DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Sourcing Guidelines on Requests for Proposals and Invitations for Bid Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Sourcing Guidelines on Requests for Proposals and Invitations for Bid Table of Contents Strategic Sourcing Guidelines on Requests for Proposals and Invitations for Bid Table of Contents Request for Proposal Overview Slide 3 RFP Timeline estimates Slide 4 Business Owner tasks (RFP) Slide 5 Strategic Sourcing tasks (RFP) Slide 6 RFP Schedule of Activities / example Slide 7-8 RFP Evaluation Criteria Slide 9 Recommended Award / Next Steps (RFP) Slide 10 Invitation for Bid (IFB) Overview Slide 12 Business Owner tasks (IFB) Slide 13 Strategic Sourcing tasks (IFB) Slide 14 Recommended Award / Next Steps (IFB) Slide 15 BOE approval limits Slide 17 Things to know (F&A and BOE) Slide 18 Contact info. Slide 19 Request for Proposal (RFP) – overview • RFP’s used to ensure fair, competitive selection of services or products that will best meet the District's needs at the best price • Board Policy requirement if purchases > $25,000 • Board of Education review / approval required if > $1M • Promotes competition • Average RFP timeline is 3 months • Once it’s determined that an RFP will be issued, Strategic Sourcing is the ONLY point of contact with vendors Avoids unfair advantage / perception of insider info. • Requires posting on DPS Strategic Sourcing website Recommendation is for 3-4 weeks. • All RFP documents (internal and external) are subject to CORA requests RFP Timeline estimates • The timeline for an RFP process can vary depending on the complexity of the purchase • Below are estimates and should be taken into account when planning to start the RFP process Business Owner / Requester tasks (RFP) • Confirm project is approved by your Sr. Management and that funding is available before an RFP is issued Create purchase requisition in Lawson to encumber funds • Identify team members that will make up the evaluation committee (odd # / ideally 5+) This includes participation throughout RFP process (i.e. scoring, vendor presentations, misc. meetings) • Create the Scope of Work and/or Technical requirements (be clear on what is mandatory vs. optional) • Responsible for responding to vendor questions prior to final proposal due date • Provide your project timeline or ask for one as part of RFP • Sign off on Sourcing Policies and Ethics acknowledgement • Prepare / provide documentation and attend Finance & Audit Meeting as well as BOE Meeting Strategic Sourcing tasks (RFP) • Strategic Sourcing (SS) will facilitate the RFP process • SS will provide the template and RFP # • SS will handle all communication with vendors Serve as single point of contact • SS will post on website and can email identified vendors Also can use Bidnet for notifying a larger vendor pool • Assist with contract negotiations • If needed, assist with prep for F&A and BOE meetings • Coordinate debriefing meeting after RFP is closed RFP Schedule of Activities • For RFP dates and milestones, requester should identify timelines that work within their project schedule -- Strategic Sourcing can also provide input. • Consider questions such as the following when building your timeline: Do you want a pre-bid call? Do you need to discuss your RFP at a high level with vendors prior to them responding to RFP to ensure they have a clear understanding of your requirements / desired outcome? Do you want to see a demo of the vendor offering? Important to note, these occur after round 1 scoring and normally are narrowed down to 2 or 3 vendors (that will come in and present) Do you want to provide an estimated Award date in your RFP timeline? Provide a Timeline for when RFP/ Vendor Selection activities should happen RFP Schedule of Activities (example) MILESTONE DATE Distribute Request for Proposal TBD •Posted on DPS Strategic Sourcing website (mandatory) Optional or Mandatory Bidder Conference TBD •Tool to give an overview of the RFP and expectations early on in the process. •Eliminates confusion on vendor side. Deadline for vendors to submit written questions TBD Deadline for DPS to provide responses to questions TBD •SS will create an Addendum which contains all Q&A and post on website Deadline for vendors to submit proposal TBD Optional: If on-site presentations are needed, notify finalist by this date TBD Optional: Est. date of on-site presentations TBD Optional: Est. date of award TBD RFP Evaluation Criteria (example) CRITERIA POINTS Bidders Capabilities 10 Description of firm and organization 3 Company size and background 1 • The evaluation criteria is Terms and conditions compliant 1 identified and posted as Ability to perform services 5 TOTAL 10 part of original RFP Scope Of Work And Specification Compliance 30 document. Scope of work and specification compliant 10 Equipment offering, availability and capability 5 Meets required specifications/new 10 Customer service and support 5 • Criteria & point allocation TOTAL 30 can be customized to fit Pricing 35 your specific RFP needs Pricing per options 30 Discounts offered 5 TOTAL 35 • Evaluators must use the Schedule And Project Implementation Plan 10 Replacement to District's timelines 5 same criteria in each Adherence to districts timelines for replacements 5 round of scoring (unless TOTAL 10 Past Performance And References 2.5 otherwise specified in the Past performance for similar entities 2 RFP document). School District references 0.5 TOTAL 2.5 Value Added components 10 • Each individual evaluator Discounts 5 Incentives 5 is responsible for filling TOTAL 10 out their own score sheet. RFP Preparation And compliance 2.5 Proposal organization/completeness 1.5 Insurance meets requirement 1 TOTAL 2.5 Total overall possible pts. 100 Recommended Award / Next Steps (RFP) • Once score sheets are completed and turned into Strategic Souring (SS), we evaluate them and confirm which vendor will be awarded business • SS posts a “recommended award” on our website, identifying the vendor we plan on awarding business to Vendors may appeal an award by submitting a request for reconsideration within 72 hours after the recommendation of award is posted – it also must be prior to the District finalizing a contract with the selected vendor • SS, Legal and the Business Owner will work together to negotiate, review and execute a contract and/or associated award paperwork • Business Owner is responsible for creating a purchase requisition in Lawson and completing the contract routing form This form is found on SS website under “Schools/Departments and Forms” • Vendor is/should be set up in Lawson Supplier Portal • Once contractual paperwork and purchase order are complete, business owner will begin working with vendor • Business owner becomes main point of contact and will monitor performance and deliverables against contract - SS is available to assist as needed Invitation for Bid (IFB) Invitation for Bid (IFB) - overview • Board Policy requirement if purchases > $25,000 • Board of Education review / approval required if > $1M • Awarded to vendor that provides lowest cost • Cannot use other criteria in evaluating vendors • No formal evaluation team needed for scoring • Quicker timeline than RFP (4-6 weeks on average) • Requires posting on DPS Purchasing website Recommendation is for 2-3 weeks • All IFB documents (internal and external) are subject to CORA requests Business Owner / Requester tasks (IFB) • Confirm project is approved by your Sr. Management and that funding is available before an IFB is issued Create purchase requisition in Lawson to encumber funds • Create the Scope of Work and/or Technical requirements (be clear on what is mandatory vs. optional) as this is what the vendors will be pricing out. • Reminder that an IFB is solely awarded on lowest cost, so evaluation criteria and a team will not be required. • Provide your project timeline. • Sign off on Sourcing Policies and Ethics acknowledgement • Prepare / provide documentation and attend Finance & Audit Meeting as well as BOE Meeting. Strategic Sourcing tasks (IFB) • Strategic Sourcing (SS) facilitate the IFB process • SS will provide the template and IFB # • SS will handle all communication with vendors Serve as single point of contact • SS will post on website and can email identified vendors Can use Bidnet for notifying a larger vendor pool • Assist with contract negotiations as applicable • If needed, assist with prep for F&A and BOE meetings Recommended Award / Next Steps (IFB) • Once cost evaluation is complete, Strategic Sourcing will confirm which vendor will be awarded business • SS posts a “recommended award” on our website, identifying the vendor we plan on awarding business to Vendors may appeal an award by submitting a request for reconsideration within 72 hours after the recommendation of award is posted – it also must be prior to the District finalizing a contract with the selected vendor • SS, Legal and the Business Owner will work together to negotiate, review and execute a contract and/or associated award paperwork • Business Owner is responsible for creating a purchase requisition in Lawson and completing the contract routing form (if applicable) This form is found on SS website under “Schools/Departments and Forms” • Vendor is/should be set up in Lawson Supplier Portal • Once contractual paperwork and purchase order are complete, business owner will begin working with vendor • Business owner becomes main point of contact and will monitor performance and deliverables against contract - SS is available to assist as needed Finance & Audit and Board of Education information Board of Education Approval Limits for Purchases NON-CAPITAL PROCUREMENT APPROVAL LIMITS Approval level Limits Board of Education Greater than $1,000,000 Superintendent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • With the NIGP Code, It Is Easier To
    With the NIGP Code, it is easier to... Organize and identify suppliers’ Manage suppliers to ensure products and services adequate competition Create a system of measures, perform Track spending to measure against comprehensive measurements and diversity goals and identify areas that provide feedback on the execution of would benefit from increased recruitment your strategic sourcing plan of disadvantaged business entities Retrieve the information needed to Conduct a quick, in-depth analysis of satisfy auditing, reporting and legal spend to inform sourcing strategies and discovery requirements improve buying efficiency A Better Way to Classify Commodities an Services in Public Procurement The NIGP Commodity/Services Code is the standard taxonomy for classifying commodities and services in the public sector. It is commonly used to classify suppliers and track data for strategic sourcing and spend analysis. “The NIGP Coding system allows us to improve our inventory process, and that is a critical component to materials management.” — Calvin Wells, Purchasing Agent, City of Houston This is why more than 1,000 government entities in 47 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Canada, Australia and the Virgin Islands use NIGP Code. Did You Know? The NIGP Code can also be cross-walked to other coding systems such as the Merchant Classification Code (MCC), United Nations Standard Products and Services Code (UNSPSC) and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) What You Gain With NIGP Code The NIGP Code services team will help you unlock key information about purchasing, materials management and supplier management. Services include existing classification review, coding, code usage reviews, inventory rationalization, “crosswalk” implementation, spend analysis, and project management.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Sourcing & Eprocurement
    Strategic Sourcing & eProcurement: "Reaping the Benefits" Charlie Villaseñor President & CEO, TransProcure Estonia Procurement Conference CEO, ADR SouthEast Asia March 27, 2014 Chairman, PASIA Tallin, Estonia Email: [email protected] Charlie Villaseñor, CSSP, CPSM Background and current positions: President and CEO, TransProcure Corporation CEO, ADR ASEAN Chairman, Procurement & Supply Institute of Asia (PASIA) Lead supply chain organizations of Chevron (Asia, Middle East and Africa), Coca-Cola, 3M and became the Regional ASEAN Head of Ariba and pioneered the largest Procurement eMarketplace in Asia Board Member, UN/WTO International Trade Center (ITC-MLS Program on Supply Chain) Board of Director, International Federation of Purchasing & Supply Chain Management (IFPSM) Chairman, Procurement & Supply Chain Committee, Management Association of the Philippines Board of Advisor, Unibersidad Los Andes School of Management, Bogota, Colombia Agenda Background Introduction Case Study Strategic Sourcing Overview Process, Methodology & Impact eProcurement Models, Types Reaping the Benefits Summary The New Business Normal – Risk & Volatility 4 Economy, Revenue and Spend In a strong economy Spend tracks below revenue Revenue Profit Spend BUT in a slow economy Necessary to keep spend below revenue Profit Revenue Spend Not Business As Usual Three Options: • Increase Revenue • Cut cost – i.e.; Lay Off • Manage Spend Balancing Cost, Risk & Value Creation Why we’re now all focusing on Procurement Example: $100 mn in new sales vs. $100 mn in procurement savings $100 mn $33 mn $100 mn $4 mn $96 mn New Internal Sales Costs (33%) Procurement Procurement Costs Savings $39 mn Pre-tax Margin External Costs (39%) $28 mn Pre-tax Margin (28%) *Assumes 30% tax rate; 10x earnings multiple; Source: CAPS, A.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Request for Proposal in Sourcing Practices
    USING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL IN SOURCING PRACTICES Case study: CPS Color Group Oy LAHTI UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES Degree programme in International Business Bachelor’s Thesis 28 October 2013 Kim Ngan Hoang Pham-Keskinen Lahti University of Applied Sciences Degree Programme in International Business PHAM-KESKINEN, KIM NGAN Using Request for Proposal in Sourcing HOANG Practices Case study: CPS Color Group Oy Bachelor’s Thesis in International Business, 49 pages, 1 page of appendices Autumn 2013 ABSTRACT Under the pressure of increasing costs efficiencies in a volatile economic environment, procurement managers are forced to make the most sensible supplier selection decision. Strategic sourcing is an optimum approach that aligns procurement projects with the best suppliers. Such approach ensures all project needs are satisfied while releases the highest savings opportunities. Request for proposal (RFP) is a strategic sourcing tool. It is a means of communication to inform prospective suppliers about the needs and requirements of a procurement project and encourage them to submit proposals that best satisfy these needs and requirements. The proposals will be evaluated and rated using an objective and structured scoring system to select the best supplier for the project being procured. This thesis is conducted to assist the case company – CPS Color Group Oy in using RFP in their sourcing practices. The theoretical part of the study introduces steps in a strategic sourcing process and describes how an RFP can be employed in the process. Following are theories concerning different aspects of an RFP including its usage, advantages, content and proposal evaluation method. In the empirical part, the sourcing practices of the case company in both direct spend and indirect spend categories are explored.
    [Show full text]
  • Sourcing and Logistics in China Costs, Processes and Strategies of German Companies Procuring in the Chinese Market
    Industries Industrial Products Sourcing and logistics in China Costs, processes and strategies of German companies procuring in the Chinese market Sourcing and logistics in China Costs, processes and strategies of German companies procuring in the Chinese market English summary of the study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers Germany in cooperation with the German association for materials management, purchasing and logistics (BME) Title of the German edition Beschaffungslogistik im China-Geschäft Kosten – Prozesse – Strategien Published by PricewaterhouseCoopers Germany in cooperation with the Bundesverband Materialwirtschaft, Einkauf und Logistik e. V. (BME)) Study concept, chief editor and responsibility under the German press law Dipl.-Ing. Anselm Stolte M. A. Editorial support Daniela Borkenhagen, Juliana Fernandes Elizabeth Montgomery (English summary) Survey concept and evaluation Dr. Yvonne Fritzsche-Sterr, Hamburg Survey conducted by teleResearch, Mannheim Proofreading Werkstatt für moderne Sprache, Frankfurt am Main Typesetting Nina Irmer, Digitale Gestaltung & Medienproduktion, Frankfurt am Main Printing Fritz Schmitz Druck, Krefeld Printed in Germany The results of the study and expert contributions are intended as information for our clients. For the resolution of relevant issues, please refer to the sources indicated or to your local PricewaterhouseCoopers office for assistance. Parts of this publication may only be reproduced or duplicated with the express prior written permission of the publisher. Statements of opinion reflect the views of the individual authors. © Oktober 2008 PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the German firm PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft and the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity Sourcing and logistics in China. Costs, processes and strategies of Foreword German companies procuring in the Chinese market Foreword China is one of the world’s export powerhouses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Sourcing Lifecycle: a Brief Introduction Michael G
    COUPA SOURCING OPTIMIZATION THE STRATEGIC SOURCING LIFECYCLE: A BRIEF INTRODUCTION MICHAEL G. LAMOUREUX, PHD CSO TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC SOURCING ....................9 The Evolution of Strategic Sourcing .................................................... 9 Stage 1: Price Per Unit (PPU) ..........................................................................10 Stage 2: Total Cost of Acquisition (TCA).......................................................10 Stage 3: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) .......................................................11 Stage 4: Total Value Management (TVM) .....................................................12 The 4-Phases of the Sourcing Process .............................................. 12 The Planning Phase ............................................................................ 13 The Business Case ......................................................................................13 Team Selection .............................................................................................13 Risk Assessment & Contingency Planning .............................................14 Strategy Formulation ..................................................................................14 Exit Plan Selection .......................................................................................14 Project Management & Execution Plan ...................................................15 The Sourcing Phase ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SOURCING STRATEGIES in a SUPPLY CHAIN by Gerard Joseph Burke Jr
    SOURCING STRATEGIES IN A SUPPLY CHAIN By GERARD JOSEPH BURKE JR. A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Gerard Joseph Burke Jr. This work is dedicated to my family, and especially my wife, Amy, for your love and support. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The hard work and dedication required by me to create this dissertation were made possible by the personal and practical support of my family, friends, committee members and other members of the Decision and Information Sciences Department. I wish to express my gratitude by specifically acknowledging each group of supporters. I wish to thank God; my parents, Jerry and Carlyn; my wife, Amy; my chil- dren, Maddie, Marley, Ella and James; my grandfather, Frank Burke (whose support is priceless); and my mother-in-law, Deb Crenshaw for their love, inspira- tion, and support. I also thank my Hoosier family, Hank and Betty Tallman, Jim and Joni Ping, Jeannie Meenach, and Drew and Pam Kissel for their unwavering encouragement, love and much needed breaks from my studious endeavors. Although this next group for gratitude is legally not considered family, they are closer to me than friendship describes. I wish to thank Lou and Sandy Paganini, and Ed and Atwood Brewton for their support, faith, and perspective. Also, many thanks go to the Kempers and Nelsons for their friendship. My doctoral studies were greatly enriched by the comradery of my fellow doc- toral students Mark Cecchini, Selcuk Colak, Enes Eryarsoy, Ling He, Jason Dean, Yuwen Chen, Christy Zhang, Fidan Boylu, and Michelle Hanna.
    [Show full text]
  • REVERSE AUCTIONS: the WAY EVERYONE WINS the SIMPLE ECONOMICS of LIVE PRICING a White Paper by Scout RFP
    REVERSE AUCTIONS: THE WAY EVERYONE WINS THE SIMPLE ECONOMICS OF LIVE PRICING a white paper by Scout RFP 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Reverse auctions help organizations successfully realize cost-savings without sacrificing quality and supplier relations. For years, they have been a vital piece of the strategic sourcing suite. Despite this, many enterprises have yet to use reverse auctions to their greatest potential. In some cases, sourcing professionals haven’t explored the benefits of reverse auctions and as such have not embraced the methodology. Others have — often valid — concerns about the process. The reality, however, is that using reverse auctions for the right categories drives better business value. To better understand enterprise reverse auctions, we surveyed over 100 sourcing, procurement, and finance professionals from around the world. After compiling their experiences and opinions, we emerged with several conclusions about reverse auctions — from the business world’s perception of them to their wide-ranging capabilities. KEY TAKEAWAYS • Adoption of reverse auctions is rising. They’re most popular among A) large enterprises, both public and private, and B) Millennials and younger GenXers. • Reverse auctions make a bottom-line impact across the enterprise through their ability to increase the efficiency and efficiency of the sourcing department. • Enterprises that successfully run reverse auctions prioritize high quality for a good price, rather than automatically awarding to the lowest bidder. • Successful reverse auctions are run in a buyer’s market to source commodities, simple services, and other items with a low cost of changing. • Collaboration and transparency — two keys factors that contribute to a successful reverse auction — can only be achieved by running the auction through technology that adequately supports it.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Indirect Sourcing Into a Multimillion-Dollar Profit Center
    Turning indirect sourcing into a multimillion-dollar profit center McKinsey Procurement April 2017 Authored by: Steve Hoffman Britta Lietke Patricio Ibáñez 2 Turning indirect sourcing into a multimillion-dollar profit center Turning indirect sourcing into a multimillion-dollar profit center Retailers usually have a long list of business boosting ideas, but are often limited in cash to fund them all. Focusing on not-for-resale spend is the single largest incremental funding mechanism and the secret lies in doing it “business-backed” Retailing is a cutthroat business. Even the largest and most successful retailers operate in an environment of fickle customers, tough competition, and razor-thin margins. These industry factors can impede the strategic investments needed to drive growth, from network expansion or store upgrades to the use of new formats and new technologies. As a result, different parts of the organization frequently compete fiercely for scarce resources. Indirect sourcing –the purchase of goods and services not for resale– represents a largely underexploited opportunity for retailers to save money and generate much-needed cash to finance those growth opportunities. In our experience, indirect spend is typically around 10 percent of total revenues, depending on the retailer’s sub-sector and format. While other industries have successfully optimized their indirect sourcing activities, retailers are significantly behind in their sourcing maturity due to several challenges, some of which are unique to the retail industry. Our experience shows that implementing a world-class indirect sourcing process can yield 100-150 basis points of incremental profit within 12 to 24 months, plus year-over-year profit improvements of 20 to 30 basis points.
    [Show full text]
  • The Request for Proposal Handbook
    The REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL HANDBOOK Fifth Edition 20th Anniversary THE BEST RFP PRACTICES, CHECKLISTS, GUIDELINES, EXAMPLES AND REGULATIONS FROM MORE THAN 100 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND THEIR AGENCIES Michael Asner Brought to you courtesy of Mediagrif Interactive Technologies Inc. (TSX: MDF) is a Canadian leader in information technology offering strategic sourcing and unified commerce solutions as well as B2B and B2C marketplaces. Mediagrif’s solutions are used by millions of consumers and businesses in North America and around the world. The Corporation has offices in Canada, the United States, Denmark and China. MERX is a leading provider of cloud-based Source-to-Contract (S2C) solutions anchored by electronic tendering and a dynamic global business network exceeding 200,000 suppliers. MERX helps thousands of customers better manage procurement spend, reduce strategic sourcing costs and achieve outcomes with actionable visibility of risks, contracts and supplier performance. BidNet offers customizable, internet-based procurement solutions and supplier network tools that help buyers automate and simplify the bidding process. The complete e-Sourcing suite includes vendor management, bid distribution, bid evaluation, contract management and vendor performance management. Based on three decades of pioneering experience and valued procurement practitioner input, BidNet provides best practice procurement solutions for more than 1, 300 government agencies and marketplace services for more than 100,000 suppliers. BidNet’s 20 regional purchasing groups further extend the vendor reach and cost savings in public procurement. ASC Networks Inc. (ASC) is a leading provider of SaaS and on-premises contract, RFx, document, form and configure, price and quote (CPQ) lifecycle management solutions tailored to automate and streamline your end-to-end business processes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Reverse Auctions in Strategic Sourcing
    13414_Cover 4/11/03 10:11 AM Page 3 The Role of Reverse Auctions in Strategic Sourcing . by Stewart Beall CAPS Research Craig Carter, Ph.D. Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland Phillip L. Carter, D.B.A. CAPS Research W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Thomas Germer Graduate School of Management WHU, Otto Beisheim University Thomas Hendrick, Ph.D. W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Sandy Jap, Ph.D. Goizueta Business School Emory University Lutz Kaufmann, Ph.D. Graduate School of Management WHU, Otto Beisheim University Debbie Maciejewski CAPS Research W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Robert Monczka, Ph.D. CAPS Research W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Ken Petersen, Ph.D. W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University CAPS RESEARCH 2003 13414_Text 4/11/03 8:28 AM Page 1 The Role of Reverse Auctions in Strategic Sourcing . by Stewart Beall CAPS Research Craig Carter, Ph.D. Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland Phillip L. Carter, D.B.A. CAPS Research W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Thomas Germer Graduate School of Management WHU, Otto Beisheim University Thomas Hendrick, Ph.D. W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Sandy Jap, Ph.D. Goizueta Business School Emory University Lutz Kaufmann, Ph.D. Graduate School of Management WHU, Otto Beisheim University Debbie Maciejewski CAPS Research W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Robert Monczka, Ph.D. CAPS Research W.P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Ken Petersen, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Business-To-Business Online Reverse Auctions
    IMPLEMENTING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS ONLINE REVERSE AUCTIONS BY LOAY SEHWAIL Bachelor of Science University of Jordan Amman, Jordan 1999 Master of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2001 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 2006 COPYRIGHT BY LOAY SEHWAIL JULY, 2006 ii IMPLEMENTING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS ONLINE REVERSE AUCTIONS Dissertation Approved: Dr. Ricki G. Ingalls Dissertation Advisor Dr. David B. Pratt Dr. Camille DeYong Dr. William D. Warde Dr. Dan Tilley Dr. A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With deep gratitude, I extend my sincere appreciation to the members of my dissertation committee: Drs. Ricki G. Ingalls, Camille DeYong, David Pratt, William D. Warde, and Dan Tilley, who provided me with knowledge and encouragement to help make my dream become a reality. I really thank my committee for all the meetings, endless intelligent conversations, and debates. You have taught me the meaning of research. I am particularly grateful to my chair, Dr. Ricki G. Ingalls, who has affected my life in many positive ways, for his friendship, guidance, and support from the first day we met. I would not have been writing this acknowledgement without his mentoring, support, and friendship. Thank you Dr. Ingalls. Special thanks must go to the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) for its support in providing the contact information for the survey sample. Additionally, I would like to recognize Dr. Rick Boyle for his help, cooperation, and fast response to any inquiry or question.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Reverse Auctions: an Overview
    Journal of International Technology and Information Management Volume 13 Issue 4 Article 5 2004 Online Reverse Auctions: An Overview Ching-Chung Kuo University of North Texas Pamela Rogers University of North Texas Richard E. White University of North Texas Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/jitim Part of the Business Intelligence Commons, E-Commerce Commons, Management Information Systems Commons, Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons, Operational Research Commons, and the Technology and Innovation Commons Recommended Citation Kuo, Ching-Chung; Rogers, Pamela; and White, Richard E. (2004) "Online Reverse Auctions: An Overview," Journal of International Technology and Information Management: Vol. 13 : Iss. 4 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/jitim/vol13/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of International Technology and Information Management by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Online Reverse Auctions: An Overview Journal of International Technology and Information Management Online Reverse Auctions: An Overview Ching-Chung Kuo Pamela Rogers Richard E. White University of North Texas ABSTRACT Electronic commerce (e-commerce) is the fastest growing area in the U.S. economy with electronic procurement (e-procurement) being a major component, and online reverse auctions (ORAs) have emerged as a key e-procurement tool. Since the mid-1990s, ORAs have been gaining in popularity because of their potentially significant positive impact on the profitability of both the buyers and the sellers. Much has been written about the new purchasing paradigm and numerous stories have been reported recently.
    [Show full text]