Legislative Assembly

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legislative Assembly 13231 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 20 June 2012 __________ The Speaker (The Hon. Shelley Elizabeth Hancock) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. The Speaker read the Prayer and acknowledgement of country. AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT The Clerk announced the receipt, pursuant to section 63C of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983, of the Performance Audit Report of the Auditor-General entitled "Managing overtime: Rail Corporation NSW (RailCorp) and Roads and Maritime Services", dated June 2012. INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION Report The Speaker tabled, pursuant to section 78 of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988, the report of the Inspector of the Independent Commission Against Corruption entitled "Report of an audit of applications for and execution of Surveillance Device Warrants and Retrieval Warrants by the Independent Commission Against Corruption", dated May 2012. Ordered to be printed. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Notices of Motions General Business Notices of Motions (General Notices) given. INSPECTOR OF CUSTODIAL SERVICES BILL 2012 Second Reading Debate resumed from 19 June 2012. Mr KEVIN CONOLLY (Riverstone) [10.07 a.m.]: I speak in support of the Inspector of Custodial Services Bill 2012 which provides for the appointment of an Inspector of Custodial Services and sets out the powers and functions of that role. The bill implements a Government election commitment and responds to the recommendations of the 2009 Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee No. 3 inquiry into the privatisation of prisons and prison-related services in New South Wales. This is another example of the Government's commitment to transparency and accountability. The inspector will fill an independent statutory role in which he or she will be required to inspect each custodial centre at least once every five years and each juvenile justice and juvenile correctional centre at least once every three years. In addition, the inspector will have the power to inspect any custodial service at any time. Following these inspections the inspector will be required to report to Parliament. The inspector also will be required to report to Parliament on any issue relating to his or her function if it is in the public interest or if requested by the Minister to do so. The bill also includes the Official Visitor Program under the jurisdiction of the inspector's office. The bill provides the inspector with broad powers to ensure that he or she is able effectively to carry out the work in an independent manner. Clause 7 provides the inspector with all access to the records of any custodial centre as well as copies or extracts from the records; visits and examinations of any custodial centre at any time the inspector thinks fit; the power to require custodial staff members to supply information or produce documents or material relating to the custodial centre's 13232 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 20 June 2012 operations; power to require centre staff members to answer questions; the ability to refer matters to appropriate agencies for action, for example, a complaint from an inmate referred to the Ombudsman; and access to persons in custody detained or residing at any custodial centre for the purpose of communicating with them. Within four months of 30 June each year the inspector is required by this legislation to make annual reports to the Parliament in relation to his or her operations. These reports must include a description of the inspector's activities during that year and recommendations for changes in the law or administrative action needing to be taken. Prior to making this report the inspector is required to provide a draft of any critical material to the affected division, department or Minister and provide them with the opportunity to respond. The responses to the criticisms by the inspector must be included in the final report. Protection of information that would prejudice the security or discipline of any custodial centre or national security is provided for through an exemption in clause 15 which provides that the inspector must not disclose information in a report to Parliament if there is an overriding public interest against the disclosure of such information. Clause 4 allows the Committee on the Office of the Ombudsman and Police Integrity Commission to veto the appointment of a person as inspector, if necessary. Clauses 17 and 18 ensure that there are checks and balances in place through the Committee on the Office of the Ombudsman and Police Integrity Commission as well as a parliamentary joint committee which will monitor and review the exercises undertaken by the inspector. Clause 19 provides that wilful obstruction or refusal to comply with any lawful requirement of the inspector or the inspector's staff is an offence which will result in a maximum of 50 penalty units or imprisonment for 12 months or both. Further, clause 20 provides that any retribution taken against a person for providing information or evidence to the inspector will result in the same penalties as refusing to comply with the inspector. I note that following the inquiry in 2009 the former Government chose not to follow the recommendations as it was seen to duplicate the role of the Ombudsman. This bill specifically confers on the inspector the ability to refer matters to the Ombudsman, such as individual complaints from inmates and ensuring there is no overlap between the two bodies. The main benefit of this bill will be the creation of a truly independent and proactive role of Inspector of Custodial Services who will take action and investigate concerns relating to any prison or correctional centre without waiting for an invitation to do so and without any constraint or unreasonable fetter on his or her operations. In this way the community will be confident in the knowledge that the inspector is oversighting our correctional facilities and reporting to Parliament if at any time serious concerns arise. This sensible reform will ensure that a proactive rather than a reactive system is in place. I commend the bill to the House. Mr BRAD HAZZARD (Wakehurst—Minister for Planning and Infrastructure, and Minister Assisting the Premier on Infrastructure NSW) [10.11 a.m.]: I contribute to debate on the Inspector of Custodial Services Bill 2012 and state at the outset that nothing is more important for our community than addressing the shortcomings of our correctional system. However, my main concern relates to whether people who are moving through the correctional system have gone through a re-humanising or dehumanising process in order to become better people or worse people. I recollect when Lindsay Le Compte was Inspector General of Corrective Services. His position was subsequently abolished by the former Labor Government—I am sure not whether its decision had the support of all Labor members—because he started to raise issues that the Government found embarrassing. The former Labor Government abolished positions in a number of areas where it did not want scrutiny or public accountability. I strongly support this initiative of the Liberal-Nationals Government. This bill will present challenges for the Government because anyone in such a position tends to disclose matters that could cause a certain amount of discomfort. However, that provides for good governance and it achieves better outcomes for the community. I was disturbed when many of the programs that worked well—for example, the anger management program that was designed to rebuild self-esteem—were taken out of the corrective services system. This Government has not yet addressed all the programs that were decimated by the former Labor Government in its 16 years in office, but much of what currently occurs dehumanises rather than re-humanises prison inmates. Division 2 sets out the powers and functions of the Inspector of Custodial Services. I say to whoever is appointed: It is ridiculous when people who do not pose a serious danger to the community enter the system as maximum security inmates but within a period of two to three weeks are moved to a minimum security environment to serve their sentence. Prisons should be multifaceted and their core service should be to re-humanise and not dehumanise inmates. We must ensure that from day one the system deals appropriately with minimum security inmates. There should also be better communication with the families of inmates. We 20 June 2012 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY 13233 must not forget that those who are sentenced generally have families. From the moment a prisoner is taken from the dock and through the back door of the courtroom those families need to know what is happening. They have not been privy to that information for years. I hope the Inspector of Custodial Services will address that issue and look beyond the definition in clause 3 of "custodial centre", which includes correctional centres, residential facilities, transitional centres and juvenile justice centres. At least one member of the Coalition—and therefore the Parliament—would like the inspector to examine how the corrective services system deals with inmates from the moment they are taken into custody. Families need to know where a prisoner is going and how to engage with that prisoner. I recall one family that had a severely disabled child at home that required such engagement with an inmate. I support the Inspector of Custodial Services Bill and look forward to the appointment of an inspector who will fill a role that the former Labor Government did not think was appropriate when it removed former Inspector General Lindsay Le Compte. Mr NICK LALICH (Cabramatta) [10.16 a.m.]: The Inspector of Custodial Services Bill 2012 has as its objects: (a) to provide for the appointment of an Inspector of Custodial Services and confer on that Inspector functions relating to the inspection and review of custodial centres and custodial services, and (b) to make a number of miscellaneous amendments of a minor or consequential nature to other Acts and regulations.
Recommended publications
  • AFTINET Bulletin No. 140 September 2007 If You Would Like to Contribute
    Level 3, Suite 3B, 110 Kippax St Surry Hills, NSW, 2010 Phone: 02 9212 7242 Fax: 02 9211 1407 Email: [email protected] ACN 097 603 131 ABN 83 659 681 462 www.aftinet.org.au AFTINET Bulletin No. 140 September 2007 If you would like to contribute to the Bulletin, please contact us at [email protected] or Phone (02) 9212 7242 Fax (02) 9211 1407 Previous AFTINET Bulletins and resources are available at www.aftinet.org.au. Contents: 1. Alternative APEC (APPEC) events a success 2. Activist comes with a health warning: Lori Wallach in the SMH 3 Did APEC achieve anything? 4. APEC fails to address sex slavery, people trafficking say unions 5. Foreign workers 'enslaved' by 457 visa 6. New free trade agreements update 7. Union Aid Abroad-APHEDA Sydney Annual Dinner September 26 8. PIAC 25th Anniversary Dinner and Conference October 18 and 19 9. John Pilger’s, ‘The War on Democracy’ opens nationally September 27 1. Alternative APEC (APPEC) events a success The events organised by the Asia Pacific People for Environment and Community were a great success with over 200 people attending both the forum and the conference to hear speakers from Australia and the region discuss alternative visions of fair trade to address the challenges of human rights, labour rights, poverty and environmentally sustainable development in the region. Congratulations to the AFTINET campaigners and volunteers who worked so hard to achieve this. Although the media was dominated by fear- mongering about security threats and demonstrations, there was also media coverage of the APPEC alternative events, which provided some fair trade voices contesting the APEC vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia in the Connected World Twelve Page Special
    An iTWire publication www.itwire.com Issue 37 12 October 2013 Australia in the connected world Twelve page special Twitter confirms it will go public New iPads on the way Cisco acquires Sourcefire Sacked NBN director slams Turnbull In this Issue TO JUMP TO A STORY, CLICK THE PAGE NUMBER SPECIAL FEATURE AUSTRALIA IN THE CONNECTED WORLD Australia improves digital ranking 4 Australian mobile downloads surge 7 … but the handset market is saturated and declining 8 … with slow growth forecast in mobile services 9 Telstra customers have the oldest phones 10 … and Aussies choose cheaper over faster 11 Australians engage with online advertising 13 … while PC sales get even sicker 14 Obama upholds Samsung ban 16 Berners-Lee promotes affordable Web 16 IT in healthcare not keeping up 17 Unisys releases new virtualisation platform 19 … and enters MDM market by Stealth 21 Huge rise in privacy concerns 22 Cisco acquires Sourcefire 23 Sydney Catholic high schools install massive Wi-Fi network 24 Microsoft pays $100K for new exploit technique 25 Facebook removes more privacy 26 Telstra says 4G demands ‘acceleration’ 27 Sacked NBN director slams Turnbull – and Conroy 28 All that Twitters will be sold 29 iTWire Magazine Issue 37 12 October 2013 iTWire Pty Ltd www.itwire.com page 2 Optus replaces Telstra in NSW Government shared services 30 … and inks $60 million Virgin deal 31 AIG wants the new NBN to prioritise business 31 Quickflix rebound continues 33 Google Australia boss says NBN debate flawed 34 Commander announces ‘rapid’ 4G plans 35 Telstra to provide
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Australian Catholic University's Paid Maternity Leave Provision
    The Impact of the Australian Catholic University’s Paid Maternity Leave Provision Final Report Denise Thompson, Michael Bittman and Peter Saunders SPRC Report 3/04 Social Policy Research Centre University of New South Wales February 2004 The Impact of the Australian Catholic University’s Paid Maternity Leave Provision Final Report Denise Thompson, Michael Bittman and Peter Saunders Report Prepared for the Australian Catholic University ACU Maternity Leave Provisions For a full list of SPRC Publications see www.sprc.unsw.edu.au or contact: Publications, SPRC, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, 2052 Australia. Telephone: +61 (2) 9385 7802 Fax: +61 (2) 9385 7838 Email: sprcpub unsw.edu.au ISSN 1446-4179 ISBN 0 7334 2119 9 March 2004 The views expressed in this publication do not represent any official position on the part of the Social Policy Research Centre, but are the views of the individual author(s). ii ACU Maternity Leave Provisions Executive Summary • On 14 August 2001, the Australian Catholic University (ACU) announced that its new General Staff Enterprise Bargaining Agreement included a provision for one year’s paid maternity leave – 12 weeks on full pay and a further 40 weeks on 60 per cent pay. • This report assesses the impact of the ACU maternity leave provision on shaping the public debate on parental leave by examining how the issue has been covered in the media since its announcement, and how this has been incorporated into the broader debate on family-friendly workplace policies. • The project does not address the impact of the provisions on the ACU itself, or on its employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Safecom News and Updates Monday, 19 June 2017
    Project SafeCom News and Updates Monday, 19 June 2017 Support us by making periodic donations: http://www.safecom.org.au/donate.htm 1. Gillian Triggs says Australia's politicians leading 'assault' on democratic ideals 2. A future for Australia's refugee program? Private sponsorship costing $100,000 3. Peter Lewis: What if Australia already had its 'Trump moment' – and it was Tony Abbott? 4. Voters back deportation of asylum seekers if refugee claims fail – Guardian Essential poll 5. Manus Island: Government could pay compensation to almost 2,000 detainees over treatment 6. Manus Island class action: government to compensate former detainees in huge settlement 7. Government to pay damages to 1,905 Manus Island detainees in class action 8. MEDIA RELEASE: No amount of money can compensate for Manus horror 9. Brutal truth of Australia's detention regime can't be written off. Not even for $70m 10. Tony Abbott and Peter Dutton condemn payout to refugees detained on Manus Island 11. Michael Gordon: Despite what Peter Dutton says, the Manus Island payout is momentous 12. Martin McKenzie-Murray: The wrong kind of settlement 13. Richard Ackland: Australian government pays heavy penalty for Manus mistreatment 14. UN official says Australia responsible for 'inhuman' treatment of asylum seekers 15. MEDIA RELEASE: "Where's Behrouz?" Refugee protest to march to Manus Film World Premiere 16. Refugee documentaries offer window into banality, brutality and hope 17. Peter Dutton pressures Labor to support Coalition's citizenship crackdown 18. Feedback on controversial citizenship changes to be kept secret 19. Coalition's citizenship laws would give Peter Dutton power to overrule court decisions 20.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Experience
    The Australian Experience Class code SCA-UA 9809 – 002 Instructor Dr Justine Greenwood Details [email protected] Consultations by Appointment Please allow at least 24 hours for your instructor to respond to your emails. Class Details Fall 2017 The Australian Experience Tuesday 12:30 – 3:30pm September 5 to December 12 Room 302 NYU Sydney Academic Centre Science House: 157-161 Gloucester Street, The Rocks 2000 Prerequisites None Class This course offers a wide-ranging critique of Australian culture and society. It aims to Description interrogate Australian society with a methodology that draws on critical race theory, feminism, social geography and cultural studies. It will look at issues such as the relationship between Australian settler culture and Aboriginal Australians; Australia’s experience of migration and multiculturalism; Australians’ relationship with their environment; and Australians’ sense of national identity. In particular, it will consider how these issues have played out in popular culture. This course offers a special experience for students wishing to broaden and deepen their methodologies of cultural analysis. Australian society is fascinating in itself, but it also offers a unique perspective on transnational issues such as identity formation, social justice movements and the experience of multiculturalism. For instance, given Australia’s history of Indigenous and non-Indigenous relations, the issue of race in a post-colonial context is particularly acute here. Through comparison with the Australian experience, students will develop a more critical view of American and global society. Students wishing to pursue a career that involves cultural analysis will benefit greatly from studying Australian society, in Australia, and thus developing this comparative approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS Mission & Vision 2 From the Chairman & CEO 3 2010 in Review 4 People 6 • Appointments 6 • Visitors 10 Learning & Teaching 12 • Postgraduate 12 • Undergraduate 12 • Internships 13 • Summer School 15 Events 16 Think Tank 20 Research 22 • Publications 22 • Opinion Survey 23 • SSMART Workshops 23 • Research Grants 24 Postdoctoral Fellows 25 American Review 27 Media & Communications 28 • Media 28 • Online 30 About Us 31 • Board of Directors 31 • Council of Advisors 32 • International Academic Advisory Committee 33 • Centre Staff 34 Financial Report 36 Partners & Supporters 38 The Year Ahead 40 The United States Studies Centre reserves the right to make alterations to any information contained within this publication without notice. The UnITed States studies cenTRE Annual Report 2010 1 MISSION & VISION Our mission is to increase understanding of the United States in Australia and around the world. Spanning the study of politics and policy, economics and business, and culture and society, the core activities of the Centre include: • Postgraduate degrees and undergraduate teaching • Academic research and research training • Policy analysis and commentary • Business leadership forums • Public education and community outreach The Centre’s ambition is to become the leading institution outside America for the study of the United States. Our principal objectives are to: • Undertake analysis, research and teaching of the highest quality • Be the international hub for the study of the United States • Build networks with preeminent American institutions and scholars US Studies Centre: from 2006 to today The United States Studies Centre was established by thousand students and hundreds of visitors, experts and the howard Government in 2006 with $25 million in scholars have passed through its doors.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Trade Treaty in Force
    ISSUE NO. 254 – THURSday 23RD MAY 2013 SUBSCRIBER EDITION NEWS | INTELLIGENCE | BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES | EVENTS IN THIS ISSUE NATIONAL NEWS Defence Trade Treaty in force . 1 CEA Technologies to develop high power PAR . 2 BAMS at last with MQ-4C Triton? . 3 Qantas Defence Services for sale . 4 Plan Beersheba takes shape . 5 Chinook crashworthy seats pass major milestone . 5 Lithgow Arms showcases new rifle . 6 Victorian defence capabilities on show . 7 Land Environmental Working Group . 8 Queensland serious about defence industry: Seeney . 8 Defence Trade Treaty in force ADM Online: Weekly Summary . 9 INTERNATIONAL NEWS Minister for Defence Stephen Smith and the US Ambassador to Australia, His Excellency Jeffrey Bleich, have exchanged First vertical takeoff for F-35B . 9 diplomatic notes to bring the Australia – US Defence Trade Schedule slip for LCS . 10 Cooperation Treaty into force. The Treaty’s entry into force BMT reports strong performance . 10 reflects Australia and the US’ commitment to cooperation in Apache Hellfire missiles restocked . 11 Defence capability and technology. Cubic awarded US$21 million FMS training contract . 11 The Australia-US Defence Trade Cooperation Treaty was signed in FORTHCOMING EVENTS .......12 Sydney September 5, 2007, creating a framework for the transfer of DEFENCE BUSINESS eligible defence goods, services and technology between approved OPPORTUNITIES...See separate PDF entities in Australia and the US, (the Approved Community) without the need to apply for separate export licences. The Treaty aims to PUBLISHING CONTACTS: improve delivery times, improve sustainment and give Australian EDITOR industry better access to technical data to tender for US contracts. Katherine Ziesing, Australia is implementing the Treaty through the Defence Trade Tel: 02 6203 9535 Email: [email protected] Controls Act 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission by Free TV Australia
    Submission by Free TV Australia Finance and Public Administration References Committee Inquiry into lessons to be learned in relation to the Australian bushfire season 2019-20 23 September 2020 S:10319183_1 AFF 1 Table of contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 ABOUT FREE TV AUSTRALIA ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 IN TIMES OF CRISIS AUSTRALIANS TURN TO FREE TV BROADCASTERS .................................................... 4 3. THE 2019-20 BUSHFIRES AND BROADCASTERS’ EMERGENCY OBLIGATIONS............................. 6 3.1 HOW OUR MEMBERS SUPPORTED AUSTRALIANS DURING THE 2019-20 BUSHFIRES .................................. 6 3.2 ENGAGEMENT WITH EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANISATIONS ............................................................... 8 3.3 THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR OUR MEMBERS ......................................................................... 8 4. ENSURING BROADCAST NETWORK RESILIENCE ....................................................................... 9 5. MEDIA ENGAGEMENT WITH EMERGENCY SERVICES AGENCIES ............................................. 10 A. ATTACHMENT - FREE TV: AUSTRALIA’S MOST WATCHED SOURCE OF NEWS .......................... 11 2 1. Executive Summary • Free TV Australia is providing
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Newsletter of the NSW Biodiversity Research Network Issue No
    BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Newsletter of the NSW Biodiversity Research Network Issue No. 25 April 2008 Contents EDITORIAL ................................................................................................................................... 2 NSW Scientific Committee final determinations...................................................................... 3 FEATURES ................................................................................................................................... 3 Indigenous Sea Rangers Return from Mexico........................................................................... 3 One-third of NSW Flora Banked for our Future ......................................................................... 4 The Occurrence and Cultivation of Native Figs ( Ficus sp.) in Southeastern Australia.............. 5 CULTURAL HERITAGE NEWS ................................................................................................... 5 Recognising Aboriginal Cultural Values of Wetlands ................................................................ 5 Request to Repatriate Carved Trees......................................................................................... 6 Bermagui Waterhole Declared as Aboriginal Place................................................................... 6 Inglebah Aboriginal Place .......................................................................................................... 6 Landscape Mapping for Culgoa National Park .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Media Roundup Issue 41 (07/10/17 – 13/10/17)
    Media Roundup Issue 41 (07/10/17 – 13/10/17) 1. ABC, Fairfax accuse Chau Chak Wing of ‘betraying’ Australia 07/10/2017 Primrose Riordan The Australian Lawyers for the ABC and Fairfax Media allege there were “reasonable grounds to believe” a billionaire businessman was spying for China. Chau Chak Wing, an Australian citizen of 20 years, lodged a defamation claim against ABC and Fairfax in July over a series of reports the property developer has claimed falsely made him out to be a “disloyal” person who had used his - influence to advance the interests of China. Lawyers for the ABC and Fairfax yesterday filed documents in their defence in the Federal Court in a matter where Dr Chau seeks damages, interest and costs. Instead of rejecting the substance of the defamation action, the documents state that ABC and Fairfax believe there is “reasonable grounds” to believe Dr Chau “betrayed” Australia. Read more (Paywall): http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/abc-fairfax-accuse-chau-chak-wing -of-betraying-australia/news-story/83003f79af39625306a423d2b925840a 2. DFAT head Frances Adamson warns China to get used to scrutiny 09/10/2017 Primrose Riordan The Australian DFAT head Frances Adamson has told universities to remain free of foreign interference in a speech to a Chinese government funded Confucius Institute in Adelaide last night. She has also delivered a pointed message to the Chinese government, saying they should get used to scrutiny of their activities abroad as their influence grows. China Matters Media Roundup Issue 41 (07/10/17 – 13/10/17) In an interview with The Australian in September, the peak body representing Australia’s elite universities acknowledged there have been “isolated” instances of Chinese government interference on campuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Aus-China Media Memo 28 April
    relationship Each week China Matters collates news items about the Australia-China relationship Media Roundup Issue 69 (28/04/18 – 04/05/18) 1. Australia-China relations need a reset, and Malcolm Turnbull has to lead the way 29/04/2018 James Laurenceson South China Morning Post Australia-China relations need a reset. But this is unlikely as long as the Australian prime minister himself remains a stumbling block. This month, Geoff Raby, a former Australian ambassador to China, said that things haven’t been this bad since 1989, when the Chinese government crushed student-led protests in Beijing. Responding to such claims, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was only prepared to concede there’s “a degree of tension in the relationship”. Read more: http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight- opinion/article/2143690/australia-china-relations-need-reset-and-malcolm-turnbull 2. China: magic weapons and “plausible deniability” 30/04/2018 Graeme Smith The Interpreter Xi Jinping’s radical overhaul of the Chinese bureaucracy is not, as Xinhua would have you believe, just about streamlining government administration and reducing “red tape”. A host of state agencies that once stood between the public and the Chinese Communist Party have been done away with. Government bodies, including the Religious Affairs Bureau, the State Ethnic Affairs Commission, and the State Council’s Office of Overseas Chinese Affairs, have been absorbed by the UFWD. While the “nameplate” of these offices will likely be maintained for foreign consumption, the move demonstrates the importance Xi places on the party’s nearly century-old United Front strategy. China Matters Media Roundup Issue 69 (28/04/18 - 04/05/18) relationship Each week China Matters collates news items about the Australia-China relationship Read more: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/plausible-deniability-and- united-front-work-department 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Productivity Commission Inquiry Into Broadcasting
    PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION INQUIRY INTO BROADCASTING SUBMISSION FROM THE FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL TELEVISION STATIONS MAY 1999 SUMMARY OF SUBMISSION Governments everywhere in the world have intervened in the broadcasting industry to secure a range of economic, social and cultural objectives. Australian Governments have done so for many reasons. Some of these reasons are now of diminishing relevance, while others remain highly relevant on social, cultural or economic grounds. This submission assesses key broadcasting policies, in order to ascertain whether the public benefits outweigh the costs to the community of the restrictions imposed on the industry, or on competition within the industry. Currently, Australia has one of the best and most comprehensive free-to-air broadcasting systems in the world. It offers diversity of programming, quality, national coverage and local services, and programs reflecting our identity as Australians. This has been achieved through a structure of broadcasting developed over many decades. It involves a hybrid system of advertiser-funded and government-funded broadcasters. The advertiser-funded commercial free-to-air services are the predominant element in the system. These locally-licensed services are highly competitive and efficient. They provide much more local service and locally-produced programming - the costliest service components - than would be expected in a country with such a small population. They are able to do this because of long-standing (though recently reviewed) regulatory limits on the number of commercial services in each licence area. These impressive (and costly) service levels are already proving hard to maintain in the face of limited advertising growth and expanding competition from other media.
    [Show full text]