DOCSLIB.ORG

Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Evolution Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Evolution Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Evolution Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Evolution Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Evolution Ignacio Marı´n, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain Advanced article Degeneration of sex-limited chromosomes generates the need for dosage compensation Article contents mechanisms able to equalize in both sexes the amount of products derived from sex-linked genes. Evolution of these mechanisms is understood in some detail in the fly Drosophila Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: melanogaster,thenematodeCaenorhabditis elegans and in eutherian mammals. An Evolutionary Perspective Human Dosage Compensation in an Evolutionary Framework Relationships among Dosage Compensation Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Systems: Common Origin or Convergence? An Evolutionary Perspective doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0006128 In many species, sex chromosomes that originated as expressed at very different levels, in different times and an identical, homologous pair currently show mor- places. However, all available data suggest that general phological differentiation in one of the sexes. An dosage compensation mechanisms are the rule, not the individual of the homogametic sex has two identical exception. We have molecular information for three sex chromosomes, whereas an individual of the dosage compensation systems, those of the fly heterogametic sex has two distinct chromosomes. Drosophila melanogaster, the nematode Caenorhabditis The chromosome restricted to the heterogametic sex elegans and eutherian mammalian species. In these often has a low number of genes. Loss of gene function three cases, the key feature is the existence of a mecha- is caused by the combined effect of chromosome nism able to modify transcriptional levels by modu- restriction to one sex (often due to the emergence of lating chromatin structure along whole chromosomes. a dominant sex-determining gene) and inhibition of A consideration of the mechanisms found in recombination with its homolog. Under these circum- protostome species is relevant here. In D. melanogaster, stances, mutations cannot be eliminated by recombi- females are the homogametic sex (XX), whereas males nation. They therefore accumulate, leading to the are heterogametic (XY). Dosage compensation occurs progressive loss of genetic function in a process via increased expression of X-linked genes in males. It known as chromosome degeneration (reviewed in is achieved by the action of a male-specific ribo- Charlesworth, 1996). (See Sex Chromosomes.) nucleoproteic complex, called a compensasome, that is When chromosome degeneration starts, a mechan- formed by at least five proteins and two noncoding ism known as dosage compensation evolves to equalize RNAs. Compensasomes bind in hundreds of positions the levels of sex chromosome-derived products in both along the male X chromosome. This binding correlates sexes. The discoverer of dosage compensation, H. J. with hypertranscription of X-linked genes. A known Muller, reasoned more than 50 years ago that once the biochemical function of the compensasome is its genes of a chromosome start accumulating mutations, contribution to the enrichment along the male X a progressive need arises to compensate for the loss chromosome of an acetylated isoform of histone H4 of their products. In particular, lowering by half the (acetylated at lysine 16). One of the proteins of the products of genes required in similar levels in both sexes compensasome is a histone acetyltransferase. It is must lead to dysfunctions in the heterogametic sex. still unknown how compensasomes detect their bind- Thus, a dosage compensation mechanism is strongly ing targets on the X chromosome, although there is favored by natural selection. (See Muller, Herman evidence of ‘entry sites’, sequences that recruit com- Joseph.) pensasomes and from which the complexes would There are two ways of generating compensatory spread in cis. mechanisms. As the need for compensation arises in In C. elegans (hermaphrodites XX, males X0), gene parallel to mutation accumulation, and thus in prin- expression in both hermaphrodite X chromosomes is ciple gene-by-gene, independent solutions for each decreased by half. This is the result of the binding of gene could emerge. The alternative is the emergence of a complex of proteins unrelated to those found in a general mechanism able to regulate a twofold the Drosophila compensasome. Which sequences are difference in the expression of many unrelated genes. detected on the X chromosomes for the complex to This option appears unlikely. Genes in a degenerating bind is not yet understood. As in Drosophila, chroma- chromosome are functionally diverse. They are often tin modification is thought to be critical. Two of the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE SCIENCES & 2005, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net 1 Dosage Compensation Mechanisms: Evolution proteins of the C. elegans dosage compensation inactivation. A large noncoding RNA transcribed from complex belong to a family of proteins involved in the Xist locus accumulates and ‘coats’ the future chromatin condensation in other processes, including inactive chromosome. The gene Tsix, involved in mitosis. However, how condensation is biochemically regulation of Xist function, is transcribed into another achieved is still unknown. noncoding RNA from the strand opposite Xist.AsTsix Comparison of these two systems reveals some overlaps with Xist, its RNA is antisense of the features that are relevant for understanding the origin Xist RNA (hence the peculiar name ‘Tsix’). The and evolution of the mammalian system: (1) compen- most current model suggests that Tsix expression sation is established by global modification of the antagonizes Xist expression, protecting one of the degree of compaction of sex chromosomes; (2) it requ- chromosomes from inactivation. Recently, the first ires the binding of trans-acting factors to sequences on trans-acting regulator has been found. The transcrip- the X chromosomes and (3) the trans-acting factors are tion factor CTCF binds Tsix. It has been suggested different in flies and nematodes, suggesting that these that CTCF binding occurs on only one of the two X mechanisms evolved independently. chromosomes, owing to methylation differences between Tsix alleles. Once CTCF binds and activates Tsix on an X chromosome, Xist function is inhibited, Human Dosage Compensation in allowing that chromosome to remain active (Chao et al., 2002). (See Noncoding RNAs: A Regulatory Role?; an Evolutionary Framework Nonprotein-coding Genes; X-chromosome Inactivation; X-chromosome Inactivation and Disease.) In most eutherian mammals, including humans, However, several lines of evidence suggest that females are the homogametic sex (XX) and males are models including only Xist and Tsix are insufficient. heterogametic (XY). The evolutionary history of For instance, the choice between X chromosomes for human sex chromosomes is complex. They originated inactivation is known to be influenced by the poorly as a pair of homologous autosomes that can be called understood X-controlling element (Xce), which is proto-X and proto-Y. At some moment after the split located nearby but does not overlap with Xist or Tsix. of the lineages (about 320 million years ago), the How Xist RNA spreads along the X chromosome is proto-Y chromosome became restricted to the male also not fully understood. In particular, what kind of sex, probably by the acquisition of a dominant male- cis-acting sequences contribute to this spreading has determining function. There is evidence that, 80–130 not been determined completely. An involvement of million years ago, regions of autosomal origin were LINE-1 repetitive elements has been suggested. These added to both the proto-X and proto-Y chromosomes. elements are enriched in the X chromosome. More- Several chromosomal inversions also occurred, lead- over, some genes are able to escape inactivation and, ing to different gene arrangements in the proto-X and in humans, are concentrated in the regions added most proto-Y, and progressively inhibiting recombination recently to the sex chromosomes. It has been suggested between them. The combination of sex-specific restric- that low concentrations of LINE-1 might define which tion and lack of recombination led to chromosome regions escape inactivation (Bailey et al., 2000). (See degeneration of the proto-Y. Mutations that arose on Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINEs).) the proto-Y could not be eliminated by recombination Once Xist RNA coats an X chromosome, it is in the heterogametic sex. The proto-Y chromosome assumed that it recruits proteins, contributing to the progressively lost most of its genes and became the Y dramatic change in chromatin structure that follows. chromosome of today (Lahn and Page, 1999). (See Soon after Xist spreading, histones H3 and H4 become Chromosome Rearrangement Patterns in Mammalian hypoacetylated, the unusual histone macroH2A1 Evolution; Chromosome X; Chromosome Y; Mammalian accumulates, and gene promoters become hyper- Sex Chromosome Evolution.) methylated. Methylation of histone H3 in its lysine 9 Dosage compensation in embryonic and adult residue, characteristic of heterochromatin in many tissues of eutherians is achieved by random inactiva- eucaryotic organisms, also occurs soon after Xist tion of one of the female X chromosomes. As coating, preceding transcriptional inactivation of happened in the protostome species discussed above, X-linked genes. This may be the first modification to this occurs by changes in chromosome condensation. appear on the future inactive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revealing the Mechanism of Xist-Mediated Silencing
    Revealing the Mechanism of Xist-mediated Silencing Thesis by Chun-Kan Chen In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended November 1, 2017 ii 2017 Chun-Kan Chen ORCID: 0000-0002-1194-9137 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I’d like to thank my great mentor, Dr. Mitch Guttman (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA), who led me to become an independent researcher and gave me valuable advice that guided me to accomplish this thesis. He has always been supportive of my future plans and career goals. I really enjoyed every discussion we have had. We often generated some interesting ideas for projects during our discussions. I would also like to send my thanks to my lab mates, Amy Chow, Mario Blanco, and Erik Aznauryan, who helped me with many experiments to move the project forward. I’d like to acknowledge Dr. Kathrin Plath (University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) for the collaboration and his critical comments on this project. Also, I want to thank Jesse Engreitz and Patrick McDonel, who provided helpful comments and suggestions to the project. I want to thank my parents, brother, and parents-in-law who provided both instrumental and emotional support to assist me in completing my Ph.D. degree. I also want to thank my friends, Lily Chen, Pei-Ying Lin, Tzu-Yao Wang, and Wei Li, for giving me valuable social support during my years in graduate school. Last but not least, I would like to send my special thanks to my wife, Christine Juang, who has always been supportive.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of BRCA1 with the Inactive X Chromosome and XIST RNA
    FirstCite Published online e-publishing Association of BRCA1 with the inactive X chromosome and XIST RNA Shridar Ganesan1, Daniel P. Silver1, Ronny Drapkin1, Roger Greenberg1, Jean Feunteun2 and David M. Livingston1* 1The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, 1 Jimmy Fund Way, Boston, MA 02115, USA 2Laboratoire de Genetique et Transfert de Gene, Institut Gustav-Roussy, Villejuif 94805, France Breast cancer, early onset 1 (BRCA1) encodes a nuclear protein that participates in breast and ovarian cancer suppression. The molecular basis for the gender and tissue specificity of the BRCA1 cancer syn- drome is unknown. Recently, we observed that a fraction of BRCA1 in female cells is localized on the inactive X chromosome (Xi). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments have demonstrated that BRCA1 physically associates with Xi-specific transcript (XIST) RNA, a non-coding RNA known to coat Xi and to participate in the initiation of its inactivation during early embryogenesis. Cells lacking wild- type BRCA1 show abnormalities in Xi, including lack of proper XIST RNA localization. Reintroduction of wild-type, but not mutant, BRCA1 can correct this defect in XIST localization in these cells. Depletion of BRCA1 in female diploid cells led to a defect in proper XIST localization on Xi and in the development of normal Xi heterchromatic superstructure. Moreover, depletion of BRCA1 led to an increased likelihood of re-expression of a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene embedded on Xi. Taken together, these findings are consistent with a model in which BRCA1 function contributes to the maintenance of proper Xi heterochromatin superstructure. Although the data imply a novel gender-specific consequence of BRCA1 loss, the relevance of the BRCA1/Xi function to the tumour suppressor activity of BRCA1 remains unclear and needs to be tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Non‑Coding Rnas XIST and MALAT1 Hijack the PD‑L1 Regulatory Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer Subtypes
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 22: 593, 2021 Long non‑coding RNAs XIST and MALAT1 hijack the PD‑L1 regulatory signaling pathway in breast cancer subtypes AMANY SAMIR1, REDA ABDEL TAWAB2 and HEND M. EL TAYEBI1 1Molecular Pharmacology Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, German University in Cairo, Cairo 11835; 2Department of General Surgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11772, Egypt Received July 18, 2020; Accepted January 14, 2021 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12854 Abstract. Long non‑coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have attracted presence of lncRNAs. Therefore, the results of the present widespread attention as potential biological and patho‑ study indicated that although miR‑182‑5p exhibited an onco‑ logical regulators. lncRNAs are involved in several biological genic effect, XIST exerted a dominant effect on the regulation processes in cancer. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is of the PD‑L1 signaling pathway via the inhibition of the onco‑ characterized by strong heterogeneity and aggressiveness. At genic function of MALAT1. present, the implication of microRNAs (miRs) and lncRNAs in immunotherapy has been poorly studied. Nevertheless, Introduction the blockade of immune checkpoints, particularly that of the programmed cell‑death protein‑1/programmed cell‑death In the context of tumor biology, the six hallmarks of cancer ligand‑1 (PD‑L1) axis, is considered as a principle approach in have been proposed to be associated with progressively breast cancer (BC) therapy. The present study aimed to inves‑ growing tumors and to be responsible for the complexity of tigate the interaction between immune‑modulatory upstream neoplastic diseases, and these are limitless replicative poten‑ signaling pathways of the PD‑L1 transcript that could enhance tial, evading apoptosis, self‑sufficiency in growth signals, personalized targeted therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Coding RNA: X-Chromosome Inactivation Unravelled
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology | AOP, published online 8 May 2015; doi:10.1038/nrm3998 NON-CODING RNA X-chromosome inactivation unravelled The long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) specific and reproducible set of ten suggesting that SAFA acts to localize Xist (X inactive-specific transcript) is proteins that directly interact with Xist to genomic DNA. Depleting required for the transcriptional silenc- Xist. Of these proteins, knocking Xist binds to SHARP led to the retention of Pol II ing of one X chromosome in each cell, down the genes encoding scaffold SHARP to at Xist-coated X chromosomes, in a process known as X-chromosome attachment factor A (SAFA; also recruit SMRT indicating that SHARP might be inactivation (XCI) that occurs during known as HNRNPU), SMRT- and required for initiating transcriptional mammalian female development. HDAC1-associated repressor protein and activate silencing following Xist localization, Owing to technical limitations, little (SHARP; also known as SPEN or HDAC3 … possibly by recruiting the transcrip- is known about the mechanism of MSX2-interacting protein) and resulting in tional co-repressors SMRT and transcriptional silencing during XCI. lamin-B receptor (LBR) largely abol- HDAC3. Indeed, depleting SMRT McHugh et al. now describe using ished the silencing of XCI‑affected gene silencing or HDAC3 (but not other HDACs) RNA antisense purification followed genes in the male ES cells as well as in abrogated Xist-dependent gene by quantitative mass spectrometry differentiating female ES cells. These silencing. Another feature of XCI (RAP–MS) — a novel approach for three proteins are therefore required is the recruitment of the Polycomb identifying proteins that directly for Xist-mediated gene silencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Agonists Regulate the Expression of Stemness and Differentiation Genes in Brain Tumour Stem Cells
    British Journal of Cancer (2012) 106, 1702–1712 & 2012 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/12 www.bjcancer.com PPARg agonists regulate the expression of stemness and differentiation genes in brain tumour stem cells E Pestereva1, S Kanakasabai1 and JJ Bright*,1,2 1 Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Methodist Research Institute, Indiana University Health, 1800 North Capitol Avenue, Noyes Building E504C, 2 Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA BACKGROUND: Brain tumour stem cells (BTSCs) are a small population of cancer cells that exhibit self-renewal, multi-drug resistance, and recurrence properties. We have shown earlier that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARg) agonists inhibit the expansion of BTSCs in T98G and U87MG glioma. In this study, we analysed the influence of PPARg agonists on the expression of stemness and differentiation genes in BTSCs. METHODS: The BTSCs were isolated from T98G and DB29 glioma cells, and cultured in neurobasal medium with epidermal growth factor þ basic fibroblast growth factor. Proliferation was measured by WST-1 (4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2 H-5- tetrazolio]-1,3-benzene disulphonate) and 3H thymidine uptake assays, and gene expression was analysed by quantitative reverse– transcription PCR and Taqman array. The expression of CD133, SRY box 2, and nanog homeobox (Nanog) was also evaluated by western blotting, immunostaining, and flow cytometry. 12,14 RESULTS: We found that PPARg agonists, ciglitazone and 15-deoxy-D -ProstaglandinJ2, inhibited cell viability and proliferation of þ T98G- and DB29-BTSCs. The PPARg agonists reduced the expansion of CD133 BTSCs and altered the expression of stemness and differentiation genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Reprogramming Capacity of Nanog Is Functionally Conserved in Vertebrates and Resides in a Unique Homeodomain Thorold W
    Reprogramming capacity of Nanog is functionally conserved in vertebrates and resides in a unique homeodomain Thorold W. Theunissen, Yael Costa, Aliaksandra Radzisheuskaya, A., Anouk L. van Oosten, Fabrice Lavial, Bertrand Pain, L. Filipe C. Castro Castro, José C. R. Silva, J. C. R. To cite this version: Thorold W. Theunissen, Yael Costa, Aliaksandra Radzisheuskaya, A., Anouk L. van Oosten, Fabrice Lavial, et al.. Reprogramming capacity of Nanog is functionally conserved in vertebrates and resides in a unique homeodomain. Development (Cambridge, England), Company of Biologists, 2011, 138 (22), pp.4853-4865. 10.1242/dev.068775. hal-02644461 HAL Id: hal-02644461 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02644461 Submitted on 28 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License DEVELOPMENT AND STEM CELLS RESEARCH ARTICLE 4853 Development 138, 4853-4865 (2011) doi:10.1242/dev.068775 © 2011. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Reprogramming capacity of Nanog is functionally conserved in vertebrates and resides in a unique homeodomain Thorold W. Theunissen1, Yael Costa1, Aliaksandra Radzisheuskaya1, Anouk L. van Oosten1, Fabrice Lavial2, Bertrand Pain3, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Functions of Natural Antisense Transcripts Andreas Werner
    Werner BMC Biology 2013, 11:31 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/11/31 COMMENTARY Open Access Biological functions of natural antisense transcripts Andreas Werner Abstract The most common meaning of the term 'antisense tran- script' refers to a protein coding sense transcript and a In theory, the human genome is large enough to fully processed (capped, polyadenylated) antisense RNA keep its roughly 20,000 genes well separated. In with complementarity in exonic regions (Figure 1). The practice, genes are clustered; even more puzzling, in key issue of whether the antisense transcripts act as ex- many cases both DNA strands of a protein coding quisitely specific gene regulators or are simply transcrip- gene are transcribed. The resulting natural antisense tional waste that a cell has learned to live with is still a transcripts can be a blessing and curse, as many matter of controversy [2]. However, a study published in appreciate, or simply transcriptional trash, as others BMC Genomics reports conservation of natural antisense believe. Widespread evolutionary conservation, as transcripts at a large scale between human, rat and mouse, recently demonstrated, is a good indicator for which strongly suggests that there is biological sense to potential biological functions of natural antisense having antisense transcripts [3]. transcripts. See research article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/ Regulatory antisense transcripts 1471-2164/14/243 The most convincing way to demonstrate the biologi- cal significance of an antisense transcript is to interfere with its expression and demonstrate phenotypic conse- By the mid-1980s antisense transcription in mammalian quences or altered expression levels of the sense tran- genomes had already been described by a few isolated script.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts About SLC16A2, TSIX and XIST Gene Like Sites in the Human Genome and a Potential Role in Cellular Chromosome Counting Martina Rinčić1, Ivan Y
    Rinčić et al. Molecular Cytogenetics (2016) 9:56 DOI 10.1186/s13039-016-0271-7 HYPOTHESIS Open Access Thoughts about SLC16A2, TSIX and XIST gene like sites in the human genome and a potential role in cellular chromosome counting Martina Rinčić1, Ivan Y. Iourov2,3,4 and Thomas Liehr5* Abstract Background: Chromosome counting is a process in which cells determine somehow their intrinsic chromosome number(s). The best-studied cellular mechanism that involves chromosome counting is ‘chromosome-kissing’ and X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) mechanism. It is necessary for the well-known dosage compensation between the genders in mammals to balance the number of active X-chromosomes (Xa) with regard to diploid set of autosomes. At the onset of XCI, two X-chromosomes are coming in close proximity and pair physically by a specific segment denominated X-pairing region (Xpr) that involves the SLC16A2 gene. Results: An Ensembl BLAST search for human and mouse SLC16A2/Slc16a2 homologues revealed, that highly similar sequences can be found at almost each chromosome in the corresponding genomes. Additionally, a BLAST search for SLC16A2/TSIX/XIST (genes responsible for XCI) reveled that “SLC16A2/TSIX/XIST like sequences” cover equally all chromosomes, too. With respect to this we provide following hypotheses. Hypotheses: If a single genomic region containing the SLC16A2 gene on X-chromosome is responsible for maintaining “balanced” active copy numbers, it is possible that similar sequences or gene/s have the same function on other chromosomes (autosomes). SLC16A2 like sequences on autosomes could encompass evolutionary older, but functionally active key regions for chromosome counting in early embryogenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Rnas and the Regulation of Cis-Natural Antisense Transcripts in Arabidopsis
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works Title Small RNAs and the regulation of cis-natural antisense transcripts in Arabidopsis Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/66p3c9bz Journal BMC Molecular Biology, 9 ISSN 1471-2199 Authors Jin, Hailing Vacic, Vladimir Girke, Thomas et al. Publication Date 2008 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California BMC Molecular Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Small RNAs and the regulation of cis-natural antisense transcripts in Arabidopsis Hailing Jin*1, Vladimir Vacic2, Thomas Girke3, Stefano Lonardi4 and Jian- Kang Zhu*3 Address: 1Departments of Plant Pathology & Microbiology, Center for Plant Cell Biology and Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA, 2Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA, 3Botany and Plant Sciences, Center for Plant Cell Biology and Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA and 4Computer Science and Engineering, Center for Plant Cell Biology and Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA Email: Hailing Jin* - [email protected]; Vladimir Vacic - [email protected]; Thomas Girke - [email protected]; Stefano Lonardi - [email protected]; Jian-Kang Zhu* - [email protected] * Corresponding authors Published: 14 January 2008 Received: 30 May 2007 Accepted: 14 January 2008 BMC Molecular Biology 2008, 9:6 doi:10.1186/1471-2199-9-6 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2199/9/6 © 2008 Jin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisense Transcription Licenses Nascent Transcripts to Mediate Transcriptional Gene Silencing
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 3, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Antisense transcription licenses nascent transcripts to mediate transcriptional gene silencing Yunkun Dang,1,4 Jiasen Cheng,2,4 Xianyun Sun,3 Zhipeng Zhou,1 and Yi Liu1 1Department of Physiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA; 2State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; 3State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, ZhongGuanCun, Beijing 100080, China In eukaryotes, antisense transcription can regulate sense transcription by induction of epigenetic modifications. We showed previously that antisense transcription triggers Dicer-independent siRNA (disiRNA) production and dis- iRNA locus DNA methylation (DLDM) in Neurospora crassa. Here we show that the conserved exonuclease ERI-1 (enhanced RNAi-1) is a critical component in this process. Antisense transcription and ERI-1 binding to target RNAs are necessary and sufficient to trigger DLDM. Convergent transcription causes stalling of RNA polymerase II during transcription, which permits ERI-1 to bind nascent RNAs in the nucleus and recruit a histone methyltransferase complex that catalyzes chromatin modifications. Furthermore, we show that, in the cytoplasm, ERI-1 targets hundreds of transcripts from loci without antisense transcription to regulate RNA stability. Together, our results demonstrate a critical role for transcription kinetics in long noncoding RNA-mediated epigenetic modifications and identify ERI-1 as an important regulator of cotranscriptional gene silencing and post-transcriptional RNA metabolism. [Keywords: DNA methylation; Neurospora; antisense transcription; gene silencing; small RNA] Supplemental material is available for this article.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Hypomethylation Can Activate Xist Expression and Silence X-Linked Genes
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press DNA hypomethylation can activate Xist expression and silence X-linked genes Barbara Panning I and Rudolf Jaenisch L2,3 IWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and 2Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 USA Xist and other X-linked gene expression was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in cells of wild type and DNA methyltranferase (Dnmt) mutant embryos and embryonic stem (ES) cells to determine whether demethylation-induced Xist expression leads to inappropriate X chromosome inactivation. In undifferentiated ES cells low-level Xist expression was detected from the single active X chromosome (Xa) in male cells and on both Xa's in female cells. Upon differentiation Xist expression was detected only in female cells, in which Xist RNA colocalized with the entire inactive X chromosome (Xi). Differentiated Dnmt mutant ES cells or cells of mutant postgastrulation embryos showed aberrant patterns of Xist expression: Xist transcripts colocalized with the single X chromosome in male cells and with both X chromosomes in female cells. X-linked gene expression was not detected from chromosomes coated with Xist RNA. These results suggest that ectopic Xist expression, induced by DNA hypomethylation, may lead to the inactivation of X-linked genes. We conclude that Xist-mediated X chromosome inactivation can occur in the absence of DNA methylation, arguing that DNA methylation may be required to repress Xist expression for the maintenance of a transcriptionally active Xa. In differentiated Dnmt mutant ES cells the activation of Xist expression correlated with a dramatic increase in apoptotic bodies, suggesting that Xist-mediated X chromosome inactivation may result in cell death and contribute to the embryonic lethality of the Dnmt mutation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epigenetics of Non-Coding RNA
    CHAPTER 4 The Epigenetics of Non-coding RNA Lesley J. Collins1, Barbara Schönfeld2,3, and Xiaowei Sylvia Chen4 1Massey Genome Service, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 2Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 3Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 4Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand INTRODUCTION Non-protein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are RNAs that are transcribed from DNA but are not translated into proteins. Many are functional and are involved in the processing and regulation of other RNAs such as mRNA, tRNA, and rRNA. Processing-type ncRNAs include small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) involved in splicing, small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) that 49 modify nucleotides in rRNAs and other RNAs, and RNase P that cleaves pre-tRNAs. Other small ncRNAs such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are involved in the regulation of target mRNAs and chromatin. Although many of these latter ncRNA classes are grouped under the term RNA interference (RNAi), it has become clear that there are many different ways that ncRNAs can interact with genes to up-regulate or down-regulate expression, to silence translation, or guide methylation [1–3]. Adding to these classes are long ncRNAs (typically 200 nt) that have also been implicated in gene regulation [4]. All of these ncRNAs form a network of processes, the RNA-infrastructure [2] that spans the cell not only spatially as RNAs move across the cell, but also temporally as the RNAs regulate gene processes during the cell cycle. Thus, the regulation of RNA processes may not only be transcriptional or translational, but also from their biogenesis and processing pathways [2].
    [Show full text]