Dietary Variability Among Prehistoric Forager-Farmers of Eastern North America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Wright State University CORE Scholar Sociology & Anthropology Faculty Publications Sociology & Anthropology 6-1996 Dietary Variability Among Prehistoric Forager-Farmers of Eastern North America Kristen J. Gremillion Kristin D. Sobolik Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/socanth Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the Sociology Commons Repository Citation Gremillion, K. J., & Sobolik, K. D. (1996). Dietary Variability Among Prehistoric Forager-Farmers of Eastern North America. Current Anthropology, 37 (3), 529-539. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/socanth/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Anthropology at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology & Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dietary Variability among Prehistoric Forager-Farmers of Eastern North America Author(s): Kristen J. Gremillion and Kristin D. Sobolik Reviewed work(s): Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Jun., 1996), pp. 529-539 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744553 . Accessed: 13/02/2013 09:59 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:59:12 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Volume37, Number3, JuneI996 1 529 age behavioral patternof sequential communitiesover DietaryVariability among a period of time. Although advances have been made PrehistoricForager-Farmers of in identifyingdifferences in production,processing, and consumption patterns between households (Hastorf EasternNorth America' I990) and other small communitygroups (Gumerman I994), variability,which is the basis of evolutionary change (Braun I990:63-63; Dunnell I980:38; O'Brien KRISTEN J. GREMILLION AND KRISTIN D. and Holland I990:40-4I), is obscured in the resulting SOBOLIK analyses. Departmentof Anthropology,The Ohio State In contrastto midden refuse,human paleofecesoffer University,Columbus, Ohio 43 210-13 64 directevidence of food consumption by individuals (who (gremillion.ir@osu. edu)/Department of Anthropology differin gender,age, and social status) in a varietyof and Institutefor QuaternaryStudies, Universityof environmentaland cultural contexts.Refined analytic Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, U.S.A. i2 X 95 techniquesmake it possible forus to obtain information about these and otherdimensions of prehistoricdietary Until recently,subsistence studies have tended to em- variabilityin unprecedenteddetail. Our goal is to dem- phasize one type of variabilityover othersas a focus of onstratethe potential of such an approach with refer- inquiry:long-term, directional change. However,in or- ence to recentlyobtained paleodietarydata fromSalts der to explain such trends (including the origin and Cave and Mammoth Cave, Mammoth Cave National growingimportance of agriculturalsubsistence), it is Park,Kentucky. critical to document variabilitythat occurs on a rela- tivelyrestricted temporal scale and along nontemporal PALEODIETARY RESEARCH IN THE dimensions. For example, plant food consumption is MAMMOTH CAVE AREA likely to be sensitiveto short-termseasonal changes in food availability. Analyses of agriculturalorigins in Salts Cave and Mammoth Cave are part of the Mam- many regions(e.g., Cowan I985, McCorristonand Hole moth Cave system,an extensive network(the world's i992, Wills I988) emphasizethe causal significanceof longest) running through a karstic plateau in west- seasonality and the role played by crops as storablere- central Kentucky (Crothersand Watson I993) (fig. I). sources.In addition,the costs and benefitsof producing, These caves were exploitedfor minerals by prehistoric processing,and consuming crops were probablysome- people,primarily during the mid-3dmillennium B.P. Be- what differentfor women and men, childrenand adults, cause of the constant humidity and temperaturein largehouseholds and small ones. These costs and bene- many of the cave interiorsas well as the exsiccating fits also varied accordingto the part of the plant used effectof some ofthe minerals,organic materials (includ- and the culturaland environmentalcontext of use. ing human paleofeces)are extremelywell preserved.Re- Neglect of these issues in studies of prehistoricsub- mains of this typefrom Salts Cave and Mammoth Cave sistence has been largelya productof limitationsinher- have providedkey evidence for the early development ent in the data base. Most investigatorsof archaeobo- in easternNorth America of agriculturebased on native tanical materials,for example, work with remains that crops (Watson I974a; Yarnell I969, I974). Paleofecal representcarbonized waste from refuse deposits. Oc- data were particularlycritical in demonstratinga sub- casionally they are able to recoverdesiccated or water- stantialdietary role forcultivated plant species. Overall, loggedmaterial that is well-preservedin its noncarbon- I127 paleofeceshave been analyzedfrom Salts and Mam- ized, organic state and offersa more complete record moth; ioo samples were studiedfor their macrobotani- of plant use. Analysis of such materialgives us the op- cal contentby Yarnell (I969, I974) and 27 by Stewart portunityto generalizeabout changes in the processing (I974). In addition,pollen frompaleofeces was analyzed and disposal of plant products but provides no direct by Schoenwetter(I974) and Bryant(I974). Yarnell (I969, evidence of consumption.Furthermore, refuse deposits I974) estimates that approximately74% of the Salts must usually be regardedas representinga sortof aver- Cave diet was composed of plant foodsthat were either cultivated(about 42%) or a productof habitats created by agriculturalactivity (another 3e2%). Skepticismabout i. ? I996 by The Wenner-GrenFoundation for Anthropological the representativenessof this dietarypattern diminished Research. All rights reserved OOII-3204/96/3703-0007$I.00. We in view of corroboratingevidence fromthe vestibule,or are gratefulto PattyJo Watson for the opportunityto workwith entrychamber, of Salts Cave, where numerouscarbon- the Salts Cave and MammothCave material.Washington Univer- sityin St. Louis and The Ohio StateUniversity provided financial ized seeds of cropplants were depositedduring the main supportfor our research,which was carriedout in collaboration period of cave utilization (GardnerI987, Yarnell I974). withthe Cave ResearchFoundation Archaeological Project. Spen- The presentproject was devised to expand and refine cerTomb and HeatherAlmquist-Jacobsen assisted with identifica- this database by applyingnew analytic techniques to a tionof Asteraceae pollen. Stephen Bicknell drafted figures I, 3, and 4. VaughnBryant, Paul Gardner,Bruce Smith, Patty Jo Watson, and series of i2 paleofecal samples collected fromSalts and one anonymousreferee provided valuable comments that helped us Mammoth. Each specimen providedmaterial for accel- to improvethe qualityof the manuscript. eratorradiocarbon dating and was processedfor macrore- This content downloaded on Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:59:12 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 530 1 CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY FG.T Mamm oth Cave s h_ \ ~~~National Park < \L>> </N ~~~~~~Mammoth Cove ~~~~~~~~~~~~~II ] ? ~ ~~~~~~~~~~2mi FIG. I. The Mammoth Cave system. mains, parasite remains, and pollen. We do not report cave interiorand occupation of Salts Cave vestibule on faunalremains (which were poorlyrepresented in the (Gardneri987, Kennedyn.d., Kennedyand Watsonn.d.). specimens)or parasites(analysis of which is still in prog- Judgingby these determinationsand by analyses of pa- ress). Related researchalso produceda pioneeringeffort leofecal content,crops had become a significantportion to extractand measure steroidsin the paleofecesin order of the diet of the people using the caves before2,500 B.P. to determinethe sex of the individualswho deposited Withinthe time periodrepresented by the paleofeces, them(Sobolik et al. I995, WhittenI994). In thispaper there is evidence of considerabledietary continuity in we synthesizeresults fromthese differentlines of evi- that the same typesof plant foodswere consumedregu- dence to discuss the implicationsof variabilityin plant larly. In fact,diet has been judged as having remained use by the prehistoricforager/farmers of the Mammoth quite consistent during the period of major cave use Cave area along threemajor dimensions:temporal (both (Watson i969:77). With the availability of i2 directly long-termand seasonal), interindividual,and contextual. dated paleofecesthat span this period,there is an oppor- tunityto evaluate this conclusion. Is there perhaps a trendtoward consumption of greaterquantities of culti- DIMENSIONS