3.5 Neutrinos Mx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3.5 Neutrinos Mx news feature On the trail of the neutrino Huge arrays of detectors now have these ghostly particles CHAMBERS NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY/R. SUDBURY in their sights — but will what they see lead physicists to rethink the standard model? Dan Falk investigates. n the subatomic zoo, few particles are as elusive as the neutrino. The Universe is Iawash with them, but they slide through most forms of matter with ease. Billions have passed through your body since you started reading this article. By one estimate, the average neutrino could travel for 1,000 light-years through solid matter before being stopped. This reluctance to interact with matter makes neutrinos difficult to detect. But, almost half a century after they were first spotted, neutrinos have become the focus of intense study. Exciting results from existing detectors, together with plans for new detec- tor projects, promise to make this a busy decade for neutrino hunters. The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) in Ontario is poised to illuminate the physics of neutrinos produced by the Sun, and a new detector in Antarctica is making Full house: the detector at Sudbury Neutrino Observatory can detect all three flavours of neutrino. progress towards studying neutrinos from deep space — a first step towards building a particles. The last of the three flavours to be neutrons or electrons it governs. Physicists larger astrophysical neutrino observatory. detected was the tau neutrino, finally snared maximize their chances of observing these Other detectors in North America, Europe last year in an experiment at the Tevatron rare interactions by monitoring huge num- and Japan are catching neutrinos produced accelerator in Fermilab, near Chicago1. bers of potential neutrino targets. Large when cosmic rays hit the atmosphere or by The problem faced by neutrino hunters is tanks of water are a common choice — water particle accelerators here on Earth. “I think that all three flavours of neutrinos are is cheap, plentiful and, being transparent, it it’s fair to say that this is the era of the neutri- extremely unwilling to interact with other allows physicists to spot any interactions that no,” says John Bahcall of the Institute for subatomic particles. Of the four types of fun- occur deep inside the tank. The tanks are Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, a damental interaction between particles, held deep below ground, so that other parti- pioneer of neutrino physics. neutrinos interact almost exclusively cles are screened out by the overlying rock. through the weak nuclear force, the puny There are several types of interaction to Three of a kind force responsible for some radioactive look for. The simplest is ‘elastic scattering’ — According to the standard model, the suc- decays. As they do not carry charge, neutri- high-speed collisions between electrons in cessful but incomplete theory that describes nos avoid electromagnetic interactions. Nor water molecules and incoming neutrinos. fundamental particles and their interac- do they interact through the strong nuclear The collision leaves the electrons travelling tions, neutrinos come in three types or force that binds nuclei together. The jury is faster than the speed of light through water. ‘flavours’: electron, muon and tau neutri- still out on whether neutrinos feel gravity, As a result, the electrons emit dim, blue flash- nos. The names derive from links within the but if they do, the forces involved will be tiny. es of light known as Cerenkov radiation — model between the neutrinos and other So the only practical way to snag a neutri- the optical equivalent of the ‘sonic boom’ particles — the familiar electron and its no hinges on the weak nuclear force and the created by supersonic aircraft. Neutrinos can rarer, heavier cousins the muon and tau interactions between neutrinos and protons, also collide with neutrons or protons in 10 © 2001 Macmillan Magazines Ltd NATURE | VOL 411 | 3 MAY 2001 | www.nature.com news feature atomic nuclei, and some of the particles pro- Super-K, have studied the problem, but duced in these reactions also travel fast irm data on because they are not equipped to distinguish enough to produce Cerenkov radiation. In between the various solar-generated neutri- each case, the flashes of light can be captured Fneutrino mass nos, the results have been inconclusive. by photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) on the The SNO, a joint project between Cana- sides of the detector tanks. could point the way to da, the United States and Britain, has per- Detectors such as these could help to settle haps the greatest chance of resolving the the most pressing issue in neutrino physics a more elegant theory. issue. Located at the bottom of one of North — that of the neutrino mass. The standard America’s deepest mines, 300 kilometres model says that neutrinos should have zero But the experiment is not foolproof. The north of Toronto, the SNO’s detector is a mass, but evidence from solar physics and calculation depends on the rate at which spherical vat 12 metres across, filled with some proposed Grand Unified Theories — atmospheric neutrinos are produced, and 1,000 tonnes of heavy water and lined with efforts to unify electromagnetism and the this is not known precisely. Those involved 10,000 PMTs. Heavy water contains deuteri- strong and weak nuclear forces as different with the project are confident that Super-K um — an isotope of hydrogen that has a neu- aspects of a single interaction — points has indeed seen neutrino flavour-switching. tron as well as a proton in its nucleus. instead to the particles having a small mass. “The oscillation theory quite nicely explains Most Cerenkov radiation observed at For physicists, the tell-tale sign that neutrinos our data,” says Yoji Totsuka, the observatory’s other detectors comes from interactions have mass would be ‘flavour-switching’, or director and head of the Institute for Cosmic between electron neutrinos and either neu- oscillation. Neutrinos oscillate if they switch Ray Research at the University of Tokyo. trons or electrons. But the SNO’s deuterium from one flavour to another as they travel. The atoms allow it to detect another type of colli- way in which such switching would occur is Solar flaws sion which is more sensitive to the other neu- not fully understood, but physicists know that Conclusive evidence for neutrino oscilla- trino flavours. Incoming neutrinos — elec- to oscillate neutrinos need to have mass2. tion would also solve one of the longest- tron, muon or tau — can, very occasionally, In 1998, a team of US and Japanese standing questions in solar physics. From split the proton and neutron in deuterium researchers using the Super-Kamiokande, or what we understand about how the Sun apart. Gamma rays are generated if the neu- Super-K, detector in Japan found evidence produces neutrinos, 60 billion solar neutri- tron released by this fission is subsequently that appeared to support the idea of neutri- nos should pass through every square centi- captured by another deuterium nucleus, and nos with mass3. The story landed on the front metre of the Earth’s surface every second. the SNO’s PMTs can detect this radiation. page of The New York Times under a headline But measurements from neutrino detectors This ability to catch all three types of neu- declaring that the “Universe May Never Be suggest that only between a half and a third trinos is the SNO’s big advantage. By compar- the Same”. of this figure are reaching the Earth2,4 . ing the numbers of each type of solar neutrino Either the models that describe the Sun’s arriving at Earth with the number expected Something in the air interior are flawed — and most scientists from theories of solar physics, the SNO Buried deep under Mount Ikena near the doubt this to be the case — or something is should be able to settle the neutrino flavour- town of Kamioka, 200 kilometres northwest happening to the neutrinos between their switching issue. The SNO team should have a of Tokyo, the Super-K detector uses 13,000 emission from the Sun’s core and their major announcement within months, says PMTs to monitor a 50-million-litre tank of arrival on Earth. In the main, the Sun gener- Art McDonald, the observatory’s director. water. It searches for signatures of ‘atmos- ates electron neutrinos, but most physicists Other physicists are studying neutrinos pheric neutrinos’ — electron or muon neu- think that many of these switch flavours en produced by artificial sources such as trinos produced when high-speed atomic route, turning into muon neutrinos or tau nuclear reactors and particle accelerators. nuclei and electrons from deep space collide neutrinos. Neutrino detectors, including Researchers using these sources have more ▲ with oxygen or nitrogen atoms in the Earth’s atmosphere. These neutrinos can be singled out because they come from a dif- ferent direction and have a different energy compared with other neutrinos. MORSE ROBERT The present theory of how atmospheric neutrinos are generated suggests that Super- K should detect twice as many muon neutri- nos as electron neutrinos. Instead, it is recording roughly equal numbers of each3. This, argues the Super-K team, shows that some of the muon neutrinos are turning into something else — tau neutrinos — as they travel through the atmosphere and the Earth’s crust. Super-K cannot detect tau neu- trinos because the particles produced when they collide with atomic nuclei are usually too short-lived to generate Cerenkov radiation. Although the Super-K results cannot give a specific value for the mass of any neutrino flavour, they can be used to calculate a mass difference — in this case, a fraction of a mil- lionth of the mass of an electron — between Eyes down: One of AMANDA’s photomultipliers the muon and tau types.
Recommended publications
  • Synergy of Astroparticle Physics and Colliders
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Synergy of astro-particle physics and collider physics Thematic Areas: (check all that apply /) (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics (Other) EF06, EF07, NF05, NF06,AF4 Contact Information: Luis A. Anchordoqui (City University of New York) [[email protected]] Authors: Rana Adhikari, Markus Ahlers, Michael Albrow, Roberto Aloisio, Luis A. Anchordoqui, Ignatios Anto- niadis, Vernon Barger, Jose Bellido Caceres, David Berge, Douglas R. Bergman, Mario E. Bertaina, Lorenzo Bonechi, Mauricio Bustamante, Karen S. Caballero-Mora, Antonella Castellina, Lorenzo Cazon, Ruben Conceic¸ao,˜ Giovanni Consolati, Olivier Deligny, Hans P. Dembinski, James B. Dent, Peter B. Denton, Car- ola Dobrigkeit, Caterina Doglioni, Ralph Engel, David d’Enterria, Ke Fang, Glennys R. Farrar, Jonathan L. Feng, Thomas K. Gaisser, Carlos Garc´ıa Canal, Claire Guepin, Francis Halzen, Tao Han, Andreas Haungs, Dan Hooper, Felix Kling, John Krizmanic, Greg Landsberg, Jean-Philippe Lansberg, John G. Learned, Paolo Lipari, Danny Marfatia, Jim Matthews, Thomas McCauley, Hiroaki Menjo, John W. Mitchell, Marco Stein Muzio, Jane M. Nachtman, Angela V. Olinto, Yasar Onel, Sandip Pakvasa, Sergio Palomares-Ruiz, Dan Parson, Thomas C. Paul, Tanguy Pierog, Mario Pimenta, Mary Hall Reno, Markus Roth, Grigory Rubtsov, Takashi Sako, Fred Sarazin, Bangalore Sathyaprakash, Sergio J. Sciutto, Dennis Soldin, Jorge F. Soriano, Todor Stanev, Xerxes Tata, Serap Tilav, Kirsten Tollefson, Diego F.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos
    July 9, 2018 21:42 ws-rv9x6 Book Title trisep_halzen_061918 page 1 Chapter 1 High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos Francis Halzen Wisconsin IceCube Particle Physics Center UW{Madison, Madison, WI USA [email protected] Chargeless, weakly-interacting neutrinos are ideal astronomical messen- gers because they travel through space without scattering, absorption, or deflection. They provide the only unobstructed view of cosmic accelera- tors. But this weak interaction also makes them notoriously difficult to detect, leading to neutrino observatories requiring large-scale detectors. The IceCube experiment discovered PeV-energy neutrinos originating beyond the Sun, with energies bracketed by those of TeV-energy gamma rays and EeV-energy extragalactic cosmic rays. In this chapter, we dis- cuss the IceCube neutrino telescope, the status of the observation of cosmic neutrinos, and what neutrinos can tell us about the nonthermal Universe. Besides the search for the sources of Galactic and extragalactic cosmic rays, the scientific missions of IceCube and similar instruments under construction in the Mediterranean Sea and Lake Baikal include the observation of Galactic supernova explosions, the search for dark matter, and the study of neutrinos themselves. 1 July 9, 2018 21:42 ws-rv9x6 Book Title trisep_halzen_061918 page 2 2 Francis Halzen Contents 1. Neutrino Astronomy: a Brief History . .3 2. IceCube . .5 2.1. Detecting Very High-Energy Neutrinos . .5 2.2. Detector Performance . 12 2.3. Atmospheric Neutrinos . 14 3. Rationale for the Construction of Kilometer-Scale Neutrino Detectors . 15 3.1. Cosmic-Ray Accelerators . 16 3.2. Neutrinos and Gamma Rays Associated with Cosmic Rays . 20 4. Neutrinos Associated with Cosmic Ray Accelerators .
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Observatory Management & Operations Plan
    IceCube Neutrino Observatory Management & Operations Plan Neutrino Observatory Management & Operations Plan December 2019 Revision 4.0 December 2019 1 IceCube Neutrino Observatory Management & Operations Plan IceCube MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS PLAN SUBMITTED BY: Francis Halzen Kael Hanson IceCube Principal Investigator Co-PI and IceCube Director of Operations University of Wisconsin–Madison University of Wisconsin–Madison Albrecht Karle Co-PI and Associate Director for Science and Instrumentation University of Wisconsin–Madison James Madsen Associate Director for Education and Outreach University of Wisconsin–River Falls Catherine Vakhnina Resource Coordinator Paolo Desiati Coordination Committee Chair John Kelley Detector Operations Manager Benedikt Riedel Computing and Data Management Services Manager Juan Carlos Diaz-Velez Data Processing and Simulation Services Manager Alex Olivas Software Coordinator Summer Blot, Keiichi Mase Calibration Coordinator December 2019 2 IceCube Neutrino Observatory Management & Operations Plan Revision History Date Section Revision Action Revised Revised 1.0 06/9/2016 First version 2.0 05/31/2017 Updated for M&O PY2 3.0 12/12/2018 Updated for M&O PY3 4.0 03/20/2020 Updated PY4 plan w new Org Chart December 2019 1 IceCube Neutrino Observatory Management & Operations Plan Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Terms ........................................................................................................................ 5 1 Preface .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics with Neutrinos
    IceCube: An Instrument for Neutrino Astronomy Francis Halzen1 and Spencer R. Klein2, 3 1Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, 1150 University Avenue, Madison WI 53706 2Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720 3Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720 Abstract Neutrino astronomy beyond the Sun was first imagined in the late 1950s; by the 1970s, it was realized that kilometer-scale neutrino detectors were required. The first such instrument, IceCube, is near completion and taking data. The IceCube project transforms a cubic kilometer of deep and ultra-transparent Antarctic ice into a particle detector. A total of 5,160 optical sensors are embedded into a gigaton of Antarctic ice to detect the Cherenkov light emitted by secondary particles produced when neutrinos interact with nuclei in the ice. Each optical sensor is a complete data acquisition system, including a phototube, digitization electronics, control and trigger systems and LEDs for calibration. The light patterns reveal the type (flavor) of neutrino interaction and the energy and direction of the neutrino, making neutrino astronomy possible. The scientific missions of IceCube include such varied tasks as the search for sources of cosmic rays, the observation of Galactic supernova explosions, the search for dark matter, and the study of the neutrinos themselves. These reach energies well beyond those produced with accelerator beams. The outline of this review is as follows: • Neutrino Astronomy and Kilometer-Scale Detectors • High-Energy Neutrino Telescopes: Methodologies of Neutrino Detection • IceCube Hardware • High-Energy Neutrino Telescopes: Beyond Astronomy • Future Projects I. Introduction The Technology Soon after the 1956 observation of the neutrino1, the idea emerged that it represented the ideal astronomical messenger.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Francis Halzen Personal Information Citizenship: United States Office addresses: Department of Physics 5293 Chamberlin Hall, 1150 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706 Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center 222 West Washington Avenue, Suite 500, Madison, WI 53703 Home address: 1845 Summit Avenue, Madison, WI 53726 Education 1972 Agrégé de l’Enseignement Supérieur, University of Louvain, Belgium 1969 Ph.D., University of Louvain, Belgium 1966 Master's degree, University of Louvain, Belgium University of Wisconsin–Madison Positions 2001–present Principal Investigator and co-Spokesperson for the IceCube project 2013–2014 Acting Director of the Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center 1991 Hilldale Professor 1987 Gregory Breit Distinguished Professor 1984–present Director of the Institute for Elementary Particle Physics Research 1977 Romnes Faculty Fellow 1977 Professor 1974 Associate Professor 1972 Assistant Professor 1971 Research Associate Education, Experience, and Awards Experience 1996 Science Associate at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1987 NSF – Japan U.S. exchange, Univ. Tokyo, Japan 1985 Scientific Associate at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1983 Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, U of Tokyo 1982 Visiting Professor at the University of Durham, UK 1982 Nordita Professor at the University of Helsinki 1977–1983 Lector at the University of Louvain, Belgium 1980 Visiting Professor at the University of Hawaii-Honolulu 1977 Consultant at the Rutherford High Energy Laboratory, Oxford, UK 1977 Visiting
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1909.08623V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 18 Sep 2019 L
    LCTP-19-19 A Search for Neutrino Point-Source Populations in 7 Years of IceCube Data with Neutrino-count Statistics M. G. Aartsen,17 M. Ackermann,55 J. Adams,17 J. A. Aguilar,12 M. Ahlers,21 M. Ahrens,47 C. Alispach,27 K. Andeen,38 T. Anderson,52 I. Ansseau,12 G. Anton,25 C. Arg¨uelles,14 J. Auffenberg,1 S. Axani,14 P. Backes,1 H. Bagherpour,17 X. Bai,44 A. Balagopal V.,30 A. Barbano,27 S. W. Barwick,29 B. Bastian,55 V. Baum,37 S. Baur,12 R. Bay,8 J. J. Beatty,20, 19 K.-H. Becker,54 J. Becker Tjus,11 S. BenZvi,46 D. Berley,18 E. Bernardini,55, ∗ D. Z. Besson,31, y G. Binder,9, 8 D. Bindig,54 E. Blaufuss,18 S. Blot,55 C. Bohm,47 M. B¨orner,22 S. B¨oser,37 O. Botner,53 J. B¨ottcher,1 E. Bourbeau,21 J. Bourbeau,36 F. Bradascio,55 J. Braun,36 S. Bron,27 J. Brostean-Kaiser,55 A. Burgman,53 J. Buscher,1 R. S. Busse,39 T. Carver,27 C. Chen,6 E. Cheung,18 D. Chirkin,36 S. Choi,49 K. Clark,32 L. Classen,39 A. Coleman,40 G. H. Collin,14, 15 J. M. Conrad,14 P. Coppin,13 P. Correa,13 D. F. Cowen,52, 51 R. Cross,46 P. Dave,6 C. De Clercq,13 J. J. DeLaunay,52 H. Dembinski,40 K. Deoskar,47 S. De Ridder,28 P. Desiati,36 K. D. de Vries,13 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the High-Energy All-Flavor Neutrino-Nucleon Cross Section with Icecube
    Measurement of the high-energy all-flavor neutrino-nucleon cross section with IceCube (IceCube Collaboration) R. Abbasi,17 M. Ackermann,57 J. Adams,18 J. A. Aguilar,12 M. Ahlers,22 M. Ahrens,48 C. Alispach,28 A. A. Alves Jr.,31 N. M. Amin,41 K. Andeen,39 T. Anderson,54 I. Ansseau,12 G. Anton,26 C. Argüelles,14 S. Axani,15 X. Bai,45 A. Balagopal V.,37 A. Barbano,28 S. W. Barwick,30 B. Bastian,57 V. Basu,37 V. Baum,38 S. Baur,12 R. Bay,8 J. J. Beatty,20, 21 K.-H. Becker,56 J. Becker Tjus,11 C. Bellenghi,27 S. BenZvi,47 D. Berley,19 E. Bernardini,57, ∗ D. Z. Besson,32, y G. Binder,8, 9 D. Bindig,56 E. Blaufuss,19 S. Blot,57 S. Böser,38 O. Botner,55 J. Böttcher,1 E. Bourbeau,22 J. Bourbeau,37 F. Bradascio,57 J. Braun,37 S. Bron,28 J. Brostean-Kaiser,57 A. Burgman,55 R. S. Busse,40 M. A. Campana,44 C. Chen,6 D. Chirkin,37 S. Choi,50 B. A. Clark,24 K. Clark,33 L. Classen,40 A. Coleman,41 G. H. Collin,15 J. M. Conrad,15 P. Coppin,13 P. Correa,13 D. F. Cowen,53, 54 R. Cross,47 P. Dave,6 C. De Clercq,13 J. J. DeLaunay,54 H. Dembinski,41 K. Deoskar,48 S. De Ridder,29 A. Desai,37 P. Desiati,37 K. D. de Vries,13 G. de Wasseige,13 M. de With,10 T.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Interest Synergy of Astro-Particle Physics and Collider Physics
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Synergy of astro-particle physics and collider physics Thematic Areas: (check all that apply /) (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics (Other) EF06, EF07, NF05, NF06,AF4 Contact Information: Luis A. Anchordoqui (City University of New York) [[email protected]] Authors: Rana Adhikari, Markus Ahlers, Michael Albrow, Roberto Aloisio, Luis A. Anchordoqui, Ignatios Anto- niadis, Vernon Barger, Jose Bellido Caceres, David Berge, Douglas R. Bergman, Mario E. Bertaina, Lorenzo Bonechi, Mauricio Bustamante, Karen S. Caballero-Mora, Antonella Castellina, Lorenzo Cazon, Ruben Conceic¸ao,˜ Giovanni Consolati, Olivier Deligny, Hans P. Dembinski, James B. Dent, Peter B. Denton, Car- ola Dobrigkeit, Caterina Doglioni, Ralph Engel, David d’Enterria, Ke Fang, Glennys R. Farrar, Jonathan L. Feng, Thomas K. Gaisser, Carlos Garc´ıa Canal, Claire Guepin, Francis Halzen, Tao Han, Andreas Haungs, Dan Hooper, Felix Kling, John Krizmanic, Greg Landsberg, Jean-Philippe Lansberg, John G. Learned, Paolo Lipari, Danny Marfatia, Jim Matthews, Thomas McCauley, Hiroaki Menjo, John W. Mitchell, Marco Stein Muzio, Jane M. Nachtman, Angela V. Olinto, Yasar Onel, Sandip Pakvasa, Sergio Palomares-Ruiz, Dan Parson, Thomas C. Paul, Tanguy Pierog, Mario Pimenta, Mary Hall Reno, Markus Roth, Grigory Rubtsov, Takashi Sako, Fred Sarazin, Bangalore Sathyaprakash, Sergio J. Sciutto, Dennis Soldin, Jorge F. Soriano, Todor Stanev, Xerxes Tata, Serap Tilav, Kirsten Tollefson, Diego F.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlos Argüelles –
    H (+1) 608 622 5009 Carlos Argüelles B [email protected] Education 2012–2015 University of Wisconsin at Madison, PhD. in Physics. 2009–2012 Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, M. Sc. in Physics. 2004–2008 Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Ba. Sc. in Physics. Professional Experience Jul. 2020 – Assistant Professor, Harvard University. Ongoing Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences Sep. 2015 – Postdoctoral Research Associate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Jul. 2020 Researcher in Janet Conrad’s group. Jul. 2012 – Research Assistant, University of Wisconsin - Madison. Aug. 2015 Research assistant under the supervision of Francis Halzen. Mar. 2010 – Research Assistant, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Jul. 2012 Research assistant under the supervision of Alberto Gago. Mar. 2010 – Teacher, Colegio Santa Margarita. Dec. 2010 High school physics teacher. Mar. 2007 – Teaching Assistant, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Dec. 2011 Teaching assistant in undergraduate courses. Awards and Fellowships 2020 IceCube Collaboration Impact Award for “for key contributions in the development of a suite software tools used broadly in IceCube analyses, and his leading efforts in the advancement of diversity, equity and inclusion within the collaboration.” 2017 American Physical Society Division of Astroparticle Physics thesis award finalist. 2015-2020 Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center (WIPAC) Honorary Fellow. 2011 Fermilab Theory Group Latin American Fellow. 2007-2008 Scholarships to spend a summer semesters at Instituto de Matemática Pura e Aplicada (IMPA). 2006 Scholarships for outstanding performance in physics to continue his undergraduate and graduate studies in physics at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Collaboration Leadership, Community Involvement, and Outreach Oct. 2018 – Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Technical Leader, IceCube Collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing the Heavens Down to Earth
    This Issue | Back Issues | Editorial Staff Collider Physics Bringing the heavens down to Earth Recent developments and discoveries in astrophysics, particle physics and cosmology are creating an increasing synergy between astroparticle physics and particle physics at accelerators, as Nikolaos Mavromatos and James Pinfold explain. As announced a year ago now, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) has measured anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background radiation to an unprecedented accuracy of 10-9 K. The vastly improved precision of these data, compared with the groundbreaking results of the earlier Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite, is clearly shown in figure 1. This is opening up a new era for astroparticle physics, as the accuracy of the WMAP data has allowed a Figure 1 determination of cosmological parameters that are of relevance to particle physicists. Specifically, data from WMAP have significantly constrained the dark-matter content of the universe. This in turn strongly implies model-dependent and stringent constraints on models in particle physics, especially in minimal supersymmetry. In addition, the current evidence for an accelerating universe has revealed a massive component of "dark energy" in the total energy of the universe. One can imagine a pie graph showing the breakdown of the energy budget of the cosmos: 4% ordinary matter, 23% dark matter and 73% dark energy. Other examples of the interplay between accelerator physics and astroparticle physics are provided by the following areas: extra dimensions and mini-black-hole production; neutrino oscillations; electroweak baryogenesis; dark matter consisting of the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP); magnetic monopole production; and ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECR).
    [Show full text]
  • High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy: the Cosmic Ray Connection
    INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS Rep. Prog. Phys. 65 (2002) 1025–1078 PII: S0034-4885(02)18687-8 High-energy neutrino astronomy: the cosmic ray connection Francis Halzen and Dan Hooper Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, 1150 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA Received 15 December 2001, in final form 2 May 2002 Published 12 June 2002 Online at stacks.iop.org/RoPP/65/1025 Abstract This is a review of neutrino astronomy anchored to the observational fact that Nature accelerates protons and photons to energies in excess of 1020 and 1013 eV, respectively. Although the discovery of cosmic rays dates back close to a century, we do not know how and where they are accelerated. There is evidence that the highest-energy cosmic rays are extra-galactic—they cannot be contained by our galaxy’s magnetic field anyway because their gyroradius far exceeds its dimension. Elementary elementary-particle physics dictates a universal upper limit on their energy of 5 × 1019 eV, the so-called Greisen–Kuzmin–Zatsepin cutoff; however, particles in excess of this energy have been observed by all experiments, adding one more puzzle to the cosmic ray mystery. Mystery is fertile ground for progress: we will review the facts as well as the speculations about the sources. There is a realistic hope that the oldest problem in astronomy will be resolved soon by ambitious experimentation: air shower arrays of 104 km2 area, arrays of air Cerenkov detectors and, the subject of this review, kilometre-scale neutrino observatories. We will review why cosmic accelerators are also expected to be cosmic beam dumps producing associated high-energy photon and neutrino beams.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Reactor Antineutrino Flavor Oscillations with the Double Chooz Far Detector Arthur James Franke
    Searching for Reactor Antineutrino Flavor Oscillations with the Double Chooz Far Detector Arthur James Franke Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 c 2012 Arthur James Franke All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Searching for Reactor Antineutrino Flavor Oscillations with the Double Chooz Far Detector Arthur James Franke This dissertation presents results from a search for reactorν ¯e flavor oscillations using the Double Chooz Far Detector. The search was performed by observing the rate and energy spectrum ofν ¯e interacting via Inverse Beta Decay in a Gd-doped liquid scintillator detector, and comparing the observation to an expectation based on a prediction of the emitted reactor flux. The Columbia University neutrino group was instrumental in construction of the Double Chooz Outer Veto, as well as the analysis efforts leading to two oscillation measurement results. The most recent analysis is presented herein, focusing on 251.27 days of data (or 33.71 GW-ton-years of exposure). In these data, 8249 IBD candidates were observed, compared to a signal+background prediction of 8936.8. A fit to a two-neutrino oscillation model considering event rate, spectral shape, and time yields a best-fit value of sin2 (2θ ) = 0.109 0.030 (stat.) 0.025 (syst.) at ∆m2 = 2.32 10−3 eV2, with 13 ± ± 31 × 2 χRS/d.o.f. = 42.1/35. A frequentist method deems the null-oscillation hypothesis excluded by the data at 99.8% C.L., or 2.9σ. These results are in agreement with the measurements of other modern reactorν ¯e experiments.
    [Show full text]