DOCSLIB.ORG

Diplomacy in the Age of Terrorism: What Is the State Department’S Strategy?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diplomacy in the Age of Terrorism: What Is the State Department’S Strategy? DIPLOMACY IN THE AGE OF TERRORISM: WHAT IS THE STATE DEPARTMENT’S STRATEGY? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION AUGUST 19, 2004 Serial No. 108–152 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/international—relations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 95–542PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 21 2002 14:35 Mar 03, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\FULL\081904\95542.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, HOWARD L. BERMAN, California Vice Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York DAN BURTON, Indiana ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American ELTON GALLEGLY, California Samoa ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BRAD SHERMAN, California PETER T. KING, New York ROBERT WEXLER, Florida STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York AMO HOUGHTON, New York WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York ROY BLUNT, Missouri BARBARA LEE, California THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York RON PAUL, Texas JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL, Pennsylvania NICK SMITH, Michigan EARL BLUMENAUER, Oregon JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania SHELLEY BERKLEY, Nevada JEFF FLAKE, Arizona GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia ADAM B. SCHIFF, California MARK GREEN, Wisconsin DIANE E. WATSON, California JERRY WELLER, Illinois ADAM SMITH, Washington MIKE PENCE, Indiana BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota THADDEUS G. MCCOTTER, Michigan BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky KATHERINE HARRIS, Florida VACANCY THOMAS E. MOONEY, SR., Staff Director/General Counsel ROBERT R. KING, Democratic Staff Director KRISTEN GILLEY, Senior Professional Staff Member LIBERTY DUNN, Staff Associate JEAN CARROLL, Full Committee Hearing Coordinator (II) VerDate Mar 21 2002 14:35 Mar 03, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\FULL\081904\95542.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL C O N T E N T S Page WITNESSES Christopher Kojm, Deputy Executive Director, National Commission on Ter- rorist Attacks Upon the United States ............................................................... 8 Susan Ginsburg, Team Leader for Border Security and Foreign Visitors, National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States .............. 11 The Honorable J. Cofer Black, Coordinator of Counterterrorism, U.S. Depart- ment of State ........................................................................................................ 39 The Honorable Patricia de Stacy Harrison, Acting Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, and Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Edu- cational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State ................................. 47 The Honorable Maura Harty, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State .................................................................................... 53 The Honorable Francis X. Taylor, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, and Directorof the Office of Foreign Missions, U.S. Department of State .................................................................................................................. 58 The Honorable Earl Anthony Wayne, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Eco- nomic and Business Affairs, U.S. Department of State .................................... 64 James W. Swigert, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Inter- national Organization Affairs, U.S. Department of State ................................ 75 Carol A. Rodley, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Inter- national Organization Affairs, U.S. Department of State ................................ 78 The Honorable Christina B. Rocca, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of South Asian Affairs, U.S. Department of State ............................................................ 81 The Honorable Philo Dibble, Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, U.S. Department of State ........................................................ 88 LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING Christopher Kojm and Susan Ginsburg: Prepared statement ............................. 14 The Honorable J. Cofer Black: Prepared statement ............................................. 41 The Honorable Patricia de Stacy Harrison: Prepared statement ........................ 48 The Honorable Maura Harty: Prepared statement ............................................... 55 The Honorable Francis X. Taylor: Prepared statement ........................................ 60 The Honorable Earl Anthony Wayne: Prepared statement ................................. 67 James W. Swigert: Prepared statement ................................................................ 76 Carol A. Rodley: Prepared statement ..................................................................... 80 The Honorable Christina B. Rocca: Prepared statement ..................................... 82 The Honorable Philo Dibble: Prepared statement ................................................ 90 APPENDIX Material Submitted for the Hearing Record .......................................................... 121 (III) VerDate Mar 21 2002 14:35 Mar 03, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\FULL\081904\95542.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL VerDate Mar 21 2002 14:35 Mar 03, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\FULL\081904\95542.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL DIPLOMACY IN THE AGE OF TERRORISM: WHAT IS THE STATE DEPARTMENT’S STRATEGY? THURSDAY, AUGUST 19, 2004 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to call, at 10 o’clock a.m., in Room 2172, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Christopher H. Smith [Vice Chairman of the Committee] presiding. Mr. SMITH OF NEW JERSEY. The hearing will come to order, and good morning, everybody. The ability of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda’s transnational ter- rorist network to inflict violence was felt with particular horror on August 7, 1998, when U.S. Embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Sa- laam were attacked. Members will recall more than 220 people were killed, including 12 U.S. Government employees. More than 4,000 were injured, mostly Africans. That was—or should have been—the wake-up call. Soon after the Embassy bombings, I chaired a hearing, one of several of legislation that I sponsored that became law, to author- ize substantial funds for counterterrorism, Embassy security, pub- lic diplomacy, broadcasting and democracy building. At one hear- ing, we heard from Admiral William Crowe, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Chairman of the Accountability Re- view Boards, not unlike the 9–11 Commission, that probed the Em- bassy bombings. Admiral Crowe said at the time, ‘‘In our investigations of the bombings, the Boards were struck, as you noted, by the similarity of our recommendations with those drawn by the Inman Commission over 14 years ago. I find very troubling, the failure of U.S. Government to take the necessary steps to prevent such tragedies in the interim.’’ He also said, ‘‘Throughout the proceedings, the Boards were most disturbed regarding two interconnected issues. The first of these was the inadequacy of the resources to provide security against terror attacks, and the second was the relatively low priority ac- corded security concerns throughout the U.S. Government by the Department of State, other agencies in general, and on the part of many employees, both in Washington and in the field.’’ (1) VerDate Mar 21 2002 14:35 Mar 03, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\FULL\081904\95542.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL 2 At that same hearing, in the late 1990s, Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security David Carpenter testified, and I quote him briefly, ‘‘During the past decade, prior to the tragic August 7th bomb- ings in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, all of the attacks against U.S. interests involved indigenous terrorist elements. While we were aware of threats from external terrorist groups, none ever materialized. The August 7th bombings demonstrated the ex- istence of a global terrorist organization capable of and intent on attacking U.S. diplomatic targets. All our posts are now con- sidered at risk and we need to take a comprehensive security approach.’’ He also concluded, ‘‘Global or regional networks may strike where we are most vulnerable.’’ Prophetic words. On September 11, 2001, we were ‘‘most vulnerable’’ in New York, at the Pentagon and on four planes carrying Americans. 9/11 wasn’t the start, but the escalation of a war on Americans and oth- ers of goodwill. We are, in fact, in a war, but with a new and far different enemy than any we have previously encountered. Our enemies are un- likely to be vanquished in any traditional sense of achieving their surrender. In fact, there may never be an end to this conflict, never an end to the need for eternal vigilance, preemption and vigorous application of all measures within our capabilities. The 9–11 Commission
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S
    Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S. Policy Updated January 27, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS21534 SUMMARY RS21534 Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S. Policy January 27, 2020 The Sultanate of Oman has been a strategic partner of the United States since 1980, when it became the first Persian Gulf state to sign a formal accord permitting the U.S. military to use its Kenneth Katzman facilities. Oman has hosted U.S. forces during every U.S. military operation in the region since Specialist in Middle then, and it is a partner in U.S. efforts to counter terrorist groups and related regional threats. The Eastern Affairs January 2020 death of Oman’s longtime leader, Sultan Qaboos bin Sa’id Al Said, is unlikely to alter U.S.-Oman ties or Oman’s regional policies. His successor, Haythim bin Tariq Al Said, a cousin selected by Oman’s royal family immediately upon the Sultan’s death, espouses policies similar to those of Qaboos. During Qaboos’ reign (1970-2020), Oman generally avoided joining other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, and Oman) in regional military interventions, instead seeking to mediate their resolution. Oman joined the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State organization, but it did not send forces to that effort, nor did it support groups fighting Syrian President Bashar Al Asad’s regime. It opposed the June 2017 Saudi/UAE-led isolation of Qatar and did not join a Saudi-led regional counterterrorism alliance until a year after that group was formed in December 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • JANUARY 2018 (Continued from Previous Page)
    14 1 number ISSUE 149 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS It has been an honor to be a part of the Sons of Utah Pioneers for the last seven years and to serve on the Chapter and National level with so many capable individuals. I have learned a great deal about this wonderful organization by participating with and observing those who have preceded me with these important responsibilities. My thanks go out especially to John Elggren, Jim Hurst, Tom Alexander, Tony Tidwell, and John Smith. I appreciate the professional service of the office staff at the National Headquarters building located at the mouth of Parley’s canyon overlooking the Salt Lake Valley. The team of Heather Davis, Linda Sorenson and Pat Cook manage most of the daily functions at the headquarters building. It is a highlight each month for me to see the Area Vice-Presidents and Program Directors at the monthly National Board meetings. Our Finance Committee is in capable hands. They meet quarterly and manage the funds of the National operations. The Pioneer Magazine Board is composed of talented writers and editors who compile the expanded and masterful quarterly magazine. Thank you, Bill (Continued On Following Page) 1 JANUARY 2018 (Continued From Previous Page) Tanner for your leadership as publisher. I am grateful for the numerous Chapter Presidents, for their service and for the quality of their leadership. As I have been reading the history of the Sons of Utah Pioneers, the Trail Marker newsletters, and the previous years issues of the Pioneer Magazine, it is apparent that we have a continuity of excellent leaders and members who will provide another outstanding year of accomplishments.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S11939
    December 8, 2004 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S11939 began work immediately on this crit- that hope. We will have kept our NER, 30 minutes; Senator LEVIN, 15 min- ical project, literally hours after the charge as Members to stand on behalf utes; Senator GRAHAM of Florida, 15 9/11 Commission issued its report. of America in her defense. And we will minutes; Senator COLEMAN, 10 minutes; From beginning to end she has brought have stood and made a lasting dif- Senator CARPER, 5 minutes; Senator her talents and skill to an extremely ference that is a fitting capstone to the SPECTER, 20 minutes, and his comments difficult issue. Chairman SUSAN COL- 108th Congress. will follow Senator LIEBERMAN’s com- LINS demonstrated tremendous leader- I thank all Members for their pa- ments this morning. ship. The Senate and the Nation are in tience. I appreciate them for their dili- I further ask that following the use her debt. gence and dedication since the end of or yielding back of the time, the Sen- This day cannot go by without also July, working nonstop to bring this ate proceed to a vote on the adoption thanking many other Members: Sen- bill to the floor and ultimately see it of the conference report, with no inter- ator LIEBERMAN, the ranking member; through to passage today and later sig- vening action or debate. members of the Governmental Affairs nature by the President of the United Mr. REID. Mr. President, reserving Committee, and the Senate conferees; States. the right to object, I will ask a couple of things: One, that the time for Senator WARNER, who stepped in to f lend an able hand in this last week; quorum calls run off of the time equal- INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TER- Senator JON KYL, whose patience has ly against everybody.
    [Show full text]
  • Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S
    Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S. Policy Updated May 19, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS21534 SUMMARY RS21534 Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S. Policy May 19, 2021 The Sultanate of Oman has been a strategic partner of the United States since 1980, when it became the first Persian Gulf state to sign a formal accord permitting the U.S. military to use its Kenneth Katzman facilities. Oman has hosted U.S. forces during every U.S. military operation in the region since Specialist in Middle then, and it is a partner in U.S. efforts to counter terrorist groups and other regional threats. In Eastern Affairs January 2020, Oman’s longtime leader, Sultan Qaboos bin Sa’id Al Said, passed away and was succeeded by Haythim bin Tariq Al Said, a cousin selected by Oman’s royal family immediately upon Qaboos’s death. Sultan Haythim espouses policies similar to those of Qaboos and has not altered U.S.-Oman ties or Oman’s regional policies. During Qaboos’s reign (1970-2020), Oman generally avoided joining other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Bahrain, Qatar, and Oman) in regional military interventions, instead seeking to mediate their resolution. Oman joined but did not contribute forces to the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State organization, nor did it arm groups fighting Syrian President Bashar Al Asad’s regime. It opposed the June 2017 Saudi/UAE- led isolation of Qatar and had urged resolution of that rift before its resolution in January 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Chapter 4 Building International Will and Capacity to Counter Terrorism The Department of State engages diplomatically with for- eign governments and in international and regional fora to accomplish the US Government’s first priority — protect- ing Americans at home and abroad. The Department of State’s diplomatic efforts help build the political will and operational skills of foreign governments to combat terror. Many countries are committed allies in the global war on terrorism. Some, however, need train- ing and resources to develop stronger institutions and capabilities. The Department of State’s counterterrorism efforts are an essential component in the success of US military, law enforcement, intelligence, and financial ac- tivities in the global fight against terrorism. Multilateral and regional organizations are also a key plat- form for developing broad international support for the adoption and implementation of policies, strategies, and “best practices” in combating terrorism and financing of terrorist activities. The Department of State works actively with foreign governments to urge adoption of all 12 inter- national counterterrorism conventions, as well as adherence to and implementation of UNSCR 1373, which imposes binding obligations on all states to suppress and prevent terrorist financing, improve their border controls, enhance information sharing and law enforcement coop- eration, suppress terrorist recruitment, and deny terrorists safe haven. Antiterrorism Assistance Program Ambassador J. Cofer Black, former US State Department Coordinator Congress authorized the Antiterrorism Assistance (ATA) Pro- for Counterterrorism, during a news conference at the IV Regular gram in 1983 as part of a major initiative against international Session of the Organization of American States Inter-American terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Indien – China – USA: Das Neue Mächtedreieck Asiens
    Indien – China – USA: Das neue Mächtedreieck Asiens Heinrich Kreft1 1 Die Entstehung eines neuen Mächtedreiecks in Asien seit Ende des Kalten Krieges Das Ende des Kalten Krieges führte nicht nur in Europa zu erheblichen politischen Veränderungen und Machtverschiebungen, sondern auch in Asien. Hinzu kam, dass zeitgleich mehrere Länder und Regionen Asiens einen beispiellosen wirtschaftlichen Boom erlebten. 1.1 Der Untergang der Sowjetunion Der wichtigste Einzelfaktor für die Veränderung der politischen Landschaft in Asien war der Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion und das sich daran anschließende Schwin- den des russischen Einflusses in Südasien. Die UdSSR war lange Zeit der wichtigste Verbündete Indiens gewesen, festgeschrieben im indisch-sowjetischen Vertrag von 1971, in dem Moskau Indiens Schutz garantierte. Allerdings wurde dieses Abkom- men bereits Ende der 1980er-Jahre durch die Bemühungen Gorbatschows unter- höhlt, die sowjetischen Beziehungen zu China zu verbessern. Die Russische Förde- ration als Rechtsnachfolger der Sowjetunion war Anfang der 1990er-Jahre kaum noch in der Lage, den sowjetischen Einfluss in Südasien aufrecht zu erhalten. Der ökonomische Niedergang Moskaus ging auch nach dem Zusammenbruch der UdSSR weiter, die russische Marine war nie in der Lage, die Rolle ihrer sowjeti- schen Vorgängerin im Indischen Ozean zu übernehmen. Die indisch-russischen Beziehungen laborieren auch heute noch an den Folgen der Auflösung der Sowjetunion, mit der Indien seinen bis dahin wichtigsten politi- schen und auch ökonomischen Partner verloren
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Inquiry
    REPORT OF THE JOINT INQUIRY INTO THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 – BY THE HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE S. REPT. NO. 107- 351 107TH CONGRESS, 2D SESSION H. REPT. NO. 107-792 JOINT INQUIRY INTO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES BEFORE AND AFTER THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ___________________ REPORT OF THE U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND U.S. HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS DECEMBER 2002 S. REPT. NO. 107- 351 107TH CONGRESS, 2D SESSION H. REPT. NO. 107-792 JOINT INQUIRY INTO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES BEFORE AND AFTER THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ___________________ REPORT OF THE U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND U.S. HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS DECEMBER 2002 Foreword This is the declassified version of the Final Report of the Joint Inquiry that was approved and filed with the House of Representatives and the Senate on December 20, 2002. With the exception of portions that were released to the public previously (e.g., the additional views of Members, the GAO Anthrax Report, etc.), this version has been declassified by the Intelligence Community prior to its public release. That review was for classification purposes only, and does not indicate Intelligence Community agreement with the accuracy of this report, or concurrence with its factual findings or conclusions. At appropriate points in the report, relevant information that developed after the report was filed, or that has appeared in other public sources, has been inserted and is denoted with an asterisk (*) and an accompanying footnote.
    [Show full text]
  • Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S
    Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S. Policy Updated May 19, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS21534 SUMMARY RS21534 Oman: Politics, Security, and U.S. Policy May 19, 2021 The Sultanate of Oman has been a strategic partner of the United States since 1980, when it became the first Persian Gulf state to sign a formal accord permitting the U.S. military to use its Kenneth Katzman facilities. Oman has hosted U.S. forces during every U.S. military operation in the region since Specialist in Middle then, and it is a partner in U.S. efforts to counter terrorist groups and other regional threats. In Eastern Affairs January 2020, Oman’s long-time leader, Sultan Qaboos bin Sa’id Al Said, passed away and was succeeded by Haythim bin Tariq Al Said, a cousin selected by Oman’s royal family immediately upon Qaboos’s death. Sultan Haythim espouses policies similar to those of Qaboos and has not altered U.S.-Oman ties or Oman’s regional policies. During Qaboos’s reign (1970-2020), Oman generally avoided joining other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, and Oman) in regional military interventions, instead seeking to mediate their resolution. Oman joined but did not contribute forces to the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State organization, nor did it arm groups fighting Syrian President Bashar Al Asad’s regime. It opposed the June 2017 Saudi/UAE- led isolation of Qatar and had urged resolution of that rift before its resolution in January 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Edit Final
    ABSTRACT You are Who You Fight: The CIA, Covert Action, and National Security Charissa Huntzinger Director: Peter Campbell Ph.D. Hollywood thrillers, conspiracy theories and political discourse, often depict the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) as an uncontrollable, enigmatic organization populat- ed by James Bonds. The agency’s mandate, set out in the National Security Act of 1947, tells a different story that is often overlooked. In essence, the US government designed the CIA as a center of intelligence analysis and not a cloak and dagger outfit. Neverthe- less, the CIA did develop a covert action branch and from the Cold War to the War on Terror, the CIA has increasingly relied on this operational component. But where did this branch come from and how and why has it adapted or failed to adapt to changes in the international environment? Through two case studies, this thesis evaluates the efficacy of bureaucratic, organizational cultural, and realist theories for explaining the evolution of covert action within the CIA. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: ________________________________________________ Dr. Peter Campbell, Political Science APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: ________________________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Director. DATE: ________________________ YOU ARE WHO YOU FIGHT: THE CIA, COVERT ACTION, AND NATIONAL SECURITY A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Charissa Huntzinger Waco, TX May 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction . 1 Chapter 2: Theoretical Framework . 6 Chapter 3: The Early Cold War . 15 Chapter 4: The War on Terror . 38 Chapter 5: Conclusion . 54 Bibliography . 65 ii CHAPTER ONE Introduction The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is a generally misunderstood arm of the American national security Apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcement of the Iran–Libya Sanctions Act and Increasing Security Threats from Iran
    ENFORCEMENT OF THE IRAN–LIBYA SANCTIONS ACT AND INCREASING SECURITY THREATS FROM IRAN HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE MIDDLE EAST AND CENTRAL ASIA OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 25, 2003 Serial No. 108–59 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/international—relations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 87–998PDF WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska HOWARD L. BERMAN, California CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York Vice Chairman ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DANA ROHRABACHER, California BRAD SHERMAN, California EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ROBERT WEXLER, Florida PETER T. KING, New York ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts AMO HOUGHTON, New York GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York BARBARA LEE, California THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York RON PAUL, Texas JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL, Pennsylvania NICK SMITH, Michigan EARL BLUMENAUER, Oregon JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania SHELLEY BERKLEY, Nevada JEFF FLAKE, Arizona GRACE F.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Intelligence in Covert Operatives
    OVERT ACCEPTANCE: CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE IN COVERT OPERATIVES CHIP MICHAEL BUCKLEY A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mercyhurst University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN APPLIED INTELLIGENCE RIDGE SCHOOL FOR INTELLIGENCE STUDIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA JANUARY 2015 RIDGE SCHOOL FOR INTELLIGENCE STUDIES AND INFORMATION SCIENCE MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA OVERT ACCEPTANCE: CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE IN COVERT OPERATIVES A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mercyhurst University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN APPLIED INTELLIGENCE Submitted By: CHIP MICHAEL BUCKLEY Certificate of Approval: ___________________________________ Stephen Zidek, M.A. Assistant Professor The Ridge School of Intelligence Studies and Information Science ___________________________________ James G. Breckenridge, Ph.D. Associate Professor The Ridge School of Intelligence Studies and Information Science ___________________________________ Phillip J. Belfiore, Ph.D. Vice President Office of Academic Affairs January 2015 Copyright © 2015 by Chip Michael Buckley All rights reserved. iii DEDICATION To my father. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge a number of important individuals who have provided an extraordinary amount of support throughout this process. The faculty at Mercyhurst University, particularly Professor Stephen Zidek, provided invaluable guidance when researching and developing this thesis. My friends and classmates also volunteered important ideas and guidance throughout this time. Lastly, my family’s support, patience, and persistent inquiries regarding my progress cannot be overlooked. v ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Overt Acceptance: Cultural Intelligence in Covert Operatives A Critical Examination By Chip Michael Buckley Master of Science in Applied Intelligence Mercyhurst University, 2014 Professor S.
    [Show full text]