DOCSLIB.ORG

Skull Valley Band of Goshute Floodplain Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Skull Valley Band of Goshute Floodplain Management Plan MARCH 2018 SKULL VALLEY BAND OF GOSHUTE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN Shambip Conservation District Skull Valley Band of Goshute Floodplain Management Plan Page left intentionally blank Skull Valley Band of Goshute Floodplain Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE OF THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................................................... 1 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT GOALS ................................................................................................... 2 Improve Emergency Response Capability ................................................................................................ 2 Develop Preventive Measures to Reduce Flood Damages ....................................................................... 2 Document the Flood History of Skull Valley ........................................................................................... 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................. 2 Plan Participation ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Development Timeline ............................................................................................................................. 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA ............................................................................................................... 6 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................................... 8 Critical Structures ..................................................................................................................................... 8 FLOODPLAIN HAZARD ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................. 10 Flood Event 2013.................................................................................................................................... 12 Response Following 2013 Flood Event .................................................................................................. 14 Flood Event 2014.................................................................................................................................... 16 Response Following 2014 Flood Event .................................................................................................. 18 Older Flood Events ................................................................................................................................. 20 Climate Change ...................................................................................................................................... 21 ONGOING PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS .............................................................................. 22 MITIGATION STRATEGIES ................................................................................................................. 22 Strategy: Modifying Human Susceptibility to Flood Hazards ................................................................ 23 Strategy: Modifying the Impact of Flooding ......................................................................................... 24 Strategy: Preserving and Restoring Floodplains’ Environmental Quality ............................................. 24 Strategy: Modifying Floodwaters .......................................................................................................... 25 Strategies and Mitigation Actions Dashboard ........................................................................................ 26 GOALS AND MITIGATION ACTIONS ................................................................................................... 28 ACTION PLAN .................................................................................................................................. 30 i | Page Skull Valley Band of Goshute Floodplain Management Plan Development of Land Policies and Land Use Regulations .................................................................... 30 Flood Warning Systems .......................................................................................................................... 31 Emergency Action Plan .......................................................................................................................... 32 Elevation of Buildings ............................................................................................................................ 33 Relocation of Buildings .......................................................................................................................... 33 Flood Proofing Buildings in the Floodplain ........................................................................................... 34 Fill or Conversion of a Basement with Main Floor Addition for Buildings ........................................... 36 Acquisition of Buildings ......................................................................................................................... 36 Berms ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 Information and Education ..................................................................................................................... 37 Flood Insurance ...................................................................................................................................... 40 Community Rating System ..................................................................................................................... 40 Tax Adjustments and Rebates ................................................................................................................ 41 Emergency Relief ................................................................................................................................... 41 Post-Flood Recovery Processes .............................................................................................................. 42 Wetlands Protection and Restoration...................................................................................................... 42 Erosion and Sediment Control ................................................................................................................ 43 Water Quality Enhancement ................................................................................................................... 43 Enhancement of Recreational and Educational Opportunities ............................................................... 44 Preservation of Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................ 44 Dams ....................................................................................................................................................... 45 Stormwater Detention and Retention Basins .......................................................................................... 45 Levees ..................................................................................................................................................... 45 Floodwalls .............................................................................................................................................. 46 Landforms ............................................................................................................................................... 46 Channel Alterations and Diversions ....................................................................................................... 46 Pump Stations ......................................................................................................................................... 47 Engineering Study .................................................................................................................................. 47 Fire Suppression Actions ........................................................................................................................ 48 Floodplain Management Plan Adoption ................................................................................................. 48 Tribal Mitigation Plan Adoption ............................................................................................................ 49 Planning Assistance to States Project ..................................................................................................... 49 PRIORITIZATION OF MITIGATION ACTIONS ....................................................................................... 50 PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 53 ii | Page Skull Valley Band of Goshute Floodplain Management Plan Responsibility for Plan Maintenance ...................................................................................................... 53 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Updating the Plan ..................................................................................... 53 Monitoring the Process of Mitigation Actions ....................................................................................... 53
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah
    Prepared in cooperation with the State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5068 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Groundwater-supplied stock tank in southwestern Rush Valley, Utah. Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah By Philip M. Gardner and Stefan Kirby Prepared in cooperation with the State of Utah Department of Natural Resources Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5068 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Gardner, P.M., and Kirby, S.M., 2011, Hydrogeologic and geochemical characterization of groundwater resources in Rush Valley, Tooele County, Utah: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Stansbury Mountains, Utah
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 43 Number 4 Article 11 10-31-1983 Flora of the Stansbury Mountains, Utah Alan C. Taye U.S. Army Intelligence Center and School, Fort Huachuca, Arizona Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Taye, Alan C. (1983) "Flora of the Stansbury Mountains, Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 43 : No. 4 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol43/iss4/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. FLORA OF THE STANSBURY MOUNTAINS, UTAH Alan C. Taye' Abstract.— The Stansbury Mountains of north central Utah rise over 2000 m above surrounding desert valleys to a maximum elevation of 3362 m on Deseret Peak. Because of the great variety of environmental conditions that can be found in the Stansburys, a wide range of plant species and vegetation types (from shadscale desert to alpine mead- ow) exist there. This paper presents an annotated list of 594 vascular plant species in 315 genera and 78 families. The largest families are Asteraceae (98 species), Poaceae (71), Brassicaceae (33), Fabaceae (27), and Rosaceae (26). Elymiis flcwescens was previously unreported from Utah. Statistical comparison of the Stansbury flora with neighboring mountain floras indicates that the Wasatch Mountains lying 65 km to the east have probably been the primary source area for development of the Stansbury flora.
    [Show full text]
  • The LDS Hawaiian Colony at Skull Valley, Utah 1889-1917
    cannon was determined to learn hawaiian was very sharp and did so finally THE LDSLOSHAWAIIAN COLONY AT SKULL VALLEY UTAH 188919171889 1917 he and soaesome others began to make some converts brigham young then sug- by leonard J arringtonarlington gested they set up a temporary gathering place where they could all live prepared for the polynesian LDSLOShistory association conference laie hawaii august 2 1980 together A committee investigated all of the islands after a careful survey they finally decided on lanai an island which was almost uninhabited one of the nostwostmost solidly established principles of the early church riding to the interior the committee found what they were looking for and was the gathering the lord instructed the saints as early as 1831 that selected the crater of lalawaiPapalawailawai this crater was about three and a half the elect should gather out of babylon to live work and worship liesilesmileswiles videwide an important obstacle was the lack of water but the committee together as a community of saints this principle was applied as the thought this could be overcome by building reservoirs the owner of the body of the church moved1ronoved froaaroa new york to northeastern ohio to jackson land faaleleahaaleleaHaa lelea agreed to letietlot the saints experiment with itit rent free for county clay county and caldwell county missouri and to hancock county four years it was a 200acre200 acraaracre site which they called the city of joseph in illinois it continued after the grationmigrationai to the salt lake valley
    [Show full text]
  • Early Exploration and Settlement of the Tooele Area, Utah
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1953 Early Exploration and Settlement of the Tooele Area, Utah Thomas Keith Midgley Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Midgley, Thomas Keith, "Early Exploration and Settlement of the Tooele Area, Utah" (1953). Theses and Dissertations. 4940. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4940 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. EARLY exploration AND settlement OF THETOOELE TOOELE AREA UTAH A thesis presented to the department of history brigham young university proveprovoprovos utah I1 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of science in history by thomas keith midgley julyjulys 1931953 PREFACE investigation of state and local history is one of the most fruitful fields for historical researchresearcho particularly in the newer regions of the west this thesis has been undertaken in order to make more lucid and available the historical material on and about the early exploration and settlement of the tooelethoelearea in utah following a discussion of the physical features of this region a description of the early natives and their ha- bitat will be presented
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Areas on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National
    Wilderness Areas On The Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forests “Wilderness is the land that was wild land beyond the frontier...land that shaped the growth of our nation and the character of its people. Wilderness is the land that is rare, wild places where one can retreat from civilization, reconnect with the Earth, and find healing, meaning and significance.” The United States was the first country to define and create designated wilderness areas. In 1964 the Wilderness Act was passed in congress. The Act describes wilderness as the following: "...lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition..." Section 2(a) "...an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man..." Section 2(c) "...an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvement or human habitation..." Section 2(c) "...generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable..." Section 2(c) "...has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation..." Section 2(c) "...shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreation, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation and historic use." Section 4(b) Within the Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forest there are 9 designated wilderness areas. These areas include: Mount Naomi Wilderness, Wellsville Mountain Wilderness, Mount Olympus Wilderness, Twin Peaks Wilderness, Lone Peak Wilderness, Mount Timpanogos Wilderness, Mount Nebo Wilderness, Deseret Peak Wilderness and the High Uinta Wilderness. Each of these areas offer unique wilderness opportunities and experiences. The Mount Naomi Wilderness was designated in 1984 and includes 44,523 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Iii Cultural Resource Inventory of the Private Fuel Storage Project in Skull Valley, Tooele County, Utah
    CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY OF THE PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE PROJECT IN SKULL VALLEY, TOOELE COUNTY, UTAH Cultural Resources Report 5126-02-9909 by Daniel K. Newsome "•,.•.. _/ l. Site 42TO1187 A Temporary datum Low Transportation Corridor oenterfine o Low Tranmportation Comdor 1 centedlne c point Rock 0 T 25 e Rock accurjmjabon ydo Intemittent drainage Contour interval: 3.0 ft F Photo point P-IIIASSOCIATES, INC. 0 9910260199 991019 PDR ADOCK 07200022 B PDR CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY OF THE PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE PROJECT IN SKULL VALLEY, TOOELE COUNTY, UTAH Cultural Resources Report 5126-02-9909 by Daniel K. Newsome Submitted to Stone & Webseter 7677 East Berry Avenue Englewood, CO 80111-2137 by P-Ill Associates, Inc. 2759 South 300 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84115-2932 July, 1999 Work completed under Department of Interior Antiquities Permit 98UT54616, State of Utah Antiquities Permit U-99-PD, and State of Utah Project-Specific Permit U-98-PD-0213bi Table of Contents Section Page List of Figures ................................................... iii L ist of T ables ....................................................... v Introduction and Project Description ..................................... 1 Environm ental Setting ................................................ 25 Regional Prehistoric and Historic Overview ............................... 28 Literature Review and Records Search ................................... 31 Field M ethods ...................................................... 33 Inventory R esults ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Native Sovereignty and the Federal Trust Lincoln L
    Maryland Law Review Volume 68 | Issue 2 Article 4 Skull Valley Crossroads: Reconciling Native Sovereignty and the Federal Trust Lincoln L. Davies Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Lincoln L. Davies, Skull Valley Crossroads: Reconciling Native Sovereignty and the Federal Trust, 68 Md. L. Rev. 290 (2009) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol68/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\server05\productn\M\MLR\68-2\MLR202.txt unknown Seq: 1 26-FEB-09 11:15 Articles SKULL VALLEY CROSSROADS: RECONCILING NATIVE SOVEREIGNTY AND THE FEDERAL TRUST LINCOLN L. DAVIES* ABSTRACT It has been long recognized that a deep tension pervades federal American Indian law. The foundational principles of the field—on the one hand, the notion that tribes keep their inherent right of sover- eignty and, on the other, that the federal government has a power and duty to protect them—clash on their face. Despite years of criti- cism of this conflict, the two principles continue to coexist, albeit un- comfortably. Using the example of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians’ controversial proposal to store high-level nuclear waste on their land, this Article revisits the tension in these doctrines, weighs prior proposals attempting to reconcile them, and concludes that, ul- timately, sovereignty and the federal trust are not reconcilable.
    [Show full text]
  • Docketing of Information Written Public Comments Received from on the Private Fuel Storage Environmental Impact Statement
    June 11, 1999 Note To: File From: Scott Flander SUBJECT: DOCKETING OF INFORMATION WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM ON THE PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT On April 29, 1999, public scoping meetings were held on certain aspects of the PFS EIS. In addition, to verbal comments provided at the meeting, the NRC allowed for written comments until May 28, 1999. Attached are comments received to date. The attached comments will be added to the PFS docket number 72-22. C -1::: ?U GcL- C i/ 'jiG A 99C09100j101 9961 P A 07200022 C IV Written Comments Received as a Result of the April 29, 1999 Scoping Meeting (1) Statement from the Women Concerned/Utahns United (Written Comments received at the April 29, 1999, scoping meeting) (2) Metallic Mineral Potential of Skull Valley, Utah Geological Survey by R.W. Gloyn. (Written Comments received at the April 29, 1999, scoping meeting) (3) Letter from Louise Hess to Scott Flanders (NRC), dated April 22, 1999 (4) Letter from Earl R. Morris, Director of the Utah Department of Public Safety, to Scott Flanders (NRC), dated May 4, 1999 (5) Letter from John E. Tanner, Jr. to Scott Flanders (NRC), dated May 19, 1999 (6) Letter from John Paul Kennedy to Scott Flanders (NRC), dated May 21, 1999 (7) Letter from Dianne Nielson, Director of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, to Scott Flanders (NRC), dated May 27, 1999 (8) Letter from Christopher Robinson, President of Ensign Ranches of Utah, L.C., to Leon Berggren (BLM), dated May 24, 1999 (9) Letter from Joro Walker, Land and Water
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Fusulinid Evaluation Results for the Rush Valley, Wildcat Mountain, Grouse Creek, and Tremonton 30' X 60' Quadrangles, Utah
    Fossil Fusulinid Evaluation Results for the Rush Valley, Wildcat Mountain, Grouse Creek, and Tremonton 30' x 60' Quadrangles, Utah by Utah Geological Survey and A.J. Wells1 1Independent Paleontologist, 7250 N. Alpine Dr., Parker, CO 80134 Bibliographic citation for this data report: Utah Geological Survey and Wells, A.J., 2017, Fossil fusulinid evaluation results for the Rush Valley, Wildcat Mountain, Grouse Creek, and Tremonton 30' x 60' quadrangles, Utah: Online, Utah Geological Survey Open-File Report 664, 64 p., https://ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/open_file_reports/ofr-664.pdf. OPEN-FILE REPORT 664 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2017 STATE OF UTAH Gary R. Herbert, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Michael Styler, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard G. Allis, Director PUBLICATIONS contact Natural Resources Map & Bookstore 1594 W. North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3320 toll-free: 1-888-UTAH MAP website: mapstore.utah.gov email: [email protected] UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY contact 1594 W. North Temple, Suite 3110 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3300 website: geology.utah.gov Disclaimer This open-file release is intended as a data repository for information gathered in support of various UGS projects. The data are presented as received from A.J. Wells and do not necessarily conform to UGS technical, editorial, or policy standards; this should be considered by an individual or group planning to take action based on the contents of this report. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the suitability of this product for a particular use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skull Valley Goshute and Nuclear Waste: Rhetorical Analysis of Claims-Making of Opponents and Proponents
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2004 The Skull Valley Goshute and Nuclear Waste: Rhetorical Analysis of Claims-Making of Opponents and Proponents Jesse T. Weiss Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Weiss, Jesse T., "The Skull Valley Goshute and Nuclear Waste: Rhetorical Analysis of Claims-Making of Opponents and Proponents" (2004). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1990. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1990 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SKULL V ALLEY GOSHUTE AND NUCLEAR WASTE: RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF CLAIMS-MAKING by Jesse T. Weiss A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY III Sociology Aooroved: \ I Richard S. Kr:iI1lfich GqMadsen Major Professor Committee Member..... JeDJfiter Peeples rnnun ittAM'fv{pm hPrl Peggy Ptttic!lka v \~rens H. SrW"ith, Jr. Committee Member li1terim Dean of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2004 -- ----- -----------------~ II ABSTRACT The Skull Valley Goshute and Nuclear Waste: Rhetorical Analysis of Claims-Making of Opponents and Proponents by Jesse T. Weiss, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2004 Major Professor: Dr. Richard S. Krannich Department: Sociology, Social Work, & Anthropology One of the greatest challenges to modem society is the management and disposal of hazardous by-products that have accompanied the industrial advances of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skull Valley Cultural Landscape," to Your Office
    72-22- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy 5168 North Windriver Place Tucson, AZ 85750 April 12, 2001 Mr. Scott C. Flanders U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Dear Mr. Flanders: This letter transmits a copy of the report entitled, "The Skull Valley Cultural Landscape," to your office. This report has been prepared at the NRC's request and is provided to support the cultural resources evaluation of the environmental impact analyses effort for the Private Fuels Storage, L.L.C., Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians and related transportation facility in Tooele County, Utah. The report describes the ethnohistorical context for historic period occupation and use of Skull Valley by Native peoples over the past two centuries, and is based solely on a review of existing relevant literature. No fieldwork or direct contacts with tribal governments or Native American persons was completed during the course of this analysis. If you have any questions on the report's contents, please contact me at the above address or at (520) 577-6024. Sincerely, Paul R. Nickens, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist Cc: w/encl Van Ramsdell - PNNL, Richland, WA 902 Battelle Boulevard - P.O. Box 999 RRiclan.d, \WAý 99352 The Skull Valley Goshute Cultural Landscape Prepared by Paul R. Nickens Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 2000 The Gosiute habitat is one of the leastfavorable in the entire Shoshoni area.
    [Show full text]
  • Enos Stookey (1839 – 1889) & Jemima Elizabeth Child
    Enos Stookey (1839 – 1889) & Jemima Elizabeth Child (1827 – 1914) Belleville, St. Clair Co., Illinois: Directly across the Mississippi River from St. Louis, Missouri. After the failure of the German Revolution in 1848, many of the educated people fled their homeland. Belleville was the center of the first important German settlement in Illinois. By 1870, an estimated 90% of the city's population was either German born or of German descent. Stookey is an English and German origin name. Stookey’s ancestors lived in the eastern U.S. (Virginia, Pennsylvania, etc.) and his Grandfather located to Belleville, St. Clair Co., Illinois around 1795. His Father, Moses Stookey, was 2nd of 12 children born to Daniel Stuckey and Barbara Whetstone. Their 12 children were born between 1796 and 1818 at Belleville, St. Clair Co., Illinois. Some reports show Moses Stookey was born at Martinsburg Co, West Virginia and all others children at Belleville, Illinois. Enos Stookey is the 6th of 9 children born to Moses Stookey and Elisabeth Anderson. Their children were all born at Belleville, St. Clair Co., Illinois between 1824 and 1845. Enos Stookey Birth 25 March 1839 Belleville, St. Clair Co., Illinois Death 22 May 1889 Salt Lake City, Salt Lake Co., Utah Burial 22 May 1889 Salt Lake City, Salt Lake Co., Utah MARRIED 24 Mar 1852 at St. Clair Co.., Illinois Jemima Elizabeth Child Birth 31 March 1827 London, Middlesex, England Death 14 July 1914 Burial Clover, Tooele Co., Utah Jemima Elizabeth Child is the 1st of 7 children born to John Child and Eliza Newport. Jemima Elizabeth was born near London, England.
    [Show full text]