S^Hyyiao $ $U, Fj

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

S^Hyyiao $ $U, Fj THE RISE AHD DECLINE OF JEFFERSON, TEXAS APPROVED: s^hyyiAo $ $u, or Professor Minor Professor fj DirectoLrector or theyDepartment] t of History Dean of the Graduate School THE RISE AND DECLINE OP JEFFERSON, TEXAS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Ben C. Cooner, B. A. Denton, Texas January, 1965 TABLE OP CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v Chapter I. EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF JEFFERSON AND MARION COUNTY 1 II. RED RIVER NAVIGATION BEFORE I860 13 III. RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION BEFORE I860 37 IV. THE DEVELOPMENT OF JEFFERSON, 1860-1870 .... 52 V. PROSPERITY AND DECLINE AFTER 1870 81 VI. THE FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL 102 VII. CONCLUSION 137 BIBLIOGRAPHY 144 in LIST OP TABLES Table Page I. Cotton Exports from Jefferson Between 1865 and 1880 83 II. Selected Statistics of Manufacturing Marion County, Texas, 1870 86 IV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Map of Marion County 12 CHAPTER I EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF JEFFERSON AND MARION COUNTY Jefferson, Texas, once the commercial and distribution center of a large area in northeast Texas and now a small town of approximately 2,970 people, is indebted to a faulty land title for its founding.-*- In 1832 a small group of Anglo-Americans settled seven miles below the present site of Jefferson on Big Cypress Bayou. This settlement became known as Smith's Landing because of a ferry operated by Stephen P. Smith.^ In December, 1839 > Smith received a certificate for one league and one labor of land from the Board of Land Commissioners of Harrison County. Because an error by the clerk of the board showed Smith to be entitled to only one-third of a league, the certificate was in- validated. By law Smith had no recourse but to petition the Congress of the Republic of Texas for a new certificate to ^-Texas Almanac. 1964-65 (Dallas, 1963), p. 248$ Marion County. Inventory of the County Archives of Texas» No. 155 (San Antonio, 194077 P* 4 (hereafter referred to as Marion County Inventory). ^Texas, A Guide to the Lone Star State (New York, 1940), p. 379; Marion County Inventory, p. 4. one league and a labor.^ Rather than waiting for Smith to petition Congress and thereby risking the loss of their home- sites and permanent improvements, the settlers at Smith's Landing decided to move to a new location.4 Because of an offer of free land from Allen Urquart, a resident of Daingerfield and recipient of a 1,280 acre land grant from the Republic, the displaced settlers from Smith's Landing relocated seven miles further west on Big Cypress Bayou near the crossing of Trammel's Trace.^ Other factors besides free land influenced their choice of locations. Small steamboats were a familiar sight on Caddo Lake by 1840, and investigations of Big Cypress Bayou indicated that navigation of the river was possible as far upstream as the proposed settlement.^ The settlers knew the advantages of being at the head of a navigable stream, and they took this opportunity to ^Harriet Smithers, editor, The Senate Journals, Sixth Congress, Yol. I of the Journals of the Sixth Congress of _37the Republir c of Texas, 1841-1842vols. (Austin, 1940J7 ^Texas, A guide to the Lone Star State, p. 379- Smith petitioned Congress on November 11, 1841, and a joint reso- lution in January, 1842, directed the Commissioner of the General Land Office to &iMe him a new certificate for one league and one labor. Smithers, 0£. cit., p. 37. ^Texas, A Guide to the Lone Star State, p. 379i Texas General Land Office, Records of Land Grants, Pile: Morris County, Red River-2-114, Austin ^"photostatic copy_J. ^William Kennedy, Texas: The Rise, Progress, and Prospects of the Republic of Texas, reprint (Fort Worth, 1922;, I, 27; Marshall iJews Messenger, November 10, 1963, Sec. E. locate there. Perhaps just as important in their decision to accept Urquart's offer was the fact that Trammel's Trace crossed Big Cypress Bayou near the proposed location of the new settlement. Many settlers entering Texas from Arkansas and the Indian Territory used this route, and the promise of a steady flow of emigrants added to the inducements of the new location.7 The exact date of the founding of Jefferson is unknown, but a number of sources claim that the settlers obtained the Q land and moved sometime in 1836. Other evidence suggests that this date is erroneous and that the establishment of Jefferson occurred much later. The settlers at Smith's Landing had no reason for leaving before 1840, and they could not have obtained land from Urquart in 1836 as he did not arrive in Texas until April 11, 1837. Moreover, Urquart did not receive a certificate permitting him to have a headright ^Texas, A Guide to the Lone Star State, p. 379* There were actually two different routes known as Trammel's Trace. They were blazed by different men and originated at different points, but converged before reaching Big Cypress and were practically identical from there to Nacogdoches. Cf. John Arrowsmith, Map of Texas, 1841 (London, 1841), No. 438, Archives Division, Texas State Library, Austin; R. L. Jones, "The Autobiography of Andrew Davis," Southwestern Historical ;, XLIII, 161; J. W. Williams, "The National Road of e Republic of Texas," S. H. £., XLVII, 217. 8 Jefferson Daily Jimplecutet September 1, 1876; Texas, A Guide to the Lone Star State, p. 379; Mrs. Arch McKay and Mrs. H. A. Spellings, A History of Jefferson, 1836-1936, 5th edition (Jefferson, n.3\), p. t>\""Marion County Inventory, p. 4. surveyed until August 3, 1838, and even then certain conditions load to "be met "before a clear title could be issued.9 According to the 1837 Texas land law Urquart and his family were re- quired to remain in Texas and perform all the duties of a citizen for three years before an unconditional patent could be issued.10 Urquart received a certificate from the Land Commissioners of Paschal County showing that he had met the conditions and was entitled to an unconditional headright of 1,280 acres on August 23, 1841. "L1 Apparently the settlers did not begin to move until Urquart was assured of a clear title to this land. The Daily Jimplecute maintains that the first settler to enter the present limits of Jefferson was Berry H. Durrum, who arrived there in 1840 to build and operate a ferry across Big Cypress Bayou for Urquart.This would mean that other settlers did not arrive before 1840 and possibly not before 1841. The Daily Jimplecute added that when Durrum arrived the territory was located in Paschal County.^ As Paschal County was not created by the legislature until January 28, ^Texas General Land Office, Records of Land Grants, File: Morris County, Red River-2-114, Austin. 10H. P. N. Gammel, editor, The Laws of Texas, 10 vols. (Austin, 1898), I, 1414. H-Texas General Land Office, Records of Land Grants, Pile: Morris County, Red River-2-114, Austin. Jefferson Daily Jimplecute t September 1, 1876. 15Ibid. 1841, "both statements cannot "be correct.If either is accurate the year in which Durrum and the settlers from Smith's Landing reached Jefferson still is narrowed to either 1840 or 1841. Paschal County ceased to exist in January, 1842, when the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas declared judicial counties unconstitutional.If the territory was in Paschal County at the time of settlement, Jefferson definitely was founded in 1841. A number of sources substantiate the establishment of Jefferson in 1841. Emigrant guides published before that date do not mention Jefferson, and maps drawn from surveys made by the General land Office in 1839 and 1841 give no evidence that a settlement or ferry existed.^ An act of the Congress of the Republic of Texas approved November 17, 1841, to change mail routes in northeast Texas to refer to Marshall, Smithland, Port Caddo, and Daingerfield, but no mention is made of any settlement that might have been Jefferson.1? P. N. Gammel, editor, The Laws of Texas, 10 vols. (Austin, 1898), II, 520-521. -^"Stockton vs. Montgomery," James Wilmer Dallam, A. Digest of the Laws of Texas (Baltimore, 1845), pp. 473-T86. •^Kennedy, op. cit., I, 732, 782$ David B. Edward, The History of Texas~T"Cincinnati« 1836), pp. 28-29; Texas in 1840 or The^Emigrant Guide to the New Republic (New York,18T0), pp. 209-222; John Arrowsmith, Map of Texas, 1841; Richard S. Hunt and Jesse P. Fandel, Map of Texas, 1839 (New York, 1839)* •^Gammel, o£. cit., II, 675. None of these exclude the possibility of a few settlers living near the Trammel Trace crossing of Big Cypress Bayou, but if settlers were at the crossing their existence was not widely known. Allen Urquart, D. N. Alley, William Humphries, and other property owners in the area surveyed and laid off the town- site of Jefferson in 1842 and named it in honor of Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States.Their eagerness to lay out the streets indicates anticipation of imminent steamboat arrivals, and the street pattern reflected their belief in Jefferson's future dependence on river navi- gation. The streets near the river in the Urquart section were laid out so that as many as possible would terminate at the river. This would provide easier access to the river and permit property owners to make the best possible use of the river frontage. The business district was located near the widest portion of the river since this was expected to be the turning basin for steamboats.
Recommended publications
  • The Water Monitor the WATER MONITOR Fall 2009/Winter 2010 Volume 2, Issue 2
    Page 1 The Water Monitor THE WATER MONITOR Fall 2009/Winter 2010 Volume 2, Issue 2 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality-Water Quality Planning Division TCEQ’s New Office of Water INSIDE THIS ISSUE By TCEQ Media Relations TCEQ’s New Office of Water 1 The TCEQ recently announced the formation of a new Updates from the SWQM Program 1 Office of Water, effective December 1st, 2009. The new USIBWC CRP Photo Gallery 2 office encompasses the three existing major water Annual SWQM Workshop Wrap-up 2 divisions in the agency: Water Planning, Water Supply, Oso Bay Cleanup 3 and Water Quality. Oso Bay Water Quality 3 The Circle of Life 5 L’Oreal Stepney will serve as deputy director of the new Master Plan for the Oso Bay Watershed 5 Office of Water. She has served with the TCEQ and Should You Measure Chlorine Residual in the Field 6 predecessor agencies since 1992 in air permitting and Addressing Bacteria Issues on the Rio Grande 7 wastewater permitting, as Water Quality Division director, Critter of the Quarter 8 and most recently as assistant deputy director for the EPA Releases First-Ever Baseline Study of US Lakes 9 Office of Permitting and Registration. She holds a Photo Gallery 10 master’s degree in Environmental Engineering from the University of Texas. former Rio Grande Watermaster Carlos Rubinstein. “Our agency’s response to the people and communities that “The new office is in recognition of the fact that the suffered from this event was extraordinary, and this new state’s population is expected to double in the next 30 Office of Water will ensure that we provide an even years, so the agency must put even more focus on water higher and more focused level of response.” “Water issues to ensure that there will be adequate water quality planning, water supply, and water quality are all issues and quantity for future demand,” said Chairman Bryan W.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting & Fishing Regulations H
    2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 Hunting & Fishing Regulations Regulations Regulations Fishing Fishing & & Hunting Hunting Hunting & Fishing Regulations FISHING FOR A RECORD RECORD A FOR FISHING FISHING FOR A RECORD BY AUBRY BUZEK BUZEK AUBRY BY BY AUBRY BUZEK ENTER OUR SWEEPSTAKES SWEEPSTAKES OUR ENTER ENTER OUR SWEEPSTAKES PAGE 102 102 PAGE PAGE 102 2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 2017-2018 TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE WILDLIFE WILDLIFE & & PARKS PARKS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE OUTDOOROUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOROUTDOOR 6/15/17 4:14 PM 4:14 6/15/17 Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app OutdoorAnnual.com/app App Mobile the 1 Download OA-2017_AC.indd Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app 6/15/17 4:12 PM 4:12 6/15/17 1 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM 6/15/17 4:12 PM 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 ANNUALANNANNUAL AL U ANN ANN ANN ANN ANN ANNUAL ANN ANN ANN ANNUALANNANNUAL AL U ANN ANN ANN ANN ANN ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUALANN ANNUALANN ANN ANN ANN 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM PM 4:12 6/15/17 ANNUAL 1 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 2017_OA_cover_FINAL.indd 1 6/15/17 4:12 PM Download the Mobile App Mobile the Download Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app Download the Mobile App OutdoorAnnual.com/app OutdoorAnnual.com/app OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE WILDLIFE WILDLIFE & & PARKS
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report
    2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following for their contribution to the 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report: Lucas Gregory, PhD Texas A&M Agrilife, Texas Water Resources Institute Lake O’ the Pines National Water Quality Initiative Phase I Update . Laura-Ashley Overdyke Executive Director, Caddo Lake Institute 2018 Updates on the Paddlefish Project: Caddo Lake Institute . Tim Bister Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Invasive Species Control Activities in 2017 . Adam Whisenant and Greg Conley Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Dewatering Below Lake O’ the Pines Ferrell's Bridge Dam PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY The preparation of this report was financed through funding from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. i 2018 Cypress Creek Basin Highlights Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands Country: USA Ref: 4US013 Name and address of compiler: Thomas J. Cloud, Jr. Senior Staff Biologist US Fish and Wildlife Service 711 Stadium Drive East Suite 252, Arlington TX 76011, USA Name of wetlands: Caddo Lake State Park and Wildlife Management Area Date of Ramsar designation: 23/10/1993 Geographical coordinates: 32o42'-32o47'N; 94o5'-94o10'W. General location: The proposed area is state owned land associated with the headwaters of Caddo Lake in Harrison and Marion Counties of Northeastern Texas. The area, known as Caddo Lake State Park and Wildlife Management Area, lies entirely within the Cypress Bayou drainage basin of Texas and is located approximately 24.1km (15 miles) northeast of Marshall, Texas, and 40.2km (25 miles) northwest of Shreveport, Louisiana. Big Cypress Bayou, known as Twelve Mile Bayou downstream of Caddo Lake, is a major tributary to the Red River which enters the lower Mississippi River in Louisiana. Area: Approx. 3,237ha, consisting of 202ha in the state park unit and 3,035ha in the wildlife management area. All of the management area lies north of Cypress Bayou in Marion County, while the state park unit is situated entirely in Harrison County south of the bayou. Degree of Protection: The land is currently owned and managed by the State of Texas, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, as a unit of its public lands system. The wildlife management unit of the project was acquired in 1992 by the Department with the assistance of a donation by the Texas Nature Conservancy and a federal matching grant from the North American Wetlands Conservation Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Rock, Arkansas
    LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS The civil works portion of this District covers an area of the District is responsible for the portion of the Little approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, River and its tributaries that are in the state of Arkansas, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri. above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In the White River This area is within the Arkansas River, Little River, and Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in White River basins. In the Arkansas River Basin, the southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas in District is responsible for planning, design, construction, the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above operation, and maintenance of the navigation portion of Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is re- the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System sponsible for navigation maintenance on the White River (MKARNS). The District is also responsible for the below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose areas included in the Arkansas River drainage basin Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River from above Pine Bluff, AR, to below the mouth of the downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. In Little River Basin, part of the MKARNS. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, And KS ........... 3 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock & Dam (No.9), AR ..... 3 28. Beaver Lake, AR ………………………………9 3. David D. Terry Lock And Dam (No. 6), AR ...... 4 29. Bull Shoals Lake, AR.................................. ….10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 137 Part 195—Transportation of Hazardous Liquids By
    Research and Special Programs Administration, DOT Pt. 195 APPENDIX B TO PART 194ÐHIGH VOLUME Major rivers Nearest town and state AREAS Smokey Hill River .................. Abilene, KS. As of January 5, 1993 the following areas Susquehanna River ............... Darlington, MD. are high volume areas: Tenessee River ..................... New Johnsonville, TN. Wabash River ........................ Harmony, IN. Wabash River ........................ Terre Haute, IN. Major rivers Nearest town and state Wabash River ........................ Mt. Carmel, IL. White River ............................ Batesville, AR. Arkansas River ...................... N. Little Rock, AR. White River ............................ Grand Glaise, AR. Arkansas River ...................... Jenks, OK. Wisconsin River ..................... Wisconsin Rapids, WI. Arkansas River ...................... Little Rock, AR. Yukon River ........................... Fairbanks, AK. Black Warrior River ............... Moundville, AL. Black Warrior River ............... Akron, AL. Brazos River .......................... Glen Rose, TX. Other Navigable Waters Brazos River .......................... Sealy, TX. Catawba River ....................... Mount Holly, NC. Arthur Kill Channel, NY Chattahoochee River ............. Sandy Springs, GA. Cook Inlet, AK Colorado River ....................... Yuma, AZ. Freeport, TX Colorado River ....................... LaPaz, AZ. Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor, CA Connecticut River .................. Lancaster, NH. Port Lavaca, TX Coosa River ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012 Hunting Seasons
    2011–2012 Hunting Seasons In addition to a hunting license, a migratory game bird stamp endorsement ($7) is required to hunt any migratory game bird, including mourning dove (a Federal Sandhill Crane Permit also is required to hunt sandhill crane). An upland game bird stamp endorsement ($7) is required to hunt turkey, quail, pheasant, lesser prairie chicken, or chachalacas. See County Listings for specific county regulations. ALLIGATOR 22 counties & special properties (by permit only) Sept. 10–30 Remainder of the state (see pg. 66) Apr. 1 – June 30 PRONGHORN ANTELOPE By permit only Oct. 1–9 DOVE (PLease Report Leg bandS to 1-800-327-BAND) North Zone and Central Zone Sept. 1 – Oct. 23, dec. 23 – Jan. 8 South Zone Sept. 23 – Oct. 30, dec. 23 – Jan. 23 Special White-winged dove Area Sept. 3, 4, 10 & 11, Sept. 23 – Oct. 30, dec. 23 – Jan.19 EARLY TEAL-ONLY Statewide (all counties) Sept. 10 – 25 CANADA GOOSE-ONLY East Zone Only Sept. 10 – 25 WHITE-TAILED DEER Archery-Only Season Oct. 1 – nov. 4 General Season: *Special Youth Season Oct. 29–30, Jan. 2–15 North Texas (209 counties) nov. 5 – Jan. 1 South Texas (30 counties) nov. 5 – Jan. 15 Late Antlerless and Spike: North Texas (106 counties) Jan. 2–15 South Texas (30 counties) Jan. 16–29 Muzzleloader (57 counties) Jan. 2–15 MULE DEER Archery-Only Season Oct. 1 – nov. 4 General Season: Panhandle (38 counties) nov. 19 – dec. 4 SW Panhandle (10 counties) nov. 19–27 Trans-Pecos (19 counties) nov. 25 – dec. 11 JAVELINA (43 counties) Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frequency of Large Hail Over the Contiguous US
    3.3 THE FREQUENCY OF LARGE HAIL OVER THE CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES Joseph T. Schaefer*, Jason J. Levit, Steven J. Weiss and Daniel W. McCarthy NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma 1. INTRODUCTION 2. HAIL REPORT COLLECTION PROCESS One of Stan Changnon’s abiding interests is the Hail size is usually reported to the NWS as a frequency and pattern of large hail occurrence. Stan comparison to the size of a common object. NWS started publishing papers in AMS journals on the instructions give a typical size for several of these items occurrence of large hail in 1966. After that initial effort, (NWS, 2003). Table 1 is constructed from the Stan has published 27 papers in AMS journals alone. information in the instructions. When other journals, such as those of the AGU, The table also contains the footnote: Conference Preprints, and Technical Reports are added, Stan has an amazing record of doing productive For many years, dime-size hail was the coin research about a single phenomenon. type associated with 0.75-inch diameter The 1966 paper (Changnon, 1966) was “Note on hailstones. However, the diameter of a dime is Recording Hail Incidences.” In it, Stan showed how 11/16 inch, slightly smaller than a penny, which weighing-bucket rain gauges with their evaporation is 12/16 inch (0.75 inch). funnels removed could be used to record hail occurrence. Since that initial paper, Changnon has This note indicates that for several years “dime devoted considerable effort to finding segregate data size” hail was erroneously considered as the smallest sources for hail observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Streams of Texas
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 448 GAZETTEER OF STREAMS OF TEXAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GLENN A. GRAY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1919 GAZETTEER OF STREAMS OF TEXAS. Prepared under the direction of GLENN A. GRAY. INTRODUCTION. The following pages contain a gazetteer of streams, lakes, and ponds as shown by the topographic maps of Texas which were pre­ pared by the United States Geological Survey and, in areas not covered by the topographic maps, by State of Texas county maps and the post-route map of Texas. For many streams a contour map of Texas, prepared in 1899 by Robert T. Hill, was consulted, as well as maps compiled by private surveys, engineering corporations, the State Board of Water Engineers, and the International Boundary Commission. An effort has been made to eliminate errors where practicable by personal reconnaissance. All the descriptions are based on the best available maps, and their accuracy therefore depends on that of the maps. Descriptions of streams in the central part of the State, adjacent to the Bio Grande above Brewster County, and in parts of Brewster, Terrell, Bowie, Casg, Btirleson, Brazos, Grimes, Washington, Harris, Bexar, Wichita, Wilbarger, Montague, Coke, and Graysoh counties were compiled by means of topographic maps and are of a good degree of accuracy. It should be understood, however, that all statements of elevation, length, and fall are roughly approximate. The Geological Survey topographic maps used are cited in the de­ scriptions of the streams and are listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers Research Guide
    RIVERS RESEARCH GUIDE Herman T. Pott National Inland Waterways Library St. Louis Mercantile Library University of Missouri-St. Louis "The Waterways Journal” Collection and "The Waterways Journal” Index, 1891 – 1914 are available at: http://www.umsl.edu/pott/ Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers to the Secretary of War, 1874 – 1972. Yearly river conditions Wtr Wys TA 23 .A2 Microfilm Bartlett, Richard A. Rolling Rivers: An Encyclopedia of America’s Rivers. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1984. MERC Ref GB 1215 .R64 1984 Bridges Over the Navigable Waters of the United States. Washington, D.C.: United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1961. Wtr Wys TG 23 .A5 1961 v. 1-4 Brown, Samuel R. The Western Gazetteer; Containing a Geographical Description of the Western States and Territories. Auburn, NY: H.C. Southwick, 1817. Rare G 89 5B v. 1 Havighurst, Walter. Voices on the River: The Story of the Mississippi Waterways. New York: Macmillan Co., 1964. MERC Ref HE 630 .M6 H35 1964 Mackenzie, Sir Alexander. Atlas to Mackenzie’s Travels. Rare St. Louis Lyceum G 822 M19 4 Mackenzie, Sir Alexander. Voyages from Montreal, on the River St. Laurence, Through the Continent of North America. Philadelphia: John Morgan, 1802. Rare St. Louis Lyceum G 822 M19 2 Quick, Herbert and Edward Quick. Mississippi Steamboatin’: A History of Steamboating on the Mississippi and its Tributaries. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1926. MERC Ref VM 623 .Q5 1926 Stine, Jeffrey K. and Michael C. Robinson. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Issues in the Twentieth Century: A Bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Accomplishments July 2015
    FY 2015 TXFWCO Activity Report: July Searching for Salado Salamanders Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Texas Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office Monthly Report Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office Activities Emphasis Areas ................................................................................................................... 2 Rio Grande Emphasis Area Project ................................................................................ 2 East Texas and Oklahoma Emphasis Area ..................................................................... 3 Camp Maxey Community Structure Survey ....................................................................... 4 Salado Salamander Monitoring........................................................................................... 4 National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) ............................................................................. 5 August Schedule of Activities: ........................................................................................... 6 Page | 1 Emphasis Areas The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is charged with a large responsibility to steer conservation of myriad species in a multitude of ecosystems - the conservation issues that persist or will arise in the southwest region are varied and diverse and require a focused attention to address. The Southwest Region identified five geographies or “Emphasis Areas” whereby we can best achieve meaningful and measurable outcomes for fish and wildlife conservation:
    [Show full text]
  • Big Cypress Bayou History the City of Jefferson Is Home to a Natural Wonder of Texas, the Big Cypress Bayou
    Big Cypress Bayou History The city of Jefferson is home to a natural wonder of Texas, the Big Cypress Bayou. To the untrained eye this bayou appears to be just an average swamp, but it is much more than that and has a special place in this town’s history. Situated on Big Cypress Bayou, Jefferson claimed to be the "River port to the Southwest" in its early years. Today, however, that is no longer the case. Big Cypress Bayou can indeed own up to its reputation as a natural wonder because it is the only “natural” lake in Texas, a fact that most native Texans do not know. The area is a series of wetlands around Jefferson, which make up part of the largest Cypress forest in the world. Surprisingly, though the wetlands are a natural habitat, they would not be the way they are today without the involvement of humans. Bayou features were altered by humans in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A log jam in 1799 on the Red River caused the Big Cypress to overflow the low-lying area that is now Caddo Lake. The backed-up waters impeded navigation on the Red River, but allowed Jefferson to thrive and grow. In 1835, Captain Henry Shreve, the namesake of Shreveport, Louisiana, led the way to clear up parts of the log jam, which had become known as the Great Raft. Life along the bayou continued to flourish until the last portions of the Great Raft were removed in 1873. At that point in time, the waters of Big Cypress Bayou began to dry up; as did the economic fortunes of the area because of the dependence on shipping.
    [Show full text]