TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2013 @ 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, KEENE

AGENDA: GENERAL COMMITTEE/PLANNING

MEETING: NOVEMBER 18, 2013 @ 6:00 PM

Page

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PUBLIC MEETING Building Permit Fees 4-11 a) Proposed Building Fee Increase

3. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST

4. ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA

5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA

6. DELEGATIONS 12 a) Andrea Dicks & Laurel Atkinson - Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough - Vital Signs b) Cell Tower (3 min presentations): a) Bonnie Clark b) Charlene Rostowski c) Ron Linton

7. FINANCE

8. PLANNING & CAO REPORTS 13-44 a) CAO Report - Mandatory & Non-mandatory septic reinspection 45-53 b) CAO Report - ORCA Fee Schedule

Page 1 of 154 Page

8. PLANNING & CAO REPORTS 54-56 c) CAO Report - Grant Funding Agreement for Sourcewater Protection Implementation 57-73 d) CAO Report - Agricultural Study for Solar Application at 1312 Crowley Line (Green Life Power/MacDonald) - if study received [Addenda] 74-90 e) CAO Report - Agricultural Study for Solar Application at 2627 Highway 7 (Endura - Wells/Allen) - if study received [Addenda] 91-95 f) CAO - Letter of Support - Re: County RED application 96 g) CAO Letter to County - Proposed County Development Charge By-law

9. BY-LAWS 97 a) 2013-54 Appointment of Occasional Building Official 98-101 b) 2013-55 Amending Agreement - OPP Contract

102-120 c) 2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund

121-140 d) 2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit

141-142 e) 2013-58 Building By-law - amend Schedule "B" Fees

10. CORRESPONDENCE 143-144 a) AMO - Development Charges Act - Policy Update

145-151 b) AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding

11. INFORMATION 152-153 a) AMO - Bill 36 Local Food Act

154 b) Otonabee-South Monaghan Food Cupboard

12. OTHER

13. CLOSED SESSION In accordance with the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 Section 239(2) (b) personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees; (Administration) (specifics of the matter to be discussed are not being referred to because the release of information related to the individual's names would undermine the confidentiality that requires the matter to be dealt with in closed session) and Section 239(2) (e) litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and information related to the potential lawsuit is the issue to be discussed and the particulars of the exact litigation matter are not included in the resolution because to do so might undermine the confidential nature of the matter to be discussed (Dunford).

Page 2 of 154 Page

14. ADJOURNMENT

Page 3 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan Public Meeting Notice

Notice of Intent to Increase Building Permit Fees

Take Notice that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan will hold a public meeting on December 9th, 2013 at 6:00 pm in the Council Chambers (Municipal Office – Third Street) in order to consider proposed changes to the current Building By-law 2009-39 with respect to Building Permit Fees under Section 7 of the Building Code Act.

Purpose and Effect – The Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan is proposing to amend the costs of Building Permit Fees following a review of the building permit fees under Section (7) of the Building Code Act. The effect will be to increase the existing fee structure.

At the Council meeting on December 9, 2013, the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan is proposing to pass a by-law under section 7 of the Building Code Act that will change existing building permit fees.

The staff report consisting of the following information will be available to the public on the township's website and the Regular Council meeting on December 9, 2013:

. The estimate of the costs of administering and enforcing the Building Code Act by the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan . The change to existing fees . The rationale for imposing or changing the fees

Any person may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposed fees.

It is the intent that the new fee schedule will be effective as of January 1, 2014.

Dated at the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan this 21st day of October, 2013

For more information regarding the meeting, contact: Barb Waldron, Chief Building officer 705-295-6852 [email protected]

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 4 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan

INCREASE IN BUILDING PERMIT FEES

DATE: July 9, 2013

SUBJECT: Permit fees increase report

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council endorses in principle the increase in Building Permit Fees as submitted as part of this report on Schedule A;

AND THAT a Public Meeting be scheduled and Notice issued for the proposed fee changes to be advertised through the Township’s website and the local newspaper in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code Act and the Township’s Notice By-law.

BACKGROUND: The Building Department has been reviewing the current building permit fees and have determined that some areas of the building permit fee schedule is required to be amended with some of the fees increasing to cover the costs of the Building Department to the best of our ability.

With regards to structuring permit fees, the point of Bill 124 when it started was to ensure building departments were getting permits out in an appropriate amount of time and to ensure that building departments were structured so that they had cost recovery and were self sufficient. To achieve the latter goal permit fees were to be structured so that costs (indirect and direct costs) were being paid for with a little left over to build reserves for slower years. Interestingly in 2013 only three municipalities in County achieved this; OSM, Trent Lakes and the City Of Peterborough. Selwyn was only under by $10,000 for 2013. For all other municipalities, the cost of much of the building department’s expenses is coming from the tax payers and most have never had a reserve. This is not the way it is suppose to work nor is it fair to the other residents. All costs for development should be paid by the person wanting to develop not from the person who has lived in the township for years. Many of the other townships at this point in time are reviewing their fees as well given the current situation.

There seems to be a theory that has been around for years but is far from the truth that low permit fees attract people to construct in the township. This is an unsubstantiated thought process for many reasons not the least of which is because the cost of the permit fee is such a small percentage of the entire building cost it is therefore just deemed to be part of doing business. Also the location you choose to build has so many other factors that people consider such as proximity to work or family that permit fees do not even enter the equation. The Development Charge is more likely to be what most people consider when choosing where to build.

Council must have a clear understanding of this to understand how structuring fees must be viewed. We cannot compare our fees to any other municipalities as each municipality has its own particular expenses based on area and the structure of the municipality. For example, the building officials of Trent Lakes cannot get to most locations for inspection without having vehicles with four wheel drive and / or boat. The amount of revenue created from permits is directly related to population as well and many of our neighbouring municipalities have higher numbers of population in the summer months for cottagers due to the size of the municipalities. 1

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 5 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

ANALYSIS: The current building permit fees were reviewed previously in 2008 where they were adopted by By-law 2008-23. At that time the permit fees for the Township had not been adjusted for number of years so the jump in permit fees was quite substantial and phased in over three years. The permit fees that are presently being proposed are not huge increases so the recommendation is that the increases be endorsed for public consultation prior to adoption by by-law for a January 1st implementation date. This will give lots of notice to builders planning for construction in 2014.

To give Council a clear understanding of the time that goes into a permit from the point of accepting and deeming the application to be complete to completing the final inspection different permit types will be broke down and detailed for time. Note that these inspections are based on a perfect situation with no re-inspection for deficiencies which almost never happens. It should also be noted that the calculations are based on current rates and do not factor in any cost increases for 2014 and beyond.

Single family dwelling

Example: 2200 sf bungalow 3 baths, kitchen sink, dish washer, washer / dryer Location: Bailieboro

Current permit fees based on this example: 2200 sf @ $0.95 per sf = $2090 Plumbing fee $100 + $12.00 per fixture = $244 Occupancy fee $100 Total permit fee: $2434

Proposed Fees 2200 sf @ $1.05 per sf = $2310 Plumbing fee $150.00 + $14 / fixture = $318 Occupancy: $200 Total permit fee: $2828

Inspections and time allotted per inspection and travel time (20 mins down and 20 mins back) (based on no re-inspections) Excavation and Footing inspection-1 hour, 15 mins Backfill inspection- 1hour, 15 mins Plumbing rough in inspection- 1 hour 15 mins Framing inspection- 2 hours Plumbing inspection: 1 hour 15 mins Heating rough in- 1 hour 15 mins Insulation and vapour barrier- 1 hour, 20 mins Pre- occupancy- I hour 40 mins Occupancy-1 hour 40 mins Final inspection-1 hour 40 mins Total hours: 14.25 hours

Pre building meeting with owner to review what is required for a permit application-1 to 2 hours Review of plans- 2 to 3 hours Review of all documents attached to permit application- 2 hours Clerical time for imputing inspections 3 hours Issuing permit- 1 hour Total hours 10 hours

*Note: Most homes require attendance to the site more than once for at least 3 inspections due to infractions observed on the previous inspections which would add another $150 to cost. 2

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 6 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

Average direct cost for CBO: 24.25 hours = $1214.52 (this includes hourly rate plus benefits.

Indirect Costs: In addition to this cost, the total cost would have additional indirect costs attributed from: Clerical support from staff, education, legal fees, insurance, vehicle costs, office supplies, cell phone, memberships, tools / safety wear and contract costs, planning meetings if required to obtain necessary approvals for construction, .

Estimated total cost for indirect and direct cost: $2200 +/-

______

Addition to dwelling unit

Example: A 1000 sf addition onto existing home One- 3 pc bathroom being added Location: Bailieboro

Current permit fees based on this example: 1000 sf @ $0.95 per sf = $950 Plumbing fee $100 + $12.00 per fixture = $136 Occupancy fee N/A Total permit fee: $1086

Proposed Fees 1000 sf @ $1.05 per sf = $1050 Plumbing fee $150.00 + $14 / fixture = $192 Occupancy: N/A Total permit fee: $1242

Inspections and time allotted per inspection and travel time (20 mins down and 20 mins back) (based on no re-inspections) Excavation and Footing inspection-1 hour, 15 mins Backfill inspection- 1hour, 15 mins Framing inspection- 1 hour, 10 mins Plumbing inspection- 1 hour, 15 mins Heating rough in- 1 hour 10 mins Insulation and vapour barrier- 1 hour, 10 mins Final inspection-1 hour 45 mins Total hours: 9 hours

Pre building meeting with owner to review what is required for a permit application-1 to 2 hours Review of plans- 2 hours Review of all documents attached to permit application- 1 hour Clerical time for imputing inspections 2 hours Issuing permit- 1 hour Total hours 7 hours

Average direct cost for CBO: 16 hours = $769.60 (this includes hourly rate plus benefits.

Indirect Costs: In addition to this cost, the total cost would have additional indirect costs attributed from: Clerical support from staff, education, legal fees, insurance, vehicle costs, office supplies, cell phone, memberships, tools / safety wear and contract costs, planning meetings if required to obtain necessary approvals for construction, .

Estimated total cost for indirect and direct cost: $ 1200 +/ -

______3

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 7 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

Garage

Example 1200 sf garage Location: Bailieboro

Current and proposed fee permit fees based on this example: 1200 sf @ $0.95 per sf = $1140 Total permit fee: $1140

Inspections and time allotted per inspection and travel time (20 mins down and 20 mins back) (based on no re-inspections) Excavation and Footing inspection-1 hour, 15 mins Backfill inspection- 1hour, 15 mins Framing inspection- 1 hour, 10 mins Insulation and vapour barrier- 1 hour, 10 mins Final inspection-1 hour 45 mins Total hours: 6.35 hours

Pre building meeting with owner to review what is required for a permit application-1 hour to 2 hours Review of plans- 1 hours Review of all documents attached to permit application- 1 hour Clerical time for imputing inspections 1 hour, 40 mins Issuing permit- 30 mins Total hours 5.20 hours

Average direct cost for CBO: 11.55 hours = $555.55 (this includes hourly rate plus benefits.

Indirect Costs: In addition to this cost, the total cost would have additional indirect costs attributed from: Clerical support from staff, education, legal fees, insurance, vehicle costs, office supplies, cell phone, memberships, tools / safety wear and contract costs, planning meetings if required to obtain necessary approvals for construction, .

Estimated total cost for indirect and direct cost: $ 1000 +/ -

______

Agricultural Building

Example 66’ x 420’ Chicken Barn with solar on roof Value: $446,000 Location: Bailieboro

Current permit fees based on this example: $446,000 @ $12 per $1000 of construction cost: $5352 Total permit fee: $5352

Proposed Fees $446,000 @ $14 per $1000 of construction value: $6244 Total permit fee: $6244

4

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 8 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

Inspections and time allotted per inspection and travel time (20 mins down and 20 mins back) (based on no re-inspections) Excavation and Footing inspection-2 hours Backfill inspection- 1.5 hours Framing inspection # 1-2 to 3 hours Framing Inspection # 2- 2 hours Truss inspection: 2 hours Insulation and vapour barrier- 2 hours

Solar framing inspection: 2 hours Final inspection-2 hours Total hours: 16.5 hours

Pre building meeting with owner to review what is required for a permit application-1 to 2 hours Review of plans- 2 hours Review of all documents attached to permit application- 1 hour Clerical time for imputing inspections 2.5 hours Issuing permit- 1 hour Total hours 7.5 hours

Average direct cost for CBO: 24 hours = $1154.40 (this includes hourly rate plus benefits.

Indirect Costs: In addition to this cost, the total cost would have additional indirect costs attributed from: Clerical support from staff, education, legal fees, insurance, vehicle costs, office supplies, cell phone, memberships, tools / safety wear and contract costs, planning meetings if required to obtain necessary approvals for construction, .

Estimated total cost for indirect and direct cost: $ 2300

*Note: Typically these permits require multiple inspections so the reality of inspections would add another 5 hours min on top of the inspections listed above. These permits have multiple layers of engineering so at the final inspection we are usually spending hours obtaining the sign off sheets from the engineers to be able to close the file as well as during construction obtaining the inspection reports from the engineers.

______

The four examples given were the cross cut of the most popular permits with additions and garages being the highest number of permits issued for the year typically.

The Building Permit Fee Schedule has a few new permits and other changes added from the previous schedule. It has been determined through use of the current Building By-law and observation of other municipal permit fee types that the township needed add a few permit types to the schedule. The additions are as follows:

Park Model Trailers: It should be noted that Park Model Trailers are not considered to be mobile homes under the Planning Act or OBC and are subject to fees and charges as a commercial trailer.

Repeat inspections: Repeat inspections are becoming more and more frequent. Other municipalities have a requirement of a fee for more than 2 inspections of each type. For example if framing had to be looked at more than three times for infractions a fee would be applied.

Transfer of Permit: With lawyers using title insurance more often than asking for work order letters, properties are passing from one owner to another without knowledge of open building permits. When this happens the permit must be transferred into the new owner’s name. The proposed fee is an administrative fee and to ensure that the inspections are completed and the file closed. 5

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 9 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

Discharge of an order: This is another charge that is frequent on other municipal building permit fees. Orders issued can sit on a property until the owner deals with the problem. This is a method of deterring people from getting orders building knowing that a fee is charged to remove it. It seems when it is known that a fee is applied some people will do whatever they can do not to have to pay that fee. Through conversations with other Building Officials and the comments I am getting back that once the person is told that it costs money to lift the order they are much quicker at completing the works so one does not have to be issued. The process of issuing orders does take up quite a bit of time so the fee also helps to offset the administrative costs.

Yearly Permit Fee: This has been a discussion item for a while now and we have looked at charging a yearly fee for a permit renewal versus asking for deposits. It will be easier for the Building Department to issue permit renewals on a yearly basis for people who have not completed the project within the year time frame. At present we send out letters advising the resident that the permit is still open and is required to be completed and we get approximately a 40% return in calls to complete inspections.

Once a person is notified that they have to pay $130.00 to keep the permit current they may be inclined to finish up projects sooner so they can avoid this payment. Other municipalities use this method and it is quite successful in achieving a closed file. This will also assist with assessment values as MPAC is tracking open permit files and generally will only assess when the building permit is closed.

Request for inspections prior to 2003: This has been a problem which occurs every once in a while with regards to finding old files and finding inspections inside of the files. The significance of 2003 is the year the system was changed from MAI to Compu Power. Previous to 2003 files are hit and miss when it comes to inspection. Usually a person wants to sell a home and is looking for a final many years after the home or addition was built. The trick to inspecting old permits is that the Building Code of the day must be pulled to check on the requirements at that time. The bigger problem is that usually everything is covered. Therefore we have to take each situation and assess the situation by asking questions of the builder of the day and observation. In short it takes a lot of time to complete this requests.

Some of the highlighted changes to the fee schedule are as follows: 1) Increase in residential permit fees 2) Increase in commercial, industrial and institutional permit fees. 3) Plumbing permit fees- fee increased 4) Outdoor solid fuel appliance – fee increased based on required inspections 5) Solar- The Building Department receives multiple solar applications in a year. At present we have been charging the minimum fee as it was not identified on our fee schedule. The fee is being proposed as a two phase fee with up to 20 kw (which is the basic roof top on a house or garage installation) at a fee of $300 and any installation exceeding 20 kw to be $500. 6) Wood stoves and Chimneys: -Fee increased to cover costs of required inspections. 7) All permit fees based on value (Agriculture, residential renovations, new foundations, in- ground swimming pools) to be $14.00 per $1000 of value so the rate is the same across the board for permits based on value.

FINANCIALS: The Building Code Act requires that Public Notice be issued and a Public Meeting held for changes in building permit fees. Council will be asked to endorse the fee changes in principle in order that the public consultation may occur prior to the preparation of the 2014 budget. This will also provide lots of notice to builders and developers in relation to new or increased fees. The Building Department has an account for advertising therefore; there will be no impact financially to the building budget as far as costs are concerned.

The proposed fee increases are being recommended to continue to have the Building Department’s costs be covered by the revenue of the building permits as required by the Ontario Building Code therefore having a 0% impact on the taxation to the residents of the community. As previously stated the cost of development is required to be paid for by the developer and not the rest of the community. 6

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 10 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 2a)

SUMMARY:

The Building Department is a busy and diverse department due to the fact that not only do we deal with permits and inspections but have other duties related to property maintenance, dealing with complaints with regards to building related matters, property standards, and other related issues. Dealing with a complaint or a person that eventually leads to a permit such as catching a person building without a permit can be time consuming to get them to the point of compliance. This is another example of where time is spent but still related to the costs of the department. The fees that are being proposed to Council for approval are based on the needs and operations of the OSM Building Department and have not been compared to other Township’s fees because each department is required to assess and set fees based on the direct and indirect costs related to operating the department. It is important for Council to keep this in mind when reviewing the proposed fees. Attached to this report also is the permit fees for other Townships for your information for purposes of pointing out the fact that only three Townships in the County covered their costs in the year 2012 and OSM was one of them.

As with everything the cost of doing business goes up every year so the proposed fees are addressing the increasing costs of doing business and meeting the needs of the community for all related building issues. As the Chief Building Official, I am very proud of the Building Department. I believe we give excellent service to the community and it is the mandate of the department to be of the upmost assistance to residents and their building needs while giving prompt and courteous service. It is my belief through comments received that the reputation we have built in the department by giving this level of service prompts people to come to the township for permits as they know that they will be given assistance to ensure their building project is built to code and meeting all safety aspects required by the Ontario Building Code.

Thank you for your consideration to this matter.

Respectfully yours,

Barbara Waldron

Barbara Waldron Chief Building Official

in consultation with Eleanor J. Rath Chief Administrative Officer

7

Proposed Building Fee Increase Page 11 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 6a)

Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough Submission for Otonabee - South Monaghan Council presentation, November 18th, 2013

Andrea Dicks, Executive Director Laurel Atkinson, Program Coordinator

Greater Peterborough’s Vital Signs®

On October 1st, the Community Foundation unveiled the inaugural Greater Peterborough’s Vital Signs®. This report is the first in what will become an annual snapshot of the quality of life in Greater Peterborough, and offers a unique and accessible way for community members to learn more about the place they call home.

Vital Signs® measures the vitality of the community, identifies needs and strengths, and supports action on issues that are critical to our quality of life. For 2013, six subject areas were chosen based on consultations with community leaders and stakeholders: Arts and Culture; Community Involvement; Employment; Environment; Food Security; Health and Wellness. Future reports will build on these subject areas.

Through Vital Signs®, the Community Foundation not only provides accessible statistics and information, but also invited community members themselves rate how they believe our region is doing across all subject areas. More than 700 people from the City, every Township and First Nation in Greater Peterborough told us what they think about how, as a region, we are doing. They also told us what they love about Greater Peterborough, as well as identified important priorities for action.

The Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough has invested in this collaborative community initiative as a way to further its goal of providing broad based community leadership. We firmly believe that knowing your community matters and we are continually seeking ways to understand our community’s strengths as well as areas of need. Vital Signs® builds and shares knowledge so our community is better prepared to mobilize around the issues that matter to our citizens.

The Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough is not the only Community Foundation to embark on this annual report. Vital Signs® was first started by the Toronto Community Foundation in 2001, after a group of civic leaders came up with a new way to engage their community in understanding and monitoring the health and vitality of Toronto on an ongoing basis. In 2006, Vital Signs® became a national program of Community Foundations of , and it continues to grow every year, both across Canada and internationally. 2013 saw 26 community foundations across the country produce a Vital Signs® report – many for the first time.

The report can be viewed or downloaded online: www.cfgp.ca/vitalsigns.

About the Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough:The Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough fosters philanthropy through the creation and management of endowed and special funds. Its grants to registered charities enhance the quality of life for local citizens. It is a part of a national network of more than 191 community foundations across Canada. The Community Foundation enables all residents to contribute to positive, lasting changes in our community. www.cfgp.ca

Andrea Dicks & Laurel Atkinson - Page 12 of 154 Community Foundation of Greater ... Agenda Item # 8a)

REPORT TO: Reeve Nelson & Council

FROM: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development

DATE: November 18, 2013

SUBJECT: Mandatory Re-inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems for Sourcewater Protection Non Mandatory Re-inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems (Optional) ______

RECOMMENDATION #1: THAT Council receives the CAO’s Report re: Health Unit proposal to the County of Peterborough – Mandatory Septic Re-inspection Program for Sourcewater Protection;

1A AND THAT the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan endorse the proposed user fee of $270 to be collected on a cost recovery basis through the property tax in the amount of $90 per year for 3 years from the affected property owners; OR 1B AND THAT the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan endorse the proposed user fee of $270 subject to the terms of the agreement being amended to provide “that each township is responsible for the repayment of the fees to the Health Unit and can determine a mechanism for re-payment from the affected property owners and/or through the municipal water system as may best fit the local circumstances.”

RECOMMENDATION #2: THAT Council receives the CAO’s Report re: Health Unit proposal to the County of Peterborough – Non Mandatory Septic Re-inspection Program for information only at this time as this program is not currently offered in Otonabee-South Monaghan.

Background The Township has received an email from Bryan Weir at the County of Peterborough seeking municipal input on the proposed Mandatory and Non-Mandatory Septic Re-inspection programs being offered by the Health Unit.

Under Part IV of the Clean Water Act, municipalities are required to conduct inspections of on- site sewage systems located in “vulnerable areas” for municipal water systems. The Mandatory program applies to properties in Keene and Stewart Hall that have been identified through the Sourcewater Protection Plan. Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 13 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Non-mandatory septic re-inspection programs are offered in some municipalities, largely in waterfront areas. The purpose of the program is to ensure that septic systems are functioning properly to protect water quality. There is currently no such program in Otonabee-South Monaghan.

Analysis

Mandatory Septic Re-inspection Program There are five properties in Otonabee-South Monaghan which have been identified as requiring mandatory re-inspections under the pending Sourcewater Protection Plan (SPP) – 3 properties for the Crystal Springs wells and 1 property for the Keene Heights existing well. It should be noted that the Township recently commissioned a technical report for the new well site in Keene which will be incorporated into the SPP prior to final approval. It is anticipated that additional septic systems are located within the “vulnerable area” for the new well and this will increase the number of affected properties in the mandatory septic re-inspection program in Keene.

Non Mandatory Septic Re-inspection Program The Health Unit is offering a new optional non-mandatory septic re-inspection program. At this time, the CAO and CBO are recommending that no action be taken with respect to the non- mandatory program. If and when the Township decides to introduce a program (or this becomes mandatory), the Health Unit would be able to provide these services under their agreement with the County and/or enter into a special agreement with the Township for a reduced fee.

Budget Implications In both instances, the Health Unit would bill the local municipality for its services. The local municipality would then be responsible for cost recovery from its residents.

Mandatory Septic Re-inspection Program A prior report was made to Council in June of 2013. The purpose of this Report is to make Council aware of the proposal put forth by the Health Unit to County Council to charge a user fee of $270. The fee is designed to cover the Health Unit’s costs to provide the re-inspection services.

The proposal to the County also includes cost recovery of the user fee by way of an annual charge on the tax bill in the amount of $90 per year for 3 years for each property. This would result in a consistent approach across the watershed in relation to who delivers the service (i.e. the Health Unit), how much is charged (i.e. $270), who pays (property owner) and how the Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 14 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

financial impact can be reduced for these ratepayers (i.e. spreading the cost over 3 years). The Health Unit report does not speak to cost recovery from non taxable properties.

If Council agrees with collection via the tax roll, resolution 1A should be passed.

Concerns have been raised by some municipalities about adding this cost to the tax roll and/or the increase administrative burden for Township Treasurers to track and remit the funds. At the time of the June report, Council expressed some concerns about placing the financial burden on a few ratepayers, particularly where these properties are not connected to municipal water. An alternative would be to add the costs for mandatory septic re-inspections to the Water budget. The cost would then become part of the water rate and be borne by the property owners who benefit from sourcewater protection.

If Council disagrees with collection via the tax roll, resolution 1B should be passed to provide local discretion.

Non Mandatory Septic Re-inspection Program The user fee for this non-mandatory service is $270 per property within the area to be re- inspected, billed to the Township. The Township then determines a mechanism for re-payment for their residents that would present the least financial hardship on the property owner. In addition, the user fee may be reduced through an agreement between the Health Unit and the local municipality, cottage association and/or other stakeholders depending upon the number of properties in a particular area in the municipality.

It is recommended that Council receive the non mandatory program for information only.

Notice & Communications There is no public notice required as a result of this report. The setting of the user fee is part of the agreements between the County and the Health Unit.

For the mandatory program, public information and/or property owner consultation with respect matters pertaining to the Sourcewater Protection Plan has and will continue to be coordinated through ORCA.

Prepared by: E.J. Rath, CAO Copied to: Barb Waldron, CBO

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 15 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

November 1, 2013

Ms. Sally Saunders County Clerk, County of Court House 470 Water Street Peterborough, ON K9H 3M3

Dear Ms. Saunders:

At its September 11, 2013 meeting, the Board of Health for the Peterborough County-City Health Unit passed the following motion:

That the Board of Health for the Peterborough County-City Health Unit:

receive the staff report, Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems County By- Law, for information; and recommend to the County of Peterborough that the appended three-year draft by-law (with fee schedule) be approved, confirming that the Health Unit will: o be the principal authority; o conduct the mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems; and o conduct the non-mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems in consultation with the local municipality, cottage associations, or other stakeholders.

Moved by: Deputy Mayor Andy Sharpe Seconded by: Mayor John Fallis CARRIED.

In further consultation with Board of Health members after the motion was passed, the original report has been divided into two separate ones – one for the mandatory re-inspection of on- site sewage systems and one for the non-mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems. This was done because mandatory re-inspections are only applicable to those municipalities that have systems in the vulnerable areas as outlined in source protection plans. On the other hand, the non-mandatory re-inspections can apply to those sewage systems that any municipality wishes to have re-inspected.

A copy of the reports is enclosed, if you would like us to provide a presentation to County Council please let us know. We also request that we be informed when this matter will be discussed and voted upon at County Council.

Page 1 of 2

10 Hospital Drive, Peterborough, ON K9J 8M1 P: (705) 743-1000 or 1-877-743-0101 F: (705) 743-2897 www.pcchu.ca

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 16 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

David Watton Chair, Board of Health Peterborough County-City Health Unit

/at

Encl.

Page 2 of 2

10 Hospital Drive, Peterborough, ON K9J 8M1 P: (705) 743-1000 or 1-877-743-0101 F: (705) 743-2897 www.pcchu.ca

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 17 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Staff Report

Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems County By-Law

Date: September 11, 2013

To: Board of Health

From: Dr. Rosana Pellizzari, Medical Officer of Health

Original approved by Original approved by

Rosana Pellizzari, M.D. Atul Jain, Manager, Inspection Services

Recommendations

That the Board of Health for the Peterborough County-City Health Unit:

receive the staff report, this report Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems County By-Law, for information; and recommend to the County of Peterborough that the appended three year draft by-law (with fee schedule) be approved, confirming that the Health Unit: o will be the principal authority; and o will conduct the mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems.

Background

Under Part IV of the Clean Water Act, the principal authority is required to conduct inspections of on-site sewage systems located in “vulnerable areas” as outlined in source protection plans.

In the geographical area served by this Health Unit, the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority working with the Lower Trent Conservation Source Protection Committee has identified, mapped and geocoded these vulnerable areas in its source protection plans and has provided the Health Unit with the number and location of sewage systems that require mandatory re-inspection.

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 1 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 18 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

There are a total of 116 systems that require re-inspection in the Health Unit district, including 18 in Asphodel-Norwood, 3 in , 73 in Trent Lakes, 14 in Havelock-Belmont- Metheun, 5 in Otonabee-South Monoghan, 1 in Selwyn and 2 in the City of Peterborough (Attachment B).

Financial Implications and Impact

The sewage system inspection program currently offered by the Peterborough County-City Health Unit (PCCHU) is a full cost-recovery program, as fees generated by applications, permits and file searches, are used to offset all operational expenses. An expansion to include mandatory and non-mandatory re-inspections would be based on the same approach, minimizing financial risk to the Board of Health.

Decision History

The Ontario Building Code (Ontario Regulation 350/06) was recently amended by Ontario Regulation 315/10. This Regulation establishes and governs mandatory sewage system maintenance inspection programs. These programs must be administered in certain areas of Ontario, by principal authorities – defined by the Building Code Act as a municipality, a board of health or a conservation authority.

These amendments largely came into force on January 1, 2012. The balance of the Regulation, pertaining to certain areas around the Lake Simcoe shoreline and watershed, will come into effect January 1, 2016.

The Clean Water Act (2006), requires mandatory inspections of septic systems in areas where septic systems are or would be significant drinking water threats as identified in approved assessment reports. Inspections must be completed within five years of the approval of the assessment report. The Trent Assessment Report was approved in October 2011, resulting in the requirement for mandatory inspections to be completed by October 2016.

The Board of Health has previously made a decision in regards to this matter (May 8, 2013) by directing staff to bring forward a draft County by-law for consideration in the Fall of 2013, confirming the Health Unit as the principal authority and proposing the Health Unit conduct the mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016 (3 years).

Delivery Options and Rationale

There are two options for the delivery of the mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems:

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 2 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 19 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

(i) Health Unit (ii) County of Peterborough or Local Municipalities

If the Health Unit is not chosen for delivery of re-inspections, in addition to not satisfying the benefits outlined above, the County/local municipalities, cottage associations or stakeholders would require:

time for transition; and an investment for recruitment, training and the appointment of staff.

If there are multiple providers for applications and re-inspections, this may create confusion for users and increase the potential for errors.

The preferred option based on this rationale is that the Health Unit deliver the mandatory re- inspections of on-site sewage systems within the County of Peterborough

Fee and Cost Recovery of Fee

A fee of $270.00 will be designated for the mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage system.

The fee noted above will ensure cost neutrality and recovery of expenses for the Health Unit and is based on current staff wages, mileage and administrative costs.

It is proposed in the draft by-law, that the Health Unit collect and retain all fees, as set out in the fee schedule in the following manner:

(i) The fee is to be placed on the property owner’s tax roll, to be; a) prorated evenly over the term of the agreement (three years), and b) when collected by the municipality, the amount to be reimbursed to the Health Unit on an annual basis.

The method outlined above for the collection of fees is the most effective and efficient means for program delivery and would present the least financial hardship on the property owner.

Strategic Direction

Although this program is not part of the Ontario Public Health Standards, it is consistent with the goals of promoting and protecting the health of the population in Peterborough County and City.

The delivery of this program also supports our efforts to improve “Quality and Performance“ and assess partnerships and leverage those that address local needs, and therefore a “Community-Centred Focus” in the area of environmental health.

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 3 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 20 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Contact: Atul Jain Manager, Inspection Services (705) 743-1000, ext. 259 [email protected]

Attachments: Attachment A – Proposed County By-law – Mandatory Re-inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Attachment B – List of properties for mandatory re-inspection on-site sewage systems (as of January 7, 2013)

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 4 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 21 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

ATTACHMENT A

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough By-law No. 2013 - xx ______A By-law to authorize the Corporation of the County of Peterborough to enter into a Mandatory Re-inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems Agreement with The Peterborough County-City Health Unit.

Whereas the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c. 25 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) at section 9 provides that a municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under this or any other Act;

And Whereas section 8(1) of the Act, further provides that section 8 shall be interpreted broadly so as to confer broad authority on municipalities, (a) to enable them to govern their affairs as they consider appropriate; and (b) to enhance their ability to respond to municipal issues.

And Whereas at the County Council Meeting of xxxx, 2013, County Council accepted the recommendation of the Director of Planning contained in his report “Mandatory Re- inspections of On-site Sewage Systems” wherein he recommended:

“That that County Council authorize the Warden and Clerk to enter into a Mandatory Re- Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement with the Peterborough County-City Health Unit for a 3 year term using the new fee structure as approved by the Board of Health; and further

Be it resolved that County Council direct that the necessary By-law be passed in this regard.”;

Now Therefore the Council of the Corporation of the County of Peterborough in Session duly assembled enacts as follows:

1. That the Corporation of the County of Peterborough be authorized to enter into a Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement with The Peterborough County-City Health Unit in the form attached hereto as Schedule “A” to this By-law.

2. That the Warden and the Clerk be and are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement attached hereto as Schedule “A” and to affix the seal of the Corporation thereto.

3. That this by-law shall be commonly called the “Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement By-law”.

Read a first, second and third time and passed in Open Council this xx day of xxx, 2013.

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 5 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 22 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Schedule “A” To By-Law 2013-XX

Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement

This Agreement dated as of the day of xx, 2013 and authorized by the Corporation of the County of Peterborough By-law No. 2013-XX.

Between:

Board of Health for The Peterborough County-City Health Unit (hereinafter called the "Health Unit") of the First Part

- And –

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough (hereinafter called the "Municipality") of the Second Part

Whereas this Agreement is being entered into pursuant to the Building Code Act (hereinafter called the "Act"), for the purpose of delegating to the Health Unit certain responsibilities under the Act and the Building Code, as they are from time to time amended, as set out herein with respect to the re-inspection of on-site sewage systems (with a capacity of less than 10,000 litres per day);

Now therefore in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

Article One

General

Section 1.01 Application: This Agreement shall be applicable to all lands where no municipal sewers are available in the Municipality (hereinafter called the "Lands").

Section 1.02 Duties: The Health Unit shall faithfully carry out its duties hereunder in accordance with the Act and the Building Code in force from time to time, this agreement and any other legislation contemplated hereunder.

Article Two

Definitions

Section 2.01 in this Agreement,

(i) "Sewage System" means any works for the collection, transmission, treatment and disposal of sewage or any part of such works to which the Act applies with a capacity of less than 10,000 litres;

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 6 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 23 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

(ii) "Inspector" means an inspector appointed under section 3.1(2) of the Building Code Act, 1992 as amended;

Article Three

Services of the Health Unit

Section 3.01 Services: The Peterborough County-City Health Unit shall provide the following services in relation to the Lands:

(i) Review the files in relation to the properties that the on-site sewage system is required to be re-inspected (i.e., mandatory - on-site sewage systems located in “vulnerable areas” as outlined in source protection plans).

(ii) Conduct a re-inspection of the on-site sewage system identified in (i).

(iii) Issue a “Certificate of Re-inspection” to the property owner indicating that the on-site sewage system is not needed for an upgrade/replacement at the time of the re- inspection.

(iv) If (iii) is not satisfied, then issue a “notice of upgrade/replacement” to the property owner requiring them to upgrade or replace their on-site septic system.

(v) Receive and process applications and requests related to activities listed in paragraph (iv)

(vi) Inspect properties prior to the issuance of a permit for the construction, installation, establishment, enlargement, extension or alteration of a Sewage System.

(vii) Issue permits under the Act and Building Code relating to Sewage Systems (a "Permit").

(viii) Following the issuance of a permit, inspect and re-inspect when necessary, Sewage System installations to ascertain compliance with the permit and other requirements under the Act or Building Code.

(ix) Maintain adequate records of all documents and other materials used in performing the duties required under this Agreement.

(x) Upon reasonable notice by the Municipality, provide reasonable access to the Municipality of all records kept under subsection 3.01 (ix).

(xi) Respond to inquiries made by any person under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and related Regulation, as amended from time to time, or through any other legal channel.

(xii) Investigate complaints and malfunctioning Sewage Systems, undertake compliance

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 7 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 24 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

counselling and preparation of reports for abatement action as it relates to existing and proposed Sewage Systems.

(xiv) Issue orders under the Act relating to Sewage Systems.

(xiii) Prepare documentation necessary for prosecution activities relating to Sewage Systems under the Act and Building Code. Administer proceedings relating to Sewage Systems pursuant to the Provincial Offenses Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33.

(xvi) Provide all forms necessary for the administration of this Agreement.

(xvii) Be responsible for any other matters related to the administration or enforcement of the Act or Building Code relating to Sewage Systems.

Article Four

Collection of Fees

Section 4.01 Mandatory Re-inspections of On-site Sewage Systems: The Health Unit shall collect and retain all fees, as set out in Schedule A by:

(ii) The fee to be placed on the property owner’s tax roll, to be;

c) prorated evenly over the term of this agreement (three years), and d) when collected by the municipality, the amount to be reimbursed to the Health Unit on a yearly basis.

Section 4.02 Fee Schedule: It is agreed and understood that the fees charged in association with the provision of the above services shall be on a cost recovery basis only. The Health Unit shall submit to County Council for approval the proposed fee schedule with supporting documentation verifying that the fees are not in excess of actual costs. The Municipality reserves the right to reduce any or all fees charged by the Board of Health, however, it is expressly understood that in doing so, the Board of Health may bill the Municipality directly for any costs not covered by the reduced fee schedule.

Section 4.03 Amendment of Fee Schedule: Any amendments to the fee schedule shall not be made by the Health Unit without the approval of County Council.

Article Five

Inspectors

Section 5.01 Qualifications: The Health Unit shall appoint Inspectors who meet the requirement of the Act and the Building Code and shall issue a certificate of appointment to each appointed Inspector.

Article Six

Liabilities and Insurance

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 8 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 25 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Section 6.01 Liability of the Health Unit: The Health Unit shall indemnify and save harmless the Municipality from and against all claims, demands, losses, costs, damage, actions, suits or proceedings by whomsoever made, brought or prosecuted in any manner based upon, arising out of, related to, occasioned by or attributable to the activities of the Health Unit in executing the work under this Agreement. The Municipality shall be named as an additional insured on the policy of the Health Unit. The Health Unit shall provide a certificate of insurance annually to the Municipality.

Section 6.02 Insurance: For the term of this Agreement, the Health Unit will, at its expense, maintain liability insurance contracts of the nature, in the amounts and containing the terms and conditions, if any, set out in Schedule B.

Article Seven

Term and Termination of Agreement

Section 7.01 Term: This Agreement shall continue in force for a period of three years commencing January 1 2014 and ending December 31 2016.

Section 7.02 Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon written notice being received six (6) months prior to the proposed termination date.

Article Eight

Miscellaneous

Section 8.01 Preamble: The preamble hereto shall be deemed to form an integral part hereto.

Section 8.02 Gender, etc.: Whenever the singular form is used in the Agreement and when required by the context, the same shall include the plural, the plural shall include the singular and the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter genders.

Section 8.03 Amendments: This Agreement shall not be changed, modified, or discharged in whole or in part except by instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto, or their respective successors or permitted assigns, or otherwise as provided herein.

Section 8.04 Assignment: This Agreement shall not be assignable by either party hereto without the written consent of the other party being first obtained.

Section 8.05 Notices: Any notice, report or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing unless some other method of giving such notice, report or other communication is expressly accepted by the party to whom it is given and shall be given by being delivered or mailed to the following addresses of the parties respectively:

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 9 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 26 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

(a) To the Health Unit:

Board of Health for the Peterborough County City Health Unit 10 Hospital Drive Peterborough, ON K9J 8M1 Attention: The Medical Officer of Health

(b) To the Municipality

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough 470 Water St. Peterborough, ON K9H 3M3 Attention: The County Clerk

Any notice, report or other written communication, if delivered, shall be deemed to have been given or made on the date on which it was delivered to any employee of such party, or if mailed, postage prepaid, shall be deemed to have been given or made on the third business day following the date on which it was mailed (unless at the time of mailing or within forty-eight hours thereof there shall be a strike, interruption or lock-out in the Canadian postal service, in which case service shall be by way of delivery only). Either party may at any time give notice in writing to the other party of the change of its address for the purpose of this Section 8.05.

Section 8.06 Headings: The section headings hereof have been inserted for the convenience of reference only and shall not be constructed to affect the meaning, construction or effect of this Agreement.

Section 8.07 Governing Law: The provisions of this Agreement shall be constructed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario as at the time in effect.

In Witness Whereof the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

Board of Health for the Peterborough County-City Health Unit

______Chairperson

______Rosana Pellizzari, M.D. Medical Officer of Health

We have the authority to bind the Board

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 10 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 27 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough

______J. M. Jones Warden

______Sally Saunders Clerk

We have the authority to bind the Corporation

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 11 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 28 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Schedule A

Mandatory Re-inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Fee in Effect until December 31, 2016

Service Type Fee Inspection of On-site Certificate of Sewage Systems $270.00 Re-inspection (Mandatory)

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 12 of 15

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 29 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection Septic System - Ptbo mandatory septicreinspection CAO Report ...

ActivitySiteArea_Municipality System LandownerContact_Municipality Property_Address Mailing_Address

Alnwick/Haldimand Grafton Alnwick-Haldimand 432-434 Edwardson Rd. P.O. Box 70, Grafton, ON K0K 2G0 -

Mandatory &Non Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 148 PARK LANE PO Box 481 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 154 PARK LANE 154 Park Lane PO Box 575 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 156 PARK LANE 156 Park Lane Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 160 PARK LANE PO Box 331 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 150 PARK LANE PO Box 159 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1163 ROGERS LANE 1163 Rogers Lane PO Box 114 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1161 ROGERS LANE 4705 Reid Street Orono ON L0B 1M0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1159 ROGERS LANE 29 Kennedy Drive Courtice ON L1E 2H2 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1157 ROGERS LANE 273 East 28th St Hamilton ON L8V 3J2 - Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1153 ROGERS LANE 40 Waymount Ave Richmond Hill ON L4S 2G5 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1149 ROGERS LANE 39 Twelve Oaks Drive Aurora ON L4G 6J5 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 164 PARK LANE 164 Park Lane PO Box 261 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 166 PARK LANE PO Box 613 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1147 ROGERS LANE 24 Lochleven Dr Scarborough ON M1M 3S1 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 1161 MCCARTHY'S PNT RD PO Box 193 Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP NA 24 Lochleven Dr Scarborough ON M1M 3S1 Asphodel-Norwood Hastings ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 168 PARK LANE 168 Park Lane Hastings ON K0L 1Y0 Asphodel-Norwoodp Hastingsg ASPHODEL-NORWOOD TOWNSHIP 174 PARK LANE 174 Park Lane Hastingsg ON K0L 1Y0 Cavan-Monaghan Fraserville Cavan Monaghan 2401 Lansdowne Street W. 2401 Landsdowne Street West. PO Box 1602 Station Main, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 7S4 Cavan-Monaghan Fraserville Cavan Monaghan 2435 Lansdowne Street W. 2435 Lansdowne Street West, RR#3 Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 6X4 Cavan-Monaghan Fraserville Cavan Monaghan 2422 Lansdowne Street W. 2422 Lansdowne Street West. RR #3 Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 6X4 City of Peterborough Peterborough City of Peterborough 1297 Dafoe Dr. 1297 Dafoe Drive, Ptbo, ON K9J 6Y1 City of Peterborough Peterborough City of Peterborough 1300 Dafoe Dr. RR 9 Station Main Peterborough, ON, K9J 6Y1 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 632 Alpine Lake Road 632 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 697 Alpine Lake Road 697 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 701 Alpine Lake Road 701 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 657 Alpine Lake Road 657 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Agenda Item#8a) Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 738 Alpine Lake Road 738 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 732 Alpine Lake Road 732 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 730 Alpine Lake Road 730 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 724 Alpine Lake Road 724 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 729 Alpine Lake Road 729 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Page 30 of154 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 707 Alpine Lake Road 707 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 711 Alpine Lake Road 711 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 626 Alpine Lake Road 626 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1621 Alpine Cres 59 Alpine Cres, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1AO Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1625 Alpine Cres 1625 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 656 Alpine Lake Road 656 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendishyy and Harvey Alpinepg Village Galway-Cavendishyy & Harvey 640 Alpinep Lake Road 640 Alpinep,,y Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeong, ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 636 Alpine Lake Road 636 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0

Page 1 BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 13 of 15 Septic System - Ptbo mandatory septicreinspection CAO Report ...

Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 4 Pinewood Drive 4 Pinewood Drive, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 725 Alpine Lake Road 725 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 720 Alpine Lake Road 720 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0

- Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 716 Alpine Lake Road 716 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Mandatory &Non Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1628 Cedar Cres 69 Sir Raymond Drive, Scarborough ON, M1E 1C1 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 618 Alpine Lake Road 618 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 4 Swiss Cres 11608-30 Carabob Court, Toronto ON, M1T 3N2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1621 Cedar Cres 444 Lawson Road, Scarborough ON, M1C 2K1 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1629 Cedar Cres 3356 Juanita Court, Mississaugua ON, L5A 3J6 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 686 Alpine Lake Road 686 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 684 Alpine Lake Road 684 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1624 Alpine Cres 1624 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 - Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 645 Alpine Lake Road 127 Duvernet Ave, Toronto ON, M4E 1V5 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 651 Alpine Lake Road 651 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 653 Alpine Lake Road 653 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1620 Cedar Cres PO Box 274, Stn Main, Lindsay ON, K9V 4S1 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 735 Alpine Lake Road 735 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 737 Alpine Lake Road 737 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 637 Alpine Lake Road 637 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 641 Alpine Lake Road 641 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendishyy and Harvey Alpinepg Village Galway-Cavendishyy & Harvey 643 Alpinep Lake Road 643 Alpinepy Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeong ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 715 Alpine Lake Road 77 Greybeaver Trail, Scarborough On, M1C 4N7 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 3 Pinewood Drive 3 Pinewood Drive, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON , K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 5 Pinewood Drive 39 Pinewood Cres, Bobaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 719 Alpine Lake Road 719 Alpine Lake Road, RR3, Bobcaygeon ON K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 663 Alpine Lake Road 663 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 654 Alpine Lake Road 578 Walsh Drive, Port Perry ON, L0L 1K9 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 660 Alpine Lake Road 660 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 6 Pinewood Drive 6 Pinewood Drive, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 1624 Cedar Cres 1624 Cedar Cres, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON K0M 1A0 Agenda Item#8a) Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 8 Swiss Cres 24 Cresswell Drive, Toronto ON, M1G 3L8 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 667 Alpine Lake Road 667 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 681 Alpine Lake Road 681 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 685 Alpine Lake Road 685 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Alpine Village Galway-Cavendish & Harvey 687 Alpine Lake Road 687 Alpine Lake Road, RR 3, Bobcaygeon ON, K0M 1A0 Page 31 of154 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 245 Sumcot Drive, Estates 245 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 235 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 235 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 239 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 239 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 797 Cedar Circle, Buckhorn Lake Estates 144 Evans Ave, Etobicoke ON, M8Z 1H9 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 795 Cedar Circle, Buckhorn Lake Estates 795 Cedar Circle, RR 1, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 793 Cedar Circle, Buckhorn Lake Estates 28 Summerfield Cres, Etobicoke ON, M9C 3X3 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 186 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 54 Holden Drive, PO Box 62, Nobleton ON, LOG 1NO Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 240 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 240 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2

Page 2 BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 14 of 15 Septic System - Ptbo mandatory septicreinspection CAO Report ...

Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 236 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 236 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 193 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 193 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 210 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 210 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2

- Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 196 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 196 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Mandatory &Non Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 190 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 49 Major Willliam Sharpe Drive, Brampton ON, L6X 3H9 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 796 Cedar Circle, Buckhorn Lake Estates 2462 Linwood St, Pickering ON, L1X 2N8 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 794 Cedar Circle, Buckhorn Lake Estates 97 Stuart St, Stouffville ON, L3A 4S4 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 792 Cedar Circle, Buckhorn Lake Estates 792 Cedar Circle, RR 1, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 228 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 228 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 224 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 224 Sumcot Drive, RR 1 Stn Delivery Centre, Peterborough ON, K9J 6X2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 218 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 8 Vantage Circle, Mississauga ON, L5M 2L2 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey Concession 15, PtL1, Plan M7 Lot 48 1505 Kenilworth Cres, Oakville ON, L6H 3G1 - Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Buckhorn Well Supply Galway-Candish & Harvey 216 Sumcot Drive, Buckhorn Lake Estates 32 Sherbo Crescent, Brampton ON, L7A 2A1 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 718 Belmont Twp Conc 8 718 Belmont TWP CON 8 RR3 Havelock ON K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 692 Bell TWP Con 8 RR # 3 Havelock ON K0L1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 134 County Rd 46 326-1099B Clonsilla Ave Peterborough On K9J 8L7 Canada Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 717 Bel TWP Con 8 RR 2 Havelock ON K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 4 Mary St 8 Mary Steet RR 3 Havelock ON K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 8 Mary St 8 Mary Street RR 3 Havelock ON K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 9 County Rd 48 PO Box 94 Trent River ON K0L 2Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipalitypy of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 116 Countyy Rd 48 PO Box 94 Rent River ON K0L 2Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 26 Mary St Box 443 Havelock On K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 10 County Rd 48 PO Box 94 Trent River ON K0L 2Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 28 MARY ST 28 Mary St., Box 32, Havelock, ON, K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 47 Mary St Box 175 Havelock ON K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 45 Mary St PO Box 898 Havelock ON K0L 1Z0 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Havelock Municipality of Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 49 Mary St PO Box 353 Havelock ON K0L 1Z0 Otonabee-South Monaghan Crystal Springs Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan 1745 Base Line, RR 6 Station Main 1745 Base Line, RR 6 Station Main, Peterborough, ON K9J 6X7 Otonabee-South Monaghan Crystal Springs Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan 1744 Base Line, RR 6 Station Main 1745 Base Line, RR 6 Station Main, Peterborough, ON K9J 6X7 Otonabee-South Monaghan Crystal Springs Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan 1754 Base Line, RR 6 Station Main 1745 Base Line, RR 6 Station Main, Peterborough, ON K9J 6X7 Agenda Item#8a) Otonabee-South Monaghan Crystal Springs Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan 1762 Base Line, RR 6 Station Main 1762 Base Line, RR6 Station Main, K9J 6X7 Otonabee-South Monaghan Keene Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan 42 Pinecrest Avenue, Keene 1994 Fisher Drive, PO Box 7190 Peterborough, ON K9J 7A1 Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield Lakefield Township of Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield 44 Water Street, Lakefield PO Box 597, Lakefield, ON K0L 2H0

Prepared: January 7, 2013 Page 32 of154

Page 3 BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 15 of 15 ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Staff Report

Non-Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems County By-Law

Date: September 11, 2013

To: Board of Health

From: Dr. Rosana Pellizzari, Medical Officer of Health

Original approved by Original approved by

Rosana Pellizzari, M.D. Atul Jain, Manager, Inspection Services

Recommendations

That the Board of Health for the Peterborough County-City Health Unit:

receive the staff report, this report Non-Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems County By-Law, for information; and

recommend to the County of Peterborough that the appended three year draft by-law (with fee schedule) be approved, confirming that the Health Unit: o will be the principal authority; and, o will conduct the non-mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems in consultation with the local municipality, cottage associations, or other stakeholders.

Background

Under Part IV of the Clean Water Act, the principal authority is required to conduct inspections of on-site sewage systems located in “vulnerable areas” as outlined in source protection plans.

In the geographical area served by this Health Unit, the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority working with the Lower Trent Conservation Source Protection Committee has

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 1 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 33 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

identified, mapped and geocoded these vulnerable areas in its source protection plans and has provided the Health Unit with the number and location of sewage systems that require mandatory re-inspection.

Non-mandatory re-inspections are those that are not required under the Building Code, however, may be requested when the local municipality, cottage associations, or other stakeholders, suspect that sewage systems adjacent to surface waters (e.g., lakes, streams, rivers) may or are currently failing and polluting these natural environments. Therefore, a re- inspection would be required to confirm if the sewage system is functioning properly.

These non-mandatory re-inspections would be done in cooperation with the local municipality, cottage associations, or other stakeholders within the County of Peterborough.

Financial Implications and Impact

The sewage system inspection program currently offered by the Peterborough County-City Health Unit (PCCHU) is a full cost-recovery program, as fees generated by applications, permits and file searches, are used to offset all operational expenses. An expansion to include mandatory and non-mandatory re-inspections would be based on the same approach, minimizing financial risk to the Board of Health.

Decision History

The Board of Health has previously made a decision in regards to this matter (May 8, 2013) by directing staff to bring forward a draft County by-law for consideration in the Fall of 2013, confirming the Health Unit as the principal authority and proposing the Health Unit conduct the non-mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016 (3 years).

Delivery Options and Rationale

Since non-mandatory inspections are not required to meet requirements under the Building Code, there are three options for the delivery of the non-mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage systems:

(i) Health Unit (ii) County of Peterborough (iii) Local municipalities, cottage associations or stakeholders

In consideration of the costs and benefits of these options, it is recommended the Health Unit be the delivery agent for non-mandatory re-inspections. Based on our review, it would be most beneficial to the property owners within the County of Peterborough and the local municipalities for the reasons outlined below.

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 2 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 34 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

The Health Unit:

is currently the principal authority; has successfully conducted sewage system inspections for the past 25 years; houses the historical files and corporate memory on the locations of sewage systems identified for mandatory and non-mandatory re-inspections; can ensure cost neutrality, professional delivery of service and consistency; staff have the training, qualifications, and are appointed sewage system inspectors under the Building Code Act; sewage system inspectors have the ability and professional experience to identify other health hazards; is a neutral third party (i.e., can be objective) separate from the local municipality or other interest groups; and already has in place an administrative support system and a current sewage system database.

If the Health Unit is not chosen for delivery of re-inspections, in addition to not satisfying the benefits outlined above, the County/local municipalities, cottage associations or stakeholders would require:

time for transition; and an investment for recruitment, training and the appointment of staff.

If there are multiple providers for applications and re-inspections, this may create confusion for users and increase the potential for errors.

The preferred option based on this rationale is that the Health Unit deliver the mandatory re- inspections of on-site sewage systems within the County of Peterborough and the Health Unit deliver the non-mandatory re-inspections of on-site sewage systems in cooperation with local municipality, cottage associations, or other stakeholders within the County of Peterborough.

Fee and Cost Recovery of Fee

A fee of $270.00 will be designated for the non-mandatory re-inspection of on-site sewage system.

However, the fee for the non-mandatory re-inspections may be set at a lower rate based on the number of on-site sewage systems in the proposed area and potential economies of scale. This reduced fee would be based on cost-recovery, determined jointly and agreed upon by the Health Unit and the local municipality, cottage associations, or other stakeholders.

The fee noted above will ensure cost neutrality and recovery of expenses for the Health Unit and is based on current staff wages, mileage and administrative costs.

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 3 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 35 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

It is proposed in the draft by-law, that the township is responsible for re-payment of the fees to the Health Unit and can determine a mechanism for re-payment for their residents that would present the least financial hardship on the property owner.

Strategic Direction

Although this program is not part of the Ontario Public Health Standards, it is consistent with the goals of promoting and protecting the health of the population in Peterborough County and City.

The delivery of this program also supports our efforts to improve “Quality and Performance“ and assess partnerships and leverage those that address local needs, and therefore a “Community-Centred Focus” in the area of environmental health.

Contact: Atul Jain Manager, Inspection Services (705) 743-1000, ext. 259 [email protected]

Attachments: Attachment A – Proposed County By-law - Non-Mandatory Re-inspection of On-site Sewage Systems

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 4 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 36 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

ATTACHMENT A

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough By-law No. 2013 - xx ______A By-law to authorize the Corporation of the County of Peterborough to enter into a Non-Mandatory Re-inspection of On-Site Sewage Systems Agreement with The Peterborough County-City Health Unit.

Whereas the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c. 25 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) at section 9 provides that a municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under this or any other Act;

And Whereas section 8(1) of the Act, further provides that section 8 shall be interpreted broadly so as to confer broad authority on municipalities, (a) to enable them to govern their affairs as they consider appropriate; and (b) to enhance their ability to respond to municipal issues.

And Whereas at the County Council Meeting of xxxx, 2013, County Council accepted the recommendation of the Director of Planning contained in his report “Non-Mandatory Re- inspections of On-site Sewage Systems” wherein he recommended:

“That that County Council authorize the Warden and Clerk to enter into a Non-Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement with the Peterborough County-City Health Unit for a 3 year term using the new fee structure as approved by the Board of Health; and further

Be it resolved that County Council direct that the necessary By-law be passed in this regard.”;

Now Therefore the Council of the Corporation of the County of Peterborough in Session duly assembled enacts as follows:

1. That the Corporation of the County of Peterborough be authorized to enter into a Re- Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement with The Peterborough County-City Health Unit in the form attached hereto as Schedule “A” to this By-law.

2. That the Warden and the Clerk be and are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement attached hereto as Schedule “A” and to affix the seal of the Corporation thereto.

3. That this by-law shall be commonly called the “Re-Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement By-law”.

Read a first, second and third time and passed in Open Council this xx day of xxx, 2013.

______J. Murray Jones Warden c/s ______Sally Saunders Clerk

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 5 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 37 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Schedule “A” To By-Law 2013-XX

Non-Mandatory Re-Inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Agreement

This Agreement dated as of the day of xx, 2013 and authorized by the Corporation of the County of Peterborough By-law No. 2013-XX.

Between:

Board of Health for The Peterborough County-City Health Unit (hereinafter called the "Health Unit") of the First Part

- And –

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough (hereinafter called the "Municipality") of the Second Part

Whereas this Agreement is being entered into pursuant to the Building Code Act (hereinafter called the "Act"), for the purpose of delegating to the Health Unit certain responsibilities under the Act and the Building Code, as they are from time to time amended, as set out herein with respect to the re-inspection of on-site sewage systems (with a capacity of less than 10,000 litres per day);

Now therefore in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

Article One

General

Section 1.01 Application: This Agreement shall be applicable to all lands where no municipal sewers are available in the Municipality (hereinafter called the "Lands").

Section 1.02 Duties: The Health Unit shall faithfully carry out its duties hereunder in accordance with the Act and the Building Code in force from time to time, this agreement and any other legislation contemplated hereunder.

Article Two

Definitions

Section 2.01 in this Agreement,

(i) "Sewage System" means any works for the collection, transmission, treatment and disposal of sewage or any part of such works to which the Act applies with a capacity of less than 10,000 litres;

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 6 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 38 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

(ii) "Inspector" means an inspector appointed under section 3.1(2) of the Building Code Act, 1992 as amended;

Article Three

Services of the Health Unit

Section 3.01 Services: The Peterborough County-City Health Unit shall provide the following services in relation to the Lands:

(i) Review the files in relation to the properties that the on-site sewage system is required to be re-inspected (i those properties requested by the municipality (non- mandatory).

(ii) Conduct a re-inspection of the on-site sewage system identified in (i).

(iii) Issue a “Certificate of Re-inspection” to the property owner indicating that the on-site sewage system is not needed for an upgrade/replacement at the time of the re- inspection.

(iv) If (iii) is not satisfied, then issue a “notice of upgrade/replacement” to the property owner requiring them to upgrade or replace their on-site septic system.

(v) Receive and process applications and requests related to activities listed in paragraph (iv)

(vi) Inspect properties prior to the issuance of a permit for the construction, installation, establishment, enlargement, extension or alteration of a Sewage System.

(vii) Issue permits under the Act and Building Code relating to Sewage Systems (a "Permit").

(viii) Following the issuance of a permit, inspect and re-inspect when necessary, Sewage System installations to ascertain compliance with the permit and other requirements under the Act or Building Code.

(ix) Maintain adequate records of all documents and other materials used in performing the duties required under this Agreement.

(x) Upon reasonable notice by the Municipality, provide reasonable access to the Municipality of all records kept under subsection 3.01 (ix).

(xi) Respond to inquiries made by any person under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and related Regulation, as amended from time to time, or through any other legal channel.

(xii) Investigate complaints and malfunctioning Sewage Systems, undertake compliance counselling and preparation of reports for abatement action as it relates to existing and proposed Sewage Systems.

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 7 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 39 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

(xiv) Issue orders under the Act relating to Sewage Systems.

(xiii) Prepare documentation necessary for prosecution activities relating to Sewage Systems under the Act and Building Code. Administer proceedings relating to Sewage Systems pursuant to the Provincial Offenses Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33.

(xvi) Provide all forms necessary for the administration of this Agreement.

(xvii) Be responsible for any other matters related to the administration or enforcement of the Act or Building Code relating to Sewage Systems.

Article Four

Collection of Fees

*Section 4.01 Non-Mandatory Re-inspections of On-site Sewage Systems: The township is responsible for re-payment of the fees to the Health Unit and can determine a mechanism for re-payment for their residents that would present the least financial hardship on the property owner.

*Note: This fee may be reduced upon agreement between the Health Unit and/or the local municipality, cottage associations, and/or other stakeholders, depending on the number of properties in a particular area, in the municipality.

Section 4.02 Fee Schedule: It is agreed and understood that the fees charged in association with the provision of the above services shall be on a cost recovery basis only. The Health Unit shall submit to County Council for approval the proposed fee schedule with supporting documentation verifying that the fees are not in excess of actual costs. The Municipality reserves the right to reduce any or all fees charged by the Board of Health, however, it is expressly understood that in doing so, the Board of Health may bill the Municipality directly for any costs not covered by the reduced fee schedule.

Section 4.03 Amendment of Fee Schedule: Any amendments to the fee schedule shall not be made by the Health Unit without the approval of County Council.

Article Five

Inspectors

Section 5.01 Qualifications: The Health Unit shall appoint Inspectors who meet the requirement of the Act and the Building Code and shall issue a certificate of appointment to each appointed Inspector.

Article Six

Liabilities and Insurance

Section 6.01 Liability of the Health Unit: The Health Unit shall indemnify and save harmless the Municipality from and against all claims, demands, losses, costs, damage,

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 8 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 40 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

actions, suits or proceedings by whomsoever made, brought or prosecuted in any manner based upon, arising out of, related to, occasioned by or attributable to the activities of the Health Unit in executing the work under this Agreement. The Municipality shall be named as an additional insured on the policy of the Health Unit. The Health Unit shall provide a certificate of insurance annually to the Municipality.

Section 6.02 Insurance: For the term of this Agreement, the Health Unit will, at its expense, maintain liability insurance contracts of the nature, in the amounts and containing the terms and conditions, if any, set out in Schedule B.

Article Seven

Term and Termination of Agreement

Section 7.01 Term: This Agreement shall continue in force for a period of three years commencing January 1 2014 and ending December 31 2016.

Section 7.02 Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon written notice being received six (6) months prior to the proposed termination date.

Article Eight

Miscellaneous

Section 8.01 Preamble: The preamble hereto shall be deemed to form an integral part hereto.

Section 8.02 Gender, etc.: Whenever the singular form is used in the Agreement and when required by the context, the same shall include the plural, the plural shall include the singular and the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter genders.

Section 8.03 Amendments: This Agreement shall not be changed, modified, or discharged in whole or in part except by instrument in writing signed by the parties hereto, or their respective successors or permitted assigns, or otherwise as provided herein.

Section 8.04 Assignment: This Agreement shall not be assignable by either party hereto without the written consent of the other party being first obtained.

Section 8.05 Notices: Any notice, report or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing unless some other method of giving such notice, report or other communication is expressly accepted by the party to whom it is given and shall be given by being delivered or mailed to the following addresses of the parties respectively:

(a) To the Health Unit:

Board of Health for the Peterborough County City Health Unit 10 Hospital Drive Peterborough, ON K9J 8M1 Attention: The Medical Officer of Health

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 9 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 41 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

(b) To the Municipality

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough 470 Water St. Peterborough, ON K9H 3M3 Attention: The County Clerk

Any notice, report or other written communication, if delivered, shall be deemed to have been given or made on the date on which it was delivered to any employee of such party, or if mailed, postage prepaid, shall be deemed to have been given or made on the third business day following the date on which it was mailed (unless at the time of mailing or within forty-eight hours thereof there shall be a strike, interruption or lock-out in the Canadian postal service, in which case service shall be by way of delivery only). Either party may at any time give notice in writing to the other party of the change of its address for the purpose of this Section 8.05.

Section 8.06 Headings: The section headings hereof have been inserted for the convenience of reference only and shall not be constructed to affect the meaning, construction or effect of this Agreement.

Section 8.07 Governing Law: The provisions of this Agreement shall be constructed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario as at the time in effect.

In Witness Whereof the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

Board of Health for the Peterborough County-City Health Unit

______Chairperson

______Rosana Pellizzari, M.D. Medical Officer of Health

We have the authority to bind the Board

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 10 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 42 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough

______J. M. Jones Warden

______Sally Saunders Clerk

We have the authority to bind the Corporation

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 11 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 43 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8a)

Schedule A

Non-Mandatory Re-inspection of On-site Sewage Systems Fee in Effect until December 31, 2016

Service Type Fee Inspection of On-site Certificate of Sewage Systems $270.00* Re-inspection (Non-Mandatory)

*Note: The non-mandatory inspection fee may be reduced upon agreement between the Health Unit and/or the local municipality, cottage associations, and/or other stakeholders, depending on the number of properties in a particular area, in the municipality.

BOH Meeting - Sept. 11/13 Page 12 of 12

CAO Report - Mandatory & Non- Page 44 of 154 mandatory septic reinspection ... Agenda Item # 8b)

REPORT TO: Reeve Nelson & Council

FROM: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development

DATE: November 18, 2013

SUBJECT: ORCA Development Related Fee Increases ______

RECOMMENDATION: THAT the C.A.O.’s Report re: Otonabee Region Conservation Authority Development Related Fee increases be received for information.

Background The Otonabee Region Conservation Authority has been reviewing its development related fee schedule. As part of the process, ORCA has been consulting with local municipalities and stakeholders. A copy of the consultation paper is attached for reference.

Analysis The proposed ORCA fees are based on three principles: - user pay - adequate consultation and notification - right to appeal

The proposed fee increases would be phased over two years in 2014 and 2015. In addition to the rate increases, ORCA is proposing a new methodology which will differentiate between minor, intermediate and major applications. In simple terms, an application with no supporting technical documents (relevant to ORCA’s mandate) falls into the ‘minor’ category. An application that is accompanied by a single technical report (e.g., EIS, Floodline report, SWM report) is considered an ‘intermediate’ application. Applications that require the review of 2 or more technical reports are considered ‘major’ applications.

Budget Implications The Township is the collection agent for minor variances, zoning by-law amendments and site plans and remits the application fees to ORCA. Fees for consents and plans of subdivision/condominium are invoiced directly to the applicant.

The most common type of applications in Otonabee-South Monaghan would be consents and zoning by-law amendments.

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 45 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

The current fee for a Consent review is $250 and the applicant is invoiced by ORCA at the time of application to the County. In the event that an Environmental Impact Study is required as part of the application, the fee would be $250 plus $350 for technical review for a total of $700. Under the proposed fee schedule for 2014, a Consent application fee would be $275 for Minor; $660 for intermediate (such as the EIS example) and $1,240 for major reviews.

The current fee for a Zoning By-law Amendment is $275 paid to the Township at the time of application. In future pre-consultation with ORCA will be required prior to the filing of a ZBA to determine whether ORCA considers an application to be minor, intermediate or major.

In the case of a ZBA required as a condition of consent, the Township is collecting the difference between the consent ($275) and the zoning fees ($250) or $25 which is remitted to ORCA. Given that the proposed ZBA fees for 2014 would be $305 for minor, $690 for intermediate and $1265 for major the applicant will only be required to pay a “top up” fee, the amount due and payable would be $30 for minor ($305-275), $30 for intermediate ($690-660) and $25 for a major application ($1265-1240). It should be noted that under the 2015 fee schedule, the application fees for consent and zoning will be the same, meaning that there will be no top up fee required for a consent-related zoning by-law amendment.

It should be noted that there will be some exemptions to the ORCA fee schedule including non- profit conservation groups contributing to the protection and restoration of the natural environment; local municipalities forming part of ORCA and works requiring a Letter of Authorization from ORCA. (See report for details)

Notice & Communications ORCA is responsible for communicating the fee schedule to its member municipalities and stakeholders. The Township will ultimately be responsible for communicating the fees collected by the municipality. Starting in 2015 no top up fee will be required for a consent- related zoning by-law amendment, thus reducing the amount of tracking required for both the Township and ORCA.

As noted above, preconsultation with ORCA will be necessary for other zoning and site plan related applications to determine the level of fees.

In the event that an applicant disagrees with the level or type of fees charged by ORCA, there will be an appeal process through the Conservation Authority.

Prepared by: E.J. Rath, CAO Copied to: Barb Waldron, CBO and Site Plan Control Officer

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 46 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

The Otonabee Region Conservation Authority 250 Milroy Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 7M9 Phone: 705-745-5791 Fax: 705-745-7488 email: [email protected]

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE POLICY AND SCHEDULE

This policy outlines the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority’s policies for setting and charging fees in support of its Plan Review and Section 28 permitting activities

Page 1 of 7

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 47 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

Basis In January 1996, a provincial Omnibus Bill was passed which, by amending the Conservation Authorities Act, empowered conservation authorities (CAs) to collect fees for services approved by the Minister of Natural Resources. Section 21(m.1) of the Conservation Authorities Act allows for the collection of fees for services such as plan review, permitting, public and legal inquires, conservation land management and community relations. The document entitled ‘Policies and Procedures for the Charging of Conservation Authority Fees (June 1997, updated March 1999),’ included the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Procedural Manual sets guidelines for fee collection. The document states that CA fee structures should be designed to recover, but not exceed, the costs associated with administering and delivering the services on a program basis. The manual also states that the setting of fees should be dependent on the complexity of applications and the level of effort required to process the application.

This Policy to charge fees primarily applies to the plan review and permitting functions provided by ORCA including the technical services required to support those functions.

Principles ORCA’s Planning and Development Services Fee Policy and Schedule is based upon the following three principles:  User-pay  Adequate consultation and notification  Right to appeal

Implementation, Update Process and Pubic Notification The attached Fee Schedules form part of this policy. ORCA staff shall apply the fees as prescribed on the Fee Schedules when reviewing planning and development related applications. ORCA does reserve the right to modify or adjust fees should the review require a substantially greater or lower level of review and/or assessment or for applications that have not been included in the attached Fee Schedules. Any such adjustments from fees outlined in the Fee Schedules due to increased or decreased work required, must be approved by the Manager, Planning & Development Services.

Fee Schedules are established by the ORCA Board of Director’s following consultation with local municipalities and other stakeholders. ORCA staff will consult with municipalities and key stakeholders at a level appropriate for proposed changes to the Fee Schedule. The larger the impacts of changes to the fee schedules, the larger the scale of consultation will be. Consultation will, at a minimum, include a direct mail-out to key stakeholders (e.g., municipalities, local home builder associations), the posting of proposed changes to the ORCA website, and the posting of a notice in the ORCA administrative office.

No guarantees are provided for requested cost adjustments in the consultation process. Fees are necessary to finance ORCA’s plan review and permitting functions in the absence of other provincial or municipal funding.

Exemptions Exemptions to the application of fees established on the Fee Schedules include:  Non-profit conservation groups contributing to the protection and restoration of the natural environment such as Ducks Unlimited (DU), Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC), Ontario Federation of Hunters and Anglers (OFAH), Kawartha Land Trust (KLT), and Community Stream Steward Program (CSSP). Page 2 of 7

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 48 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

 Local municipalities forming part of ORCA for planning applications, inquiries, permits, and review of environmental assessments (EA).  Works requiring a Letter of Authorization from ORCA (See Policy 4.1.2(1)) of ORCA’s ‘Watershed Planning & Regulation Policy Manual’ for a list of these works).

Transition The establishment of this Policy supercedes and replaces all previous Fee Schedules. The Policy also applies to proposals not previously invoiced, such as draft approved plans of subdivision that predated any Fee Schedules or additional technical reports associated with active applications not previously invoiced.

Appeal An applicant has the right to appeal a fee and request either a reduction or waiving of the fee. In order to appeal a fee, the applicant must submit in writing the reasons for the appeal. The consideration for waiving/reducing a fee will be based largely on: 1) the scope of work required to administer and review the application and supporting technical reports; and, 2) if the municipality has waived or reduced their application fee.

Appeals will first be heard by the Chief Administrative Officer. If still not satisfied, an appeal may be heard by the Executive Committee. Appeals heard by the Executive Committee will be dismissed or upheld through a resolution. The appellant will then be notified in writing of the Board’s decision.

Monitoring This Policy shall be monitored from time to time to evaluate its effectiveness and fairness. The Policy, including its fee schedules will subject to a comprehensive staff review at least every five years and annually for a cost of living adjustment. Any changes or amendments to the Policy shall proceed through the approval process utilized to establish the fee schedule.

Page 3 of 7

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 49 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

PLAN REVIEW FEE SCHEDULE (FOR APPLICATIONS AND INQUIRIES MADE UNDER THE PLANNING ACT)

Plan Review Category As of January 1, 2014 As of January 1, 2015 Proposal Inquiry $140 $250 Minor Variance  Minor $220 $300  Intermediate $605 $1,000  Major $1,180 $1,950 Consent (Severance)  Minor $275 $375  Intermediate $660 $1,100  Major $1,240 $2,050 Zoning By-Law Amendment  Minor $305 $375  Intermediate $690 $1,100  Major $1,265 $2,050 Official Plan Amendment  Minor $385 $475  Intermediate $770 $1,200  Major $1,350 $2,200 Site Plan  Minor $400 $400  Intermediate $825 $1,250  Major $3,055 $4,000 Plan of Subdivision/Condominium

 Draft Plan Conditions o Minor $5,000 $5,000 o Major $10,000 $10,000  Clearance of Conditions $1,500/ha $1,500/ha  Draft Plan Extension $1,000 $1,000  Reactivation $1,000 $1,000  Revision Fee $385 $1,000 Golf Courses/Aggregate Pits $4,400 $5,000 Optional Expedited Review TBD TBD Other Fees Additional Technical Review $70/hr $75/hr Additional Site Visits $70/hr $75/hr Application Amendments 50% of fee to a 50% of fee to a maximum of $500 maximum of $500 File Reactivation 50% of fee to a 50% of fee to a maximum of $500 maximum of $500

THE FINE PRINT:

Minor – An application is determined to be “Minor” where there is low risk of impact on a natural hazard or natural features and no technical letters or studies are required. Subdivisions less than 5 hectares in size are determined to be “Minor”.

Page 4 of 7

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 50 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

Intermediate – An application is determined to be “Intermediate” where there is moderate risk of impact on natural hazards or natural features and/or limited or scoped technical studies are required.

Major – An application is determined to be “Major” where risk to natural hazard and natural heritage features is high and/or technical studies are required. Subdivisions greater than 5 hectares are determined to be “Major”.

1. Applicants and/or municipalities are encouraged to consult with staff prior to submission of all applications to determine the extent and nature of information required to accompany the application, and to determine the appropriate fee. 2. Application fees are collected in the following fashion and must be paid before ORCA review will commence: a. Application fees for Minor Variances, Zoning By-Law Amendments and Site Plan applications are collected by the municipality. b. Fees for Consents (Severance), Plans of Subdivision and Plans of Condominium will be collected by the municipality within the City of Peterborough, the City of and the Municipality of Trent Hills. Fees for Consent (Severance), Plans of Subdivision and Plans of Condominium within the County of Peterborough will be invoiced to applicants directly. c. Fees for Official Plan Amendments will be collected by the municipality within the City of Peterborough, the City of Kawartha Lakes, the Township of Douro-Dummer, the Township of Cavan Monaghan, the Township of South-Monaghan and the Municipality of Trent Hills. Fees for Official Plan Amendments will be invoiced to the applicant directly within the Township of Asphodel-Norwood and Selwyn Township. 3. ORCA reserves the right to modify or adjust fees should the review require a substantially greater or lower level of review and/or assessment or for applications that have not been included in the above table. 4. Consolidated Planning Act applications will be subject to only the higher of the application fees if submitted within a one year time period. 5. Peer review fees will be recovered when a report contains information that is beyond the scope of ORCA’s in- house expertise OR come to a third-party resolution where there is conflict. 6. ORCA reserves the right to increase fees without notice to address year to year increases that may occur from inflationary increases in operating costs 7. The net hectare fee required for Clearance of Conditions will exclude lands outside of the development limit (e.g., natural hazards, natural heritage features and buffers). 8. Fees for applications requiring technical review are based on the initial submission and two resubmissions. Submissions beyond those three will be reviewed and charged at the hourly technical review rate. 9. Fees for amendments to applications are charged when the proposed development is modified after planning approval has been granted. 10. A File Reactivation fee is charged for applications that have been dormant for over one year. 11. All studies submitted to ORCA for review become the property of the Authority and the information may be used by ORCA and its member municipalities. In order for members of the public to view any studies, plans and reports related to a permit, a formal request under the Municipal Freedom of Information Protection and Privacy Act, PRSO 1990, c M. 56 is required. Access is subject to statutory exemptions.

Page 5 of 7

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 51 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE (FOR APPLICATIONS MADE UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 167/06 – DEVELOPMENT, INTERFERENCE WITH WETLANDS AND ALTERATIONS TO SHORELINES AND WATERCOURSES)

Permit Category As of January 1, 2014 As of January 1, 2015 Real Estate/Legal Inquiry $125 $125 Proposal Inquiry $140 $250 Letter of Authorization $0 $0 Development Applications (Adjacent to or within Flooding Hazards, Erosion Hazards or Unstable Soils  Minor $275 $325  Intermediate $660 $950  Major $1,240 $1,750 Development Adjacent to Wetlands, Interference with Wetlands, Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses  Minor $340 $450  Intermediate $725 $1,050  Major $1,305 $1,850 Large Fill TBD TBD Golf Courses $4,400 $5,000 Other Fees Violations or Unauthorized 2x permit cost 2x permit cost Works Additional Technical Review $70/hr $75/hr Additional Site Visit $70/hr $75/hr 50% of fee to a maximum 50% of fee to a maximum File Reactivation of $500 of $500 Permit Amendments (after 50% of fee to a maximum 50% of fee to a maximum approval) of $500 of $500 Optional Expedited Review TBD TBD Administrative Fee For Board Process  At scheduled Board Meeting $200 $200  At Special Meeting $350 $350

THE FINE PRINT:

Minor – An application is determined to be “Minor” where there is low risk of impact on a natural hazard or natural features and no technical letters or studies are required.

Intermediate – An application is determined to be “Intermediate” where there is moderate risk of impact on natural hazards or natural features and/or limited or scoped technical studies are required.

Page 6 of 7

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 52 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8b)

Major – An application is considered to be “Major” where there is a hazard risk and/or potential impact to natural hazards or features and requires more than one technical study.

1. Applicants and/or municipalities are encouraged to consult with staff prior to submission of all applications to determine the extent and nature of information required to accompany the application, and to determine the appropriate fee. 2. Application fees must be paid at the time of filing an application. A permit will not be issued unless the application fee has been submitted. 3. ORCA reserves the right to modify or adjust fees should the review require a substantially greater or lower level of review and/or assessment. 4. Where an application is made and determined not to be subject to Ontario Regulation 167/06, the application fee will be refunded less a $100 administrative fee. 5. Permits are generally granted for two years. Permit extensions or renewals will not be granted. Applicants may re-apply for the reissuance of a new permit for the original approved works in accordance with most recent technical requirements and legislation. 6. Projects with multiple components will be subject to only the higher of the application fees, not the aggregated amount. 7. Fees for applications requiring technical review are based on the initial submission and two resubmissions. Submissions beyond those three will be reviewed and charged at the hourly technical review rate. 8. ORCA reserves the right to increase fees without notice to address year to year increases that may occur from inflationary increases in operating costs. 9. Peer review fees will be recovered when a report contains information that is beyond the scope of ORCA’s in- house expertise OR come to a third-party resolution where there is conflict. 10. A File Reactivation fee is charged for applications that have been dormant for over one year. 11. All studies submitted to ORCA for review become the property of the Authority and the information may be used by ORCA and its member municipalities. In order for members of the public to view any studies, plans and reports related to a permit, a formal request under the Municipal Freedom of Information Protection and Privacy Act, PRSO 1990, c M. 56 is required. Access is subject to statutory exemptions.

Page 7 of 7

CAO Report - ORCA Fee Page 53 of 154 Schedule ... Agenda Item # 8c)

REPORT TO: Reeve Nelson & Council

FROM: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development

DATE: November 18, 2013

SUBJECT: Grant Funding Agreement for Sourcewater Protection Implementation ______

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receives the CAO’s Report re: Grant Funding Agreement for Sourcewater Protection Implementation;

AND THAT Council confirms the Township’s ongoing commitment to work jointly with the Trent Conservation Coalition Source Protection Committee, the Otonabee‐Peterborough Source Protection Authority and Otonabee‐Peterborough Municipal Working Group on Sourcewater Protection Plan matters including implementation;

AND FURTHER THAT the Clerk be directed to bring forward the necessary by‐law to authorize the Reeve and Clerk to sign the Agreement with the Ministry of the Environment.

Background The Clean Water Act requires municipalities to implement Source Protection for Municipal Drinking Water Systems. The Township has been working with the Trent Conservation Coalition Source Protection Committee and the Otonabee‐Peterborough Source Protection Authority as well as participating on the Otonabee‐Peterborough Municipal Working group.

Municipalities have lobbied the Provincial government for funding to implement the Sourcewater Protection Plans and MOE has responded by announcing the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund. The Township has received a Grant Funding Agreement for consideration and must respond by not later than December 13, 2013.

Analysis To receive funding the Township of Otonabee‐South Monaghan was required to meet four criteria  Located in a source protection area as defined by the Clean Water Act  Municipality contains vulnerable areas identified by the local source protection committee where there could be significant drinking water threats  25% or more of the municipality’s population is living in a rural area

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Grant Funding Page 54 of 154 Agreement for Sourcewater ... Agenda Item # 8c)

 A sourcewater protection plan has been submitted for approval specifies that the municipality is required to implement one or more of the following significant drinking water threat policies o Policies under Part IV of the Clean Water Act o Policies that govern Planning Act decisions o Policies that establish education and outreach programs or o Policies that specify other types of actions the municipality is required to take T The amount of funding is based on:  Each municipality’s weighted assessment per household  Number of drinking water threats  Types of significant drinking water threat policies the municipality is required to implement  The number of municipalities with which a municipality collaborates

The purpose of the funding is to cover eligible activities between December 13, 2013 and December 7, 2015 that are directly related to:  Risk Management: Establishing and enforcing risk management plans; communication with landowners; refining the threats  Land Use Policies: Implementing municipal land use policies related to activities that are identified as significant drinking water threats  Education and Outreach: implementing policies  Other activities: working with SPA and SPC to understand municipality’s requirements under SPP; developing and/or modifying municipality’s business processes; establishing processes for information sharing among municipalities and SPA; developing reporting framework that aligns with data collection required under Clean Water Act and regulations  Other activities undertaken to fulfill municipal requirements

The guidelines for the fund also set out a number of ineligible activities which are not directly related to the municipality’s source protection responsibilities. The Province has also defined what is an eligible cost (such as Risk Management Official/Inspector/Administrative support salaries, consultants fees and printing/distribution )as well as an ineligible cost (travel, meals, accommodation, overhead, capital, training, land expropriation/purchase, incentives/ compensation for land owners/ costs for risk management plans if costs will be recovered from property owners.) See full text of Agreement and Schedule “B” under By‐laws for more detailed information on what can and cannot be funded.

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Grant Funding Page 55 of 154 Agreement for Sourcewater ... Agenda Item # 8c)

Budget Implications Under the proposed Grant Funding Agreement, Otonabee‐South Monaghan would receive up to a maximum of $83,302 which consists of $68,302 together with up to $15,000 collaboration incentive funding. The incentive funding is based on partnerships with one or more municipalities starting at $5000 for 1 or 2 other municipalities, $10,000 for 3 other municipalities and $15,000 for 4 or more other municipalities.

The Township of Otonabee‐South Monaghan will be collaborating with six other municipalities in the Otonabee‐Peterborough Source Protection Area to establish the Risk Management Office and fund the Risk Management Official/Inspector. As a result, it is anticipated that the Township of Otonabee‐South Monaghan will be elgibile for the full $15,000 of collaboration incentive funding. The Township of Otonabee‐South Monaghan is also a participating member of the Otonabee‐Peterborough Municipal Working Group (O‐P MWG), which further demonstrates its commitment to collaboration with the 11 other municipalities in the Otonabee‐Peterborough Source Protection Area. The OPSPA and MWG are coordinated through staff at the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority. Council has previously endorsed the provision of Risk Management Official/Inspector services through ORCA.

The Township would be required to submit the Collaboration Statement using the Provincial Template by not later than December 12, 2014. It is recommended that Otonabee‐South Monaghan work with ORCA and the Municipal Working Group on the submission of the necessary documentation to ensure consistency.

Payment is made through various milestones which are set out in Schedule C of the Agreement The Township would be required to provide progress reports and demonstrate value for money. An audit may also be conducted.

Notice & Communications While there is no notice or communication terms set out in Agreement, one of the purposes of the funding is for public education and outreach.

Prepared by: E.J. Rath, CAO

Copied to: Meredith Carter, ORCA

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Grant Funding Page 56 of 154 Agreement for Sourcewater ... Agenda Item # 8d)

REPORT TO: Reeve Nelson & Council

FROM: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development

DATE: November 18, 2013

SUBJECT: Request for Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation Proposed FIT Ground Mount Solar Installation 1312 Crowley Line (MacDonald) ______

RECOMMENDATION: THAT the C.A.O.’s Report to Council regarding the Request for Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation for FIT Ground Mount Solar Installation by Green Life Power at 1312 Crowley Line (MacDonald) be received for information;

AND THAT, subject to receipt of the Agricultural Soils Evaluation and confirmation that the lands are Class 4, the Clerk be authorized to bring forward the Municipal Council Support Resolution(s) as prescribed by the Ontario Power Authority as the Agricultural Land Evaluation & Soil Study by Clark Consulting Services confirms that the subject lands do not fall within Class 1, 2, 3 or organic soil classifications.

Background In November of 2012, the Ministry of Energy relaunched its Renewable Energy Program in Ontario. This program governs applications to the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) for renewable energy projects under the Feed in Tariff (FIT) and MicroFIT programs. The window for FIT 3.0 applications is opening on November 4, 2013. At its November 4th meeting, the Township received requests for Municipal Support Council Resolutions for three proposed solar installations by Green Life Power at 1870 Crowley line (Cummings), 1312 Crowley Line (MacDonald) and 2161 Blezard Line (Leadbetter/Delisle). Council consideration of the application at 1312 Crowley Line was deferred pending receipt of an agricultural soils evaluation for the area of the proposed solar installation.

Analysis

1312 Crowley Line (MacDonald) The subject lands are owned by Steve and Liane MacDonald. The MacDonald property is located on the west side of Crowley Line between County Road 2 and Base Line Road in Part Lot 15, Concession 13, Otonabee Ward.

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 57 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

To assist in the Township staff in reviewing the applications, the Township requested and received: - Written request for municipal confirmation of support - Property owner authorization - Detailed site sketch showing the location of the proposed solar installation on the property - Visual showing type of solar installation - Agricultural Study (to be provided at the meeting)

The solar installation is being proposed within a leased area of 2 hectares (5 acres but the actual solar installation will be on a 1 hectare (2.5 acre) footprint. The proposed installation will be located 480 metres from the front lot line on Crowley Line and setback as required from the southern and rear lot lines. The site location is well in excess of the minimum 100 metre setback from residential lots. The subject lands are located outside of the EP zone which includes the required set back. The location is setback well into the property and screened from Crowley Line by the topography as well as treed areas to the east and south of the proposed site.

The lands are designated Agricultural in the Township Official Plan and zoned Agricultural and Environmental Protection in the Township Zoning By-law. According to the Canada Soils Inventory, the subject installation would be located on Class 4 lands. Given that the lands located within an agricultural area, an Agricultural Land Evaluation & Soil Study has been provided and will be distributed at the Council meeting to confirm the land class. The applicant will also be attending to answer any Council questions.

Conclusion On the basis of the information now provided, Township staff has no questions or concerns regarding the FIT application for 1312 Crowley Line

Budget Implications There are no budget implications.

Notice & Communications There is no notice required under the FIT program.

Prepared by: E.J. Rath, CAO

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 58 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Agricultural Land Evaluation & Soil Study

8679886 Canada Inc. Project: G18 Crowley Line Lot 15, Concession 13 Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan County of Peterborough

November 2013

Prepared by: CLARK CONSULTING SERVICES LTD. Offices: Kingston and Port Hope, ON www.clarkcs.com

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 59 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soil Study In Support of a Proposal for a Ground Mounted Solar PV

CCS Project No. 2128-G18 Crowley Line Date: November 2013

Prepared for: 8679886 Canada Inc. Prepared by: Clark Consulting Services

Clark Consulting Services (CCS) was retained by Simon Rowland of Green Life Power Ltd., Toronto, to prepare an Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soils Study in support of a FIT application to the Ontario Power Authority for a ground mounted solar PV project greater than 10kW. A site visit and assessment was made by CCS on November 15, 2013 and a report created in accordance with OMAFRA guidelines.

In accordance with FIT project eligibility, CCS conducted a review of available mapping related to agricultural land capability, conducted a site visit with excavation of test pits as required. The test pits are reproduced as Attachment A. The following report presents our findings.

1. LOCATION - FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP

The site is located on the west side of Crowley Line, in Lot 15, Concession 13, Geographic Township of Otonabee, Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, County of Peterborough. It is approximately 10.8 hectares (26.7 acres) in size. The site has rolling topography with a very steep wooded ridge in the western part of the site and a less steep slope in the eastern part sloping up to the residence along Crowley Line. The intervening lands are wet with surface water. There are boulders and stones on the surface.

2. SOILS MAPPING - FIGURE 2

The Soils Map for Peterborough County, completed in 1981, provides a description and mapping of soils for the subject lands. The soils in this area have developed through a combination of glacial and post glacial lacustrine effects.

The parent material is glacial till deposited during glacial movement and modified by water action as the glaciers receded. This accounts for the high concentration of lacustrine fragments, stones and boulders. The soils report identifies the soils on the subject lands as Bondhead sandy loam and

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 60 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Lyons loam. They are described as a calcareous, moderately stony loam till and saturated, mottled moderately stony loam till. Our field visit confirmed this general description.

The Soils Report goes on to identify the depth of the soil as in excess of 30 inches.

The topography ranges from irregular moderately sloping to irregular very steeply sloping.

Figure 2 is an excerpt from the 1981 soils map.

SOIL TYPE PARENT MATERIAL CHARACTERISTIC Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) calcareous moderately stony loam till well drained Lyons loam (Lyl) calcareous stony loam till poorly drained

3. CLI CAPABILITY MAPPING - FIGURE 3A & 3B

The Canada Land Inventory provides a Capability for Agriculture based upon 7 classes and a series of sub classes related to limitations of soils for agricultural production. The 7 classes rate the soil on severity of limitation to cultivation beginning with Class 1 which has no limitations and progressing to Class 7 which cannot be cultivated. The published capability rating was based upon the Soils Mapping. The following capability classifications are associated with the soils types:

SOIL TYPE CLI RATING Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) 4T Lyons loam (Lyl) 4W

An excerpt from the CLI Mapping has been reproduced as Figure 3a. An excerpt from the CLI mapping available from the Agricultural Information Atlas is reproduced as Figure 3b.

Our capability classification based upon a detailed field investigation is presented in Figure 4.

4. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

4.1 Class 1, 2, 3 and Organic Soils Must Be Avoided

The OPA FIT Rules 3.0, released in October 2013, indicate that for lands comprised in whole, or in part, as CLI Organic Lands, CLI Class 1, 2, or 3 on the CLI mapping (Figure 3b), a soil study of the property must be prepared to demonstrate that the site is not located on CLI Organic, CLI Class 1, 2, or 3 lands (Section 3.3(d)(iii)(E)(1)).

Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soil Study Green Life Power Ltd. - G18 Crowley Line Page 2

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 61 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

4.2 Capability Assessment - Figure 4

The site exhibits a variable capability on the CLI Mapping (Figure 3a). The proponent has indicated the preferred site location for the project (shown on Figure 4, Capability). Our assessment of capability indicates that there are no Class 1, 2, 3, or Organic soils within this site location.

5. CONCLUSIONS

The Ontario Power Authority has released the FIT Rules 3.0 in which soils within Classes 1,2, 3 and Organic Lands should be avoided in a FIT application.

In preparing an application for a proposed solar farm over 10 kW, Simon Rowland of Green Life Power Ltd. asked Clark Consulting Services to complete an agricultural evaluation of property as part of the required documentation in support of a FIT application to the OPA for a ground mounted solar PV project greater than 10 kW. During a field investigation of the property on November 15, 2013, CCS did not find evidence of Classes 1, 2, 3 or Organic soils in the site area intended for solar development.

The Capability Mapping (Figure 4) provides a refined mapping of the soil classes based on our site visit and test pit findings, and shows that the preferred site location lies entirely within Classes 4 and 6 soils.

Sincerely,

Bob Clark, P.Eng., P.Ag., MCIP, RPP, OLE President

ATTACHMENTS Figure 1 - Location Map Figure 2 - Soils Map (1981) Figure 3a - CLI Capability Mapping Figure 3b - CLI Rating Map, Agricultural Information Atlas Figure 4 - Capability Assessment Appendix A - Test Pit Logs

z:\2128-G18 Crowley\2128-Land Evaluation and Soil Study-November 2013.wpd

Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soil Study Green Life Power Ltd. - G18 Crowley Line Page 3

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 62 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Figure1-Location G18-CrowleyLine Lot15,Concession13,TownshipofOtonabee-SouthMonaghan CountyofPeterborough

Subject Lands

Detailed Map

NTS Date:Nov2013 Z:\2128G18CrowleyLine\Figure1-LocationMap.cdr

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 63 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Figure2-Soils G18-CrowleyLine Lot15,Concession13,TownshipofOtonabee-SouthMonaghan CountyofPeterborough

Legend Bsl-Bondheadsandyloam Lyl-Lyonsloam

SubjectLands

PreferedSiteLocation

NTS Date:Nov2013 Z:\2128G18CrowleyLine\Figure2-Soils.cdr

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 64 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Figure3a-CLI G18-CrowleyLine Lot15,Concession13,TownshipofOtonabee-SouthMonaghan CountyofPeterborough

SubjectLands

PreferedSiteLocation

NTS

Date:November2013 Z:\2128G18CrowleyLine\Figure3a-CLI.cdr

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 65 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 Figure3b-AgriculturalInformationAtlas for Solar Application at 1312 CAO Report G18-CrowleyLine ... Lot15,Concession13,TownshipofOtonabee-SouthMonaghan CountyofPeterborough - Agricultural Study Agenda Item # 8d) Page 66 of 154

SubjectLands

PreferedSiteLocation

NTS Date:November2013 Z:\2128-G18CrowleyLine\Figure3b-AIAMap.cdr for Solar Application at 1312 CAO Report ...

Figure4-CapabilityAssessment G18-CrowleyLine Lot15,Concession13,TownshipofOtonabee-SouthMonaghan

- CountyofPeterborough Agricultural Study

4W TP3

6T TP4W TP4E 4TP

4W 4W TP1 TP2 V5 4W 4TP

6T UNCLASSIFIED V3 Agenda Item # 8d) Legend LegendClassConstraint Bsl-Bondheadsandyloam Lyl-Lyonsloam 4W Class4,excesswater 4TP Class4,waterandstoniness SoilClassSeparation 6T Class6,excessslope Unclassified TotalPropertyOwnership Page 67 of 154 TP (#) TestPit(TestPitNumber) TestPitLocation PreferredSiteLocation

Date:Nov2013 Z:\2128G18CrowleyLine\Figure4-CapabilityAssessment.cdr

... Agenda Item # 8d)

APPENDIX A

Test Pit Logs

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 68 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Test Pit Logs G18 Crowley Line CCS Project No. 2128 Soil Dig Date: November 15, 2013 Weather: high cloud, cool, breezy, dry

Test Pit No. 1 Surface Conditions: wet area with till, grass and shrubs A Horizon: 0- 10" dark brown clay loam B Horizon: 10-18"+ light grey clay, water at 10" Soil Type: Lyons loam (Lyl) Soil Capability for Agriculture: 4W

Test Pit No. 2 Surface Conditions: rough pasture with cedar trees A Horizon: 0 -12" dark brown clay loam B Horizon: 12-24"+ brown clay Soil Type: Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) Soil Capability for Agriculture: 6T

Test Pit No. 3 Surface Conditions: top of slope westward drops sharply into cedars A Horizon: 0 -4" stony brown till B Horizon: 4" heavy stone layers Soil Type: Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) Soil Capability for Agriculture: 6T

Test Pit No. 3 VISUAL Surface Conditions: surface boulders Soil Type: Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) Soil Capability for Agriculture: 6T

Test Pit No. 4E Surface Conditions: grazing, boulders on surface A Horizon: 0 -10" brown clay loam- stony B Horizon: 10-15" light brown clay - wet, very stony- water infiltration Soil Type: Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) Soil Capability for Agriculture: 4TP

Test Pit No. 4W Surface Conditions: grazing- across swale frequent boulders A Horizon: 0 -12" brown stony loam -wet B Horizon: 12-15" light brown clay water infiltration Soil Type: Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) Soil Capability for Agriculture: 4W

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 69 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

Test Pit No. 5 VISUAL Surface Conditions: house land and wet low lying area separated by wet swale Soil Type: Bondhead sandy loam (Bsl) Soil Capability for Agriculture: 4W

2128 test pit logs

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 70 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

120 Adelaide Street West, Suite 1600 Toronto, Ontario M5H 1T1

T 416-967-7474 F 416-967-1947 www.powerauthority.on.ca INSTRUCTIONS: MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SUPPORT RESOLUTION (Section 5.1(g)(i) of the FIT Rules, Version 3.0)

Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the FIT Rules, Version 3.0.

INSTRUCTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL RESOLUTIONS

1. The instruction page is not required to be submitted with the hard copy Application materials.

2. The first page of the resolution must be marked, by the Applicant, with the FIT reference number associated with the Application.

3. Where the resolution has multiple pages, the resolution should be stapled.

4. Information provided in the resolution must be consistent with the information provided in the electronic Application Form in order for the Application to be awarded Priority Points.

5. Apart from the completion of any blanks in the template resolution, no amendments, other than those outlined in paragraph 6 below, may be made to the wording of this form.

6. Words in between square brackets (i.e. “[” and “]”) are immaterial to the intent of the template resolution and may be modified to follow standard procedure of the issuing body. Wording not contained within square brackets must not be changed in order for the Application to be awarded Priority Points.

7. The entirety of the resolution (all blanks) must be completed in order for the Application to be awarded Priority Points.

INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE RESOLUTION

8. Local Municipal councils have the option of drafting the Template: Municipal Council Support Resolution on the Council or equivalent governing body letterhead. The language of the Template: Municipal Council Support Resolution must be the same as shown in the template in order for the Applicant to obtain Priority Points. The OPA does not award Priority Points if the resolution includes additional conditions or delegation of authority to staff for additional approvals.

9. The separate Prescribed Form: Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation may be completed and provided to the OPA by an Applicant that had received a FIT Rules, Version 2.1 Template: Municipal Council Support Resolution (that was not a blanket support resolution) that was issued by the Local Municipality prior to October 9, 2013 in relation to the Applicant and the Project. The Prescribed Form: Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation may not be used as a substitute for a Municipal Council Support Resolution where no Municipal Council Support Resolution was issued for the Project previously.

10. Where no resolution number exists, insert "N/A" into the appropriate field.

Oct 2013 Page i of i

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 71 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 72 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8d)

120 Adelaide Street West, Suite 1600 Toronto, Ontario M5H 1T1

T 416-967-7474 F 416-967-1947 www.powerauthority.on.ca TEMPLATE: MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SUPPORT RESOLUTION (Section 5.1(g)(i) of the FIT Rules, Version 3.0) OPARP/f-FIT-012r2

Resolution NO: Date:

[WHEREAS] capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the FIT Rules, Version 3.0.

[AND WHEREAS] (the "Applicant") proposes to construct and operate a

(the "Project") on (the "Lands") in

under the Province's FIT Program;

[AND WHEREAS] the Applicant has requested that Council of indicate by resolution Council's support for the construction and operation of the Project on the Property;

[AND WHEREAS], pursuant to the FIT Rules, Version 3.0, Applications whose Projects receive the formal support of Local Municipalities will be awarded Priority Points, which may result in the Applicant being offered a FIT Contract prior to other Persons applying for FIT Contracts;

[NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT]:

Council of the supports the construction and operation of the Project on the Lands.

This resolution's sole purpose is to enable the Applicant to receive Priority Points under the FIT Program and may not be used for the purpose of any other form of municipal approval in relation to the Application or Project or any other purpose.

Title:

Title:

(signature lines for elected representatives.)

FIT reference number:

(The reference number must be inserted by the Applicant in order for the resolution to comply with the FIT rules, even where Local Municipal letterhead is used. This is not to be inserted by the Local Municipality.)

Oct 2013 Page 1 of 1

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 73 of 154 for Solar Application at 1312 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

REPORT TO: Reeve Nelson & Council

FROM: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development

DATE: November18, 2013

SUBJECT: Request for Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation Proposed FIT Ground Mount Solar Installations 2627 Highway 7 (Wells/Allen) ______

RECOMMENDATION: THAT the C.A.O.’s Report to Council regarding the Request for Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation for FIT Ground Mount Solar Installation by Endura Energy Developments Inc. at 2627 Highway 7 (Wells/Allen) be received;

AND THAT, on the basis that the Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soil Study confirms that there are no Class 1, 2, 3 or organic soils affected by the proposed solar installation, the Clerk be authorized to bring forward the Municipal Council Support Resolution as prescribed by the Ontario Power Authority.

Background In November of 2012, the Ministry of Energy relaunched its Renewable Energy Program in Ontario. This program governs applications to the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) for renewable energy projects under the Feed in Tariff (FIT) and MicroFIT programs. The window for FIT 3.0 applications is opening on November 4, 2013. At its October 21, 2013 meeting, Council received a request for a Municipal Support Council Resolution for a proposed solar installation by Endura Energy at 2627 Highway 7. At the time of the initial report, Council deferred its decision pending the submission of an Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soil Study.

Analysis The subject lands are owned by Thomas Wells and Meaghan Allen. The Wells/Allen property is located on the south side of the highway between Blezard Line and Cameron Line in Part Lot 26, Concession 1, Otonabee Ward. To assist in the Township staff in reviewing the applications, the Township requested: - Written request for municipal confirmation of support (see attached) - Property owner authorization - Site sketch showing the location of the proposed solar installation on the property (part of submission) - Any other relevant information Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 74 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

The lands are designated Agricultural in the Township Official Plan and zoned Agricultural in the Township Zoning By-law. As the lands are designated as Prime Agricultural, Endura has provided an Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soils study to confirm that there are no Classes 1, 2, 3 or Organic soils located within the site area for the ground mounted solar installation. It should be noted that the portion of the property evaluated (7 acres) is larger than the proposed area for the solar installation (4-5 acres) which is in the easterly portion of the identified site. (See October 21st report.)

The subject lands are set back into the property and screened from Highway 7 and neighbours by the existing tree lines. Additional visual screening may also be provided as prescribed by the OPA. The setbacks from the property lines exceed the minimum 20 metres required by the OPA.

On the basis of the information previously provided and the Agricultural Land Evaluation and Soils Study, the FIT application appears to meet the requirements of the OPA requirements with respect to land use. Township staff has no further questions.

Budget Implications There are no budget implications.

Notice & Communications There is no notice required under the FIT program.

Prepared by: E.J. Rath, CAO

Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development [email protected]

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 75 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 76 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 77 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 78 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 79 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 80 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 81 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 82 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 83 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 84 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 85 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 86 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 87 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

120 Adelaide Street West, Suite 1600 Toronto, Ontario M5H 1T1

T 416-967-7474 F 416-967-1947 www.powerauthority.on.ca INSTRUCTIONS: MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SUPPORT RESOLUTION (Section 5.1(g)(i) of the FIT Rules, Version 3.0)

Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the FIT Rules, Version 3.0.

INSTRUCTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL RESOLUTIONS

1. The instruction page is not required to be submitted with the hard copy Application materials.

2. The first page of the resolution must be marked, by the Applicant, with the FIT reference number associated with the Application.

3. Where the resolution has multiple pages, the resolution should be stapled.

4. Information provided in the resolution must be consistent with the information provided in the electronic Application Form in order for the Application to be awarded Priority Points.

5. Apart from the completion of any blanks in the template resolution, no amendments, other than those outlined in paragraph 6 below, may be made to the wording of this form.

6. Words in between square brackets (i.e. “[” and “]”) are immaterial to the intent of the template resolution and may be modified to follow standard procedure of the issuing body. Wording not contained within square brackets must not be changed in order for the Application to be awarded Priority Points.

7. The entirety of the resolution (all blanks) must be completed in order for the Application to be awarded Priority Points.

INSTRUCTIONS SPECIFIC TO THE RESOLUTION

9. Local Municipal councils have the option of drafting the Template: Municipal Council Support Resolution on the Council or equivalent governing body letterhead. The language of the Template: Municipal Council Support Resolution must be the same as shown in the template in order for the Applicant to obtain Priority Points. The OPA does not award Priority Points if the resolution includes additional conditions or delegation of authority to staff for additional approvals.

10. The separate Prescribed Form: Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation may be completed and provided to the OPA by an Applicant that had received a FIT Rules, Version 2.1 Template: Municipal Council Support Resolution (that was not a blanket support resolution) that was issued by the Local Municipality prior to October 9, 2013 in relation to the Applicant and the Project. The Prescribed Form: Municipal Council Support Resolution Confirmation may not be used as a substitute for a Municipal Council Support Resolution where no Municipal Council Support Resolution was issued for the Project previously.

11. Where no resolution number exists, insert "N/A" into the appropriate field.

Oct 2013 Page i of i

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 88 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 89 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8e)

120 Adelaide Street West, Suite 1600 Toronto, Ontario M5H 1T1

T 416-967-7474 F 416-967-1947 www.powerauthority.on.ca TEMPLATE: MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SUPPORT RESOLUTION (Section 5.1(g)(i) of the FIT Rules, Version 3.0) OPARP/f-FIT-012r1

Resolution NO: Date:

[WHEREAS] capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the FIT Rules, Version 3.0.

[AND WHEREAS] (the "Applicant") proposes to construct and operate a

(the "Project") on (the "Lands") in

under the Province's FIT Program;

[AND WHEREAS] the Applicant has requested that Council of indicate by resolution Council's support for the construction and operation of the Project on the Property;

[AND WHEREAS], pursuant to the FIT Rules, Version 3.0, Applications whose Projects receive the formal support of Local Municipalities will be awarded Priority Points, which may result in the Applicant being offered a FIT Contract prior to other Persons applying for FIT Contracts;

[NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT]:

Council of the supports the construction and operation of the Project on the Lands.

This resolution's sole purpose is to enable the Applicant to receive Priority Points under the FIT Program and may not be used for the purpose of any other form of municipal approval in relation to the Application or Project or any other purpose.

Title:

Title:

(signature lines for elected representatives.)

FIT reference number:

(The reference number must be inserted by the Applicant in order for the resolution to comply with the FIT rules, even where Local Municipal letterhead is used. This is not to be inserted by the Local Municipality.)

Oct 2013 Page 1 of 1

CAO Report - Agricultural Study Page 90 of 154 for Solar Application at 2627 ... Agenda Item # 8f)

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Peter Nielsen, Manager of Technical Services

Date: October 16, 2013

Subject: Rural Economic Development (RED) Application Highway 115 Gateway Sign

Recommendation:

That Council endorses the application to the Provincial Rural Economic Development (RED) program for the installation of a Gateway (Decorative Municipal Display) Sign at an acceptable sign location for northbound traffic along Provincial Hwy. 115, and further;

That Council authorizes the Warden and the Clerk to enter into an Agreement with the Province of Ontario in support of the RED application, and further;

That Council authorizes staff to proceed with an application to the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) for an acceptable sign location for northbound traffic along Hwy. 115, and further;

That funding of the 50% share of costs be provided from reserves as part of the 2014 budget.

Financial Impact:

Financial impact to implement the project estimated at $51,000 plus staff salary expenses.

Background:

With the next Provincial Rural Economic Development (RED) program start slated for October 31, 2013, County staff is requesting the endorsement of Council for an application to the Provincial RED program to install a Gateway (Decorative Municipal Display) Sign at an appropriate sign location along Provincial Hwy. 115.

Staff is also requesting authorization to apply to the MTO for an acceptable sign location along Hwy. 115 so that the most appropriate site can be selected and secured in order to expedite the site selection process.

CAO - Letter of Support - Re: Page 91 of 154 County RED application ... Agenda Item # 8f)

Page 2

The proposed project involves engaging a graphic artist to prepare a dynamic sign design, securing approvals from the MTO for an appropriate sign location along Hwy. 115 and engaging professional consultants (structural, electrical, landscape) and contractors to design, manufacture and install the Gateway Sign feature.

A Committee of County Council is proposed to oversee the development of a design concept (brand) which will assist in marketing and promoting this community as a place to live, work and play.

The make-up of the Committee is proposed to include Warden J. Murray Jones and his designate(s) who will review a number of design concepts and achieve a consensus on the preferred design concept to be implemented for the Gateway sign.

The ideal design concept will reflect the features and assets of the Peterborough County community by representing the geography, the economic opportunities, various industries (ie. agriculture, etc.), recreational activities and historic features within this rural region.

Overview:

The primary objective of this project is to pursue opportunities to establish a greater visual presence at this key entry point into the County of Peterborough through the use of a Gateway Sign.

At many locations along the Province's highways, Decorative Municipal Display Signs are used to welcome many tourists and to invite new businesses into their communities as a means of economic development.

Provincial Highway 115 accommodates more than 20,000 vehicles per day on average. Through the utilization of a large pictorial sign located within the Hwy. 115 corridor, this sign will visually show travellers what the County has to offer and will assist in promoting tourism, shopping and industry in this community.

Implementation of the design concept will be achieved through the installation of one 20m X 5m (approximate) sign for viewing by northbound traffic along Provincial Highway 115 at this busy entry point into the County.

In accordance with Ontario Traffic Manual Book 8, one “Decorative Municipal Display Sign” for each direction of travel may be approved by the MTO for installation along a freeway. Signs must be placed outside of the Clear Zone of the highway.

Display designs are restricted to the community name and municipal logo or slogan and a Council resolution is required to support a sign application.

CAO - Letter of Support - Re: Page 92 of 154 County RED application ... Agenda Item # 8f)

Page 3

At an early stage to this project, the design concept of the core message and image to be depicted on the Gateway Sign will be developed by a Committee of County Council through the design services of a graphic artist.

Prior to the onset of winter, staff would hope to meet with MTO representatives to review and select a preferred site for the Decorative Municipal Display Sign which will satisfy the requirements of the MTO.

Once a design has been selected, the search for fabricators to manufacture the sign will be able to commence.

The size of the sign must be of significance in order to achieve the desired visual effect for vehicles travelling at high speeds along Hwy. 115.

A consultant with varied expertise in structural, electrical and landscape design will be required to manage the design and installation of the sign by an expert contractor with similar varied expertise.

Estimated Project Timelines and Costs:

Time Estimated Project Activity Outcome Frame Expenditure 1 Engage Graphic Artist to Approval of sign design Jan. 14 prepare design concepts for $15,000 concept by Council – Apr. 14 Committee approval Committee 2 Oct. 13 – Approval by MTO of MTO Application $2,000 Apr. 14 proposed sign location 3 Issue quotation for Delivery of 115 Gateway May 14 manufacture of Gateway Sign $20,000 Sign – Aug 14 & structure & structure 4 Issue RFP to engage Design May 14 Structural, electrical and $25,000 Consultant (design/tender/CA) – Aug 14 landscaping designs 5 Issue quotation for Sept 14 Installation of sign structure, $40,000 structure/electrical/landscaping – Dec 14 electrical & landscaping

Summary:

This project represents an excellent opportunity to develop a marketing brand and greater visual presence at this key entry point into the County of Peterborough.

The visual appeal of a dynamic Gateway Sign will increase the awareness of travellers that they are entering the County of Peterborough and that the County is "open for business", particularly by establishing a presence on the Highway 115 corridor.

CAO - Letter of Support - Re: Page 93 of 154 County RED application ... Agenda Item # 8f)

Page 4

There is a growing need to promote the local economy through increased awareness of the services and opportunities provided within the County.

The Hwy. 115 Gateway Sign project will assist in promoting business development, investment attraction, infrastructure development and marketing and communications.

The Hwy. 115 Gateway Sign design concept may also be used as a marketing brand by the lower tier municipalities, local businesses and other organizations to promote their presence within the County of Peterborough, thereby extending the reach of this project throughout the Province of Ontario and beyond.

Respectfully submitted,

Originally signed by

Peter Nielsen, Manager of Technical Services

CAO - Letter of Support - Re: Page 94 of 154 County RED application ... Agenda Item # 8f)

The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan

November 14, 2013

Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Economic Development Division Programs Operations Unit Ontario Government Bldg. 4th Flr. 1 Stone Rd. W. Guelph, Ont. N1G4Y2

Attention: Janna Arntz-Gray, Project Analyst

Re: County of Peterborough RED Project - File 6021 Highway 115 Municipal Gateway Display Sign

On behalf of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, I offer this letter of support for the County of Peterborough application to the Provincial Rural Economic Development (RED) program for the installation of the Gateway (Decorative Municipal Display) Sign to be installed along Provincial Highway 115.

The Gateway Sign project will be of importance to this community in our efforts to promote the economic prosperity of the area Townships that make up this County of Peterborough.

The Gateway Sign project will establish a greater visual presence at this key entry point into the County of Peterborough and will assist in promoting business development, investment attraction, infrastructure development and marketing and communications. Please feel free to contact me should you require additional information.

Thank you.

Yours truly,

Eleanor J. Rath, CMO Chief Administrative Officer/Director of Planning & Economic Development

From the Office of the CAO

Email: [email protected] www.osmtownship.ca (705) 295-6852 or (705) 295-6405 fax

CAO - Letter of Support - Re: Page 95 of 154 County RED application ... Agenda Item # 8g)

The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan

BY EMAIL November 14, 2013

County of Peterborough 470 Water Street, PETERBOROUGH ON K9H 3M3

ATTN: Gary King CAO and Bryan Weir, Director of Planning

Dear Gary & Bryan:

RE: County Development Charges (DC) By‐law Amendments

Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed Development Charge By‐law amendments to provide lower rates for certain multi‐residential developments and to reduce the non‐residential charge.

As a result of the staff review, the Township is seeking one point of clarification. The definition of “multi‐residential” as set out in the draft by‐law is “one of three of more dwelling units located on the same lot as part of a residential use”. Based on this definition, can you confirm that a row house dwelling of three or more dwelling units constructed on individual lots and/or a block of land to be subdivided into free standing parcels lots through the removing of part lot control would continue to fall within the definition of a single dwelling unit and be subject to the development charge accordingly?

The Township staff also noticed a minor typographical error in the third paragraph of the draft by‐law. The date of the public meeting should be November 20th, 2013 not the 19th.

Thank you in advance for your response to our question and once again for the opportunity to make comments prior to the passage of the County Development Charges By‐law amendment.

Yours truly,

Eleanor J. Rath, CMO Chief Administrative Officer/Director of Planning & Economic Development

From the Office of the CAO

Email: [email protected] www.osmtownship.ca (705) 295-6852 or (705) 295-6405 fax

CAO Letter to County - Proposed Page 96 of 154 County Development Charge By- ... Agenda Item # 9a)

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN

BY-LAW NO. 2013-54

Being a By-law to appoint an Occasional Building Official ______

WHEREAS under the provisions of Section 3(2) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, Chapter B.13, as amended, the Council of a municipality shall appoint a Chief Building Official and such inspectors as are necessary for the purposes of the enforcement of the Act;

AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan deems it necessary to appoint an Occasional Building Official in the absence of the Chief Building Official;

NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan hereby enacts as follows:

1. That Doug Bowman (B.C.I.N. #19505) be and is hereby appointed an Occasional Building Official for the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan.

2. That this appointment shall be effective immediately.

Read a first time this 4th day of November, 2013

Read a second time this 4th day of November, 2013

Read a third time and finally passed this 4th day of November A.D. 2013.

______Head of Council – David P. Nelson

______Clerk – Heather Scott

2013-54 Appointment of Page 97 of 154 Occasional Building Official ... Agenda Item # 9b)

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN BY-LAW NUMBER 2013 - 55

BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES OF ONTARIO.

WHEREAS the Council of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan did enter into an agreement with Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services on the 1st day of September 2009 for the provision of Police Services in accordance with Section 10 of the Police Services Act;

AND WHEREAS pursuant to Section 32 of the Agreement, each party may amend the Agreement by written Agreement;

AND WHEREAS the parties wish to amend Section 29 of the Agreement to extend the duration of the contract from the 31st of August 2014 to the 31st of December 2014;

AND WHEREAS it is deemed necessary to authorize the execution of an Amending Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the Reeve and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, an Amending Agreement with Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety.

Read a First time this 18th day of November, 2013 Read a Second time this 18th day of November, 2013 Read a Third time and finally passed this 18th day November A.D. 2013.

______Reeve – David P. Nelson

______Clerk – Heather Scott

2013-55 Amending Agreement - Page 98 of 154 OPP Contract

... Agenda Item # 9b)

This AMENDING AGREEMENT, made in four (4) originally executed copies, is from the 1st day of September, 2014 to the 31st day of December, 2014.

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO

as represented by

THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES (“Ontario")

-and-

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE – SOUTH MONAGHAN (“the Municipality”)

BACKGROUND

A. The Parties entered into the Agreement for the provision of Police Services under Section 10 of the Police Services Act (the "Agreement") which commenced on the 1st day of September, 2009.

B. The Agreement includes all the Schedules and Appendices to the Agreement.

C. Pursuant to Section 32 the Parties may amend the Agreement by written agreement.

D. The Parties wish to amend the Agreement as set out in this Amending Agreement, by extending the duration of the contract to conclude on the 31st day of December 2014, as supported by By-law # 2013-55 dated the 18th day of November, 2013, of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee – South Monaghan, (attached as Schedule “A-2”).

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

Section 29 of the Agreement shall be replaced with the following:

29. Notwithstanding the date upon which this Agreement is signed, the term of this Agreement shall commence on the 1st day of September, 2009, and shall conclude on the 31st day of December, 2014.

2013-55 Amending Agreement - Page 99 of 154 OPP Contract

... Agenda Item # 9b)

Relevant terms and conditions of the Agreement, that are not specifically amended but that relate to the amendments set out in this Amending Agreement shall be deemed to be amended so as to give effect to the changes herein.

Except for the amendments set out herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and time shall remain of the essence.

Notwithstanding the date upon which this Amending Agreement is signed, this Amending Agreement is effective from the 1st day of September 2014, and shall conclude on the 31st day of December, 2014.

FOR ONTARIO ______The Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

FOR THE MUNICIPALITY ______Reeve – David P. Nelson

______Clerk - Heather Scott

Date signed by the Municipality:______

2013-55 Amending Agreement - Page 100 of 154 OPP Contract

... Agenda Item # 9b)

Schedule “A-2”

BY-LAW OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

2013-55 Amending Agreement - Page 101 of 154 OPP Contract

... Agenda Item # 9c)

SOURCE PROTECTION MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION FUND

GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN

BY-LAW NUMBER 2013 – 56

BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT ______

WHEREAS the Council of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan deems it desirable to enter into an agreement with Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Environment under the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund which provides one-time funding to offset a portion of the costs for small, rural municipalities in preparing to implement and implementing source protection plans.

NOW THEREFORE THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the Reeve and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, an Agreement with Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Environment for funding under the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund.

Read a First time this 18th day of November, 2013

Read a Second time this 18th day of November, 2013 Read a Third time and finally passed this 7th day January A.D. 2013.

______Reeve – David P. Nelson

______Clerk – Heather Scott

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 102 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

SOURCE PROTECTION MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION FUND

GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT

THE AGREEMENT effective as of December 13, 2013 (the “Effective Date”).

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO as represented by the Minister of the Environment

(the “Province”)

- and -

The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan

(the “Municipality”)

BACKGROUND:

The Province funds projects similar to the Project, defined in Article 1.

As described in Schedule A, the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund provides one-time funding to offset a portion of the costs for small, rural municipalities in preparing to implement and implementing source protection plans.

The Municipality requires funding from the Province to assist the Municipality in carrying out the Project and the Province wishes to provide such funds.

CONSIDERATION:

In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are expressly acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS

1.1 In the Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

“Agreement” means this agreement entered into between the Province and the

Page 2 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 103 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement Municipality and includes all of the schedules listed in section 19.1 and any amendments.

“Conflict of Interest” includes any circumstances where in relation to its performance under the Agreement, the Municipality’s or its officers, employees or agents other commitments, relationships or financial interests could, or could be seen to, interfere with the Municipality’s objective, unbiased and impartial judgment relating to the Project and the use of the Funds or could, or could be seen to, compromise, impair or be incompatible with the effective performance of its contractual obligations.

“Funds” means the money the Province provides to the Municipality pursuant to the Agreement.

“Indemnified Parties” means her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario, her ministers, agents, appointees and employees.

“Maximum Funds” means a total amount of up to $83,302 which consists of $68,302 together with up to $15,000 collaboration incentive funding (if applicable) as determined by the Province pursuant to section 3.1(a).

“Project” means any of the eligible activities described in section B.1 of Schedule “B” undertaken by the Municipality.

ARTICLE 2

TERM OF THE AGREEMENT

2.1 The term of the Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire on March 31, 2016 unless terminated earlier pursuant to Article 9. The Municipality shall, upon expiry or termination of the Agreement, return to the Province any Funds remaining in its possession or under its control.

ARTICLE 3

FUNDS AND CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT

3.1 The Province shall:

(a) based upon the Province’s assessment of the information provided by the Municipality in the collaboration statement set out in Schedule “D”, determine the exact amount of the $15,000 collaboration incentive funding which will form part of the Maximum Funds and provide notification of that exact amount to the Municipality;

(b) provide the Municipality up to the Maximum Funds for the purpose of carrying out the Project; and

Page 3 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 104 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement (c) provide the Funds to the Municipality in accordance with the payment schedule attached to the Agreement as Schedule “C” or at any other time for any reason in the sole discretion of the Province.

3.2 Despite section 3.1 the Province:

(a) is not obligated to provide instalments of Funds until it has approved the reports as set out in Schedule “C”;

(b) may adjust the amount of Funds it provides to the Municipality based upon the Province’s assessment of the information provided by the Municipality pursuant to section 6.1.

3.3 The Municipality shall:

(a) carry out the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and in compliance with all federal and provincial laws and regulations, all municipal by-laws, and any other orders, rules and by-laws related to any aspect of the Project;

(b) use the Funds only for the purpose of carrying out the Project;

(c) subject to section 3.3 (d), spend the Funds only on eligible costs and eligible activities as set out in Schedule “B”; and

(d) notwithstanding anything else in this Agreement, not spend the Funds on any ineligible activities or ineligible costs as set out in Schedule “B”.

3.4 The Municipality shall not make any changes to the Project without the prior written consent of the Province.

3.5 The Municipality acknowledges that the Funds available to it from the Province pursuant to the Agreement shall not exceed the Maximum Funds. The Municipality undertakes to incur all costs associated with the Project should it exceed the Maximum Funds.

3.6 The Province is not the owner of any intellectual property generated as a result of the Agreement.

ARTICLE 4

ACQUISITION

4.1 The Municipality agrees that if it buys any supplies, equipment or services with the Funds, it will ensure the best value for money.

Page 4 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 105 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement ARTICLE 5

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

5.1 The Municipality shall avoid any Conflict of Interest in the performance of this Agreement and shall disclose to the Province, without delay, any actual or potential Conflict of Interest.

ARTICLE 6

REPORTING, ACCOUNTING AND REVIEW

6.1 The Municipality shall submit to the Province all reports set out in Schedule “D” or any other reports as required by the Province. All reports will be approved by the Province.

6.2 The Province, its authorized representatives or an independent auditor identified by the Province may, at its own expense, upon twenty-four hours’ notice to the Municipality and during normal business hours, enter upon the Municipality’s premises to review the progress of the Project and the Municipality’s expenditure of the Funds and, for these purposes, the Province, its authorized representatives or an independent auditor identified by the Province may:

(a) inspect and copy any financial records (including invoices) and non-financial documents and records relating to the Funds or otherwise to the Project; and

(b) conduct an audit or investigation of the Municipality in respect of the expenditure of the Funds and/or the Project.

6.3 To assist in respect of the rights set out in section 6.2, the Municipality shall disclose any information requested by the Province, its authorized representatives or an independent auditor identified by the Province, and shall do so in a form requested by the Province, its authorized representatives or an independent auditor identified by the Province, as the case may be.

ARTICLE 7

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNITY

7.1 The Province’s officers, employees and agents shall not be liable to the Municipality or any of the Municipality’s personnel for costs, losses, claims, liabilities and damages howsoever caused (including any incidental, indirect, special or consequential damages, injury or any loss of use or profit of the Municipality) arising out of or in any way related to the Project or otherwise in connection with the Agreement, unless solely caused by the negligence or wilful misconduct of the Province’s officers, employees and agents.

Page 5 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 106 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

7.2 The Municipality shall indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages and expenses (including legal, expert and consultant fees), causes of action, actions, claims, demands, lawsuits or other proceedings, by whomever made, sustained, incurred, brought or prosecuted, in any way arising out of or in connection with the Project or otherwise in connection with the Agreement, unless solely caused by the negligence or wilful misconduct of the Province and its agents, appointees and employees.

ARTICLE 8

INSURANCE

8.1 Municipality’s Insurance. The Municipality represents and warrants that it has, and shall maintain for the term of the Agreement, at its own cost and expense, with insurers having a secure A.M. Best rating of B+ or greater, or the equivalent, all the necessary and appropriate insurance that a prudent person carrying out a project similar to the Project would maintain, including commercial general liability insurance on an occurrence basis for third party bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, to an inclusive limit of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence. The policy shall include the following:

(a) the Indemnified Parties as additional insureds with respect to liability arising in the course of performance of the Municipality’s obligations under, or otherwise in connection with, the Agreement;

(b) a cross-liability clause;

(c) contractual liability coverage; and

(d) a 30 day written notice of cancellation, termination or material change.

8.2 The Municipality shall provide the Province with certificates of insurance, or other proof as may be requested by the Province, that confirms the insurance coverage as provided for in section 8.1. Upon the request of the Province, the Municipality shall make available to the Province a copy of each insurance policy.

ARTICLE 9

TERMINATION

9.1 The Province in its sole discretion, without liability, cost or penalty, and without prejudice to any other rights or remedies of the Province under this Agreement or at law or in equity, may terminate the Agreement at any time, for any reason, upon giving at least 15 days notice to the Municipality.

Page 6 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 107 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

9.2 If the Province terminates the Agreement, the Province may (i) demand the repayment of any Funds remaining in the possession or under the control of the Municipality and/or (ii) determine the reasonable costs for the Municipality to wind down the Project, and permit the Municipality to offset those wind down costs against any amount owing pursuant to (i); and/or (iii) subject to section 3.5, provide Funds to the Municipality to cover those wind down costs.

ARTICLE 10

REPAYMENT

10.1 If, pursuant to the provisions of the Financial Administration Act (Ontario), the Province does not receive the necessary appropriation from the Ontario Legislature for payment under the Agreement, the Province is not obligated to make any such payment, and, as a consequence, the Province may (i) reduce the amount of the Funds and, in consultation with the Municipality, change the Project or (ii) immediately terminate the Agreement. If the Province terminates the Agreement, the Province may (i) cancel all further instalments of Funds, and/or (ii) demand repayment as set out in Section 9.2(i) and/or (iii) determine reasonable costs as set out in Section 9.2(ii) and/or section 9.2(iii).

10.2 If in the sole opinion of the Province, the Municipality breaches any representation, warranty, covenant or other material term of the Agreement, fails to carry out the Project, fails to provide reports or improperly uses or spends Funds, the Province may (i) demand the repayment of any Funds remaining in the possession or under the control of the Municipality, (ii) demand the repayment of an amount equal to any Funds the Municipality used, but did not use in accordance with the Agreement, and/or (iii) demand the repayment of an amount equal to any Funds the Province provided to the Municipality.

10.3 If the Municipality fails to pay any amount demanded by the Province, the Municipality acknowledges and agrees that the Province may deduct any unpaid amount from any money payable to the Municipality by the Province, or may exercise any other remedies available to the Province to collect the unpaid amounts.

10.4 The Municipality shall pay any money owing to the Province by cheque payable to the “Ontario Minister of Finance” and mailed to the Province at the address provided in section 11.1

ARTICLE 11

NOTICE

11.1 Notice shall be in writing and shall be delivered by email, postage-prepaid mail, personal delivery or fax, and shall be addressed to the Province and the Municipality respectively as set out below, or as either party later designates to the other by notice:

Page 7 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 108 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

To the Province:

Ministry of the Environment 40 St. Clair Ave. West, 14th Floor Toronto, ON M4V 1M2

Attention: Manager, Source Protection Implementation, Source Protection Programs Branch

Fax: 416-212-2757 Email: [email protected]

To the Municipality:

Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan P.O. Box 70, 20 Third Street Keene, Ontario K0L 2G0

Attention: Eleanor J. Rath, CAO

Fax: (705) 295-6405 Email: [email protected]

11.2 Notices shall be deemed to have been received (a) in the case of postage-prepaid mail, 7 days after a party mails the notice; or (b) in the case of email, personal delivery or fax, at the time the other party receives the notice. In the event of a postal disruption, notice by postage-prepaid mail shall not be deemed to be received and the party giving notice shall provide notice by email, personal delivery or by fax.

ARTICLE 12

MUNICIPALITY’S POWER TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT

12.1 The Municipality represents and warrants that it has the full power and authority to enter into the Agreement.

ARTICLE 13

SEVERABILITY OF PROVISIONS

13.1 The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of the Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of the Agreement. Any invalid or unenforceable provision shall be deemed to be severed.

Page 8 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 109 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement ARTICLE 14

WAIVER

14.1 If a party fails to comply with any term of the Agreement, that party may only rely on a waiver of the other party if the other party has provided a written waiver in accordance with the notice provisions in Article 11. Any waiver must refer to a specific failure to comply and shall not have the effect of waiving any subsequent failures to comply.

ARTICLE 15

INDEPENDENT PARTIES

15.1 The Municipality acknowledges that it is not an agent, joint venturer, partner or employee of the Province, and the Municipality shall not take any actions that could establish or imply such a relationship.

ARTICLE 16

GOVERNING LAW

16.1 The Agreement and the rights, obligations and relations of the parties shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the applicable federal laws of Canada. Any actions or proceedings arising in connection with the Agreement shall be conducted in Ontario.

ARTICLE 17

FORCE MAJEURE

17.1 Neither party shall be liable for damages caused by delay or failure to perform its obligations under the Agreement where such delay or failure is caused by an event beyond its reasonable control.

ARTICLE 18

SURVIVAL

18.1 The provisions in Article 1, any other applicable definitions, sections 3.1(b), 3.1 (c), 6.1 (to the extent that the Municipality has not provided the reports to the satisfaction of the Province), 6.2, 6.3, Article 7, Section 9.2, Articles 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, 19, and 20, and all applicable cross-referenced provisions and schedules shall continue in full force and effect for a period of 7 years from the date of expiry or termination of the Agreement.

Page 9 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 110 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

ARTICLE 19

SCHEDULES

19.1 The Agreement includes the following schedules: (a) Schedule “A” – Background and Objectives; (b) Schedule “B” – Eligible Costs and Activities; (c) Schedule “C” - Payment; and (d) Schedule “D” - Reports.

ARTICLE 20

ENTIRE AGREEMENT

20.1 The Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter contained in the Agreement and supersedes all prior oral or written representations and agreements.

20.2 The Agreement may only be amended by a written agreement duly executed by the parties.

Page 10 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 111 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

The parties have executed the Agreement as of the Effective Date.

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO

as represented by the Minister of the Environment

______Name: Ling Mark Title: Director, Source Protection Programs Branch Pursuant to delegated authority

Date: ______

The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan

______Name: David P. Nelson Title: Reeve Date: November 18, 2013

______Name: Heather Scott Title: Clerk Date: November 18, 2013 I/We have authority to bind the Municipality.

Page 11 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 112 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

Schedule “A” BACKGROUND and OBJECTIVES A.1 BACKGROUND

Ontario is committed to protecting drinking water from source to tap. The Clean Water Act, 2006 enables communities to protect their drinking water sources through the preparation of collaborative, locally developed, science-based assessment reports and source protection plans.

Municipalities have a key role to play in implementing these plans. On May 2, 2013 the Province announced, as part of the 2013 Ontario Budget, an investment to help support small municipalities protect existing and future sources of drinking water. The Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund provides one-time funding to offset a portion of the costs for small, rural municipalities.

A.2 FUND OBJECTIVES

A.2.1 Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund Objective and Goals

The objective of the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund is to provide funding to assist small, rural municipalities in fulfilling policy obligations for significant drinking water threats as specified in an approved or proposed source protection plan that has been submitted for approval.

Those with policy obligations under source protection plans, including municipalities, are required to undertake preparatory activities such as acquiring the necessary resources (human, financial and technical) to position themselves to deliver on their obligations under the Clean Water Act, 2006 and source protection plans.

The goals of the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund are to help build municipal capacity to implement source protection plans; and support sustainable, local actions to protect drinking water.

A.2.2 Project Objectives

The objectives of the Project are for the Municipality to use the Funds toward fulfilling their responsibility to implement one or more of the following significant drinking water threat policies in an approved or proposed source protection plan that has been submitted for approval:  Policies for the purpose of Part IV of the Clean Water Act, 2006;  Policies that govern Planning Act decisions;  Policies that establish education and outreach programs; or  Policies that specify other types of actions the municipality is required to take.

Page 12 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 113 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

A.3 COLLABORATION INCENTIVE

To support the development of sustainable, local actions to protect drinking water and to help increase collaboration efforts among municipalities, up to $15,000 in funding from the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund is available to each eligible municipality that collaborates with other municipalities. The Maximum Funds amount referenced in Article 1 includes the amount of up to $15,000. As set out in section 3.1(a), the Province will determine the exact amount of the collaboration incentive funding based on the information set out in the collaboration statement referred to in Schedule “D.” In order to receive any of the $15,000, the Municipality must complete the collaboration statement and provide it to the Province by the due date shown in Schedule “D”. The Province will subsequently notify the Municipality of the amount of collaboration incentive funding the Municipality is entitled to, based on the collaboration statement.

The Municipality’s eligibility for this collaboration incentive funding is dependent upon the number of other municipalities that the Municipality has joined with to perform the Project. The Municipality may receive one of following amounts: $5,000 for collaborating with one to two other municipalities; or $10,000 for collaborating with three other municipalities, or $15,000 for collaborating with four or more other municipalities.

To be eligible for this collaboration incentive funding, the Municipality must meet the following criteria:

a) Municipal collaborator(s) are located in a source protection area and have vulnerable areas where activities could be a significant drinking water threat;

b) Collaboration activities are related to the eligible activities listed in Schedule “B,” section B.1; and

c) Collaboration activities must take place within a reasonable time frame.

Page 13 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 114 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

SCHEDULE “B”

ELIGIBLE COSTS and activities

B.1 Eligible Activities

The Municipality may only spend the Funds on the following eligible activities undertaken by the Municipality, or are undertaken on the Municipality’s behalf, between December 13, 2013 and December 7, 2015 that are directly related to the following:

Risk management

a) Establishing and enforcing risk management plans under Part IV of the Clean Water Act, 2006;

b) Communication with landowners affected by policies pertaining to Part IV of the Clean Water Act, 2006;

c) Refining the number of threats within the Municipality pertaining to Part IV of the Clean Water Act, 2006;

Land use policies

d) Implementing the Municipality’s municipal land-use planning policies related to activities that are identified as significant drinking water threats;

Education and outreach

e) Implementing education and outreach policies to address significant drinking water threats;

Other activities

f) Working with the local source protection authority and local source protection committee to understand the Municipality’s requirements under the source protection plan;

g) Developing and/or modifying the Municipality’s business processes in order to implement significant drinking water threat policies;

h) Establishing processes for information sharing among municipalities and source protection authorities;

Page 14 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 115 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement i) Developing a reporting framework for the Municipality that aligns with the collection of data under section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07, made under the Clean Water Act, 2006; and

j) Other activities the Municipality undertakes to fulfill its requirements to implement significant drinking water threat policies.

B.2 Ineligible Activities

The following activities are not eligible for funding under the Agreement and the Municipality may not spend the Funds on the following:

a) Refining the number of threats within the Municipality not pertaining to Part IV of the Clean Water Act, 2006;

b) Threat refinement work already funded by the Province through source protection authorities;

c) Activities that are already funded through another program, funding body, partners, or other means;

d) Activities that are funded by the Source Protection Municipal Implementation Fund through another municipality;

e) Fulfilment of the Municipality’s responsibilities as a property owner undertaking activities identified as significant drinking water threats;

f) Fulfilment of the Municipality’s responsibilities under other legislation (e.g., Building Code); and

g) Activities not related to fulfilling the Municipality’s requirements to implement significant drinking water threat policies specified in an approved or proposed source protection plan that has been submitted for approval.

B.3 Eligible Costs

The eligible costs listed below must be directly related to the source protection implementation activities outlined in B.1:

a) Municipal staff salaries and benefits for time spent working on the Project (such as hiring or re-assigning Municipal staff to serve as Risk Management Officials and Risk Management Inspectors as specified under the Clean Water Act, 2006; or administrative support required to establish and/or maintain the Risk Management Office);

b) Fees incurred for contracted professional services from professionals, technical personnel, consultants, and contractors for work on the Project (such as hiring a consultant to support the Risk Management Official in determining appropriate measures the Municipality should include in a risk management plan); and Page 15 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 116 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

c) Printing and distribution costs related to education and outreach programs and activities necessary to implement a source protection plan.

B.4 Ineligible Costs

The following costs are not eligible for funding under the Agreement and the Municipality may not spend the Funds on the following:

a) Travel, meals, accommodation and hospitality;

b) Overhead (such as rent, utilities, human resources services, office supplies);

c) Capital (such as vehicles, office furniture, computers, software licenses, etc.);

d) Training (including staff and contracted professional services associated with training);

e) Land expropriation or purchase;

f) Incentives or compensation for property owners; and

g) Costs for establishing risk management plans if costs have been or will be recovered from property owners.

Page 16 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 117 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

Schedule “C”

Payment

MILESTONE AMOUNT Following Province execution of Agreement $27,446 Following Province approval of progress report $27,235 as indicated in Schedule D (if applicable) Following Province approval of collaboration Up to $15,000 as statement as indicated in Schedule D (if determined by the Province applicable) (see Schedule “A,” section A.3) Following Province approval of final report as $13,621 indicated in Schedule D

Page 17 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 118 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement

Schedule “D”

Reports

Name of Report Due Date

Collaboration Statement (if December 12, 2014 applicable)

Progress Report December 12, 2014

Final Report December 11, 2015

Other Reports as specified On a date or dates specified by the Province. from time to time

Report Details

The Municipality will use the collaboration statement template to set out the following: (i) A brief description of the collaboration activities, the municipalities that are collaborating, and the lead organization for each activity;

(ii) the policies that the activities are supporting;

(iii) the timelines for each activity; and

(iv) the contact information and signatures of the collaborating municipalities.

2. The Municipality will use the progress report template which will set out the following:

(i) actions undertaken to the date of the report in relation to the eligible activities and related expenditures outlined in Schedule “B”, sections B.1 and B.3;

(ii) information on general progress under the Project, including how it is meeting the Project objectives outlined in Schedule “A”, section A.2.2;

Page 18 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 119 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9c)

Grant Funding Agreement (iii) an assessment of the Municipality’s readiness to fulfill its responsibilities under the source protection plan(s); and

(iv) an attestation confirming that all Project expenditures were spent in accordance with Schedule “B” and confirming the Project is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement signed by the Chief Administrative Officer, or equivalent unless otherwise agreed to by the Province.

3. The Municipality will use the final report template which will include the following:

(i) a final description of the actions undertaken in relation to the eligible activities and related expenditures outlined in Schedule “B”, sections B.1 and B.3;

(ii) information on all progress under the Project, including a confirmation that the Project objectives outlined in Schedule “A”, section A.2.2 were met;

(iii) a final assessment of the Municipality’s readiness to fulfill its responsibilities under the source protection plan(s);

(iv) an attestation confirming that all Project expenditures were spent in accordance with Schedule “B” and confirming the Project is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement signed by the Chief Administrative Officer, or equivalent unless otherwise agreed to by the Province;

(v) a description of the status of the progress made as a result of the collaboration activities, including any variance from the information provided in the collaboration statement; and

(vi) an accounting of any unspent Funds and an explanation as to why there are remaining Funds.

4. Other Reports:

(i) the Province will specify the timing and content of any other Reports as may be necessary.

Page 19 of 19

2013-56 Agreement - MOE - Page 120 of 154 Source Protection Municipal ... Agenda Item # 9d)

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN

BY-LAW 2013- 57

Being a By-law to authorize the Reeve and Clerk to Execute an Agreement with Jack Clysdale East ½ of Lot 16, Concession 2 ______

WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan deems it desirable to enter into an agreement with Jack Clysdale;

NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township o f Otonabee-South Monaghan hereby enacts as follows:

1. That the Reeve and Clerk are hereby authorized to sign and affix the Seal of the Corporation to the agreement with Jack Clysdale for an agreement for East ½ Lot 16, Concession 2 for the Township to remove gravel, sand and associated products from the site;

2. That a copy of the said agreement is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law.

Read a First time this 18th day of November, 2013. Read a Second time this 18th day of November, 2013 Read a Third time and finally passed this 18th day of November, 2013 A.D. ______Reeve - David P. Nelson ______Clerk – Heather Scott

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 121 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Definitions

2. Grant of Exclusive Licence

3. Term

4. Renewal

5. Quiet Enjoyment

6. Owner’s Covenants

7. Corporation’s Covenants

8. Statements

9. Preliminary Testing

10. Timber Rights

11. Owner’s Use

12. Termination

13. Undertakings of the Corporation

14. Refusal of Application for Licence

15. Arbitration

16. Miscellaneous

(a) Payments and Communications (b) Headings (c) Entire Agreement (d) Partial Invalidity (e) Force Majeure (f) Time of the Essence (g) Non-performance (h) Number and Gender (i) Heirs and Assigns

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 2

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 122 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

SCHEDULES

“A” Legal Description “B” Application for a Licence “C” Payment schedule per tonne

THIS AGREEMENT made on the day of , 2013 “ BETWEEN:

JACK CLYSDALE, of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan in the County of Peterborough in the Province of Ontario

(hereinafter referred to as “the Owner”)

PARTY OF THE FIRST PART

- AND –

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN

(hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”)

PARTY OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS the Owner is the registered owner of certain lands and premises being composed of part of the east half of Lot 16, Concession 2, in the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, more particularly described in Schedule “A” attached hereto (hereinafter called “the Licenced Lands”);

AND WHEREAS the Corporation wishes to excavate for and remove gravel, sand and associated products (hereinafter called “Gravel Products”) from the Licenced Lands;

AND WHEREAS the Corporation has applied to the Ministry of Natural Resources pursuant to Section 7 of the Aggregate Resources Act, 1989, S.O. 1989, Chapter 23 and amendments thereto for a Class “B” licence to operate a pit or quarry on the Licenced Lands, a copy of which said application is attached hereto as Schedule “B”;

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 3

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 123 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

AND WHEREAS the Parties have decided to enter into this licence agreement to enable the Corporation to excavate for and remove the Gravel Products from the Licenced Lands;

NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS

The following terms, wherever used in this licence, shall have the meaning set forth below:

(a) “ACT” means the Aggregate Resources Act, 1989, S.O. 1989, Chapter 23 and amendments thereto.

(b) “CORPORATION” means The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan.

(c) “GRAVEL PRODUCTS” means gravel, sand and associated products.

(d) “LICENCED LANDS” means those lands being composed of part of the east half of Lot 16, Concession 2, in the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, more particularly described in Schedule “A” attached hereto.

(e) “OWNER” means Jack Clysdale and the owner or owners from time to time of the Licenced Lands as defined herein.

2. GRANT OF EXCLUSIVE LICENCE

The Owner hereby grants to the Corporation, by its servants, agents and workmen with plant machinery, equipment and vehicles an exclusive licence to enter upon the Licenced Lands and to dig for, acquire, crush, process and remove all of the Gravel Products there from or to stockpile the said Gravel Products on the said Licenced Lands and move them at a later date provided this agreement is still in full force and effect at such later date and hereby sells to the Corporation all of the said Gravel Products as and when removed from the Licenced Lands for the price per tonne, tonne of Gravel Products removed from the Licenced Lands.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 4

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 124 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

3. TERM

The exclusive licence hereby granted shall be for the period of ten (10) years, commencing on the 31st day of December, 2012 and ending on the 31st day of December 2022.

4. RENEWAL

Provided that the Corporation gives the Owner six (6) months’ notice in writing before the expiration of the term thereof, the Corporation shall have an option to renew this Licence Agreement for a further period of ten (10) years on the same terms and conditions of this Licence Agreement.

5. QUIET ENJOYMENT

Subject to the provisions of this exclusive licence, the Owner agrees that during the term hereof, the Corporation shall have quiet enjoyment of the Licenced Lands.

6. OWNER’S COVENANTS

The covenants to the Corporation as follows:

(a) that he has good and marketable title to the Licenced Lands free and clear of any and all encumbrances whatsoever and shall not subsequent to the date of this agreement encumber the Licensed Lands in any manner whatsoever without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Corporation;

(b) that he has the right to licence the Licensed Lands and to grant any rights given to the Corporation in this licence;

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 5

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 125 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

(c) that the Licenced Lands have not been dealt with in any way whatsoever that might prevent the Corporation from exercising any of the rights granted to it pursuant to the terms of this exclusive licence.

7. CORPORATION’S COVENANTS

The Corporation covenants to the Owner as follows:

(a) to conform strictly with the terms of the Class “B” licence it will obtain including all conditions contained therein;

(b) to conform strictly with all of the provisions of the Act and any regulations passed thereto;

(c) to maintain sufficient public liability insurance coverage with respect to its permitted use of the Licenced Lands;

(d) to completely fence the Licenced Lands with material supporting structures in accordance with the plans filed with and approved by the Ministry of Natural Resources

(e) not to remove any Gravel Products from portions of the Licenced Lands not previously under excavation without first providing the Owner with sufficient notice of the Corporation’s intention to do so to give the Owner an opportunity to remove any existing crops that he may have on those unexcavated portions of the Licenced Lands.

(f) to crush and deliver at no cost to the owner no more than fifty (50) tonnes of Gravel Products per year during the term hereof to be used for his own personal use and on lands of which he is the registered owner, provided however that the Corporation shall not be required to pay any fee to the Owner for the cost of such Gravel Products removed from the Licenced Lands.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 6

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 126 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

8. PAYMENT

The Corporation shall pay the agreed price per tonne as set out in “schedule C” for materials removed from the site. A review of the average unit cost shall be performed on an annual basis or at the request of either party.

9. STATEMENTS

The Corporation shall, on or before January 15th of each and every calendar year of the term hereof, deliver to the Owner a certified statement in writing signed by a designated officer of the Corporation showing in reasonable detail the amount of Gravel Products removed from the Licenced Lands for the preceding calendar year, and contemporaneously with the delivery of that statement, the Corporation shall pay to the Owner any amount payable by reason of the quantities disclosed in that statement.

10. PRELIMINARY TESTING

The Corporation shall be entitled to enter onto the Licenced Lands immediately upon the signing hereof for the purpose of making all necessary soil and drill tests to ascertain the condition, quality and location of the Gravel Products to be removed, provided that any excavations or drill holes on any portion of the Licenced Lands not subsequently worked for Gravel Products shall be filled in by the Corporation at the request of the Owner.

11. TIMBER RIGHTS

Any timber or trees cut down or removed by the Corporation for the purpose of removing Gravel Products shall remain the property of the Owner.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 7

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 127 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

12. OWNER’S USE

The Owner shall be entitled to use for any use permitted by the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Township of Otonabee- South Monaghan any of the Licenced Lands which shall not be required for the purpose of excavating or removing Gravel Products. And in the event that the permitted use by the Owner is agricultural in nature he shall erect and maintain, at his own expense, such fencing as shall be necessary to prevent any animals entering that part of the Licenced Lands required by the Corporation, and shall move such fencing at the request of the Corporation.

13. TERMINATION

(a) If at any time the Corporation shall find the Gravel Products on the Licenced Lands are not of marketable quality or of sufficient quantity to enable it to carry on its obligations, it shall be entitled to terminate this agreement upon giving the Owner fifteen (15) days’ notice in writing provided that the Corporation pays the Owner all sums payable hereunder to the date of such termination.

(b) As soon as the Corporation shall have removed all marketable Gravel Products from the Licenced Lands, and in any case on or before the termination date hereof, the Corporation shall vacate the Licenced Lands.

(c) The Corporation may terminate this exclusive licence at any time upon giving the Owner Sixty (60) days’ previous written notice of its intention to do so, and at the expiration of the sixty (60) days, this exclusive licence shall terminate accordingly.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 8

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 128 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

(d) The Owner agrees that after the termination of this exclusive licence, the Corporation shall be entitled for a period of sixty (60) days to enter on and remove from the Licenced Lands all buildings, plant, tools, machinery, appliances, equipment and stockpiles erected or placed on the Licenced Lands and any buildings, plant, tools, machinery, appliances, equipment and stockpiles not removed within that period shall become the property of the Owner. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the Corporation from removing buildings, plant, tools, machinery, appliances, equipment and stockpiles erected or placed on the Licenced Lands during the term.

(e) Nothwithstanding the foregoing, if this exclusive licence is terminated because of a default by the Corporation and money is owed to the Owner by the Corporation, the Corporation shall not have any rights to enter on and remove from the Licenced Lands buildings, plant, tools, machinery, appliances, equipment and stockpiles until such time as the Corporation’s indebtedness to the Owner has been discharged.

(f) (i) In the event of any failure of the Corporation to pay any sum due under this exclusive licence on the day or dates appointed for the payment thereof or in the event of any failure of the Corporation to perform or observe any provision of this exclusive licence to be observed or performed by the Corporation, the Owner shall have first given the Corporation twenty (20) days’ written notice of any failure to observe or perform, and the Corporation shall, within that period of twenty (20) days, have failed to commence diligently and thereafter proceeded diligently, to cur any failure to observe or perform, or if the Corporation or any agent of the Corporation shall falsify any report required to be furnished to the Owner pursuant to the terms of this exclusive licence or if the Corporation abandons or attempts to abandon the Licenced Lands or if the Licenced Lands are used by any other person than is entitled to use it, the Owner, besides any other rights or remedies he may have, pursuant to this exclusive Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 9

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 129 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

licence or by law, shall have, to the extent permitted by law, the immediate right of re-entry either by force or otherwise and may remove all people and property from the Licenced Lands and that property may be removed and stored in a public warehouse or elsewhere at the cost of, and for the account of the Corporation or sold by way of private or public sale, all without service or notice or resort to legal process and without being deemed guilty of trespass or becoming liable, for any loss or damage which may be occasioned thereby.

(g) In addition to the Owner’s right of re-entry, the Owner may by written notice terminate this exclusive licence, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies he may have including, without limitation, the right to receive compensation for loss of any payments for which the Corporation is liable together with the reasonable expenses of the Owner attributable to the termination of this exclusive licence and the Corporation shall immediately deliver up possession of the Licenced Lands to the Owner.

14. UNDERTAKINGS OF THE CORPORATION

The Corporation undertakes as follows:

(a) to use such methods in its operations as will do as little damage as possible to the unworked portion of the Licenced Lands.

(b) not to do or permit any act which will divert or pollute any water course traversing the Licenced Lands or the adjoining lands;

(c) upon vacating the Licenced Lands, to restore the surface of the Licenced Lands, at the Owner’s request in such a way as to minimize danger to the Owner or the public from excavations, landslips or erosion.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 10

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 130 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

15. REFUSAL OF APPLICATION FOR LICENCE

In the event that the Corporation’s application to the Ministry of Natural Resouces for a Class “B” licence to operate a pit or quarry on the Licenced Lands is refused and/or denied this agreement shall immediately be terminated effective as of the date of such refusal and/or denial.

16. ARBITRATION

(a) In the case of any dispute between the Owner and the Corporation during the term hereof and any renewal thereof, as to any matter arising under this Licence Agreement, either party shall be entitled to give to the other party, notice of the dispute and demand arbitration thereof and, after giving notice and demand, each party shall at once appoint an arbitrator and the appointees shall jointly appoint a third arbitrator. The decision of any two of the three arbitrators so appointed shall be final and binding upon the parties who covenant with each other that their disputes shall be decided by arbitration alone and not by recourse at law.

(b) If within a reasonable time, the two arbitrators appointed by the parties do not agree upon a third arbitrator, or if the party who has been notified of the dispute fails to appoint an arbitrator, then a third arbitrator or an arbitrator to represent the party in default may, upon petition of the party not in default, be appointed by a judge of the Ontario Court (General Division) or any other court of competent jurisdiction. The cost of arbitration shall be apportioned between the parties as the arbitrators or a majority of them may decide.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 11

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 131 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

17. MISCELLANEOUS

(a) Payments and Communications

All payments and communications which may be or are required to be given by either party to the other, shall (in the absence of any specific provision to the contrary) be in writing and delivered or sent by prepaid registered mail or telecopier to the Parties at their following respective addresses:

For the Owner: R.R. # 1 Keene, Ontario K0L 2G0

For the Corporation: P.O. Box 70 Keene, Ontario K0L 2G0

And if any payment or communication is sent by prepaid registered mail, it shall, subject to the following sentence, be conclusively deemed to have been received on the third business day following the mailing of it and, if delivered or telecopied, it shall be conclusively deemed to have been received at the time of delivery or transmission. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions with respect to mailing, in the event that it may be reasonably anticipated that, due to any strike, lock-out or similar event involving an interruption in postal service, any payment or communication will not be received by the addressee by no later than the third business day following the mailing of it, then the mailing of any payment or communication as mentioned shall not be an effective means of sending it but rather any payment or communication must then be sent by an alternative means of transportation which it may reasonably be anticipated will cause the payment or communication to be received reasonably expeditiously by the addressee. Either party may from time to time change his/her or its address by notice to the other in accordance with this paragraph.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 12

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 132 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

(b) Headings

The headings of this exclusive licence and the schedules, if any, are solely for convenience of reference and do not affect the interpretation or define, limit or construe the contents of any provision of this exclusive licence.

(c) Entire Agreement

With respect to the subject matter of this exclusive licence, this agreement:

(i) sets forth the entire agreement between the Parties and any persons who have in the past or who are now representing either of the Parties.

(ii) supersedes all prior understandings and communication between the Parties or either of them, oral or written; and

(iii) constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties.

Each party acknowledges that this exclusive licence is entered into after full investigation and that no Party is relying on any statement or representation made by the other which is not embodied in this exclusive licence. Each Party acknowledges that he/she or it shall have no right to rely on any amendment, promise, modification, statement or representation made or occurring subsequent to the execution of this exclusive licence unless it is in writing and executed by both the Parties.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 13

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 133 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

(d) Partial Invalidity

If any provision of this exclusive licence or the application of it to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this exclusive licence, or the application of that provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each provision of this exclusive licence shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law and be independent of every other provision of this exclusive licence.

(e) Force Majeure

No Party shall be held responsible or liable or be deemed to be in default or in breach of this exclusive licence for his or its delay, failure or inability to meet any of his or its obligations under this exclusive licence (other than any obligation to pay money) caused by or arising from any cause which is unavoidable or beyond the reasonable control of that Party, including war, warlike operations, riot, insurrection, order of government, strikes, lock-outs, disturbances or any act of God or other cause which frustrates the performance of this exclusive licence.

(f) Time of the Essence

Time shall be of the essence of this exclusive licence and of every part of it and no extension or variation of this agreement shall operate as a waiver of this provision.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 14

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 134 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

(g) Non-performance

The failure of either Party to this agreement to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this agreement or any of his or its rights in respect to it or to insist on strict adherence to any term of this exclusive licence will not be considered to be a waiver of that provision, right or term or in any way to affect the validity of this agreement or deprive the applicable Party of the right thereafter to insist on strict adherence to that term or any other term of this agreement. The exercise by either Party to this agreement of any of his or its rights provided by this agreement will not preclude or prejudice the Party from exercising any other right he or it may have be reason of this agreement or otherwise, irrespective of any previous action or proceeding taken by him or it under this exclusive licence. Any waiver by either Party of the performance of any of the provisions of this agreement will be effective only if in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party.

(h) Number and Gender

Words importing the singular number shall include the plural and vice versa, words importing the neuter gender shall include the masculine and feminine genders, and words importing persons shall include firms and corporations.

(i) Heirs and Assigns

This exclusive licence shall enure to the benefit of and be binding on the Corporation and the Owner and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and permitted assigns.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 15

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 135 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Party of the First Part has hereunto set his hand and seal at the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan in the County of Peterborough and Province of Ontario, this ______day of ______, 2010.

SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED ) In the presence of ) ) ______) ______Witness Jack Clysdale

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Party of the Second Part has caused this agreement to be executed under seal at the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, in the County of Peterborough and Province of Ontario this ______day of ______, 2010.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN

Per: ______David Paul Nelson Reeve

Per: ______Heather Scott Clerk

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 16

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 136 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

SCHEDULE “A”

DESCRIPTION OF LANDS AND PREMISES

ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises, situate, lying and being in the Township of Otonabee- South Monaghan, in the County of Peterborough and Province of Ontario, and being composed of the east half of Lot Number 16, in the 2nd Concession of the said “Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan” save and except thereon and therefrom those parcels of said lots more particularly described as follows:

FIRSTLY: That part shown bordered red on plan of survey attached to registered instrument number 123878 more particularly described as follows:

PREMISING that the bearings herein are astronomic and are referred to the meridian passing through the south-east angle of the west half of Lot 27, Concession 7, of the said Township.

COMMENCING where a survey post has been planted at a point in the easterly limit of the said Lot 16, which point is distant 90.27 feet, when measured southerly along the said easterly limit, from the north-east angle of the said Lot;

THENCE north 20 degrees 45 minutes west, and being along the easterly limit of the said Lot, a distance of 19.57 feet;

THENCE north 64 degrees 56 minutes west, and being along the south-westerly limit of the Hastings-Keene Road according to Deposited Plan No. 121847, a distance of 71.70 feet.

THENCE south 70 degrees 52 minutes west, and being along the southerly limit of the Hastings-Keene Road according to the said Deposited Plan, a distance of 1,606.54 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 70 degrees 21 minutes west, continuing along the said southerly limit, a distance of 320.90 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 66 degrees 32 minutes west, continuing along the said southerly limit, a distance of 150.33 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 70 degrees 21 minutes west, continuing along the said southerly limit, a distance of 86.41 feet to a survey post planted in the westerly limit of the east half of the said Lot 16;

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 17

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 137 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

THENCE south 21 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds east, and being along the said westerly limit, a distance of 1,253.00 feet to a survey post;

THENCE north 72 degrees 33 minutes east, and being along the present fence, a distance of 719.26 feet to a survey post;

THENCE north 50 degrees 37 minutes east a distance of 53.64 feet to a survey post;

THENCE north 21 degrees 37 minutes west a distance of 440.0 feet to a survey post;

THENCE north 33 degrees 31 minutes east a distance of 579.04 feet to a survey post;

THENCE north 47 degrees 51 minutes east, and being along the present fence, a distance of 1,046.30 feet more or less to the point of commencement.

SECONDLY: That part of said Lot number 16 shown bordered on red on plan of survey attached to registered instrument number 124309 more particularly described as follows:

PREMISING that the easterly limit of the said Lot has a bearing of North 20 degrees 43 minutes West, and relating all bearings herein thereto.

COMMENCING where a survey post has been found planted at a point within the said Lot, which point is distant 1.046.30 feet, when measured on a course south 47 degrees 53 minutes west, from a point in the easterly limit of the said Lot which point is distant 90.27 feet, when measured southerly along the said easterly limit, from the northeast angle of the said Lot;

THENCE south 36 degrees 20 minutes east, and being along the westerly limit of the lands described in Registered Instrument No. 77150 for the said Township, a distance of 121.54 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 79 degrees 26 minutes East, and being along southerly limit of the lands described in the said Registered Instrument Number 77150, a distance of 387.87 feet to a survey post;

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 18

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 138 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

THENCE south 44 degrees 34 minutes West a distance of 303.37 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 1 degree 52 minutes East a distance of 262.60 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 44 degrees 32 minutes West 177.80 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 12 degrees 24 minutes west 197.65 feet to a survey post;

THENCE south 70 degrees 04 minutes west 247.74 feet to a survey post;

THENCE north 21 degrees 35 minutes west a distance of 459.24 feet to a survey post;

THENCE north 33 degrees 33 minutes east a distance of 579.04 feet more or less to the point of commencement.

THIRDLY: That part of said Lot Number 16 shown bordered red on plan of survey attached to registered instrument number 77150 and more particularly described as follows, containing an area of 7.30 acres more or less, premising that the eastern limit of the said lot has a bearing of north 20 degrees 43 minutes west and relating all bearings herein, thereto;

COMMENCING at a post in the eastern limit of the said lot, distant 90.27 feet as measured on a course south 20 degrees 43 minutes east along the said limit from the north eastern angle of the said lot;

THENCE south 20 degrees 43 minutes east, along the said eastern limit, 466.07 feet to a post;

THENCE south 59 degrees 03 minutes west, 568.80 feet to a post;

THENCE south 79 degrees 26 minutes west, 387.87 feet to a post;

THENCE north 36 degrees 20 minutes west, 121.54 feet to a post;

THENCE north 47 degrees 53 minutes east, 1,046.30 feet, more or less to the point of commencement.

As previously described in instrument number 501475.

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 19

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 139 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9d)

SHEDULE “C” PRICE PER TONNE AND CORRESPONDING CALANDAR YEAR

YEAR PRICE PER TONNE 2013 $0.80 2014 $0.81 2015 $0.82 2016 $0.83 2017 $0.84 2018 $0.85 2019 $0.86 2020 $0.87 2021 $0.88 2022 $0.89

Clysdale Pit Agreement – By-law #2013-57 Page 20

2013-57 Agreement - Clysdale Pit Page 140 of 154

... Agenda Item # 9e)

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN BY-LAW NO. 2013-58

Being a By-law to amend By-law 2008-23 - Schedule “B” Fees (Permits) ______

WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan adopted By-law 2008-23 which provides for the Administration and Enforcement of the Ontario Building Code.

AND WHEREAS Council deems it desirable to amend Schedule “B” Fees Section to By-law No. 2008-23.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan hereby enacts as follows:

1. That Schedule “B” Fee Schedule attached to and forming part of this by-law replaces only that section related to Fees to By-law No. 2008-23, passed by Council on May 5, 2008.

2. That the Permit Fee Schedule”B” to By-law No. 2008-23 passed by Council on May 5, 2008 is hereby repealed.

3. That all other provisions of By-law 2008-23 remain in effect

4. Notwithstanding the date the By-law is adopted, Schedule “B” shall come into force and effect January 1, 2014.

Read a First time this 18th day of November, 2013

Read a Second time this 18th day of November, 2013

Read a Third time and Finally passed this 18th day of November, A.D. 2013.

______Reeve – David P. Nelson

______Clerk – Heather Scott

2013-58 Building By-law - amend Page 141 of 154 Schedule "B" Fees ... Agenda Item # 9e)

Building Permit Fee Schedule Existing 2013 Fees Proposed 2014 Fees New Dwelling units $0.95 / sf $1.05/sf New Res. Additions $0.95 / sf $1.05/sf $12.00 per $1000 of const. Residential renovations $14.00/1000 value Mobile Homes $1.05/sf Accessory Buildings $0.95 / sf $.95/sf Building Re-location $0.95 / sf $1.05/sf $12.00 per $1000 construction New Foundation $14.00/1000 value Plumbing permits $100 + $12 per fixture $150.00 + $14 per fixture Decks/carports/porches $0.95 / sf $0.95/sf Outdoor solid fuel app. $100.00 $250.00 $300.00 < 20kkw Solar $500.00 > 20kw Wood stoves/ chimneys $100.00 $250.00 Occupancy permits $100.00 $200.00 Non-Residential Permits Commercial / Industrial/ Institutional-new $0.95 / sf $1.05/sf construction & additions Commercial/Industrial/Institutional Renovations $14.00/1000 $12.00 / $1000 of construction Agricultural buildings new construction & additions $14.00/1000 value Soft Cover / coverall/ tent type structures $0.20 / sf $0.30 Other permits $12.00 / $1000 of construction Change of use permit $14.00/1000 value Commercial Sign Permits NA $550.00 Demolition permits $200.00 $200.00 Discharge of an order $100.00 Minimum permit fee $125.00 $175.00 Repeat inspections beyond 2 $120.00 Request for inspections years before 2003 $130.00 $9.50 / $1000 of construction Swimming pools – (inground) $14.00/1000 value Swimming pools – (above ground) $100.00 $150.00 Swimming pool sur-charge $100.00 $100.00 Transfer of Permit $65.00 Yearly permit renewal $130.00 Development Fees Otonabee-South Monaghan Township

Residential for Single & Semi units $4082.00 Residential Multiple units $3053.00 Non-Residential (Commercial) $2.26 per sq.ft.

County of Peterborough $4250.00 Residential Unit ($500.00 increase 2014, 2015 and $4750.00 2016) $12.39 per sq.meter ($1.15 Non-Residential sq.ft.)

Revised 10/2013

2013-58 Building By-law - amend Page 142 of 154 Schedule "B" Fees ... Agenda Item # 10a)

TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CLERK AND COUNCIL

November 4, 2013

Policy Update: Development Charges – Make the Municipal Voice Heard

On October 24 2013, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Honorable Linda Jeffrey released a consultation document on Development Charges (DC) in Ontario. An invitation was sent to all municipal treasurers seeking their municipality’s interest in attending consultation sessions. Municipal governments are requested to reply by Tuesday, November 5th to attend a consultation session. Alternatively, written submissions will be accepted up to January 10, 2014.

AMO, in every budget submission since 2008, has called for new DCA legislation and we encourage all municipal governments that currently use development charges or those that might in the future, to attend a session or make a written submission. Municipalities wishing to attend in person should reply to [email protected].

While municipal governments recognize the important role the development industry and housing plays in our communities, some key municipal issues regarding DCs should not be forgotten in the discussions. Highlights follow:

 In 1997 the new Act imposed significant restrictions on municipalities. These changes were dramatic. Initial estimates where some $550 million in growth related costs were shifted from developers to existing property taxpayers.  Plans for forward looking investments, like transit in cities, have been drawn up but not built. Research on DCs through the Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and Service Delivery Review (PMFSDR) (2008) identified over $1 billion transit investment gap, not including the $2 billion annually required of Metrolinx’s Big Move transit proposals in the GTHA. Ontario’s Environmental Commissioner released a Report in September 2013 seeking reforms to the DC Act. Among the Commissioner’s findings: "Public transit is treated inequitably, despite the clear benefits it provides in addressing traffic congestion" and "statutory limitations were specifically identified as a key barrier for municipalities wishing to enhance their public transit system".

 The 2007 provincial-municipal research and resulting report identified specific action. "Four priority areas appear to be most inconsistent with the ‘growth pays for growth’ principle". These areas are: ineligible services; the Mandatory "10% Discount" that must be applied to some services; the Service Level Calculation (10-year average service level); and the treatment of Grants, Subsidies and other Contributions under the Act. Despite this comprehensive review, no legislative changes were made.

Several links are included to help municipalities prepare:

AMO - Development Charges Act - Page 143 of 154 Policy Update

... Agenda Item # 10a)

PMFSDR Development Charges Report (2007)

Ontario’s Environmental Commissioner’s Report (September 2013)

Sustainable Prosperity’s Report "Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations" October 2013

AMO’s key messages and considerations:

 Growth must pay for growth. Development charges are important to ensuring tax equity among property taxpayers.  Discounted development charges can drive up property taxes for all residents.  Delaying infrastructure investments does not eliminate the problem, but can exasperate it more.

 If we devalue the public services which support our homes we shortchange our communities and their long-term future.

AMO will be making a submission itself, working with the Municipal Finance Officers Association (MFOA), urging it to consider the findings of the 2007 Development Charges Subgroup in its current deliberations.

AMO encourages municipal governments to directly deliver their own messages to the Province regarding the importance of DCs to your community’s well-being and how the current legislation impacts your community.

Contact: Matthew Wilson, Senior Advisor, [email protected] - 416.971.9856 Ext. 323.

AMO - Development Charges Act - Page 144 of 154 Policy Update

... Agenda Item # 10b)

TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CLERK AND COUNCIL

November 14, 2013

2014 OMPF Allocations Announced

Today the Ministry of Finance issued 2014 allocations from the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF). Letters to heads of council and treasurers are being mailed at this time. Allocation notices may be viewed on the Ministry’s website. Below are key aspects of the funding announcement for 2014 and issues on the funding horizon for 2015 and beyond.

A reduced envelope province-wide

The total envelope will continue to decrease. A further $25 million cut will occur in 2014 dropping total allocations to $550 million. The Fund was $575 million in 2013 and $598 million in 2012. If the government continues with its fiscal plan for the OMPF, continued cuts should be expected in 2015 to reach $500 million by 2016.

Impact on recipient municipalities

While all recipient municipalities will continue to receive some funding, there will be negative impacts for most communities. Individual municipal reductions for the coming year will be primarily determined as a percentage of 2013 allocations and scaled based on the relative fiscal health of each municipality.

Northern Ontario municipalities will experience either no change or a cut ranging up to 10% of the previous year’s allocation. Municipalities in all other regions will experience either no change or a cut of up to 15% of their previous year’s allocation. (Last year’s cuts were up to 5% in the North and up to 10% in other regions). These changes are very significant for some communities – at least 10% will experience an impact greater than $50 per household.

How does OMPF structure for 2014 compare?

For 2014, the grant components are Assessment Equalization, Northern Communities, Rural Communities, Fiscal Circumstances and Transitional. Previous grant components dedicated to policing, farmland and managed forests have been eliminated.

In 2013, the Ministry introduced a new funding concept to measure the relative fiscal circumstances of municipalities. This continues for 2014 and scales allocation cuts according to those municipalities most in need. The Municipal Fiscal Circumstances Index (MFCI) measures such factors as weighted assessment per household, median household income and employment rates among others, on a relative basis for municipalities that have been receiving OMPF. As noted above, the degree of funding cuts to municipalities will be determined in part by the use of this measure.

AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding Page 145 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 10b)

This approach demonstrates some sensitivity to the fiscal condition of municipalities and the limited capacity of some to shoulder these cuts. However, the transition formulas of 2013 and 2014 have not and will not be responsive to changing social service and police costs. This is a concern.

AMO’s Position

AMO participated in OMPF discussions with the Ministry of Finance. AMO advocated for a deferral of the 2014 cut of $25 million and reconciliation to be restored. AMO is very concerned that the municipal subsidy of provincial farmland and managed forest property taxation policy continues, now without any provincial assistance. AMO also emphasised the need for new transitional assistance from the provincial government for municipalities facing future OPP billing model changes. This would include help now for those with high costs and transition assistance for those with bills that will increase.

Fiscal Outlook

While the upload of social assistance benefit programs and court security costs continues, there are a number of significant issues facing municipalities in the near future which pose significant risk. They are:

Policing Costs

The scale of OMPF cuts will be magnified by 2014 OPP wage related cost increases of approximately $25 million in 2014. The lost OMPF revenue and the OPP cost increase will have a $50 million (est.) impact on property taxpayers. Almost ¾ of all municipalities use the OPP. The impact of these two events at the same time will put a burden on municipal property taxpayers. Tax increases or service reductions are likely in all corners of the province.

Other OMPF recipient municipalities will also face increased policing costs in 2014. Emergency service costs are rising faster than the rate of inflation and other municipal costs and services. This affects the resources available to deliver other core services that are just as vital to a community.

Reconciliation

From 2005 to 2011, reconciliation was a key feature of OMPF funding. Reconciliation recognized the difference between projected and actual municipal costs. From 2011 onwards, the impact of a reduced OMPF funding envelope has been amplified by the government’s decision to end reconciliation payments. In 2014 and future years, the significance of this change will become particularly acute for municipalities facing OPP wage related cost increases.

Property Tax Room

For the last 15 years, the Province has offset reassessment impacts by resetting education tax rates. This has allowed municipalities to "occupy" the tax room created and help offset the

AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding Page 146 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 10b)

impact of municipal tax increases. The 2013 Fall Economic Statement signalled a likely end to this policy and possible education property tax increases in the future.

Property Assessment Issues

A number of key property assessment methodology issues remain unresolved and represent a risk to the stability of the assessment base. These include assessments related to mills, billboards and landfills in particular. Market value is the foundation of the assessment system. The successful resolutions of these issues need to be fair for all taxpayers.

Our evaluation of the Future of the OMPF

 The four grant components for 2014 will likely be the core funding elements for future years. Discontinued grant components include policing and offsets for provincial farmland and managed forest property taxation policies.  Significant dollars in 2014 are designated as "transitional". These funds are not discretionary in the same manner as the province considered "transition" funding in prior years. These dollars remain an integral part of the overall OMPF envelope.  Which grant components will be cut in 2015 and 2016 has yet to be determined.  For context, below are historical OMPF allocations to the sector.

Historical OMPF Allocation by Grant (in millions of $) Component 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Social Services Grant 84 25 25 0 0 0 Policing Grant 82 92 94 0 0 0 Farmland and Managed Forests 47 47 0 46 0 0 Grant Assessment Equalization Grant 150 147 147 0 149 ? Northern Communities Grant 84 85 86 0 79 ? Rural Communities Grant 158 159 162 0 138 ? Northern and Rural Fiscal 0 0 ? 0 0 50 Circumstances Grant Transitional and Stabilization 45 42 ? Grants 38 0 134 (incl. Northern & Rural Social Program) TOTAL OMPF 650 597 598 575 550 525

AMO Contact: Matthew Wilson, Senior Advisor – [email protected] – 416-971-9856 Ext. 323.

AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding Page 147 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 10b)

PLEASE NOTE AMO Breaking News will be broadcast to the member municipality's council, administrator and clerk. Recipients of the AMO broadcasts are free to redistribute the AMO broadcasts to other municipal staff as required. We have decided to not add other staff to these broadcast lists in order to ensure accuracy and efficiency in the management of our various broadcast lists.

DISCLAIMER These are final versions of AMO documents. AMO assumes no responsibility for any discrepancies that may have been transmitted with the electronic version. The printed versions of the documents stand as the official record.

AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding Page 148 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 10b)

AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding Page 149 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 10b)

Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) 2014 Allocation Notice

Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan 66621 County of Peterborough

2014 Highlights for the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan

• The Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan's 2014 OMPF allocation is $610,500 which is the equivalent of 15% of the Township's municipal property tax revenue.

• The estimated total benefit of the 2014 provincial uploads for the County of Peterborough is $3,994,300 which is the equivalent of 6% of all municipal property tax revenue in the County.

A Total 2014 OMPF $610,500

1. Assessment Equalization Grant - 2. Northern Communities Grant - 3. Rural Communities Grant $416,500 4. Northern and Rural Fiscal Circumstances Grant $47,300 5. Transitional Assistance $146,700

B Upper-Tier 2014 Provincial Uploads

The estimated total benefit of the 2014 provincial uploads for the County of Peterborough is $3,994,300. The removal of these costs off the property tax base benefits all taxpayers within the County of Peterborough, including those residing in the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan.

C Other Ongoing Provincial Support n/a

1. Public Health n/a 2. Land Ambulance n/a

D Key OMPF Data Inputs

1. Households 3,085 2. Total Weighted Assessment per Household $245,409 3. Rural and Small Community Measure 96.4% 4. Northern and Rural Municipal Fiscal Circumstances Index 1.7 5. 2014 Guaranteed Level of Support 85.0% 6. 2013 OMPF (Line A from 2013 Allocation Notice) $718,200

Issued: November 2013

AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding Page 150 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 10b)

Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) 2014 Allocation Notice

Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan 66621 County of Peterborough 2014 OMPF Allocation Notice - Line Item Descriptions

The OMPF grants are described in detail in the OMPF Technical Guide – this document can be found on the Ministry of Finance's A website at: http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/budget/ompf/2014

If applicable, reflects the amount of transitional support provided to assist the municipality in adjusting to the redesigned OMPF A5 program.

Information regarding the 2014 provincial uploads for the County of Peterborough can be found in the accompanying 2014 B Upload Notice Insert.

The estimated 2014 municipal benefit of the Province's 75 per cent share of public health funding relative to its 50 per cent share in 2004. Actual municipal savings may not correspond with the Allocation Notice due to budget approvals made by the local C1 Boards of Health. Municipalities may provide additional funding beyond their obligated cost share. Any additional municipal funding is not included in the calculation of the public health figure.

The estimated 2014 municipal benefit of the Province's 50 per cent share of land ambulance funding is relative to its share in C2 2005. This incremental increase in land ambulance funding delivers on the Province's commitment to strengthen land ambulance services and maintain the 50:50 sharing of land ambulance costs.

Refers to the total assessment for a municipality weighted by the tax ratio for each class of property (including payments in lieu of D2 property taxes retained by the municipality) divided by the total number of households.

Represents the proportion of a municipality's population that resides in rural areas or small communities. For additional D3 information see the 2014 OMPF Technical Guide.

The northern and rural Municipal Fiscal Circumstances Index (MFCI) measures a municipality’s fiscal circumstances relative to other northern and rural municipalities in the province, and ranges from 0 to 10. A lower MFCI corresponds to relatively positive D4 fiscal circumstances, whereas a higher MFCI corresponds to more challenging fiscal circumstances. For additional information see the 2014 OMPF Technical Guide.

Represents the guaranteed level of support the municipality will receive from the Province through the 2014 OMPF. For additional D5 information see the 2014 OMPF Technical Guide.

D6 2013 OMPF allocation.

Note: Provincial funding and other ongoing provincial support initiatives rounded to multiples of $100.

Ontario Ministry of Finance Provincial-Local Finance Division Issued: November 2013

AMO - OMPF 2014 Funding Page 151 of 154 ... Agenda Item # 11a)

TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CLERK AND COUNCIL

November 5, 2013

Bill 36, the Local Food Act, Passes Third Reading

Today, the Ontario Legislature proclaimed the Local Food Act. AMO was actively involved and provided input on behalf of municipal governments as the Bill was developed and considered by the Legislature.

The government has clarified the section on goals and targets in the legislation. The Minister of Agriculture and Food shall establish goals and targets to which the public sector is to aspire to in the following areas:

 improve food literacy regarding local food;  encourage increased use of local food by public sector organizations, and  increase access to local food.

Under the Act, municipalities have been identified as a public sector organization. Goals and targets shall be established by the Minister within one year after it comes into force. Consultation with public sector organizations must occur before a goal or target is established. The Minister must also prepare an annual report that summarizes the Province’s activities regarding local food as well as other relevant information.

AMO continues to caution the government to not establish goals and targets that would oblige the municipal sector to have to develop yet more administration and reports from municipal governments. It is our view that municipal government resources are best devoted to leadership and network building to advance local food activities.

Much work has been already undertaken by municipal governments in partnership with local food producers. In August, the joint AMO/Ontario Municipal Knowledge Network/Ministry of Agriculture and Food project on Best Practices in Local Food: A Guide for Municipalities identified innovative case study examples to help inform and support a municipal role. It sets out local food initiatives, policies and programs that could be replicated to complement each municipality’s local circumstance. Empowering and leading, not regulating and reporting, is the preferred way forward for municipal governments in advancing local food goals.

The Act was amended to create a non-refundable tax credit of 25% for farmers who donate excess agricultural products to community food programs such as food banks. AMO welcomes this addition to the Act as it advances the intent of the legislation. As well, the Act proclaims a Local Food Week that will occur annually beginning the first Monday in June.

At this time, it is unknown how the government will proceed in encouraging increased use of local food as it applies to public sector organizations. AMO will seek clarification from the government, provide further advice on best paths forward and continue to advocate municipal interests as the legislation begins to be implemented.

AMO - Bill 36 Local Food Act Page 152 of 154

... Agenda Item # 11a)

AMO Contact: Nicholas Ruder, Policy Advisor, [email protected], 416-971-9856 ext. 411.

PLEASE NOTE AMO Breaking News will be broadcast to the member municipality's council, administrator and clerk. Recipients of the AMO broadcasts are free to redistribute the AMO broadcasts to other municipal staff as required. We have decided to not add other staff to these broadcast lists in order to ensure accuracy and efficiency in the management of our various broadcast lists.

DISCLAIMER These are final versions of AMO documents. AMO assumes no responsibility for any discrepancies that may have been transmitted with the electronic version. The printed versions of the documents stand as the official record.

AMO - Bill 36 Local Food Act Page 153 of 154

... Agenda Item # 11b)

OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN

FOOD CUPBOARD

Starting Thursday November 14, 2013 12 Noon-2:00pm

Hosted By Keene United Church, 30 North Street, Keene, ON

Please bring reusable shopping bags.

The OSM Food Cupboard will also operate Noon-2:00pm on:

Thursday December 12/13 Thursday January 16/14 Thursday February 13/14

For more information, please email [email protected] or call 705-295 -6952 and leave a message.

Please note that all inquiries are strictly confidential.

Donations of non-perishable food items are much appreciated. Please check best before dates prior to donating. We thank you in advance for your co-operation.

Individuals wishing to make monetary donations to the OSM Food Cupboard will be issued a charitable tax receipt.

Otonabee-South Monaghan Food Page 154 of 154 Cupboard