REVERSE AUCTION BEST PRACTICES: PRACTICAL APPROACHES to ENSURE SUCCESSFUL ELECTRONIC REVERSE AUCTION EVENTS © Copyright 2006 SAP AG
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
BID#:10417 Description: Leaming Management System 2021 Reverse Auction
NOTICE TO BIDDERS The Wayne County School District will accept un-priced proposals until 9:00 a.m. CSI, Monday, May 3, 2027. BID#:10417 Description: Leaming Management System 2021 Reverse Auction Bid submittals will be evaluated and qualified bidders will be invited to participate in the Leaming Management System 2021 Reverse Auction. The Leaming Management System 2021 Reverse Auction bidding will be held on Tuesday, May 4,2021, ftom 10:00 a.m.-10:30 a.m., CST. Oficial bid documents can be downloaded from Central Bidding at wwwcentralbiddino.com, for a fee, or by visiting www.wayne.k12.ms.us. All submissions must be sealed and clearly marked. Leaming Management System 2021 Reverse Auction ln order to participate in the reverse auction, you must be registered at Central Bidding. For any questions relating to the electronic bidding process, please call Central Bidding at 2254104814. Bid documents may also be obtained from the Wayne County School District at the Omce of the Superintendent of Education by emailing your request to [email protected] or by contacting Cindy Cooley at 601 .735.4894. Electronic bids and/or reverse auction bids can be submitted at www.centralbiddino.com. For any questions relating to the reverse auction bidding process, please call Central Bidding at 225-8104814. The Wayne County School District reserves the right to reject any or all bids submitted and to waive any informalities. L REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Reverse Auction Bid #10417 Learning Management System 2021 Wayne County School District Attn: Cindy Cooley 1409 Azalea Drive Waynesboro, MS 39367 Gontact: Cindy Cooley, Director of Federal Programs Phone: 601-7354894 Emai I : [email protected] Proposals Due Date: Monday. -
With the NIGP Code, It Is Easier To
With the NIGP Code, it is easier to... Organize and identify suppliers’ Manage suppliers to ensure products and services adequate competition Create a system of measures, perform Track spending to measure against comprehensive measurements and diversity goals and identify areas that provide feedback on the execution of would benefit from increased recruitment your strategic sourcing plan of disadvantaged business entities Retrieve the information needed to Conduct a quick, in-depth analysis of satisfy auditing, reporting and legal spend to inform sourcing strategies and discovery requirements improve buying efficiency A Better Way to Classify Commodities an Services in Public Procurement The NIGP Commodity/Services Code is the standard taxonomy for classifying commodities and services in the public sector. It is commonly used to classify suppliers and track data for strategic sourcing and spend analysis. “The NIGP Coding system allows us to improve our inventory process, and that is a critical component to materials management.” — Calvin Wells, Purchasing Agent, City of Houston This is why more than 1,000 government entities in 47 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Canada, Australia and the Virgin Islands use NIGP Code. Did You Know? The NIGP Code can also be cross-walked to other coding systems such as the Merchant Classification Code (MCC), United Nations Standard Products and Services Code (UNSPSC) and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) What You Gain With NIGP Code The NIGP Code services team will help you unlock key information about purchasing, materials management and supplier management. Services include existing classification review, coding, code usage reviews, inventory rationalization, “crosswalk” implementation, spend analysis, and project management. -
Strategic Sourcing & Eprocurement
Strategic Sourcing & eProcurement: "Reaping the Benefits" Charlie Villaseñor President & CEO, TransProcure Estonia Procurement Conference CEO, ADR SouthEast Asia March 27, 2014 Chairman, PASIA Tallin, Estonia Email: [email protected] Charlie Villaseñor, CSSP, CPSM Background and current positions: President and CEO, TransProcure Corporation CEO, ADR ASEAN Chairman, Procurement & Supply Institute of Asia (PASIA) Lead supply chain organizations of Chevron (Asia, Middle East and Africa), Coca-Cola, 3M and became the Regional ASEAN Head of Ariba and pioneered the largest Procurement eMarketplace in Asia Board Member, UN/WTO International Trade Center (ITC-MLS Program on Supply Chain) Board of Director, International Federation of Purchasing & Supply Chain Management (IFPSM) Chairman, Procurement & Supply Chain Committee, Management Association of the Philippines Board of Advisor, Unibersidad Los Andes School of Management, Bogota, Colombia Agenda Background Introduction Case Study Strategic Sourcing Overview Process, Methodology & Impact eProcurement Models, Types Reaping the Benefits Summary The New Business Normal – Risk & Volatility 4 Economy, Revenue and Spend In a strong economy Spend tracks below revenue Revenue Profit Spend BUT in a slow economy Necessary to keep spend below revenue Profit Revenue Spend Not Business As Usual Three Options: • Increase Revenue • Cut cost – i.e.; Lay Off • Manage Spend Balancing Cost, Risk & Value Creation Why we’re now all focusing on Procurement Example: $100 mn in new sales vs. $100 mn in procurement savings $100 mn $33 mn $100 mn $4 mn $96 mn New Internal Sales Costs (33%) Procurement Procurement Costs Savings $39 mn Pre-tax Margin External Costs (39%) $28 mn Pre-tax Margin (28%) *Assumes 30% tax rate; 10x earnings multiple; Source: CAPS, A.T. -
Request for Proposal Guidelines Function: Procurement/AP Procedure: [Insert the Corresponding Procedure Or N/A] Contact: Megan Moran
Request for Proposal Guidelines Function: Procurement/AP Procedure: [insert the corresponding procedure or N/A] Contact: Megan Moran Guideline Recommendations The creativity and innovation that suppliers choose to build into their proposals may be used to judge supplier proposals against each other, at the risk of failing to capture consistent information between bidders and thus hampering the decision making process. Effective RFPs typically reflect the strategy and short/long-term business objectives, providing detailed insight upon which suppliers will be able to offer a matching perspective. Solicitations should be disseminated to leverage and encourage competition. They may be disseminated to potential vendors based on prior experience or industry knowledge or other reasonable means. Solicitations may also be posted to the RF website. A request for proposal (referred to as RFP) is an invitation for suppliers, often through a bidding process, to submit a proposal on a specific commodity or service. A bidding process is one of the best methods for leveraging a company's negotiating ability and purchasing power with suppliers. The RFP process brings structure to the procurement decision and allows the risks and benefits to be identified clearly up front. The RFP may dictate to varying degrees the exact structure and format of the supplier's response. Considerations The RF has elected to accept the grace period for implementing the new procurement standards in the OMB Uniform Guidance as codified in 2 CFR Part 200. This policy is in compliance with OMB Circular A- 110. The new procurement standards will be implemented by the RF to be effective on July 1, 2018. -
Using Request for Proposal in Sourcing Practices
USING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL IN SOURCING PRACTICES Case study: CPS Color Group Oy LAHTI UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES Degree programme in International Business Bachelor’s Thesis 28 October 2013 Kim Ngan Hoang Pham-Keskinen Lahti University of Applied Sciences Degree Programme in International Business PHAM-KESKINEN, KIM NGAN Using Request for Proposal in Sourcing HOANG Practices Case study: CPS Color Group Oy Bachelor’s Thesis in International Business, 49 pages, 1 page of appendices Autumn 2013 ABSTRACT Under the pressure of increasing costs efficiencies in a volatile economic environment, procurement managers are forced to make the most sensible supplier selection decision. Strategic sourcing is an optimum approach that aligns procurement projects with the best suppliers. Such approach ensures all project needs are satisfied while releases the highest savings opportunities. Request for proposal (RFP) is a strategic sourcing tool. It is a means of communication to inform prospective suppliers about the needs and requirements of a procurement project and encourage them to submit proposals that best satisfy these needs and requirements. The proposals will be evaluated and rated using an objective and structured scoring system to select the best supplier for the project being procured. This thesis is conducted to assist the case company – CPS Color Group Oy in using RFP in their sourcing practices. The theoretical part of the study introduces steps in a strategic sourcing process and describes how an RFP can be employed in the process. Following are theories concerning different aspects of an RFP including its usage, advantages, content and proposal evaluation method. In the empirical part, the sourcing practices of the case company in both direct spend and indirect spend categories are explored. -
Sourcing and Logistics in China Costs, Processes and Strategies of German Companies Procuring in the Chinese Market
Industries Industrial Products Sourcing and logistics in China Costs, processes and strategies of German companies procuring in the Chinese market Sourcing and logistics in China Costs, processes and strategies of German companies procuring in the Chinese market English summary of the study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers Germany in cooperation with the German association for materials management, purchasing and logistics (BME) Title of the German edition Beschaffungslogistik im China-Geschäft Kosten – Prozesse – Strategien Published by PricewaterhouseCoopers Germany in cooperation with the Bundesverband Materialwirtschaft, Einkauf und Logistik e. V. (BME)) Study concept, chief editor and responsibility under the German press law Dipl.-Ing. Anselm Stolte M. A. Editorial support Daniela Borkenhagen, Juliana Fernandes Elizabeth Montgomery (English summary) Survey concept and evaluation Dr. Yvonne Fritzsche-Sterr, Hamburg Survey conducted by teleResearch, Mannheim Proofreading Werkstatt für moderne Sprache, Frankfurt am Main Typesetting Nina Irmer, Digitale Gestaltung & Medienproduktion, Frankfurt am Main Printing Fritz Schmitz Druck, Krefeld Printed in Germany The results of the study and expert contributions are intended as information for our clients. For the resolution of relevant issues, please refer to the sources indicated or to your local PricewaterhouseCoopers office for assistance. Parts of this publication may only be reproduced or duplicated with the express prior written permission of the publisher. Statements of opinion reflect the views of the individual authors. © Oktober 2008 PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the German firm PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft and the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity Sourcing and logistics in China. Costs, processes and strategies of Foreword German companies procuring in the Chinese market Foreword China is one of the world’s export powerhouses. -
The Strategic Sourcing Lifecycle: a Brief Introduction Michael G
COUPA SOURCING OPTIMIZATION THE STRATEGIC SOURCING LIFECYCLE: A BRIEF INTRODUCTION MICHAEL G. LAMOUREUX, PHD CSO TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC SOURCING ....................9 The Evolution of Strategic Sourcing .................................................... 9 Stage 1: Price Per Unit (PPU) ..........................................................................10 Stage 2: Total Cost of Acquisition (TCA).......................................................10 Stage 3: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) .......................................................11 Stage 4: Total Value Management (TVM) .....................................................12 The 4-Phases of the Sourcing Process .............................................. 12 The Planning Phase ............................................................................ 13 The Business Case ......................................................................................13 Team Selection .............................................................................................13 Risk Assessment & Contingency Planning .............................................14 Strategy Formulation ..................................................................................14 Exit Plan Selection .......................................................................................14 Project Management & Execution Plan ...................................................15 The Sourcing Phase .......................................................................... -
RFP Issuance Due Date: 18 March 2021
RFP Issuance Due Date: 18 March 2021 Questions Due Date: 26 March 2021 Proposal Submission Due Date: 2 April 2021 Anticipated Start Date: 15 April 2021 SUBJECT: Request for Proposals (RFP) No. RFP/KZN/RIGO-SS/RFP-0010 To Develop and Implement an e-Procurement System at the East African Community THE KAIZEN COMPANY is seeking proposals from qualified organizations interested in providing the services described in the attached Request for Proposals (RFP). Consultancy for the Development and Implementation of an e-Procurement System at the East African Community The purpose of this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) is to invite qualified organizations to submit a proposal for the development and implementation of an e-Procurement solution for the East African Community (EAC). The RFP should be read together with the User Requirements and the Technical Specification (URD/TSD) document issued separately (Appendix I). The assignment will entail the development, installation, testing, comprehensive training, and capacity building of the EAC staff, and system handover, outlined more fully in Sections III and IV. THE KAIZEN COMPANY intends to issue a fixed-price subcontract to suitable vendors who demonstrate that they have the capacity to deliver quality technical assistance and are the most responsive to the requirements of the RFP. The remainder of this RFP provides additional information that will allow an offeror to understand the scope of the effort and develop a proposal in the format desired by THE KAIZEN COMPANY. Issuance of this Request for Proposal (RFP) does not constitute an award commitment on the part of THE KAIZEN COMPANY. THE KAIZEN COMPANY reserves the right to reject any offer received in response to this request. -
State of New Hampshire
State of New Hampshire REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For PBM Technology Platform Services RFP # 2387-21 RESPONSES DUE BY: December 1, 2020 at 2:00 PM Eastern Time (ET) Department of Administrative Services Division of Risk & Benefits State of New Hampshire Table of Contents SECTION I: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 RFP Timetable ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Objective ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION II: BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS AND CONDITIONS ................................................................... 5 Procedural Requirements ........................................................................................................................... 5 Questions/Addenda .................................................................................................................................... 7 Legal Requirements ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Evaluation Process ................................................................................................................................... -
SOURCING STRATEGIES in a SUPPLY CHAIN by Gerard Joseph Burke Jr
SOURCING STRATEGIES IN A SUPPLY CHAIN By GERARD JOSEPH BURKE JR. A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Gerard Joseph Burke Jr. This work is dedicated to my family, and especially my wife, Amy, for your love and support. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The hard work and dedication required by me to create this dissertation were made possible by the personal and practical support of my family, friends, committee members and other members of the Decision and Information Sciences Department. I wish to express my gratitude by specifically acknowledging each group of supporters. I wish to thank God; my parents, Jerry and Carlyn; my wife, Amy; my chil- dren, Maddie, Marley, Ella and James; my grandfather, Frank Burke (whose support is priceless); and my mother-in-law, Deb Crenshaw for their love, inspira- tion, and support. I also thank my Hoosier family, Hank and Betty Tallman, Jim and Joni Ping, Jeannie Meenach, and Drew and Pam Kissel for their unwavering encouragement, love and much needed breaks from my studious endeavors. Although this next group for gratitude is legally not considered family, they are closer to me than friendship describes. I wish to thank Lou and Sandy Paganini, and Ed and Atwood Brewton for their support, faith, and perspective. Also, many thanks go to the Kempers and Nelsons for their friendship. My doctoral studies were greatly enriched by the comradery of my fellow doc- toral students Mark Cecchini, Selcuk Colak, Enes Eryarsoy, Ling He, Jason Dean, Yuwen Chen, Christy Zhang, Fidan Boylu, and Michelle Hanna. -
REVERSE AUCTIONS: the WAY EVERYONE WINS the SIMPLE ECONOMICS of LIVE PRICING a White Paper by Scout RFP
REVERSE AUCTIONS: THE WAY EVERYONE WINS THE SIMPLE ECONOMICS OF LIVE PRICING a white paper by Scout RFP 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Reverse auctions help organizations successfully realize cost-savings without sacrificing quality and supplier relations. For years, they have been a vital piece of the strategic sourcing suite. Despite this, many enterprises have yet to use reverse auctions to their greatest potential. In some cases, sourcing professionals haven’t explored the benefits of reverse auctions and as such have not embraced the methodology. Others have — often valid — concerns about the process. The reality, however, is that using reverse auctions for the right categories drives better business value. To better understand enterprise reverse auctions, we surveyed over 100 sourcing, procurement, and finance professionals from around the world. After compiling their experiences and opinions, we emerged with several conclusions about reverse auctions — from the business world’s perception of them to their wide-ranging capabilities. KEY TAKEAWAYS • Adoption of reverse auctions is rising. They’re most popular among A) large enterprises, both public and private, and B) Millennials and younger GenXers. • Reverse auctions make a bottom-line impact across the enterprise through their ability to increase the efficiency and efficiency of the sourcing department. • Enterprises that successfully run reverse auctions prioritize high quality for a good price, rather than automatically awarding to the lowest bidder. • Successful reverse auctions are run in a buyer’s market to source commodities, simple services, and other items with a low cost of changing. • Collaboration and transparency — two keys factors that contribute to a successful reverse auction — can only be achieved by running the auction through technology that adequately supports it. -
Lower Costs and Optimize Sourcing Capabilities
Solution Overview Sourcing Lower Costs and Optimize Sourcing Capabilities The Exostar sourcing solution, known Key Features as SourcePass, is a comprehensive, on- • Support for complex sourcing events, demand sourcing solution based on including: RFI, RFP, RFQ, buyer survey, market leading software and hosted and forward and reverse eAuctions Improve your within our secure operating environment. • Built-in identity and access organization’s ability This tool enables organizations to management functionality for to lower your total effectively lower their total landed cost increased level of security cost for goods and for goods and services, while enabling • Single sign-on (SSO) with other services across best practices and enterprise visibility. Exostar offerings through Exostar’s the entire spend identity and access management portfolio via RFx, The Solution supports complex sourcing integrated platform reverse auction, and events, including support for supplier • Integration with buyer back-end bid optimization evaluation, bid analysis, and awarding ERP systems enables automated capabilities. techniques, with the capability to submission and processing of integrate with Buyer Enterprise Resource supplier quotes (bids) directly within Planning (ERP) Systems for automated the ERP systems, without the buyer processing of supplier responses. having to login to the application • Support for country-specific export control requirements (ITAR, UK Official Sensitive, etc.). • Seamless access to Exostar’s comprehensive supplier network Sourcing Assets RFx Module – • Request for Information (RFI) – Provides easy, side-by-side comparison functionality to aid buyers in their evaluation process. • Request for Quotation (RFQ) – Supports the development by buyers of complete item request packages, to which suppliers may respond electronically. • Request for Proposal (RFP) – Supports the development by buyers of complete proposal request packages with questions at the proposal level, as well as the specific biddable item level.