DOCSLIB.ORG

This Amendment Updates the Number and Descriptions of Properties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Amendment Updates the Number and Descriptions of Properties NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section 7 Page 1 Montpelier Historic District Amendment name of property Montpelier, Washington County, Vermont Town, county and State Amendment This Amendment to the Montpelier Historic District updates the number, documentation, and description of properties presently included in the District and also provides new documentation for resources that were left out originally or that have been constructed since 1978. The original roughly 250-acre historic district, listed in 1978, included the commercial, governmental and institutional core of the downtown as well as surrounding residential neighborhoods. It primarily celebrated the 19th century architecture that predominates but included several early 20th century buildings and structures. Accessory buildings were usually included and non-contributing resources were numbered and briefly described. 528 resources were originally registered on November 3, 1978 and another 20 resources were added on April 19, 1989. The total listed resources after 1989 was 548 which included 477 contributing buildings, 7 contributing structures, 60 non-contributing buildings and 4 non-contributing structures. The amendment adjusts the resource count and documentation to reflect the extension of the period of significance to 1959, as well as demolition, alteration and new construction since 1978.1 Some accessory and other resources within the 1978 boundaries were not documented originally and these are now documented by the addition of an accessory number such as “211a” 1 The period of significance of the district has extended to 1959 which changes the contributing status of 27 properties (#s 1, 17, 18, 19, 50, 51, 80, 97, 104, 119, 126, 130, 169, 201, 215, 310, 346, 364a, 375, 387, 388, 409, 449, 464, 496, 504, & 521a) previously listed as non-contributing due to age. One property, #301, previously listed as non-contributing due to alterations has been restored and is now contributing. 3 buildings that were contributing (#s 236, 257, & 320) are now non-contributing due to alterations. In addition, 21 historic buildings (#s 57, 68, 75, 85, 106, 109, 135, 136, 143, 145, 212, 213, 214, 262, 263, 267, 320, 344, 452, 497, & 502) and 17 non-historic buildings (#s 52, 53, 56, 77, 78, 104, 144, 306, 316, 343, 345, 450, 453, 455, 462, 463 & 487) have been demolished. A total of 13 new non-contributing buildings have been constructed in the historic district and if they were on the site of an earlier resource were given that 1978 number. For example, #57 the Miss Montpelier Diner, had been listed as contributing but was demolished in 1982; a new information booth building was built on the site in 1990 and is now listed in this amendment as non-contributing property #57. There are 55 historic (#s 5a, 10a, 24a, 25a, 26a, 27a, 28a, 30a, 33a, 34a, 41a, 45a, 88a, 89a, 90a, 94a, 114a, 151a,159a, 160a, 165a, 168a, 170a, 204a, 245a, 258a, 269a, 270a, 275a, 283a, 299a, 300a, 329a, 330a, 350a, 351a, 362a, 370a, 375a, 381a, 383a, 387a, 388a, 389a, 399a, 401a, 405a, 406a, 429a, 432a, 441a, 442a, 445a, 446a, & 479a) and 30 non-historic (#s11a, 37a, 37b, 45b, 47a, 48a, 50a, 117a, 122a, 154a, 157a, 219a, 232a, 244a, 252a, 254a, 257a, 261a, 270b, 329b, 333a, 402a, 415a, 418a, 450a, 454a, 462a, 465a, 492a, & 563*) accessory buildings that were not documented or counted originally. In addition, there is one contributing structure (the railroad turntable, #106A, that had been within the contributing roundtable building (#106) in 1978 which has since been demolished and replaced with a non-contributing building (retaining the number “106”) near the original footprint but which avoided the structure. The remaining turntable is now documented separately as 106A. [*Property #563, a three-bay garage, was initially added as accessory building #371a. However, a final review of parcel data revealed that it was in fact un-related to property #371 but was instead a separate parcel (159 Main St.) under separate ownership. It has been re-numbered - #563, to reflect that.] NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section 7 Page 2 Montpelier Historic District Amendment name of property Montpelier, Washington County, Vermont Town, county and State to denote an accessory or second building or structure on property #211. One site – the Elm Street cemetery – and one structure – the Winooski Dam at Main Street – were within the originally drawn boundaries but were omitted. They have been added with new numbers (515 & 516). The 14 properties added in 1989 were originally numbered separately 1-14. In this amendment they have been re-numbered (517 – 530) to be sequential to the main district. The boundaries in this amendment have only changed from the original in that they more accurately reflect the actual property lines of each included resource. During the re-mapping of the Montpelier Historic District for this amendment, the use of actual, irregular property lines revealed three “donut holes” within the district boundary. Within the two larger of these “holes” – the Monsignor Crosby Avenue and Franklin Street areas - were 35 additional resources of similar vintage, significance, and integrity to the properties of the surrounding district. These were documented and are being added in this 2009 amendment as #s 531 to 561. The third was the single resource of Hubbard Park Observation Tower (#562) which juts into the large state house parcel (#491). The amendment/update of all the properties is documented with a new cover sheet with an updated total resource count of 653 which includes 571 contributing resources (560 buildings, 2 sites, and 9 structures) and 82 non-contributing resources (77 buildings and 5 structures). The 1978 nomination contained 53 photographs that documented only about 15% of the properties in the district. The 1989 boundary increase included 22 photographs that documented every primary and accessory structure as well as some streetscapes and historic views and these have not been re-photographed. New photographs of every structure and accessory structure – both contributing and non-contributing – within the 1978 district boundaries are included with this amendment. The level of integrity in the district has remained the same or improved in some areas. As a distinct entity, the district retains integrity of location, design, setting, usually materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section 7 Page 3 Montpelier Historic District Amendment name of property Montpelier, Washington County, Vermont Town, county and State Updated General Description of the 1978-1989 Existing District The 1978 nomination description stated: “The Montpelier Historic District is situated along the Winooski River, the North Branch, and the valleys which they form. The streets follow the bends of the rivers and at times go up the steep banks of the valley allowing buildings to be built at street focal points and on a variety of grades. … Architecturally, the city is very rich with both high style and vernacular buildings of the Federal, Greek Revival, Italianate, French Second Empire, and Queen Anne styles and a scattering of the Gothic, Dutch Colonial and Colonial Revival styles. The district is comprised of houses, commercial blocks, churches, a railroad station, and schools with no one style concentrated on any one building type. No neighborhood is built exclusively in one style, because the city has grown in spurts throughout its history and with each period, constructing buildings in the then current style.” The description above is still reflected by the present cityscape of the large, 250-acre district although to the list of styles may be added a few examples of the Art Deco (#198 – Capitol Theater), Moderne (#126 – 34 Barre Street) and International (#s 215, 346, 348, & 504) styles of the 20th century. Despite the city‟s steady growth over time and several major fires of the late 19th century, a large portion of the largely residential architecture pre-dates 1870 and reflects the Greek Revival and to a lesser extent the Federal styles. Some notable examples of the Federal style include the rare survival of the 1826 commercial block (#65) at the corner of State and Main Streets and residences from c. 1800 – c. 1825 such as the brick Reed House (#197), the Silas French House (#202), and the Judge Keith House (#238). The Greek Revival style with over fifty examples is the best represented of any other single style in the district and dominates the residential neighborhoods. The Greek Revival architecture of the district ranges from the very simple such as #s 361, 362, and 367 on St. Paul Street to higher style versions with monumental porticoes such as #89 on Barre Street and #282 on Elm Street. Although the Gothic Revival style is not as prevalent in the district, the majority of downtown churches, including the 1868 Christ Episcopal (#54) by J. J. R. Randall, the 1892 St. Augustine Roman Catholic Church (#128), the 1868 Bethany Congregational Church (#146) by Charles Edward Parker, and the 1868-73 First Baptist Church (#376) by A.M. Burnham were built in the High Gothic style and are good examples of NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section 7 Page 4 Montpelier Historic District Amendment name of property Montpelier, Washington County, Vermont Town, county and State architect-designed interpretations of that genre. The 1868 Trinity Methodist Church (#148) by Edward Dow uses a more Romanesque/Italianate style.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NPS Form 10 900-B
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet DRAFT 8/31/2012 Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail Section number G Page 136 GEOGRAPHICAL DATA The geographical data presented provide an important basis for interpreting and understanding the historic resources of the Santa Fe Trail. Establishing the course of the trail and the physical and cultural environment over which it extended are of primary importance. Ideally, such geographical data should encompass a description of the trail and all its branches. An understanding of the physiographic regions through which the trail passes allows a better appreciation of the ease or difficulty of movement across the trail. Relatively level areas provided ease of wagon movement while areas like Raton Pass presented considerable obstacles. The climate also presented challenges ranging from infrequent precipitation over sections of the Cimarron Route to abundant thunderstorms along other portions of the trail. The climate also contributed to other physical processes which molded the landscape, including mechanical and chemical weathering and erosion. The spatial and temporal variations in the physical environment clearly entered into the decision-making process of the Santa Fe Trail traveler. Since many of the historic resources presented in this nomination deal with elements of the physical landscape, an understanding of the resources’ physical and cultural emergence is needed. For the purposes of identification and interpretation, even their physical appearance bears much importance. Vegetation and soils provide an epidermis for the physical landscape, and in doing so, often hide the remains of resources important to a better understanding of the trail.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Form 10 900-B
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) Section number Appendices Page 159 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION Figure 1. William Buckles, “Map showing official SFT Routes…,” Journal of the West (April 1989): 80. Note: The locations of Bent’s Old Fort and New Fort Lyon are reversed; New Fort Lyon was west of Bent’s Old Fort. NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) Section number Appendices Page 160 Figure 2. Susan Calafate Boyle, “Comerciantes, Arrieros, Y Peones: The Hispanos and the Santa Fe Trade,” Southwest Cultural Resources Center: Professional Papers No. 54: Division of History Southwest Region, National Park Service, 1994 [electronic copy on-line]; available from National Park Service, <http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/safe/shs3.htm> (accessed 11 August 2011). NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) Section number Appendices Page 161 Figure 3. “The Southwest 1820-1835,” National Geographic Magazine, Supplement of the National Geographic November 1982, 630A. NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised)
    NPS Form 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NPS Approved – April 3, 2013 National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items New Submission X Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) I. The Santa Fe Trail II. Individual States and the Santa Fe Trail A. International Trade on the Mexican Road, 1821-1846 A. The Santa Fe Trail in Missouri B. The Mexican-American War and the Santa Fe Trail, 1846-1848 B. The Santa Fe Trail in Kansas C. Expanding National Trade on the Santa Fe Trail, 1848-1861 C. The Santa Fe Trail in Oklahoma D. The Effects of the Civil War on the Santa Fe Trail, 1861-1865 D. The Santa Fe Trail in Colorado E. The Santa Fe Trail and the Railroad, 1865-1880 E. The Santa Fe Trail in New Mexico F. Commemoration and Reuse of the Santa Fe Trail, 1880-1987 C. Form Prepared by name/title KSHS Staff, amended submission; URBANA Group, original submission organization Kansas State Historical Society date Spring 2012 street & number 6425 SW 6th Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Thomas O. Boggs December 2012 Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Background his reconnaissance study was prepared by the National Park Service (NPS) at T the request of U.S. Representative Cory Gardner (CO), who asked the NPS to evaluate Boggsville, Colorado, as a potential new unit of the park service.1 Boggsville, which is in Bent County, Colorado, is a 39-acre historic district that was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1986; that nomination determined that Boggsville had a state level of significance. The purpose of the NPS reconnaissance study was to determine if Boggsville also met NPS criteria for national significance. If deemed nationally significant, Boggsville could then be further considered as a National Historic Landmark, or as a potential unit of the NPS. The primary contributing buildings at Boggsville include the Thomas O. Boggs home and the John W. Prowers house. The Pioneer Historical Society of Bent County acquired Boggsville in 1985. The site consists of 110 acres of land, of which 39 acres are associated with the Boggsville settlement. Thomas Boggs Home - NPS Photo, Greg Kendrick The history and evaluation of national significance was prepared by historian and PhD candidate Steven C. Baker, under the supervision of Dr. Ralph Mann, associate professor, Department of History, University of Colorado Boulder, working in cooperation with the Heritage Partnerships Program of the NPS Intermountain Region. 1 Cory Gardner, Member of Congress, House of Representatives, letter to Jon Jarvis, Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Form 10 900-B
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Resources of the Santa Fe Trail (Revised) Section number G Page 134 GEOGRAPHICAL DATA The geographical data presented provide an important basis for interpreting and understanding the historic resources of the Santa Fe Trail. Establishing the course of the trail and the physical and cultural environment over which it extended are of primary importance. Ideally, such geographical data should encompass a description of the trail and all its branches. An understanding of the physiographic regions through which the trail passes allows a better appreciation of the ease or difficulty of movement across the trail. Relatively level areas provided ease of wagon movement while areas like Raton Pass presented considerable obstacles. The climate also presented challenges ranging from infrequent precipitation over sections of the Cimarron Route to abundant thunderstorms along other portions of the trail. The climate also contributed to other physical processes which molded the landscape, including mechanical and chemical weathering and erosion. The spatial and temporal variations in the physical environment clearly entered into the decision-making process of the Santa Fe Trail traveler. Since many of the historic resources presented in this nomination deal with elements of the physical landscape, an understanding of the resources’ physical and cultural emergence is needed. For the purposes of identification and interpretation, even their physical appearance bears much importance. Vegetation and soils provide an epidermis for the physical landscape, and in doing so, often hide the remains of resources important to a better understanding of the trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 35, Number 4, 2013
    Kansas Preservation Volume 35, Number 4 • 2013 REAL PLACES. REAL STORIES. Heritage Trust Fund – Still Making a Difference See story on page 15 Historical Society Lost The Kansas 4-H Foundation, which owns and operates the Rock Springs 4-H Center near Junction City, recently demolished the 1878 water wheel Newsletter of the Cultural Resources Division ranch house on its property. Efforts to save the building, led by Mel Borst of Kansas Historical Society Manhattan and the Kansas Preservation Alliance, were unsuccessful. The Kansas State Historic Preservation Office reviewed a request for determination Volume 35 Number 4 of eligibility in October 2013 and determined the property to be potentially Contents 1 eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for its local National and State Register Nominations significance in the areas of architecture and engineering. 8 Nearby Rock Springs fed a large water wheel that was built to power a grist Updating the Historic Resources of the mill operation. James H. “Buttermilk” Dickson, a dairyman, bought the ranch Santa Fe Trail Multiple Property Document house in 1883 and used the grist mill to grind cow feed; he also belted a large 15 Heritage Trust Fund – Still Making a Difference churn to the water wheel. The property functioned as a dairy through the early 20th century. Rock Springs Ranch was established by Abilene lawyer C. E. Rugh 17 The Story Behind an 1837 Half Penny in 1928. He sold the property to the 4-H Foundation in 1946. from Canada: Why Was it Lost in Bourbon County, Kansas? 20 Retracing John Brown’s Steps KANSAS PRESERVATION Published quarterly by the Kansas Historical Society, 6425 SW 6th Avenue, Topeka KS 66615-1099.
    [Show full text]
  • Highways to the Sky: a Context and History of Colorado’S Highway System
    FINAL HIGHWAYS TO THE SKY: A CONTEXT AND HISTORY OF COLORADO’S HIGHWAY SYSTEM Submitted to: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4201 E. Arkansas Avenue Denver, Colorado 80222 Contract Routing No. 01HAA00247 Submitted by: ASSOCIATED CULTURAL RESOURCE EXPERTS 8341 Sangre de Cristo Road, Suite 202 Littleton, Colorado 80127 April 24, 2002 (Funded In Part By A State Historical Project Fund Grant from the Colorado Historical Society. Grant #2001-01-043) HIGHWAYS TO THE SKY: A CONTEXT AND HISTORY OF COLORADO'S HIGHWAY SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 IntroductionandProjectDescription...... ......... ...... 1-1 1.1 Historical Context.................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Sponsorship......................................................... 1-2 1.3 Methods andProcedures.......................................................... 1-3 1.4 Further Areas of Research 1-5 Chapter 2 Setting...... ... ......... ..... 2-1 2.1 Locations and Topographical Description Pertinent to Colorado's Highways........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 General History and Mining, Settlement and Political Organization....... 2-1 2.3 The Colorado Highway Commission and Succeeding Agencies............ 2-3 Chapter 3 The Road Ahead: Early Trails in Colorado.................................. 3-1 3.1 Native Trails: Pre-History to 1850s............................................. 3-1 3.2 Emigrant and Trade Routes ........... 3-3 3.2.1 Santa Fe Trai1....................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Cherokee Trail .., ...,... 3-4 3.2.3 Smoky Hill Trail ,............. 3-5 3.2.4 Overland Trail ,...... 3-5 3.2.5 Trapper's Trai1..................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Military Roads and Federal Involvement. ,... 3-6 3.4 Mining-Related Roads. ,.. ,.. 3-8 3.5 Railroads and the End of the Wagon Trail.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3-11 Chapter 4 Territorial and Pre-Automobile State Roads.............................
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Fort Union National Monument New Mexico June 2014 Foundation Document Fort Union National Monument Contents
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Fort Union National Monument New Mexico June 2014 Foundation Document Fort Union National Monument Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Park Purpose 4 Park Significance 5 Fundamental Resources and Values 6 Other Important Resources and Values 6 Interpretive Themes 7 Part 2: Dynamic Components 8 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 8 Special Mandates 8 Administrative Commitments 9 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 9 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 10 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values 23 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs 25 Planning and Data Needs 26 Part 3: Contributors 29 Appendixes 30 Appendix A: Enabling Legislation for Fort Union National Monument 30 Appendix B: Traditionally Associated Tribes and Park Stakeholders 38 Traditionally Associated Tribes 38 Park Stakeholders 38 Foundation Document Fort Union National Monument Mission of the National Park Service The National Park Service (NPS) preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The National Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. The NPS core values are a framework in which the National Park Service accomplishes its mission. They express the manner in which, both individually and collectively, the National Park Service pursues its mission. The NPS core values are: · Shared stewardship: We share a commitment to resource stewardship with the global preservation community.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico's Rich Cultural Heritage
    New Mexico’s Rich Cultural Heritage Listed State and National Register Properties September 2012 Pictured clockwise: Acoma Curio Shop, Cibola County (1934); ); Belen Harvey House, Valencia County (888); Gate, Fence, and Hollow Tree Shelter Designed by Dionicio Rodriguez for B.C. Froman, Union County (1927); and Lyceum Theater, Curry County (1897). New Mexico’s Rich Cultural Heritage Listed State and National Register Properties Contents II Glossary 1-88 Section 1: Arranged by Name 1-144 Section2: Arranged by County 1-73 Section 3: Arranged by Number II Glossary Section 1: Arranged by Name Section 2: Arranged by County Section 3: Arranged by Number Section 2: Arranged by County HPD County City Name Of Property SR Date NR Date 1946 Moon Objects & Structures at 4/9/2010 Tranquility Base 1235 Bernalillo Alameda Alameda School Site 2/28/1986 1243 Bernalillo Alameda LA 717 (Possibly Puaray 2/28/1986 Pueblo) 1241 Bernalillo Alameda North Edith Casa Corral 2/28/1986 1173 Bernalillo Alameda Pueblo Calabacillas (LA 289) 7/19/1985 1174 Bernalillo Alameda Santa Rosalia de Corrales (LA 7/19/1985 50268) 1929 Bernalillo Albuqerque Relief Model Map of the State 8/8/2008 of New Mexico 1492 Bernalillo Albuquerque Agriculture Building, New 11/4/1988 Mexico State Fair 508 Bernalillo Albuquerque Albuquerque High School, Old 6/3/1977 749 Bernalillo Albuquerque Albuquerque Historic District, 10/26/1979 Old 843 Bernalillo Albuquerque Albuquerque Indian School 10/23/1981 7/26/1982 Employees' Dorm #232 840 Bernalillo Albuquerque Albuquerque Indian School 10/23/1981 7/26/1982 Gymnasium #210 (REMOVED SR & NR) 844 Bernalillo Albuquerque Albuquerque Indian School 10/23/1981 Health Services #233 Friday, September 21, 2012 Page 1 of 145 HPD County City Name Of Property SR Date NR Date 841 Bernalillo Albuquerque Albuquerque Indian School 10/23/1981 Home Ec.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico's Rich Cultural Heritage
    New Mexico’s Rich Cultural Heritage Listed State and National Register Properties by Number March 2012 Pictured clockwise: Acoma Curio Shop, Cibola County (1934); ); Belen Harvey House, Valencia County (888); Gate, Fence, and Hollow Tree Shelter Designed by Dionicio Rodriguez for B.C. Froman, Union County (1927); and Lyceum Theater, Curry County (1897). Section 3: Arranged by Number Section 3: Arranged by Number File# Name Of Property County City SR Date NR Date 1 Abo Mission Ruin NHL Torrance Scholle 10/15/1966 2 Anderson Basin NHL Roosevelt Portales 10/15/1966 3 Aztec Mill Colfax Cimarron 4 Barrio de Analco National Register Santa Fe Santa Fe 11/24/1968 Historic District NHL 5 Big Bead Mesa NHL Sandoval Casa Salazar 10/15/1966 6 Blumenschein, Ernest L., House NHL Taos Taos 10/15/1966 7 Carlsbad Reclamation Project NHL Eddy Carlsbad 10/15/1966 8 Carson, Kit, House NHL Taos Taos 10/15/1966 9 Folsom Man Site NHL Colfax Folsom 10/15/1966 10 Hawikuh Ruin NHL McKinley Zuni Pueblo 10/15/1966 11 Las Trampars Historic District NHL Taos Las Trampas 5/28/1967 12 Lincoln Historic District NHL Lincoln Lincoln 10/15/1966 13 Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory NHL Los Alamos Los Alamos 10/15/1966 14 Mesilla Plaza NHL Dona Ana Mesilla 10/15/1966 15 Old Fort Ruin Rio Arriba Blanco 1/21/1987 16 Ortiz, Nicholas and Antonio Jose, Santa Fe Santa Fe Houses 17 Palace of the Governors NHL Santa Fe Santa Fe 10/15/1966 18 Acoma Pueblo NHL Cibola Acoma Pueblo 10/15/1966 19 Puye Ruins NHL Rio Arriba Santa Clara Pueblo 10/15/1966 20 Raton Pass NHL Colfax Raton 10/15/1966
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK Theme #6 Western Expansion 1763-1898- Western Trails and Travelers NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3"82> FHR-8-250 (10/78) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name historic _ Watrous_J.La_Juntai and or common La Junta 2. Location street & number TL^_!_ Route 85 not for publication city, town Watrous vicinity of state New Mexico code county Mo i'a code 33 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public x occupied x agriculture __ museum building(s) _JL_ private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational x private residence x site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process x yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation __ no __ military __ other: 4. Owner of Property name Mr. G, M. (Dogie) Jones (Sapello Stage Station & Fort Union Corral and Buildings) street& number '°' Box Watr-cus--v.no city, town vicinity of state NM 87753 5. Location of Legal Description Mora Countv Courthouse courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. street & number city, town I-fora. state New Mexico 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title The Sa.nte Fe Trail, Subtheme Report has this property been determined eligible? yes no National Survey of Historic Sites & Bldgs date 1963 x federal state county local depository for survey records Division of History, National Park Service Washington DC 202UO city, town state 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation Architect Spring 2011
    Preservation Architect Spring 2011 UPCOMING CONFERENCES AND EVENTS Voices in Preservation Education: An Interview with Hugh Miller, FAIA Wednesday March 23, 2011, 6:30 pm | Middleton-Pinckney House, Charleston, SC By Ashley Robbins, AIA, 2011 Chair, AIA-HRC Historic Preservation Education Subcommittee The American Institute of Architects, Historic Resources Committee and Clemson/College of Charleston Graduate Program in Historic Preservation will introduce the inaugural lecture in a series entitled Voices in Preservation Education with an interview with Hugh Miller, FAIA, on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 6:30 pm in the Middleton-Pinckney House, piano nobile. The interview will be taped, recorded and archived at the College of Charleston & viewed online in the next issue of Preservation Architect. The Middleton-Pinckney House is located at 14 George Street, Charleston, South Carolina. Seating is limited. RSVP Allisyn Miller (843-937-9596) More Information. Symposium on the Restoration of Cast and Wrought Iron March 19 - 20, 2011 | Wood Auditorium, Avery Hall, Columbia University, New York, New York From the Historic Preservation Education Foundation Wrought and cast iron have long been among the most versatile building materials available to designers, craftsmen, and builders. Able to provide structural utility and decorative embellishment, iron can mimic delicate filigree or the solidity of a stone column. In the United States, especially during the late nineteenth and earlier twentieth centuries, hand-crafted wrought-iron and mass-produced cast-iron features were common in municipal buildings, churches, warehouses, factories, and commercial storefronts. Though extremely durable, cast and wrought iron, like all historic materials, require sensitive maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and, on occasion, replacement.
    [Show full text]