Barrens Dagger Moth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Barrens Dagger Moth Acronicta albarufa State Status: Threatened Route 135, Westborough, MA 01581 tel: (508) 389-6360; fax: (508) 389-7891 Federal Status: None www.nhesp.org Description: The Barrens Dagger is a noctuid moth with blue-gray forewings mottled with black and white, a black basal dash curving towards the costa, a rusty-brown reniform spot, and a small, round orbicular spot, often white with a dark center. The hind wings are white in males and grayish-brown in females. Wingspan is 30-37 mm. Habitat: Xeric, oak-dominated woodland, barrens, and scrub habitats on sandy soil. In Massachusetts, the Barrens Dagger inhabits open-canopy pitch pine-scrub oak barrens, especially scrub oak thickets; also open oak woodland on Martha's Vineyard. Photo by M.W. Nelson Life History: Adult moths fly from late June through early August. Larvae feed from summer into early fall, and pupae overwinter. Scrub oak (Quercus ilicifolia) is Adult Flight Period in Massachusetts the primary host plant, though other oak species may also Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec be used. Range: This species is widespread in North America, but populations occur in restricted, disjunct areas. In the East, Threats major populations occur in the Ozark Mountains of • Habitat loss Missouri and Arkansas and the pine barrens of southern • Fire suppression New Jersey and southeastern Massachusetts. • Invasion by exotic plants • Introduced generalist parasitoids • Insecticide spraying • Off-road vehicles • Light pollution Distribution in Massachusetts 1982 - 2007 Based on records in the Natural Heritage Database Updated June 2007 M.W. Nelson .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Lepidoptera of North America 5
Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
[Show full text]
Ecological Sustainability Will Probably Always Be Limited by Its Small Size and Fragmented Condition (See Section 3.5)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2011 Terrestrial Species Viability Evaluation for The Uwharrie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Requirements in the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) ............................. 1 3.0 Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Spatial Scales for Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 4 3.2 Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................................................... 7 3.3 Range of Variation .................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Current Condition and Trend of Ecosystem Characteristics and Status of Ecosystem Diversity ..................................................................................................... 15 3.5 – Risks to Selected Characteristics of Ecosystem Diversity ................................... 20 3.6 Recommended Forest Plan Components ............................................................... 21 3.7 Assessing effects of Forest Plan alternatives on viability ....................................
[Show full text]
INDEX for VOLUME 52 (New Names in Boldface)
Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 52(4). 1998, 388- 401 INDEX FOR VOLUME 52 (new names in boldface) 2-methyloctadecane. 356 Amblyscirtes, 237, 240 fimbriata pallida, 54 Abaeis nicippe, 57 jluonia, 54 Acacia farnesiana, 215 folia, 54 Acanthaceae, 74, 107,215 patriciae, 54 Acer rubrum, 128 raphaeli, 54 Aceraceae, 128 tolteca tolteca, 54 AchaZarus, 236, 240 Ampelocera hottleii, 109 casica,50 Anaea, 239, 242 toxeus,50 aidea, 62 Achlyodes, 240 Anartia, 242 busirus heros, 52 amathea colima, 59 selva , .52 Jatrophe, 25 Acrodipsas illidgei, 139 Jatrophe luteipicta, 59 Acronicta albarufa, 381 Anastnls adaptation, 207 robigus, 52 Adelia triloba, 338 sempiternus sempiternus, 52 Adelotypa eudocia, 66 Anatrytone, 237 Adelpha, 239 mazai,54 basiioicies has i/o ides , 62 Anchistea virginica, 128 celerio diademata , 62 Ancyloxypha, 240 fessonia fessonia , 62 arene,54 iphiclus massilides, 62 Anemeca ehrenbergii, 60 ixia leucas, 62 Annonaceae, 107 leuceria leuceria, 62 Anteos, 241 naxia epiphicla, 62 clorinde nivifera, 57 phylaca phyiaca, 62 maerula lacordairei , 57 serpa massilia, 62 Anteros carausius carausius, 65 Adhemarius gannascus, 110 Anthanassa, 239 ypsilon, 11 0 alexon alexon, 60 Aegiceras corniculatum, 141 ardys anlys, 60 Aellopos pto/yea arrUltor, 60 ceculus, 111 sitalces cortes, 60 clavi pes , III texana texana, 60 fadus , III tulcis, 60 Aeshnidae, 137 Antlwcharis Aethilla lavochrea, 52 cardamines, 156 Agathymus rethon, 55 euphenoid~s, 1.56 Aglais urticae, 156 Anthoptus insignis, 53 Agraulis Antig()nus vanillae, 25 emorsa,52 vanillae incarnata,
[Show full text]
Litchfield County
A County Report of Connecticut's Endangered, Threatened and Special Concern Species Litchfield County Amphibians Scientific Name Common Name Protection Status Ambystoma jeffersonianum Jefferson salamander "complex" SC Ambystoma laterale Blue-spotted salamander E/SC Gyrinophilus porphyriticus Northern spring salamander T Necturus maculosus Mudpuppy SC Plethodon glutinosus Northern slimy salamander T Rana pipiens Northern leopard frog SC Scaphiopus holbrookii Eastern spadefoot E Birds Scientific Name Common Name Protection Status Accipiter gentilis Northern goshawk T Accipiter striatus Sharp-shinned hawk E Aegolius acadicus Northern saw-whet owl SC Ammodramus henslowii Henslow's sparrow SC* Ammodramus savannarum Grasshopper sparrow E Asio otus Long-eared owl E Bartramia longicauda Upland sandpiper E Botaurus lentiginosus American bittern E Buteo platypterus Broad-winged hawk SC Caprimulgus vociferus Whip-poor-will SC Circus hudsonius Northern harrier (Circus cyaneus) E Cistothorus platensis Sedge wren E Dolichonyx oryzivorus Bobolink SC Empidonax alnorum Alder flycatcher SC 6/23/2021 1 Litchfield County Birds Scientific Name Common Name Protection Status Eremophila alpestris Horned lark E Falco peregrinus Peregrine falcon T Falco sparverius American kestrel SC Gallinula galeata Common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) E Gavia immer Common loon SC Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle T Ixobrychus exilis Least bittern T Melanerpes erythrocephalus Red-headed woodpecker E Passerculus sandwichensis Savannah sparrow SC Podilymbus podiceps Pied-billed
[Show full text]
Wintucket Cove Frostbottom and Sheriff’S Meadow Foundation
Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation A VINEYARD LAND TRUST Founded in 1959, Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation is the land trust for the island of Martha’s Vineyard. Its mission is to conserve, manage and administer lands for wildlife habitat and all other lands that represent the beautiful, rural, natural character of Martha’s Vineyard. Wintucket Cove Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation is proud to be a Frostbottom partner in conservation with the Vineyard Golf Eastern Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) Club. Sheriff’s Meadow congratulates the Vineyard Golf Club for creating a golf course that is entirely organic, and for the numerous awards that the Club has received in recognition of this accomplishment. That this golf course is all-organic most certainly benefits the rare, and the common, plants and animals that find their home in this unique frost- bottom habitat. If you have any questions about this frostbottom or Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation, please do feel free to contact our Executive Director, Adam Moore, at Imperial Moth (Eacles imperialis) [email protected], or our Director of Stewardship, Kristen Fauteux, at fauteux@sheriffs - meadow.org. You may also reach us via telephone at 508.693.5207. At the Vineyard Golf Club Thank you for your interest in the Wintucket Cove Frostbottom and Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation. Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation Property Map PO Box 1088 Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 508.693.5207 www.sheriffsmeadow.org Wintucket Cove Frostbottom The low, treeless area bordering holes 7, 8, and 9 is FROSTBOTTOM MOTHS FROSTBOTTOM FLORA a globally rare geological feature called the Wintucket Surprisingly, a number of moths not only survive under Two trees dominate the flora of the frostbottom: Cove Frostbottom.
[Show full text]
The Cutworm Moths of Ontario and Quebec
The Cutworm Moths of Ontario and Quebec Eric W. Rockburne and J. Donald Lafontaine Biosystematics Research Institute Ottawa, Ontario Photographs by Thomas H. Stovell Research Branch Canada Department of Agriculture Publication 1593 1976 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1976 Available by mail from Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K 1A 089 or through your bookseller. Catalogue No. A43-1593/1976 Price: Canada: $ 8.50 ISBN 0-660-00514-X Other countries: $10.20 Price subject to change without notice. 01 A05-6-38481 The Cutworm Moths of Ontario and Quebec INTRODUCTION The cutworm, or owlet, moths constitute a family belonging to the order Lepidoptera. This order consists of all the moths and butterflies. Cutworm moths are common throughout the world. In Canada and the United States over three thousand species are represented, from the Arctic tundra to the arid deserts of southwestern United States. Many species are found in eastern North America, but the family is best represented in the mountains and on the plateaus of western North America. CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE In zoology, classification is the systematic arrangement of animals into related groups and categories, and nomenclature is the system of names given to these groups. The cutworm moths are insects that belong in the class Insecta. Insecta is divided into several orders: Diptera, the true flies: Hymenoptera. the wasps, bees, and ants: Coleoptera. the beetles, and so on. The order Lepidoptera includes all the moths and butterflies. Each order is divided into a number of families, and the Noctuidae family, which includes all the cutworm moths, is a family of the Lepidoptera.
[Show full text]
New Jersey Dept of Environmental Protection: Rare Species And
Department of Environmental Protection Page I of 2 parks and forestry links New Jersey Rare Species and Natural Community Lists By County Lists of rare species and natural communities by county can be viewed on this home page. These lists are revised several times each year. Included in the lists is information on the rarity and official status of each species/natural community. Explanations of codes used in Natural Heritage Reports are also available to assist in your interpretation of the lists. The Natural Heritage Database is continuously updated as new information becomes available. Sources of data include scientific literature, museum records, observations of naturalists around the state, staff scientists and field inventories. Entry of information into the database is prioritized according to the rarity of the species or natural community. Most emphasis has been placed on globally rare or officially listed endangered and threatened species. Information provided by the Natural Heritage Database should not be considered a definitive statement on the presence, absence, or condition of biological elements in any part of New Jersey, but simply what has been included in the database to date. If you have information which you believe would add to our knowledge of a specific county, species or natural community, please contact our staff or submit a rare species reporting form. Rare Species and Natural Community Lists by County * Atlantic " Gloucester " Ocean " Bergen " Hudson * Passaic * Burlington " Hunterdon " Salem • Camden " Mercer
[Show full text]
SWAP 2015 Report
STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN September 2015 GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE RESOURCES DIVISION Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Recommended reference: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 2015. Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan. Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Recommended reference for appendices: Author, A.A., & Author, B.B. Year. Title of Appendix. In Georgia State Wildlife Action Plan (pages of appendix). Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Cover photo credit & description: Photo by Shan Cammack, Georgia Department of Natural Resources Interagency Burn Team in Action! Growing season burn on May 7, 2015 at The Nature Conservancy’s Broxton Rocks Preserve. Zach Wood of The Orianne Society conducting ignition. i Table&of&Contents& Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv! Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ x! I. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................. 1! A Plan to Protect Georgia’s Biological Diversity ....................................................... 1! Essential Elements of a State Wildlife Action Plan .................................................... 2! Species of Greatest Conservation Need ...................................................................... 3! Scales of Biological Diversity
[Show full text]
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
[Show full text]
Karner Blue Butterfly Recovery Plan
Karner Blue Butterfly Recovery Plan (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) September 2003 Department of the Interior U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Great Lakes - Big Rivers Region (Region 3) Fort Snelling, Minnesota KARNER BLUE BUTTERFLY RECOVERY TEAM David Andow, Team Leader Department of Entomology University of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota Miles Benson Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin (former Director of Timberlands, Consolidated Papers, Inc.) Catherine Carnes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recovery Coordinator Ecological Services Field Office (Green Bay) New Franken, Wisconsin Mark Clough U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Robyn Niver) New York Field Office Cortland, New York Rex Ennis Huron-Manistee National Forest Cadillac, Michigan Stephanie Gifford The Nature Conservancy (Neil Gifford) Troy, New York (formerly Bob Zaremba) Bill Gilbert Plum Creek Timber Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin Thomas Givnish Botany Department University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Alan Haney College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, Wisconsin Steve Hatting Huron-Manistee National Forest White Cloud, Michigan Paul Kooiker Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (formerly Cathy Bleser) Grantsburg, Wisconsin Cynthia Lane Ecological Strategies, LLC Maiden Rock, Wisconsin ii Kathy O'Brien New York Department of Environmental Conservation Albany, New York Pat Lederle Michigan Department of Natural Resources (formerly Mary Rabe) Lansing, Michigan Dale Schweitzer The Nature Conservancy Port Norris, New Jersey John Shuey The Nature Conservancy Indianapolis, Indiana Jennifer Szymanski U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Onalaska, Wisconsin Larry Wargowsky Necedah National Wildlife Refuge Necedah, Wisconsin iii * * * This recovery plan has been prepared by the Karner Blue Butterfly Recovery Team under the leadership of Dr. David Andow, University of Minnesota-St. Paul. Dr.
[Show full text]
Rare Animal Status List October 2017
Rare Animal Status List October 2017 New York Natural Heritage Program i A Partnership between the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry and the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 5th Floor, Albany, NY 12233-4757 (518) 402-8935 Fax (518) 402-8925 www.nynhp.org Established in 1985, the New York Natural Heritage NY Natural Heritage also houses iMapInvasives, an Program (NYNHP) is a program of the State University of online tool for invasive species reporting and data New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry management. (SUNY ESF). Our mission is to facilitate conservation of NY Natural Heritage has developed two notable rare animals, rare plants, and significant ecosystems. We online resources: Conservation Guides include the accomplish this mission by combining thorough field biology, identification, habitat, and management of many inventories, scientific analyses, expert interpretation, and the of New York’s rare species and natural community most comprehensive database on New York's distinctive types; and NY Nature Explorer lists species and biodiversity to deliver the highest quality information for communities in a specified area of interest. natural resource planning, protection, and management. The program is an active participant in the The Program is funded by grants and contracts from NatureServe Network – an international network of government agencies whose missions involve natural biodiversity data centers overseen by a Washington D.C. resource management, private organizations involved in based non-profit organization. There are currently land protection and stewardship, and both government and Natural Heritage Programs or Conservation Data private organizations interested in advancing the Centers in all 50 states and several interstate regions.
[Show full text]
A Multiscale Landscape Approach to Predicting Bird and Moth Rarity Hotspots in a Threatened Pitch Pine–Scrub Oak Community
A Multiscale Landscape Approach to Predicting Bird and Moth Rarity Hotspots in a Threatened Pitch Pine–Scrub Oak Community JOANNA GRAND,∗‡ JOHN BUONACCORSI,† SAMUEL A. CUSHMAN,∗ CURTICE R. GRIFFIN,∗ AND MAILE C. NEEL∗ ∗Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Department of Natural Resources Conservation, Holdsworth Natural Resources Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003–9285, U.S.A. †Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lederle Graduate Research Tower, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003–9305, U.S.A. Abstract: In the northeastern United States, pitch pine ( Pinus rigida Mill.)–scrub oak (Quercus ilicifolia Wang.) communities are increasingly threatened by development and fire suppression, and prioritization of these habitats for conservation is of critical importance. As a basis for local conservation planning in a pitch pine–scrub oak community in southeastern Massachusetts, we developed logistic-regression models based on multiscale landscape and patch variables to predict hotspots of rare and declining bird and moth species. We compared predicted moth distributions with observed species-occurrence records to validate the models. We then quantified the amount of overlap between hotspots to assess the utility of rare birds and moths as indicator taxa. Species representation in hotspots and the current level of hotspot protection were also assessed. Predictive models included variables at all measured scales and resulted in average correct classification rates (optimal cut point) of 85.6% and 89.2% for bird and moth models, respectively. The majority of moth occurrence records were within 100 m of predicted habitat. Only 13% of all bird hotspots and 10% of all moth hotspots overlapped, and only a few small patches in and around Myles Standish State Forest were predicted to be hotspots for both taxa.
[Show full text]