Iannis Xenakis and Sieve Theory an Analysis of the Late Music (1984-1993)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iannis Xenakis and Sieve Theory an Analysis of the Late Music (1984-1993) Iannis Xenakis and Sieve Theory An Analysis of the Late Music (1984-1993) A Dissertation Presented in Fulfilmentof the Requirements forthe Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Goldsmiths College, University of London by Dimitrios Exarchos Volume 1 of 2: Text Dissertation Supervisor: Dr Craig Ayrey November 2007 2 Abstract Iannis Xenakis and Sieve Theory An Analysis of the Late Music (1984-1993) Dimitrios Exarchos 2007 This thesis is divided in three parts, the firsttwo of which are theoretical and the third analytical. Part I is an investigation oflannis Xenakis's general theory of composition, the theory of outside-time musical structures. This theory appears in many of Xenakis's writings, sometimes quite idiosyncratically. The aim of this part is to reveal the function of the non-temporal in Xenakis's musical structures, by means of a historical approach through his writings. This exploration serves to unveil certain aspects discussed more thoroughly through a deconstructive approach. The deconstructive is demonstrated in the classificationof musical structures and aims partly at showing the nature of Time in Xenakis's theory. Part II is preoccupied with Xenakis's Sieve Theory. In the earlier writings on Sieve Theory he presented a slightly differentapproach than in the later, where he also provided an analytical algorithm that he developed gradually from the mid 1980s until 1990. The rationale of this algorithm and the pitch-sieves of 1980-1993 guides Part III, which is preoccupied with a methodology of sieve analysis, its application, and an exploration of the employment of sieves in some of Xenakis's compositions of the 1980s. When possible, the analysis takes in consideration the pre-compositional sketches, available at the Archives Xenakis, Bibliotheque Nationale de France. The sketches reveal aspects of the application of Sieve Theory, not included in Xenakis's theoretical writings. 3 As with the application of other theories, Xenakis progressed to less formalised processes. However, this does not mean that Sieve Theory ceased to informthe process of scale-construction. As the conclusion of this dissertation indicates, he employed Sieve Theory in order to achieve structures that conformto his general aesthetic principles, that relate to various degrees of symmetry and periodicity. 4 Contents Acknowledgements 8 .......................................................................................... Abbreviations 9 .................................................................................................. Introduction 10 .................................................................................................. PART I 1 Outside-Time Structures 20 .............................................................................. 1.1 Literature 20 ...................................................................................................... 1.2 Overview 21 ........................................................................................................ 1.3 Symbolic Logic ('Symbolic Music'- 1963) 23 .................................................. 1.4 Two Natures ('La de la de la 28 voie recherche et question' -1965) ............... 1.5 Tomographies Over Time ('Towards Metamusic' 31 a -1965) ....................... 1.6 `Towards Philosophy Music' (1966) 33 a of ...................................................... 1.7 Ontological/Dialectical ('Une 34 note' -1968) .................................................. 1.8 Arts/Sciences: Alloys (1976) 36 ........................................................................... 2 Outside-Time Structures Writing 38 as ............................................................ 2.1 The Third Term 38 ............................................................................................ 2.2 The Critique Serialism 40 of .............................................................................. 2.2.1 General Harmony 40 ......................................................................................... 2.2.2 Magma 42 ........................................................................................................... 2.3 The Temporal Outside-Time 44 as .................................................................... 2.4 Outside-Time Supplement 46 as ........................................................................ 2.5 Symmetry 47 ...................................................................................................... 2.5.1 Series 47 .............................................................................................................. 2.5.2 Non-Retrogradable Rhythms 50 ....................................................................... 2.6 Spacing 51 .......................................................................................................... PART II 3 Sieve Theory 54 .............................................. .................................................... 3.1 The Sieve Eratosthenes 54 of ......................... .................................................... 3.2 Logical Operations 57 .................................... .................................................... 3.2.1 Union 57 ......................................................... .................................................... 3.2.2 Intersection 58 ................................................ .................................................... 3.2.3 Complementation 59 ...................................... .................................................... 3.3 Transcription 60 ............................................. .................................................... 3.3.1 Transcription 61 of unions ............................ .................................................... 3.3.2 Transcription intersections 62 of ....................................................................... 3.4 Types Sieves 63 of .......................................... .................................................... 3.4.1 Symmetry 64 .................................................. .................................................... 5 3.4.1.1 Symmetric Sieves 65 .......................................................................................... 3.4.1.1.1 Symmetric Sieves Even Number Intervals 66 with of ...................................... 3.4.1.1.2 Symmetric Sieves Odd Number Intervals 68 with of ........................................ 3.4.1.2 Asymmetric Sieves 70 ........................................................................................ 3.4.2 Periodicity 71 ..................................................................................................... 3.4.2.1 Prime Sieves 71 .................................................................................................. 3.4.2.2 Composite Asymmetric Sieves 72 ...................................................................... 3.5 Metabolae Sieves (Transformations) 74 of ........................................................ 3.5.1 Residues 74 ......................................................................................................... 3.5.1.1 Inversion 74 ........................................................................................................ 3.5.1.2 Cyclic Transposition 76 ..................................................................................... 3.5.1.3 Variables 79 ........................................................................................................ 3.5.2 Moduli 80 ........................................................................................................... 3.5.3 Unit 81 ................................................................................................................ 4 Sieve Theory Primes 82 and .............................................................................. 4.1 Canonical Form 82 ............................................................................................. 4.2 Limitations 86 .................................................................................................... 4.3 Types Formulae 86 of ........................................................................................ 4.3.1 Decomposed Formula 86 ................................................................................... 4.3.2 Simplified Formula 88 ....................................................................................... 4.4 Program: Generation Points 91 of .................................................................... 4.5 Sieve Theory Sieves 94 and ................................................................................ 4.6 Symmetries/Periodicities 95 ............................................................................... PART III 5 Methodology 101 ................................................................................................ Inner Periodicities Formulae Redundancy 101 5.1 and ......................................... Inner-Periodic Simplified Formula 104 5.2 Construction of the ........................... Analytical Algorithm: Early Stage 107 5.3 ............................................................. 5.4 The Condition Inner Periodicity 110 of ............................................................ 5.5 Inner-Periodic Analysis 112 .............................................................................. 5.6 Interlocking Periodicities 116 ............................................................................ Analytical Algorithm: Final
Recommended publications
  • 00 Title Page
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Arts and Architecture SPATIALIZATION IN SELECTED WORKS OF IANNIS XENAKIS A Thesis in Music Theory by Elliot Kermit-Canfield © 2013 Elliot Kermit-Canfield Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts May 2013 The thesis of Elliot Kermit-Canfield was reviewed and approved* by the following: Vincent P. Benitez Associate Professor of Music Thesis Advisor Eric J. McKee Associate Professor of Music Marica S. Tacconi Professor of Musicology Assistant Director for Graduate Studies *Signatures are on file in the School of Music ii Abstract The intersection between music and architecture in the work of Iannis Xenakis (1922–2001) is practically inseparable due to his training as an architect, engineer, and composer. His music is unique and exciting because of the use of mathematics and logic in his compositional approach. In the 1960s, Xenakis began composing music that included spatial aspects—music in which movement is an integral part of the work. In this thesis, three of these early works, Eonta (1963–64), Terretektorh (1965–66), and Persephassa (1969), are considered for their spatial characteristics. Spatial sound refers to how we localize sound sources and perceive their movement in space. There are many factors that influence this perception, including dynamics, density, and timbre. Xenakis manipulates these musical parameters in order to write music that seems to move. In his compositions, there are two types of movement, physical and apparent. In Eonta, the brass players actually walk around on stage and modify the position of their instruments to create spatial effects.
    [Show full text]
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Vagopoulou, Evaggelia Title: Cultural tradition and contemporary thought in Iannis Xenakis's vocal works General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Cultural Tradition and Contemporary Thought in lannis Xenakis's Vocal Works Volume I: Thesis Text Evaggelia Vagopoulou A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordancewith the degree requirements of the of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts, Music Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Xenakis Performance, Practice, Philosophy
    Exploring Xenakis Performance, Practice, Philosophy Edited by Alfia Nakipbekova University of Leeds, UK Series in Music Copyright © 2019 Vernon Press, an imprint of Vernon Art and Science Inc, on behalf of the author. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Vernon Art and Science Inc. www.vernonpress.com In the Americas: In the rest of the world: Vernon Press Vernon Press 1000 N West Street, C/Sancti Espiritu 17, Suite 1200, Wilmington, Malaga, 29006 Delaware 19801 Spain United States Series in Music Library of Congress Control Number: 2019931087 ISBN: 978-1-62273-323-1 Cover design by Vernon Press. Cover image: Photo of Iannis Xenakis courtesy of Mâkhi Xenakis. Product and company names mentioned in this work are the trademarks of their respective owners. While every care has been taken in preparing this work, neither the authors nor Vernon Art and Science Inc. may be held responsible for any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the information contained in it. Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition. Table of contents Introduction v Alfia Nakipbekova Part I - Xenakis and the avant-garde 1 Chapter 1 ‘Xenakis, not Gounod’: Xenakis, the avant garde, and May ’68 3 Alannah Marie Halay and Michael D.
    [Show full text]
  • Iannis Xenakis, Roberta Brown, John Rahn Source: Perspectives of New Music, Vol
    Xenakis on Xenakis Author(s): Iannis Xenakis, Roberta Brown, John Rahn Source: Perspectives of New Music, Vol. 25, No. 1/2, 25th Anniversary Issue (Winter - Summer, 1987), pp. 16-63 Published by: Perspectives of New Music Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/833091 Accessed: 29/04/2009 05:06 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=pnm. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Perspectives of New Music is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Perspectives of New Music. http://www.jstor.org XENAKIS ON XENAKIS 47W/ IANNIS XENAKIS INTRODUCTION ITSTBECAUSE he wasborn in Greece?That he wentthrough the doorsof the Poly- technicUniversity before those of the Conservatory?That he thoughtas an architect beforehe heardas a musician?Iannis Xenakis occupies an extraodinaryplace in the musicof our time.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Hhowe\Dropbox\Courses
    Iannis Xenakis (1922-2001): Catalogue of Musical Compositions (from www.iannis-xenakis.org) Seven untitled pieces, Menuet, Air populaire, Allegro molto, Mélodie, Andante : 1949-50; piano, unpublished. Six Chansons : 1951; piano; 8’. Dhipli Zyia :1952; duo (vln, vlc); 5’30. Zyia :1952; 2 versions: a) soprano, men’s chorus (minimum 10) and duo (fl, pno); b) soprano, fl, pno; 10’. Trois poèmes : 1952; narrator and pno; unpublished. La colombe de la paix : 1953; alto and 4-voice mixed chorus; unpublished. Anastenaria. Procession aux eaux claires : 1953; mixed chorus (30), men chorus (15) and orchestra (62); 11’. Anastenaria. Le Sacrifice :1953; orchestra (51); 6’. Stamatis Katotakis, chanson de table : 1953; voice and 3-voice men chorus; unpublished. Metastasis : 1953-4; orchestra (60); 7’ Pithoprakta :1955-6; string orchestra (46), 2 trb and perc; 10’ Achorripsis :1956-7; orchestra (21); 7’ Diamorphoses :1957-8; electroacoustic tape. 7’. Concret PH :1958; electroacoustic tape; 2’45". Analogiques A & B :1958-9; string ensemble (9) and electroacoustic tape; 7’30". Syrmos :1959; string ensemble (18 or 36); 14". Duel :1959; 2 orchestras (56 total) and 2 conductors; variable duration (circa 10’). Orient-Occident :1960; electroacoustic tape; 12’. Herma : 1961; for solo piano; 10’ ST/48,1-240162 :1956-62); orchestra (48); 11’ ST/10, 1-080262 : 1956-62; ensemble (10); 12’ ST/4, 1-080262 : 1956-62; string quartet; 11’ Morsima - Amorsima (ST/4, 2-030762) :1956-62); quartet (pno, vln, vlc, db); 11’ Atrées (ST/10, 3-060962) : 1956-62; ensemble (11); 15’. Stratégie : 1962; 2 orchestras (82 total) and 2 conductors; variable duration (10 to 30’) Polla ta dhina :1962; children's chorus (20) and orchestra (48); 6’ Bohor :1962; electroacoustic tape; 21’30".
    [Show full text]
  • SELF-BORROWINGS in the INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC of IANNIS XENAKIS Benoît Gibson : University of Evora / CESEM1 (Portugal), [email protected]
    SELF-BORROWINGS IN THE INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC OF IANNIS XENAKIS Benoît Gibson : University of Evora / CESEM1 (Portugal), [email protected] In Makis Solomos, Anastasia Georgaki, Giorgos Zervos (ed.), Definitive Proceedings of the “ International Symposium Iannis Xenakis ” (Athens, May 2005). Paper first published in A. Georgaki, M. Solomos (éd.), International Symposium Iannis Xenakis. Conference Proceedings, Athens, May 2005, p. 265-274. This paper was selected for the Definitive Proceedings by the scientific committee of the symposium: Anne-Sylvie Barthel-Calvet (France), Agostino Di Scipio (Italy), Anastasia Georgaki (Greece), Benoît Gibson (Portugal), James Harley (Canada), Peter Hoffmann (Germany), Mihu Iliescu (France), Sharon Kanach (France), Makis Solomos (France), Ronald Squibbs (USA), Georgos Zervos (Greece) Abstract As one of the most important composers of the twentieth century, Iannis Xenakis is also known for having used mathematical models in his compositions and for developing a formalization of music. But Xenakis’s compositional processes did not rely only on mathematics. Like many other composers, he borrowed extensively from his own works. These borrowings, which cannot be properly regarded as self-quotations, did not always relate to theoretical problems. Most of the time, they were selected for their particular sonic qualities or transformed in order to create new ones. This presentation examines the extent of self-borrowing in the music of Iannis Xenakis and shows how the composer made use of montage techniques as a means of producing different kinds of objects or textures. INTRODUCTION Iannis Xenakis figures among the most important composers of the twentieth century. Besides an extensive work, he left many writings which reflect his interest in concepts developed by science and philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Περίληψη : a Music Composer of Greek Origin, Coming from a Family of the Greek Diaspora
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Ροβίθη Χαρά Μετάφραση : Αμπούτη Αγγελική Για παραπομπή : Ροβίθη Χαρά , "Xenakis Iannis", Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Εύξεινος Πόντος URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=11573> Περίληψη : A music composer of Greek origin, coming from a family of the Greek Diaspora. During his lifetime, being as a participant of the social, political and cultural life in the years following the Second World War, he followed a course of research and creation serving his vision of art. Iannis Xenakis produced a rich musical, architectural and auctorial work which made him one of the most important progressive creators of the 20th century. Τόπος και Χρόνος Γέννησης 29th of May, 1922 ? (or 1921), Brăila, Romania. Τόπος και Χρόνος Θανάτου 4th of February, 2001, Paris. Κύρια Ιδιότητα Architect, mechanic, composer. 1. The First Years-Basic Studies Iannis Xenakis was born in Brăila of Romania, on the 29th of May, 1922 (the date is uncertain as it is probable that he was born in 1921) of parents who were members of the Greek Diaspora. His father, Klearchos, director of a British import-export company, came from Euboea, and his mother, Fotini Pavlou, came from the island of Limnos. Iannis Xenakis had two younger brothers, Kosmas, an urban planner and a painter, and Iasonas, a philosophy professor. Xenakis was introduced to music by his mother, who was a pianist. It is said that during his early childhood his mother gave him as a present a flute encouraging him to get involved in music. When he was five years old, his mother died from measles and the three children were brought up by French, English and German governesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Experience in Works for Solo Cello by Lachenmann, Xenakis and Ferneyhough: a Performance-Sensitive Approach to Morphosyntactic Musical Analysis
    DOI: 10.1111/musa.12076 CHRISTIAN UTZ TIME-SPACE EXPERIENCE IN WORKS FOR SOLO CELLO BY LACHENMANN, XENAKIS AND FERNEYHOUGH: A PERFORMANCE-SENSITIVE APPROACH TO MORPHOSYNTACTIC MUSICAL ANALYSIS Recent studies in music performance reflect an increasing degree of specialisation: quantifiable methods of performance science, research into the impact of historical performance styles on contemporary practice, performance- oriented analysis and performers’ own perspectives on the music they perform often share common objectives but approach them through radically different channels and methods. In particular, two methodological oppositions frequently coexist unsympathetically rather than communicating with each other: (1) the historical and analytical interest in how musical structure is qualified in particular performances or performance styles often seems incompatible with the quantifiability of tempo, duration and dynamics in recorded music as widely explored in current performance studies; (2) such a rationalisation of performance parameters is often considered to be antagonistic to the inescapable and idiosyncratic forms of ‘intuitive knowledge’ or ‘informed intuition’ (Rink 2002, p. 36) applied by performers in rehearsal and performance. In this essay I plan to tackle the first opposition by means of continuous references to the second. In facing the first opposition, I wish to find ways in which a historically and analytically informed qualification of performed sound structures and quantified data derived from recordings can be brought into a meaningful cross-relation. My case studies here are three significant solo cello works dating from the 1960s and ’70s: Iannis Xenakis’s Nomos Alpha (1966), Helmut Lachenmann’s Pression (1969–70) and Brian Ferneyhough’s TimeandMotionStudyII(1973–6). All three have become classics of the solo cello repertoire despite the exceptional difficulties they pose, and they have been performed and recorded frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complexity of Xenakis's Notion of Space
    The Complexity of Xenakis’s Notion of Space Makis Solomos To cite this version: Makis Solomos. The Complexity of Xenakis’s Notion of Space. In Martha Brech et Ralph Paland, Technische Universität, Berlin, juillet 2014, publiée dans Martha Brech, Ralph Paland (éd.), Kompo- sition für hörbaren Raum. Die frühe elektroakustische Musik und ihre Kontexte / Compositions for Audible Space. The Early Electroacoustic Music and its Contexts, Bilefeld, transcript Verlag, 2015, p. 323-337., 2015, 10.14361/9783839430767-020. hal-01202884 HAL Id: hal-01202884 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01202884 Submitted on 21 Sep 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Complexity of Xenakis’s Notion of Space MAKIS SOLOMOS ABSTRACT The notion of space is crucial to Xenakis’s music and thought. This chapter will offer a global approach, trying to show the complexity and inner rich- ness of this notion. Indeed, there are at least four levels where we can found it. First, there is the ontological and philosophical level. On that level, space is a fundamental notion for Xenakis. In the 1960s he created the notion of »outside-time structures«, which minimizes the importance of time, and in the 1980s he stated that time could be viewed as an epiphenomenal notion, while space would be more fundamental.
    [Show full text]
  • To Graphic Notation Today from Xenakis’S Upic to Graphic Notation Today
    FROM XENAKIS’S UPIC TO GRAPHIC NOTATION TODAY FROM XENAKIS’S UPIC TO GRAPHIC NOTATION TODAY FROM XENAKIS’S UPIC TO GRAPHIC NOTATION TODAY PREFACES 18 PETER WEIBEL 24 LUDGER BRÜMMER 36 SHARON KANACH THE UPIC: 94 ANDREY SMIRNOV HISTORY, UPIC’S PRECURSORS INSTITUTIONS, AND 118 GUY MÉDIGUE IMPLICATIONS THE EARLY DAYS OF THE UPIC 142 ALAIN DESPRÉS THE UPIC: TOWARDS A PEDAGOGY OF CREATIVITY 160 RUDOLF FRISIUS THE UPIC―EXPERIMENTAL MUSIC PEDAGOGY― IANNIS XENAKIS 184 GERARD PAPE COMPOSING WITH SOUND AT LES ATELIERS UPIC/CCMIX 200 HUGUES GENEVOIS ONE MACHINE— TWO NON-PROFIT STRUCTURES 216 CYRILLE DELHAYE CENTRE IANNIS XENAKIS: MILESTONES AND CHALLENGES 232 KATERINA TSIOUKRA ESTABLISHING A XENAKIS CENTER IN GREECE: THE UPIC AT KSYME-CMRC 246 DIMITRIS KAMAROTOS THE UPIC IN GREECE: TEN YEARS OF LIVING AND CREATING WITH THE UPIC AT KSYME 290 RODOLPHE BOUROTTE PROBABILITIES, DRAWING, AND SOUND TABLE SYNTHESIS: THE MISSING LINK OF CONTENTS COMPOSERS 312 JULIO ESTRADA THE UPIC 528 KIYOSHI FURUKAWA EXPERIENCING THE LISTENING HAND AND THE UPIC AND UTOPIA THE UPIC UTOPIA 336 RICHARD BARRETT 540 CHIKASHI MIYAMA MEMORIES OF THE UPIC: 1989–2019 THE UPIC 2019 354 FRANÇOIS-BERNARD MÂCHE 562 VICTORIA SIMON THE UPIC UPSIDE DOWN UNFLATTERING SOUNDS: PARADIGMS OF INTERACTIVITY IN TACTILE INTERFACES FOR 380 TAKEHITO SHIMAZU SOUND PRODUCTION THE UPIC FOR A JAPANESE COMPOSER 574 JULIAN SCORDATO 396 BRIGITTE CONDORCET (ROBINDORÉ) NOVEL PERSPECTIVES FOR GRAPHIC BEYOND THE CONTINUUM: NOTATION IN IANNIX THE UNDISCOVERED TERRAINS OF THE UPIC 590 KOSMAS GIANNOUTAKIS EXPLORING
    [Show full text]
  • TEM Issue 91 Cover and Back Matter
    AN INTERESTING NEW WORK for your STRING ORCHESTRA repertoire MALCOLM WILLIAMSON ANDRZEJ PANUFNIK A Vision of LANDSCAPE Beasts and Gods Duration: circa 6\ mins. Poems by GEORGE BARKER High voice and piano Score 5/- String parts each 1/6 BOOSEY £r HAWKES BOOSEY & HAWKES 295 REGENT STREET LONDON W1A 1BR IANNIS XENAKIS EOIMTA For piano and brass ensemble AKRATA For sixteen wind instruments MO RSI MA-A MO RSI MA For four instruments METASTASEIS For orchestra of sixty-one players PITHOPRAKTA For two trombones, percussion and strings NOMOS ALPHA For violoncello solo SYRMOS For string orchestra HERMA Forpianosolo NUITS For twelve mixed voices ST 48 For forty-eight instruments ST 10 For ten instruments ST 4 For string quartet "lannis Xenakis—THE MAN AND HIS MUSIC"—10/- available from BOOSEY & HAWKES Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 27 Sep 2021 at 07:16:47, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0040298200026656 AARON COPLAND Chamber Music As it fell upon a day Words by for Soprano, Flute and Clarinet Richard Barnefield Duration 5± minutes Full score and parts Quartet for Piano and Strings Duration: 23 minutes Piano score and parts Vitebsk (Study on a Jewish theme) for Violin, Cello and Piano Duration: 11 minutes Piano score and parts BOOSEY €t HAW KES Carte and Co. ltd. Makers of the finest hand crafted Flutes Specialist manufacturers of G Alto Flutes and C Bass Flutes Brochure and "Approach to the Flute" by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidimensional Data-Sets for Sound Applications
    Multidimensional Data-Sets for Sound Applications Ioannis Tsirikoglou Master’s Thesis Institute of Sonology Den Haag May 2012 Acknowledgments I would like to thank: My mentor, Paul Berg. Without his help, comments and support this thesis would not have been realized. All my teachers in the Institute of Sonology: Kees Tazelaar, Richard Barrett, Johan van Kreij, Peter Pabon, Raviv Ganchrow and Joel Ryan. They all provided me with great knowledge and inspiration. My good friends Angel Faraldo and Aurimas Bavarskis for reading and commenting on my thesis. All my colleagues in the Institute of Sonology and my friends (in the Netherlands as well as in Greece). Finally I would especially like to thank my parents for their support and understanding. © Ioannis Tsirikoglou 2012 2 Contents 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………...……..…5 2. Generating Form …………………………………………………………....8 2.1 In Between Music and Architecture ……………………………………..…..8 2.2 Algorithms, Nature and Morphogenesis ………………......…………..…11 2.3 Formalizing Macro and Micro Structures ………………….................14 2.4 Graphic Representations, Complexity and Intuition .........................18 3. Multidimensional Data Sets ……………………………………………. 23 3.1 Wave Terrain Sythesis ………………………………………………………..24 3.2 Virtual Navigation of Parameter Spaces ……………………………..…..29 3.3 From Instrument Design to Compositional Form. Nomos Alpha. …… 32 3.4 Generative Scores and Worlds ……………………………………………. 37 4. Mapping ……………………………………………………………………..40 4.1 Composing Mappings………………………………………………………....40 4.1.1 General……………………………………………………………………………40
    [Show full text]