DOCSLIB.ORG

Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Plan Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program February 2005 This page was left blank intentionally Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program Submitted To: National Atmospheric Oceanic Administration, Office of Coastal Resource Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Prepared By: Indiana Department of Natural Resources Lake Michigan Coastal Program In conjunction with the following partners Indiana Department of Environmental Management Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation Purdue University, Agriculture Extension Special Thanks to: 6217 Workgroup Members Funding for this document made possible in part by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, Office of Coastal Resource Management under authority of the Coastal Zone Management Act. This page was left blank intentionally Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 A -- Overview 1 B -- Nonpoint Source Pollution – Defined 3 C -- Partners in Nonpoint Source Pollution 4 D -- Boundary Area 4 Indiana’s Coastal Waters 5 Calumet River Basin 7 Diverted Chicago Watershed 9 St. Joseph River Basin – Lake Michigan Watershed 10 Maumee River Basin 12 Proposed Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Program Boundary 14 E -- Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Area Background Information 15 Land Use of the Region 15 Climate 18 Geology and Soils 18 Lakes 19 Wetlands 20 Rivers and Streams 21 Chapter 2 – Management Measures for Agriculture Sources 23 A – Introduction 23 B – Potential Sources of Agricultural Nonpoint Pollution in the CNPCP Watershed 27 Erosion from Cropland 27 Facility Wastewater & Runoff Control from Confined Animal Facilities 30 Application of Nutrients to Cropland 31 Application of Pesticides to Cropland 34 Grazing Management 36 Irrigation of Cropland (Justification for Exclusion) 37 C – Agricultural Management Measures to be Implemented 37 1. Erosion and Sediment Control Management Measure 38 a. Definition 38 b. Applicability 38 c. Existing Practices and Programs 39 1. Existing Programs: Federal 39 2. Existing Programs: State and Local 40 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 41 2. Facility Wastewater & Runoff from Confined Animal Facilities Management Measure (Large & Small Units) 41 a-1. Definition Large Unit 41 a-2. Definition Small Unit 42 b. Applicability 42 c. Existing Practices & Programs 42 1. Existing Programs: Federal 43 2. Existing Programs: State and Local 43 List of Table and Figures - Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Plan Page v d. Enforcement Mechanisms 44 3. Nutrient Management Measure 45 a. Definition 45 b. Applicability 45 c. Existing Practices and Programs 46 1. Existing Programs: Federal 46 2. Existing Programs: State and Local 47 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 48 4. Pesticide Management Measure 48 a. Definition 48 b. Applicability 49 c. Existing Practices and Programs 49 1. Existing Programs: Federal 49 2. Existing Programs: State and Local 50 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 51 5. Grazing Management Measure 51 a. Definition 51 b. Applicability 51 c. Existing Practices and Programs 52 1. Existing Programs: Federal 53 2. Existing Programs: State and Local 53 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 54 6. Irrigation Water Management - Management Measure (Excluded) 54 a. Definition 55 b. Applicability 55 D – Coordination 55 E – Goal and Objectives for Implementing Agricultural Management Measures 57 Chapter 3 – Request for Exclusion of Forestry Source Category 64 A -- Introduction 64 Geography, Forest Cover, and Land Uses 64 Nonpoint Programs Inventories and Information 66 Description and Documentation of Data Rationale 67 B -- Conclusions and Recommendations 68 Chapter 4 – Management Measures for Urban/Rural Areas 69 A – Introduction 69 Background – Storm Water Permit Requirements for Point & Nonpoint 74 1. Phase I Implementation in Indiana 74 2. Phase II Implementation in Indiana 75 MS4 Designation Criteria 76 Stormwater Quality Management Plan 78 A. Public Education and Outreach 78 B. Public Involvement and Participation 80 C. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping For Municipal … 80 D. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 80 E. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff 80 F. Post-Construction Storm Water Management 81 3. Inventory of Management Measures Excluded 82 List of Table and Figures - Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Plan Page vi 4. Inventory of Management Measures Full Excluded 82 B – Potential Sources of Urban Nonpoint Pollution 83 1. Runoff from Developing Areas 83 2. Runoff from Construction Sites 84 3. Runoff from Existing Development 84 4. On-site Sewage Disposal Systems 85 5. General Sources (Including Household, Commercial, & Landscaping) 86 6. Roads, Highways, and Bridges 87 C – Urban Management Measures 87 1. Urban Runoff New Development 88 a. Definition 88 b. Applicability 88 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 88 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 89 2. Watershed Protection Management Measure 89 a. Definition 89 b. Applicability 90 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 90 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 91 3. Site Development Management Measure 91 a. Definition 91 b. Applicability 92 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 92 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 93 4. Construction Site Erosion & Sediment Control (Excluded) 94 a. Definition 94 b. Applicability 94 5. Construction Site Waste and Chemical Control (Excluded) 94 a. Definition 94 b. Applicability 95 6. Existing Development (Geographically Excluded) 95 a. Definition 95 b. Applicability 95 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 95 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 96 7. New On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems 96 a. Definition 96 b. Applicability 97 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 98 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 100 8. Operating Onsite Sewage Disposal Systems Management Measure 100 a. Definition 100 b. Applicability 101 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 101 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 102 9. Pollution Prevention Management Measure 102 a. Definition 102 b. Applicability 103 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 103 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 104 List of Table and Figures - Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Plan Page vii 10. Management Measures; Planning, Siting, & Developing Roads & Highways 104 a. Definition 104 b. Applicability 104 c. Existing Programs 105 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 105 11. Management Measure for Bridges 106 a. Definition 106 b. Applicability 106 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 106 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 107 12. Management Measure for Road, Highway, & Bridge Construction (Excluded) 108 a. Definition 108 b. Applicability 108 13. Management Measure for Road, Highway, & Bridge Construction Site Waste & Chemical Control (Excluded) 108 a. Definition 108 b. Applicability 108 14. Management Measure for Road, Highway, & Bridge Operation & Maintenance (Geographically limited Exclusion) 109 a. Definition 109 b. Applicability 109 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 110 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 109 15. Management Measure for Road, Highway, & Bridge Runoff Systems (Geographically limited Exclusion) 110 a. Definition 110 b. Applicability 110 c. Existing Programs or Practices and Lead Agencies 110 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 111 D -- Coordination 112 E -- Goals & Objectives of Urban & Rural Areas 119 Chapter 5 – Management Measures for Marinas and Recreational Boating 130 A -- Introduction 130 1. Definition of Marina 130 2. Overview of Existing Governmental Programs 130 3. Overview of Existing State Programs 131 B – Potential Sources of Marina & Recreational Boating Nonpoint Pollution 135 1. Fish Waste 135 2. Liquid Materials 135 3. Improper solid waste 135 4. Sewage waste disposal 135 5. Improper Boat Operation 135 6. Poorly designed marinas 136 C – Marinas & Recreational Boating Management Measures to be Implemented 136 1. Site Location and Design Management Measure 136 a. Definition 136 b. Applicability 136 List of Table and Figures - Indiana Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Plan Page viii c. Existing Practices & Programs 136 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 137 2. Marina Flushing Management Measure 138 a. Definition 138 b. Applicability 138 c. Existing Practices & Programs 138 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 139 3. Water Quality Assessment Management Measure 139 a. Definition 139 b. Applicability 139 c. Existing Practices and Programs 139 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 140 4. Habitat Assessment Management Measure 141 a. Definition 142 b. Applicability 142 c. Existing Practices and Programs 142 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 142 5. Shoreline Stabilization Management Measure 142 a. Definition 142 b. Applicability 142 c. Existing Practices and Programs 142 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 143 6. Stormwater Runoff Management Measure 144 a. Definition 144 b. Applicability 144 c. Existing Practices and Programs 144 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 145 7. Fueling Station Design Management Measure 145 a. Definition 145 b. Applicability 145 c. Existing Practices and Programs 145 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 146 8. Sewage Facility Management Measure 147 a. Definition 147 b. Applicability 147 c. Existing Practices and Programs 147 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 148 9. Solid Waste Management Measure 149 a. Definition 149 b. Applicability 149 c. Existing Practices and Programs 149 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 150 10. Fish Waste Management Measure 150 a. Definition 150 b. Applicability 150 c. Existing Practices and Programs 150 d. Enforcement Mechanisms 151 11. Liquid Material Management Measure 152 a. Definition 152 b. Applicability 152 c. Existing Practices and Programs 152 List
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TENNESSEE FISH and WILDLIFE COMMISSION PROCLAMATION 15-27 SPORT FISHING Page1of18 Pursuant to the Authority Granted by Title
    Page1of18 TENNESSEE FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION PROCLAMATION 15-27 SPORT FISHING Pursuant to the authority granted by Title 70, Tennessee Code Annotated, and Sections 70-4-107 and 70- 4-119, thereof, the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission proclaims the following regulations effective March 1, 2016. SECTION I. ENDANGERED SPECIES, GENERAL SEASONS, AND STATEWIDE CREEL, POSSESSION, AND LENGTH LIMITS. A. ENDANGERED SPECIES All fish identified as endangered or threatened or listed as in need of management as proclaimed by the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission may not be taken. B. GAME FISH SPECIES The season is open year-round on the following species, unless otherwise specified in this proclamation. The possession limit is twice the daily creel limit. Only the daily creel limit may be possessed while afield. It shall also be unlawful to possess while afield any fish, which has been altered to the extent that its species and/or total body length cannot be determined. The length of a fish shall be determined with the fish laying on a flat ruler, the mouth closed, and the caudal (tail) fin lobes squeezed so as to produce the maximum length. The mouth of the fish may not be manipulated or extended. Unless stated otherwise a slot limit is a protected length range within which no fish may be harvested. Statewide daily creel and length limits for fish species are listed in the table below which includes exceptions for specific waterbodies. Additional exceptions are listed in Sections Ill, IV, V, and VI. See Special Definitions (Section XV) for reservoir boundary and specific area descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies
    2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Patrick Center for Environmental Research 2010 South Fork Holston River Environmental Monitoring Studies Report No. 10-04F Submitted to: Eastman Chemical Company Tennessee Operations Submitted by: Patrick Center for Environmental Research 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195 April 20, 2012 Executive Summary he 2010 study was the seventh in a series of comprehensive studies of aquatic biota and Twater chemistry conducted by the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University in the vicinity of Kingsport, TN. Previous studies were conducted in 1965, 1967 (cursory study, primarily focusing on al- gae), 1974, 1977, 1980, 1990 and 1997. Elements of the 2010 study included analysis of land cover, basic environmental water chemistry, attached algae and aquatic macrophytes, aquatic insects, non-insect macroinvertebrates, and fish. For each study element, field samples were collected and analyzed from Scientists from the Academy's Patrick Center for Environmental Research zones located on the South Fork Holston River have conducted seven major environmental monitoring studies on the (Zones 2, 3 and 5), Big Sluice (Zone 4), mainstem South Fork Holston River since 1965. Holston River (Zone 6), and Horse Creek (Zones HC1and HC2), the approximate locations of which are shown below. The design of the 2010 study was very similar to that of previous surveys, allowing comparisons among surveys. In addition, two areas of potential local impacts were assessed for the first time: Big Tree Spring (BTS, located on the South Fork within Zone 2) and Kit Bottom (KU and KL in the Big Sluice, upstream of Zone 4).
    [Show full text]
  • FORT PATRICK HENRY RESERVOIR Volume IV
    FORT PATRICK HENRY RESERVOIR FINAL RESERVOIR LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Volume IV NORTHEASTERN TRIBUTARY RESERVOIRS LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MARCH 2010 This page intentionally left blank Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Northeastern Tributary Reservoirs Land Plan Project Number: 2008-32 NORTHEASTERN TRIBUTARY RESERVOIRS LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME IV Fort Patrick Henry Reservoir PREPARED BY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY MARCH 2010 For information, contact: Tennessee Valley Authority Holston-Cherokee-Douglas Land Planning Team 106 Tri-Cities Business Park Drive Gray, Tennessee 37615 Phone: (423) 467-3801 Fax: (423) 467-3815 Page intentionally blank Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... IV-1 1.1. Background ......................................................................................................................... IV-1 1.2. Purpose ............................................................................................................................... IV-2 2.0 PLANNING PROCESS ......................................................................................................... IV-5 2.1. Planning Goals .................................................................................................................. IV-10 2.2. Allocation Process ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fishing Length Range, Only One Fish Over 20 Inches May Sunrise to One-Half Hour After Sunset License and Trout Stamp
    Fishing Regulations Effective March 1, 2010 through February 28, 2011 Tennessee 2010 ishing F G U I D E Fis F Ju R hi ee N N e 12, g2010 Day Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency www.tnwildlife.org Tailwater Brook Trout — New Live Bait Regulations f e at u r e 6 DowN FRom The mountaiNs For decades Tennessee’s anglers have climbed cascading mountain streams to catch brook trout. Nothing can replace the solitude of high-country fishing or the tug of these elegant fish on a lightweight rod. But after you have caught your 20th or so 5-inch brook trout, you may start to wonder “are there bigger brookies anywhere?” 6 CON t e N t S 2 whaT’s New FoR 2010 28 TRouT sTockiNg scheDuLe 4 TwRa oFFices 29 contamiNants iN Fish 4 TeNNessee wiLDLiFe 30 ReguLaTioNs FoR meThoDs ResouRces commissioN oTheR ThaN RoD & ReeL 8–9 LiceNse iNFoRmaTioN 32–34 IdentiFyiNg youR Fish 10 geNeRaL iNFoRmaTioN 36–37 TeNNessee aNgLeR RecogNiTioN pRogRam 11–13 LimiTs & ReguLaTioNs 37 QuesTioNs & aNsweRs 14–15 Live BaiT 38–39 StaTe RecoRDs 16–17 TwRa FishiNg Lakes 40–41 SportiNg showcase 18–23 ReseRvoiR ReguLaTioNs 26–27 TRouT ReguLaTioNs New 2010 regulations Tennessee 2010 ishing statewide F G U I D E • Several new regulations that limit the sale, use, and collection of live bait are listed in detail on pages 14–15. • Sport anglers must mark or tag their trotlines, limblines, and jugs with either their name and address or their current TWRA identification number. Region 3 Caney FoRk RiveR: Center Hill Dam downstream to Cumberland River, including tributaries Ε Rainbow, Brown, and Brook trout: creel limit 5 per day in combination.
    [Show full text]
  • TVA's Dams Provide Hydropower, Flood Control, Water Quality, Navigation
    TVA’s dams provide hydropower, ood Catawba Rhododendron (Rhododendron catawbiense) control, water quality, navigation and ample Lexington Destination water supply for the Tennessee Valley. Did you know that they also provide fun? Come summer, TVA operates its dams to ll the reservoirs for recreation. Boating, shing, swimming, rafting and blueway paddling are all supported Bald Eagle KENTUCKY by TVA with boat ramps, swim beaches and put ins. There are plenty of hiking (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and biking trails, picnic pavilions, playgrounds, campsites, scenic overlooks SOUTH and other day-use areas, too. So plan a TVA vacation this year—you’re sure HO W.V. ILLINOIS LSTON 77 to have a dam good time. o R i v i e Rainbow Trout South Holston Dam - 1951 h r (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Because of its depth and clarity, South Holston Lake is a O FORT premier destination for inland scuba diving. The aerating Paducah PATRICK weir below the dam has many benets—among them NRY creating an oxygen-rich environment that’s fostered a HE world-class trout shery. ORRIS 75 MISSOURI N Hopkinsville 65 Kentucky – 1944 24 Norris - 1936 CKY Norris Dam—the rst built by a newly VIRGINIA KENTU Around Kentucky Lake there are Ft. Patrick Henry - 1953 55 formed TVA—is known for its many Fort Patrick Henry Dam is an ideal shing over 12,000 acres of state wildlife hiking and biking trails. The Norris River management areas, that offer small destination. The reservoir is stocked with rainbow Bluff Trail is a must-see destination for trout each year, and is also good for hooking and large game and waterfowl wildower enthusiasts each spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish And
    Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Fisheries Mitigation Programs Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service May 28,2002 Table of Contents Introduction Definition of Terms General Authorities Recommendations to Facilitate Full Cost Recovery Recommendations for Administrative Actions Recommendations for Legislation Current Fisheries Mitigation Programs Overview Description of Fisheries Mitigation Programs Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tennessee Valley Authority National Marine Fisheries Service Bonneville Power Administration Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of Agriculture Appendix I Recent Directives and Recommendations for Fisheries Mitigation Programs 75 Appendix I1 List of Hatcheries involved in Mitigation and State Location 77 Appendix I11 List of Species Raised for Mitigation Programs 78 INTRODUCTION The predecessor of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), the U.S. Commission on Fish and Fisheries, was formed in 1871 to protect and enhance fisheries which were being depleted by a growing Nation. Since that time, the Service's Fisheries Program, including the National Fish Hatchery System (NFHS), has been involved in, among other things, mitigating the losses of fish habitats, fish populations, and fishing opportunities. The U.S. Congress and the Courts have provided laws, appropriations, and orders which have authorized the construction and operation of dams, and other water diversion projects. The construction and operation of these Federal water resource development projects have had impacts on many water systems and their respective fish populations. The construction and operation of these projects have resulted in the need to build and operate fish hatcheries to provide direct mitigation (e.g., provide disease-free fish eggs or fish for stocking) for waters impaired by Federal water resource development projects.
    [Show full text]
  • TVA Reservoir Aeration Diffuser System
    Technical Paper 97-3 Presented at WaterPower ‘97 August 5-8, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia TVA Reservoir Aeration Diffuser System Mark H. Mobley1 Abstract The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has developed an efficient and economical aeration diffuser design that has been installed and operated successfully at six TVA hydropower projects, one TVA nuclear plant and two non-power reservoirs. The line diffuser design transfers oxygen efficiently, and minimizes temperature destratification and sediment disruption by spreading the gas bubbles over a very large area in the reservoir. TVA test results have consistently indicated oxygen transfer efficiencies of 90 to 95 percent. The line diffusers are installed from the surface and can be retrieved if necessary for maintenance without the use of divers. The diffusers can be supplied with air or with oxygen, either from a bulk liquid oxygen storage tank, an onsite air separation plant, or air compressors. A line diffuser system can be designed to continuously aerate a large volume in the reservoir to handle peaking hydroturbine flows. Aeration within the reservoir can be an economical means to meet dissolved oxygen requirements for hydropower releases. Introduction The dissolved oxygen content of reservoir releases has become a problem for hydropower projects. Many FERC licenses now include minimum dissolved oxygen requirements. TVA has just completed the Lake Improvement Plan, a five- year, voluntary program that included developing and installing equipment to meet target levels of dissolved oxygen and minimum flow at 16 TVA hydropower projects. TVA now maintains target levels of dissolved oxygen and minimum flow at all of its 28 hydropower projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygenation of Turbine Discharges from Fort Patrick Henry Dam
    FROM OXYGENATION OF TURBINE DISCHARGES FORT PATRICK HENRY DAM Ri. J. RUANE Tennessee. Tennessee Valley Authority, Chattanooga, DR. SVEIN VIGANDER Tennessee Valley Authority, Norris, Tennessee. ABSTRACT the use of oxygen injection The Tennessee Valley Authority is investigating oxygen concentrations in through fine-pore diffusers for increasing dissolved Dam. Oxygen injection is the turbine discharges from Fort Patrick Henry from the turbine intakes, being considered either immediately upstream into the turbines, or immedi- so that the oxygenated water is drawn directly ately downstream from the "boil" area in the tailrace. ) selection of a diffuser for Research is being conducted in.two phases: (1 best location for injecting the *injecting the oxygen, and (2) selection of the are being evaluated for oxygen. In Phase I, various commercial diffusers efficiency. Field and * possible plugging problems and for oxygen absorption apparently is not a significant laboratory tests indicate that diffuser-plugging approaching 100 percent can problem and that oxygen absorption efficiency with several commercially be achieved in a 42-foot height of bubble rise system will be evaluated available diffusers. In Phase II, a large-scale diffuser fall of 1973. at Fort Patrick Henry Dam during the summer and if results of this research A full-scale system will be installed at the dam and economically feasible. show this method of reaeration to be technically INTRODUCTION through fine-pore diffusers TVA is investigating the use of oxygen injection in the turbine dis- for increasing dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations charges from Fort Patrick Henry Dam. River at river mile 8.2 in The dam is located on the South Fork Holston from Kingsport, Ten- Sullivan County, Tennecssee, about 2.5 miles upstream Boone Dam (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Data Tennessee Water Year 2004
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Data Tennessee Water Year 2004 By D.F. Flohr, J.W. Garrett, J.T. Hamilton, and T.D. Phillips Water-Data Report TN-04-1 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Tennessee and with other agencies U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, SECRETARY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director For information on the water program in Tennessee write to: District Chief, Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey 640 Grassmere Park, Suite 100 Nashville, Tennessee 37211 2005 PREFACE This volume of the annual hydrologic data report of Tennessee is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S. Geological Survey’s surface- and ground-water data-collection networks in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of streamflow, ground-water levels, and quality of water provide the hydrologic informa- tion needed by State, local, and Federal agencies, and the private sector for developing and man- aging our Nation’s land and water resources. This report is the culmination of a concerted effort by dedicated personnel of the U.S. Geo- logical Survey who collected, compiled, analyzed, verified, and organized the data, and who typed, edited, and assembled the report. In addition to the authors, who had primary responsibility for assuring that the information contained herein is accurate, complete, and adheres to Geologi- cal Survey policy and established guidelines, most of the data were collected, computed, and pro- cessed from the subdistrict offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission Proclamation 18-13 Sport Fishing
    Page 1 of 17 TENNESSEE FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION PROCLAMATION 18-13 SPORT FISHING Pursuant to the authority granted by Title 70, Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 70-4-107, the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission proclaims the following regulations effective March 1, 2019 . SECTION I. GENERAL SEASONS, AND STATEWIDE CREEL, POSSESSION, AND LENGTH LIMITS. A. GAME FISH SPECIES The season is open year-round on the following species, unless otherwise specified in this proclamation. The possession limit is twice the daily creel limit. Only the daily creel limit may be possessed while afield. It shall also be unlawful to possess while afield any fish, which has been altered to the extent that its species and/or total body length cannot be determined. The length of a fish shall be determined with the fish laying on a flat ruler, the mouth closed , and the caudal (tail) fin lobes squeezed so as to produce the maximum length. The mouth of the fish may not be manipulated or extended. Unless stated otherwise a slot limit is a protected length range within which no fish may be harvested. Statewide daily creel and length limits for fish species are listed in the table below which includes exceptions for specific waterbodies. Additional exceptions are listed in Sections Ill , IV, V, VI, and XIII. See Special Definitions (Section XIV) for reservoir boundary and specific area descriptions. Daily Length Limit Creel (minimum unless Species Limit otherwise stated) Rock bass and shadow bass (both species in combination) 20 None From Calderwood Reservoir
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fishing Regulations 2008
    FISHING REGULATIONS Effective March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009 2008 TENNESSEE ISHING F G U I D E FI S FREE JU HI N N E 7 , 2G 0 0 8 D A Y Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency www.tnwildlife.org Funding Fisheries Programs • Tennessee’s Lake Sturgeon Project Bill Dance’s Three Key Words • Aquatic Nuisance Species Become a Millionaire with FLW FantasyFishing.com Bass Pro Shops® Outdoor World® is not only a spectacular outdoor store—it’s MUCH more! Our lodge-style architecture—complete with waterfalls, rustic wildlife displays, and huge aquariums stocked with trophy fish—offers a breath- taking backdrop to the area’s biggest selection of golf, fishing, hunting, camping, and boating gear. Browse through the expansive TRACKER® Marine Boat Center Indoor Showroom. So bring the entire family and plan on spending the day. It’ll be an outdoor adventure you’ll never forget! Memphis: I-40 at Sycamore View Road, Exit 12 6140 Macon Road Memphis, TN (901) 213-5800 Hours: Mon–Sat 9am–10pm, Sun 10am–7pm For an adventure in itself Nashville: 323 Opry Mills Drive Nashville, TN Shop online at For a FREE catalog (615) 514-5200 Boat: (615) 514-5180 Visit Our Stores Hours: Mon–Sat 9am–10pm, Sun 9am–7pm basspro.com 1-800-BASS PRO Sevierville: I-40, Exit 407 3629 Outdoor Nationwide Sportsman’s Place Kodak, TN (865) 932-5600 Hours: Mon–Sat 9am–10pm, Sun 9am–8pm BP321802 FEATURES 18 6 FUNDING FISHERIES PROGRAMS Have you ever wondered how your fishing license revenue is spent? Hopefully after reading this article you will understand not only where it is spent but also how and why it is spent as it is.
    [Show full text]
  • TVA Hydroelectric System NRHP
    NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2015) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 168). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric System, 1933-1979 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) 1. The Character of the Tennessee Valley and the Coming of TVA 2. The Tennessee Valley Authority, 1933-1945 3. The Tennessee Valley Authority, 1945-1979 C. Form Prepared by name/title Andra Martens/Cathleen Collett/Phil Thomason/Rebecca Hightower date 11/11/2015 organization Thomason and Associates telephone ....:6=-1.:....:5=---=3..::.8..::.5_-4:....:9:...:6:...:0:.__ _____ street & number P.O. Box 121225 email [email protected] city or town Nashville state TN zip code 37212 ~~~~~----------------------------------- D. Certification Date of Action 1 NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2015) Alabama, Georgia Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kentucky, North Hydroelectric System, 1933-1979 Carolina and Tennessee Name of Multiple Property Listing State Table of Contents for Written Narrative Provide the following information on continuation sheets.
    [Show full text]