DOCSLIB.ORG

DEATH and AFTERLIFE Death and Afterlife

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEATH and AFTERLIFE Death and Afterlife DEATH AND AFTERLIFE Death and Afterlife Stephen T. Davis Professor of Philosophy and Religion Claremont McKenna College Claremont, California Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 978-1-349-10528-1 ISBN 978-1-349-10526-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-10526-7 © Claremont Graduate School, 1989 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1989 All rights reserved. For information, write: Scholarly and Reference Division, St. Martin's Press, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 First published in the United States of America in 1989 ISBN 978-0-312-03537-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Death and afterlife/[edited by] Stephen T. Davis. p. em. ISBN 978-0-312-03537-2 1. Death. 2. Death-Religious aspects. 3. Future life. I. Davis, Stephen T., 1940-. BD444.D34 1990 12~c20 89-39431 CIP Contents Notes on the Contributors vii Introduction viii 1 The Faces of Immortality 1 Kai Nielsen Response to Nielsen 31 John Hick 2 God, the Soul, and the Future Life 36 Paul Badham God and the Soul: A Response to Paul Badham 53 Kai Nielsen 3 The Idea of Reincarnation 65 Joseph Prabhu Karma and Rebirth in India: A Pessimistic Approach 81 Ariel Glucklich 4 Life After Death, Parapsychology, and 88 and Post-Modern Animism David Ray Griffin The Soul in Modern Philosophy: A Response 108 Edward J. Hughes 5 The Resurrection of the Dead 119 Stephen T. Davis From Here to Eternity: A Response to Davis 145 Jerry A. Irish God, the Soul, and Coherence: 149 A Response to Davis and Hick Kai Nielsen v vi Contents 6 Memento Mori: The Buddhist Thinks about Death 154 Francis H. Cook Zen and Death: A Response to Cook 172 Paul Badham Response to Cook 177 John Hick Response to Badham's Response 180 Francis H. Cook 7 A Possible Conception of Life After Death 183 John Hick Conceivability and Immortality: 197 A Response to John Hick Kai Nielsen Index 204 Notes on the Contributors Paul Badbam is Senior Lecturer in Theology and Religious Studies at Saint David's University College, Lampeter, in the University of Wales. Francis H. Cook is Professor of Religious Studies at the University of California at Riverside. Stephen T. Davis is Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Claremont McKenna College. Ariel Glucklich is Assistant Professor of Modem Languages and Literature at Pomona College. David Ray Grifim is Professor of the Philosophy of Religion at the School of Theology at Claremont. John Hick is Danforth Professor of the Philosophy of Religion at Claremont Graduate School. Edward J. Hughes is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of LaVerne. Jerry A. Irish is Vice-President and Dean of the College and Professor of Religion at Pomona College. Kai Nielsen is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Calgary. Joseph Prabhu is Professor of Philosophy at California State University at Los Angeles. vii Introduction Do we live after bodily death? This is surely one of the most pressing questions we human beings ask. Virtually everyone has an opinion. Virtually everyone is vitally interested in the answer. Does death end all, so to speak? Or do we (in some sense) continue as conscious, acting individuals after death? It is sometimes said that death is the most fearful reality that we face. Perhaps this is true. Death is a universal human problem. We can find thinkers in all generations and cultures who are concerned about death, fear of death, and the possibility of survival of death. It might prove helpful to ask why death is such a frightening thing. Why do most people look upon their own death with dread? Perhaps there are (at least) the following six reasons that we fear death: 1. We all know that death is inevitable; but most of us do not know when we will die. Accordingly, we live constantly under death's threat. 2. Death is unknown. Death is not something that we experience but is rather (as Wittgenstein put it) the end of experience. So there are many opinions but few or no accepted truths about death and what happens to us (if anything) after we die. 3. Every person must face death alone. Perhaps if we could expe­ rience death together - if we could, so to speak, hold hands and leap together into the void - death would not be so alarming to us. Unfortunately we cannot. 4. In death we will be separated from our friends and loved ones. 5. In death our personal hopes and aims about the future will not be realized. 6. There is a real and fearful possibility that death does indeed 'end all', that my death means my annihilation as a person. After my death, I simply no longer exist. These fears (and other factors like religious tradition) naturally lead people to wonder whether there is life after death. There seems to be four main answers to the question: What happens to me, if anything, after I die? These are the major options we find suggested by reflective people, both religious and irreligious, throughout hi­ story: viii Introduction ix 1. Nothing happens to me after I die because death is the end of me. I may live on in other people's memories, or perhaps my influence will continue for a time, but as a conscious, acting individual I do not survive my death. We can call this the 'death ends all' option. 2. After my death my body disintegrates permanently, but my immaterial essence (my mind, or soul, or jiva) is reborn in another body (animal or human) here on earth, perhaps to be reborn again many (or even an infinite number of) times. We can call this the 'reincarnation' option. 3. After death my body disintegrates, but my immaterial essence lives on forever in an immaterial world. We can call this the 'immortality of the soul' option. 4. After death my body disintegrates, but at some point in the future God will miraculously raise it from the ground and reconstitute me as a person. We can call this the 'resurrection' option. It might also be noted that these options are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Many Christian and Islamic scholars, for example, affirm both (3) and (4). This is a book about death and the possibility of life after death. All four of the options mentioned above are defended and discussed here. The book began as a series of papers at a scholarly conference called 'Death and Afterlife' held in Claremont, California in January 1987 under the auspices of the Department of Religion of the Claremont Graduate School. All the papers included in the book were written especially for the conference (although two have appeared subsequently elsewhere). The responses to each paper that were read at the conference are also included here, as are several comments submitted later. The high level of the papers themselves, the many positions they reflect, and the informed nature of the debate led the participants to believe that the papers and comments on the papers would constitute a unique and helpful book. We trust that this has proved to be so. Let me introduce the scholars who contributed the main chapters of the book (in the order in which their papers appear in it). Kai Nielsen is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Calgary. Well known in the philosophy of religion as well as in other areas of philosophy, Nielsen is an atheist who in this book defends his own version of the 'death ends all' option. Paul Badham is Senior Lecturer in Theology and Religious Studies at St David's University College, Lampeter, in the University of Wales, where he co-ordinates a X Introduction unique master's degree programme in Death and Immortality. In his paper Badham defends the viability and necessity of the concept of the soul in Christian theology. Joseph Prabhu is Professor of Philo­ sophy at California State University at Los Angeles. A native of India, in this book Prabhu steps outside his normal area of expertise (he is a Hegel scholar) and contributes an excellent contemporary defence of reincarnation. David Ray Griffin is Professor of the Philosophy of Religion at the School of Theology at Claremont. Griffin's orientation is Whiteheadean; his paper is interesting in that it goes beyond his own avowal earlier in his career of 'objective immortality' toward a notion of personal survival of death. Stephen T. Davis, the book's editor, is Professor of Philosophy at Claremont McKenna College. In his paper he defends a traditional Christian view of bodily resurrection. Francis H. Cook is Professor of Religious Studies at the University of California at Riverside. A Buddhist scholar and a practising Zen Buddhist, Cook presents a Buddhist version of the 'death ends all' option. (I should add that because of the lively nature of the debate stirred up by Cook's provocative paper, I have allowed him to contribute a reply to his two main critics.) John Hick is Danforth Professor of the Philosophy of Religion at Claremont Graduate School, and was the organiser of the conference. In his paper Hick summarises and defends. his own survival of death thesis (developed originally in his Death and Eternal Life), a unique synthesis of insights from reincarnation, immortality, and resurrection. Three other scholars contributed responses. Ariel Glucklich, an expert in Hinduism, is Visiting Assistant Professor of Modem Languages and Literatures at Pomona College. Edward J. Hughes is Assistant of Philosophy at the University of LaVerne. And Jerry A. Irish is Vice-President and Dean of the College and Professor of Religion at Pomona College.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Professors of Paranoia?
    http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i42/42a01001.htm From the issue dated June 23, 2006 Professors of Paranoia? Academics give a scholarly stamp to 9/11 conspiracy theories By JOHN GRAVOIS Chicago Nearly five years have gone by since it happened. The trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over. Construction of the Freedom Tower just began. Oliver Stone's movie about the attacks is due out in theaters soon. And colleges are offering degrees in homeland-security management. The post-9/11 era is barreling along. And yet a whole subculture is still stuck at that first morning. They are playing and replaying the footage of the disaster, looking for clues that it was an "inside job." They feel sure the post-9/11 era is built on a lie. In recent months, interest in September 11-conspiracy theories has surged. Since January, traffic to the major conspiracy Web sites has increased steadily. The number of blogs that mention "9/11" and "conspiracy" each day has climbed from a handful to over a hundred. Why now? Oddly enough, the answer lies with a soft-spoken physicist from Brigham Young University named Steven E. Jones, a devout Mormon and, until recently, a faithful supporter of George W. Bush. Last November Mr. Jones posted a paper online advancing the hypothesis that the airplanes Americans saw crashing into the twin towers were not sufficient to cause their collapse, and that the towers had to have been brought down in a controlled demolition. Now he is the best hope of a movement that seeks to convince the rest of America that elements of the government are guilty of mass murder on their own soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragments for a Process Theology of Mormonism
    Fragments for a Process Theology of Mormonism by James McLachlan I. SOME TENSIONS want to offer an interpretation of the ongoing revelation that is Mormonism from the point of view of Process Theology. This will Ibe a fragmentary interpretation because I cannot develop all of the possibilities in the space of one paper. Beyond the fragmentary character of this project there are at least two important tensions that will result from this attempt. eA. Religion and Theology First, there is always the possibility that one might take the theological reflection as the Mormon revelation and reduce it to that. This is the mis- take that theologians have made for millennia and is certainly the mistake that Sterling McMurrin makes in his pioneering classic of Mormon Theology: The Theological Foundations of the Mormon Religion. I believe that Ninian Smart is correct when he says that the theological/doctrinal is only one element of the religious which includes other elements; they are social, material, ritual, narrative/mythological, ethical, and perhaps most Element Vol. 1 Iss. 2 (Fall 2005) 1 Element importantly experiential.1 Thus theology is certainly not the foundation of a religion, but when we approach the religion through theoretical reflection it certainly appears to be. But when we are involved in concrete praxis, whether it is in temple work, working in the cannery, or just look- ing at a friend, the idea of our theological reflections as the foundation of our religion fades into the background. But it is far too simple to sim- ply split the theological from the other elements of religious life and say (as I have done in the recent past) that religious experience and narrative precedes everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy Theories.Pdf
    Res earc her Published by CQ Press, a Division of SAGE CQ www.cqresearcher.com Conspiracy Theories Do they threaten democracy? resident Barack Obama is a foreign-born radical plotting to establish a dictatorship. His predecessor, George W. Bush, allowed the Sept. 11 attacks to P occur in order to justify sending U.S. troops to Iraq. The federal government has plans to imprison political dissenters in detention camps in the United States. Welcome to the world of conspiracy theories. Since colonial times, conspiracies both far- fetched and plausible have been used to explain trends and events ranging from slavery to why U.S. forces were surprised at Pearl Harbor. In today’s world, the communications revolution allows A demonstrator questions President Barack Obama’s U.S. citizenship — a popular conspiracists’ issue — at conspiracy theories to be spread more widely and quickly than the recent “9-12 March on Washington” sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots and other conservatives ever before. But facts that undermine conspiracy theories move opposed to tax hikes. less rapidly through the Web, some experts worry. As a result, I there may be growing acceptance of the notion that hidden forces N THIS REPORT S control events, leading to eroding confidence in democracy, with THE ISSUES ......................887 I repercussions that could lead Americans to large-scale withdrawal BACKGROUND ..................893 D from civic life, or even to violence. CHRONOLOGY ..................895 E CURRENT SITUATION ..........900 CQ Researcher • Oct. 23, 2009 • www.cqresearcher.com AT ISSUE ........................901 Volume 19, Number 37 • Pages 885-908 OUTLOOK ........................902 RECIPIENT OF SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SILVER GAVEL AWARD BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................906 THE NEXT STEP ................907 CONSPIRACY THEORIES CQ Re search er Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • David Ray Griffin Foreword by Richard Folk
    THE NEW PEARL HARBOR Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 by David Ray Griffin foreword by Richard Folk CONTENTS Acknowledgements vi Forword by Richard Falk vii Introduction xi PART ONE THE EVENTS OF 9 / 11 1. Flights 11 and 175: How Could the Hijackers' Missions Have Succeeded? 3 2. Flight 77: Was It Really the Aircraft that Struck the Pentagon? 25 3. Flight 93: Was It the One Flight that was Shot Down? 49 4. The Presidents Behavior. Why Did He Act as He Did? 57 PART TWO THE LARGER CONTEXT 5. Did US Officials Have Advance Information about 9/11? 67 6. Did US Officials Obstruct Investigations Prior to 9/11? 75 7. Did US Officials Have Reasons for Allowing 9/11? 89 8. Did US Officials Block Captures and Investigations after 9/11? 105 PART THREE CONCLUSION 9. Is Complicity by US Officials the Best Explanation? 127 10. The Need for a Full Investigation 147 Notes 169 Index of Names 210 Back Cover Text OLIVE BRANCH PRESS An imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc. Northampton, Massachusetts First published in 2004 by OLIVE BRANCH PRESS An imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc. 46 Crosby Street, Northampton, Massachusetts 01060 www.interlinkbooks.com Text copyright © David Ray Griffin 2004 Foreword copyright © Richard Falk 2004 All rights reserved. No pan of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher unless National Security in endangered and education is essential for survival people and their nation .
    [Show full text]
  • David Ray Griffin, UNSNARLING the WORLD-KNOT: CONSCIOUSNESS, FREEDOM, and the MIND-BODY PROBLEM
    Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 16 Issue 2 Article 13 4-1-1999 David Ray Griffin, UNSNARLING THE WORLD-KNOT: CONSCIOUSNESS, FREEDOM, AND THE MIND-BODY PROBLEM Leemon McHenry Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation McHenry, Leemon (1999) "David Ray Griffin, UNSNARLING THE WORLD-KNOT: CONSCIOUSNESS, FREEDOM, AND THE MIND-BODY PROBLEM," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 16 : Iss. 2 , Article 13. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil199916225 Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol16/iss2/13 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. BOOK REVIEWS 269 women. Cases in point are divorce, contraception, and abortion (which in their effects, to say nothing of their nature, are disproportionately damaging to women). Nussbaum appeals to the words of John Paul II to support her views about freedom but she ignores his words about the evils of divorce, contraception, and abortion. In fact, in the case of con­ traception, she wants to stop the Pope and religious authorities general­ ly from publicly speaking out against it. For contraception, she says, is a basic human right for women and any religious leader who speaks in public fora against it should be criticized as a "subverter of the constitu­ tion" (she does not say this about those who speak against abortion, but only, it seems, because some third world feminists speak against it).
    [Show full text]
  • Process Theodicy and the Life After Death: a Possibility Or a Necessity?
    PROCESS THEODICY AND THE LIFE AFTER DEATH: A POSSIBILITY OR A NECESSITY? Sofia Vescovelli Abstract: In this paper I argue for the necessity of eschatology for process thought, and against the idea that the belief in a life after death is not an essential element for this theodicy. Without reference to an eschatological dimension, a process theodicy is led to admit a consequentialist conception of divine love and goodness that is inconsistent with its notion of a responsive and participative God who loves each creature. In the world many creatures suffer atrocious evils, which destroy the value of their lives, but the process God does not redeem these sufferings in a personal post-mortem life in which the sufferers participate and can find meaning for their individual evils. In order to support my thesis, I intend to examine some difficulties in process theodicy, especially in Charles Hartshorne’s position, showing how his doctrine of objective immortality is unsatisfactory. My starting point will be some criticisms advanced by John Hick against Hartshorne and the replies made by the process philosopher David R. Griffin. I conclude by contending that process theodicy, at least in its Hartshornean version, in denying the necessity of a personal afterlife, does not provide a satisfying answer to the soteriological-individual aspect of the problem of evil, namely the problem of the individual salvation in which the individual person can find redemption and meaning for the sufferings undergone or inflicted. In the process perspective the divine love is conceived in consequentialist terms and evils suffered by the individual are merely considered a by-product or the negative side of the divine creation out of chaos.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Constructive Postmodern Pluralism on the Perspectives of Alfred North Whitehead and David Ray Griffin
    Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Toward A Constructive Postmodern Pluralism on the Perspectives of Alfred North Whitehead and David Ray Griffin Purwanto Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel, Surabaya [email protected] Abstrak Tidak bisa dipungkiri perkembangan pemikiran keagamaan selalu memberikan corak yang dinamis, salah satunya adalah pemikiran tentang posmodernisme. Kaitannya dengan hal tersebut istilah pluralism posmodern konstruktif merupakan salah satu pemikiran posmodern yang menjadi kajian utama dalam tulisan ini. Meskipun banyak yang menolak penggunaan kata posmodernisme karena banyaknya asumsi yang berkembang namun istilah tersebut mempunyai kegunaan lebih dalam menyelami pemikiran- pemikiran yang berkembang saat ini. Saya menggunakan istilah tersebut untuk membedakan dua macam pluralism; 1) pluralism modern yang mencari kesamaan dasar pada tiap tradisi agama yang berbeda, dan 2) pluralisme posmodern yang menolak setiap pencarian dasar kesamaan berdasarkan penekanan terhadap keragaman dan keutamaan agama. Dari situ, artikel ini menjelaskan tentang ide-ide seputar pluralisme posmodern konstruktif (constructive postmodern pluralism). Selain itu, pembahasan dalam artikel ini lebih banyak bertumpu pada pemikiran dua tokoh, yakni Alfred North Whitehead, yang diperkenalkan dan dikembangkan oleh Cobb, dan David Ray Griffin. Pluralisme yang diusung dua tokoh ini melampaui gagasan pluralisme yang dijelaskan oleh John Hick, yaitu pluralisme yang menempatkan agama dalam posisi dasar the same down deep. Kata Kunci: Pluralisme,
    [Show full text]
  • David R. GRIFFIN's THEODICY David Ray Griffin Was Professor Of
    CHAPTER FOUR DAVID R. GRIFFIN’S Theodicy David Ray Griffin was Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology at Claremont School of Theology from 1973 until he retired in 2004. In 1973 he founded The Center for Process Studies along with John Cobb Jr. Griffin defends process theism, which is a theology based mainly on the work of philosophers Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947) and Charles Hartshorne (1897–2000). Griffin wrote a book on theodicy in 1976 calledGod, Power, and Evil: A Process Theodicy. In 1991 he published Evil Revisited: Responses and Reconsiderations, which presented some new ideas on theodicy, but mainly responded to critique against the book from 1976. In 2001 Griffin wrote two chapter long presentations of his process theodicy in two different books; his ownReenchantment Without Supernaturalism, and a new edition of the 1981 book Encountering Evil. Live Options in Theodicy edited by Stephen T. Davis. Griffin’s last whole book on theodicy is the book from 1991. His book Reenchantment Without Supernaturalism from 2001 has a chapter on theodicy which is struc- turally very similar to his 1991-book, but with some changes in content. Because of the changes I will use his most updated text, Reenchantment without Supernaturalism, but when there are more details in the 1991- book, I will supplement with that. I will follow the structure from the 1991 and 2001 books, and add supplements from other books by Griffin when these supply details that are relevant for the discussion to come.1 First there will be a presentation of how Griffin understands the problem of evil in relation to his understanding of God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Crime of All Time Vol 2
    Praise for Global Outlook Issue 11 which is now this book called: 9/11: THE GREATEST CRIME OF ALL TIME The Best of Global Outlook™ Vol. II “I’ve described [Issue 11 of Global Outlook] to friends as an excellent overview, which could well be given to people as a very accessible introduction to many of the major issues, along with suggestions on how to get involved in the movement. This should really be considered one of the major 9/11 publications, to be mentioned alongside the leading books. Congratulations on a grand achievement.” – David Ray Griffin, Author of The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions & Distortions “The current issue of Global Outlook [# 11], is much more than a magazine. It approaches being a book. It’s an inspiring and fact-filled current affairs reader and reference book combined. In a few years (very few I hope), when the hideously corrupt and deceitful planet-killing oligarchy is deposed, this issue, among others, will be sought after by librarians and historians. Hang on to your copy now, sell it then, and use the proceeds to enjoy the safer, saner world you’ll be living in then, thanks in large part to the efforts of the people behind this publication.” – Barrie Zwicker, Author of Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-Up and 9/11 and Producer of The Great Conspiracy – The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw (DVD) “Thanks for sending me Issue 11 of Global Outlook. It’s quite an impressive issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Panpsychism As Personal Experience: Resolving a Paradox
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses : Honours Theses 2004 Panpsychism as personal experience: Resolving a paradox Jonathan Cotton Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons Part of the Philosophy of Mind Commons Recommended Citation Cotton, J. (2004). Panpsychism as personal experience: Resolving a paradox. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ theses_hons/960 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/960 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. USE OF THESIS The Use of Thesis statement is not included in this version of the thesis. Panpsychism as Personal Experience: Resolving a Paradox By Jonathan Cotton Project: Honours Thesis Faculty: CSESS Supervisor: Dr Alan Tapper Associate Supervisor: Dr Peter Bedford Student Number: 2003736 Edith Cowan University Joondalup Date: 26111 Nov 2004 2 Abstract The thesis of panpsychism is that throughout the natural universe there is mentality, althouJh I prefer the term "mind".
    [Show full text]
  • Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Paranoid Conspiracy Theories Can’T Stand up to the Facts / by David Dunbar & Brad Reagan
    9/11 Conspiracy Theories: The World Trade Center Towers Collapse A selected bibliography of materials, many controversial, from the University of Oregon Library System and Internet. *In support of the Community Conversations program in University Housing* WORLD TRADE CENTER COLLAPSE AND OTHER BUILDING FAILURES Building on Ground Zero / by NOVA PBS Online, WGBH Educational Foundation, 2006 Available from: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/ Location: INTERNET A multimedia website that explores the reasons for the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and conspiracy theories related to that event. Construction Failure, 2nd ed. / by Jacob Feld & Kenneth L. Carper. New York: Wiley, 1997 Location: ARCHITECTURE & ALLIED ARTS LIBRARY Call #: TH441. F43 A textbook on the construction problems associated with the collapse of buildings and other human-made structures. Day of Terror / by Barbara Shangle. Beaverton, OR: American Products, 2001 Location: KNIGHT Call #: HV6432 .S528 Collection of photographic images of New York City on September 11, 2001. Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Paranoid Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts / by David Dunbar & Brad Reagan. New York: Hearst Books, 2006 Location: SUMMIT CATALOG An analysis and challenge of contemporary conspiracy theories regarding the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Tower, NIST NCSTAR 1-1 through NCSTAR 1-8/ by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Washington: U.S. G.P.O. Available from: http://wtc.nist.gov/reports_october05.htm Location: INTERNET The definitive technical report on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Denying the Apollo Moon Landings: Conspiracy and Questioning in Modern American History
    Denying the Apollo Moon Landings: Conspiracy and Questioning in Modern American History Roger D. Launius* Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20650 I. Abstract Almost from the point of the first Apollo missions, a small group of Americans denied that it had taken place at all. It had, they argued, been faked in Hollywood by the federal government for purposes ranging—depending on the particular Apollo landing denier—from embezzlement of the public treasury to complex conspiracy theories involving international intrigue and murderous criminality. They tapped into a rich vein of distrust of government, populist critiques of society, and questions about the fundamentals of epistemology and knowledge creation. At the time of the first landings, opinion polls showed that overall less than five percent, among some communities larger percentages, ―doubted the moon voyage had taken place.‖1 For example, Andrew Chaikin commented in his massive history of the Apollo Moon expeditions that at the time of the Apollo 8 circumlunar flight in December 1968 some people thought it was not real; instead it was ―all a hoax perpetrated by the government.‖ Bill Anders, an astronaut on the mission, thought live television would help convince skeptics since watching ―three men floating inside a spaceship was as close to proof as they might get.‖2 He could not have been more wrong. Fueled by conspiracy theorists of all stripes, this number has grown over time. In a 2004 poll, while overall numbers remained about the same, among Americans between 18 and 24 years old ―27% expressed doubts that NASA went to the Moon,‖ according to pollster Mary Lynne Dittmar.
    [Show full text]