DOCSLIB.ORG

Species of the Type Section of Sphagnum (Bryophyta, Sphagnaceae) in Poland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1-2: 69-76, 2006 BRC www.brc.amu.edu.pl Species of the type section of Sphagnum (Bryophyta, Sphagnaceae) in Poland Iwona Melosik Department of Genetics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 PoznaÒ, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The paper presents data on the distribution and phytosociological preferences of species belonging to the genus Sphagnum, section Sphagnum, in Poland. The distribution maps were constructed on the basis of verified herbarium materials accessible in Polish and some German herbaria. All data were presented on the maps by using a cartogram technique in accordance with the ATMOS system. In Poland, S. palustre and S. magellanicum are the most common, widespread species, whereas S. centrale and S. affine are the rarest. S. centrale is found mainly in the eastern part of the country, influenced by the continental climate. Its characteristic distribution in Poland is indicative of its specific status. S. affine is more frequent in the northwestern part, in regions subjected to Atlantic climatic influences. S. papillosum is more scattered but the majority of its localities are in western Poland. So far, S. austinii has not been reported from any Polish locality. There are two regions with particularly high numbers of localities of the studied species: Pomerania (northwestern part of Poland) and the southern uplands. Key words: Sphagnum palustre, Sphagnum magellanicum, Sphagnum papillosum, Sphagnum centrale, Sphagnum affine, distribution, Poland 1. Introduction was supported later by Flatberg (1994, 2002) and Thingsgaard (2001, 2002). The varieties were Within the genus Sphagnum L., one of the most distinguished on the basis of several stem leaf traits. clearly delimited sections is the section Sphagnum L. However, Andrus (1987), on the basis of specimens (syns. Cymbifolia, Palustria), which used to be fre- from eastern North America claimed that the characters quently elevated to the rank of a separate subgenus are not consistent and all possible combinations can be Inophlea Russ. In older treatments, Demaret (1941) in a found in different plants. He therefore failed to voluminous article on the subsection Cymbifolia Lindb. recognize var. flagellare. Also, no differences between in Belgium recognized Sphagnum palustre as the only var. flagellare and var. affine were detected in the species, while the other taxa were treated as its varieties. isozyme survey by Thingsgaard (2002). The taxonomy S. palustre was described as a first species in the genus proposed for the S. imbricatum complex was questioned by Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1106 in 1753. In later studies, five by Crum (1997) and Daniels & Eddy (1990). With species were distinguished: S. palustre L., S. magellani- respect to the S. imbricatum complex, the currently cum Brid., S. centrale C. Jens., S. papillosum Lindb., recognized division into two European species S. affine and S. imbricatum Hornsch ex Russ. (Sawitz-Lubitzkaja Ren. & Card. and S. austinii Sull. (Andrus 1984, 1987; 1952; Isoviita 1966; Nyholm 1969). Flatberg 2002; Thingsgaard 2001, 2002) was followed Two species are problematic from a taxonomic in this work. Microscopically S. affine was distinguished standpoint: S. centrale and S. imbricatum. Within the by comb fibrils on the innermost stem cortex layer. Also, latter species, Flatberg (1984, 1986) distinguished two Thingsgaard (2002) treated this character as the most European taxa: S. imbricatum ssp. affine (Ren. & Card.) important and consistent. Flatb., including var. flagellare (Roell) Card., and S. The distribution of taxa recognized within the S. imbricatum ssp. austinii (Sull.) Flatb., including var. imbricatum complex was given by Andrus (1987), arcticum Flatb. In North America, Andrus (1984, 1987) Flatberg (1984, 1986), Gauthier & BruguÈs (1997), and accorded these subspecies the species status. His view Thingsgaard (2002). The boreal-mountain species S. CHOROLOGY © Adam Mickiewicz University in PoznaÒ (Poland), Department of Plant Taxonomy. All rights reserved. 70 Iwona Melosik Species of the type section of Sphagnum (Bryophyta, Sphagnaceae) in Poland centrale is considered by British authors (Daniels & should be referred to the status of exploration of the Eddy 1985) as a variety S. palustre var. centrale C. investigated area. Therefore, the status of bryological Jens. A. Eddy. By contrast, bryologists from Eastern, exploration of Poland and differentiation of regions in Central and Northern Europe (Sawitz-Lubitzkaja 1952; respect of Sphagnum flora are presented in this study Melosik 1993; Flatberg 2002), treat both these taxa as on the basis of all the herbarium materials (from sections species because they differ in morphology, habitat Acutifolia, Squarrosa, Subsecunda, Rigida and Sphagnum) preferences and distribution. that have been available and verified by me so far. The remaining species (S. palustre, S. papillosum, S. magellanicum) are generally considered to be easy 2. Material and methods to distinguish in the field thanks to their distinct coloration and general appearance. Nevertheless, mis- A total of 6959 samples were verified, which in most takes are frequent. Plants of S. papillosum in which cases belonged to the following sections: Acutifolia, papillae are very weakly developed (such forms were Sphagnum, Subsecunda, Squarrosa and Rigida. Among named in the past var. sublaeve Limpr.) or completely the samples, 2459 specimens belonging to the section absent (var. leave Warnst.) are often confused with S. Sphagnum were found in 18 Polish herbaria (BSG, BIL, magellanicum or S. palustre. In turn, S. centrale grow- GDMA, UGDA, KRAM, LBL, LOD, POZM, POZG, ing in shady places in relatively base-rich habitats is POZNF, SOSN, SZUB, SZCZ, TRN, WA, WRAB, frequently mistaken for green forms of S. magellanicum WSRP, WRSL, Mirek et al. 1997) and 3 German herbaria or S. palustre, while S. affine is confused with S. (B, HAL, STU, http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/ palustre. IndexHerbariorum.asp). Fig. 1. Status of bryological explorations of Poland based on the Fig. 2. Number of species of Sphagnum recorded in individual distribution of Sphagnum species squares of the ATMOS grid, based on herbarium collections veri- fied to date (sections: Acutifolia, Sphagnum, Subsecunda, Squarrosa and Rigida) According to the map presented by Daniels & Eddy The current status of explorations conducted in (1985), S. papillosum occurs only in the southwestern Poland, on the basis of all samples analyzed so far, part of Poland, whereas S. imbricatum s.l. is found only is presented on Fig. 1, whereas differentiation of re- in its northernmost part. On the other hand, Flatberg gions in respect to Sphagnum flora is presented on (1984) reported that two species of the S. imbricatum Fig. 2. complex (S. affine and S. austinii) are present in Poland. The materials subjected to verification were Hence the aim of this study was to analyze the collected between 1853 and 2003 by German and distribution of species from the section Sphagnum in Polish bryologists (see the legend of Fig. 1). The entire Poland on the basis of herbarium collections verified studied material was subdivided into three groups by me. However, the occurrence of particular species according to collection date. The fourth group consisted Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1-2: 69-76, 2006 71 Table 1. Relative distribution of localities of Sphagnum palustre (pal), S. magellanicum (mag), S. centrale (cen), S. papillosum (pap), and S. affine (aff) (as percentage of all Polish localities of each species) in Polandís physiographic subprovinces (Kondracki 1988) and their characteri- zation (Woú 1999; Krawczyk & B≥aøejczyk 1999) Subpro- Altitude range Mean annual Mean January Percentage of localities of Sphagnum species vince (m) precipitation* (mm) temperature* (ºC) pal mag cen pap aff 313 0−100 527–698 -0.6 to -1.0 8.9 6.1 4.0 11.3 10.0 314 50–329 (440) 573 (794) -3.2 30.0 30.8 13.2 37.3 46.8 315 75–312 520 -1.8 to -2.2 7.4 7.2 12.2 3.95 3.3 317 18–200 700–1000** ** 0.2 – – – – 318 60–284 508–612 -1.9 to -3.4 12.0 5.5 4.0 10.2 10.0 332 >400–1603 701 -1.5 to -7.2 1.4 2.0 1.0 4.5 – 341 220–500 740 -3.0 6.0 0.8 1.0 6.8 10.0 342 180–500 649 -3.8 7.9 9.5 2.0 12.4 3.3 343 160–400 603 -3.9 2.7 2.9 4.0 – 3.3 512 200–300 678–702 -3.4 to 3.5 5.7 2.9 – 3.95 3.3 513 400–1390 1000–1300** ** 3.3 2.9 3.0 2.3 6.7 514 905–2503 700–2000 -2.0 to -11.9 0.7 3.4 2.0 2.8 3.3 521 300 600–700** ** 0.8 0.2 – – – 522 600–1220 700–800 (1150−1200)** -4.8 to -5.2 0.3 0.4 – 1.1 – 841 80–216 600–700** ** 0.1 – – – – 842 130–300 631 -5.3 4.6 10.5 22.3 2.3 – 843 164−241 550–600** -5.0 5.9 12.0 29.3 – – 845 140−210 (290) 500–600 -4.0 to -5.2 2.1 2.7 2.0 1.1 – 851 220–260 550–600** ** – 0.2 – – – * Ranges of mean values are given if data from several weather stations are available, ** Approximate data ñ insufficient weather station coverage or short recording periods of specimens with no date given. Contemporary 3. Results specimens (years 1944-2003) accounted for 75% of the analyzed material. 3.1. The current status of explorations The data on distribution of species were illustrated conducted in Poland by using the cartogram technique, employing a grid of The results of this study of the distribution of large (100 km◊100 km) and small (10 km◊10 km) Sphagnum species in Poland, summarized on Figs. 1-2 squares.
Recommended publications
  • Check- and Red List of Bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003)

    Check- and Red List of Bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003)

    Preslia, Praha, 75: 193–222, 2003 193 Check- and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003) Seznam a Červený seznam mechorostů České republiky (2003) Jan K u č e r a 1 and Jiří Vá ň a 2 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Prague, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Kučera J. & Váňa J. (2003): Check- and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003). – Preslia, Praha, 75: 193–222. The second version of the checklist and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic is provided. Generally accepted infraspecific taxa have been incorporated into the checklist for the first time. With respect to the Red List, IUCN criteria version 3.1 has been adopted for evaluation of taxa, and the criteria used for listing in the respective categories are listed under each red-listed taxon. Taxa without recent localities and those where extinction has not been proven are listed as a subset of DD taxa. Little known and rare non-threatened taxa with incomplete knowledge of distribution which are worthy of further investigation are listed on the so-called attention list. In total, 849 species plus 5 subspecies and 19 varieties have been accepted. 23 other historically reported species and one va- riety were evaluated as doubtful with respect to unproven but possible occurrence in the territory, and 6 other species with proven occurrence require taxonomic clarification.
  • Download Species Dossier

    Download Species Dossier

    Pallavicinia lyellii Veilwort PALLAVICINIACEAE SYN: Pallavicinia lyellii (Hook.) Caruth. Status UK BAP Priority Species Lead Partner: Plantlife International & RBG, Kew Vulnerable (2001) Natural England Species Recovery Programme Status in Europe - Vulnerable 14 10km squares UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) These are the current BAP targets following the 2001 Targets Review: T1 - Maintain populations of Veilwort at all extant sites. T2 - Increase the extent of Veilwort populations at all extant sites where appropriate and biologically feasible. T3 - If biologically feasible, re-establish populations of Veilwort at three suitable sites by 2005. T4 - Establish by 2005 ex situ stocks of this species to safeguard extant populations. Progress on targets as reported in the UKBAP 2002 reporting round can be viewed online at: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/2002OnlineReport/mainframe.htm. The full Action Plan for Pallavicinia lyellii can be viewed on the following web site: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=497. Work on Pallavicinia lyellii is supported by: 1 Contents 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics................................................2 2 Distribution & Current Status ...........................................................................4 2.1 World ......................................................................................................4 2.2 Europe ....................................................................................................4 2.3 Britain .....................................................................................................5
  • Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1

    Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1

    Northern Fen CommunityNorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1 Community Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Overview: Northern fen is a sedge- and rush-dominated 8,000 years. Expansion of peatlands likely occurred wetland occurring on neutral to moderately alkaline following climatic cooling, approximately 5,000 years saturated peat and/or marl influenced by groundwater ago (Heinselman 1970, Boelter and Verry 1977, Riley rich in calcium and magnesium carbonates. The 1989). community occurs north of the climatic tension zone and is found primarily where calcareous bedrock Several other natural peatland communities also underlies a thin mantle of glacial drift on flat areas or occur in Michigan and can be distinguished from shallow depressions of glacial outwash and glacial minerotrophic (nutrient-rich) northern fens, based on lakeplains and also in kettle depressions on pitted comparisons of nutrient levels, flora, canopy closure, outwash and moraines. distribution, landscape context, and groundwater influence (Kost et al. 2007). Northern fen is dominated Global and State Rank: G3G5/S3 by sedges, rushes, and grasses (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Additional open wetlands occurring on organic Range: Northern fen is a peatland type of glaciated soils include coastal fen, poor fen, prairie fen, bog, landscapes of the northern Great Lakes region, ranging intermittent wetland, and northern wet meadow. Bogs, from Michigan west to Minnesota and northward peat-covered wetlands raised above the surrounding into central Canada (Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec) groundwater by an accumulation of peat, receive inputs (Gignac et al. 2000, Faber-Langendoen 2001, Amon of nutrients and water primarily from precipitation et al.
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?

    Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?

    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science

    Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science

    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
  • Zero to Moderate Methane Emissions in a Densely

    Zero to Moderate Methane Emissions in a Densely

    Zero to moderate methane emissions in a densely rooted, pristine Patagonian bog - biogeochemical controls as revealed from isotopic evidence Wiebke Münchberger1, 2, Klaus-Holger Knorr1, Christian Blodau1, †, Verónica A. Pancotto3, 4, Till 5 Kleinebecker2 1Ecohydrology and Biogeochemistry Research Group, Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Muenster, Heisenbergstraße 2, 48149 Muenster, Germany 2Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research Group, Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Muenster, Heisenbergstraße 2, 48149 Muenster, Germany 10 3Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC-CONICET), B. Houssay 200, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina 4Instituto de Ciencias Polares y Ambiente (ICPA-UNTDF), Fuegia Basket, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina Correspondence to: Wiebke Münchberger ([email protected]), Klaus-Holger Knorr (kh.knorr@uni- 15 muenster.de) Abstract. Peatlands are significant global methane (CH4) sources, but processes governing CH4 dynamics have been predominantly studied on the northern hemisphere. Southern hemispheric and tropical bogs can be dominated by cushion- forming vascular plants (e.g. Astelia pumila, Donatia fascicularis). These cushion bogs are found in many (mostly southern) parts of the world but could also serve as extreme examples for densely rooted northern hemispheric bogs dominated by rushes 20 and sedges. We report highly variable summer CH4 emissions from different microforms in a Patagonian cushion bog as determined by chamber measurements. Driving biogeochemical processes were identified from pore water profiles and carbon isotopic signatures. An intensive root activity within a rhizosphere stretching over 2 m depth accompanied by molecular -1 oxygen release created aerobic microsites in water-saturated peat leading to a thorough CH4 oxidation (< 0.003 mmol L pore 13 -2 -1 water CH4, enriched δ C-CH4 by up to 10‰) and negligible emissions (0.09 ± 0.16 mmol CH4 m d ) from Astelia lawns.
  • Peatlands & Climate Change Action Plan 2030 Pages 0-15

    Peatlands & Climate Change Action Plan 2030 Pages 0-15

    Peatlands and Climate Change Action Plan 2030 © Irish Peatland Conservation Council 2021 Published by: Irish Peatland Conservation Council, Bog of Allen Nature Centre, Lullymore, Rathangan, Co. Kildare R51V293. Telephone: +353-45-860133 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ipcc.ie Written and compiled by: Dr Catherine O’Connell BSc, HDipEdn, PhD; Nuala Madigan BAgrEnvSc, MEd; Tristram Whyte BSc Hons Freshwater Biology and Paula Farrell BSc Wildlife Biology on behalf of the Irish Peatland Conservation Council. Irish Peatland Conservation Council Registered Revenue Charity Number CHY6829 and Charities Regulator Number (RCN) 20013547 ISBN 1 874189 34 X All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise with the prior permission of the Irish Peatland Conservation Council. Funded by: This Action Plan was funded by the Irish Peatland Conservation Council’s supporters - friends of the bog - who made donations in response to a spring appeal launched by the charity in 2020. Printing costs for the Action Plan were supported by the Heritage Council through their Heritage Sector Support Grant 2021. Copyright Images: Every effort has been made to acknowledge and contact copyright holders of all images used in this publication. Cover Image: Blanket bog complex south of Killary Harbour, Co. Galway. Blanket bogs face a number of pressures - overgrazing, drainage for turf cutting and forestry, burning to improve grazing, recreation and windfarm developments. Together these uses can change the natural function of the blanket bog so that it switches from slowing climate change as a carbon sink, to become a carbon source that releases greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.
  • Species List For: Labarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey

    Species List For: Labarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey

    Species List for: LaBarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey 5/15/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey 5/16/2006 Nels Holmberg, George Yatskievych, and Rex Plant Survey Hill 5/22/2006 Nels Holmberg and WGNSS Botany Group Plant Survey 5/6/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey Multiple Visits Nels Holmberg, John Atwood and Others LaBarque Creek Watershed - Bryophytes Bryophte List compiled by Nels Holmberg Multiple Visits Nels Holmberg and Many WGNSS and MONPS LaBarque Creek Watershed - Vascular Plants visits from 2005 to 2016 Vascular Plant List compiled by Nels Holmberg Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha monococca (A. gracilescens var. monococca) one-seeded mercury Euphorbiaceae 3 5 Acalypha rhomboidea rhombic copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 1 3 Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer negundo var. undetermined box elder Sapindaceae 1 0 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry Ranunculaceae 8 5 Adiantum pedatum var. pedatum northern maidenhair fern Pteridaceae Fern/Ally 6 1 Agalinis gattingeri (Gerardia) rough-stemmed gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia parviflora swamp agrimony Rosaceae 5 -1 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Agrostis elliottiana awned bent grass Poaceae/Aveneae 3 5 * Agrostis gigantea redtop Poaceae/Aveneae 0 -3 Agrostis perennans upland bent Poaceae/Aveneae 3 1 Allium canadense var.
  • Controlling the Invasive Moss Sphagnum Palustre at Ka'ala

    Controlling the Invasive Moss Sphagnum Palustre at Ka'ala

    Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 192 Controlling the invasive moss Sphagnum palustre at Ka‘ala, Island of O‘ahu March 2015 Stephanie Marie Joe 1 1 The Oahu Army Natural Resource Program (OANRP) USAG-HI, Directorate of Public Works Environmental Division IMPC-HI-PWE 947 Wright Ave., Wheeler Army Airfield, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857-5013 [email protected] PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Organization Contact Information: Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, Department of Botany, 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822. Office: (808) 753-0702. Recommended Citation: Joe, SM. 2015. Controlling the invasive moss Sphagnum palustre at Ka‘ala, Island of O‘ahu. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit Technical Report 191. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Botany. Honolulu, HI. 18 pages. Key words: Bryocides, Sphagnum palustre, invasive species control Place key words: Pacific islands, O‘ahu, Ka‘ala Natural Area Reserve Editor: David C. Duffy, PCSU Unit Leader (Email: [email protected]) Series Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (Email: [email protected]) About this technical report series: This technical report series began in 1973 with the formation of the Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa. In 2000, it continued under the Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit (PCSU). The series currently is supported by the PCSU.
  • VH Flora Complete Rev 18-19

    VH Flora Complete Rev 18-19

    Flora of Vinalhaven Island, Maine Macrolichens, Liverworts, Mosses and Vascular Plants Javier Peñalosa Version 1.4 Spring 2019 1. General introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------1.1 2. The Setting: Landscape, Geology, Soils and Climate ----------------------------------2.1 3. Vegetation of Vinalhaven Vegetation: classification or description? --------------------------------------------------3.1 The trees and shrubs --------------------------------------------------------------------------3.1 The Forest --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.3 Upland spruce-fir forest -----------------------------------------------------------------3.3 Deciduous woodlands -------------------------------------------------------------------3.6 Pitch pine woodland ---------------------------------------------------------------------3.6 The shore ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.7 Rocky headlands and beaches ----------------------------------------------------------3.7 Salt marshes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.8 Shrub-dominated shoreline communities --------------------------------------------3.10 Freshwater wetlands -------------------------------------------------------------------------3.11 Streams -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.11 Ponds -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3.11
  • &lt;I&gt;Sphagnum&lt;/I&gt; Peat Mosses

    <I>Sphagnum</I> Peat Mosses

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12547 Evolution of niche preference in Sphagnum peat mosses Matthew G. Johnson,1,2,3 Gustaf Granath,4,5,6 Teemu Tahvanainen, 7 Remy Pouliot,8 Hans K. Stenøien,9 Line Rochefort,8 Hakan˚ Rydin,4 and A. Jonathan Shaw1 1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 2Current Address: Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, Illinois 60022 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvagen¨ 18D, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden 5School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 6Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden 7Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland 8Department of Plant Sciences and Northern Research Center (CEN), Laval University Quebec, Canada 9Department of Natural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Museum, Trondheim, Norway Received March 26, 2014 Accepted September 23, 2014 Peat mosses (Sphagnum)areecosystemengineers—speciesinborealpeatlandssimultaneouslycreateandinhabitnarrowhabitat preferences along two microhabitat gradients: an ionic gradient and a hydrological hummock–hollow gradient. In this article, we demonstrate the connections between microhabitat preference and phylogeny in Sphagnum.Usingadatasetof39speciesof Sphagnum,withan18-locusDNAalignmentandanecologicaldatasetencompassingthreelargepublishedstudies,wetested
  • TAXON:Sphagnum Palustre L. SCORE:11.0 RATING

    TAXON:Sphagnum Palustre L. SCORE:11.0 RATING

    TAXON: Sphagnum palustre L. SCORE: 11.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Sphagnum palustre L. Family: Sphagnaceae Common Name(s): boat-leaved sphagnum Synonym(s): Sphagnum cymbifolium (Ehrhart) R. Hedwig peat moss praire sphagnum spoon-leaved sphagnum Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 17 Sep 2019 WRA Score: 11.0 Designation: H(Hawai'i) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Dioecious Moss, Environmental Weed, Shade-Tolerant, Dense Mats, Spreads Vegetatively Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) Intermediate tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic y=1, n=0 y 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 y 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems y=1, n=0 n Creation Date: 17 Sep 2019 (Sphagnum palustre L.) Page 1 of 19 TAXON: Sphagnum palustre L.