DOCSLIB.ORG

Endangered Species Biological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Endangered Species Biological Assessment PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENT STUDY SR 997 / SW 177th AVENUE / KROME AVENUE SOUTH FROM SW 296th STREET (AVOCADO DRIVE) TO SW 136th STREET (HOWARD DRIVE) FM NO.: 249614-4-22-01 ETDM No. 7800 Endangered Species Biological Assessment Florida Department of Transportation, District Six 1000 NW 111th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172 September 2013 SR 997/SW 177th Avenue/Krome Avenue (South) PD&E Study Endangered Species Biological Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 LAND USE ......................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 2-5 2.4 ALTERNATE CORRIDORS ................................................................................................... 2-7 2.5 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 2-9 2.5.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................................ 2-9 2.5.2 Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative ....................................... 2-10 2.5.3 Action Plan Alternative .......................................................................................... 2-11 2.5.4 Proposed Build Alternatives .................................................................................. 2-14 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 NATURAL COMMUNITIES (UPLANDS/WETLANDS) ............................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Upland Communities ............................................................................................... 3-8 3.1.2 Wetland /Surfacewater Communities ..................................................................... 3-12 3.1.3 Other Notable Communities in Close Proximity to the Project ............................. 3-14 3.2 PROTECTED SPECIES AND HABITATS .............................................................................. 3-17 3.2.1 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................... 3-19 3.2.2 Protected Species Coordination Results ................................................................ 3-19 3.2.3 Protected Species Survey Results ........................................................................... 3-20 3.2.4 Designated Habitats Results .................................................................................. 3-38 3.2.5 Other Notable Sites/Habitats ................................................................................. 3-42 4.0 PROJECT IMPACTS ....................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 HABITAT IMPACTS ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1 Upland Communities ............................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Wetland/Surface Water Communities ...................................................................... 4-1 4.1.3 Other Notable Communities in Close Proximity to the Project ............................... 4-3 4.2 LISTED SPECIES IMPACTS .................................................................................................. 4-5 4.2.1 Mammals .................................................................................................................. 4-6 4.2.2 Birds ......................................................................................................................... 4-7 4.2.3 Reptiles ..................................................................................................................... 4-8 4.2.4 Mollusks ................................................................................................................. 4-10 4.2.5 Plants ..................................................................................................................... 4-10 4.3 DESIGNATED HABITAT IMPACTS ..................................................................................... 4-10 4.3.1 Critical Habitats .................................................................................................... 4-10 4.3.2 South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan Consultation Areas .......................... 4-10 4.3.3 Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas ................................................................... 4-11 4.3.4 Essential Fish Habitat............................................................................................ 4-11 4.3.5 Environmentally Endangered Lands (EEL) ........................................................... 4-11 4.3.6 Other Notable Sites/Habitats ................................................................................. 4-20 5.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 5-1 6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 6-1 i SR 997/SW 177th Avenue/Krome Avenue (South) PD&E Study Endangered Species Biological Assessment LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Project Location Map ........................................................................................... 1-2 Figure 2-1 Existing Two-Lane Rural Typical Roadway Section .......................................... 2-2 Figure 2-2 Land Use Map ...................................................................................................... 2-3 Figure 2-3 Alternate Corridors .............................................................................................. 2-8 Figure 2-4 Action Plan (Original) Proposed Typical Roadway Section ............................. 2-12 Figure 2-5 Action Plan (Modified) Proposed Typical Roadway Section ............................ 2-13 Figure 2-6 Alternative 1 Proposed Typical Roadway Section (Rural) ................................ 2-15 Figure 2-7 Alternative 2 Proposed Typical Roadway Section (Rural) ................................ 2-16 Figure 2-8 Alternative 3 Proposed Typical Roadway Section (Rural) ................................ 2-17 Figure 2-9 Alternative 4 Proposed Typical Roadway Section (Rural) ................................ 2-18 Figure 2-10 Alternative 5 Proposed Typical Roadway Section (Suburban) ......................... 2-19 Figure 2-11 Alternative 5 Proposed Typical Roadway Section (Rural) ................................ 2-20 Figure 3-1 Natural Communities Map ................................................................................... 3-2 Figure 3-2 Natural Communities Map ................................................................................... 3-3 Figure 3-3 Natural Communities Map ................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-4 Natural Communities Map ................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 3-5 Natural Communities Map ................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3-6 Natural Communities Map ................................................................................... 3-7 Figure 3-7 Additional Communities Map ............................................................................ 3-16 Figure 4-1 Owaissa Bauer Pineland Preserve Addition No. 1 Avoidance Alternative ....... 4-13 Figure 4-2 Proposed Owaissa Bauer Minimization Treatment (Typical) ........................... 4-14 Figure 4-3 View of Weedy Herbaceous Disturbed Area (at Owaissa Bauer Pineland Preserve Addition No. 1) .................................................................................................. 4-16 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 Summary of ETAT Natural Resources Comments ............................................ 3-18 Table 3-2 Listed Species Potentially Occurring within the Project Study Corridor .......... 3-21 Table 4-1 Direct Surface Water Impacts .............................................................................. 4-2 Table 4-2 Encroachment into Owaissa Bauer Pineland Preserve Addition No. 1 per Build Alternative.......................................................................................................... 4-11 Table 4-3 Impacts with Minimization Treatment per Build Alternative ............................ 4-15 Table 4-4 Vegetation Community Impacts within Owaissa Bauer Pineland Preserve Addition No. 1 ................................................................................................... 4-16 Table 4-5 Encroachment into Florida Audubon Society Property per Build Alternative .. 4-20 Table 4-6 Vegetative Canopy Impacts Within and Directly Adjacent to Florida Audubon Society Property ................................................................................................. 4-21 Table 5-1 Federal-Listed Species with the Potential to Occur ............................................. 5-3 ii SR 997/SW 177th
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nature Policy Plan
    Ministry of Public Housing, Spatial Planning, Environment And Infrastructure Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening, Milieu en Infrastructuur Nature Policy Plan 2021 – 2025 Established/Approved: Date: By: i Nature Policy Plan Sint Maarten 2021 – 2025 “We the people of Sint Maarten: RESOLVED to provide for the continuing preservation of nature and the environment”. Constitution of Sint Maarten ii Nature Policy Plan Sint Maarten 2021 – 2025 Nature Policy Plan Sint Maarten 2021 – 2025 Ministry of Public Housing, Spatial Planning, Environment and Infrastructure (Ministry of VROMI) Address: Government of Sint Maarten Ministry of VROMI Soualiga Road #1 Pond Island, Great Bay Sint Maarten Contact: [email protected] [email protected] iii Nature Policy Plan Sint Maarten 2021 – 2025 Lignum Vitae (Guaiacum officinale) iv Photo by: Mark Yokoyama Nature Policy Plan Sint Maarten 2021 – 2025 Acknowledgments In writing the Nature Policy Plan Sint Maarten 2021 – 2025, the Ministry of VROMI consulted several government ministries, and external stakeholders including private sector entities and NGO’s. Some were engaged in the preparation of the policy from the onset; others were part of a review of the policy and stakeholder meetings. The Ministry of VROMI acknowledges and appreciates the time and effort of the stakeholders who contributed to the formulation of this Nature Policy Plan, which provides insights into the current state of affairs of nature on Sint Maarten and the proposed way forward on nature conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Myrciaria Floribunda, Le Merisier-Cerise, Source Dela Guavaberry, Liqueur Traditionnelle De L’Ile De Saint-Martin Charlélie Couput
    Myrciaria floribunda, le Merisier-Cerise, source dela Guavaberry, liqueur traditionnelle de l’ile de Saint-Martin Charlélie Couput To cite this version: Charlélie Couput. Myrciaria floribunda, le Merisier-Cerise, source de la Guavaberry, liqueur tradi- tionnelle de l’ile de Saint-Martin. Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]. 2019. dumas-02297127 HAL Id: dumas-02297127 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-02297127 Submitted on 25 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE DE BORDEAUX U.F.R. des Sciences Pharmaceutiques Année 2019 Thèse n°45 THESE pour le DIPLOME D'ETAT DE DOCTEUR EN PHARMACIE Présentée et soutenue publiquement le : 6 juin 2019 par Charlélie COUPUT né le 18/11/1988 à Pau (Pyrénées-Atlantiques) MYRCIARIA FLORIBUNDA, LE MERISIER-CERISE, SOURCE DE LA GUAVABERRY, LIQUEUR TRADITIONNELLE DE L’ILE DE SAINT-MARTIN MEMBRES DU JURY : M. Pierre WAFFO-TÉGUO, Professeur ........................ ....Président M. Alain BADOC, Maitre de conférences ..................... ....Directeur de thèse M. Jean MAPA, Docteur en pharmacie ......................... ....Assesseur ! !1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !2 REMERCIEMENTS À monsieur Alain Badoc, pour m’avoir épaulé et conseillé tout au long de mon travail. Merci pour votre patience et pour tous vos précieux conseils qui m’ont permis d’achever cette thèse.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Natural History ®
    FLORI'IDA MUSEUM BULLETIN OF NATURAL HISTORY ® A MIDDLE EOCENE FOSSIL PLANT ASSEMBLAGE (POWERS CLAY PIT) FROM WESTERN TENNESSEE DavidL. Dilcher and Terry A. Lott Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 1-43 2005 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE - The FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HiSTORY is Florida«'s state museum of natural history, dedicated to understanding, preser¥ingrand interpreting].biologica[1 diversity and culturafheritage. The BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA- MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is a peer-reviewed publication thatpziblishes.the result5 of origifial reseafchin zodlogy, botany, paleontology, and archaeology. Address all inquiries t6 the Managing Editor ofthe Bulletin. Numbers,ofthe Bulletin,afe,published,at itregular intervals. Specific volumes are not'necessarily completed in anyone year. The end of a volume willl·be noted at the foot of the first page ofthe last issue in that volume. Richard Franz, Managing Editor Erika H. Simons, Production BulletinCommittee Richard Franz,,Chairperson Ann Cordell Sarah Fazenbaker Richard Hulbert WilliamMarquardt Susan Milbrath Irvy R. Quitmyer - Scott Robinson, Ex 01#cio Afember ISSN: 0071-6154 Publication Date: October 31,2005 Send communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication and manustfipt queries to: Managing Editor of the BULLETIN Florida MuseumofNatural-History University offlorida PO Box 117800 Gainesville, FL 32611 -7800 U.S.A. Phone: 352-392-1721 Fax: 352-846-0287 e-mail: [email protected] A MIDDLE EOCENE FOSSIL PLANT ASSEMBLAGE (POWERS CLAY PIT) FROM WESTERN TENNESSEE David L. Dilcher and Terry A. Lottl ABSTRACT Plant megafossils are described, illustrated and discussed from Powers Clay Pit, occurring in the middle Eocene, Claiborne Group of the Mississippi Embayment in western Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Migrations in Florida: Seasonal Patterns and Long-Term
    POPULATION ECOLOGY Butterfly Migrations in Florida: Seasonal Patterns and Long-Term Changes THOMAS J. WALKER1 Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611Ð0620 Environ. Entomol. 30(6): 1052Ð1060 (2001) ABSTRACT Flight traps at Gainesville, in north-central Florida, operating from 1984 to spring 2000, separated butterßies migrating into the Florida peninsula (SSE Ϯ 90Њ) from those migrating out of the Florida peninsula (NNW Ϯ 90Њ). Five species ßew southward in the fall and northward in the spring: Phoebis sennae (L.), Agraulis vanillae (L.), Junonia coenia (Hu¨ bner), Urbanus proteus (L.), and Eurema lisa (Boisduval & LeConte). Five species had signiÞcant northward ßights in spring but no signiÞcant migration in fall: Pieris rapae (L.), Vanessa virginiensis (Drury), Vanessa atalanta (L.), Eurytides marcellus (Cramer), and Libytheana bachmanii (Kirtland). Danaus plexippus (L.) had a southward ßight in fall but no signiÞcant migration in spring. Eurema daira (Godart) switched from a net movement northward in early fall to a net movement southward in late fall, whereas Eurema nicippe (Cramer) maintained a net movement northward throughout the fall. The major migrants differed signiÞcantly in the seasonal timing and duration of peak migration. When the numbers trapped were greatest, the proportion of those ßying in the migratory direction was greatest. The numbers of spring migrants of A. vanillae increased during the course of the study, whereas both the spring and fall migrations of J. coenia declined. The fall migrations of P. sennae and U. proteus declined sharply. In 1990Ð1999, the fall migrations of P. sennae and U. proteus averaged only 37 and 15% of what they had averaged in 1984Ð1989.
    [Show full text]
  • A Distributional Study of the Butterflies of the Sierra De Tuxtla in Veracruz, Mexico. Gary Noel Ross Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1967 A Distributional Study of the Butterflies of the Sierra De Tuxtla in Veracruz, Mexico. Gary Noel Ross Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ross, Gary Noel, "A Distributional Study of the Butterflies of the Sierra De Tuxtla in Veracruz, Mexico." (1967). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1315. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1315 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67-14,010 ROSS, Gary Noel, 1940- A DISTRIBUTIONAL STUDY OF THE BUTTERFLIES OF THE SIERRA DE TUXTLA IN VERACRUZ, MEXICO. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical CoUege, Ph.D., 1967 Entomology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan A DISTRIBUTIONAL STUDY OF THE BUTTERFLIES OF THE SIERRA DE TUXTLA IN VERACRUZ, MEXICO A D issertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and A gricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Gary Noel Ross M.S., Louisiana State University, 196*+ May, 1967 FRONTISPIECE Section of the south wall of the crater of Volcan Santa Marta. May 1965, 5,100 feet. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many persons have contributed to and assisted me in the prep­ aration of this dissertation and I wish to express my sincerest ap­ preciation to them all.
    [Show full text]
  • Mysore Raspberry Rubus Niveus Thimbleberry Rubus Rosifolius
    Big Island Invasive Species Committee (BIISC) Hawaii‘i Island Weed ID Card – DRAFT– v20030508 • Local/Common Name: None • Scientific Name: Rubus glaucus • Family : Rosaceae (Rose Family) • Origin and Status: – Invasive weed in Hawai‘i – Native to ? – First introduced to into Hawai‘i in ? • Description: Rubus glaucus is a raspberry plant with long thorny vines. Its leaves are compound, consisting of 3 oblong-shaped leaflets that have a pointy tip. The stems are white, almost as if coated with flour, and have sparse long thorns. The flowers are white, with 5 tiny petals, and tending to occur in clusters along the stems. Its fruits are red when ripe and are about 1” long. • Distribution: R. glaucus is currently found in the Volcano area along disturbed roadsides and abandoned fields. • Other Information: R. glaucus is a rambling vine. This means, like other vines, that it tends to grow up and over other plants. It ends up smothering whatever is growing beneath it. It can also grow out and along the ground instead of erect. Birds have been witnessed eating the berries from this plant. • Contact: Rubus glaucus Prepared by MLC/KFB Big Island Invasive Species Committee (BIISC) Local/Common Name: Hill or Mysore Raspberry Hawaii‘i Island Weed ID Card – DRAFT– v20030508 Scientific Name: Rubus niveus Family : Rosaceae (Rose Family) Origin and Status: ?Invasive weed in Hawai‘i ?Native from India, southeastern Asia, the Philippines, and Indonesia ?First introduced to into Hawai‘i in 1965 Description: Rubus niveus is a stout shrub that grows up to 6 ½ ft. tall . The compound leaves have 5 to 9 leaflets that are oval- shaped with pointed tips and thorns located on the underside.
    [Show full text]
  • Cocoa Beach Maritime Hammock Preserve Management Plan
    MANAGEMENT PLAN Cocoa Beach’s Maritime Hammock Preserve City of Cocoa Beach, Florida Florida Communities Trust Project No. 03 – 035 –FF3 Adopted March 18, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………. 1 II. Purpose …………………………………………………………….……. 2 a. Future Uses ………….………………………………….…….…… 2 b. Management Objectives ………………………………………….... 2 c. Major Comprehensive Plan Directives ………………………..….... 2 III. Site Development and Improvement ………………………………… 3 a. Existing Physical Improvements ……….…………………………. 3 b. Proposed Physical Improvements…………………………………… 3 c. Wetland Buffer ………...………….………………………………… 4 d. Acknowledgment Sign …………………………………..………… 4 e. Parking ………………………….………………………………… 5 f. Stormwater Facilities …………….………………………………… 5 g. Hazard Mitigation ………………………………………………… 5 h. Permits ………………………….………………………………… 5 i. Easements, Concessions, and Leases …………………………..… 5 IV. Natural Resources ……………………………………………..……… 6 a. Natural Communities ………………………..……………………. 6 b. Listed Animal Species ………………………….…………….……. 7 c. Listed Plant Species …………………………..…………………... 8 d. Inventory of the Natural Communities ………………..………….... 10 e. Water Quality …………..………………………….…..…………... 10 f. Unique Geological Features ………………………………………. 10 g. Trail Network ………………………………….…..………..……... 10 h. Greenways ………………………………….…..……………..……. 11 i Adopted March 18, 2004 V. Resources Enhancement …………………………..…………………… 11 a. Upland Restoration ………………………..………………………. 11 b. Wetland Restoration ………………………….…………….………. 13 c. Invasive Exotic Plants …………………………..…………………... 13 d. Feral
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Morphological Support for a Florida Origin of the Cuban
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2011) SPECIAL Molecular and morphological support ISSUE for a Florida origin of the Cuban oak Paul F. Gugger* and Jeannine Cavender-Bares Department of Ecology, Evolution and ABSTRACT Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Aim The origins of the Cuban biota are of long-standing interest in Building, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, Saint Paul, MN, USA biogeography, and the source of a small live oak (Quercus series Virentes) population on Cuba remains unresolved. Based on morphological evidence, previous authors have hypothesized a Florida origin from either Q. geminata or Q. virginiana or both; a Mexican origin from Q. oleoides; or a hybrid origin from both sources. We use molecular data and taxonomically informative leaf morphology to identify the source species and timing of colonization. Location Cuba, Central America, Mexico and the south-eastern United States. Methods We collected representative samples of Cuban oaks and each putative source species and genotyped each sample at 12 nuclear microsatellites and two chloroplast DNA sequences. We estimated population structure using a Bayesian clustering analysis and F-statistics, pairwise migration rates among taxa, and divergence time using an isolation-with-migration model. We measured seven leaf traits and conducted an analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) to determine which putative source species was most similar to Cuban oaks. Results Cuban oak contains one chloroplast DNA haplotype, which is common in southern Florida. Bayesian clustering analysis of microsatellites revealed that the Cuban oak forms a distinct and pure population cluster, and F-statistics showed that Cuban oaks are differentiated least from Q. virginiana and most from Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of Citrus County and Host Plants
    Butterflies of Citrus County ~---4- --•;... ____ - Family I Species Host plant Hesperiidae SkipQers Phocides Qigmalion Mangrove Skipper ~mangrove herbs, vines, shrubs, and trees in the pea family (Fabaceae) including false indigobush (Amorpha fruticosa L.), American hogpeanut (Amphicarpaea bracteata [L.) Fernald), Atlantic pidgeonwings or butterfly pea (Clitoria mariana L.), groundnut (Apios ~vreus clarus Silver-spotted Skip~ americana Medik.), American wisteria (Wisteria frutescens [L.) Poir.) and the introduced Dixie ticktrefoil (Desmodium tortuosum [Sw.] DC.), kudzu (Pueraria montana [Lour.] Merr.), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), Chinese wisteria (Wisteria sinensis [Sims) DC.) and a variety of other legumes Urbanus prqJg_µs Long-t~.Ued SkiQpec vine legumes including various beans (Phaseolus), hog peanuts (Amphicarpa bracteata), beggar's ticks (Desmodium), blue peas (Clitoria), and wisteria (Wisteria) Various legumes inclu ding wild and cu ltivated beans (Phaseolus), begga r's ticks Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail (Desmodium), and bl ue peas (Clit oria ) -· Beggar\'s ticks (Desmodium); occasionally false indigo (Baptisia) and bush clover Achalarus ly-ciades Hoar.y_r;_ggg {Lespedeza); all in the pea family {Fabaceae) - pea family (Fabaceae) including beggar's ticks (Desmodium), bush clover (Lespedeza), Thor'lbes P'llades Northern Cloud'lwing clover (Trifolium), lotus (Hosackia), and others. -----· Thory-bes bathy-llus Southern Cloudywing Potato bean, Apios americana. Ozark milkvetch, Astragalus distortus var. engelmanni ~ ---- Lespedezas (Lespedeza spp .) are reported as well as Florida Hoarypea (Tephrosia l ibQr:_y_bes confusis Confused Cloudy-wing florid a) . -· -- -------- Staphy:lus hayhurst_ii Ha yh u r?J?-5.IAJ.\QQ Wi ri_g Lambsquart ers {Che nopodium) in the goosefoot family (Chenopodiaceae ), and occasiona lly chaff flower (Alternanthera) in the pigweed family (Amaranthaceae).
    [Show full text]
  • Origen I Evolució Dels Endemismes Vegetals De Les Illes Del Carib
    Òscar Castillo Agudo Final Degree Project Origin and evolution of the Biology (2020) Caribbean Islands endemic plants The Islands Geological History The Caribbean Islands, also known Greater Antilles: originated as a submerged volcanic arc (Proto-Greater as the West Indies, are conformed Antilles) between North and South America (130 Ma.) The last time the by three archipelago. These islands islands emerged as a landmass was 49 Ma and later Cuba, the have been categorized as one of Hispaniola and Puerto Rico split (25-20 Ma). the world’s biodiversity hotspots Lesser Antilles: originated in two times as oceanic islands. with conservation priority as the Bahames: got the current configuration in the Eocene but the land ecosystem is threatened by loss of surface and connections changed drastically due to the fluctuations in habitat from anthropogenic origin. the sea level. Figure 1. Source 8. GAARlandia: an hypothetical land bridge connecting the Biodiversity: some numbers north of South America and the Greater Antilles for 3 million 12.847 taxa of seed plants, 10.948 years at Eocene-Oligocene are native and 7.868 are endemic transition (c. 33 Ma). (72% out of the native). 1.447 native genera with 181 endemic and 10 nearly endemic, Biogeography Figure 3. Source 9. 47,5% of the endemic are monotypic. 2 ways of colonization of the islands from the continent: The Greater Antilles hosts most of Vicariance: the endemic genera. First interpretations considered the Proto-Antilles to be connected with Figure 2. Source 1. the continent but now we know they were submerged. Now it is Isolation atribuited to GAARAlandia acting as a low-land connection for the biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Galactia Smallii) and Candidate Sand Flax (Linum Arenicola) Dade County Florida, Adjacent to SOCSOUTH Headquarters Homestead, Florida
    Plant Survey for the Endangered Small’s Milkpea (Galactia smallii) and Candidate Sand Flax (Linum arenicola) Dade County Florida, Adjacent to SOCSOUTH Headquarters Homestead, Florida PO 952722 Craig van der Heiden and James Johnson October 30, 2013 Small’s milkpea Sand flax Submitted by: The Institute for Regional Conservation 100 E. Linton Blvd, Suite 302B Delray Beach, FL 33483 Craig van der Heiden PhD, CEO Submitted to: CH2M HILL Northpark 400 1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 1600 Atlanta, GA 30328 2 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 3 Results ................................................................................................................................. 4 Survey area 1................................................................................................................... 5 Survey area 2................................................................................................................... 6 Survey area 3................................................................................................................... 7 Survey area 4................................................................................................................... 9 Survey area 5................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Papilionidae and Pieridae Butterflies (Lepidoptera
    Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie) ISSN: 0065-1737 [email protected] Instituto de Ecología, A.C. México Kir¿ Yanov, Alexander V.; Balcázar Lara, Manuel A. Papilionidae and Pieridae Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) of the state of Guanajuato, Mexico Acta Zoológica Mexicana (nueva serie), vol. 23, núm. 2, 2007, pp. 1-9 Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Xalapa, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57523201 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Acta ZoológicaActa Mexicana Zool. Mex. (n.s.) (n.s.) 23(2): 23(2) 1-9 (2007) PAPILIONIDAE AND PIERIDAE BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA, PAPILIONOIDEA) OF THE STATE OF GUANAJUATO, MEXICO Alexander V. KIR’YANOV* y Manuel A. BALCÁZAR-LARA** *Centro de Investigaciones en Óptica, Loma del Bosque, No. 115, Col. Lomas del Campestre, León 37150, Guanajuato, MÉXICO **Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Colima, Km 40 Autopista Colima-Manzanillo, Tecomán 28100, Colima, MÉXICO [email protected] [email protected] RESUMEN Presentamos, por primera vez, una lista anotada de las familias Papilionidae y Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) para el estado de Guanajuato. Esta lista es el resultado de muestreos sistemáticos de estos taxones en un conjunto de localidades del estado (principalmente en las cercanías de León y la Ciudad de Guanajuato) durante 1998-2004, así como de especímenes depositados en la Colección Nacional de Insectos. Se registran 12 de Papilionidae y 27 especies de Pieridae, de las cuales 4 y 15 respectivamente son nuevos registros para el estado.
    [Show full text]