMING TO ACT—Newly elected or appointed public officers must not assume to perform any of the duties of public office before “qualification” according to law. Doing so would be a second degree misdemeanor.” STINSON v. STATE 80 So2d 506 (Fla. 1918). Florida Supreme Court determined that F.S.839. 18 applied to a person who performed the duties of deputy sheriff before being qualified according to law. Person had been appointed as a deputy, had taken the required oath, and had executed a bond, but board of county commissioners had not approved the bond. Therefore, the person was not yet qualified to perform the duties of deputy sheriff . F.S. 876.05(1) 876.09(1) Oaths for Office.” F.S.92.50(1) Those required to take their Oath of Office. F.S. 876.08, “Any governing authority or person who knowingly or carelessly permits an employee to continue in employment after failing to take the oath is guilty of a second degree misdemeanor.” U.S. C. Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure Part I. Crimes Chapter 13 Civil Rights; Section 241 Conspiracy against rights. Section 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law. Section 245 Federally protected activities. Section 246 Deprivation of Relief benefits. Section 247 Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs. (2) intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, any person in the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so;…(d) (1) …or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, …or an attempt to kill…(2) if bodily injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section…or an explosive; Section 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States. Section 373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence. “If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. (c) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime, because he lacked a state of mind required for its commission, because he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution.” 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, per the Civil Rights act of 1871; Deprivation of Rights;

243

CRIMES VICTIMS’ RIGHT ACT—State Attorneys Victims Assistance. Nance Lopez and Curtis Baughman both admitted in 2007, they were directed to target Townsend and make false charges by their undisclosed Superior Officer assisting Joe Howlett as they attended court 11/15/2001. FLORIDA BAR RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE All At some point or another most by Appellee’s have been violated. “FLORIDA SUPREME COURT MANUAL INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES SECTION I. B. THE CHIEF JUSTICE. C. THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE. SECTION II. J. “It is the policy of the Court to expedite proceedings presenting time-sensitive issues affecting children.” But not in the Townsend case as the Florida Bar and FSCT “impostor” judges have threatened any person and Townsend since 1994 and before to not advocate his Constitutional and or Contract Rights or Parenting/Custody/Religious Rights even per the Society of Sisters Ruling as listed in the Complaint and protected by the 1994 BYLAWS “impeded” by the “impostor” deputies and “impostor” church members acting as Appellee’s Agents. RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT “RICO” Effective October 15, 1970, Introduced in the Senate by John L. McClellan (D-AR) and signed into law by R. Nixon. Applied with Anti-SLAPP Acts (Strategic lawsuit against public participation) and the “CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE STATUTE a.k.a , “KINGPIN STATUTE”. Famous Cases: Louisiana Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry, Gil Dozier, accused of compelling companies doing business with his department to make campaign contributions; KEY WEST PD, Officers arrested for running a Protection Racket for illegal cocaine smugglers; Michael Milken, Insider Trading and Extortion, and per Respondent Superior, Corporation is responsible for acts of its employee’s crimes; Los Angeles Police Department, charged as a Racketeering enterprise; TAMPA LATIN KINGS, 2006 by The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office and the Tampa Police Department; TAMPA GAMBINO CRIME FAMILY 2006; JUDGES Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella, Pennsylvania, charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, tax evasion, money laundering and honest services fraud for kickbacks, as “Kids for Cash”. FLORIDA RICO ACT 895.01-895.06

244

*First Degree Felony up to 30 years in prison. *Person engaged in at least 2 incidents of the enterprise. *Section 895.02(1)(a) , Intimidating another person to commit and of the criminal charges that could be charged by information, indictment, or petition. The prosecutor is not required to prove that any of the predicate acts nor the RICO Enterprise itself involved any underlying economic motivation. The charging document is not required to identity the relationship between the defendant and the crimes on its face. *Allows a prosecutor to charge a complete enterprise all at once. *Two or more acts with 5 years of the other. FLORIDA GANG ACT F.S.874 874.06, “A prevailing plaintiff under subsection (1) has a right or claim that is superior to any right or claim that the state has in the same property or proceeds…” HCSO REPORT ON SARASOTA POLICE CHIEF ABBOTT, 2009 http://www.judgeoneforyourself.com/mainpage/DavidGee2014Jan.pdf Townsend had also requested this FSCT incorporate herein all previous case evidence since 1987, and newly discovered evidence and the Petition For Mandamus and Supplemental Petition For Mandamus recently filed in this Action to be included herein. C. MARBURY V. MADISON 5 U.S. 137 (1803) “…Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge engaged in acts of treason …” and acted to aid and abet “Hate Crimes” and extortion by not enforcing Constitutional Laws and willfully acting per Lamb v. Leiter 6003 2d 632, “Conduct that prevents one from trying a case” by OCASIO v. U.S. 578 U,S, (2016) collusion by two or more persons for an unlawful agreement for PIPER v. PEARSON 2 GRAY 120, “It is no more than the act of a private citizen, pretending to have judicial poser which does not exist at all….” For RANKIN id. and the HOLDER STANDARD and thus by these facts, “Frauds on the Court” must be resolved as all the prior Orders are rendered Void and or Voidable per U.S. v. THROCKMORTON id. (Tr. Of 1/8/16, p.18) by Exparte Corruption.” D. BRADY v. MARYLAND 373 U.S. 83 (1963) “The government’s withholding of evidence that is material to the determination of either guilt or punishment of a criminal defendant violates the defendant’s constitutional right to due process.” 4th and this case now proves the Actual Intent of Malicious Enterprise of the “Ineffective Counsel” and “Alias” “Officers of the Court” to for their own

245 benefits and or as “Unjust Enrichments” as David Popper wrote in the initial litigation these Lane et al are directly connected through his “PAY TO PLAY” WITH Townsends unpaid Commissions directly he paid through Jeb Bush to his Father who bribed others and included that they admitted they lawyers and judges never even read the Contracts of the Joint Venture Agreement of August 7, 1987 and the 1994 Bylaws and as per Beatrice Foods and knowing same made intentionally conspired threats of John Grant in his emails with Sheriff David Gee and State Attorney Mark Ober and the exhibit November 4, 2015 even by John Grant forwarded to the Court and his email who have in collusion continued their illegal threats to Townsend who is advocating Our Constitutional Rights and laws and Constitutional Rights we “Redress Government” having pierced the “Corporate Veil” and the “Government Veil” as this 11th Circuit Court of Appeals advised to expose in 2008, now proving since 1987, these “Persons” that were to be exposed by Patricia McCarthy per her agreement of representation on 11/18/1987d, was to 1. Get Lane’s withheld records; 2. Set Up a Court Receiver of monies coming into the JVA; 3.Get a Declaratory Judgment on the Rights of the Parties; 4. Expose the Criminal acts of Lane and Lane et al which as an Officer of the Court each is required to do. This is then the basis of the “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” claim filed by David H. Popper and David Landis for Townsend filed in June 1988, and which Charles E. Lane Jr. and his attorney Charles E. Williams Jr. did not answer timely and therefore are in Default since 7/8/1988. With this 3rd Return now is exposed “Willful Intent” and “Singularity” and “Actual Malice” for their Intentional acts of “Fraud on the Court” and with proofs that each Defendant had no “legal” “Color of Right” or “Color Of Law” or “Jurisdiction” per RANKIN and per Our U.S. and Florida Constitution as with no Constitutional protection to perform their acts of Treason as even Florida Representative Charles Canady Jr. on the Floor Of Congress said Not even the President is above the Law and in this case the Presidents have intentionally directed Crimes ruled as “Hate Crimes” by Marva Crenshaw and confessed by defendants counsel Charles Denny IV on May 10, 2006 and used TITLE IV and KOCH FAMILES MONIES through various lobbyist and INFLUENCE to fund their “Pay to Play” from monies as commissions Townsend earn per the JVA and Or per the 1994 FBCCP BYLAWS per his commission as the Supreme Court Officer of the Nominations Committee responsible to the Owner Membership to advise on the Sovereign Rights of the 1994 FBCCP Bylaws and the Corporation “Not for Profit” and with CPCS as it Ministry in accordance with Our Sovereign Rights and Practices.

246

Even the timing of the FSCT Order and the Whittemore Orders and the Quid Pro Quo proved in 2017, with Pam Bondi, Rick Scott, Charlie Crist and Others shows intentional “Fraud On the Court” based on the rulings of the Eleventh Circuit Courts rulings in this case as their conflicts of interest are blasted all over the media. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito says “No person in this country, no matter how high or powerful, is above the law, and no person in this country is beneath the law.” I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied judgment over these 30+ years, that this case involves one or more questions of exceptional importance as Petitioners again advise this Court of the following Question and Facts: QUESTION---Are not per our Constitution and laws all Judges of this 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and the lower courts (especially the Florida Supreme Court “Justices” who per the Florida Attorney’s General Report and Our Florida Laws, had not taken their proper oaths and recused by Chief Judge Canady in 2011 and again by Chief Judge Labarga in 2016 and admitted by Judges James Moody Jr., Marva Crenshaw, Orfinger and “others”) and government persons who reviewed these earlier still ongoing related cases Townsend ET AL v.: Beck ET AL; Lane ET AL; Williams ET AL; Popper ET AL; Chapin ET AL; Karen (Harrod) Townsend ET AL; Scruggs ET AL; and now (Disbarred) Gray ET AL; guilty of continuing the Civil Rights violations, HOBBS ACT and RICO Acts since 1987 of Charles E. Lane ET AL, [in Breach and Default of Contracts and illegally and criminally taking Whistle Blower Townsends rights, money, services, property since 1987 and illegal abduction of the children since 1999, and depriving “others” for whom Townsend speaks] as “law enforcers” are required to stop not aid and abet an ongoing unconstitutional and criminal act(s)? FACTS! The United States and Florida Constitution state, “No Law shall impede the obligation of a contract”. Petitioner Townsend et al per our Constitutional Rights never Willfully gave up our Sovereign Rights as: Redress the Government; Due Process of a Jury Trial; and or Sovereign Religious Practices and or Constitutional Due Process in Our Courts and or Unlawful Seizures of Our Kids, Property and Resources and Rights, yet alias “Officers of the Court” and “Others” have impeded Due Process in this Whistleblower action since 1987 or before by their taking bribes from these Defendants through various Lane/McCarthy Et Al defendants who embezzled Townsend’s resources by Omission of

247

Truthful Disclosure and Fraud and Deceptive Practices still ongoing as Townsend defined in this Claims. The Joint Venture (JV) Agreement of Sabal/Future signed and notarized 8/7/1987, is a binding legal document not violated by Townsend as McCarthy and Popper and Chapin directed and yet to be honored by Lane et al or McCarthy et al or Grant et al nor was Townsend fully paid for the services rendered. The FBCCP By-Laws are a legal contract of our members as fully recognized per Florida, F.S. 617, and members upon joining take an oath to uphold our By-Laws and Defendants (a.k.a. Masked Jeffers ET AL Deputies) must not tort same. To Footnote 2 of the 2/1/13, Order, the filings are notarized. Our contracts for services with retained lawyers, Florida Bar Members and Judges and Government Officers named herein this Amended Complaint and others as “Others DOE” as retained to uphold is to be served per the Black Law Rules and Cannons of the Florida Bar Association and American Bar Association and rules per the Judicial Qualifications Commission per their Oath to uphold our Constitutions of these United States and of Florida, the Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinellas, Santa Rosa, Escambia and Orange County Charters as Laws and binding contracts to protect our rights of Townsend Petitioners. Despite the unfounded 2/1/2013, opinion stated by Judges Hull, Jordan and Black, as: “Townsend’s notarized amended complaint named over 200 defendants, the vast majority of which had no obvious connection to his underlying grievances.” is not supported by: (1) Our Laws; (2) previous rulings of this court; (3) nor facts in evidence or facts stated as caused RICO actions in this or other verified affidavits, brief(s) and complaint(s) or facts admitted by “judges” and defendants themselves admitting their willful co- participation upon knowing these RICO crimes of LANE ET AL since 1987, or of facts yet to be published due to torts of this courts 2/1/13, Opinion as contradictory to the “Ineffective Services” Unpublished 2008 Opinion(s) of Judge Black and this Court En Banc related to the same named “Lawyers” and “Government Persons” now named in this action as each had and still has Mens Rea motives in collusion to damage Townsend et al per our Contract Relationship(s) and their expected rewards of Quid Pro Quo Actions and the money trail from their Superior Government Connections as now exposed as the “Government Veil” Townsend alleged since the 1990”s when first learning Bruce Chapin was married to Linda Chapin, the Chair Person of the Orlando County Commission (controlling Orange County Government just like Pat Bean ET AL did control Hillsborough County

248

Government actions against Townsend) and then with later facts learning Bruce Chapin had since on or before 1991 and has biased secret connections with the Florida Supreme Court, Florida Bar, Florida Department of Law Enforcers, Governors Chiles (already since the 1970’s having a personal vendetta against the Townsend family) and MacKay and Hillsborough County Lawyer turned Hillsborough County Administrator Pat Bean (later fired by the Hillsborough County Commissioners for same actions of self- dealing herself County Funds and “unlawfully” fixing the Hillsborough County v. FBCCP, Eminent Domain Case as Townsend alleged as unlawful and in breach of the By-Laws by these named Beck, Jeffers, Howlett, Smoak, Meister, Powell, Leatherman, Smith and “Others” in the FBCCP Sect) and receiving “Ineffective Services” by unlawful illegal benefit from the alleged “legal counsels” (Grant, Gibbs, Gardner, Gaylord, Scruggs, Turmel, Dickinson & Gibbons, Solomon, Gray and Others Doe”) of the FBCCP and the Membership as a whole now proved by even this own courts 2008 Opinion as giving “ineffective services” to Townsend since 1987 and those for whom Townsend speaks. Despite this 2013 opinion that Defendants are not connected each, Defendant(s) since “ineffective services” lawyers Patricia McCarthy, David Popper, Charles E. Williams intentionally concealed the Charles E. Lane, Jr. ET AL, [Charles E. Lane Sr., Ed Crenshaw follow the Publix Advertising and Marketing Dollars trail], [Joe Ligori (Nova) follow the companies Townsend lost to Ligori in 1993 and since, because of or by threats of Chapin(s), Judge Powell and Lanes Publix Connections] and “Others” Named herein and “Others DOE” since 11/1987, when Townsend became the Whistle Blower to the Lanes Drug’s Uses and Extortion and Bribery, Judge Muszynski’s 1989 Orders if obeyed prove each has an ongoing motive to continue the RICO and “Other” illegal Actions still ongoing verified by HCSO illegal threats just made again for all to Townsend and his family in 11/2012 as admitted by John Grant in 11/2012, and “Others” since. McCarthy and Bondi, Ober and Bushes with U.S. Attorney O’Neill acts are also still being revealed. New evidence now fully connects the embezzled resources from Townsend via Lane et al were since 1987 and still used by Lane et al to bribe and extort “impostor” “judges” and “Government persons” through the Lane et al connections with “other Does to be named” as Third Parties and or lobbyist, as Brian Ballard, Former Florida Attorney’s General Jim Smith, the KOCH Families and Southern Strategies Group, Charles Canady Sr and Charles Canady Jr and Governors Martinez through Scott and with “others” who have been in the “Pay to Play” created by Lane et al with using lobbyist as

249

Lane, Trohn and Gray Robinson and Southern Strategies Group and Ballard and Associates with direct ties to Jeb Bush and “Others” since 1987 directly from the Lane et al bribery and RICO. Since the 1991, meeting by Townsend with David Gibbs III, and then informing John Grant, Jeb Bush and Ken Connor since 1994, “Republicans” (Per Governor(s) Jeb Bush and his family and Gov. Charlie Crist and Gov. Rick Scott and Charles Canady Jr. and Pam Bondi with State and Federal “Others Doe” appointing and controlling “judges”, State Attorneys, Assistant State Attorneys, Florida Secretary of States, FDLE Officers, Florida Attorney’s Generals, DOJ and “Others” had and has just as much will, knowledge and reckless leverage over the defendants and has had Mens Rea Motives to privately know Townsend’s Whistle Blower information and yet at the same time deny, distract and deprive Townsend ET AL about his and others Whistle Blower facts per U.S.C. 1962 (c) against them in individually and as co-conspirators per U.S.C. 1962 (d). This 2013, Ruling of Judges Hull, Jordan and Black as Justice Black from the 2008, unpublished ruling seeming obviously to abandon and reverse himself from his 2008 finding of “ineffective counsel” as also upheld by the entire court En Banc, did not per the intent of our laws answer the Appellants Legitimate Legal Questions raised in these connected Appeal(s) and as such raises more suspicion to the claim of illegal acts Under Color Of Law to evade Constitutional Rights of Appellants to ever have Due Process, their or our first Honorable Day in any court as it is the directly connected co-participants from illegally acting Under Color Of Law by Governors and their “agents” through other “alias law enforcers” who abducted and still illegally detain Appellants Children, Contractual and Constitutional Rights and property and of others. These named Judges and “Others” in collusion since on or about or since the ruling of Judge Muszynski of the 18th Circuit Court of Florida in 1988- 1989, have knowingly and intentionally participated in violations of Townsend and continues to all Petitioners Constitutional Laws and Rights, Due Process and intentional fraud in violation of the United States Constitution, The Constitution of the State Of Florida, The By-Laws of the FBCCP and Laws of Just Courts even ruling on facts Townsend advocated since 1988 or before acting in intentional collusion with those under contract allegedly acting as attorney’s for Townsend and those for whom per Florida Statues 617.0834 were retained to advocate per the law. “Law Enforcers” since Townsend fired David H. Popper, Bruce Chapin, Charles Scruggs, Heather Gray and Dickinson and Gibbons and John Grant per the facts advised to the Crenshaw court on 9/7/2006, have knowingly

250 conspired with keeping RICO: bribery; Extortion; unlawful detention; intentional tort interference with business relations; intentional interference with custody; assembly relationships; frauds; drug uses; freedom of speech; discovery; Due Process and other practices started in 1987, by Charles E. Lane Jr. and Joe Ligori and “Others Doe” ongoing against Townsend and extending RICO Acts to those for whom Townsend speaks. 18 U.S.C. 201, by intentional collusion with Jeb Bush, Ballards, A.G. Jim Smith and Family, John Grant and Family, Patricia McCarthy, David H. Popper, Bruce E. Chapin and his wife Linda Chapin, Governors Chiles and McKay, The Florida Supreme Court, The Orange County Judges and Commissioners, Sheriffs and Orange County City Police and FDLE and Florida Bar Members and “others DOE” intentionally as “Public Officials” conspiring to conceal the malfeasance and collusion of Popper, McCarthy and Williams, Jr. with Charles E. Lane Jr. and Sr. ET AL concealing the Future/Sabal JV Business Records directly and indirectly affected and disturbed and impeded interstate commerce even removing Townsend from his Future Marketing National Business practices and employments and practices of Lane’s extortion and bribery practices even the use of Federal and State Funds leading to and including political campaign illegal practices and the use of HUD and Child Services funds set up for Quid Pro Quo rewards by George H.W. Bush (#41) and The Clintons and George W. Bush (#43) and Mel Martinez and “Others” using their powers and various other Federal and State Funds through various programs still used today as extortion Quid Pro Quo against Townsend by the same Gibbs III since 1991 and since 1994, Retired Senator John Grant (just 11/10/12 confessing his illegal co-participation), with HCSO , Pinellas, Pasco, Santa Rosa, Escambia, Polk Sheriff’s Deputies, Jeb Bush, Ken Connor, Mel Martinez and the Chapins (Bruce, Linda, Patrick), Harrod’s (Don, Norma, Keith, Steve, Karen) the “Sect” and “Others Named in this FRAP 26.1 and Others DOE” being unlawfully bribed and rewarded by Publix Supermarkets Executives Charles E. Lane Sr. and Ed Crenshaw and “Others” to conceal their illegal practices with LANE/LIGORI/BALLARD/WILLIAMS ET AL specifically directly and indirectly meeting the Code @ 666 as stated by Del Toro to even to this day these same knowingly and intentionally conspiring extortionist Co-Participants refuse and still refuse to allow Whistle Blower Townsend by their ongoing threats, to know if his children, illegally detained from their home, church, school, father, paternal family and grandparents since September-October 1999, are alive or how Townsend can contact his own now adult children as HCSO Deputies in 3/2010 and in 2012 and at many other times acting outside their jurisdiction of

251

Hillsborough County traveled to Sarasota County Florida as they had done in 3/2010, and did threaten Townsend to “stop filing court papers, stop trying to go to your Church at Citrus Park and stop trying to find your kids”. Also the Lane ET AL with McCarthy, Ligori, Ballard’s, Smiths, Williams, Popper, Chapins, Crenshaw, Gray for the Bush and Bondi ongoing ET AL “Gang” and their knowingly conspiring co-participant “Agents” have directly by RICO and HOBBS ACT and Constitutional violations “impeded” Townsend in his all business contracts and employment(s) but expounding on these facts in this or other verified Affidavits, Complaints and Briefs are ignored by conspiring “alias” Law enforcers who willfully continue the bribery and extortion of Lane ET AL. Attempting to hide these illegal practices is “masked” in stating the Complaints are not “short” or “plain”(FRAP 8) or “not detailed enough”(FRAP 9) or enough fee’s have not been paid as each judge and law enforcer contradicts their own co- participants to continue their unjust enrichment and extortion in the “Pay to Play” with even the proofs of “judges” taking bribes and Quid Pro Quo benefits. Note that even the 5/10/06, over three hour session of “Judge” Marva Crenshaw conspiring and writing with “Ineffective services” and conspiring Charles Denny IV, the Malicious Prosecution Count and naming all co-participants as “Others” is even by later “judges” and “law enforcers” ignored and dismissed by multiple and illegal means as proved by this recent “void” orders of James Whittemore and the Florida Supreme Court “alias” judges who claim they “Under Color of Official Right” have jurisdiction. Quoting even from this 11th Courts cases own rulings even herein citing Salinas v. United States 522 U.S. 52 (1997) quoting on accepting RICO VIOLATIONS per (1962 (c) bribes and (1962 (d)) conspiracy and Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 646 (1946) (“And so long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other in carrying it forward.”) If conspirators to perpetrate the crime and others to provide support, the supporters are as guilty as the perpetrators. As Justice Holmes observed: “[Plainly a person may conspire for the commission of a crime by a third person.” United States v. Holte, 236 140, 144 (1915). Defendants own records show their U.S.C. 1962, and other U.S. Codes illegal actions and willful admissions to conspire. Attorneys and “Others” in collusion did fraud Townsend to get the Townsend v. Lane and the false Counter Claim by Lane V. Townsend case moved from Seminole County to Orange County so Bruce Chapin and Linda Chapin and “Others” in case 89-3299 could conceal the illegal acts of all against Townsend ET AL. and as the conspiracy to continue criminal acts is still ongoing now having involved these Appellees and “Others”.

252

Thus discovery in 5/2011, of this Robinson v. Weiland, ET AL 5D05-2380, Judge Orfinger ruling 9/1/2006, and his reversal cases in 2011 shows and proves to these average citizens as Appellants each court since Orange County in 1989 or before (State and Federal) aided and abets this still ongoing criminal RICO and Anti-Trust and others acts still concealing discovery of Lanes original and ongoing criminal acts with defendants including judges under the direct supervision and direction of Orange County Commission Chair Persons Linda Chapin(Democrat) and her successor Mel Martinez (Republican) and former business law partner with Ken Connor and Gibbs III as legal counsel for Jeb Bush and “Others” now Defendants. It by this Courts Order of Dismissal of 2/1/13, as a reversal to their Order of 2008, as “Ineffective Services” now as proved true by other acts and admissions and confessions even of their own criminal acts is now proof that this 11th Circuit Court in earlier decisions on this LANE ET AL extended case where LANE ET AL is proved involved in ongoing RICO ACTS and as Salinas v. United States 522 U.S. 52, (1997) in acts by alias judges took or benefited from QUID PRO QUO RICO Bribes and therefore as required to recuse themselves and their earlier Orders are null and void as the Orders of Florida Supreme Court Chief Judge Charles Canady, the Order of Fifth DCA Judges in 2006, and Judge Crenshaw in 2006, and Judge Moody in 2007, show the co-participants as Lane ET AL RICO Participants and therefore this court should resolve these issues. “There is no question of general doctrine that fraud violates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments” See U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S.61, 64 (1878). “Fraud vitiates everything, and a judgment equally with a contract…”(Id. At 66, citing Wells, Res Adjudicata, Section 499).” “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot [act] beyond the power dedicated to them. If they act beyond that authority and certainly in contravention of it, their judgment and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal. Elliott v. Peirson 1 Pet. 328, 340; Old Wayne Life Ass’n v. Mc Donough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 Sup. Ct. 236; (See Valley v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co, 254 U.S. 348, 353-354 (1920). “If the underlying judgment is void, the judgment based upon it is also void.” See Austin v. Smith, 312 F.2d 337, 343 (1962). Thus concealment, omissions and frauds Under Color of Law denies due process to Townsend and Townsend ET AL.

253

The Supreme Court in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Cool Co. Ins. 556 U.S. (2009) per Tuney v. Ohio 273 U.S. 510, 532 (1927): “Every procedure which would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judge to forget the burden of proof required to convict the defendant, or which might lead him not to hold the balance nice, clear and true between the state and the accused, denies the latter due process of law.” The Supreme Court states in Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 (1954): “A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he the presiding does not give the appearance of justice.” These “Void” Orders of Magistrate “Judge” Rizzo and “Judge Whittemore” and the Florida Supreme Court are all “Void” as proved by their collusion to act without jurisdiction per their “Fraud on the Court” and violation and “Impeding” of Our Constitution and Due Process and thus a Superior Court must determine this matter to the fullest extent of Our Constitution and Laws with the vested right of determining “Domestic Tranquility” resting in Our Jury Trial Process. Conclusion: Shortly and Plainly, all named in this included FRAP 26.1 and the Amended FRAP 26.1 as Defendants and “Others” are also guilty of continuing the RICO Acts of Lane and Ligori and Ballards and Smiths and Bushes and Koch’s and Clintons and Williams ET AL started and concealed by McCarthy ET AL, Popper ET AL, Chapin(s) ET AL and Scruggs ET AL and John Grant ET AL, Gray ET AL and still continuing by each as the “BONDI GANG ET AL” and even this 11th Circuit Court En Banc as since in 2008, are “Others DOE” now included and have a duty to recuse themselves, resign the court and turn themselves in for the fullest prosecution per our Federal and State Laws for their Treason to Our Constitution by their “Fraud on the Court” as Townsend first proved to and about Rom Powell since 1994. WHEREFORE, THIS PETITION FOR MANDAMUS is required for Our Citizens “DUE PROCESS” Constitutional Rights to enforce Our Laws by Our Jury Process in an Honorable Court of Law per Our Constitutional Rights and Due Process by Our Jury and A. Prosecution to the fullest extent of Our Laws for these Defendants and their Co=participants; B. Restoration of Townsend and Townsend et al of our relationships, rights and resources to the fullest extent of Our Laws and awards as per “Due Process” and a Jury Trial. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this

254

_17th_day of February, 2017, to the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida and to Florida Supreme Court as case SC-16-1501 and to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and Clerk of the 13th Circuit Court Florida and the 5th DCA @ the 5th DCA eportal system using case Numbers 5D16-2184 as the Case 2D16-612 of and to the 2DCA and or email: to Pam Bondi et al per [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] for Tim and Karen Jeffers Odessa, Florida 33556 and Littler, Mendelson, P.C. Attn. [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; EEOC Tampa Field Office C/O Mr. Stanley Moffett, [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] for Bruce and Linda Chapin; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED RANDALL C. TOWNSEND, PRESENTING IDENTIFICATON, WHO UPON BEING DULY SWORN AND CAUTIONED EXECUTED AND STATED IN HIS OWN WORDS AND TOOK AN OATH THAT THE STATEMENTS AND THE THINGS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, TO THE BEST

255

OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF.WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS 17th DAY OF February, 2017, BY ID PRODUCED______FLORIDA DL______NOTARY PUBLIC:______MECHELE A. LEONARD #FF47636_____ Respectfully submitted; Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com”

TOWNSEND PER THIS REPLY TO THE 6/17/20 “VOID” “PCA” FOR FRAUD ORDER STATES: Even the Leon County Judge Angela Dempsey recent 12 page ruling issue against 8th Circuit Candidate Democrat Beverly McCallum for having not been a “member of the bar for the previous five years” raises “Odious and Outrageous” “double Standards” and or lack of standards by Defendants as Judge Marva Crenshaw ruled Townsend must prove as the “Malicious Prosecution” and or “Hate Crimes” against Townsend and this Florida “judge” ruling shows the double standard of these “Officers of the Court” who have extremely done Bush Code Red RICO Crimes and violations of Professional Conduct that the Florida Bar and the FSCT should have prosecuted and did not just as they prosecuted Heather Gray and yet concealed his malfeasance to Townsend and other her clients. So for full F.S. 38, disclosure, Who was the Judge and or Other Parties who conspire and obstruct Townsend from being the “General Of the Attorney’s” of the “Free Will” of “We the People” so “We the People” may protect our “Free Will” and Rights and regain our Relationships and Recourses.

WHEREAS:

256

A. THE “PCA” “VOID” FOR FRAUD(S) ACTS OF THE WOLF’S

1st DCA, CANNOT BECOME FINAL AS IT VIOLATES F.S. 80.02

AND DOES NOT FOLLOW DUE PROCESS TO RESTORE THE

RIGHTS, RESOURCES AND RELATIONSHIPS REQUIRED BY

OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR LAWS AND NOR DOES IT

PROSECUTE AS REQUIRED BY LAW THESE BUSH CODE RED

TCR REPEATED OFFENDERS WHO HAVE ADMITTED THEIR

CRIMES IN “OPEN COURT(S) TO OFFICERS OF THE COURT(S);

B. Townsend’s Motion to Write Written Opinion must be lawfully answered by each Line and or each claim not Deny is True.

C. Per F.R.C.P. 1.210, Parties, these named herein who obstruct claimants Townsend and Townsend Et al and “Next Friend” and the

State of Florida, are directed to the Clerks and the Court to be Named

Defendants in this Action.

D. Per Florida Statutes 80.032, these Defendants shall be served immediately a “Judgment of Ouster” and be prosecuted to the fullest extent of our laws and ordered to pay full restitution and punitive damages per the ruling of a lawful jury trial of “We the People”;

And “Others Doe to be Named” once the Obstructed discovery is

Completed shall be named and charged as per “B” above herein.

257

E. And that “WE the People” to secure and sustain our “Public

Trust” per our Constitutional Rights be allowed to vote in an immediate

New election whom we chose as Our Attorney’s General, CFO, U.S.

Senators, Legislators and “Judges” and “Others” as for the protection of our Public Trust;

F. That Governor Elect Ron Desantis or others not be allowed to select from the current list of JQC Nominated Supreme Court Judges until “We the People” are not obstructed from full vetting discovery;

G. . That Ashley Moody not be given the Oath of Office until a

New election with a “Blank Line” is lawfully on each ballot;

G. All Demands as previously stated be restated herein;

H. That the Petition For Mandamus and Other Motions and Issues of

Law be done by this 1st DCA En Banc and be done per Our

Constitution(s) an laws;

I. That the Quo Warranto Petition be answered immediately;

J. That these in “Neglect of Duty” and other Fraud and Deceptive Practices be arrested and prosecuted per our laws; K. That this Action not be Obstructed or Dismissed and proceed to the fullest extent of our laws to a jury trial to determine all issues for Our full satisfaction and restoration. L. That the 1st DCA Court and “judges” take judicial notice of any and all records and discovery and Memorandums of Law as filed in this Action since 1987, as necessary to restore Townsend and Townsend et al and the State of Florida Our Rights from these violators. CERTIFICATION OF FONT

258

I certify that the lettering in this brief is TIMES NEW ROMAN 14 POINT and complies with the font requirements of the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 1st day of July, 2020, to the 1St DCA; THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDIDICAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA and Florida Secretary of State; and Ron Desantis and to Ashley B. Moody of The Capital PL-01, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 per [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] E Filing 1st DCA, Florida Supreme Court, Leon County 2nd Circuit.

Signed Randall Townsend, Verified to the best of our knowledge, opinions and belief based on the concealed information of Defendants. Signed Respectfully submitted; Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and as a “Next Friend” of the over 13 Million Florida Voters and Others as said “Private Attorney’s General” and FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA herein. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com”

ARGUMENT II. THE FOUR FEDERAL WASHINGTON D.C. COURTS “IMPEDING” AND THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS,

259

EN BANC IN THESE TOWNSEND ACTIONS RULED FOR TOWNSEND TO PROVE SINCE ABOUT 1987, THE “GLASS CEILING” AND CRIMINAL ACTS BY “BUSH CODE RED” VIOLATIONS OF “DUE PROCESS” AND “CIVIL RIGHTS” BY “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” BY THEIR “PAY TO PLAY” “NOBILITY” AND THESE RESPONDENTS ACTS CONTINUE TO PROVE AN UNJUST OBSTRUCTION OF OUR ORGANIC RIGHTS IS STILL BEING ATTEMPTED BY THEIR “FRAUD ON THE COURT” AND CONSPIRED “OMISSION OF TRUTHFUL DISCLOSURE” IN THIS ACTION AS OUR U.S. SUPREME COURT WILL LEARN BY REVIEW OF AND FROM THESE FACTS STATED HEREIN.

The EnBanc Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals repeatedly acted per their

“Bush Code Red” Orders even as for “Hate Crimes” and “Malicious

Prosecution” to continue they knew their role to keep the “Glass Ceiling” to keep their “unjust enrichment” “Nobility” and this U.S. Supreme Court must hold them to justice per the fullest extent of Our Constitution and Laws.

ARGUMENT

III. TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND ET AL (“FOR WHOM OF THE CLASS HE SPEAKS”) RIGHTS, RESOURCES AND RELATIONSHIPS HAVE SINCE 1987 AND BEFORE HAVE BEEN AND ARE STILL BEING “ODIOUSLY AND OUTRAGEOUSLY” SERIOUSLY AND IRREPARABLY HARMED IF RESPONDENTS CONTINUE THEIR “BUSH CODE RED” NEW WORLD ORDER “PREDICATE ACTS” OF RICO AND HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS. “This Fraud on the Court and Extrinsic Fraud Violates CROCKER v. PLEASANT 778 So2d 978, 988 (Fla. 2001), Rather, there must be a deliberate decision of the government official to deprive a person of life, liberty, or property…” as Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” Block discovery since 1987 of Lane et al and since 10/1994 to Townsend as F.S. 617.0834–for Defendants and “Others Doe to be Named” to abduct Resources; kidnap children; then take the money and the school for Their Common Core Unjust Enrichment. MAJOR POINT—“

260

As stated above even with the False Arrests and False Prosecutions and

Malicious Prosecutions and “Fraud to the Court” done to many victims as we know:

A. happened in the disbarment of attorney Heather Gray for a pattern of malfeasance done to Townsend and to many other clients who never got justice and restitution; and

B. as we see in the Legal briefs of this Action, omitting Truthful disclosure of the patterns of all the “Predicate Acts” to “impede” the “Free

Will” Ballot Use of the “Blank Line”, these Respondent “Government Persons” and “Bar Members” show they intentionally still will “Traffic” for their “Nobility” “Pay to Players” illegally “Under Color of Law” and “Under Color of Official Right” while intentionally violating F.S. 111.07, “Wanton and willful disregard” for “All

Voters” and “All Rights”.

Townsend re-states all facts above and below to be included herein, and the law requires Due Process hold these respondents to justice per the fullest extent of our Constitution and Laws.

ARGUMENT

IV. PER THE FACTS STATED HEREIN OF THESE IN RICO,

261

DRUG AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND OTHER HOBBS ACT VIOLATIONS THE HOBBS ACT QUESTIONS MUST BE STATED AS FOLLOWS: “1. Did the defendant induce or attempt to induce the victim to give up property or property rights? Yes 2. Did the defendant use or attempt to use the victim's reasonable fear of physical injury or economic harm in order to induce the victim's consent to give up property? Yes 3. Did the defendant's conduct actually or potentially obstruct, delay, or affect interstate or foreign commerce in any (realistic) way or degree? Yes 4. Was the defendant's actual or threatened use of force, violence or fear wrongful?” Yes

Townsend re-states each and all facts as stated above and below herein and in each Action he has filed since 11/18/987, to show the HOBBS ACT and

RICO violations by these Respondents who have multiple times in OPEN

COURT admitted their illegal actions, and thus should be held accountable to the fullest extent of our Constitution and Laws for restitution to

Townsend and the “Class” for whom Townsend speaks.

CONCLUSION:

Respondents and “Others Doe to be Named” are in their actions in OPEN

COURT shown and proved as RICO and HOBBS ACT violators acting in intentional Treason to our Constitutions against Townsend and Townsend et al. and even “impeding” our “Free Will” Organic Right to Vote for justice.

THE ARGUMENTS I-IV, stated above and to be restated and included herein cannot as a Matter of Fact and or as a Matter of Law be denied as

True Constitutional Facts and thus to the issues be Ruled in Favor of

262

Townsend or the Felonies even as their Treason and “TCR” continue.

WHEREFORE:

Townsend and for victims of “Hate Crimes” and “Treason” and “HOBBS

ACT CRIMES” as Townsend et al Respectfully requests the Honorable

Clarence Thomas;

A. take judicial notice of all these actions since 1987 and per our U.S. and Florida Constitution(s) lawfully rule on each Matter Of Law;

B. issue “Judgment of Ouster’s” as to the fullest extent of Our Laws;

C. Order Justice on these Respondents for their “Fraud on the Court” and their “Extrinsic Fraud” on the Courts and on these as victims as Townsend and Townsend et al. as proved even by their own “Open Court” admissions;

D. Issue and Order per our Petition(s) for Mandamus as stated above.

E. Order New Elections based on Ballots with the Required Blank Line so the “Free Will” of All Voters may be restored without servitude.

F. Convene a “Jury” for Townsend to prosecute all “violators”.

CERTIFICATION OF FONT I certify that the lettering in this brief is TIMES NEW ROMAN 14 POINT and complies with the font requirements of the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2) and per the Rules of the U.S. Supreme Court.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was provided this 21st & 22nd day of July, 2020, to the: United States Supreme Court; 1St DCA; THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT AND CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

263

OF THE SECOND JUDIDICAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and Florida Secretary of State; and Ron Desantis and to Ashley B. Moody of The Capital PL-01, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 per [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] E Filing 1st DCA, Florida Supreme Court, Leon County 2nd Circuit. And Via email of [email protected] as Paul M. Smith for The Raysor, Gruver, McCoy and other respondents named herein.

Signed Randall Townsend, Verified to the best of our knowledge, opinions and belief based on the concealed information of Defendants. Signed Respectfully submitted; Randall C. Townsend, Individual, Pro Se, for himself and as “Private Attorney’s General” and per F.S. 617.0834, the Unanimously Elected Representative of the First Baptist Church of Citrus Park and its Ministry as The Citrus Park Christian School per our 1994 BYLAWS, never lawfully removed from said Commission as Member and or Officer of the Nominations Committee as the Supreme Court of the F.S.617 Corporation “Not for Profit” with Ownership of Citrus Park Christian School as its Ministry and as a Citizen and as a “Next Friend” of the over 13 Million Florida Voters and Others as said “Private Attorney’s General” and FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA herein. P.O. Box 5, Osprey, FL 34229 941.350.2677 [email protected] [email protected] www.Judgeoneforyourself.com”

264