SW Chief TIGER 9 Status

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Amtrak Southwest Chief TIGER 9 Grant Application Summary The local communities have pledged $135,500 and are: (still expect another to come in as of Friday, October 13) Association of Private Rail Car Owners ColoRail Santa Fe County San Miguel County City of La Junta City of Trinidad Prowers County Bent County Otero County Pueblo County Colfax County (Applicant) Cimarron, NM City of Maxell County of Mora City of Raton City of Hutchinson Garden City The synopsis: The Amtrak Southwest Chief Route Stabilization Project continues the work done on the route of the Southwest Chief beginning with the TIGER grant award in 2014. The project will rehabilitate the right of way along the La Junta Subdivision between Hutchinson, KS and Las Animas Junction in Colorado. New rail from American steel mills will replace rail installed in the 1950s resulting in 42 miles of rehabilitated track, switches, and grade crossings. After the project is done, only 28 miles of older rail will remain out of the 178 miles present when the first TIGER project began. Along the route in New Mexico, the project will address right-of-way issues including drainage and rock slides. Earlier TIGER work is complete and the associated speed restrictions have been lifted on the line north and east of Albuquerque. This Route Stabilization Project will continue the improvement of the line in this area, replacing 17 miles of ancient signals, restoring passing sidings and culverts, and addressing rock slide issues at Devils Throne. In the 200 miles between Lamy, NM and Trinidad, CO the project will install 24,000 new ties to preserve the integrity of the line and keep train speeds at their current level. Colfax County, NM is the applicant in this project. The application is requesting $18.3M in TIGER funds to be matched with $9.3M of non-Federal funds including $1M each from the states of New Mexico, Colorado, and Kansas. Local communities all up and down the line are pledging support and providing funds as is the BNSF Railway and Amtrak. BNSF Railway and Amtrak are each pledging $3 million in matching funds. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Status of Passenger Rail Improvements in the Region and Plans for the Future
9/23/15 Working to implement a 21st century passenger rail system by adding the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative network and additional state-supported corridors to the region’s existing passenger rail infrastructure. MIPRC 2015 Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 St. Paul, Minnesota The Status of Passenger Rail Improvements in the Region and Plans for the Future 1 9/23/15 State Reports Illinois Indiana Kansas Michigan Minnesota Missouri North Dakota Wisconsin IDOT Report On Passenger Rail Infrastructure MIPRC September 23‐24, 2015 2 9/23/15 AMTRAK • Operates 56 trains in and through Illinois. • Serves nearly 5 million riders at Illinois stations. • Illinois subsidizes 30 state‐sponsored trains that provide service in 4 regional corridors, with 2 million annual riders. AMTRAK Illinois Amtrak Corridors: • Chicago – Milwaukee (Jointly supported with Wisconsin) • Chicago ‐ St. Louis • Chicago ‐ Quincy • Chicago ‐ Carbondale 3 9/23/15 Illinois HSR Project • The Chicago‐St. Louis High Speed Rail (HSR) Project involves upgrading the existing railroad corridor between Chicago and St. Louis to accommodate passenger train speeds of up to 110 mph. • The project includes reconstruction of main track, new and rebuilt sidings, grade crossing improvements, new fencing, new and rebuilt structures, upgraded stations and installation of Positive Train Control. • Construction activities along the corridor began in 2010 and are scheduled to be largely complete in 2017 (some activities continuing into 2018). Illinois HSR Project • The overall benefits of the project can be summarized as follows: • Overall travel time between Chicago & St. Louis ‐ reduced by 1 hour; • New passenger cars and high efficiency diesel locomotives; • On time performance at 85% and above, compared to the current 75%; • Four quadrant gates, fencing, and related improvements will significantly improve safety at crossings.
[Show full text]
SM 18 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
1 A MEMORIAL 2 RECOGNIZING THE IMPORTANCE OF AMTRAK, THE NATIONAL RAILROAD 3 PASSENGER CORPORATION, AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO NEW MEXICO'S 4 MOBILITY AND ECONOMY; ACKNOWLEDGING THE THREAT TO THE 5 VIABILITY OF THE SOUTHWEST CHIEF TRAIN; REQUESTING THAT THE 6 NEW MEXICO CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION AND THE GOVERNOR SUPPORT 7 THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE SOUTHWEST CHIEF. 8 9 WHEREAS, Amtrak, the national railroad passenger 10 corporation and a federally chartered corporation, provides 11 intercity transportation service to millions of Americans 12 each year and operates two long-distance routes through 13 New Mexico; and 14 WHEREAS, Amtrak's southwest chief train runs between 15 Chicago and Los Angeles, with stops in New Mexico at Raton, 16 Las Vegas, Lamy, Albuquerque and Gallup; and 17 WHEREAS, the southwest chief serves cities and rural 18 areas, carries passengers through scenic landscapes not 19 visible from highways and provides a safe, comfortable and 20 energy-efficient form of transportation; and 21 WHEREAS, many New Mexico residents who ride the 22 southwest chief depend on it as the only form of public 23 transportation between Raton and Albuquerque; and 24 WHEREAS, the southwest chief provides interstate 25 transportation for New Mexico residents and travelers SM 18 Page 1 1 visiting New Mexico; and 2 WHEREAS, in federal fiscal year 2017, passengers boarded 3 and disembarked the southwest chief in New Mexico at 4 Albuquerque, Gallup, Lamy, Las Vegas and Raton more than one 5 hundred twenty-two thousand times; and 6 WHEREAS, each
[Show full text]
Project Narrative the SOUTHWEST CHIEF ROUTE STABILIZATION PROJECT Ms
US Department of Transportation's National Infrastructure Investments Program Fiscal Year 2017 "TIGER" Discretionary Grants Project Narrative THE SOUTHWEST CHIEF ROUTE STABILIZATION PROJECT Ms. Mary Lou Kern Lead Applicant and Point of Contact: Colfax County Manager P.O. Box 1498 Raton, NM 87740 (575) 445-9661 Email: [email protected] Type of Project: Intercity Passenger Rail Federal Funds Requested: $17,538,615 Non-Federal Match $9,189,000 (34.3%) Table of contents Project Narrative ..................................................................................................................... i Executive summary .................................................................................................................. 1 i. Project Description ........................................................................................................... 2 Transportation challenge and no-build scenario .................................................................. 3 Proposed engineering description ........................................................................................ 7 Build scenario transportation impact ................................................................................... 9 Project history ...................................................................................................................... 9 ii. Project location .............................................................................................................. 11 iii. Source and use of funds ................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Kansas State Rail Plan
Kansas State Rail Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction ......................................................................................... 9 1.1 The Rail System’s Role in Kansas 9 1.2 Federal Mandate for State Rail Plans 9 Chapter 2 – State Rail Plan Consultation and Vision ........................................ 11 2.1 Rail Plan Outreach Approach 11 2.1.1 Stakeholder Outreach and Involvement Plan ............................................................... 11 2.1.2 Public Meetings ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Stakeholder Interviews ................................................................................................. 13 2.1.4 State Rail Plan Advisory Committee ........................................................................... 13 2.2 Stakeholder Outreach Findings and Issues 13 2.2.1 Common Themes ......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Divergent Themes ........................................................................................................ 15 2.2.3 Proposed Actions to Address Outreach Recommendations ......................................... 16 2.3 Rail Vision 17 2.4 Integration with the National Rail Plan 18 Chapter 3 – Public Rail Program Activities in Kansas ...................................... 19 3.1 Kansas’ Legislative Rail Authority 19 3.2 Kansas DOT’s Rail Organization and Roles 20 3.2.1 KDOT Freight and Rail Unit
[Show full text]
Kansas Statewide Rail Plan
Kansas Statewide Rail Plan Kansas Department of Transportation September 2017 i Kansas Rail Plan • Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Role of Rail in Kansas’ Multimodal System ..................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Kansas’ Goals for its Multimodal Transportation System .................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Kansas State Freight Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Kansas Long Range Transportation Plan, 2008-2030 ............................................................. 1-2 1.2.3 Kansas State Transportation Improvement Program, 2017-2020 .................................... 1-3 1.3 The Role of Rail within the Kansas Transportation System ................................................................ 1-4 1.3.1 The Early Years ......................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.2 The Current System Takes Shape ..................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.3 Evolution of Passenger Rail Services .............................................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Institutional Structure of Kansas’s State
[Show full text]
Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch
Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2016-1117 Amtrak ((National Railroad Passenger Corporation) ATK) Cimarron, KS March 14, 2016 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2016-1117 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT SYNOPSIS Synopsis On March 14, 2016, at 12:02 a.m., CDT, an eastbound Amtrak passenger train, ATK 4, traveling on BNSF Railway’s (BNSF) La Junta Subdivision, derailed just west of BNSF Milepost 373. The town nearest to the accident was Cimarron, Kansas, located approximately 2 miles away. Cimarron is approximately 15 miles west of Dodge City, Kansas, on the La Junta Subdivision. The rear eight passenger cars were derailed. Damages to track and signals was $363,000 and equipment damages were $2,784,355. Total Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) reportable damages were $3,147,355. At the time of the accident, it was night and the weather cloudy. The temperature was 46 °F. FRA’s investigation determined the probable cause of the derailment was track damage caused by non- railroad interference with track structure, and will be listed in the FRA Factual Accident/Incident Report as cause code M506. Cimarron Feeders of Kansas, LLC, allowed a feed truck to damage the track structure and failed to notify BNSF prior to the arrival and derailment of Amtrak Passenger Train ATK 4.
[Show full text]
Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2017 State of Kansas
Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2017 State of Kansas Amtrak Service & Ridership Amtrak operates one National Network train through Kansas, the Southwest Chief (daily Chicago-Kansas City-Los Angeles via Topeka, Newton, Dodge City, and Garden City). During FY17 Amtrak served the following Kansas locations: City Boardings + Alightings Dodge City 5,208 Garden City 6,966 Hutchinson 4,294 Lawrence 9,834 Newton 15,828 Topeka 10,084 Total Kansas Station Usage: 52,214 (up 5.7% from FY16) Procurement Amtrak spent $3,321,504 on goods and services in Kansas in FY17. Much of this, $2,280,341, was in Parsons. Employment At the end of FY17, Amtrak employed 19 Kansas residents. Total wages of Amtrak employees living in Kansas were $1,441,330 during FY17. Expansion Planning The Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) requested Amtrak study options for the return of passenger rail service along a route between Kansas City and Oklahoma City, via Newton and Wichita. The Feasibility Report of Proposed Amtrak Service provided an analysis of potential service scenarios, schedules, ridership and revenue estimates, required state operating contribution, and capital requirements, to establish new service. Kansas sought further refinement of the initial Amtrak study and continues to Amtrak Government Affairs: November 2017 investigate options for implementation. Amtrak has testified before a joint committee of the Kansas legislature on the benefits of and the railroad’s experience providing passenger service under contract for state governments. In June 2017, Amtrak, BNSF Railway, policy makers, and other stakeholders conducted an inspection trip from Oklahoma City to Newton. This well publicized trip was the next step toward restoring passenger rail service between Texas and Kansas.
[Show full text]
Kansas City-Wichita-Oklahoma City-Fort Worth Corridor Passenger Rail Service Development Plan
Kansas City-Wichita-Oklahoma City-Fort Worth Corridor Passenger Rail Service Development Plan Prepared for: With the cooperation and assistance from: Texas Department of Transportation Missouri Department of Transportation BNSF Railway Company AMTRAK Federal Railroad Administration Prepared by: November 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. v 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 FRA Passenger Rail Development Process ................................................................................. 1 1.2 History of Passenger Rail in the Corridor ................................................................................... 2 1.3 Discussions Related to Potential Rerouting of the Southwest Chief ......................................... 3 1.4 Speed of Operation .................................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Recent History of Rail Passenger Efforts .................................................................................. 10 3. Rationale ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.1
[Show full text]
KDOT Rail Plan
Kansas Statewide Rail Plan Kansas Department of Transportation November 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 Role of Rail in Kansas’ Multimodal System................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Kansas’ Goals for its Multimodal Transportation System .................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Kansas State Freight Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Kansas Long Range Transportation Plan, 2008-2030 ............................................................. 1-2 1.2.3 Kansas State Transportation Improvement Program, 2017-2020 .................................... 1-3 1.3 The Role of Rail within the Kansas Transportation System ................................................................ 1-4 1.3.1 The Early Years ......................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.2 The Current System Takes Shape ..................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.3 Evolution of Passenger Rail Services .............................................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Institutional Structure of Kansas’s
[Show full text]
Wilson & Company Maintenance Study
Amtrak Southwest Chief Maintenance Cost Between Newton, KS and Dalies, NM Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Data Collection ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Evaluations ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Track Evaluation ................................................................................................................................ 11 Bridge Evaluation............................................................................................................................... 17 Signal Evaluation ............................................................................................................................... 21 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 23 References ............................................................................................................................................ 24 Tables Table 1: Summary of Ridership ...............................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Signalman's JOURNAL
SiGNALMAN’STHE JOURNAL Volume 91 • Number 1 1st Quarter 2010 # !# #"$ ! ! # ! # ( "#" "! ! $ "" !' "" # & !"!"# !$"' !! $!# ""! !#""%"#"" "#"# &# & " ! !" " ! ! $ ! "#" "" ""!" #" ! " "!" ! ! $ ! " "'" !"$% ! THE SIGNALMAN’S Official Publication of the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen Web Page: www.brs.org JOURNAL Volume 91 • Number 1 • 1st Quarter 2010 DIRECTORY FEATURES: NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS: Roadway Worker Protection SAVES LIVES ..............................6 917 Shenandoah Shores Road Front Royal, VA 22630-6418 As the railroads push for increased productivity, our safety and the (540) 622-6522 Fax: (540) 622-6532 RWP safety of our fellow workers cannot be compromised. Full compli- email:[email protected] Dan Pickett, International President SAVES ance with the RWP regulations is mandatory under Federal law (ext. 525) email:[email protected] and employees and employers can be held liable for violation of the Walt Barrows, International Secretary-Treasurer LIVES (ext. 527) email:[email protected] RWP regulations. Jerry Boles, International Vice President Grand Lodge (ext. 524) email:[email protected] AFL-CIO Union Veterans Council............................................................................. 8 Kelly Haley, Director of Research The UVC promotes access to good jobs, quality healthcare, and is an advocate for (ext. 531) email:[email protected] Mark Ciurej, Grand Lodge Representative Union veterans. The BRS is proud to serve on the Governing Board of this council. (ext. 566) email:[email protected] John Bragg,
[Show full text]
Narrative Swchief 042814.3 Pdf Version
US Department of Transportation's National Infrastructure Investments Program Fiscal Year 2014 "TIGER" Discretionary Grants Project Narrative THE SOUTHWEST CHIEF ROUTE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Lead Applicant Mr. Matt Allen , City Manager and Point of 301 N. 8th St. Contact: Garden City, KS Telephone: (620)276 -1160 Email: [email protected] Type of Project: Intercity Passenger Rail Federal Funds $14,969,963 Requested: Critical Confidential Business Information has been removed from this Document Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................ii Table of Figures ...............................................................................................................ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................... iii Referenced documents ................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 I. Project Description ....................................................................................................... 2 History of the Train ........................................................................................................................... 2 a. Transportation Challenges and the No-Build Scenario ...............................................................
[Show full text]