DOCSLIB.ORG

High Court of Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

[Home ] [ Databases ] [ WorldLII ] [ Search ] [ Feedback ] High Court of Australia You are here: AustLII >> Databases >> High Court of Australia >> 1996 >> [1996] HCA 40 [Database Search ] [ Name Search ] [ Recent Decisions ] [ Noteup ] [ Help ] Wik Peoples v Queensland ("Pastoral Leases case") [1996] HCA 40; (1996) 187 CLR 1; (1996) 141 ALR 129; (1996) 71 ALJR 173 (23 December 1996) HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA BRENNAN CJ, DAWSON, TOOHEY, GAUDRON, McHUGH, GUMMOW AND KIRBY JJ ______________________ Matter No B8 of 1996 THE WIK PEOPLES APPELLANTS AND THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS RESPONDENTS Matter No B9 of 1996 THE THAYORRE PEOPLE APPELLANTS AND THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS RESPONDENTS ORDER 1. Each appeal allowed in part. 2. Set aside the answers given by Drummond J to Question 1B(b), (c) and (d) and Question 1C(b), (c) and (d). Affirm the answers given by Drummond J to Question 1C(a), Question 4 and Question 5. 3. Answer Questions 1B, 1C, 4 and 5 as follows: Question 1B " If at any material time Aboriginal title or possessory title existed in respect of the land demised under the pastoral lease in respect of the Holroyd River Holding a copy of which is attached hereto (pastoral lease): (a) [not pressed] (b) does the pastoral lease confer rights to exclusive possession on the grantee? If the answer to (a) is 'no' and the answer to (b) is 'yes': (c) does the creation of the pastoral lease that has these two characteristics confer on the grantee rights wholly inconsistent with the concurrent and continuing exercise of any rights or interests which might comprise such Aboriginal title or possessory title of the Wik Peoples and their predecessors in title which existed before the New South Wales Constitution Act 1855 (Imp) took effect in the Colony of New South Wales? (d) did the grant of the pastoral lease necessarily extinguish all incidents of Aboriginal title or possessory title of the Wik Peoples in respect of the land demised under the pastoral lease?" Answer (b) No. (c) Does not arise. (d) Strictly does not arise but is properly answered No. Question 1C " If at any material time Aboriginal title or possessory title existed in respect of the land demised under the pastoral leases in respect of the Mitchellton Pastoral Holding No 2464 and the Mitchellton Pastoral Holding No 2540 copies of which are attached hereto (Mitchellton Pastoral Leases): (a) was either of the Mitchellton Pastoral Leases subject to a reservation in favour of the Thayorre People and their predecessors in title of any rights or interests which might comprise such Aboriginal title or possessory title which existed before the New South Wales Constitution Act 1855 (Imp) took effect in the Colony of New South Wales? (b) did either of the Mitchellton Pastoral Leases confer rights to exclusive possession on the grantee? If the answer to (a) is 'no' and the answer to (b) is 'yes': (c) does the creation of the Mitchellton Pastoral Leases that had these two characteristics confer on the grantee rights wholly inconsistent with the concurrent and continuing exercise of any rights or interests which might comprise such Aboriginal title or possessory title of the Thayorre People and their predecessors in title which existed before the New South Wales Constitution Act 1855 (Imp) took effect in the Colony of New South Wales? (d) did the grant of either of the Mitchellton Pastoral Leases necessarily extinguish all incidents of Aboriginal title or possessory title of the Thayorre People in respect of the land demised under either of the Mitchellton Pastoral Leases?" Answer (a) No. (b) No. (c) Does not arise. (d) Strictly does not arise but is properly answered No. Question 4 " May any of the claims in paras 48A to 53, 54 to 58(a), 59 to 61, 61A to 64 and 65 to 68 of the further amended statement of claim [being claims of alleged breach of fiduciary duty and failure to accord natural justice] be maintained against the State of Queensland or Comalco Aluminium Limited notwithstanding the enactment of the Comalco Act, the making of the Comalco Agreement, the publication in the Queensland Government Gazette of 22 March 1958 pursuant to s 5 of the Comalco Act of the proclamation that the agreement authorised by the Comalco Act was made on 16 December 1957 and the grant of Special Bauxite Mining Lease No 1?" Answer No. Question 5 " May any of the claims in paras 112 to 116, 117 to 121, 122 to 124, 125 to 127, 128 to 132, and 141 to 143 of the further amended statement of claim [being claims of alleged breach of fiduciary duty and failure to accord natural justice] be maintained against the State of Queensland or Aluminium Pechiney Holdings Pty Ltd notwithstanding the enactment of the Aurukun Associates Agreement Act 1975, the making of the Aurukun Associates Agreement, the publication in the Queensland Government Gazette of the proclamation of the making of the agreement pursuant to the Act and the grant of Special Bauxite Mining Lease No 9?" Answer No. 4. The respondents who opposed the orders sought in relation to Question 1B(b), (c) and (d) pay the costs of the proceedings in this Court of the Wik Peoples relating to that question. 5. The respondents who opposed the orders sought in relation to Question 1C(b), (c) and (d) pay the costs of the proceedings in this Court of the Thayorre People and the Wik Peoples relating to that question. The Thayorre People pay the costs of the proceedings in this Court of the respondents relating to Question 1C(a). 6. The Wik Peoples pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings in this Court relating to Questions 4 and 5. 7. Remit the matters to the Federal Court with respect to the costs of the proceedings before Drummond J or otherwise in that Court. 23 December 1996 On appeal from the Federal Court of Australia. Representation: W Sofronoff, QC, with R W Blowes and G C Newton for the appellants in B8/96 and for the nineteenth respondents in B9/96 (instructed by Ebsworth & Ebsworth) M H Byers, QC, with J W Greenwood, QC, G E Hiley, QC and P M McDermott for the appellants in B9/96 and for the nineteenth respondents in B8/96 (instructed by Bottoms English) P A Keane, QC, Solicitor-General for the State of Queensland, with G J Gibson, QC, G J Koppenol and D A Mullins for the first and third respondents in each matter (instructed by B T Dunphy, Crown Solicitor for the State of Queensland) G Griffith, QC, Solicitor-General for the Commonwealth, with D J McGill, SC and M A Perry for the second respondent in each matter (instructed by the Australian Government Solicitor) H B Fraser, QC, with P L O'Shea and J K Bond for the fourth respondent in each matter (instructed by Blake Dawson Waldron) G A Thompson for the fifth respondent in each matter (instructed by Feez Ruthning) No appearance for the sixth respondent G M G McIntyre for the seventh respondent in each matter (instructed by S M Coates) P J Favell for the eighth respondent in each matter (instructed by Farrellys) D J S Jackson, QC, with J D McKenna for the ninth to twelfth respondents and the fourteenth to eighteenth respondents in each matter (instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth) S L Doyle, SC for the thirteenth respondent in each matter (instructed by Clayton Utz) Interveners: D Graham, QC, Solicitor-General for the State of Victoria, with M Sloss intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Victoria (instructed by R C Beazley, Victorian Government Solicitor) R J Meadows, QC, Solicitor-General for the State of Western Australia, with C A Wheeler, QC and K M Pettit intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia (instructed by P A Panegyres, Crown Solicitor for Western Australia) B M Selway, QC, Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia, with E E David intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of South Australia (instructed by M D Walter, Crown Solicitor for South Australia) D M J Bennett, QC, with R J Webb intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the Northern Territory (instructed by the Solicitor for the Northern Territory) J L Sher, QC, with B A Keon-Cohen intervening for the Northern Land Council and the Central Land Council (instructed by B Midena, Principal Legal Officer of the Northern Land Council) G M G McIntyre intervening on behalf of the Kimberley Land Council, the Nanga-Ngoona Moora-Joonga Association Aboriginal Corporation, the Western Desert Punturkurnuparna Aboriginal Corporation and the Ngaanyatjarra Land Council (instructed by the DCH Legal Group) R H Bartlett intervening on behalf of Ben Ward, John Toby, Jimmy Ward, Ronnie Carlton, Jeff Janama, Button Jones, Ben Barney, Dodger Carlton, Kim Aldus, Paddy Carlton, Rita Gerrard, Murphy Simon, Sheba Dignari, Joe Lissadell, Chocolate Thomas and Peter Newry on behalf of the Miriuwung and Gajerrong People (instructed by the Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia) Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports. CATCHWORDS The Wik Peoples v The State of Queensland & Ors The Thayorre People v The State of Queensland & Ors Aborigines - Native Title- Grant of pastoral leases pursuant to Land Act 1910 (Q) and Land Act 1962 (Q) - History of pastoral tenures and disposal of Crown land considered - Whether leases conferred rights to exclusive possession - Application of principles of statutory construction - Whether legislative intention to confer possession to exclusion of holders of native title rights - Rights and obligations of pastoral lessees determined by reference to the language of the statute authorising the grant and terms of the grant - Grant for "pastoral purposes only" - Whether grant of pastoral lease necessarily extinguished all incidents of Aboriginal title - Whether clear and plain intention to extinguish exists - Inconsistency of native title rights and rights conferred on pastoral lessees - Whether grant or exercise of the rights may operate to extinguish - Whether reversion to the Crown - Whether reversion inconsistent with continued existence of native title rights - Effect of non-entry into possession of lease.
Recommended publications
  • Nber Working Paper Series De Facto and De Jure Property Rights

    Nber Working Paper Series De Facto and De Jure Property Rights

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DE FACTO AND DE JURE PROPERTY RIGHTS: LAND SETTLEMENT AND LAND CONFLICT ON THE AUSTRALIAN, BRAZILIAN AND U.S. FRONTIERS Lee J. Alston Edwyna Harris Bernardo Mueller Working Paper 15264 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15264 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2009 For comments we thank Eric Alston, Lee Cronk, Ernesto Dal Bó, John Ferejohn, Stephen Haber, P.J. Hill, Gary Libecap, Henry Smith, Ian Wills and participants at: a seminar on social norms at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton; a conference on “Australian Economic History in the Long Run;” the Research Group on Political Institutions and Economic Policy held at Princeton University; and a seminar at Monash University. Alston and Mueller acknowledge the support of NSF grant #528146. Alston thanks the STEP Program at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton for their support as a Visiting Research Scholar during 2008/2009 and The Australian National University for support as Research Fellow in 2009. We thank Eric Alston for research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2009 by Lee J. Alston, Edwyna Harris, and Bernardo Mueller. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.
  • Patrick John Cosgrove

    Patrick John Cosgrove

    i o- 1 n wm S3V NUI MAYNOOTH Ollfctel na t-Ciraann W* huatl THE WYNDHAM LAND ACT, 1903: THE FINAL SOLUTION TO THE IRISH LAND QUESTION? by PATRICK JOHN COSGROVE THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH HEAD OF DEPARTMENT: Professor R. V. Comerford Supervisor of Research: Dr Terence Dooley September 2008 Contents Acknowledgements Abbreviations INTRODUCTION CHAPTER ONE: THE ORIGINS OF THE WYNDHAM LAND BILL, 1903. i. Introduction. ii. T. W. Russell at Clogher, Co. Tyrone, September 1900. iii. The official launch of the compulsory purchase campaign in Ulster. iv. The Ulster Farmers’ and Labourers’ Union and Compulsory Sale Organisation. v. Official launch of the U.I.L. campaign for compulsory purchase. vi. The East Down by-election, 1902. vii. The response to the 1902 land bill. viii. The Land Conference, ix. Conclusion. CHAPTER TWO: INITIAL REACTIONS TO THE 1903 LAND BILL. i. Introduction. ii. The response of the Conservative party. iii. The response of the Liberal opposition to the bill. iv. Nationalist reaction to the bill. v. Unionist reaction to the bill. vi. The attitude of Irish landlords. vii. George Wyndham’s struggle to get the bill to the committee stage. viii. Conclusion. CHAPTER THREE: THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES THAT FORGED THE WYNDHAM LAND ACT, 1903. i. Introduction. ii. The Estates Commission. iii. The system of price‘zones’. iv. The ‘bonus’ and the financial clauses of Wyndham’s Land Bill. v. Advances to tenant-purchasers. vi. Sale and repurchase of demesnes. vii. The evicted tenants question. viii. The retention of sporting and mineral rights.
  • Statute Law Revision Bill 2007 ————————

    Statute Law Revision Bill 2007 ————————

    ———————— AN BILLE UM ATHCHO´ IRIU´ AN DLI´ REACHTU´ IL 2007 STATUTE LAW REVISION BILL 2007 ———————— Mar a tionscnaı´odh As initiated ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1896. 6. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1962. 7. Miscellaneous amendments to post-1800 short titles. 8. Evidence of certain early statutes, etc. 9. Savings. 10. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Statutes retained PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 [No. 5 of 2007] SCHEDULE 2 Statutes Specifically Repealed PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 ———————— 2 Acts Referred to Bill of Rights 1688 1 Will. & Mary, Sess. 2. c. 2 Documentary Evidence Act 1868 31 & 32 Vict., c. 37 Documentary Evidence Act 1882 45 & 46 Vict., c. 9 Dower Act, 1297 25 Edw. 1, Magna Carta, c. 7 Drainage and Improvement of Lands Supplemental Act (Ireland) (No. 2) 1867 31 & 32 Vict., c. 3 Dublin Hospitals Regulation Act 1856 19 & 20 Vict., c. 110 Evidence Act 1845 8 & 9 Vict., c. 113 Forfeiture Act 1639 15 Chas., 1. c. 3 General Pier and Harbour Act 1861 Amendment Act 1862 25 & 26 Vict., c.
  • LAND REGISTRATION for the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY a Conveyancing Revolution

    LAND REGISTRATION for the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY a Conveyancing Revolution

    LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND COMMENTARY Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 July 2001 LAW COMMISSION H M LAND REGISTRY LAW COM NO 271 LONDON: The Stationery Office HC 114 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. THE COMMISSIONERS ARE: The Honourable Mr Justice Carnwath CVO, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale Mr Stuart Bridge· Professor Martin Partington Judge Alan Wilkie QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers Her Majesty’s Land Registry, a separate department of government and now an Executive Agency, maintains the land registers for England and Wales and is responsible for delivering all land registration services under the Land Registration Act 1925. The Chief Land Registrar and Chief Executive is Mr Peter Collis The Solicitor to H M Land Registry is Mr Christopher West The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001. The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk · Mr Stuart Bridge was appointed Law Commissioner with effect from 2 July 2001. The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001, while Mr Charles Harpum was a Law Commissioner. ii LAW COMMISSION HM LAND REGISTRY LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY- FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: THE LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND
  • Chapter Ix. Old Melbourne Described

    Chapter Ix. Old Melbourne Described

    CHAPTER IX. OLD MELBOURNE DESCRIBED. 1840—1843. SYNOPSIS:—Difficulties of Pedcstrianism—Early Legal Difficulties.—The Queen's Wharf—Solar Perplexities.—First Public Clock.—Early Letter-carriers. —Tardy Mail-deliveries.—First Burial Ground.—A Threatened Famine.—Early Mercantile Firms.—Jewish Residents.—Population of Colony in 1840-1.—Nocturnal Outrages.—Bill of Wants.—Sir Gcor«e Gipps' Visit.—•" Kiteflying."—The Unemployed.—Street Procession.—Open-air Demonstration.—Population of the Town. —First Executions of Criminals. —Commercial Depression.—Mr. Wentworth.—First Boiling-down Establishments.—Revival of Trade. PERSON now standing on the summit of Parliament House, and looking at the city spreading its wings, fan-like in every direction—its steeples, domes, and edifices glinting in the sunlight—the people, like bees, buzzing and busying about—the vehicles of every description, tram cars, and other evidences of active li'e thronging the streets—the whinnying and whistling of the "iron horse" as he rushes through the suburbs, and the fleet of shipping in Hobson's Bay—will smile with incredulity at my portraiture of the Melbourne of nearly half a century ago, yet it will be limned to the life without a single shade or tint of exaggeration thrown in to set off the effect. Forty odd years is such a brief period in the life of a great city, that unless the Melbourne of 1840 could be attested by an eye witness, it is difficult even to imagine the state of things then existent as compared with the present, and there never has been a stronger verification than the comparison supplies, of Burke's famous adage, that " fiction lags after fact, invention is unfruitful, and imagination is cold and barren." Melbourne in 1840 was certainly not a city, and could hardly be called a town ; nor did it even partake of the characteristics of a village or a hamlet.
  • Crown Land Legislation Amendment Act 2017

    Crown Land Legislation Amendment Act 2017

    Crown Land Legislation Amendment Act 2017 As at 10 April 2018 See also: Transport Administration Amendment (Sydney Metro) Bill 2018 Note: Amending Acts and amending provisions are subject to automatic repeal pursuant to sec 30C of the Interpretation Act 1987 No 15 once the amendments have taken effect. Long Title An Act to amend certain legislation consequent on the enactment of the Crown Land Management Act 2016. 1 Name of Act This Act is the Crown Land Legislation Amendment Act 2017. 2 Commencement (1) This Act commences on the day on which the Crown Lands Act 1989 is repealed by the Crown Land Management Act 2016, except as provided by this section. (2) Schedule 1 commences on the date of assent to this Act. Schedule 1 (Repealed) Schedule 2 Amendment of legislation referring to reserve trusts 2.1 – Betting and Racing Act 1998 No 114 Section 4 Definitions Omit paragraph (c) of the definition of "approved body" in section 4 (1). Insert instead: (c) a statutory land manager within the meaning of the Crown Land Management Act 2016. 2.2 – Cemeteries and Crematoria Act 2013 No 105 [1] Section 3 Objects of Act Omit "section 11 of the Crown Lands Act 1989 " from section 3 (f). Insert instead "section 1.4 of the Crown Land Management Act 2016 ". [2] Section 4 Interpretation Omit section 4 (3). Insert instead: (3) An expression that is used in this Act and that is defined in the Crown Land Management Act 2016 (not being an expression that is defined in this Act) has the same meaning in this Act in relation to a Crown cemetery or Crown cemetery operator as it has in that Act in relation to dedicated or reserved Crown land or a person responsible for the care, control and management of dedicated or reserved Crown land, respectively.
  • The Legislative Process

    The Legislative Process

    House of Commons Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1097 House of Commons Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 25 July 2006 HC 1097 Published on 7 September 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons is appointed by the House of Commons to consider how the House operates and to make recommendations for modernisation. Current membership Mr Jack Straw (Labour, Blackburn) (Chairman) Mr Paul Burstow, (Liberal Democrat, Sutton & Cheam) Ms Dawn Butler (Labour, Brent South) Ann Coffey (Labour, Stockport) Mr George Howarth (Labour, Knowsley North & Sefton East) Mr Greg Knight (Conservative, Yorkshire East) Mark Lazarowicz (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Mrs Theresa May (Conservative, Maidenhead) Mr Adrian Sanders, (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Richard Shepherd (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Paddy Tipping (Labour, Sherwood) Mr Edward Vaizey (Conservative, Wantage) Lynda Waltho (Labour, Stourbridge) Sir Nicholas Winterton (Conservative, Macclesfield) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Liz Blackman (Labour, Erewash) Chris Grayling (Conservative, Epsom and Ewell) Mr David Heath (Liberal Democrat, Somerton and Frome) Mr Geoffrey Hoon (Labour, Ashfield) (Chairman) Jessica Morden (Labour, Newport East) Andrew Stunell (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in an Appendix to the House of Commons Standing Orders.
  • Kew Gardens (Leases) (No

    Kew Gardens (Leases) (No

    KEW GARDENS (LEASES) (NO. 3) BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Kew Gardens (Leases) (No. 3) Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 25 April 2019 (HL Bill 174). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. HL Bill 174–EN 57/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 2 Policy background 2 Legal background 2 Territorial extent and application 2 Commentary on provisions of Bill 3 Clause 1: Power to grant a lease in respect of land at Kew Gardens 3 Clause 2: Extent, commencement and short title 3 Commencement 3 Financial implications of the Bill 3 Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights 3 Annex A – Territorial extent and application in the United Kingdom 4 Subject matter and legislative competence of devolved legislatures 4 These Explanatory Notes relate to the Kew Gardens (Leases) (No. 3) Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 25 April 2019 (HL Bill 174) 1 1 Overview of the Bill 1 This Bill provides that the Secretary of State's powers of management in relation to the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Kew) include powers to grant a lease over land at Kew for a term of up to 150 years.
  • 1951 Census Armagh County Report

    1951 Census Armagh County Report

    GOVERNMENT OF NORTHERN IRELAND CENSUS OF POPULATION OF NORTHERN IRELAND 1951 County of Armagh Printed & presented pursuant to 14 & 15 Geo. 6, Ch. 6 BELFAST : HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1954 PRICE 7s M NET GOVERNMENT OF NORTHERN IRELAND CENSUS OF POPULATION OF NORTHERN ffiELAND 1951 County of Armagh Printed & presented pursuant to 14 & 15 Geo. 6, Ch. 6 BELFAST ; HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1954 PREFACE Three censuses of population have been taken since the Governinent of Northern Ireland was established. The first enumeration took place in 1926 and incorporated questions relating to occupation and industry, orphanhood and infirmities. The second enumeration made in 1937 was of m^ore limited scope and was intended to bridge the gap between the census of 1926 and the census which it was proposed to take in 1941, but which had to be abandoned owing to the outbreak of war. The census taken as at mid­ night of 8th-9th April, 1951, forms the basis of this report and like that in 1926 questions were asked as to the occupations and industries of the population. The length of time required to process the data collected at an enumeration before it can be presented in the ultimate reports is necessarily considerable. In order to meet immediate requirements, however, two Preliminary Reports on the 1951 census were published. The first of these gave the population figures by administrative areas and towns and villages, and by Counties and County Boroughs according to religious profession. The Second Report, which was restricted to Counties and County Boroughs, gave the population by age groups.
  • Protest: a Collection from Local Museums in Northern Ireland

    Protest: a Collection from Local Museums in Northern Ireland

    INTRODUCTION Digital Trail Protest: A Collection from Local Museums in Northern Ireland Examples of protest are all around us, we are presented with it on the streets, through the airwaves and on our social media channels. Individuals and groups use objects in many ways to communicate disapproval, and to campaign for economic, social and cultural rights. But what of protests in the past, what did they look like, what did they object to, and are they still relevant today? From a trade union poster to a punk record, this digital trail examines the powerful role of objects to protest. The trail features images of objects along with descriptions as well as details of the local museums across Northern Ireland which care for them. Use this trail to explore how objects can be used to highlight campaigns, stand up for different values and ideas, and help bring about or disrupt change. The collection portrays real events and conditions, but more poignantly, taps into sensibilities, objections and perceived struggles which are of local, national and international relevance. Map of MuseumsMuseums on on the the Trail Trail UseTap the on thenumber numbered buttons pins onfor themore map information to fnd outon the more museums information in the trail. about each Museum. 2 MUSEUM 1 Peace People banner, 1976 Belfast in 1976 was the birth place of The Peace People movement which was a community-led reaction to the violence of Northern Ireland’s Troubles. Within weeks a branch was set up in Armagh and during the autumn and winter several rallies attended by church leaders took place in the ecclesiastical capital.
  • Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009

    Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009

    Number 27 of 2009 LAND AND CONVEYANCING LAW REFORM ACT 2009 REVISED Updated to 1 September 2019 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009. It is prepared by the Law Reform Commission in accordance with its function under the Law Reform Commission Act 1975 (3/1975) to keep the law under review and to undertake revision and consolidation of statute law. All Acts up to and including Judicial Council Act 2019 (33/2019), enacted 23 July 2019, and all statutory instruments up to and including National Treasury Management Agency (Amendment) Act 2014 (State Authority) Order 2019 (S.I. No. 446 of 2019), made 1 September 2019, were considered in the preparation of this Revised Act. Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in the preparation of this Revised Act, the Law Reform Commission can assume no responsibility for and give no guarantees, undertakings or warranties concerning the accuracy, completeness or up to date nature of the information provided and does not accept any liability whatsoever arising from any errors or omissions. Please notify any errors, omissions and comments by email to [email protected]. Number 27 of 2009 LAND AND CONVEYANCING LAW REFORM ACT 2009 REVISED Updated to 1 September 2019 Introduction This Revised Act presents the text of the Act as it has been amended since enactment, and preserves the format in which it was first passed. Related legislation This Act is not collectively cited with any other Act. Annotations This Revised Act is annotated and includes textual and non-textual amendments, statutory instruments made pursuant to the Act and previous affecting provisions.

  • ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRAN

    Click here for Explanatory Memorandum ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1896. 6. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1962. 7. Miscellaneous amendments to post-1800 short titles. 8. Evidence of certain early statutes, etc. 9. Savings. 10. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Statutes retained PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 1 [No. 28.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [2007.] SCHEDULE 2 Statutes Specifically Repealed PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 ———————— 2 [2007.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [No. 28.] Acts Referred to Bill of Rights 1688 1 Will. & Mary, sess. 2, c. 2 Documentary Evidence Act 1868 31 & 32 Vict., c. 37 Documentary Evidence Act 1882 45 & 46 Vict., c. 9 Dower Act 1297 25 Edw. 1, Magna Carta, c. 7 Drainage and Improvement of Lands Supplemental Act (Ireland) (No. 2) 1867 31 & 32 Vict., c. 3 Dublin Hospitals Regulation Act 1856 19 & 20 Vict., c. 110 Evidence Act 1845 8 & 9 Vict., c. 113 Forfeiture Act 1639 15 Chas.