A Study of the Effects of Cycling Frequency on Lithium-Ion And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF CYCLING FREQUENCY ON LITHIUM-ION AND LITHIUM-POLYMER BATTERIES’ DEGRADATION _______________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science _____________________________________________________ BHAVANA SHARON GANGIREDDY Dr. Robert O’Connell, Thesis Supervisor DECEMBER 2020 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF CYCLING FREQUENCY ON LITHIUM-ION AND LITHIUM-POLYMER BATTERIES’ DEGRADATION presented by Bhavana Sharon Gangireddy, a candidate for the degree of master of science, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _______________________________________________________ Dr. Robert O’Connell, Ph.D. Committee Chair and Thesis Advisor _______________________________________________________ Dr. Naz Islam, Ph.D. _______________________________________________________ Dr. Stephen Lombardo, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to wholeheartedly thank and praise God, the almighty for the blessings and opportunity he bestowed on me, so that I have been able to accomplish my thesis. I would like to sincerely thank my advisor, Dr. Robert O’Connell, for believing in me and for the remarkable support and expert guidance he has provided throughout my time as his student. He was always quick and patient with my numerous questions and doubts, and genuinely cared about my work. Without his persistent help, I would not have accomplished my goal. I would like to thank Dr. Naz Islam and Dr. Stephen Lombardo for being my committee members and for extending their time and concern. I would like to thank my parents, Mr. Deva Kumar and Mrs. Jerusha Kantha Kumari for their love and support in all points of my life, especially in my education. I would like to thank my sister, Keerthana Sharon for always being there for me and for her valuable suggestions. I would like to thank my friend, Puneeth Bathula for being there for me through thick and thin. I would also like to thank my relatives and friends who believed in me and supported me at all times. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ iv ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... v Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2. Energy Storage Systems ..........................................................................................8 1.3. Battery Energy Storage Systems ........................................................................... 16 2. BATTERIES USED IN BESS 2.1. Working mechanism of a battery ......................................................................... 17 2.2. Comparison of different types of batteries ........................................................... 19 2.3. Types of Lithium-ion batteries ............................................................................ 21 2.4. Characteristics of Lithium-ion and Lithium Polymer batteries ........................... 26 2.5. Factors contributing to the degradation of Lithium-ion and Lithium Polymer batteries ................................................................................................................ 30 3. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND PROCEDURES 3.1. Equipment used and their specifications.............................................................. 33 3.2. Lab design .......................................................................................................... 34 3.3. Operating procedures .......................................................................................... 35 4. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 4.1. Experimental data and analysis ............................................................................ 37 iii 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH PROSPECTS 5.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 45 5.2 Future prospects ................................................................................................. 45 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 47 iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1.1 Global fossil consumption .......................................................................................... 6 1.2 Various forms of energy storage ................................................................................ 9 2.1 Discharging process of a battery............................................................................... 18 2.2 Charging process of a battery.................................................................................... 19 2.3 U.S. grid scale battery storage capacity by chemistry .............................................. 29 3.1 Experimental set-up of the equipment ...................................................................... 34 4.1 Plot of the charging process of the INR battery ....................................................... 38 4.2 Plot of the discharging process of the INR battery ................................................... 40 4.3 Behavior of discharge capacity under standard rate of charging/discharging (1.3 A, 0.5 A) ......................................................................................................................... 41 4.4 Behavior of discharge capacity under increased rate of charging/discharging (2 A, 2 A) ............................................................................................................................ 42 4.5 Comparison of three different batteries with different cycling frequencies under increased charging/discharging conditions (2 A, 2 A) .............................................. 43 4.6 Comparison of lithium-ion and lithium-polymer batteries under their standard conditions .................................................................................................................. 44 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 Comparison of different chemistries of batteries .................................................. 25-26 4.1 Projected cycle life of the batteries ............................................................................. 44 vi ABSTRACT Conventional energy sources are depleting rapidly and might last for another 50-150 years depending on our current usage. Environmental issues like global warming are also rising quickly. Renewable energy sources can address both these issues and offer various other advantages like stabilizing the load, lower maintenance requirements etc. However, due to their intermittent supply, they are not always reliable. The energy harnessed from renewable sources needs to be stored and readily available for our use. Hence, the power system network is shifting towards energy storage technologies. There are various energy storage technologies available, out of which the battery energy storage systems (BESS) for large-scale energy storage are widely used. Examples of BESS are in the modern electronics & electrical devices like laptops, smartphones, iPad etc. This thesis focuses on various types of batteries used in BESS, their degradation processes and the factors contributing to their degradation. Two types of batteries, lithium-ion and lithium-polymer were tested under different conditions to observe the degradation process and the results obtained were analyzed. vii Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Global demand for energy has been increasing rapidly due to growing populations and economies. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the total global energy consumption statistics over the last five decades are found to be 86,005.52 TWh in 1980, 105,204.31 TWh in 1990, 117,927.7 TWh in 2000, 153,531.4 TWh in 2010 and 171,006.38 TWh in 2017 [1]. Such a rise in consumption poses two serious problems to the world — depletion of fossil fuel reserves and rise in global warming. To begin with, continuous usage of fossil fuels to generate electricity started raising concerns of depleting fossil fuel reserves, creating a need for energy security for future consumers. Out of 171,000 TWh of total global energy consumption in 2017, 132,500 TWh of energy dominantly came from fossil fuel sources of coal, crude oil and natural gas [2] as shown in Figure 1.1. These fossil fuel reserves continue to diminish as demand for them keeps increasing. According to the Statistical Review of World Energy 2019 by BP, one of the world's seven oil and gas supermajors, the coal reserves accounted for only 132 years of current production, oil reserves for only 50 years and gas reserves also for only 50 years [3]. These figures are only helpful as a static measure, since they vary with time as our levels of consumption rise or fall. 1 Figure 1.1 Global fossil fuel consumption Another important limit to fossil fuel usage is its environmental impact. Since