Images of a Fourth Planet Orbiting HR 8799
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Young Nearby Stars by Adam Conrad Schneider (Under The
Young Nearby Stars by Adam Conrad Schneider (Under the Direction of Professor Inseok Song) Abstract Nearby young stars are without equal as stellar and planetary evolution laboratories. The aim of this work is to use age diagnostic considerations to execute a complete survey for new nearby young stars and to efficiently reevaluate and constrain their ages. Because of their proximity and age, young, nearby stars are the most desired targets for any astrophysical study focusing on the early stages of star and planet formation. Identifying nearby, young, low-mass stars is challenging because of their inherent faint- ness and age diagnostic degeneracies. A new method for identifying these objects has been developed, and a pilot study of its effectiveness is demonstrated by the identification of two definite new members of the TW Hydrae Association. Nearby, young, solar-type stars are initially identified in this work by their fractional X-ray luminosity. The results of a large-scale search for nearby, young, solar-type stars is presented. Follow-up spectroscopic observations are taken in order to measure various age diagnostics in order to accurately assess stellar ages. Age, one of the most fundamental properties of a star, is also one of the most difficult to determine. While a variety of proce- dures have been developed and utilized to approximate ages for solar-type stars, with varying degrees of success, a comprehensive age-dating technique has yet to be constructed. Often- times, different methods exhibit contradictory or conflicting findings. Such inconsistencies demonstrate the value of a uniform method of determining stellar ages. -
The Chara Array Angular Diameter of Hr 8799 Favors Planetary Masses for Its Imaged Companions
The Astrophysical Journal, 761:57 (15pp), 2012 December 10 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/57 C 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. THE CHARA ARRAY ANGULAR DIAMETER OF HR 8799 FAVORS PLANETARY MASSES FOR ITS IMAGED COMPANIONS Ellyn K. Baines1, Russel J. White2, Daniel Huber3, Jeremy Jones2, Tabetha Boyajian2, Harold A. McAlister2, Theo A. ten Brummelaar2, Nils H. Turner2, Judit Sturmann2, Laszlo Sturmann2, P. J. Goldfinger2, Christopher D. Farrington2, Adric R. Riedel2, Michael Ireland4, Kaspar von Braun5, and Stephen T. Ridgway6 1 Remote Sensing Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20375, USA; [email protected] 2 Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3969, Atlanta, GA 30302-3969, USA 3 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University, New South Wales, NSW 2109, Australia 5 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of Technology, 770 S. Wilson Ave., MS 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125-2200, USA 6 Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726-6732, USA Received 2012 July 3; accepted 2012 September 29; published 2012 November 21 ABSTRACT HR 8799 is an hF0 mA5 γ Doradus-, λ Bootis-, Vega-type star best known for hosting four directly imaged candidate planetary companions. Using the CHARA Array interferometer, we measure HR 8799’s limb-darkened angular diameter to be 0.342 ± 0.008 mas (an error of only 2%). By combining our measurement with the star’s parallax and photometry from the literature, we greatly improve upon previous estimates of its fundamental parameters, including stellar radius (1.44 ± 0.06 R), effective temperature (7193 ± 87 K, consistent with F0), luminosity (5.05 ± 0.29 L), and the extent of the habitable zone (HZ; 1.62–3.32 AU). -
Arxiv:1904.05358V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 10 Apr 2019
Draft version April 12, 2019 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX62 The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Survey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics From 10{100 AU Eric L. Nielsen,1 Robert J. De Rosa,1 Bruce Macintosh,1 Jason J. Wang,2, 3, ∗ Jean-Baptiste Ruffio,1 Eugene Chiang,3 Mark S. Marley,4 Didier Saumon,5 Dmitry Savransky,6 S. Mark Ammons,7 Vanessa P. Bailey,8 Travis Barman,9 Celia´ Blain,10 Joanna Bulger,11 Jeffrey Chilcote,1, 12 Tara Cotten,13 Ian Czekala,3, 1, y Rene Doyon,14 Gaspard Duchene^ ,3, 15 Thomas M. Esposito,3 Daniel Fabrycky,16 Michael P. Fitzgerald,17 Katherine B. Follette,18 Jonathan J. Fortney,19 Benjamin L. Gerard,20, 10 Stephen J. Goodsell,21 James R. Graham,3 Alexandra Z. Greenbaum,22 Pascale Hibon,23 Sasha Hinkley,24 Lea A. Hirsch,1 Justin Hom,25 Li-Wei Hung,26 Rebekah Ilene Dawson,27 Patrick Ingraham,28 Paul Kalas,3, 29 Quinn Konopacky,30 James E. Larkin,17 Eve J. Lee,31 Jonathan W. Lin,3 Jer´ ome^ Maire,30 Franck Marchis,29 Christian Marois,10, 20 Stanimir Metchev,32, 33 Maxwell A. Millar-Blanchaer,8, 34 Katie M. Morzinski,35 Rebecca Oppenheimer,36 David Palmer,7 Jennifer Patience,25 Marshall Perrin,37 Lisa Poyneer,7 Laurent Pueyo,37 Roman R. Rafikov,38 Abhijith Rajan,37 Julien Rameau,14 Fredrik T. Rantakyro¨,39 Bin Ren,40 Adam C. Schneider,25 Anand Sivaramakrishnan,37 Inseok Song,13 Remi Soummer,37 Melisa Tallis,1 Sandrine Thomas,28 Kimberly Ward-Duong,25 and Schuyler Wolff41 1Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 4NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 94035, USA 5Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. -
Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆
A&A 565, A15 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323058 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Correlations between the stellar, planetary, and debris components of exoplanet systems observed by Herschel J. P. Marshall1,2, A. Moro-Martín3,4, C. Eiroa1, G. Kennedy5,A.Mora6, B. Sibthorpe7, J.-F. Lestrade8, J. Maldonado1,9, J. Sanz-Forcada10,M.C.Wyatt5,B.Matthews11,12,J.Horner2,13,14, B. Montesinos10,G.Bryden15, C. del Burgo16,J.S.Greaves17,R.J.Ivison18,19, G. Meeus1, G. Olofsson20, G. L. Pilbratt21, and G. J. White22,23 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 15 November 2013 / Accepted 6 March 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stars form surrounded by gas- and dust-rich protoplanetary discs. Generally, these discs dissipate over a few (3–10) Myr, leaving a faint tenuous debris disc composed of second-generation dust produced by the attrition of larger bodies formed in the protoplanetary disc. Giant planets detected in radial velocity and transit surveys of main-sequence stars also form within the protoplanetary disc, whilst super-Earths now detectable may form once the gas has dissipated. Our own solar system, with its eight planets and two debris belts, is a prime example of an end state of this process. Aims. The Herschel DEBRIS, DUNES, and GT programmes observed 37 exoplanet host stars within 25 pc at 70, 100, and 160 μm with the sensitiv- ity to detect far-infrared excess emission at flux density levels only an order of magnitude greater than that of the solar system’s Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. Here we present an analysis of that sample, using it to more accurately determine the (possible) level of dust emission from these exoplanet host stars and thereafter determine the links between the various components of these exoplanetary systems through statistical analysis. -
Arxiv:2105.12820V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 26 May 2021 Known with Exquisite Precision
Draft version May 28, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The First Dynamical Mass Measurement in the HR 8799 System 1, 1 2 3 G. Mirek Brandt , ∗ Timothy D. Brandt , Trent J. Dupuy , Daniel Michalik , and Gabriel-Dominique Marleau 4, 5, 6 1Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 2Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK 3European Space Agency (ESA), European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands 4Institut f¨urAstronomie und Astrophysik, Universit¨atT¨ubingen,Auf der Morgenstelle 10, 72076 T¨ubingen,Germany 5Physikalisches Institut, Universit¨atBern, Gesellschaftsstr. 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland 6Max-Planck-Institut f¨urAstronomie, K¨onigstuhl17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany (Received April 7, 2021; Revised May 14, 2021; Accepted May 26, 2021) Submitted to ApJ Letters ABSTRACT HR 8799 hosts four directly imaged giant planets, but none has a mass measured from first principles. We present the first dynamical mass measurement in this planetary system, finding that the innermost +1:9 planet HR 8799 e has a mass of 9:6−1:8 MJup. This mass results from combining the well-characterized orbits of all four planets with a new astrometric acceleration detection (5σ) from the Gaia EDR3 version of the Hipparcos-Gaia Catalog of Accelerations. We find with 95% confidence that HR 8799 e +24 is below 13 MJup, the deuterium-fusing mass limit. We derive a hot-start cooling age of 42−16 Myr for HR 8799 e that agrees well with its hypothesized membership in the Columba association but is also consistent with an alternative suggested membership in the β Pictoris moving group. -
Worlds Apart - Finding Exoplanets
Worlds Apart - Finding Exoplanets Illustrated Video Credit: NASA, JPL-Caltech, T. Pyle; Acknowledgement: djxatlanta Dr. Billy Teets Vanderbilt University Dyer Observatory Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Thursday, November 5, 2020 Outline • A bit of info and history about planet formation theory. • A discussion of the main exoplanet detection techniques including some of the missions and telescopes that are searching the skies. • A few examples of “notable” results. Evolution of our Thinking of the Solar System • First “accepted models” were geocentric – Ptolemy • Copernicus – heliocentric solar system • By 1800s, heliocentric model widely accepted in scientific community • 1755 – Immanuel Kant hypothesizes clouds of gas and dust • 1796 – Kant and P.-S. LaPlace both put forward the Solar Nebula Disk Theory • Today – if Solar System formed from an interstellar cloud, maybe other clouds formed planets elsewhere in the universe. Retrograde Motion - Mars Image Credits: Tunc Tezel Retrograde Motion as Explained by Ptolemy To explain retrograde, the concept of the epicycle was introduced. A planet would move on the epicycle (the smaller circle) as the epicycle went around the Earth on the deferent (the larger circle). The planet would appear to shift back and forth among the background stars. Evolution of our Thinking of the Solar System • First “accepted models” were geocentric – Ptolemy • Copernicus – heliocentric solar system • By 1800s, heliocentric model widely accepted in scientific community • 1755 – Immanuel Kant hypothesizes clouds of gas and dust • 1796 – Kant and P.-S. LaPlace both put forward the Solar Nebula Disk Theory • Today – if Solar System formed from an interstellar cloud, maybe other clouds formed planets elsewhere in the universe. -
Structure and Evolution of Debris Disks Around F-Type Stars
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,193:4(25pp),2011March doi:10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/4 C 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. ! STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF DEBRIS DISKS AROUND F-TYPE STARS. I. OBSERVATIONS, DATABASE, AND BASIC EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS A. Moor´ 1,I.Pascucci2, A.´ Kosp´ al´ 3,P.Abrah´ am´ 1,T.Csengeri4,L.L.Kiss1,5,D.Apai2,C.Grady6,7,Th.Henning8, Cs. Kiss1, D. Bayliss9,A.Juhasz´ 8,J.Kovacs´ 10,andT.Szalai11 1 Konkoly Observatory of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 67, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected] 2 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 3 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, NL-2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands 4 Laboratoire AIM, CEA/DSM, IRFU/Service d’Astrophysique, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France 5 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics A28, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 6 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 667, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 7 Eureka Scientific, 2452 Delmer Street, Suite 100, Oakland, CA 94602, USA 8 Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Astronomie, Konigstuhl¨ 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 9 Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Mount Stromlo Observatory, Cotter Road, Weston Creek, ACT 2611, Australia 10 Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, ELTE University, 9707 Szombathely, Hungary 11 Department of Optics and Quantum Electronics, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Dom´ ter´ 9, Hungary Received 2010 May 30; accepted 2010 December 10; published 2011 January 20 ABSTRACT Although photometric and spectroscopic surveys with the Spitzer Space Telescope remarkably increased the number of well-studied debris disks around A-type and Sun-like stars, detailed analyses of debris disks around F-type stars remained less frequent. -
GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY of the HR 8799 PLANETS C and D
The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 794:L15 (5pp), 2014 October 10 doi:10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L15 C 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. GEMINI PLANET IMAGER SPECTROSCOPY OF THE HR 8799 PLANETS c AND d Patrick Ingraham1, Mark S. Marley2, Didier Saumon3, Christian Marois4, Bruce Macintosh1, Travis Barman5, Brian Bauman6, Adam Burrows7, Jeffrey K. Chilcote8, Robert J. De Rosa9,10, Daren Dillon11,Rene´ Doyon12, Jennifer Dunn4, Darren Erikson4, Michael P. Fitzgerald8, Donald Gavel11, Stephen J. Goodsell13, James R. Graham14, Markus Hartung13, Pascale Hibon13, Paul G. Kalas14, Quinn Konopacky15, James A. Larkin8, Jer´ omeˆ Maire15, Franck Marchis16, James McBride14, Max Millar-Blanchaer15, Katie M. Morzinski17,24, Andrew Norton11, Rebecca Oppenheimer18, Dave W. Palmer6, Jenny Patience9, Marshall D. Perrin19, Lisa A. Poyneer6, Laurent Pueyo19, Fredrik Rantakyro¨ 13, Naru Sadakuni13, Leslie Saddlemyer4, Dmitry Savransky20,Remi´ Soummer19, Anand Sivaramakrishnan19, Inseok Song21, Sandrine Thomas2,22, J. Kent Wallace23, Sloane J. Wiktorowicz11, and Schuyler G. Wolff19 1 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 3 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 4 NRC Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada 5 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0092, USA 6 Lawrence Livermore National Lab, -
Structure of Exoplanets SPECIAL FEATURE
Structure of exoplanets SPECIAL FEATURE David S. Spiegela,1, Jonathan J. Fortneyb, and Christophe Sotinc aSchool of Natural Sciences, Astrophysics Department, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540; bDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; and cJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board December 4, 2013 (received for review July 24, 2013) The hundreds of exoplanets that have been discovered in the entire radius of the planet in which opacities are high enough past two decades offer a new perspective on planetary structure. that heat must be transported via convection; this region is Instead of being the archetypal examples of planets, those of our presumably well-mixed in chemical composition and specific solar system are merely possible outcomes of planetary system entropy. Some gas giants have heavy-element cores at their centers, formation and evolution, and conceivably not even especially although it is not known whether all such planets have cores. common outcomes (although this remains an open question). Gas-giant planets of roughly Jupiter’s mass occupy a special Here, we review the diverse range of interior structures that are region of the mass/radius plane. At low masses, liquid or rocky both known and speculated to exist in exoplanetary systems—from planetary objects have roughly constant density and suffer mostly degenerate objects that are more than 10× as massive as little compression from the overlying material. In such cases, 1=3 Jupiter, to intermediate-mass Neptune-like objects with large cores Rp ∝ Mp , where Rp and Mp are the planet’s radius mass. -
First Direct Detection of an Exoplanet by Optical Interferometry Astrometry and K-Band Spectroscopy of HR 8799 E?,??
A&A 623, L11 (2019) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935253 & c S. Lacour et al. 2019 Astrophysics LETTER TO THE EDITOR First direct detection of an exoplanet by optical interferometry Astrometry and K-band spectroscopy of HR 8799 e?;?? GRAVITY Collaboration: S. Lacour1,2, M. Nowak1, J. Wang20;???, O. Pfuhl2, F. Eisenhauer2, R. Abuter8, A. Amorim6,14, N. Anugu7,22, M. Benisty5, J. P. Berger5, H. Beust5, N. Blind10, M. Bonnefoy5, H. Bonnet8, P. Bourget9, W. Brandner3, A. Buron2, C. Collin1, B. Charnay1, F. Chapron1, Y. Clénet1, V. Coudé du Foresto1, P. T. de Zeeuw2,12, C. Deen2, R. Dembet1, J. Dexter2, G. Duvert5, A. Eckart4,11, N. M. Förster Schreiber2, P. Fédou1, P. Garcia7,9,14 , R. Garcia Lopez15,3, F. Gao2, E. Gendron1, R. Genzel2,13, S. Gillessen2, P. Gordo6,14, A. Greenbaum16, M. Habibi2, X. Haubois9, F. Haußmann2, Th. Henning3, S. Hippler3, M. Horrobin4, Z. Hubert1, A. Jimenez Rosales2, L. Jocou5, S. Kendrew17,3, P. Kervella1, J. Kolb9, A.-M. Lagrange5, V. Lapeyrère1, J.-B. Le Bouquin 5, P. Léna1, M. Lippa2, R. Lenzen3, A.-L. Maire19,3, P. Mollière12, T. Ott2, T. Paumard1, K. Perraut5, G. Perrin1, L. Pueyo18, S. Rabien2, A. Ramírez9, C. Rau2, G. Rodríguez-Coira1, G. Rousset1, J. Sanchez-Bermudez21,3, S. Scheithauer3, N. Schuhler9, O. Straub1,2, C. Straubmeier4, E. Sturm2, L. J. Tacconi2, F. Vincent1, E. F. van Dishoeck2,12, S. von Fellenberg2, I. Wank4, I. Waisberg2, F. Widmann2, E. Wieprecht2, M. Wiest4, E. Wiezorrek2, J. Woillez8, S. Yazici2,4, D. Ziegler1, and G. Zins9 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 12 February 2019 / Accepted 28 February 2019 ABSTRACT Aims. -
Birth Sites of Young Stellar Associations and Recent Star Formation in a Flocculent Corrugated Disk
MNRAS 000, 000{000 (0000) Preprint 5 August 2020 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Birth Sites of Young Stellar Associations and Recent Star Formation in a Flocculent Corrugated Disk Alice C. Quillen1?, Alex R. Pettitt2, Sukanya Chakrabarti3, Yifan Zhang1, Jonathan Gagn´e4;5, and Ivan Minchev6 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA 2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 3School of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester Institute of Technology, 84 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA 4Institut de Recherche sur les Exoplan`etes, Universit´ede Montr´eal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, PO Box 6128 Centre-Ville STN, Montr´eal QC H3C 3J7, Canada 5Plan´etarium Rio Tinto Alcan, Espace pour la Vie, 4801 av. Pierre-de Coubertin, Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, Canada 6Leibniz Institut fur¨ Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, D-14482, Potsdam, Germany 5 August 2020 ABSTRACT With backwards orbit integration we estimate birth locations of young stellar associ- ations and moving groups identified in the solar neighborhood that are younger than 70 Myr. The birth locations of most of these stellar associations are at smaller galac- tocentric radius than the Sun, implying that their stars moved radially outwards after birth. Exceptions to this rule are the Argus and Octans associations, which formed outside the Sun's galactocentric radius. Variations in birth heights of the stellar asso- ciations suggest that they were born in a corrugated disk of molecular clouds, similar to that inferred from the current filamentary molecular cloud distribution and dust extinction maps. -
WTS-1 B: the first Extrasolar Planet Detected in the WFCAM Transit Survey
WTS-1 b: the first extrasolar planet detected in the WFCAM Transit Survey Michele Cappetta M¨unchen2012 WTS-1 b: the first extrasolar planet detected in the WFCAM Transit Survey Michele Cappetta Dissertation an der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Ludwig{Maximilians{Universit¨at M¨unchen vorgelegt von Michele Cappetta aus Bolzano, Italien M¨unchen, den 19. Dezember 2012 Erstgutachter: R. P. Saglia Zweitgutachter: B. Ercolano Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:5. Februar 2013 Contents Zusammenfassung xix Summary xxi 1 Extrasolar planets 1 1.1 Introduction . .2 1.2 Detection methods . .4 1.3 Planet formation . .7 1.3.1 The Solar Nebular Model . .7 1.3.2 Rocky planets formation . .8 1.3.3 Gas-giant planets formation . 10 1.4 Planet evolution . 13 1.4.1 Gas disk migration . 13 1.4.2 Planetesimal-driven migration . 14 1.4.3 Planet-planet scattering . 16 1.5 Extrasolar planets properties . 17 1.5.1 Radius anomaly of the hot-Jupiters . 22 2 WFCAM Transit Survey 25 2.1 Observing strategy . 27 2.2 Reduction pipeline . 29 2.3 Transit detection algorithm . 32 2.4 Transit recovery ratios . 34 2.5 Results . 37 3 Instrumentation and spectroscopic observations 39 3.1 Hobby-Eberly Telescope . 40 3.2 The HRS Spectrograph . 42 3.3 Instrumental configurations . 46 3.4 Visit types . 49 4 Reduction and analysis pipeline 51 4.1 Introduction . 52 vi CONTENTS 4.2 Data reduction . 54 4.2.1 Cosmic-rays filtering . 54 4.2.2 Frames calibration . 54 4.2.3 Apertures definition . 55 4.2.4 Spectra extraction .