HDTV – High Definition Television Jim Krause, M.A. Assistant Professor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
State of Oklahoma
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Extraordinary Session of the 47th Legislature (1999) SENATE BILL 1x By: Robinson AS INTRODUCED An Act relating to the Corporation Commission; amending Section 2, Chapter 408, O.S.L. 1997, as amended by Section 9, Chapter 246, O.S.L. 1998 (17 O.S. Supp. 1998, Section 139.102), which relates to the Oklahoma Telecommunications Act; modifying definition; and providing an effective date. BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: SECTION 1. AMENDATORY Section 2, Chapter 408, O.S.L. 1997, as amended by Section 9, Chapter 246, O.S.L. 1998 (17 O.S. Supp. 1998, Section 139.102), is amended to read as follows: Section 139.102 As used in the Oklahoma Telecommunications Act of 1997: 1. "Access line" means the facility provided and maintained by a telecommunications service provider which permits access to or from the public switched network; 2. "Commission" means the Corporation Commission of this state; 3. "Competitive local exchange carrier" or "CLEC" means, with respect to an area or exchange, a telecommunications service provider that is certificated by the Commission to provide local exchange services in that area or exchange within the state after July 1, 1995; 4. "Competitively neutral" means not advantaging or favoring one person over another; 5. "End User Common Line Charge" means the flat-rate monthly interstate access charge required by the Federal Communications Commission that contributes to the cost of local service; Req. No. 5010 Page 1 6. "Enhanced service" means a service that is delivered over communications transmission facilities and that uses computer processing applications to: a. -
Comparison of HDTV Formats Using Objective Video Quality Measures
Multimed Tools Appl DOI 10.1007/s11042-009-0441-2 Comparison of HDTV formats using objective video quality measures Emil Dumic & Sonja Grgic & Mislav Grgic # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract In this paper we compare some of the objective quality measures with subjective, in several HDTV formats, to be able to grade the quality of the objective measures. Also, comparison of objective and subjective measures between progressive and interlaced video signal will be presented to determine which scanning emission format is better, even if it has different resolution format. Several objective quality measures will be tested, to examine the correlation with the subjective test, using various performance measures. Keywords Video quality . PSNR . VQM . SSIM . TSCES . HDTV. H.264/AVC . RMSE . Correlation 1 Introduction High-Definition Television (HDTV) acceptance in home environments directly depends on two key factors: the availability of adequate HDTV broadcasts to the consumer’s home and the availability of HDTV display devices at mass market costs [6]. Although the United States, Japan and Australia have been broadcasting HDTV for some years, real interest of the general public appeared recently with the severe reduction of HDTV home equipment price. Nowadays many broadcasters in Europe have started to offer HDTV broadcasts as part of Pay-TV bouquets (like BSkyB, Sky Italia, Premiere, Canal Digital ...). Other major public broadcasters in Europe have plans for offering HDTV channels in the near future. The announcement of Blu-Ray Disc and Game consoles with HDTV resolutions has also increased consumer demand for HDTV broadcasting. The availability of different HDTV image formats such as 720p/50, 1080i/25 and 1080p/50 places the question for many users which HDTV format should be used with which compression algorithm, together with the corresponding bit rate. -
Digital Television Systems
This page intentionally left blank Digital Television Systems Digital television is a multibillion-dollar industry with commercial systems now being deployed worldwide. In this concise yet detailed guide, you will learn about the standards that apply to fixed-line and mobile digital television, as well as the underlying principles involved, such as signal analysis, modulation techniques, and source and channel coding. The digital television standards, including the MPEG family, ATSC, DVB, ISDTV, DTMB, and ISDB, are presented toaid understanding ofnew systems in the market and reveal the variations between different systems used throughout the world. Discussions of source and channel coding then provide the essential knowledge needed for designing reliable new systems.Throughout the book the theory is supported by over 200 figures and tables, whilst an extensive glossary defines practical terminology.Additional background features, including Fourier analysis, probability and stochastic processes, tables of Fourier and Hilbert transforms, and radiofrequency tables, are presented in the book’s useful appendices. This is an ideal reference for practitioners in the field of digital television. It will alsoappeal tograduate students and researchers in electrical engineering and computer science, and can be used as a textbook for graduate courses on digital television systems. Marcelo S. Alencar is Chair Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Campina Grande, Brazil. With over 29 years of teaching and research experience, he has published eight technical books and more than 200 scientific papers. He is Founder and President of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Communications (Iecom) and has consulted for several companies and R&D agencies. -
The Epic Guide to Branded Video “There's Always Room for a Story That Can Transport People to Another Place.”
The Epic Guide to Branded Video “There's always room for a story that can transport people to another place.” J.K. Rowling Foreword Jerrid Grimm Co-Founder & CEO, Pressboard Our sincerest thanks to The power of video is undeniable. The combination of sight and sound evokes emotional responses difficult to replicate through any other format. A story told through video can make people burst into laughter or shed tears of sadness. Video transports the viewer to another place, another time — and with advances in virtual reality it’s even possible to see the world through someone else’s eyes. What video is not, by any means, is easy. Fraught with challenges in production, distribution and measurement, video is one of the most resource-heavy creative processes out there. As brands move from making one or two TV commercials a year to creating weekly or even daily video for social media, these challenges grow exponentially. Pressboard is a story marketplace. We make it easy for brands to collaborate with hundreds of media publishers on video content — instead of ads. In that same collaborative spirit, we created this guide to combine the wisdom of the greatest video minds in the world and turn those insights into actionable advice that marketers, publishers, creators and technologists can all apply to their own brands. We cannot wait to see the stories that you will tell. 3 Foreword Mark Greenspan Chief Influencer, influenceTHIS Founding Members In an effort to support the growth of the branded content industry in Canada we have partnered with Pressboard to distribute this report to marketers, advertisers, influencer networks and creators. -
BA(Prog)III Yr 14/04/2020 Displays Interlacing and Progressive Scan
BA(prog)III yr 14/04/2020 Displays • Colored phosphors on a cathode ray tube (CRT) screen glow red, green, or blue when they are energized by an electron beam. • The intensity of the beam varies as it moves across the screen, some colors glow brighter than others. • Finely tuned magnets around the picture tube aim the electrons onto the phosphor screen, while the intensity of the beamis varied according to the video signal. This is why you needed to keep speakers (which have strong magnets in them) away from a CRT screen. • A strong external magnetic field can skew the electron beam to one area of the screen and sometimes caused a permanent blotch that cannot be fixed by degaussing—an electronic process that readjusts the magnets that guide the electrons. • If a computer displays a still image or words onto a CRT for a long time without changing, the phosphors will permanently change, and the image or words can become visible, even when the CRT is powered down. Screen savers were invented to prevent this from happening. • Flat screen displays are all-digital, using either liquid crystal display (LCD) or plasma technologies, and have replaced CRTs for computer use. • Some professional video producers and studios prefer CRTs to flat screen displays, claiming colors are brighter and more accurately reproduced. • Full integration of digital video in cameras and on computers eliminates the analog television form of video, from both the multimedia production and the delivery platform. • If your video camera generates a digital output signal, you can record your video direct-to-disk, where it is ready for editing. -
A Review and Comparison on Different Video Deinterlacing
International Journal of Research ISSN NO:2236-6124 A Review and Comparison on Different Video Deinterlacing Methodologies 1Boyapati Bharathidevi,2Kurangi Mary Sujana,3Ashok kumar Balijepalli 1,2,3 Asst.Professor,Universal College of Engg & Technology,Perecherla,Guntur,AP,India-522438 [email protected],[email protected],[email protected] Abstract— Video deinterlacing is a key technique in Interlaced videos are generally preferred in video broadcast digital video processing, particularly with the widespread and transmission systems as they reduce the amount of data to usage of LCD and plasma TVs. Interlacing is a widely used be broadcast. Transmission of interlaced videos was widely technique, for television broadcast and video recording, to popular in various television broadcasting systems such as double the perceived frame rate without increasing the NTSC [2], PAL [3], SECAM. Many broadcasting agencies bandwidth. But it presents annoying visual artifacts, such as made huge profits with interlaced videos. Video acquiring flickering and silhouette "serration," during the playback. systems on many occasions naturally acquire interlaced video Existing state-of-the-art deinterlacing methods either ignore and since this also proved be an efficient way, the popularity the temporal information to provide real-time performance of interlaced videos escalated. but lower visual quality, or estimate the motion for better deinterlacing but with a trade-off of higher computational cost. The question `to interlace or not to interlace' divides the TV and the PC communities. A proper answer requires a common understanding of what is possible nowadays in deinterlacing video signals. This paper outlines the most relevant methods, and provides a relative comparison. -
Video Terminology Video Standards Progressive Vs
VIDEO TERMINOLOGY VIDEO STANDARDS 1. NTSC - 525 Scanlines/frame rate - 30fps North & Central America, Phillipines & Taiwan . NTSC J - Japan has a darker black 2. PAL - 625 scanlines 25 fps Europe, Scandinavia parts of Asia, Pacific & South Africa. PAL in Brazil is 30fps and PAL colours 3. SECAM France Russia Middle East and North Africa PROGRESSIVE VS INTERLACED VIDEO All computer monitors use a progressive scan - each scan line in sequence. Interlacing is only for CRT monitors. LCD monitors work totally differently - no need to worry about. Interlacing is for broadcast TV. Every other line displayed alternatively. FRAME RATES As we transition from analogue video to digitla video. Film is 24 fps, PAL video 25 fps. NTSC 30fps. Actually film and NTSC are slightly different but we don't need to worry about that for now. IMAGE SIZE All video is shot at 72 px/inch - DV NTSC - 720 x 480 (SD is 720 x 486) DV PAL - 720 x 576 (SD PAL is 720 x 576) HD comes in both progressive and interlaced. HD480i is usual broadcast TV 480p is 480 progressive. 720i is 720 interlaced 720p is progressive. 720 means 720 vertical lines 1080 is 1080 vertical lines. 1080i is most popular. 720p is 1280 x 720, HD 1080 is 1920x1080px. All HD formats are 16:9 aspect ratio. Traditional TV is 4:3 aspect ratio. HDV is 1440 x 1080. New format - is it the new HD version of DV? Cameras like the Sony and JVC make minor alterations to this format when shooting In summary HD 1080i = 1920 x 1080 HD 720p = 1280 x 720 Traditional = 720 x 480 (NTSC) 720 x 576 (PAL) VIDEO OUTPUTS Analog Composite, S-Video, Component in increasing quality. -
Digital Transformation Through Data: a Guide for News and Media Companies to Drive Value with Data March 2019 Content
In collaboration with the Activation Guide Digital transformation through data: a guide for news and media companies to drive value with data March 2019 Content Data foundations 7 Culture and ways of working ............................................ 8 Skills ................................................................................... 10 Technology........................................................................ 12 Data ................................................................................... 14 Use cases 17 Improve overall reader engagement Content planning ............................................................. 18 Recirculation ..................................................................... 20 Reader experience ........................................................... 22 Increase direct-paying relationships with readers Subscription pricing and promotion ............................. 24 Design for reader lifetime value (LTV) ........................... 26 Revenue diversification ................................................... 28 Drive revenue from advertisers Audience-based advertising ........................................... 30 Advertising pricing strategy ............................................ 32 Inventory yield management ......................................... 34 Data activation guide: news and media companies | INTRODUCTION 3 Introduction Digital innovation has reshaped the news To capitalize on this evolution, news and and media industry. The transition from print media companies -
The Digital Dilemma 2 Perspectives from Independent Filmmakers, Documentarians and Nonprofi T Audiovisual Archives
Copyright ©2012 Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. “Oscar,” “Academy Award,” and the Oscar statuette are registered trademarks, and the Oscar statuette the copyrighted property, of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. The accuracy, completeness, and adequacy of the content herein are not guaranteed, and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences expressly disclaims all warranties, including warranties of merchantability, fi tness for a particular purpose and non-infringement. Any legal information contained herein is not legal advice, and is not a substitute for advice of an attorney. All rights reserved under international copyright conventions. No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher. Published by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Inquiries should be addressed to: Science and Technology Council Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences 1313 Vine Street, Hollywood, CA 90028 (310) 247-3000 http://www.oscars.org Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Digital Dilemma 2 Perspectives from Independent Filmmakers, Documentarians and Nonprofi t Audiovisual Archives 1. Digital preservation – Case Studies. 2. Film Archives – Technological Innovations 3. Independent Filmmakers 4. Documentary Films 5. Audiovisual I. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and -
The State of Recorded Sound Preservation in the United States: a National Legacy at Risk in the Digital Age
The State of Recorded Sound Preservation in the United States: A National Legacy at Risk in the Digital Age August 2010 Commissioned for and sponsored by the CounCil on library and information resourCes and the library of Congress The State of Recorded Sound Preservation in the United States: A National Legacy at Risk in the Digital Age August 2010 from last round: National Recording Preservation Board OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS revised: Commissioned for and sponsored by the National Recording Preservation Board OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Council on Library and Information Resources and The Library of Congress Washington, D.C. National Recording Registry OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS The National Recording Preservation Board The National Recording Preservation Board was established at the Library of Congress by the National Recording Preservation Act of 2000. Among the provisions of the law are a directive to the Board to study and report on the state of sound recording preservation in the United States. More information about the National Recording Preservation Board can be found at http://www.loc.gov/rr/record/nrpb/. ISBN 978-1-932326-36-9 CLIR Publication No. 148 Copublished by: Council on Library and Information Resources 1752 N Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 Web site at http://www.clir.org and The Library of Congress 101 Independence Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20540 Web site at http://www.loc.gov Additional copies are available for $30 each. Orders must be placed through CLIR’s Web site. This publication is also available online at no charge at http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub148abst.html. -
Color Handout
Caring for Audiovisual Material: Webinar 10/23/13 3 Videotape and Optical Media Identification and Preservation Webinar October 23, 2013 Linda Tadic Audiovisual Archive Network [email protected] 1 What Will be Covered Physical properties of media Preservation issues Formats and identification 2 Heritage Preservation: Caring for Yesterday's Treasures--Today 1 Caring for Audiovisual Material: Webinar 10/23/13 3 What Will Not be Covered Digitization (that’s the webinar on October 30) Cataloging and metadata 3 Additional Resources Bibliography of web-based readings Archival video preservation labs vendor list (USA) List of current video formats 4 Heritage Preservation: Caring for Yesterday's Treasures--Today 2 Caring for Audiovisual Material: Webinar 10/23/13 3 VIDEO 5 Videotape in Brief If it has sprockets, it’s film – not video. 6 Heritage Preservation: Caring for Yesterday's Treasures--Today 3 Caring for Audiovisual Material: Webinar 10/23/13 3 Videotape in Brief Like audiotape, videotape is magnetic media. Video can come in reel or cassette form – like audiotape. It can carry both analog and digital signals – like audiotape. 7 Primary Concerns Multitude of formats (identification can be difficult) Format obsolescence Short Life Expectancy (LE) Environmental, organic, and human factors contributing to signal degradation 8 Heritage Preservation: Caring for Yesterday's Treasures--Today 4 Caring for Audiovisual Material: Webinar 10/23/13 3 How Videotape Started Thank Bing Crosby. First funded development of audiotape. In 1950 gave $50,000 to a start-up called Ampex to develop magnetic videotape. 9 How Videotape Started Original market/users: broadcasting Like other time-based media, formats for the consumer market quickly followed. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.987,155 B2 Fernandez (45) Date of Patent: Jul
USOO7987.155B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.987,155 B2 Fernandez (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 26, 2011 (54) NETWORK EXTENSIBLE 6,526,491 B2 * 2/2003 Suzuoki et al. ............... 711 (164 RECONFIGURABLE MEDIA APPLIANCE 6,585,521 B1* 7/2003 Obrador ........................ 434,236 RE38,432 E 2/2004 Fai et al. 6,690,424 B1 2/2004 Hanagata et al. (76) Inventor: Dennis Fernandez, Atherton, CA (US) 6,691,133 B1 2/2004 Rieffanaugh, Jr. et al. - 6,700,640 B2 3/2004 Morley et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 6,760,042 B2 7/2004 Zetts patent is extended or adjusted under 35 6,809,734 B2 * 10/2004 Suzuoki et al. ............... 345,506 U.S.C. 154(b) by 438 days. 6.850.252 B1* 2/2005 Hoffberg ...................... 715,716 6,863,699 B1 3/2005 Krasnov et al. 6,888,568 B1 5, 2005 Neter (21) Appl. No.: 12/114,160 6,980,596 B2 12/2005 Wang et al. 7,102,669 B2 9, 2006 Skow (22) Filed: May 2, 2008 (Continued) (65) Prior Publication Data FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS US 2008/02094.88A1 Aug. 28, 2008 JP A-H08-214212 8, 1996 Related U.S. Application Data (Continued) (63) Continuation of application No. 10/448,202, filed on OTHER PUBLICATIONS May 28, 2003, now Pat. No. 7,577,636. U.S. Appl. No. 10/448,202, filed May 28, 2003, Fernandez, Dennis. (51) Int. Cl. (Continued) G06F 7700 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ........................... 707/622; 707/913; 725/86 Primary Examiner — Shahid A.