Relational-Cultural Theory and Reality Therapy: a Culturally Responsive Integrative Framework
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
W&M ScholarWorks Arts & Sciences Articles Arts and Sciences 1-2-2017 Relational-Cultural Theory and Reality Therapy: A Culturally Responsive Integrative Framework Natoya Hill Haskins College of William and Mary, [email protected] Brandee Appling Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/aspubs Recommended Citation Haskins, Natoya Hill and Appling, Brandee, Relational-Cultural Theory and Reality Therapy: A Culturally Responsive Integrative Framework (2017). 10.1002/jcad.12120 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts and Sciences at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Received 06/03/14 Revised 08/23/15 Accepted 10/16/15 DOI: 10.1002/jcad.12120 Theory & Practice Relational-Cultural Theory and Reality Therapy: A Culturally Responsive Integrative Framework Natoya Hill Haskins and Brandee Appling The authors propose an integration of relational-cultural theory and reality therapy. The authors contend that the traditional assumptions of reality therapy are consistent with the relational aspects of relational-cultural theory and together provide a culturally responsive approach for diverse clients. The authors also include an overview of the 2 theories as well as highlight the convergences and divergences. In addition, the authors present a case illustration depicting the integration method in practice. Keywords: reality theory, relational-cultural theory, multiculturalism, theoretical integration Over the past 50 years, scholars have consistently identified and Related Educational Programs [CACREP], 2015), approaches that focus on the relationship within and outside counselors may not only identify cultural considerations of the therapeutic environment as having a significant effect or limitations within counseling approaches but also use on culturally diverse clients’ well-being (May & Yalom, 2000; these as a means to develop new, more integrative ap- Rogers, 1967). Although these scholars make claims to address proaches. Many scholars using cognitive and behavioral the needs of diverse clients (Clark, 2010; Tanaka-Matsumi, approaches, such as reality therapy, chose to alter or Higginbotham, & Chang, 2002; van Deurzen, 2002), few adapt their therapeutic process to meet the needs of di- have theoretically attended to the cultural and diversity needs verse clients (Bedoya & Safren, 2009; Hays & Iwamasa, of clients; instead, they have relied on ethical codes and mul- 2006). However, literature related to the integration of ticultural or advocacy competencies to address the deficiency more culturally responsive and sensitive approaches (Arciniega & Newlon, 2003; Spiegler & Guevremont, 2010). is scant. Consequently, we examine relational-cultural However, relational-cultural theorists have filled this gap theory (RCT) and reality therapy as integrative ap- by specifically operationalizing how counselors can use the proaches that combine behavioral, psychoanalytic, and therapeutic alliance to examine and enhance current relational postmodern paradigms. interactions with culturally diverse clients (Ball, 2005; Jordan, Counseling with a traditional approach such as reality 2009). We classify culturally diverse clients as individuals that therapy through the lens of RCT provides an appropriate self-identify with culturally marginalized populations (e.g., framework for counselors to address systemic issues of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning [LGBTQ] power, privilege, marginalization, and the ways these issues individuals; racial and ethnic minorities; low-income indi- influence the choices their clients make (Frey, 2013). In the viduals; individuals with disabilities; American Counseling following sections, we (a) provide an overview of RCT and Association [ACA], 2014). reality therapy; (b) discuss the theoretical rationale for integra- As counseling professionals embrace the needs of cultur- tion; (c) present a case illustration depicting the application ally diverse clients through multicultural competencies, ethics of RCT and reality therapy with a biracial, adolescent client; codes, and accreditations standards (ACA, 2014; Arredondo (d) offer evaluation procedures; and (e) provide implications et al., 1996; Council for Accreditation of Counseling for research and practice. Natoya Hill Haskins, Department of School Psychology and Counselor Education/School of Education, University of Georgia; Brandee Appling, Grayson High School, Grayson, Georgia. Natoya Hill Haskins is now at Counselor Education, The College of William & Mary. Brandee Appling is now at Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and Counseling, Auburn University. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Natoya Hill Haskins, Department of School Psychology and Counselor Education and School of Education, The College of William & Mary, 301 Monticello Avenue, Williamsburg, VA 23185 (e-mail: [email protected]). © 2017 by the American Counseling Association. All rights reserved. Journal of Counseling & Development ■ January 2017 ■ Volume 95 87 Haskins & Appling RCT result of being in the relationship. The last concept is that relational competence and capacities are enhanced Scholars originally developed RCT in an attempt to under- over the life span. Distinctively, individuals improve stand the relational interactions in the lives of women (Jordan, their capacity to be productive in life as well as increase 2009; Jordan, Kaplan, Miller, Stiver, & Surrey, 1991; Miller, their opportunities for constructive connections (Miller 1986) and to emphasize the role that caretakers and cul- & Stiver, 1997). tural contexts have in these interactions (Miller, 1986). RCT Using these concepts, RCT scholars aim to renego- scholars have suggested that traditional theories of human tiate relational disconnections, promote self-empathy, development and psychodynamics mistakenly and harmfully deconstruct relational images, examine power within the perpetuate the oppressive cycle of inaccurately pathologizing social context, and improve relational resilience (Jordan, clients by disregarding the historical and systemic injustices 2009; Miller, 1986). RCT focuses on creating a sup- experienced by marginalized groups (Comstock et al., 2008; portive relational context, which entails the counselor Jordan, 2001; Trepal, Boie, & Kress, 2012). Consequently, displaying authenticity and presence even when discon- RCT facilitates social justice, decreases emotional and physi- nection arises. RCT also maintains a focus on mutual cal separation, and increases relational connections (Jordan, empathy and mutual change. Therefore, RCT depends 2009). Furthermore, RCT emphasizes the role of power more on an attitude and quality of mutual engagement dynamics on well-being and the role these dynamics have than on any specific techniques or interventions (Jordan, on perpetuating shame and feelings of unworthiness (Jordan, 2009). This focus on mutual empathy creates an environ- 2009). In this regard, RCT scholars have identified the seven ment of safety, which allows the client to move from a fundamental concepts for the theory (Jordan, 2009; Miller, location of protective disconnection toward a relational 1986), which include relational characteristics and growth- growing process (Miller, 1986). fostering interactions. Relational Characteristics RCT and Diverse Clients The first concept of RCT specifies that individuals grow Although research regarding the effectiveness of RCT through and toward relationships during the course of their is sparse in comparison with more widely used counsel- lives, which embraces the notion that relational aspects of the ing approaches (e.g., reality therapy, cognitive behavior life span are inevitable and an integral part of life. The second therapy, behavior therapy), researchers have determined concept, mature functioning, is characterized as movement that this approach is clinically effective with students toward mutual empathy rather than separation. In this move- of color and various clinical issues (Lenz, Speciale, & ment, the individuals are able to see the impact they have on Aguilar, 2012; Morray & Liang, 2005; Sparks, 2004; others as well as how others affect them and begin to change. Tantillo & Sanftner, 2003). For example, Morray and Li- The third fundamental concept of RCT is that relationship dif- ang (2005) used an RCT intervention to enhance cross- ferentiation and elaboration characterize growth. This concept cultural relations between Arab and Israeli youth. As a is described as an individual’s openness to exploring various result of this intervention, the participants’ displays of relational images (i.e., past relational experiences that now mutual empathy increased and dysfunctional interactions guide an individual’s beliefs and expectations regarding current decreased. Additional researchers have indicated that relationships) and differentiating between negative relational RCT is effective with African American and Latino ado- images and discrepant relational images (i.e., those that are lescent girls who are experiencing behavioral challenges more positive or create a different expectation). The fourth in nontraditional residential settings, such as juvenile concept is that mutual empathy and mutual empowerment are detention and residential treatment facilities (Lenz et at the core of growth-fostering relationships;