Mantle Convection and the Thermal Structure of the Plates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 6 Natural Convection in a Large Channel with Asymmetric
Chapter 6 Natural Convection in a Large Channel with Asymmetric Radiative Coupled Isothermal Plates Main contents of this chapter have been submitted for publication as: J. Cadafalch, A. Oliva, G. van der Graaf and X. Albets. Natural Convection in a Large Channel with Asymmetric Radiative Coupled Isothermal Plates. Journal of Heat Transfer, July 2002. Abstract. Finite volume numerical computations have been carried out in order to obtain a correlation for the heat transfer in large air channels made up by an isothermal plate and an adiabatic plate, considering radiative heat transfer between the plates and different inclination angles. Numerical results presented are verified by means of a post-processing tool to estimate their uncertainty due to discretization. A final validation process has been done by comparing the numerical data to experimental fluid flow and heat transfer data obtained from an ad-hoc experimental set-up. 111 112 Chapter 6. Natural Convection in a Large Channel... 6.1 Introduction An important effort has already been done by many authors towards to study the nat- ural convection between parallel plates for electronic equipment ventilation purposes. In such situations, since channels are short and the driving temperatures are not high, the flow is usually laminar, and the physical phenomena involved can be studied in detail both by means of experimental and numerical techniques. Therefore, a large experience and much information is available [1][2][3]. In fact, in vertical channels with isothermal or isoflux walls and for laminar flow, the fluid flow and heat trans- fer can be described by simple equations arisen from the analytical solutions of the natural convection boundary layer in isolated vertical plates and the fully developed flow between two vertical plates. -
Archimedean Proof of the Physical Impossibility of Earth Mantle Convection by J. Marvin Herndon Transdyne Corporation San Diego
Archimedean Proof of the Physical Impossibility of Earth Mantle Convection by J. Marvin Herndon Transdyne Corporation San Diego, CA 92131 USA [email protected] Abstract: Eight decades ago, Arthur Holmes introduced the idea of mantle convection as a mechanism for continental drift. Five decades ago, continental drift was modified to become plate tectonics theory, which included mantle convection as an absolutely critical component. Using the submarine design and operation concept of “neutral buoyancy”, which follows from Archimedes’ discoveries, the concept of mantle convection is proven to be incorrect, concomitantly refuting plate tectonics, refuting all mantle convection models, and refuting all models that depend upon mantle convection. 1 Introduction Discovering the true nature of continental displacement, its underlying mechanism, and its energy source are among the most fundamental geo-science challenges. The seeming continuity of geological structures and fossil life-forms on either side of the Atlantic Ocean and the apparent “fit’ of their opposing coastlines led Antonio Snider-Pellegrini to propose in 1858, as shown in Fig. 1, that the Americas were at one time connected to Europe and Africa and subsequently separated, opening the Atlantic Ocean (Snider-Pellegrini, 1858). Fig. 1 The opening of the Atlantic Ocean, reproduced from (Snider-Pellegrini, 1858). 1 Half a century later, Alfred Wegener promulgated a similar concept, with more detailed justification, that became known as “continental drift” (Wegener, 1912). Another half century later, continental drift theory was modified to become plate tectonics theory (Dietz, 1961;Hess, 1962;Le Pichon, 1968;Vine and Matthews, 1963). Any theory of continental displacement requires a physically realistic mechanism and an adequate energy source. -
(2 Points Each) 1. the Velocity Of
GG 101, Spring 2006 Name_________________________ Exam 2, March 9, 2006 A. Fill in the blank (2 points each) 1. The velocity of an S-wave is ______lower_________ than the velocity of a P-wave. 2. What type of seismic wave is being recorded by the above diagram? A __P__ wave. 3. The most voluminous layer of Earth is the ___mantle_________. 4. The rigid layer of Earth which consists of the crust and uppermost mantle is called the __ lithosphere__________. 5. Which of the major subdivisions of Earth's interior is thought to be liquid? ____outer core________. 6. When the giant ice sheets in the northern hemisphere melted after the last ice age, the Earth's crust ____rebounded____ because a large weight was removed. Name _______________________________ GG 101 Exam 2 Page 2 7. The process described in question 6 is an example of ___isostasy____. 8. Earth's dense core is thought to consist predominantly of ____iron________. 9. The island of Hawaii experiences volcanism because it is located above a(n) ___hot spot_________. 10. The Himalaya Mountains were caused by ___collision__ between ___India__________ and Asia. 11. ___Folds____ are the most common ductile response to stress on rocks in the earth’s crust. 12. ___Faults___ are the most common brittle response to stress on rocks in the earth’s crust. 13. What types of faults are depicted in the cross section shown above? ___thrust_______ faults. Name _______________________________ GG 101 Exam 2 Page 3 14. The structure shown in the above diagram is a(n) ____anticline_____. 15. The name of a fold that occurs in an area of intense deformation where one limb of the fold has been tilted beyond the vertical is called a(n) ____overturned____ fold. -
Forced and Natural Convection
FORCED AND NATURAL CONVECTION Forced and natural convection ...................................................................................................................... 1 Curved boundary layers, and flow detachment ......................................................................................... 1 Forced flow around bodies .................................................................................................................... 3 Forced flow around a cylinder .............................................................................................................. 3 Forced flow around tube banks ............................................................................................................. 5 Forced flow around a sphere ................................................................................................................. 6 Pipe flow ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Entrance region ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Fully developed laminar flow ............................................................................................................... 8 Fully developed turbulent flow ........................................................................................................... 10 Reynolds analogy and Colburn-Chilton's analogy between friction and heat -
Convectional Heat Transfer from Heated Wires Sigurds Arajs Iowa State College
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1957 Convectional heat transfer from heated wires Sigurds Arajs Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Arajs, Sigurds, "Convectional heat transfer from heated wires " (1957). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 1934. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/1934 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONVECTIONAL BEAT TRANSFER FROM HEATED WIRES by Sigurds Arajs A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR 01'' PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Physics Signature was redacted for privacy. In Chapge of K or Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduate College Iowa State College 1957 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS 3 A. Basic Principles of Heat Transfer in Fluids 3 B. Heat Transfer by Convection from Horizontal Cylinders 10 C. Influence of Electric Field on Heat Transfer from Horizontal Cylinders 17 D. Senftleben's Method for Determination of X , cp and ^ 22 III. APPARATUS 28 IV. PROCEDURE 36 V. RESULTS 4.0 A. Heat Transfer by Free Convection I4.0 B. Heat Transfer by Electrostrictive Convection 50 C. -
Forced Convection Heat Transfer Convection Is the Mechanism of Heat Transfer Through a Fluid in the Presence of Bulk Fluid Motion
Forced Convection Heat Transfer Convection is the mechanism of heat transfer through a fluid in the presence of bulk fluid motion. Convection is classified as natural (or free) and forced convection depending on how the fluid motion is initiated. In natural convection, any fluid motion is caused by natural means such as the buoyancy effect, i.e. the rise of warmer fluid and fall the cooler fluid. Whereas in forced convection, the fluid is forced to flow over a surface or in a tube by external means such as a pump or fan. Mechanism of Forced Convection Convection heat transfer is complicated since it involves fluid motion as well as heat conduction. The fluid motion enhances heat transfer (the higher the velocity the higher the heat transfer rate). The rate of convection heat transfer is expressed by Newton’s law of cooling: q hT T W / m 2 conv s Qconv hATs T W The convective heat transfer coefficient h strongly depends on the fluid properties and roughness of the solid surface, and the type of the fluid flow (laminar or turbulent). V∞ V∞ T∞ Zero velocity Qconv at the surface. Qcond Solid hot surface, Ts Fig. 1: Forced convection. It is assumed that the velocity of the fluid is zero at the wall, this assumption is called no‐ slip condition. As a result, the heat transfer from the solid surface to the fluid layer adjacent to the surface is by pure conduction, since the fluid is motionless. Thus, M. Bahrami ENSC 388 (F09) Forced Convection Heat Transfer 1 T T k fluid y qconv qcond k fluid y0 2 y h W / m .K y0 T T s qconv hTs T The convection heat transfer coefficient, in general, varies along the flow direction. -
The Relation Between Mantle Dynamics and Plate Tectonics
The History and Dynamics of Global Plate Motions, GEOPHYSICAL MONOGRAPH 121, M. Richards, R. Gordon and R. van der Hilst, eds., American Geophysical Union, pp5–46, 2000 The Relation Between Mantle Dynamics and Plate Tectonics: A Primer David Bercovici , Yanick Ricard Laboratoire des Sciences de la Terre, Ecole Normale Superieure´ de Lyon, France Mark A. Richards Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of California, Berkeley Abstract. We present an overview of the relation between mantle dynam- ics and plate tectonics, adopting the perspective that the plates are the surface manifestation, i.e., the top thermal boundary layer, of mantle convection. We review how simple convection pertains to plate formation, regarding the aspect ratio of convection cells; the forces that drive convection; and how internal heating and temperature-dependent viscosity affect convection. We examine how well basic convection explains plate tectonics, arguing that basic plate forces, slab pull and ridge push, are convective forces; that sea-floor struc- ture is characteristic of thermal boundary layers; that slab-like downwellings are common in simple convective flow; and that slab and plume fluxes agree with models of internally heated convection. Temperature-dependent vis- cosity, or an internal resistive boundary (e.g., a viscosity jump and/or phase transition at 660km depth) can also lead to large, plate sized convection cells. Finally, we survey the aspects of plate tectonics that are poorly explained by simple convection theory, and the progress being made in accounting for them. We examine non-convective plate forces; dynamic topography; the deviations of seafloor structure from that of a thermal boundary layer; and abrupt plate- motion changes. -
Geothermal Gradient - Wikipedia 1 of 5
Geothermal gradient - Wikipedia 1 of 5 Geothermal gradient Geothermal gradient is the rate of increasing temperature with respect to increasing depth in the Earth's interior. Away from tectonic plate boundaries, it is about 25–30 °C/km (72-87 °F/mi) of depth near the surface in most of the world.[1] Strictly speaking, geo-thermal necessarily refers to the Earth but the concept may be applied to other planets. The Earth's internal heat comes from a combination of residual heat from planetary accretion, heat produced through radioactive decay, latent heat from core crystallization, and possibly heat from other sources. The major heat-producing isotopes in the Earth are potassium-40, uranium-238, uranium-235, and thorium-232.[2] At the center of the planet, the temperature may be up to 7,000 K and the pressure could reach 360 GPa (3.6 million atm).[3] Because much of the heat is provided by radioactive decay, scientists believe that early in Earth history, before isotopes with short half- lives had been depleted, Earth's heat production would have been much Temperature profile of the inner Earth, higher. Heat production was twice that of present-day at approximately schematic view (estimated). 3 billion years ago,[4] resulting in larger temperature gradients within the Earth, larger rates of mantle convection and plate tectonics, allowing the production of igneous rocks such as komatiites that are no longer formed.[5] Contents Heat sources Heat flow Direct application Variations See also References Heat sources Temperature within the Earth -
Mantle Convection in Terrestrial Planets
MANTLE CONVECTION IN TERRESTRIAL PLANETS Elvira Mulyukova & David Bercovici Department of Geology & Geophysics Yale University New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8109, USA E-mail: [email protected] May 15, 2019 Summary surfaces do not participate in convective circu- lation, they deform in response to the underly- All the rocky planets in our Solar System, in- ing mantle currents, forming geological features cluding the Earth, initially formed much hot- such as coronae, volcanic lava flows and wrin- ter than their surroundings and have since been kle ridges. Moreover, the exchange of mate- cooling to space for billions of years. The result- rial between the interior and surface, for exam- ing heat released from planetary interiors pow- ple through melting and volcanism, is a conse- ers convective flow in the mantle. The man- quence of mantle circulation, and continuously tle is often the most voluminous and/or stiffest modifies the composition of the mantle and the part of a planet, and therefore acts as the bottle- overlying crust. Mantle convection governs the neck for heat transport, thus dictating the rate at geological activity and the thermal and chemical which a planet cools. Mantle flow drives geo- evolution of terrestrial planets, and understand- logical activity that modifies planetary surfaces ing the physical processes of convection helps through processes such as volcanism, orogene- us reconstruct histories of planets over billions sis, and rifting. On Earth, the major convective of years after their formation. currents in the mantle are identified as hot up- wellings like mantle plumes, cold sinking slabs and the motion of tectonic plates at the surface. -
Chaotic Flow in a 2D Natural Convection Loop
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 61 (2013) 565–576 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhmt Chaotic flow in a 2D natural convection loop with heat flux boundaries ⇑ William F. Louisos a,b, , Darren L. Hitt a,b, Christopher M. Danforth a,c a College of Engineering & Mathematical Sciences, The University of Vermont, Votey Building, 33 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05405, United States b Mechanical Engineering Program, School of Engineering, The University of Vermont, Votey Building, 33 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05405, United States c Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Vermont Complex Systems Center, Vermont Advanced Computing Core, The University of Vermont, Farrell Hall, 210 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05405, United States article info abstract Article history: This computational study investigates the nonlinear dynamics of unstable convection in a 2D thermal Received 13 August 2012 convection loop (i.e., thermosyphon) with heat flux boundary conditions. The lower half of the thermosy- Received in revised form 1 February 2013 phon is subjected to a positive heat flux into the system while the upper half is cooled by an equal-but- Accepted 3 February 2013 opposite heat flux out of the system. Water is employed as the working fluid with fully temperature dependent thermophysical properties and the system of governing equations is solved using a finite vol- ume method. Numerical simulations are performed for varying levels of heat flux and varying strengths Keywords: of gravity to yield Rayleigh numbers ranging from 1.5 Â 102 to 2.8 Â 107. -
Enhancement of Natural Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient by Using V-Fin Array
International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April, 2015 ISSN 2091-2730 Enhancement of Natural convection heat transfer coefficient by using V-fin array Rameshwar B. Hagote, Sachin K. Dahake Student of mechanical Engg. Department, MET’s IOE, Adgaon, Nashik (Maharashtra,India). Email. Id: [email protected], Contact No. +919730342211 Abstract— Extended surfaces known as fins are, used to enhance convective heat transfer in a wide range of engineering applications, and offer an economical and trouble free solution in many situations demanding natural convection heat transfer. Fin arrays on horizontal, inclined and vertical surfaces are used in variety of engineering applications to dissipate heat to the surroundings. Studies of heat transfer and fluid flow associated with such arrays are therefore of considerable engineering significance. The main controlling variables generally available to the designer are the orientation and the geometry of the fin arrays. An experimental work on natural convection adjacent to a vertical heated plate with a multiple V- type partition plates (fins) in ambient air surrounding is already done. Boundary layer development makes vertical fins inefficient in the heat transfer enhancement. As compared to conventional vertical fins, this V-type partition plate works not only as extended surface but also as flow turbulator. This V-type partition plate is compact and hence highly economical. The numerical analysis of this technique is done using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software, Ansys CFX , for natural convection adjacent to a vertical heated plate in ambient air surrounding. In numerical analysis angle of V-fin is further optimized for maximum average heat transfer coefficient. -
Chapter 7. Convection and Complexity
Chapter 7 Convection and complexity ... if your theory is found to be convection has been taken as the classic exam against the second law of ple of thermal convection, and the hexagonal planform has been considered to be typical of thermodynamics, I can give you no convective patterns at the onset of thermal con hope; there is nothing for it but to vection. Fifty years went by before it was real collapse in deepest humiliation. ized that Benard's patterns were actually driven from above, by surface tension. not from below by Eddington an unstable thermal boundary layer. Experiments Contrary to current textbooks ... the showed the san1.e style of convection when the fluid was heated from above, cooled from below observed world does not proceed or when performed in the absence of gravity. This from lower to higher "degrees of confirmed the top-down surface-driven nature of disorder", since when all the convection which is now called Marangoni or B€mard-Marangoni convection. gravitationally-induced phenomena Although it is not generally recognized as are taken into account the emerging such, mantle convection is a branch of the newly result indicates a net decrease in the renamed science of complexity. Plate tectonics may be a self-drivenfarjrom-equilibrium system that orga "degrees of disorder", a greater nizes itself by dissipation in and between the "degree of structuring" ... classical plates, the mantle being a passive provider of equilibrium thermodynamics ... has energy and material. Far-from-equilibrium sys to be completed by a theory of tems, particularly those in a gravity field, can locally evolve toward a high degree of order.