DOCSLIB.ORG

Convergence of Y Chromosome STR Haplotypes from Different SNP Haplogroups Compromises Accuracy of Haplogroup Prediction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Convergence of Y Chromosome STR Haplotypes from Different SNP Haplogroups Compromises Accuracy of Haplogroup Prediction Title ： Convergence of Y chromosome STR haplotypes from different SNP haplogroups compromises accuracy of haplogroup prediction Authors：Chuan-Chao Wang1, Ling-Xiang Wang1, Rukesh Shrestha1, Shaoqing Wen1, Manfei Zhang1, Xinzhu Tong1, Li Jin1,2,3, Hui Li1* Affiliations 1. State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China 2. CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, SIBS, CAS, Shanghai, China 3. Institute of Health Sciences, China Medical City, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China * Correspondence to: [email protected] 1 Abstract Short tandem repeats (STRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are two kinds of commonly used markers in Y chromosome studies of forensic and population genetics. There has been increasing interest in the cost saving strategy by using the STR haplotypes to predict SNP haplogroups. However, the convergence of Y chromosome STR haplotypes from different haplogroups might compromise the accuracy of haplogroup prediction. Here, we compared the worldwide Y chromosome lineages at both haplogroup level and haplotype level to search for the possible haplotype similarities among haplogroups. The similar haplotypes between haplogroups B and I2, C1 and E1b1b1, C2 and E1b1a1, H1 and J, L and O3a2c1, O1a and N, O3a1c and O3a2b, and M1 and O3a2 have been found, and those similarities reduce the accuracy of prediction. Keywords Y chromosome, SNP, STR, haplotype, haplogroup prediction 2 Introduction The paternally inherited Y chromosome has been widely used in forensics for personal identification, in anthropology and population genetics to understand origin and migration of human populations, and also in medical and clinical studies. There are two extremely useful markers in Y chromosome, SNP and STR1,2. With a very low mutation rate on the order of 3.0x10-8 mutations/nucleotide/generation3, SNP markers have been used in constructing a robust phylogeny tree linking all the Y chromosome lineages from world populations4,5. Those lineages determined by the pattern of SNPs are called haplogroups. That is to say, we have to genotype an appropriate number of SNPs in order to assign a given Y chromosome to a haplogroup. Compared with SNPs, the mutation rates of STR markers are about four to five orders of magnitude higher. To recognize a Y chromosome, typing STR has advantages of saving time and cost compared with typing SNPs6. A set of STR values for an individual is called a haplotype. Because of the disparity in mutation rates between SNP and STR, one SNP haplogroup actually could comprise many STR haplotypes6. It is most interesting that STR variability is clustered more by haplogroups than by populations7,8, which indicates that STR haplotypes could be used to infer the haplogroup information of a given Y chromosome. There has been increasing interest in this cost effective strategy for predicting the haplogroup from a given STR haplotype when SNP data are unavailable. For instance, Vadim Urasin’s YPredictor (http://predictor.ydna.ru/), Whit Atheys’ haplogroup predictor (http://www.hprg.com/hapest5/) 9,10, and haplogroup classifier of Arizona University11 have been widely employed in previous studies for haplogroup prediction12-15. Although this approach for haplogroup prediction is correct in principle, there are still many ongoing debates about the accuracy of using STR haplotypes in haplogroup assigning 16, 17. In particular, it has been reported that the number of STRs used in prediction and the available STR-SNP associated reference data have a significant impact on the accuracy of haplogroup prediction11. Furthermore, taken the mutation rates of the STRs and the time depth of the haplogroup ramifications into consideration, it is possible to find the same or similar haplotypes from different haplogroups16. However, the possible bias caused by the convergence of STR haplotypes in haplogroup prediction has not been discussed before. Here, we use a large amount of worldwide Y chromosome SNP and STR data to address this question. Materials and methods Altogether, 20403 pieces of Y chromosome data with informative SNP and STR markers have been included in this study (Table S1): unpublished data of 231 East Asian samples from our lab, unpublished data of 101 samples from Genographic Consortium (haplogroup B), and other data retrieved from the literature4, 17-80. We renewed the haplogroup names according to the nomenclature of Y Chromosome Consortium and the ISOGG Y-DNA Haplogroup Tree 2013 (http://www.isogg.org/) 4, 5, 81. Different authors typed different STR markers, which has reduced the feasibility for STR haplotype references. Here, we use the AmpFlSTR® YfilerTM seventeen Y chromosomal STRs (DYS19, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS385a, DYS385b, DYS438, DYS439, DYS437, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635, and YGATAH4) as standard. 3 Comparisons of STR allele frequency distribution among different haplogroups were performed using the Arlequin ver 3.5 software package (arlecore3513_64bit in Linux)82. The Neighbor-joining tree was constructed in MEGA 5.1083 using the Slatkin’s distance (Rst) matrix calculated in Arlequin. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis of haplogroup structure was carried out using the program Structure 2.3.484. YPredictor by Vadim Urasin v1.5.0 (http://predictor.ydna.ru/) was used for haplogroup prediction. Results and Discussion Our dataset has covered all the main haplogroups and almost all their sublineages in the Y chromosome phylogeny tree (Fig. 1a, Table 1S). Although the high mutation rates of STR markers make it difficult to construct phylogeny trees, the neighbor-joining tree of STR data (Fig.1b) shows a similar pattern as the trunk of Y chromosome haplogroup tree (Fig.1a). There are four main branches in the neighbor-joining tree, namely I, II, III, and IV. The three ancient haplogroup C, D, and E were clustered in branch I, representing the out of Africa migration. Haplogroup F, G, H, I, J were mainly clustered in branch II, which might indicate the possible population expansion in the Middle East and Europe. Haplogroup L, T, K, N, and O were clustered in branch III, representing the peopling of the Far East. Haplogroup P, Q, and R were mainly clustered in branch IV, demonstrating the population expansion from Central Eurasia and the migration through northern Eurasia into the Americas. Obvious haplogroup divisions were also observed in the neighbor-joining tree, in which haplogroup R1b1+s (+s means certain haplogroup and its sublineages), haplogroup Q1+s, haplogroup G2a1+s, haplogroup J2+s, haplogroup E1b1b1+s, haplogroup D+s, and haplogroup E1b1a1+s were clustered tightly together, demonstrating the specific or even exclusive STR haplotypes of those haplogroups. However, haplogroups A, B were scattered in the tree, probably due to the high diversification among different sublineages of the two oldest haplogroups. Haplogroup C+s were mainly clustered with haplogroups D and E. Haplogroup C1 and C3 showed strong affinity with haplogroup E1b1b1, however, C2a* and C2a1 tended to cluster with E1b1a1. The three main subclades of haplogroup O, O1, O2, and O3, tended to be clustered together. Haplogroup O1a+s showed very strong affinity with haplogroup N* and N1c. Haplogroup O2a1 and O2a1a fell out the scale of STR patterns of haplogroup O. Haplogroup O2b* and O2b1a were clustered with T* and T1a*, and also showed affinity with O3a* and O3a1c*. Haplogroup O3a2+s formed a tight cluster, indicating high similarities between those lineages, although haplogroup L+s have also been placed in the O3a2 cluster. Haplogroup P was clustered with haplogroup Q+s in a separated small branch. Haplogroup R1a1 were clustered with E1b1a1 and C2a in branch I, while its sister clade R1b1+s were grouped with R2 and M1b in branch IV. The neighbor-joining tree based on pairwise comparisons gives an overall clustering pattern of the worldwide haplogroups. However, the results at haplogroup level could be misleading because of the highly diversified STR haplotypes within haplogroups, especially in very ancient lineages. Here, we used Structure software to show the STR haplotype patterns among haplogroups at individual level (Fig 2). We also used YPredictor to infer haplogroup for each haplotype and then compared the inferred haplogroups with the genotyped haplogroups to 4 estimate the error rates. The most ancient lineage A00 also has the exclusive STR haplotypes. The haplotypes of haplogroup A1a and A1b1b2b show similarities with haplogroup DE and E1b1a1, thus, about 30% of A1a and A1b1b2b samples were mistaken as DE in YPredictor. Haplogroup B+s are probably the most diverse clades, sharing similar haplotypes with various haplogroups, such as haplogroups I2a1, R1a1, D2a, E1b1b1, and L. Actually, only 18% of haplogroup B samples could be successfully inferred, and 26% were mistaken as I2 or IJ, 21% were assigned as haplogroup R in YPredictor. Similar to haplogroup B, the haplotypes of paragroup F*, H*, and K* are also too diverse to be used in haplogroup prediction. Most haplotypes of haplogroup C1 are similar to those of E1b1b1 and 22% of C1 samples were mistaken as E1b1b1 in prediction. Similarly, haplogroup C2 and its sublineages C2a and C2a1 shared most haplotypes with E1b1a1 and therefore 37% of those C2 samples were mistaken as E1b1a1. The haplotype pattern of haplogroup H1 and H1a is very similar to that of haplogroup J, resulting in erred assigning of about 20% of H1 and H1a samples as J in prediction. Haplogroup I*, I1*, and I1a1b1 share some haplotypes with haplogroup G+s. The haplotypes of haplogroup L+s are similar to those of haplogroup O3a2c1* and O3a2c1a. The haplotypes of O1a+s bear some similarity to those of haplogroup N. Similarly, haplotypes of haplogroup O3a1c show some similarity to O3a2b, and M1a and M1b are similar to O3a2+s. Those haplotype sharing or similarities among different haplogroups often mislead us in haplogroup prediction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Association Between Haplotypes and Specific Mutations in Swiss Cystic Fibrosis Families
    003 I -3'19Xj9 1/3004-0304903.00/0 PEDIATRIC RESEARCH Vol. 30. No. 4, 199 1 Copyright (5 1991 International Pediatric Research Foundation. Inc. h.i~~rc,d~n U..S .,I Association between Haplotypes and Specific Mutations in Swiss Cystic Fibrosis Families SABINA LIECHTI-GALLATI. NASEEM MALIK, MUALLA ALKAN, MARC0 MAECHLER, MICHAEL MORRIS, FRANCINE THONNEY, FELIX SENNHAUSER. AND HANS MOSER Mrclic.al Gcnctics Unii, Dcy~ur/mo~to/'Pedinfrics (In.vel.~pitol). Universirv of Bun. 3010 Bern. S+t.itzerlancl [S.L.-G.. H. \I./: Dc,[)a~.~n~e/i/c!f Gc~ndics, Urli~~rr:cilj~ C'lli/dr.c,n'.c Ho.sl)ital. 4058 Rct.scl. S~.t'il~er.lr~tlrl/N.iC/., M.A I, 117slitrrcc~of iLlcelicol G'enclic.~,U~ri~~er.eitj~ c?fZuric/z, 8001 Zz~ricIi,Swi~z~rland /.IJLI.Mu.]; 11i.cfil~rle of Medicrcl Genetics, Uni1~wvi11,of Geticvu, Centre M6dical Uniro-situire, I21 1 Gencva 4. S~t~irzerluncl/Mi.Mo.J; Mediccrl Gcnrtic.~L'/li/. Uni~~c~r.sit~~of Lu~l.sc~nne, C'c~nrrc Hospitnlier U~iil~c~~sitaircI.i~ucloi.c.. 101 1 Larl.trrtlne. S~~~itserlanci [F T.];NIICI C/II/C/~CII'SHo.el~;tal. SI. Gallen, S~t.itzerlu~lc//F.S.] ABSTRACT. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common CF is the most common severe autosomal recessive genetic severe autosomal recessive genetic disorder in Caucasian disorder in Caucasian populations. with an incidence of about 1 populations, with an incidence of about 1 in 2000 live in 2000 live births, implying a carrier frequency of about 1 in births, implying a carrier frequency of about 1 in 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Y-Chromosome and Surname Analyses for Reconstructing Past Population Structures: the Sardinian Population As a Test Case
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Y-chromosome and Surname Analyses for Reconstructing Past Population Structures: The Sardinian Population as a Test Case Viola Grugni 1, Alessandro Raveane 1, Giulia Colombo 1, Carmen Nici 1, Francesca Crobu 1,2, Linda Ongaro 1,3,4, Vincenza Battaglia 1, Daria Sanna 1,5, Nadia Al-Zahery 1, Ornella Fiorani 6, Antonella Lisa 6, Luca Ferretti 1 , Alessandro Achilli 1, Anna Olivieri 1, Paolo Francalacci 7, Alberto Piazza 8, Antonio Torroni 1 and Ornella Semino 1,* 1 Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “L. Spallanzani”, Università di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected] (V.G.); [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (G.C.); [email protected] (C.N.); [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (L.O.); [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (N.A.-Z.); [email protected] (L.F.); [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (A.O.); [email protected] (A.T.) 2 Istituto di Ricerca Genetica e Biomedica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 09042 Monserrato, Italy 3 Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, Riia 23, 51010 Tartu, Estonia 4 Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Riia 23, 51010 Tartu, Estonia 5 Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Università di Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy 6 Istituto di Genetica Molecolare “L.L. Cavalli-Sforza”, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 27100 Pavia, Italy; fi[email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Germanic Origins from the Perspective of the Y-Chromosome
    Germanic Origins from the Perspective of the Y-Chromosome By Michael Robert St. Clair A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy in German in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Irmengard Rauch, Chair Thomas F. Shannon Montgomery Slatkin Spring 2012 Abstract Germanic Origins from the Perspective of the Y-Chromosome by Michael Robert St. Clair Doctor of Philosophy in German University of California, Berkeley Irmengard Rauch, Chair This dissertation holds that genetic data are a useful tool for evaluating contemporary models of Germanic origins. The Germanic languages are a branch of the Indo-European language family and include among their major contemporary representatives English, German, Dutch, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian and Icelandic. Historically, the search for Germanic origins has sought to determine where the Germanic languages evolved, and why the Germanic languages are similar to and different from other European languages. Both archaeological and linguist approaches have been employed in this research direction. The linguistic approach to Germanic origins is split among those who favor the Stammbaum theory and those favoring language contact theory. Stammbaum theory posits that Proto-Germanic separated from an ancestral Indo-European parent language. This theoretical approach accounts for similarities between Germanic and other Indo- European languages by posting a period of mutual development. Germanic innovations, on the other hand, occurred in isolation after separation from the parent language. Language contact theory posits that Proto-Germanic was the product of language convergence and this convergence explains features that Germanic shares with other Indo-European languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Haplogroup Background May Influence
    Genetics Mitochondrial Haplogroup Background May Influence Southeast Asian G11778A Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Supannee Kaewsutthi,1,2 Nopasak Phasukkijwatana,2,3 Yutthana Joyjinda,1 Wanicha Chuenkongkaew,3,4 Bussaraporn Kunhapan,1 Aung Win Tun,1 Bhoom Suktitipat,1 and Patcharee Lertrit1,4 PURPOSE. To investigate the role of mitochondrial DNA markedly incomplete penetrance. The three most common (mt DNA) background on the expression of Leber hereditary primary LHON mutations, G3460A in ND1, G11778A in ND4, optic neuropathy (LHON) in Southeast Asian carriers of the and T14484C in ND6, account for more than 90% of LHON G11778A mutation. cases worldwide2 with G11778A being the most common. In 3 4–6 METHODS. Complete mtDNA sequences were analyzed from 53 Thailand and other Asian countries, G11778A is responsi- unrelated Southeast Asian G11778A LHON pedigrees in Thai- ble for approximately 90% of LHON families. land and 105 normal Thai controls, and mtDNA haplogroups The sex bias and the marked incomplete penetrance of were determined. Clinical phenotypes were tested for associ- LHON indicate that there must be other factors that modify disease expression. Mitochondrial background,7–8 nuclear ation with mtDNA haplogroup, with adjustment for potential 9–11 12 confounders such as sex and age at onset. background, and environmental factors have been impli- cated in disease expression, although the precise mechanisms RESULTS. mtDNA subhaplogroup B was significantly associated of pathogenesis are largely undefined. with LHON. Follow-up analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Original File Was Neolithicadmixture4.Tex
    Supplementary Information: Parallel ancient genomic transects reveal complex population history of early European farmers Table of Contents Supplementary note 1: Archaeological summary of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods in the region of today’s Hungary………………………………………………………………………....2 Supplementary note 2: Description of archaeological sites………………………………………..8 Supplementary note 3: Y chromosomal data……………………………………………………...45 Supplementary note 4: Neolithic Anatolians as a surrogate for first European farmers..………...65 Supplementary note 5: WHG genetic structure and admixture……………………………….......68 Supplementary note 6: f-statistics and admixture graphs………………………………………....72 Supplementary note 7: ALDER.....……..…………………………………………………...........79 Supplementary note 8: Simulations……………………………………………….…...................83 1 Supplementary note 1: Archaeological summary of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods in the region of today’s Hungary The Carpathian Basin (including the reagion of today’s Hungary) played a prominent role in all prehistoric periods: it was the core territory of one cultural complex and, at the same time, the periphery of another, and it also acted as a mediating or contact zone. The archaeological record thus preserves evidence of contacts with diverse regions, whose vestiges can be found on settlements and in the cemeteries (grave inventories) as well. The earliest farmers arrived in the Carpathian Basin from southeastern Europe ca. 6000–5800 BCE and they culturally belonged to the Körös-Çris (east) and Starčevo (west) archaeological formations [1, 2, 3, 4]. They probably encountered some hunter-gatherer groups in the Carpathian Basin, whose archaeological traces are still scarce [5], and bioarchaeological remains are almost unknown from Hungary. The farmer communities east (Alföld) and west (Transdanubia) of the Danube River developed in parallel, giving rise around 5600/5400 BCE to a number of cultural groups of the Linearband Ceramic (LBK) culture [6, 7, 8].
    [Show full text]
  • Y-Chromosome Marker S28 / U152 Haplogroup R-U152 Resource Page
    Y-Chromosome Marker S28 / U152 Haplogroup R-U152 Resource Page David K. Faux To use this page as a resource tool, click on the blue highlighted words, which will take the reader to a relevant link. How was this marker discovered? In 2005 Hinds et al. published a paper outlining the discovery of almost 1.6 million SNPs in 71 Americans by Perlegen.com, and which were deposited in the online dbSNP database. Gareth Henson noticed three SNPs that appeared to be associated with M269, what was then known as haplogroup R1b1c. Dr. James F. Wilson of EthnoAncestry developed primers for these Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers on the Y-chromosome, one of which was given the name of S28 (part of the S-series of SNPs developed by Dr. Wilson). Who were the first to be identified with this SNP? In testing the DNA of a number of R- M269 males (customers or officers of EthnoAncestry), two were found to be positive for S28 (U152). These were Charles Kerchner (of German descent) and David K. Faux, co- founder of EthnoAncestry (of English descent). How is this marker classified? In 2006 the International Society of Genetic Genealogists (ISOGG) developed a phylogenetic tree since the academic grouping (the Y Chromosome Consortium – YCC) set up to do this task had lapsed in 2002. They determined, with the assistance of Dr. Wilson, that the proper placement would be R1b1c10, in other words downstream of M269 the defining marker for R1b1c. Karafet et al. (2008) (including Dr. Michael Hammer of the original YCC group) published a new phylogenetic tree in the journal Genome Research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Haplotypes in Candidate Gene Studies
    Genetic Epidemiology 27: 321–333 (2004) The Role of Haplotypes in Candidate Gene Studies Andrew G. Clarkn Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Human geneticists working on systems for which it is possible to make a strong case for a set of candidate genes face the problem of whether it is necessary to consider the variation in those genes as phased haplotypes, or whether the one-SNP- at-a-time approach might perform as well. There are three reasons why the phased haplotype route should be an improvement. First, the protein products of the candidate genes occur in polypeptide chains whose folding and other properties may depend on particular combinations of amino acids. Second, population genetic principles show us that variation in populations is inherently structured into haplotypes. Third, the statistical power of association tests with phased data is likely to be improved because of the reduction in dimension. However, in reality it takes a great deal of extra work to obtain valid haplotype phase information, and inferred phase information may simply compound the errors. In addition, if the causal connection between SNPs and a phenotype is truly driven by just a single SNP, then the haplotype- based approach may perform worse than the one-SNP-at-a-time approach. Here we examine some of the factors that affect haplotype patterns in genes, how haplotypes may be inferred, and how haplotypes have been useful in the context of testing association between candidate genes and complex traits. Genet. Epidemiol. & 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Key words: haplotype inference; haplotype association testing; candidate genes; linkage equilibrium Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant numbers: GM65509, HL072904.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Independent Histories of the Human Y Chromosome and the Human Mitochondrial Chromosome
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 8 Print Reference: Pages 133-151 Article 7 2018 An Overview of the Independent Histories of the Human Y Chromosome and the Human Mitochondrial chromosome Robert W. Carter Stephen Lee University of Idaho John C. Sanford Cornell University, Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences School of Integrative Plant Science,Follow this Plant and Biology additional Section works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Carter, R.W., S.S. Lee, and J.C. Sanford. An overview of the independent histories of the human Y- chromosome and the human mitochondrial chromosome. 2018. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 133–151. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Carter, R.W., S.S. Lee, and J.C. Sanford. An overview of the independent histories of the human Y-chromosome and the human mitochondrial chromosome. 2018. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Matrilineal Contributions to Genetic Structure of Ethnic Groups in the Silk Road Region in China
    Different Matrilineal Contributions to Genetic Structure of Ethnic Groups in the Silk Road Region in China Yong-Gang Yao,*1 Qing-Peng Kong,* à1 Cheng-Ye Wang,*à Chun-Ling Zhu,* and Ya-Ping Zhang* *Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Evolution, and Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China; Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resource, Yunnan University, Kunming, China; and àGraduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China Previous studies have shown that there were extensive genetic admixtures in the Silk Road region. In the present study, we analyzed 252 mtDNAs of five ethnic groups (Uygur, Uzbek, Kazak, Mongolian, and Hui) from Xinjiang Province, China (through which the Silk Road once ran) together with some reported data from the adjacent regions in Central Asia. In a simple way, we classified the mtDNAs into different haplogroups (monophyletic clades in the rooted mtDNA tree) according to the available phylogenetic information and compared their frequencies to show the differences among Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/21/12/2265/1071048 by guest on 27 September 2021 the matrilineal genetic structures of these populations with different demographic histories. With the exception of eight unassigned M*, N*, and R* mtDNAs, all the mtDNA types identified here belonged to defined subhaplogroups of haplogroups M and N (including R) and consisted of subsets of both the eastern and western Eurasian pools, thus providing direct evidence supporting the suggestion that Central Asia is the location of genetic admixture of the East and the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Y-Chromosome & Mitochondrial DNA Variation
    The Genetic Structure of the Kuwaiti and Failaka Island Populations: Y-chromosome & Mitochondrial DNA Variation By Jasem Bader Theyab M.A., University of Kansas, 2010 Copyright 2013 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Anthropology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson, Dr. Michael H. Crawford ________________________________ Dr. Majid Hannoum ________________________________ Dr. Deborah Smith ________________________________ Dr. Bartholomew C. Dean ________________________________ Dr. John Kelly Date Defended: May 28, 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Jasem Bader Theyab certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Genetic Structure of the Kuwaiti and Failaka Island Populations: Y-chromosome & Mitochondrial DNA Variation ________________________________ Chairperson, Dr. Michael H. Crawford Date approved: May 31, 2013 ii Abstract Recent studies applying multidisciplinary approaches suggest that the Anatomically Modern Homo sapiens (AMHS) passed through the Arabian Peninsula in their major diaspora out of Africa. The Arabian Peninsula is connected to three continents: Africa, Asia, and Europe. In addition to the major diaspora, the Arabian Peninsula has witnessed numerous migrations among the three continents. The populations of the Arabian Peninsula have been investigated to better understand their evolutionary history. This dissertation investigated the paternal genetic structure of the Kuwaiti and Failaka Island populations using 15 loci Y-STR data. In addition, the maternal genetic structure of Failaka Island has been investigated using mtDNA HVS-I sequence data. This is the first genetic study to characterize Failaka Island population. The result showed that the Kuwaiti population has a high frequency of Y- haplogroup J1 (37%) similar to other Arabian populations.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Geography of Human Y-Chromosome in Europe: a SNP Perspective
    JASs Invited Reviews Journal of Anthropological Sciences Vol. 86 (2008), pp. 59-89 History and geography of human Y-chromosome in Europe: a SNP perspective Paolo Francalacci & Daria Sanna Dipartimento di Zoologia e Genetica Evoluzionistica, Università di Sassari, via Muroni 25 – 07100 Sassari, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Summary - e genetic variation observed in the modern European populations can be used to reconstruct the history of the human peopling of the continent. In recent times, a great importance has been given to uniparental markers such as the Y-chromosome. is chromosome, which is passed from father to son, does not have a counterpart subject to recombination and the only possible source of variation is mutation. e nucleotide changes accumulate over time in the molecule, with no rearrangement among lineages. Lately, the D-HPLC technique, which allows the eff ective detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), was used to boost the number of available polymorphisms on the Y-chromosome. Since the year 2000, a number of studies were aimed both at the reconstruction of Y-chromosome phylogeny and the geographic distribution of Y-chromosome variation in Europe. e distribution of distinctive Y-chromosome lineages can also display a correspondence with geography, thus providing patterns of affi nity and clues concerning past human movements. It is therefore possible to recognize the eff ect of the colonization of Europe following the Last Glacial Maximum, both from the western Iberian and the eastern Balkan refuges. Other lineages show a migratory wave from the Near East, consistent with the demic diff usion model of agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 1158-1162, February 1994 Genetics Mitochondrial DNA "clock" for the Amerinds and its implications for timing their entry into North America (Amerind mlgrations/Chibeba time depth/Amerind mtDNA evolution) ANTONIO TORRONI*t, JAMES V. NEELt, RAMIRO BARRANTES§, THEODORE G. SCHURR*, AND DOUGLAS C. WALLACE* Departments of *Genetics and Molecular Medicine and lAnthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; tDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0618; and fEscuela de Biologia, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica Contributed by James V. Neel, October 11, 1993 ABSTRACT Students of the time of entry of the ancestors erinds are defined primarily by four sets of specific muta- of the Amerinds into the New World are divided into two tions that cluster in four haplotype groups (haplogroups), camps, one favoring an "early" entry [more than approxi- termed A, B, C, and D. Moreover, the observation that each mnately 30,000 years before the present (YBP)], the other of these haplogroups was apparently founded by a single favoring a "late" entry (less than approximately 13,000 YBP). haplotype present in Asia permitted a quantification of the An "intermediate" date is unlikely for geological reasons. The mtDNA variation that had accumulated within each ofthose correlation of the appropriate data on mtDNA variation in haplogroups from the time of the first human arrival in the Amerinds with lin s, archaeological, and genetic data Americas (13). offers the possibility of establishing a time frame for tDNA We have also recently developed, from archeological, evolution in Amerinds.
    [Show full text]