DOCSLIB.ORG

Friday, May 10Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Friday, May 10Th ! ! "#$%!&'()*+*(,*!-./*+0.12! 3'+!! 456+27.89!-.8!:/5!;!3+07.89!-.8!$#/5! ! "#$%&'(')! <'6=1.2!&'6(/8!&+'22'>*+!?'6/5! @+.,/0,*!-'7*1!A&?@-B! ! 30=5/0(=!3'+!&5.(=*! -'/0>./0'(.1!C(/*+>0*D0(=! ! CEF!G*+*!/'!G*1H9!4+62/!-*! -'/0>./0'(.1!C(/*+>0*D0(=! C()0(0/*!I0=5/!! G.(7'6/2!$!J!"! ! KLMCL!N''O! P*=021./0>*!@.(*1!G.(7'6/2! ! &'()*+*(,*!@.+/0,0H.(/!P02/! ! DOUGLAS COUNTY CROSSOVER YOUTH PRACTICE MODEL (CYPM) May 9, 2013 Nebraska Juvenile Justice Association Conference TODAY’S PRESENTATION 2 !! Juvenile Maltreatment and Delinquency !! Defining Crossover Youth !! Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM) !! Douglas County CYPM Structure and Implementation !! CYPM Data Snapshot Juvenile Maltreatment and Delinquency PATHWAYS TO DELINQUENCY 4 !! The average age at which juveniles took their first step toward delinquent behavior was approximately 7. !! Moderately serious behavior began at about age 9.5. !! Serious delinquency began at age 12. !! The average age at which youth first came in contact with the juvenile court was 14.5. This means that there is a seven year window of opportunity to intervene and interrupt their pathway to delinquency. CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT AS A RISK FACTOR FOR DELINQUENCY 5 !! Increased likelihood of arrest as a juvenile by 55% and for a violent crime as a juvenile by 96% !! Increased likelihood of arrest as an adult by 28% and for a violent crime as an adult by 30% !! Increased the odds of future delinquency and adult criminality overall by 29% 5 Source: Widom, Tuell, & Wiig, 2003; Update on the Cycle of Violence, 2001. Defining Crossover Youth CROSSOVER YOUTH: DEFINITIONS 7 WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT CROSSOVER YOUTH !! They are often in the child welfare system for long periods of time. !! They are more likely to be female as compared to the general delinquency population. !! Minorities, particularly African Americans, appear to be over represented. !! Most are placed out of the home and often experience multiple placements. !! They are often truant and/or performing poorly in school. !! Over half are detained prior to adjudication. !! Herz & Ryan, 2008b; Halemba, Siegel, Lord, & Zawacki, 2004; Kelley, Thornberry, & Smith, 1997; Saeturn & Swain, 2009 CROSSOVER YOUTH PATHWAYS 9 Pathway 1: Open CW case with subsequent delinquency referral or arrest Child Welfare ! Juvenile Justice Pathway 2: Previous but not current CW case at time of new delinquency referral or arrest Pathway 3: Upon JJ investigation after delinquency occurs, maltreatment discovered ! referral to CW Juvenile Justice Pathway 4: Term of correctional ! Child Welfare placement ends, but no home/safe home to return to ! referral to CW PREVALENCE 10 !! Studies estimate that between 9 and 29% of child welfare involved youth have contact with the juvenile justice system !! Most maltreated youth do not have official records and do not self report delinquency. !! Higher proportion of crossover youth as penetration in the juvenile justice system deepens: 42% 7% Placement Probation Cases 1% Cases Diversion Cases Sources: Smith, Thornberry, Ireland, & Elwyn, 2008; Johnson, Ereth, & Wagner, 2004; Dennison & Waterson, 2002; Halemba 2004. CHARACTERISTICS: MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS 11 Source: Herz, Denise. A Review of the Research and Issues Related to Crossover Youth. June 2009. EXPERIENCES IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM 12 Pre- Adjudication Charging Disposition System personnel Less likely to receive Inconsistent perceive Dually- probation supervision identification; More Involved Youth as and more likely to likely to be detained higher risk; Less likely receive placement in to receive diversion a group home setting ! ! ! Higher proportion of crossover youth ! ! ! Sources: Conger & Ross, 2010; Morris & Freundlich, 2004; Ryan, Herz, Hernandez, & Marshall, 2007; Halemba, et al., 2004. LONG TERM OUTCOMES 13 •! Higher rates of substance abuse and mental illness •! Higher recidivism rates •! Higher rates of criminal involvement as adults •! Higher rates of child welfare involvement as parents/perpetrators of maltreatment CROSSOVER YOUTH PRACTICE MODEL PRACTICE AREAS 15 Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, and Detention Practice Area 2: Decision-making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment, and Planning Practice Area 4: Coordinated Case Supervision and Ongoing Assessment Practice Area 5: Planning for Youth Permanency, Transition, and Case Closure CYPM PHASES OF IMPLEMENTATION 16 PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III Practice Practice Practice Areas 1 & 2 Area 3 Areas 4 & 5 CYPM GOALS 17 Overarching Goals •! Reduction in: •! Number of youth placed in out-of-home care •! Use of congregate care •! Disproportionate representation of children of color •! Number of youth crossing over and becoming dually involved CYPM GOALS 18 Practice Goals Process Goals •! Reduction of use of pre- •! Increase use of adjudication detention interagency information- •! Increase use of diversion sharing •! Reduction of number of •! Increase use of “joint” youth reentering child assessment welfare from juvenile •! Increase inclusion of justice placements youth and family voice in •! Improvement in pro- decision-making social bonds •! Reduction in recidivism Crossover Youth Practice Model sites Ohio •! Cuyahoga Co. •! Franklin Co. •! Hamilton Co. •! Lucas Co. •! Mahoning Co. •! Montgomery Co. •! Stark Co. •! Summit Co. Oregon •! Marion Co. •! Multnomah Co. Pennsylvania •! Philadelphia Arizona South Carolina •! Maricopa Co. •! Berkley Co. California •! Charleston Co. •! Alameda Co. •! Georgetown Co. •! Los Angeles Co. Texas •! San Diego Co. •! Bexar Co. Colorado Florida •! Dallas Co. •! Broomfield Co •! Bartow •! El Paso Co. •! Denver Co. •! Duval Co. •! McLennan Co. Minnesota Nebraska •! Douglas Co. •! Ft. Lauderdale •! Tarrant Co. •! El Paso Co. •! Carver Co. •! Douglas Co. •! Miami-Dade •! Travis Co. •! Jefferson Co. • Hennepin Co. Nevada •! Volusia Co. ! Washington •! Larimer Co. •! Kandiyohi Co. ! Washoe Co. Iowa • •! King Co. •! Morgan Co. •! Woodbury Co. •! Olmsted Co. New York •! San Luis Valley Maryland •! Stearns Co. •! Monroe Co. Wyoming •! Prince George’s Co. Missouri •! Bronx Michigan •! County TBD •! County TBD •! County TBD CYPM INTERIM DATA FINDINGS June 2012 20 CYPM Treatment Youth N % Open Child Welfare Case with Subsequent Delinquency 786 82 Delinquency with previous but not current child welfare case 102 11 Delinquency with no current or previous child welfare case 68 7 Total CYPM Youth 957 Pre-CYPM Youth N % Open Child Welfare Case with Subsequent Delinquency 196 88 Delinquency with previous but not current child welfare case 17 8 Delinquency with no current or previous child welfare case 9 4 Total Pre-CYPM Youth 222 Total N=1,179 IMPROVEMENTS AS A RESULT OF THE CYPM – June 2012 !! ! of CYPM youth were identified at arrest or as a result of a warrant. The majority of the remaining youth were identified at charging, which was a focal point for two CYPM sites. !! CYPM Youth were most likely to receive some type of interagency meeting or handling in a one judge/one family court. The use of a specialized supervision unit drastically increased in the last nine months of implementation. !! Only " of CYPM youth were detained and this remained consistent over time (30% decrease in the use). !! Placement related offenses decreased in the last nine months. IMPROVEMENTS AS A RESULT OF THE CYPM, cont. – June 2012 22 !! CYPM youth were more likely to receive a diversionary option, probation supervision, or have their case dismissed or no action taken by the juvenile justice system. !! CYPM delinquent youth were more likely to have remain at home (37%) as a permanency goal followed by reunification (26%) and PPLA (23%). !! 43% of Pre-CYPM youth had a new arrest within 6 months of being identified, while only 32% of CYPM Youth had a new arrest within that same time period. !! 31% of Pre-CYPM youth had a sustained petition at 6 months after arrest/referral, while only 15% of CYPM had a sustained petition after they were identified as dually-involved. DOUGLAS COUNTY CYPM HOW IT BEGAN !! January 2012 !! Agreement between Nebraska Supreme Court, Department of Health and Human Services and Douglas County !! Crossover Youth Practice Model is situated within the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative to create efficiency utilize existing resources and infrastructure to move the work of the initiative !! Co-Chaired by Juvenile Court Judge Doug Johnson and Nick Juliano PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP !! Boys Town, Douglas County Juvenile County Attorney, Douglas County Juvenile Probation, Juvenile Assessment Center, NDHHS, NFC, Nebraska Family Support Network, Project Harmony !! Many other collaborating organizations !! Utilizes MOU and 1184 Sub-Protocol !! Resource Sharing !! Guided by Steering Committee and CYPM Subcommittee CYPM Goals in Douglas County: !! Reduce the “crossover” !! Reduce recidivism !! Reduce out of home placement and group/ congregate care !! Reduce entry into detention !! Reduce disproportionate representation of youth of color, particularly dually involved youth Douglas County CYPM Target Population A youth; 1.) Referred to the County Attorney’s office for a delinquency, truancy, or status offense AND 2.) Has a Child Welfare case as the victim that is open or closed, within the last 12 months. The case can be voluntary or court involved. 60% of referrals received by the Juvenile County Attorney’s office in May 2012 were for law enforcement contact Types of Referral n=569 250 224 200 163 150 138 100 50 29 6 7 1 1 0 Intake Juv. Intake
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gangs Beyond Borders
    Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Message from the Attorney General California is a leader for international commerce. In close proximity to Latin America and Canada, we are a state laced with large ports and a vast interstate system. California is also leading the way in economic development and job creation. And the Golden State is home to the digital and innovation economies reshaping how the world does business. But these same features that benefit California also make the state a coveted place of operation for transnational criminal organizations. As an international hub, more narcotics, weapons and humans are trafficked in and out of California than any other state. The size and strength of California’s economy make our businesses, financial institutions and communities lucrative targets for transnational criminal activity. Finally, transnational criminal organizations are relying increasingly on cybercrime as a source of funds – which means they are frequently targeting, and illicitly using, the digital tools and content developed in our state. The term “transnational organized crime” refers to a range of criminal activity perpetrated by groups whose origins often lie outside of the United States but whose operations cross international borders. Whether it is a drug cartel originating from Mexico or a cybercrime group out of Eastern Europe, the operations of transnational criminal organizations threaten the safety, health and economic wellbeing of all Americans, and particularly Californians.
    [Show full text]
  • Gang Project Brochure Pg 1 020712
    Salt Lake Area Gang Project A Multi-Jurisdictional Gang Intelligence, Suppression, & Diversion Unit Publications: The Project has several brochures available free of charge. These publications Participating Agencies: cover a variety of topics such as graffiti, gang State Agencies: colors, club drugs, and advice for parents. Local Agencies: Utah Dept. of Human Services-- Current gang-related crime statistics and Cottonwood Heights PD Div. of Juvenile Justice Services historical trends in gang violence are also Draper City PD Utah Dept. of Corrections-- available. Granite School District PD Law Enforcement Bureau METRO Midvale City PD Utah Dept. of Public Safety-- GANG State Bureau of Investigation Annual Gang Conference: The Project Murray City PD UNIT Salt Lake County SO provides an annual conference open to service Salt Lake County DA Federal Agencies: providers, law enforcement personnel, and the SHOCAP Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, community. This two-day event, held in the South Salt Lake City PD Firearms, and Explosives spring, covers a variety of topics from Street Taylorsville PD United States Attorney’s Office Survival to Gang Prevention Programs for Unified PD United States Marshals Service Schools. Goals and Objectives commands a squad of detectives. The The Salt Lake Area Gang Project was detectives duties include: established to identify, control, and prevent Suppression and street enforcement criminal gang activity in the jurisdictions Follow-up work on gang-related cases covered by the Project and to provide Collecting intelligence through contacts intelligence data and investigative assistance to with gang members law enforcement agencies. The Project also Assisting local agencies with on-going provides youth with information about viable investigations alternatives to gang membership and educates Answering law-enforcement inquiries In an emergency, please dial 911.
    [Show full text]
  • Tacoma Gang Assessment January 2019
    Tacoma Gang Assessment January 2019 Prepared by: Michelle Arciaga Young Tytos Consulting Tytos Consulting would like to express our appreciation to the City of Tacoma for underwriting this report and to the Neighborhood and Community Services Department for providing support and coordination during the assessment process. Personnel from Comprehensive Life Resources – Rise Against the Influence (RAIN) Program and the Washington Department of Corrections - Community Corrections Gang Unit (WDOC-CCGU) were responsible for arranging the gang member interviews. Calvin Kennon (RAIN Program) and Randi Unfred, and Kelly Casperson (WDOC-CCGU), as well as other personnel from these agencies, dedicated considerable time to ensuring access to gang-involved individuals for gang member interviews. We are very grateful for their help. Kelly Casperson also provided data on security threat group members in Tacoma which was helpful for this report. We would also like to recognize the individuals who participated in these interviews, and who so candidly and openly shared their life experiences with us, for their valuable contributions to this report. Jacqueline Shelton of the Tacoma Police Department Gang Unit spent considerable time cleaning and preparing police incident report and gang intelligence data for analysis and inclusion in this report. We are indebted to her for this assistance. Focus groups were conducted with personnel from the Washington Department of Corrections Community Corrections Gang Unit, Pierce County Juvenile Court, agency partners from the RAIN multidisciplinary team, safety and security personnel from Tacoma Public Schools, and officers from the Tacoma Police Department Gang Unit. These focus groups contributed greatly to our ability to understand, analyze, and interpret the data for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Gangs in Virginia
    An Introduction to Gangs in Virginia Office of the Attorney General Photographs Provided By: Virginia Gang Investigators Association Virginia Department of Corrections Fairfax County Gang Unit Pittsylvania County Sheriff’s Office Boys & Girls Clubs of Virginia Galax Police Department Richmond Police Department unless otherwise specified Videos Provided By Dr. Al Valdez and are NOT from Virginia Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II Attorney General of Virginia American Violence Contains some graphic content Overview I. Facts About Gangs II. Identifying Signs of Gang Association III. Safety Issues for EMS Part I FACTS ABOUT GANGS Gangs In History Gangs have been present throughout human history. Blackbeard and other pirates plundered the Caribbean during the 1600’s and 1700’s. The word “Thug” dates back to India from around 1200, and refers to a gang of criminals. Gangs In History Irish gangs were a part of riots in NYC during the 1860’s. Gangs like “The Hole in the Wall Gang” and Billy the Kid’s Gang robbed in the Southwest during the 1800’s. Gangs In History Picture from The United Northern and Southern Knights of the Ku Klux Klan website with members in Virginia. This from a 2007 cross lighting ceremony. Al Capone’s Organization and the Ku Klux Klan are examples of prominent gangs in the 1900’s. Gangs Today Many of today’s gangs can trace their roots to the later half of the 20th Century. El Salvador Civil War – 1980’s. The Sleepy Lagoon Boys – 1940’s Zoot Suit Riots. The “Truth” in Numbers There are at least 26,500 gangs and 785,000 gang members in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Gang Prevention
    PROVIDING STUDENTS WITH A PLACE TO BELONG & FEEL LOVED Provide students with opportunities to create a welcoming environment Create mentoring opportunities and provide positive role models Create opportunities to develop relationships between adults & students BUILDING STUDENTS’ SELF ESTEEM 1) Establish a Student Council: Develops leadership skills & promotes students as positive role models Recognizes value of youth; Respects their ideas & input; Pays attention to their feelings; Gives positive recognition DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ SELF CONCEPT 2) Teach youth their own history & celebrate their culture (ex: Hispanic Heritage Month activities) 3) Teach Male & Female Responsibility 4) Refer families to counseling & parenting 5) Provide substance abuse education/ prevention programs GUIDE STUDENTS IN THE DISCOVERY OF THEIR TRUE SELVES Create “Rites of passage” ceremonies Teach & give responsibilities to youth Give youth an opportunity to examine & develop own values & make good choices Community service projects After-school activities to develop talents: arts, sports, writing, acting, science DHDC’s School-Based Programs Staff are assigned full-time to schools to provide: Gang mediation Truancy prevention Monitoring students going to and from school, lunch room, hall ways In-school suspension Work with parents Provide communication between streets, schools, community and law enforcement Connect students to other programs and resources DHDC’s After-School Programs Program elements: Safe Haven for youth ages 6 -19 after school & summer Life Skills – gang, substance abuse, HIV, and drop-out prevention Male & female responsibility (relationships) Counseling – Individual, Group & Family Parenting Urban Arts - multi-media and technology Entrepreneurial Training Leadership Academy Terminology Nation: A nation is a group of gangs that come together as one group.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Emergence of Gangs in the United States— Then and Now
    Chapter 1 The Emergence of Gangs in the United States— Then and Now CHAPTER OBJECTIVES î Examine the emergence of gangs in the United States. î Explore where gangs from New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles first emerged. î Identify the differences and similarities between each regions growth of gangs. î Examine the emergence of Black and Hispanic/Latino gangs. î Describe the newest gang trends throughout the United States. “The Cat’s Alleys,” the Degraw Street Gang, the Sackett Street gang, “The Harrisons,” the Bush Street Gang, and 21 other boys’ gangs were the subjects of a report of the New York State Crime Commission which told, last week, of its findings in the Red Hook section of Brooklyn. The boys who comprise the gangs have to undergo rigorous initiations before being qualified for membership. In one of the more exclusive gangs initiates, usually aged about nine, have to drink twelve glasses of dago-red wine and have a revolver pressed into their temples while they take the pledge. Source: Gangs (1927). Time, 9(13), 11. Introduction The above excerpt comes from a 1927 article in Time Magazine that identifies local gangs in New York City and their activities. However, gangs existed long before any established city in the United States. British crime chronicler, Luke Pike (1873), reported that the first 1 ch01.indd 1 12/23/15 9:08 AM 2 Chapter 1: The Emergence of Gangs in the United States—Then and Now set of active gangs were in Europe. During those times, they were better known as highway robbers.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court
    Case 1:06-cv-01759-JMD Document 25 Filed 08/11/08 Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SALVADOR DAVID GEROLAGA, ) 1:06-CV-1759 JMD HC ) 12 Petitioner, ) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT ) OF HABEAS CORPUS 13 v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 14 ) TO ENTER JUDGMENT D. ADAMS, Warden, ) 15 ) ORDER DECLINING ISSUANCE OF Respondent. ) CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 16 ) 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 20 BACKGROUND 21 Petitioner is currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections pursuant to 22 a judgment of the Stanislaus County Superior Court. On June 17, 2005, a jury found Petitioner 23 guilty of one count of possession of a firearm by a felon (Cal. Penal Code § 12021(a)). The jury also 24 found that Petitioner possessed the firearm for the benefit of a criminal street gang (Cal. Penal Code 25 § 186.22(b)(1)). Petitioner admitted that he had served three prior prison terms. (Cal. Penal Code § 26 667.5(b)). The court sentenced Petitioner to an aggregate term of ten years in state prison, consisting 27 of an upper term of three years for the firearm possession offense, an aggravated four-year gang 28 enhancement, and three one-year prior prison term enhancements. (Answer at 1-4.) U.S. District Court E. D. California Jp 1 Case 1:06-cv-01759-JMD Document 25 Filed 08/11/08 Page 2 of 18 1 Petitioner appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid and Other Modern Gangs
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention December 2001 Hybrid and Other A Message From OJJDP Modern Gangs Gangs have changed significantly from the images portrayed in West Side Story and similar stereotypical David Starbuck, James C. Howell, depictions. Although newly emerging and Donna J. Lindquist youth gangs frequently take on the names of older traditional gangs, the The proliferation of youth gangs since 1980 same methods of operation as traditional similarities often end there. has fueled the public’s fear and magnified gangs such as the Bloods and Crips (based This Bulletin describes the nature of possible misconceptions about youth gangs. in Los Angeles, CA) or the Black Gangster modern youth gangs, in particular, To address the mounting concern about Disciples and Vice Lords (based in Chicago, hybrid gangs. Hybrid gang culture is youth gangs, the Office of Juvenile Justice IL). These older gangs tend to have an age- characterized by mixed racial and and Delinquency Prevention’s (OJJDP’s) graded structure of subgroups or cliques. ethnic participation within a single Youth Gang Series delves into many of the The two Chicago gangs have produced or- gang, participation in multiple gangs key issues related to youth gangs. The ganizational charts and explicit rules of by a single individual, vague rules and series considers issues such as gang migra- conduct and regulations, including detailed codes of conduct for gang members, tion, gang growth, female involvement with punishments for breaking gang rules (Sper- use of symbols and colors from gangs, homicide, drugs and violence, and gel, 1995:81).
    [Show full text]
  • SURENOS 13 (SOUTH SIDE) RACE: Mostly Hispanic, Caucasian SYMBOLS: SUR, 13, X3, XIII, La Eme, 3 Dots COLORS: Blue
    A gang is a group of people who claim a territory and use it to make money through illegal activities (i.e. drug trafficking). Gangs can be organized based upon race, ethnicity, territory, or money-making activities, and are generally made up of members ages 8 to 22. Members of gangs wear specific articles of clothing to be recognized as part of the group such as bandanas, hats, scarves of certain colors, or gang- related tattoos or symbols. Gangs are one of the leading factors for growth of violent crimes both on and off school property. 86 percent of U.S. cities with a population of 100,000 or more report gang activity. According to the FBI there are 33,000 violent street, motorcycle, and prison gangs active in the U.S., with more than 1.4 million members (a 40 percent increase from 2009). In recent years, gangs are participating in more non-traditional crimes such as prostitution, alien smuggling, and human trafficking, as well as white-collar crimes like counterfeiting, identity theft, and mortgage fraud. These new, non-traditional crimes create higher profitability and lower visibility. There are gangs in Central Texas. The following 5 gangs are the largest gangs in our area. SURENOS 13 (SOUTH SIDE) RACE: Mostly Hispanic, Caucasian SYMBOLS: SUR, 13, X3, XIII, La Eme, 3 dots COLORS: Blue NORTENOS 14 (NORTH SIDE) RACE: Mostly Hispanic, Caucasian SYMBOLS: NORTE, 14, X4, XIV, Huelga bird, 4 dots COLORS: Red CRIPS RACE: Mostly Black, Asians, Native Americans and Caucasians SYMBOLS: BK (Blood Killer), 6-point star (used rarely) COLORS: Blue, Purple BLOODS RACE: Mostly Black, Asians, Native Americans, and Caucasians SYMBOLS: CK (Crip Killer), 5-point star COLORS: Red, sometimes Green FOLK NATION- GANGSTER DISCIPLES RACE: Black SYMBOLS: 6-point star, heart w/ wings, pitchfork upwards, devil horns COLORS: Black, sometimes Blue LOS CHOLOS Los Cholos was formed by Lanier High School Students of Mexican descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Shattered Hearts the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of American Indian Women and Girls in Minnesota
    Shattered Hearts The Commercial Sexual Exploitation Of American Indian Women And Girls In Minnesota Minnesota Indian Women’s Resource Center Prepared by Alexandra (Sandi) Pierce, Ph.D. for the Minnesota Indian Women’s Resource Center, Minneapolis MN © 2009 Minnesota Indian Women’s Resource Center Table of contents Dedication ............................................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... iii Background ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Organization of the report ...................................................................................................................................... 3 I. The context ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 II. Methods and definitions ................................................................................................................................ 16 III. Prevalence..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Involvement in prostitution ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 August 24, 2020 MR. JOHN GREENEWALD JR. SUITE
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 August 24, 2020 MR. JOHN GREENEWALD JR. SUITE 1203 27305 WEST LIVE OAK ROAD CASTAIC, CA 91384-4520 FOIPA Request No.: 1374338-000 Subject: List of FBI Pre-Processed Files/Database Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is in response to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request. The FBI has completed its search for records responsive to your request. Please see the paragraphs below for relevant information specific to your request as well as the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for standard responses applicable to all requests. Material consisting of 192 pages has been reviewed pursuant to Title 5, U.S. Code § 552/552a, and this material is being released to you in its entirety with no excisions of information. Please refer to the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for additional standard responses applicable to your request. “Part 1” of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. “Part 2” includes additional standard responses that apply to all requests for records about yourself or any third party individuals. “Part 3” includes general information about FBI records that you may find useful. Also enclosed is our Explanation of Exemptions. For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under “Contact Us.” The FOIPA Request number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, 441 G Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • CJSA 1371 Online
    Introduction to Security Threat Groups (CJSA 1371) Credit: 3 semester credit hours (3 hours lecture) Prerequisite/Co-requisite: none Course Description: Study of Security Threat Groups and their impact on communities, law enforcement, the military, and schools throughout the United States. Includes methods of combating domestic and international Security Threat Groups’ operations, narcotics traffic, the mind of the gang member, and the criminal enterprise of security threat groups and organized crime’s impact on terrorism. Required Text and Materials 1. GANGS: A Guide to Understanding Street Gangs 5, by Al Valdez, Ph.D. ©2009 ISBN: 978 1 56325 147 4 Course Objectives Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to: 1. Identify security threat groups and subcultures 2. examine security threat groups’ philosophies, political, economic, and environmental impact on public administration and the private sector 3. identify the legal changes required to combat security threat groups 4. present the results of Gangology research Course Outline A. Overview 5. American Militias 1. American Street Gangs 6. National Alliance 2. Gang Violence 7. Tagger Crews 3. Can Gang Membership be predicted? 8. Party Crews, Posses and Clubs B. Ethnic & Gender Based Gangs 9. Occult Gangs 1. West Coast Latino Gangs 10. The Goth Scene 2. Sureno-Norteno Gangs 11. Hybrid Gangs 3. 18th Street Gang 12. Midwest and East Coast Gangs 4. Mara Salvatrucha 13. Motorcycle Gangs 5. Asian Gangs D. Prison Gangs 6. Tiny Rascal Gang 1. Prison Gangs in California 7. Wah Ching 2. Prison Gangs in Texas 8. Asian Boyz E. Military Gangs 9. African-American Gangs 1.
    [Show full text]