Prikaz Slučaja Delija I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prikaz Slučaja Delija I Sadržaj Metabolički sindrom danas Rumboldt M ...................................................................................................... 5 Metabolički sindrom Bekić S, Pribić S, Samardžić Ilić M, Gmajnić R .............................................. 13 Polifarmacija u obiteljskoj medicini – rastući problem u 21.stoljeću Kašuba Lazić Đ ................................................................................................ 28 Puno lijekova (polifarmacija) i/ili previše je lijekova (overtreatment)? Vrcić Keglević M .............................................................................................. 47 Prehrambene navike unazad deset godina u oboljelih od arterijske hipertenzije Pribić S, Bekić S, Samardžić Ilić M, Samardžić-Ilić V, Gmajnić R .................. 58 Uloga liječnika obiteljske medicine u prepoznavanju i praćenju autoimunih oboljenja u obitelji Haralović D....................................................................................................... 67 Antikoagulantna terapija i metabolički sindrom Došen Janković S ............................................................................................. 75 Akutni pankreatitis - prikaz slučaja Delija I ............................................................................................................. 85 Kretanje hipertenzije registrirane u obiteljskoj medicini i potrošnja antihi- pertenziva: longitudinalni trendovi, 2004.-2013. Rapić M, Maćešić B, Vrcić Keglević M ............................................................ 94 Psorijaza i metabolički sindrom Tiljak A, Čeović R ............................................................................................ 112 Metabolički sindrom i depresija Tudorić-Gemo D, Benzon T, Šerić N ................................................................122 Razlika propisivanja antibiotika u ordinaciji obiteljske medicine između Varaždina i Amsterdama Cikač T, Vučetić M, Sambol K ..........................................................................135 Povezanost padova u starih ljudi sa upotrebom lijekova Kumbrija S ........................................................................................................144 Polipragmazija u starijoj životnoj dobi Begić N, Mosorović N, Kovačević S, Bećarević M, Dautović A .......................153 Propisivanje antibiotika: izazov za liječnike obiteljske medicine Cikač T, Sambol K, Bosak T, Škvorc B .............................................................163 Problemi u provođenju probira na kronične bolesti u obiteljskoj medicini. Poboljšanje u medicinskoj dokumentaciji Vrca Botica M, Zelić I ......................................................................................174 Male žlijezde u vratu – gigantski poremećaji u organizmu Ferenčak V, Prusac B, Ivandić Lončar M, Lončar J .......................................182 Statini u ordinaciji obiteljske medicine Dubravica M, Vinter-Repalust N .....................................................................190 O epidemiološkim i farmakoekonomskim aspektima šećerne bolesti Depolo T, Džono-Boban A .............................................................................. 201 Zdrava, lijepa i uspješna. Metabolički sindrom i mediteranska prehrana - prikaz slučaja Tudorić-Gemo D, Roguljić S ...........................................................................209 Fibrilacija atrija i ambulantno uvođenje varfarina u ordinaciji obiteljske medicine – prikaz slučaja Knez LJ, Fijačko B ..........................................................................................218 Bullyng (vršnjačko nasilje) u osnovnoj školi Benčić M, Vrcić-Keglević M ............................................................................232 Prekomjerna tjelesna težina i pretilost u djece Tkalec J, Golek Mikulić M ..............................................................................240 Hipotireoza i metabolički sindrom Toplak-Hranić S, Perčinlić Ž, Carević D ........................................................249 Prikaz slučaja oštećenja sluha u ambulanti izabranog doktora. Kadić, M, Kljajević M, Kontonar G, Kadić B, Ćatić S ...................................259 Racionalna farmakoterapija i polipragmazi- j a – v i đ e n j e H r v a t s k o g z a v o d a z a z d r a v s t v e n o o s i g u r a n j e Bekić T .............................................................................................................262 RADIONICE: Napredno održavanje života odraslih /ALS/ u ordinaciji obiteljske medicine Bosak T, Ognjanović Z .....................................................................................267 Pristup pacijentu s boli Čop R, Sambol K .............................................................................................269 Balintova metoda i rad u Balintovoj grupi Vuković H, Kumbrija S ....................................................................................272 Spirometrija Fijačko B, Marinić T .......................................................................................275 Savjetovalište za dijabetičare u ordinaciji obiteljske medicine Cikač T, Sambol K ...........................................................................................277 Oftalmoskopija Kotur G................. ...........................................................................................286 Fibrilacija atrija i profilaksa tromboembolije varfarinom Knez Lj, Car S, Cikač T ...................................................................................288 Metabolički sindrom danas Metabolic syndrome today Mirjana Rumboldt Sažetak. Epidemijsko širenje metaboličkog sindroma uz pretilost i niz drugih otklona u mijeni tvari predstavlja prvorazredni javnozdravstveni problem i važno područje djelovanja liječnika obiteljske medicine. U ovom kratkom pregledu ukazano je na povijesne, dijagnostičke, epidemiološke i terapijske osobitosti pristupa ovoj rastućoj pošasti suvremenog svijeta. Ključne riječi: metabolički sindrom, obiteljska medicina Summary. Metabolic syndrome, with obesity and a number of other metabolic derangements, is reaching epidemic proportions, becoming a paramount public health problem and an important goal in family medicine. This brief overview summarizes historical, diagnostics epidemiologic and therapeutic peculiarities of this contemporary world plague. Key words: metabolic syndrome, family medicine Metabolički sindrom (MetS) postaje sve važniji javnozdravstveni problem jer utrostručuje rizik srčanožilnih bolesti, upeterostručuje rizik šećerne bolesti tipa 2 (DM2), a povezan je i s nizom malignih bolesti, poput raka dojke, debelog crijeva, jetre i gušterače1. 5 Definicija Premda se zadnjih desetak i više godina taj izraz široko rabi u medicinskim krugovima, već je sama definicija MetS-a prijeporna. Još uvijek se ne može postići čvrsti dogovor vodećih organizacija i ustanova. Naime, svjetski autoriteti, kao što su International Diabetes Federation (IDF), European Group for the study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), American Heart Association (AHA), World Heart Federation (WHF), International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS), National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) i World Health Organization (WHO) postavljaju slična, ali ipak različita mjerila za dijagnozu MetS-a, pa su i definicije različite2. Većina primjerice preporuča kao ključni kriterij abdominalnu gojaznost, koja je ujedno i vanjska manifestacija MetS-a, dok su za WHO to u prvom redu pokazatelji inzulinske rezistencije, posebno povišena glikemija natašte. Postoje i razilaženja u procjeni gojaznosti. Prema IDF-u je to indeks tjelesne mase (ITM, engl. Body Mass Index, BMI) veći od 30, koji podrazumijeva centralnu debljinu pa nije potrebno mjerenje opsega struka. Na taj se način isključuju sve osobe s BMI < 30, što ipak ne znači da sigurno nemaju abdominalnu pretilost. Nasuprot tome, NCEP i većina drugih uzimaju za procjenu abdominalne pretilosti obujam struka, što opet može biti sporno kako zbog tehnike mjerenja (različite trake, različite visine postavljanja, različita zatezanje), tako i zbog antropometrijskih razlika između etničkih skupina. Ni vrijednosti glikemije niti arterijskog tlaka nisu usuglašene (tab. 1). Nadalje, za djecu i adolescente još nema široko prihvaćenih mjerila. Vrlo je izgledno da će se definicija MetS-a i dalje dorađivati. Sigurno je međutim da MetS predstavlja skup (engl. cluster) ili grupiranje više metaboličkih poremećaja, uključujući abdominalnu pretilost, intoleranciju glukoze, arterijsku hipertenziju i dizlipidemiju, koji su povezani s porastom žilnih komplikacija, naročito na srcu, mozgu, bubrezima i drugim organima. Uz gojaznost, koja je gotovo neizbježna, bez obzira na koji se način MetS određuje, potrebna su još bar dva čimbenika: arterijska hipertenzija, dislipidemija (povišene koncentracije triglicerida, snižene koncentracije HDL kolesterola), inzulinska rezistencija/ hiperglikemija, odnosno mikroalbuminurija1,2. 6 Tablica 1. Osobitosti pojedinih definicija metaboličkog sindroma (prema2) WHO EGIR NCEP AHA IDF Temeljni Inzulin natašte: Inzulin - Ako je BMI kriterij gornji kvartil; GUK natašte: >30 , opseg ≥6,1; oGTT 2h gornji kvartil trbuha ne ≥7,8 treba mjeriti Broj otklona Gornji + ≥2 Gornji + ≥2 ≥3 ≥3 Gornji + ≥2 GUK - ≥6,1 ≥6,1 ≥5,6 ≥5,6 natašte HDL ≤ 0,9 M, ≤1,0 Z <1,0 ili pod <1,03 M, <1,03 M, <1,03 M, (mmol/l) terapijiom <1,29 Ž <1,29 Ž <1,29 Ž TG (mmol/l) ≥1,7 >2,0 >1,7 >1,7 >1,7 Pretilost WHR >0,9 M, Opseg >0,85 Ž; BMI ≥30 struka ≥94 cm M, ≥80 cm Ž Opseg
Recommended publications
  • Opportunities to Increase Efficiency in Healthcare
    s REPORT 2020 | OCTOBER CONSULTING Maria Errea Rikard Althin Chris Skedgel Thomas Hofmarcher Bernarda Zamora Peter Lindgren Grace Hampson Graham Cookson OCTOBER 2020 Maria Errea Rikard Althin Office of Health Economics, The Swedish Institute for Health London Economics, Lund Chris Skedgel Thomas Hofmarcher Office of Health Economics, The Swedish Institute for Health London Economics, Lund Bernarda Zamora Peter Lindgren Office of Health Economics, The Swedish Institute for Health London Economics, Stockholm Grace Hampson Graham Cookson Office of Health Economics, Office of Health Economics, London London Please cite this report as: Errea, M., Skedgel, C., Zamora, B., Hampson, G., Althin, R., Hofmarcher, T., Lindgren, P. and Cookson, G., 2020. Opportunities to increase efficiency in healthcare. Consulting Report, London: Office of Health Economics. Available at https://www.ohe.org/publications/opportunities- increase-efficiency-healthcare Corresponding Author: Graham Cookson [email protected] Professor Graham Cookson Chief Executive, OHE Honorary Visiting Professor in Economics at City, University of London Tel +44 (0)207 747 1408 Email [email protected] ii Many of the studies OHE Consulting performs are proprietary and the results are not released publicly. Studies of interest to a wide audience, however, may be made available, in whole or in part, with the client’s permission. They may be published by OHE alone, jointly with the client, or externally in scholarly publications. Publication is at the client’s discretion. Studies published by OHE as OHE Consulting Reports are subject to internal quality assurance and undergo external review, usually by a member of OHE’s Editorial Panel. Any views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OHE as an organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • ER 17 Sue Ieraci – De-Diagnosing, De-Prescribing & Non-Testing Size
    < = > less is more De-diagnosing De-prescribing Non-testing Sue Ieraci 2017 Who says? • Overdiagnosis • Polypharmacy • False positives • Too much medicine • Risk aversion $$$ Sue Ieraci 2017 Sources Prof David Le Couteur, Clin Pharm and Aged Care Preventing Overdiagnosis Conference 2016 Sue Ieraci 2017 Sources • Evidence-Based Medicine 2012 Sue Ieraci 2017 Language • IMU = inappropriate medication use • IMUP = inappropriate med use w polypharmacy • PIM = potentially inappropriate medication • POM = prescribing optimisation method • ADR = adverse drug reactions • DDIs = drug-drug interactions • DBI = drug burden index • VOCODFLEX = very old age, the extent of comorbidity, dementia, frailty and limited life expectancy • CRIME = Criteria to Assess Appropriate Medication Use Among Elderly Complex Patients Sue Ieraci 2017 Concept of De-Diagnosis • Age-appropriate BP vs hypertension • Diabetic control in the elderly • Bacteruria vs UTI • Ankle oedema • “High cholesterol” • Don’t have it -> no need to treat it. Sue Ieraci 2017 Sue Ieraci 2017 Need to understand: • The individual, robust vs frail, their therapeutic goals • The benefits and risks of all of their medicines + combination • Ethics of autonomy, dignity of risk, preferences • Very limited evidence on the safety and efficacy of medicines in older adults, particularly in the frail, who often have multiple comorbidities and functional impairments. • In robust older patients, therapy usually aims to delay or cure disease and to minimise functional impairment. • In frail older patients,
    [Show full text]
  • Medication Overload: America's Other Drug Problem | Lown Institute PART 2 Drivers of Medication Overload
    Medication Overload: America’s Other Drug Problem How the drive to prescribe is harming older adults April 2019 Medication Overload: America’s Other Drug Problem How the drive to prescribe is harming older adults April 2019 About the Lown Institute The Lown Institute is a nonpartisan think tank dedicated to transforming America’s high-cost, low-value health system. We conduct research, generate bold ideas, and create a vision for a just and caring system of health that works for all. Table of Contents PART 1 02 Medication Overload: Understanding the Scope and Impact PART 2 16 Drivers of Medication Overload PART 3 26 Interventions to Address Medication Overload 39 Appendices and References 01 Medication Overload: America’s Other Drug Problem | Lown Institute PART 1 Medication Overload: Understanding the Scope and Impact Medication Overload: Understanding the Scope and Impact Introduction: An Epidemic of Too Much Medication Every day, 750 older people living in the United States (age 65 and older) are hospitalized due to serious side effects from one or more medications.1 Over the last decade, older people sought medical treatment or visited the emergency room more than 35 million times for adverse drug events, and there were more than 2 million hospital admissions for serious adverse drug events (see Appendix A, p. 40).2 Older adults are hospitalized for adverse drug events at a greater rate than the general population is hospitalized for opioids.3 In the past decade, prescribing multiple medications to individual patients (called “polypharmacy” in the scientific literature) has reached epidemic proportions.More than four in ten older adults take five or more prescription medications a day, an increase of 300 percent over the past two decades.4 Nearly 20 percent take ten drugs or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Older Australians: Trends and Impacts of Alcohol and Other Drug Use
    Older Australians: Trends and Impacts of Alcohol and Other Drug Use Celia Wilkinson Consultant and Adjunct Senior Research Fellow, National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University February 2018 Preventing harmful drug use in Australia The National Drug Research Institute at Curtin University is supported by funding from the Australian Government under the Drug and Alcohol Program WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Abuse National Drug Research Institute Curtin University GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845 Telephone: (08) 9266 1600 Facsimile: (08) 9266 1611 Email: [email protected] Website: ndri.curtin.edu.au Corresponding Author: Dr Celia Wilkinson Email: [email protected] CRICOS Provider Code 00301J ISBN 978-0-6487367-3-8 2020001 Older Australians: Trends and impacts of alcohol and other drug use FINAL REPORT Celia Wilkinson (PhD) Consultant and Adjunct Senior Research Fellow, National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University This report is prepared for the Australian Government, Department of Health February 2018 Contents Page Acknowledgments 6 Commissioning the report 6 Executive summary 7 Chapter One: Introduction 16 1.1 Background 16 1.2 Project overview 18 1.3 Terminology 19 1.3.1 Alcohol and other drugs (AOD) 19 1.3.2 Older Australians 19 Chapter Two: Literature review 21 2.1 Prevalence of alcohol and other drug use amongst older Australians 22 2.1.1 Alcohol use 22 2.1.2 Illicit drug use 28 2.1.3 Misuse of pharmaceuticals 33 2.2 Alcohol and other drug use use amongst future generations
    [Show full text]
  • Medication Deprescribing
    5/7/2020 Medication Deprescribing: Medication discontinuation, dose reduction, and switching in the PPD Promise™ hospice setting Quarterly In-Services Presented by: Corina Reyna, PharmD, BCGP Co-Founder/Head Clinical Hospice Pharmacist Origins Pharmacy Solutions® Eagle, Idaho Graduate of Idaho State University College of Pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) for hospice agencies Pharmacy Idaho based company providing services 15 years of hospice pharmacy experience nationwide ◦ Compounding Advocate for hospice in the pharmacy setting Minimizing medication costs ◦ Medication therapy reviews Optimizing medication therapy through medication ◦ Speaker at state hospice conferences throughout reviews and streamlined reporting services the Northwest PPD Promise™ Partner with hospice to meet hospice’s medication PPD Board Certified Geriatric Pharmacist (BCGP) goal ® Origins’ pricing model, reporting, service options, and Co-founder of Origins Pharmacy Solutions hospice coaching combine to lower PPD by $3, on average Built on premise of giving back to communities Presenter Background 1) Upon completion of this session, participants will be able to describe the pitfalls of polypharmacy and why Target deprescribing is valuable in the hospice Audience population. •Nurses 2) Attendees will leave with the ability to list three barriers to depresribing and how to •Medical providers address them. •Administrators 3) Participants will leave the session able to describe key points important in conversations about deprescribing. Objectives 1 5/7/2020 Polypharmacy One study estimates hospice patients come on ◦ Can be defined several ways: services on an average of 11.5 medications. Oxford Dictionary: the simultaneous use of multiple drugs to treat a single ailment or condition. U.S. Pharmacist Journal: the use of several (usually five or more) medications on a daily basis, with the possibility that these may not all be clinically necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Medication Overload: America’S Other Drug Problem
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Medication Overload: America’s Other Drug Problem How the drive to prescribe is harming older adults EXECUTIVE SUMMARY April 2019 Medication Overload: America’s Other Drug Problem EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction: An Epidemic of Too Much Medication In the last year, older adults in the U.S. sought medical care nearly 5 Polypharmacy million times due to serious side effects from one or more medications. More than a quarter million of these visits resulted in hospitalizations, at a cost of $3.8 billion (see Appendix A in the full report). A term used in the scientific literature to describe the These numbers point to a rapidly growing epidemic of medication condition of taking multiple overload among older Americans. Over the last decade, adults age 65 and medications. Usually the older have been hospitalized for serious drug side effects, called adverse threshold for polypharmacy drug events (ADEs), about 2 million times. To put this in context, older is five or more medications, adults are hospitalized for adverse drug events at a greater rate than the although the cutoff varies general population is hospitalized for opioids.1 because there is not a single The trend of increasing ADEs is not propelled by drug abuse, but by agreed upon definition. the rising number of medications prescribed to older adults (called Polypharmacy can be helpful “polypharmacy” in the scientific literature). More than 40 percent of or harmful, depending on the older adults take five or more prescription medications a day, a three- patient’s conditions and the 2,3 fold increase over the past two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Why a Critical Skills Curriculum on Psychotropic
    June 2008 A Critical Curriculum on Psychotropic Medications • Principal Investigator: • Research Coordinator: – David Cohen, Ph.D. – Inge Sengelmann, M.S.W. • Professional Consultants: • Flash production and design: A Critical Curriculum on – David O. Antonuccio, Ph.D. – Sane Development, Inc., and (psychology) Cooper Design, Inc. Psychotropic Medications – Kia J. Bentley, Ph.D. (social • Voice narration and Flash editing: work) – Saul McClintock – R. Elliott Ingersoll, Ph.D. (counseling & psychology) – Stefan P. Kruszewski, M.D (psychiatry) – Robert E. Rosen, J.D., Ph.D. (law) www.CriticalThinkRx.org CriticalThinkRx CriticalThinkRx was made Module 1 possible by a grant from the Attorneys General Consumer and Why a Critical Skills Prescriber Grant Program, funded by the multi -state Curriculum on settlement of consumer fraud Psychotropic Medications? claims regarding the marketing of the prescription drug Neurontin ® 4 Curriculum Rationale Part A Physicians write prescriptions, but other professionals often influence Curriculum Rationale, who gets prescribed and why Funding and Contents Training for these professionals is mostly haphazard and often influenced by the pharmaceutical industry 6 Module 1 www.CriticalThinkRx.org 1 June 2008 Curriculum Objectives Critical thinking Help practitioners in mental involves assessing beliefs, health and child welfare arguments and claims to arrive sharpen critical thinking skills at well -reasoned judgments to deal with complex and uses standards such as clarity, evolving issues about accuracy, relevance,
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Need to Rationalize Drug Prescribing
    International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology Vishal S et al. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;9(12):1917-1921 http:// www.ijbcp.com pISSN 2319-2003 | eISSN 2279-0780 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20204982 Review Article Deprescription: a global need to rationalize drug prescribing Subhash Vishal*, Biswadeep Das, Shailendra Handu Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India Received: 17 October 2020 Accepted: 07 November 2020 *Correspondence: Dr. Subhash Vishal, Email: [email protected] Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Appropriate prescribing and deprescription of unwanted medicines are a global concern. Polypharmacy is common in old age due to multiple comorbidities. This poses many risks that can be prevented by deprescription as a measure of planned reduction in number of medicines no longer needed. For articles to be included in this narrative review, a non-systematic search of deprescription and related term was conducted at PubMed and Google Scholar database. Articles detailing deprescription in general were included whereas those about deprescription in a particular disease or of particular drug groups were excluded. The review discusses about related terms, process of deprescription, when it is to be planned, which patients need deprescription, tools available for appropriate prescription, importance of patient oriented deprescription, actual steps involved in deprescription, present scenario, future scope of trials and formulation of guidelines for deprescription, and finally current state of deprescription in India and actions needed.
    [Show full text]