SURVEY of CURRENT BUSINESS October 1936

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SURVEY of CURRENT BUSINESS October 1936 OCTOBER 1936 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE WASHINGTON VOLUME 16 NUMBER 10 THE RAYON INDUSTRY IN THE UNITED STATES has a record of almost uninter- rupted expansion since the development of this product on a commercial scale. Production of yarn in 1935 amounted to 265,000,000 pounds, or considerably more than double the 1929 total; 1936 production will establish another record. Nearly three-fourths of rayon yarn shipments go to broad woven goods manufacturers. Allied products of the industry, such as wrapping tissue, have assumed major importance. The United States was the world's leading pro- ducer in 1935 as in other recent years. The increase in Japanese production during the first half of 1936 was much more rapid than the expansion in United States production. The article on page 14 by J. A. Van Swearingen of the staff of the Survey of Current Business pre- sents a summary of developments in the industry, with particular emphasis on production trends and the major uses of the fiber. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DANIEL C. ROPER, Secretary BUREAU OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE ALEXANDER V. DYE, Director SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS Prepared in the DIVISION OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH ROY G. BLAKEY, Chief M. JOSEPH MEEHAN, Editor Volume 16 OCTOBER 1936 Number 10 CONTENTS SUMMARIES AND CHARTS STATISTICAL D ATA—Continued Page Business indicators 2 Monthly business statistics: Page Business situation summarized 3 Business indexes 22 Graphic comparison of principal data 4 Commodity prices 23 Commodity prices 5 Construction and real estate 24 Domestic trade 6 Domestic trade 25 Employment 7 Employment conditions and wages 27 Finance 8 Finance 31 Real estate and construction 9 Foreign trade 36 Transportation 10 Transportation and communications 37 Review of the— Statistics on individual industries: Automobile and rubber industries 11 Chemicals and allied products 39 Iron and steel industries 12 Electric power and gas 41 Textile industries 13 Foodstuffs and tobacco 42 Fuels and byproducts 45 Leather and products 47 Lumber and manufactures 48 SPECIAL ARTICLE Progress of the domestic rayon industry 14 Metals and manufactures: Iron and steel 49 Machinery and apparatus 51 Nonf errous metals and products 52 STATISTICAL DATA Paper and printing 53 Revised series: Rubber and products 55 Stone, clay, and glass products 56 Hours of work and factory weekly and hourly earnings (25 indus- Textile products 57 tries) July 1914, June 1920-June 1936; Annalist indexes of Transportation equipment 58 business activity, January 1923-July 1936 17, 20 Canadian statistics 60 Weekly business statistics through September 26 21 General index Inside back cover Subscription price of the SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS is 31-50 a year. Single-copy price: Monthly, 10 cents; weekly, 5 cents. Foreign subscriptions, 33, including weekly supplements. Make remittances only to Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. 94948—36 1 1 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS October 1936 Business Indicators 1923-25=100 INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION FACTORY EMPLOYMENT AND PAYROLLS 125 125 100 100 \ EMPLOYMENT (Adjusted) y \ 75 \ /-\ 1 75 Adjusted e 50 50 PAYROLLS (Unadjusted) 25 25 0 i II i 11 i I ii I Mill I | | M 1 1 II1I I 1 1 0 i i i i i 1 i i i i i llllllllMI 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 FREIGHT CAR LOADINGS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AWARDED 125 125 \ 100 100 e L.C.L. (Adjusted) \ 75 7 75 \ ^^ 50 50 v\ / W TOTAL (Ac \ TOTAL (Aqiusted)*/ ^\—S _ 25 25 V / V —• itSftEStDENn, U (Ac/justed) 0 MM lllll II \ | M 1 1 I1t \ ' 1 1 » M 1 II II 1 0 II | M 1 M | 1 1llllllllMI \ 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 M DEPARTMENT STORE SALES WHOLESALE PRICES 125 125 V • 100 100 ALL COMMOLVT/ES \ \ 75 75 •^•^s^ TOTAL -y^ Adjusted) 9 \ <*+*~r FARM PRODUCTS 50 50 25 25 0 i i i i I 1 i I 1 l l11111111111 llllllllMI 0 M 1 II 1 | | | 1 i| i I I I 1 II I I iII 11 1 1 1 1111 FEDERAL RESERVE MEMBER BANK LOANS* BANK DEBITS OUTSIDE NEW YORK CITY 150 150 \ 125 125 100 N 100 N TOTAL;? \ f 75 L \ 75 V 50 50 t~ALL OTHER (Commercial) 1 3 0 M M 1 1 M 1 1 1 ..... i ' o llllllllMI 1 1 II 1 1 M 1I I1 I 11 I 111 111 1 I929'3O*3I^Z*33 1934 1935 1936 I9Z9'3O'3I "3Z'33 1934 1935 1936 ADJUSTED FOR SEASONAL VAR/AT/ON * REPORT/NG MEMBER BANKS D.D. '8639 J.M. October 1936 SURVEY OP CURRENT BUSINESS Business Situation Summarized USINESS activity during the third quarter made a The failure of the usual seasonal recession in con- B substantial advance, with gains in industrial pro- struction contracts awarded to materialize during the duction, construction activity, retail trade, and freight summer months indicates that the trend in the build- traffic. While the broad nature of the improvement ing industry is still definitely upward. While projects was of outstanding interest, it is significant that further financed by public funds increased considerably, pri- progress was made in those directions in which capital vately financed work did not show the customary outlays are important, e. g., plant expansions, ma- seasonal decline. chinery installations, railway-equipment building, and Retail sales during the quarter increased on a sea- residential construction. sonally adjusted basis, and were considerably in excess Industrial production for the period was one-fifth of the sales in the corresponding months of 1935. July larger than the corresponding quarter of 1935, and was was the best month of the period according to the only about one-tenth below the 1929 average. Output adjusted indexes, but sales throughout the quarter of the manufacturing industries, on a seasonally cor- benefited from the further rise in consumer income and rected basis, was larger than for any quarter subsequent the distribution of Government funds in settlement of to 1929. the veterans' bonus. Aggregate retail sales in rural Steel output increased during this period, contrary areas have not been affected to a major degree by the to seasonal expectations, and at the end of September drought; actual cash farm income, at least during daily average steel production was the highest since July and August, increased more than seasonally as the early months of 1930. This improved demand for a result of the higher prices of farm products and some steel is a reflection of the expanding output of the dur- acceleration in the marketing of available supplies. able-goods industries generally. Automobile manu- Prices of nonfarm products also tended to advance facturers required smaller quantities of steel in theduring the quarter. past quarter as production gradually declined to the The trend of employment continued upward during seasonal low in the latter part of September when the summer months. The seasonally adjusted index assembly operations of most companies were suspended. of factory employment advanced nearly 3 percent from Manufacturers of building materials have had the most June to August, the latter month being the most recent active quarter in several years. Production of textiles for which data are available. has risen sharply. MONTHLY BUSINESS INDEXES Factory em- Freight- Retail sales Foreign Cash farm Industrial production ployment value, trade, value, and pay rolls car loadings adjusted adjusted * income > Mer- Unadjusted 1 Adjusted » chan- Total dise, l is If Year and month Co a i! I V f f Monthly Monthly Monthly average, 1923-25=100 1929-31 Monthly average, 1923-25=100 average, average, 100 1924-29=100 1926-100 1929: August. _. 122 122 121 121 122 115 107.2 112.0 107 106 111 129.0 109 119 143.5 122 113.5 108.5 96.3 1930: August 90 88 101 90 88 96 88.2 83.3 89 95 102 95.9 85 70 106.2 81 79.5 81.0 84.3 1931: August 78 77 82 78 78 79 76.8 65.9 72 86 89 76.5 47 54 83.8 59 50.0 49.5 72.1 1932: August.. __. 59 58 66 60 59 65 60.0 40.3 51 68 64 58.5 31 29 59.6 30 38.5 38.5 65.2 1933: August 90 89 95 91 91 91 76.5 56.4 61 69 74 75.2 38 50 62.7 24 49.5 51.0 69.5 1934: August 73 71 83 73 72 80 79.4 61.7 59 65 76 79.2 49 39 68.0 27 62.5 65.0 76.4 1935: August 87 87 85 87 88 81 81.8 69.1 60 64 77 92.8 49 54 78.8 38 67.0 64.5 80.5 September 90 89 92 90 91 87 81.9 71.7 62 65 81 104.8 50 53 76.1 43 76.5 66.0 80.7 October 97 96 100 65 95 93 83.7 74.3 64 64 78 104.6 48 58 85.4 95.0 69.0 80.5 November 97 98 95 97 98 92 84.8 73.7 66 64 81 103.7 62 52 84.6 79.0 69.5 80.6 December.. 96 95 96 104 104 101 85.6 75.6 71 66 83 109.8 56 94.7 72.5 67.0 80.9 1936: January 95 95 99 98 97 103 84.8 71.9 70 64 81 96.3 51 88.7 65.0 66.5 80.6 February , 95 93 106 94 91 110 83.8 72.0 70 62 83 93.0 53 80.0 53.0 63.0 80.6 March 96 97 89 93 93 95 84.2 75.5 66 62 84 106.7 51 90.6 59.5 67.5 79.6 April 103 105 94 100 99 105 84.9 77.2 69 63 84 109.9 53 88.7 58.5 69.5 79.7 May__ 105 105 100 101 100 101 85.8 78.5 70 64 87 113.3 56 86.2 64.0 72.5 78.6 June 104 105 100 103 104 99 86.3 78.7 70 66 87 112.4 55 95.7 69.5 80.0 79.2 July 104 105 101 107 108 101 87.7 77.8 73 67 91 114.7 54 94.4 84.0 88.0 80.5 August 105 106 103 107 108 9S 88.6 81.0 70 67 87 111.9 51 86.7 75.5 74.5 81.6 Monthly average, January through August: 1934 82 81 86 79.6 62.1 62 66 69.4 51.3 74.0 1935 88 88 88 81.0 67.4 61 64 84.
Recommended publications
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarrow March
    80th Anniversary of the Jarrow March 5-31 October 1936 The March After suffering years of high unemployment and deprived social conditions, it was decided by the Jarrow Borough Council on 20 July 1936 to present a petition to Parliament asking for the re-establishment of industry in the town. To deliver it, a deputation of 200 men from Jarrow would march 300 miles to London, raising awareness of the town’s situation. The march was referred to as a “crusade”, partly to emphasise the seriousness of the situation and partly to distinguish themselves from the “hunger marches” carried out by the National Unemployed Worker’s Movement during the 1920s and 30s. The NUWM had Communist connections, and the Jarrow crusade was firmly non-partisan. The march attracted broad local support, including that of the local political parties (Labour, Conservative and Liberal), and the marchers included Labour, Liberal, Conservative and Communist supporters. The town could not spend taxpayers’ money on the demonstration, but about 200,000 letters were sent to other corporations, trade unions and cooperative societies, raising money for a march fund. The initial target was £800; by 13 October the fund contained £850, and ultimately nearly double the target amount was raised. The marchers left Jarrow on 5 October 1936. They carried blue and white banners and the petition, bearing 11,000 signatures, bound in blue hand- tooled leather and kept in an oak box with gold lettering. Only men were appointed to march, having first been medically checked by the Local Medical Officer; however, they were accompanied for much of the journey by the MP for Jarrow, Ellen Wilkinson.
    [Show full text]
  • Download OCTOBER 1936.Pdf
    ",x -mmmli:ij;Qj ,,0( li:ij "'It "fA "'It "'X "'Itjij "'Itm"'Itmmmmmmmmmmmmmmme--mm 'Olt "'It"'It "'It "'It "'It "'It "'It lUlt "'It lUJf. lUJf. "'Jf."'It lUJf. MIt lilt)I{U{ ;me j(ij"'It "'It III m m III ; I m F B I III m IIIIt! "If.!,... 'ox III LAW ENFORCEMENT III III I� II BULLETIN I 1m �I mlli m"'X ä Á III m è! I",,, "'X III - I� III v." III e A'1t "'It I!J r_ e ".x 'ox III m m_Ii m)I{')I( III III III III III III m åæ III J i;' J 1m �J I Hugh Gant is charged by complaint filed before United States ! "'It Commissioner at Pensacola, Florida, March 7, 1936, with the rob- ix III lttl bery of the Dixie County State Bank, Cross City, Florida, insured r, ã iti by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation of $4,004.40 on Jan- :, It!' uary 14, 1936. Gant was also indicted on September 17, 1932 by a ifS é'x Federal Grand Jury at Mobile, Alabama, for violation of the Na- :ix "" m tiona1 Motor Vehicle Theft Act. He is the subject of Identifi- ,,: " III cation Order No. 1358, issued by the Federal Bureau of Investiga- r,... III tion, and is an associate of Alva Dewey Hunt, subject of Identifi- I m cation Order No. 1399, issued by this Bureau. i III III f.� 1I1tllrral'iurrau of 1Jnutsttgatton Ii iii lltntttb tatr!i Itpartment of iJusttre iii 1m 1m �J Jon £bgar )loourr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Party and the Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939
    1 Britain and the Basque Campaign of 1937: The Government, the Royal Navy, the Labour Party and the Press. To a large extent, the reaction of foreign powers dictated both the course and the outcome of the Civil War. The policies of four of the five major protagonists, Britain, France, Germany and Italy were substantially influenced by hostility to the fifth, the Soviet Union. Suspicion of the Soviet Union had been a major determinant of the international diplomacy of the Western powers since the revolution of October 1917. The Spanish conflict was the most recent battle in a European civil war. The early tolerance shown to both Hitler and Mussolini in the international arena was a tacit sign of approval of their policies towards the left in general and towards communism in particular. During the Spanish Civil War, it became apparent that this British and French complaisance regarding Italian and German social policies was accompanied by myopia regarding Fascist and Nazi determination to alter the international balance of power. Yet even when such ambitions could no longer be ignored, the residual sympathy for fascism of British policy-makers ensured that their first response would be simply to try to divert such ambitions in an anti-communist, and therefore Eastwards, direction.1 Within that broad aim, the Conservative government adopted a general policy of appeasement with the primary objective of reaching a rapprochement with Fascist Italy to divert Mussolini from aligning with a potentially hostile Nazi Germany and Japan. Given the scale of British imperial commitments, both financial and military, there would be no possibility of confronting all three at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • C.6.M.5.1936. Geneva, January 2Nd,1936<, NUMERICAL LIST OF
    LEAGUE OF NATIONS (Communicated to the Members of the League.) C.6.M.5.1936. Geneva, January 2nd,1936<, NUMERICAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED TO THE MEMBERS OF THE LEAGUE No.12 (December 1935) Officiel number S U B J E__C T C.462(d).M,198(d).1934.XI ® Estimated world requirements of dangerous drugs in 1955,- 4th Supplement to the statement of the Supervisory Body. C.445(1).M.233(1).1935.IX Convocation of the London Nava 1 Conf e ren c e_, - Letters from the Government of the United Kingdom (October 24 and November 30,1935) and replies from the Secretary-General (Octo­ ber 30 and December 2,1935). C .458.M.240.1935.VIII Advisory and Technical Comraittee for communi­ cations and transit.-- (19th bession, November 1935.) . - Records. C.462.M.242.1935. Numerical list of documents distributed_to the Members of the League,- No.il (November 1935). C.463.M.243,1935„V and Annex @3 Case Lo singer & Co. Sw i tz_e r] .and/Yugos lav la. - Nore by the Secretary-General and Application instituting proceedings from the Swiss Govern­ ment to the Permanent Court of International Justifie. (November 23,1935). @ Confidential document. C.P.J.I.,Distr. 3420 - 2 - Cv464.M.244.1935.Ill and Annex @ In te r-G_) vernmen t al Conference on. _ b i_o1 o^ioal ste.ndardJ. sati on J October 1935).- I-lote by the Secretary-General and report. C.467.M.245,1935.VII Dlsp ute bet ween Et h lopi a. a rid _It aly Tel eg ram from the Ethiopian Government (December 2, 1935), C.469,IVU246» 1935»V and Erratum to numbering, @@ Composition of the_ Çhamb er _ f or Suinma ry_ Pro ce - du rn_ o f the P e rmane nt_ Court of International _ Justice.- Note by the éucretary-Generaï.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Civil War (1936–39)
    12 CIVIL WAR CASE STUDY 1: THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR (1936–39) ‘A civil war is not a war but a sickness,’ wrote Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. ‘The enemy is within. One fights almost against oneself.’ Yet Spain’s tragedy in 1936 was even greater. It had become enmeshed in the international civil war, which started in earnest with the Bolshevik revolution. From Antony Beevor, The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936–1939 , 2006 The Spanish Civil War broke out in 1936 after more than a century of social, economic and political division. Half a million people died in this conflict between 1936 and 1939. As you read through this chapter, consider the following essay questions: Ģ Why did a civil war break out in Spain in 1936? Ģ How significant was the impact of foreign involvement on the outcome of the Spanish Civil War? General Francisco Franco, the Ģ What were the key effects of the Spanish Civil War? leader who took Nationalist forces to victory in the Spanish Civil War. Timeline of events – 1820–1931 1820 The Spanish Army, supported by liberals, overthrows the absolute monarchy and makes Spain a constitutional monarchy in a modernizing revolution 1821 Absolute monarchy is restored to Spain by French forces in an attempt to reinstate the old order 1833 In an attempt to prevent a female succession following the death of King Ferdinand, there is a revolt by ‘Carlists’. The army intervenes to defeat the Carlists, who nevertheless remain a strong conservative force in Spanish politics (see Interesting Facts box) 1833–69 The army’s influence in national politics increases during the ‘rule of the Queens’ 1869–70 Anarchist revolts take place against the state 1870–71 The monarchy is overthrown and the First Republic is established 1871 The army restores a constitutional monarchy 1875–1918 During this period the constitutional monarchy allows for democratic elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, Thursday, October 29, 1936
    A % S Vi* FEDERAL REGISTER •Ä ^ j & VOLUME I '934 NUMBER 163 W ashington, Thursday, October 29, 1936 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. of Agriculture to be affixed in the city of Washington, Dis­ trict of Columbia, this 27th day of October 1936. E xecutive Order [seal] W. R. G regg, DESIGNATION OP THE DIRECTOR OP THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TO Acting Secretary of Agriculture. ACT AS SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR [F. R. Doc. 3143—Filed, October 28,1936; 11:51 a. m.] By virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 179 of the Revised Statutes (5 U. S. C., sec. 6), I hereby authorize and direct Dr. W. C. Mendenhall, Director SR—B-5, Supplement (c) of the Geological Survey, to perform the duties of the Sec­ 1936 Agricultural Conservation P rogram—Southern R egion retary of the Interior during the absence or sickness from October 27, 1936 to November 3, 1936, inclusive, of the BULLETIN NO. 5 Secretary of the Interior, the Under Secretary of the In­ Supplement (c) terior, the First Assistant Secretary of the- Interior and the Assistant Secretary of the Interior. Southern Region Bulletin No. 5 is hereby amended by add­ ing at the end thereof the following: Executive Order No. 7277 of January 17, 1936, is modified Where an application for payment is made covering land accordingly. on which cotton was grown in 1936 and no cotton soil-deplet­ F ranklin D R oosevelt ing base could be established for such farm in 1936 pursuant T he White H ouse, to part HI of Southern Region Bulletin No.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama Canal Record
    MHOBiaaaan THE PANAMA CANAL RECORD VOLUME 31 m ii i ii ii bbwwwuu n—ebbs > ii h i 1 1 nmafimunmw Panama Canal Museum Gift ofthe UNIV. OF FL. LIB. - JUL 1 2007 j Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/panamacanalr31193738isth THE PANAMA CANAL RECORD PUBLISHED MONTHLY UNDER THE AUTHORITY AND SUPER- VISION OF THE PANAMA CANAL AUGUST 15, 1937 TO JULY 15, 1938 VOLUME XXXI WITH INDEX THE PANAMA CANAL BALBOA HEIGHTS, CANAL ZONE 1938 THE PANAMA CANAL PRESS MOUNT HOPE, CANAL ZONE 1938 For additional copies of this publication address The Panama Canal, Washington, D.C., or Balboa Heights, Canal Zone. Price of bound volumes, $1.00; for foreign postal delivery, $1.50. Price of current subscription, $0.50 a year, foreign, $1.00. ... .. , .. THE PANAMA CANAL RECORD OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE PANAMA CANAL PUBLISHED MONTHLY Subscription rates, domestic, $0.50 per year; foreign, $1.00; address The Panama Canal Record, Balboa Heights, Canal Zone, or, for United States and foreign distribution, The Panama Canal, Washington, D. C. Entered as second-class matter February 6, 1918, at the Post Office at Cristobal, C. Z., under the Act of March 3, 1879. Certificate— direction of the Governor of The By Panama Canal the matter contained herein is published as statistical information and is required for the proper transaction of the public business. Volume XXXI Balboa Heights, C. Z., August 15, 1937 No. Traffic Through the Panama Canal in July 1937 The total vessels of all kinds transiting the Panama Canal during the month of July 1937, and for the same month in the two preceding years, are shown in the following tabulation: July 1937 July July Atlantic Pacific 1935 1936 to to Total Pacific Atlantic 377 456 257 200 457 T.nnal commerrifl 1 vessels ' 52 38 30 32 62 Noncommercial vessels: 26 26 22 22 44 2 2 1 1 For repairs 2 1 State of New York 1 Total 459 523 310 255 565 1 Vessels under 300 net tons, Panama Canal measurement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1935 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1935 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, D. C., September 1, 1936. SIR: Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (r) of section 12B of the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the honor to submit its annual report. Respectfully, Leo T. Crowley, Chairman. T h e P r e s id e n t o f t h e S e n a t e T h e Sp e a k e r o f t h e H o u s e o f R epresentatives Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................................................................................................. 3 PART ONE OPERATIONS OF THE CORPORATION DURING THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1935 Inauguration of permanent plan of insurance of bank deposits.......................... 7 Organization and staff.......................................................................................................... 8 Financial aspects of the Corporation............................................................................. 9 Payments.to depositors in suspended insured banks............................................... 11 Liquidation of insured
    [Show full text]
  • The Jarrow March Booklet 1-10-14.Pdf
    Subject Support History Developing students’ critical thinking skills Case study: The Jarrow March, October 1936 October, 2014 Efforts have been made to trace and acknowledge copyright holders. In cases where a copyright has been inadvertently overlooked, the copyright holders are requested to contact the PDST History Administrator, Esther Herlihy, [email protected] © 2014 Cultural and Environmental Education, Professional Development Service for Teachers (PDST), Dublin West Education Centre, Tallaght, Dublin 24 01-4528018, 01-4528010, [email protected], www.pdst.ie © PDST, 2014 1 Professional Development Service for Teachers (PDST) Subject Support History Contact details Administrator Esther Herlihy Telephone (046) 9078382 Fax (046) 9078385 E-mail [email protected] Address Navan Education Centre, Athlumney, Navan, Co. Meath Note: Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the historical data contained herein. Any inadvertent errors are regretted. © PDST, 2014 2 CONTENTS Page Developing students’ critical thinking skills: The Jarrow March, October 1936: 4 The enquiry-focused approach 4 Linking your work on the case study to the National Literacy Strategy 5 A contextual overview of the case study 6 Glossary of important terms: develop your historical literacy skills 7 Biographical notes 9 Timeline of important developments 12 Map of Jarrow March route 13 The Jarrow March, October 1936: a possible line of enquiry 14 A possible hook: an online film clip 14 Transcript of the audio element of the film clip 15 Worksheet:
    [Show full text]
  • 1935 Sanctions Against Italy: Would Coal and Crude Oil Have Made a Difference?
    1935 SANCTIONS AGAINST ITALY: WOULD COAL AND CRUDE OIL HAVE MADE 1 A DIFFERENCE? CRISTIANO ANDREA RISTUCCIA LINACRE COLLEGE OXFORD OX1 3JA GREAT BRITAIN Telephone 44 1865 721981 [email protected] 1 Thanks to (in alphabetical order): Dr. Leonardo Becchetti, Sergio Cardarelli (and staff of the ASBI), Criana Connal, John Fawcett, Prof. Charles Feinstein, Dr. James Foreman-Peck, Paola Geretto (and staff of the ISTAT library and archive), Gwyneira Isaac, Clare Pettitt, Prof. Maria Teresa Salvemini, Prof. Giuseppe Tattara, Leigh Shaw-Taylor, Prof. Gianni Toniolo, Dr. Marco Trombetta, and two anonymous referees who made useful comments on a previous version of this paper. The responsibility for the contents of the article is, of course, mine alone. ABSTRACT This article assesses the hypothesis that in 1935 - 1936 the implementation of sanctions on the export of coal and oil products to Italy by the League of Nations would have forced Italy to abandon her imperialistic war against Ethiopia. In particular, the article focuses on the claim that Britain and France, the League’s leaders, could have halted the Italian invasion of Ethiopia by means of coal and oil sanctions, and without the help of the United States, or recourse to stronger means such as a military blockade. An analysis of the data on coal consumption in the industrial census of 1937 - 1938 shows that the Italian industry would have survived a League embargo on coal, provided that Germany continued her supply to Italy. The counterfactual proves that the effect of an oil embargo was entirely dependent on the attitude of the United States towards the League’s action.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Government and the Rhineland Crisis”
    “The British Government and the Rhineland Crisis” Benjamin Thomas Reynolds Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of History (by Thesis Only) October 2010 School of Historical Studies The University of Melbourne Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to re-examine the historiographical debate concerning the response of the British Government to the German remilitarization of the Rhineland on 7 March 1936 in light of the recent resurgence of ‘traditional’ interpretations of the crisis. The traditional view argues that the Rhineland Crisis represented an opportunity for Britain and France to prevent the Second World War by using their armed forces to intimidate Hitler. By not opposing the weaker Wehrmacht in 1936, the British and French response, it is argued, encouraged Hitler’s later foreign policy demands. Despite ‘revisionist’ writers having uncovered evidence that Hitler was not prepared to withdraw his forces from the Rhineland and that efforts to do so would have provoked a war in Europe in 1936, the revisionist view has enjoyed a recent resurgence. This thesis investigates Britain’s social, economic, military and diplomatic situation between 1919 and 1936 and explores how these affected Britain’s response to the Rhineland Crisis. The thesis makes extensive use of archival records, especially the minutes from the Cabinet meetings held during the crisis. My analysis of this material leads to the conclusion that because of the social and economic crises of the inter- war years and the risk of simultaneous conflicts with other powers Britain did not possess sufficient armed forces to risk war with Germany in March 1936; the efforts of the Cabinet to reach a negotiated settlement can therefore be regarded as justified.
    [Show full text]