DOCSLIB.ORG

Reflections on 20 Years of Aboriginal Art” Biography / Abstract / Lecture 12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reflections on 20 Years of Aboriginal Art” Biography / Abstract / Lecture 12 The Trudeau Foundation Papers volume iv, 1 • 2012 A Canadian institution with a national purpose, the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation is an independent and non-partisan charity. It was established in 2001 as a living memorial to the former prime minister by his family, friends, and colleagues. In 2002, the Government of Canada endowed the Foundation with a donation of $125 million with the unanimous support of the House of Commons. In addition, the Foundation benefits from private sector donations in support of specific initiatives. Through its scholarship, fellowship, mentorship, and public interaction programs, the Foundation supports outstanding individuals who make meaningful contributions to critical public issues. Human Rights and Dignity | Responsible Citizenship Canada in the World | People and Their Natural Environment president Pierre-Gerlier Forest directors Michel Bastarache, Ottawa, Ontario John H. McCall MacBain, Geneva, Switzerland William G. Davis, Toronto, Ontario L. Jacques Ménard, Montreal, Quebec Roy L. Heenan, Montreal, Quebec Heather Munroe-Blum, Montréal, Québec Alexander Himelfarb, Ottawa, Ontario Patrick Pichette, Mountain View, California Chaviva Hošek, Toronto, Ontario Marc Renaud, Montreal, Quebec Edward Johnson, Montreal, Quebec Sean E. Riley, Antigonish, Nova Scotia Marc Lalonde, Montreal, Quebec Emőke J. E. Szathmáry, Winnipeg, Manitoba Paule Leduc, Montreal, Quebec Alexandre Trudeau, Montreal, Quebec The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation 1514 Docteur-Penfield Ave. Montreal QC Canada h3g 1b9 trudeaufoundation.ca The Trudeau Foundation Papers, Volume 4, 1 • 2012 isbn 978-2-9812034-7-2 (print version) isbn 978-2-9812034-8-9 (pdf) Legal Deposit—Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2012 Legal Deposit—Library and Archives Canada, 2012 Table of Contents Preface Roy L. Heenan Chairman, The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation 5 In Theory, in Practice Pierre-Gerlier Forest President, The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation 7 Trudeau Lectures Steven Loft 2010 Visiting Trudeau Fellow Ryerson University “Reflections on 20 Years of Aboriginal Art” biography / abstract / lecture 12 Jocelyn Létourneau 2006 Trudeau Fellow Université Laval “History and Social Hope” biography / abstract / lecture 34 Alain-G. Gagnon 2010 Trudeau Fellow Université du Québec à Montréal “Empowerment Through Different Means: Regionalism, Nationalism, and Federalism” biography / abstract / lecture 56 Sujit Choudhry 2010 Trudeau Fellow New York University “The Globalization of the Canadian Constitution” biography / abstract / lecture 88 Janine Brodie 2010 Trudeau Fellow University of Alberta “Social Literacy and Social Justice in Times of Crisis” biography / abstract / lecture 114 Preface When the Trudeau Foundation first began its work some twelve years ago, its program consisted of the selection and appointment of scholars, fellows, and mentors in the humanities. It soon became apparent that we needed another element—the sharing of the research, scholarship, and ideas with the public at large. So began the Foundation’s Public Interaction Program, of which this volume is but the latest example. Referring to the conferences and lectures organized by the Foundation, we have chosen for publication five papers written by our fellows, to share with a wider audience. Year after year, the Foundation supports fine thinkers and renowned experts on global issues, enabling Trudeau fellows to undertake independent research in search of answers to pressing challenges. The fellows focus on four topics that preoccupied Pierre Trudeau and which continue to demand our attention—human rights and dignity, responsible citizenship, people and their natural environment, and Canada in the world—offering fresh perspectives and pioneering approaches to some of the most contentious issues confronting humanity. While their areas of specialty are diverse, these scholars in the humanities and social sciences share a capacity to not only conceive 6 the trudeau foundation papers new ideas but also to share these ideas widely to help resolve major contemporary challenges. One of the Foundation’s goals is to foster long-term relationships with the larger community in order to translate great ideas into even greater societal results. Fellows are encouraged to give back to society by transferring the key ideas from their research through public lectures, thus contributing to the greater public good. Pierre Elliott Trudeau reminded us that “Each of us must do all in our power to extend to all persons an equal measure of human dignity—to ensure through our efforts that hope and faith in the future are not reserved for a minority of the world’s population, but are available to all.” As this fourth edition of The Trudeau Foundation Papers underscores, five fellows have embraced Trudeau’s call and carried on in his footsteps, offering their visions for a more equit- able society and invaluable guidance on how these visions might be achieved. Since launching the Fellowship Program in 2002, the Foundation has named 46 Trudeau fellows and has held 20 Trudeau Lectures from coast to coast. Collectively, the fellows have breathed life into the Foundation’s mission to “foster a fruitful dialogue between scholars and policymakers in the arts community, business, government, the professions, and the voluntary sector.” They have brought to fruition the Foundation’s vision to invest in two key areas of strategic importance to Canada’s growth and well-being: bright and caring people committed to providing inspired leadership, and the world of creativity and ideas shaping positive change. It is an honour and privilege for me to be a part of this critical process, and I hope that these papers will inspire further scholarship and dialogue. Roy L. Heenan, oc Chairman, The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation October 2012 In Theory, in Practice “The struggle for democracy and the ongoing development of its political and social content was not solely a twentieth-century problem… it will continue to be one for the century to come, whatever concrete forms it adopts.” Jorge Semprún, L’expérience du totalitarisme (1996) When it comes down to it, all of the conversations at the Trudeau Foundation are about democracy. We mix disciplines, languages, and bases for knowledge; we celebrate their dialogue and we encourage them to intermarry. But our purpose is always to work together in the service of a certain promise of emancipation—an emancipation at once political, social, and cultural. This is the promise of which Pierre Elliott Trudeau wrote in 1958 that it “encourages each citizen and each group of citizens to protest against the defects of society to demand justice.” Those who have read previous editions of The Trudeau Foundation Papers know that the Foundation fears neither theory nor abstraction. We know and accept that to call people and things, however different, by their true names, to investigate and uncover the relationships between them, sometimes requires us to depart from what is commonly held to be true. At times, this means risking not 8 the trudeau foundation papers being immediately understood. In this new century— enamoured of the transparent and the immediate, valuing intuition over reason, and wary of knowledge that cannot be monetized—it has become audacious to celebrate erudition, to value the long, hard work of thinking about difficult issues, to invest the time necessary for sound research. Which is really the heart of the matter. It is evident that this precludes moving quickly to reap the fruits of what we sow. In any event, democracy, to paraphrase Jorge Semprún, is in a permanent state of development. It requires con- stant attention, a continually renewed supply of ideas and images, and it ridicules definitive solutions and final answers. No matter how much circumstances change, the challenges remain: freedom, justice, law, solidarity, human dignity. Our true usefulness is there- fore a function of our capacity to confront these crucial issues and, above all, to continue adhering to a demanding program despite rebuffs and roadblocks. Of course, this poses a predictable problem: is speaking or writing enough to further democracy in Canada and abroad? If the Foundation is so attached to this ideal, why does it not fund more tangible projects, more direct initiatives, more concrete actions? Why waste time with studies and endless discussion when you could leap into the fray? The truth is that the Foundation does this too. It would be absurd to cloister oneself in the realm of words with- out ever descending into that of action. The authority conferred by knowledge – an authority for which the Foundation has the greatest respect – is not marred by the authority that comes from experience and commitment. Au contraire: it is only right that ideas are embod- ied and that the surfacing of new facts and realities topples standing convictions, no matter how entrenched. But this line of reasoning is too abstract still. The fact is that the researchers and creators whom we invite to join the Trudeau com- munity have already proven their ability to move freely and fluidly In Theory, in Practice 9 between the world of ideas and that of practice. Their engagement and their intellectual work are as it were two sides of the same coin, not necessarily because these people defend a cause in particular— although this is sometimes the case—but because they simply have no time to linger over less important things. They are weighed down by persistent inequality, the degradation of nature, the violent attack on the rights and dignity of their fellows, the foolish risks taken by states in their quest for power. The reader should look, for example, to Sujit Choudry’s rigorous essay on constitutional law. It is the work of a lawyer, and we are not surprised to discern the author’s propensity for principles, norms, and models. But Choudhry also reveals how working with coun- tries in reconstruction, he has discovered at the heart of Canadian values an aspiration common to all peoples: the desire for “peace, order and good government,” as in the famous preamble to Canada’s Constitution Act of 1867.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Performing Power
    Rebecca Belmore: Performing Power Jolene Rickard The aurora borealis or northern lights, ignited by the intersection of elements at precisely the right second, burst into a fire of light on black Anishinabe nights. For some, the northern lights are simply reflections caused by hemispheric dust, but for others they are power. Rebecca Belmore knows about this power; her mother, Rose, told her so.1 Though the imbrication of Anishinabe thinking was crucial in her formative years in northern Ontario, Belmore now has a much wider base of observation from Vancouver, British Columbia. Her role as 2 transgressor and initiator—moving fluidly in the hegemony of the west reformulated as "empire " —reveals how conditions of dispossession are normalized in the age of globalization. Every country has a national narrative, and Canada is better than most at attempting to integrate multiple stories into the larger framework, but the process is still a colonial project. The Americas need to be read as a colonial space with aboriginal or First Nations people as seeking decolonization. The art world has embraced the notion of transnational citizens, moving from one country to the next by continuously locating their own subjectivities in homelands like China, Africa and elsewhere. As a First Nations or aboriginal person, Belmore's homeland is now the modern nation of Canada; yet, there is reluctance by the art world to recognize this condition as a continuous form of cultural and political exile. The inclusion of the First Nations political base is not meant to marginalize Belmore's work, but add depth to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Westwood Creative Artists ______
    Westwood Creative Artists ___________________________________________ FRANKFURT CATALOGUE Fall 2019 INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS Director: Meg Wheeler AGENTS Chris Casuccio Jackie Kaiser Michael A. Levine Hilary McMahon John Pearce Bruce Westwood Meg Wheeler FILM & TELEVISION Michael A. Levine 386 Huron Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2G6 Canada Phone: (416) 964-3302 ext. 233 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.wcaltd.com Table of Contents News from Westwood Creative Artists page 2 – 4 Recent sales page 5 – 6 Recent prizes page 7 Fiction Dede Crane, One Madder Woman page 9 Charles Demers, Primary Obsessions page 10 Thomas King, 77 Fragments of a Familiar Ruin page 11 Keith Ross Leckie, Cursed! page 12 Kathryn Nicolai, Nothing Much Happens page 13 Sara O’Leary, The Ghost in the House page 14 Non-Fiction Madhur Anand, This Red Line Goes Straight to Your Heart page 17 Bill Cosgrave, Love Her Madly page 18 Antonio Michael Downing, Saga Boy page 19 Tara Henley, Lean Out page 20 Thomas Homer-Dixon, Commanding Hope page 21 Jay Ingram, The Science of Why 5 page 22 – 23 Bruce Kirkby, Blue Sky Kingdom page 24 Jeannie Marshall, Seeing Things page 25 Bob McDonald, An Earthling’s Guide to Outer Space page 26 Peter Nowak, The Rise of Real-life Superheroes page 27 Sarah Quigley, The Divorce Diaries page 28 Titles of Special Note M.G. Vassanji, A Delhi Obsession page 31 Nellwyn Lampert, Every Boy I Ever Kissed page 32 Tessa McWatt, Shame on Me page 33 Ailsa Ross, The Woman Who Rode a Shark page 34 Jenny Heijun Wills, Older Sister. Not Necessarily Related.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Bias in Quebec Since 1936
    Canadian Political Science Review 4(1) March 2010 Electoral Bias in Quebec Since 1936 Alan Siaroff (University of Lethbridge) * Abstract In the period since 1936, Quebec has gone through two eras of party politics, the first between the Liberals and the Union Nationale, the second and ongoing era between the Liberals and the Parti Québécois. This study examines elections in Quebec in terms of all relevant types of electoral bias. In both eras the overall electoral bias has clearly been against the Liberal Party. The nature of this bias has changed however. Malapportionment was crucial through 1970 and of minimal importance since the 1972 redistribution. In contrast gerrymandering, ultimately involving an ‘equivalent to gerrymandering effect’ due to the geographic nature of Liberal core support, has been not only a permanent phenomenon but indeed since 1972 the dominant effect. The one election where both gerrymandering and the overall bias were pro-Liberal — 1989 — is shown to be the ‘exception that proves the rule’. Finally, the erratic extent of electoral bias in the past four decades is shown to arise from very uneven patterns of swing in Quebec. Introduction In common with other jurisdictions using the single-member plurality electoral system, elections results in the province of Quebec tend to be disproportionate. This can be seen in Table 1, which provides some summary measures on elections since 1936 — the time period of this analysis. Average disproportionality over this period has been quite high at 20.19 percent. This has almost entirely been in favour of the winning party, with the average seat bias of the largest party being 19.65 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian Jungen Friendship Centre
    BRIAN JUNGEN FRIENDSHIP CENTRE Job Desc.: AGO Access Docket: AGO0229 Client: AGO A MESSAGE FROM Supplier: Type Page: STEPHAN JOST, Trim: 8.375" x 10.5" Bleed: MICHAEL AND SONJA Live: Pub.: Membership Mag ad KOERNER DIRECTOR, Colour: CMYK Date: April 2019 AND CEO Insert Date: Ad #: AGO0229_FP_4C_STAIRCASE DKT./PROJ: AGO0229 ARTWORK APPROVAL Artist: Studio Mgr: Production: LESS EQUALS MOREProofreader: Creative Dir.: Art Director: Copywriter: The AGO is having a moment. There’s a real energy when I walkTranslator: through the galleries, thanks to the thousands of visitors who have experienced the AGOAcct. for Service: the first time – or their hundredth. It is an energy that reflects our vibrant and diverseClient: city, and one that embraces the undeniable power of art to change the world. And weProof: want 1 more2 3 4people 5 6 to7 Final experience it and make the AGO a habit. PDFx1a Laser Proof Our membership is generous and strong. Because of your support, on May 25 we’re launching a new admission model to remove barriers and encourage deeper relationships with the AGO. The two main components are: • Everyone 25 and under can visit for free • Anyone can purchase a pass for $35 and visit as many times as they’d like for a full year Without your vital support as an AGO Member, this new initiative wouldn’t be possible. Thanks to you, a teenager might choose us to impress their date or a tired dad might take his children for a quick 30-minute visit, knowing he can come back again and again. You will continue to enjoy the special benefits of membership, including Members’ Previews that give you first access to our amazing exhibitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments in Footnotes Added by WE Charity October 19, 2020 Standing
    Comments in footnotes added by WE Charity October 19, 2020 Standing Committee on Finance Sixth Floor, 131 Queen Street House of Commons Ottawa ON K1A 0A6 Canada E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 613-947-3089 In anticipation of the Finance Committee resuming its study of WE Charity, and in fulfilment of undertakings from its previous study, I write to provide information and documents requested during my testimony, and the testimony of Craig Kielburger, Dalal Al-Waheidi and Scott Baker, at the Finance Committee on July 28 and August 13, 2020 regarding the Canada Student Service Grant (“CSSG”). The chart below provides our responses to each of the requests identified in the list compiled by the Library of Parliament provided by The Honourable Pierre Poilievre on August 30, 20201. Please note that we have not redacted personal information from the documents requested by the Committee and enclosed with this submission. We trust however that if any of the documents are made public, the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons will make the necessary redactions in accordance with the redaction protocol approved by the Committee on July 7, 2020. No. Request Response Marc & Craig Kielburger 1. The total amount that his Margaret Trudeau organizations, including WE but not limited to it, have paid in Between October 2016 and March 2020, a speaking expenses, benefits, bureau was used to engage Margaret Trudeau 28 reimbursements fees, or any times. On each occasion she attended an average of other consideration in kind or 3-5 events per engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    COMMUNIQUÉ Volume 27, Issue 30 July 28, 2020 WE Scandal Highlights the PM’s Ethical Incoherence Rod Taylor Leader, CHP Canada There are limits to public credulity and tolerance for blatantly reckless behaviour with public funds. The failed attempt by Prime Minister Trudeau to funnel $43.5 million of taxpayer money to his friends at the WE Charity Foundation fell outside those limits. The optics were bad. The amounts were staggering. The lies uttered to cover it up were appalling. This was not simply a Prime Minister’s error in judgment. This was a campaign to divert public funds into behind-the- scenes partisan grooming. The idea of passing nearly a billion dollars ($912 million, to be exact) into the hands of a charity connected with the Liberal brand raises questions on its face. Investigators have also discovered that the since- aborted contract to administer $912 million was not even made directly with WE Charity but with the WE Charity Foundation, a separate (sort of) charity that has only been registered for just over a year. It has no significant assets and no proven track record; it appears the reason for using a separate charity was to minimize liability risk for We Charity.1 The fact that the WE Charity Foundation would have pocketed about $43.5 million for distributing the rest of the money makes one blink hard, especially when Canada already has an army of civil servants who have proven themselves quite capable of handing out taxpayers’ money. Side-stories, new angles and “footnotes-of-interest” seem to be sprouting up all along the trail.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005-2006 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2005 2006 © Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 2006, all rights reserved. Reprinted with permission. UNITING GREAT THINKERS TO INSPIRE US ALL Microfinancing can be highly beneficial in diminishing the vulnerability of the poorest while contributing towards their becoming autonomous and empowered, particularly for women who often are most greatly affected by poverty and inequality. Although microfinancing is not a panacea for the many problems of the poor in developing countries, it brings with it the freedom of choices and possibilities, which enables those who have the least to change their daily lives their and future. Christian Girard, Trudeau Scholar 2005 © Christian Girard. Muhammad Yunus, founder of the Grameen Bank, greets Trudeau Scholar Christian Girard during a research visit to Bangladesh in July 2006. A pioneer of microfinancing, Professor Yunus was awarded the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize for his struggle against extreme poverty and marginalization. The two discussed issues related to microfinancing at the Grameen Bank’s head office in Dhaka. trudeaufoundation.ca The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation 1514 Doctor Penfield Avenue, 2nd Floor Montréal, Québec H3G 1B9 Canada Tel: 514.938.0001 Fax: 514.938.0046 E-mail: tfi[email protected] An independent and non-partisan Canadian charity, The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation was created in 2002 with an original endowment of $125 million from the Government of Canada as a living memorial to the former Prime Minister. Its fiscal year runs from September 1st to August 31st. The Trudeau Foundation internally develops and maintains a confidential list for the dissemination of all of its documents, including this annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comment on Reference Re Secession of Quebec
    Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies Volume 8 Article 6 1-1-1999 Culture, Postmodernism, and Canadian Legal Hermeneutics: A Comment on Reference Re Secession of Quebec John Rice Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/djls This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Recommended Citation John Rice, "Culture, Postmodernism, and Canadian Legal Hermeneutics: A Comment on Reference Re Secession of Quebec" (1999) 8 Dal J Leg Stud 183. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMMENT ON REFERENCE RE SECESSION OF QUEBEC - 183 CULTURE, POSTMODERNISM, AND CANADIAN LEGAL HERMENEUTICS: A COMMENT ON REFERENCE RE SECESSION OF QUEBEC JoHN RICEt I. INTRODUCTION: CANADA, CULTURE, POSTMODERNITY & POWER When I was an undergraduate, I recall having heard Canada described as the world's "first postmodern state" in a history seminar. The professor who made this contention based this opinion on the fact that Canada is unlike most of the world's nation-states in that it was founded and structured to accommodate the needs and aspirations of two founding "peoples," instead of one. At the time, I was quite taken with this idea. I return to it now in order to explore and interrogate the "postmodernity" of the Canadian polity and Canadian law. In the years since that history seminar, Quebeckers have voted in a second sovereignty referendum, and I feel that I have developed a more sophisticated understanding of postmodern ideas and the (in)ability of the Canadian state to accommodate cultural difference.
    [Show full text]
  • 1866 (C) Circa 1510 (A) 1863
    BONUS : Paintings together with their year of completion. (A) 1863 (B) 1866 (C) circa 1510 Vancouver Estival Trivia Open, 2012, FARSIDE team BONUS : Federal cabinet ministers, 1940 to 1990 (A) (B) (C) (D) Norman Rogers James Ralston Ernest Lapointe Joseph-Enoil Michaud James Ralston Mackenzie King James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent 1940s Andrew McNaughton 1940s Douglas Abbott Louis St. Laurent James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent Brooke Claxton Douglas Abbott Lester Pearson Stuart Garson 1950s 1950s Ralph Campney Walter Harris John Diefenbaker George Pearkes Sidney Smith Davie Fulton Donald Fleming Douglas Harkness Howard Green Donald Fleming George Nowlan Gordon Churchill Lionel Chevrier Guy Favreau Walter Gordon 1960s Paul Hellyer 1960s Paul Martin Lucien Cardin Mitchell Sharp Pierre Trudeau Leo Cadieux John Turner Edgar Benson Donald Macdonald Mitchell Sharp Edgar Benson Otto Lang John Turner James Richardson 1970s Allan MacEachen 1970s Ron Basford Donald Macdonald Don Jamieson Barney Danson Otto Lang Jean Chretien Allan McKinnon Flora MacDonald JacquesMarc Lalonde Flynn John Crosbie Gilles Lamontagne Mark MacGuigan Jean Chretien Allan MacEachen JeanJacques Blais Allan MacEachen Mark MacGuigan Marc Lalonde Robert Coates Jean Chretien Donald Johnston 1980s Erik Nielsen John Crosbie 1980s Perrin Beatty Joe Clark Ray Hnatyshyn Michael Wilson Bill McKnight Doug Lewis BONUS : Name these plays by Oscar Wilde, for 10 points each. You have 30 seconds. (A) THE PAGE OF HERODIAS: Look at the moon! How strange the moon seems! She is like a woman rising from a tomb. She is like a dead woman. You would fancy she was looking for dead things. THE YOUNG SYRIAN: She has a strange look.
    [Show full text]
  • PERIOD 1 (CHONG): Trial of the Pms Schedule June 2006
    Trials of the PMs Schedule Date Trial CHARGE Prosecution Prosecution Defence Defence Witnesses Judge PM Name Witnesses Mon Jan 10 Robert Decision to institute the Wartime Abdullah Karen (Wilfrid Laurier) Naeem Sukhpreet (Nelly Victor Mr. N Borden Elections Act McClung) Causing division by forcing Samuel Byron (Henri Bourassa) Krunal Garry (Sir Sam Hughes) conscription on the country Internment of Enemy Aliens Brandon Justin (Stefan Galant) Kayne Edward L.(William Otter) Tues Jan 11 Mackenzie Racial Discrimination in turning Peter Brianna (Captain Gustav Edward L. Kayne (Frederick Blair) Abdullah Samuel King away the SS St. Louis Schroeder) Ineffective leadership in the Byron Luxman (James Ralston) Sherry Nelson (Andrew policy of Conscription in WWII McNaughton) Unjust Internment of Japanese Garry Krunal (David Suzuki) Sharon Jason (John Hart) Canadians Wed Jan 12 John Unjustified in cancelling the Nelson Edward F. (Crawford Justin Brandon (General Guy Jayna Mr. N. Diefenbaker Avro Arrow Gordon Jr.) Simonds) Failure to act decisively during Mihai Kayne (John F. Kennedy) Jason Sharon (Howard Green) Cuban Missile Crisis Failed to secure Canada by not Mihai Sherry (Douglass Luxman Victor (Howard Green) arming Bomarc Missiles with Harkness) nuclear warheads Thurs Jan 13 Pierre Unjustified invoking of the War Stefani Sherry (Tommy Douglas) Victor Luxman (Robert Brianna Mr. N. Trudeau Measures Act in October Crisis Bourassa) Ineffective policy of the 1980 Keara Kayne (Peter Lougheed) Edward F. Abdullah (Marc Lalonde) National Energy Program Failure to get Quebec to sign the Jayna Byron (Rene Levesque) Maggie Jenise (Bill Davis) Constitution Act in 1982 Fri Jan 14 Brian Weakened Canada’s economy Brianna Jayna (Paul Martin) Annie Stefani (Michael Wilson) Kayne Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Plan De Developpement Pour La Gaspesie Et Le Bas-Saint-Laurent
    ol. 4, numero 5, mai 1983 MON1-3011 C S 4404 - PECH UN PLAN DE DEVELOPPEMENT POUR LA GASPESIE ET LE BAS-SAINT-LAURENT Le gouvernement canadien a annonce au debut de mai un programme special de developpement de la Gaspesie et du Bas-Saint-Laurent de 224,5 millions $, repartis sur 5 ans, dont 71 millions $ pour le secteur des peches. Cette annonce a ete faite a Matane devant les organismes regionaux par les ministres Pierre De Bane, Marc Lalonde et Herb Gray, accom- pagnes des deputes de la region. AU SOMMAIRE D'autres ameliorations au havre de Matane 7 224,5 millions $ pour la region du Un centre de recherche a Mont-Joli 8 Bas-Saint-Laurent/Gaspesie 2 71 millions $ pour le developpement Un nouveau havre de !Ache a Cap-Chat 9 des 'Aches en Gaspesie 3 Six nouveaux projets de developpement La formation en p8che: un choix de carrieres 10 4 dans le comte de Gaspe Lancement de la phase II du programme PERIO : ants travaux a Gascons, federal de developpement economique SH defroi et Bonaventure 6 des Iles-de-la-Madeleine 12 223 E57 224,5 MILLIONS $ POUR LA REGION DU BAS-SAINT-LAURENT/GASPESIE Le gouvernement canadien a initiatives issues du milieu ainsi Un connite executif regroupant les annonce au debut de mai un pro- que les frais d'administration du differents ministeres sera tree sous gramme special de developpement Plan. la presidence du coordonnateur de la Gaspesie et du Bas-Saint- federal du developpement econo- Le gouvernement favorisera les Laurent de 224,5 millions $ repartis mique pour le Quebec, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Annuel 1999-2000
    CENTRE INTERUNIVERSITAIRE D’ÉTUDES SUR LES LETTRES, LES ARTS ET LES TRADITIONS (CELAT) RAPPORT ANNUEL 1999-2000 Laurier Turgeon Directeur CELAT UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC FACULTÉ DES LETTRES À MONTRÉAL À CHICOUTIMI Décembre 2000 1 Dans cette publication, le masculin est utilisé en accord avec les normes de la langue française et ne sous-entend aucune discrimination. 2 TABLE DES MATIÈRES FAITS SAILLANTS................................................................................................................. ...........5 COMPENDIUM DE DONNÉES SUR LE CELAT EN 1999-2000........................................... ...........9 PRÉSENTATION GÉNÉRALE I Membres et personnel du Centre......................................................................................... .........11 Le bureau de direction................................................................................................... .........11 Le personnel administratif.............................................................................................. .........11 Le comité-conseil........................................................................................................... .........11 Les membres émérites, réguliers, associés, adjoints et correspondants.............................. .........12 Les membres postdoctoraux........................................................................................... .........12 Les membres étudiants..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]