Bayonne Energy Center Project Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Bayonne Energy Center Project Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Assessment PREPARED FOR Bayonne Energy Center, LLC c/o Pure Energy Resources, LLC 25 Mall Road, Suite 404 Burlington, MA 01803 PREPARED BY ESS Group, Inc. 888 Worcester Street, Suite 240 Wellesley, Massachusetts 02482 Project No. P273-003 September 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 METHODS ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Field Collection...................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Laboratory Analysis ............................................................................................................... 2 3.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Taxonomic Richness .............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Faunal Density ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Percent Dominant Taxa.......................................................................................................... 5 4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................... 6 TABLES Table 1 Macroinvertebrate sampling data for Bayonne Energy Center Project Submarine Cable Area, May 2008 Table 2 Macroinvertebrate dominance within the Bayonne Energy Center Submarine Cable Area, May 2008 Table 3 Overall relative abundance of macroinvertebrates sampled within the Bayonne Energy Center Submarine Cable Area, May 2008 FIGURES Figure 1 Benthic Grab Locations from 2008 Marine Survey Copyright ©ESS Group, Inc., 2008 j:\p273 bec project\regulatory\article vii\draft appendices\app 4.7a benthics\bayonne benthic report 093008.doc 1.0 INTRODUCTION ESS Group, Inc. (ESS) conducted an assessment of the benthic macroinvertebrate community in the vicinity of the proposed Bayonne Energy Center Project submarine cable route (Submarine Cable Area) in May 2008. The submarine portion of the proposed cable will enter the Kill Van Kull at the Bayonne Energy Center and make landfall in Brooklyn near the Con Edison Gowanus Substation. The Submarine Cable Area includes portions of Kill Van Kull, Upper New York Bay and Gowanus Bay. For the purposes of this assessment, benthic macroinvertebrates are defined as those organisms greater than 500 microns (μm) in length that either live on or beneath the substrate, including segmented worms, mollusks and crustaceans, among others. The information presented in this section is derived from field investigations conducted in support of the Bayonne Energy Center Project and placed in the context of previous studies of the macrobenthic community within the region. 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Field Collection A single surface grab benthic sample was obtained from 19 locations along the proposed submarine cable route (Table 1 and Table 2). The benthic sample locations correspond to 19 of the 29 vibracore sediment sampling locations that were sampled as part of the Project (Figure 1). Sample locations are anticipated to adequately characterize the benthic community in the Submarine Cable Area since the full range of benthic habitats encountered along the route was included in sampling. The survey vessel was anchored at each sample location, and sample positions were recorded using a Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) unit. The benthic samples were taken with a portable gravity dredge (or grab) sampler deployed over the side of the survey vessel. A modified Van Veen grab sampler was used throughout the study and provided adequate sample recovery across sediment types and water depths encountered in the study area. The modified Van Veen sampler (measuring 14.25 inches x 14.25 inches at the sampling interface) was lowered through the water column with the sampler open and locked. The grab sampler was lowered steadily and decisively into the sediment to minimize disturbance to the sample. Upon reaching the sea floor the sampler was set and returned to the deck for field logging, sub-sampling and preservation. Copyright ©ESS Group, Inc., 2008 j:\p273 bec project\regulatory\article vii\draft appendices\app 4.7a benthics\bayonne benthic report 093008.doc Bayonne Energy Center Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Assessment September 30, 2008 Upon retrieval of the sampler, field descriptions of the sample were made including: sample identification, sampling date, nature of the substrate material, depth of water at the sample site, and the depth and area of sediment removed from the dredge. Knowing the effective bottom area sampled allowed benthic data to be presented as individuals per square meter of bottom area, which enabled quantitative comparisons among the samples. In all instances, a gloved hand was used to remove a sub-sample of the collected material, measuring 6 inches by 14.25 inches wide and including the top two inches (5 centimeters) of sediment from the grab. Samples were placed in a 500 µm bucket sieve for onboard sieving. Each sample was washed by gently dipping the bucket sieve in and out of a rinse water bucket. The sieving process removes silts and clays while retaining the target benthic organisms in good condition for subsequent laboratory analysis. Samples (bottom material and benthos) were then placed in a pre-labeled one-quart sample jar. Immediately thereafter, each sample was preserved by adding sufficient formalin solution to yield a concentration of approximately 10% buffered formalin and 90% sample/seawater. The formalin solution was gently mixed throughout the sample so that benthic organisms were adequately preserved but not damaged. The preserved samples were returned to ESS for laboratory analysis. 2.2 Laboratory Analysis Upon receipt at the laboratory, each sample was logged in and the liquid portion of each sample (formalin and seawater) was decanted through a 500 µm sieve. The sieve retained any animals or sediment present in the sample. The solid portion of each sample (sand, stones, shells, plant matter, etc.) was then emptied into the same 500 µm sieve and gently washed with tap water to remove extraneous fine sediments. The material in the sieve was gently washed to one side, minimizing the opportunity for organisms to become damaged from the direct flow of water from the tap. The rinsed material retained in the sieve was then rinsed into a grid-lined tray. Subsequently, the sieve was checked to ensure that all organisms had been removed. Any organisms found on the sieve were carefully transferred with forceps and added to the tray. The sample material was then spread evenly throughout the tray and a random number sheet was used to select one section of the grid for sorting. The contents of this grid section were examined using a dissecting microscope (7X to 45X magnification) and high-intensity fiber optic lamp. Grid sections were randomly selected and sorted until either at least 100 organisms had been picked out or half the sample had been sorted. Organisms found during the sorting process were removed with forceps, sorted into four broad taxonomic groups (worms, mollusks, crustaceans and others) and placed in separate vials of 75% ethanol. Each vial was labeled with the collection date, sample identification number and taxonomic group. All residue from the sorted portion of each sample was preserved in a separate jar in 75% ethanol and labeled with collection date, sample identification number and the words “sorted residue.” The unsorted portion of each sample was returned to the original sample jar and preserved in 75% ethanol. Copyright ©ESS Group, Inc., 2008 Page 2 j:\p273 bec project\regulatory\article vii\draft appendices\app 4.7a benthics\bayonne benthic report 093008.doc Bayonne Energy Center Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Assessment September 30, 2008 All sorted organisms were subsequently identified by a qualified taxonomist to the lowest taxonomic level possible using a dissecting microscope and readily available taxonomic keys. The primary taxonomic references used for this task included: • Smith, R.I. 1964. Keys to the Marine Invertebrates of the Woods Hole Region. Marine Biological Laboratory. • Martinez, A.J. 1999. Marine Life of the North Atlantic, Canada to New England. Down East Books. • Gosner, K.L. 1978. The Peterson Field Guide Series. A Field Guide to the Atlantic Seashore from the Bay of Fundy to Cape Hatteras. Houghton Mifflin Company. • Weiss, H.M. 1995. Marine Animals of Southern New England and New York. Identification Keys to Common Nearshore and Shallow Water Macrofauna. Bulletin 115 of the State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut. Department of Environmental Protection. Voucher specimens of each taxon identified from within the study area were labeled and compiled into a project reference collection. For quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) purposes, a second appropriately trained staff member performed a quality check on 10% of the samples analyzed. The quality check included the sorting phase of the analysis to ensure that no organisms or groups of organisms were being inadvertently excluded
Recommended publications
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary

    Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary

    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
  • Conspecific Competition Leads to Incomplete Drill Holes in the Naticid Gastropod Neverita Delessertiana (R Cluz) Jack A

    Conspecific Competition Leads to Incomplete Drill Holes in the Naticid Gastropod Neverita Delessertiana (R Cluz) Jack A

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 No Honor Among Snails: Conspecific Competition Leads to Incomplete Drill Holes in the Naticid Gastropod Neverita delessertiana (R cluz) Jack A. Hutchings University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hutchings, Jack A., "No Honor Among Snails: Conspecific ompeC tition Leads to Incomplete Drill Holes in the Naticid Gastropod Neverita delessertiana (R cluz)" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4336 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. No Honor Among Snails: Conspecific Competition Leads to Incomplete Drill Holes in the Naticid Gastropod Neverita delessertiana (Récluz) by Jack A. Hutchings A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Geology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Gregory Herbert, Ph.D. Peter Harries, Ph.D. H.L. Vacher, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November, 16, 2012 Keywords: Prey Effectiveness, Failure, Predation, Experimental, Ecology Copyright © 2012, Jack A. Hutchings Acknowledgments I am thankful to all those involved in my research and life during the completion of my thesis. My wife, Angela, has been a constant source of support throughout this time. She has been ever willing to listen to my ponderings and problems about snails and clams and life.
  • Jacksonville, Florida 1998 Odmds Benthic Community Assessment

    Jacksonville, Florida 1998 Odmds Benthic Community Assessment

    JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 1998 ODMDS BENTHIC COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Prepared by Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. 8060 Cottage Hill Rd. Mobile, Alabama 36695 (334) 633-6100 November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………….……………………………3 LIST OF FIGURES ……………………..………………………………………………..4 1.0 INTRODUCTION ………..…………………………………………………………..5 2.0 METHODS ………..…………………………………………………………………..5 2.1 Sample Collection And Handling ………………………………………………5 2.2 Macroinfaunal Sample Analysis ……………………………………………….6 3.0 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS ……..………………………………………………6 3.1 Assemblage Analyses ..…………………………………………………………6 3.2 Faunal Similarities ……………………………………………………….…….8 4.0 HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS ……………………………………………….…8 5.0 BENTHIC COMMUNITY CHARACTERIZATION ……………………………..9 5.1 Faunal Composition, Abundance, And Community Structure …………………9 5.2 Numerical Classification Analysis …………………………………………….10 5.3 Taxa Assemblages …………………………………………………………….11 6.0 1995 vs 1998 COMPARISONS ……………………………………………………..11 7.0 SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………….13 8.0 LITERATURE CITED ……………………………………………………………..16 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Station locations for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 2. Sediment data for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 3. Summary of abundance of major taxonomic groups for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 4. Abundance and distribution of major taxonomic groups at each station for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 5. Abundance and distribution of taxa for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 6. Percent abundance of dominant taxa (> 5% of the total assemblage) for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 7. Summary of assemblage parameters for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS stations, June 1998. Table 8. Analysis of variance table for density differences between stations for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS stations, June 1998.
  • Neverita Delessertiana

    Neverita Delessertiana

    Zootaxa 1257: 1–25 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1257 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Neverita delessertiana (Récluz in Chenu, 1843): a naticid species (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda) distinct from Neverita duplicata (Say, 1822) based on molecular data, morphological characters, and geographical distribution THOMAS HÜLSKEN, MARINA CLEMMENSEN & MICHAEL HOLLMANN Thomas Hülsken, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany, tho- [email protected] Marina Clemmensen, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany Michael Hollmann, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, D-44780 Bochum, Germany, [email protected] Abstract The members of the caenogastropod family Naticidae show highly conserved morphological characters, which in many cases complicate species separation. In such cases DNA sequence analysis may help to distinguish between species. In this work partial sequences from the small mitochondrial ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene, the small nuclear ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene, a short intron of the nuclear calmodulin (Cal) gene, and the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene are shown to differ significantly between the genomes of what generally had been considered to be merely two morphological variants of the common Western Atlantic naticid Neverita duplicata (Say, 1822). Sequence differences between the two forms of Neverita duplicata are similar to differences between either of these two forms and the Eastern Pacific Neverita reclusiana (Deshayes, 1839), the Indopacific Neverita didyma (Röding, 1798), and the Mediterranean Neverita josephinia (Risso, 1826). The COI sequences divergence between the two forms of Neverita duplicata is in the range of the average COI sequences divergence reported for congeneric species of Mollusca (Hebert 2003).
  • Tube Epifaum of the Polychaete Phyllopchaetopterus Socialis

    Tube Epifaum of the Polychaete Phyllopchaetopterus Socialis

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (1995) 41, 91–100 Tube epifauna of the Polychaete Phyllochaetopterus socialis Claparède Rosebel Cunha Nalessoa, Luíz Francisco L. Duarteb, Ivo Pierozzi Jrc and Eloisa Fiorim Enumod aDepartamento de Zoologia, CCB, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil, bDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto Biologia, C.P. 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13.081-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil, cEmbrapa, NMA, Av. Dr. Julio Soares de Arruda, 803 CEP 13.085, Campinas, SP, Brazil and dProtebras, Rua Turmalina, 79 CEP 13.088, Campinas, SP, Brazil Received 8 October 1992 and in revised form 22 June 1994 Keywords: Polychaeta; tubes; faunal association; epifauna; São Sebastião Channel; Brazil Animals greater than 1 mm, found among tangled tubes of Phyllochaetopterus socialis (Chaetopteridae) from Araçá Beach, São Sebastião district, Brazil, were studied for 1 year, with four samples in each of four seasons. They comprised 10 338 individuals in 1722·7 g dry weight of polychaete tubes, with Echino- dermata, Polychaeta (not identified to species) and Crustacea as the dominant taxa. The Shannon–Wiener diversity index did not vary seasonally, only two species (a holothurian and a pycnogonid) showing seasonal variation. Ophiactis savignyi was the dominant species, providing 45·5% of individuals. Three other ophiuroids, the holothurian Synaptula hidriformis, the crustaceans Leptochelia savignyi, Megalobrachium soriatum and Synalpheus fritzmuelleri, the sipunculan Themiste alutacea and the bivalve Hiatella arctica were all abundant, but most of the 68 species recorded occurred sparsely.
  • <I>Diopatra Cuprea</I>

    <I>Diopatra Cuprea</I>

    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 40(1): 11-21, 1987 ROLE OF DIOPATRA CUPREA BOSC (POLYCHAETA: ONUPHIDAE) TUBES IN STRUCTURING A SUBTROPICAL INFAUNAL COMMUNITY Suzanne M. Ban and Walter G. Nelson ABSTRACT An a priori hypothesis predicted that in the vicinity of aggregated Diopatra cuprea tubes an enhanced infaunal density and species richness would be found, resulting from a biological refuge effect of the tubes. To test this hypothesis, cores were taken over a 5-month period in both vegetated, Halodule wrighti! Aschers. beds, and unvegetated areas of a site in the Indian River lagoon, Florida. An inner, 0.01 m2, frame was placed to enclose densities of 0, I, or 4 D. cuprea tubes, while an outer concentric, 0.02 m2, frame was placed so that it enclosed the smaller frame, plus a surrounding area lacking in D. cuprea tubes. The presence of D. cuprea tubes was found to have no consistent significant effect on the abundance and number of infaunal species found in either the vegetated or unvegetated areas. Laboratory experiments employing a benthic predator, Callinectes, were carried out in order to determine whether D. cuprea tubes andlor H. wrightii rhizome mats actually constitute a barrier to predation. Significantly higher survivorship of the bivalve Mulinia lateralis Say, used as prey, was found in laboratory treatments containing 10 tubes per 0.01 m2 versus treatments containing 4 or a tubes per 0.01 m2. Highest survivorship of bivalves was found in treatments containing a H. wrightii rhizome mat; tubes placed within the mat did not enhance clam survivorship. The discrepancy between the findings of this study, and previous studies on the refuge effect of D.
  • Foraging and Mobility in Three Species of Aciculata (Annelida: Polychaeta)

    Foraging and Mobility in Three Species of Aciculata (Annelida: Polychaeta)

    FORAGING AND MOBILITY IN THREE SPECIES OF ACICULATA (ANNELIDA: POLYCHAETA) PARDO, E. V. and AMARAL, A. C. Z. Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, C. P. 6109, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence to: Erica Veronica Pardo, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, C. P. 6109, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, e-mail: [email protected] Received February 3, 2005 – Accepted August 22, 2005 – Distributed November 1, 2006 (With 1 figure) ABSTRACT Aspects of feeding, such as food capture and ingestion, as well as mobility of the polychaetes Eurythoe complanata, Marphysa formosa and Diopatra aciculata, from São Sebastião Channel (São Sebastião, state of São Paulo) were observed in laboratory conditions. Eurythoe complanata, a carnivorous species, fed exclusively on pieces of fish with the aid of strong muscular retractable lips, and detected the presence of food by chemical stimuli. Diopatra aciculata, an omnivorous species, captured and ingested different kinds of food with the aid of its jaws, generating a flow of water through its tube by which it detects the presence of food and oxygenates its gills. Marphysa formosa also used its jaws to bite and lacerate food. These species showed greater or lesser degrees of intolerance to light. Keywords: foraging, mobility, Aciculata, Polychaeta, Annelida. RESUMO Forrageamento e mobilidade em Polychaeta Alguns aspectos da atividade alimentar, tais como a captura e ingestão de alimento, bem como a mobilidade dos poliquetas Eurythoe complanata, Marphysa formosa e Diopatra aciculata, procedentes do Canal de São Sebastião (São Sebastião, SP), foram observados em laboratório.
  • Benthic Habitats of the Delaware

    Benthic Habitats of the Delaware

    BENTHICHABITATSOF THEDELAWAREBAY BenthicHabitatsoftheDelawareBay BenthicHabitatsofDelawareBay MarkG.Anderson,JosephA.M.Smith,andBartholomewD.Wilson INTRODUCTION ThissectiondescribesandmapsthemajorphysicalhabitatsoftheDelawareBayseafloor.Weused informationonbenthicorganisms,theirdistributionandtheirrelationshipstophysicalfeatures,to delimitadistinctsetofenvironmentsrepresentingthevarietyofbenthichabitatsintheBay.As individualspeciesareadaptedtovariationsindepth,sedimentsize,seabedtopographyandsalinity,we examinedthesefactorsinrelationshiptotheorganismcompositionandclassifiedthemintobasictypes toillustratethediversityofconditionsexistingontheseafloor.Wehopethatthisbenthichabitatmapof theDelawareBay,basedonpreviouslycollecteddata,willprovideabetterunderstandingofthe abundanceanddistributionofseafloorhabitattypes. Benthicorganismsarethosethatinhabittheseafloor;fromtheGreekwordbenthos,meaning“depths ofthesea.”Basedonajustasmallsample(246samples),theseafloorhabitatsoftheDelawareBay containover300speciesin8phylaincluding: 106speciesofarthropods(crabs,lobsters,shrimp,barnacles) 75speciesofmollusks(clams,scallops,squid,limpets,seaslugs,snails) 130speciesofannelids(seaworms) 8speciesofechinoderms(seastars,seaurchins,seacucumbers,sanddollars) 5speciesofcnidarians(corals,anemones,jellyfish) 4speciesofchordates(seasquirts) 1speciesofporiferans(sponges) 6speciesofnemerteans(ribbonworms) Thedistributionsandlifehistoriesofbenthicorganismsaretiedtotheirphysicalenvironment.Filter feederstendtodominateonshallowsandybottomswhiledepositfeeders,maydominateinfine
  • Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora)

    Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora)

    Gulf of Mexico Science Volume 34 Article 4 Number 1 Number 1/2 (Combined Issue) 2018 Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Spatial and Temporal Distribution Martha Reguero Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Andrea Raz-Guzmán Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México DOI: 10.18785/goms.3401.04 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Reguero, M. and A. Raz-Guzmán. 2018. Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Spatial and Temporal Distribution. Gulf of Mexico Science 34 (1). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol34/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reguero and Raz-Guzmán: Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Lagu Gulf of Mexico Science, 2018(1), pp. 32–55 Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Spatial and Temporal Distribution MARTHA REGUERO AND ANDREA RAZ-GUZMA´ N Molluscs were collected in Laguna Madre from seagrass beds, macroalgae, and bare substrates with a Renfro beam net and an otter trawl. The species list includes 96 species and 48 families. Six species are dominant (Bittiolum varium, Costoanachis semiplicata, Brachidontes exustus, Crassostrea virginica, Chione cancellata, and Mulinia lateralis) and 25 are commercially important (e.g., Strombus alatus, Busycoarctum coarctatum, Triplofusus giganteus, Anadara transversa, Noetia ponderosa, Brachidontes exustus, Crassostrea virginica, Argopecten irradians, Argopecten gibbus, Chione cancellata, Mercenaria campechiensis, and Rangia flexuosa).
  • Tube-Forming Polychaetes Enhance Invertebrate Diversity and Abundance in Sandy Sediments of Mozambique, Africa

    Tube-Forming Polychaetes Enhance Invertebrate Diversity and Abundance in Sandy Sediments of Mozambique, Africa

    African Journal of Marine Science 2011, 33(2): 327–332 Copyright © NISC (Pty) Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE ISSN 1814–232X EISSN 1814–2338 doi: 10.2989/1814232X.2011.600433 Short Communication Tube-forming polychaetes enhance invertebrate diversity and abundance in sandy sediments of Mozambique, Africa MS Thomsen1,2*, MF Muth3 and KJ McGlathery3 1 Marine Department, National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, PO Box 4000, Roskilde, Denmark 2 School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009 WA, Australia 3 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Rd, Clark Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received March 2011; accepted May 2011 In marine soft-bottom systems, polychaetes can increase habitat complexity by constructing rigid tubes (e.g. several onuphid species) that contrast with surrounding topographically flat sediments. These structures can provide predation refuges and increase larval settlement and thereby increase the richness and abundance of fauna. We collected invertebrate samples from an intertidal flat with low onuphid tube density (2.7 m–2) in Mozambique and document that more organisms (70 times higher mollusc abundances) and more species (15 times more mollusc species) were found associated with solitary tubes of an onuphid polychaete compared with surrounding sand habitats. These results are in agreement with tube versus sand comparisons from soft-bottom systems in the North Atlantic where polychaete tube densities are often much higher. Keywords: habitat formation, onuphid polychaete, species richness, western Indian Ocean Introduction Species that form or modify habitat, often referred to as (Thomsen et al.
  • Initial Survey of Plum Island's Marine Habitats

    Initial Survey of Plum Island's Marine Habitats

    Initial Survey of Plum Island’s Marine Habitats New York Natural Heritage Program Initial Survey of Plum Island’s Marine Habitats Emily S. Runnells Matthew D. Schlesinger Gregory J. Edinger New York Natural Heritage Program and Steven C. Resler Dan Marelli InnerSpace Scientific Diving A report to Save the Sound April 2020 Please cite this report as follows: New York Natural Heritage Program and InnerSpace Scientific Diving. 2020. Initial survey of Plum Island’s marine habitats. Report to Save the Sound. Available from New York Natural Heritage Program, Albany, NY. Available at www.nynhp.org/plumisland. Cover photos (left to right, top to bottom): Bryozoans and sponges; lion’s mane jellyfish; flat-clawed hermit crab; diver recording information from inside quadrat; bryozoans, sponges and northern star corals. All photos herein by the authors. Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Results .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Discussion and Next Steps ............................................................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................................................
  • What's in the Clam Bag?

    What's in the Clam Bag?

    What’s in the Clam Bag? A guide to marine organisms found in, on, and around a clam culture bag Jon Fajans, Florida Institute of Oceanography Leslie Sturmer, UF/IFAS Cooperative Extension Shirley Baker, UF/IFAS Dept. of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Kevin Hulen, UF Biological Sciences Department • Clam bag creates favorable environment, provides habitat and protection for many plants and animals • Pictorial guide set up to assist clam farmers identify these marine organisms • Limited to those “critters” commonly found in Suwannee Sound, leases in Levy and Dixie Counties • Over 150 marine organisms included in guide How do I use this pictorial guide? • Divided into easily recognizable, but not taxonomic, categories • Click first on identification category that most resembles organism you want to identify • Link will take you to a category page which features several species and their pictures • From there, you navigate to pages that provide Biological Sketch Pages that describe the organism Biological Sketch Page? • Provides taxonomy / Describes organism • Defines whether it is a – FRIEND: An organisms that is friendly, or positive, to clam farming – Consumes predators of clams – Consume organisms that foul clams or bags – Burrow and aerate the sediment – Consumes clam wastes – FOE: Predator / Fouler / Competitor – NEIGHBOR: An organism that has neither positive or negative effects on clam farming • Describes effects on clam farming • Provides information on what a clam farmer can do What does it look like? • Blob or Sponge-like • Plant-like • Starfish-like • Shrimp-like • Crab-like • Worm-like • Snail-like • Clam-like • Fish-like Snail-like? • Oyster drill • Lace murex • Banded tulip • Pear whelk Snail-like? • Lightening whelk • Crown conch • Moon snail • Channel whelk Moon snail • Taxonomy – Neverita duplicata • Description – The moon snail is a common predatory gastropod along the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coasts, the shell reaching 3 inches in length.