DOCSLIB.ORG

Wilderness Management Plan Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wilderness Management Plan Environmental Assessment NATIONAL SYSTEM OF PUBLIC LANDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of the Interior Forest Service Bureau of Land Management Draft Hemingway-Boulders and White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan Environmental Assessment Sawtooth National Forest, Sawtooth National Recreation Area Bureau of Land Management, Idaho Falls District, Challis Field Office October 25, 2017 For More Information Contact: Kit Mullen, Forest Supervisor Sawtooth National Forest 2647 Kimberly Road East Twin Falls, ID 83301-7976 Phone: 208-737-3200 Fax: 208-737-3236 Mary D’Aversa, District Manager Idaho Falls District 1405 Hollipark Drive Idaho Falls, ID 83401 Phone: 208-524-7500 Fax: 208-737-3236 Photo description: Castle Peak in the White Clouds Wilderness In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Hemingway-Boulders and White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan Environmental Assessment Acronyms, Initialisms, and Abbreviations AFWA Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies ATV all-terrain vehicle BLM Bureau of Land Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations EA environmental assessment EIS environmental impact statement EO Executive Order ESA Endangered Species Act FEIS final environmental impact statement Forest Plan Land and Resource Management Plan FSH Forest Service Handbook FSM Forest Service Manual GPS Global Positioning System IDFG Idaho Department of Fish and Game IDEQ Idaho Department of Environmental Quality IDT Interdisciplinary Team IMPROVE Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments LAU Lynx Analysis Unit MA Management Area MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MIS Management Indicator Species MIST minimum impact suppression tactics MOU Memorandum of Understanding MPC Management Prescription Category MRA Minimum Requirements Analysis NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFS National Forest System NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NRHP National Register of Historic Places NRA National Recreation Area ORV Outstandingly Remarkable Values i Hemingway-Boulders and White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan Environmental Assessment RMP Resource Management Plan RNA Research Natural Area ROS Recreation Opportunity Spectrum SAR Search and Rescue SGCN Species of Greatest Conservation Need SHPO State Historic Preservation Office USC United States Code USDA United States Department of Agriculture USDI United States Department of Interior USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service UTV utility vehicle WAQV Wilderness Air Quality Values WMP Wilderness Management Plan WSA Wilderness Study Area (BLM designation) ii Hemingway-Boulders and White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Scope of the Wilderness Management Plan ....................................................................................... 1 1.2. Purpose of and Need of the Wilderness Management Plan ............................................................... 2 1.3. Decision to be Made .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Public Involvement and Tribal Consultation ..................................................................................... 3 1.5. Issues .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.5.1. Issues Not Analyzed in Detail ..................................................................................................... 4 1.6. Document Organization ..................................................................................................................... 5 2. Alternatives ..................................................................................................................................6 2.1. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ...................................................... 6 2.2. Management Direction Common to all Alternatives ......................................................................... 6 2.2.1. Sawtooth National Recreation Area General Management ........................................................ 6 2.2.2. Eligible Wild and Scenic Rivers ................................................................................................. 7 2.2.3. Recreation Resources .................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.4. Rangeland Resources .................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.5. Forest Service–specific Direction ............................................................................................... 7 2.3. Management Direction Common to Alternatives A and B ................................................................ 8 2.3.1. Wilderness ................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.2. Wildlife Resources ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.3. Recreation Resources .................................................................................................................. 8 2.3.4. Scenic Environment .................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.5. Heritage, Archaeological and Cultural Resources .................................................................... 10 2.3.6. Rangeland Resources ................................................................................................................ 10 2.3.7. Fire Management ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.8. Lands and Special Uses ............................................................................................................. 10 2.3.9. Wilderness Education and Interpretation .................................................................................. 10 2.3.10. Search and Rescue .................................................................................................................. 10 2.3.11. Management Zones ................................................................................................................. 11 2.4. Management Direction Common to Alternatives A and C .............................................................. 11 2.4.1. Recreation Resources ................................................................................................................ 11 2.5. Alternative A—Proposed Action ..................................................................................................... 11 2.5.1. Wildlife Resources .................................................................................................................... 11 2.5.2. Recreation Resources ................................................................................................................ 12 iii Hemingway-Boulders and White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan Environmental Assessment 2.6. Alternative B—Natural-Focus ......................................................................................................... 12 2.6.1. Wildlife Resources .................................................................................................................... 12 2.6.2. Recreation ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Cloud Milkvetch), a Region 4 Sensitive Species, on the Sawtooth National Forest
    FIELD INVESTIGATION OF ASTRAGALUS VEXILLIFLEXUS VAR. NUBILUS (WHITE CLOUD MILKVETCH), A REGION 4 SENSITIVE SPECIES, ON THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST by Michael Mancuso and Robert K. Moseley Natural Heritage Section Nongame/Endangered Wildlife Program Bureau of Wildlife December 1990 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Cooperative Challenge Cost-share Project Sawtooth National Forest Idaho Department of Fish and Game Purchase Order No. 40-0261-0-0801 ABSTRACT An inventory for Astragalus vexilliflexus var. nubilus (White Cloud milkvetch) was conducted on the Sawtooth National Forest by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game's Natural Heritage Program during August of 1990. The inventory was a cooperative Challenge Cost-share project between the Department and the Sawtooth National Forest. White Cloud milkvetch is a narrow endemic to the White Cloud Peaks and Boulder Mountains of central Idaho, in Custer County. Populations are scattered along the ridge systems that slope generally west to east on the east side of the White Cloud crest. Additionally, one population from the Bowery Creek drainage of the Boulder Mountains is known. It is a high elevation species, found mostly on exposed, dry, rocky ridge crests or upper slopes that typically support a relatively sparse vegetation cover. Prior to our 1990 survey, the species was known from three populations. Five new populations were discovered during the 1990 field investigation. Together, these eight populations support approximately 5,700 plants and cover an area less than 40 acres. Both current and potential threats have been identified at several populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 the Natural Ecological Value of Wilderness
    204 h The Multiple Values of Wilderness USDA Forest Service. (2002).National and regional project results: 2002 National Chapter 11 Forest Visitor Use Report. Retrieved February 1,2005. from http:Nwww.fs.fed.usl recreation/pmgrams/nvum/ The Natural Ecological Value USDA Forest Service. (200 1). National und regional project results: FY2001 National Foresr ViorUse Report. Retrieved February 1,2005, from http:llwww.fs.fed.usI of Wilderness recreation/pmgrams/nvum/ USDA Forest Service. (2000).National and regional project results: CY20a) Notional Fowst Visitor Use Repor?. Retrieved February 1,2005, from http://www.fs.fed.usl recreation/programs/nvud H. Ken Cordell Senior Research Scientist and Project Leader Vias. A.C. (1999). Jobs folIow people in the nual Rocky Mountain west. Rural Devel- opmenr Perspectives, 14(2), 14-23. USDA Forest Service, Athens, Georgia Danielle Murphy j Research Coordinator, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Kurt Riitters Research Scientist USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina J. E, Harvard Ill former University of Georgia employee Authors' Note: Deepest appreciation is extended to Peter Landres of the Leopold Wilderness Research Institute for initial ideas for approach, data. and analysis and for a thorough and very helpful review of this chapter. Chapter I I-The Natural Ecological Value of Wilderness & 207 The most important characteristic of an organism is that capacity modem broad-scale external influences, such as nonpoint source pollutants. for self-renewal known QS hcaltk There are two organisms whose - processes of self-renewal have been subjected to human interfer- altered distribution of species, and global climate change (Landres, Morgan ence and control.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Day Turns 50 on April 22 © Kevin Mcneal
    America’s Wilderness MEMBER NEWSLETTER • WINTER 2019-2020 • VOL. XXII, NO. 1 • WWW.WILDERNESS.ORG Earth Day Turns 50 on April 22 © Kevin McNeal Mount Rainier National Park, Washington A half-century ago, on April 22, 1970, Earth Day erupted Earth Day 2020 gives us an opportunity into the national consciousness, bringing unprecedented to generate bold action on climate attention to the importance of protecting the planet that sustains us. More than just a one-day demonstration, and leave an impact as powerful and that first Earth Day awakened a sense of urgency about enduring as Earth Day 1970. the health of our environment and ignited a demand for change that altered the course of history. to the streets to voice their disgust over dirty air and water and to demand a new set of priorities for a livable planet. Former Wilderness Society leader Gaylord Nelson conceived the idea for a national day to focus on the Earth Day changed the world. It motivated political environment while he was serving as a U.S. Senator from leaders of every stripe to work together to pass 28 critical Wisconsin. Under his leadership, 20 million Americans took environmental laws in the decade that followed, including continued on page 3 WHAT YOU THE FORESTS YOU SAVE 13 DAYS IN THE YOUR 2 CAN DO 4 WILL HELP SAVE US 6 THE ARCTIC REFUGE 7 IMPACT EARTH DAY TURNS 50 ON APRIL 22 continued from page 1 the Clean Air, Clean Water and Endangered Species which wildlife and natural systems can thrive, and most Acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Legend Wilderness Gardens Hiking Trails
    Wilderness Gardens Hiking Trails RULES AND REGULATIONS WILDERNESS There are over three miles of hiking trails in the preserve, and all are considered easy to moderate. ACCIDENTS: The County of San Diego shall not be All trailheads are identified by name, and trails are clearly marked with intermittent signposts. responsible for loss or accidents. GARDENS ALCOHOLIC Alcoholic beverages are permitted providing BEVERAGES: the alcohol content does not exceed 20%. COUNTY PRESERVE DEFACEMENT No person shall remove, deface, or destroy PROHIBITED: trail markers, monuments, fences, trees, A San Diego County park amenities, or other preserve facilities. DRONES: Remotely piloted aircraft and drones Open Space Preserve are prohibited. FIRE HAZARDS Smoking, including the use of AND SMOKING: vaporizing products, is not permitted in County parks. LITTERING: Littering is prohibited. MOTOR The unauthorized operation of motor VEHICLES: vehicles is prohibited. NO HUNTING: No person shall use, transport, carry, fire, or discharge any firearms, air guns, archery device, slingshot, fireworks, or Legend explosive device of any kind in a preserve. Ranger Station Mileage Marker PRESERVATION All wildlife, plants, and geologic OF TRAIL features are protected and are not to Restrooms Hiking Trails FEATURES: be damaged or removed. All historical resources are to be left in place. Picnic Are Park Boundaries Preserve Hours Park Entrance River The Upper Meadow Trail is the most scenic C trail in the preserve, offering commanding views 8 a.m. – 4 p.m. • Thursday – Tuesday Sickler Brothers Grist Mill Intermittent Creek of the Pauma Valley and the mountains to the east. Closed Wednesdays and the month of August This trail is moderate in difficulty.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth, Ecological Economics, and Wilderness Preservation
    Economic Growth, Ecological Economics, and Wilderness Preservation Brian Czech Abstract—Economic growth is a perennial national goal. Per- wilderness preservation if, for example, it consisted entirely petual economic growth and wilderness preservation are mutually of arable land. The lack of tallgrass or Palouse wilderness is exclusive. Wilderness scholarship has not addressed this conflict. evidence for the susceptibility of arable lands to develop- The economics profession is unlikely to contribute to resolution, ment, as is the high percentage of designated wilderness because the neoclassical paradigm holds that there is no limit to that is rugged, arid or otherwise difficult to develop. economic growth. A corollary of the paradigm is that wilderness can Second, the United States contains an unrivalled wealth be preserved in a perpetually growing economy. The alternative, and diversity of natural resources. Few of these resources ecological economics paradigm faces a formidable struggle for cred- were employed at the dawn of American history, partly ibility in the policy arena. Wilderness scholars are encouraged to because the Native American tribes had been decimated by develop research programs that dovetail with ecological economics, diseases that swept the continent ahead of the European and wilderness managers are encouraged to become conversant immigrants (Stannard 1992). The extremely high ratio of with macroeconomic policy implications. natural resources (including acreage) to humans allowed the new American civilization to quickly amass vast amounts of money, which could then be spent on wilderness preserva- tion and other “amenities.” While this history supports the Economic growth is an increase in the production and notion that economic growth once contributed to wilderness consumption of goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Evaluating Air Pollution Impacts on Class I Wilderness Areas in the Pacific Northwest
    United States Department of Guidelines for Evaluating Agriculture Forest Service Air Pollution Impacts on Pacific Northwest Research Station Class I Wilderness Areas General Technical in the Pacific Northwest Report PNW-GTR-299 May 1992 Janice Peterson, Daniel Schmoldt, David Peterson, Joseph Eilers, Richard Fisher, and Robert Bachman Authors JANICE PETERSON is a research forester, US. Department of Agriculture Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 4043 Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105 DANIEL SCHMOLDT is a research forest products technologist, U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Blacksburg, VA 24081; DAVID PETERSON is a research biologist and associate professor, National Park Service, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, AR-10, Seattle, WA 98195; JOSEPH EILERS a principal scientist, E & S Environmental Chemistry, Inc., P.O. Box 609, Corvallis, OR 97339 RICHARD FISHER is an air resource management specialist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service National Office, c/o Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 Prospect Street, Fort Collins, CO 80526 and ROBERT BACHMAN is an air resource manager, US. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, P.O. Box 3823, Portland, OR 97208-3823. Guidelines for Evaluating Air Pollution Impacts on Class I Wilderness Areas in the Pacific Northwest From a workshop held in May 1990, Orcas Island, Washington Janice Peterson, Daniel Schmoldt, David Peterson, Joseph Eilers, Richard Fisher, and Robert Bachman U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-299 May 1992 Abstract Peterson, Janice; Schmoldt, Daniel; Peterson, David; Eilers, Joseph; Fisher, Richard; Bachman, Robert.
    [Show full text]
  • Practices for Wilderness and Backcountry David N
    United States Department of Agriculture Low-Impact Recreational Forest Service Intermountain Practices for Wilderness Research Station General Technical and Backcountry Report INT-265 August 1989 David N. Cole THE AUTHOR There are three primary ways of accessing information on specific practices. Someone interested in all of the practices DAVID N. COLE is research biologist and Project Leader for useful in avoiding specific problems can use the lists follow- the Intermountain Station’s Wilderness Management Re- ing the discussions of each management problem. Major search Work Unit at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory, categories of practices, such as all those that pertain to the Missoula. Dr. Cole received his B.A. degree in geography use of campfires, can be located in the table of contents. from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1972. He Specific practices are listed in appendix A. received his Ph.D., also in geography, from the University of Oregon in 1977. He has written many papers on wilderness CONTENTS management, particularly the ecological effects of recrea- tional use. Introduction ..........................................................................l Education-A Personal Perspective ................................... .2 PREFACE Management Problems.. ......................................................3 Trail Problems ................................................................. 3 This report summarizes information on low-impact recrea- Campsite Problems .........................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring White Cloud Milkvetch (Astragalus Vexilliflexus Var. Nubilus) on the Sawtooth National Recreation Area: Baseline Results, 2005
    MONITORING WHITE CLOUD MILKVETCH (ASTRAGALUS VEXILLIFLEXUS VAR. NUBILUS) ON THE SAWTOOTH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA: BASELINE RESULTS, 2005 Idaho Conservation Data Center Idaho Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Michael Mancuso 2006 Sawtooth National Forest and Idaho Department of Fish and Game ABSTRACT White Cloud milkvetch (Astragalus vexilliflexus var. nubilus) is a U.S. Forest Service, Region 4 sensitive plant species known from ten occurrences, all located within the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. It is endemic to an approximately 21 km x 10 km area on the eastern slope of the White Cloud Peaks and western slope of the adjacent Boulder Mountains in Custer County, Idaho. In 2005, the Sawtooth National Forest contracted the Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s Idaho Conservation Data Center to establish a monitoring program for this species. White Cloud milkvetch census, plant community, and ground disturbance information was collected along permanently marked transects at eight of the ten known occurrences. Photo point photographs and the collection of additional occurrence area disturbance and threat information were also part of the monitoring protocol. Baseline results showed occurrences had variable White Cloud milkvetch density and habitat characterized by low vegetation cover. The majority had minimal or no disturbance. The landscape surrounding all occurrences was dominated by native vegetation and unfragmented except for occasional secondary roads. Bowery Ridge is the occurrence requiring the most immediate management attention. Recent off-trail motorcycle and heavy cattle use were observed within and near the occurrence. Imminent, serious threats were not observed within the other occurrences visited. Periodic monitoring is recommended to ensure managers are kept appraised of population and habitat trends, the status of any threats, and to evaluate whether directed management actions such as grazing allotment boundary adjustments, are having the intended effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemingway-Boulders and Cecil D. Andrus-White Clouds Wilderness
    NATIONAL SYSTEM OF PUBLIC LANDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of the Interior Forest Service Bureau of Land Management Hemingway-Boulders and Cecil D. Andrus-White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan Sawtooth National Forest, Sawtooth National Recreation Area BLM, Idaho Falls District, Challis Field Office May 7, 2018 For More Information Contact: Kit Mullen, Forest Supervisor Sawtooth National Forest 2647 Kimberly Road East Twin Falls, ID 83301-7976 Phone: 208-737-3200 Fax: 208-737-3236 Mary D’Aversa, District Manager Idaho Falls District 1405 Hollipark Drive Idaho Falls, ID 83401 Phone: 208-524-7500 Fax: 208-737-3236 Description: Castle Peak in the Cecil D. Andrus-White Clouds Wilderness In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Rick Johnson, Executive Director, Idaho Conservation League
    Testimony of Rick Johnson, Executive Director, Idaho Conservation League Before the US Senate Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Regarding S. 3294, the Central Idaho Economic Development and Recreation Act June 16, 2010 – Washington, DC Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to appear today. My name is Rick Johnson and I am the executive director of the Idaho Conservation League. I ask that these comments be included in the hearing record. The Idaho Conservation League was founded in 1973 and our mission is to protect Idaho’s clean air and water, wilderness, and the outdoor values that provide Idaho its extraordinary quality of life. The Idaho Conservation League strongly supports this legislation and we have worked with members of the Idaho congressional delegation, particularly, Rep. Mike Simpson, to advance various forms of this measure for nearly a decade. I personally have worked to protect this area for over 25 years. I have been the executive director of the Idaho Conservation League for the past 15 years and our organization has worked with every member of the Idaho congressional delegation to craft common sense solutions on a variety of conservation measures over many years. The Idaho Conservation League’s strategic approach to conservation has evolved over time, and across a broad portfolio of work, we have become Idaho’s leading voice for conservation. Our work in the Boulder-White Clouds initiative has been a major catalyst to our development of collaborative approaches to conservation on issues ranging from energy, mercury pollution, mining, engagement with major businesses already in or seeking to locate in Idaho, open space protection, and what brings us here today: public land protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Hemingway-Boulders and White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan
    NATIONAL SYSTEM OF PUBLIC LANDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of the Interior Forest Service Bureau of Land Management Draft Hemingway-Boulders and White Clouds Wilderness Management Plan Sawtooth National Forest, Sawtooth National Recreation Area BLM, Idaho Falls District, Challis Field Office October 25, 2017 For More Information Contact: Kit Mullen, Forest Supervisor Sawtooth National Forest 2647 Kimberly Road East Twin Falls, ID 83301-7976 Phone: 208-737-3200 Fax: 208-737-3236 Mary D’Aversa, District Manager Idaho Falls District 1405 Hollipark Drive Idaho Falls, ID 83401 Phone: 208-524-7500 Fax: 208-737-3236 Photo description: Castle Peak in the White Clouds Wilderness In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Lands and Forests Legislation Hearing
    S. HRG. 111–730 PUBLIC LANDS AND FORESTS LEGISLATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS AND FORESTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION TO S. 3294 S. 3310 S. 3313 JUNE 16, 2010 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 62–594 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico, Chairman BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska RON WYDEN, Oregon RICHARD BURR, North Carolina TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARIA CANTWELL, Washington JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, Arkansas ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont JIM BUNNING, Kentucky EVAN BAYH, Indiana JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DEBBIE STABENOW, Michigan BOB CORKER, Tennessee MARK UDALL, Colorado JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire ROBERT M. SIMON, Staff Director SAM E. FOWLER, Chief Counsel MCKIE CAMPBELL, Republican Staff Director KAREN K. BILLUPS, Republican Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS AND FORESTS RON WYDEN, Oregon, Chairman TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho MARIA CANTWELL, Washington JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BLANCHE L.
    [Show full text]