DOCSLIB.ORG

UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The influence of contextual constraint on word recognition during reading Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/37h586gm Author Plummer, Patrick Reynard Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Influence of Contextual Constraint on Word Recognition during Reading A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology by Patrick Reynard Plummer Committee in charge: Professor Victor Ferreira, Chair Professor David Barner Professor Seana Coulson Professor Roger Levy Professor John Wixted 2015 The Dissertation of Patrick Reynard Plummer is approved, and is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2015 iii DEDICATION For Keith Rayner, a mentor who opened the doors for me, and whose door was always open for me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ............................................................................................................... iii Dedication ...................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contexts ........................................................................................................... v List of Figures ............................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ................................................................................................................. ix Vita ................................................................................................................................. x Abstract of the Dissertation ........................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 Eye movement control ........................................................................................ 1 Word Recognition ............................................................................................... 4 Contextual constraint and word predictability .................................................... 8 Word guessing accounts.................................................................................... 18 Interactive accounts .......................................................................................... 21 Post-lexical accounts ........................................................................................ 25 Predictions for eye movement behavior ........................................................... 28 Chapter 2 ...................................................................................................................... 32 Method .............................................................................................................. 38 Results............................................................................................................... 43 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 3 ...................................................................................................................... 56 Method .............................................................................................................. 61 v Results............................................................................................................... 66 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 69 Chapter 4 ...................................................................................................................... 79 Method .............................................................................................................. 86 Results............................................................................................................... 90 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 94 Chapter 5 .................................................................................................................... 105 Method ............................................................................................................ 110 Results............................................................................................................. 113 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 115 Chapter 6 .................................................................................................................... 125 General Discussion ......................................................................................... 125 Appendix 2.1 .............................................................................................................. 129 Appendix 2.2 .............................................................................................................. 131 Appendix 3.1 .............................................................................................................. 135 Appendix 3.2 .............................................................................................................. 138 Appendix 4.1 .............................................................................................................. 146 Appendix 4.2 .............................................................................................................. 151 Appendix 5.1 .............................................................................................................. 161 References .................................................................................................................. 169 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 – Average first-pass skipping rates for target word across preview and predictability conditions ............................................................................................... 52 Figure 2.2 – Average first-pass skipping rates for target word across preview, similarity, and predictability conditions ....................................................................... 53 Figure 2.3 – Average gaze durations (ms) for target word across preview and predictability conditions ............................................................................................... 54 Figure 2.4 – Average go-past durations (ms) for target word across preview, similarity, and predictability conditions ........................................................................................ 55 Figure 3.1 – First-pass skipping rates on the target word across word predictability and preview conditions ........................................................................................................ 75 Figure 3.2 – First-pass skipping rates on the target word across word predictability condition and orthographic neighborhood size for high and low letter overlap ........... 76 Figure 3.3 – Gaze durations (ms) on the target word across word predictability and preview conditions. ....................................................................................................... 77 Figure 3.4 – Regression rates on target word across word preview and predictability conditions ..................................................................................................................... 78 Figure 4.1– First-pass skipping rates proportion across all preview and predictability conditions ................................................................................................................... 100 Figure 4.2 – First-pass skipping proportion for full previews and phonological previews across word length ...................................................................................... 101 Figure 4.3 – Gaze durations (ms) across full and orthographic control preview conditions for lower frequency words ........................................................................ 102 vii Figure 4.4 – Gaze durations (ms) across full and orthographic control preview conditions for short words .......................................................................................... 103 Figure 4.5 – Gaze durations (ms) across full and orthographic control preview conditions for long words ........................................................................................... 104 Figure 5.1 – Target word first-pass skipping rates across word predictability and bigram frequency ........................................................................................................ 121 Figure 5.2 – Target word first-pass skipping rates across word predictability, word length, and bigram frequency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OSTM/Jason-2 Products Handbook
    OSTM/Jason-2 Products Handbook References: CNES : SALP-MU-M-OP-15815-CN EUMETSAT : EUM/OPS-JAS/MAN/08/0041 JPL: OSTM-29-1237 NOAA : Issue: 1 rev 0 Date: 17 June 2008 OSTM/Jason-2 Products Handbook Iss :1.0 - date : 17 June 2008 i.1 Chronology Issues: Issue: Date: Reason for change: 1rev0 June 17, 2008 Initial Issue People involved in this issue: Written by (*) : Date J.P. DUMONT CLS V. ROSMORDUC CLS N. PICOT CNES S. DESAI NASA/JPL H. BONEKAMP EUMETSAT J. FIGA EUMETSAT J. LILLIBRIDGE NOAA R. SHARROO ALTIMETRICS Index Sheet : Context: Keywords: Hyperlink: OSTM/Jason-2 Products Handbook Iss :1.0 - date : 17 June 2008 i.2 List of tables and figures List of tables: Table 1 : Differences between Auxiliary Data for O/I/GDR Products 1 Table 2 : Summary of error budget at the end of the verification phase 9 Table 3 : Main features of the OSTM/Jason-2 satellite 11 Table 4 : Mean classical orbit elements 16 Table 5 : Orbit auxiliary data 16 Table 6 : Equator Crossing Longitudes (in order of Pass Number) 18 Table 7 : Equator Crossing Longitudes (in order of Longitude) 19 Table 8 : Models and standards 21 Table 9 : CLS01 MSS model characteristics 22 Table 10 : CLS Rio 05 MDT model characteristics 23 Table 11 : Recommended editing criteria 26 Table 12 : Recommended filtering criteria 26 Table 13 : Recommended additional empirical tests 26 Table 14 : Main characteristics of (O)(I)GDR products 40 Table 15 - Dimensions used in the OSTM/Jason-2 data sets 42 Table 16 - netCDF variable type 42 Table 17 - Variable’s attributes 43 List of figures: Figure 1
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Interception and Export by Experimental Salt Marsh Plots Exposed to Chronic Nutrient Addition
    Vol. 400: 3–17, 2010 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published February 11 doi: 10.3354/meps08460 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Nitrogen interception and export by experimental salt marsh plots exposed to chronic nutrient addition Lindsay D. Brin1, 2,*, Ivan Valiela2, Dale Goehringer3, Brian Howes3 1Brown University, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 80 Waterman Street, Box G-W, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA 2The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL St., Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 3School of Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, 706 South Rodney French Blvd., New Bedford, Massachusetts 02744, USA ABSTRACT: Mass balance studies conducted in the 1970s in Great Sippewissett Salt Marsh, New England, showed that fertilized plots intercepted 60 to 80% of the nitrogen (N) applied at several treatment levels every year from April to October, where interception mechanisms include plant uptake, denitrification and burial. These results pointed out that salt marshes are able to intercept land-derived N that could otherwise cause eutrophication in coastal waters. To determine the long-term N interception capacity of salt marshes and to assess the effect of different levels of N input, we measured nitrogenous materials in tidal water entering and leaving Great Sippewissett experimental plots in the 2007 growing season. Our results, from sampling over both full tidal cycles and more inten- sively sampled ebb tides, indicate high interception of Salt marshes limit the amount of land-derived nitrogen externally added N. Tidal export of dissolved inorganic carried by ebbing tides out to receiving coastal waters N (DIN) was small, although it increased with tide + Photo: Ivan Valiela height and at high N input rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Dissolved Oxygen Modeling Study: Development of an Intermediate Scale Water Quality Model
    Washington State Department of Ecology Publication No. 12-03-049 PNNL-20384 Rev 1 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Puget Sound Dissolved Oxygen Modeling Study: Development of an Intermediate Scale Water Quality Model by T Khangaonkar and W Long of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and B Sackmann, T Mohamedali, and M Roberts of the Washington State Department of Ecology November 2012 This page is purposely left blank This page is purposely left blank PNNL-20384 Rev 1 Puget Sound Dissolved Oxygen Modeling Study: Development of an Intermediate Scale Water Quality Model by T Khangaonkar and W Long of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory B Sackmann, T Mohamedali, and M Roberts of the Washington State Department of Ecology October 2012 Prepared for the Washington State Department of Ecology under an Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Any use of product or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the authors or the Department of Ecology. If you need this document in a format for the visually impaired, call 360-407-6764. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341. This page is purposely left blank Summary The Salish Sea, including Puget Sound, is a large estuarine system bounded by over seven thousand miles of complex shorelines, consists of several subbasins and many large inlets with distinct properties of their own.
    [Show full text]
  • How a Tide Clock Works.Pub
    Conventional time clocks have a 12 hour cycle, with 1 hand for hours, another for minutes. Tide clocks have a single hand, and a cycle of 12 hours 25 minutes, coinciding to an average time of about 6 hours 12 minutes between high and low tides. High tide is indicated when the hand is at the ‘12 o’clock’ position, low tide is indicated with the hand at the ‘6 o’clock’ position. A tide clock is not indicating 6 or 12 o’clock of course. It is merely a convenient reference point on the dial, showing us when our local tide is high or low. 12 is marked as High, 6 is marked as Low. However, the hour markings on the dial between the High and Low tide points do show us the number of hours since the last high or low tide, and the hours before the next high or low tide. A tide clock which has been initially set correctly will continue to display tide predictions quite accurately, requiring resetting only at intervals of about 4 months, depending upon the location. A brief explanation of how the tidal cycle works The Moon is the major cause of the tides. The ‘lunar day’ (the time it takes for the Moon to re-appear at the same place in the sky) is 24 hours and 50 minutes. New Zealand, and many other places in the world, have 2 high tides and 2 low tides each day. These are called semi-diurnal tides. Some areas of the world (eg Freemantle in Australia), have only one tide cycle per day, known as diurnal tides.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin 84 (2014) 191–200
    Marine Pollution Bulletin 84 (2014) 191–200 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Pollution Bulletin journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul The effects of river run-off on water clarity across the central Great Barrier Reef ⇑ K.E. Fabricius a, , M. Logan a, S. Weeks b, J. Brodie c a Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No. 3, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia b Biophysical Oceanography Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia c Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia article info abstract Article history: Changes in water clarity across the shallow continental shelf of the central Great Barrier Reef were inves- Available online 23 May 2014 tigated from ten years of daily river load, oceanographic and MODIS-Aqua data. Mean photic depth (i.e., the depth of 10% of surface irradiance) was related to river loads after statistical removal of wave and Keywords: tidal effects. Across the 25,000 km2 area, photic depth was strongly related to river freshwater and Turbidity phosphorus loads (R2 = 0.65 and 0.51, respectively). In the six wetter years, photic depth was reduced Photic depth by 19.8% and below water quality guidelines for 156 days, compared to 9 days in the drier years. After Generalized additive mixed models onset of the seasonal river floods, photic depth was reduced for on average 6–8 months, gradually return- Great Barrier Reef ing to clearer baseline values. Relationships were strongest inshore and midshelf ( 12–80 km from the Nutrient runoff River floods coast), and weaker near the chronically turbid coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupling of Repetitive Multibeam Surveys and Hydrodynamic Modelling to Understand Bedform Migration and Delta Evolution by Danar
    Coupling of Repetitive Multibeam Surveys and Hydrodynamic Modelling to Understand Bedform Migration and Delta Evolution by Danar Guruh Pratomo B.Sc.Eng GGE, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2003 M.Sc.Eng GGE, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2007 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Academic Unit of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Supervisor: John Hughes Clarke, Ph.D., Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Examining Board: Susan Haigh, Ph.D., Fisheries and Oceans Canada Katy Haralampides, Ph.D., Civil Engineering Ian Church, Ph.D., University of Southern Mississippi External Examiner: Peter Talling, Ph.D., National Oceanography Course Southampton, UK This dissertation is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK June, 2016 ©Danar Guruh Pratomo, 2016 ABSTRACT This study addresses channelized delta top sediment transport on the Squamish estuary in Howe Sound, British Columbia. The mechanism of bedform migration and delta evolution is affected by the manner in which the available sediment flux from the feeder fluvial system is distributed. The present study is complementary to a parallel project looking at the sediment migrating on the delta slope as landslides or turbidity currents. The termination of the Squamish River consists of a single channel that flows between flanking intertidal sand bars and over a mouth bar at the lip of the delta. The delta front is growing rapidly with about 1 million m3 of sediment being input from the river system annually. There is a 3 to 5 m tidal range that strongly modulates the flow in the channel and over the adjacent intertidal sand banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tide Clock Print Ver Instructions.Pub
    THANK YOU FOR PURCHASING THIS TIDE CLOCK An ‘AA’ size battery is required for operation. Insert into the holder on the rear of the movement A high quality battery will last longer and is also much less likely to leak corrosive fluid. Never leave a discharged battery in the clock. Properly cared for, this clock should provide years of service SETTING YOUR CLOCK Conventional time clocks have a 12 hour cycle. Tide clocks have a cycle of 12 hours 25 minutes. This coincides to an average time of about 6 hours 12 minutes between high and low tides. For the reasons outlined in more detail below, and to attain the best accuracy, it is recommended to first set the clock on a day when your local high tide coincides with a full Moon. Obtain a local tide table and calendar showing phases of the Moon from the links page of our website, www.cruisingelectronics.co.nz or your local newspaper, a Nautical Almanac or similar. On the day of a full Moon, use the small adjusting wheel on the rear of the clock movement to adjust the clock hand to the high tide position at your exact local time of high tide. Set in this way, the clock will exhibit a minimum error throughout the month, usually less than 30 minutes DO NOT adjust your tide clock for daylight saving time Please read below for a more detailed description of the tides and their influences. A brief explanation of how the Tidal cycle works The Moon is the major cause of the tides.
    [Show full text]
  • Shapel Tide Clocks
    Shapel Tide Clocks How to set the tide indicator Setting Instructions IMPORTANT To achieve the maximum accuracy from your Tide-Time indicator it should be set at the ‘High Tide’ position on the day of a full moon. The tide hand is already set in this position so all you need to do is to insert an ‘AA’ battery at this time to start it going. By setting the tide function in this way it will display the minimum error throughout the month. This can vary from zero to around 30 minutes earlier or later. However, on the following full moon these discrepancies will cancel themselves out and the time will again be accurate. How Does it Work? The major cause of the tide cycle is the moon. The tide clock is based on the ‘lunar Day’ (the time it takes for the moon to reappear in the same place in the sky). This time is 24 hours and 50 minutes. Since there are two high and low tides each day the clock hand is set to rotate once every 12 hours and 25 minutes. Thus the tide clock always stays in step with the moon. There are however many other factors which can have a slight bearing on the tide ie: the sun, wind etc. If for any reason the hand needs to be adjusted there is an adjusting ring on the back of the movement. Once again, for best accuracy, any adjustments should be made on the full moon. Proudly designed & hand made in Australia by Sole Supplier: Artisans on the Hill 702 Tinonee Road | Mondrook (Tinonee) 2430 | (02) 6553 1199 | [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Tide Clock Instructions.Cdr
    HOW YOUR TIDE CLOCK WORKS. Tides are caused mainly by the moon’s gravitational pull on the oceans. The time it takes the moon to reappear at the same place in the sky each day is 24 hours and 50 minutes. Most areas in the world have two high tides and two low tides a day, so the tide clock has been specially designed to rotate twice each lunar day (every 12 hours and 25 minutes) giving you a quick and easy indication of high and low water. Your Quartz tide clock will always stay synchronised to the moon. Setting your tide clock. Establish your local high tide time by logging on to www.ashortwalk.com At exactly high tide set the clock in its high tide position (hand pointing straight up). You can adjust the hand by turning . the small wheel on the back of the movement. DO NOT PHYSICALLY PUSH THE HAND as this will damage the movement. Insert battery (size AA). One AA battery will last around two years. Moon Phase Clock The moon’s cycle is every 29 days, 12 hours and 44 minutes. During this time the moon's gravitational pull causes the oceans to bulge in its direction, intensifying the tides. When the Sun and Moon are aligned, these forces are exceptionally strong causing very low and very high tides. These are called Spring Tides, although they have nothing to do with the season. When the sun and moon are not aligned during a Quarter Moon, these tides are less intense and called Neap tides.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbormaster Installation & Operation Instructions
    HARBORMASTER INSTALLATION & OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS INSTALLATION Please follow this procedure before setting your tide clock. Use of our wall mounted panels or mantle mounts is recommended but not necessary. Our panels are pre-drilled so that centering the instrument is not a concern. Simply screw the two supplied right angle hangers into the two centrally located pilot holes on either side of the large hole in the panel. These hangers should be screwed in so that there is approximately a ½” of clearance left between the hanger and the panel. On the back of your tide clock you will find 2 holes that will line up with the hangers. Align the holes and hangers and push the clock against the panel. The clocks three rubber feet (not the rim of the brass case) will now be resting on the panel. While still applying pressure against the rubber feet simply slide the clock down so that it seats on the 2 hangers. If this feels too tight simply back the hangers off one turn. If it feels too loose simply tighten the hangers one turn. If you are not using one of our panels you can use the supplied template to spot the hanger holes on your mounting surface. Using a #50 or 1/16” drill bit bore the two hanger holes into your mounting surface. The installation instructions above will now apply as if you were using one of our panels. TIDE SETTING Insert a standard AA 1.5 volt battery in the battery compartment observing proper polarity. Look at the face and check that the round disc with the small hand at the center of the clock is rotating.
    [Show full text]
  • … … Mushi Production
    1948 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 … Mushi Production (ancien) † / 1961 – 1973 Tezuka Productions / 1968 – Group TAC † / 1968 – 2010 Satelight / 1995 – GoHands / 2008 – 8-Bit / 2008 – Diomédéa / 2005 – Sunrise / 1971 – Deen / 1975 – Studio Kuma / 1977 – Studio Matrix / 2000 – Studio Dub / 1983 – Studio Takuranke / 1987 – Studio Gazelle / 1993 – Bones / 1998 – Kinema Citrus / 2008 – Lay-Duce / 2013 – Manglobe † / 2002 – 2015 Studio Bridge / 2007 – Bandai Namco Pictures / 2015 – Madhouse / 1972 – Triangle Staff † / 1987 – 2000 Studio Palm / 1999 – A.C.G.T. / 2000 – Nomad / 2003 – Studio Chizu / 2011 – MAPPA / 2011 – Studio Uni / 1972 – Tsuchida Pro † / 1976 – 1986 Studio Hibari / 1979 – Larx Entertainment / 2006 – Project No.9 / 2009 – Lerche / 2011 – Studio Fantasia / 1983 – 2016 Chaos Project / 1995 – Studio Comet / 1986 – Nakamura Production / 1974 – Shaft / 1975 – Studio Live / 1976 – Mushi Production (nouveau) / 1977 – A.P.P.P. / 1984 – Imagin / 1992 – Kyoto Animation / 1985 – Animation Do / 2000 – Ordet / 2007 – Mushi production 1948 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 … 1948 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 … Tatsunoko Production / 1962 – Ashi Production >> Production Reed / 1975 – Studio Plum / 1996/97 (?) – Actas / 1998 – I Move (アイムーヴ) / 2000 – Kaname Prod.
    [Show full text]
  • Protoculture Addicts Is ©1987-2006 by Protoculture • the REVIEWS Copyrights and Trademarks Mentioned Herein Are the Property of LIVE-ACTION
    Sample file CONTENTS 3 ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ P r o t o c u l t u r e A d d i c t s # 8 7 December 2005 / January 2006. Published by Protoculture, P.O. Box 1433, Station B, Montreal, Qc, Canada, H3B 3L2. ANIME VOICES Letter From The Publisher ......................................................................................................... 4 E d i t o r i a l S t a f f Page Five Editorial ................................................................................................................... 5 [CM] – Publisher Christopher Macdonald Contributor Spotlight & Staff Lowlight ......................................................................................... 6 [CJP] – Editor-in-chief Claude J. Pelletier Letters ................................................................................................................................... 74 [email protected] Miyako Matsuda [MM] – Contributing Editor / Translator Julia Struthers-Jobin – Editor NEWS Bamboo Dong [BD] – Associate-Editor ANIME RELEASES (R1 DVDs) ...................................................................................................... 7 Jonathan Mays [JM] – Associate-Editor ANIME-RELATED PRODUCTS RELEASES (UMDs, CDs, Live-Action DVDs, Artbooks, Novels) .................. 9 C o n t r i b u t o r s MANGA RELEASES .................................................................................................................. 10 Zac Bertschy [ZB], Sean Broestl [SB], Robert Chase [RC], ANIME & MANGA NEWS: North
    [Show full text]