DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Plan Mad River Bluffs Background Description and Management Plan Prepared for the McKinleyville Land Trust by Sabra Steinberg with funding provided by the California Coastal Conservancy November 2003 Mad River Bluffs Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements……………………………………………… iv List of Figures…………………………………………………… vi Introduction……………………………………………………… 1 PART 1: BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION Location & Climate……………………………………………… 3 Geology………………………………………………………….. 5 Geology and Soils……………………………………….. 5 Groundwater and Drainage……………………………… 5 Erosion and Geological Stability………………………… 6 Seismic Issues…………………………………………… 8 Historical Conditions……………………………………………. 8 Habitats and Vegetation…………………………………………. 12 Beach Pine/Spruce Forest……………………………….. 12 Coastal Grassland/Shrub………………………………… 19 Coastal Bluffs……………………………………………. 20 Riverbank………………………………………………... 20 Beach and Dunes………………………………………… 20 Mad River Estuary………………………………………. 21 Wetlands………………………………………………… 24 Fish and Wildlife………………………………………………… 26 Aquatic Life……………………………………………… 26 Terrestrial Wildlife………………………………………. 29 Historical Use……………………………………………………. 32 Wiyots…………………………………………………… 32 Ownership and Land Use since 1850……………………. 34 Current Use Patterns…………………………………………….. 42 PART 2: MANAGEMENT PLAN Management Goals and Objectives……………………………… 45 Executive Summary ……………………………………………... 45 Regulatory Environment…………………………………………. 52 Public Input………………………………………………………. 56 Public Access…………………………………………………….. 59 Open Hours………………………………………………. 59 Vehicular Access and Parking…………………………… 59 Pedestrian Access………………………………………... 60 Bicycle Access…………………………………………… 60 Handicap Accessibility…………………………………... 61 Dogs……………………………………………………… 62 Equestrian Use…………………………………………… 66 Organization/Agency Use……………………………….. 68 ii Mad River Bluffs Management Plan Facilities………………………………………………………… 69 Trail System…………………………………………….. 69 Overview of Planned Trail System……………... 69 Blufftop Trails………………………………….. 72 Vertical Access Routes…………………………. 73 Recommendations………………………………. 76 Scenic Overlooks & Benches…………………………… 80 Picnic Area ……………………………………………... 83 Dogi-pot Stations……………………………………….. 84 Other Facilities………………………………………….. 85 Facility Monitoring and Maintenance…………………... 85 Public Education & Outreach…………………………………… 87 Signage………………………………………………….. 87 Types and Locations for Signs………………….. 88 Design/Format…………………………………... 89 Sign Content…………………………………….. 90 Educational & Interpretive Displays……………………. 91 Educational/Community Events………………………… 93 Volunteer Activities to Support MRB…………………... 95 Cooperative Research Opportunities……………………. 96 Resource Restoration & Protection……………………………... 98 Invasive Weeds………………………………………….. 98 Control/Removal of Invasive Weeds……………. 99 Targeting Invasive Plant Hot Spots at MRB…….. 101 Invasive Weeds: Descriptions & Specific Controls 104 Additional Concerns—The Watch List………….. 110 Calendar of Weed Control Activities……………. 112 Managing Beach Pine/Spruce Forest…………………….. 113 Prairie Restoration……………………………………….. 114 Erosion Control & Water Quality Protection……………. 115 Limitations to Access……………………………………. 115 Cooperative Management with MCSD………………….. 116 Safety…………………………………………………………….. 117 Patrols & Enforcement…………………………………... 117 Tree Safety Program……………………………………... 118 References………………………………………………………... 121 Appendices……………………………………………………….. 131 A. Flora of Mad River Bluffs…………………………….. 131 B. Preliminary Mushroom List for Mad River Bluffs……. 137 C. Wildlife and Fish of Mad River Bluffs………………... 138 D. Bird List for Mad River Bluffs………………………... 140 E. Cost Estimates for Northern Bluff Trail Work………… 143 F. Correspondence………………………………………... 145 G. Application for Coastal Development Permit iii Mad River Bluffs Management Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The list of individuals and agencies I need to thank is long. There really is a community of helpful people interested in this stunning slice of the California coastline. First, I must thank Sheila Seamans and The Coastal Conservancy, without whom this property would not now be protected and available to the public for recreational opportunities. I thank them also for providing the grant that funded development of this management plan. And next, I thank McKinleyville Land Trust (MLT) for giving me this opportunity to work again on this property. Almost ten years ago, as then-President of the land trust, I began work on a project to acquire this property, then known as Hiller West. Though others continued and then finished that project when my time on the board was over, I now get a unique sense of closure, making recommendations for the management of Mad River Bluffs. I would also like to thank the MLT board members for their support throughout this process and their help at the public meeting (plus a personal thank you to Gina Rimson, MLT treasurer and check writer). Special thanks go to Johnny Caulkins and Steve Fisher (and their respective agencies, the California Conservation Corps and the California Dept. of Parks and Recreation) for their willingness to help and their expert guidance on trail issues. They visited the bluff trail sites and provided information and estimates for materials and costs for various trail options under consideration in this plan. I also want to thank Mike Sparkman at California Dept. of Fish and Game (CDFG) for providing information and insight on the lower Mad River and estuary. I wish to express my heartfelt gratitude to Traci Ferdolage, Director of Recreation at McKinleyville Community Services District (MCSD), and to Tom Marking, Manager of MCSD for their willingness to coordinate and cooperate on recreation issues involving MLT’s and MCSD’s adjoining properties. I also appreciate their helpfulness in sharing documents and information on grants, volunteer groups, and various sign and park-related possibilities. Tom also attended and participated in our public meeting, which was very helpful. I would like to thank the folks at Humboldt County Historical Society, especially Matina Kilkenny and Katherine Mace. When I was doing historical research, they were so friendly and helpful in assisting me find historical “bits and pieces” that might be useful. The Historical Society office is a truly wonderful repository of community history, and I appreciate being given access to its resources. I also want to thank Joan Berman, head of special collections at HSU Library, for her help searching out references there--this isn’t the first project she has helped me with, and probably won’t be the last! A special thanks goes to Alan Compher for providing a wealth of additional information about the property and its history. And I want to thank Steve Moser for letting me use his copy of the Sand Pointe EIR, which saved me from another excruciating visit to the County Offices in Eureka. I also want to thank someone I have never met, Stephen Outlaw, who is an Information Specialist with Land Trust Alliance. My request to Land Trust Alliance (LTA) for information on public access liability issues was routed to him, and he sent me a series of articles from LTA publications and email strings from the Land Trust Listserve. iv Mad River Bluffs Management Plan I want to thank Dennis Halligan and Natural Resources Management Corporation (NRM) for providing recent air photos, for help with the neighborhood address list, and use of GPS units for trail mapping. I would also like to thank Mike O’Hern for his assistance on boundary questions. I thank John Moseman, working for MLT under Americorps, for his assistance at the public meeting, for help collecting visitor-use data, and his work with Cedar Academy students. Thanks go to the Cedar Academy students for producing a large-scale aerial photo for use at the public meeting. A most grateful thank-you goes to HSU students Theresa Wong and Jeremy Hunter for ground work and initial GIS mapping of most of the trails, and for reconciling the air photo map with the GIS trail map, respectively. A big heartfelt thanks also goes to Jeff Dunk, HSU faculty (and my husband), for his work with these students, adding the final trail segments to the maps, producing the final maps, wrestling graphics into the document, and companionship on many site visits. (He also deserves thanks for making dinner for our family every night for several months while I was being consumed by this project). I am grateful to Jen Kalt of California Native Plant Society (CNPS) for her help with the plant list, and to Andrea Pickart, also of CNPS, for review comments on the plan. I want to thank Shayne Greene who made time for a site visit, shared his expertise on beach pines, and provided insight into current and potential future conditions of the forest at Mad River Bluffs. I also thank Dr. William Wood for his contribution of a list of the mushrooms he has found in the Mad River Bluffs area, to Linda Doerflinger and Ron LeValley for the bird list for the vicinity of MRB, and to Greg Goldsmith and Bradford Norman for information on aquatic life in the estuary. I also thank Darci Short for providing information on several park-related issues. I am grateful to the following reviewers for their helpful comments: Dennis Halligan, Kristin Schmidt, Andrea Pickart, Sheila Seamens, and Jeff Dunk. I would also like to thank all the citizens who took time from their busy lives to participate in a public meeting to discuss options and concerns about Mad River Bluffs. And finally, I think we all owe a debt of gratitude to Dorothy Blade, to Alan Compher and his neighbors, and to the many others in the community who worked for so long to keep this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Background of Younger Lagoon Reserve
    Background to Younger Lagoon Reserve 1 Naomi Stern Senior Internship Professor Karen Holl Winter 2013 Background to Younger Lagoon Reserve: A Socio-political Perspective Introduction Younger Lagoon Reserve (YLR) is a 72 acre (29 hectare) protected natural area surrounded by a diverse mix of agricultural and urban land uses. YLR is part of the University of California Natural Reserve System (UCNRS). Founded in 1965, the UC NRS is a network of protected lands that are used for research, education and public service. Today there are 39 reserves spanning approximately 750,000 acres of rare or endangered ecosystems in California (UC Natural Reserve 2012). UC Santa Cruz manages four reserves: Año Nuevo Island Reserve, Fort Ord Natural Reserve, Landels-Hill Big Creek Reserve in Big Sur, and Younger Lagoon Reserve. Located only half a mile north from one of the most popular beaches in Santa Cruz, Natural Bridges State Park, and near Highway 1, YLR land is highly visible to the public. YLR’s habitat types include such as seasonal freshwater wetlands, coastal prairie, and coastal scrub. Throughout its history, this land and its ecology have been continuously transformed by the social, economic, and political issues of the time. Today, adjacent to the reserve are highly visited tourist attractions and official government agencies, as well as world-class marine laboratories. The history of land use conversion and public policy at YLR influences the managerial restoration decisions made to protect it. Developing an understanding of the political systems Background to Younger Lagoon Reserve 2 that impact Younger Lagoon provides insight into the restoration that interns and volunteers take part in.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY of the UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Environmental Legacy of the Uc Natural Reserve System
    THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY OF THE UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This page intentionally left blank the environmental legacy of the uc natural reserve system edited by peggy l. fiedler, susan gee rumsey, and kathleen m. wong university of california press Berkeley Los Angeles London The publisher gratefully acknowledges the generous contri- bution to this book provided by the University of California Natural Reserve System. University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The environmental legacy of the UC natural reserve system / edited by Peggy L. Fiedler, Susan Gee Rumsey, and Kathleen M. Wong. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-520-27200-2 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Natural areas—California. 2. University of California Natural Reserve System—History. 3. University of California (System)—Faculty. 4. Environmental protection—California. 5. Ecology—Study and teaching— California. 6. Natural history—Study and teaching—California. I. Fiedler, Peggy Lee. II. Rumsey, Susan Gee. III. Wong, Kathleen M. (Kathleen Michelle) QH76.5.C2E59 2013 333.73'1609794—dc23 2012014651 Manufactured in China 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 2002) (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • County Profile
    FY 2020-21 PROPOSED BUDGET SECTION B:PROFILE GOVERNANCE Assessor County Counsel Auditor-Controller Human Resources Board of Supervisors Measure Z Clerk-Recorder Other Funds County Admin. Office Treasurer-Tax Collector Population County Comparison Education Infrastructure Employment DEMOGRAPHICS Geography Located on the far North Coast of California, 200 miles north of San Francisco and about 50 miles south of the southern Oregon border, Humboldt County is situated along the Pacific coast in Northern California’s rugged Coastal (Mountain) Ranges, bordered on the north SCENERY by Del Norte County, on the east by Siskiyou and Trinity counties, on the south by Mendocino County and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The climate is ideal for growth The county encompasses 2.3 million acres, 80 percent of which is of the world’s tallest tree - the forestlands, protected redwoods and recreational areas. A densely coastal redwood. Though these forested, mountainous, rural county with about 110 miles of coastline, trees are found from southern more than any other county in the state, Humboldt contains over forty Oregon to the Big Sur area of percent of all remaining old growth Coast Redwood forests, the vast California, Humboldt County majority of which is protected or strictly conserved within dozens of contains the most impressive national, state, and local forests and parks, totaling approximately collection of Sequoia 680,000 acres (over 1,000 square miles). Humboldt’s highest point is sempervirens. The county is Salmon Mountain at 6,962 feet. Its lowest point is located in Samoa at home to Redwood National 20 feet. Humboldt Bay, California’s second largest natural bay, is the and State Parks, Humboldt only deep water port between San Francisco and Coos Bay, Oregon, Redwoods State Park (The and is located on the coast at the midpoint of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Historic NM Maps Online at Atlas.Nmhum.Org
    Josiah Gregg: Map of the Indian Territory, Northern Texas and New Mexico, Showing the Great Western Prairies 1844 1 4 2 3 5 6 7 Rumsey Collection Image No. 2351001 - Terms of Use 1: Fray Cristobal 1831-1844 Quote: Our next camping place deserving of mention was Fray Cristobal, which, like many others on the route, is neither town nor village, but a simple isolated point on the riverbank ? a mere parage, or camping- ground.... We arrived at Fray Cristobal in the evening, but this being the threshold of the famous Jornada del Muerto, we deemed it prudent to let our animals rest here until the following afternoon. The road over which we had hitherto been travelling, though it sometimes traverses upland ridges and undulating sections, runs generally near the border of the river, and for the most part in its immediate valley: but here it leaves the river and passes for nearly eighty miles over a table-plain to the eastward of a small ledge of mountains, whose western base is hugged by the circuitous channel of the Rio del Norte. The craggy cliffs which project from these mountains render the eastern bank of the river altogether impassable. As the direct route over the plain is entirely destitute of water, we took the precaution to fill all our kegs at Fray Cristobal, and late in the afternoon we finally set out. We generally find a great advantage in travelling through these arid tracts of land in the freshness of the evening, as the mules suffer less from thirst, and move on in better spirits particularly in the season of warm weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised)
    NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NPS Approved – April 3, 2013 National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items New Submission X Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) I. The Santa Fe Trail II. Individual States and the Santa Fe Trail A. International Trade on the Mexican Road, 1821-1846 A. The Santa Fe Trail in Missouri B. The Mexican-American War and the Santa Fe Trail, 1846-1848 B. The Santa Fe Trail in Kansas C. Expanding National Trade on the Santa Fe Trail, 1848-1861 C. The Santa Fe Trail in Oklahoma D. The Effects of the Civil War on the Santa Fe Trail, 1861-1865 D. The Santa Fe Trail in Colorado E. The Santa Fe Trail and the Railroad, 1865-1880 E. The Santa Fe Trail in New Mexico F. Commemoration and Reuse of the Santa Fe Trail, 1880-1987 C. Form Prepared by name/title KSHS Staff, amended submission; URBANA Group, original submission organization Kansas State Historical Society date Spring 2012 street & number 6425 SW 6th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report to the University of California, Office of the President
    A knowledge base to assess site suitability for ecological field stations A case study for the UC Natural Reserve System at UC Merced David M. Stoms1, Jennifer M. McDonald², and Frank W. Davis² 1Institute for Computational Earth System Science ²Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106 USA Final Report to the University of California, Office of the President Principal Investigator: Frank W. Davis Report Date: September 29, 2000 Table of Contents Project Summary........................................................................................................................ii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Suitability Assessment .................................................................................................................4 Knowledge-base of Assessment Criteria ...................................................................................5 Assessment of Representativeness of Existing NRS Reserves..............................................8 Assessment of Suitability of Existing NRS Reserves.............................................................15 Assessment in the Stage 1 UC-Merced Assessment Region ................................................21 Assessment in the Stage 2 UC-Merced Assessment Region ................................................28 Assessment in the Stage 3 UC-Merced Assessment Region ................................................40
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsideration of the Death of Josiah Gregg
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 22 Number 3 Article 4 7-1-1947 Reconsideration of the Death of Josiah Gregg Howard T. Dimick Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Dimick, Howard T.. "Reconsideration of the Death of Josiah Gregg." New Mexico Historical Review 22, 3 (1947). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol22/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. RECONSIDERATION OF THE DEATH OF JOSIAH GREGG By HOWARD T. DIMICK Acknowledgments In tracing the history of the line of William Gregg I of Delaware, I have had the assistance of several persons and institutions among whom the following deserve especial mention: The Library of Congress, especially the research and manuscripts divisions; The Historical Society of Pennsyl­ vania; Virginia State Library; The Hill Memorial Li­ brary, Louisiana State University; Howard-Tilton Memorial Library, Tulane University; The Shreve-Memorial Library, Shreveport, and Miss Virginia Walker of the staff; Mrs. Louise P. Bosworth, New York City, a descendant of Wil­ liam Gregg I and a Gregg genealogist; Dr. W. A. Evans, Aberdeen, Mississippi, and members of the Garth family in Mississippi. The Alabama Department of Archives & History and Mrs. Marie Bankhead Owen gave me aid and encouragement at a time when war was obstructive to historical investiga­ tion and the pursuit of researches.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Natural Reserve System Transect Publication 13:2
    UC Office of the President NRS Transect Title The NRS Transect 13:2 (winter 1995) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1xg9k2ps Journal UC Natural Reserve System, 13(2) Author UC Natural Reserve System Publication Date 1995-12-21 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Volume 13, No.2 University of California Natural Reserve System Winter 1995 In this issue: .Ancestral wetlands restored (p. 5) .Hastings CIS progresses (p. 6) ."Most Productive Habitat" discovered (p. 7) .Marine mammals monitored (p. 8) Report of the Director Q: When is a reserve more than a reserve? [A: When it's also a regional field station.] The mission of the Natural Reserve System is to contribute to the understanding and wise man- agement of the Earth and its natural systems by supporting university-Ievel teaching, research, and public service at protected natural areas throughout Ollifomia. Lordotus pulchrissi,,!us, a be,: fly species, represen~ a single col!1po~en~in the.complex ~ono Basin ecosystem. This furry silver male, perhaps a fierce competitor m his lekking group, IS seen )4 fu NRS does include man y valuable here resting on the fin~er of UC scientist <;atherine Toft, one of many UC researche~ who haye "es, e " .long used the NRS's Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Lab?ratory as a home base while studymg protected natural areas for our study, With Mono Lake and the surrounding region. (Photo by Cathenne Toft) current acreage totaling around 140,(:K:X}. In addition, however, about half of our 32 d h d .
    [Show full text]
  • Wagon Tracks. Volume 9, Issue 4 (August, 1995) Santa Fe Trail Association
    Wagon Tracks Volume 9 Issue 4 Wagon Tracks Volume 9, Issue 4 (August Article 1 1995) 1995 Wagon Tracks. Volume 9, Issue 4 (August, 1995) Santa Fe Trail Association Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/wagon_tracks Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Santa Fe Trail Association. "Wagon Tracks. Volume 9, Issue 4 (August, 1995)." Wagon Tracks 9, 4 (1995). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/wagon_tracks/vol9/iss4/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wagon Tracks by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Wagon Tracks. Volume 9, Issue 4 (August, 1995) VOLUME 9 AUGUST 1995 NUMBER 4 t:• ! DEATH ON THE TRAIL, 1828 I ,I MCNEES IDENTIFIED • by Harry C. Myers (Myers is the superintendent of Fort SYMPOSIUM COMING SOON Union National Monument. chairman THE biennial SFTA Symposium at of the SFTA 175th anniversary com­ Lamed and Great Bend. KS. Septem­ mittee. and afrequent contributor to ber 21-24. offers an outstanding pro­ WT. He has again located. new infor­ gram for participants. There will be mation about the early history of the TraU.) . lectures. tours. business meetings. entertalnment. and good food. IN August 1828 the eastbound cara­ The schedule and registration form van from Santa Fe crossed the Cana­ dian River and headed toward Point of were included In the last Issue of wr. and early registration is still recom­ Rocks and Rabbit Ears in north­ eastern New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Mad River Ranger District, Six Rivers National Forest, California
    WESTEt BIRDS Volume 29, Number 2, 1998 BIRDS OF THE MAD RIVER RANGER DISTRICT, SIX RIVERS NATIONAL FOREST, CALIFORNIA JOHN E. HUNTER, USDA Forest Service, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 BayshoreWay, Eureka,California 95501 GJON C. HAZARD, Department of Wildlife, HumboldtState University,Arcata, California 95521 The Mad River RangerDistrict (MRRD) of the Six RiversNational Forest (SRNF)is locatedin northwesternCalifornia (Figure 1). We compileddata on the statusand distribution of the birdsof thisarea for threeprimary reasons. First,except for collectingtrips to SouthFork Mountain and nearby areas in the 1930s (Grinnelland Miller 1944), thisarea hasbeen littlestudied (Harris 1996). Whilethe MRRD wasincluded by Harris(1991, 1996), we soughtto providemore detailed information for a uniquearea. Second, we hopedto provideresource managers and otherswith localstatus and distribution data. Much of our data has been gleanedfrom obscuresources not generally accessibleto mostworkers. While more detailed distribution and life history dataare neededfor mostspecies, this report can serve as a startingpoint for furthermanagement considerations and research.Third, while the MRRD containsseveral noteworthy birding areas in Humboldt(e.g., Mount Lassic and BlakeMountain) and Trinity(e.g., RuthLake, HettenshawValley, and Ant Point)counties, the isolationof thisarea relativeto populationcenters hasresulted in relativelylittle recreational birdwatching to date.We hopethis report will stimulateothers to explorethe MRRD and other portionsof interior northwestern
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of the Log Boom Humboldt County Logging from 1945 to 1955 Logging in Humboldt County in Northwestern California Began in 1850
    Paul G. Wilson The Legacy of the Log Boom Humboldt County Logging from 1945 to 1955 Logging in Humboldt County in northwestern California began in 1850. When settlers first saw the giant old growth coast redwoods in Humboldt County they were in awe of them. These trees had diameters up to 30 feet and heights up to almost 400 feet. Old growth redwood trees are the oldest living things on earth; they can live about two thousand years. The settlers of Humboldt County had a respect for the redwoods; however, the settlers saw an immediate profit to be made. Old growth redwood lumber was used to build houses, railroad ties, shingle bolts, fence posts, and grape stakes.1 Redwood timberland in Humboldt County was located near the coast and extended twenty-five miles inland. The mills that cut the redwood logs into dimension sized lumber were located on the shores of Humbolt Bay. Humboldt Bay was a safe place for ocean vessels to pick up loads of redwood lumber to be sent to San Francisco Bay. Lumber vessels were often overloaded with redwood lumber. Because the vessels were piled with lumber, the vessels were believed to be unsinkable.2 Redwood lumber was sent all over the world for its preference in woodworking. In 1878 the United States government passed the Timber and Stone Act which allowed loggers to buy 160 acres of timberland for $2.50 per acre as long as the loggers "improved" the land through logging and ranching. Loggers acquired thousands of acres of redwood land and often formed partnerships to begin lumber companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2015 Cal-IPC News Protecting California’S Natural Areas from Wildland Weeds
    Vol. 23, No. 3 Fall 2015 Cal-IPC News Protecting California’s Natural Areas from Wildland Weeds Newsletter of the California Invasive Plant Council Going to great lengths EDRR in Bay Area National Parks 4 Symposium photos 6 Does glyphosate cause cancer? 8 Do No Harm 9 Puncturevine attacks! 10 Scotch broom mite to the rescue 11 Treating fennel on San Clemente EMAPi in Hawai’i 13 Island. Winner of the 2015 Photo Habitat conservation planning 14 Contest, by Aaron Echols, Channel Islands Restoration From the Director’s Desk It’s the little things… By Executive Director Doug Johnson Cal-IPC 1442-A Walnut Street, #462 Berkeley, CA 94709 ometimes small changes can result in significant progress. A new sentence in a ph (510) 843-3902 fax (510) 217-3500 www.cal-ipc.org [email protected] Splanning document may provide a stronger foundation for programmatic policies. Protecting California’s lands and waters Here are a few small improvements made recently that hold promise for helping our from invasive plants work in the future. STAFF The California Dept. of Water Resources recently updated its model ordinance for Doug Johnson, Executive Director Elizabeth Brusati, Senior Scientist Water Efficient Landscaping. This serves as a template for local jurisdictions to use Agustín Luna, Director of Finance & Administration in setting local policy. Now included under landscape design: “The use of invasive Bertha McKinley, Program Assistant plant species, such as those listed by the California Invasive Plant Council, is strongly Dana Morawitz, Program Manager for GIS and Regional Conservation discouraged.” We have received calls from municipalities wanting guidance on using BOARD OF DIRECTORS our list, and we are working with Alameda County StopWaste on developing guidelines Jason Casanova, President for using our list in making appropriate site-specific landscaping decisions.
    [Show full text]