DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Evaluation of the European Union Humanitarian Aid, 2012-2016 Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Evaluation of the European Union Humanitarian Aid, 2012-2016 Final Report Comprehensive evaluation of the European Union humanitarian aid, 2012-2016 Final report Written by: ICF January 2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations EUROPEAN COMMISSION Comprehensive evaluation of the European Union humanitarian aid, 2012-2016 Final report Key authors: ICF: Jerome Kisielewicz, Petra van Nierop, Inga Pavlovaite, Miriam Deodato, Ilze Feifa, Rossella Nicoletti, Laurence Bedoret, Juliette Mathis, Mélanie Dubuis, Charu Wilkinson. Independent experts: Karen Sherlock, Volker Hüls, Antonella Vitale, Mike Brewin, Kashka Huyton, Bernard Crenn, Francesca Cook. Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations January, 2018 KR-04-18-017-EN-N Comprehensive evaluation of the European Union's humanitarian aid, 2012-2016 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 ISBN 978-92-79-77763-9 doi: 10.2795/119375 © European Union, 2018 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Comprehensive evaluation of the European Union's humanitarian aid, 2012-2016 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................... 5 Executive summary .......................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 20 1.1 Objectives and scope of the evaluation ......................................... 20 1.2 The intervention logic for the EU humanitarian aid activities ............ 20 1.3 Methodological approach and validity of the evaluation results ......... 25 1.4 The structure of the report ......................................................... 33 2 Snapshot of EU’s humanitarian aid activities during the evaluation period ......... 33 2.1 Total humanitarian aid funding 2012-2016 .................................... 33 2.2 EU humanitarian aid funding per country and region, 2012-2016 ..... 35 2.3 Overview of funding per sector, 2012-2016 ................................... 36 2.4 Overview of funding per objective, 2012-2016 ............................... 38 3 Evaluation findings .................................................................................... 40 3.1 Relevance ................................................................................ 40 3.1.1 To what extent did the allocation of the EU humanitarian aid budget consider the needs, actions of other donors and the EU humanitarian aid objectives ? ......................................................................... 40 3.1.2 To what extent does DG ECHO have appropriate, comprehensive and context-adapted strategies in place for addressing regional humanitarian needs and different challenges, including medium and longer-term objectives, where applicable? ..................................... 49 3.1.3 To what extent is DG ECHO’s choice of partnerships appropriate? How could DG ECHO improve in the choice of partners? ......................... 55 3.1.4 To what extent does the configuration of DG ECHO’s field network ensure an added value in terms of efficiency and effectiveness of DG ECHO’s actions? ........................................................................ 60 3.1.5 Relevance of the EU humanitarian aid objectives to the global humanitarian aid needs and context ............................................. 65 3.2 Coherence ................................................................................ 67 3.2.1 Coherence with humanitarian principles ........................................ 67 3.2.2 Internal coherence .................................................................... 73 3.2.3 External coherence .................................................................... 86 3.3 Effectiveness ............................................................................ 99 3.3.1 To what extent has DG ECHO achieved its objectives? .................... 99 3.3.2 Effectiveness of DG ECHO sectoral policies .................................. 112 3.3.3 Visibility of DG ECHO activities .................................................. 115 3.4 Efficiency ............................................................................... 119 3.5 Sustainability .......................................................................... 130 3.6 EU added value ....................................................................... 139 4 Prospective evaluation ............................................................................. 147 4.1 Part 1: what are the implications of the World Humanitarian Summit and the Grand Bargain for DG ECHO’s strategic direction and operating framework? ............................................................................. 147 4.2 Part 2: What are the main challenges and opportunities globally in humanitarian aid delivery and how should these be taken on board by DG ECHO at policy and operational levels? ................................... 155 4.3 Part 3: What are the implications of the ECA audit reports on the African Great Lakes region for the EU humanitarian aid activities? .............. 158 5 Recommendations .................................................................................. 160 Annexes ...................................................................................................... 167 January, 2018 Comprehensive evaluation of the European Union's humanitarian aid, 2012-2016 Annex 1 Cost-effectiveness assessment framework .................................. 167 Annex 2 Full list of interviewed stakeholders ............................................ 167 Annex 3 Methodological notes on the sources and use of the quantitative data ... ............................................................................................ 167 Annex 4 Profile of the respondents to the three surveys ............................ 167 Annex 5 Meta-evaluation ...................................................................... 167 Annex 6 Field reports ........................................................................... 167 Annex 7 Rapid evaluations .................................................................... 167 Annex 8 Relevance .............................................................................. 167 Annex 9 Coherence .............................................................................. 167 Annex 10 EU added value ....................................................................... 167 Annex 11 Effectiveness .......................................................................... 167 Annex 12 Efficiency ............................................................................... 167 Annex 13 Prospective evaluation ............................................................. 167 Annex 14 OPC analysis ........................................................................... 167 Annex 15 Proposal for dissemination ........................................................ 167 Annex 16 Terms of reference .................................................................. 167 January, 2018 Comprehensive evaluation of the European Union humanitarian aid, 2012-2016 List of abbreviations AECID Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation AFD Agence Francaise de Dévelopement AGIR Global Alliance for Resilience Initiative AGL African Great Lakes BNPB National Board for Disaster Management CAR Central African Republic CBT Cash Based Transfer COHAFA Council Working Party on Humanitarian Aid and Food Aid CRRF Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework DAC Development Aid Committee DCI Development Cooperation Instrument DEVCO DG for International Cooperation and Development DFID Department for International Development DG Directorate General DG CLIMA Directorate General for Climate Action DG ECHO Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations DG HOME Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs DIPECHO European Commission Humanitarian Aid department's Disaster Preparedness Programme DRC Democratic Republic of Congo DREF Disaster Relief Emergency Fund DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EAR Emergency Aid Reserve ECA European Court of Auditors ECDPM European Centre for Development Policy Management ECHO DG European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations EDF European Development Fund EDG Emergency Directors Group EEAS European External Action Service EIDHR European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights EiE Education in Emergencies EMC European Medical Corps EN Eastern Neighbourhood ENI European Neighbourhood Instrument ERC Enhanced Response Capacity ERCC Emergency Response Coordination Centre January, 2018 1 Comprehensive evaluation of the European Union humanitarian aid, 2012-2016 ESOP Emergency Support Operational Priorities EU European Union EUAV EU Aid Volunteers EUTF EU Trust Fund ExAR External
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists & Democrats in the European Parliament
    Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists & Democrats in the European Parliament European Parliament S&D Rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Bruxelles www.socialistsanddemocrats.eu [email protected] +32 2 284 5159 The President Brussels, 1st April 2016 European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker Cc: Frans Timmermans - First Vice-President of the European Commission,Federica Mogherini - High Representative of theJonathan European Hill Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, - European Commissioner Pierre Moscovicifor Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union - European Commissioner Neven Mimica for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs - European Commissioner for International Cooperation and Development Re: Public Country-By-Country Reporting on Tax Matters Dear President Juncker, Caro Jean-Claude, I am writing to you with regard to the upcoming proposal on public country-by-country reporting (CBCR) on tax matters that the European Commission is going to make public, together with an impact assessment concerning this measure, on the 12th of April 2016. As you know the European Parliament has been pushing for public CBCR in different occasions1with wide majorities, including recently in the report on the Shareholders' Rights Directive, in the report of2 the special committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures3 Similar in Nature or Effect and in the legislative initiative report on corporate taxation . The European Parliament has therefore been consistently asking for an ambitious instrument in order to improve corporate transparency with regard to tax strategies and to 1 Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 8 July 2015 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2007/36/EC as regards the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement and Directive 2013/34/EU as regards certain elements of the corporate 2governance statement (COM(2014)0213 – C7-0147/2014 – 2014/0121(COD).
    [Show full text]
  • CONCORD Europe High Level Conference Outlook on Inequalities: Three Perspectives to Ensure We Leave No One Behind
    CONCORD Europe High level Conference Outlook on Inequalities: Three perspectives to ensure we leave no one behind 20th of November 2019 Co-hosted by the MEP and Vice-chair of the DEVE Committee, Erik Marquardt Venue: Renaissance Hotel, Brussels Programme 9:00-9:30 Registration and welcome coffee Opening remarks by CONCORD Director, Tanya Cox 9:30-9:45 Welcome by MEP Erik Marquardt 9:45-10:15 Keynote speech by Neven Mimica - European Commissioner tbc 10:15-10:30 Setting the scene: Intervention by Rev. John Patrick Ngoyi - Director of the Justice, Development and Peace Commission in Nigeria Discussion panel on tackling inequalities 10:30-12:00 Presentation of the new CONCORD paper “Inequalities Unwrapped – An urgent call for systemic change” - Isabelle Brachet, ActionAid International ● Annika Söder, Cabinet Secretary to the Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs ● Rev. Fr John Patrick Ngoyi, Director of the Justice, Development and Peace Commission in Nigeria ● Paola Simonetti, Deputy-Director of the Economic and Social policy department, International Trade Unions Confederation ● Elisa Casazza, Project Manager, CSR Europe Concluding Remarks - Alex Prats, Oxfam Intermon 12:00-13:00 Networking Lunch 13:00-14:15 Discussion on Leaving No One Behind Presentation of the Aidwatch 2019 report - Åsa Thomasson, Policy and Advocacy Coordinator, CONCORD Sweden ● Felix Fernandez-Shaw, Director of the Directorate for International Cooperation and Development Policy, European Commission ● Charles Goerens, Member of the Committee on Development, European
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • President High Representative
    First Vice-President High Representative Frans Timmermans Federica Mogherini Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional High Representative of the Union Relations, the Rule of Law and the for Foreign Affairs and Security Poli- Charter of Fundamental Rights cy / Vice-President of the PRESIDENT Commission Vice-President JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER Vice-President Kristalina Georgieva Andrus Ansip Vice-President Vice-President Budget & Human Resources Digital Single Market Vice-President Alenka Bratušek Valdis Dombrovskis Jyrki Katainen Energy Union Euro & Social Dialogue Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Vĕra Jourová Günther Oettinger Pierre Moscovici Marianne Thyssen Corina Creţu Johannes Hahn Justice, Consumers and Gender Digital Economy & Society Economic and Financial Affairs, Employment, Social Affairs, Regional Policy European Neighbourhood Policy Equality Taxation and Customs Skills and Labour Mobility & Enlargement Negotiations Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos Vytenis Andriukaitis Jonathan Hill Elżbieta Bieńkowska Miguel Arias Cañete Neven Mimica Financial Stability, Financial Services and Health & Food Safety Migration & Home Affairs Capital Markets Union Internal Market, Industry, Climate Action & Energy International Cooperation Entrepreneurship and SMEs & Development Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Margrethe Vestager Maroš Šefčovič Cecilia Malmström Karmenu Vella Competition Transport & Space Trade Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Tibor Navracsics Carlos Moedas Phil Hogan Christos Stylianides * The HRVP may ask the Commissioner Education, Culture, Youth and Research, Science Agriculture & Humanitarian Aid & (and other commissioners) to deputise Citizenship and Innovation Rural Development Crisis Management for her in areas related to Commission competence.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Template
    Through a glass darkly 1 Briefing note June 2014 The new European Parliament: what to expect From 22 to 25 May 2014, Europeans went to the polls. Many of them went to express their dissatisfaction. Although the majority of the incoming 751 MEPs remain broadly supportive of the EU, both they and those who need to engage with the European Parliament will have to adapt to the increased power of a disparate anti-EU and anti- establishment minority over the next five years. This briefing provides an overview of the election results* at the EU level and what happens next, further analysis on results in France, Germany, Greece and the UK, a look at the key outgoing and incoming MEPs, and an examination of the selection procedures for the new leaders of the European Commission, European Parliament and European Council. The election results The election saw a marked rise, of about 10%, in the number of MEPs elected from anti-EU and anti-establishment parties from both ends of the political spectrum. They won around 230, or 31%, of the 751 seats, compared to 164, or 21%, of the 766 seats in 2009. What remains to be seen is whether the newly -elected MEPs will join existing, or form new, political groups in the Parliament (see below for more information on the importance of political groups and how they are formed). Despite their decreased numbers, the pro-Europeans remain the dominant force in the European Parliament. Their four groups – the centre-right, the centre-left, the liberals and the greens – won 521, or 69%, of the 751 available seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforms in Lisabon Strategy Implementation
    REFORMS IN LISBON STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION: Economic and Social Dimensions Proceedings CIP zapis dostupan u računalnom katalogu Nacionalne i sveučilišne knjižnice u Zagrebu pod brojem 622331 ISBN 953-6096-41-2 (IMO) ISBN 953-7043-23-1 (FES) REFORMS IN LISBON STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION: Economic and Social Dimensions Proceedings of the International Conference Held in Zagreb, 3 May 2006 Edited by Višnja Samardžija Institute for International Relations - IMO Friedrich Ebert Stiftung - FES Zagreb, 2006 EDITION EUROPE Published by Institute for International Relations, Zagreb - IMO Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Zagreb - FES Editor Višnja Samardžija Reviewers Ana Maria Boromisa Paul Stubbs Technical Assistant Hrvoje Butković Language Editor Charlotte Huntly Layout Vesna Ibrišimović Printed by Smjerokaz 2000 d.o.o. For the Publishers Mladen Staničić Mirko Hempel C o n t e n t s Editorial...................................................................................................... 1 Foreword.................................................................................................... 3 Abbreviations............................................................................................. 5 Višnja Samardžija THE LISBON STRATEGY IN THE WIDER EUROPEAN CONTEXT.. 7 Will Europe win the Lisbon Strategy?.................................................. 9 The Lisbon Strategy as a challenge for the new candidates.................. 17 The Lisbon Strategy and Croatia........................................................... 19 Conclusions..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions Taken by the 10Th PES Congress
    Budapest, 12 th & 13 th June 2015 Decisions taken by the 10th PES Congress 1. Congress organisation • Confirmation of voting rights: 419 voting rights were considered valid (see composition of delegations in Annex 1). • The Congress unanimously adopted the Rules of procedures (Annex 2). • Jan Royall was unanimously elected as Congress chair . Francisco André (PS Portugal), Anniken Huitfelt (DNA Norway), Randel Länts (SDE Estonia) and Karolina Leakovic (SDP Croatia) were unanimously elected tellers . 2. Elections • Election of the PES President : Sergei Stanishev (BSP Bulgaria) was the only candidate. Enrique Baron Crespo decided to withdraw his candidacy during the congress. Sergei Stanishev was elected by the Congress with 69,5% in favour, 16,5% against and 13,3% abstention (Annex 3). • Election of the PES Presidency: The Congress unanimously confirmed the PES Presidency members, as presented by the PES full and associate Member Parties and organisations (Annex 4). • PES Vice-Presidents, Treasurer, Secretary General and Deputy Secretary Generals At the proposal of the new PES President, the newly elected PES Presidency in its meeting of 13 June unanimously elected the following persons as part of the PES leadership. The congress was informed of the Presidency decision. Vice-Presidents - Jean-Christophe Cambadélis (PS France), - Carin Jämtin (SAP Sweden), - Katarína Nevedalová (SMER-SD Slovakia), - Jan Royall (Labour Party UK) Treasurer - Ruairi Quinn (Labour Party Ireland) Secretary General - Achim Post (SPD Germany) The following persons were – at the proposal of the newly elected President - appointed by the PES Presidency as Deputy Secretary Generals : - Giacomo Filibeck (PD Italy) - Marije Laffeber (PvdA, The Netherlands) - Yonnec Polet (PS Belgium) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests Communication FE
    Communication from the European Commission Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests. 2019, July 24th After last December’s announcement of the EU’s initiative to “step up European Action against Deforestation and Forest Degradation”, the European Commission has published yesterday its Communication “on stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests.” The document was presented by Frans Timmermans (first vice-president of the Commission) and Jyrki Katainen, (vice-president of the Commission and Commissioner for Jobs, Growth, Investment & Competitiveness) and praised both by Karmenu Vella (Commissioner for environment, maritime affairs and fisheries) and Neven Mimica (Commissioner for International Development). The Commission starts with the following assessment: Despite the EU’s recent positive trend in the growth of domestical forest cover, the global level still shows a bleak picture of continuing logging and rapidly disappearing forests, in particular regarding tropical primary forests. Indirectly, through consumption and trade, the EU is causing deforestation too as it represents around 10% of final consumption of products associated with deforestation. These products include palm oil, meat, soy, cocoa, rubber, timber and maize in the form of processed products or services. Thus the Communication expressed that deforestation and forest degradation pose a significant risk and challenge that needs to be tackled globally with more actions ”as despite all the efforts, we currently fall short on the conservation and sustainable use of forests”. Therefore the Commission calls for “a variety of regulatory and non-regulatory actions” and proposes a list of initial actions to reach its two-fold obJective of protecting the existing forests and to restore and increase the coverage worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-27 WATCH No.7
    EU-27 WATCH No. 7 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in September 2008 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Sofia Academy of Sciences, Budapest Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Institute for Strategic and International Studies, University, Ankara Lisbon Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Institute of International and European Affairs, Centre d’étude de la vie politique, Université libre de Dublin Bruxelles Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of International Relations and Political Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Science, Vilnius University Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Latvian Institute of International Affairs, International Studies, Nicosia Riga Danish Institute for International Studies, Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, Copenhagen University of Malta Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Netherlands Institute of International Relations European Institute of Romania, Bucharest ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Federal Trust for Education and Research, London Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Foundation
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Statement on the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation
    European Commission - Statement Joint Statement on the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation Brussels, 5 February 2018 On the International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission Federica Mogherini, Commissioner for European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations, Johannes Hahn, Commissioner for International Cooperation and Development, Neven Mimica, and Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, Vĕra Jourová, joined together to reaffirm the EU's strong commitment to eradicate Female Genital Mutilation and made the following statement: "On International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation we confirm our firm resolve to put an end to this practice which is painful, traumatic and causes long-term health consequences. A practice that is nearly always carried out on children. A practice that is a fundamental human rights violation and an extreme form of discrimination against women and girls. Despite the efforts of the European Union and its partners, 200 million girls are still suffering from this violation, which occurs in all parts of the world. It is estimated that the same number of girls are at risk of undergoing this practice by 2030. In Europe itself, girls are still today subject to this illegal practice. The Commission works on its prevention by training professionals, such as judges, asylum officers or doctors who are in contact with girls at risk. We have put laws in place, to ensure that there can be no impunity in Europe for this practice. Female genital mutilation is a crime in all EU Member States and in most of them a person, who bring girls outside the EU to be mutilated can be prosecuted.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Affairs
    Council of the European Union EN 15573/14 (OR. en) PRESSE 584 PR CO 58 PRESS RELEASE 3346th Council meeting Foreign Affairs Brussels, 17 and 18 November 2014 President Federica Mogherini High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affai rs and Security Policy P R E S S Rue de la Loi 175 B – 1048 BRUSSELS Tel.: +32 (0)2 281 6319 Fax: +32 (0)2 281 8026 [email protected] http://www.consilium.europa.eu/press 15573/14 1 EN 17 and 18 November 2014 Main results of the Council Ukraine was the main focus of the Foreign Affairs Council. The Council once more urged all parties to fully implement the Minsk documents. It called in particular for respect of the cease-fire, the withdrawal of all illegal forces and military equipment, as well as for securing the Ukrainian- Russian border. The Ukrainian elections on 26 October were an important step in Ukraine's aspirations to consolidate its democratic development, the Council said. The EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini added: "We also made it clear that we ask the new government to commit to reforms internally as this is crucial to guarantee that EU support and assistance is there. I will pay a visit to Kiev as soon as the new government is formed." Having assessed the situation on the ground, the Council called on the European External Action Service and the Commission to present a proposal on additional listings targeting separatists. A decision is due by the end of this month.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2007
    EU-25/27 WATCH No. 5 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in September 2007 Edited by the Institute for European Politics (IEP), Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Groupe d’Etudes Politiques Européennes, Brussels Bulgarian European Community Studies Association, Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Sofia Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Academy of Sciences, Budapest University, Ankara Institute for Strategic and International Studies, Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Lisbon Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of European Affairs, Dublin Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Institute of International Relations and Political Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Science, Vilnius University International Studies, Nicosia Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Danish Institute for International Studies, Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Copenhagen Riga Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, EuroCollege, University of Tartu University of Malta European Institute of Romania, Bucharest Netherlands Institute of International Relations Federal Trust for Education and Research, London ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Foundation for European Studies, European Institute, Swedish
    [Show full text]