Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 78/Wednesday, April 22, 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 78 / Wednesday, April 22, 2020 / Notices 22399 Comment 9: Whether to Rescind the International Aust. Pty. Ltd., and S-Mart Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Shandong (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Centralized Electronic Service System Hengyu Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Ltd. (collectively, Pioneer et al.),2 Mid (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to V. Recommendation Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (the registered users at http:// Appendix II petitioner),3 The Stanley Works access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete (Langfang) Fastening Systems Co., Ltd. version of the Issues and Decision List of Companies Not Receiving Separate and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Rate Status Memorandum can be accessed directly (Stanley B&D) (collectively, Stanley),4 1. Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. on the internet at http:// and Building Material Distributors, Inc., enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 2. Qingdao Odyking Tyre Co., Ltd. Qingdao D&L Group Ltd., Shandong 3. Tianjin Wanda Tyre Group Co., Ltd. The signed Issues and Decision Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products [FR Doc. 2020–08540 Filed 4–21–20; 8:45 am] Memorandum and the electronic Co., Ltd., Dezhou Hualude Hardware versions of the Issues and Decision BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Products Co., Ltd., and Mingguang Memorandum are identical in content. Ruifeng Hardware Products Co., Ltd. (collectively Building Material Changes Since the Preliminary Results DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Distributors et al.),5 submitted timely- Based on a review of the record and International Trade Administration filed case briefs. On December 9, 2019, Pioneer,6 the petitioner,7 and Stanley,8 comments received from interested [A–570–909] submitted timely-filed rebuttal briefs. parties, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, Scope of the Order Certain Steel Nails From the People’s we are revising the margin calculations Republic of China: Final Results of The merchandise covered by the order for Stanley and Pioneer. Accordingly, Antidumping Duty Administrative is nails from China. For a complete for these final results, Commerce Review and Final Determination of No description of the scope of this order, updated the rate assigned to the non- Shipments; 2017–2018 see the Issues and Decision selected companies, which is based on Memorandum.9 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, an average of the rates for the three International Trade Administration, Analysis of Comments Received mandatory respondents, Stanley, Department of Commerce. We addressed all issues raised in the Pioneer, and Tianjin Universal SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce case and rebuttal briefs filed by Machinery Imp. & Exp. Corporation (Commerce) determines that certain interested parties in the Issues and (Universal), as discussed in the Issues steel nails (nails) from the People’s Decision Memorandum. Attached to this and Decision Memorandum. For a Republic of China (China) were sold in notice, in Appendix II, is a list of the discussion of these changes, see the the United States at less than normal issues which parties raised. The Issues ‘‘Changes Since the Preliminary value (NV) during the period of review and Decision Memorandum is a public Results’’ section of the Issues and (POR) August 1, 2017 through July 31, document and is on file in the Central Decision Memorandum. 2018. Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the Final Determination of No Shipments DATES: Applicable April 22, 2020. main Department of Commerce FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: building, as well as electronically via In the Preliminary Results, Commerce Annathea Cook or Benito Ballesteros, Enforcement and Compliance’s preliminarily determined that eleven AD/CVD Operations, Office V, companies did not have any reviewable Enforcement and Compliance, 2 See Pioneer et al.’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails transactions during the POR: Astrotech from the People’s Republic of China: Case Brief,’’ International Trade Administration, dated November 25, 2019. Steels Pvt. Ltd.; Geeky Wires Limited; U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd.; Jinhai Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, the People’s Republic of China: Case Brief, dated Hardware Co., Ltd.; Nanjing Yuechang DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0250 or November 25, 2019. 4 Hardware Co., Ltd.; Region Industries (202) 482–7425, respectively. See Stanley’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of China; Tenth Co., Ltd.; Region System Sdn. Bhd.; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Administrative Review; Case Brief of The Stanley Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Works (Langfang) Fastening Systems Co., Ltd and Group Co., Ltd.; Shandong Oriental Background Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.,’’ dated November 25, Cherry Hardware Import & Export Co., On October 18, 2019, Commerce 2019 . 5 See Building Material Distributors et al.’s Letter, Ltd.; Shanghai Jade Shuttle Hardware published in the Federal Register the ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of Tools Co., Ltd.; and Zhangjiagang Preliminary Results of the China, 10th Administrative Review; Administrative Lianfeng Metals Products Co., Ltd. Case Brief,’’ dated November 25, 2019. administrative review of the Following the publication of the antidumping duty order on nails from 6 See Pioneer’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of China: Rebuttal Case Preliminary Results, we received no China.1 Brief,’’ dated December 9, 2019 (Pioneer Rebuttal). comments from interested parties In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309, 7 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from regarding these companies, nor has any we invited parties to comment on our the People’s Republic of China: Rebuttal Brief,’’ party submitted record evidence which Preliminary Results. On November 25, dated December 9, 2019 (Petitioner Rebuttal). 2019, Shanxi Pioneer Hardware 8 See Stanley’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from would call our preliminary Industrial Co., Ltd. (Pioneer), Shanxi the People’s Republic of China; Tenth determination into question. Therefore, Administrative Review; Rebuttal Brief of The Hairui Trade Co., Ltd., SDC for these final results, we continue to Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening Systems Co., find that these eleven companies did Ltd and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.,’’ dated 1 See Certain Steel Nails from the People’s December 9, 2019 (Stanley Rebuttal). not have any reviewable transactions Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the during the POR. Consistent with our Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision practice, we will issue appropriate Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017– Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2017–18 instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 2018, 84 FR 55906 (October 18, 2019) (Preliminary Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision April 15, 2020 (Issues and Decision Memorandum) Protection (CBP) based on our final Memorandum. which is hereby adopted by this notice. results. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Apr 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM 22APN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 22400 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 78 / Wednesday, April 22, 2020 / Notices Separate Rates mandatory respondents have changed exception discussed in the Issues and In the Preliminary Results, we from the Preliminary Results. Decision Memorandum (related to determined that 20 companies, Accordingly, for the final results, Stanley B&D),11 we have not received including the three mandatory Commerce has updated the rate any information since the issuance of respondents, met the criteria for assigned to the non-selected companies, the Preliminary Results that provides a separate rate status. We have not which is based on an average of the basis for reconsidering this preliminary received any information since the rates of the three mandatory determination. Therefore, Commerce issuance of the Preliminary Results that respondents, as discussed in the Issues continues to find that these companies provides a basis for reconsidering this and Decision Memorandum. are part of the China-wide entity.12 preliminary determination. Therefore, China-Wide Entity Commerce continues to find that these Final Results of Administrative Review In the Preliminary Results, we found companies meet the criteria for a The weighted-average dumping separate rate for the final results. that 182 companies for which a review was requested had not established margins for the administrative review Rate for Non-Selected Companies eligibility for a separate rate and, thus, are as follows: As noted above, for the final results, we considered them to be part of the the dumping margins for two of the China-wide entity.10 With one Weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margin Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 118.04 The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening Systems Co., Ltd. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc ............................................................. 2.11 Tianjin Universal Machinery Imp. & Exp. Corporation .............................................................................................................................. 118.04 Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products