General Assembly Distr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Assembly Distr UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/7/NGO/5 21 February 2008 ENGLISH ONLY HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Seventh session Agenda item 3 PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT Written statement* submitted by Interfaith International, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. [17 February 2008] • This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting non-governmental organization(s). GE.08-10755 A/HRC/7/NGO/5 page 2 China Implements new Measures to control the recognition of Tibetan Reincarnation Lineages In July 2007, the China's State Administration of Religious Affairs (SARA) issued the 14 article legal measures on reincarnation, which came into effect on 1 September, clearly demonstrating the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) adamant attempt to undermine and tarnish the centuries-old Tibetan tradition of Buddhist reincarnate lineages. The new measure forbids any Tibetan Buddhist reincarnate-spiritual master living outside the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) from either being enthroned or exercising the religious right to recognize or confirm new reincarnations (Tibetan: Tulkus) thus effectively attempting to end the centuries-old Tibetan Buddhist lineages of spiritual masters and its practices. In August 2007, senior officials, including Liu Yandong, Head of the Communist Party United Front Work Department (UFWD), and Ye Xiaowen, Director of SARA, convened a national seminar in Beijing on ‘‘Tibetan Buddhism work,’’ and stressed that in the matter of seating Tibetan Buddhist reincarnated teachers, ‘‘our own come first.’’[1] The phrase underscores Party resolve to ensure that candidates for reincarnated teachers will from now on fulfil the Party’s political expectations, and that the Dalai Lama and other senior Tibetan Buddhist teachers living in exile will have no religious rights or influence on the process. Chinese officials at the above seminar emphasized that the Measures on the Management of the Reincarnation of Living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism (MMR) must be implemented fully throughout the Tibetan areas of China and in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, where many Mongols believe in Tibetan Buddhism. At an August 17–18 UFWD work forum in Lhasa, Director of the Tibet Autonomous Region UFWD, Lobsang Gyaltsen (Luosang Jiangcun), relayed the national guidelines to regional officials, and Zhang Yijiong, Deputy Secretary of the TAR Party Committee, called on attendees to ‘‘thoroughly implement the policy of the [Party] on religious work’’ and ‘‘energetically unite the religious and patriotic forces.’’ According to the official statement issued by the China's SARA, "All the reincarnations of living Buddha of Tibetan Buddhism must get government approval through submitting application; otherwise they are 'illegal or invalid'". It is obvious from this new measure that the centuries-old traditional Tibetan system of recognizing reincarnate lamas is made irrelevant with atheist Chinese government making itself the final authority on whether a potential reincarnation is a legitimate religious figure or not. The measures reflect the mindset of the present Chinese state, which has translated its ability to ensure control over the Tibetan areas to maintaining control over key religious leaders, such as Panchen Lama. Recognizing the authority and influence accorded to reincarnated lamas, on both the religious and social levels, the Chinese state’s religious policy in Tibet is focused on inserting its own power into this Buddhist hierarchy and preventing the influence of the Tibetan monasteries in exile. [1] ‘‘Our Own Come First’ in the Reincarnation of Living Buddhas,’’ Singtao Daily, 23 August 07 (Open Source Center, 13 September 07). The report does not state the date when the forum took place A/HRC/7/NGO/5 page 3 China’s latest move to undermine the core practices of Tibetan Buddhism’s reincarnation lineages has met with hostile global reaction. On 1 September last year, Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy urged the Chinese authorities to conform to international human rights obligations, commitments that were reaffirmed on the occasion of China’s election as a member of the new United Nations Human Rights Council.[2] On 2nd September 2007, the Central Tibetan Administration in India denounced the MMR as 'ludicrous and unwarranted', 'replete with contradictory statements and wild claims, the document reflects the ulterior or true motives of the Chinese leadership.' [3] Freedom House said the new rules issued by the Chinese government were “both deeply offensive and [a] violation of basic religious principles.”[4] Indeed, the measures are antithetical to the ICCPR Article 18(1), (3)[ 5 ] and the 1981 UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Rights or Belief, Article 6(g), which protect within the freedom to practice one’s religion – the freedom “to appoint, elect or designate by succession appropriate leaders”. The US Commission of International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) stated that China’s actions was: “In violation of international human rights standards, China continues to use its National Regulations on Religious Affairs and specious security claims to curtail the religious freedom of tens of millions of its citizen.”[6] Since September 1, the party and its 'religious department' will have the monopoly over the selection: 'No group or individual may without authorisation carry out any activities related to searching for or recognising reincarnating living Buddha soul children.' It practically means that the Communist Party of China forbids the Dalai Lama and other senior lamas living in exile to perform their centuries-old religious duties to preserve the lineages of great spiritual masters of Tibetan Buddhism. They are even threatened: 'Persons and units who are responsible for being in contravention of these measures and who, without authority, carry out living Buddha reincarnation affairs, shall be dealt administrative sanction by the people's government religious affairs departments... when a crime has been constituted, criminal responsibility shall be pursued. Mr. Lodi Gyari, the Dalai Lama's special envoy declared that 'These stringent new measures strike at the heart of Tibetan religious identity. They will only create further resentment among the Tibetan people and cannot override the Party's lack of legitimacy in the sphere of religion.'[7] With regard to reincarnation of next Dalai Lama, on 27 November at a gathering of religious leaders in Amritsar, India, the Dalai Lama clarified his position that 'The Tibetan nation is 2,000 years old. The Dalai Lama institution is relatively recent -- only a few centuries old. If I die, it will be a setback for the Tibetan people for some time. But then, the struggle will continue.' He added: 'If the Tibetan people decide that the Dalai Lama [2] http://www.tchrd.org/press/2007/pr20070901.html [3] http://www.tibet.net/en/prelease/2007/020907.html [4] http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=70&release=538 [5] See General Comment 22, par.4 [6] http://www.uscirf.gov/mediaroom/press/2007/August/USCIRF_concerned_over_New_Regs_for_Tibet.html [7] http://www.savetibet.org/news/newsitem.php?id=1159 A/HRC/7/NGO/5 page 4 institution is no longer relevant, then it will automatically cease to exist. If people feel that the institution of the Dalai Lama is still necessary, it will continue.' The Dalai Lama even spoke of the possibility of a referendum: 'When my physical condition becomes weak, then serious preparations (for a referendum) should happen.' He further elaborated: 'The very purpose of reincarnation is to carry out the tasks of the previous life that are not yet achieved. If I die while we are still refugees, my reincarnation, logically, will come outside Tibet, who will carry out the work I started.' A week earlier, in Japan, the Dalai Lama aired the possibility of naming the next Dalai Lama while he was still alive. Reacting to the Dalai Lama's comment that he was looking at "different methods or ways" of selecting a successor, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said that the process would "violate religious rituals and historical conventions of Tibetan Buddhism" (Xinhua, November 22). The Dalai Lama's Special Envoy, Lodi Gyaltsen Gyari, said: "Such an uninformed response from Beijing betrays its own lack of legitimacy in this area. His Holiness was referring to options that exist in the future and that are deeply rooted in Tibetan Buddhist practice." Tibetan Buddhists believe that all enlightened beings have the ability to choose the mode, the nature, and the timing of their rebirth, and/or succession. Historically, the 'rule by incarnation' has not always been prevalent in Tibet; it was only established during the reign of the fifth Dalai Lama, Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso (1617- 1682). In the 14th and 15th centuries for example, the hierarchs of the Sakya monastery ruled over the Land of Snows (as Tibet is also known to Tibetans); their succession was set up by way of 'transmission' from uncle to nephew. Contrary to what the present regime in Beijing may think, there are no rules fixed for eternity for the succession of Tibetan spiritual teachers. Some historians (one of them was Michael Aris, the late husband of Burmese leader Aug San Suu Kyi) believed that, at the beginning of the 17th century, two Dalai Lamas were alive at the same time (the sixth and the seventh reincarnations respectively). There was no fixed place either as to where a Dalai Lama should be reborn - - the fourth one, Yonten Gyatso was born in Mongolia while the 6th one, Tsangyang Gyatso, took birth in India (in Tawang district of today's Arunachal Pradesh). Since this is a religious matter, the Dalai Lama and Tibetan Buddhist leaders are far more authorised and competent to interpret Buddhist traditions than atheist Communist China.
Recommended publications
  • Communist Party As Living Buddha: the Crisis Facing Tibetan Religion Under Chinese Control
    ICT-Europe ICT-Deutschland e.V. ICT-Brussels Vijzelstraat 77 Schönhauser Allee 163 11, Rue de la Linière 1825 Jefferson Place, NW 1017HG Amsterdam 10435 Berlin 1060 Brussels Washington, DC 20036 The Netherlands Germany Belgium T +1 202 785 1515 T +31 (0)20 3308265 T +49 (0)30 27879086 T +32 (0)2 6094410 F +1 202 785 4343 F +31 (0)20 3308266 F +49 (0)30 27879087 F +32 (0)2 6094432 E [email protected] E [email protected] E [email protected] E [email protected] www.savetibet.org The International Campaign for Tibet is a non-profit membership organization that monitors and promotes internationally recognized human rights in Tibet. ICT was founded in 1988 and has offices in Washington, DC, Amsterdam, Berlin and Brussels. The Communist Party as Living Buddha: The crisis facing Tibetan religion under Chinese control ©2007 by the International Campaign for Tibet Printed in the USA Design: William Whitehead Design www.WmWhiteheadDesign.com THE COMMUNIST PARTY AS LIVING BUDDHA THE CRISIS FACING TIBETAN RELIGION UNDER CHINESE CONTROL A report by the International Campaign for Tibet Washington, DC l Amsterdam l Berlin l Brussels www.savetibet.org Tibet Autonomous Region Party chief Zhang Qingli recently labeled THE COMMUNIST PARTY AS LIVING BUDDHA the Chinese Communist Party a ‘living Buddha’ and a ‘parent’ to the Tibetan people. (Xinhuanet, March 2, 2007) THE CRISIS FACING TIBETAN RELIGION UNDER CHINESE CONTROL Cover: An image of the 11 th Panchen Lama, Gedun Choekyi Nyima, seen in a monastery in eastern Tibet near a photograph of the Dalai Lama.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Religious Freedom Policy
    File:free religion ed-final1 China’s Religious Freedom Policy: The Art of Managing Religious Activityi Beatrice Leung, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Politics and Sociology Lingnan University Tuen Mun, Hong Kong. E-mail:[email protected] i The author is grateful to the Graduate and Research Committee of Lingnan University which gave her a research grant for this study. She is very grateful to Leo F. Goodstadt who gave very valuable comments and suggestions at different stages of writing the research. She also owes her gratitude To Ben Blain who proof read the manuscript, and two of anonymous reviewers who gave valuable suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. 1 China’s Religious Freedom Policy: The Art of Managing Religious Activity Introduction The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) adopted a “Religious Freedom Policy” soon after it came to power in 1949. However, restrictions have been continuously imposed on religious organizations, religious personnel and religious activities.1 In discussing this paradox, I explore the State’s official interpretation of its Religious Freedom Policy and examine how the policy is implemented in practice. In the course of study, I find out that the “Religious Freedom Policy” is only instrumental to control religions. The purpose of this study is to discussion how “Religious Freedom Policy“ has been used as an instrument to elucidate the CCP’s desire to retain institutional and ideological control over this particular sector of Chinese society.2 The findings also highlight twists and turns of the ideological clash between religious idealism and the dialectic materialism of the CCP of Maoist period plus the economic materialism (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • CHINA: Religious Freedom and the Legal System: Continuing Struggle
    FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway http://www.forum18.org/ The right to believe, to worship and witness The right to change one's belief or religion The right to join together and express one's belief This article was published by F18News on: 28 April 2004 CHINA: Religious Freedom and the Legal System: Continuing Struggle By Magda Hornemann, Forum 18 News Service <http://www.forum18.org> The Communist party-state remains determined to maintain control over society, using over the past 20 years an increasing number of laws and regulations as a means to this end. In the field of religion, Ye Xiaowen, Director of the State Administration for Religious Affairs, has publicly stated that "The purposeof strengthening the administration of religious affairs according to law is actively to guide the religions to adapt themselves to socialist society." There is a complex web of laws and regulations on religion under which, to take one example, children may not receive religious education, whatever their parents think. The state claims the exclusive right to decide on what are "normal" religious activities and is effectively pursuing a policy of divide-and-rule towards religious communities. Some religious communities de facto accepted this policy, not forseeing that the state's repression of Falun Gong would also lead to measures against, for example, the unofficial Protestant community. The Chinese state's relationship with religion can only improve if the state accepts that laws are supreme - even over the party - and protect individuals and society from arbitrary actions by those in power. In the two decades since it launched the policy of economic reforms and openness, the Chinese government has issued laws and administrative regulations to address the concerns of foreign businesses and governments.
    [Show full text]
  • International Resolutions and Recognitions on Tibet (2005 to 2013)
    International Resolutions and Recognitions on Tibet (2005 to 2013) DIIR PUBLICATION Published by: Department of Information and International Relations (DIIR) Central Tibetan Administration, Gangchen Kyishong, Dharamshala - 176215, Himachal Pradesh INDIA Email: [email protected] www.tibet.net / www.tibet.com ©DIIR First Edition, March 2014 1000 copies ISBN : 978-93-80091-44-0 Printed at: Narthang Press, Gangchen Kyishong, Dharamshala, 176215 (H.P.) PREFACE This compilation of international resolutions on Tibet (2005-2013) is a follow-up to the prior compilation of resolutions from 1959 to 2005. With the support of our global network of Tibet supporters, this latest compilation spans a period of nine years with resolutions reflecting the international community’s continued solidarity with the aspirations of the Tibetan people inside Tibet who yearn for free- dom and stand strong in the face of great adversity. So much has happened during that period, the mass protests across the Tibetan plateau in 2008, the year the Olympic Games were held in Beijing, the wave of self-immolations which started in 2009 and, sadly, per- sists to this day. All the resolutions call for the Chinese government to recognize and peacefully address the underlying grievances of the Tibetan people. Each day, China grows more assertive globally and carries on with implementation of policies in Tibetan areas giving rise to political repression, cultural assimilation, lack of religious freedom, economic marginalization and environmental destruction. Under such cir- cumstances, the unwavering expression of support by governments, parliamentarians and civil society is all the more critical. Thanks to the guidance of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan struggle is known today as an enduring symbol of non-violent politi- cal movement based on the Middle Way Approach (Umaylam in Ti- betan).
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S6344
    S6344 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE September 13, 2012 there have been 246 maulings, 253 es- Memorial Establishment Act of 1994; to beating him with electrified batons, uri- capes, 143 big cat deaths, and 128 the Committee on Indian Affairs. nating on him, leaving him tied up for hours, confiscations. Mr. AKAKA. Mr. President, as Chair- and holding lighted cigarettes close to his This is also an animal welfare issue. man of the Committee on Indian Af- eyes and nose; Research shows that the captive big Whereas the Government of the People’s fairs, I am introducing legislation to Republic of China arrested and detained Gao cat community is characterized by a make technical corrections to the Na- Zhisheng again on February 4, 2009; systemic culture of inhumane mis- tional Native American Veterans’ Me- Whereas Gao Zhisheng’s whereabouts were treatment of the animals. One major morial Act of 1994. unknown until March 2010, when he resur- reason for this is that once individual The 1994 Act honors the profound faced, only to be arrested once more on April big cats have outgrown the infancy contributions of Native Veterans by 20, 2010; stage when they are most profitable, authorizing the construction of a Na- Whereas, on November 19, 2010, the United they are often warehoused in terrible tional Native American Veterans’ Me- Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Deten- tion determined Gao Zhisheng’s ongoing de- conditions. Because private ownership morial. Unfortunately, technical issues is allowed to continue, many sanc- tention to be arbitrary and in violation of with the law have made it difficult to international law; tuaries for mistreated or unwanted big move forward with the Memorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibet Brief a Monthly Report of the International Campaign for Tibet FEBRUARY 2010
    Tibet Brief A monthly report of the International Campaign for Tibet FEBRUARY 2010 “ This is an opportunity for world leaders to be constructive and help the parties identify a common goal.” – Mary Beth Markey, VP for International Advocacy, ICT In This Issue PAGE 2 Top-level meeting in Beijing sets strategy on Tibet PAGE 3 Special Envoy Lodi Gyari (C) and Envoy Kelsang Gyaltsen (R), address the media in Dharamsala on President Obama to meet Dalai Lama the latest round PAGE 4 China Jails Tibetan Filmmaker Dhondup Wangchen for 6 Years 9th round of Sino-Tibetan dialogue PKLU[PÄLZLSLTLU[Z[VI\PSK\WVU The Dalai Lama’s envoys, led by Lodi Gyaltsen both inside and outside of government, have compromise” on the issue of sovereignty in Gyari, visited China from January 26 to 31, been looking for ways to work constructively Tibet and said that the two sides were still 2010, for the ninth round of discussions with with the Chinese and Tibetans to secure an “sharply divided.” Zhu also warned that if US representatives of the Chinese leadership. This end to repression, genuine stability and a better President Obama “chooses to meet with the round was held after a gap of 15 months. way forward in Tibet. According to the Tibetan Dalai Lama at this time, it will certainly threaten statement, this 9th round has produced some trust and co-operation between China and the The International Campaign for Tibet welcomed elements to build on,” said Mary Beth Markey, United States.” (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ the strong and detailed statement1 issued on Vice President for International Advocacy at the ^VYSKHZPHWHJPÄJ Z[T2) The White his return to Dharamsala by Lodi Gyaltsen International Campaign for Tibet.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Assault on Religion in China and What to Do About It Testimony Before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee
    The Assault on Religion in China and What To Do About It Testimony Before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations, September 27, 2018 Thomas F. Farr* Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Bass, and members of the sub-committee, thank you for holding this important hearing and inviting me to give my views on (1) the status of religious freedom in China, especially that of Catholics, (2) what Congress and American diplomacy can do that is not now being done, and (3) last week’s Provisional Sino-Vatican agreement. The Bottom Line The current assault on religion in China under President Xi Jinping is the most comprehensive attempt to manipulate and control religious communities since the Cultural Revolution. Xi’s policy should be seen as a particularly troubling aspect of the global crisis in religious freedom, one in which over three-quarters of the world’s people live in nations where religion is highly, or very highly, restricted. China is one of those nations. Within China, Xi’s policy intensifies a decades-long government strategy of undermining a major threat to the authority of the communist state – namely, that religion is a source of authority, and an object of fidelity, that is greater than the state. This characteristic of religion has always been anathema to totalitarian and authoritarian despots, and to majoritarian democracies. Most religions, by their nature, limit the power of the secular state, which is a major reason why the American Founders put religious freedom at the beginning of our Bill of Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Tibet.Pdf
    TIBET hile the Chinese believe that Tibet has been have even sometimes gone to the extreme of taking up arms to part of China since the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368), Tibet preserve the Dharma — I am not saying this is the right has a recorded history of statehood that goes back to 127 approach, rather to stress the fact that Dharma is precious to B.C. After centuries of history, studded with wars and the Tibetan people. [In recent history] it wasn't when the reforms, the multitude of voices claiming opposing views Chinese took away the land from the Tibetan rich, but precisely reached cacophony in 1949, when Communist China when the monasteries were being reduced to rubble, and when invaded Tibet, forcing the young Dalai Lama, Tibet's polit- learned scholars and venerated religious leaders were being ical and spiritual leader, to flee to India in 1959. The imprisoned, and in many cases executed, that the Tibetans Tibetan Government-in-Exile is based in Dharamsala. throughout the plateau rose up and resisted. Most Tibetans do not believe, as the Chinese maintain, Most important for us Tibetans is that we are able to lead that the invasion has "liberated" them from feudal serfdom. our lives according to our beliefs. I certainly don't see a Tibet Rather, the "liberation" has resulted in the death of over 1.2 where every Tibetan is in some cave meditating or reciting million Tibetans and the destruction of over 6,000 Tibetan mantras — in fact I would like Tibet to become a modernized monasteries and cultural centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Films and Videos on Tibet
    FILMS AND VIDEOS ON TIBET Last updated: 15 July 2012 This list is maintained by A. Tom Grunfeld ( [email protected] ). It was begun many years ago (in the early 1990s?) by Sonam Dargyay and others have contributed since. I welcome - and encourage - any contributions of ideas, suggestions for changes, corrections and, of course, additions. All the information I have available to me is on this list so please do not ask if I have any additional information because I don't. I have seen only a few of the films on this list and, therefore, cannot vouch for everything that is said about them. Whenever possible I have listed the source of the information. I will update this list as I receive additional information so checking it periodically would be prudent. This list has no copyright; I gladly share it with whomever wants to use it. I would appreciate, however, an acknowledgment when the list, or any part, of it is used. The following represents a resource list of films and videos on Tibet. For more information about acquiring these films, contact the distributors directly. Office of Tibet, 241 E. 32nd Street, New York, NY 10016 (212-213-5010) Wisdom Films (Wisdom Publications no longer sells these films. If anyone knows the address of the company that now sells these films, or how to get in touch with them, I would appreciate it if you could let me know. Many, but not all, of their films are sold by Meridian Trust.) Meridian Trust, 330 Harrow Road, London W9 2HP (01-289-5443)http://www.meridian-trust/.org Mystic Fire Videos, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardinal Calls for Unity of Chinese Catholic Communities
    Cardinal calls for unity of Chinese Catholic communities LONDON – A Scottish cardinal has told Chinese Communist Party officials there is no need for a patriotic association in their country. Cardinal Keith O’Brien of St. Andrews and Edinburgh said he told the officials the overwhelming majority of Chinese Catholics wanted to be united in one church community under the authority of the pope and did not want to be working through the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association. The patriotic association acts as a liaison between registered Catholics and the Chinese government. The cardinal made his remarks in a late-October visit to China during an hour of discussions with Ye Xiaowen, the director of the State Administration for Religious Affairs, and deputy director Wang Zuo’an. “I was saying that in every country in the world Catholics are regarded as being patriotic and loyal to their country as they are to their religion,” the cardinal told Catholic News Service in a telephone interview Nov. 2. “I said that there is no need in Scotland for a patriotic Scottish church. We are as patriotic as anyone else in our country,” said Cardinal O’Brien. “I said I saw no need to have a patriotic Catholic Church in China. Catholics in China are as much patriots to their country as Catholics are in any other country in the world and, therefore, there is no need for a patriotic church in China,” he added. He said he told the officials he thought it “extremely sad” that the four Chinese Catholic bishops invited to attend the Synod of Bishops on the Eucharist at the Vatican in 2005 were not allowed to leave their country.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibet: Problems, Prospects, and U.S
    Order Code RL34445 Tibet: Problems, Prospects, and U.S. Policy Updated July 30, 2008 Kerry Dumbaugh Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Tibet: Problems, Prospects, and U.S. Policy Summary On March 10, 2008, a series of demonstrations began in Lhasa and other Tibetan regions of China to mark the 49th anniversary of an unsuccessful Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule in 1959. The demonstrations appeared to begin peacefully with small groups that were then contained by security forces. Both the protests and the response of the PRC authorities escalated in the ensuing days, spreading from the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) into parts of Sichuan, Gansu, and Qinghai Provinces with Tibetan populations. By March 14, 2008, mobs of angry people were burning and looting establishments in downtown Lhasa. Authorities of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) responded by sealing off Tibet and moving in large-scale security forces. Beijing has defended its actions as appropriate and necessary to restore civil order and prevent further violence. Still, China’s response has resulted in renewed calls for boycotts of the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony on August 8, 2008, and for China to hold talks with the Dalai Lama. China sees itself as having provided Tibet with extensive economic assistance and development using money from central government coffers, and PRC officials often seem perplexed at the simmering anger many Tibetans nevertheless retain against them. Despite the economic development, Tibetans charge that the PRC interferes with Tibetan culture and religion. They cite as examples: Beijing’s interference in 1995 in the choice of the Panchen Lama, Tibet’s second highest- ranking personage; enactment of a “reincarnation law” in 2007 requiring Buddhist monks who wish to reincarnate to obtain prior approval from Beijing; and China’s policy of conducting “patriotic education” campaigns, as well as efforts to foster atheism, among the Tibetan religious community.
    [Show full text]
  • CHINA USES 60Th TAR ANNIVERSARY to UNDERMINE DALAI LAMA Jayadeva Ranade Distinguished Fellow, Centre for Air Power Studies, New Delhi
    54\11 16 August 2011 CHINA USES 60th TAR ANNIVERSARY TO UNDERMINE DALAI LAMA Jayadeva Ranade Distinguished Fellow, Centre for Air Power Studies, New Delhi Mystery continues to shroud the high mountain fastness of Tibet Secretary Zhang Qingli accompanied Xi Jinping throughout his where, to this day, persons who revere the Dalai Lama are stay in Tibet. engaged in a serious tussle with cadres of the Chinese Coinciding with the anniversary, China’s State Council Communist Party (CCP) for the loyalty of Tibetans. Some weeks announced in Beijing on July 20, 2011, that the central th ago, China celebrated the 60 anniversary of the ‘peaceful government will invest 138.4 billion yuan (US$21.38 billion) in liberation’ of Tibet by Chinese troops. The celebrations, which TAR over the next five years to support 226 major construction were held on July 18 instead of the date of the actual anniversary projects involving a total investment of 330.5 billion yuan. The on May 23, coincided with a month-long ban on foreigners projects envisage construction of facilities for TAR’s public traveling to the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) imposed by the services and infrastructure such as railways, highways, airports authorities till July 25. Publicity in China’s official media seemed and hydropower plants. to be low key for the event, where the importance of social The visit by Xi Jinping, who is virtually certain to succeed Hu stability and combating the ‘Dalai Lama separatists’ were Jintao as President of China at the 18th Party Congress consistently emphasized. scheduled for October 2012, also had symbolic value.
    [Show full text]