Dark Money and Democracy: Review of Peter Geoghan’S Democracy for Sale

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dark Money and Democracy: Review of Peter Geoghan’S Democracy for Sale Dark Money and Democracy: Review of Peter Geoghan’s Democracy for Sale ‘Major changes are never impossible. Who would have thought that a coalition of people, working over two decades could convince a country to leave a major international organisation? But with a lot of perseverance, we managed to make history.’ Michael Elliott, founder Tax Payers Alliance and Vote leave. Political parties have always required money to project themselves into the democratic marketplace. Given their role of defending and advancing the interests of property holders and business, the Conservative Party has never wanted for rich donors and supporters. In its early days, the Liberal Party also could call upon rich business sponsors and, of course, Lloyd George supplemented such income by selling honours to those rich enough to buy them. Labour’s rise was funded by and still survives upon regular donations from UK’s trade unions. ‘Dark money’ is a term used to describe funding of legitimate political activities with money which has been funnelled in anonymously, often through ‘backdoors’ like ‘front’ organisation or offshore tax havens. Peter Geoghan’s superb and alarming book (2020), Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics, Head of Zeus, analyses and assesses the impact of such dodgy finance but offers very much more. This book by a brilliant young investigative journalist, working for the website Open Democracy, also tells, in fascinating detail, the inside story of: the growth of Euro-scepticism to its triumph in 2016 and how the ERG - ‘a party within a party’ finessed the final victory; how the growth of social media gave the anti-EU cause a dangerously powerful tool which helped them succeed; and how the far right in western countries over the past decade has been enabled to advance often into government. He also explains how weak and insufficient official regulation plus transformative digital technology allowed these forces to grow its strength to a point where democracy itself is now in considerable existential danger. As he concludes: ‘Far from being an aberration, dirty politics is the new normal.’1 Geoghan identifies the far right as the major recipient of ‘dark money’ but should anyone think this is mere knee jerk left-wing criticism - I’m sure he’s no Tory - they should recognise the impeccable research behind the book. His story begins with a body established early in the new millennium. Tax Payer’s Alliance (TPA): This was set up in 2004 by 25-year-old Mathew Elliot, intent on applying American libertarian methods to British politics: it advocated ending the BBC’s licence fee and replacing the NHS by US style private insurance provision. Soon the TPA enjoyed a £1m annual turnover and employed a dozen staff. Elliott defended the right of those donating to ‘charities and campaigns’ to remain anonymous. Investigations revealed funding came mostly from Tory donors like JCB’s Anthony Bamford, billionaire banker-businessman, Peter Cruddas (former co Treasurer of the party) and the unconvincing ‘front’ organisation the Midlands Industrial Council.2 In 2011 Elliott was appointed to lead the campaign against the referendum proposal to change the UK voting system from First Past the Post to the Alternative Vote. It focused on finance, claiming it would cost £250m to deliver AV. The crushing 2-1 victory of No to AV meant Elliott, already friends with anti-EU zealot, Daniel Hannon, was a natural to set up the 2016 Brexit campaign, Vote Leave. Elliott also, daringly, hired maverick firebrand, Dominic Cummings, who had earlier, using tabloid style stunts and financial arguments, 1 Peter Geoghan (2020), Democracy for Sale, Head of Zeus, p6. 2 Ibid, p18. successfully defeated the referendum campaign to establish a regional assembly in the north east. UK Election Laws and the Brexit Campaign: These laws comprise 50 Acts and 170 statutory Instruments; expert in this area, Gavin Millar QC, is quoted as saying ‘almost no one knows how it all works’. 3 This might explain why Vote Leave’s cavalier spending during the campaign was never properly called to account. Another strong factor was that the maximum fine for breaking UK election law is only £20,000 - small change to causes with deep pockets filled from dubious sources. Moreover - one of democracy’s perennial weaknesses - there is no check on the veracity of claims made during campaigns. During the last three days of the campaign Vote Leave placed millions of Facebook ads spreading outright lies about immigration: one claimed, ‘Turkey’s 76 million people are being granted visa-free travel by the EU.’ Turkey, of course had only applied for EU membership but had no chance of being allowed in. Cummings admitted that without the Turkey ploy plus the false NHS/£350m red bus claim, Remain might have won the vote. In the wake of the Leave victory, there was almost no calling to account of the campaign’s excesses. DUP used as ‘Front’ to Avoid Overspending: It seems almost certain that Vote Leave channelled close to half a million pounds via Ulster’s DUP into the UK campaign to avoid breaching ‘spending limits imposed by election laws.’4 This money, ‘donated’ by a fictional organisation called the Constitutional Research Council was then used to conduct and fund the campaign elsewhere in the UK. Arron Banks, Cambridge Analytica and Brexit: Businessman with South African connections whose wealth has never been fully explained; had tried several times to be elected, without success (just like Farage) so clearly had political ambitions. After the Referendum was announced, Banks donated £1m to UKIP and later a total of £8.4m to anti-EU causes plus many gifts in kind – staff, offices etc; a record donation by anyone in British political history. Cambridge Analytica (CA) was favoured as a possible source of using psychographic techniques to target political ads - it was bankrolled by Trump backer, billionaire hedge funder, Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah who sat on CA board and also backed Breitbart run by Steve Bannon. These techniques have been viewed by many as undermining democracy in that they can provide political campaigners with such a wealth of data that, using new digital techniques, voters’ opinions can be divined and voting behaviour predicted, thus providing huge advantages to its users. Banks was rumoured to have broken election laws by overspending and external donations both of which he fiercely denied plus dodgy connections with the Russian ambassador and interests within Russia; Banks also had a Russian wife. He claimed his South African diamond mines were worth £100m but Channel 4 inquiries revealed they had not produced more than a few low standard diamonds. Banks took out a loan from his offshore business to cover his spending on the referendum. He won his case against the Electoral Commission re overspending; however, the case proved it was legal for companies in offshore to underwrite political donations: a virtual open door. 3 Ibid, p25. 4 Ibid, p89. Electoral Law and Foreign Dark Money: Foreign interests can set up shell companies purely for the purpose of donating to political causes- the Electoral Commission accepted this was a ‘weakness in the law’.5 In 2016 Britain First (member of which murdered Jo Cox) set up a shell company - Albion Promotions - to hide £200,000 of donations; it was dissolved before any source of donations could be identified. Anyone not resident in UK for tax purposes or not domiciled in UK (‘non doms’) are banned from giving more than £7500 to a political party. But parties can raise millions from abroad: Tories received £5.5m from tax haven donors 2009-19. ‘The vast offshore empire that runs through Britain is tailor made for secretive donations…Future political donors will be able to make campaign contributions through secretive companies in the Isle of Man, Gibraltar and other offshore vestiges of empire…. In the US it’s the ‘super PACs which are used to funnel vast sums of dark money into the political system.’ Spending caps apply only to the period of the election campaign itself so any amount can be spent before and after. Electoral rolls are for use only during campaigns but Banks, via Leave EU – the Farage rival to Vote Leave - retained the data and used it to advance adverts for his insurance businesses including Eldon; he was fined £120,000. The European Research Group (ERG): Geoghan begins the provenance of this body by recounting how, back in the 1990s, James Goldsmith invested £20million of his own money into supporting Euro-scepticism.6 His own attempt to defeat David Mellor in Putney in 1997 failed: he memorably and ‘maniacally’ led chants of ‘out, out, out!’ when Labour took the seat. The ERG began as a group of Tory MPs who had lunchtime meetings during the 1990s, with Daniel Hannan - intent upon breaking up the EU - as its motivating force; Steve Baker later became its organising and transforming core. Baker’s attendance at an American Principles conference on global finance in 2015 drew him into the orbit of ‘dark money - funded US conservative groups.’; the Koch brothers and Robert Mercer - all billionaires - being the financial source.7 Baker also joined the Freedom Association - dubbed by David Baddiel as a ‘slightly posher version of the BNP’: the BBC apologised when Baker complained. On the ERG, Geoghan comments, ‘rarely has a pressure group exerted so much influence on a governing party’; of course, May’s vanished majority handed unusual power to the faction, but Baker’s militant stewardship maximised its control over May’s Brexit direction; even when he and his successor, Suella Braverman, were given ministerial office, Baker maintained his control.
Recommended publications
  • Political Ideas and Movements That Created the Modern World
    harri+b.cov 27/5/03 4:15 pm Page 1 UNDERSTANDINGPOLITICS Understanding RITTEN with the A2 component of the GCE WGovernment and Politics A level in mind, this book is a comprehensive introduction to the political ideas and movements that created the modern world. Underpinned by the work of major thinkers such as Hobbes, Locke, Marx, Mill, Weber and others, the first half of the book looks at core political concepts including the British and European political issues state and sovereignty, the nation, democracy, representation and legitimacy, freedom, equality and rights, obligation and citizenship. The role of ideology in modern politics and society is also discussed. The second half of the book addresses established ideologies such as Conservatism, Liberalism, Socialism, Marxism and Nationalism, before moving on to more recent movements such as Environmentalism and Ecologism, Fascism, and Feminism. The subject is covered in a clear, accessible style, including Understanding a number of student-friendly features, such as chapter summaries, key points to consider, definitions and tips for further sources of information. There is a definite need for a text of this kind. It will be invaluable for students of Government and Politics on introductory courses, whether they be A level candidates or undergraduates. political ideas KEVIN HARRISON IS A LECTURER IN POLITICS AND HISTORY AT MANCHESTER COLLEGE OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY. HE IS ALSO AN ASSOCIATE McNAUGHTON LECTURER IN SOCIAL SCIENCES WITH THE OPEN UNIVERSITY. HE HAS WRITTEN ARTICLES ON POLITICS AND HISTORY AND IS JOINT AUTHOR, WITH TONY BOYD, OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION: EVOLUTION OR REVOLUTION? and TONY BOYD WAS FORMERLY HEAD OF GENERAL STUDIES AT XAVERIAN VI FORM COLLEGE, MANCHESTER, WHERE HE TAUGHT POLITICS AND HISTORY.
    [Show full text]
  • Cesifo Working Paper No. 7803
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Ryan, John Working Paper The Brexit Conundrum Worsens the UK's Relationship with the European Union CESifo Working Paper, No. 7803 Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Ryan, John (2019) : The Brexit Conundrum Worsens the UK's Relationship with the European Union, CESifo Working Paper, No. 7803, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/207194 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 7803 2019 August 2019 The Brexit Conundrum Worsens the UK’s Relationship with the European Union John T.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Spiegel-Confirmation from the East by Brian Crozier 1993
    "Der Spiegel: Confirmation from the East" Counter Culture Contribution by Brian Crozier I WELCOME Sir James Goldsmith's offer of hospitality in the pages of COUNTER CULTURE to bring fresh news on a struggle in which we were both involved. On the attacking side was Herr Rudolf Augstein, publisher of the German news magazine, Der Spiegel; on the defending side was Jimmy. My own involvement was twofold: I provided him with the explosive information that drew fire from Augstein, and I co-ordinated a truly massive international research campaign that caused Augstein, nearly four years later, to call off his libel suit against Jimmy.1 History moves fast these days. The collapse of communism in the ex-Soviet Union and eastern Europe has loosened tongues and opened archives. The struggle I mentioned took place between January 1981 and October 1984. The past two years have brought revelations and confessions that further vindicate the line we took a decade ago. What did Jimmy Goldsmith say, in 1981, that roused Augstein to take legal action? The Media Committee of the House of Commons had invited Sir James to deliver an address on 'Subversion in the Media'. Having read a reference to the 'Spiegel affair' of 1962 in an interview with the late Franz Josef Strauss in his own news magazine of that period, NOW!, he wanted to know more. I was the interviewer. Today's readers, even in Germany, may not automatically react to the sight or sound of the' Spiegel affair', but in its day, this was a major political scandal, which seriously damaged the political career of Franz Josef Strauss, the then West German Defence Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Diversity in Politics and Public Life
    BRIEFING PAPER CBP 01156, 22 October 2020 By Elise Uberoi and Ethnic diversity in politics Rebecca Lees and public life Contents: 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 2. Parliament 3. The Government and Cabinet 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 5. Public sector organisations www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Ethnic diversity in politics and public life Contents Summary 3 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 6 1.1 Categorising ethnicity 6 1.2 The population of the United Kingdom 7 2. Parliament 8 2.1 The House of Commons 8 Since the 1980s 9 Ethnic minority women in the House of Commons 13 2.2 The House of Lords 14 2.3 International comparisons 16 3. The Government and Cabinet 17 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 19 4.1 Devolved legislatures 19 4.2 Local government and the Greater London Authority 19 5. Public sector organisations 21 5.1 Armed forces 21 5.2 Civil Service 23 5.3 National Health Service 24 5.4 Police 26 5.4 Justice 27 5.5 Prison officers 28 5.6 Teachers 29 5.7 Fire and Rescue Service 30 5.8 Social workers 31 5.9 Ministerial and public appointments 33 Annex 1: Standard ethnic classifications used in the UK 34 Cover page image copyright UK Youth Parliament 2015 by UK Parliament. Licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 / image cropped 3 Commons Library Briefing, 22 October 2020 Summary This report focuses on the proportion of people from ethnic minority backgrounds in a range of public positions across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roots and Consequences of Euroskepticism: an Evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship at UWindsor University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Political Science Publications Department of Political Science 4-2012 The roots and consequences of Euroskepticism: an evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party John B. Sutcliffe University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/poliscipub Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Sutcliffe, John B.. (2012). The roots and consequences of Euroskepticism: an evaluation of the United Kingdom Independence Party. Geopolitics, history and international relations, 4 (1), 107-127. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/poliscipub/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Political Science at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations Volume 4(1), 2012, pp. 107–127, ISSN 1948-9145 THE ROOTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF EUROSKEPTICISM: AN EVALUATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM INDEPENDENCE PARTY JOHN B. SUTCLIFFE [email protected] University of Windsor ABSTRACT. This article examines the causes and consequences of Euroskepticism through a study of the United Kingdom Independence Party. Based on an analysis of UKIP’s election campaigns, policies and performance, the article examines the roots of UKIP and its, potential, consequences for the British political system. The article argues that UKIP provides an example of Euroskepticism as the “politics of oppo- sition.” The party remains at the fringes of the political system and its leadership is prepared to use misrepresentation and populist rhetoric in an attempt to secure sup- port.
    [Show full text]
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Euroskepticism's Influence on Britain's Vote to Leave the European Union
    An Analysis of Euroskepticism’s Influence on Britain’s Vote to Leave the European Union* Kayla McCrary Abstract In June 2016, the United Kingdom held an in/out referendum on membership in the European Union (EU) resulting in a narrow victory for Euroskeptics. Historically, Britain has notably been a Euroskeptic nation, and the following analysis of Britain’s relationship with the EU will explore the implications of Brexit in context with Euroskepticism. This analysis is a result of previous research on the British vote to the leave the EU and draws substantially on research in the fields of voting patterns, social identity, and Britain’s unique characteristics that culminated in the vote to leave the EU. As a result, this paper relies heavily on historical implications of Euroskepticism as well as recent literature on the theories of Euroskeptic voting, demographics, and the history of the relationship between the UK and the EU. The paper concludes that populist and anti-globalist sentiments driven by political parties such as the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) mobilized Euroskepticism, allowing for a philosophy to transform into effective policy change. The main driving factors behind Britain’s unique position of leaving the EU were economic and social. This conclusion is substantiated by a constituency-based analysis, which utilizes demographic data, voter turnout, and the referendum result data in order to quantify Euroskepticism and its impact on the top constituencies that voted to leave the EU. Keywords: European Union, Euroskepticism, Brexit, UKIP, Britain, referenda *Adapted from “An Analysis of British Euroscepticism and Britain’s Vote to Leave the European Union,” a University Honors Thesis for Middle Tennessee State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
    Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. – UK 'Special Relationship' – a Bond That Has Endured for Decades
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 5 No 3 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy November 2016 U.S. – UK ‘Special Relationship’ – A Bond that has Endured for Decades Alketa Dumani PhD. Candidate, “Aleksander Moisiu” University [email protected] Doi:10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3p45 Abstract United States and United Kingdom have based their relations on common cultural and historical links and, as Winston Churchill first articulated the notion of a ‘special relationship’, both countries share traditions, values, interests, and institutions of national and international nature. Although the basic elements were important in formulation of the special relationship, there have been a lot of disagreements between the two countries. The aim of this paper is to analyze the ups and downs of the ‘special relationship. There are arguments that this relationship is not so special and many say that it is in jeopardy and this relationship has been the subject of much mockery and criticism, as UK power and capacity has diminished and the U.S. has become more dominant, particularly since the collapse of the Soviet Union. This paper argues that, in spite of what analysts maintain, this ‘special relationship’ should continue, because America and Britain need each other. This paper is written in the historical comparative method aiming at giving a general overview of this relationship. Different from other countries in the world, with which America is looking for other special relationships, Britain has the same commitment to peace, freedom and democracy, and it is willing to fight and stand for these values.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Funds and Following Last Week’S Brexit Vote by Boosting Allocations to Hedge Funds
    Tuesday June 28, 2016 www.bloombergbriefs.com Following Brexit, Clearbrook Plans to Add Funds INSIDE Alaska’s $53 billion wealth fund plans BY HEMA PARMAR Clearbrook Global Advisors is seeking to take advantage of market turmoil to exit all of its funds of hedge funds and following last week’s Brexit vote by boosting allocations to hedge funds. will instead make investment decisions in- The New York-based firm, which has $2 billion of its $28 billion invested in hedge house: From the Minutes funds, is looking to bring on at least two new managers in the next few weeks whose strategies could benefit from the fallout of Britain’s unexpected decision to quit the Computer-driven funds led the winners European Union, according to Tim Ng, its chief investment officer. Clearbrook currently following Britain's decision to leave the EU: Returns in Brief has 30 managers on its platform of direct hedge fund investments. Equity markets plunged and the pound fell to a three-decade low on Friday in the aftermath of the 52 percent to 48 percent vote to leave. Many hedge funds avoided Citadel hires Morgan Stanley's betting around the vote altogether, but several computer-driven funds that did profited Lieblich as chief technology officer. from the market turmoil. Mariner Investment's Co-CIO Williams Clearbrook is planning to add two distressed funds to its platform to take advantage of is leaving the firm: On the Move stocks hit in the market rout, Ng said in an interview on Friday. The firm will also raise its existing long-short equity fund allocation to 6 percent from 4 percent to benefit from New York Life Insurance's Private equity valuation spreads, which "have blown out quite dramatically," said Ng.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Brings a Fresh Outlook for Industry
    WINTER 2020 / 2021 2021 brings a fresh outlook for industry MANAGEMENT 75 YEARS OF SERVICE DIGGER AND TRAINING PROGRAMME STAFF HOLIDAY HELD DUMPER OPERATIONAL RETURNS TO CELEBRATE SAFETY P34 P19 P40 INT_Issue4_FC.indd 1 04/02/2021 10:43 #JoinTheRentalRevolution MCS RENTAL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE C M Y WORKING CM MY CY CMY BETTER K TOGETHER PASSIONATE ABOUT YOUR SUCCESS WWW.MCSRENTALSOFTWARE.COM p02_IFWin20.indd 1 19/01/2021 11:09:07 A VIEW FROM ON HIGH www.hae.org.uk PAUL GAZE, CEO DESIGNATE UPDATES ON THE LATEST AT HAE EHA GREATER CONFIDENCE EMERGING WITHIN INDUSTRY elcome to 2021 and individuals and businesses. However, Covid-19 and may remain a feature what will hopefully the stark economic consequences of business, together with greater be a brighter year arising from the pandemic and the use of digital business. for us all. rounds of emergency support and Throughout this journey, HAE EHA WI am enthusiastic for the future restrictions will take much longer to will be with you in support of the of the hire and rental sector based recover from. sector we represent. Some new and on the hard work and strong will to Hire is well-placed to be at the exciting products and services are succeed that I see for myself across our forefront of this recovery, but the being developed and our team is industry. Added to this is a continuous pressures on costs and effi ciency totally focused on giving maximum pattern of innovation and product are here to stay. Alongside this assistance to you. development which results from close are new environmental standards, cooperation between hire businesses costs on property and people and suppliers – a relationship mirrored employed.
    [Show full text]