DOCSLIB.ORG

Budget Justifications and Performance Information FY2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Budget Justifications and Performance Information FY2021 The United States BUDGET Department of the Interior JUSTIFICATIONS and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2021 BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS NOTICE: These budget justifications are prepared for the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittees. Approval for release of the justifications prior to their printing in the public record of the Subcommittee hearings may be obtained through the Office of Budget of the Department of the Interior. Printed on Recycled Paper Table of Contents DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR INDIAN AFFAIRS Budget Justifications Fiscal Year 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... IA-ES-1 General Statement ............................................................................................................................. IA-GS-1 Organization Chart......................................................................................................................... IA-GS-5 Summary Tables Budget Summary Table .................................................................................................................. IA-ST-1 Comprehensive Budget Table ......................................................................................................... IA-ST-2 Fixed Costs Summary ..................................................................................................................... IA-ST-5 Budget Changes at a Glance .......................................................................................................... IA-ST-6 Authorizing Statutes.................................................................................................................... IA-AUTH-1 Administrative Provisions ............................................................................................................ IA-PROV-1 Appropriation: Operation of Indian Programs (OIP) Appropriation Language – Operation of Indian Programs ........................................................... IA-OIP-1 Summary of OIP Requirements .................................................................................................... IA-OIP-2 Justification of Fixed Costs and Related Changes ........................................................................ IA-OIP-3 Justification of OIP Program and Performance by Activity Tribal Government......................................................................................................................... IA-TG-1 Human Services ............................................................................................................................. IA-HS-1 Trust – Natural Resources Management ..................................................................................... IA-TNR-1 Trust – Real Estate Services ........................................................................................................ IA-RES-1 Public Safety and Justice .............................................................................................................. IA-PSJ-1 Community and Economic Development ................................................................................... IA-CED-1 Executive Direction and Administrative Services ..................................................................... IA-ADM-1 Contract Support Costs Appropriation Language – Contract Support Costs..................................................................... IA-CSC-1 Summary of Contract Support Costs Requirements .................................................................... IA-CSC-2 Contract Support Costs ................................................................................................................ IA-CSC-3 Payment for Tribal Leases Appropriation Language – Payment for Tribal Leases ................................................................ IA-TLE-1 Summary of Payment for Tribal Leases Requirements ............................................................... IA-TLE-2 Payment for Tribal Leases ........................................................................................................... IA-TLE-3 IA-1 Appropriation: Construction Appropriation Language – Construction .......................................................................... IA-CON-SUM-1 Appropriation Language Citations.................................................................................... IA-CON-SUM-2 Summary of Construction Requirements.......................................................................... IA-CON-SUM-5 Justification of Fixed Costs and Related Changes ............................................................ IA-CON-SUM-6 Construction Summary ..................................................................................................... IA-CON-SUM-7 Five Year Deferred Maintenance and Construction Plan ............................................... IA-CON-SUM-11 Justification of Construction Program and Performance by Activity Public Safety and Justice Construction................................................................................ IA-CON-PSJ-1 Resources Management Construction ................................................................................ IA-CON-RM-1 Other Program Construction ............................................................................................. IA-CON-OTH-1 Appropriation: Indian Land and Water Claim Settlements and Miscellaneous Payments to Indians Appropriation Language: Indian Land and Water Claim Settlements and Miscellaneous Payments to Indians ...................................................................................... IA-SET-1 Summary of Indian Land and Water Claim Settlements and Miscellaneous Payments to Indians Requirements ............................................................... IA-SET-2 Appropriation: Indian Land and Water Claim Settlements and Miscellaneous Payments to Indians ...................................................................................... IA-SET-3 Loan Accounts Appropriation Language - Indian Guaranteed Loan Program ................................................. IA-LOAN-1 Summary of Indian Guaranteed Loan Program Requirements ................................................ IA-LOAN-2 Justification of Fixed Costs and Related Changes ................................................................... IA-LOAN-3 Appropriation: Indian Guaranteed Loan Program .................................................................. IA-LOAN-4 Appropriation: Indian Guaranteed Loan Financing Account ................................................. IA-LOAN-6 Appropriation: Indian Loan Guaranty and Insurance Fund Liquidating Account .................. IA-LOAN-7 Appropriation: Indian Direct Loan Program Account ............................................................ IA-LOAN-8 Appropriation: Indian Direct Loan Financing Account .......................................................... IA-LOAN-9 Appropriation: Revolving Fund for Loans Liquidating Account ......................................... IA-LOAN-10 Permanent Appropriations Permanent Appropriations ....................................................................................................... IA-PERM-1 Appropriation: White Earth Settlement Fund ......................................................................... IA-PERM-2 Appropriation: Indian Water Rights and Habitat Acquisition Program ................................. IA-PERM-3 Appropriation: Miscellaneous Permanent Appropriations ..................................................... IA-PERM-4 Appropriation: Operation and Maintenance of Quarters ........................................................ IA-PERM-6 Appropriation: Gifts and Donations ....................................................................................... IA-PERM-8 IA-2 Appendices Public Safety and Justice .......................................................................................................... Appendix-1 Employee Count by Grade ........................................................................................................ Appendix-2 Tribal Priority Allocations by Location .................................................................................... Appendix-3 Bureau Regional Allocations .................................................................................................... Appendix-4 Self-Governance Compacts Participation ................................................................................. Appendix-5 Self-Governance Compacts by Tribe/Consortium .................................................................... Appendix-6 Consolidated Tribal Government Program (CTGP) by Location ............................................. Appendix-7 Section 403 Compliance ............................................................................................................... IA-S403-1 IA-3 Executive Summary Bureau of Indian Affairs FY 2021 Budget Request Executive Summary We remain committed to preserving and protecting Native American cultures, languages, and history, while ensuring prosperity and opportunity for all Native Americans. President Donald J. Trump Statement issued November 26, 2019 Within this budget request, the term “Indian Affairs” is meant to include the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE), and the Office of the Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review
    Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review • William Printup, Civil Engineering • Wendy Andersen, Permitting Allegheny National Forest Slide 1 Wildlife Learning Objectives For successful completion of the wildlife section, contestants should be able to: 1. Assess suitability of habitat for given wildlife species 2. Identify signs of wildlife 3. Cite examples of food chains based on specific site conditions 4. Analyze/Interpret site factors that limit or enhance population growth, both in the field and with aerial photos 5. Interpret significance of habitat alteration due to human impacts on site 6. Evaluate factors that might upset ecological balance of a specific site 7. Identify wildlife by their tracks, skulls, pelts, etc. 8. Interpret how presence of wildlife serves as an indicator of environmental quality 9. Identify common wildlife food Slide 2 WILDLIFE OUTLINE I. Identification of NYS Species (http://www.dec.ny.gov/23.html) • A. Identify NYS wildlife species by specimens, skins/pelts, pictures, skulls, silhouettes, decoys, wings, feathers, scats, tracks, animal sounds, or other common signs • B. Identify general food habits, habitats, and habits from teeth and/or skull morphology • C. Specific habitats of the above • II. Wildlife Ecology • A. Basic ecological concepts and terminology • B. Wildlife population dynamics • 1) Carrying capacity • 2) Limiting factors • C. Adaptations of wildlife • 1) Anatomical, physiological and/or behavioral • D. Biodiversity • 1) Genetic, species, ecosystem or community Slide 3 Outline Continued.. • III. Wildlife Conservation and Management • A. Common management practices and methods • 1) Conservation • 2) Protection • 3) Enhancement • B. Hunting regulations • C. Land conflicts with wildlife habitat needs • D. Factors influencing management decisions • 1) Ecological • 2) Financial •3) Social • E.
    [Show full text]
  • Greg J Sheehan, FWS Principal Deputy Director
    Greg J Sheehan, FWS Principal Deputy Director Tue Jun 6, 2017 2:45pm FWS weekly check in meeting Video call: (b) (5), (b) (6) Where: AS/FWP Conference Room -- 3144 Calendar: Maureen Foster Created by: Tasha Robbins Who: Thomas Irwin, Charisa Morris, Maureen Foster, Richard Goeken, GregSheehan, Wendy Fink, Stephen Guertin, Catherine Gulac, Jason Larrabee,Tasha Robbins, Aurelia Skipwith, Marshall Critchfield, Heather Swift,Jim Kurth, Todd Willens, Roslyn Sellars, Zachariah Gambill, PegRomanik, Barbara Wainman 3pm *FWS weekly check in meeting Video call: (b) (5), (b) (6) Where: AS/FWP Conference Room -- 3144 Calendar: Greg Sheehan Created by: Roslyn Sellars Wed Jun 7, 2017 1pm OIG monthly status update meeting/conference call (Jim, Steve, Kathy Garrity, Keith Toomey, Charisa) Room 3357 Video call: (b) (5), (b) (6) Where: Dial: (b) (5) , Code: (b) (5) Calendar: Jim Kurth Created by: Roslyn Sellars Who: Casey Hammond, Stephen Guertin, Katherine Garrity, Jim Kurth, GregSheehan, Charisa Morris, Keith Toomey 2:30pm [Asst Directors/Regional Directors Only-No Deputies or Actings] - Weekly Directorate VTC: Transition Check-In--Room 3038 Video call: (b) (5), (b) (6) Calendar: Jim Kurth Created by: Thomas Irwin Who: [email protected], Tom Melius, [email protected], WandaCantrell, Edward Grace, [email protected], Henry Schlitzer,Pamela Michalegko, Kenneth Taylor, Benjamin Tuggle, Brian Bloodsworth,Robyn Thorson, Gary Frazer, Michael Gale, Jim Kurth, Charisa Morris,Paul Rauch, Denise Thompson, Seth Mott, Cynthia Martinez,cynthia_dohner@fws
    [Show full text]
  • SELECTED FEDERAL LEGISLATION RELATING to PUBLIC LANDS in the 113TH CONGRESS Revised and Updated—January 2014 Conveyance H.R. 4
    SELECTED FEDERAL LEGISLATION RELATING TO PUBLIC LANDS IN THE 113TH CONGRESS Revised and Updated—January 2014 Conveyance H.R. 433 – Rep. Amodei, Mark E. [NV] (introduced 1/29/13) and S. 342 – Sen. Reid, Harry [NV] (introduced 2/14/13) Designates specified federal land managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Humboldt County, Nevada, and to be known as the Pine Forest Range Wilderness, as wilderness and as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to take necessary measures in such wilderness to control fire, insects, and diseases. Releases BLM land in any part of the Blue Lakes and Alder Creek wilderness study areas not designated as wilderness by this Act from further study for wilderness designation. Authorizes land exchanges involving identified federal and non-federal lands in Humboldt County. (Nevada co-sponsors: Heck, Horsford, Titus; Heller) H.R. 1167 – Rep. Amodei, Mark [NV] (introduced 3/14/13) Directs the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM to convey to Storey County, Nevada, all surface rights of the United States in specified federal land, including any improvements. Makes the BLM responsible for all costs associated with such conveyance. (Nevada co-sponsors: None) H.R. 1168 – Rep. Amodei, Mark [NV] (introduced 3/14/13) Directs the Secretary of the Interior, if an offer is received from the city of Carlin, Nevada, to purchase certain federal land within the city, through the BLM, to convey to the city all interest of the U.S. in such land in exchange for consideration equal to the fair market value of the land.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Preservation Board Report December 69, 2011 Washington
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Heritage Resources BLM Preservation Board Report December 6­9, 2011 Washington, DC In attendance: Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Preservation Officer Robin Hawks (formerly Robin Burgess) (WO), Deputy Preservation Officers (DPO) Robert King (AK), John Sullivan (ES), Gary Smith (MT), Tom Burke (NV), Stan McDonald (OR), Byron Loosle (UT), Kirk Halford (WA), and Ranel Capron (WY), Field Managers, Beth Maclean (AK), and Will Runnoe (ID), District Manager Chris McAlear (NV), and field office (FO) Specialists Diana Hawks (AZ) and G. L. “Buck” Damone (WY). DPOs Signa Larralde (NM) and Tim Smith (CA) were unable to attend. Additional BLM attendees were Richard Hanes (WO), Jerry Cordova (WO), Michael Thomas (WO), Jeanne Moe (MT), Kate Winthrop (WO), John McCarty (WO), Cynthia Herhahn (NM), Duane Dippon (WO), Lucas Lucero (WO), Emily Palus (WO), and Leslie Courtright (WO) for portions of the meeting. Attending in person from outside the BLM, was Bambi Kraus, President, National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, Nancy Schamu, Executive Director, National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers, Nancy Brown, BLM Liaison, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Elizabeth Merritt, Deputy General Counsel, National Trust for Historic Preservation, and Michael Smith, Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor, and Stephen Fosberg, Consultant. Welcome The Board was welcomed to Washington by Ed Roberson, Assistant Director for Renewable Resources and Planning. Ed brought greetings from the Director and from Deputy Director Pool and thanked the Board for all it does for the BLM. He noted the many historic elements of the Main Interior Building and explained the organization of the Directorate of Renewable Resources and Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Elk (Cervus Elaphus) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park
    Environmental Assessment for the Establishment of Elk (Cervus elaphus) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park Environmental Assessment Executive Summary ________________________________________________________________________ Elk Status and Management in Great Smoky Mountains National Park SUMMARY Elk were extirpated from the southern Appalachians in the early 1800’s pre- dating Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM, Park) establishment in 1934. In 1991, Park management took steps to initiate a habitat feasibility study to determine whether elk could survive in GRSM. The feasibility study concluded that there seemed to be adequate resources required by elk in and around GRSM, but many questions remained and could be answered only by reintroducing a small population of elk in the southern Appalachians and studying the results. An experimental release of elk was initiated in 2001 to assess the feasibility of population reestablishment in GRSM. Research efforts from 2001 to 2008 demonstrated that the current elk population had limited impact on the vegetation in GRSM, the demographic data collected supported that the population was currently sustainable, and human-elk conflicts were minimal. Estimated long-term growth rates and simulations maintained a positive growth rate in 100% of trials and produced an average annual growth rate of 1.070. This outcome indicates a sustainable elk population has been established in the Park, and has resulted in the need to develop long-term management plans for this population. Four alternatives are proposed: a No Action Alternative where the current elk management would continue based on short-term research objectives of the experimental release; an Adaptive Management Alternative where elk (the Preferred and Environmentally Preferred Alternative) are managed as a permanent resource in GRSM; an alternative with extremely limited management of elk; and an alternative implementing complete elk removal.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240 Phone, 202–208–3171
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240 Phone, 202±208±3171. Internet, www.doi.gov. SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT Deputy Secretary DAVID J. HAYES Chief of Staff ANNE H. SHIELDS Deputy Chief of Staff KENNETH L. SMITH Special Trustee for American Indians (VACANCY) Chief Information Officer DARYL W. WHITE Director of Congressional and Legislative LENNA M. AOKI Affairs Counselors to the Secretary ROBERT T. ANDERSON, MOLLIE S. MCUSIC Special Assistant to the Secretary and White (VACANCY) House Liaison Science Adviser to the Secretary WILLIAM BROWN Director, Office of Communications MICHAEL GAULDIN Director of Intergovernmental Affairs GRACE GARCIA Special Assistant to the Secretary and JULIETTE A. FALKNER Director, Executive Secretariat and Office of Regulatory Affairs Special Assistant to the Secretary for Alaska MARILYN HEIMAN Solicitor JOHN D. LESHY Deputy Solicitor EDWARD B. COHEN Associate Solicitor (Administration) ROBERT S. MORE Associate Solicitor (Conservation and RENEE STONE Wildlife) Associate Solicitor (Land and Water DALE PONTIUS Resources) Associate Solicitor (General Law) KAREN SPRECHER KEATING Associate Solicitor (Indian Affairs) DERRIL B. JORDAN Associate Solicitor (Mineral Resources) KATHRINE HENRY Inspector General EARL E. DEVANEY Deputy Inspector General MARY K. ADLER Assistant Inspector General (Audits) ROBERT J. WILLIAMS Assistant Inspector General (Investigations) DAVID A. MONTOYA Assistant Inspector General (Management SHARON D. ELLER and Policy) General Counsel ROBIN L. BREENWALD Assistant SecretaryÐWater and Science (VACANCY) Deputy Assistant Secretary MARK SCHAEFER Director, U.S. Geological Survey CHARLES G. GROAT Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation ELUID L. MARTINEZ Assistant SecretaryÐFish and Wildlife and DONALD J. BARRY Parks Deputy Assistant Secretary STEPHEN C. SAUNDERS Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Strategic Management Plan for Elk, 2016-2019
    INTERIM STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ELK INTERIM STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ELK Strategic Management Plan for Elk Project Team Executive Sponsor Paul Telander Managing Sponsor Leslie McInenly Project Manager John Williams Process and Facilitation Team Greg Nelson, Blane Klemek, Ruth Anne Franke, Joel Huener, Graham Parson, Kyle Arola, Kristi Coughlon, Rita Albrecht The MN DNR received input and advice from citizen volunteers from across the region and state. Two work groups representing the Grygla area and Kittson County met during 2014 to review the 2009 plan and make recommendations for the 2016 plan. The MN DNR would like to thank and recognize these volunteers for their contributions of ideas and time to complete the plan. Grygla Work Group Kittson Work Group Jacob Boyd Robert Albrecht Ronald Engelstad Paul Blomquist James Gladen Carl Christopherson Bryan Grove Jon Eerkes Gary Huschle Casey Faken Jay Huseby Erik Finney Mark Johnson John Hart Gary Kiesow Kenneth Hultgren Darwin Klamar Brad Kulyk Pat McMullen Mark Larson Gavin Nordby Mike Larson Jamie Omdahl Roland (Doc) Larter Gary Satre Pat McMullen Brian Stanley Tom Miesner James Younggren Leon Olson Kim Murphy Cody Schmalz Donnie Schmiedeberg Ex-Officio Kelly Turgeon Howard Person (U of M Extension) Joseph (Joe) Wilebski Ex-Officio Nathan Johnson (U of M Extension) Copies of this plan may be obtained at: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-4040 651-296-6157, 1-888-MINNDNR (1-888-646-6367) i INTERIM STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ELK www.dnr.state.mn.us August 3, 2017 Notice is hereby given that the Interim Elk Management Plan for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has been completed and is now adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 He Finest Way to Measure What the Rocky Mountain Elk Landowners and Partners to the Table
    Annual Report 2018 he finest way to measure what the Rocky Mountain Elk landowners and partners to the table. That’s exactly the case TFoundation has accomplished is through the soles of your there along McKay Creek where the goal is to greatly improve PRESIDENT’S boots, the chirps of cows and calves as they filter through aspens, the health of 45,000 acres throughout the watershed. And this & CHAIRMAN’S the smell of rain on sage, that first flash of ivory tines through is the kind of work RMEF helped accomplish in 2018 on almost MESSAGE black timber. Those are the moments that stay with us, and RMEF 135,000 acres across 27 of the 28 states that are home to wild elk. delivered them all across America in 2018. RMEF also sustained its long history of seeking answers Last year we forever protected more than 13,000 acres of to the crucial questions shaping North America’s wildlife and the most vital elk country in eight states. That included two wild lands. We invested more than $700,000 in 2018 to help fund families who fled Texas heat and Big Apple hustle and found 39 research studies in 14 states, working to find lasting solutions an overlooked stretch of Colorado. Neighbors and friends now, to chronic wasting disease, document crucial elk migration their passion led them to ensure their home ground remains corridors and much more. magnificent, wild and whole by donating a pair of conservation People only spend their money to join or sustain their easements on more than 2,300 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Chief Information Officer Employee Guide
    Office of the Chief Information Officer Employee Guide Version 3.0 October 12, 2016 Document History Document Issue Date By Description Of Revision(s) Version # September 30, OCIO-Human Capital Version 2.0 Final 2013 Office October 28, OCIO-Human Capital Updated Points of Contact list table, Version 2.1 2013 Office Section 9.1.1 Updated OCIO Leadership, Section October 8, OCIO-Human Capital 1.3.1, Link to OCIO How To Guide on Version 2.2 2014 Office Administrative Operations, Section 4, Conference Room Points of Contacts Updated Sections 1.2 Background, October 12, OCIO-Human Capital Version 3.0 1.3 OCIO Organization, and various 2016 Office sections throughout the document. OCIO Employee Guide Page 2 of 54 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 About the Document 1.2 Background 1.3 The OCIO Organization 1.3.1 OCIO Leadership 1.3.2 OCIO Executive Support Staff 1.3.3 Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) – Functional Leads 2 Onboarding 3 Telework 3.1 Accessing the DOI Network thru the Virtual Private Network (VPN) 4 Time and Attendance (Quicktime) ​ 4.1 Quicktime via Web Access 4.2 Quicktime via Remote Access 5 Training 5.1 DOI University (DOIU) 5.1.1 Commercial Training (External to DOI) 5.2 DOI Learn 5.2.1 Skillsoft Online Learning Library 6 Official Travel (GovTrip) => Concur Government Edition (CGE) 7 Office Supplies & Equipment 7.1 Supplies 7.2 IT Hardware 8 Transit Benefits Program 8.1 Washington Metropolitan Area (WMA) 8.2 Denver, CO 9 Points of Contact 9.1.1 Points of Contact for Systems and Services Used by OCIO 10 Dress Code 11 Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Round Church, Richmond, for the Purpose of Nominating It for Possible Designation As a National Historic Landmark
    United States Department of the Interi NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. Box 37127 Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 IN REPLY REFERTO: Ì996 H34(2280) MAR IX Mr. Townsend Anderson, SHPO Agency of Development & Community Affairs 135 State Street, 4th Floor, Drawer 33 Montpelier, Vermont 05633-1201 Dear Mr. Anderson: We are pleased to inform you that the National Park Service has completed the study of the Round Church, Richmond, for the purpose of nominating it for possible designation as a National Historic Landmark. We enclose a copy of the study report. The National Park System Advisory Board will consider the nomination during its next meeting, at the time and place indicated on an enclosure. This enclosure also specifies how you may comment on the proposed nomination if you so choose. The Board will make its recommendation to the Secretary of the Interior based upon the criteria of the National Historic Landmarks Program. You have 60 days to submit your views in writing, if you so desire. After the 60-day period, we will submit the nomination and your comments to the National Park System Advisory Board's Landmarks Committee, which will then inform the full Advisory Board of the Committee's recommendations at the Board's meeting. The Secretary of the Interior will then be informed of the Board's recommendations for his final action. To assist you in considering this matter, we have enclosed a copy of the regulations governing the National Historic Landmarks Program. They describe the criteria for designation (Sec. 65.4) and include other information on the Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Bus Hides Again!
    CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CRM VOLUME 25 NUMBER 5 2002 the Red Bus Hides Again! National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cultural Resources PUBLISHED BY THE CRM magazine's 25th anniversary year NATIONAL PARK SERVICE VOLUME 25 NUMBER 5 2002 Information for parks, Federal agencies, Contents ISSN 1068-4999 Indian tribes, States, local governments, and the private sector that promotes and maintains high standards for pre­ The Red Bus Rides Again! serving and managing cultural resources DIRECTOR Fran E Mainella Finding Friends in Pennsylvania 3 Catherine C. Lavoie ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR CULTURAL RESOURCES Katherine H. Stevenson Surveying Boulders at the Sacred Site of the Birdman 7 MANAGING EDITOR E. Blaine Cliver John Robbins EDITOR Sue Waldron Faded Landmark to First Class Hotel — Hotel Monaco a Preservation ASSOCIATE EDITOR Success Story 12 Janice C. McCoy Audrey T. Tepper ADVISORS David Andrews Saving America's Treasures 18 Editor, NPS Rebecca Shiffer Joan Bacharach Curator, NPS Randall J. Biallas Historical Architect, NPS An Appalachian Tale — Restoring Boone's Wilderness Road 20 John A. Burns Architect, NPS Mark Woods Harry A. Butowsky Historian, NPS Prart Cassity Executive Director, On the Road Again — Glacier National Park's Red Buses 23 National Alienee of Preservation Commissions Amy B. Vanderbilt Muriel Crespi Cultural Anthropologist, NPS Mary Cullen Director, Historical Services Branch Parks Canada Preserving Yesterday's View of Tomorrow — The Chicago World's Fair Houses 27 Roger E. Kelly Judith Collins and Al Nash Archeologist, NPS Antoinette J. Lee Historian, NPS The Building Doctor Is In 32 ASSISTANT Mariangela F. Pfister Denise M. Mayo Endnotes 34 This and previous issues of CRM are available online at Cover photo: Glacier National Park's Red Buses have returned to service, once again treating park <http://www.cr.nps.gov/crm>.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L
    Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L. 2016 Work Plan Date of Report: May 29, 2016 Date of Next Status Update Report: Date of Work Plan Approval: Project Completion Date: 30 June 2019 Does this submission include an amendment request? __ PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Elk to Northeastern Minnesota Project Manager: James D Forester Organization: University of Minnesota Mailing Address: 2003 Upper Buford Cir., Suite 135 City/State/Zip Code: Saint Paul, MN 55108 Telephone Number: (612) 626‐6721 Email Address: [email protected] Web Address: foresterlab.cfans.umn.edu Location: Carlton, Pine, and St. Louis Counties Total ENRTF Project Budget: ENRTF Appropriation: $300,000 Amount Spent: $0 Balance: $300,000 Legal Citation: M.L. 2016, Chp. 186, Sec. 2, Subd. 03l Appropriation Language: $300,000 the second year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota in cooperation with the Fond du Lac Band and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation to determine the habitat suitability and levels of public support for restoring elk to northeastern Minnesota. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2019, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered. Page 1 of 12 05/29/2016 Subd. 03l - DRAFT I. PROJECT TITLE: Restoration of Elk to Northeastern Minnesota II. PROJECT STATEMENT: Elk historically occupied most of Minnesota prior to the early 1900’s. Although two small populations were re‐ established in northwest MN, they are currently managed at low levels to reduce human‐wildlife conflict. Forested areas of the state, however, could avoid some of these conflicts and see significant ecological and economic benefits from returning elk to the landscape.
    [Show full text]