DOCSLIB.ORG

Yale Debate Association Cap- Demonstrated the Continual Commitment 1 of Yale’S Alumni to the Team and Circuit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yale Debate Association Cap- Demonstrated the Continual Commitment 1 of Yale’S Alumni to the Team and Circuit THE Yale Stampedes to Victory at 2014 APDA YALE DEBAT National Championship E ty in a debate about the commercialization of rap. ASSOCIATION Yale also forward- ed the youngest team to break at nationals, with 11 2013/2014 Newsletter sophomores Tony Nguyen Debaters (DC ’16) and Edwin Zhang Qualified for The YDA by the Yale Caps Thrilling Season with National Title (MC ’16) advancing to Nationals Numbers: quarterfinals after hand- ing defeat to William and After a season Mary by proposing a case that saw a hard fought about net neutrality. race for APDA’s Team of the Year Title, Yale runs The tournament also to finals at the North The Yale Debate Association cap- demonstrated the continual commitment 1 of Yale’s alumni to the team and circuit. YDA’s U.S. American and United tured its first American Parliamentary Kate Falkenstein (SY ‘12) served on the Ranking States Universities De- Debate Association National Champion- bating Championships, a ship in five years this past may at the Uni- tournament’s tab staff, with Andrew Con- fantastic performance at versity of Pennsylvania, where for the nery (PC ‘13), David Trinh (TD ‘12), Max the World Champion- sixth consecutive year Yale led the league Dovala (SM ‘13), Ben Kornfeld (DC ‘13), ships, and another successful year atop and Diana Li (DC ’15) finishing in 9th and in the number and skill of debaters quali- Robert Colonel (SY ‘13), and Nate Blevins fied for the tournament, falling short only (PC’ 12) judging. 5 the list of the best debate teams in the 10th place with Nick Cugini (CC ‘14) and APDA National to previous Yale records. country, Yale captured its first American Eric Brooks (DC ‘14). Championships Parliamentary Debate Association Na- At the same time, the YDA had an Zach Bakal and Michael Barton 6 tional Championship since 2009. While Years in a Row incredible year on North American and defeated the team of Quinn Maingi and Yale had finaled at the tournament in as top US Team international British Parliamentary cir- Sean Leonard from Rutgers in the final 2011 and 2012, and narrowly lost the cuits, with Sam Ward-Packard (SY ‘14) round, opposing a case about how San chance to do so in 2013, the team of Zach and Sesenu Woldmariam (BK ‘14) reach- Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk should Bakal (CC ‘14) and Michael Barton (BK ing the finals of the North American have been depicted in the eponymous ‘14) defeated teams from across the coun- Championship, while Barton and Ward- 2008 film. “Yale BB” was one of five Yale try to claim victory in a national champi- Packard broke first at Oxford, finaled at teams to reach the tournament’s elimina- onship that saw one of Yale’s most suc- Cambridge, semifinaled at the World tion rounds. In quarterfinals, the pair cessful years yet at the tournament. Championships, and then reached the faced the Yale team of Allison Douglis 11 The early part of the year was finals of the U.S. Championship. (BK ’15) and Joanna Zheng on a case Tournaments 5 dominated by one of the most competi- about tort law. Douglis and Zheng had Won Unsurprisingly, the YDA contin- Breaking Teams tive races for APDA’s Team of the Year previously defeated a team from Ameri- ued to prove itself as the best team in the at Nationals (TOTY) award in recent years, with Bar- can University in the octofinal round in a United States through its continued dom- ton and Bakal locked in a close battle with debate on Saudi Arabian foreign policy. inance of APDA’s College of the Year a pair of debaters from Harvard. While Bakal and Barton also faced the Yale team (COTY) ranking, where Yale accumulated Harvard ultimately gained the upper of Nick Cugini and Diana Li. On a differ- nearly double the points of the second- hand, Yale would go on to dominate the ent side of the elimination bracket, Eric place team. This ranking reflects an ex- TOTY standings regardless, with Barton Brooks and Sam Ward-Packard also cellent class of new novices, and the dedi- 13 and Joanna Zheng (TC ’14) taking third made the octofinal round, losing narrow- cation and involvement of the YDA’s Top Speaker position to Bakal and Barton’s second, ly to adversaries from Brandeis Universi- Awards members to every aspect of the team. Yale Continues Reign as Top School on Yale Leads US Charge at Northams APDA Throughout the year the YDA tournaments at Brandeis and Harvard three teams, nearly half the number of competes at more than 40 tournaments, itself. While Bakal and Barton suffered total American teams in the break. The across the country and world. Domesti- an early defeat at Harvard, they emerged team of Zach Bakal and Michael Barton cally, many of these tournaments are in victorious from the Brandeis tournament reached the quarterfinal round of the the format of American Parliamentary once again clutching the lead in the TOTY tournament, while the team of Allison 4 debate, sanctioned by the American Par- race. Unfortunately, a string of Harvard Douglis and Joanna Zheng made octofi- 3 Of the Country’s wins at Brown, George Washington, and nals, as did the team of Reed Berry (ES Teams Top 10 Teams Maryland meant that Yale’s remaining ’16) and Nathaniel Rubin (SY ‘15). These Advancing to wins and valiant defeats were unable to achievements were topped only by Mi- Elimination turn the tide. The North American Champion- chael Barton claiming the title of top Rounds ships (“NorthAms”) - held this year at the speaker, Yale’s third time winning the While Yale fought fiercely with Harvard University of Ottawa—is a unique debate award in four years. for the top spot on the TOTY board, Yale tournament that brings together schools steamrolled the rest of the circuit for The tournament also saw substan- from Canada and the USA in a hybrid of third place, with Barton and Joanna tial success for Yale’s novice teams, with Canadian and APDA styles. Yale has tra- Zheng handily winning a pair of tourna- Evan Lynyak (MC ‘17) and Henry Zhang ditionally been very dominant at North- ments and finishing behind only another (ES ’17) reaching the novice final, unfor- Ams, most recently winning the title in Yale team at Stanford. At the same time, tunately being defeated by a team from the years 2009 and 2011. Despite not Yale rounded out the TOTY board with the University of Toronto’s Hart House winning outright, even this year the YDA the partnership of Nick Cugini and Diana Debating Society. outperformed the rest of the American Li finishing ninth, and Li repeating her contingent at the tournament, breaking 4 performance with Eric Brooks to capture Of the Country’s 10th TOTY as well. 1 Top 15 Speakers The YDA routed the APDA in the Rank of Yale’s COTY “race.” In typical Yale fashion, the Best Speaker liamentary Debate Association. Through- YDA accumulated over 200 more points out the year the YDA and its members than the combined total of the second compete at tournaments every weekend ranked team, and qualified the plurality in an effort to qualify for Nationals and of debaters for the national tournament. earn points towards APDA’s prestigious APDA also recognizes the perfor- year end awards: Club of the Year, Team mance of individual speakers through its of the Year, Speaker of the Year SOTY awards. In this category too, Yale (“SOTY”) and Novice of the Year shone. Zach Bakal won three tourna- (“NOTY”). ments to finish the year ranked 2nd, This year’s TOTY race was a while Michael Barton secured 9th place. 216 hard fought struggle between Yale and Harvard which featured excellent per- 0 More Points than 2nd Place formances by numerous Yale debaters. The YDA gained the upper hand early Other U.S. schools on as Zach Bakal and Michael Barton de- to break more feated Harvard’s Shomik Ghosh and Josh Zoffer in the semifinals at Johns Hopkins. than 2 teams However, Harvard’s victory at Columbia turned the tables going into a series of What We’ve Been Debating Yale Dominates in British Parliamentary Sesenu Woldemariam On the YDA we debate primarily in two formats: successfully made it to American Parliamentary the final round, finish- British Parliamentary ing behind McGill in a debate about religious In American Parliamentary debate, the government (or affirmative) team pro- leaders in politics. At poses a topic of their choosing — usually a case they have written in advance. The op- the same time, fresh- 4 position (or negating) team has only the 7 minutes of the first government speaker’s men Adil Hakeem (PC 3 Of the Country’s speech to think of their counterargument. ‘17) and Shirley Kuang Consecutive (TD ‘17) won the nov- Top 10 Teams For example, in the Semifinals of the 2012 APDA National Championships, the Years of Yale ice division and title of government team Yale CF (Nick Cugini and Kate Falkenstien) proposed a hypothet- Top Speakers at best first-year team in ical—asking whether the government should ban a pill that parents could take to as- BP Nationals North America. sure their children would be straight. The opposition team, Yale BK (Nate Blevins & Ben Kornfeld) defended their side in the round by arguing for the justness of the gov- Back home, Yale had a ernment’s use of people as an end. The government team won the debate. A video of number of notable the round can be found at the following address: http://videos.apdaweb.org/?p=552 achievements.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • College Historical Society
    COLLEGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY LAWS OF THE SOCIETY Chapter I Fundamental Regulations The following shall be considered the fundamental regulations of the College Historical Society and no Law or resolution in anywise contradicting, suspending or repealing them, or any part of them, shall be valid without the consent of the Board. 1. All persons paying the capital levy shall be eligible for the ordinary Membership of the Society. 2. Topics of religious controversy and present party politics shall be prohibited at the meetings of the Society. 3. Every meeting of the Society shall terminate not later than twelve o’clock by College time. 4. No person can be elected an Officer of the Historical Society without the sanction of the Board unless he be either officially connected with the University or be a member of the Society. This law shall not apply to the election of Vice-Presidents. Chapter II Annual Members 1. The amount of the annual subscription shall be determined by the General Committee in advance of the first of October of each session. 2. All persons who are eligible shall become Annual Members immediately upon paying their annual subscription. 3. The membership of every Annual Member shall lapse at the end of the sixth week of Michaelmas Term in the session following that in which his annual subscription was last paid. Every person whose membership shall have so lapsed shall be re-admissible on payment of the annual subscription. 4. Any member who is neither indebted to the Society in any amount, nor has in his possession any book from the Society’s Library, nor has any key belonging to the Society may resign from membership of the Society on notifying in writing the Record Secretary of his wish to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Academy Guide
    Debate Academy Guide 29 July to 3 August 2019, Uppingham School Introduction from the Course Director Debate Academy is an annual, week-long summer school in the United Kingdom dedicated to improving young people’s debating skills. It is held each year in late July to early August at Uppingham School in Rutland. Students aged 14-18 receive tuition from expert debating mentors in a variety of competitive debating formats. Whether you have little or no experience, or are getting ready for trials for your national debating team, Debate Academy will offer a tailored experience to suit you. This document is designed to provide additional information and hopefully to answer any questions you may have about Debate Academy. For the most up to date information on this year’s Debate Academy or to sign up for a place, please visit our website: http://www.esu.org/programmes/debate-academy If you have any further questions or queries about Debate Academy feel free to get in touch with me at [email protected]. I look forward to seeing you there! Bob Saull Debating Programmes Officer English-Speaking Union 1 Contents Learning at Debate Academy 3 Which ‘Track’ is for Me? 4 Which ‘Stream’ is for Me? 5 Living at Debate Academy 6 Applying to Debate Academy 9 2 Learning at Debate Academy At Debate Academy you will receive expert tuition on debating from some of the best debaters in the country. You will get the chance to discuss world issues, sharpen your analytical, reasoning and public speaking skills, and spar with other students from all over the world in competitive debates.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 Newsletter
    2018-2019 Newsletter The YDA by the Numbers: Another Outstanding Year The Yale Debate Association continued to dominate both at 1 home and abroad this year. The The YDA’s US team snagged its tenth consecutive Ranking Club of the Year Award and broke three teams and five judges at the World Universities Debating Championships among a long list 10 of its other stellar accomplishments Years in a Row from this year. as Top US Team The team excelled once more at APDA Nationals, with one team reaching semifinals, and one team reaching quarterfinals. By stay- ing on top of the ranks throughout the season, Yale also keep its COTY status for the tenth year in a row, leading second place team 8 Harvard by over 40 points. Tournaments Won Yale also performed strongly at WUDC. Three of five teams broke to elimination rounds, with Yale B reaching quarterfinals, and Yale A and Yale C both reaching double-octafinals. All five Yale-affiliat- 5 ed judges also judge broke. Top Speaker Awards The YDA had another oustanding year, and is looking forward to the next! Excellence at APDA Nationals The YDA had another incredible year at APDA Nationals. Eleven 11 team members qualified, and five Debaters teams competed at Nationals, Qualified to including two novices. Yale's Nationals competitors performed very well. Three debaters earned top twenty speaker awards: Will Arnesen ('20), also 10th Speaker of the Year, was 2nd speaker, Ellie Singer ('21) was 6th speaker, and Jack Kelly ('21) was 16th speaker. Two teams also broke to elimination rounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Marking 200 Years of Legal Education: Traditions of Change, Reasoned Debate, and Finding Differences and Commonalities
    MARKING 200 YEARS OF LEGAL EDUCATION: TRADITIONS OF CHANGE, REASONED DEBATE, AND FINDING DIFFERENCES AND COMMONALITIES Martha Minow∗ What is the significance of legal education? “Plato tells us that, of all kinds of knowledge, the knowledge of good laws may do most for the learner. A deep study of the science of law, he adds, may do more than all other writing to give soundness to our judgment and stability to the state.”1 So explained Dean Roscoe Pound of Harvard Law School in 1923,2 and his words resonate nearly a century later. But missing are three other possibilities regarding the value of legal education: To assess, critique, and improve laws and legal institutions; To train those who pursue careers based on legal training, which may mean work as lawyers and judges; leaders of businesses, civic institutions, and political bodies; legal academics; or entre- preneurs, writers, and social critics; and To advance the practice in and study of reasoned arguments used to express and resolve disputes, to identify commonalities and dif- ferences, to build institutions of governance within and between communities, and to model alternatives to violence in the inevi- table differences that people, groups, and nations see and feel with one another. The bicentennial of Harvard Law School prompts this brief explo- ration of the past, present, and future of legal education and scholarship, with what I hope readers will not begrudge is a special focus on one particular law school in Cambridge, Massachusetts. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ∗ Carter Professor of General Jurisprudence; until July 1, 2017, Morgan and Helen Chu Dean and Professor, Harvard Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrutinised Long Manifestos - Tt20 (2Nd Election)
    SCRUTINISED LONG MANIFESTOS - TT20 (2ND ELECTION) CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT-ELECT Amy Gregg (Ex-Treasurer, Exeter College ) - Candidate for President-Elect - Long Manifesto The Union has had significant setbacks in the last few years. I did not intend to run this term, but it is clear that the Union needs a President who has the experience and the capability to set it back on the right course. The Union can do so much better, and the Union must do so much better. As an undergraduate, I was President of the Cambridge Union. During this time I ran a record-setting membership drive, managed a £100,000 budget, and hosted over thirty speakers including Stephen Fry, Quentin Blake and Moazzam Begg. After leaving Cambridge I was a trainee solicitor at a Magic Circle Law firm, and I now hold an offer for a pupillage to be a barrister. I have real world experience which I can use to improve our Union as well. I previously served on committee for 7 terms. In this time I arranged 5 debates, including confirming 5/6 speakers for the Comedy debate. I ran Debates, Panels and Speaker events, confirmed multiple speakers and chaired the Union’s largest committee. I also spent over 50 days of vacation working for the Union and made 3 winning paper speeches. As Treasurer I secured 29 debate Floor Prizes, 12 New Treasurer’s Treats and coordinated sponsorship from a major Scholarship fund - ensuring transparency by publishing the audited accounts on the app. This demonstrates that I have the ability to run the Union, but it also made me realise: the Union needs real change - change only an experienced President can bring.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Association & Debate Speech National ©
    © National SpeechDebate & Association DEBATE 101 Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Bill Smelko & Will Smelko DEBATE 101 Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Bill Smelko & Will Smelko © NATIONAL SPEECH & DEBATE ASSOCIATION DEBATE 101: Everything You Need to Know About Policy Debate: You Learned Here Copyright © 2013 by the National Speech & Debate Association All rights reserved. Published by National Speech & Debate Association 125 Watson Street, PO Box 38, Ripon, WI 54971-0038 USA Phone: (920) 748-6206 Fax: (920) 748-9478 [email protected] No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, information storage and retrieval, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. The National Speech & Debate Association does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, gender identity, gender expression, affectional or sexual orientation, or disability in any of its policies, programs, and services. Printed and bound in the United States of America Contents Chapter 1: Debate Tournaments . .1 . Chapter 2: The Rudiments of Rhetoric . 5. Chapter 3: The Debate Process . .11 . Chapter 4: Debating, Negative Options and Approaches, or, THE BIG 6 . .13 . Chapter 5: Step By Step, Or, It’s My Turn & What Do I Do Now? . .41 . Chapter 6: Ten Helpful Little Hints . 63. Chapter 7: Public Speaking Made Easy .
    [Show full text]
  • 639 Bedford Rd Pocantico Hills, NY 10591 [email protected] Library
    639 Bedford Rd Pocantico Hills, NY 10591 [email protected] Library The Rollin G. Osterweis Washington Irving Collection Finding Aid Collection Overview Title: The Rollin G. Osterweis Washington Irving Collection, 1808-2012 (bulk 1808-1896) Creator: Osterweis, Rollin G. (Rollin Gustav), 1907- Extent : 159 volumes; 1 linear foot of archival material Repository: Historic Hudson Valley Library and Archives Abstract: This collection holds 159 volumes that make up the Rollin G. Osterweis Collection of Irving Editions and Irvingiana. It also contains one linear foot of archival materials related to the collection. Administrative Information Preferred Citation: Item title. (date) City: Publisher [if applicable]. The Rollin G. Osterweis Washington Irving Collection, 1808-2012, (Date of Access). Historic Hudson Valley Library and Archives. Historic Hudson Valley. Provenance: This collection was created by Rollin Gustav Osterweis and donated to Historic Hudson Valley by Ruth Osterweis Selig. 18 December 2012. Access: This collection is open for research with some restrictions based on the fragility of certain materials. Research restrictions for individual items are available on request. For more information contact the Historic Hudson Valley librarian, Catalina Hannan: [email protected]. Copyright: Copyright of materials belongs to Historic Hudson Valley. Permission to reprint materials must be obtained from Historic Hudson Valley. The collection contains some material copyrighted by other organizations and individuals. It is the responsibility of the researcher to obtain all permission(s) related to the reprinting or copying of materials. Processed by: Christina Neckles Kasman, February-August 2013 Osterweis Irving Collection - 1 Biographical Note Rollin Gustav Osterweis was a native of New Haven, Connecticut, where his grandfather had established a cigar factory in 1860.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of the Cambridge Union Society
    The Constitution of the Cambridge Union Society THE LAWS 0) Definitions 1) The Laws and Rules The Structure of The Cambridge Union 2) Membership 3) The Standing Committee 4) Officers 5) The Responsibilities of the Officers 6) The Review Committee Elections and Appointments 7) Elections Procedure 8) Charitable Points for Elections 9) Electoral Rules 10) Electoral Investigations 11) Appointments Procedure Codes and Policies 12) Code of Conduct 13) Code of Conduct Investigation 14) Principles of the Union 15) Restrictions on Invitations 16) Expenses Policy 17) Procedure for Main Debates 18) Policy on Reciprocal Membership Page 1 of 67 THE RULES Events Policies 1) Duty Officer 2) House Rules 3) Guest Policy Competitive Debating 4) Debating Team Selection and Reimbursement 5) Management of Debating Budget 6) Convenors 7) Convenors Positions and Responsibilities Organisational Committees 8) Full Committee 9) Full Committee Departments and Responsibilities 10) Sub-Committees 11) Budget Committee 12) Competitive Debating Committee 13) Vacation Committee 14) Executive Committee Miscellaneous 15) Handover 16) Social Events Planning Procedure Page 2 of 67 Definitions THE LAWS Definitions In these Laws and Rules the following expressions have the following means unless inconsistent with the context: 1) Accounts Manager means the individual hired by the Society to run its accounts. 2) Appeals Panel means the panel appointed in accordance with Law 13 which handles disciplinary appeals. 3) Appellant means a member of the Society who is seeking an appeal to a disciplinary decision. 4) Appointee means a member of the Society appointed to a formal position. 5) Board of Trustee-Directors means the group of individual trustee directors who have ultimate responsibility for directing the affairs of the charity from time to time in accordance with the Charities Act 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Resilience Debating Resource Pack for Primary Schools Contents
    community resilience debating resource pack for primary schools contents getting started what is debating? 4 game: if I ruled the world... 4 game: just a minute 4 planning your debates 5 looking at resilience group activity: how resilient is your community? 6 individual activity: how resilient are you? 8 people who help us debate format and planning 10 handout: people who help us debate 12 debate role cards 13 preparing the debate 14 handout: r.e.a.l. arguments & speech structure 15 debating techniques 16 speech plan & fish speech plan 18 summary speech plan 20 audience task 21 resilience role-plays role-play debate format 22 designing your own role-play 23 tourism impact role-play 24 local bypass role-play 26 handout: finding things out 28 handout: being persuasive 29 judging debates judging a debate 30 helping first time speakers 31 debating resilience and cfe literacy and english 32 social studies, health and wellbeing, expressive arts 33 welcome... ...to this Community Resilience Primary School Debating Resource, which has been developed by the English-Speaking Union Scotland for Education Scotland as part of their Community Resilience project. Community Resilience is a very broad topic and each community will face its own challenges. However, there are common threads: challenging situations and adversity; problem solving; being prepared; mitigating impact; overcoming a personal or community challenge or obstacle; and adapting and building resilience. In all of these situations it’s about communitities coming together to provide mutual support and build resilience. Debating is a great way of encouraging this process and there are many ways that the whole class can be involved in debating, building on the strengths of each individual pupil who will contribute to the activity in different ways, developing confidence and skills that will be useful to themselves and their communities throughout their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Debate Association
    THE YALE DEBATE ASSOCIATION 2015-2016 Newsletter The YDA by the Yale Continues Reign as Top School on APDA Numbers: After a season that saw a hard fought race for APDA’s Club of the Year title, Yale runs to finals at the 1 United States Universities YDA’s US Rank- Debating Championships, ing begets a fantastic perfor- mance at the World Champi- onships, and finishes another successful year at the top of the list of the best debate teams in the country. In addition to its in- 7 Individual members of the YDA Years in a Row ternationally recognized success, the YDA were also greatly successful throughout continued its run of unprecedented do- as top US Team the year. Yale LZ, consisting of Diana Li mestic dominance. Breaking its own rec- and Henry Zhang, were APDA’s Team of ord for total points, Yale won APDA’s the Year (“TOTY”), winning back the coveted COTY award of the 2014-2015 award with 88 points. Additionally, most season, for the seventh year running, ac- of the best speakers at the 2015 National cumulating 66 more points than the sec- championships were from Yale. The 2016 ond ranked school, Brandeis. North American Championships also saw 11 As part of a record breaking year, Edwin Zhang and Tony Nguyen become Tournaments not only did Yale win its seventh consecu- finalists. Won tive COTY award from the American Par- Unsurprisingly, the YDA contin- liamentary Debate Association (“APDA”), ues to prove itself as the best team in the it is continuing the 2016 season as first United States this year, and the ranking place with 433 points, more than 160 also reflects an excellent class of new nov- points higher than the current second ices and the dedication and involvement place, with Brown University holding 286 of the YDA's members to every aspect of points.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamela Susan Karlan
    PAMELA SUSAN KARLAN Stanford Law School (650) 725-4851/0253 (fax) Stanford, CA 94305-8610 [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Stanford Law School Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law (since 1999); Co-Director, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic (since 2004); Associate Dean (1999-2000, 2005-06); Professor of Law (1998-99) University of Virginia School of Law Roy L. and Rosamond Woodruff Morgan Research Professor (1994-98); Professor of Law (1993-98); Associate Professor of Law (1988-93) Visiting Professor, Harvard Law School (1994-95); N.Y.U. School of Law (Spring 1993); Stanford Law School (Fall 1996); University of Virginia School of Law (Fall 2002); Yale Law School (Fall 1992, Fall 2006) Courses Taught: Civil Procedure; Classics in Constitutional Scholarship; Constitutional Law; Constitutional Litigation; Criminal Adjudication; Justice at Home and Abroad (undergraduate course); Regulation of the Political Process; Professional Responsibility; Sex Discrimination; Supreme Court Litigation Clinic; Supreme Court Term Seminar; Torts Coif Distinguished Visiting Professor (2006); John Bingham Hurlbut Award for Excellence in Teaching, Stanford (2002, 2009); State Council of Higher Education in Virginia Outstanding Faculty Award (1997); University of Virginia All-University Outstanding Teaching Award (1995-96); Elected Graduation Speaker, Yale Law School (2007), University of Virginia School of Law (1991) OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Commissioner, California Fair Political Practices Commission (2003-05) (appointed
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy: the Missing Link in the Devolution Debate
    Democracy: the missing link in the devolution debate Devolution in England could change the way we are governed and create a fairer dispersion of power, with more opportunities for people outside of Westminster to have a say. An overriding focus on economic growth currently threatens to de-rail devolution by encouraging local governments to promise economic outcomes they could struggle to deliver, outcomes which are not necessarily in the residents’ best interests. Presently the debate on devolution neglects the • Environmental sustainability is part of just democratic transformations that could make 0.8% of arguments. devolution worthwhile. In this research, we map arguments in favour of devolution produced by • Only 2.9% of arguments address the central government, local government, think- potential downsides and risks of devolution. tanks, and civil society groups between 2011 and 2015. • Local governments in particular seldom consider the impact of devolution on democracy, discussing democratic outcomes Key findings less than central government or think-tanks. • Of the arguments made for devolution, 41.6% focus on achieving economic growth as the main justification for devolving Introduction power. Decentralising power from Westminster to • Only 12.9% of arguments make the case regions is a debate with a long history, one in for devolution in order to shift power, which numerous governments have engaged, strengthen democracy, and increase citizen offering various regional power structures involvement in decision-making. for the devolution of government functions and decisions – not least in Scotland, Wales, • Just 7.4% of arguments address inequalities and Northern Ireland. Following the 2014 in wealth and power between regions.
    [Show full text]