DOCSLIB.ORG

Brandywine Creek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brandywine Creek Brandywine Creek Watershed Action Plan Note: This Plan is being made available as an intermediate step in the development of the Brandywine Creek Watershed Conservation Plan by the Brandywine Valley Association. December 2002 Mission Watersheds Statement To protect, sustain, and enhance the quality and quantity of all water resources to insure the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens, and preserve the diverse natural resources and aesthetic and recreational assets of Chester County and its watersheds. Disclaimer The maps, data and information presented herein were compiled by the Chester County Water Resources Authority for the County of Chester, PA and are hereby referenced to the Chester County, Pennsylvania Water Resources Compendium (2001). These information and data are pro- vided for reference and planning purposes only. This document is based on and presents the best information available at the time of the preparation. Funding Partners Chester County and the Chester County Water Resources Authority express their appreciation to those entities who provided financial support for this effort. This project was funded by: • Chester County Board of Commissioners. • Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund Program. • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Program. • Brandywine Valley Association and William Penn Foundation. • U. S. Geological Survey. Chester County Board of Commissioners Karen L. Martynick, Chairman Colin A. Hanna Andrew E. Dinniman Watershed Action Plan December 2002 Prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority Chester County Planning Commission Camp Dresser and McKee Gaadt Perspectives, LLC Prepared as a component of: Chester County, Pennsylvania Water Resources Compendium _________________________ Prepared under a Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Grant funded by Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Table of Contents Section 1. Watershed Setting ..................................................................................................1 Section 2. Planning Framework..............................................................................................3 Section 3. Watershed Characteristics ....................................................................................5 Population ......................................................................................................................5 Land Use .......................................................................................................................5 Impervious Cover...........................................................................................................5 Geology .........................................................................................................................5 Watershed Water Budgets..............................................................................................6 Ground Water Balances .................................................................................................7 DE River Basin Commission Southeastern PA Ground Water Protected Area ............9 Ground Water Quality ...................................................................................................9 Stream Water Quality ....................................................................................................9 State Water Protected Use Designations......................................................................10 Stream Water Quality Assessments – Impaired Waters ..............................................11 Total Maximum Daily Load Regulations ....................................................................11 Nonpoint Source Pollutant Loads ................................................................................11 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Regulations....12 Biological Diversity Monitoring..................................................................................12 Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Index (PNDI) ............................................................13 Cultural, Recreational and Historic Resources ............................................................13 First Order Streams......................................................................................................14 Land Use Analysis within Stream Corridors ...............................................................14 Sources of Water Supplies...........................................................................................15 Surface Water Withdrawals and Discharges................................................................16 Integrated Water Resources Planning to Meet Future Needs .....................................16 Section 4. Watershed Management Needs and Priorities ..................................................19 Inventory of Watershed Management Needs...............................................................19 Watershed and Subbasin Priorities ..............................................................................19 Section 5. Priority Watershed Management Objectives and Actions ...............................22 Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................22 Recommended Priority Management Actions.............................................................23 Other Recommended Management Actions ................................................................23 Ongoing Initiatives.......................................................................................................23 Section 6. Indicators of Progress ..........................................................................................24 Landscapes Indicators .................................................................................................24 Watersheds Indicators .................................................................................................24 Section 7. References .............................................................................................................25 Brandywine Creek Watershed Action Plan i Tables 1 Subbasins within the Watershed 2 Snapshot of Watershed Characteristics 3 Population – 1998 Estimates and 2020 Projections by Subbasin 4 Land Use in the Watershed 5 Percent Impervious Cover by Subbasin 6 Estimated 1998 Net Ground Water Withdrawals by Subbasin 7 Protected Water Use Designations 8 Listing of Impaired Streams (PA and DE) 9 Average Yearly Brillouin’s Diversity Index Values for the Watershed 10 PNDI Sites Located Within the Watershed 11 Inventory of Mapped County and State Owned Recreational Resources 12 Inventory of Mapped Historic Resources 13 First Order Stream Miles 14 Drainage Areas to First Order Streams 15 Land Use Within Corridors of First Order Streams - East Branch Brandywine Creek Subbasins 16 Land Use Within Corridors of First Order Streams - West Branch Brandywine Creek Subbasins 17 Land Use Within Corridors of First Order Streams - Main Stem Subbasins 18 Land Use Within Corridors of Higher Order Streams - East Branch Brandywine Creek Subbasins 19 Land Use Within Corridors of Higher Order Streams - West Branch Brandywine Creek Subbasins 20 Land Use Within Corridors of Higher Order Streams - Main Stem Subbasins 21 Estimated Annual Water Withdrawals and Future Needs by Subbasin – 1998 and 2020 22 List of Small Community Water Systems (shown on Figure 23) 23 Inventory of Watershed Management Needs 24 Subbasin Priorities 25 Recommended Priority Management Actions 26 Components of the Landscapes Index 27 New Watersheds Indicators for Landscapes Index Figures 1 Basemap of Watershed 2 Subbasins 3 Municipalities within the Watershed 4 Inventory of Problems and Potential Concerns 5 Stream Resources and Competing Water Uses 6 1995 Land Use 7 Estimated Percent Impervious Cover in Subbasins - 1998 8 Generalized Geology 9 1998 Net Ground Water Withdrawals as a Percent of the 1 in 25 Year Average Annual Baseflow ii Brandywine Creek Watershed Action Plan Figures (continued) 10 2020 Net Ground Water Withdrawals as a Percent of the 1 in 25 Year Average Annual Baseflow 11 Municipalities Located within the DRBC Ground Water Protected Area 12 State Protected Water Use Designations 13 Municipalities Required to Implement NPDES Phase II Regulations 14 Location of USGS Biological Monitoring Sites 15 Cultural, Recreational and Historic Resources 16 Drainage Areas of First Order Streams 17 Land Use Within One-Quarter Mile Corridor of First Order Streams 18 Land Use Within One-Quarter Mile Corridor of Higher Order Streams 19 Recommended Integrated Water Resources Planning Regions 20 Recommended Net Ground Water Withdrawal Management Thresholds 21 Chester County Areas of Planned Growth and Future Needs - Water 22 Chester County Areas of Planned Growth and Future Needs - Wastewater 23 Community Water Supply Systems Operating Within or Near Chester County Appendices A Water Balance Data Sheet B Watershed and Subbasin Data Sheets C Watershed and Subbasin Nonpoint Source Loadings Data Sheets D Additional Recommendations of Management Actions E Ongoing Initiatives Brandywine Creek Watershed Action Plan iii Section 1. Watershed Setting The Brandywine Creek watershed has several primary characteristics that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • News Release Address: Email and Homepage: U.S
    News Release Address: Email and Homepage: U.S. Department of the Interior Maryland-Delaware-D.C. District [email protected] U.S. Geological Survey 8987 Yellow Brick Road http://md.water.usgs.gov/ Baltimore, MD 21237 Release: Contact: Phone: Fax: January 4, 2002 Wendy S. McPherson (410) 238-4255 (410) 238-4210 Below Normal Rainfall and Warm Temperatures Lead to Record Low Water Levels in December Three months of above normal temperatures and four months of below normal rainfall have led to record low monthly streamflow and ground-water levels, according to hydrologists at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in Baltimore, Maryland. Streamflow was below normal at 94 percent of the real-time USGS gaging stations and 83 percent of the USGS observation wells across Maryland and Delaware in December. Record low streamflow levels for December were set at Winters Run and Pocomoke River. Streamflow levels at Deer Creek and Winters Run in Harford County have frequently set new record daily lows for the last four months (see real-time graphs at http://md.water.usgs.gov/realtime/). Streamflow was also significantly below normal at Antietam Creek, Choptank River, Conococheague Creek, Nassawango Creek, Patapsco River, Gunpowder River, Patuxent River, Piscataway Creek, Monocacy River, and Potomac River in Maryland, and Christina River, St. Jones River, and White Clay Creek in Delaware. The monthly streamflow in the Potomac River near Washington, D.C. was 82 percent below normal in December and 54 percent below normal for 2001. Streamflow entering the Chesapeake Bay averaged 23.7 bgd (billion gallons per day), which is 54 percent below the long-term average for December.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Study
    FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY CECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND AND INCORPORATED AREAS Cecil County Community Community Name Number ↓ CECIL COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 240019 *CECILTON, TOWN OF 240020 CHARLESTOWN, TOWN OF 240021 CHESAPEAKE CITY, TOWN OF 240099 ELKTON, TOWN OF 240022 NORTH EAST, TOWN OF 240023 PERRYVILLE, TOWN OF 240024 PORT DEPOSIT, TOWN OF 240025 RISING SUN, TOWN OF 240158 *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified Revised: May 4, 2015 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 24015CV000B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of the FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: July 8, 2013 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: May 4, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Streamflow and Water Quality in the Brandywine Creek Subbasin of the Christina River Basin, Pennsylvania and Delaware, 1994-98
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey SIMULATION OF STREAMFLOW AND WATER QUALITY IN THE BRANDYWINE CREEK SUBBASIN OF THE CHRISTINA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE, 1994-98 Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4279 In cooperation with the DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, and the PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey SIMULATION OF STREAMFLOW AND WATER QUALITY IN THE BRANDYWINE CREEK SUBBASIN OF THE CHRISTINA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE, 1994-98 by Lisa A. Senior and Edward H. Koerkle Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4279 In cooperation with the DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, and the PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION New Cumberland, Pennsylvania 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 215 Limekiln Road Box 25286, Federal Center New Cumberland, Pennsylvania 17070-2424 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Email: [email protected] Telephone 1-888-ASK-USGS Internet address: http://pa.water.usgs.gov ii CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Purpose and scope . 4 Previous studies . 5 Acknowledgments . 5 Description of study area . 5 Physical setting . 5 Climate . 5 Geology . 6 Soils. 6 Hydrology . 6 Land use. 8 Water use . 8 Description of model . 8 Data for model input and calibration . 10 Model-input data .
    [Show full text]
  • Background Research
    BACKGROUND RESEARCH PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS Several archaeological investigations have been completed in the project vicinity, most of them associated with the building of SR 1 (Table 1). Figures 3-7 show the locations of these studies and the known archaeological sites in the APE. Table 1: Previous Archaeological Studies in the APE DESCRIPTION REFERENCE Phase I Archaeological Survey, Routes 4, 7, 273 Thomas 1980 Archaeological Planning Survey of the SR 1 Corridor Custer and Bachman 1986 Phase I and II Archaeological Studies, Route 7 South Corridor Catts et al. 1988 Archaeological Testing and Historical Investigations of “The Place at Catts et a. 1989 Christeen” Phase I Archaeological Survey of the SR 1 Canal Section, Red Lion Hodny et al. 1989 Creek to Scott Run Phase II Archaeological Testing of the Lewden Green Site, 7NC-E-9 Custer et al. 1990 Phase I Survey of Waterline Near Route 13/72 Intersection Mellin and Baumgardt 1990 Management plan for Delaware’s historic archaeological resources De Cunzo and Catts 1990 Cultural Resource Planning Study for the proposed Route 301 Corridor, Kellogg 1992 New Castle County Phase II Archaeological Investigations, SR 1 Canal Section Kellogg et al. 1994 Paleoenvironmental Studies of the SR 1 Corridor Kellogg and Custer 1994 Phase III Archaeological Excavations of the Wrangle Hill Site (7NC-G- Custer et al. 1995 105) Phase III Archaeological Excavations of the Snapp Site (7NC-G-101) Custer and Silber 1995 Phase I and II Testing at Scott Run and the Route 13/72 Interchange, and Doms et al. 1995 Phase III Mitigation of the Woodville Grave Site Phase I and II Archaeological Investigations in the SR 1 Corridor, Scott Bedell et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Career and Technical Education Students in Pennsylvania
    Career and Technical Student Organizations Serving Career and Technical Education Students in Pennsylvania 1 Dear CTSO Leaders, As the leader of a statewide trade association dedicated to the growth and development of the technology industry in Pennsylvania, I am keenly aware of the need for a highly-skilled, well-trained, and motivated workforce. At the Technology Council of Pennsylvania, we are strong advocates for advancements in and the promotion of S.T.E.M. education, as well as career and technical training, in order to prepare our young people to succeed in the 21st Century, global economy. That is why we support the work of Pennsylvania’s Career and Technical Student Organizations (CTSOs) and the critical role they play in today’s education community. For nearly 70 years, CTSOs have been able to extend teaching and learning through a variety of targeted programs, public-private partnerships and leadership development initiatives that produce technically advanced, employable students to meet the needs of this country’s diverse employer base. Today, the work of CTSOs has never been more valuable as our economy demands workers with a strong understanding of science, technology, engineering and math concepts as well as hands-on technical expertise. The co-curricular approach of CTSOs uniquely positions these organizations to enhance student skill sets and better prepare them to excel in their chosen careers. In order for Pennsylvania and the United States to not only compete, but succeed on a global stage, we need to ensure that the very technology and innovation companies that are driving this global economy have the availability of a well-qualified workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 162.65
    Coast Guard, DHS § 162.65 (2) No vessels having a height of more with moorings and lines which are suf- than 35 feet with reference to the plane ficient and proper. of mean high water shall enter or pass (c) Right-of-way. All vessels pro- through the area whenever visibility is ceeding with the current shall have the less than one mile. right-of-way over those proceeding against the current. Large vessels or § 162.30 Channel of Tuckerton Creek, tows must not overtake and attempt to N.J.; navigation. pass other large vessels or tows in the (a) Power boats or other vessels pro- waterway. All small pleasure craft pelled by machinery shall not proceed shall relinquish the right-of-way to deeper draft vessels, which have a lim- at any time within the limits of these ited maneuvering ability due to their waters at a greater speed than 8 stat- draft and size. ute miles per hour. (d) Stopping in waterway. Vessels will not be permitted to stop or anchor in § 162.35 Channel of Christina River, Del.; navigation. the ship channel. (e) Water skiing. Water skiing in the (a) That vessels of over 20 tons capac- waterway is prohibited between Reedy ity, propelled by machinery, shall not Point and Welch Point. proceed at any time within the limits (f) Sailboats. Transiting the canal by of these waters at a greater speed than vessels under sail is not permitted be- 8 statute miles per hour. tween Reedy Point and Welch Point. NOTE: The Corps of Engineers also has reg- § 162.40 Inland waterway from Dela- ulations dealing with this section in 33 CFR ware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Railroad Byway Delaware
    Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway Delaware Chapter 3.0 Intrinsic Resource Assessment The following Intrinsic Resource Assessment chapter outlines the intrinsic resources found along the corridor. The National Scenic Byway Program defines an intrinsic resource as the cultural, historical, archeological, recreational, natural or scenic qualities or values along a roadway that are necessary for designation as a Scenic Byway. Intrinsic resources are features considered significant, exceptional and distinctive by a community and are recognized and expressed by that community in its comprehensive plan to be of local, regional, statewide or national significance and worthy of preservation and management (60 FR 26759). Nationally significant resources are those that tend to draw travelers or visitors from regions throughout the United States. National Scenic Byway CMP Point #2 An assessment of the intrinsic qualities and their context (the areas surrounding the intrinsic resources). The Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway offers travelers a significant amount of Historical and Cultural resources; therefore, this CMP is focused mainly on these resource categories. The additional resource categories are not ignored in this CMP; they are however, not at the same level of significance or concentration along the corridor as the Historical and Cultural resources. The resources represented in the following chapter provide direct relationships to the corridor story and are therefore presented in this chapter. A map of the entire corridor with all of the intrinsic resources displayed can be found on Figure 6. Figures 7 through 10 provide detailed maps of the four (4) corridors segments, with the intrinsic resources highlighted. This Intrinsic Resource Assessment is organized in a manner that presents the Primary (or most significant resources) first, followed by the Secondary resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodledge at Whitford Hills Community Guide Copyright 2009 Toll Brothers, Inc
    A GUIDE TO THE SERVICES AVAILABLE NEAR YOUR NEW HOME Woodledge at Whitford Hills COMMUNITY GUIDE Copyright 2009 Toll Brothers, Inc. All rights reserved. These resources are provided for informational purposes only, and represent just a sample of the services available for each community. Toll Brothers in no way endorses or recommends any of the resources presented herein WAWH-3187-18925_07-09 Contents COMMUNITY PROFILE .................................................... 1 SCHOOLS ................................................................... 2 DAY CARE/PRE-SCHOOL .................................................. 3 SHOPPING .................................................................. 4 MEDICAL FACILITIES...................................................... 5 UTILITIES................................................................... 6 WORSHIP . 7 TRANSPORTATION ........................................................ 8 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES - LOCAL .................................... 9 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES - REGIONAL................................10 RESTAURANTS ............................................................ 11 LIBRARIES ................................................................. 12 COLLEGES................................................................. 12 VETERINARIAN ........................................................... 13 ORGANIZATIONS ......................................................... 13 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTERS ............................................... 14 GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
    [Show full text]
  • CHURCH FARM PS Dec 23.Spub
    Church Farm School Assistant Head of School/ Director of Academic Affairs Position Statement Exton, Pennsylvania July 1, 2021 Church Farm School Assistant Head of School/Director of Academic Affairs Position Statement Start Date: July 1, 2021 “Inspiring Boys – Fulfilling Dreams” THE POSITION Church Farm School (CFS), an Episcopal, independent, college preparatory, boarding and day school for boys in grades 9-12 located in Exton, PA seeks an Assistant Head of School and Director of Academic Affairs, effecKve July 1, 2021. The School is located 30 miles west of Philadelphia on a 140-acre campus in Chester County and named by Architectural Digest as Pennsylvania’s most beauful. The Assistant Head of School and Director of Academic Affairs is system, and the academic program Directors, communicate frequently integral to the senior leadership of for all students. He/she will have with parents and will represent the the School and will report to Head responsibility for the School’s Head of School during the head’s of School. He/she will be reaccreditaon process and absence from campus. He/she will have responsible for the academic subsequent reports, adhered to strong oversight of the School’s curriculum and all instrucon, the pernent government educaon educaonal program, plan and School’s annual and daily schedule, regulaons, oversight of all grading facilitate faculty meengs (and include and will be the key administrator for and reporng, and annual updang Staff on occasion), and will be versed in academic/technology staff, of the Student/Parent Handbook all aspects of teaching and learning, department chairs, faculty and Faculty Manual.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICES DEPARTMENT of BANKING Actions on Applications
    6760 NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF BANKING Actions on Applications The Department of Banking (Department), under the authority contained in the act of November 30, 1965 (P. L. 847, No. 356), known as the Banking Code of 1965; the act of December 14, 1967 (P. .L. 746, No. 345), known as the Savings Association Code of 1967; the act of May 15, 1933 (P. L. 565, No. 111), known as the Department of Banking Code; and the act of December 9, 2002 (P. L. 1572, No. 207), known as the Credit Union Code, has taken the following action on applications received for the week ending December 11, 2007. BANKING INSTITUTIONS Conversions Date Name of Bank Location Action 12-7-07 Quakertown National Bank Quakertown Approved Quakertown Bucks County To: QNB Bank Quakertown Bucks County Application for conversion from a Federally-chartered bank to a Pennsylvania State-chartered bank. Section 112 Applications Date Name of Individual Location Action 12-7-07 Steven D. Hovde to acquire up to Barrington, IL Approved 13.4% of the common shares of Bucks County Bank, Doylestown. Consolidations, Mergers and Absorptions Date Name of Bank Location Action 12-11-07 Fulton Bank, Lancaster, PA, and Lancaster Approved Resource Bank, Virginia Beach, VA Surviving Institution— Fulton Bank, Lancaster, PA Branch Applications Date Name of Bank Location Action 11-26-07 Parkvale Savings Bank 681 Clairton Boulevard Opened Monroeville Pittsburgh Allegheny County Allegheny County Branch Relocations Date Name of Bank Location Action 12-3-07 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania To: 6052 Ridge Avenue Effective Philadelphia Philadelphia Philadelphia County Philadelphia County From: 6060 Ridge Avenue Philadelphia Philadelphia County Branch Discontinuances Date Name of Bank Location Action 12-5-07 Reliance Savings Bank 3119 Pleasant Valley Boulevard Filed Altoona Altoona Blair County Blair County PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTENTION PAOLI/THORNDALE LINE RIDERS SPECIAL WEEKEND AM & LATE NIGHT TIMETABLE Saturday, June 16 & Sunday, June 17, 2018
    ATTENTION PAOLI/THORNDALE LINE RIDERS SPECIAL WEEKEND AM & LATE NIGHT TIMETABLE Saturday, June 16 & Sunday, June 17, 2018 Due to Amtrak construction, changes to service patterns and a Shuttle Bus Substitution will take effect on the dates noted above for select AM and late night trains between Bryn Mawr and Thorndale Stations Please look for the "B" next in the timetables on the reverse side for Shuttle Bus departure times. Please note Bus departure times will be different than regularly scheduled Train times. Buses and Trains will not make stops at Whitford Station during construction. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR TIMETABLES Customer Service 215-580-7800 To get the latest service news, follow Paoli/ ® Thorndale @SEPTA_PAO www.septa.org SATURDAY JUNE 16, 2018 AM SERVICE TO CENTER CITY PM SERVICE TO/FROM CENTER CITY Fare Services Train Number 500 1502 504 Fare Services Train Number 564 9568 9570 9572 P9584 Fare Services Train Number 557 561 2565 569 4597 Zone Stations AM AM AM Zone Stations PM PM PM AM AM Zone Stations PM PM AM AM AM Thorndale —— B11:22 B12:22 B1:09 C Temple University 9:32 10:32 11:32 12:32 1:36 Thorndale —— B6:48 Downingtown —— B11:30 B12:30 B1:17 C Jefferson Station 9:38 10:38 11:38 12:38 1:42 Downingtown —— B6:56 Whitford ————— C Suburban Station 9:43 10:43 11:43 12:43 1:45 Whitford —— — Exton —— B11:45 B12:45 B1:32 C 30th Street Station 9:47 10:47 11:47 12:47 1:49 Exton —— B7:11 Malvern B10:00 — B12:00 B1:00 B1:47 2 Overbrook 9:55 10:55 11:55 12:55 1:57 Malvern B6:00 — 7:26 Paoli (Rt 204) B10:05 — B12:05
    [Show full text]