Materials and Methods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Materials and Methods Appendix, pp. 1–11 ДВ Орн. Журнал, 2014. №4. С.3—19 Far East. J. Orn. 4: 3—19 (2014) PUBLISHER’S TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH Shibaev Yu.V. (2014) Expansion of “Mongolian gull” Larus (Smithsonianus) mongolicus Sushkin, 1925 to the eastern periphery of the Asian Continent // Far East. J.Orn. 4: 3—19. SUMMARY This paper describes the process of colonization of a small island (Furugelm Island) in Peter the Great Bay (Russian side of the Sea of Japan) by a gull species from the Larus argentatus superspecies complex, starting from a single nesting pair in 2004 to a stable population of 72 pairs in 2012. The taxonomic status of the colonist species remains debatable and is not the purpose of this paper. Rather, this is an analysis of the dynamics of regional colonization, characteristics of seasonal migration, and species biology that allow for the conclusion that these observations amount to a sequential colonization by Larus (smithsonianus) mongolicus of the eastern periphery of the Asian continent. The settlers colonized two habitat types from Lake Khanka to the lower reaches of the Amur River: large, freshwater lakes, and coastal islands. The birds that settled on Furugelm Island started as a group of seven differently-aged birds: two mature birds (that bred) and five younger birds of varying maturity. Successful colonization by this species was based on a series of factors, including the protected status of Furugelm Island where the birds fortuitously chose to nest, an abundance of available habitat and food resources, and a relatively low abundance of Slaty-backed gulls, which occupy the same niche. The referred figures and tables are in the original article in Russian, at pages 3—19 This manuscript was prompted by the discovery sites on Furugelm Island in the Far Eastern State of a new nesting species in the Peter the Great Bay Marine Biosphere Reserve and also in spring and (in extreme southwestern Primorskii Krai, Russia); a autumn 2009 during a series of surveys (to search for gull from the Larus argentatus superspecies complex. other concentrations of these gulls) along the entire Following a review of the literature it became clear coastline of Peter the Great Bay. that this was a species colonizing a vast region - the Observations at breeding colonies to detect eastern periphery of the Asian continent. The purpose breeding birds were conducted from 19 June-25 of this text, which documents the genesis of a new August in 2004, and from 14 May-24 June and 07 breeding group of this gull (apparently the first in August-18 September in 2005. In all subsequent years, the Sea of Japan), is to discuss the timing, means, annual monitoring was conducted at the colony, and consequences of the new breeding population including a census of all gulls nesting there. on Furugelm Island in the Far Eastern State Marine The adjacent Tumen wetland—a complex of Biosphere Reserve. land, sea, and shallow bays—was a potential location for feeding habitat suitable for the colonist. In the pre- MATERIALS AND METHODS breeding period in 2005 (from 16 March-19 April), I Field observations were carried out in conducted a series of surveys there, in which all “large, southwestern Primorskii Krai from 2004-2012. Data White-headed gulls” of the L. argentatus complex were collected primarily at colonial waterbird nesting were recorded. Nearly all locations suitable for resting or feeding use by gulls were examined. The length *E-mail: <[email protected]> of a single route was ~ 130 km. Other surveys were (Received 03.07.2014; Accepted 12.11.2014) conducted 24 July-05 August in 2005, and 09 April-10 May and 28 August- 21 September in 2009. Some © 2014 Shibaev Yu.V. © 2014 Amur-Ussuri Center for Avian Biodiversity islands in Peter the Great Bay were surveyed from 06- © 2014 Inst. of Biol. and Soil Sci. FEB RAS, Vladivostok 16 June, 2012. www. birdland.ru Appendix, p. 1 Yu. V. Shibaev RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Yellow Sea in 1910 or even earlier. Historical Analysis Furugelm Island, Peter the Great Bay. Over the Starting in the second half of the 20th Century past few decades, only two gull species have been and into the 21st, scattered reports of a previously- recorded breeding in this area: Black-tailed gull L. unrecorded gull species from the L. argentatus crassirostris and Slaty-backed gull L. schistisagus. superspecies complex appeared across the vast, Nesting by a third species was first recorded in summer temperate region of extreme eastern Asia. Different 2004, on Furugelm Island. There was a single nesting authorities have referred to this species by different pair that year, and by 2012 this number had risen to names, but it is likely that all describe the same ~130 breeding adults (Figs. 3, 4). species. What follows is a brief summary of each After analyzing the literature, I believe regional report (and see Fig. 1). that, more likely than not, all of these previously- Lake Khanka. The first “herring gulls” recorded published records refer to the same species: L. nesting on the lake were in the 1970s (Glushchenko mongolicus. However, it was not my goal to identify et al., 2011). From then, the breeding population grew the taxonomic status of this colonizing species, and in from a few dozen pairs to 1,873 pairs in the present this manuscript I defer to the classification proposed day (Fig. 2; Glushchenko et al., 2011). These Khanka in the latest (fourth) edition of The Howard and gulls have been called different names, including L. Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World argentatus mongolicus (Yudin and Firsova, 1988); L. (Dickinson and Remsen, 2013), where the Asian form (cachinnans) mongolicus (Yudin and Firsova, 2002); is regarded as a subspecies of the American herring L. cachinnans (Glushchenko et al., 2011), and L. vega gull: L. (smithsonianus) mongolicus. Hereafter, I use mongolicus (Firsova, 2013). the conditional name «Mongolian gull» to refer to Lake Udyl, Lower Amur River basin. The first this bird. nesting L. (cachinnans) mongolicus were recorded on Lake Udyl in June 2003, when 16 adult breeding birds The Likely Source of Colonization were seen there. The birds were identified following Although this has not been specifically taxonomy in Olsen and Larsson (2004). This species emphasized or discussed, most (if not all) authors of was subsequently confirmed as a nesting species in previous publications concerning this species note 2010, when 20 young birds were observed, and again that this gull is distributed inland. The Mongolian in 2011, when four nests were found (Pronkevich gull’s primary breeding range is in fact continental and Oleinikov, 2010; Pronkevich et al., 2011). (Fig. 1), so observations in eastern Russia represent Presumably, the species began nesting at Lake Udyl an expansion towards the eastern periphery of the around the year 2000. Asian continent. What follows are some facts and Yellow Sea. There are multiple reports of a large, considerations to support this statement. white-headed gull nesting on a number of islands off 1. At the start of the 20th Century, the Herring the western coast of the Korean Peninsula, both in gull L. a. mongolicus was a very rare bird in the Altai- North and South Korea. Initially, these birds were Sayanskii ecoregion (Baranov and Melnik, 2009). identified as Herring gulls L. argentatus, then later These authors report that there was an increase in as “Mongolian gulls” L. mongolicus (Chong et al., the number of these birds over the past 50 years, 1996: Moores, 2003, 2008; Chan et al., 2010; Moores, and that their colonization of the central Siberian 2012). According to Moores (2012), the “Mongolian section of the Altai-Sayanskii ecoregion during that gull” is a common breeding species on some islands time was “particularly intensive.” Numerous nesting in the Yellow Sea. A colony of ~100 Herring gulls colonies settlements have appeared in the Tuvinskaya were observed on Dokdo Island (North Korea) in and Minusinskaya Hollows, and it has become an the breeding season in 1995 (Chong et al., 1996), abundant nesting species on water bodies of western and Moores (2012), in interpreting information from Mongolia (Baranov and Melnik, 2009). This species Austin (1948), even suggested that “Mongolian gulls” clearly had means and opportunity for expansion. were a broadly-distributed summer visitor to the 2. The increase in numbers of L. a. mongolicus in its Appendix, p. 2 Expansion of “Mongol gull” Larus (Smithsonianus) mongolicus to the eastern periphery of the Asian Continent primary breeding range largely coincides with the first an advanced stage of colonization. breeding records of the “Herring gull” at Lake Khanka The proposed expansion from Lake Khanka (Glushchenko et al., 2011). It seems that these birds might be the result of a deficit of nesting territories began expanding their range into the eastern sections there. The appearance of nesting Mongolian gulls at of the Asian continent sometime in the second half of Lake Udyl (in 2003 or a little earlier) and on Furugelm the 20th Century. That is, the process of expansion Island (2004) generally coincide with two potentially- continued past that documented in #1 above. related events at Lake Khanka: 3. The breeding areas newly-established by 1. Overpopulation. There was high nesting these gulls are approximately the same latitude as the density and limited availability of flat, sandy islands. primary range of the mongolicus form. It is likely easier By 2003, there were already ~1,500 breeding pairs for birds colonizing from the west to acclimate to the there (Glushchenko et al. 2011). seasonal rhythms of an area than if they were to come 2. Deteriorating conditions for nesting.
Recommended publications
  • Unexpected Feature of the Lepidoptera Assemblages on The
    ioprospe , B cti ity ng rs a e n iv d d D o i e v B e f l Journal of Biodiversity, Bioprospecting o o l p a m n r e Beljaev, J Biodivers Biopros Dev 2014, 1:1 n u t o J ISSN: 2376-0214 and Development DOI: 10.4172/2376-0214.1000113 Research Article Open Access Unexpected Feature of the Lepidoptera Assemblages on the Small Shelf Islands in the Peter the Great Gulf (Sea of Japan, South of Russian Far East) Evgeny A Beljaev* Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Vladivostok, Russia *Corresponding author: Evgeny A. Beljaev, Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690022, Russia, Tel: +74232311133; Fax:+7423310193; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: Apr 02, 2014, Accepted date: May 26, 2014, Publication date: May 29, 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Beljaev EA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The article describes and discusses unexpected feature of agrological structure of the moths' species assemblages on four small shelf islands in the Peter the Great Gulf (Sea of Japan, south of Russian Far East). Before insect fauna of these islands was almost unknown. The study was conducted according to standard entomological procedures of insect collecting and chorological analysis of local faunas. Statistical analysis was performed using the detrended correspondence analysis. Typification of areas was made following the principles by Gorodkov.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Preliminary Faunistic Analysis Margarita G
    ioprospe , B cti ity ng rs a e n iv d d D o i e v B e f l Journal of Biodiversity, Bioprospecting o o l p a m Ponomarenko, J Biodivers Biopros Dev 2014, 2:1 n r e n u t o J DOI: 10.4172/ijbbd.1000135 ISSN: 2376-0214 and Development Research Article Open Access Gelechiid Moths from the Islands of Peter the Great Gulf (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Preliminary Faunistic Analysis Margarita G. Ponomarenko* Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia *Corresponding author: Margarita G. Ponomarenko, Leading scientific researcher, Laboratory of Entomology, Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok-22, Russia, Tel: +7 (423)2311133; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: Jul 08, 2014, Accepted date: Nov 06, 2014, Publication date: Nov 10, 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Ponomarenko MG. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The comparative faunistic analysis of species diversity of family Gelechiidae in Islands of Peter the Great Gulf and in neighboring continental territories is made. The island fauna turned out depleted because of small size of islands, limited landscape diversity and impossibility of active moth migration due to their weak flying abilities. However the concentration of species diversity in islands is almost two orders of magnitude larger than that in continental part.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation
    NEASPEC-NEAMPAN1 Management Plans and Strategies at Selected Sites of NEAMPAN in the Russian Federation 1 This report was prepared by SAVELYEV, Anatoly (Center for International Project), ORLOVA,Tatiana (National Scientific Center of Marine Biology Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Science), SUTYRINA,Svetlana (Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Reserve), and KACHUR,Anatolii (Institute of Geography of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences) Table of Contents 1. Basic information of the target MPA .......................................................................................................... 3 2. Background of strategic/management plan of the target MPA ................................................................. 13 3. Objective of MPA management plan ........................................................................................................ 19 4. Key contents of the management plans ..................................................................................................... 21 4.1. Links between monitoring/assessment results and management ........................................................ 24 5. NEAMPAN sites studies ........................................................................................................................... 26 5.1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 26 5.2. Sikhote-Alin Nature Biosphere Reserve ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Rare and Endangered Amphibians and Reptiles in Primorsky Krai (Far East, Russia)
    Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2018. 3(Suppl.1): 61–72 DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2018.052 DISTRIBUTION OF RARE AND ENDANGERED AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN PRIMORSKY KRAI (FAR EAST, RUSSIA) Irina V. Maslova1, Ekaterina Yu. Portnyagina2, Darja A. Sokolova2, Polina A. Vorobieva2, Mikhail V. Akulenko3, Arseniy S. Portnyagin2,4, Alexey A. Somov5 1Federal Scientific Centre of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of RAS, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2Far Eastern Federal University, Russia e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 3Gidrotekhnika Ltd., Russia e-mail: [email protected] 4Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch of RAS, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 5Pacific Research Fisheries Centre (TINRO-Centre), Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 20.04.2018 Information is given on new findings of five rare and endangered species of amphibians and reptiles inhabiting the Primorsky Krai: Onychodactylus fischeri, Pelodiscus maackii, Takydromus wolteri, Oocatochus rufodorsa- tus and Hebius vibakari. New locations are presented for the studied amphibians and reptiles. For the first time, Onychodactylus fischeri is reported here for the Partizanky Ridge, thus expanding its known habitat range in the south-western direction. Data on Takydromus wolteri, Oocatochus rufodorsatus and Hebius vibakari findings in western Primorsky Krai are provided for the first time. Habitat borders ofTakydromus wolteri in the northern part of its distribution has been updated in various directions: to the west (Khankaysky District), north (Kras- noarmeysky District) and northeast (Olginsky District). The current model of habitat range and breeding places of Khankaysky population of Pelodiscus maackii has been demonstrated, taking into account submerging sandy spits on the western coast of Lake Khanka in 2014–2017.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT North-East Asian Marine Protected Areas
    Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas Assessment of Marine Protected Monitoring and Management Plans, Network Areas Asian Marine Protected North-East North-East Asian Marine Protected Areas Network Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas North-East Asian Marine Protected Areas Network Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas Management Plans, Monitoring and Assessment of Marine Protected Areas Copyright © NEASPEC 2021 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NEASPEC. The report is published without formal editing. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is acknowledged. The NEASPEC Secretariat would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. Layout and Design: DocuFriends Contents Contents Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................................................................xii Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................................................................................xiv Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................................................xv
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Dr. Anatoly KACHUR
    Introduction on status of conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in Russian part of NOWPAP region. Kachur Anatoly N. Pacific Geographical institute Far East Branch Russian Academy of Sciences 1 • Marine and coastal waters of Russia are the environment for a considerable diversity of habitats and species. • The coastal and marine environment of Russia includes a great number of the unique coastal objects which provide habitat conditions for many biota representatives. • Some biotopes, such as shallow hydrothermal objects, cold channels and mud volcanoes are unique and have biota of the global importance. • Phenomena, periodically repeating in the open sea, such as frontal zones, upwellings and stationary glades in the freezing seas, are of special importance for maintenance of the sea productivity and biodiversity. According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation internal marine resources, territotial waters, exclusive economic zones and the continental shelf are under the federal jurisdiction. In Russia, about 17 millions people live in the coastal zone (within a belt of 50 km from the coastline) and only 5 millions of them render habitable the coastal zones of the Far-Eastern seas – Bering, Okhotsk, Japan and open coasts of the Pacific Ocean. The Russian coast is characterized by a rich natural-resource potential but its intensive development started only in the last 60 years. Main present and potential environmental issues and threats for biodiversity in 7 Russian Far East • The Far East of the Russian Federation as a whole, and its south area first of all, is unrivalled among all regions of Russia in diversity of fauna and flora species, including in the coastal zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Far Eastern Entomologist Number 343: 15-18 ISSN 1026-051X October
    Far Eastern Entomologist Number 343: 15-18 ISSN 1026-051X October 2017 https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.343.3 http/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A409063A-2E09-4AF1-B557-D866CF587224 MARADANA FAVIUSALIS (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALOIDEA) – NEW GENUS AND SPECIES FOR THE RUSSIAN FAUNA A. N. Streltzov Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Summary. Maradana faviusalis (Walker, 1859) is found for the first time in Russia on the Furugelm Island located in the Gulf of Peter the Great, the Sea of Japan. Imago of this species and male genitalia are described and illustrated. The data on distribution of M. faviusalis and taxonomic remarks on its generic position are given. Key words: Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Maradana, fauna, new record, Russian Far East. А. Н. Стрельцов. Maradana faviusalis – новый для фауны России род и вид настоящих огнёвок (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea) // Дальневосточный энтомолог. 2017. N 343. С. 15-18. Резюме. Впервые для территории России указывается Maradana faviusalis (Walker, 1859), найденный на остове Фуругельма в заливе Петра Великого, Приморский край. Приводится описание внешней морфологии и гениталий самца, дано распространение вида и сделаны таксономические замечания по его родовому положению. The fauna of pyralid moths of the southern part of the Russian Far East is relatively well studied. Although the general reviews of Far Eastern pyralids were published recently (Kir- pichnikova, 2009; Streltzov, 2016), the fauna on island territories of this vast region is still poorly known. Researchers mainly focused on the large islands of Far Eastern seas – on the Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands (mostly Southern) (Matsumura, 1925; Kirpichnikova, 1978; Dubatolov & Ustjuzhanin, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of China - Russia Bilateral Symposium On“Comparison on Marine Biodiversity in the Northwest Pacific Ocean”
    PROCEEDINGS OF CHINA - RUSSIA BILATERAL SYMPOSIUM ON“COMPARISON ON MARINE BIODIVERSITY IN THE NORTHWEST PACIFIC OCEAN” Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences A.V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 10-11 October 2010 Qingdao, China Conference Conveners Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Professor Song Sun Professor Ruiyu Liu A.V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Professor Andrey Adrianov Professor Konstantin Lutaenko Supported by Chinese Academy of Sciences Supported by the External Cooperation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. GJHZ200808. Asian-Pacific Network for Global Change Research Secretary Dr. Xiaoxia Sun Tel: +86 532 82898599 Fax: +86 532 82868008 E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Mengtan Liu Tel: +86 532 82898925 E-mail: [email protected] PROCEEDINGS OF CHINA - RUSSIA BILATERAL SYMPOSIUM ON“COMPARISON ON MARINE BIODIVERSITY IN THE NORTHWEST PACIFIC OCEAN” Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences A.V. Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 10-11 October 2010 Qingdao, China Preface The United Nations declared 2010 to be the International Year of Biodiversity. It is a celebration of life on earth and of the value of biodiversity for our lives. The world is invited to take action in 2010 to safeguard the variety of life on earth: biodiversity (see: http://www.cbd.int/2010/about/). Biological diversity - or biodiversity - is the term given to the variety of life on Earth and the natural patterns it forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report of Transboundary Cooperation Among Protected
    Last update: 30 September 2020 Transboundary cooperation among protected wetlands in the Tumen River Estuary Table of Contents (to be added) Acknowledgements (to be added) Executive summary in English, Chinese and Russian (to be prepared) 1 Last update: 30 September 2020 1. Introduction 1.1. Background The Tumen River Estuary is a globally important area with rich biodiversity and habitats for globally endangered and vulnerable species, including flagship species 1 of the North-East Asian Subregional Programme for Environmental Cooperation (NEASPEC). Three neighboring countries, i.e. China, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the Russian Federation, already recognized its ecological importance, and introduced conservation measures such as by designating the area as a nature reserve. While research and monitoring in the Chinese and Russian territories of the Tumen River Delta indicated that it is a habitat for thousands of migratory bird species, a complete picture of the Tumen River Delta habitat could not be drawn due to the lack of information on the DPRK side until early 2010s. In this regard, UNESCAP East and North-East Asia Office (ENEA) and Hanns-Seidel- Foundation Korea Office (HSF), with the generous support of the Economic Cooperation Bureau of the People’s Committee of Rason City, conducted a field survey in Rason Migratory Bird Reserve during 26- 31 March 2014. The field survey has produced the first markings of baseline information of the habitat including key geographical information, and most importantly, it confirmed that the Reserve meets Ramsar criteria as an “internationally important wetland” and that it supports over a hundred species of birds (Annex 1)2.
    [Show full text]