DOCSLIB.ORG

Narrative and Characterization Techniques in Sue Monk Kidd's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Narrative and Characterization Techniques in Sue Monk Kidd's Anya Pritafania Narrative And Characterization Techniques In Sue Monk Kidd’s Novel The Secret Life Of Bees (An Analysis With Narratological Approach) Narrative and Characterization Techniques in Sue Monk Kidd’s Novel The Secret Life Of Bees (An Analysis with Narratological Approach) Anya Pritafania English Language and Literature Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia [email protected] ABSTRACT: This research analyzes narrative techniques in Sue Monk Kidd’s novel The Secret Life of Bees (2002) by using Barry’s version (2002) of Genette’s Narratology theory (1980). The purpose of the research is to identify how the story is narrated and how the narrative constructs the main character as evidenced in the novel. By applying the theory, this research attempts to gain insights into how the narrative is presented to the reader in the form of first person mode. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method. This research finds that the story The Secret Life of Bees is narrated through six narrative categorizations: narrative level, narrative time, narrative voice, focalization, narrative of words, and narrative mode. Moreover, the narrative constructs the main character through four methods of characterizations: physical description, dialogue and actions, thoughts and feelings, and what other characters’ say about the main character. This research implies that the story The Secret Life of Bees is well organized. The use of first person narrative and the presence of child character who is also the narrator have made the story interesting and easy to follow. Furthermore, the development of the main character also plays a crucial role in giving the clue to the story’s meaning and successfully covers the major theme of the story. Keywords: Narrative techniques, Barry’s Version (2002) of Genette’s narratology theory (1980), Narrative Categorizations, Characterization, Methods of Characterization 27 Passage2014, 2(2), 27-39 INTRODUCTION structure of narration or the way Narrative involves an action or an stories are told. Of many different event to be told. People in general narratology theories, Barry believes often associate narrative with literary that Genette’s theory of narratology types, like novels, short stories, fairy (1980) is considered as one of the tales, sagas or folk tales. As a most valuable theories, because the widespread activity which is closely work has as its focus, not the story related to the acts of telling and re- itself, but rather the process of telling telling, narrative can have numerous the story itself (Barry, 2002: 151). variety of structures that produce Concerning to Genette’s theory, different kinds of effects and Barry provides six basic questions responses. In specific, narrative can which possibly cover the main areas be found in a text, such as literary discussed by Genette. First, how is text. In relation to this, Thwaites, the story ‘packaged’? this question Davis, and Mules (1994:114), state deals with the analysis of narrative that narrative structure complements level. According to Barry (2002), texts in three ways: it depicts the narratives can be divided into primary sequences of events or ideas in a story and secondary narratives. The by foregrounding their movement primary narrative refers to the through the passing of time, narrative that comes first in the story, emphasizes a network of social but it does not mean the main meanings by transforming events into narrative of the story. The secondary actions performed by characters, and narrative, in fact, is usually the main offers the kinds of pleasure and story, although it comes after and is enjoyment to the readers. embedded into the primary narrative. The study of narrative is The second question proposed commonly called narratology. by Barry is: how is time handled in According to Barry (2002: 145), the story? This question deals with narratology is not the reading and the analysis of narrative time in order interpretation of individual stories, to understand how time reference but rather the attempt to study the determines the order of events in the 28 Anya Pritafania Narrative And Characterization Techniques In Sue Monk Kidd’s Novel The Secret Life Of Bees (An Analysis With Narratological Approach) story. For instance, a writer often uses everything because the narrator has an flashback technique to relate an event access to enter the minds and which happened in the past and flash emotions of more than one character forward technique to present the in the story. The term internal future events. focalization refers to a narrative Barry’s third question is: who which is focused on the is telling the story? This question consciousness of a single character deals with the analysis of narrative and it only tells what the character voice. According to Abbott (2008: ‘thinks’ and ‘experiences’, whereas 70), “voice in narration is a question the external focalization refers to a of who it is we “hear” doing the narrative in which everything is narrating.” There are two possible narrated from the viewpoint of a types of narrators which emerge in narrator who is completely located the story, one is the kind of narrator outside of the story and focuses on who is not identified as neither a what the characters ‘say’ and ‘do’. character nor the author’s voice in the The fifth question is: how are story. The other one is a narrator who speech and thought represented? This is identified as a character and takes question deals with Genette’s idea of part in telling the events of the story. narrative of words. Genette (1980) The fourth question is: how is introduces three modes of speech the narrative focalised? This question representation in narrative, such as deals with the analysis of focalization narratized, transposed, and mimetic or viewpoint from which a narrative speech. Considering that Genette’s is presented. There are three types of terms are too general, Barry (2002) focalization as suggested by Genette provides another options which (1980: 10), those are zero, internal, hopefully can be a useful indicator for and external focalization. Zero analyzing the representation of focalization is often called as a character’s speech and thought in classical narration. It is used to narrative by introducing the terms, describe a narrative in which the such as ‘direct and tagged’, ‘direct narrator is the one who knows 29 Passage2014, 2(2), 27-39 and untagged’, ‘direct and selectively character in the novel. Character is tagged’, and ‘tagged indirect speech’. one of the essential elements in a The sixth question is: is the story. Characters’ traits and roles are basic narrative mode ‘mimetic’ or shaped based on how they are ‘diegetic’? This question deals with described and how they act in a story. Genette’s ideas of narrative mode. Characters may perform various The terms mimesis and diegesis are functions in a story. Different types of often paraphrased as ‘showing’ and characters perform different roles in a ‘telling’. Barry (2002: 151) says that: narrative process. Mimesis can be regarded as ‘slow Forster (1927) states that telling’, in which what is done and based on the personality they possess, said is staged for the readers, characters in a novel are either creating the illusion that they are relatively flat (simple) or round seeing and hearing things for (complex). Flat characters are often themselves. By contrast, diegesis static in which they do not grow means ‘telling’ or ‘relating’, in emotionally from beginning to the which the narrator just says what end of the story. Round characters, happens, without trying to show it as it happens. however, are much harder to However, in reality, many understand and describe because they writers often use the two modes in have multiple personality traits. tandem for strategic reasons. This is Another way of classifying because an entirely mimetic novel characters in the story is by looking will tend to be a very long story and through the roles they play. an entirely diegetic novel will tend to Altenbernd and Lewis (1966: 59) be a summary of a story. Therefore, a state that according to their roles in combination of the two modes is the story, characters can be classified needed in order to create a good story. into protagonist and antagonist. Furthermore, this research also Protagonist is the central character in applies the characterization analysis the story which can be directly to reveal the way the narrative identified by the readers and often constructs the personality of the main claimed as a good character (the hero 30 Anya Pritafania Narrative And Characterization Techniques In Sue Monk Kidd’s Novel The Secret Life Of Bees (An Analysis With Narratological Approach) or heroine). By contrast, antagonist is different from other characters. the villain (the anti-hero) or the Myers-Shaffer (2002: 175) argues character who is blocking the hero’s that “the basis of characterization is way. the revelation of the character’s Characters can be regarded as identifying traits, the mental and people in narratives. Although ethical (including moral) traits sometimes characters may not always (qualities or characteristics) of the be people, they may be animals, individual.” Therefore, good robots or other imagery creatures, the characterization is that one which can writer gives them human ability and give vivid images to the readers. psychological traits. Thus, we can Practically, both characters consider them as people but in a and characterization are the crucial different form. Characters are created elements in elements in making a by writer for different purposes to story interesting. Characters help the build a story. In the novel The Secret writer and the readers connect each Life of Bees, the writer creates the other within a story. In relation to main character, Lily Melissa Owens, this, Werlock (2010) explains that to generate the theme of the story.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy
    Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, Chair Professor Eric Naiman Professor Dorothy J. Hale Spring 2016 Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy © 2016 By Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Abstract Illusion and Instrument: Problems of Mimetic Characterization in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy by Chloe Susan Liebmann Kitzinger Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation focuses new critical attention on a problem central to the history and theory of the novel, but so far remarkably underexplored: the mimetic illusion that realist characters exist independently from the author’s control, and even from the constraints of form itself. How is this illusion of “life” produced? What conditions maintain it, and at what points does it start to falter? My study investigates the character-systems of three Russian realist novels with widely differing narrative structures — Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1865–1869), and Dostoevsky’s The Adolescent (1875) and The Brothers Karamazov (1879–1880) — that offer rich ground for exploring the sources and limits of mimetic illusion. I suggest, moreover, that Tolstoy and Dostoevsky themselves were preoccupied with this question. Their novels take shape around ambitious projects of characterization that carry them toward the edges of the realist tradition, where the novel begins to give way to other forms of art and thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflationary and Deflationary Characterization in the Novels of Ayi Kwei Armah
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1719 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2863 (Online) Vol.3, No.17, 2013 Inflationary and Deflationary Characterization in the Novels of Ayi Kwei Armah Peace Ibala Amala Ph.D. Department of English, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Abstract It is a truism of course, that much of the pleasure of contemporary readers comes from the study of characters. For every literary work is an artistic response of the perception of man and his society. The purpose of this paper is to examine how Ayi Kwei Armah employs the Inflationary and deflationary technique of characterization which is shown to be his foremost stylistic method in his novels. Armah does so by revealing that his technique is a means of objective correlative, meaningful within the African society. Armah’s technique as this study reveals brings to the fore that characters who perpetrate corruption and the destructiveness inherent in the African continent are deflated. And morally upright characters are presented in the inflationary mode. Introduction It is common critical knowledge that the basis of fictional writingis character creation, perhaps nothing else. Characters not only add depth and complexity to the novels by giving readers perspectives of situations, but keep the readers engaged at all times. Armah is one of the African novelists that has continually captivated his readers for the experimental quality of his literary output (Wright 12, Obiechina 53, Folarin 117, Fraser ix ); the yardstick of experimentation in African fiction (Ogungbesan 68 ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2012 The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Joseph Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Joseph, "The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno" (2012). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 125. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/125 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 2011 By Joseph Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 2 ABSTRACT Joseph Weiss Title: The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Critical Theory demands that its forms of critique express resistance to the socially necessary illusions of a given historical period. Yet theorists have seldom discussed just how much it is the case that, for Walter Benjamin and Theodor W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Patrick Chakaipa's 'Rudo Ibofu'
    Journal of English and literature Vol. 2(1). pp. 1-9, January 2011 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ijel ISSN 2141-2626 ©2011 Academic Journals Review Epistemological and moral implications of characterization in African literature: A critique of Patrick Chakaipa’s ‘Rudo Ibofu’ (love is blind) Munyaradzi Mawere Department of Humanities, Universidade Pedagogica, Mozambique. E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted 26 November, 2010 This paper examines African epistemology and axiology as expressed in African literature through characterization, and it adopts the Zimbabwean Patrick Chakaipa’s novel, Rudo Ibofu as a case study. It provides a preliminary significance of characterization in Zimbabwean literature and by extension African literature before demonstrating how characterization has been ‘abused’ by some African writers since colonialism in Africa. The consequences are that a subtle misconstrued image of Africa can indirectly or directly be perpetuated within the academic settings. The Zimbabwean novel as one example of African literature that extensively employs characterization, it represents Africa. The mode of this work is reactionary in the sense that it is responding directly to trends identifiable in African literature spheres. The paper therefore is a contribution towards cultural revival and critical thinking in Africa where the wind of colonialism in the recent past has significantly affected the natives’ consciousness. In the light of the latter point, the paper provides a corrective to the western gaze that demonized Africa by advancing the view that Africans were without a history, worse still epistemological and moral systems. The paper thus criticizes, dismantles and challenges the inherited colonial legacies which have injured many African scientists and researchers’ consciousness; it is not only against the vestiges of colonialism, but of neo-colonialism and western cultural arrogance that have been perpetuated by some African writers through characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARACTERIZATION in FICTION HONORS THESIS Presented to The
    CHARACTERIZATION IN FICTION HONORS THESIS Presented to the Honors Committee of Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation in the Honors College by Jack Reams San Marcos, Texas May 2015 CHARACTERIZATION IN FICTION Thesis Supervisor: ________________________________ John M. Blair, Ph.D. Department of English Second Reader: __________________________________ Twister Marquiss, M.F.A Department of English Approved: ____________________________________ Heather C. Galloway, Ph.D. Dean, Honors College Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 P.A.R.T.S of Characterization .............................................................................................4 Direct Characterization ......................................................................................................15 Indirect Characterization ....................................................................................................30 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................43 Abstract The purpose of my thesis is to examine the importance of characterization in fiction, as well as the methods of characterization itself. The scope of the paper will be primarily limited to three works of
    [Show full text]
  • Genre, Characterization, and Cognition
    Chapter 1 Genre, Characterization, and Cognition 1 Genre Recognition and Character Cognition How do you recognize a detective story when you see one? Is it a constellation of expected features? A list of necessary elements? A “family resemblance” with other detective stories? Do the author’s intentions make it a detective story? Or is it a detective story for social and paratextual reasons—the publish- ing house, the jacket illustration, where it is shelved at a library or bookstore, the literary tastes of the friend who recommended it? Versions of all these ap- proaches have been used to theorize genre, both at the abstract, universal level and also in connection to specific cultures, places, and times. The proposition explored in this book is that generic connections are forged by readers attend- ing to what characters’ minds are doing—what characters are represented as wanting, thinking, and otherwise cogitating. Central to the detective story genre is a detective character that solves a mystery. Perhaps a corpse is discovered under suspicious circumstances; the authorities are engaged; the detective takes the case and works from hunches, inferences, and deduction to find and apprehend the culprit. The reader expe- riences the narrative by sharing in the initial confusion of the still-living char- acters, by following the detective’s reasoning process as he or she solves the case, and then celebrating vicariously when the perpetrator is identified and apprehended. My reader might now object that there are dozens of ways in which the schema just articulated fails to account for many detective stories. Potential variables are legion.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTS of FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms That Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction
    Dr. Hallett ELEMENTS OF FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms that Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction” is defined as any imaginative re-creation of life in prose narrative form. All fiction is a falsehood of sorts because it relates events that never actually happened to people (characters) who never existed, at least not in the manner portrayed in the stories. However, fiction writers aim at creating “legitimate untruths,” since they seek to demonstrate meaningful insights into the human condition. Therefore, fiction is “untrue” in the absolute sense, but true in the universal sense. Critical Thinking – analysis of any work of literature – requires a thorough investigation of the “who, where, when, what, why, etc.” of the work. Narrator / Narrative Voice Guiding Question: Who is telling the story? …What is the … Narrative Point of View is the perspective from which the events in the story are observed and recounted. To determine the point of view, identify who is telling the story, that is, the viewer through whose eyes the readers see the action (the narrator). Consider these aspects: A. Pronoun p-o-v: First (I, We)/Second (You)/Third Person narrator (He, She, It, They] B. Narrator’s degree of Omniscience [Full, Limited, Partial, None]* C. Narrator’s degree of Objectivity [Complete, None, Some (Editorial?), Ironic]* D. Narrator’s “Un/Reliability” * The Third Person (therefore, apparently Objective) Totally Omniscient (fly-on-the-wall) Narrator is the classic narrative point of view through which a disembodied narrative voice (not that of a participant in the events) knows everything (omniscient) recounts the events, introduces the characters, reports dialogue and thoughts, and all details.
    [Show full text]
  • Narration in Poetry and Drama
    Published on the living handbook of narratology (http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de) Narration in Poetry and Drama Peter Hühn Roy Sommer Created: 6. December 2012 Revised: 1. November 2013 Roy Sommer 1 Definition Narration as a communicative act in which a chain of happenings is meaningfully structured and transmitted in a particular medium and from a particular point of view underlies not only narrative fiction proper but also poems and plays in that they, too, represent temporally organized sequences and thus relate “stories,” albeit with certain genre-specific differences, necessarily mediating them in the manner of presentation. Lyric poetry in the strict sense (and not only obviously narrative poetry like ballads or verse romances) typically features strings of primarily mental or psychological happenings perceived through the consciousness of single speakers and articulated from their position. Drama enacts strings of happenings with actors in live performance, the presentation of which, though typically devoid of any overt presenting agency, is mediated e.g. through selection, segmentation and arrangement. Thanks to these features characteristic of narrative, lyric poems as well as plays performed on the stage can be profitably analyzed with the transgeneric application of narratological categories, though with poetry the applicability of the notion of story and with drama that of mediation seems to be in question. 2 Explication Transgeneric narratology proceeds from the assumption that narratology’s highly differentiated system of categories can be applied to the analysis of both poems and plays, possibly opening the way to a more precise definition of their respective generic specificity, even though (lyric) poems do not seem to tell stories and stories in dramas do not seem to be mediated (but presented directly).
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Concept of Narratology and Narrative
    Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature 14(2) April 2020 P-ISSN 1858-0157 Available online at http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/LC E-ISSN 2460-853X The Basic Concept of Narratology and Narrative Devi Sari Panggabean Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Email: [email protected] Rahmadsyah Rangkuti Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Abstract The field of narratology is concerned with the study and analysis of narrative texts. It puts under investigation literary pieces of language and yields an understanding of the components has in its very texture. The aim of this article is to provide insights about the field of ‘narratology’ and its associated subject of study ‘narrative’. It also tries to sketch the main issues concerning these two concepts. For this, the present review is presented in two major sections, each with related discussions about narratology and narrative. The first major part, narratology, will be presented in three sections: the first section, deals with the definitions and origins of narratology. The defi- nitions are inspected and the researchers show how they go from general (encompassing all which is narrated) to more specific (encompassing literary narratives told by a narrator) ones. The second section, focuses on the two phases of narratology which are classical and post-classical ones in which narratology changed its orientations and scope.RETRACTED The last section is devoted to some of the elements and components of which narratology is made up, such as narration, focalization, narrative situation, action, story analysis, tellability, tense, time, and narrative modes which will be elaborated on in more details.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Terms-Key
    Malcolm Literary Terms ________________________ English 11 Name 1. Allegory – A story with 2 levels of meaning: literal and symbolic 2. Alliteration – Repetition of a consonant sound at beginning of words. 3. Allusion – Reference to well-known people, places, events, work of literature, etc. 4. Ambiguity – When a statement contains 2 or more possible meanings. (“I promise I’ll give you a ring tomorrow.”) 5. Ambivalence – The state of having 2 opposing feelings toward a person or thing at the same time. (“Can’t live with you, can’t live without you.”) 6. Analogy – The comparison of a new idea to a well-known idea to aid in comprehension 7. Anecdote – A brief story about an interesting, unusual, or humorous event 8. Antagonist – Character or force in conflict with the main character. (The Joker, The Green Goblin) 9. Antanaclasis – Stylistic repetition of a word utilizing different definitions of the word each time (“We must all hang together, or assuredly we will all hang together.”) 10.Antithesis – The use of phrases with opposite meanings in close conjunction. (“One small step for man; one giant leap for mankind.”) 11.Aphorism – A general truth or observation about life, often witty. (An apple a day keeps the doctor away.) 12.Apostrophe – figure of speech in which the writer directly addresses the reader or an absent/abstract idea. (Build thee more stately mansions, oh my soul.) 13.Aside – In drama, a short passage that an actor speaks to the audience and the other characters pretend they cannot hear. 14.Assonance – repetition of vowel sounds. (Ashley asked for applesauce after her anchovies.) 15.Autobiography – Work of nonfiction in which the author writes about his/her own life.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature?
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Spring 5-2015 The Importance of Appearances in Literature: What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature? Chelsea J. Anderson University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Chelsea J., "The Importance of Appearances in Literature: What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature?" (2015). Honors Theses. 274. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/274 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi The Importance of Appearances in Literature: What Does It Mean to Be a Redhead in Literature? by Chelsea Anderson A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of English May 2015 ii Approved by ____________________________________ Alexandra Valint, Ph. D., Thesis Adviser Assistant Professor of English ____________________________________ Eric Tribunella, Ph. D., Chair Department of English ____________________________________ Ellen Weinauer, Ph.D., Dean Honors College iii Abstract In literature, appearances always seem to play a major part of each character. The physical descriptions of each character are important to the development of the story. Therefore, it seems that a character’s physical appearance becomes an important part of character development, and his/her physical traits help to determine the type of character he/she will be.
    [Show full text]
  • Enunciative Narratology : a French Speciality Sylvie Patron
    Enunciative Narratology : a French Speciality Sylvie Patron To cite this version: Sylvie Patron. Enunciative Narratology : a French Speciality. Greta Olson. Current Trends in Narratology, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 267-289, 2011, Narratologia. hal-00698702v1 HAL Id: hal-00698702 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00698702v1 Submitted on 28 Mar 2013 (v1), last revised 13 May 2013 (v2) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SYLVIE PATRON (University of Paris 7-Denis Diderot) Enunciative Narratology: A French Speciality1 Abstract This essay is intended as an introduction to “French enunciative narratology” or the theory thus termed on the basis of a certain number of criteria presented in the introduction: the fact that it is produced by linguists; the fact that it aims to remedy the shortcomings of Genettian narratology in the domain of linguistics; the fact that it refers to the work of enunciative linguistics, applied to the corpus of fictional narratives. The first section of the essay concerns the historical and methodological relations, or lack of relations, between enunciative linguistics and narratology (in Genette’s sense). The second section examines the contributions made by enunciative narratology to narratology or narrative theory.
    [Show full text]