Arxiv:1912.03881V1 [Hep-Ph]

arXiv:1912.03881v1 [hep-ph] 9 Dec 2019 tzr oetmtransfer, momentum zero at rpitsbitdt Elsevier to submitted Preprint ndb h lp ftepoo hrefr factor form non- charge de- proton is the the of It slope in the interactions. by Model fined strong Standard the of successful regime so perturbative understand- the our challenges of it ing as physics, particle in tity notegm nyltr ihamc ihrsensitiv- higher much a with to later, ity only came game thus the and into theory precision energy pre- and the require experiments in however, cision imprint determinations, small finite Such a the leaves where spectrum. proton proton, the a of with size muon) states (a bound electron electromagnetic an are of These [3]. pro- the radius to ton sensitive also hy- is electronic hydrogen pi- muonic in and these shift drogen following Lamb decades the measurements the experiments, the in oneering refine radius to proton the choice scattering of of electron While method radius the dipole. form the was the the extracted of and fitted slope form the who dipole from 2], a [1, with data al. experi- factor et scattering Hofstadter electron by winning ments prize measured Nobel indirectly the first was in radius charge proton The esrmn ftemoi yrgnLm hf e to to led surprise shift first Lamb the true hydrogen when muonic a below) the as see of measurement all, came not then (but elec- It researchers the most was from shift. This determination Lamb the tronic [4]. CODATA with by consistent given also value the also was with unmass, muon aeteso-called experiments scattering the electron gave Most enhanced. e much the and smaller is radius Bohr ecmeto h ttsadhsoyo h rtncag radi charge proton the of history and status the on comment We Abstract h rtncag radius charge proton The c r emot ntttfu taln n enhskadBethe and Kernphysik und für Strahlen- Institut Helmholtz t r 2 p p h nain ormmnu rnfrsquared. transfer four-momentum invariant the = o unchdoe.Ti sdet h larger the to due is This hydrogen. muonic for 6 b xrM atrIsiueEM,GIHlhlzetu für S Helmholtzzentrum GSI EMMI, Institute Matter ExtreMe dG d nttt o dacdSmlto n ntttfür Kernph Institut and Simulation Advanced for Institute m dt E p µ ( / t m )

e t large = 0 ≃ , a 0,s httecorresponding the that so 200, ntttfu enhsk ehiceUniversität Darmst Technische für Kernphysik, Institut h rtnrdu:Fo uzet precision to puzzle a From radius: proton The radius, r P ff safnaetlquan- fundamental a is c ftepoo radius proton the of ect r P asWre Hammer Hans-Werner ≃ e 0 bls tt nvriy 16Tiii Georgia Tbilisi, 0186 University, State Tbilisi . 8f,which fm, 88 G E p etrfrTertclPyis nvri¨tBn,D-5311 Universität Bonn, Physics, Theoretical for Center (1) ( t ) sk oshnsetu ¨lc,D545Jülich, German Jülich, D-52425 Forschungszentrum ysik, a,b heinnoshn mH 49 amtd,Germany Darmstadt, 64291 GmbH, chwerionenforschung l-.Meißner Ulf-G. , aabs fncenfr atrdt 1] Again, [13]. data factor form nucleon a world of on the base based of data authors analysis the dispersion-theoretical and the in Belushkin thorough anticipated by was paper puzzle radius 2007 proton the 12]. fact, [11, In group Bonn-Mainz Chro- the Quantum by (QCD) from modynamics constraints consistent and made symmetries and developed with further Karlsruhe and the [10], by ap- group first This utilized and [9]. pioneered radius was proton proach the of extraction proper a importance for utmost of is and fashion model-independent rbto rmtecoetsnuaiyi h momentum the con- in transfer singularity the uni- closest particular, the of In from principles tribution analyticity. general and rela- the magnetic crossing dispersion embody tarity, and using these charge analyzed as neutron best tions, lead- are and data factors proton scattering form Electron the this to story. [8]), ing whole Ref. the (cf. not Model is universal- Standard lepton the the underlying ity questioning even theoretical or and approaches, experimental the scrutinizing lications re- a For [8]. media. e.g., online see, view and print be- many featured long, that in puzzle”, since prominently radius “proton understood quantity, the as be known fundamental came to a believed was such which in This discrepancy [7]. muonic value glaring of small the measurement supported Another however, with hydrogen, [4]. consistent measure- e.g., shift also see, Lamb ments, was electronic from which value average [6], the radius reinforced large (MAMI) Microtron the Mainz the from data scattering electron-proton high-precision when thickened n y5 by ing h so-called the sdeterminations. us oee,wieti e oalrenme fpub- of number large a to led this while However, d,629Drsat Germany Darmstadt, 64289 adt, σ t h w-incnium a eicue na in included be can continuum, two-pion the , rmteCDT au 5.Tepo further plot The [5]. CODATA value the from small c,d,e radius, r P = 0 . 48(7 m di fm, 84184(67) on Germany Bonn, 5 eebr1,2019 10, December y ff er- ing as well as the on-going activities to analyze electron Table 1: Modern extractions of the proton charge radius from the electronic Lamb shift and electron-proton scattering. scattering data using dispersive methods, we can now consider the proton radius puzzle solved and look for- rp [fm] year method Ref. ward to an increased precision in the determination of 0.8335(95) 2017 el. Lamb shift [16] this fundamental quantity. 0.877(13) 2018 el. Lamb shift [17] 0.833(10) 2019 el. Lamb shift [18] Conflict of interest 0.831(7)(12) 2019 e − p scattering [19] The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments a small radius in the range rp = 0.82 ...0.85fm was We thank Hans Ströher for pertinent comments found and it was further shown that a large proton ra- and Bastian Kubis for a careful reading of the dius rP = 0.88 ... 0.90fm could hardly be accommo- manuscript. This work was supported in part by dated by the form factor data if the constraints from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German unitarity and analyticity are taken into account. The Research Foundation) – Projektnummer 279384907 – reanalysis of the exquisite MAMI data from 2010 us- CRC 1245 and the DFG and the NSFC through funds ing the same dispersion-theoretical framework also led provided to the Sino-German CRC 110 “Symmetries to a small radius of rp = 0.84(1) fm [14], similar to all and the Emergence of Structure in QCD”. The work other such analyses before. This was later refined in- of UGM was also supported by the Chinese Academy cluding effects from the two-photon exchange and per- of Sciences (CAS) President’s International Fellowship forming an improved error analysis, leading to rp = Initiative (PIFI) (Grant No. 2018DM0034)and by Volk- 0.840 (0.828 − 0.855)fm [15]. swagenStiftung (Grant. No. 93562). The work of HWH was also supported by the German Federal Min- Still, the situation remained unsatisfactory as rp from the electronic Lamb shift was on the large side and there istry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Grant no. has been on-going debate about the extraction of the 05P18RDFN1). radius from electron scattering experiments. The situation changed, however, dramatically when three new experiments on the electronic Lamb shift [16, 17, 18], a References novel measurement of electron-proton scattering at un- precedented small momentum transfer [19], and another [1] R.W. McAllister and R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. 102, 851 (1956). [2] R. Hofstadter, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 7, 231 (1957). dispersion-theoretical inspired analysis of electron scat- [3] R. Karplus, A. Klein and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 86, 288 tering data [20] became available in the last few years, (1952). with the latter one just reinforcing the claims made by [4] P. J. Mohr, B. N. Taylor and D. B. Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, the Bonn-Mainz group since the mid 1990ties. With 633 (2008) [arXiv:0801.0028 [physics.atom-ph]]. [5] R. Pohl et al., Nature 466, 213 (2010). the exception of the Paris electronic Lamb shift mea- [6] J. C. Bernauer et al. [A1 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, surement [17], all of these new determinations of rp 242001 (2010) [arXiv:1007.5076 [nucl-ex]]. consistently give a small proton radius. Consequently, [7] A. Antognini et al., Science 339, 417 (2013). the newest addition of the CODATA compilation lists [8] R. Pohl, R. Gilman, G. A. Miller and K. Pachucki, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 175 (2013) [arXiv:1301.0905 [physics.atom- the proton charge radius as rp = 0.8414(19) fm [21], ph]]. completely consistent with the value from muonic hy- [9] G. Höhler and E. Pietarinen, Phys. Lett. 53B, 471 (1975). drogen and electron scattering data analysed using dis- [10] G. Höhler, E. Pietarinen, I. Sabba Stefanescu, F. Borkowski, G. G. Simon, V. H. Walther and R. D. Wendling, Nucl. Phys. persion theory. In light of these results, an improved B 114, 505 (1976). dispersion-theoretical analysis including the most re- [11] P. Mergell, U.-G. Meißner and D. Drechsel, Nucl. Phys. A 596, cent high-precision determination of the two-pion con- 367 (1996). [hep-ph/9506375]. tinuum contribution [22] based on the tremendously [12] H. W. Hammer, U.-G. Meißner and D. Drechsel, Phys. Lett. B 385, 343 (1996) [hep-ph/9604294]. successful Roy-Steiner analysis of pion-nucleon scatter- [13] M. A. Belushkin, H.-W. Hammer and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. ing [23] should be performed. Complementary scatter- C 75, 035202 (2007). [hep-ph/0608337]. ing experiments using muons are also planned [24, 25]. [14] I. T. Lorenz, H.-W. Hammer and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A In summary, in view of the new extractions of the 48, 151 (2012) [arXiv:1205.6628 [hep-ph]]. [15] I. T. Lorenz, U.-G. Meißner, H.-W. Hammer and Y.-B. Dong, proton charge radius from electronic Lamb shift mea- Phys. Rev. D 91, 014023 (2015) [arXiv:1411.1704 [hep-ph]]. surements and very low-energy electron-proton scatter- [16] A. Beyer et al., Science 358, 79 (2017). 2 [17] H. Fleurbaey et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 183001 (2018) [arXiv:1801.08816 [physics.atom-ph]]. [18] N. Bezginov, T. Valdez, M. Horbatsch, A. Marsman, A. C. Vutha and E. A. Hessels, Science 365, 1007 (2019). [19] W. Xiong et al., Nature 575, 147 (2019). [20] J. M. Alarcon, D. W. Higinbotham, C. Weiss and Z. Ye, Phys. Rev. C 99, 044303 (2019) [arXiv:1809.06373 [hep-ph]]. [21] https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?rp [22] M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, J. Ruiz de Elvira, H.-W. Ham- mer and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 331 (2016) [arXiv:1609.06722 [hep-ph]]. [23] M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rept. 625, 1 (2016) [arXiv:1510.06039 [hep-ph]]. [24] R. Gilman et al. [MUSE Collaboration], arXiv:1303.2160 [nucl- ex]. [25] C. Dreisbach et al. [COMPASS++/AMBER working group], PoS DIS 2019, 222 (2019).