DOCSLIB.ORG

Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’S Novel “Frankenstein”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’S Novel “Frankenstein” A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTER OF FRANKENSTEIN IN MARY SHELLEY’S NOVEL “FRANKENSTEIN” A PAPER WRITTEN BY RAHMA KESUMA ANJANI REG. NO: 152202056 DIPLOMA III ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OF CULTURE STUDY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATERA MEDAN 2018 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA It has been Approved by Supervisor, Dra. Diah Rahayu Pratama. M.Pd NIP. 195612141986012001 Submitted to Faculty of Culture Study. University of North Sumatera in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Diploma III in English Study Program. Approved by Head of Diploma III English Study Program, Dra. Swesana Mardia Lubis. M.Hum NIP. 19571002 198601 2 003 Approved by the Diploma III of English Study Program Faculty of Culture Study, University of North Sumatera. UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA As a Paper for the Diploma III Examination Accepted by the Board of Examiners in partial of the requirements for the D-III Examination of the Diploma III English Study Program, Faculty of Culture Study, University of North Sumatera. The examination is held 10th January 2018 Faculty of Culture Study University of North Sumatera Board of Examination : 1. Dra. Swesana Mardia Lubis. M.Hum 2. Dra. Diah Rahayu Pratama. M.Pd 3. Riko Andika Rahmat Pohan. S.S. M.Hum UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I am, RAHMA KESUMA ANJANI, declare that I am the sole author of this paper. Except where reference is made in the text of this paper, this paper contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a paper by which I have qualified for or awarded another degree. No other person‟s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of this paper. This paper has not been submitted for the award of another degree in any tertiary education. Signed : Date : UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA COPYRIGHT DECLARATION Name : RAHMA KESUMA ANJANI Title of Paper : A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTER OF FRANKENSTEIN IN MARY SHELLEY’S NOVEL “FRANKENSTEIN” Qualification : D-III/ Ahli Madya Study Program: English 1. I am willing that my paper should be available for reproduction at the discretion of the Liberation of the Diploma III English Study Program Faculty of Cultural Studies, USU on the understanding that users are made aware of their obligation under law of the Republic of Indonesia. 2. I am not willing that my papers be made available for reproduction. Signed : Date : UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA ABSTRACT Literature is a form of art that depict human life. The novel is one of the artworks. In the novel, the author can tell something different and others. At this time, the author will discuss matters relating to the characters. Character is the most interest in a novel. The uniqueness of the characters in a novel are always eager to make people want to know what the actual figure. Characters in the novel provide another view point on anything related to human life, namely the standpoint of literature to something. Therefore, the authors decided to chose the title "A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTER OF FRANKENSTEIN IN MARY SHELLEY’S NOVEL “FRANKENSTEIN”. The author will describe the disposition of the main characters in literary works. Thus, the authors accept criticism and feedback on this paper for more leverage. UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA ABSTRAK Sastra merupakan suatu bentuk karya seni yang menggambarkan kehidupan manusia. Novel adalah salah satu dari karya seni tersebut. Di dalam novel penulis dapat menceritakan sesuatu yang berbeda dan lain. Pada kali ini penulis akan membahas hal yang berkaitan dengan karakter. Karakter merupakan unsur yang paling menarik perhatian dalam sebuah novel. Keunikan karakter dalam sebuah novel selalu membuat masyarakat berhasrat ingin mengetahui seperti apa sosoknya yang sebenarnya. Karakter dalam novel memberikan sudut pandang yang lain terhadap sesuatu yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan manusia, yaitu sudut pandang sastra terhadap sesuatu. Oleh karena itu, penulis memutuskan untuk memilih judul “A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTER OF FRANKENSTEIN IN MARY SHELLY’S NOVEL “FRANKENSTEIN”. Penulis akan mendeskripsikan perwatakan dari para karakter utama dalam karya sastra tersebut. Maka dari itu penulis menerima kritikan dan masukan terhadap karya tulis ini agar lebih maksimal. UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I want to thank my God, Allah SWT and the prophet Muhmmad SAW, for all the blessing and gives me health, strength, wisdom, and inspiration to finish this paper as one the requirements to get Diploma III certificate from English Diploma Study Program, University of North Sumatera. The second, i want to thank and gratitude to Dr. Budi Agustono, M.Si. as the Dean of faculty of cultural studies, University of North Sumatera and Dra.Swesana Mardia Lubis M.Hum, as the Head of Diploma III English Study Programs, who give me chance to prove my qualified for finishing this paper. Third, i want to thank and great gratitude to Dra. Diah Rahayu Pratama, M.pd. as the supervisor for the precious time and knowledge with many advices that she gaves me. Fourth, i would like to thank to my big family for their support, care and great love to me for finishing this paper, and big thank for supporting me till here i am. To my sister who always help me, and also the teacher who taught me many things to learn. Thank you very much. The last, i want to thank to my best friends at campus, Putri Nova Syuhada, Yusnaini Yusda Lubis, Maghfira Syahbandia, who fill my days and support me until this paper has finished. I want to thank to peoples around me that always support me, i am sorry i can’t mention all of you, but thanks for your axsistence and you kindness. UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Finally, i will accept the suggestion and critics that build me up from the readers because i know this paper is far from being perfect. That’s why your critics will fix my fault in the future. Thanks to all readers who read this paper and appreciate it. Medan,............................2018 The Writer, Rahma Kesuma Anjani Reg. No. 152202056 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................... i CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 1.1 Background Of The Study.................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem Of Study ................................................................................. 3 1.3 Scope Of The Study ............................................................................. 3 1.4 Objective Of The Study........................................................................ 3 1.5 The Method Of The Study ................................................................... 3 1.6 The Reason Choosing The Topic ......................................................... 4 CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE .......................... 5 2.1 Literture ................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Novel .................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Intrinsic Elements ................................................................................. 6 2.3.1 Character ..................................................................................... 6 2.3.1.1 Types of The Character ............................................................ 6 1. Round and Flat Character ............................................... 6 2.3.2 Character Traits ........................................................................... 7 1. The Way of Character Disclosed in Novel : ................... 8 1. Action ....................................................................... 8 2. Descriptions, both personal and Environmental ...... 9 3. Dramatic statement and thoughts ............................. 9 4. Statements by other characters................................. 9 CHAPTER III THE DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 10 3.1 Physical Appearances ........................................................................... 10 3.2 Action ................................................................................................... 11 3.3 What They Say About Themselves ...................................................... 13 3.4 What The Other People Say About Them ............................................ 13 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGESTION ................................... 15 3.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................ 15 3.6 Sugestion .............................................................................................. 16 BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................... 17 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Of The Study Literature is an art of written works. Literature is writing that is considered to be an art form or any single writing deemed to have artistic or intellectual value. Literature can be classified according to whether it is fiction or non fiction and wether it is poetry or prose. Literature is a term used to describe written or spoken material. Broadly speaking, "literature" is used to describe anything from creative writing to more technical or scientific works. Literature refers to compotitions that tell stories, dramatize situations, express emotions, and analyze and advocate ideas. Literature
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Representations of Love and Marriage in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft Hels Ley and Percy Bysshe Shelley Jenna E
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Spring 2016 “One Feeling in Such a Solitude”: Representations of Love and Marriage in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft helS ley and Percy Bysshe Shelley Jenna E. Fleming Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, and the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Fleming, Jenna E., "“One Feeling in Such a Solitude”: Representations of Love and Marriage in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley and Percy Bysshe Shelley" (2016). Student Publications. 456. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/456 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/ 456 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “One Feeling in Such a Solitude”: Representations of Love and Marriage in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft helS ley and Percy Bysshe Shelley Abstract The ae rly nineteenth century was characterized by a dynamic literary discussion and debate over the nature and effects of human relationships. Mary Wollstonecraft heS lley and Percy Bysshe Shelley, two of the foremost writers of the period, experimented with and drew conclusions about differing images of marriage within their works. Making use of this public literary genre, the couple engaged in a conversation with one another as they explored and refined their views and judgments of relationships including their own.
    [Show full text]
  • The Machine at the Mad Monster Party
    1 The Machine at the Mad Monster Party Mad Monster Party (dir. Jules Bass, 1967) is a beguiling film: the superb Rankin/Bass “Animagic” stop-motion animation is burdened by interminable pacing, the celebrity voice cast includes the terrific Boris Karloff and Phyllis Diller caricaturing themselves but with flat and contradictory dialogue, and its celebration of classic Universal Studios movie monsters surprisingly culminates in their total annihilation in the film’s closing moments. The plot finds famous Dr. Baron Boris von Frankenstein convening his “Worldwide Organization of Monsters” to announce both his greatest discovery, a “formula which can completely destroy all matter,” and his retirement, where he will surprisingly be succeeded not by a monster but by something far worse: a human, his nebbish pharmacist nephew Felix Flanken. Naturally, this does not sit well with the current membership, nor even Felix, who is exposed to monsters for the first time in his life and is petrified at what he sees. Thus, a series of classic monsters team up to try to knock off Felix and take over for Baron Frankenstein: Dracula, The Werewolf, The Mummy, The Invisible Man, Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde, The Creature from the Black Lagoon, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Frankenstein’s Monster, The Monster's Mate, King Kong (referred to only as “It”), Yetch (an ersatz Peter Lorre/Igor hybrid), and Francesca, the buxom red-head secretary. Much of the plot’s comedy is that Felix is so humanly clueless: glasses-wearing, naive, constantly sneezing, he fails to recognize the monsters’ horribleness and manages to avoid their traps mainly by accident and dumb luck.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Shelley: Teaching and Learning Through Frankenstein Theresa M
    Forum on Public Policy Mary Shelley: Teaching and Learning through Frankenstein Theresa M. Girard, Adjunct Professor, Central Michigan University Abstract In the writing of Frankenstein, Mary Shelley was able to change the course of women’s learning, forever. Her life started from an elite standpoint as the child of Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin. As such, she was destined to grow to be a major influence in the world. Mary Shelley’s formative years were spent with her father and his many learned friends. Her adult years were spent with her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and their literary friends. It was on the occasion of the Shelleys’ visit to Lord Byron at his summer home that Mary Shelley was to begin her novel which changed the course of women’s ideas about safety and the home. No longer were women to view staying in the home as a means to staying safe and secure. While women always knew that men could be unreliable, Mary Shelley openly acknowledged that fact and provided a forum from which it could be discussed. Furthermore, women learned that they were vulnerable and that, in order to insure their own safety, they could not entirely depend upon men to rescue them; in fact, in some cases, women needed to save themselves from the men in their lives, often with no one to turn to except themselves and other women. There are many instances where this is shown throughout Frankenstein, such as: Justine’s prosecution and execution and Elizabeth’s murder. Mary Shelley educated women in the most fundamental of ways and continues to do so through every reading of Frankenstein.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman's Film Score Bride of Frankenstein
    This is a repository copy of Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman’s film score Bride of Frankenstein. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/118268/ Version: Accepted Version Article: McClelland, C (Cover date: 2014) Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman’s film score Bride of Frankenstein. Journal of Film Music, 7 (1). pp. 5-19. ISSN 1087-7142 https://doi.org/10.1558/jfm.27224 © Copyright the International Film Music Society, published by Equinox Publishing Ltd 2017, This is an author produced version of a paper published in the Journal of Film Music. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Paper for the Journal of Film Music Of Gods and Monsters: Signification in Franz Waxman’s film score Bride of Frankenstein Universal’s horror classic Bride of Frankenstein (1935) directed by James Whale is iconic not just because of its enduring images and acting, but also because of the high quality of its score by Franz Waxman.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real "Monster" in Frankenstein
    ISSN 2380-5064 | Arsenal is published by the Augusta University Libraries | http://guides.augusta.edu/arsenal Volume 1, Issue 1 (2016) The Real "Monster" in Frankenstein David O. Urizar Citation Urizar, D. O. (2016). The Real "Monster" in Frankenstein. Arsenal: The undergraduate research journal of Augusta University, 1(1), 20-27. http://doi.org/10.21633/issn.2380.5064/f.2016.01.20 © 2016 Urizar. This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/) ISSN 2380-5064 10.21633/issn.2380.5064/f.2016.01.20 Real “Monster” in Frankenstein David O. Urizar Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Mathematics Faculty Mentor: Todd Hoffman, Ph.D., Department of English and Foreign Languages The story of Frankenstein is typically seen as a battle between Victor Frankenstein and the “monster” of the story. However I argue that that the real “monster” of the story is in fact Victor Frankenstein who is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and that the “monster” is really just a delusions that Victor uses to cope with the idea that he in fact is the killer of the story. This concept is evident in the fact that no one in the story has ever seen both Victor Frankenstein and the “monster” alive in the same place. The characteristics of the “monster’ also point towards the idea that the “monster” could not possibly exist. Even the way that Victor acts throughout the book point to the idea that he does not really care for the safety of his loved ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Frankenstein"
    "YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN" SCREENPLAY by GENE WILDER FIRST DRAFT FADE IN: EXT. FRANKENSTEIN CASTLE A BOLT OF LIGHTNING! A CRACK OF THUNDER! On a distant, rainy hill, the old Frankenstein castle, as we knew and loved it, is illuminated by ANOTHER BOLT OF LIGHTNING. MUSIC: AN EERIE TRANSYLVANIAN LULLABY begins to PLAY in the b.g. as we MOVE SLOWLY CLOSER to the castle. It is completely dark, except for one room -- a study in the corner of the castle -- which is only lit by candles. Now we are just outside a rain-splattered window of the study. We LOOK IN and SEE: INT. STUDY - NIGHT An open coffin rests on a table we can not see it's contents. As the CAMERA SLOWLY CIRCLES the coffin for a BETTER VIEW... A CLOCK BEGINS TO CHIME: "ONE," "TWO," "THREE," "FOUR..." We are ALMOST FACING the front of the coffin. "FIVE," "SIX," "SEVEN," "EIGHT..." The CAMERA STOPS. Now it MOVES UP AND ABOVE the satin-lined coffin. "NINE," "TEN," "ELEVEN," "T W E L V E!" CUT TO: THE EMBALMED HEAD OF BEAUFORT FRANKENSTEIN Half of still clings to the waxen balm; the other half has decayed to skull. Below his head is a skeleton, whose bony fingers cling to a metal box. A HAND reaches in to grasp the metal box. It lifts the box halfway out of the coffin -- the skeleton's fingers rising, involuntarily, with the box. Then, as of by force of will, the skeleton's fingers grab the box back and place it where it was. Now the "Hand" -- using its other hand -- grabs the box back from the skeleton's fingers.
    [Show full text]
  • Movies & Languages 2013-2014 Hotel Transylvania
    Movies & Languages 2013-2014 Hotel Transylvania About the movie (subtitled version) DIRECTOR Genndy Tartakovsky YEAR / COUNTRY 2012 U.S.A GENRE Comedy, Animation ACTORS Adam Sandler, Andy Samberg, Steve Buscemi, Selena Gomez PLOT The Hotel Transylvania is Dracula's lavish five-stake resort he built for his beloved wife Martha and their daughter Mavis. Monsters and their families are invited to Mavis's 118th birthday party where they can live it up, free from meddling with the human world. But here's a little known fact about Dracula: he is not only the Prince of Darkness; he is also a dad. Over-protective of his teenage daughter, Mavis, Dracula fabricates tales of elaborate dangers to dissuade her adventurous spirit. As a haven for Mavis, he opens the Hotel Transylvania, where his daughter and some of the world's most famous monsters – Frankenstein and his bride, the Mummy, the Invisible Man, a family of werewolves, gremlins and more – can kick back in safety and peace. For Drac, catering to all of these legendary monsters is no problem but his world could come crashing down when one ordinary guy discovers the hotel and takes a shine to Mavis. LANGUAGE Simple English spoken in Eastern European, American and French accents GRAMMAR INDEPENDENT ELEMENTS/INTERJECTIONS Introductory - Oh! ah! alas! Ha ha, ha! hollo! hurrah! pshaw! etc. express sudden bursts of feeling. As they have no grammatical relation to any other word in the sentence, we say that they are independent. Words belonging to other parts of speech become interjections when used as mere exclamations: What! are you going? Well! you surprise me Other words besides interjections may be used independently: Come on boys Well, we will try it Now, that is strange Why, this looks right There is reason in this Boys simply arrests the attention of the persons addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Questions for Frankenstein Written by Hailey Toporcer, Hiram College Class of 2019 Edited by Prof
    Discussion Questions for Frankenstein Written by Hailey Toporcer, Hiram College Class of 2019 Edited by Prof. Kirsten Parkinson As you read Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, either on your own or with a group, we invite you to use these questions to add layers to your discussion or thinking about the novel. The first section includes questions for each chapter of the novel; you will find questions reflecting on the book as a whole at the end. We have not included specific pages numbers as various editions have different page numbers, but the quotations are based on the 1831 edition of the novel. Discussion Questions for Each Chapter Letters I through IV 1. Frankenstein begins and ends with letters written by Robert Walton. Why do you think that Mary Shelley chose to have him frame the novel? How would your opinions of Victor Frankenstein and his creation differ if their story was told directly by Victor Frankenstein himself? What if the story was told solely by the creation? 2. Walton yearns for a friend, much like Victor Frankenstein’s creature does. What does this tell you about human nature? Is it in our nature to want companionship, someone to confide in, and someone to care for? 3. In Letter IV, Walton writes, “Yesterday the stranger said to me, “You may easily perceive, Captain Walton, that I have suffered great and unparalleled misfortunes. I had determined at one time that the memory of these evils should die with me, but you have won me to alter my determination. You seek for knowledge and wisdom, as I once did; and I ardently hope that the gratification of your wishes may not be a serpent to sting you, as mine has been.
    [Show full text]
  • Pearson English Active Reading Level 3: Frankenstein 9781292121512
    CHAPTER 1 Young Frankenstein I was interested in the secrets of the sky and the earth, of the natural world. y name is Victor Frankenstein. I come from Geneva, in Switzerland, and M my family is one of the most important in that country. When I was very young, my parents travelled a lot. I was their only child, and they took me with them. My parents were kind and they loved me very much. My earliest memories are happy ones. When I was about five years old, we stayed for a week at Lake Como in Italy. My mother was a kind woman and visited a poor family on a farm. They had five children. Four had dark hair like the man and his wife, but the other child, a girl, had fair hair and looked quite different. The farmer’s wife told my mother the child’s history. The girl’s name was Elizabeth Lavenza, and she was the daughter of a rich man from Milan. Her mother died when she was born. Elizabeth’s father died too, trying to free his country from a bad government. He lost everything – his house and his money. It was all taken away. Hispages child was left with this family. My mother wanted to have another child very much. And she wanted a daughter. When she saw Elizabeth, she loved her immediately. She wanted to bring Elizabeth up as her own child. She talked to the farmer and his wife about her idea. The farmer and his wife loved the girl, but they agreed.
    [Show full text]
  • La Novia De Frankenstein La Rara Proeza De Mejorar La Obra Inicial Y Acercarse Mucho Al Nivel De Lo Que Se Puede Entender Como Una Obra Maestra
    Una de las obras cumbre del género fantástico FICHA TÉCNICA: Título original: Bride of Frankenstein Nacionalidad: EEUU Año: 1935 Dirección: James Whale Guión: William Hurlbut, John Balderston (sugerido por la novela Frankenstein o el moderno Prometeo de Mary W. Shelley) Producción: Carl Laemmle Jr. Dirección de Fotografía: John Mescall Montaje: Ted Kent Dirección Artística: Charles D. Hall Música: Franz Waxman Maquillaje: Jack Pierce Efectos Especiales: John P. Fulton Reparto: Boris Karloff ( El Monstruo ), Colin Clive (Barón Henry Frankenstein ), Valerie Hobson ( Eli- zabeth ), Ernest Thesiger ( Dr. Septimus Pretorius ), Elsa Lanchester ( Mary W. Shelley / Compañera del Monstruo ), Gavin Gordon ( Lord Byron ), Douglas Walton ( Percy Bysshe Shelley ), Una O'Connor (Minnie ), E.E. Clive ( Burgomaestre ), Lucien Prival (Albert, el Mayordomo ), Dwight Frye ( Karl, el Jo- robado ) Duración: 75 min. (B/N) SINOPSIS: Durante su convalecencia, Henry Frankenstein recibe la visita de un hombre extravagante que dice ser el Dr. Pretorious , quien le pide que colabore con él en sus experimentos para la creación de la vida. Con objeto de animarle a ello, Pretorious le muestra una colección de homúnculos que reviven durante unos segundos un mundo mágico ante la mirada fascinada de Henry . No obstante, Frankenstein no se deja tentar y rehúsa el ofrecimiento. Pero Pretorious contará con una baza inesperada a su favor: El Monstruo . Juntos obligan a Henry a crear una mujer que sea la compañera del monstruo. HOJA INFORMAT IVA Nº 68 Abril 2005 COMENTARIOS: Cuatro años después de su éxito inicial con El Dr. Frankenstein y tras haber rodado, entre otras, la magnífica adaptación cinematográfica de la novela El Hombre Invisible de H.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2009 Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Martha Bellows University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Bellows, Martha, "Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein" (2009). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 129. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/129http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/129 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Martha Bellows Major: English and Spanish Email: [email protected] Title of Project: Categorizing Humans, Animals, and Machines in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Galen Johnson Abstract From Plato to Descartes and Kant and now to modern day, there is a general idea that pervades Western society. This idea is about the uniqueness and superiority of the human being. We are rational and conscious beings that apparently stand alone in the world, separated intellectually from animals and biologically from machines. The relationship between humans, animals, and machines is a tumultuous one and it is not easily definable. For many classical philosophers, this relationship has always been a hierarchy. Humans are on the top and animals and machines fall somewhere below. These beliefs have created a distinct category for the three terms that leaves no room for overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Monster Squad
    The Monster Squad by Alek J. Talevich (Based on the 1987 original film) Working Draft Daschwah LABS Bellingham, WA (626) 590-4765 FADE IN EXT. SEATONVILLE HARBOR - NIGHT The brackish waters of a modest commercial marina, with rows of contract fishing and cargo trawlers hugging the concrete strip of the waterfront and warehouse blocks. Fog hangs low over the water. All's quiet on the night watch, save for the dinging of buoys and slow churn of the tides. INT. HARBORMASTER'S OFFICE The cluttered office of the Harbormaster, manned by a single operator: a night watchman in his late fifties. Hokey nautical memorabilia hugs the walls, a coffee pot brews, and the watchman reads from a dog-eared paperback while seated before several security monitors. NIGHT WATCHMAN (singsong) My father's a poor missionary… he saves pretty women from sin… The silhouette of a man moves across the monitors, unnoticed by the sentry; pacing from one screen to the next, along the perimeter fence. NIGHT WATCHMAN (still singing) … he'll save you a blonde for five dollars… Lord, how the money rolls in. The sentry flips a page, not noticing as the intruder nonchalantly LEAPS over the twelve-foot high fence without missing a step, vanishing from the security cameras' view. CUT TO: 2. EXT. SEATONVILLE HARBOR Leather dress shoes touch down on the corrugated steel roof of a warehouse, as the intruder is revealed: CHARLES RUEGER, somewhere in his forties, bespectacled, his expression haunted. Dressed in a threadbare overcoat and the dirty, ripped trappings of what was once a three-piece suit underneath.
    [Show full text]