DOCSLIB.ORG

Informe Final PROCODES 201

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIAGNÓSTICO FLORÍSTICO DE LAS ISLAS DE LA BAHÍA NAVACHISTE Elaborado por: M.C. JOSÉ SATURNINO DÍAZ Comunidad Beneficiada: Ejido el Huitussi, Guasave, Sinaloa PROCODES 2013 CULIACÁN DE ROSALES, SINALOA; A NOVIEMBRE DE 2013 DIAGNÓSTICO FLORÍSTICO DE LAS ISLAS DE LA BAHÍA NAVACHISTE Introducción En la porción noroeste de México, entre los límites establecidos por la Península de Baja California y la zona costera de los estados de Sonora, Sinaloa y Nayarit, se encuentra el Mar de Cortés en el cual se distribuyen un amplio número de islas e islotes de diferentes dimensiones y características ecológicas. En las costas de Sinaloa de acuerdo con Flores-Campaña et. al. (2003) y el Programa de Manejo Islas del Golfo de California (Anónimo, 1999) están contemplados 423 cuerpos insulares, entre islas, islotes, rocas, cayos, farallones y arrecifes cuya importancia es de una relevancia considerable tomando en cuenta que son refugio de numerosas especies de flora y fauna, además de que funcionan, dentro de los corredores de migración de las especies, como un vínculo que permite el descanso, la alimentación y la reproducción de aves, mamíferos, y peces, mientras que en la dinámica de dispersión de las plantas aportan el sustrato que permite que éstas aumente su rango de distribución. MARCO JURÍDICO Las islas de las lagunas costeras Navachiste y Macapule -decretadas como sitio Ramsar 108 en febrero del año 2008- se encuentran distribuidas en el Mar de Cortés, mismas que están incluidas bajo régimen jurídico de Área Natural Protegida (ANP) y cuyo decreto como tal se estableció en el Diario Oficial de la Federación del 2 de agosto de 1978. Así mismo, son parte de la “Reserva de la Biosfera Islas del Golfo de California” reconocida por la UNESCO en 1995; también han sido decretadas como “Zona de Reserva y Refugio de Aves Migratorias y de la Fauna Silvestre-Islas del Golfo de California” misma que, a partir del 7 de junio de 2000, según publicación en el Diario Oficial de la Federación, se le modificó su categoría a la de Área de Protección de Flora y Fauna (APFF) “Islas del Golfo de California” y la UNESCO, en el año 2005, las decretó como Patrimonio Mundial de la Humanidad. ANTECEDENTES A nivel regional son escasos los registros que se tienen acerca de estudios realizados en las islas de la entidad, así como en las del estado de Sonora con las cuales se les puede relacionar al menos por la cercanía. Entre estos estudios destacan los de Flores-Campaña et al. (1994) realizados en la Isla de Venados, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, así como los de Vega et al. (2001) en las Islas Lobo y Pájaros de la Bahía de Mazatlán, Sinaloa; los de Felger y Lowe (1976) sobre las islas de las costas del estado de Sonora, así como una serie de estudios realizados por Ramírez-García y Lot (1994) sobre los manglares y pastos marinos de la zona costera del Mar de Cortés. Son importantes también los estudios de Nabhan (2000) sobre la dispersión cultural de plantas y reptiles en algunas islas del mar de Cortés, así como los trabajos de Reyes- Olivas (2000) sobre la distribución de cactáceas y la composición florística de la Isla Mazocahui en Topolobampo, Sinaloa, y Flores-Campaña et al. (2003) en las Islas Tachichiltle y Altamura situadas en el municipio de Angostura, Sinaloa. Entre los antecedentes más relevantes sobre estudios relacionados con la vegetación en el área destacan el de Hernández Cornejo et al. (2005), donde se menciona que en el interior del complejo lagunar San Ignacio-Navachiste-Macapule predomina una vegetación de manglar tanto en la zona litoral, así como en los márgenes de las islas, particularmente en aquellas cuya constitución edáfica es de arcilla y arena, y menciona también que su cobertura para el año 2000 osciló en alrededor de 11, 330 Has con predominancia de Rhizophora mangle, Laguncularia racemosa y Avicennia germinans. Además, el estudio sobre la estructura de la vegetación y flora de dichas islas llevado a cabo por Díaz et al (2008) y el de Carrasquilla-Henao (2011) sobre cobertura del bosque de manglar y su correlación con la pesque ribereña en la Laguna Navachiste, Guasave, Sinaloa. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivos identificar y describir la flora y las comunidades vegetales en las islas de las lagunas Navachiste y Macapule del norte de Sinaloa. ÁREA DE ESTUDIO La laguna Navachiste se sitúa en el norte de Sinaloa entre los 25° 22´ y 25° 35´ de latitud Norte y los 108° 42´ y 108° 56´ de longitud oeste con una cobertura de 140 km2. De acuerdo con De la Lanza-Espino (1991) se ubica en la provincia III (Golfo Interior) que se localiza entre la Isla Tiburón y una línea imaginaria que une a Mazatlán y Cabo San Lucas. Se encuentra semicerrada por la isla de San Ignacio y se comunica al este con la isla San Ignacio, al noroeste con la Laguna San Ignacio y al este con el Golfo de California y la laguna de Macapule. Esta última se ubica entre los 25° 21´ y 25° 24´ de latitud Norte y los 108° 30´ 108° 45´ de longitud oeste con las mismas características generales que la anterior y con una área de 38 km2 (Magaña-Álvarez, 2004; Poot- Delgado, 2006). Los suelos más característicos de la zona, y en orden de importancia por su cobertura son el regosol eútrico, el arenosol y el solonchak. El clima, según la Clasificación de Köppen modificada por García (1973), es del tipo BW (h´) hw (e), que se caracteriza por ser muy seco o desértico, muy cálido, con régimen de lluvias de verano, con una temperatura media anual de 24.8° C y una precipitación media anual de 305.5 mm (Plan de Desarrollo Guasave, 2002). De acuerdo a las divisiones del desierto sonorense propuestas por Shreve (1951), el área de estudio se ubica dentro de la zona llamada foothills of Sonora que se caracteriza por la presencia de colinas escabrosas de baja altura. En cuanto a sus coordenadas geográficas y considerando la frontera sur del desierto sonorense propuestos por Turner et al. (2005) el área cae justo dentro de los límites de dicha provincia. Bajo el esquema de las divisiones florísticas de México propuesto por Rzedowski (1978), la zona de estudio se ubica dentro del Reino Neotropical, en la Región Xerofítica Mexicana y en la Provincia Planicie Costera del Noroeste. COORDENADAS Y ÁREA APROXIMADA DE LAS 18 ISLAS DEL SISTEMA LAGUNAR NAVACHISTE-MACAPULE. ISLA COORDENADAS ÁREA EN HAS SAN IGNACIO 108° 48' y 109° 03' O 3700 25° 22' y 25° 27' N MACAPULE 108° 32' y 108° 46’ O 2700 25° 19' y 25° 23’ N TESOBIARE 108° 51' y 108° 54' O 510 25° 29' y 25° 31' N NISCOCO 108° 49' y 108° 54’ O 531 25° 29' y 25° 31' N VINORAMAS 108° 44' y 108° 48' O 870 25° 21' y 25° 25' N GUASAYEYE 108° 50.2’ y 108° 52.6’ O 54 25° 28.8’ y 25° 29.3’ N LA HUITUSSERA 108° 47.4’ y 108° 47.9’ O 26 25° 30.1’ y 25° 30.5’ N LA VENTANA 108° 48.1’ y 108° 48.2’ O 4 25° 29.6’ y 25° 29.8’ N METATES 108° 52.22’ y 108° 52.6’ O 53 25° 29.1’ y 25° 29.5’ N PAJAROS 108° 41.9’ y 108° 42.4’ O 50 25° 22.5’ y 25° 22.9’ N SAN LUCAS 108° 47.8’ y 108° 48.4’ O 44 25° 28.2’ y 25° 28.6’ N LAS CHIVAS 108° 52.2’ y 108° 52.8’ O 65 25° 31.2’ y 25° 31.8’ N EL ALHUATE 108° 52.5’ y 108° 52.3’ O 53 25° 32’ y 25° 32.2’ N PAJAROS II 108° 43.2’ y 108° 43.48’ O 66 25° 22.5’ y 25° 23.02’ N LA MAPACHERA 108° 48.6’ y 108° 48.97’ O 23 25° 31.5’ y 25° 31.8’ N BLEDOS 108° 52.98’ y 108° 52.83’ O 1 25° 31.8’ y 25° 32.4’ N MOLCAJETE 108° 51.9’ y 108° 52’ O 2 25° 28.7’ y 25° 28.81’ N CERRITOS 108° 52’ y 108° 52.01’ O 1 BLANCOS 25° 28.4’ y 25° 28.5’ N OBJETIVOS GENERAL Determinar el estado actual de la flora de las islas del sistema lagunar Navachiste- Macapule del norte de Sinaloa. ESPECÍFICOS ♦ Identificar y describir la flora de las islas del sistema lagunar Navachiste- Macapule. ♦ Identificar y describir los tipos de vegetación presentes en las islas del sistema lagunar Navachiste-Macapule. ♦ Describir la Fenología de cada una de las especies de plantas presentes en la Isla. ♦ Determinar las especies de plantas invasoras y las amenazas que éstas representan para la biodiversidad de las islas. ♦ Proponer estrategias de erradicación o eliminación de aquellas especies invasoras que amenacen la biodiversidad de las islas. METODOLOGÍA Para llevar a cabo el estudio florístico, así como para identificar las comunidades vegetales se realizarán muestreos y toma de fotos a partir de julio de 2013 hasta noviembre del mismo año. En cada muestreo se realizará la identificación in situ y adicionalmente se tomarán fotografías que serán cotejadas con las colecciones de los herbarios más importantes de la localidad, así como también con literatura especializada para tal efecto como floras locales, regionales y nacionales, y se emplearon una serie de monografías de familias y géneros característicos de las zonas áridas y semiáridas del norte de Sinaloa y sur de Sonora. Para la descripción de las especies se incluirá nombre científico, autor, familia, así como una serie de características como la forma de vida, tamaño, fenología de la floración y fructificación por estación den año, origen, distribución y abundancia.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source

    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source

    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
  • Copyright Notice

    Copyright Notice

    Copyright Notice This electronic reprint is provided by the author(s) to be consulted by fellow scientists. It is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. Further reproduction or distribution of this reprint is restricted by copyright laws. If in doubt about fair use of reprints for research purposes, the user should review the copyright notice contained in the original journal from which this electronic reprint was made. ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Arid Environments Journal of Arid Environments 62 (2005) 413–426 www.elsevier.com/locate/jnlabr/yjare Functional morphology of a sarcocaulescent desert scrub in the bay of La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico$ M.C. Pereaa,Ã, E. Ezcurrab, J.L. Leo´ n de la Luzc aFacultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Tucuma´n, Biologia Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 San Miguel de Tucuma´n, Tucuma´n, Argentina bInstituto Nacional de Ecologı´a, Me´xico, D.F. 04530, Me´xico cCentro de Investigaciones Biolo´gicas del Noroeste, La Paz, Baja California Sur 23000, Me´xico Received 9 August 2004; received in revised form 4 January 2005; accepted 12 January 2005 Available online 22 April 2005 Abstract A functional morphology study of a sarcocaulescent scrub in the Baja California peninsula was performed with the goal of identifying plant functional types. We sampled 11 quadrats in three distinct physiographic units within the sarcocaulescent scrub ecoregion: the open scrub, the clustered scrub, and the closed scrub. We found 41 perennial species, which we characterized using 122 morphology-functional characteristics, corresponding to vegetative parts (stem and leaf), reproductive parts (flower and fruit), and functional phases (phenology, pollination, and dispersion).
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument

    Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument

    In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service This page left intentionally blank. In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt, William L. Halvorson, and Pamela Anning Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B.F., Schmidt, C.A., Halvorson, W.L., and Anning, Pamela, 2008, Vascular plant and vertebrate inventory of Chiricahua National Monument: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1023, 104 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1023/]. Cover photo: Chiricahua National Monument. Photograph by National Park Service. Note: This report supersedes Schmidt et al. (2005). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve

    Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve

    Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve Scientific and Common names obtained from Wunderlin 2013 Scientific Name Common Name Status EPPC FDA IRC FNAI Family: Azollaceae (mosquito fern) Azolla caroliniana mosquito fern native R Family: Blechnaceae (mid-sorus fern) Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern native Woodwardia virginica Virginia chain fern native R Family: Dennstaedtiaceae (cuplet fern) Pteridium aquilinum braken fern native Family: Nephrolepidaceae (sword fern) Nephrolepis cordifolia tuberous sword fern exotic II Nephrolepis exaltata wild Boston fern native Family: Ophioglossaceae (adder's-tongue) Ophioglossum palmatum hand fern native E I G4/S2 Family: Osmundaceae (royal fern) Osmunda cinnamomea cinnamon fern native CE R Osmunda regalis royal fern native CE R Family: Polypodiaceae (polypody) Campyloneurum phyllitidis long strap fern native Phlebodium aureum golden polypody native Pleopeltis polypodioides resurrection fern native Family: Psilotaceae (whisk-fern) Psilotum nudum whisk-fern native Family: Pteridaceae (brake fern) Acrostichum danaeifolium giant leather fern native Pteris vittata China ladder break exotic II Family: Salviniaceae (floating fern) Salvinia minima water spangles exotic I Family: Schizaeaceae (curly-grass) Lygodium japonicum Japanese climbing fern exotic I Lygodium microphyllum small-leaf climbing fern exotic I Family: Thelypteridaceae (marsh fern) Thelypteris interrupta hottentot fern native Thelypteris kunthii widespread maiden fern native Thelypteris palustris var. pubescens marsh fern native R Family: Vittariaceae
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012

    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
  • LIST of PLANTS ACCEPTABLE in UTILITY EASEMENT Guideline for Shallow Rooting Plants* *Some Neighborhoods May Have More Stringent Or Restricted Plant List

    LIST of PLANTS ACCEPTABLE in UTILITY EASEMENT Guideline for Shallow Rooting Plants* *Some Neighborhoods May Have More Stringent Or Restricted Plant List

    LIST OF PLANTS ACCEPTABLE IN UTILITY EASEMENT Guideline for Shallow Rooting Plants* *Some Neighborhoods may have more stringent or restricted plant list. In those cases use plant that are on both this plant list and that required by the neighborhood. Botanical Name Common Name GROUNDCOVERS Acacia redolens Desert carpet trailing acacia 2’ by 15’ Aloe barbadensis Medicinal aloe 2” by 2” Aloe saponaria Tiger aloe 1” by 1” Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle leaf bur-sage 2” by 2 Ambrosia dumosa White bur-sage 2’ by 3’ Artemisia ludoviciana White sage 2’ by 4’ Asparagus densiflorus ‘Sprengeri” Sprenger asparagus 2’ by 4’ Baccharis spp. “Twin Peaks” Twin peaks coyote brush 2’ by 5’ Bulbine frutescens Bulbine 1’ by 2’ Convolvulus mauritanicus Ground morning glory 1’ by 2’ Dalea Capitata “Sierra Gold” Yellow flowered trailing dalea 8, by 3’ Dalea greggii Trailing indigo bush 2’ by 4’ Ericameria laricifolia Turpentine bush 2’ by 3’ Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat 2’ by 2’ Eriogonum wrightii Buckwheat 2’ by 3’ Gazania rigens “Sun Gold” Gold gazania 1’ by 3’ Lantana spp. “New Gold” Yellow lantana “New Gold” 1’ by 3’ Oenothera berlandieri Mexican evening primrose 1’ by 4’ Oenothera caespitosa Tufted evening primrose 1’ by 2’ Oenothera stubbei Saltillo Primrose 1’ by 4’ Rosemarinus officinalis “Prostratus” Trailing rosemary 2’ by 6’ Salvia chamaedryoides Blue sage 2’ by 2’ Salvia coccinea Sage 2’ by 3’ Santolina chamaecyparissus Lavender cotton 2’ by 2’ Santolina virens Green santolina 2’ by 18” Turf (out of R.O.W. areas and less then 50% of total landscape area) Teucrium chamaedrys ‘Prostrata” Germander 1’ by 2’ Verbena peruviana Peruvian verbena 8” by 3’ Verbena rigida Sandpaper verbena 2’ by 3’ Zephyranthes candida Rain lily 1’ by 1’ Zinnia grandiflora Rocky mountain zinnia 6” by 1’ SHRUBS Abutilon palmeri Superstition mallow Aloysia spp.
  • GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes

    GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes

    GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps region.
  • Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas

    Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas

    Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas William L. Halvorson and Brooke S. Gebow, editors Technical Report No. 68 United States Geological Survey Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USGS Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona, Tucson The Sonoran Desert Field Station (SDFS) at The University of Arizona is a unit of the USGS Western Ecological Research Center (WERC). It was originally established as a National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU) in 1973 with a research staff and ties to The University of Arizona. Transferred to the USGS Biological Resources Division in 1996, the SDFS continues the CPSU mission of providing scientific data (1) to assist U.S. Department of Interior land management agencies within Arizona and (2) to foster cooperation among all parties overseeing sensitive natural and cultural resources in the region. It also is charged with making its data resources and researchers available to the interested public. Seventeen such field stations in California, Arizona, and Nevada carry out WERC’s work. The SDFS provides a multi-disciplinary approach to studies in natural and cultural sciences. Principal cooperators include the School of Renewable Natural Resources and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at The University of Arizona. Unit scientists also hold faculty or research associate appointments at the university. The Technical Report series distributes information relevant to high priority regional resource management needs. The series presents detailed accounts of study design, methods, results, and applications possibly not accommodated in the formal scientific literature. Technical Reports follow SDFS guidelines and are subject to peer review and editing.
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List

    Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List

    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
  • Hybridization in Compositae

    Hybridization in Compositae

    Hybridization in Compositae Dr. Edward Schilling University of Tennessee Tennessee – not Texas, but we still grow them big! [email protected] Ayres Hall – University of Tennessee campus in Knoxville, Tennessee University of Tennessee Leucanthemum vulgare – Inspiration for school colors (“Big Orange”) Compositae – Hybrids Abound! Changing view of hybridization: once consider rare, now known to be common in some groups Hotspots (Ellstrand et al. 1996. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 93: 5090-5093) Comparison of 5 floras (British Isles, Scandanavia, Great Plains, Intermountain, Hawaii): Asteraceae only family in top 6 in all 5 Helianthus x multiflorus Overview of Presentation – Selected Aspects of Hybridization 1. More rather than less – an example from the flower garden 2. Allopolyploidy – a changing view 3. Temporal diversity – Eupatorium (thoroughworts) 4. Hybrid speciation/lineages – Liatrinae (blazing stars) 5. Complications for phylogeny estimation – Helianthinae (sunflowers) Hybrid: offspring between two genetically different organisms Evolutionary Biology: usually used to designated offspring between different species “Interspecific Hybrid” “Species” – problematic term, so some authors include a description of their species concept in their definition of “hybrid”: Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2. Genetic “additivity” Presence of genes from each parent Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2.
  • 134.3 Sinaloan Thomscrub

    134.3 Sinaloan Thomscrub

    Sinaloan Thornscrub Item Type Article Authors Brown, David E. Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 26/09/2021 00:31:18 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/550968 Brown Sinaloan Thornscrub 101 Sinaloan thornscrub includes the "Thornforest" of Gentry 134.3 Sinaloan (1942) and Shreve (1937b, 1951), the "Tropical Thorn Wood­ land" of Hardy and McDiarmid (1969), and is analogous to the "Tamaulipan Thornscrub" of Muller (1947). We would also Thomscrub include most of Shreve's (1951) "Foothills of Sonora" and other communities of his subdivisions of the Sonoran Desert as Sinaloan thornscrub (Brown and Lowe, 1974b; Felger and Lowe, 1976). The reasons for this revision are based on both David E. Brown physiognomic and biotic criteria, and include: (1) the abun­ dance of shrubbery and increased participation of short Arizona Game and Fish Department microphyllous trees which together make up a cover of from 20% to 90% with much of the intervening areas held by perennial forbs and grasses, (2) the fact that a large number of dominant and characteristic plant and animal species have their center of distribution and abundance here, e.g. Tree Ocotillo (Fouquieria macdougalii) and Elegant Quail (Lophortyx doug]asii), (3) the absence or poor representation of numerous characteristic Sonoran desert species [e.g., Larrea tridentata, Simmondsia chinensis, Cercidium microphyllum, etc.), and (4) the appearance and often heavy representation of numerous southern tropical forms not found in the Sonoran desertscrub to the north [e.g., Acacia cymbispina and Felis pardalis).