DOCSLIB.ORG

The Value Added Tax (Miscellaneous Amendments, Northern Ireland Protocol and Savings and Transitional Provisions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Value Added Tax (Miscellaneous Amendments, Northern Ireland Protocol and Savings and Transitional Provisions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2020 No. 1545 EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION VALUE ADDED TAX The Value Added Tax (Miscellaneous Amendments, Northern Ireland Protocol and Savings and Transitional Provisions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 Made - - - - 18th December 2020 Laid before the House of Commons - - - - 21st December 2020 Coming into force in accordance with regulation 1 The Treasury make these Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 51(1)(a) and (3) and 52(2) of the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018(1). In accordance with section 51(1) of that Act, the Treasury consider it appropriate in consequence of, or otherwise in connection with, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU to make the following provision in relation to value added tax, including to make such provision as might be made by Act of Parliament. In accordance with section 52(2) of that Act, the Treasury consider it appropriate in consequence of, or otherwise in connection with, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU for these Regulations to come into force on such day or days as the Treasury may by regulations under section 52 of that Act appoint. Part 1 Preliminary Citation and commencement 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Value Added Tax (Miscellaneous Amendments, Northern Ireland Protocol and Savings and Transitional Provisions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 and come into force on such day as the Treasury may by regulations under section 52 of the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018 appoint. (1) 2018 c. 22 (“TCTA”); section 51(1)(a) permits “the appropriate Minister” to make provision relating to value added tax and under section 51(4)(b) “the appropriate Minister” means the Treasury. Document Generated: 2021-08-27 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). Part 2 Amendment of secondary legislation relating to value added tax Amendment of the Value Added Tax (Imported Goods) Relief Order 1984 2.—(1) The Value Added Tax (Imported Goods) Relief Order 1984(2) is amended as follows. (2) After article 3 insert— “Application to importations into Northern Ireland 3A.—(1) This article applies where goods are imported into the United Kingdom as a result of their entry into Northern Ireland(3). (2) Where this article applies this Order has effect with the following modifications— (a) article 2(1) is to be read as if the following definitions were substituted for their equivalents — ““abroad” means a place outside Northern Ireland and the member States;”; ““exported” means exported to a place outside Northern Ireland and the member States, and “exportation” shall be construed accordingly;”; ““sent” means sent from a place outside Northern Ireland and the member States;”; (b) article 2(2) does not apply and instead references to a heading or sub-heading are to be read as references to a heading or sub-heading of the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union which is contained in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1776 of 9 October 2019 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff(4) as it has effect in Northern Ireland as a result of section 7A of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2020(5); (c) article 2(5) does not apply and instead, except where it appears in Note (3) to Group 7 of Schedule 2 and Items 3 and 4 of Group 6 of Schedule 2, references to “United Kingdom” are to be read as references to “member States”; (d) Note 2 of Group 5 of Schedule 2 does not apply and instead Item 3 of that Group applies only where the goods fulfil the conditions laid down under or by virtue of Article 53 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1186/2009 of 16 November 2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty(6) as it has effect in Northern Ireland as a result of section 7A of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2020; (e) in Group 6 of Schedule 2— (i) in Items 3 and 4, for “United Kingdom” read “one or more member States”; and (ii) in Note 5, for “HM Treasury” read “the Commission of the European Union”. (2) S.I. 1984/746. Amended by S.I. 1987/2108, 1988/1193, 1988/2212, 1992/3120, section 77(1) of the Finance Act 2011 (c. 11), section 199 of the Finance Act 2012 (c. 14), S.I. 2011/1043, 2014/2364, 2018/1376, 2019/59 and paragraph 18 of Schedule 3 to the Taxation (Post-transition Period) Act 2020 (c. 26) (“TPTPA”). Paragraph 28 of Schedule 3 to TPTPA also inserts a new Schedule 9ZC into the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (c.23; “VATA”) which modifies Schedule 2 to S.I. 1984/746 (see Part 2 of the new Schedule 9ZC). S.I. 2018/1376 is revoked by S.I. 2020/1495. S.I. 2019/59 is not yet in force and is amended by this instrument. (3) Paragraph 3(5) of Schedule 9ZB to VATA (which was inserted by paragraph 2 of Schedule 2 to TPTPA) provides that references to importation are to be read as including removal of goods from Great Britain to Northern Ireland. Paragraph 32 of that Schedule makes an equivalent provision to goods removed to Northern Ireland from the Isle of Man. (4) OJ No. L 280, 31.10.2019, p 1. (5) 2018; c. 16. Section 7A was inserted by section 5 of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 (c. 1). (6) OJ No. L 324, 10.12.2009, p 23. 2 Document Generated: 2021-08-27 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). (3) The modifications provided for in this article are subject to the modifications provided for in paragraph 5 of Schedule 9ZC to the Value Added Tax Act 1994. 3B.—(1) This article applies where goods are imported pursuant to paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 9ZB to the Value Added Tax Act 1994. (2) Where this article applies this Order has effect with the following modifications— (a) article 2(1) is to be read as if the following definitions were substituted for their equivalents— ““abroad” means a place outside Great Britain;”; ““exported” means exported to a place outside Great Britain, and “exported” shall be construed accordingly;”; ““sent” means sent from a place outside Great Britain;”; (b) article 2(5) does not apply and instead, except where it appears in Note (3) to Group 7 of Schedule 2, for “United Kingdom” read “Great Britain”.”. Amendment of the Value Added Tax (Removal of Goods) Order 1992 3. The Value Added Tax (Removal of Goods) Order 1992(7) is amended as follows. 4. In article 2— (a) in the definition of “the Act”, for “1983” substitute “1994”; (b) after that definition insert— ““departure country” means the member State or Northern Ireland (as the case may be) from which the goods mentioned in paragraph 30 of Schedule 9ZB to the Act are removed; “destination country” means the member State or Northern Ireland (as the case may be) to which the goods mentioned in paragraph 30 of Schedule 9ZB to the Act are removed;”; (c) omit the definitions of “the member State of arrival” and “the member State of dispatch”; (d) in the definition of “the owner” after “the person” insert “referred to in paragraph 30(1) of Schedule 9ZB to the Act”; (e) omit the definition of “registered”; (f) in the definition of “temporary importation relief” — (i) after “means relief” insert “under the temporary admission procedure provided for in Union customs legislation”, and (ii) for the words from “the European Union(8)” to the end substitute “Northern Ireland or a member State;”; (g) after that definition insert— ““Union customs legislation” has the same meaning as in paragraph 1(8) of Schedule 9ZB to the Act.”. 5. In article 3, for “a member State” substitute “Northern Ireland or a member State (as the case may be)”. 6. In article 4— (7) S.I. 1992/3111. Amended by S.I. 2012/2953 and revoked by S.I. 2019/59 which also revoked S.I. 2012/2953. The provisions revoking S.I. 1992/3111 and S.I. 2012/2953 have not been commenced and are now omitted by this instrument. (8) “European Union” was substituted for “Community” by S.I. 2011/1043. 3 Document Generated: 2021-08-27 Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). (a) for “paragraph 5A of Schedule 2” substitute “paragraph 30(1) and (2) of Schedule 9ZB”; (b) in paragraph (a) — (i) for “in a member State” substitute “in a place”, (ii) for “member State of dispatch” substitute “departure country”, and (iii) for “section 6(2A), (2B) or (2C) of” substitute “section 7(3) of, or paragraph 29 of Schedule 9ZB to,”; (c) in paragraph (b) — (i) for “member State of dispatch” substitute “departure country”, and (ii) for “1992” substitute “2004”; (d) in paragraph (c), for “section 16(6) or (7) of” substitute “section 30(6) to (8) of, or paragraph 17(3) of Schedule 9ZA(9) to,”; (e) in paragraph (e) — (i) in sub-paragraph (i) — (aa) for “to another member State” substitute “to a place in the destination country”, and (bb) for “in that member State” substitute “in that place”, and (ii) in sub-paragraph (ii) for “member State of dispatch” substitute “departure country”; (f) in paragraph (f) — (i) in sub-paragraph (i) — (aa) for “member State of dispatch” substitute “departure country”, and (bb) for “member State of arrival” substitute “destination country”, and (ii) in sub-paragraph (iv), for “member State of dispatch” substitute “departure country”; (g) in paragraph (g) — (i) in sub-paragraph (i) after “the member States” insert “and Northern Ireland”; (ii) for sub-paragraph (ii) substitute— “(ii) the owner intends, before the end of the period of two years beginning with the day on which the goods were removed, to— (aa) export the goods to a place outside the EU and Northern Ireland, (bb) remove the goods from Northern Ireland to Great Britain, or (cc) remove the goods to a place in Northern Ireland or a member State (as the case may be) other than the destination country;”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Part I Background and Summary
    PART I BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Chapter 1 BRITISH STATUTES IN IDSTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The North American plantations were not the earliest over­ seas possessions of the English Crown; neither were they the first to be treated as separate political entities, distinct from the realm of England. From the time of the Conquest onward, the King of England held -- though not necessarily simultaneously or continuously - a variety of non-English possessions includ­ ing Normandy, Anjou, the Channel Islands, Wales, Jamaica, Scotland, the Carolinas, New-York, the Barbadoes. These hold­ ings were not a part of the Kingdom of England but were govern­ ed by the King of England. During the early medieval period the King would issue such orders for each part of his realm as he saw fit. Even as he tended to confer more and more with the officers of the royal household and with the great lords of England - the group which eventually evolved into the Council out of which came Parliament - with reference to matters re­ lating to England, he did likewise with matters relating to his non-English possessions.1 Each part of the King's realm had its own peculiar laws and customs, as did the several counties of England. The middle ages thrived on diversity and while the King's writ was acknowledged eventually to run throughout England, there was little effort to eliminate such local practices as did not impinge upon the power of the Crown. The same was true for the non-Eng­ lish lands. An order for one jurisdictional entity typically was limited to that entity alone; uniformity among the several parts of the King's realm was not considered sufficiently important to overturn existing laws and customs.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodefense and Constitutional Constraints
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2011 Biodefense and Constitutional Constraints Laura K. Donohue Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 11-96 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/677 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1882506 4 Nat'l Security & Armed Conflict L. Rev. 82-206 (2014) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons BIODEFENSE AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS Laura K. Donohue* I. INTRODUCTION"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" & II. STATE POLICE POWERS AND THE FEDERALIZATION OF U.S. QUARANTINE LAW """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 2 A. Early Colonial Quarantine Provisions""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 3 """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 4 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""&)
    [Show full text]
  • National Implementing Measures
    n;J .f~ COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES National Implementing Measures to give effect to the White Paper of the Commission on the Completion of the Internal Market Situation at 30 April 1991 0 0 () c s:: •*• m * * z * * -1 * * 92 * * * This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1991 ISBN 92-826-2694-6 Catalogue number: CM-70-91-782-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels • Luxembourg, 1991 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium NOTE TO READERS This guide, available In all the official languages of the Conunlty, Is beIng pub II shed as part of an I nfor~~at I on exercIse. It was designed as a documentary tool and In no way binds the Conlsslon. The lnforutlon It contains Is drawn from the INF092 data base accessible to the public and there Is no Implied crltlcln or otherwise of what the Member States have done. Measures whIch have not been offIcI a II y notIfIed are not II sted. Because the situation Is constantly changing, the guide can do no more than ref I ect the posIt I on on a gIven date, In thIs case 30 April 1991. A new edition wl I I appear every six months . • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE REMOVAL OF PHYSICAL BARRIERS Control of goods Dlr. 85/347 Duty-free fuel contained In fuel tanks of commercial 1otor vehicles Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Sp Catalog B 06
    Scottish Parliamentary and Statutory Publications January 2004 - July 2004 Published 2008 ISBN: 978 033880065 7 TSO subscription classification: 7001039 Contents TSO Contacts iv Business Bulletin 27 Contacts iv What’s happening in the Scottish Parliament 30 Introduction 1 SPICe Research Publications 31 Parliamentary Publications 3 SPICe Briefings 31 Bills 3 IPRN Briefings 31 Scottish Parliament Bills - Session 2 (2004) 3 Documents Subject to Scrutiny 33 Passage of Bills 7 Laid Papers 33 Parliamentary Papers 7 Scottish Executive Papers 2003 33 Scottish Parliament papers - Session 2 (2004) 8 Scottish Executive Papers 2004 34 Official Report - Plenary Session 14 Auditor General for Scotland 38 Scottish Public Services Ombudsman 38 Official Report - Plenary Session 14 Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner 38 Minutes of Proceedings 15 Draft Statutory Instruments 38 Written Answers Report 17 Petitions 40 Official Report (Committees) 18 Audit Committee 18 Statutory Publications 45 Communities Committee 18 Acts 45 Edinburgh Tram (Line Two) Bill Committee 19 Education Committee 19 Acts of the Scottish Parliament 2004 45 Enterprise and Culture Committee 20 Acts of the Scottish Parliament - Environment and Rural Development Committee 20 Explanatory notes 2004 46 Equal Opportunities Committee 21 Statutory Instruments 47 European and External Relations Committee 21 Finance Committee 22 Commencement orders 2003 47 Health Committee 22 Commencement orders 2004 47 Justice 1 and Justice 2 Committees 23 Scottish statutory instruments 2003 48 Justice
    [Show full text]
  • The Speech Or Debate Clause: Bastion of Congressional Independence Or Haven for Corruption, 57 N.C
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 57 | Number 2 Article 3 2-1-1979 The pS eech or Debate Clause: Bastion of Congressional Independence Or Haven for Corruption Craig M. Bradley Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Craig M. Bradley, The Speech or Debate Clause: Bastion of Congressional Independence Or Haven for Corruption, 57 N.C. L. Rev. 197 (1979). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol57/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SPEECH OR DEBATE CLAUSE: BASTION OF CONGRESSIONAL INDEPENDENCE OR HIAVEN FOR CORRUPTION? CRAIG M. BRADLEYt As the popular concern gradually shifts away from the problem of a corrupt presidency to the more familiar problem of the corrupt con- gressman, it seems appropriate to reconsider the principles of congres- sional privilege. While the constitutionally guaranteed congressional privileges, such as the freedom of speech or debate, may tend to protect Congress from overreaching by the executive, they may also have the effect of shielding corrupt congressmen from legitimate efforts to inves- tigate and prosecute their transgressions. Indeed, in the investigation of the Korean corruption of the United States Congress the investiga- tive efforts of the Justice Department
    [Show full text]
  • April 2021 International Trade Compliance Update
    International Trade Compliance Update (Covering Customs and Other Import Requirements, Export Controls and Sanc- tions, Trade Remedies, WTO and Anti-Corruption) Newsletter | April 2021 In This Issue: World Trade Organization (WTO) World Customs Organization (WCO) Other International Matters The Americas - North America The Americas - South America Please see our Webinars, Meetings, Seminars section for information for Asia-Pacific links to the webinars in our 18th annual Global Trade and Supply Chain Europe, Middle East and North Africa Webinar Series: “International Trade & Developments in a World Fo- cused on Recovery & Renewal,” which just began, as well as links to addi- Africa (except North Africa) tional webinars and other events. Newsletters, reports, articles, etc. There are also links to the video recordings, PowerPoints and handout materi- Webinars, Meetings, Seminars, etc. als of the WTO Cov id-19 Notifications 2020-2021 Asia Pacific International Commercial and Trade Webi- WTO TBT Notifications nar Series CBP Rulings: Downloads and Searches 2020 Virtual Trade Conference (July 14-16 2020) CBP Rulings: Rev ocations or Modifi- 2020 Virtual Year-End Review of Import/Export Developments cations European Classification Regulations 2020 Global Trade and Supply Chain Webinar Series: Interna- Amendments to the CN Explanatory tional Trade Basics and Trends Notes To keep abreast of international trade-related news, visit our blogs: Section 337 Actions For International Trade Compliance Updates, please regularly visit Antidumping, Counterv ailing Duty https://www.internationaltradecomplianceupdate.com/. and Safeguard Inv estigations, Or- ders & Reviews For additional articles and updates on trade sanctions and export controls, please visit: http://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/ regularly. For resources and news regarding international trade, particularly in Asia, please visit our Trade Crossroads blog at http://tradeblog.bakermckenzie.com/.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Health Regulations: Impact on Business
    An Audit of the impact of the Department of Health’s Regulations upon business Final Report September 2013 1 Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................. 4 Background .............................................................................................................................. 6 DH Regulatory landscape ......................................................................................................... 7 Audit Results .......................................................................................................................... 10 Annex A - Detailed commentary on the Department of Health’s stock of regulations ............. 12 1. Care Quality .................................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Care Quality Commission (CQC) .................................................................................. 13 1.2 Mental Health and Mental Capacity .............................................................................. 18 1.3 Social Care (Isles of Scilly) ........................................................................................... 23 1.4 Social Care other .......................................................................................................... 24 2. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) ................................... 25 2.1 Blood ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • L INTRODUCTION Most of the Countries of the Commonwealth and States of the United States of America Are Known As Common-Law Jurisdictions
    1977] THE RECEPTION OF ENGLISH LAW 29 THE RECEPTION OF ENGLISH LAW J.E. COTE* A new country is faced with a choice in deciding upon a system of law for itself. It can either copy someone else's codified law or it can adopt a system of law which is largely judge-made. If it opts for the latter it cannot afford to spend centuries building up a system of judge-made law. Therefore it must copy the rules of a society which has already developed a sophisticated body of such law. Most of the Commonwealth nations have chosen the latter route and as a result have received English law as their own. The rules and consequences inherent in such a reception are discussed in this article. After a short discussion of the distinction between the Imperial law in force proprio vigore and the English law received in the colony as such, the modes of reception of English law are described. In this respect the differences in reception between settled and conquered colonies are outlined. The parts of English law which have been received and the general rules of applicability as well as the applicability of particular areas of the law are also analyzed. The article concludes with a discussion of repeal, amendment and reform of imported English law by the country receiving such law. An appendix contains an account of the reception of English law in each of the Canadian provinces. The subject of this article is often considered as part of legal history. It should be stressed however that this is not the case, as all the rules described are rules of present-day law and many of them are being applied and expounded continually, particularly in Australia and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter of the Forest: Evolving Human Rights in Nature
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2014 The Charter of the Forest: Evolving Human Rights in Nature Nicholas A. Robinson Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Legal History Commons, Natural Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Nicholas A. Robinson, The Charter of the Forest: Evolving Human Rights in Nature, in Magna Carta and the Rule of Law 311 (Daniel Barstow Magraw et al., eds. 2014), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/ lawfaculty/990/. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter 12 The Charter of the Forest: Evolving Human Rights in Nature Nicholas A. Robinson Ln 1759 William Bla kstone published TJ)e Great Charter and the harter of tbe Forest, with other Authentic Instruments, to whjch is Prefixed An lntrodu tory Discourse containing The History of the hal·ters.! Since then, much ha been written about Magna Carta but little has been written about the companioD Forest Charter. This chapter reexamines "the e twO sacred charters,,,2 focusing u,p n the "liberties of the for sr '3 that the po,re t barter established, an I how they evolved amjd the contentious struggles over stewardship of England' fore t re urce.4 The Forest harter both contributed to establishing the ruJe of law and aJ 0 laun hed ight enturies f legislation conserving forest resources and lands ape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appropriations Power and Sovereign Immunity
    Michigan Law Review Volume 107 Issue 7 2009 The Appropriations Power and Sovereign Immunity Paul F. Figley Washington College of Law, American University Jay Tidmarsh Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Common Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Legal Remedies Commons Recommended Citation Paul F. Figley & Jay Tidmarsh, The Appropriations Power and Sovereign Immunity, 107 MICH. L. REV. 1207 (2009). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol107/iss7/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE APPROPRIATIONS POWER AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY Paul F. Figley* Jay Tidmarsh** Discussions of sovereign immunity assume that the Constitution contains no explicit text regarding sovereign immunity. As a result, arguments about the existence-or nonexistence-of sovereign im- munity begin with the English and American common-law doctrines. Exploring political, fiscal, and legal developments in England and the American colonies in the seventeenth and eight- eenth centuries, this Article shows that focusing on common-law developments is misguided. The common-law approach to sovereign immunity ended in the early 1700s. The Bankers' Case (1690- 1700), which is often regarded as the first modern common-law treatment of sovereign immunity, is in fact the last in the line of English common-law decisions on sovereign immunity.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trade Compliance Update
    International Trade Compliance Update (Covering Customs and Other Import Requirements, Export Controls and Sanc- tions, Trade Remedies, WTO and Anti-Corruption) Newsletter | December 2020 In This Issue: World Trade Organization (WTO) World Customs Organization (WCO) Other International Matters Multilateral Trade Agreements The Americas - North America The Americas - South America Please see our Webinars, Meetings, Seminars section for contact and regis- Asia-Pacific tration information for the new webinars in our 17th annual Global Trade and Europe, Middle East and North Africa Supply Chain Webinar Series: International Trade Basics and Trends as well as links to past webinar recordings, PowerPoints and handout materials Africa (except North Africa) and information on other events. Newsletters, reports, articles, etc. Webinars, Meetings, Seminars, etc. In addition, there are links to the video recordings of the WTO TBT Notifications 2020 Virtual Trade Conference (July 14-16 2020) and the CBSA Adv ance Rulings 2020 Virtual Year-End Review of Import/Export Developments CBP Rulings: Downloads and Searches CBP Rulings: Rev ocations or Modifi- cations European Classification Regulations Amendments to the CN Explanatory Notes Section 337 Actions Antidumping, Counterv ailing Duty and Safeguard Inv estigations, Orders & Rev iews Asia Pacific International Commercial and Trade Webinar Series December 2020 – January 2021 | 11:00 am – 12:00 pm (GMT+8) Editor, International Trade Com- To get details, see our Webinars, Meetings, Seminars section pliance Update Stuart P. Seidel Note: Unless otherw ise indicated, all information in this Update is taken from official Washington, D.C. +1 202 452 7088 gazettes, official w ebsites, new sletters or press releases of international organiza- [email protected] tions (UN, WTO, WCO, APEC, INTERPOL, etc.), the EU, EFTA, EAEU, Customs Unions or government agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • A “Second Magna Carta”: the English Habeas Corpus Act and the Statutory Origins of the Habeas Privilege
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\91-5\NDL507.txt unknown Seq: 1 29-AUG-16 16:02 A “SECOND MAGNA CARTA”: THE ENGLISH HABEAS CORPUS ACT AND THE STATUTORY ORIGINS OF THE HABEAS PRIVILEGE Amanda L. Tyler* “[I]f any person be restrained of his liberty . [,] he shall, upon demand of his coun[sel], have a writ of habeas corpus . And by . the habeas corpus act, the methods of obtaining this writ are so plainly pointed out and enforced, that, so long as this statute remains unimpeached, no subject of England can be long detained in prison, except in those cases in which the law requires and justifies such detainer.” –Blackstone’s Commentaries1 © 2016 Amanda L. Tyler. Individuals and nonprofit institutions may reproduce and distribute copies of this Article in any format at or below cost, for educational purposes, so long as each copy identifies the author, provides a citation to the Notre Dame Law Review, and includes this provision in the copyright notice. * Professor of Law, University of California Berkeley School of Law. I dedicate this Article to the memory of my brilliant federal courts professor, Daniel Meltzer, who inspired me at every turn and was an extraordinary scholar and teacher, generous mentor, and wonderful friend. In working on this project, I have benefited enormously from the comments and suggestions of participants to whom I presented earlier versions of this work at the Cornell University Law School Constitutional Law and Theory Colloquium, the Stanford Law School Faculty Workshop, the University of California Berkeley School of Law Public Law and Policy Workshop, the Oxford University Law Faculty Legal History Forum, the London School of Economics Legal and Political Theory Seminar, and the Columbia University School of Law Courts and Legal Process Workshop.
    [Show full text]